Podcasts about Customs

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, we tackle pressing issues surrounding national debt and immigration policy. Senator Rand Paul joins us to discuss his groundbreaking six-penny plan aimed at reducing the staggering $39 trillion national debt, a burden that weighs heavily on future generations. His insights on fiscal responsibility and government spending are vital as we navigate these turbulent economic times.We also welcome Mark Morgan, the former acting director of Customs and Border Protection, and Ken Cuccinelli, former Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, who provide an in-depth analysis of the current state of border security and election integrity. Their expertise sheds light on the complexities of immigration enforcement and the implications for American democracy.Additionally, John Solomon dives into a critical story about the new leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, Juan Carlos Valencia Gonzalez. As a dual U.S. and Mexican citizen, Valencia's rise to power raises important questions about birthright citizenship and its consequences for national security. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of the Carl Jackson Show, Carl is joined by Mark Morgan, former head of Customs and Border Patrol under Trump 45. They dive into the state of our nation's borders and the threats we face from international terrorist organizations. Mark shares his concerns about the Biden administration's open border policies and the risks they pose to national security. They discuss the importance of securing our borders, vetting immigrants, and addressing the issue of sleeper cells. Mark also weighs in on the recent Iranian conflict and its potential implications for the homeland. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com Visit our Store https://CarlJacksonStore.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - अस्ट्रेलिया आउने मानिसहरूका लागि सामान्यतया कस्टम्स पहिलो सम्पर्क बिन्दु हुन्छ। त्यहाँ अस्ट्रेलियन बोर्डर फोर्सका अधिकारीहरू खटिएका हुन्छन्, जसले देशभित्र त्यस्ता प्रतिबन्धित वस्तुहरू प्रवेश हुन नदिने सुनिश्चित गर्छन्, जसले अस्ट्रेलियाको अनौठो वातावरण, अर्थतन्त्र र समुदायहरूलाई नोक्सान पुर्‍याउन सक्छन्। अस्ट्रेलिया बुझ्नुहोस् पोडकास्ट शृङ्खलाको यस अङ्कमा आफ्नो सुटकेस प्याक गर्नु अगि यहाँ के ल्याउन पाइन्छ, के पाइँदैन र बायोसेक्युरिटी सम्बन्धी नियमहरूको उल्लङ्घन गरेमा के–कस्ता जोखिम हुन सक्छन् भन्नेबारे महत्वपूर्ण जानकारी दिनेछौ।

Tara dives deep into three explosive stories dominating the headlines: the radical Democrat push to shut down the Department of Homeland Security, Democrats' controversial stance on Iran, and a shocking new study linking porn consumption to bisexuality. From national security risks to media bias and the latest science you won't hear anywhere else, this episode unpacks the headlines with no spin. SUMMARY In this episode, Tara unpacks the growing political and national security crises. First, she examines the Democrats' effort to defund the Department of Homeland Security, detailing the implications for ICE, Customs and Border Patrol, and how this could affect U.S. security at the border. Tara highlights reports that thousands of known or suspected terrorists have been allowed entry into the country under current policies. Next, she explores the Democrats' alignment with Iran and China, examining media misreporting and censorship. Tara details UK Daily Mail and CNN reports, including revelations about CNN bureau chiefs partying with Iranian officials while thousands of protesters were being killed. Finally, Tara breaks down a groundbreaking study on pornography consumption and sexual orientation, revealing how increased exposure to porn correlates with higher rates of bisexual identification—especially among young users. She ties this to broader societal trends and the challenges of parental guidance in the digital age. KEY TALKING POINTS Democrats' push to end all immigration detention and its national security implications Allegations that 18,000 known or suspected terrorists entered the U.S. under Biden administration policies Democrats' political alignment with Iran and China amid international conflict Media bias and censorship: CNN's access to Iran while protesters are massacred Pentagon's long-standing planning for the Strait of Hormuz and debunking fake media reports New study linking porn consumption to increased bisexuality rates in youth and adults The societal impact of phones, digital exposure, and early porn consumption on sexual development SOCIAL MEDIA BLURB DHS shutdown, Democrats backing Iran, and porn rewiring brains? Tara breaks down the shocking headlines you won't hear anywhere else. National security, media bias, and new science—exposed. CUSTOM LABELS DHS Shutdown, Iran, Democrats, National Security, Porn Study, Media Bias, Sexual Orientation, Youth Safety, Border Security, U.S. Politics

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - Ciidanka Ilaalada Xuduudaha (Customs) ayaa inta badan ah cidda ugu horreysa ee ay dadka soo gelaya dalka Australia, la kulmaaan iyagoo ilaaliya in dalka lasoo geliyo walxo ama badeecado khatar ah. Haddaba ka hor, inta aadan boorsada cabbaysanin, halkan ka baro waxa aad keeni karto dalka, waxa lagaa rabo inaad sheegto haddii aad sidato, iyo khatarta ka dhalan karta haddii aad iska indho-tirto xeerarka xuduudaha.

Early this year, following the deaths of Keith Porter, Renee Good, and Alex Pretti at the hands of federal agents and the violent immigration raids on communities across the United States, 1,500 Google workers signed a new petition demanding the company cut contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).Justin Hendrix spoke to two of the employees who signed the petition about why they signed it, the environment inside the company, and how they think about the risk they face for speaking out.

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - オーストラリアに入国する際、まず対応するのが税関です。空港などでは国境警備隊（ボーダーフォース）の職員が待機し、国内に持ち込めない物がないかを確認します。これはオーストラリア特有の自然環境や経済、コミュニティを守るためです。スーツケースを閉める前に、何を持ち込めて、何が禁止されているのかを確認しておきましょう。また、バイオセキュリティのルールに違反した場合にどのようなリスクがあるのかも知っておくことが大切です。

Welcome to Light ‘Em Up!At the conclusion of the editing and postproduction process for this episode in preparation for its upload and debut - DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was fired from her role as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.Tonight, on this brand-new, intense episode we'll investigate and examine the more than 32 deaths that have happened at the hands of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE).It may come as a surprise, but the killing of Renee Good (a mother of three) and Alex Pretti (an ICU nurse at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System Hospital in Minnesota) were not the first and they won't be the last.We'll drill down on the Department of Homeland Security — an organization led by individuals who lack both qualifications and integrity.This witch's brew often forces an organization — whether desired or not -- to eventually face severe consequences, ranging from operational inefficiencies to catastrophic, fatal incidents.Research indicates that when leadership prioritizes self-interest over competence and honesty, it creates a toxic culture that undermines safety and performance. ICE has made our streets unsafe with its tyrannical tactics, terrorizing our own people in the name of Trump.Since returning to office in 2025, President Trump has implemented a "hardline" and "maximalist" immigration policy focused on executing the largest domestic deportation operation in U.S. history.The administration doesn't care how the policy is carried out — ONLY that it is — so that Stephen Miller can satisfy his own sick, sadistic wishes.Miller is credited with shaping the racist and draconian immigration policies of President Trump, and Noem oversaw carrying those decisions out, which include:—   zero-tolerance policy, also known as family separation,—   the Muslim ban and—   ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.As we go to air with this episode, a federal judge accuses the White House of ‘terror' against immigrants in the U.S.The administration has pursued a whole-of-government approach to identify, detain, and remove undocumented immigrants, aiming for a "1 million per year" deportation goal.But, in the process, there've been:—  tremendous oversights,—  poor procedural safeguards and protocols put in place,—  very little to no training for new hires,—  negligence and outright lies which have led to more than 32 people's death across the nation.We'll introduce you to those who have lost their lives at the hands of the governmental “political theater” that is unfolding right in front of our own eyes, daily.We will report that the (former) DHS Secretary, Kristi Noem is an outright liar — as is her boss.  That isn't opinion — that is fact and we have the receipts to prove it.Be sure to tune in for our reporting regarding a completely fabricated story — that Noem stated in one of her press briefings to the nation — about a man in deportation proceedings “cannibalizing” others, then, himself, like the fictitious character Hannibal Lecter, who Trump thinks is a real person.As we speak truth to power, we never cower — as we expose the fact that Secretary Noem has deported U.S. military veterans AND U.S. citizens and lied and covered up about that as well.As a painter paints and a singer sings, a liar lies.The streets of the U.S. are safer with Noem ousted at the top of DHS, but the man tapped to be her replacement isn't much of an improvement.Tune in for this episode and our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot!We want to hear from you!Support the show

Multiple terror-related incidents in recent weeks have reignited fierce debate about immigration policy, border enforcement, and political leadership. Tara examines claims about extremist threats, the controversy surrounding a deadly campus attack, and the broader fight over messaging in Washington as tensions over national security continue to escalate. Episode Summary: In today's episode, Tara examines a surge of terror-related incidents and the political fallout surrounding immigration, national security, and domestic extremism. The discussion focuses on several attacks targeting institutions viewed as pro-American or conservative, raising questions about ideological violence and radicalization. A central part of the episode revisits the deadly attack at Old Dominion University, where Lieutenant Colonel Brandon Shaw, a respected ROTC leader and combat veteran, was killed. The suspect had previously pleaded guilty to providing material support to ISIS, sparking intense debate over why the individual remained in the United States after serving time. The show also explores broader claims about immigration vetting, alleged failures in federal enforcement, and controversial statistics regarding individuals on terrorist watch lists who have entered the country in recent years. Tara and Lee discuss political disputes over funding for the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and Customs and Border Protection, arguing that these issues could have major implications for border security. Beyond immigration policy, the episode addresses the political messaging battle in Washington. Tara argues that the debate over terrorism, immigration, and foreign policy—including tensions with Iran—is increasingly being fought in the court of public opinion. She contends that without a coordinated communication strategy, critical national security concerns risk being misunderstood or ignored by the public. The episode closes with a warning about the potential consequences of rising geopolitical tensions, economic impacts from global instability, and the importance of leadership and communication in times of crisis. Key Topics Covered: Recent terror-related incidents and ideological violence The Old Dominion University attack and the death of Lt. Col. Brandon Shaw Debate over deportation and denaturalization for terrorism convictions Immigration vetting and border enforcement controversies DHS funding disputes and calls to eliminate certain enforcement agencies Claims about individuals on terrorist watch lists entering the U.S. Political messaging battles shaping the national debate Broader geopolitical tensions and national security risks A deadly terror attack, rising global tensions, and a fierce political fight over immigration and border enforcement—are America's leaders prepared for the threats ahead? Are Border Policies Increasing Terror Risks? #NationalSecurity #BorderDebate #ImmigrationPolicy #Terrorism #USPolitics #GlobalSecurity #AmperWave Suggested Segment Titles: Four Terror Incidents in Two Weeks – What's happening? The Old Dominion Attack – A veteran's tragic death Immigration Vetting Under Fire – How did suspects get in? The DHS Funding Battle – Politics vs. security The Messaging War – Who's shaping the narrative? Global Stakes – Iran, oil markets, and rising tensions

Are U.S. border policies putting Americans at risk? Tara breaks down claims about suspected terrorists entering the country, the political fight over border enforcement, and the controversial debate over chain migration. Plus, heartbreaking news as four U.S. service members are confirmed dead after a KC-135 tanker crash during a military operation. What does it mean for national security and the political battle ahead? Episode Summary: Today's episode dives deep into the heated debate over border security and terrorism concerns. Tara discusses reports that thousands of suspected terrorists may have entered the United States in recent years, raising questions about vetting, immigration policy, and national safety. The conversation also examines political arguments surrounding immigration, including accusations that Democrats favor policies that could expand their voter base through immigration and chain migration. Tara and Lee analyze the messaging battle in Washington over calls to defund or dismantle border enforcement agencies like ICE, Customs and Border Protection, and the Department of Homeland Security. Finally, the show turns somber as breaking news confirms that four U.S. service members have died after a KC-135 Stratotanker crashed during an operation in Iraq. Tara reflects on the sacrifices made by American troops and the importance of national security in an increasingly dangerous world. Key Topics Covered: Allegations about suspected terrorists entering the U.S. The political fight over border enforcement and DHS funding Debate over chain migration and immigration policy Messaging battles between Democrats and Republicans Breaking news: KC-135 crash and the loss of U.S. service members The broader national security implications Hook / Teaser: Are open border policies creating national security risks—or is the political rhetoric masking a more complicated reality? Tara digs into the numbers, the policies, and the consequences. Social Media Clip Title: 18,000 Suspected Terrorists Entered the U.S.? Suggested Hashtags: #BorderSecurity #ImmigrationDebate #NationalSecurity #TerrorThreat #USPolitics #MilitaryNews #AmperWave

This Day in Legal History: Butler ActOn March 13, 1925, the Tennessee General Assembly approved the Butler Act, a statute that made it unlawful for public school teachers to present any theory that denied the biblical account of human creation. The law specifically prohibited teaching that humans evolved from lower forms of life, reflecting growing tensions between scientific ideas and religious beliefs in early twentieth-century America. Tennessee lawmakers framed the statute as a way to protect traditional moral values in public education. Critics, however, immediately argued that the law restricted academic freedom and undermined the teaching of modern science.The controversy quickly escalated when a young teacher, John T. Scopes, agreed to challenge the statute. Scopes was charged with violating the Butler Act after he allowed evolution to be discussed in his classroom. His prosecution led to the famous 1925 Scopes “Monkey” Trial in Dayton, Tennessee. The trial drew national attention and featured two of the era's most prominent legal figures: Clarence Darrow for the defense and William Jennings Bryan for the prosecution. Their courtroom clash turned the case into a dramatic public debate over science, religion, and the role of government in shaping school curricula.Although Scopes was ultimately convicted and fined $100, the trial exposed deep cultural divisions within the United States. Media coverage portrayed the proceedings as a symbolic struggle between modern scientific thinking and religious fundamentalism. Over time, the Butler Act came to be seen by many as an example of government overreach into education and intellectual inquiry. Tennessee formally repealed the statute in 1967, decades after the trial had become a lasting symbol of the conflict between science and law.Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her ongoing challenge to a suspension imposed by her fellow judges. In a petition filed Thursday, the 98-year-old judge argues that the D.C. Circuit wrongly ruled that courts cannot review many challenges to judicial suspension orders under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act. Newman contends that the statute should allow review when suspension decisions violate the law or the Constitution. Her petition claims the lower court misinterpreted the law by blocking challenges to actions that exceed the authority granted under the statute. Newman argues that her suspension effectively removes her from the bench without impeachment, which she says undermines constitutional protections for judicial independence and lifetime tenure.The Federal Circuit's judicial council first suspended Newman in 2023 after concerns that potential mental or physical health issues made her unable to perform judicial duties. The suspension followed her refusal to undergo medical evaluations requested by her colleagues and was characterized as serious misconduct. Although the suspension was initially set for one year, it has been renewed twice. Newman appealed through the internal judicial review process, but a national committee of judges upheld the suspension in 2024. She also challenged the suspension in federal court, arguing that parts of the judicial discipline law are unconstitutional. Both a district court and the D.C. Circuit dismissed the case, relying on a statutory provision stating that disciplinary orders under the act are final and not subject to judicial review. Newman now asks the Supreme Court to clarify whether courts may still review suspension orders that allegedly exceed legal or constitutional limits.Judge Newman Takes Suspension Battle To Supreme Court - Law36098-year-old judge asks US Supreme Court to hear case over her suspension | ReutersThe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has begun the process of developing regulations for prediction markets, issuing an advance notice of proposed rulemaking and asking the public for input on how the industry should be governed. The agency said the move is intended to support innovation while ensuring prediction markets operate within the framework of the Commodity Exchange Act. Interest in regulation has grown as more companies apply to register as designated contract markets, with many applications coming from prediction market platforms. These platforms allow users to trade on the outcomes of events such as sports games, elections, and entertainment awards.The CFTC is seeking feedback on several issues, including whether margin trading should be allowed, what types of event contracts might be harmful to the public interest, and whether individuals with insider knowledge should be restricted from trading on certain outcomes. At the same time, the agency released staff guidance reminding platforms to avoid contracts that could be easily manipulated, such as those tied to specific player injuries or actions by a single referee. The guidance also explains that platforms can list new contracts through a self-certification process, although the CFTC can intervene if it believes a contract violates the law.The regulatory effort comes amid ongoing legal disputes about who has authority over prediction markets. The CFTC maintains that it has exclusive jurisdiction, while several states have attempted to regulate or restrict these platforms under gambling laws. Meanwhile, members of Congress have introduced legislation that would ban certain types of event contracts, including those related to violence or death, and strengthen rules against insider trading on prediction markets.CFTC Proposes Prediction Markets Rule - Law360CFTC Seeks Public Comment on Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Relating to Prediction MarketsThe Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against California seeking to block the state's Advanced Clean Cars I (ACC I) regulations, arguing that the rules unlawfully interfere with federal authority over vehicle fuel economy standards. The lawsuit, brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of Transportation, targets California rules adopted in 2012 that require automakers to sell increasing numbers of low-emission and zero-emission vehicles. Federal officials claim the regulations effectively force manufacturers to meet stricter nationwide standards and function as a quota system for electric vehicles.According to the complaint, California cannot impose its own limits on vehicle emissions because the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act gives the federal government authority to set fuel-economy standards through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The administration argues that California's requirements could increase vehicle prices, reduce consumer choice, and disrupt the national auto market. Federal officials also say Congress revoked certain Clean Air Act waivers in 2025 that previously allowed California to enforce some emissions rules.California leaders strongly dispute the lawsuit and say the state is defending policies designed to reduce pollution and expand access to cleaner vehicles. State officials argue the federal government is attempting to undermine California's environmental regulations and its efforts to lead the transition to cleaner transportation. The lawsuit is part of a broader series of legal disputes between the federal government and California over vehicle emissions standards and electric-vehicle mandates.Feds Sue To Stop California's ‘Illegal' EV Regulations - Law360U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) told a federal court that it is making progress on a system to refund about $166 billion in tariffs that were ruled unlawful. According to a court filing, the agency's four-part refund system is between 40% and 80% complete, with the review portion the most developed and the mass-processing component the least finished. The system will include an online portal where importers and brokers can submit claims for reimbursement.The filing was submitted to the U.S. Court of International Trade in response to an order from a judge directing the government to begin refunding tariffs after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down most of the tariffs in February. The Court's decision invalidated tariffs collected since February 2024 but did not explain how refunds should be handled. CBP previously suggested building a new system to process claims rather than using its existing process, and officials say the new portal could begin accepting applications as soon as mid-April.More than 330,000 importers paid the tariffs on roughly 53 million shipments, though only about 21,000 importers are currently registered to receive refunds. Refunds will go only to the companies that originally paid the tariffs, and there is no legal requirement that businesses pass the money on to consumers. Some companies, including FedEx, have said they will reimburse customers, while Costco indicated it may lower prices using the refunded funds. Meanwhile, new legal disputes are emerging as businesses and states challenge additional tariffs imposed after the Supreme Court ruling.US customs agency says building system for tariff refunds is 40% to 80% complete | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Tara exposes the chaos stemming from the current Department of Homeland Security shutdown, ICE and border patrol disruptions, and cybersecurity risks. From sleeper cell warnings to Iranian and Muslim migrant activity at the southern border, this episode breaks down how Democrats' inaction could be putting Americans in danger. Tara also covers the shocking implications of jury nullification in DC, where a plot to assassinate Donald Trump went unpunished, and how left-wing activist groups are allegedly training jurors to manipulate verdicts. On top of that, she uncovers media misreporting surrounding a terror attack in New York and how misinformation continues to spread. Summary In this episode, Tara details multiple threats to national security and political stability: DHS & ICE Shutdown: Democrats reportedly obstructing funding to key agencies like TSA, ICE, Customs and Border Patrol, and federal cyber operations, even amid warnings of sleeper cells and cyber attacks. Southern Border Crisis: Reports of hundreds of military-aged men from predominantly Muslim countries entering through a welded-open door at Lukeville, bypassing legal border crossings and facilitated by federal agencies. Energy and Iran Concerns: Iran and its proxies reportedly impacting global oil markets, while political actions and policies under the Biden administration affect domestic energy prices. DC Jury Nullification: Natalie Rose Jones allegedly got away with plotting to kill Trump in DC due to activist-trained jurors and partisan jury pools, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities. Media Misinformation: CNN and other outlets misreported an attempted terror attack against New York's mayor Zoran Mamdani, blaming the wrong group and spreading confusion about anti-Muslim attacks. Expert Commentary: Former Representative Adam Morgan weighs in on political and security implications, including the Freedom Caucus' ongoing monitoring. Tara emphasizes the urgent need for awareness, accountability, and vigilance in the face of political and security challenges. Key Topics DHS and federal agency shutdowns ICE and Customs border patrol disruptions Sleeper cell and cybersecurity threats Lukeville border breach by foreign nationals Iran's geopolitical influence on energy markets DC jury nullification and partisan legal manipulation Media misinformation in high-profile terror attacks Republican political risk and national security Social Media Post

Joe Piscopo will be co-hosting with Stephen Parr, Meteorologist for "The Joe Piscopo Show" and co-host of "American Ground Radio" on AM 970 The Answer. Col. Jack Jacobs, a retired colonel in the United States Army and a Medal of Honor recipient for his actions during the Vietnam WarTopic: Latest in Iran; Potential drone threat to the West Coast Assemblyman Dov Hikind, former New York State Assemblyman and the son of holocaust survivorsTopic: Mayor Mamdani's dinner with Mahmoud Khalil Jonathan Hoenig, portfolio manager at Capitalist Pig Hedge Fund LLC and a Fox News ContributorTopic: Iran War's impact on the economy John Iannarelli, former police officer, retired FBI Special Agent, consultant, and the author of "Disorderly Conduct"Topic: Terror threat to the West Coast Liz Peek, Fox News contributor, columnist for Fox News and The Hill, and former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim & CompanyTopic: "Iran war could become the achievement that ensures Trump’s legacy" (Fox News op ed) Mark Morgan, Visiting Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, Former Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs & Border Protection, and Former Assistant Director with the FBITopic: Upheaval in DHS; SAVE Act Pastor Dave Watson, Senior Pastor of Calvary Chapel on Staten Island, Founder and President of the New York Institute of Biblical Studies, and the host of "God in Our City" on WMCATopic: St. Patrick's Day; Our expectations in a war; New York's first Muslim MayorSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - 海关通常是人们进入澳大利亚后遇到的第一个关卡。 澳大利亚边境执法人员在边境口岸严阵以待，致力于阻止违禁品入境。 澳大利亚采取了严格的生物安全措施，以保护我们独特的环境、经济和社区。 在您拉上行李箱拉链之前，您需要了解哪些物品可以入境，哪些物品禁止入境，以及如果忽视生物安全规定会造成哪些后果。 （点击音频收听详细报道）

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - Митниця, як правило, є першою точкою контакту для людей, які в'їжджають до Австралії. Наші співробітники прикордонної служби чекають там. Вони стежать за тим, щоб ми не ввозили заборонені товари, які можуть загрожувати унікальному довкіллю, економіці та громадам Австралії. Перш ніж застібати валізу, ось що вам потрібно знати про те, що можна — і що не можна — перетинати кордон, і що стоїть на кону, якщо правила біобезпеки ігнорувати.

President Donald Trump tells reporters outside the White House the U.S. has hit Iran "harder than virtually any country in history has been hit" but "we're not finished yet"; International Energy Agency says its 32 member countries have agreed to release a record 400 million barrels of oil to try to lower prices that have spiked with the disruptions caused by the war with Iran; United Nations Security Council adopts a resolution condemning Iranian attacks against neighboring Gulf nations. The resolution does not mention the attacks by the United States or Israel. Russia and China abstain from the vote; Department of Homeland Security remains closed after more failed funding attempts on the Senate floor. Democrats offer to reopen all agencies but Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs & Border Protections while negotiations over federal immigration procedure reform continues, and Republicans object. Republicans offered to reopen the entire department, and Democrats object; House Oversight Committee questions the accountant for the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Richard Kahn; Japan pauses to remember the devastating earthquake and tsunami that hit the country 15 years ago today, killing thousands and causing a nuclear power plant meltdown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The American Radicals Podcast covers a new whistleblower disclosure from Customs and Border Protection, FISA 702 renewal tied to DHS funding, and the weaponization of federal gun laws. Check us out on Spotify! https://open.spotify.com/show/09AZ2WuYnWbZ2941wsb6jW?si=76c005605dc64dc1 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immigration/4485075/whistleblower-says-cbp-chief-targeted-senior-staff-political-vendettas/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/10/shutdown-that-everyone-has-forgotten/ https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/03/safe-act-imperfect-vehicle-real-section-702-reform https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/02/us/politics/supreme-court-guns-drugs.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/nyregion/us-attorney-nj-prosecutors.html https://zeale.co/news/articles/doj-moves-to-dismiss-or-pause-pro-life-lawsuit-seeking-to-reinstate-abortion-pill-safeguards?utm_campaign=129541854-The%20LOOP&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-87QF-RQi6OkeHDcAfU5AC4X17xKSVXW2DrurwiOpz1mmDj70Xhdn6KHkES0hLdVyH5YUFkM1Gq9XlgoRZfYyKKTVmYOw&_hsmi=24801923&utm_content=24801923&utm_source=hs_email https://zeale.co/news/articles/doj-asks-judge-to-delay-abortion-pill-restrictions?utm_campaign=129541854-The%20LOOP&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8NE_JuVA1x2jcNJfqjIH_bOwdT7FYJvY0VIwGd6OvDWLO8qxOjk0-oU1Dbx6o7fJhk6a1q https://zeale.co/news/articles/fda-approves-new-version-of-abortion-pill-prompting-backlash-from-pro-life-leaders/ https://zeale.co/news/articles/planned-parenthoods-latest-pivot-affiliates-add-cosmetic-services-to-offset-funding-cuts?utm_campaign=129541854-The%20LOOP&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8MqAX186uwRmRMPUsVv7TWvfFdzkLCmtCW9poNExjP8F8uyeBcGMVptZeRYNziZix5PQKzurUDpg6NMZF_CuzOWI32eQ&_hsmi=24325166&utm_content=24325166&utm_source=hs_email 

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - 세관은 호주 입국 시 사람들이 가장 먼저 접하는 곳입니다. 국경수비대 직원들이 그곳에서 기다리고 있습니다. 이들은 호주의 고유한 환경, 경제 및 지역 사회를 위협할 수 있는 금지 물품의 반입을 막습니다. 여행 짐을 싸기 전에 국경을 넘을 수 있는 물품과 넘을 수 없는 물품, 그리고 생물보안 규정을 무시할 경우 어떤 결과가 초래될 수 있는지 알아두어야 할 사항들을 정리해 드립니다.

Wednesday, 11 March 2026   He said, “Yes.” And when he had come into the house, Jesus anticipated him, saying, “What do you think, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth take customs or taxes, from their sons or from strangers?” Matthew 17:25   “‘Yes,' he says. And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him, saying, ‘What, you, it seems, Simon? The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census? From their sons or from unfamilars?'” (CG).   In the previous verse, Peter was asked if his Teacher paid the didrachma or not. The response is, “‘Yes,' he says.”   Peter acknowledged that this is something Jesus did. The implication is that Peter had seen Him pay in the past, or that he was aware that Jesus paid any such obligation imposed by either the law or societal mandates without dispute. Otherwise, he would have answered “I don't know,” or something similar. The simple answer speaks of Peter's awareness of the matter.   However, that affirmative answer brings in a logical disconnect that Jesus will next address. He will do it in the form of a question to elicit Peter's contemplation, followed by a response based on that. As such, Matthew records, “And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him.”   Here is a word found only once in Scripture, prophthanó, to get an earlier start of a matter. It is derived from pro, in front of or prior, and phthanó, to anticipate or precede. The archaic word preanticipate gives the proper sense. It is a word that bears redundancy. Jesus didn't just speak before Peter did. He spoke of the matter that had just occurred before Peter could.   The previous verse noted that people talked to Peter about Jesus. It then said, “And when he entered into the house.” As Peter is the nearest antecedent, and the verb is singular (he entered), it means Peter went into the house.   At that point, Jesus, who was in the house and not present during the conversation between Peter and the collectors of the didrachma, was aware of their conversation. The unstated wording implies that Jesus supernaturally knew the contents of the conversation. With Peter in the house, Matthew next records, “saying, ‘What, you, it seems, Simon?'”   Jesus wants Peter to think through a matter. It is what any good teacher will do at times by stopping during a class and asking a question to help solidify an important point in the minds of the students. Jesus' question is, “The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census?”   The first word, telos, has already been seen in a different context in Matthew 10:22. It refers to the point aimed at as a limit. In this case, it would be a tribute. Customs (used by some translations) refers to goods crossing international borders. A toll (used by some translations) is a duty on goods. This is a tribute, something paid to maintain peace or express loyalty to a ruler.   The second word, kensos, is the etymological root of our word census. It refers to an enrollment. In this case, the enrollment is one where the payment stands for the act of enrollment. In essence, it is the census derived from a census. Understanding this, Jesus questions further, “From their sons or from unfamiliars?”   Another new word is used, the adjective allotrios, not one's own. It is derived from allos, different or else, and speaks of “not one's own family.” A suitable word would be unfamiliar, being derived from un-familial, not relating to the family.   Jesus' question is one intended to get Peter to think on two levels at the same time. He will think on the standard worldly level, but it asks Peter to also consider why Jesus would ask such a question and what his answer to them means based on his own proclamation made in Matthew 16:16, as well as what has transpired throughout Chapter 17, especially concerning the proclamation called out on the mountain in verse 5.   Life application: Older translations of this verse use the word prevent instead of preanticipate –   “He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying...” KJV et. al.   The word once meant to go before or precede. It no longer carries that meaning. Because of this, when reading an older translation, one will naturally assume that Jesus stopped Peter from speaking, forbidding him to say anything in order for Him to speak first. That is not the intent.   He did stop Peter from speaking, but Peter wasn't forbidden from doing so. Rather, he had no chance to do so. The subtlety of difference changes the intent. There are good lessons we can learn from older translations, and there is, at times, a clarity that is not found in modern translations, such as pronouns that speak of more than one and others that speak of one only. For example, today the word you can mean singular or plural.   This is why it is always good to read lots of translations. If you are told to only read the KJV, you might, at times, be prevented from learning things properly. However, if you read it along with other Bibles, you might preanticipate problems before they cause confusion. You will be able to keep from making incorrect conclusions about what is actually being conveyed.   O God, what a fun world of delight it can be, sitting and thinking about all You have done in Your creation, in progressing through Your plan of redemption, and in contemplating those things as they are laid out in Your word. May we always consider You and what You have done and are doing as we live our lives before You. Amen.  

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - تعتبر الجمارك بشكل عام نقطة الاتصال الأولى للأشخاص القادمين إلى أستراليا. يتواجد عناصر حرس الحدود الأسترالي على أهبة الاستعداد. إنهم يضمنون عدم جلب السلع المحظورة التي يمكن أن تهدد البيئة والاقتصاد والمجتمعات الفريدة في أستراليا. قبل أن تُغلق حقيبتك، إليك ما تحتاج معرفته حول ما يُسمح له وما لا يُسمح له بعبور الحدود، وما هي العواقب المترتبة إذا تم تجاهل قواعد الأمن البيولوجي.

Coming up in the news: Did a senior investigator follow protocol at the scene of a 2024 killing? The defence says no — but the witness insists otherwise. Full details ahead. Thirteen new Caymanian recruits step into training with Customs and Border Control. What they'll be learning over the next few months — coming up. And a bill to raise the civil service retirement age didn't reach debate — but the Deputy Governor still had plenty to say. That and more your evening news update which is next.

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - Hải quan thường là điểm tiếp xúc đầu tiên với những người nhập cảnh Úc. Các nhân viên của Lực lượng Bảo vệ biên giới Úc luôn túc trực tại cửa khẩu, tập trung ngăn chặn các mặt hàng bị cấm vào Úc. Những biện pháp an ninh sinh học nghiêm ngặt của Úc được thiết lập nhằm bảo vệ môi trường độc đáo, nền kinh tế và cộng đồng của đất nước.

Customs data shows China's foreign trade grew 18.3 percent in the first two months of 2026. Total goods trade volume reached over 7.7 trillion yuan, or about 1.1 trillion U.S. dollars, during the period.

Customs is generally the first point of contact for people entering Australia. Our Border Force Officers are there waiting. They ensure that we don't bring in prohibited goods that could threaten Australia's unique environment, economy and communities. Before you zip up your suitcase, here's what you need to know about what can—and can't—cross the border, and what's at stake if biosecurity rules are ignored. - โดยทั่วไปแล้ว ด่านศุลกากรเป็นจุดแรกที่ผู้ที่เดินทางต้องผ่านก่อนเข้าออสเตรเลีย และจะมีเจ้าหน้าที่กองกำลังชายแดน (Border Force Officers) รอคุณอยู่ โดยมีหน้าที่ตรวจสอบว่าผู้เดินทางไม่ได้นำสินค้าต้องห้ามเข้าประเทศ ซึ่งอาจเป็นภัยคุกคามต่อสิ่งแวดล้อม เศรษฐกิจ และชุมชนอันเป็นเอกลักษณ์ของออสเตรเลีย ก่อนที่คุณจะรูดซิปกระเป๋าเดินทาง เนื้อหาในบทความนี้คือสิ่งที่คุณต้องรู้เกี่ยวกับสิ่งของข้ามพรมแดนที่อนุญาตและไม่อนุญาตให้นำเข้า และผลกระทบหากไม่ปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบด้านความปลอดภัยทางชีวภาพ

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, we unveil a blockbuster story that has captured national attention: the FBI's grand jury subpoena for election records from Maricopa County, spanning from 2020 to 2024. John Solomon breaks down the implications of this significant development, confirmed by the Arizona State Senate, and hints at further actions likely to unfold in the coming days.We delve into the ongoing concerns surrounding Maricopa County's vote counting processes, highlighting alarming reports from congressional staffers about improper handling of ballots at a third-party facility. This segment sets the stage for a deeper exploration of the issues at play in Arizona's electoral landscape.Kicking off the show, Congressman John McGuire, a Navy SEAL from Virginia, joins us to discuss the pressing terror threats facing America today, including a recent attack in Austin and alarming incidents involving ISIS-inspired individuals. His insights provide a sobering look at the challenges we face on our own soil.Next, we welcome Congressman Ralph Norman from South Carolina, who is running for the Republican nomination for governor. He shares his plans for redistricting efforts aimed at addressing racially gerrymandered districts and raises concerns about retroactive pay raises being sought by long-serving lawmakers.Finally, we hear from Mark Morgan, the former acting director of Customs and Border Protection, who discusses the future of immigration enforcement under the new leadership at the Department of Homeland Security. His extensive experience in law enforcement provides valuable perspective on the challenges ahead.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This Day in Legal History: The AmistadOn March 9, 1841, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. The Amistad, ruling that a group of Africans who had seized control of the Spanish ship La Amistad were free individuals who had been illegally enslaved. The case began after the captives, led by Sengbe Pieh—often called Cinqué—revolted against the ship's crew while being transported from Cuba in 1839. They had originally been kidnapped in West Africa and sold into slavery in violation of international agreements banning the transatlantic slave trade. After the revolt, the ship was intercepted near Long Island and the Africans were taken into U.S. custody. Spanish officials demanded that the United States return both the ship and the captives to Cuba. The U.S. government supported Spain's request, arguing that the captives were property under Spanish law.Abolitionists rallied to the Africans' defense and secured legal representation for them in American courts. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, where former President John Quincy Adams joined the legal team arguing for the captives' freedom. Adams delivered a lengthy and passionate argument emphasizing natural rights and the illegality of the slave trade that had brought the Africans to Cuba. Writing for the majority, Justice Joseph Story concluded that the captives had been unlawfully enslaved and were therefore not property. Because they were free individuals, the Court held that they had the legal right to resist their captivity and fight for their liberty. The Court ordered that the Africans be released rather than returned to Spanish authorities.The ruling was celebrated by abolitionists as an important moral and legal victory in the fight against slavery. Although it did not end slavery in the United States, the decision demonstrated that courts could recognize limits on the slave trade and acknowledge the legal claims of enslaved people.Thirteen major U.S. book publishers have filed a copyright lawsuit against Anna's Archive, a website they describe as one of the largest “shadow libraries” distributing pirated books and academic papers. The publishers—including HarperCollins, Wiley, McGraw Hill, and Cengage—filed the complaint in federal court in New York, alleging that the site hosts more than 63 million books and 95 million research papers without authorization. According to the lawsuit, Anna's Archive allows users to download these materials directly or through torrent networks, making copyrighted works widely available for free. The publishers claim the site openly presents itself as a pirate platform and intentionally violates copyright law.The complaint also alleges that Anna's Archive was created in 2022 after copying entire collections from other illegal book repositories and has continued expanding its database. The publishers say the site operates anonymously and frequently changes domain names across different countries to avoid enforcement efforts. They further claim the platform targets artificial intelligence developers by offering large datasets of books and papers. While free users can access files slowly, the complaint states that faster downloads are available to users who make donations through untraceable methods like cryptocurrency or gift cards. The publishers allege that these donations can reach roughly $200,000 for high-speed bulk access. In response, the plaintiffs are asking the court to shut down the site and award statutory damages of up to $150,000 for each infringed work.The lawsuit follows a separate case brought by Atlantic Recording Corp., which earlier obtained a preliminary injunction preventing Anna's Archive from distributing millions of music files allegedly copied from Spotify. That case resulted in a default after the site failed to respond to the complaint. However, the publishers argue that the earlier injunction does not cover books, allowing the alleged book piracy to continue. The Association of American Publishers has publicly supported the lawsuit, describing the scale of digital piracy as extremely large and urging legal action to stop the operation.Publishers Sue ‘Shadow Library' For ‘Staggering' Book Piracy - Law360Companies that operate in California are facing uncertainty as the state moves forward with major climate disclosure laws while a federal appeals court considers whether the rules should be blocked. The laws—California Senate Bills 253 and 261—require large companies doing business in the state to disclose information about greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks. In late February, the California Air Resources Board approved initial regulations explaining how the reporting system will be administered and how companies will pay implementation fees. At the same time, the Ninth Circuit has temporarily blocked enforcement of S.B. 261 and is reviewing a request from business groups to halt both laws entirely.Because of this parallel regulatory and legal process, many companies are unsure whether they should invest heavily in compliance or wait for the courts to rule. S.B. 253 applies to companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenue and requires reporting of Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, which include direct emissions, energy-related emissions, and emissions from supply chains. S.B. 261 applies to companies with more than $500 million in revenue and requires disclosure of climate-related financial risks and mitigation strategies. Attorneys say collecting this data could be difficult, especially for companies that only have limited operations in California or that must gather information from suppliers and partners in other regions.The reporting requirements could also affect businesses outside California because companies subject to the law may need emissions data from their partners and vendors. Regulators have begun setting deadlines for initial reporting, including an August deadline for certain emissions data, but many details about how the system will function remain unresolved. Meanwhile, business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce argue the laws violate the First Amendment by forcing companies to speak on controversial issues related to climate change. With rulemaking still underway and litigation ongoing, companies are left trying to prepare for possible compliance while waiting to see whether the courts ultimately uphold or invalidate the laws.Companies In Limbo Over Calif. Climate Disclosure Laws' Fate - Law360In a major California bellwether trial over claims that social media harms children's mental health, the plaintiff has finished presenting her case against Instagram and YouTube. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old referred to as Kaley G.M. to protect her identity, alleges that features on the platforms contributed to anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia she experienced as a minor. Her attorney, Mark Lanier, chose not to call Kaley's mother to testify live, instead presenting a brief portion of her deposition to the jury. The decision appeared partly influenced by strict time limits imposed by the judge during the trial. In the deposition testimony, the mother acknowledged she had little knowledge of her daughter's social media use and did not monitor her phone because she viewed it similarly to a household landline.Defense attorneys have argued that Kaley's mental health problems were caused by difficulties at home rather than the platforms themselves. Evidence introduced at trial suggested the plaintiff had conflicts with her mother, including allegations of neglect, verbal abuse, and limited supervision of internet use. The defense also pointed to bullying and other personal issues as alternative explanations for the plaintiff's struggles. Meanwhile, a former Meta employee testified that internal company information suggested Instagram could be addictive and harmful to young users, although defense lawyers challenged his credibility and the extent of his involvement with safety issues.The plaintiff's final expert witness discussed ways social media companies could design safer platforms for children. After the plaintiff rested, Meta began presenting its defense with testimony from school administrators connected to the plaintiff. The case is the first bellwether trial among thousands of similar lawsuits consolidated in California, with outcomes potentially shaping settlement negotiations and future trials. TikTok and Snap previously settled with this plaintiff, but the broader litigation against social media companies continues.Meta, Google Begin Defense As Mental Harm Plaintiff Rests - Law360 UKThe U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency told a federal trade court that it expects to create a system within about 45 days to process refunds for tariffs that were previously imposed under President Donald Trump and later ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. The tariffs generated roughly $166 billion in payments from about 330,000 importers, and the Court's decision did not specify how those funds should be returned. As a result, government lawyers and a judge from the U.S. Court of International Trade are working to establish a practical process for issuing refunds.Under the proposed plan, importers would submit a declaration through CBP's electronic system detailing the tariffs they paid. The agency would verify the information and then issue a single payment from the Treasury Department to each importer, including interest. Officials say this approach would avoid forcing businesses to file individual lawsuits to recover their money. The judge overseeing the matter recently modified an earlier order that required immediate refunds, acknowledging that the agency needs time to build a workable system.CBP explained that its current administrative system cannot automatically process refunds on the massive scale required. Importers paid tariffs on more than 53 million shipments, and manually reviewing each transaction could require millions of hours of labor. Several large companies, including affiliates of Nintendo and CVS, have already filed lawsuits seeking repayment, though the government hopes a broader refund system will resolve claims more efficiently.Business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have supported the proposal, saying it could simplify the process for smaller companies. However, officials noted that relatively few importers have registered for the electronic refund system created earlier this year. The court continues to oversee the development of the refund process through a test case that could guide how payments are returned to all affected businesses.US customs agency expects tariff refund system to be ready in 45 days | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it cannot quickly process refunds tied to Trump-era tariffs that the Supreme Court ruled illegal. In a new court filing, the agency says more than 330,000 importers paid about $166 billion across more than 53 million shipments, and refunding that money manually would take about 4.4 million labor hours. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed with the latest news from a leading Black-owned & controlled media company: https://aurn.com/newsletter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This Episode is Sponsored by: CBIZ While many food industry professionals were hoping that the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs would elucidate the current global trade environment, it appears that it may have added more uncertainty than before. CBIZ's Lou Biscotti and Mark Baran, and former Customs expert Michael Contino, all join The Food Institute Podcast to provide clarity and actionable insights. More about CBIZ: From farm to fork, optimize operations, control costs, and prioritize profits. CBIZ teams work across the supply chain—supporting agribusinesses, manufacturers, distributors, processors, importers, restaurants, retailers, and hospitality concepts in achieving their goals. CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE:CBZ) is a publicly traded, leading professional services advisor to middle market businesses and organizations nationwide. With unmatched industry knowledge and expertise in accounting, tax, advisory, benefits, insurance and technology, CBIZ delivers forward-thinking insights and actionable solutions to help you anticipate next steps and accelerate growth. We help your organization navigate challenges, turn risk into opportunity and drive sustainable, long-term excellence — where you are today and wherever you want to grow. Our 9,500+ team members across 23 major markets provide top-tier industry expertise with local delivery, relationships and support. To learn more, visit https://www.cbiz.com/. More about Louis Biscotti: Louis Biscotti is the national leader of CBIZ's Food and Beverage Services group. He has been an entrepreneurial leader in accounting for over 40 years. Mr. Biscotti has focused his efforts on improving his clients' growth and profitability and has guided many companies in their development from small emerging entities into organizations worth hundreds of millions of dollars. While his clients represent a variety of industries, he is particularly well known for his work in manufacturing and distribution, especially with food and beverage companies. An active member of many local chambers of commerce, Mr. Biscotti served as a trustee for the Foundation for Accounting Education and was a board member of the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA). He is a former president of the Accounting Circle and an Executive Advisory Board member of St. John's, his alma mater, and Molloy College. More about Mark Baran: Mark Baran is a Managing Director in the National Tax Office. He has more than 25 years of tax, transactional and legal experience advising publicly-traded and private companies, regulated financial institutions, investors, high net worth individuals, and government agencies. Mark's practice areas include providing tax consulting and transactional services to a broad spectrum of clients and industries including the public sector. He routinely provides tax opinions on the tax implications of proposed transactions, products, services and initiatives, and serves as a firm resource in the areas of financial services and products, regulatory compliance and planning, lending transactions and payment obligations, tax information reporting, expert witness support, asset management and tax controversies. More about Michael Contino: Mike began his career with U.S. Customs in 1973 and concluded more than three decades of service in 2007, serving under seven Presidential administrations and working across three major U.S. tariff frameworks: the Hawley-Smoot Tariff of 1930, the Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUSA) of 1968, and the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of 1986, which now underpins the global tariff system adopted by more than 160 nations. Over the course of his career, he held numerous leadership and technical roles, including Import Specialist, Assistant to the National Import Specialist, Supervisory Import Specialist, Division Director, Operations Officer, Field National Import Specialist, and ultimately National Import Specialist.

Linktree: ⁠⁠https://linktr.ee/Analytic⁠⁠Join The Normandy For Ad-Free NME, Additional Bonus Audio And Visual Content For All Things Nme+! Join Here:⁠⁠ ⁠⁠https://ow.ly/msoH50WCu0K⁠⁠The Nintendo Lawsuit Against U.S. Government Over Tariffs (2026) is heating up as Nintendo of America files suit on March 6, 2026, in the United States Court of International Trade. In this segment of Notorious Mass Effect, Analytic Dreamz dives into the high-profile case where Nintendo demands a full refund—with interest—of tariffs paid under now-invalidated policies imposed by the Trump administration starting February 1, 2025.The tariffs, enacted via executive orders under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), targeted imports from numerous countries, including key Nintendo manufacturing hubs like Vietnam and Cambodia. The Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that IEEPA does not authorize such tariffs, deeming them unlawful and triggering over 380 similar corporate lawsuits (with thousands more including prior cases) from companies like Costco, Toyota, and GoPro seeking refunds on billions collected—estimates range from $166 billion to over $200 billion in total duties.Nintendo claims substantial harm from these "unlawful trade measures," citing impacts like delayed U.S. pre-orders for the Nintendo Switch 2 (originally set to begin April 9, 2025, but postponed due to tariff uncertainty) and price hikes on the original Switch and some Switch 2 peripherals in 2025 to offset costs. The suit names agencies including the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Commerce, and the U.S. Trade Representative, plus officials like Scott Bessent and Kristi Noem.Refunds face delays: CBP cites manpower shortages, outdated systems, and massive volume, though a new processing system is expected in about 45 days. A federal judge has ordered reimbursements to begin, but logistical hurdles persist amid broader industry fallout, including potential future pressures like global RAM shortages.Analytic Dreamz breaks down the timeline, Supreme Court ruling, Nintendo's financial arguments, and what refunds could mean for console pricing across gaming—potentially stabilizing or lowering costs for Switch 2, PlayStation, Xbox, and hardware in 2026–2027 if the wave of litigation succeeds.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/analytic-dreamz-notorious-mass-effect/exclusive-contentPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

-- On the Show -- Donald Trump removes Kristi Noem as Secretary of Homeland Security after a series of public embarrassments, then assigns her a vague new envoy role to disguise the firing -- The real political divide in the United States is between powerful elites and ordinary Americans rather than traditional partisan conflicts -- Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer faces an investigation after reports that taxpayer funds were used for a birthday celebration disguised as an official Department of Labor event -- Prosecutors investigate former Customs and Border Protection commander Gregory Bovino over video showing him throwing a chemical gas canister at protesters during a federal operation in Minneapolis -- Rising oil prices following the Iran conflict trigger internal panic in the Trump White House as officials scramble to respond to the political fallout from higher gasoline costs -- Larry Kudlow publicly argues that Donald Trump ended a war by starting one, highlighting the administration's attempt to reframe military escalation as peacekeeping -- Marjorie Taylor Greene tells Megyn Kelly that Donald Trump has said he does not expect to go to heaven and is near the end of his life -- On the Bonus Show: Trump suggests regime change in Cuba is next, a Fox & Friends host blames Americans trapped in the Middle East, Kristi Noem speaks immediately after get fired, and much more...

In our news wrap Friday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it should have a process ready in about 45 days to start refunding invalidated tariffs to hundreds of thousands of companies, storms are rolling across the central U.S. with forecasters warning of possible tornadoes and GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales is vowing to finish out his term after announcing he won't seek re-election. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

What do you get when you mix a lousy jobs report, spiking oil prices and a downturn in retail sales?  Simple, a mess and that is where we start this evening.  This is the Business News Headlines for Friday the 6th day of March, thanks for listening.  In other news, oil popped by over ten dollars a barrel. January retail sales slumped and we'll share by how much. The U.S. will now sell Venezuelan gold. Indonesia will ban social media for children under the age of 16. In other international news Canada and Japan have signed an agreement to strengthen defense and economic opportunities. Customs and Border Protection official says a new process for tariff refunds could be ready in 45 days. We'll check the numbers in The Wall Street Report and Sunday is International Women's Day but…there is a but.  Let's go. Thanks for listening! The award winning Insight on Business the News Hour with Michael Libbie is the only weekday business news podcast in the Midwest. The national, regional and some local business news along with long-form business interviews can be heard Monday - Friday. You can subscribe on  PlayerFM, Podbean, iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher or TuneIn Radio. And you can catch The Business News Hour Week in Review each Sunday Noon Central on News/Talk 1540 KXEL. The Business News Hour is a production of Insight Advertising, Marketing & Communications. You can follow us on Twitter @IoB_NewsHour...and on Threads @Insight_On_Business.

This Day in Legal History: FDR Declares Bank HolidayOn March 6, 1933, just two days after taking office, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared a nationwide bank holiday in response to the escalating financial panic of the Great Depression. At the time, banks across the country were collapsing as frightened depositors rushed to withdraw their savings. The closures threatened to completely destabilize the American financial system. Roosevelt used emergency executive authority to temporarily shut down the nation's banks in order to stop the flood of withdrawals. The pause allowed federal officials to inspect financial institutions and determine which were stable enough to reopen.Although the order began as an executive action, Congress quickly moved to support the president's efforts. On March 9, lawmakers passed the Emergency Banking Act, which retroactively approved Roosevelt's bank holiday and expanded federal oversight of banks. The law allowed only financially sound banks to resume operations and provided additional confidence to depositors. In the days that followed, many banks reopened under stricter supervision, and public trust gradually returned to the banking system. Roosevelt reinforced this confidence through his first “fireside chat,” explaining the reforms directly to the American public.Legal challenges later tested the government's authority to take such sweeping action during a crisis. Courts ultimately upheld many emergency financial measures adopted during the early New Deal period. These rulings helped establish the principle that the federal government has broader power to respond to national economic emergencies. The bank holiday of March 6, 1933, therefore became an important early example of how executive initiative and congressional support can combine to address a national crisis.An insurer has filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law after its AI chatbot allegedly provided faulty legal assistance to a disability benefits recipient. According to the complaint, Nippon Life Insurance Co. of America had settled a long-term disability dispute with Graciela Dela Torre in January 2024. About a year later, she questioned the agreement and asked her attorney about reopening the case due to alleged documentation problems. When her lawyer explained that the settlement was final, Dela Torre consulted ChatGPT, asking whether her attorney had dismissed her concerns.The insurer claims the chatbot suggested that her attorney had invalidated her feelings and deflected responsibility. After receiving that response, Dela Torre fired her lawyer and attempted to reopen the case on her own. The lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT generated legal arguments asserting that her former counsel had pressured her into signing a blank signature page. She filed a motion based on those arguments, which Nippon says violated the settlement agreement releasing the company from future claims.According to the complaint, Dela Torre then submitted numerous additional filings drafted with the chatbot's help, including more than twenty motions and other court documents. The court rejected her attempt to reopen the case and upheld the settlement as valid. Despite that ruling, she allegedly used ChatGPT again to prepare a new lawsuit asserting claims such as fraudulent misrepresentation and interference with disability benefits. Nippon says she has filed dozens of motions that serve no legitimate legal purpose, forcing the company to spend significant time responding. The insurer is now seeking damages and an injunction preventing OpenAI from providing legal assistance to Dela Torre, while OpenAI has dismissed the claims as meritless.OpenAI Practices Law Without A License, Insurer Alleges - Law360A coalition of 24 states has filed a lawsuit challenging new global tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The case was brought in the U.S. Court of International Trade and seeks to block tariffs introduced on February 20 under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The states argue the administration rushed to impose the tariffs only hours after the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated an earlier set of trade measures that had been issued under a different statute. According to the complaint, the new tariffs were an attempt to revive similar trade restrictions using a separate legal authority.The policy first imposed a 10% tariff on imports worldwide and was raised to the statute's maximum 15% the following day. The administration justified the move by claiming it was necessary to address serious U.S. balance-of-payments deficits. However, the states argue that such deficits do not actually exist and that the government selectively relied on negative data while ignoring overall positive financial inflows. They claim this misuse of the statute mirrors the earlier tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down.The lawsuit also argues that the tariffs violate the Constitution because the authority to impose taxes and duties belongs to Congress. The Supreme Court recently emphasized this principle when it ruled against the administration's earlier tariff policy. According to the states, Section 122 was originally enacted to address problems tied to an outdated international currency system that no longer exists today. Because the statutory conditions cannot be met, the coalition argues the president's tariffs are unlawful. The states are asking the court to invalidate the measures before they remain in effect through the summer.Two Dozen States Sue Trump to Halt New Global Tariffs - Law360Twenty-four US states file lawsuit to stop Trump's latest global tariffs | ReutersA federal trade judge is meeting privately with government lawyers to determine how the United States will refund billions of dollars in tariffs that courts recently ruled unconstitutional. Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade scheduled the closed-door meeting as a settlement conference to discuss a practical process for returning money to importers. The tariffs at issue were a major part of President Donald Trump's trade policy but were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February for exceeding presidential authority. Because the Court did not provide guidance on how refunds should be handled, lower courts are now working to establish a workable procedure.The scale of the refunds could be enormous, potentially reaching $175 billion and affecting more than 300,000 importers. Government attorneys have warned that processing the reimbursements will be unusually complex because it may involve manual review of tens of millions of tariff payments. Many of the affected importers are small businesses concerned about the cost and administrative burden of seeking repayment. Judge Eaton has indicated that he wants a system that avoids forcing companies to file individual lawsuits.The issue arose in a case filed by Atmus Filtration Inc., which claims it paid $11 million in unlawful tariffs. Eaton recently ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to begin using its internal processes to refund tariffs not only to Atmus but potentially to all affected importers. The upcoming conference is expected to focus on how the agency can efficiently review roughly 79 million shipments and distribute refunds. Attorneys involved in related cases believe the meeting could lead to a standardized process that allows most businesses to receive reimbursements without extended litigation.Exclusive: US judge to meet parties on Trump-tariff refunds in closed-door ‘settlement conference' | ReutersA federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump has the authority to suspend refugee admissions to the United States, reversing most of a lower court decision that had blocked the policy. The ruling came from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The judges concluded that federal law gives the president broad power to restrict the entry of foreign nationals when he believes it serves national interests. As a result, the panel allowed Trump's halt of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program to remain in place.The policy was introduced shortly after Trump took office in 2025 and paused the admission of refugees while the administration reviewed whether the program ensured proper assimilation. Refugees, their family members, and several resettlement organizations filed a class action lawsuit challenging the move. A federal judge in Seattle had previously issued injunctions blocking the suspension and related actions. However, the Ninth Circuit determined that most of those rulings exceeded the district court's authority.Writing for the panel, Judge Jay Bybee acknowledged that the decision could have serious real-world consequences for thousands of refugees who had already completed years of vetting and were awaiting resettlement. Despite those concerns, the court emphasized that Congress granted the president sweeping authority over immigration entry decisions. The judges said policy judgments about refugee admissions belong to the executive branch rather than the courts.The panel did leave some portions of the lower court's order in place. It upheld injunctions that prevent the government from cutting services to refugees who have already been admitted to the United States and from terminating certain agreements with refugee support organizations. One judge dissented in part, arguing that the district court's injunctions should have been entirely overturned.Trump can suspend refugee admissions, US appeals court rules | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

It's been three months since U.S. Customs and Border Protection descended on Charlotte. Operation “Charlotte's Web” brought fear, confusion and disruption to the city, especially to the immigrant community. There are still many unknowns about that operation despite attempts by politicians at all levels asking for transparency and accountability. We get an update on those attempts and examine the economic, legal and cultural fallout.

The recent court ruling regarding tariff refunds for importers marks a significant development within the furniture industry, as it has the potential to influence numerous stakeholders reliant on imported goods. This episode elucidates the implications of a federal trade court's directive for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to initiate refunds related to previously imposed tariffs, thereby opening avenues for financial recuperation for affected importers. Concurrently, we explore retail strategies that furniture retailers might adopt from established entities such as Target, particularly in terms of enhancing customer engagement through innovative showroom designs and improved service models. Furthermore, the episode addresses the escalating challenges posed by rising big box rents, which are prompting furniture retailers to reconsider their expansion strategies amidst a competitive real estate landscape. We also evaluate recent corporate developments, including the Chapter 11 filing of a regional retailer and the closure of enduring independent stores, which collectively reflect the evolving dynamics of the furniture market in the face of economic uncertainties.Takeaways:The recent court ruling may enable furniture importers to receive refunds for previously imposed tariffs, significantly impacting financial operations within the industry.Furniture retailers are encouraged to adopt innovative strategies akin to those utilized by Target, enhancing customer engagement through improved store presentations and service.Despite a wave of retail closures, rising rents for big box stores pose significant challenges, compelling furniture retailers to reassess their expansion strategies in competitive markets.In a notable bankruptcy case, American Home Furniture and Mattress seeks reorganization amidst industry challenges, indicative of broader financial pressures affecting regional retailers.The closure of longstanding independent stores, such as Kelsey Furniture, underscores the intense competitive pressures that have reshaped the retail landscape in recent years.Industry demand remains stable yet cautious, with new residential furniture orders showing little growth, reflecting consumer wariness amid ongoing economic fluctuations.

The House fails to pass the ROTOR Act, and the competing ALERT Act is introduced. The military is shooting down drones with a laser, combat action in the Middle East is disrupting commercial flights, former President Biden flies commercial, Breeze Airways continues to expand, and United adds a new passenger requirement to its Contract of Carriage. Plus, more feedback on the Lockheed Constellation, and the passion for flying. Aviation News U.S. House rejects aviation safety bill after Pentagon abruptly withdraws support When we talked about the ROTOR Act last week, we explained that the Senate unanimously passed the bill requiring ADS-B In and that a House vote was scheduled. Before the House vote, the Pentagon withdrew its support, saying that the bill could create “unresolved budgetary burdens and operational security risks.” The bill failed to meet the required two-thirds majority: 264 in favor and 133 opposed, with more than 130 Republicans voting against it. Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said, “This bill will undermine our national security. Requiring our fighters and bombers and highly classified assets to regularly broadcast their location puts our men and women in uniform at risk.” Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., the chairman of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, called the ROTOR Act an “unworkable government mandate” that would be “burdensome” to some pilots. ALERT Act Aviation Safety Bill Introduced in U.S. House . Graves and Rogers put their support behind their own bipartisan bill, known as the ALERT Act, or Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act. It is broader, more process‑driven, and relies more on future FAA rulemaking. The ROTOR Act uses mandates and concentrates on collision‑avoidance and traffic‑awareness, especially mandatory ADS‑B In equipage for aircraft operating near airports, plus related airspace reviews and military‑civil coordination.​ The ALERT Act uses rulemaking to implement essentially all ~50 NTSB recommendations from the DCA midair, including tech, ATC staffing/training, helicopter routes, DCA‑specific procedures, and FAA safety culture reforms. Military Laser Downs CBP Drone, Tiny TFR Established When Federal Agencies Start Shooting at Each Other's Drones, We Have a Real Airspace Problem The Defence Department has a laser weapon that can shoot down drones. Recently, a TFR closed the airspace in El Paso due to a drone downing. Now, Congress has been briefed that along the Mexican border at Fort Hancock, Texas, a Defense Department laser weapon shot down a Customs and Border Protection drone. In response, the FAA issued a TFR for that area. In a statement, three lawmakers said, “Our heads are exploding over the news that DoD reportedly shot down a Customs and Border Protection drone using a high-risk counter-unmanned aircraft system.” Also, “We said MONTHS ago that the White House's decision to sidestep a bipartisan, tri-committee bill to appropriately train C-UAS operators and address the lack of coordination between the Pentagon, DHS and the FAA was a short-sighted idea. Now, we're seeing the result of its incompetence.” Hundreds of thousands of travelers stranded by flight disruptions after attack on Iran Military combat in Iran and the surrounding region has forced the diversion and cancellation of flights. Airspace was closed by Israel, Qatar, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Bahrain. The United Arab Emirates announced a “temporary and partial closure” of its airspace. Reportedly, hundreds of thousands of travelers were impacted and either stranded or diverted to other airports. Important hub airports in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Doha were closed. Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Etihad typically move about 90,000 passengers per day through those hubs. Three US Fighter Jets Accidentally Shot Down by Kuwaiti Air Defenses On 1 March 2026, three USAF F‑15E Strike Eagles were shot down over Kuwait by Kuwaiti air-defense systems during combat operations against Iran. U.S. Central Command described it as an apparent friendly‑fire incident; all six crew members ejected and were recovered. Biden flies commercial from DCA and winds up stuck in delays like everyone else Imagine getting settled into your seat on a commuter flight from DCA to Columbia, South Carolina, and realizing that your seatmate is a former President of the United States. Breeze adding new nonstop options from Portland, Maine Breeze Airways is adding new, summer seasonal nonstop flights from the Portland International Jetport to Akron/Canton and Cincinnati. Breeze is also adding new Breeze Thru service options, providing same plane, one-stop flights to Savannah, Georgia, and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The Breeze Thru service to Savannah starts July 1, 2026, with the service to Myrtle Beach on July 2, 2026. BreezeThru flights include a quick stop at an airport along the way to your destination. Just hang out. There’s no need to change planes or recheck bags. Your reservation will have a single confirmation number for both segments. United Threatens To Kick Off Passengers Who Don't Use Headphones United Airlines has added a new passenger requirement to Rule 21 Refusal of Transport in its Contract of Carriage. Item 22 reads, “Passengers who fail to use headphones while listening to audio or video content.” Under the Contract of Carriage, “UA shall have the right to refuse transport on a permanent or temporary basis or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger…” for the stated reasons. United Airlines Contract of Carriage. Delta Air Lines Contract of Carriage: U.S. American Airlines Conditions of Carriage. Singapore Airshow 2026 Brian Coleman brings us interviews from the Singapore Airshow. In this episode, he and Grant McHerron talk with Nigel Pittaway, the Editor of Australia Defence Magazine. Mentioned How Live ATC Went Live Stories about Flying: Armchair Accident Investigators Veteran airline stowaway strikes again, this time on a Newark-to-Milan flight Aviation Safety Network, Focke-Wulf FWP-149D, N9145.  Hosts this Episode Max Flight, our Main(e) Man Micah, and Rob Mark.

More than 70 Democrats in the House and Senate are pushing the Department of Homeland Security's inspector general to open a new investigation into the agency's “warrantless purchases of Americans' location data.” In a letter sent Tuesday, the lawmakers tasked IG Joseph Cuffari with investigating whether Immigration and Customs Enforcement is purchasing illegally obtained location data about Americans, how that data has been used, whether audits of employee access to uncover abuse are occurring and the policies governing data usage. “Location data is extremely sensitive, and can reveal someone's religion, their political views, medical conditions, addictions, and with whom they spend time,” the Democrats said. “It is for that reason that ordinarily, the government must obtain a warrant from a judge in order to demand such data from phone or technology companies.” The letter comes nearly three years after an initial IG report found that Customs and Border Protection, the Secret Service and ICE violated federal law through warrantless purchase and use of location data. As part of that 2023 report, the watchdog office said the DHS components did not adhere to established privacy policies, nor did they develop sufficient guardrails before procurement and use. The chief information officer at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency announced his departure Tuesday, ending his nearly five-year run at CISA. Robert Costello, an 18-year veteran of the Department of Homeland Security, posted about the move on LinkedIn.nCostello's tenure had recently grown turbulent, with conflicting accounts of whether the since-departed acting director of CISA, Madhu Gottumukkala, had tried to force him out. Costello last week received transfer orders for possible reassignment to another agency. “Serving as CIO at CISA has been one of the greatest privileges of my career,” he said. “Together, we strengthened our cybersecurity posture, modernized critical systems, and built capabilities that will endure. I am incredibly proud of what we accomplished as a team. The Daily Scoop Podcast is available every Monday-Friday afternoon. If you want to hear more of the latest from Washington, subscribe to The Daily Scoop Podcast  on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify and YouTube.

Hosts: Renee Chiuchiarelli & Julie Parks Length: ~15 minutes Format: Simply Trade Tips Episode Summary Welcome to Series 6 of Simply Trade Tips. This series tackles a foundational — and often overlooked — issue in global trade: Where does Customs actually sit inside your organization? In this opening episode, Renee and Julie lay the groundwork by breaking down the three most common organizational structures and how each one impacts customs operations, compliance authority, budgeting, and risk management. Because here's the truth: Customs rarely fails because people don't care. It fails because it's structurally misaligned. This episode sets the foundation for understanding how org structure dictates decision-making, funding, escalation paths, and ultimately — compliance outcomes. Why Org Structure Matters for Customs Customs sits in the middle of everything: Procurement Finance Logistics Legal Tax Sales & contracts Export operations Yet it rarely “owns” all the decisions that affect it. That misalignment can create compliance gaps, conflicting priorities, and operational tension between speed and governance. Follow the money. Follow the reporting lines. That's where risk lives. The Three Core Organizational Structures 1️⃣ Centralized (Functional) Structure Definition: Departments operate in defined lanes (Supply Chain, Finance, Legal, Sales), each with its own leadership. Where Customs Usually Sits: Under Supply Chain Under Legal Occasionally under a dedicated Trade Compliance function Upside: Clear ownership Defined reporting line Often its own budget (if structured well) Downside: Under Supply Chain → can become overly execution-focused (velocity & cost driven) Under Legal → can become overly compliance-focused and disconnected from operations If no independent budget → strategy becomes fragmented Key theme: Budget authority drives strategic control. 2️⃣ Decentralized (Divisional) Structure Definition: Trade responsibilities are spread across business units, regions, or product lines. Each division may manage its own customs activity. Upside: Faster decision-making Direct access to business leaders Local agility Downside: Inconsistent processes across divisions Requires corporate oversight or council to maintain standards Heavy reliance on influence rather than authority This model works — but it requires strong coordination and governance discipline. 3️⃣ Matrix (Hybrid) Structure Definition: Dual reporting lines — often operationally to Supply Chain, dotted line to Legal, Tax, or Finance. This is where many global organizations land. Reality of the Matrix: Multiple “bosses” Consensus-driven decisions Speed vs. compliance tension Performance reviews may not align with dotted-line accountability Success in a matrix requires: Clear budget ownership Clear escalation paths Strong consensus-building skills Mature leadership alignment Without alignment, it becomes a tug-of-war between execution and governance. Customs Operations vs. Customs Compliance A critical distinction discussed in this episode: Customs Operations: Entry filings ACE submissions Broker management Day-to-day problem solving Customs Compliance: Classification governance Valuation methodology Origin policy Audit strategy Risk tolerance Julie and Renee strongly advocate for structural separation of these roles — even in small teams. Why? Operations finds errors. Compliance fixes root causes. Both must cross-communicate consistently. When they don't align, friction, inefficiency, and risk increase. Real-World Red Flags Renee and Julie call out four common structural warning signs:

Drove to Kentucky to visit one of the most lethal anglers in that region right now, Luke Lamb. Enjoy as we take some deep dives, share stories, talk scoping techniques, JDM lures, and more. One things for sure, after this episode, its easy to understand why Lamb Chop is an absolute Hammer. Thank you to co-host and fellow Basstronaut, Ricky Harris, for letting us use his basement. Thank you Luke Lamb! Keep an eye on this dude.Support St. Jude Children's Cancer Research, every dollar helps support kids who need it more than we do! --> Click to DonateSneaky JDM Tackle & More --> Thorne Bros - the ultimate tackle destination! NEW Limited Edition Drops at Vocelka Fishing & Customs click the link to see all the latest!#tealsbassgalaxy #fishingpodcast #lambchop #ricky #bassfishing #kentucky #minnesota

In the Anonymous Inbox, we help a listener who was debating 90's country with their friend. Bobby shares his Top 3 Country artists of all-time. We did a Bobby Bones Show Draft of Foods that start with the Letter R. But we found out the letter right before we began making it extra difficult! Bobby talked about this year's list of nominees for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Can Lunchbox name the artist and sing a song by them? Eddie shared why he was detained by customs coming back into the US.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended her department's immigration enforcement tactics in front of a Senate committee on Tuesday and pushed back against criticism from Democrats who say she wrongly disparaged two protesters killed by federal officers in Minneapolis earlier this year.It was Noem's first congressional appearance since the shooting deaths of the two protesters galvanized widespread opposition to how the Trump administration is executing its mass deportation agenda, a centerpiece policy of President Donald Trump's second term. At the time, Noem portrayed the protesters, two U.S. citizens, as agitators, although accounts from local officials and bystander video contradicted assertions from her and other administration officials.In one exchange, retiring Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina called her leadership a “disaster” and skewered her handling of the immigration crackdown and her management of emergency response.In the hearing, which stretched nearly five hours, Noem defended her agency's treatment of immigrants caught up in enforcement activities, and blamed activists and others for attacks against officers.“I want to address the dangerous environment that our ICE officers face on the streets today," Noem said. “They are facing a serious and escalating threat as a result of deliberate mischaracterizations of their heroic work and rhetoric that demonizes our law enforcement.”Since the deaths in Minneapolis, the administration has taken steps meant to tone down tensions, including drawing down the operation there. But the administration has continued pressing restrictions against both legal and illegal immigration, has been buying up warehouses for immigration detention and persisting in federal enforcement in areas around the country. Noem said about 650 investigators remain in Minnesota as part of a broader fraud probe.The immigration tactics of Noem's department have triggered a clash in Congress over its routine funding, which remains unresolved, although a spending bill passed last year granted it a significant infusion of cash for the Republican administration's mass deportation policy. Noem called the partial shutdown “reckless” and blamed Democrats for a move she said put national security at risk.Her appearance in front of the Judiciary Committee also comes after a weekend shooting at a bar in Texas that is being investigated as a possible act of terrorism, leading to concerns that the escalating conflict in Iran could have repercussions for security in the U.S.Noem blames chaotic situation for her characterization of killed protestersIn what was initially billed as an effort to root out fraud in Minnesota, Homeland Security sent hundreds of officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection to the state. They were met by protesters who organized marches, patrolled neighborhoods for ICE activity with whistles and ferried food to immigrants too afraid to leave their homes.Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was shot and killed by an ICE officer on Jan. 7, setting off intense protests demanding an end to the operation. Then on Jan. 24, Customs and Border Protection officers opened fire on another Minnesota resident, Alex Pretti, who had been filming enforcement operations.Those deaths led to cries for accountability and transparency. Noem, whose initial comments portrayed both Good and Pretti as the aggressors, has come under withering criticism by Democrats and some Republicans, who have called for her to resign.Democrats repeatedly questioned Noem about her initial comments and called on her to apologize.“You and your agency rushed to brand these victims as, quote, domestic terrorists,” said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee. “We have ample video evidence and eyewitness testimony proving you are wrong. Your statements caused immeasurable pain to these families.”Noem said she was relying on information from people on the scene and blamed “violent protesters” for contributing to the chaos officers encountered.“I was getting reports from the ground from agents at the scene, and I would say that it was a chaotic scene,” she said.After public outrage over the deaths, Trump sent border czar Tom Homan to Minneapolis to take control of operations. Homan has since announced a drawdown of the ICE and CBP officers who had been sent to Minnesota to carry out what had been dubbed Operation Metro Surge, although he's been adamant that the president's mass deportation agenda will continue.Noem also faced some Republican criticismRepublicans largely kept the focus on the large numbers of migrants who came into the country under former President Joe Biden, portraying Noem as the leader of a cleanup effort of the former administration's mess.But she did come under some harsh questioning by members of her own party. Tillis, who called on Noem to resign following the shootings in Minneapolis, criticized her for erroneously arresting American citizens, for failures in her disaster recovery agency and for how she shot her own dog.“What we've seen is a disaster under your leadership, Miss Noem, a disaster," Tillis said. “What we've seen is innocent people getting detained that turn out are American citizens.”Tillis, who has already announced that he is not running for another term., added: “We're beginning to get the American people to think that deporting people is wrong. It's the exact opposite. The way you're going about deporting them is wrong."Another Republican, Sen. John Kennedy from Louisiana, also pushed her to explain why her department paid more than $200 million for an ad campaign she appeared in last year encouraging migrants to leave the country voluntarily and questioned whether Trump knew about the price tag ahead of time.Noem, who is set to appear Wednesday in front of a House committee, defended those ads, saying they were effective and went through the regular department bidding process.“Well, they were effective in your name recognition,” Kennedy said.

Questions are being asked about possible drone activity on the U.S.-Mexico border after two recent incidents in the El Paso area shut down air space and a military laser was fired to accidentally take down a U.S. Customs and Border Protection drone.

Big Bend National Park lately has drawn a lot of national attention, and not in a good way. Recently the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol announced that it wanted to build some sort of border wall along all or part of the 118 miles of border the national park shares with Mexico. Is that a good idea? Will it adversely impact the park? Can it even be done? To discuss those and other questions, our guest today is Bob Krumenaker, whose long Park Service career included a stint as Big Bend's superintendent. Bob also is chair of the Keep Big Bend Wild organization that is pushing to see a large portion of the park designated as official wilderness. 

-- On the Show -- Senator John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton fight a divisive primary as Democrats James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett post competitive polling that forces Republicans to defend Texas -- Dr. Mehmet Oz praises Donald Trump's State of the Union as historically great while public reaction and polling show widespread disagreement -- New Jeffrey Epstein materials and statements from Congressman Robert Garcia intensify scrutiny of Donald Trump and the Department of Justice -- Senator Adam Schiff reveals that Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection approved $144 million in weapons purchases -- Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Ryan Schwank alleges major training cuts and unconstitutional instruction at the ICE Academy -- Fox News host Jessica Tarlov confronts FBI Director Kash Patel over private jet hypocrisy and exposes inconsistent defenses on live television -- The Friday Feedback segment -- On the Bonus Show: Hillary Clinton testifies in Epstein probe and Benny Johnson manages to disrupt it, Jesse Watters thinks Trump has an attractive cabinet, and much more...

//The Wire//1300Z February 27, 2026////ROUTINE////BLUF: FINAL PREPARATIONS BEGIN FOR COMBAT OPERATIONS IN MIDDLE EAST. US MILITARY SHOOTS DOWN BORDER PATROL DRONE IN FRIENDLY FIRE INCIDENT. CONFLICT FLARES UP AGAIN BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events-Middle East: As of this morning, Chinese satellite imagery indicates that Al-Udeid Airbase has been fully evacuated of tanker aircraft, with only a small number of other airframes remaining at this location. The *FORD* CSG has arrived on station off the coast of Israel, and most of the movement of fighter aircraft has slowed to a crawl, as all of the aircraft that have been forward-deployed throughout the region are in their final staging areas, awaiting the launch of the operation.Western Asia: Border clashes between the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan have flared up again, as intense fighting has been reported along the border in the east. Pakistani forces have bombed a few ammo dumps in the Afghan district in Nangarhar, with Taliban forces responding in kind by shooting at Pakistani observation posts along the border. Taliban forces have also claimed to have conducted drone strikes of their own, with improvised explosive drones being used to target several Pakistani military installations overnight.-HomeFront-Texas: Yesterday evening a friendly-fire shootdown incident was reported involving US military forces shooting down a Customs and Border Patrol drone, which was conducting patrols along the southern US border.Analyst Comment: Many details have not been provided on this shootdown incident just yet, however it looks like a CBP drone was operating along the border in the vicinity of Fort Hancock, and due to a lack of deconfliction measures they shot down one of their own drones using a laser-based defense system similar to the system that was being used in El Paso last week.-----END TEARLINE-----Analyst Comments: In the Middle East, so far everything is lining up for the next potential strike window to open up sometime this weekend, with weather conditions throughout Iran being favorable for most military operations. Lunar illumination is good, and there are no cloud ceilings throughout the nation for the next few days.This morning diplomatic efforts to draw down forces throughout the region continue as well. American Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee sent an email to staffers at the Embassy this morning, telling them that departure is authorized, and that anyone who wants to leave "should do so today". This timeline lines up with the American tradition of conducting strikes after the stock markets close on Friday, though as to the exact hour of the operation beginning, it's anyone's guess. More broadly, we're now in the most optimal targeting window, and this window will be open for the next few days.Analyst: S2A1Research: https://publish.obsidian.md/s2undergroundDisclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report.//END REPORT//

David Waldman shakes out the KITM grab bag o' stories heading into the weekend. It turns out that Donald K. Trump's State of the Union speech wasn't only a boring litany of lies but was filled with confessions of 2025 and plans for 2026 crimes. In that case, it was kind of amazing that he was able to fit so much into so little time. At that rate, Trump's Epstein testimony could still take days. A judge blocked Trump from cutting off funding to 22 Dem states to coerce them into giving up food stamp data. Netflix has backed out of its Warner Bros. bid, so CNN slides all the way to the dark side. The military shot off its ray guns again, taking out a Customs and Border Protection drone. Soon, the CBP army will be unstoppable. Kristi Noem is assembling a fleet of bidet-equipped, dildo-laden, flying boudoirs. U.S. Vice Admiral Fred Kacher has been removed from his position as director of the Joint Staff after only taking the post in December. Some just aren't cut out for the military life. Idiot Nick Shirley makes money frightening idiots. Trump can rule the world with enough frightened idiots. A massive pro-Trump Twitter account is run by a paid White House staffer. Zohran Mamdani goes back to the White House to play Trump and makes it all look so easy. Kansas' trans bounty hunter bill was slipped through the legislature hidden in a gut and go shell. A three-year-old company with fewer than five employees hopes to pick up $25 billion before the tariff gravy train runs off the rails.

DOD – Disrupter Disrupters China markets reopening after Lunar New Year Mexico Cartel Wars Refunds requested for the illegal tariffs PLUS we are now on Spotify and Amazon Music/Podcasts! Click HERE for Show Notes and Links DHUnplugged is now streaming live - with listener chat. Click on link on the right sidebar. Love the Show? Then how about a Donation? Follow John C. Dvorak on Twitter Follow Andrew Horowitz on Twitter Warm-Up - The CTP for Caterpillar announced - DOD - Disrupter Disrupters - China markets reopening after Lunar New Year - Mexico Cartel Wars (Jalisco) Markets - Mortgage Rates - looking good! - Tariffs found illegal - that is not stopping anything - Refunds requested for the illegal tariffs - Monday's big drop and AI taking a bite out of stock prices Tariffs - First, who actually knows what is going on. 100% chaos - Supreme court ruled illegal (6-3) - 10% flat across all countries immediately added - Wait a day and make that 15% - FedEx seeks refund for illegal IEEPA tariffs imposed by Trump after the Supreme Court ruled Trump's tariffs exceeded authority - Numerous lawsuits expected for IEEPA tariff refunds - Apple has spent more than $3 billion on tariffs since President Donald Trump enacted his trade policies. What about that? (HOW TO FIGURE OUT WHO GETS THE REFUND) --- Estimate that $175B tariffs have been collected alreay - A group of 22 U.S. Senate Democrats on Monday introduced legislation that would require President Donald Trump's administration to fully refund within 180 days all of the revenue, with interest, collected from tariffs struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. - The legislation would require the Customs and Border Protection agency, which collects tariffs at U.S. ports of entry, to prioritize small businesses. - The U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency said it will halt collections of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act at 12:01 a.m. EST (0501 GMT) on Tuesday Stop The Presses - After years of JCD's rants....... - Apple will soon introduce MacBooks with touch screens - Apple Inc.'s initial touch Macs will have the Dynamic Island at the center top of the display and OLED screen technology. The new MacBook Pro models will have a refreshed, dynamic user interface that can shift between being optimized for touch or point-and-click input. Europe Reacts - "The current situation is not conducive to delivering 'fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial' transatlantic trade and investment, as agreed to by both sides" in the joint statement setting out the terms of last year's trade agreement, the Commission said. "A deal is a deal." - All active discussions are halted on any USA/Europe trade deal The Potential Winners - Brazil and China may be the winners here - Chinese President Xi Jinping has a boost in bargaining power after the US Supreme Court invalidated Donald Trump's broad emergency tariffs, a key point of leverage over China. - The removal of tariff threats will make it harder for Trump to press Xi for larger purchases of certain products and leaves him without a key weapon to strike back if Chinese negotiators make fresh demands. - Xi's team will likely push harder for access to advanced semiconductors, the removal of trade restrictions on Chinese companies, and reduced US support for self-ruled Taiwan, according to Wu Xinbo, director at Fudan University's Center for American Studies. NVDA Earnings - NVIDIA drops its fiscal Q4 2026 (ended Jan 2025) results tomorrow—another make-or-break moment for the AI trade. - The bar is sky-high after years of blowout beats, but whispers of "peak AI" and slowing growth momentum have investors on edge. --- Consensus Expectations : ----Revenue: ~$65.6–$66.1 billion (up ~67–68% YoY from last year's ~$39B; guided $65B ±2% in prior report) ------EPS (adjusted/non-GAAP): ~$1.50–$1.53 (up ~70–72% YoY from $0.89). --------Gross margins: Targeting ~75% non-GAAP (holding strong despite supply chain noise). -----------Key driver: Data Center segment expected to crush ~$58–$60B, fueled by Blackwell ramp and hyperscaler spend. Home Depot Earnings - The home-improvement retailer gained 2.7% after posting fourth-quarter adjusted earnings of $2.72 per share on revenues of $38.20 billion. - That exceeded the per-share earnings of $2.54 on revenues of $38.12 billion expected by analysts polled by LSEG. AMD News - The semiconductor maker rose about 11% after it inked a multiyear deal with Meta to lend up to 6 gigawatts of its graphics processing units to artificial intelligence data centers. - The cost of the deal is unclear, but the companies' agreement includes a a performance-based warrant that could amount to up to 160 million of AMD shares, according to a statement dated Tuesday. - Meta has committed to deploying up to 6 gigawatts (GW) of AMD's Instinct GPUs (high-end graphics processing units optimized for AI workloads) to power its massive AI data centers. - Analysts estimate the GPU portion alone could be worth $60–$100+ billion over 5+ years Mortgage Rates - The average rate on the popular 30-year fixed mortgage fell to 5.99% on Monday, according to Mortgage News Daily, matching its lowest levels since 2022. - Last year at this time the rate was 6.89%. - A buyer putting 20% down on the median priced home, about $400,000 according to the National Association of Realtors, would have a monthly payment of $1,916 for the principal and interest. One year ago, that payment would have been $2,105, a difference of $189. Life Insurance Record - Manulife Financial Corp. sold a $300 million life insurance policy in Singapore, topping what Guinness World Records certified as the most valuable policy ever issued. - The policy surpasses the previous record of $250 million, set by HSBC Life in Hong Kong in 2024. Manulife said in a statement Tuesday that the deal reflects growing demand from ultra-wealthy clients to preserve their assets. - In Singapore over the past 12 months, Manulife has issued 25 individual policies each worth more than $50 million. Bitcoin Rout - Gemini said it was axing as much as a quarter of its staff and exiting the UK, European Union and Australia entirely. - This week, it parted with its chief operating officer, chief financial officer and chief legal officer, all in a single day. - Its stock has fallen more than 80% from a post-listing high last year, collapsing its market value from a peak of almost $4 billion to under $700 million. Over the Greenland - USA sending a "hospital ship" over - Trump's post on the ship came hours after Denmark's Joint Arctic Command said it had evacuated a crew member who required urgent medical treatment from a U.S. submarine in Greenlandic waters, seven nautical miles outside of Greenland's capital, Nuuk. - Greenland said thanks but no thanks So Long! - U.S. investors are pulling money out of their own stock market at the fastest pace in at least 16 years as Big Tech returns fade and better-performing overseas markets look more attractive. - In the last six months, U.S.-domiciled investors have pulled some $75 billion from U.S. equity products, with $52 billion flowing out since the start of 2026 alone, the most in the first eight weeks of the year since at least 2010 AI Disruption - DOD (Disruption of Disrupters) - CrowdStrike -9.8% and other cybersecurity names under heavy pressure again as AI disruption fears build following Anthropic's Claude Code release - - Cybersecurity stocks are under broad pressure today, extending recent weakness following Friday's launch of Claude Code Security by Anthropic. Claude Code Security scans codebases for vulnerabilities and suggests software patches for human review, fueling a narrative that AI platforms may be moving more quickly into parts of the security workflow than investors had previously expected. For cybersecurity, that raises concern around the forward demand outlook and competitive positioning, particularly in areas tied to application security, cloud security, identity workflows, and security operations automation, where AI-native tools could start to narrow perceived differentiation. - The move suggests investors are still sorting through the implications for product overlap, pricing power, and competitive positioning as AI capabilities evolve quickly. - IBM shares dropping toward lows of the session; attributed to news that Claude can automate cobol modernization COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language) is a high-level, English-like programming language created in 1959 for business, finance, and administrative data processing. It is renowned for its verbosity, readability, and reliability, processing massive amounts of transactions on mainframe systems,, notes NetCom Learning and IBM. Despite being decades old, it remains critical in banking, insurance, and government sectors. - It is estimated that 70-80% of the world's business transactions are processed by COBOL Grok's Prediction about Future of OpenAi/ChatGPT Scenario Likelihood (My Estimate) Key Factors Outcome for OpenAI/ChatGPT Thriving Leader Medium (40%) Sustained breakthroughs, partnerships (e.g., Microsoft), regulatory wins OpenAI as AI giant; ChatGPT as ecosystem hub for agents/robots Evolved Survivor High (50%) Adaptation to agents/hardware; mergers Exists but rebranded; ChatGPT integrated into daily life tools Decline/Acquisition Low (10%) Overcompetition, funding collapse Absorbed or legacy; ChatGPT commoditized or obsolete Quick check on Europe Shares - European company earnings growth is picking up this reporting season against a tentatively improving economic backdrop, but wary investors are demanding more than solid results to justify sky-high valuations. - Companies representing 57% of Europe's market capitalization have reported so far, achieving average earnings growth of 3.9% in the fourth quarter, ahead of estimates for a final result of a contraction of 1.1% --- That is a big differential.... +3.9 vs -1.1 Iran Talks - News over the weekend that Iran will look to discuss a variety of items and potentially get a deal.... energy, mining and aircraft - Best guess: Iran will string us along like Russia is doing and we will say we have some kind of bogus deal. --- There is some talk of US "going in" as we are building military presence. Supposedly there are some saying it could be a multi-week incursion. - What is the plan - Regime change? What is this? - A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Americans can't sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail. - By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled against a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for two years. Konan, who is Black, claims racial prejudice played a role in postal employees' actions. - Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of five conservative justices, said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.” - So can ballots just be thrown in garbage for mail-ins for one party that will throw out another party's?     Love the Show? Then how about a Donation? HE CLOSEST TO THE PIN for CATERPILLAR Winners will be getting great stuff like the new "OFFICIAL" DHUnplugged Shirt!     FED AND CRYPTO LIMERICKS   See this week's stock picks HERE Follow John C. Dvorak on Twitter Follow Andrew Horowitz on Twitter

Nicolle Wallace covers the 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court to block Donald Trump from imposing global tariffs. The Supreme Court, while not suggesting that tariffs can't be imposed, is asserting that tariffs can only be imposed with the approval of Congress. Later, Epstein survivor Dani Bensky joins Nicolle to discuss the latest reporting that Epstein had ties to Customs and Border Patrol officials in the U.S. Virgin Islands who likely knew that Epstein would abuse women and children on his private island. Instead of intervening, they chose to gift Epstein concierge service and speedy security lines instead. For more, follow us on Instagram @deadlinewh To listen to this show and other MS NOW podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. For more from Nicolle, follow and download her podcast, “The Best People with Nicolle Wallace,” wherever you get your podcasts.To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.