Podcast appearances and mentions of carlos de oliveira

Good morning, America. The legal saga surrounding Donald Trump continues to unfold with significant developments in recent days. Today is June 6th, 2025, and the Trump administration has once again turned to the Supreme Court, this time seeking large-scale reductions in the federal workforce. This move, made just three days ago, marks another chapter in Trump's contentious relationship with government institutions.The Trump administration's legal battles have been numerous and complex. Looking back at the timeline, Trump's New York criminal case reached a conclusion earlier this year. After being found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records by a Manhattan jury on May 30th, 2024, Trump received his sentence on January 10th, 2025, when Justice Merchan handed down an unconditional discharge.In the classified documents case in Florida, we saw a dramatic turn last summer when Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment against Trump on July 15th, 2024. Her ruling stated that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department initially appealed this decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals but ultimately dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29th, 2024. By January 29th of this year, the Justice Department had also dismissed appeals against Trump's co-defendants, Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira.The legal calendar for Trump has been packed with other significant events as well. Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari following the 11th Circuit's decision to dismiss his attempt to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court.In the New York civil fraud case, Trump and other defendants have filed appeals against Justice Engoron's September 2023 summary judgment and February 2024 final decision. The Appellate Division has granted New York Attorney General Letitia James's request to consolidate these appeals.Meanwhile, defendants are appealing Judge McAfee's order regarding motions to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia. Although each appellant has an individual case number, all oral arguments will be heard together.Trump has also made another attempt to remove Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's state prosecution to federal court. After his second notice of removal was rejected as deficient and Judge Hellerstein denied his request for leave, Trump appealed to the Second Circuit.As the legal battles continue to unfold, the Trump administration's recent move to seek workforce reductions through the Supreme Court signals that the intersection of law and politics remains as active as ever in the Trump era.

Just a few days ago, the latest chapter in Donald Trump's legal odyssey unfolded—one that's been captivating the nation. On May 30, 2024, in a packed New York City courtroom, a Manhattan jury delivered a historic verdict: former President Trump was found guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. This was the culmination of the People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, a case that began with accusations that Trump had manipulated financial documents to conceal information during the 2016 campaign. The trial, presided over by Justice Juan Merchan, started back on April 15, 2024, and the verdict marked the first time a former U.S. president was convicted of felony crimes after leaving office.The world watched as Justice Merchan handed down his sentence on January 10, 2025. Trump received an unconditional discharge, meaning he won't serve jail time but the felony convictions remain on his record. This outcome reverberated far beyond the courtroom, fueling debate across political, legal, and public spheres.But New York is only one front in Trump's legal battles. Down in Florida, another high-profile prosecution took center stage. On June 8, 2023, Trump, along with aides Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, was indicted in the Southern District of Florida, accused of retaining classified national defense information, obstructing justice, and making false statements. By July 15, 2024, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dropped the federal indictment, arguing that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was flawed. The government swiftly appealed, but by November 29, 2024, the Justice Department dismissed its case against Trump, and by January 29, 2025, cases against his aides were dropped too.Trump's legal calendar is dense with ongoing appeals and litigation. In New York, Trump's legal team filed appeals against both Justice Engoron's earlier summary judgment and the final February 2024 decision in his civil fraud case. The Appellate Division, First Department, has consolidated these appeals, and the parties are in the thick of written arguments. Back in Georgia, legal wrangling continues in the sprawling case against Trump and allies over alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, with appeals regarding District Attorney Fani Willis's role all being heard together and oral arguments scheduled.Amid this legal storm, Donald Trump remains a dominant figure in American politics and headlines. Each courtroom drama brings new twists, sparking fierce reactions from supporters, critics, and legal experts alike. With appeals grinding forward and new legal challenges constantly surfacing, the courtroom battles involving the former president show no sign of slowing as the country follows every development.

Good morning, viewers. The legal battles surrounding Donald Trump continue to evolve as we head into June 2025. Today marks one year and three days since a Manhattan jury delivered a historic verdict that made Trump the first U.S. president or former president to be convicted of a felony.On May 30, 2024, Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts for falsifying business records as part of an alleged scheme to influence the 2016 election through hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Despite the conviction, Trump received no prison time, fines, or probation when New York Judge Juan Merchan sentenced him to an unconditional discharge this past January, stating it was the "only lawful sentence" to avoid "encroaching upon the highest office in the land."The fight isn't over, though. In just nine days, on June 11, a federal appeals court in Manhattan will hear oral arguments in Trump's renewed effort to move his criminal case from state to federal court. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg opposes this motion, arguing that cases can't be relocated to federal court after conviction. Trump's legal team maintains that this "unprecedented criminal prosecution" of a former and current president belongs in federal jurisdiction.Meanwhile, Trump's legal victory in Florida remains intact. Last July, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment against Trump related to classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. While Smith initially appealed the decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Justice Department ultimately dismissed the appeal against Trump in late November 2024, and later dropped appeals against his co-defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira in January 2025.In more recent developments, President Trump's tariff policies faced significant setbacks last week. On May 31, two separate federal court orders were issued within 24 hours that could substantially undermine his trade agenda.As Trump navigates these ongoing legal challenges, the intersection of his presidency and his legal troubles continues to create unprecedented constitutional questions. The upcoming June 11 hearing may provide clarity on whether state courts can maintain jurisdiction over a sitting president's criminal conviction, or if federal courts should assume control.For now, Trump remains in office while continuing to contest the legal framework surrounding his New York conviction, creating a remarkable chapter in American legal and political history that continues to unfold before our eyes.

It's been a whirlwind in the courts these past few days, and Donald Trump's legal saga remains at the center of national headlines. Just three days ago, on May 30, 2024, in Manhattan, a historic verdict shook the political landscape—Trump was found guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The charges stemmed from allegations that he orchestrated the falsification to conceal damaging information during his 2016 presidential campaign. The trial, officially titled “The People for the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump,” kicked off April 15, 2024, and with unprecedented media attention, jurors quickly became household names and Judge Juan Merchan's courtroom a focal point for heated debate.After weeks of testimony, cross-examination, and high legal drama, the jury delivered a resounding verdict: guilty on every count. Then, on January 10, 2025, Judge Merchan issued the sentence. While many speculated about possible prison time or hefty penalties, the sentence was an unconditional discharge—meaning Trump avoided incarceration or probation, but carries 34 felony convictions on his record. The country watched as Trump exited the courthouse, defiant as ever, vowing to appeal and framing the result as politically motivated, only further energizing his base.Meanwhile, down in Florida, another major courtroom battle unfolded. Special Counsel Jack Smith led the prosecution against Trump in the Southern District of Florida. This time, charges focused on Trump's handling of classified documents after leaving office. The indictment was sweeping: 32 counts for willfully retaining national defense information, alongside counts of obstruction of justice, making false statements, and interfering with a federal investigation. Trump wasn't alone—his longtime aide Waltine Nauta and Mar-a-Lago's property manager Carlos De Oliveira were also named as defendants.But on July 15, 2024, Judge Aileen Cannon ignited controversy of her own by dismissing the federal indictment, ruling that Jack Smith's appointment and funding as special counsel were improper. The Justice Department did appeal, but by November 29, 2024, it dropped its appeal against Trump, and two months later, on January 29, 2025, dropped it against his co-defendants as well.Through all of this, the courtroom has become a political stage, with Trump's legal battles fueling his continued national prominence. Jury verdicts, sentencing hearings, and surprise judicial rulings have turned legal language into front-page news and daily conversation across America. These past few days have only reinforced that in Donald Trump's world, the courtroom is as much a battleground as any campaign trail.

Good morning, I'm reporting to you live on May 12, 2025, with the latest updates on the various legal proceedings involving former President Donald Trump.The past week has brought significant developments in Trump's legal landscape. Just three days ago, on May 9th, Trump unveiled his first round of judicial nominees for his second term. These selections have already sparked intense debate across political circles, with critics expressing serious concerns about the qualifications and ideological positions of nominees like Whitney Hermandorfer.Looking back at Trump's recent legal battles, perhaps the most notable was his New York criminal case. On January 10th of this year, Justice Juan Merchan delivered the sentencing for Trump following his conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The Manhattan jury had found Trump guilty of all charges on May 30th, 2024, in a trial that captivated the nation for weeks. Despite the felony convictions, Justice Merchan ultimately sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge, meaning no jail time or probation was imposed.The classified documents case in Florida took a dramatic turn last year when Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the entire federal indictment against Trump on July 15th, 2024. Her ruling stated that Special Counsel Jack Smith had been improperly appointed and funded. Though Smith initially appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Justice Department ultimately dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29th, 2024, effectively ending that prosecution. The appeals against Trump's co-defendants, Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, were similarly dismissed in late January of this year.Trump's legal calendar has been extraordinarily complex, with multiple cases proceeding simultaneously across different jurisdictions. Court records show a flurry of legal filings throughout late 2024, with numerous decisions, orders, and letters filed in the New York case alone between November and January.As Trump now shifts focus to his judicial appointments, the legal battles that dominated headlines throughout 2023 and 2024 appear to be largely resolved. The outcomes of these cases have undoubtedly shaped the political landscape as Trump begins his second term.This is just the latest chapter in what has been an unprecedented period in American legal and political history. I'll continue to bring you updates as new developments emerge in this extraordinary saga.

Good morning, America. I'm standing here today, May 11th, 2025, reflecting on what has been an unprecedented legal journey for former President Donald Trump. Just four months into 2025, and the aftermath of numerous court battles continues to shape our political landscape.Back in January, we witnessed the conclusion of the Manhattan criminal case where Trump faced charges of falsifying business records. On January 10th, Justice Merchan delivered his sentence - an unconditional discharge - following the Manhattan jury's verdict from May 30th last year that found Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. This marked the first time in American history that a former president was convicted of felony crimes.Meanwhile, the classified documents case in Florida took a dramatic turn. Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the entire indictment against Trump last July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department initially appealed to the 11th Circuit but ultimately dropped their appeal against Trump in late November 2024, followed by dismissing appeals against his co-defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira in January of this year.The legal calendar for Trump has been relentless. Just yesterday, news broke that the Supreme Court is preparing to review what critics have described as a "power grab" by the President. The justices will be examining the constitutional limits of presidential authority in a case that could have far-reaching implications.Trump's legal team has been working overtime, filing appeals in multiple jurisdictions. In the New York civil fraud case, Trump and his co-defendants have appealed both Justice Engoron's September 2023 summary judgment and his February 2024 final decision. The Appellate Division consolidated these appeals at the request of New York Attorney General Letitia James.In Georgia, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has taken his case all the way to the Supreme Court, seeking to move his state criminal case to federal court after the 11th Circuit dismissed his previous attempt.Trump himself has made another attempt to remove Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's state prosecution to federal court, though his filing was rejected as deficient and his request for leave was denied by Judge Hellerstein. His appeal to the Second Circuit is still pending.As we move deeper into 2025, these legal battles continue to unfold against the backdrop of Trump's controversial judicial appointments, which many legal experts have characterized as transformative for the federal judiciary. The intersection of legal proceedings and politics remains a defining feature of our current moment in American history.

Good morning, I'm reporting live on the latest developments in the legal saga surrounding former President Donald Trump. It's Friday, May 9th, 2025, and the past few months have seen significant developments in Trump's various legal battles.Earlier this year, on January 10th, Justice Juan Merchan sentenced Donald Trump to unconditional discharge following his conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in Manhattan. This marked the conclusion of the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president, which had captivated the nation since it began on April 15th, 2024, resulting in the jury's guilty verdict last May.Meanwhile, in the classified documents case in Florida, a dramatic turn occurred when Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment against Trump last July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. Though the Justice Department initially appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, they ultimately dropped the appeal against Trump in late November 2024, followed by dismissing appeals against his co-defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira in January of this year.The legal calendar continues to be packed with Trump-related proceedings. Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, has petitioned the Supreme Court following the 11th Circuit's dismissal of his attempt to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court.In the New York civil fraud case, Trump and his co-defendants have filed appeals against Justice Engoron's decisions from last year. Attorney General Letitia James successfully requested to consolidate these appeals, which are now proceeding with a single record and set of briefs.Just three months ago, in February, a new lawsuit emerged challenging the Trump administration's handling of the refugee processing system. The case, Pacito v. Trump, was filed on February 10th with plaintiffs seeking a preliminary injunction the following day.Trump is also making another attempt to remove Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's state prosecution to federal court. After his second notice of removal was rejected and Judge Hellerstein denied his request for leave, Trump appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.As these cases continue to unfold, the intersection of law and politics remains at the forefront of American discourse, with each development adding new chapters to this unprecedented legal saga surrounding the former president.

The past several days have been a whirlwind in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Donald Trump. Most notably, all eyes have been on the aftermath of his conviction in New York. Last year, on May 30, 2024, a Manhattan jury found former President Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges tied to hush money payments that shook the political world. Fast forward to this January, Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Trump, but in a move that left both critics and supporters buzzing, the sentence was “unconditional discharge.” That means Trump faces no jail time or probation, but the record of conviction stands, marking a historic moment as the first time a former U.S. president was convicted of a felony.Meanwhile, Trump's legal battles in Florida took an unexpected turn. Last summer, in the Southern District of Florida, Trump, along with his aide Waltine Nauta and Mar-a-Lago employee Carlos De Oliveira, faced a blockbuster federal indictment. They were charged with willfully retaining national defense information, obstruction of justice, interfering with a federal investigation, and making false statements—charges stemming from classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago. The nation waited for a high-stakes courtroom showdown, but on July 15, 2024, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case. Her ruling focused not on Trump's conduct, but rather on the appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith, deeming them improper. The Justice Department quickly appealed, but by late November, they dropped the appeal against Trump. On January 29, 2025, the remaining appeals against Nauta and De Oliveira were also dismissed. The sudden end to this federal case stunned legal observers and injected even more uncertainty into an already chaotic legal landscape.Elsewhere, Trump continues to face civil litigation and ongoing scrutiny over his executive actions, particularly regarding immigration and funding for so-called “sanctuary cities.” San Francisco and other municipalities have lawsuits pending that challenge his administration's orders to withhold federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, citing constitutional violations.As of today, with the criminal cases in New York now concluded and the Florida charges dismissed, Donald Trump's legal fate remains a fiercely debated topic. This past week crystallized two things: Trump's unique place in American legal history, and the volatile, unpredictable nature of his court battles. From the hushed halls of Manhattan criminal court to the federal courthouse in Florida, each trial has not only tested the boundaries of law and precedent but has kept the nation riveted at every turn.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, let's dive right into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced in the New York case to unconditional discharge by Justice Merchan. This conclusion came after a Manhattan jury found him guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024[1][4].But the New York case is just one piece of the puzzle. In the Southern District of Florida, a federal grand jury indicted Trump and his aide Waltine Nauta on June 8, 2023, charging them with willfully retaining national defense information, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. However, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the federal indictment on July 15, 2024, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed and funded. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against President Trump on November 29, 2024, and against Nauta and co-defendant Carlos De Oliveira on January 29, 2025[1].In Washington, D.C., Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury on August 1, 2023, on charges including corruptly obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States. However, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case on December 6, 2024[1].Meanwhile, in Fulton County, Georgia, Trump and 18 co-defendants were indicted on August 14, 2023, on charges including violating the Georgia RICO Act and solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer. Four co-defendants have pleaded guilty, but a trial date for Trump and the remaining defendants has not been set. Notably, the Court of Appeals of Georgia granted the motion to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from the case on December 19, 2024[1].As these legal battles unfold, it's clear that President Trump's legal landscape remains as complex and contentious as ever. Despite recent dismissals and sentencing, the road ahead is paved with ongoing challenges and uncertainties. For now, we watch and wait for the next chapter in these high-stakes trials.

The Department of Justice has moved to drop the appeal of Judge Cannon's dismissal of the charges against Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira in the classified documents case.The Trump's administration has told at least six top FBI officials in charge of cyber security, criminal investigations, and national security to resign or be fired by Monday as Kash Patel sits for his confirmation hearing to head the agency.Trump's administration fires DoJ officials who investigated Donald, and has launched a special investigation into January 6th.Trump has illegally fired nearly 20 independent inspectors general, and even had one who was investigating Elon Musk physically escorted out of her office.Questions for the pod ?https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJ Follow AG Substack|MuellershewroteBlueSky|@muellershewroteAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

Judge Aileen Cannon is popping off, the Alex Jones bankruptcy continues to be crazy, and judges in Arkansas are going to war with each other. Plus, as always, we'll check in with our pal Rudy.   Links: Alex Jones - TX Plaintiffs settlement https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsb.459750/gov.uscourts.txsb.459750.1011.0.pdf   McKesson v. Arkansas complaint https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3671323-McKesson-Complaint/   Baker Jan. 1 appointment orders https://arkansasadvocate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appointment-Orders.pdf   Arkansas Administrative Order 24 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523224/index.do   Arkansas Supreme Court per curiam opinion 1/6/25 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523226/index.do   “Order of Chief Justice,” 2025 Ark. 4 https://opinions.arcourts.gov/ark/supremecourt/en/item/523231/index.do   Trump emergency motion to block release of Smith Report https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.700.0_1.pdf   Giuliani NY docket https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.627518/ Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod  

This Day in Legal History: Treaty of ParisOn January 14, 1784, the Continental Congress ratified the Treaty of Paris, formally concluding the American Revolutionary War. This monumental event solidified the United States' independence from Great Britain, marking a turning point in world history. Negotiated in 1783 and signed on September 3 of that year, the treaty was a carefully crafted agreement between representatives of the United States and Great Britain. Ratification by Congress was required to finalize the agreement, and its approval on this day ensured compliance with international diplomatic norms.The Treaty of Paris recognized the sovereignty of the United States and established its borders, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi River and from Canada to the northern boundary of Spanish Florida. In addition to territorial gains, the treaty contained provisions for the repayment of debts, the return of confiscated property to Loyalists, and the withdrawal of British troops from American territory.The ratification process underscored the fledgling nation's commitment to the principles of diplomacy and the rule of law, as Congress navigated the logistical and political challenges of convening delegates during a harsh winter. This event also reflected the fragile unity of the 13 colonies, which worked together to achieve a peaceful resolution to years of conflict.The Treaty of Paris laid the groundwork for the United States' future as an independent republic. It established precedents for territorial negotiations and diplomatic relations, serving as a testament to the resilience and determination of the Revolutionary generation. January 14, 1784, stands as a pivotal date in legal history, symbolizing the birth of a nation under the framework of international law.A federal judge in Florida, Aileen Cannon, ruled that Attorney General Merrick Garland can release part of the final report on the federal criminal investigations into Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. However, Cannon extended her previous order barring the Justice Department from releasing the second part of the report, which pertains to the investigation into Trump's alleged retention of classified documents and related obstruction. Garland had intended to keep the second volume confidential but planned to share it with senior members of Congress. Cannon scheduled a hearing for January 17 to review this matter further.Co-defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who opposed the report's release, might appeal Cannon's decision. While Trump is not a formal party to the case, his lawyers have expressed opposition to releasing the report, and he filed an amicus brief. Cannon emphasized her limited jurisdiction over the documents-related volume and noted insufficient grounds to block the release of the election-related section. However, she underscored that even partial disclosure to Congress could compromise the legal rights of the defendants.Smith, who previously secured indictments against Trump, later dropped charges post-election following DOJ policy against prosecuting sitting presidents. A pending DOJ appeal seeks to overturn Cannon's broader restrictions on the report. A prior appeals court ruling rejected Nauta and De Oliveira's emergency bid to block the report's release entirely. Cannon's latest order maintains restrictions on the second volume until further court deliberation.Judge Clears Release of Trump Special Counsel Report on ElectionUS judge allows DOJ to release report on Trump's election subversion case | ReutersThe state of Texas has sued Allstate, accusing the insurance company of illegally tracking drivers through their cell phones without consent. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleged that Allstate built a vast driving behavior database, tracking over 45 million Americans by paying mobile app developers to embed tracking software into apps like Fuel Rewards, GasBuddy, Life360, and its own app, Routely. The lawsuit claims Allstate used this data to raise insurance premiums, deny coverage, and sell information to other insurers.Allstate allegedly expanded its data collection by purchasing vehicle location data directly from manufacturers, including Toyota, Lexus, Mazda, and Stellantis brands like Chrysler and Jeep, to more precisely determine when policyholders were driving. The lawsuit argues these practices violate Texas laws on data privacy, data brokerage, and deceptive acts by insurers. Texas is seeking restitution for consumers, damages, fines of up to $10,000 per violation, and the destruction of improperly collected data.This follows a similar lawsuit Paxton filed last year against General Motors for collecting and selling driver data without consent. Allstate has not yet responded to the allegations.Texas sues Allstate for collecting driver data without consent | ReutersNew York's Affordable Broadband Act (ABA), requiring Internet providers to offer low-cost plans for low-income residents, will take effect on January 15, 2025, after a prolonged legal battle. The law mandates that providers offer plans priced at $15 per month for at least 25Mbps or $20 per month for 200Mbps, inclusive of recurring fees and equipment rental costs. Annual price increases are capped at 2%, and state officials will periodically review speed requirements.The ABA's implementation follows a significant court victory, with a U.S. appeals court upholding the law in April 2024 and the Supreme Court declining to review the broadband industry's challenge in December 2024. The law is seen as a critical measure to address the digital divide, especially after the FCC's broadband discount program expired in 2024, leaving 1.7 million New York households without federal assistance.Exemptions are available for smaller ISPs serving fewer than 20,000 households if compliance would cause financial strain. Over 40 ISPs sought exemptions before the law was initially blocked in 2021. Providers seeking long-term exemptions must submit financial details by February 15, 2025. Noncompliance can result in civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation. Major ISPs, including Charter Spectrum, Comcast, Optimum, and Verizon, already offer discounted plans, but New York's law ensures standardization and broader accessibility for low-income residents.New York starts enforcing $15 broadband law that ISPs tried to kill - Ars Technica This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

This Day in Legal History: Birth of NixonOn January 9, 1913, Richard Milhous Nixon was born in Yorba Linda, California, a man destined to leave a complicated and indelible mark on American history. Nixon is perhaps the most paradoxical of U.S. presidents—on one hand, he created the Environmental Protection Agency, championed detente with the Soviet Union, and opened diplomatic relations with China. On the other hand, the man also gave us Watergate, wiretapping, enemies lists, and enough shady political machinations to keep conspiracy theorists busy for decades.Nixon's "greatest hits" of questionable decisions include the secret bombing of Cambodia, illegally expanding the Vietnam War while publicly claiming to wind it down, and the sabotage of peace talks to ensure his election in 1968. Let's not forget his role in orchestrating the War on Drugs, a policy whose consequences are still felt today, particularly in communities of color. And, of course, he made liberal use of “plausible deniability,” whether it was about spying on political opponents or using government resources for personal vendettas.While Nixon may have soothed the environment by founding the EPA, he simultaneously polluted the political landscape, cementing cynicism in American politics for a generation. If you're struggling to reconcile his good deeds with his transgressions, don't worry—you're not alone. Historians, politicians, and everyday Americans have been wrestling with the Nixon conundrum for decades.Was he a political genius or a paranoid megalomaniac? Probably both, in addition to being a raging narcissist and, by all accounts, a deeply unpleasant man. His favorite breakfast? Cottage cheese with ketchup – or black pepper if he was feeling spicy. On this day in legal history, we remember Richard Nixon—a … man. He would have been 112 had a blood clot not cut him down as he prepared dinner in his Park Ridge, New Jersey home in 1994. The U.S. Justice Department announced that it will not publicly release Special Counsel Jack Smith's full report on Donald Trump's handling of classified records, citing ongoing prosecutions against two Trump associates, Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. While the report's section addressing Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election will be made public, the documents-related portion will remain accessible only to specific members of Congress responsible for oversight.Attorney General Merrick Garland confirmed that Smith completed a two-volume report on Trump, with the Justice Department stating that limited disclosure would balance public interest with protecting the legal rights of Nauta and De Oliveira. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the release of the report upon a request by the two defendants.Previously, Trump was charged with illegally retaining classified records and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them, as well as attempting to interfere with the certification of President Joe Biden's election victory. However, the department dismissed these charges after Trump's November election, adhering to its policy against prosecuting a sitting president.Despite these dismissals, prosecutors are seeking to revive the obstruction case against Nauta and De Oliveira, who have pleaded not guilty. The Justice Department emphasized that its actions comply with federal regulations requiring a final report from special counsel investigations.US Justice Dept will not publicly release all of special counsel report on TrumpPresident-elect Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to halt his sentencing in a New York criminal case involving hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels. In a filing made public on Wednesday, his lawyers argued that further proceedings in the Manhattan state court would harm the presidency and federal government operations, citing presidential immunity.The New York appeals court recently rejected Trump's effort to delay sentencing, scheduled for Friday. His legal team has requested similar emergency relief from both the Supreme Court and New York's highest court. The Supreme Court has asked prosecutors to respond by Thursday, suggesting a swift decision is likely.Trump was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 payment by his former attorney Michael Cohen to Daniels before the 2016 election. He denies any wrongdoing or the alleged sexual encounter with Daniels. His sentencing judge indicated Trump would likely face an unconditional discharge, leaving a judgment of guilt on record but imposing no jail time, fines, or probation.Trump's lawyers contend the case violates principles of presidential immunity established by a Supreme Court ruling granting former presidents broad protection from prosecution for official acts. They argue this immunity applies during the transitional period between his election and inauguration. Manhattan prosecutors have vowed to respond to Trump's request, marking the latest development in a historic case that made Trump the first U.S. president to be criminally convicted.Trump asks Supreme Court to halt sentencing in New York hush money case | ReutersZwillGen, a law firm specializing in technology and privacy law, has expanded into artificial intelligence with the acquisition of Luminos.Law, a Washington, D.C.-based firm focused on AI and analytics risk. The merger adds six attorneys and data scientists to ZwillGen's team, enabling the firm to offer services in AI bias and cybersecurity testing, which are increasingly in demand amid regulatory scrutiny.ZwillGen, founded in 2010, now employs over 45 attorneys across offices in Washington, New York, Chicago, and San Francisco, with a total headcount of about 125, including subsidiaries specializing in subpoenas and gaming licensing. Its high-profile clients include Airbnb, Bose, DoorDash, NBCUniversal, and The New York Times.Luminos.Law, established five years ago, spun off a separate software company, Luminos.AI, in 2024 to offer custom AI risk management software on an enterprise platform. While Luminos.AI remains independent, Andrew Burt, co-founder of Luminos.Law, will focus on the software company while serving as a legal advisor to ZwillGen's new AI unit. Brenda Leong, also from Luminos, will lead ZwillGen's AI division.The deal is part of a broader trend of law firm mergers in 2025, particularly among small firms, as demand for legal expertise in emerging technologies grows.Tech, AI lawyers join forces in latest US law firm merger | ReutersIn my latest piece for Forbes, I talk about taxing oil wells. The United States is grappling with a crisis of orphaned and uncapped oil wells—sites with no accountable owner and no proper closure. These wells pose significant environmental and public health risks, leaking methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and contaminating groundwater. Estimates suggest there are between 310,000 and 800,000 undocumented orphan wells, with over 120,000 already identified as uncapped. Addressing this problem is critical, but the cost—ranging from tens of thousands to millions of dollars per well—is increasingly falling on taxpayers.The root of this issue lies in systemic regulatory failures and cost-shifting practices within the oil and gas industry. Older wells are often sold to smaller operators who lack the resources to maintain or cap them. When these operators go bankrupt, liabilities are abandoned. Bonding requirements meant to ensure cleanup funds are woefully inadequate, typically covering less than 2% of the actual cost.To tackle this crisis, I propose an Environmental Liability Tax (ELT) on oil and gas extraction. Levied per barrel, this tax would ensure that cleanup costs are collected upfront, placing the financial responsibility on the companies benefiting economically from the wells. Funds from the ELT could be held in state or federal trusts dedicated to plugging orphaned wells and restoring lands.The ELT could also incentivize better practices by offering tax credits to companies proactively addressing environmental risks. By taxing extraction rather than chasing bankrupt operators, the ELT would create a sustainable, enforceable funding mechanism to address this growing environmental liability. As the U.S. approaches peak oil, the time for systemic reform is now—before the cleanup bill comes due with no one left to pay.Towards An Environmental Liability Tax For Oil And Gas Wells This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira marked the first federal indictment of a former U.S. president. The prosecution, led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, argued that Trump illegally retained hundreds of classified government documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence after leaving office and obstructed efforts to retrieve them. He said this posed a national security risk and violated laws governing the handling of sensitive information. Trump's defense team, however, argued that the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel was unconstitutional, violating the Appointments Clause. They claimed that Smith lacked the proper authority to bring charges, as he was not a Department of Justice employee at the time of his appointment. Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case on July 15, ruling that the appointment of Smith had been unconstitutional. Join us as we discuss the case and its implications.

This Day in Legal History: Narcotic Control Act Becomes LawOn July 18, 1956, the Narcotic Control Act became law, significantly transforming the landscape of narcotics regulation in the United States. The Act was introduced to combat the growing concerns about drug abuse and trafficking. It imposed harsher penalties for violations of existing drug laws, including mandatory minimum sentences and the death penalty for certain repeat offenders. The Act expanded federal control over the use, possession, and sale of narcotic drugs and marijuana, aiming to curb the rising tide of addiction and illegal drug activities. This legislation marked a pivotal shift towards more stringent drug policies, reflecting the era's intensifying war on drugs. Enforcement was also bolstered, granting law enforcement agencies greater authority to tackle drug-related crimes. For better or worse, the Narcotic Control Act laid the groundwork for future drug legislation and enforcement strategies, significantly influencing the country's approach to drug control for decades to come.U.S. prosecutors have appealed a federal judge's decision to dismiss the criminal case against Donald Trump regarding the retention of classified documents post-presidency. Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, was deemed unlawfully appointed by Judge Aileen Cannon. Cannon, a Trump appointee, ruled that Garland did not have Congressional authorization to appoint Smith with such extensive powers. This ruling has favored Trump, who is the Republican candidate for the upcoming presidential election. Trump's campaign called for the dismissal of all four criminal cases against him following this decision. Cannon's ruling dismissed charges against Trump and his co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who were accused of obstructing the investigation. Trump had been indicted in other cases, including a New York conviction related to hush money payments and charges in Georgia over election interference. The appeal is directed to the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where many judges were appointed by Trump.Prosecutors appeal Trump classified documents case dismissal | ReutersThe espionage trial of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich resumed yesterday July 17, 2024, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, with witness testimonies heard behind closed doors. Gershkovich, accused of spying for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, faces up to 20 years in prison. Arrested in March 2023, he has been held in Moscow's Lefortovo prison since then. Both Gershkovich and his employer, as well as the U.S. government, deny the allegations, asserting that he was simply performing his duties as an accredited journalist. The Wall Street Journal has criticized the trial as a sham and continues to advocate for his release. Russian authorities claim to have irrefutable evidence of his espionage activities, though specifics have not been disclosed. The trial is closed to the press, a standard procedure in Russia for cases involving treason or espionage. U.S. officials view Gershkovich and another detained American, Paul Whelan, as bargaining chips for a potential prisoner exchange, with President Putin indicating openness to such negotiations. The trial will continue on Friday with arguments from the respective lawyers.Russian trial of detained US reporter Gershkovich hears witness testimony in secret | ReutersThe Biden administration announced the testing of 17 new climate technologies in federal buildings, part of a $9.6 million initiative aimed at advancing near-commercial climate tech. The General Services Administration (GSA), which oversees federal properties, will facilitate these real-world trials. The effort aligns with the administration's broader goal to reduce carbon emissions across federal facilities. The GSA will select testing sites by the end of the year, with evaluations concluding in 2026.Technologies include Armstrong World Industries' ceiling tiles that manage heat, Brightcore Energy's compact geothermal drilling rigs, and Gridscape's modular microgrid systems. Other innovations involve Nostromo Energy's ice storage cooling systems, SafeTraces' air quality mapping using DNA-tagged particles, Moxion Power's portable battery systems, and Lamarr.AI's drones for building audits.Successful technologies will be connected with energy service companies (ESCOs) through a unique matchmaking session to drive scalability. GSA administrator Robin Carnahan emphasized that the program supports market demand rather than picking winners, suggesting that the adoption of these technologies will persist regardless of potential administrative changes. The initiative aims to demonstrate the practical benefits and cost savings of these advanced climate technologies.US Taps Federal Buildings to Test Next-Generation Climate TechThe Biden administration's effort to strengthen protections for gay and transgender students under Title IX remains blocked in ten states following rulings from the Fifth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeals. The rulings represent a significant setback for President Biden's transgender rights initiatives, as the appeals courts indicated the rule might be unconstitutional.In the Sixth Circuit, Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton upheld a district court's injunction against the rule in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, and West Virginia. The court argued that the rule's definition of sex discrimination likely exceeded the Education Department's authority. This decision prevents these states from implementing the rule, which includes provisions like using preferred pronouns and allowing students to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity.Meanwhile, the Fifth Circuit upheld a separate injunction for Louisiana, Mississippi, Idaho, and Montana. This ruling came after the Department of Education failed to convince the court that delaying the rule would cause irreparable harm. The court noted that enforcing the rule could impose significant administrative costs and legal uncertainties on these states.The rulings underscore the ongoing legal battles over expanding Title IX protections to include sexual orientation and gender identity, with conservative states challenging the federal government's authority in this domain. These setbacks come after a similar injunction was upheld by the Sixth Circuit in June, affecting federal guidance documents related to LGBTQ+ student rights.The Biden administration's rule, set to take effect on August 1, 2024, is now blocked in multiple states, with ongoing litigation likely to continue influencing the rule's future. The cases in question are Tennessee v. Cardona and Louisiana v. US Department of Education.Block on Biden Trans Rights Rule Upheld by 2 Appeals Courts (1) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

A longtime Trump employee named Brian Butler has come forward with some of the incriminating information he has regarding the conduct of Trump and his two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. Butler was identified only as "Trump employee 5" in Trump's federal indictment in Florida for unlawfully concealing classified documents, obstructing justice, and violating our nation's espionage laws. Butler said he hired his own attorney rather than accepting an attorney provided by Donald Trump. He also indicated that he's been cooperating with federal law enforcement authorities from the very beginning. Butler said he's sharing his story now to counter Trump's false claim that the case against him is a "witch hunt". Glenn covers three of the main takeaways from the new revelations by Brian Butler.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A longtime Trump employee named Brian Butler has come forward with some of the incriminating information he has regarding the conduct of Trump and his two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. Butler was identified only as "Trump employee 5" in Trump's federal indictment in Florida for unlawfully concealing classified documents, obstructing justice, and violating our nation's espionage laws. Butler said he hired his own attorney rather than accepting an attorney provided by Donald Trump. He also indicated that he's been cooperating with federal law enforcement authorities from the very beginning. Butler said he's sharing his story now to counter Trump's false claim that the case against him is a "witch hunt". Glenn covers three of the main takeaways from the new revelations by Brian Butler.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The previous office holder of the U.S. Presidency, Donald Trump, was seen in a federal courthouse in Florida last Thursday, making his presence felt alongside his legal counsel. They have taken on a mission to bring to an end the ongoing litigation regarding classified documents. At the forefront of this courtroom battle for Trump's lawyers is a bid to convince U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the lawsuits in her Fort Pierce courtroom, the basis of their argument hinges on the nebulous application of the Espionage Act and the Presidential Records Act invoked by special counsel Jack Smith. Meanwhile, the prosecution team from the federal government counters this effort robustly. They insist in a legal document that the ex-president's assertions are fundamentally flawed as they originate from three erroneous assumptions. These errors, as per the prosecution, mirror Trump's belief that his status as a former president exempts him from laws and the concept of accountability, principles which typically apply to all other citizens. Present in the courtroom along with Trump are co-defendants Walt Nauta, working as an aide for him and Carlos De Oliveira, who oversees the property management of Mar-a-Lago. This hearing takes place in the wake of an election interference case against Trump and his co-defendants, where there were some counts dismissed by Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee of Fulton County, Ga. Despite these dismissals, the past president still grapples with 10 pending charges.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week; Professor Steve Vladeck joins to discuss Trump's immunity motion and the probable scenarios that are playing out within the SCOTUS; Trump files a plethora of motions in Florida; Carlos De Oliveira, co-defendant in the classified documents case, files a motion to dismiss; Governor Kemp reveals that he was interviewed by Jack Smith's team; Smirnov is arrested; plus Allison and Andy answer a couple of listener questions.Steve Vladeckhttps://twitter.com/steve_vladeckhttps://stevevladeck.substack.com/ Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to knowRule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C.  § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or InformantsQuestions for the pod Submit questions for the pod herehttps://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P Brian Greer's Quick Guide to CIPAhttps://www.justsecurity.org/87134/the-quick-guide-to-cipa-classified-information-procedures-act/ AMICI CURIAE to the District Court of DC https://democracy21.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Attachment-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-in-Support-of-Governments-Proposed-Trial-Date.pdfGood to know:Rule 403bhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_40318 U.S. Code § 1512https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512 Prior RestraintPrior Restraint | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information InstituteBrady MaterialBrady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institutehttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule#:~:text=Brady%20material%2C%20or%20the%20evidence,infer%20against%20the%20defendant's%20guiltJenksJencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossaryhttps://content.next.westlaw.com/Glossary/PracticalLaw/I87bcf994d05a11e598dc8b09b4f043e0?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)Gigliohttps://definitions.uslegal.com/g/giglio-information/Statutes:18 U.S.C. § 241 | Conspiracy Against Rights18 U.S.C. § 371 | Conspiracy to Defraud the United States | JM | Department of Justice18 U.S.C. § 1512 | Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants Questions for the pod Submit questions for the pod here https://formfacade.com/sm/PTk_BSogJCheck out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AGFollow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodAndrew McCabe isn't on social media, but you can buy his book The ThreatThe Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and TrumpWe would like to know more about our listeners. Please participate in this brief surveyListener Survey and CommentsThis Show is Available Ad-Free And Early For Patreon and Supercast Supporters at the Justice Enforcers level and above:https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr when you subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3YNpW3P

A federal court has negated the petition of Special Counsel Jack Smith to retain confidentiality of certain records in the court proceedings involving the previously classified documents allegedly kept by the former President Donald Trump. The presiding Judge Aileen Cannon in the same case disregarded the appeal made by Smith to continue concealing certain documents from Trump and his defense team. The pronouncement, issued on December 4, envisioned the court clerk to make several documents public, which were previously kept hidden due to special counsel's request. These documents are part of a lawsuit accusing Trump of storing highly classified government records, including those stated as 'top secret', at his Mar-a-Lago residential property. The former president, however, has consistently maintained that he had utilized presidential privileges to declassify said documents. In this ongoing legal battle, Trump asserts that he is innocent and describes this case as a politically motivated tactic to thwart his potential 2024 candidacy for the presidency. The lawsuit also accuses Walter Nauta, a long-standing aide of the former president, and Carlos De Oliveira, the manager of Mar-a-Lago, as accomplices; both have also categorically denied all allegations. Trump's defense along with Smith's prosecution team has been ardently debating over which classified documents the defense should be allowed to inspect. The recent decision by the presiding judge to unseal certain documents could act as a small victory for Trump and his co-defendants. Citing the judge's order dated December 4, 'Given the Special Counsel's response to the Defendant's request to unseal dockets, considering the principle of public accessibility to judicial documents, the clerk is instructed to unseal docket entries 223, 224, and 230.' This uncovers the previously sealed response by prosecutors to a court order from December 1.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Do you often find yourself lost in the whirlwind of American politics? Well, prepare yourself for a deep dive into the stormy seas of Trump's legal troubles, and how they could impact his loyal supporters. We'll unpack the staggering fundraising boost his campaign received post-mugshot and the implications of the recent shooting in Florida, and the peculiar motion for a speedy trial by Kenneth Cheeseboro in Georgia. As we navigate this political storm, we'll offer insights on Trump's nationally televised trial and its potential fallout. The alleged coordination between Trump's defense and his co-conspirators will be scrutinized, as well as the possible conflict of interest in the Florida case involving Stan Woodward, Trump, and Carlos De Oliveira and Tavares, his co-conspirators. This episode will help you make sense of the convoluted American political landscape. So, tune in and let's untangle these knots together!Support the showhttps://www.buzzsprout.com/2003879/supportFollow our show's hosts on Twitter: twitter.com/@CoolTXchicktwitter.com/@Caroldedwinetwitter.com/blackknight10ktwitter.com/@pardonpodSubscribe to Ty's substack:https://theworldasiseeit.substack.com/Support Our Sponsor:Eucalyptus Sheets (Recommended):Sleep Mask (I use this every night)Eucalyptus ComfortorAdjustable Eukalyptus Pillow

SEASON 2 EPISODE 19: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: One of Trump's Georgia co-defendants is already PRE-flipping on him. And his Mar-a-Lago “Employee 4” got rid of his Trump-supplied lawyer and recanted testimony that almost got him brought up on perjury charges and guess who he was lying FOR because after he changed his tune, that's when Jack Smith added the new charges against Trump and the new co-defendant. The former Chairman of the Georgia Republican Party David Shafer – more importantly the former Quote “Chairman” unquote of the Georgia Fake Electors Slate - filed to switch his part of the trial to federal court and in his argument for doing so he added a small detail: this is all Trump's fault. “Mr. Shafer and the other Republican Electors iin the 2020 election,”write Shafer's attorneys, “acted at the DIRECTION OF THE INCUMBENT PRESIDENT and other federal officials. Attorneys for the President and Mr. Shafer specifically instructed Mr. Shafer, verbally and in writing,” write Shafer's attorneys, “that the Republican electors' meeting and casting their ballots on December 14, 2020 was consistent with counsels' advice and was necessary to preserve the presidential election contest.” Shafer even handed over evidence. Not just to Fonni Willis but to the public. That December 14th sham electors' vote? Shafer released a copy of the TRANSCRIPT of that gathering of the coven and the guy who addressed them beforehand was Ray Smith, another one of Trump's co-defendants and oh by the way Trump's local attorney of record in Atlanta who walked the suckers through their part in the coup attempt. And in the Florida case, Jack Smith answered Judge Aileen Cannon's confused query in a now-unsealed filing and revealed matter-of-factly that this was because the District of Columbia Grand Jury had been hearing evidence that maybe one of the witnesses – Mar-a-Lago Employee Number 4 – should be charged with perjury because while he still had Trump stooge Stanley Woodward as his attorney, he testified that he didn't know nothing about nobody erasing no security video from no servers and never heard nobody say The Boss Wanted The Servers Deleted. And then somebody told Employee Number 4 that he'd just committed perjury and he DID see the light and doth repented and got a new attorney from the Public Defenders' office. And the next thing you knew, Employee Number 4 – Trump's I-T guy, Yuscil Taveras, was remembering clear as a bell and suddenly the guy who said “The Boss Wanted The Servers Deleted” had become the latest indicted victim of the maxim “Everything Trump Touches, Dies” and his name is Carlos De Oliveira and he is still a defendant but if you want to draft somebody in your fantasy Who Flips First in Florida league, pick him. And oh yeah, as soon as Taveras got his OWN attorney and not the same one Walt Nauta has, Smith filed three more counts against Trump. B-Block (17:10) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: Vivek, caught lying, on tape, the day before the GOP debate? He's the Ron DeSantis of Scott Walkers. The full pre-debate nonsense, and Jair Bolsonaro may have pawned two high-end watches given to him by other governments, and the "Rich Men North of Richmond" singer had his 15 Days of fame. Now they've discovered Oliver Anthony is the reverse Milk Shake Duck: he's NOT racist. (24:34) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: The weekly Eric Adams disaster here in Fun City. Greg Abbott has an ugly soul. And the Republican National Committee and Jeanine "Hooters Pants On a 72-Year Old" Pirro attack Biden on... talking to a rescue dog? C-Block (29:30) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: I was reminded of him the other day so I thought it was time to tell a few stories about a man whose absence is still so shocking, so wrong, so something you wish you could correct: Tony Gwynn.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The criminal charges against Donald Trump continue to pile up.On July 27, a superseding indictment was filed in the classified documents case against Trump, adding three additional charges to the 37 originally filed in June. Five days later, Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a new indictment over the former president's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.The superseding indictment in the classified documents case alleges that Trump violated the Espionage Act by retaining a classified document described as a “presentation concerning military activity in a foreign country,” at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, and that Trump conspired with two associates, Carlos De Oliveira and Walt Nauta, to obstruct justice by attempting to delete security camera footage at Mar-a-Lago in order to conceal it from the FBI and a grand jury. Joining the show to discuss the additional charges in the classified documents case is David Aaron. David is a Senior Counsel in the Washington, D.C. and New York offices of the law firm Perkins Coie. Before joining private practice, David was a prosecutor in the Justice Department's National Security Division, where he prosecuted Espionage Act violations and saw how the process works from the inside. This conversation was recorded on July 30, 2023. Show Notes: David Aaron (@davidcaaron)Paras Shah (@pshah518) Just Security's Espionage Act coverageJust Security's classified information coverageJust Security's coverage of Special Counsel Jack Smith Just Security's Trump Classified Docs ClearinghouseTess Bridgeman (@bridgewriter) and Ryan Goodman's (@rgoodlaw) Just Security article on the national security implications of the superseding indictment Brian D. Greer (@secretsandlaws) and Wendy Leben's Just Security Podcast episode on the presidential classification and declassification process Music: “The Parade” by “Hey Pluto!” from Uppbeat: https://uppbeat.io/t/hey-pluto/the-parade (License code: 36B6ODD7Y6ODZ3BX)Music: “Covert Affair” by Kevin MacLeod from Uppbeat: https://uppbeat.io/t/kevin-macleod/covert-affair (License code: Z20AS7IAZ04VZZBR) 

As we await next moves in the special counsel's election interference case, Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis reveals “we're ready to go” on charging decisions in her election probe of Trump. It comes as Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira makes his first court appearance in the classified documents case. Plus, new reporting found Trump's team is creating a new legal defense fund to help pay for his allies' legal bills. And GOP candidates are gearing up for their first debate, but the frontrunner may not be there. Carol Leonning, Tali Farhadian Weinstein, David Cay Johnston, Claire McCaskill, Robert Gibbs, Mike Murphy and Gen. Barry McCaffrey join.

Tuesday, August 1st, 2023    Today, in the Hot Notes: Judge McBurney throws out Donald's motion to quash the Fulton County Special Purpose Grand Jury report and remove Fani Willis as the prosecutor; the DA investigating migrant flights to Martha's Vineyard has referred the matter to the DoJ; President Biden has decided to keep Space Command in Colorado shunning Alabama; Carlos De Oliveira made his first court appearance; a pride protest at a San Diego library backfires; another rapid unscheduled disassembly for Elon Musk; plus AG and Dana deliver your Good News. Want some sweet Daily Beans Merchhttps://shop.dailybeanspod.com/Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/allisongillhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodhttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedy/https://www.facebook.com/dgcomedy/Google Doc of current legislation threatening trans people and their families:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fTxHLjBa86GA7WCT-V6AbEMGRFPMJndnaVGoZZX4PMw/edit?usp=sharing Have some good news; a confession; or a correction?https://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Promo CodesFor 20% off all mattress orders AND two free pillows for our listeners! Go to https://www.helxsleep.com/dailybeans and use code HELIXPARTNER.Go to HelloFresh dot com slash https://www.hellofresh.com/dailybeans50 and use code dailybeans50 for 50% off plus free shipping.Visit http://www.greenpan.us and use promo code DAILYBEANS and you'll receive 30% OFF YOUR ENTIRE ORDER – plus free shipping on orders over $99. Ohio Special Election Information:https://www.ohiosos.gov/globalassets/elections/2023/spec/issuereport.pdfListener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short Follow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://dailybeans.supercast.techOrhttps://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcastshttps://apple.co/3UKzKt0

The newest co-defendant in the special counsel's criminal case against former President Trump and his staff over their alleged mishandling of classified information made his first court appearance. Carlos De Oliveira, the Mar-a-Lago property manager, was indicted by a grand jury on four charges last week and was released on $100,000 bond pending trial. Trump and his aide Walt Nauta have already pleaded not guilty in the case after being indicted in June. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe tells Anderson Cooper if there's still time for De Oliveira to cooperate with Jack Smith's investigators. Plus, in a New York Times/Siena College poll of the likely Republican primary electorate, the former president is dominating his rivals for the GOP presidential nomination. New Hampshire Republican Gov. Chris Sununu joins AC360 to discuss who he thinks has the best chance at challenging Trump.To learn more about how CNN protects listener privacy, visit cnn.com/privacy

Joy Reid leads this episode of The ReidOut with reports that Donald Trump is likely waiting to see whether Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis and/or special counsel Jack Smith will increase his number of indictments to three or even four before the end of summer. Plus, we examine the first court appearance of Carlos De Oliveira, the Mar-a-Lago manager accused of scheming with Donald Trump to cover up his purloined classified documents. Also in this episode, Joy and her expert guests critique the Ron DeSantis campaign. Polls show DeSantis trailing Trump by a wide margin, with a former supporter saying Ron just does not understand the game and does not connect with voters. Finally, we spotlight the controversy of Samuel Alito saying Congress has no business imposing ethics rules on the Supreme Court. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse joins Joy on the effort to stop him and Clarence Thomas from accepting fancy gifts from their wealthy associates. All this and more in this edition of The ReidOut on MSNBC.

Today's Headlines: Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira appeared in court for an arraignment but couldn't offer a plea due to lacking a lawyer authorized in Florida. Trump's indictment related to January 6 is still pending. Anti-abortion groups pressure Ron DeSantis to advocate for a national abortion ban, but he focuses on state-level policies. Twitter, owned by Elon Musk, threatens to sue a group tracking hate speech. Cardi B faces a police report after throwing her microphone at a fan who threw a drink at her. Biden decides to keep the Space Force command in Colorado despite Trump's earlier decision to relocate it to Alabama, which had implications for military readiness and reproductive care access for service members. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: AP News: Mar-a-Lago manager De Oliveira makes his first court appearance in Trump's classified documents case Politico: DeSantis' latest comments slammed by anti-abortion group as ‘unacceptable' The Hill: Musk, anti-hate-speech group in legal scrap NBC News: Fan files police report after Cardi B hurled microphone into crowd during Las Vegas show The Hill: Biden overturns Trump decision to move Space Command HQ from Colorado to Alabama Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage alongside Amanda Duberman and Bridget Schwartz Edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Monday, a Mar-a-Lago employee made his first court appearance in Miami, Florida, after being accused of carrying out orders from the former president to destroy security footage. The former President stands accused of attempting to hide this from investigators looking into his mishandling of classified documents. The estate's property manager, Carlos De Oliveira, is the second Trump employee named in the case, alongside Walt Nauta, Trump's long-time valet, who is facing charges for allegedly moving boxes full of classified documents at least five times. FOX News Contributor and law professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley, joins the Rundown to discuss how the new charges will impact the case as it moves forward, what would happen if the trial were pushed to after the election, and why Trump would be unable to pardon himself if elected to a second term. President Biden has been touting 'Bidenomics' as a success, as inflation has been decreasing and unemployment is low. Despite the positive direction of the economy, there is a feeling of disconnect among the American people, with the latest Fox News Poll showing 45 percent of people believe the nation is falling behind economically. Co-anchor of "The Big Money Show" on FOX Business, Taylor Riggs, joins the podcast to explain why financial pessimism still persists for many citizens and what exactly economists mean when they predict a soft landing for the economy. Later, she breaks down how younger generations' spending and lifestyle habits could impact the country's future and how union strikes may inflict a wage price spiral on consumers. Plus, commentary by Fox Nation host Tammy Bruce. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Trump's second co-defendant in the classified documents case, Carlos De Oliveira, appears in court as the former president prepares for another indictment in the January 6 probe as early as this week. New polling shows Trump dominating the Republican primary — and several warning signs for his chief rival, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Security camera footage shows an SUV slamming into a group of migrants in North Carolina. Raf Sanchez sits down with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for an exclusive interview amid mass protests against his judicial overhaul plan. A fan files a police report against Cardi B after the singer threw a microphone at a fan after a drink was thrown at her. And the son of Colombian President Gustavo Petro is arrested for allegedly laundering funds for his father's campaign.

On Monday, a Mar-a-Lago employee made his first court appearance in Miami, Florida, after being accused of carrying out orders from the former president to destroy security footage. The former President stands accused of attempting to hide this from investigators looking into his mishandling of classified documents. The estate's property manager, Carlos De Oliveira, is the second Trump employee named in the case, alongside Walt Nauta, Trump's long-time valet, who is facing charges for allegedly moving boxes full of classified documents at least five times. FOX News Contributor and law professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley, joins the Rundown to discuss how the new charges will impact the case as it moves forward, what would happen if the trial were pushed to after the election, and why Trump would be unable to pardon himself if elected to a second term. President Biden has been touting 'Bidenomics' as a success, as inflation has been decreasing and unemployment is low. Despite the positive direction of the economy, there is a feeling of disconnect among the American people, with the latest Fox News Poll showing 45 percent of people believe the nation is falling behind economically. Co-anchor of "The Big Money Show" on FOX Business, Taylor Riggs, joins the podcast to explain why financial pessimism still persists for many citizens and what exactly economists mean when they predict a soft landing for the economy. Later, she breaks down how younger generations' spending and lifestyle habits could impact the country's future and how union strikes may inflict a wage price spiral on consumers. Plus, commentary by Fox Nation host Tammy Bruce. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Monday, a Mar-a-Lago employee made his first court appearance in Miami, Florida, after being accused of carrying out orders from the former president to destroy security footage. The former President stands accused of attempting to hide this from investigators looking into his mishandling of classified documents. The estate's property manager, Carlos De Oliveira, is the second Trump employee named in the case, alongside Walt Nauta, Trump's long-time valet, who is facing charges for allegedly moving boxes full of classified documents at least five times. FOX News Contributor and law professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley, joins the Rundown to discuss how the new charges will impact the case as it moves forward, what would happen if the trial were pushed to after the election, and why Trump would be unable to pardon himself if elected to a second term. President Biden has been touting 'Bidenomics' as a success, as inflation has been decreasing and unemployment is low. Despite the positive direction of the economy, there is a feeling of disconnect among the American people, with the latest Fox News Poll showing 45 percent of people believe the nation is falling behind economically. Co-anchor of "The Big Money Show" on FOX Business, Taylor Riggs, joins the podcast to explain why financial pessimism still persists for many citizens and what exactly economists mean when they predict a soft landing for the economy. Later, she breaks down how younger generations' spending and lifestyle habits could impact the country's future and how union strikes may inflict a wage price spiral on consumers. Plus, commentary by Fox Nation host Tammy Bruce. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mar-a-Lago staff, Carlos De Oliveira, is to appear in court on Monday for allegedly hiding security footage linked to Trump's classified documents probe.

Monday briefing: Deadly strike in Ukraine; Carlos De Oliveira; rent prices; how to watch U.S. vs. Portugal; and moreRead today's briefing.

EPISODE 257: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:43) SPECIAL COMMENT: It's just guess but I think Trump is TERRIFIED that his “Property Manager” Carlos De Oliveira is about to flip. Trump freaked out again last night about Jack Smith and the documents and Hilary emails and Biden documents and the Special Counsel covering the Biden documents review – and without provocation from any known developments – and the LAST time he did that I told you “SOMETHING is going on at the Grand Jury but I'll be damned if I know what” and hours later there was a superseding indictment on the documents so with that context let me say it again: SOMETHING is going on at the Grand Jury because Trump may not have MANY human traits but he is really good on exhibiting cause and effect. And this freakout may have something to do with either or both of two developments. At 10:30 this morning, at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building in Miami, Courtroom 5, before Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres, we will see present himself for his first appearance who else but Trump's newest co-defendant, his Mar-a-Lago “Property Manager” Carlos De Oliveira: the guy who gave us THE money quote, so far, of the destruction of evidence and obstruction case, “The boss wants the server deleted.” And if the Trump freak out doesn't owe to THAT indictment hearing, and the prospect that not everybody is as dumb as Walt Nauta, and that a YEAR ago Trump wasn't sure De Oliveira wasn't the kind of guy who'd flip, then it's the fact that CLEARLY Trump's Mar-a-Lago I-T Guy Yuscil Taveras already flipped. B-Block (18:51) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: The Trump stochastic terrorist who hunted Barack Obama moves to be released from jail, and we have a SCOTUS problem: Sam Alito isn't just corrupt, he's gone crazy (22:38) IN SPORTS: Max Scherzer, Jordan Hicks, others traded as baseball's deal deadline looms. But what the GM of the New York Mets said AFTER he traded Scherzer kind of paints himself and his owner into a corner in which they have to sign Shohei Ohtani (29:26) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Ron DeSantis's pro-slavery campaign costs Orlando $4.6 million. NJ Congressman Christopher Smith wants to scuttle the World HIV/AIDS program over a conspiracy theory. And Musk reinstates Kanye West. C-Block (35:15) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: The adorable Petros in Devore CA (36:15) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: I made a flub on D-Day which reminded me of the day the president of MSNBC staked everything on covering the 60th Anniversary OF D-Day - and major news broke which he tried to avoid running in order to protect his dream!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former President Donald Trump's aide, Carlos De Oliveira, made his first appearance at a Miami court Monday morning. The Mar-a-Lago property manager is set to enter a plea in the classified documents case. The new director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says her agency is planning to recommend Americans get an annual COVID-19 vaccine shot. Recent polling shows former President Trump is still in the lead among GOP voters, but Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis may be losing ground in second place. An Iowa poll shows Sen. Tim Scott close to overtaking Mr. DeSantis. ⭕️Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

Tras disturbios en Chiapas detienen a 12 motonetosEdomex realiza la Jornada Estatal de Vacunación Antirrábica Carlos De Oliveira, se presentará ante la corte este lunes en el caso Trump

The Special Prosecutor, Jack Smith, charged Donald Trump with additional crimes on Thursday and indicted another Trump employee. Carlos De Oliveira, the Mar-a-Largo maintenance manager, is now charged in the case. The charges relate to the Classified Documents case in Florida. The Superseding Indictment includes allegations that the former President ordered his staff to erase close-circuit video files. Trump is also charged with another violation of the Espionage Act.  

This time in our longform weekend podcast, Glenn again recaps the legal stories of the week. First up: Rudy Giuliani has admitted in court that he lied about 2 Georgia election workers - Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman. Glenn says this warms his heart. Second: Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty after his plea breaks down in court. Glenn explains - this actually happens a lot more often than you think. Third: We knew that there was a search warrant executed at Mar-a-Lago. But when a court filing was unsealed this week we learned there were actually EIGHT search warrants obtained in connection with the investigation of Trump's documents crimes. Glenn wonders - so what's with the other seven search warrants? And fourth: The new Trump indictment includes new counts of obstruction and willful retention of national defense information. Prosecutors also added a third defendant to the case: Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, who they say schemed with Trump and his valet, Walt Nauta, to conceal the footage from investigators. Glenn explains how the law works for co-conspirators. Then winding it up, another discussion on reform. Republicans in congress attempted to help Donald Trump steal the 2020 election from Joe Biden and change our democracy to a dictatorship. They asked for pardons because they knew they broke the law. Glenn says "Is personal responsibility in today's Republican party an oxymoron?"See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This time in our longform weekend podcast, Glenn again recaps the legal stories of the week. First up: Rudy Giuliani has admitted in court that he lied about 2 Georgia election workers - Shay Moss and Ruby Freeman. Glenn says this warms his heart. Second: Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty after his plea breaks down in court. Glenn explains - this actually happens a lot more often than you think. Third: We knew that there was a search warrant executed at Mar-a-Lago. But when a court filing was unsealed this week we learned there were actually EIGHT search warrants obtained in connection with the investigation of Trump's documents crimes. Glenn wonders - so what's with the other seven search warrants? And fourth: The new Trump indictment includes new counts of obstruction and willful retention of national defense information. Prosecutors also added a third defendant to the case: Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, who they say schemed with Trump and his valet, Walt Nauta, to conceal the footage from investigators. Glenn explains how the law works for co-conspirators. Then winding it up, another discussion on reform. Republicans in congress attempted to help Donald Trump steal the 2020 election from Joe Biden and change our democracy to a dictatorship. They asked for pardons because they knew they broke the law. Glenn says "Is personal responsibility in today's Republican party an oxymoron?"See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Say hello to Carlos De Oliveira,  Mar-a-Lago's property manager, who allegedly assisted Trump aide Walt Nauta, in attempting to delete security footage that showed the men moving boxes of classified documents around the property to hide them from federal agents.Special Counsel Jack Smith filed three new criminal counts against Trump on Thursday bringing the total to 40. The superseding indictment charged De Oliveira with conspiracy to obstruct justice, accusing him of helping Trump to hide documents.De Oliveira told a fellow Mar-a-Lago employee, that "the boss" wanted security videos of the property in Florida deleted after the Justice Department subpoenaed them.Prosecutors also charged De Oliveira with lying to the FBI during a voluntary interview, falsely claiming he had no involvement in moving boxes of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. "Never saw nothing," De Oliveira told the agents, according to the indictment.The superseding indictment against Trump also includes a a new count of willfully retaining national defense information. The charge alleges that Trump showed a top secret military document about Iran to other people who, like him, lacked the security clearance required to see such material. Trump himself admitted the documents were not declassified. That old adage is true : It's not the lie, it's the coverup. Thanks for helping us save democracy one episode at a time!Join the Dirty Moderate Nation on Substack! Tell us what you think on Twitter! Or, if you are fed up with Elon's bullshit, hit us up on Threads! There are always shenanigans over on TikTok too…Are you registered to VOTE?

Carlos De Oliveira is in hot water. Why does that matter? Because Senior de Oliveria worked for Senor Donald Trump at his golf club and residence known as Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. De Oliveira told the FBI earlier this year that he knew nothing about the secret government documents Trump was in his residence. Telling the FBI a lie can get you several years of prison time-unless- unless-unless you give them something that's a lot larger than your presence in a prison. If you have valuable information that allows them to go after a much bigger fish, you may not end up drowning your tomorrows in the pen. The big fish he can give them is his boss, the former President of the United States. If he can tell a grand jury and then a trial jury that Donald Trump told him to wipe a server containing important surveillance footage, then the Prosecutor has the President where he wants him - not just committing a crime but giving the jury the proof that he knew what he was doing was criminal. The biggest burden on every prosecution is proving the accused had a criminal mindset, knew that what they were doing was wrong-criminally wrong. Every jury member is expected to know that Donald Trump wasn't trying to get rid of evidence that little green men from Mars were planting evidence to incriminated him. The destroyed surveillance footage wouldn't be of FBI agents planting evidence. It would have to be connected to Trump and that's why Trump would have told Carlos De Oliveira to get rid of it. The uncomfortable truth for Trump fans is that this may be the lynch pin that puts Trump in the pen. But just because it's uncomfortable doesn't make it untrue. I'm Charles Adler telling the Truth about Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith tacks on additional charges against Trump and his aide Walt Nauta in the classified documents case. It comes as Smith adds a third defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, to the case. Plus, House Republicans boast about a “productive” session just before leaving for a five-week recess. And prosecutors drop another charge against former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. Peter Baker, Katie Benner, Charles Coleman, Joyce Vance, Frank Figliuzzi, Conor Lamb and David Gura join.

Joy Reid leads this episode of The ReidOut with breaking news in the multiple special counsel investigations into Donald Trump. A superseding indictment has added a new charge against Donald Trump: one additional count of willful retention of national defense information. It also adds a third defendant to the case, alongside Trump and his longtime valet Waltine Nauta. Carlos De Oliveira was the head of maintenance at Trump's Florida resort and reportedly helped Nauta move boxes of documents from the infamous storage room at a key moment, a day before prosecutors came to retrieve those remaining classified documents. He is facing four charges including conspiracy to obstruct justice, concealing an object, corruptly concealing a document, and false statements. This comes as Trump is likely facing his third indictment as a former president. Joy Reid and her expert guests bring you the latest developments in this edition of The ReidOut on MSNBC.

In a superseding indictment, Special Counsel Jack Smith has added more charges in the stolen documents case against Donald Trump and has additionally added a new defendant, Mar-a-Lago maintenance worker Carlos De Oliveira. Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok report. Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 American Psyop: https://pod.link/1652143101 Burn the Boats: https://pod.link/1485464343 Majority 54: https://pod.link/1309354521 Political Beatdown: https://pod.link/1669634407 Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://pod.link/1676844320 MAGA Uncovered: https://pod.link/1690214260 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

New charges against Trump in classified documents case.USA TODAY National Political Correspondent Phillip M. Bailey on Dianne Feinstein getting confused and being told how to vote.Student loan interest crisis? A new bill could eliminate rates for many borrowers.July 2023 temperatures to smash records.Bronny James, cardiac arrest and young athletes: USA TODAY Health Reporter Adrianna Rodriguez on what you need to know.Episode Transcript available hereAlso available at art19.com/shows/5-ThingsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More charges against former President Trump in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case! Special counsel Jack Smith is adding one defendant and additional charges to the prior indictment against Trump and his #1 helper Walt Nauta. Carlos De Oliveira, a maintenance worker who helped Nauta move boxes full of classified documents under subpoena around Mar-a-Lago last May, was added. Also joining the party, additional charge of willful retention and two new obstruction counts. We will check in with Jim Avila and Michael Shure to get their take. Friday Fabulous Florida is upon us and we welcome former producer John Daly to examine the whackiest state. Albert says he is having no trouble finding material! And….we're off to the movies with Michael Snyder. The Marina Times columnist will bring all the ding words to his witty reviews of this weekends offerings. Mark is flying back to California - Kim & Albert are holding down the fort.

EPISODE 256: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:43) SPECIAL COMMENT: “The boss wanted the server deleted.” WHY would you try to destroy the security video if you didn't do anything wrong? WHY would you try to destroy the security video if it didn't PROVE you broke the law? WHY would you move the documents after the government said don't move the documents, and WHY would you move the documents without remembering that you'd get caught ON security video MOVING the documents, and why when you DID remember that you'd get caught on security video would you then try to destroy the security video and GET CAUGHT TRYING TO DESTROY THE SECURITY VIDEO? Why would you personally launch a plot to destroy the server that seemed to have been good at only one thing – leaving clues. And oh by the way this is still on top of the espionage. I went to a January 6th Indictment and a Stolen Classified DOCUMENTS Indictment broke out! It was the cover-up sank Richard Nixon. The cover-up got Bill Clinton impeached. And THIS cover-up – Destroy the Servers, Destroy the Servers, now looks exactly like the Server cover-up Trump accused Hillary Clinton of in 2016, a theme he pounded weekly and daily and hourly and arguably won him the White House. And one thing we can infer from the superseding indictment is that the government has witnesses to whom Trump showed the Mark Milley Iran War document, and has all Trump's Property Manager's texts and it looks like it has his IT Guy, Employee 4? He and Employee 5 are testifying against Trump and they have all of Walt Nauta's messages right down to the SHUSH emoji he used to remind the person he was telling all this to not to tell anybody. (Prosecutor holds up giant blow-up of Nauta text with SHUSH emoji, six feet tall. “Perhaps, Mr. Nauta, THIS will refresh your memory!”) And let us not forget: the January 6th Indictments are still coming. Today? Beginning of next week? They remain next. POOP EMOJI! Trump's guilt is now even more obvious than ever; thus so too is the fact that we are playing Beat The Clock. Is the play now to offer to trade Trump justice and revenge in a disqualification plea deal? B-Block (22:00) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: Maybe Trump had his Property Manager also send the IT guy to fix McConnell. Can he have a look at Feinstein? And while he's at it, maybe he could remove the adult content from Rep. Nancy 'I Skipped Sex To Be Here, Reverend' Mace. (26:30) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: The Barbie movie. Now they will ALL BE Barbie Movies. Jonathan Turley suggests Biden might pardon his son and then announce he's not running for re-election. And while Senator Tommy Tuberville is blocking military promotions, The Washington Post reports he's also dragged his own father's honorable military record through the mud by inflating his service in World War 2. C-Block (33:20) FRIDAYS WITH THURBER: I haven't read this one to you before. It's a delightfully crafted story of the crassest kind of practical joker: "Meet Birdey Doggett."See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this day in legal history, July 28th, 1868, Secretary of State William H. Seward declared the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, granting citizenship to former slaves and protecting due process of law and equal protection of laws in the States..The journey to the ratification of the 14th Amendment was a difficult one. Many southern states, recently defeated in the Civil War and undergoing the Reconstruction period, were initially opposed to the amendment, largely because of its implications for the rights of freed slaves.However, the Republican-controlled Congress passed the Reconstruction Acts, which made the ratification of the 14th Amendment a prerequisite for the re-admission of the Southern states to the Union. As the Secretary of State, Seward was responsible for officially announcing when constitutional amendments were ratified by the necessary number of states and thereby became a part of the Constitution. On July 20, 1868, Seward initially announced that the 14th Amendment had been ratified by the necessary three-fourths of the states. However, there was some controversy, as two states (Ohio and New Jersey) that had initially ratified the amendment subsequently voted to rescind their ratifications. To remove any doubt about the amendment's validity, Congress passed a resolution on July 27 declaring that three-fourths of the states had indeed ratified the amendment. The next day, on July 28, 1868, Seward issued an official proclamation confirming the ratification. The ratification of the 14th Amendment marked a major milestone in American history, establishing equal protection under the law and due process as constitutional rights, as well as setting the stage for future advancements in civil rights. Seward's declaration on July 28, 1868, cemented this momentous change in the U.S. Constitution.Teresa La Dart, an author who accused singer Taylor Swift and her production company of infringing on the copyright of her 2010 book "Lover", has voluntarily dropped her lawsuit. La Dart had claimed that Swift's 2019 album "Lover" and its accompanying book used its title and several creative elements from her work, leading to a suit in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The lawsuit, which sought over $1 million in damages, was dropped after mediation proceedings, details of which remain undisclosed. Swift's legal team had moved to dismiss the lawsuit prior to mediation, arguing it lacked a legitimate claim. Swift has previously successfully defended herself against multiple copyright claims.Taylor Swift Beats $1 Million ‘Lover' Book Copyright LawsuitMastercard Inc. has instructed banks and payment processors to discontinue marijuana transactions through its debit cards. The company's decision to prohibit pot purchases using PIN debit cards on its network aligns with their policies and is a consequence of the ongoing federal illegality of marijuana, despite its legalization in many U.S. states. The move presents challenges for companies facilitating PIN debit payments for cannabis and limits options for consumers. The shutdown is considered a victory for banks and credit card companies keen on maintaining strict anti-money laundering and fraud control measures. The decision follows earlier issues for digital payment solutions that cater to the cannabis industry, including difficulties with cashless ATMs. The crackdown leaves cannabis companies seeking alternatives and heightens the risks for dispensaries that may need to handle increased volumes of cash transactions.Mastercard Demands Shutdown of Marijuana Buys on Its Debit CardsA federal judge dismissed a lawsuit against Kraft Heinz & Co, in which the company was accused of misleading consumers about the preparation time of its Velveeta microwavable macaroni and cheese. The plaintiff, Amanda Ramirez, argued that the company's claim that the product is "ready in 3-1/2 minutes" was deceptive as it didn't account for time to remove the lid, add water, and stir in the cheese sauce. However, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom found that Ramirez lacked standing to pursue the proposed $5 million class action lawsuit or to compel Kraft Heinz to change its packaging. Judge Bloom stated that Ramirez had not demonstrated that she couldn't eat or even attempted to prepare the product, or that it was fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, the judge dismissed the possibility of future injury, as Ramirez now understands the 3-1/2 minute claim refers solely to microwave time.Kraft Heinz defeats lawsuit over mac & cheese preparation time | ReutersFormer President Donald Trump has denied any wrongdoing following the addition of new charges related to his handling of security tapes from his Mar-a-Lago resort. Prosecutors have alleged that Trump ordered resort employees to delete the security videos, a claim Trump denies. In an interview, Trump stated he wasn't obligated to hand over the tapes, but did so anyway. Additional charges were filed against a resort maintenance worker, Carlos De Oliveira, accusing him of aiding Trump in document concealment and lying to the FBI. Despite these charges, Trump, the current frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, vowed to continue his campaign even if convicted and sentenced.Trump says he handed over security tapes, denies wrongdoing after latest charges | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Holyoke Media, en asociación con WHMP radio, emiten diariamente la Síntesis informativa en español a través del 101.5 FM y en el 1240 / 1400 AM. Esta es la síntesis informativa del viernes 28 de julio de 2023: El expresidente Donald Trump enfrenta acusaciones de que él y sus ayudantes le pidieron a un miembro del personal que borrara las imágenes de la cámara en su propiedad de Florida en un esfuerzo por obstruir las investigaciones de documentos clasificados. Las alegaciones se hicieron el jueves en una acusación actualizada del gran jurado que agrega nuevos cargos contra Trump y agrega otro acusado al caso. Un portavoz de Trump desestimó los nuevos cargos como “nada más que un continuo intento desesperado y agitado” por parte de la administración Biden de “hostigar al presidente Trump y a quienes lo rodean” e influir en la carrera presidencial de 2024. Los cargos contra el individuo, identificado en el expediente judicial como Carlos De Oliveira, no se revelaron de inmediato el jueves. Trump y el ayuda de cámara Walt Nauta fueron acusados el mes pasado por el fiscal especial del Departamento de Justicia Jack Smith en una acusación de 38 cargos por conspirar para ocultar documentos clasificados en su propiedad de Florida, Mar-a-Lago, de los investigadores del gobierno que exigían que se los devolvieran. Los registros fueron llevados por Trump al complejo de Palm Beach después de dejar la Casa Blanca en enero de 2021. Ambos hombres se han declarado inocentes. FUENTE: AP Los abogados de Donald Trump se reunieron el jueves con miembros del equipo del fiscal especial Jack Smith antes de una posible acusación por los esfuerzos del expresidente para anular los resultados de las elecciones de 2020, según una persona familiarizada con el asunto. El mismo Trump confirmó la reunión en una publicación en su red Truth Social, escribiendo: “Mis abogados tuvieron una reunión productiva con el Departamento de Justicia esta mañana, explicando en detalle que no hice nada malo, muchos abogados me aconsejaron y una acusación contra mí solo destruiría aún más nuestro país”. No quedó claro de inmediato qué se discutió en la reunión, aunque se produjo una reunión similar con los abogados en los días previos a que Trump fuera acusado el mes pasado por cargos de retención ilegal de documentos clasificados. El abogado de Trump, John Lauro, dijo en una entrevista televisiva la semana pasada que su cliente no había hecho “nada malo”. Trump, el favorito en las primarias presidenciales republicanas de 2024, fue informado a principios de este mes por la oficina de Smith de que era objeto de la investigación del Departamento de Justicia, lo que sugiere que pronto podría presentarse una acusación. La investigación se ha centrado en el turbulento período de dos meses después de las elecciones de noviembre de 2020 en el que Trump se negó a aceptar su derrota ante el demócrata Joe Biden y difundió mentiras de que le robaron la victoria. La agitación resultó en el motín del 6 de enero de 2021 en el Capitolio de los EE. UU. Más de 1,000 personas han sido acusadas de delitos federales relacionados con los disturbios en el Capitolio. FUENTE: AP

Tema da semana: Interação entre mercado e universidade Edi Carlos de Oliveira, professor e pesquisador do programa de pós-graduação em Administração da UEM Mais de 1,8 mil acadêmicos da Universidade Estadual de Maringá participam de programas de bolsas de pesquisa. Qual é o impacto das atividades da instituição na cidade e região? Como os empresários podem potencializar o retorno deste investimento? Quem responde é o professor Edi Carlos de Oliveira, que estudou o assunto para a tese de doutorado. Confira!

Lizzie est une instinctive, une passionnée qui un jour tomba amoureuse de Lisbonne, du fado mais surtout de la langue portugaise. De ce pays, elle n'en connaissait rien mais en quelques secondes il était devenu une évidence. Une connexion qui ne l'a quittera plus, et c'est à 16 ans qu'elle commencera son chemin pour décortiquer la langue et en comprendre sa mélodie. Car Lizzie est avant tout une musicienne, une artiste qui chante le fado comme elle le vit, avec sa personnalité et ce petit grain de folie qui m'a complètement happé. Je l'ai découverte en réalisant le montage du 1er épisode du podcast Agosto, et sa musique a tourné en boucle comme pour me dire d'aller au bout de mon rêve comme elle l'a fait. Pendant cet épisode elle nous parlera de sa rencontre avec la langue portugaise, de son travail acharné pour en comprendre chaque construction et sa poésie. Puis, elle nous transportera dans les rues lisboètes où vous l'imaginerez déambuler dans le quartier de l'Alfama et da Mouraria, berceaux du Fado. Lizzie est une artiste solaire. Une force féminine fadista soulignée d'une touche de fantaisie propre à l'enfance. Lizzie c'est un peu tout cela à la fois.Fermez les yeux quelques secondes… Laissez-vous porter dans l'univers de Lizzie…/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Si vous avez aimé ce 1er épisode et que vous souhaitez soutenir ce projet, vous pouvez mettre 5 étoiles sur les différentes plateformes de Podcasts ainsi qu'un petit commentaire !> Suivez les coulisses du projet sur IG via le profil @agostopodcast> Ecrivez-nous à agostopodcast@gmail.com> Création originale : Céline Lopes> Production, enregistrement, textes : Céline Lopes> Montage: Céline Lopes> Musique de l'épisode : Lizzie interprète le titre Loucura de Mariza; Fado Clandestino - Fado Clandestino; Mona Ki Ngi Xica - Bonga; Algo estranho acontece - Antonio Zambujo; Gaivota - Amália Rodrigues; As Meninas dos Meus Olhos - Mariza; Ó gente da minha terra - Mariza; O começo (Fado Bizarro) - Carminho; L'albatros - Fado Clandestino; Além Fado - Fado Clandestino.> Les références littéraires : Fernando Pessoa, Florbela Espanca, Carlos De Oliveira.> Suivez Lizzie et le groupe Fado Clandestino sur IG via le profil @lizzie.officiel Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Processo para tornar o licor de Cachoeira patrimônio cultural imaterial da Bahia

2022

Nesta edição do Isso é Bahia Entrevistas, temos o prazer de receber, João Carlos de Oliveira - Diretor-geral do IPAC.

Carlos de Oliveira (centenário em 2021) - Poesia com Ana Luísa Amaral e Luís Caetano

As novas regras para seguros de carros já estão em vigor. Agora, é possível personalizar o seguro e contratar apenas as coberturas que se deseja ou tem necessidade. Isso, claro, poderá reduzir o preço da apólice. As novas regras é uma iniciativa da Susep (Superintendência de Seguros Privados) e entraram em vigor em 1º de setembro. Entre as novidades está a contratação de seguro por quem não tem carro em seu nome. Ele será vinculado à CNH e oferecerá proteção a terceiros. Portanto, motoristas de aplicativos, condutores de veículos de amigos, entre outros, poderão contratar dentro das novas regras para seguros de carros. É importante destacar que o seguro vinculado à CNH não tem cobertura aos danos do veículo. Somente responsabilidade civil facultativa (RCF), assistência e acidentes pessoais de passageiros (APP). Nas regras anteriores, a responsabilidade era do dono do carro. Mas as mudanças não param por aí. José Carlos de Oliveira comenta no programa Consumo em Pauta todas as novidades. Ele atua há mais de 40 anos no setor de seguros, é coordenador de Grupos de Trabalho da Comissão Automóveis da Fenseg e ex-diretor de eventos da APTS (Associação Paulista dos Técnicos de Seguros). Atualmente é diretor-proprietário da JC Oliveira Corretagem de Seguros e Associado Asteca Seguros. . O programa Consumo em Pauta é apresentado pela jornalista Angela Crespo todas as segundas, às 16h, com reapresentações as terças, às 9h, e as quartas, às 20h, na Rádio Mega Brasil Online, e é disponibilizado, simultaneamente com a estreia, em imagens na TV Mega Brasil.

Vozes de homens e mulheres, como deve ser o mundo. #70

Leitura de poema. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/carlos-henrique-batista-d/message

Leitura de poema. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/carlos-henrique-batista-d/message

https://roidz.club/ Instagram Vitor Capial https://instagram.com/vitorcapial Carlos de Oliveira https://instagram.com/caikepro