Podcast appearances and mentions of lynn goldsmith

Bruce Springsteen, Michael Jackson, Prince, Sting, Cher, Bob Dylan, Patti Smith… Son algunos de los artistas a los que fotografió antes y después de ser famosos

In the realm of photography, Lynn Goldsmith stands out as a luminary with a career spanning over five decades. Her lens has captured the essence of iconic figures across entertainment, sports, and more, with her work featured in esteemed publications like LIFE and Rolling Stone. In this episode, Goldsmith shares her journey and insights while … Continue reading "Episode 138: Lynn Goldsmith (Entertainment Photography)" The post Episode 138: Lynn Goldsmith (Entertainment Photography) first appeared on A Photojournalism Podcast for Everyone.

The music festival promoters hustle hard to secure a plane to Zaire. Finally on board, all the artists are nearly killed by James Brown and his oversized ego. Despite the high drama, the flight is a magical experience for all aboard when the musicians turn the plane into an epic jam session. This shared joy carries the crew through to Zaire. Upon arrival, they are greeted by the drums and voices of The Motherland. Meanwhile, fight promoters scramble to rearrange the weekend after Foreman’s cut and, in doing so, find out who President Mobutu really is. LITERARY REFERENCES “The Greatest, My Own Story”by Muhammad Ali (autobiography) “By George” by George Foreman (autobiography) “Hit Me, Fred” by Fred Wesley (autobiography) “LATIN NY” (Magazine, Issue No. 20, Nov 1974 Editor-in-Chief, Diane Weathers) Courtesy of Lola! Love OTHER MEDIA US State Department cables (available online in the US State Dept Archives and Wikileaks: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/1974KINSHA07638_b.html) See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join Buzz Knight with photographer, filmmaker and producer Lynn Goldsmith. Lynn discusses her incredible career and her new book "Before-Easter-After" which is a beautiful book of photographs of music legend Patti Smith. Lynn is a creative force and she takes you behind the scenes to the creation of her work. If you have questions or comments, write Buzz@Buzzknightmedia.com Find Buzz on Instagram@takinawalkpodcast. Like this show? Tell your friends and leave us a review. ReviewSupport the show: https://takinawalk.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On episode #66 of “Sound Up!,” Mark and Alan welcome legendary photographer Lynn Goldsmith to discuss her latest book, Patti Smith: Before Easter After. In music news, we discuss Oasis cracking down on ticket resales, Young Thug getting out of prison, Ed Sheeran winning a big court case, The Cure performing a three-hour record release show in London, and Jell Roll dropping 100 pounds while touring. We get two reviews from our Sound Up Pod Squad, one of The Cure's new album Songs of a Lost World and another of Morrissey live.This week's new music picks feature tracks from Dorothy, Chena, Cleo Sol, and Paul Simon. We want to make you part of the conversation. Leave us your comments via text or audio message at connect@sounduppod.com https://www.instagram.com/sounduppod/https://twitter.com/sounduppod

https://youtube.com/live/wEdL41aDjIk?feature=share On tonight's episode of "Exclusively Van Halen," we'll dive into Alex Van Halen's latest social media post featuring his drum solo that dropped today. We'll also flip through a rock magazine I picked up at Amoeba Music in Hollywood last week. I'll share a personal story about meeting Sammy Hagar at the Bammies Awards in Oakland, California, back in 2000. Plus, we'll check out some incredible Van Halen photos shared by Lynn Goldsmith on her Instagram in tribute to Eddie and Alex. “Exclusively Van Halen" is the ultimate destination for all things Van Halen. Step into the world of rock and roll legends as we delve deep into the history, music, and trivia surrounding one of the most iconic bands of all time. Join us as we explore Van Halen's storied career, from their electrifying performances to the making of their timeless hits. Get to know the band members, their inspirations, and the stories behind the songs that have rocked generations. But that's not all – tune in for exciting giveaways where you can win exclusive Van Halen merchandise and more. Whether you're a die-hard fan or just discovering the magic of Van Halen, this show promises to keep you entertained, informed, and rocking out from start to finish. Get ready to jump into the world of "Exclusively Van Halen" and experience the music like never before. We talk all things Van Halen! #vanhalen #johnnybeaneTV #eddievanhalen #alexvanhalen #exclusivelyvanhalen

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you'll hear the Court's opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v Goldsmith. In this case, the court considered this issue: What is the proper test for whether a work is “transformative” under the first factor of the Copyright Act's fair use doctrine? The case was decided on May 18, 2023. The Supreme Court held that he “purpose and character” of the Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF)'s particular commercial use of Lynn Goldsmith's photograph of the musician Prince does not favor AWF's fair use defense to copyright infringement. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the 7-2 majority opinion of the Court. The fair use defense to copyright infringement promotes creativity by recognizing that some secondary works make unauthorized use of original works but serve a different purpose, add new expression, or convey new ideas. Andy Warhol's “Orange Prince,” one of the Prince Series that was derived from the photograph by Lynn Goldsmith, appeared on the cover of a Vanity Fair magazine commemorating the late musician for a fee of $10,000—all of which to AWF and of which Goldsmith received none. In contrast, Goldsmith's photographs were licensed and used on several other magazine covers commemorating Prince. AWF's use of Orange Prince on the cover of Vanity Fair served essentially the same commercial purpose as Goldsmith's original. Thus, the first fair-use factor—the purpose and character of use, including whether the use is for commercial or nonprofit purpose—weighs against the conclusion that AWF's use of Goldsmith's photograph for the specific purpose of a magazine cover commemorating Prince was fair. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined, emphasizing the narrowness of the majority's opinion and its appropriate focus on the specific use challenged. Justice Elena Kagan authored a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined, criticizing the majority of stifling creativity and disregarding the reality that creativity relies upon the borrowing of works that came before. Note: The Court's opinion here included pictures and paintings. Those images are not captured in this recording. I encourage you to find the opinion online and review the images referenced here. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.  --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scotus-opinions/support

For anyone familiar with the photo industry, the mammoth lawsuit between The Andy Warhol Foundation and renowned music photographer Lynn Goldsmith should be no secret. This complex battle over the rights to her 1981 portrait of the artist formerly known as Prince lasted seven years and went all the way to the Supreme Court.   But do you know the circumstances behind her original portrait session with the famously reserved musician, and were you aware of all the misinformation about this case that was disseminated in both legal documents and the press?   Lynn is a longtime friend of the show, and our 2017 episode about her extensive, long-term work with the band Kiss, among other crazy stories, was a fan favorite. We invited her back to discuss this case in 2022, when the Supreme Court first agreed to hear it, but heeding the advice of her legal counsel she wisely declined our offer at that time.    In May 2023, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled in Lynn's favor in a 7-2 decision, which has already been shown to benefit others seeking remedies for the misuse of their creative works.   Yet, while this landmark decision happened last year, the case itself was not officially resolved until very recently—Friday, March 15, 2024, to be exact—a day some might recognize as the Ides of March.   Now that the final resolution has been signed, sealed, and delivered, we felt it was a perfect opportunity for Lynn to give us a recap of this David vs Goliath battle, with all its complexities and underlying bias.   From details about the Fair Use doctrine, to the matter of copyright registration, to her thoughts about the current photographer community, to the importance of standing up for one's rights, Lynn provides a clear and insightful assessment of one of the most traumatic and threatening experiences that any independent artist can face, as only she can.   To her very core, Lynn believes creativity can make anything possible, an ideology she sums up aptly at the end of our chat.   “I felt like some higher power picked me for this,” she says. “And that I had to make myself feel like a 1940s film with Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, where there was going to be a happy ending, that everything would work out just fine, and that I was going to prevail.”   Guest: Lynn Goldsmith Top shot © Lynn Goldsmith   Episode Timeline: 2:50: The backstory to Lynn Goldsmith's 1981 photo session with Prince. 7:17: Shooting both color and black-and-white in the days of film, a separate camera for each option. 11:15: Vanity Fair's 1984 use of Lynn's black and white portrait for artist reference.   13:47: Lynn's discovery of the original image use after Prince died in 2016.  19:50: The value of saving detailed records of licensing agreements for future reference. 23:14: The preemptive lawsuit the Andy Warhol Foundation filed against Lynn, and the misinformation contained in the Federal court filing. 32:15: Lynn discusses the Fair Use doctrine and the matter of copyright registration in relation to her case. 36:43: Episode Break 38:04: Meeting with the Andy Warhol Foundation and the deal on offer to resolve the lawsuit. 44:40: Lynn's thoughts about the current photographer community and the importance of standing up for your rights. 48:09: The multiple rounds of the Prince portrait lawsuit, from the first Federal case to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court. 56:29: Uneven reporting about the lawsuit in the press, with the photo press being fearful to write anything, and the art press releasing misinformation without fact checks. 1:00:27: Behind the scenes at the Supreme Court hearing, the effects of the 7 – 2 decision, as well as Justice Kagan's written opinion. 1:08:48: Lynn's thoughts about generative AI. Guest Bio: Lynn Goldsmith is a multi-awarded portrait photographer whose work has appeared on and in between the covers of top magazines worldwide. Her subjects have varied from entertainment to sports, film directors to authors, and from top celebrities to the ordinary man on the street. Her forty years of photography are both an investigation into the nature of the human spirit, as well as the natural wonders of our planet. As the author of 12 major photo books, Lynn's images are also featured in numerous museum collections, yet her professional achievements are in no way limited to the world of photography. She is the youngest member ever accepted into the Director's Guild of America (DGA), where she achieved several firsts—from the first rock show on network television to the first music documentary released as a theatrical short, and more. In the mid-seventies, Lynn stopped directing to concentrate fully on photography. By the early 80s, she departed from both photography and film, to become the first ‘optic-music' artist. Using the a.k.a. Will Powers, she produced the album "Dancing for Mental Health" on Island Records. Her debut album won critical acclaim and her single, Kissing with Confidence, reached #3 on the British charts. The wide range of Lynn's talents, skills and achievements are products of a belief she holds constant: Creativity is based on breaking limiting thought patterns, thus making anything possible.   Stay Connected: Lynn Goldsmith's Website: https://lynngoldsmith.com/menu.html Rock and Roll Photo Gallery Website: https://rockandrollphotogallery.com/ Lynn Goldsmith's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lynngoldsmith/ Lynn Goldsmith's Twitter: https://twitter.com/goldsmithphoto Lynn Goldsmith's Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lynngoldsmithartist/ Lynn Goldsmith's YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@lynn-goldsmith/ Lynn Goldsmith's GoFundMe Campaign Lynn Goldsmith's Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Goldsmith Pelican 1510TP Carry-On Case: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1241003-REG/pelican_015100_0050_110_1510tp_carry_on_case_with.html

Artificial intelligence is the most important technological tool being developed today, but the use of preexisting copyrighted works to train these AI systems is deeply controversial. At the end of 2023 the New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging that OpenAI's use of articles from the New York Times to train their ChatGPT large language model constitutes copyright infringement. An answer is due at the end of February, and it's expected the case will revolve on the question of whether the use of the copyrighted content of the Times was a fair use. The fair use analysis will likely turn on whether the use of copyrighted content to train a AI system "transforms" the work in a way which makes the use fair. The Supreme Court has spoken on this question twice recently, holding that Google's use of parts of Oracle's Java programming language to build the Android operating system was transformative, but that the licensing of a Andy Warhol work based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith was not transformative of Goldsmith's work. Also important and perhaps most on-point is a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that Google's Image Search system is transformative of the photographs it indexes and displays as thumbnails.To help understand this case Professors Charles Duan from the American University Washington College of Law and Zvi Rosen of the Simmons School of Law at Southern Illinois University was joined by Steven Tepp of Sentinel Worldwide, who is also a Lecturer at the George Washington University School of Law and formerly of the U.S. Copyright Office. John Moran of Holland & Knight moderated the panel and provided additional perspective.

Copyright law is complicated, especially when it comes to visual art. So there was a lot of fanfare around the Supreme Court's May ruling involving a celebrity portrait photographer, the pop artist Andy Warhol, and an orange silk screen of the late musician Prince. Would the decision give us some clarity around what's ‘infringing' in the world of appropriation art? Lauryn Guttenplan, former deputy general counsel for the Smithsonian, walks us through some high-profile copyright cases from the past, as well as the Supreme Court's decision. See the artwork we discussed: Obama “Hope” Portrait by Shepard Fairey, original photo by Mannie Garcia “Canal Zone” Collage by Richard Prince, original photo by Patrick Cariou “Orange Prince” by Andy Warhol Prince Portrait by Lynn Goldsmith

Welcome. My guest this episode is artist and photographer Lynn Goldsmith. Her career as a photographer has brought her into the orbit of rock n roll legends like Bob Dylan, The Rolling Stones, Michael Jackson, and notably Bruce Springsteen with whom she had a romantic relationship in the 70s as he was still working his way up, with his blistering live shows, and the relentlessly determined creative drive which produced the album Darkness On The Edge Of Town. Her document of this era forms the basis of a new coffee table book published by Taschen entitled “Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band: Darkness on the Edge of Town”. She's had an incredible life: working with Elektra Records in the late 60s, co-managing Grand Funk Railroad in the early 70s, and releasing music under the name of Will Powers in the early 80s. She's also worked in other mediums of art and her photographs have graced album and magazine covers. Lynn joined me from Nashville to talk about her new book and her career in general. We had a great chat. Hope you enjoy it.  Instagram: @sendingsignalspodcastX: @signalspodcast

Episode 417 of the Lens Shark Photography Podcast In This Episode If you subscribe to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast, please take a moment to rate and review us to help make it easier for others to discover the show. Sponsors: - Build Your Legacy with Fujifilm - Shop with the legends at RobertsCamera.com, and unload your gear with UsedPhotoPro.com - Get 20% OFF with code SHARKY20 at BenroUSA.com - Get 20% OFF with code SHARKY20 at KupoGrip.com - More mostly 20% OFF codes at LensShark.com/deals. Stories: Sony's groundbreaking new a9 III with a global shutter. (#) A wedding photographer gets the green light to discriminate. (#) Finally a 300mm f/2.8 for Sony E. (#) Lynn Goldsmith's win cost her well over $2.5 million. (#) Sony finally buckles on the firmware issue for older bodies. (#) Really Right Stuff introduces a universal L-plate. (#) NanLite's new PavoSlim LED panels. (#)   Connect With Us Thank you for listening to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast! Connect with me, Sharky James on Twitter, Instagram Vero, and Facebook (all @LensShark).

Staci's guest is the incredibly talented and legendary musician and vocalist, Mark Farner. He is a founding member of the original Grand Funk Railroad and a platinum recording artist. You know and love him from classic rock staples like “I'm Your Captain” (Closer to Home)” “We're An American Band” and “Heartbreaker.” He's also in Staci's documentary, “The Ventures: Stars on Guitars.” As 2023 closes out, Mark has three big projects that he's working on and releasing—a re-discovered concert from 1989, Farner's chords instructional guitar playing videos, and a new album that's produced by Mark Slaughter. He also discusses Lynn Goldsmith's creative influence on GFR, the magic of the cowbell, and shares his own personal rock & roll nightmare!

Photographer Lynn Goldsmith has a new book about the E Street Band. We discuss Bruce and so much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 1981, photographer Lynn Goldsmith took a portrait of the musician Prince. It's a pretty standard headshot — it's in black-and-white, and Prince is staring down the camera lens.This was early in his career, when he was still building the pop icon reputation he would have today. And in 1984, shortly after Prince had released Purple Rain, he was chosen to grace the cover of Vanity Fair. The magazine commissioned pop culture icon Andy Warhol to make a portrait of Prince for the cover. He used Lynn Goldsmith's photo, created a silkscreen from it, added some artistic touches, and instead of black-and-white, colored the face purple and set it against a red background. Warhol was paid, Goldsmith was paid, and both were given credit.However, years later, after both Prince and Warhol had passed away, Goldsmith saw her portrait back out in the world again. But this time, the face was orange, and Goldsmith wasn't given money or credit. And what began as a typical question of payment for work, led to a firestorm in the Supreme Court. At the center of it, dozens of questions of what makes art unique. And at what point does a derivative work become transformative? The answer, it seems, has to do less with what art critics think, and more with what the market thinks.Help support Planet Money and get bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit nealkatyal.substack.comAndy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. Goldsmith et al. is a landmark 2023 Supreme Court decision concerning copyright law and the “fair use” exception. We have two amazing guests in conversation to discuss it. Adam Weinberg is the Director of the Whitney Museum, and the smartest person about art that I know. Deborah Kass is a brilliant artist, and some of her most famous work plays on Warhol. They are the ideal guests to discuss how this decision will transform the art world — and guide us through a vicious debate between Justice Sotomayor (for the majority) and Justice Kagan (for the dissent, joined by Chief Justice Roberts).To understand what's going on, first know that the Copyright Act gives artists a number of rights intended to preserve and promote creative expression. Included among these are the right to reproduce copyrighted work, the right to create derivative works, and the right to display copyrighted work in a public setting.However, artists do not have absolute control over their work. In 1976, Congress passed a law stating that the use of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching…scholarship, or research” is not an infringement of copyright. This is known as the “fair use” exception to the Copyright Act.To determine if a piece qualities as “fair use,” the statute offers four factors for consideration: “The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; the nature of the copyrighted work; the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and; the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.” If a new piece of art alters an original work to such an extreme that, under factor one, the “purpose and character” of the new piece is altogether different from the original, it is said to be “transformative.”Enter Andy Warhol. In 1984, Vanity Fair commissioned Warhol to create a portrait of Prince for their magazine cover. The portrait was to be based on a photo taken by photographer Lynn Goldsmith; Vanity Fair had paid Goldsmith $400 for the photo and agreed to use it only for the cover of the magazine. However, Warhol went on to create 15 separate portraits of Prince, each of which used the photo as inspiration. In 2016, the Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF) sold Condé Nast the rights to one of these portraits. Goldsmith received no compensation, and when she heard about the transaction, she demanded payment. AWF responded by launching a lawsuit. You can see Goldsmith's original photo on the right, and what Warhol did on the left.AWF argued that Warhol's rendition of Prince (titled Orange Prince) was so transformative that, under the first factor for fair use, the portrait acquired an entirely new “purpose and character” and was therefore legal. Lawyers for Goldsmith disagreed. Thus, the decision centered around one, key question: Did the sale of Warhol's portrait of Prince make fair use of Goldsmith's photograph, particularly with respect to factor one of the Copyright Act's “fair use” exception?Writing for a 7-2 majority, Justice Sotomayor held that the Warhol Foundation committed copyright infringement when, in 2016, it sold the rights to a Warhol work (based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith) without compensating Goldsmith. In a blistering dissent, Justice Kagan argued that the Majority Opinion would have chilling effects on the creative process, limiting artists, musicians, writers, and others in their ability to create new and inspired works.I'm thrilled that listeners will get to hear Deborah Kass, one of the greatest living artists, and someone whose work appropriates Warhol (who in turn is appropriating others). This is the Red Deb of her's that we discuss in the episode:While it is too early to know exactly how the Supreme Court's Warhol decision will play out, many experts see the case as a shift in the world of copyright law, opening the floodgates to more lawsuits and potentially hindering artistic creation across the country. It will be a fascinating next few years for copyright.One last thing: I'm well aware that it's hard to just listen to this episode without seeing the pictures. Next week's copyright episode will be about music, not pictures, with the great guitarist and most sought after music writer today, Aaron Dessner. Together, they will give you a comprehensive look at how copyright law is impacting our lives, every day. For all the written materials about the case, along with pictures and the full written opinion, and a bonus discussion with Deb and Adam, become a subscriber to Courtside at nealkatyal.substack.com.

The law protects creators' original work against copycats, but it also leaves the door open for some kinds of copying. When a photographer sues the Andy Warhol Foundation for using her work without permission, the justices struggle not to play art critics as they decide the case. More Perfect explores how this star-studded case offers a look at how this Court actually makes decisions. Voices in the episode include: • David Hobbs — known as Mr. Mixx, co-founder of the hip-hop group 2 Live Crew • Jerry Saltz — senior art critic and columnist for New York magazine • Pierre Leval — judge on U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit • Jeannie Suk Gersen — More Perfect legal advisor, Harvard Law professor, New Yorker writer • Lynn Goldsmith — photographer • Andy Warhol — as himself Learn more: • 1994: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. • 2023: Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith • "Toward A Fair Use Standard" by Pierre Leval • The Andy Warhol Foundation   Shadow dockets, term limits, amicus briefs — what puzzles you about the Supreme Court? What stories are you curious about? We want to answer your questions in our next season. Click here to leave us a voice memo. Supreme Court archival audio comes from Oyez®, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. Click here to donate to More Perfect. Support for More Perfect is provided in part by The Smart Family Fund. Follow us on Instagram, Threads and Facebook @moreperfectpodcast, and X (Twitter) @moreperfect.

Picture this: A courageous photographer significantly impacts the estate of a world-renowned artist. Welcome to our deep dive into the landmark Supreme Court ruling in favor of veteran photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the iconic Andy Warhol Foundation. Our guest, attorney Aaron Stark,  brings his legal prowess to analyze this transformative case that could alter the landscape of copyright law for artists around the globe.Entering the murky waters of art and copyright infringement, we unpack the labyrinthine twists and turns of the Warhol Foundation v. Lynn Goldsmith case with Aaron Stark's expert interpretation. Together, we explore the judgment, its potential implications, and the significant role it will play in defining the parameters of fair use for future artists. Are you mindful of the power dynamics in the art world and the complexities of copyright law? This episode illuminates these aspects in a way that's both enlightening and empowering for all creatives.We conclude our exploration by underscoring the crucial role of photographers in asserting their rights in cases of copyright infringement. Uncover the intricate dance between photography copyright and celebrity rights and loop in on the importance of registering copyrights. We also set the stage for an exciting discussion on the intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law in our upcoming episode. Don't miss out on this riveting discourse on the ever-evolving world of art, law, and technology.Support the show

New eps are on our Patreon first! Frieze art fair (2:02), the miracles of Ozempic (9:34), hopepunk vs grimdark (15:32), Lynn Goldsmith (26:03), NYC weed stores aesthetics (33:02), Horses scandle (46:44), are we going to Bluesky? (57:33), Doc finally canned and Sixers optimism (1:03:34), Celtics down bad (1:14:33), Nuggets vs Lakers (1:31:23), Wemby to the Spurs (1:48:42).

In a copyright case closely watched by content creators, the U.S. Supreme Court held, 7-2, that the first fair use factor—“the purpose and character of the use” —weighed against Andy Warhol's use of Lynn Goldsmith's black-and-white photograph of Prince to create a colorful silk-screen illustration of the musician that was later licensed to Vanity Fair without Goldsmith's consent. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, first explained that courts analyzing the first fair use factor should balance “the degree to which the use has a further purpose or different character” against the “nature of the use,” whether commercial or nonprofit. Under that rubric, the Court next found that even though Warhol's illustration “adds new expression to Goldsmith's photograph,” the first fair use factor favored Goldsmith because the works shared “substantially the same commercial purpose”—Goldsmith's photograph and Warhol's illustration were both “portraits of Prince used to depict Prince in magazine stories about Prince.”

2023. Június 28., szerda - 8-9 óra MÁGIKUS “E” Magyarország első lakossági BNPL szolgáltatója. Az IzzyPay Magyarország első lakossági BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later – Vásárolj most, fizess később) szolgáltatója. Segítségével a vásárlók úgy tudják megrendelni, kipróbálni a termékeket, hogy azokért 14 napig nem kell fizetniük és kártyaadataikat sem szükséges megadniuk. A szolgáltatást webáruházak vehetik fel kínálatukba, így kínálva előnyös fizetési feltételeket ügyfeleiknek, növelve saját értékesítési lehetőségeiket. Farkas Róbert, az IzzyPay Zrt. vezérigazgatója. ARANYKÖPÉS: Az a pénz, amely a tiéd, a szabadságod eszköze, míg az a pénz, amelyet hajszolsz, a szolgájává tesz. -  Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a francia felvilágosodás filozófusa (1712).  GONDOLKODOM, TEHÁT VAGYON Andy Warhol Prince-ről készült sorozata szerzői jogokat sértett. Az Egyesült Államok Legfelsőbb Bírósága Lynn Goldsmith fotográfus javára döntött, és kimondta, hogy Warhol azzal, hogy az ő fotográfiáját használta fel a Prince-ről készült sorozatához, megsértette Goldsmith szerzői jogait. Nálunk ez hogy zajlik? Mit szabad, mit nem? Mi lenne, ha ez itt történne? Sulyok Ádám, az SZTNH szerzői jogi főosztályvezetője. PIACI HOTSPOT: A Porsche tőzsdei cégként az első közgyűlését kezdi Stuttgartban - a vezérigazgató és tulajdonos elsősorban az osztalék javaslatot vitatja meg. A tavalyi év kimondottan jól sikerült a Porschének, további növekedést várnak idénre. Közben a VW papírjai estek nagyobbat. A Tesla indiai terveiről beszélt Elon Musk. Baráth Tibor, Erste Befektetési Zrt. vezető üzletkötője.

In a copyright case closely watched by content creators, the U.S. Supreme Court held, 7-2, that the first fair use factor—“the purpose and character of the use” —weighed against Andy Warhol's use of Lynn Goldsmith's black-and-white photograph of Prince to create a colorful silk-screen illustration of the musician that was later licensed to Vanity Fair without Goldsmith's consent. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, first explained that courts analyzing the first fair use factor should balance “the degree to which the use has a further purpose or different character” against the “nature of the use,” whether commercial or nonprofit. Under that rubric, the Court next found that even though Warhol's illustration “adds new expression to Goldsmith's photograph,” the first fair use factor favored Goldsmith because the works shared “substantially the same commercial purpose”—Goldsmith's photograph and Warhol's illustration were both “portraits of Prince used to depict Prince in magazine stories about Prince.”

First off, thank you for the lovely messages of support. We hear from Harry Waters, Scott Tournet, Kaz PS, Nate Kalwicki, Austin Loman, Keith Grasso, Charlie Lentz, Ciri, Cam, and Charlie Kline, Alex Kline, Katie Stover & Erik Lenhart! (Thanks to Jay's impressive networking acumen, we also had some, somewhat enthusiastic messages from Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Dr. Hibbert & even King Charles III!)Greg kicks things off with a remembrance for Tina Turner, who passed at the age of 83 late last month. Then we hear about the latest album from Greg's latest favorite new band, Sleep Token. Take Me Out To Eden, their third album, came out in mid-May and has only Songs: Tina Turner - “Heard It Through the Grapevine”Tina Turner & Bryan Adams - “It's Only Love”Sleep Token - “Ascensionism”Jay recently emerged from the haze of his first Dead & Company concert at Jiffy Lube Live and has vague recollections to share on our latest episode of “Tales From The Concert.” Dragged along by friend of the show Kresimir, Jay braved the lone road to Bristow. Inch by inch he crawled through the concert traffic, walking a mile to and from the concert. In the end, all that remained was exhaustion and fond memories of Bob Weir's song ending. We get to hear a clip of John Mayor tearing it up and celebrate Jay's first step into his eventual conversion to the jam band genre.Song: Dead & Company - “Throwing Stones”Finally, Nick has been dying to follow up on a story from episode 167 about the Supreme Court's decision affecting creativity and fair use. To recap, Conde Nast licensed photographs of Prince from photographer Lynn Goldsmith for a Vanity Fair article in 1984. Andy Warhol used the photograph as inspiration for his Prince series and Conde Nast licensed one of those images for 2016 remembrance of the late artist & litigation ensued. In the end, the court decided that the Warhol Foundation was not within the Fair Use guidelines because it was competing directly with Goldsmith's photographs for magazine use. It feels like a very narrow decision and the implications will take years to affect future litigation, but it seems like a fair balance to the guys.Song: Cory Wong - “Flyers Direct”

On May 18, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of rock and roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith in a dispute between Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation regarding Warhol's works based on Goldsmith's photo of the musician Prince. The fair use doctrine excuses from liability certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works, and the question before the Court was whether Warhol's creation of a series of paintings copied from the photo, and the licensure of those paintings to periodicals, constituted a fair use. In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled that it did not.Intellectual property law professor Zvi Rosen, who filed an amicus brief in the case in support of Goldsmith, joined us to break down the decision and answer audience questions.Featuring:- Zvi Rosen, Assistant Professor, Southern Illinois University School of Law

CMU's Andy Malt and Chris Cooke review key events in music and the music business from the last week, including the US Supreme Court ruling on a long-running copyright dispute between the Andy Warhol Foundation and the photographer Lynn Goldsmith, and Universal getting into bed with AI music company Endel. SECTION TIMES 01: Prince (00:06:30) 02: AI Music (00:23:37) (Timings may be slightly different due to adverts) STORIES DISCUSSED THIS WEEK • Music industry welcomes US Supreme Court ruling in Prince artwork copyright case • Universal Music allies with music AI company Endel to create some “science-backed soundscapes” ALSO MENTIONED • TikTok sues Montana over ban • CMU Podcast: Sound Of 2017, AI in music, Kate Bush (December 2016) MORE FROM CMU • Upcoming CMU webinars • Buy MMF and CMU Insights' Dissecting The Digital Dollar book on Amazon • Sign up to receive the CMU Daily news bulletin • Listen to the full Setlist theme tune

Gary has a busy week launching headshot tools, Booray ponders the headshot photographer's phenomenon. The fellas discuss losing balance on skateboards, sharing nudes, and potty parties. In Photography News, Fujifilm xs20, Fujifilm 8mm f3.5 super wide lens, Canon EOS R100, Canon 28mm f2.8 pancake lens, the Fujifilm App, Nikon Z8, a win for photographer Lynn Goldsmith, and Ed Sheeran.Headshot Tools WebinarEmail: support@headshottools.com Check out Gary's YouTube channel HERE.Check out Booray's YouTube channel HERE.Join our Facebook Group, the Bombardiers Lounge

The Court treated us to an assortment of nude pictures this week.  The occasion was a copyright case featuring the works of Andy Warhol and the photography of Lynn Goldsmith, and the persona of the late artist Prince.  To enlighten us on the intricacies and melodies of copyright law and history, we bring the premier scholar in the field to our podcast - Professor James Boyle of Duke.  The result is a far-ranging discussion ranging from Plato to Creative Commons, the latter an achievement due in no small part to Professor Boyle's efforts.  As for the case, it might be more important than the Court wants it to be, and we will tell you why.

Intellectual property and copyright laws are something that should interest anyone who is involved in the photography industry. The digital age has made it easier and easier for artistic work to be disseminated and copied.  In recent years, theSupreme Court has been hearing more and more intellectual property cases and this week they sent down a decision ruling against the Andy Warhol Foundation in a copyright infringement case versus photographer Lynn Goldsmith. However, does the decision make the sometimes murky waters of 'fair use' and 'transformative' works any clearer? What will the impact of the ruling be? What should photographers know about intellectual property law and copyright infringement? You can click here to check out the SCOTUS decision, which includes Justice Kagan's dissenting opinion complete with visual examples and references to other art forms to clarify her points. About My Guest Jessica Silbey is a professor of law at Boston University. She teaches and writes in the areas of intellectual property, constitutional law, and law and the humanities. In her book, Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age, "Professor Silbey considers intellectual property debates in law and culture as a bellwether of changing social justice needs in the 21st century. The book argues that intellectual property law is becoming a central framework through which to discuss essential socio-political issues, extending ancient debates over our most cherished constitutional values, refiguring the substance of “progress” in terms that demonstrate the urgency of art and science to social justice today." Promos Siteground Website Hosting - https://nerdyphotographer.com/recommends/siteground Free 30 day trial of Audible - https://audibletrial.com/nerdyphoto Get Social With Us! Instagram - https://instagram.com/thenerdyphoto Tiktok - https://tiktok.com/@thenerdyphoto Twitter - https://twitter.com/thenerdyphoto Facebook - https://facebook.com/NerdyPhotographer Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/user/thenerdyphoto Support the Podcast There are many ways you can support The Nerdy Photographer Podcast: Subscribe on your favorite podcast platform! Use our affiliate link to buy from Amazon - if you are going to be there anyway, help us out Shop our store for photography resources - from contracts to prompts and more! Buy Nerdy Photographer merchandise - this stuff makes you look both cool and nerdy! Make a Donation - just because you want to show us how much you care Share Your Thoughts With Us! Want to weigh in on this topic? Or perhaps tell us what you would like to hear covered on a future episode? Leave us a voice message at https://nerdyphotographer.com/contact and tell us what you think!

What is the proper test is for determining whether a work is “transformative” under the first factor of the Copyright Act's fair use doctrine? Audio of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Lynn Goldsmith(May 18, 2023) Music by Epidemic Sound

What is the proper test is for determining whether a work is “transformative” under the first factor of the Copyright Act's fair use doctrine? Audio of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Lynn Goldsmith (May 18, 2023)   Music by Epidemic Sound

In 1981, the rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith did a photoshoot with an up-and-coming singer songwriter called Prince. A few years later, he became a superstar, and she licenced one of her photos to Vanity Fair to be used as a reference picture for an illustration. That portrait, known as “Purple Prince” was painted by Andy Warhol. But what Lynn Goldsmith didn't know, and nor did anyone else, was that Warhol made multiple portraits from her photograph. After Prince died in 2016, Vanity Fair licenced a different one of these portraits from the Andy Warhol Foundation for a tribute in the magazine. That picture was called the “Orange Prince”. When Lynn Goldsmith saw this new portrait, she asserted her copyright – and so did the Andy Warhol Foundation. The US Supreme Court, is now trying to decide whether the photo was “transformed” when Warhol painted it, and what constitutes “fair use”. It's a case with vast implications for artists, photographers, galleries and the art business. So this week on the Inquiry, we're asking: why are Warhol's Prince works before the US Supreme Court? Presenter: Charmaine Cozier Producer: Ravi Naik Editor: Tara McDermott Researcher: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty Broadcast co-ordinators : Sophie Hill and Siobhan Reed (Photo: Prince Rogers Nelson Credit: ©️ 1981 Lynn Goldsmith)

Fair Use? What's that? This legal battle between the Andy Warhol Foundation and photographer Lynn Goldsmith has made it all the way to the Supreme Court and could have impacts across the art world and beyond.View this week's show notes.

To read Sandra Enimil's Blog from Harvard's celebration of Fair Use Week that is referenced in this podcast episode, go here: https://blogs.harvard.edu/copyrightosc/2023/02/22/fair-use-week-2023-10th-anniversary-day-three-with-guest-expert-sandra-aya-enimil/ Sara: So, welcome. This is a live version of the copyright chat with Sandra Enimil from Yale University Library. We are here, and celebrating Fair Use Week. Welcome. Sandra: Da, da! That's the trumpet sounding. Sara: Very exciting. It's the tenth anniversary of Fair Use Week. I'm super excited, and I'm even more jazzed because we have a pending Supreme Court case. Sandra: Very exciting! Sara: Tell us about it. Tell us what you think about it. What do you think about it? Sandra: Alright! So the case is Warhol v. Goldsmith, and it is a very exciting case, I mean. There's the thing of there being, two artists, you know, who are being, you know, not being pit, but they are pit against each other, and a third artist, you know, is the subject of the photograph of which you know one of them, you know made it.  I think it's a really very beautiful photo of Prince. And then it became an Andy Warhol—Andy Warhol treated series of full of photographs and paintings, and whatever. The original photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, then, you know, finds out that you know this image has been “Warholized” basically. And you know, contacts of Warhol Foundation to say, this is my image using my image. What's going on? Nobody's asked for permission. Nobody has a license, and the Warhol Foundation says it's fair use. Actually, we're gonna go to court and get the court to say that it's fair use. We're just, you know, you know. You go away. Goldsmith does not go away, and she, you know it, you know, pursues it. And now we're at the Supreme Court waiting to see, like what the court is gonna say about is this fair use? You know we heard, I think, at in the hearing, the oral arguments we heard, you know, transformative being tossed around. We heard questions about why this particular image? Why didn't Warhol, you know, take his own image. Interestingly, you know, we don't hear anything about Vanity Fair, who they license the image, and then they just gave it to Warhol and said, Hey, do your thing with this and he didn't like not even mention anymore. That is like, so how that works. Okay? They license it right? Sara: That's an interesting point, because they licensed it for the 1985 version. Sandra: Right, right. Sara: They knew they didn't have another license, but you know we know why, right? It's the deep pockets, and they're going for the deep pockets and Warhol made all the money off of it right? Sandra: Like, who is right, who has a deep pocket? Right? Yeah, Warhol made all the money. Sara: Not Vanity Fair. Sandra: Warhol made all the money. Yeah, yeah. So yeah. Sandra: So you know I and I still like it not even sure how I feel about the whole thing. I am, you know, really kind of like is, this is, is, is it not? Is it fair? Is it, you know, like thinking a lot about it? And I, it's actually it's like this, I'm going into a tangent. So apologies. But Kyle Courtney host, the Harvard's that has a fair use blog for on Harvard's system, and you know, every year he asks folks to write something about fair use and I was just like kind of struggling with what I wanted to write about and decided, okay, I'm gonna write about this case. But kind of not really. So writing about something that's real tangential. Again, and it's about the use of likeness. So it's about it's basically about Prince. It's about subjects and photos, and they're people's ability to say, yes. So certain things happening with images that you know contain their likeness and then I'm gonna find a way to loop that back around the fair use at some point tonight, while I'm you know, finishing it up and crying. You know as you do as a forget procrastinator. But I just you know I've just been thinking a little about that about the use of his likeness, and how this is the set. It's the center of the dispute, but he's not really even part of it. Much like Vanity Fair. Like he's not even part of this, I mean the considerations around him is not really a part of it. Sara: Yeah. The part where I saw him come into it the most frankly was during the oral argument, where there were weird ways, one where people were joking about whether they, the Supreme Court justices, listened to Prince. Like what? And then also because one of the arguments about the transformative nature of the work was that the original photograph was supposed to be vulnerable right, and that the new photo by Warhol was meant to like be like pop culture and like commercialism and all this. So that was like the transformativeness arguably. Sandra: Right and that's what the you know. So his side is trying to try to make that argument of that. They needed this photo. They need because it's an early photo of him. And they needed to use that, because, of course, the common is like, why can't you use to use anything else or take up another photo of him? Or you know as Warhol has done in the past. He's taken his own photos, and then, you know, done his. The extra process that he does to things, or paid for licenses, which he's also done before. And so they're like, well, why this photo? Because you could have done anything else. And so that, yeah, that was their response was that it had to be this one because of the reasoning of the original, and how it looked and presented. Sara: But I, okay, I I know you're presenting it, as this is what they're arguing. Sandra: That's what they're arguing. Sara: But like the extent that they made the comparison, I really bought this comparison, which was they made the comparison to this Campbell soup cans right and saying like, Oh, well, why do you do it? Of Campbell's soup. He could have done it for Cheerios. He could have done it. It's like, yeah. But he wanted to do that brand, because that was the brand that was like comfort comforting like, you see, it. And you're like your kids sick, and you gotta buy them like the Campbell's soup right? Sandra: Yeah. Sara:  And like that was the that was what he was going for, and same thing like he could have gone for another image could have gone for another artist. Sandra: Yeah. Yes. Sara: But he didn't want to. This is what he was doing. And like also, are we seriously going to start telling artists like Warhol? Which brand they should critique like a you know what I mean like it's I don't know like I'm not. I don't wanna be in that business. Sandra: I don't know. So the thing that's like awful, you know, I cause I like, I said. I have been all over the place with this, too, and like listening to a bunch of different commentary about it. And I'm just like, you know, Warhol and Goldsmith. They're both white, but one is a woman, and one is a man, and I like thinking about like the dynamics of that. You know that he feels like he could just take this thing from her there, you know I'm you know. That's in there and then also, like, you know, Prince, like I said, he's just he's just there, kinda you know, like he's not, you know, not even getting like the prints like it's Prince kind of thing. It's just he's just there, you know, as the black artist, you know. So I just I don't know. I have like so many things that are circling around in my brain, rattling around. Sara:  I like that. Our, I mean, I hadn't thought of that point of like the gendered point, and also the fact that, like, you know, she really didn't get it paid a lot right. Sandra: No Nope. She didn't get paid. She didn't get paid a lot, and then it's like when she goes to say, Hey, what's happening here? There isn't like, Okay, maybe. Or maybe there was I don't know we don't know about. I don't know that, you know. They didn't offer her something. Maybe they did. But you know what we know from like the filings that they came and said, we want the court to tell us that what we did was okay. And I'm just like I don't know. I'm kind of struggling with that, you know. Sara: But that's where. Okay, yes, but that's how every good, fair use case happens, isn't it? I mean, like. Sandra: You know, I know I'm on pins and needles and like know how it, how it, how it's gonna end up right? You know. Sara: Well, I also wonder. And I really, really do wonder this, how it could or would impact libraries at all. And I said this about the second circuit opinion, where they said, like, you can't change art into art. That's not transformative and my response to that is well, you know, libraries aren't really in the business of making art so. But if they start making new transformative decisions, right decisions about the purpose and character that could impact us a lot. So it depends on what they have to say. Right? I'm back to. It depends. Sandra: I mean, I think, like the how we sometimes get stuck with transformation is like, we think it has to be like a whole new thing. And I think for a lot of the work that we do. You know. Obviously, it's not everything, but for a lot of it. It's not transformative. It's like kind of working in the same direction as the original thing. But you know we have a smaller audience, or we're only using this. A portion of it, you know there are a number of other things that really help us if we don't have that transformative piece of it from the first factor. But yeah, I also don't know how it will impact us. We're not alone in that.  I think in a lot of the amicus briefs that kinda went around, you know, at least from the library perspective. It was like, we're just concerned. We don't. We're not saying which way to go, but you know we're watching. Sara: Yeah, it's kinda like, do no harm right like, do no harm.  Supreme Court like you can decide what you need to just leave us out of this. Sandra: Yeah, please please don't ruin the Fair Use part and make it very against, but worthless to libraries.  Do I think, you know, there's definitely especially with, like, you know, this particular Supreme Court, like, what are they gonna do you know? And the thing about oral arguments is like it doesn't give you anything like you just are listening. And it's interesting and blah blah blah, but they never. They're not really showing their hand. Sara: Sometimes they do, but I felt like in this case it was hard to tell. It was very hard to tell. Sandra: Sometimes. Yeah, yeah. It was hard to tell. It was hard to. Yeah. It was hard to tell from this from these arguments, though very interesting, though. Sara: Yeah, it'll be. It'll be super interesting, I mean, no matter what happens, I'll be interested to read the case and to try to understand it, and then to like, look at the tea leaves and try to see what impact it might have it's it will inevitably have some impact. Because I mean, look at the Campbell. The last case that we had with the Roy Orbison on fair use so long ago, I mean, that has had a massive impact. Sandra: Yeah. Sara: So I do agree with the first, do no harm. Yeah, but you know, yeah, I mean, cause you know, Campbell give gives us, you know, the articulation of transformation. Sandra: And but you know, I think it's interesting that we go to the Supreme Court. It gives us transformation. But in hip, hop, you know there was where it should have been like a whole bunch of folks like, okay, so we can sample and like the things. And that actually didn't happen. How they go interesting. Yeah, cause you would have thought that people, you know, we transformative. This, you know, came out and helped a lot of other at industries along with the music, industry and hip hop in particular, where it shows have been the case where. Now rely on and say and talk about. I'm making a comment about this, so I can go ahead and sample this. It didn't turn out that way and went a different tact, which I think is really fascinating. Sara: Yeah. I wonder why that is. Maybe that's a difference in the community. Sandra: Oh, yeah, for sure. And you know, maybe one day when I can invent more time, I'll write something about that. I mean, a lot of people like thought about it and mentioned it, but I really wanna know, like, why, why not? Sara: I think you should do that sooner rather than later, for a special issue that's coming up, that I might know something about. I see what you're saying, and like I've had conversations with. So a friend of mine is married to a jazz artist, and like that's another area where, like jazz artists like, they steal from each other all the time, and nobody like gets mad about it, because it's just part of the culture. And that's the culture of it, right? Sandra: That's the culture of it. And yeah, I definitely think there is. There's something interesting about it. I think there's something interesting in, you know. Now we have, you know, mash-up artists. And yeah, some of them definitely license. And you know they are. You know they are licensing things, but not all of them. And they're not getting in trouble. Sara: Well, this has been so fun. And actually, I love the way this conversation went, because it was like just it just turned many ways as one does, and I I hope you all enjoyed listening to this podcast. Sandra, thank you so much for joining me for fair use. Week! It was such a blast, and may all your fair use adventures be risk-free. Sandra: Amen! Thank you. Sara: I really appreciate talking with you. Thank you. Sandra: Bye, everyone.

Lynn Goldsmith is an artist of many hats, painter of conceptional images, film director, even co-manager at one point for Grand Funk Railroad. But the reason we are thrilled to talk with Lynn today are the images she has created with her camera. There is not enough space to list the hundreds of museums, galleries and magazines that have featured her work, but let's just say that if you are a music fan, you have had the honor of viewing her artistry. She has fourteen published photography books, featuring artists like Bruce Springsteen, Patti Smith, KISS, and The Police. Her latest book is called Music In The 80s, so we are thrilled to welcome Lynn Goldsmith into our virtual studio. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lynn Goldsmith is an artist of many hats, painter of conceptional images, film director, even co-manager at one point for Grand Funk Railroad. But the reason we are thrilled to talk with Lynn today are the images she has created with her camera. There is not enough space to list the hundreds of museums, galleries and magazines that have featured her work, but let's just say that if you are a music fan, you have had the honor of viewing her artistry. She has fourteen published photography books, featuring artists like Bruce Springsteen, Patti Smith, KISS, and The Police. Her latest book is called Music In The 80s, so we are thrilled to welcome Lynn Goldsmith into our virtual studio. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lynn Goldsmith has documented over five decades of American culture, photographing stars from The Beatles and The Rolling Stones to David Bowie and Iggy Pop. She joins to talk about her legendary career behind the camera and new book, “Music in the ‘80s.”

Award-winning portrait and documentary photographer Lynn Goldsmith joins CBS News Vladimir Duthiers to discuss her new book, "Music in the '80s." Goldsmiith looks back at her career - switching gears from directing to managing bands before becoming an iconic photographer. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Award-winning portrait and documentary photographer Lynn Goldsmith joins CBS News Vladimir Duthiers to discuss her new book, "Music in the '80s." Goldsmiith looks back at her career - switching gears from directing to managing bands before becoming an iconic photographer. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Supreme Court is considering a lawsuit between rock and roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation regarding Warhol's works based on Goldsmith's photo of the musician Prince. The fair use doctrine excuses from liability certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works. The question before the Court in Warhol v. Goldsmith is whether Warhol's creation of a series of paintings copied from the photo, and the licensure of those paintings to periodicals, constitutes a fair use. Underlying the case are core intellectual property questions about the nature and scope of the fair use doctrine.Following oral arguments on October 12, Zvi Rosen, who filed an amicus brief in the case in support of the respondent (Goldsmith), joined us to break down the case.Featuring:Zvi Rosen, Assistant Professor, Southern Illinois University School of Law

Today on Boston Public Radio: We began the show by talking with listeners about the now ex-British Prime Minister Liz Truss, who served 45 days in office before stepping down. Rep. Ayanna Pressley discussed student debt forgiveness, and the current state of the MBTA after numerous safety issues. Andrea Cabral talked about the resignation of Woburn police officer John Donnelly after he was accused of helping plan the deadly 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, VA. Cabral is the former Suffolk County sheriff and secretary of public safety, and former CEO of the cannabis company Ascend. Paul Reville shared his thoughts on ongoing teachers' strikes in Haverhill. Reville is Massachusetts' former secretary of education and a professor at Harvard University's Graduate School of Education, where he also runs the Education Redesign Lab. Sue O'Connell talked about members of KPOP group BTS enlisting in South Korea's military for mandatory service, and the cancellation of numerous TV shows centering queer women. O'Connell is the co-publisher of Bay Windows and South End News, and contributor to Current on NBC LX and NECN. Jared Bowen explained the Supreme Court's debate over whether Andy Warhol stole famed artist Lynn Goldsmith's portrait of Prince. He also talked about MFABoston's exhibit on the photography of LIFE Magazine. Bowen is GBH's executive arts editor and the host of Open Studio. We ended the show by talking with listeners about talking with and smiling at strangers.

Nick kicks things off with a case from the current docket of the Supreme Court. “Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith” is the case of the photographer Lynn Goldsmith, whose photograph of Prince was licensed by Conde Nast exclusively for a cover photo (she kept the rights for any other licensing opportunities). Years later, Conde Nast commissioned Andy Warhol to do a series of Prince prints with the cover photo as their reference photograph. Goldsmith is suing because she argues the prints are too close to her original photograph and The Andy Warhol Foundation, which has made hundreds of millions in sales and licensing from the Prince prints, argues that it falls under fair use. So, per the SCOTUS blog, the decision comes down to “whether a work of art is “transformative” when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material” or whether a judge is allowed to make that interpretation. [NPR]Song: Frank Zappa - “San Ber'dino (Live In Ljubljana, November 22, 1975)”Greg found a great article from NPR by Nate Chinen suggesting a new genre for the class of prolific (often) jazz influenced musicians that have emerged as influencers on YouTube. “Viral jazz” was coined on Twitter by artist Vijay Iyer and includes artists such as Louis Cole, MonoNeon, DOMi & JD Beck, and Jacob Collier. Among other qualifications, Chinen asserts that the genre requires prolific chops and that the medium/channel that they broadcast on informs their process. It's a great read and we have a cool discussion about the concept, whether we like it and whether it'll stick.Song: Louis Cole - “Dead Inside Shuffle”Jay is back with a game to close out the show. The last time we played “Tag The Track,” Nick had his butt handed to him. This time around, Jay decided to try and help his odds by doing a “Drum Intros Only” edition. Greg & Nick listen to the first few seconds of a song that begins with a drum fill and have to guess the artist and song. Will Nick redeem his record when the clips feature only drums or is Greg just too strong to take down? You'll have to listen to find out…Song: Bill Callahan - “Natural Information”Episode 167 Page

The Supreme Court is considering a lawsuit between rock and roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation regarding Warhol’s works based on Goldsmith’s photo of the musician Prince. The fair use doctrine excuses from liability certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works. The question before the Court in Warhol v. Goldsmith is whether Warhol’s […]

The Supreme Court is considering a lawsuit between rock and roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation regarding Warhol's works based on Goldsmith's photo of the musician Prince. The fair use doctrine excuses from liability certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works. The question before the Court in Warhol v. Goldsmith is whether Warhol's creation of a series of paintings copied from the photo, and the licensure of those paintings to periodicals, constitutes a fair use. Underlying the case are core intellectual property questions about the nature and scope of the fair use doctrine.Following oral arguments on October 12, Zvi Rosen, who filed an amicus brief in the case in support of the respondent (Goldsmith), joined us to break down the case.Featuring:- Zvi Rosen, Assistant Professor, Southern Illinois University School of Law

It was a quiet week for orders, but a very exciting week for oral arguments. Your hosts discuss the copyright fight between the Andy Warhol Foundation and legendary rock-and-roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith, and the ideologically unpredictable Bacon Case, which might spark economic warfare between the states. GianCarlo then interviews Braden Boucek of the Southeastern Legal […]

It was a quiet week for orders, but a very exciting week for oral arguments. Your hosts discuss the copyright fight between the Andy Warhol Foundation and legendary rock-and-roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith, and the ideologically unpredictable Bacon Case, which might spark economic warfare between the states. GianCarlo then interviews Braden Boucek of the Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the two chat about fighting race essentialism in schools and the conservative legal movement. Last up, Zack grills GianCarlo about the Supreme Court's art cases.Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Fair use is one of those things where the lines are not so clear cut. In the mid 80's, Andy Warhol doctored an existing photo of Prince, taken by Lynn Goldsmith, for a magazine cover and that same bit of art is currently being debated in the Supreme Court. Factors such as what the media was used for, how much of it was used, and the effect it had on the market certainly factor into whether Goldsmith's art was fairly used, but was cropping and colors enough for Warhol to claim the work as his own? Jack Russo and Rafael Chodos discuss the blurred lines between fair use and copyright infringement.

Zilm, Kerstinwww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, FazitDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether a work of art is “transformative” when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material (as the Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and other courts of appeals have held), or whether a court is forbidden from considering the meaning of the accused work where it “recognizably deriv[es] from” its source material (as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has held).Date                  Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)Dec 09 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 12, 2022)Dec 29 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 12, 2022 to February 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 30 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2022.Jan 10 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Copyright Law Professors filed.Jan 10 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Barbara Kruger and Robert Storr filed.Jan 12 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Art Law Professors filed.Jan 12 2022 | Brief amici curiae of The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, Roy Lichtenstein Foundation, and Brooklyn Museum filed.Feb 04 2022 | Brief of respondents Lynn Goldsmith, et al. in opposition filed.Feb 23 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.Feb 23 2022 | Reply of petitioner The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Mar 21 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.Mar 28 2022 | Petition GRANTED.Apr 18 2022 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.May 02 2022 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Lynn Goldsmith, et al.May 02 2022 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.May 04 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 10, 2022. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 8, 2022.Jun 10 2022 | Brief of petitioner The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. filed.Jun 10 2022 | Joint appendix (Volumes I and II) filed. (Statement of cost filed)Jun 14 2022 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, October, 12, 2022.Jun 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Royal Manticoran Navy: The Official Honor Harrington Fan Association, Inc. filed.Jun 16 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Art Law Professors filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Floor64, Inc. d/b/a The Copia Institute filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Authors Guild, Inc., et al. in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of The Motion Picture Association, Inc. in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Art Institute of Chicago, et al. in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Authors Alliance filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Library Futures Institute, et al. in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in suppoprt of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Art Professor Richard Meyer in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Artists, et al. filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Copyright Alliance in support of neither party filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Copyright Law Professors filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Documentary Filmmakers filed.Jun 17 2022 | Brief amici curiae of The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, et al. filed.Jun 22 2022 | Record requested from the 2nd Circuit.Jun 27 2022 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit has been electronically filed.Jul 21 2022 | CIRCULATEDAug 08 2022 | Brief of respondents Lynn Goldsmith, et al. filed. (Distributed)Aug 11 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Professors Peter S. Menell, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, and Jane C. Ginsburg as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents filed. (Distributed)Aug 12 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Graphic Artists Guild, Inc. and American Society for Collective Rights Licensing, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Aug 12 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Philippa S. Loengard filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Jeffrey Sedlik, Professional, Photographer and Photography Licensing Expert filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Digital Media Licensing Association filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Prof. Zvi S. Rosen filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Senator Marsha Blackburn filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Guy A. Rub filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice and Intellectual-Property Professors filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Photographers Gary Bernstein and Julie Dermansky filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Association of American Publishers filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Terry Kogan filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amici curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amici curiae of The Recording Industry Association of America and The National Music Publishers Association filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies filed. (Distributed)Aug 15 2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)Sep 07 2022 | Reply of petitioner The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Sep 28 2022 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.Oct 12 2022 | Argued. For petitioner: Roman Martinez, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C.; and Yaira Dubin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)

A case in which the Court held that Andy Warhol Foundation's commercial use of artwork derived from Lynn Goldsmith's copyrighted photograph of the musician Prince lacked transformative value and thus weighed against fair use.

While the artist Prince rocked fans for decades, an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case concerning a 1981 portrait of him could potentially rock America's copyright law and fair use doctrine.

When does a work of art qualify for fair use? On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. v. Goldsmith. Andy Warhol used celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith's picture of Prince, taken in 1981, for his artwork. Did Andy Warhol violate Lynn Goldsmith's copyright? Professor Kristelia Garcia Esq., an expert in copyright law, helps shed light on this question that could have far-reaching implications for art and copyright. This episode of “Let's Brief It” is hosted by Niranjan Seshadri, and Eric Tarosky, both law students at the Georgetown University Law Center in Washington D.C. Want to get ahead of the pack? Joining the D.C. Bar Law Student Community (LSC) can get you there. Your LSC membership will provide resume and skills boosting opportunities and one-on-one access to local practicing attorneys. To learn more, click here. Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations. Thank you to our Sponsor! The George Washington College of Professional Studies, Paralegal Studies Program: As Washington D.C.'s only academic-credit bearing paralegal studies program, the master's degree in Paralegal Studies is more than a powerful credential: it's a signal to the best employers that you withstood the academic rigor of one of the nation's best paralegal programs. George Washington University's Paralegal Studies program has met the approval of the American Bar Association for the excellence of its curriculum, faculty and administration, the only such program granted the designation in Washington, D.C. GW joins 260 programs nationally that have met the organization's requirements. Visit https://www.cps.gwu.edu/paralegal-studies-master-professional-studies to learn more.

Booray has beef about Nancy Green Day and Gary waxes poetic about middle age. The fellas comment on Hurricane Ian and the big PPA announcement. In photography news, Lynn Goldsmith vs. Warhol,  the Canon r-100, and Kate Middleton: the Princess of Wales & photography. Qualcomm seems to think smartphones will outperform DSLR in a few years and a debate on where wedding photographers prefer to eat.  PPA Merit Image Review___________________________________________________________________________Hurricane Ian:City of OrlandoCity of Winter Park Thomas Roofing & Repair Volunteer  CORE Response_____________________________________________________________________________Save 50% on your first year with 17 Hats using the code "photobomb" at checkout just go to www.17hats.comCheck out Gary's YouTube channel HERE.Check out Booray's YouTube channel HERE.Join our Facebook Group, the Bombardiers Lounge

While this U.S. Supreme Court term shouldn't result in as many sweeping decisions as the last, which upended nationwide abortion rights and gun control precedents, it'll be far from a lightweight season. The court's cases are varied: from redistricting to artist integrity to the legality of the Indian Child Welfare Act, which gives tribal governments jurisdiction over the adoption and foster care of Native American children.In this episode, we break down some of the heavyweight appeals the court will hear with the help of our very own Kelsey Reichmann.First, we delve into two cases that could affect elections for decades to come, deciding whether states should take race into account during redistricting and if legislatures should be the ones to draw those lines or if the courts have any say in the process.The Supreme Court will also weigh in on a copyright dispute between the Warhol Foundation and Lynn Goldsmith over a photo she took of the artist Prince that Andy Warhol used as a reference in several prints. Another case rooted in the visual arts comes to the court from Colorado. A website designer is challenging the state's Anti-Discrimination Act, saying it violates her First Amendment rights by forcing her to serve LGBT couples.Last, we lay out the Indian Child Welfare Act, what is at stake over its continued legality, and what the law means to tribal governments, courts and their people.

DACAPO - Våra extranummer Succén är tillbaka.. ännu fler böcker, ännu mer Roney Lundell. Vi djupdyker i en strid ström av bra och inte så bra KISS-böcker i detta extra avsnitt - DaCapo. Gäst: Roney Lundell Detta har vi pratat om: Jess Sush & Curt Gooch - KISS Alive Forever,  Per Strid, Chris Lendt-Kiss and sell, Ron Leejack - Still Wicked, Lynn Goldsmith 1977-1980, Hotter Tham Hell fotografen Norman Seeff, Barry Levine, Fin Costello, Hans Hatwig, färgen svart, Chip Rock, Original KISS crew, Bryan J Kinnaird - Hell box (om Sean Delaney), Julian Gill - Gene, Ace, Peter & Paul: A detailed exploration of the 1978 KISS solo albums, Daniel Westman, Alex Bergdahl - Partners in Crime I och II och Den sista Dynastin , Playboy December 1977 "How I spent my vacation",  Elise Kreutzer - “Under My Skin – Drama, Trauma & Rock ‘n' Roll”,  Tidningen Destroyer, Tom Shannon - Kiss My Wax Volume I, II och III, Alains Bellichas böcker, Destroyer-tidningen, Kiss i Göteborg 2022, Kiss Army Sweden, DestoyerAlive - vloggen, Carl Linnaeus - Kiss den osminkade sanningen, Rock At Sea, Johan Kihlberg,  Flera omnämnbara böcker som ej nämns med titlar.

This week: our associate editor, Kabir Jhala, and editor-at-large, Jane Morris, have been in Kassel, Germany, to see Documenta, the quinquennial international art exhibition. They review the show and respond to the escalation of a long-running row over antisemitism and broader racism, which has resulted in a work being removed from the exhibition. Virginia Rutledge, an art historian and lawyer, discusses the dispute over Andy Warhol's appropriation of a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith of the pop icon Prince. The case will be heard in the US Supreme Court this autumn and has potentially huge implications for artistic freedom. And this episode's Work of the Week is An Outpost of Progress (1992), a drawing by the late Spanish artist Juan Muñoz, inspired by Joseph Conrad's short story of the same name.Documenta 15, Kassel, Germany, until 25 September.Juan Muñoz: Drawings 1982-2000, Centro Botín, Santander, Spain, 25 June-16 October. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Enjoy this interview with the hugely successful photographer Lynn Goldmsith on her 80s music side project, Will Powers and the hit single, Kissing With Confidence.And what a cast list; vocals by Carly Simon, co-written and played by Steve Winwood, Nile Rodgers and Todd Rundgren. Further co-writes on the LP with Sting and Tom Bailey of the Thompson Twins.We explore the creation of this fabulous track  with many other famous names along the way; Robert Palmer, Marianne Faithfull, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton...and Graham Rix.Find out what Bob Dylan song she inspired and on which song on the LP, Music For Mental Health, she chanelled the Bobster for.Much to enjoy here so pucker up and plant those lips (sorry, sounds a bit rude..)Check out Lynn on various platforms;Website: Lynngoldsmith.comTwitter: @GoldsmithphotoFacebook: LynnGoldsmithArtistYoutube: Lynn GoldsmithInstagram: lynngoldsmithTwitter: @80sographyEmail: 80sography@gmail.com                            Do you know someone who drools when he kisses or burps or bites?                            Why not do them a favor and send them this record anonymously?

When Pop Art hit its peak in the 1960s, artists embraced polkadots, popular culture, and consumerism. If you're curious about how soup cans and comics became fine art, join Klaire Lockheart as she shares the details of this Modernist art movement. Artists and Artwork: Yayoi Kusama (Accumulation No. 1, Aggregation: One Thousand Boats Show, Infinity Mirror Room [Phalli's Field], All the Eternal Love I have for the Pumpkins), Georgia O'Keeffe, Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, Andy Warhol (Campbell's Soup Cans, Marilyn Diptych, Cow Wallpaper), Lynn Goldsmith, Claes Oldenburg and Patty Mucha (Soft Calendar for the Month of August), Coosje van Bruggen and Claes Oldenburg (Spoonbridge and Cherry), and Roy Lichtenstein (Look Mickey, Drowning Girl) Additional Topics: Appropriation, Intersectionality, Soft Sculpture, Jason Pargin (What the Hell Did I Just Read), Abstract Expressionism, Clement Greenberg (“Avant-Garde and Kitsch”), Marilyn Monroe, Serigraphy, Comic Books, CMYK Printing, and Ben-Day Dots klairelockheart.com instagram.com/klairelockheart facebook.com/klairealockheart

For Video Edition, Please Click and Subscribe Here: https://youtu.be/ZlY-HUkxcMk Born in Washington DC in 1952 Bobby Miller studied photography at The New School with Lisette Model and has been making photographs for 45 years. As a hair-make up artist he worked with photographers Robert Mapplethorpe, Lynn Goldsmith, Greg Gorman, and Christopher Makos among others. He is also a published poet and writer and is included in “ The Outlaw Bible of American Poets” and “ The Outlaw Bible of American Artists” He is the author of 25 books of photography and 4 books of poetry. His work has been shown at AMP Gallery in Provincetown, Woody Shimko Gallery in Palm Springs and most recently The Howl Gallery in NYC. Mr. Miller makes his home in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. On June 15, 2021 at 6:00 – 10:00 PM Until August 31 Artsee Gallery in Hudson NY at 529 Warren Street Presents the photographs of Studio 54 by Bobby Miller “An insider's view of the mother of all nightclubs” There has never been – and there will never be – another nightclub to rival the playfulness, the glamour, the sheer audacity of Studio 54.  Bobby Miller was there to photograph these unbelievable apparitions of the night, and in Fabulous! Andy Warhol, Grace Jones, John Belushi, Eartha Kitt, Mohammed Ali…..The list of celebrities in this book goes on and on, it's sheer magnitude astounding, its diversity downright shocking.  The photographs in this collection, along with the anecdotes that Bobby Miller shares, make this the most complete portrait we have of the gorgeous chaos that was Studio 54.  https://www.blurb.com/user/TroubleBlond?filter=bookstore&page=5

Katie and Steve finally tackle the evolving area of fair use as a defense to copyright infringement with Luke Nikas, attorney for the Andy Warhol Foundation and Partner at Quinn Emanuel. Luke represents the Foundation in its ongoing litigation with photographer Lynn Goldsmith about Warhol’s use of Goldsmith’s photograph of the artist Prince as an artist study for a series of screen prints. Goldsmith claims Warhol infringed her copyright in the original photograph. The Warhol Foundation says Warhol’s use of the photograph is fair use under the Copyright Act. The trial court agreed with the Warhol Foundation and the Second Circuit recently agreed with Goldsmith. Katie, Steve, and Luke discuss this complicated area of law and how artists navigate (or don’t) around it.

In this episode of the Fine Art Photography Podcast, we'll talk about the copyright battle between photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation over a portrait of Prince. Was Warhol's use of the Goldsmith photograph transformative? A Federal Appeals court says no. Sources: AP. "US court sides with photographer in fight over Warhol art." Larry Neumeister. March 26, 2021. https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-new-york-copyright-music-prince-aea4afa0b71e816149476804e601555a Artnet. "The Andy Warhol Foundation Has Won Out Against a Photographer Who Claimed the Pop Artist Pilfered Her Portrait of Prince." Sarah Cascone. July 2, 2019. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/andy-warhol-prince-copyright-case-1590703 The Art Newspaper. "US appeals court rules that Warhol's reliance on a photographer's portrait image did not constitute ‘fair use'." Laura Gilbert. March 29, 2021. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/us-appeals-court-rules-that-warhol-portrait-series-violated-photographer-s-copyright The Verge. "The story of Richard Prince and his $100,000 Instagram art." Lizzie Plaugic. May 30, 2015. https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/30/8691257/richard-prince-instagram-photos-copyright-law-fair-use Wikipedia. "Cariou v. Prince." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cariou_v._Prince --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/keith-dotson/support

In this episode of the Fine Art Photography Podcast, we'll talk about the copyright battle between photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation over a portrait of Prince. Was Warhol's use of the Goldsmith photograph transformative? A Federal Appeals court says no. Sources: AP. "US court sides with photographer in fight over Warhol art." Larry Neumeister. March 26, 2021. https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-new-york-copyright-music-prince-aea4afa0b71e816149476804e601555a Artnet. "The Andy Warhol Foundation Has Won Out Against a Photographer Who Claimed the Pop Artist Pilfered Her Portrait of Prince." Sarah Cascone. July 2, 2019. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/andy-warhol-prince-copyright-case-1590703 The Art Newspaper. "US appeals court rules that Warhol’s reliance on a photographer’s portrait image did not constitute ‘fair use’." Laura Gilbert. March 29, 2021. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/us-appeals-court-rules-that-warhol-portrait-series-violated-photographer-s-copyright The Verge. "The story of Richard Prince and his $100,000 Instagram art." Lizzie Plaugic. May 30, 2015. https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/30/8691257/richard-prince-instagram-photos-copyright-law-fair-use Wikipedia. "Cariou v. Prince." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cariou_v._Prince --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/keith-dotson/support

Lynn Goldsmith is more than the “Rock and Roll photographer” of Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan, Keith Richards, and so many others. She has made kind, collaborative, and keenly perceptive portraits of world leaders like John Lewis, John McCain, and Jane Goodall. She is an artist who works in photography, painting, performance, spoken word and released “Will Powers” on Island Records in 1983. Goldsmith and Zuckerman discuss learning instead of judging, seeing more than what other people can see, the camera as a tool for answers, portrait photographers as psychologists, control, pattern interrupts, having a limited amount of time, breaking limitations, having a platform, taking pictures of beloved musical icons, the power of dress, confronting and utilizing our fears, making life lighter, and why hard work matters! *** This episode is brought to you by Kelly Klee private insurance . Please check out their website: Kellyklee.com/Heidi and they will make a $50 donation to Artadia, an art charity I’ve recommended, per each qualified referral. This episode is brought to you by Best & Co. Please visit www.BestandCoAspen.com and use discount code Heidi2020 to receive 5% off of any item on the Best & Co. website. If you are interested in creating a custom piece please email custom@bestandcoaspen.com and mention that you heard about Best & Co. on my podcast to receive the special discount. *** Interested in sponsoring the podcast? Please email press@hiz.art *** If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests.Follow Heidi: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/heidizuckerman/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/heidizuckerman LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/heidi-zuckerman-a236b55/

Nikki and Brooke from the "My So-Called Whatever Podcast" join me for an episode packed with NKOTB goodness! We do a little trivia quiz, talk solo careers, the cruise, Donnie and Joey on their podcast, my meet and tweet with Jordan, how they helped get Lady Gaga noticed, that photo book by Lynn Goldsmith that felt like softcore porn, and why we still love them. Forever. 

The Rock N Roll Archaeologist digs deep into the new art book, David Bowie: Icon - The Definitive Photographic Collection. Christian welcomes project editor, Carrie Kania to the show, where they talk about not only the book's contents, but also how a book like this gets made.David Bowie: Icon gathers the greatest images of one of the greatest stars in history, into a single, luxurious volume. The result is the most important anthology of David Bowie images that has ever been compiled. Featuring work from many of the greatest names in photography, this book showcases an incredible portfolio of imagery, featuring the iconic, the awe inspiring, the candid and the surprising.Follow the visual evolution of Bowie over the years, through the lenses of his famous photographer collaborators.Photography and text by: Gerald Fearnley, Justin de Villeneuve, Terry O'Neill, Masayoshi Sukita, Norman Parkinson, Kevin Cummins, Janet Macoska, Lynn Goldsmith, Geoff MacCormack, Alec Byrne, Brian Aris, Andrew Kent, Vernon Dewhurst, Gavin Evans, Fernando Aceves, Barry Schultz, Ray Stevenson, Chalkie Davies, Markus Klinko, Greg Gorman, John Scarisbrick, Denis O'Regan, Mick Rock, Philippe Auliac, Steve Schapiro.When David Bowie passed away on 10 January 2016, the world lost an icon. And yet, his legacy lives on. From his humble origins as a teen musician in the 1960s up until the very end, David Bowie's music, lyrics and provocative performances inspired not only his generation, but every generation that followed. While his sound and style underwent several alterations throughout his career, two facts never changed. He was an innovator, and photographers adored him. This book pays homage to this once-in-a-lifetime icon. The most significant collection of David Bowie images ever assembled A luxurious opus published to coincide with the 5th anniversary of David Bowie's death Impeccably printed, sumptuously designed, large format hardback book Top photographers, iconic images, wonderful surprises Major marketing campaign, including radio, print and online promotions Events with photographers, including on-stage Q&As and book signings Tie-in to exhibitions at galleries, globally https://www.amazon.com/David-Bowie-Definitive-Photographic-Collection/dp/1788840968/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=david+bowie+icon&qid=1608166608&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExOUtESU5UODNETTdWJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUExMDI0NDAyMUxCR1hJVDlaU0w0UyZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwODMwODY3TkVBS0w1SjFTMTg3JndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==

The Rock N Roll Archaeologist digs deep into the new art book, David Bowie: Icon - The Definitive Photographic Collection. Christian welcomes project editor, Carrie Kania to the show, where they talk about not only the book's contents, but also how a book like this gets made.David Bowie: Icon gathers the greatest images of one of the greatest stars in history, into a single, luxurious volume. The result is the most important anthology of David Bowie images that has ever been compiled. Featuring work from many of the greatest names in photography, this book showcases an incredible portfolio of imagery, featuring the iconic, the awe inspiring, the candid and the surprising.Follow the visual evolution of Bowie over the years, through the lenses of his famous photographer collaborators.Photography and text by: Gerald Fearnley, Justin de Villeneuve, Terry O'Neill, Masayoshi Sukita, Norman Parkinson, Kevin Cummins, Janet Macoska, Lynn Goldsmith, Geoff MacCormack, Alec Byrne, Brian Aris, Andrew Kent, Vernon Dewhurst, Gavin Evans, Fernando Aceves, Barry Schultz, Ray Stevenson, Chalkie Davies, Markus Klinko, Greg Gorman, John Scarisbrick, Denis O'Regan, Mick Rock, Philippe Auliac, Steve Schapiro.When David Bowie passed away on 10 January 2016, the world lost an icon. And yet, his legacy lives on. From his humble origins as a teen musician in the 1960s up until the very end, David Bowie's music, lyrics and provocative performances inspired not only his generation, but every generation that followed. While his sound and style underwent several alterations throughout his career, two facts never changed. He was an innovator, and photographers adored him. This book pays homage to this once-in-a-lifetime icon. The most significant collection of David Bowie images ever assembled A luxurious opus published to coincide with the 5th anniversary of David Bowie's death Impeccably printed, sumptuously designed, large format hardback book Top photographers, iconic images, wonderful surprises Major marketing campaign, including radio, print and online promotions Events with photographers, including on-stage Q&As and book signings Tie-in to exhibitions at galleries, globally https://www.amazon.com/David-Bowie-Definitive-Photographic-Collection/dp/1788840968/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=david+bowie+icon&qid=1608166608&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExOUtESU5UODNETTdWJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUExMDI0NDAyMUxCR1hJVDlaU0w0UyZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwODMwODY3TkVBS0w1SjFTMTg3JndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==

The Rock N Roll Archaeologist digs deep into the new art book, David Bowie: Icon - The Definitive Photographic Collection. Christian welcomes project editor, Carrie Kania to the show, where they talk about not only the book’s contents, but also how a book like this gets made. David Bowie: Icon gathers the greatest images of one of the greatest stars in history, into a single, luxurious volume. The result is the most important anthology of David Bowie images that has ever been compiled. Featuring work from many of the greatest names in photography, this book showcases an incredible portfolio of imagery, featuring the iconic, the awe inspiring, the candid and the surprising. Follow the visual evolution of Bowie over the years, through the lenses of his famous photographer collaborators. Photography and text by: Gerald Fearnley, Justin de Villeneuve, Terry O'Neill, Masayoshi Sukita, Norman Parkinson, Kevin Cummins, Janet Macoska, Lynn Goldsmith, Geoff MacCormack, Alec Byrne, Brian Aris, Andrew Kent, Vernon Dewhurst, Gavin Evans, Fernando Aceves, Barry Schultz, Ray Stevenson, Chalkie Davies, Markus Klinko, Greg Gorman, John Scarisbrick, Denis O'Regan, Mick Rock, Philippe Auliac, Steve Schapiro. When David Bowie passed away on 10 January 2016, the world lost an icon. And yet, his legacy lives on. From his humble origins as a teen musician in the 1960s up until the very end, David Bowie's music, lyrics and provocative performances inspired not only his generation, but every generation that followed. While his sound and style underwent several alterations throughout his career, two facts never changed. He was an innovator, and photographers adored him. This book pays homage to this once-in-a-lifetime icon. The most significant collection of David Bowie images ever assembled A luxurious opus published to coincide with the 5th anniversary of David Bowie's death Impeccably printed, sumptuously designed, large format hardback book Top photographers, iconic images, wonderful surprises Major marketing campaign, including radio, print and online promotions Events with photographers, including on-stage Q&As and book signings Tie-in to exhibitions at galleries, globally https://www.amazon.com/David-Bowie-Definitive-Photographic-Collection/dp/1788840968/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=david+bowie+icon&qid=1608166608&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExOUtESU5UODNETTdWJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUExMDI0NDAyMUxCR1hJVDlaU0w0UyZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwODMwODY3TkVBS0w1SjFTMTg3JndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==

The Rock N Roll Archaeologist digs deep into the new art book, David Bowie: Icon - The Definitive Photographic Collection. Christian welcomes project editor, Carrie Kania to the show, where they talk about not only the book’s contents, but also how a book like this gets made. David Bowie: Icon gathers the greatest images of one of the greatest stars in history, into a single, luxurious volume. The result is the most important anthology of David Bowie images that has ever been compiled. Featuring work from many of the greatest names in photography, this book showcases an incredible portfolio of imagery, featuring the iconic, the awe inspiring, the candid and the surprising. Follow the visual evolution of Bowie over the years, through the lenses of his famous photographer collaborators. Photography and text by: Gerald Fearnley, Justin de Villeneuve, Terry O'Neill, Masayoshi Sukita, Norman Parkinson, Kevin Cummins, Janet Macoska, Lynn Goldsmith, Geoff MacCormack, Alec Byrne, Brian Aris, Andrew Kent, Vernon Dewhurst, Gavin Evans, Fernando Aceves, Barry Schultz, Ray Stevenson, Chalkie Davies, Markus Klinko, Greg Gorman, John Scarisbrick, Denis O'Regan, Mick Rock, Philippe Auliac, Steve Schapiro. When David Bowie passed away on 10 January 2016, the world lost an icon. And yet, his legacy lives on. From his humble origins as a teen musician in the 1960s up until the very end, David Bowie's music, lyrics and provocative performances inspired not only his generation, but every generation that followed. While his sound and style underwent several alterations throughout his career, two facts never changed. He was an innovator, and photographers adored him. This book pays homage to this once-in-a-lifetime icon. The most significant collection of David Bowie images ever assembled A luxurious opus published to coincide with the 5th anniversary of David Bowie's death Impeccably printed, sumptuously designed, large format hardback book Top photographers, iconic images, wonderful surprises Major marketing campaign, including radio, print and online promotions Events with photographers, including on-stage Q&As and book signings Tie-in to exhibitions at galleries, globally https://www.amazon.com/David-Bowie-Definitive-Photographic-Collection/dp/1788840968/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?dchild=1&keywords=david+bowie+icon&qid=1608166608&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExOUtESU5UODNETTdWJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUExMDI0NDAyMUxCR1hJVDlaU0w0UyZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwODMwODY3TkVBS0w1SjFTMTg3JndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==

SUPPORT US ON PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/cometowhereimfrom

On this episode of ROCK TALK WITH MITCH LAFON. New interviews with guitarists Mark Farner and Nils Lofgren. Alan Niven co-hosts. In our first interview, we speak with for Grand Funk Railroad guitarist Mark Farner. He discusses his current 50th Anniversary tour, the formation of GFR, Detroit (the rock city), corporate radio, new single Can't Stop, new EP, We're An American Band, cowbells, recording with Todd Rundgren, manager/photographer Lynn Goldsmith, GFR using the name with a new lineup, working again with Don Brewer, GFR live performances, and more.  in our second interview, guitarist Nils Lofgren discusses his new album Blue With Lou, writing with Lou Reed, Bob Ezrin and his hands on approach to producing, the NFL, recording live in studio, a look back at his career, working with Foreigner's LOU GRAMM, Neil Young's After The Gold Rush and much more. Twitter: @mitchlafonInstagram: @mitch_lafon Rock Talk With Mitch Lafon is available on: 1. Spotify 2. iHeart 3. Apple Podcasts 4. GooglePlay 5. Amazon Alexa 6. TuneIn 7. Google Podcasts 8. Stitcher Please subscribe! Help support the show. Please consider a donation: https://www.paypal.me/MitchLafon See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tom Kennedy chats with photographer Lynn Goldsmith about her life documenting some of the biggest personalities in music and popular culture as well as the importance of copyright for photographers. Lynn Goldsmith’s imagery is in numerous collections: The Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery, The Museum of Modern Art, The Chicago Museum of Contemporary Photography, The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Museum Folkwang, The Polaroid Collection, The Kodak Collection, etc. Her work over the past 50 years in the editorial world has appeared on and between the covers of Life, Newsweek, Time, Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone, National Geographic Traveler, Sports Illustrated, People, Elle, Interview, The New Yorker, etc. The subjects have varied from entertainment personalities to sports stars, from film directors to authors, from the extra-ordinary to the ordinary man on the street. Winning numerous prestigious awards from the Lucien Clergue to the World Press in Portraiture, she considers herself extremely fortunate to have had the opportunity to make her passion of a quest into the nature of identity and the human spirit into her living. https://lynngoldsmith.com https://www.asmp.orgSupport the show (https://www.asmp.org/asmp-foundation-donations/)

For the B&H Photography Podcast, 2017 has been a wonderful year. We published our 100th episode, surpassed one million downloads, and reached #1 on the iTunes podcast chart in the Visual Arts category. Achievements aside, we are simply pleased with the remarkable guests we have hosted on our show, the variety of subjects we have covered, and the consistently entertaining and intelligent conversations we have published. And honestly, we are proud to have maintained our production output—week in week out—and to still really enjoy what we do. With this in mind and with gratitude to our listeners, guests, co-workers, and the management at B&H, we have cobbled together a 2017 year-in-review episode in which we discuss our favorite shows from 2017 and play a few clips of the most interesting moments from these episodes. The highlights were many and hard to narrow down, but Allan Weitz chose our episode with photographer Lynn Goldsmith as his favorite, with a close second being our talk with Bellamy Hunt, aka the Japan Camera Hunter. He also mentioned our talks with Richard Drew on his photograph, referred to as “Falling Man,” and our episodes with photojournalists (and husband and wife) Ben Lowy and Marvi Lacar. As for Jason Tables, he pointed to History of Hip-Hop Photography and Night Photography—From Film into Digital, as his favorites. My list included a few of those mentioned above, as well as an episode on social documentary projects, but the clip I chose was from our serial segment, “Dispatch” with Adriane Ohanesian, in which she recounts the story of a fatal attack she endured while covering a story in Congo. We discuss several more episodes during this end-of-year extravaganza and hope that the clips pique your interest and inspire you to subscribe to our show and check out programs from our catalog, which now includes more than 100 episodes. Thank you and happy New Year from Allan, Jason, and John. Guests: Lynn Goldsmith, Bellamy Hunt, Richard Drew, Ben Lowy, Marvi Lacar, Danny Hastings, Eric Johnson, Janette Beckman, Vicky Tobak, Chris Nicholson, Lance Keimig, Adriane Ohanesian Photographs (l-r) © Janette Beckman, Robert Rodriguez Jr., Mark Maio, Christian Vizl, Jenna Martin, Adriane Ohanesian, Art Wolfe, Daniel Kordan, David Speiser, Ryan Dyar, Steve Simon, Bellamy Hunt, Leo Sang, Thomas Roma, Jide Alakija, Griselda San Martin

EPISODE #23 – Happy Thanksgiving folks! This month we give you a large helping of Van Halen goodies to chew on. After enjoying appetizers of VH News and a hefty mailbag, dig into the 20th anniversary celebration of David Lee Roth’s autobiography, “Crazy from the Heat” for the entrée. But save room because an exclusive interview with rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith, who shot VH back in the day, is for dessert. Strap in because this one is a wild journey!Download the podcast for free on Spreaker or iTunes. Connect with the Daves on Twitter: @ddunchained, Facebook: Dave & Dave Unchained – A Van Halen podcast, Instagram: ddunchainedpodcast or via email: ddunchainedpodcast@gmail.com.

EPISODE #23 – Happy Thanksgiving folks! This month we give you a large helping of Van Halen goodies to chew on. After enjoying appetizers of VH News and a hefty mailbag, dig into the 20th anniversary celebration of David Lee Roth’s autobiography, “Crazy from the Heat” for the entrée. But save room because an exclusive interview with rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith, who shot VH back in the day, is for dessert. Strap in because this one is a wild journey!Download the podcast for free on Spreaker or iTunes. Connect with the Daves on Twitter: @ddunchained, Facebook: Dave & Dave Unchained – A Van Halen podcast, Instagram: ddunchainedpodcast or via email: ddunchainedpodcast@gmail.com.

Lynn Goldsmith is een van de eerste vrouwelijke rockfotografen. Met een onwijs groot portfolio waarin artiesten staan zoals: Bruce springsteen, Bob Marley, The Rolling Stones, Michael Jackson, Kiss, Sting, Prince en Bob Dylan behoort ze tot de absolute top. Hoe leef je je volste potentie?

Lynn Goldsmith is een van de eerste vrouwelijke rockfotografen. Met een onwijs groot portfolio waarin artiesten staan zoals: Bruce springsteen, Bob Marley, The Rolling Stones, Michael Jackson, Kiss, Sting, Prince en Bob Dylan behoort ze tot de absolute top. Hoe leef je je volste potentie?

This week we talk about the upcoming KISS events, and discuss the Lynn Goldsmith book, and also have an interview Joe did with one of the people responsible for the soon to be released KISS game, KISS ROCk CITY! Check it out!

With her latest book, KISS: 1977-1980, just released, legendary rock ’n’ roll photographer Lynn Goldsmith joins us to talk about her time with this extraordinary band and what drew her to photograph and befriend them. In addition to the stories behind some of her iconic photos of Frank Zappa, Bob Dylan, Patti Smith, and Prince, we also speak with Goldsmith about her other creative outlets. Did you know that she released an album under the name Will Powers, was co-manager of the band Grand Funk Railroad and photographed for the National Lampoon? Throughout her career, Goldsmith has demonstrated an ability to photograph musicians in a manner that embodies their music and, as is the case with her new book, with an understanding of what the band’s fans want to see. We talk to her about creating the atmosphere for the shot you want, about changes in music publicity over the years and the varying approaches she takes when shooting in-studio, at a live concert, or with an artist in a more casual setting. We also chat about other aspects of her photographic work and what her music and celebrity portraiture shares with her documentary and fine art work. The magic of photography and the joy of creativity burn bright in Lynn Goldsmith, so join us for this enjoyable and insightful conversation. If you are in the Los Angeles area on November 3, 2017, join Lynn Goldsmith and Paul Stanley from KISS for a special presentation and book signing at the Barnes & Noble bookstore at The Grove. Guest: Lynn Goldsmith Photograph © Lynn Goldsmith B&H Photography Podcast

Welcome to the House of Crouse. This weekend Rachel McAdams will be on every movie screen in North America as part of the "Doctor Strange" cast. Before the film's release she stopped by the HoC to talk about sewing up turkeys and much more. Legendary photographer Lynn Goldsmith also drops in, talking about praying with Bono, loaning a leather jacket to Bruce Springsteen and asking Bob Dylan to be quiet. It's great stuff and you don't want to miss it. So, c'mon in and set a spell!

Music is the subject of The Halli Casser-Jayne Show, Talk Radio for Fine Minds, Wednesday, October 9, 3 pm ET when Halli is joined bytwice nominated for the National Book Critics Circle Award for his writing talent, and author of the new much-talked about biography Kansas City Lightning, The Rise and Times of Charles Parker, Stanley Crouch and iconic portrait photographer Lynn Goldsmith with her new book, Rock and Roll Stories. Stanley Crouch has been writing about jazz music and the black experience for more than forty years. His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, Vogue, Downbeat, and the New York Times. He has served as artistic consultant for programming at Lincoln Center and is a regular columnist for the New York Daily News. Lynn Goldsmith is the iconic portrait photographer best known for her images of musicians. After coming of age in the Midwest in the tumultuous 1960s, she crashed the music scene in New York, emerging as one of its leading image-makers, chronicling Bruce Springsteen, the Rolling Stones, Michael Jackson, Bob Dylan and more.

Lynn Goldsmith is a legendary portrait, commercial and fine-art photographer who has photographed many of the great entertainers of film, television and music including Bruce Springsteen, Michael Jackson, Patti Smith and Miles Davis, just to name a few. Her photographs have appeared on the covers of Life, Newsweek, Time, Rolling Stone, Sports Illustrated, People, and more. She has also created a body of fine-art photography which includes a remarkable series of self-portraits. You can discover more of her work by visiting .Lynn Goldsmith recommends the work of . For streaming audio or subscribe to the podcast for free via