Podcasts about Arbitration

Episode #1380: Today we're talking about Amazon's Zoox gearing up for robotaxi production, an Indiana dealer crowdsourcing wholesale transparency with a new arbitration platform, and why Starbucks is investing in frontline leadership instead of just ad...

We'd love to hear from you. Send us fan mail!Workplace dispute resolution is one of the least discussed and most costly blindspots in executive leadership. In this episode of Shedding the Corporate B!tch, executive coach Bernadette Boas sits down with Felicia Harris Hoss, of Harris Hoss Mediations & Arbitration, a nationally recognized mediator with 30 years of trial law experience, to break down early dispute resolution and why it is one of the most powerful, underutilized tools available to corporate executives and HR leaders.Felicia explains why less than five percent of filed lawsuits ever reach trial, what that means for how executives should be approaching conflict, and why the decision to mediate early is not a sign of weakness, it is a strategic move that preserves relationships, resources, and reputation. She walks through the four Cs of mediation, the questions every executive should be asking their attorney, and how to shift from a reacting posture to a responding one in any dispute.If you lead people, manage HR concerns, or sit in any seat where workplace conflict can escalate into legal action, this conversation will change how you think about resolution. What You Will Learn• What early dispute resolution (EDR) is and why it is ABA official policy• When to engage a mediator before a lawsuit is filed• Why litigation means surrendering control — and what executives can do instead• The four Cs of mediation: confidentiality, control, creativity, certainty• What questions to ask your attorney about workplace disputes and resolution options• How the respond vs. react mindset shifts negotiation outcomes• What 'winning' actually looks like in a corporate dispute Key Quote"If you go to the courthouse, you pass that baton called control to strangers. — Felicia Harris Hoss" Episode Chapters00:00:00 — The Legal Dispute Already Living in Your Organization 00:02:00 — Why Staying in the Room Changes Everything 00:03:00 — Meet Felicia Harris-Hoss: From Trial Partner to Neutral 00:06:00 — What Mediation Actually Is (And Isn't) 00:09:00 — Workplace Scenarios That Call for a Mediator 00:12:00 — Why Early Mediation — Before Positions Harden 00:13:00 — The Human Cost Behind Every Corporate Lawsuit 00:15:00 — Why Early Mediation Wasn't Working — And What Changed 00:17:00 — Ego, Fear, and the Real Reason Leaders Avoid Resolution 00:18:00 — The Courtroom Hands Control to Strangers 00:21:00 — The Four C's of Mediation: Confidentiality, Control, Creativity, Certainty 00:26:00 — Key Questions Every Leader Should Ask Their Attorney 00:27:00 — What to Know Before You Bring a Dispute to HR 00:31:00 — Why Even Lawyers Get Confirmation Bias 00:32:00 — Respond, Don't React: The Mindset That Changes Outcomes 00:34:00 — Bernadette's Takeaways for Every Leader and HR Professional About the GuestFelicia Harris Hoss, of Harris Hoss Mediations & Arbitration, is a 30-year trial attorney and nationally credentialed mediator who specializes in early dispute resolution for executives, corporations, and complex business conflicts. She co-authored Resolution 500 for the American Bar Association, which was unanimously adopted in 2024, making early dispute resolution official ABA policy. She also helped establish the American Arbitration Association's EDR Mediation Panel.Learn more at HarrisHossPLLC| Connect on LinkedIn HERE Related Episodes Employee Engagement Strategies That Actually Move the Needle with Ian Watts— HEREYour Calendar is Lying - The Timer Leadership Framework— HERESlow Down To Go Fast with Loretta Stagnitto — HERE Subscribe CTAIf this conversation gave you a new way to think about conflict, leadership, and control, subscribe to Shedding the Corporate Bitch on YouTube at @ShedtheCorpBitchTV for new episodes every week. You can also DOWNLOAD our free Leadership Gap Diagnostic and identify where your leadership needs the most attention right now. Support the show

Join Luke as he reacts to all the latest Aston Villa transfer news, Aston Villa will take their appeal to formally register 17 year old january signing Brian Madjo to the court of arbitration for sport - Jacob Tanswell the athletic #astonvilla #avfc #premierleague

Lawyers are trained to spot risk. But when it comes to AI, focusing only on risk may cause firms to miss the bigger opportunity. In episode 623 of the Lawyerist Podcast, Zack Glaser sits down with Bridget McCormack to talk about AI arbitration, legal innovation, and why the future of legal work may be less about replacement and more about reinvention.  Bridget reflects on her time as Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, including how the pandemic forced courts to adopt technology faster than anyone expected. She explains why that moment revealed both the limits of traditional legal systems and the potential for more accessible, user-friendly ways to resolve disputes.  Now leading the American Arbitration Association, Bridget shares how AAA is using AI to build tools for clause drafting, self-represented parties, resolution simulation, and even documents-only arbitration. The conversation explores what fairness looks like when AI is involved, why human oversight remains essential, and how legal professionals should think about accountability, bias, and trust.  If AI changes the routine parts of legal work, lawyers will need to rethink what clients actually need from them. This episode offers a practical and future-focused look at arbitration, legal technology, and the new kinds of judgment lawyers will need to bring to the table.  Listen to our previous episodes on Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Legal Practice.  #612 – AI for Lawyers: What You Need to Know Before Your Clients Do, with Cat Casey Apple | Spotify | LTN  #607 – The Future of Law Firm Business Models in the Age of AI, with Jordan Furlong Apple | Spotify | LTN  #619– What Claude Means for Law Firms: AI Skills, Connectors, and Workflow Strategy, with Sam Harden Apple | Spotify | LTN  #590 – Innovating Without Overwhelm: Practical AI Tips for Lawyers, with Graydon Trusler Apple | Spotify | LTN   #587 – Future-Proofing Your Firm in the Age of AI, with Jack Newton Apple | Spotify | LTN   #577 – Rethinking Law Firm Growth in the Age of AI, with Sam Harden Apple | Spotify | LTN  Links from the episode:  https://adr.org/  Have thoughts about today's episode? Join the conversation on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and X!   If today's podcast resonates with you and you haven't read The Small Firm Roadmap Revisited yet, get the first chapter right now for free! Looking for help beyond the book? See if our coaching community is right for you.   Access more resources from Lawyerist at lawyerist.com.   Chapters / Timestamps:  00:00 – Introduction  00:55 – Why Lawyers Should Test Their Own Intake Process03:35 – Meet Bridget McCormack04:25 – Leading Michigan Courts Through COVID05:20 – Why Remote Court Was Already on the Radar06:40 – Moving Trial Courts Online Fast08:45 – Why Legal Systems Are Slow to Change10:33 – From Chief Justice to CEO of AAA13:18 – How Alternative Dispute Resolution Is Evolving14:50 – AI Tools for Arbitration and Self-Represented Parties15:57 – Building AAA's AI Arbitrator17:36 – Resolution Simulation and Faster Settlements19:05 – What Is Left for Lawyers?21:19 – Fairness, Bias, and Human Oversight in AI Arbitration23:45 – Why Legal Disputes Need More Options24:41 – AI Agents and the Future of Legal Infrastructure26:26 – When AI Agents Negotiate Contracts28:30 – Closing Thoughts   

In episode 60 of Law in the Family, host Jen Ryan speaks with Shelly Grossman and Candice Komar about the growing use of arbitration as an alternative to traditional court proceedings in Pennsylvania family law matters. Attorneys Grossman, Komar and Ryan provide firsthand insights into the arbitration process, common misconceptions, and best practices for attorneys representing clients in arbitration. Topics include: the advantages of arbitration, procedural considerations, and strategies for achieving efficient, client-focused resolutions and offer valuable guidance for family law practitioners looking to expand their dispute resolution toolkit.Candice Komar is a founding member of the Pittsburgh law firm of Pollock Begg. She is the next PBA FLS Chair  commencing July 2026.  Shelly Grossman, Esquire, founded the Center for Family Resolution to provide alternative dispute resolution services to parties seeking to resolve their domestic relations issues outside of the court system.  Having spent 15 years in private practice before serving more than 14 years as a Family Court Master in Chester County, Pennsylvania, where she presided over hundreds of equitable distribution matters and custody disputes, Attorney Grossman brings over 30 years of family law experience to her practice.   Host Jennifer R. Ryan is a partner at Boyd & Early Family Law, servicing Montgomery, Bucks, Chester, Philadelphia and Delaware counties. *audio editing, voice over & music by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Nick DeMatteo

A major WWE legal story takes a new turn, Danhausen becomes an unlikely sports hero, and the Georgia indie scene is heating up heading into the weekend.This week, Nick and Myron discuss the Janel Grant vs. Vince McMahon case moving to arbitration and what it means for TKO moving forward. Is this the best-case scenario from a business perspective?The guys also dive into Danhausen's further rise in popularity following the New York Knicks' championship run. With reports that WWE wants to capitalize on his newfound connection to New York sports fans, is Danhausen about to become a much bigger player in WWE's promotional plans?Plus, the hosts tackle the latest CM Punk to AEW rumors and explain why a return to AEW simply doesn't make much sense given the current landscape of wrestling.The guys look back at another loaded weekend of independent wrestling, including:1FW (Gainesville, GA) – Satnam continues to dominate1FW (Buford, GA) – Harley-Davidson hosts an exciting day of actionWrestleMerica (Forsyth, GA) – KJ Impala survives the brutal Unchained Match to retain the WrestleMerica ChampionshipPro Wrestling Domination (Ranburne, AL) – The saga between Dante Diamond and Rebirth continues to escalate1FW TV Taping (McDonough, GA) – The Summer Stage 2 main event picture changes dramaticallyScrappy Championship Wrestling (Royston, GA) – Tower captures the Heavyweight Championship in a shocking title changePlanning your wrestling weekend? We've got you covered:Thursday, June 181FW – Monroe, GAFriday, June 19New Legacy Pro – Franklin, GASaturday, June 20Southern Fried Championship Wrestling: Shindig – Monroe, GA1FW – Hartwell, GAViral Pro Wrestling – Augusta, GAGeorgia Premier Wrestling – Jasper, GASunday, June 21 (Father's Day)Kraken Pro Wrestling – Tifton, GA: Fan Appreciation Night with fan-selected matchesMonday, June 22ACTION Wrestling – Atlanta, GA: Monday at Meehan's

This week on the Experience, Jim previews Dark Side Of The Ring's 7th season with the show's producer! Plus Jim talks about CM Punk rumors, WWE & TKO's legal issues, the last months of Jim Crockett Promotions, Mark Shapiro, and much more! Also, Jim reviews a few things from AEW Dynamite! Thanks to our episode sponsors: SHOPIFY: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial and start selling today at shopify.com/jce WILLIE'S REMEDY: Order now at drinkwillies.com and use code JCE for 20% off your first order + free shipping on orders over $95, and enjoy life in the high country. Follow Jim and Brian on Twitter: @TheJimCornette @GreatBrianLast Join Jim Cornette's College Of Wrestling Knowledge on Patreon to access the archives & more! https://www.patreon.com/Cornette Subscribe to the Official Jim Cornette channel on YouTube! http://www.youtube.com/c/OfficialJimCornette Visit Jim's official site at www.JimCornette.com for merch, live dates, commentaries and more! You can listen to Brian on the 6:05 Superpodcast at 605pod.com or wherever you find your favorite podcasts!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lee Jay Berman began as a full-time mediator 30 years ago, and has successfully mediated over 2,700 matters as, many of which were high profile cases, as a private, independent commercial mediator. Visit his website here: https://mediationtools.com/

In this episode, we discuss the end of the lawsuit between Janel Grant and WWE, TNA Slammiversary and the card taking shape, and WWE Returns for Orton, Punk, McIntyre, and possible John Cena!All this and the rest of the Day's news and Rumors!Don't Forget to Support Our Sponsors:3WA - www.wwwawrestling.comSketchy People - Available now at thegamecrafter.comWrestler Unstoppable - available exclusively through Facebook!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/fro-wrestling-podcast--2103073/support.

Ep. 339: Pope and Pollo Del Mar return to discuss all things In Da Newz including Vince McMahon/Janel Grant, Dustin Rhodes Retirement, Sheamus Injury and more.

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the move by Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE to move their case toward private arbitration and what it means.Plus: Grant comments on the anonymous emails to the WWE board in 2022, depositions by key WWE execs, and WSJ's reporting. The WWE shareholder settles before the trial & all the latest news. 00:00:00 Start00:02:04 Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE jointly seek arbitration 00:15:27 Grant posts about 2022 emails to the Board of Directors00:23:53 Depositions by Nick Khan, Frank Riddick & Michelle McKenna 00:43:11 WWE shareholder lawsuit reaches a settlement agreement 00:49:39 Lawsuit aims to stop UFC Freedom 250 at the White House 00:53:41 AEW v. Ryan Nemeth 00:59:43 Details on Bushiroad's sale of New Japan Pro Wrestling 01:06:16 Conor McGregor accused of using PEDs, per The New York Times Music courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the move by Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE to move their case toward private arbitration and what it means.VIDEO VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqttCcluHwwPlus: Grant comments on the anonymous emails to the WWE board in 2022, depositions by key WWE execs, and WSJ's reporting. The WWE shareholder settles before the trial & all the latest news. Topics this week include:Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE jointly seek arbitration Grant posts about 2022 emails to the Board of DirectorsDepositions by Nick Khan, Frank Riddick & Michelle McKenna WWE shareholder lawsuit reaches a settlement agreement Lawsuit aims to stop UFC Freedom 250 at the White House AEW v. Ryan Nemeth Details on Bushiroad's sale of New Japan Pro Wrestling Conor McGregor accused of using PEDs, per The New York Times Music courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/wrestlenomics.comAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In January 1860 the New York Times gave its blessing to a new machine: the sewing machine. These "iron needle-women", it wrote, were the only invention that could be claimed “chiefly for women's benefit”. Sewing was women's work in the nineteenth century, rich or poor, and a machine could now do it in a fraction of the time. So did it set women free?Philipp Ager and Davide Coluccia have traced the adoption of the sewing machine in Massachusetts between 1850 and 1900, using census records and digitised business directories to work out who was exposed to it, in the factory and in the home. For poorer women the machine meant work, in garment factories and in boot and shoe production; they married later, had fewer children, and many never married at all. For wealthier women, who had few acceptable jobs open to them, the hours it saved went into earlier marriage and earlier motherhood. Philipp tells Tim Phillips the story of a machine that had very different impacts in different social classes.The research behind this episode:Ager, Philipp, and Davide Coluccia. 2026. "Liberation Technology? The Impact of the Sewing Machine on Women." CEPR Discussion Paper No. 21496. CEPR Press, Paris and London. CEPR Discussion Papers are gated; CEPR members and subscribing institutions can download the paper at the link.To cite this episode:Phillips, Tim, and Philipp Ager. 2026. "Did the Sewing Machine Liberate Women?" VoxTalks Economics (podcast). Assign this as extra listening. The citation above is formatted and ready for a reading list or VLE.About the guestsPhilipp Ager is professor of economics at the University of Mannheim, a Research Fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and an editorial board member at Explorations in Economic History. His research spans the economic history of the United States, technological change, and the long-run effects of crises and disasters; his work on the Great Fire of London of 1666 featured in an earlier episode of VoxTalks Economics.Research and sources cited in this episodeThe Song of the Shirt. Thomas Hood's poem about a destitute seamstress was first published anonymously in Punch in December 1843. Hood based it on the case of Mrs Biddell, a London widow prosecuted after pawning clothes she had been given to sew. Godey's Lady's Book. The most widely read women's magazine in the US at the time crowned the sewing machine "the queen of inventions" in 1860, having calculated that a man's shirt took 20,620 stitches and 14 hours to sew by hand, against an hour and a quarter by machine. Singer and the Sewing Machine: A Capitalist Romance. Ruth Brandon's 1977 biography of Isaac Singer (Google Books) is the source for both Singer quotations read in this episode. .How the Other Half Lives. Jacob Riis, a Danish-born police reporter in New York, published his account of tenement and sweatshop life in 1890 (free at Project Gutenberg). The shirtmaker's testimony read in this episode was given to the State Board of Arbitration during the shirtmakers' strike and reported by Riis in his chapter on the working girls of New York.The household appliance revolution. Philipp contrasts the sewing machine with the washing machines and vacuum cleaners that arrived two generations later, which economists have credited with freeing women to join the workforce; "Engines of Liberation" by Jeremy Greenwood, Ananth Seshadri and Mehmet Yorukoglu, Review of Economic Studies, 2005, covers this topic. The sewing machine saved time in the same way, but in the 1860s far fewer acceptable jobs awaited the women whose time it saved.More VoxTalks Economics episodesThe economic effect of the Great Fire of London. Philipp Ager's previous visit to VoxTalks Economics, with Paul Sharp, on what contemporary records reveal about London's uneven recovery after 1666.Related reading on VoxEUGender norms and the labour market, a VoxEU column on how norms, both internalised and enforced by peers, constrain women's labour market outcomes; the modern counterpart of the stigma that kept married women in Massachusetts out of paid work.

NATHAN B. HOFFMAN is a mediator who has participated in over one hundred mediations is his practice since 1979.Visit his website here: https://www.thehoffmanlawfirm.com/

In Part 2 of Episode 155/156, Matthew Brickman speaks with entrepreneur and Best Interest App founder Sol Kennedy for a powerful conversation about how AI and apps are already reshaping the future of family law.Drawing from his own high-conflict divorce experience, Sol explains how the Best Interest App uses AI to help co-parents reduce emotional triggers, filter toxic communication, and stay focused on what truly matters: the best interests of the children.Matthew and Sol dive deep into: The psychology of co-parent conflict  Emotional triggers during divorce  AI-powered communication moderation  Differences between Best Interest and apps like OurFamilyWizard & Talking Parents  Solo-mode communication tools  Parenting plans and mediation  How courts and mediators use co-parenting apps  Why reducing conflict early can change a child's future This episode blends technology, psychology, mediation, and real-world family dynamics into one fascinating discussion about the future of co-parenting support systems.If you're a parent, mediator, attorney, therapist, or simply interested in how AI is transforming human communication, this conversation is a must-listen.

„Sport has the power to change the world.“ Von dem Optimismus dieser Worte des ehemaligen südafrikanischen Präsidenten Nelson Mandela (1918–2013) scheint inzwischen nur noch wenig übrig zu sein. Bereits bei den Fußballweltmeisterschaften der Männer 2018 in Russland und 2022 in Katar stellte sich die Frage, wie geeignet die jeweiligen Gastgeberländer angesichts der Unterdrückung queerer Menschen sowie der teils katastrophalen Arbeitsbedingungen auf den Stadionbaustellen überhaupt sind. Dies geschieht, obwohl die FIFA sich laut ihren Statuten „zur Einhaltung aller international anerkannten Menschenrechte“ bekennt und „sich für den Schutz dieser Rechte“ einsetzen will (Art. 3 FIFA-Statuten 2024, eigene Übersetzung). Mit Blick auf die anstehende Fußballweltmeisterschaft der Männer, deren Austragung mit den Vereinigten Staaten zumindest eine umstrittene Gastgebernation umfasst, stellen wir uns im Podcast die Frage: In welchem Verhältnis stehen Sport und Menschenrechte zueinander?Dafür haben wir uns mit Björn Schiffbauer unterhalten, der in seiner wissenschaftlichen Karriere die Themenschwerpunkte dieser Folge vereint hat – Völkerrecht, Menschenrechte und Sport. Im Jahr 2025 gab er auch einen Sammelband zu dieser Thematik heraus. Ergänzend beleuchtet Deborah Peters im Grundlagenteil die Rechte von Athlet*innen und stellt Fälle vor dem Internationalen Sportgerichtshof (Court of Arbitration for Sport, CAS) vor.Eine automatische Transkription der Folge findest du hier auf dem Völkerrechtsblog. Für die Richtigkeit der automatischen Transkription übernehmen wir keine Gewähr.Wir sind gespannt auf eure Rückmeldungen! Lob, Anmerkungen und Kritik sind herzlich willkommen an ⁠podcast@voelkerrechtsblog.org⁠. Abonniert unseren Podcast ⁠via RSS⁠, über ⁠Spotify⁠ oder überall dort, wo es Podcasts gibt. Es gibt die Möglichkeit, auf diesen Plattformen den Völkerrechtspodcast zu bewerten, wir freuen uns über 5 Sterne! Hintergrundinformationen:Antoine Duval und Mark James, Is the International Olympic Committee's Decision to Disqualify Vladyslav Heraskevych Legal?, Verfassungsblog. 12.02.2026.Björn Schiffbauer, Der Wettkampfausschluss von Nationen aus politischen Gründen – Grundzüge einer Ausschlussdogmatik in der Schnittmenge zwischen Völkerrecht und Sportrecht, in: Schiffbauer (Hrsg.), Menschenrechte und Werte im Sport (2025), S. 43-80.Livia Hinz, The ECtHR's Final Ruling in Semenya v Switzerland: A Missed Opportunity to Uphold Human Rights in Sports?, European Papers Vol. 10, No. 3 (2025), pp. 687-707.James AR Natziger, International Sports Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (2015).Paul Ziegler, Game Over Israel: Why UEFA Is Legally Obliged to Suspend the Israel Football Association IFA from Its Competitions, Völkerrechtsblog, 19.01.2026.Sahra Simay Günalp, Reactive justice: how FIFA and CAS co-construct child protection in football: A legal analysis of Article 19 of the FIFA RSTP through CAS jurisprudence, International Journal of Sports Law (2026). Moderation: Marie-Christin Manke & Salman KhanGrundlagen: Deborah PetersInterview: Prof. Dr. Björn Schiffbauer & Salman KhanSchnitt: ⁠Daniela RauCredits für den O-Ton zu Beginn: https://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/president-donald-j-trump-wins-the-inaugural-2025-fifa-peace-prize/, The White House, abgerufen am 04.06.2026, Minute 00:00-00:21, verwendet unter der CC BY 3.0 US Lizenz, wie in der White House Copyright Policy niedergelegt. Außer des Zuschnitts auf den angegebenen Bereich wurden keine Veränderungen vorgenommen.

Tehran's familiar playbook, housing affordability, Supreme Court decisions on arbitration agreements, and the world's oldest working journalist. Plus, Janie B. Cheaney on the dignity of dependence, the navigational design of pigeons, and the Tuesday morning news Support The World and Everything in It today at wng.org/donateAdditional support comes from Pensacola Theological Seminary... Preparing students to preach God's Word. go.pcci.edu/startseminaryFrom Ambassadors Impact Network, a nonprofit investor group that has helped investor members deploy over $26 million into more than 60 companies since 2018. The network seeks growth-stage businesses led by Christians who tangibly show and share the gospel. If you know an investor interested in faith-aligned private company opportunities, encourage them to explore membership at ambassadorsimpact.comAnd from Dordt University, host of the upcoming At Work in the Garden conference, celebrating God's good design of work. Dordt.edu/garden

Forced arbitration clauses have become embedded as a dominant mechanism in technology vendor contracts, shifting legal risk and accountability away from large vendors and reducing recourse options for managed service providers (MSPs) and IT service firms. This structural change, present in agreements with RMM and PSA vendors as well as hyperscalers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, establishes a private dispute resolution system that operates beyond the traditional court system and is typically non-negotiable for smaller partners. The shift is evidenced by data and case studies outlined by Brendan Ballou. According to supplied figures, while consumers win in 89% of small claims court cases, their success rate drops to between 20% and 30% in arbitration, and even less—sometimes as low as 0.2%—for certain arbitration providers. Arbitration clauses are enforced even in extreme cases, as illustrated by a notable instance involving Disney, in which a forced arbitration clause was applied following a consumer's prior account registration. Legal precedent as far back as the 2011 Supreme Court decision referenced by Brendan Ballou has broadened the Federal Arbitration Act well beyond its 1925 origins, further entrenching this system. Additional developments reference increased litigation in the 1980s, often cited as justification for expanding arbitration, though he attributes much of the legal caseload surge to government actions rather than consumer or employee lawsuits. The technology industry's broad adoption of arbitration, especially in contracts where MSPs have little or no room to negotiate, further cements these power imbalances. Alternatives such as mediation are discussed as potentially less risky, but their adoption remains limited. The operational implications for MSPs, IT service providers, and IT leaders include heightened contract risk and reduced leverage in vendor disputes. Arbitration clauses limit access to open legal processes, restrict discovery rights, and are prone to bias in favor of vendors with repeat arbitrator relationships. For MSPs reliant on large platforms and suppliers, this creates ongoing exposure and complicates risk management. Mitigating measures—such as leveraging peer coordination for "mass arbitration" or negotiating for post-dispute mediation rather than pre-dispute forced arbitration—require proactive planning but may remain unavailable in standard vendor agreements. Supported by:MoovilaHaloPSA  

On today's Legally Speaking Podcast, I'm joined by three fantastic guests from the world of disputes. First, Loukas Mistelis, International Arbitration Partner at Clyde & Co, Professor of Transnational Commercial Law and Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London and Co-Chair of London International Disputes Week. Next, returning guest Henrietta (Hetti) Jackson-Stops, mediator, Partner of IPOS Mediation, founder of Simply Resolved, former Allen & Overy litigator, former Government lawyer, and currently leading the LegalTech Showcase at LIDW. And also returning to the show, Emilie Jones, Legal Director and Barrister at Pinsent Masons, Co-Chair of London International Disputes Week, specialising in commercial litigation and leading Pinsent Masons' Litigation and Regulatory practice development function.This episode is all about the modern litigator and arbitrator, and how legal tech and AI are changing dispute resolution in practice, not just in principle. Because the real question is no longer whether change is coming. It is what has actually changed, what is genuinely adding value, and what still depends on human judgment. So today, we are getting into the realities of modern disputes practice, the opportunities, the risks and what great litigators and arbitrators need to look like in 2026.So why should you be listening in? You can hear Rob, Loukas, Hetti and Emilie discussing:- Artificial Intelligence Enhancing Efficiency In Litigation, Arbitration and Mediation- Online Dispute Resolution Expanding Cross-Border Collaboration and Accessibility- Document Review Technology Transforming Complex Case Management- Human Judgment Remaining Essential Despite Rapid Legal Tech Adoption- Legal Professionals Focusing On Practical Value Beyond AI HypeConnect with Emilie Jones here - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emilie-j-a32415162Connect with Loukas Mistelis here - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/prof-loukas-mistelis-fciarb-0a736b1bConnect with Henrietta Jackson-Stops here - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/henrietta-hetti-jackson-stops-2331482

You know it's bad when the New York Times questions if your team is the Best Bad team in baseball or the Worst Good team in baseball. That’s the Padres and they are looking for answers. MLB Union makes first big proposal to owners. MLB News Rays, Braves, Brewers. NBA Playoffs Thunder, Spurs, Knicks. NBA Trade Rumors Thunder, Bulls, Celtics, Lakers, Warriors, Heat. NFL Racism Lawsuit. NFL Trade Rumors Eagles, Rams, Patriots, Chiefs, Jaguars, Chargers. Raiders, Packers, Falcons. NCAA Anti-Trust, Texas Tech, and Sports Gambling. NHL News Kings, Ducks, Maple Leafs. Team USA coach Maurico Pochettino preps for World Cup. Got a question or comment for The Franchise? Drop your take in the live chat on YouTube, X or Facebook. Here's what Lee Hamilton thinks on Thursday, May 28, 2026. 1)…PADRES HEAD OUT ON ROAD-LOOKING FOR ANSWERS “BEST BAD TEAM-WORST GOOD TEAM?” 1A) …MLB UNION MAKES 1ST PROPOSAL…BRUCE MEYER “UNION DEMANDS OF OWNERS” …PLAYERS PAY RAISE …PRE ARB BONUS POOL …SUPER 2-ARBITRATION …FA SERVICE TIME …LUX TAX THRESHOLD …INTEGRITY TAX …TV TAX 1B) …OWNERS PROPOSAL TO UNION…ROB MANFRED “RADICAL MONEY PROPOSAL” …HARD CAP (245M) …HARD FLOOR (171M) …50-50 SPLIT ALL REVENUE …SHARE OF ALL LOCAL TV-RADIO REVENUE …PHASE IN CAP …LARRY BIRD-RETAIN FA RULE 2)…MLB NOTEBOOK “NAMES IN NEWS” WANDER FRANCO BOB HORNER JACOB MISIROWSKI ————- 3)…NBA PLAYOFFS “SUPER TEAM-VS-UPSTART” OKC SPURS NY KNICKS 4)…NBA NOTEBOOK “TRADE RUMORS” OKC-BULLS BOSTON-LAKERS GOLDEN STATE-MIAMI —————- 5)…NFL LOSES IN SUPREME COURT…ROGER GOODELL/BRIAN FLORES “RACISM SUIT TO TRIAL” 6)…NFL NOTEBOOK…EAGLES/AJ BROWN “TRADE OFFERS” LA RAMS …PATRIOTS CHIEFS…JAGUARS CHARGERS-CHIEFS RAMS-RAIDERS PACKERS-FALCONS ============== (HALFTIME…DIXIELINE LUMBER) ============== 7)…CONGRESS-TO DO INTERVENTION ON NCAA PROBLEMS…TEXAS TECH “ANTI TRUST & GAMBLING” ———– 8)…NHL NOTEBOOK…KINGS/DUCKS/LEAFS/CANADIENS “COACHES-GM STORIES” ———— 9)…WORLD CUP ROSTERS SET…TEAM USA/MAURICIO POCHETTINO “TEAM USA-WORLD CUP” ============ #MLB #PADRES #mannymachado #fernandotatisjr #jakecronenworth #robmanfred #MLBPA #BRUCEMEYER #nfl #PATRIOTS #JAGUARS #CHIEFS #CHARGERS #RAIDERS #EAGLES #PACKERS #FALCONS #fernandomendoza #joehortiz #BRIANFLORES #ROGERGOODELL #ROONEYRULE #lakers #knicks #celtics #bucks #thunder #spurs #WARRIORS #BULLS #GIANNISANTETOKOUNMPO #KARLANTHONYTOWNS #VICTORWEMBENYAMA #TEXASTECH #nhl #MAPLELEAFS #DUCKS #KINGS #goldenknights #canadiens #CLAUDELEMIEUX #teamusa #christianpulisic #MauricioPochettino #worldcup2026 Be sure to share this episode with a friend! ☆☆ STAY CONNECTED ☆☆ For more of Hacksaw's Headlines, The Best 15 Minutes, One Man's Opinion, and Hacksaw's Pro Football Notebook: http://www.leehacksawhamilton.com/ SUBSCRIBE on YouTube for more reactions, upcoming shows and more! ► https://www.youtube.com/c/leehacksawhamiltonsports FACEBOOK ➡ https://www.facebook.com/leehacksaw.hamilton.9 TWITTER ➡ https://twitter.com/hacksaw1090 TIKTOK ➡ https://www.tiktok.com/@leehacksawhamilton INSTAGRAM ➡ https://www.instagram.com/leehacksawhamiltonsports/ To get the latest news and information about sports, join Hacksaw’s Insider’s Group. It’s free! https://www.leehacksawhamilton.com/team/ Thank you to our sponsors: Dixieline Lumber and Home Centers https://www.dixieline.com

This Day in Legal History: Rhode Island Ratifies the Constitution, 1790On this day in 1790, Rhode Island became the thirteenth and final original state to ratify the United States Constitution, doing so by a margin of 34 to 32 at a convention in Newport. Rhode Island's hesitation had been considerable: the state refused to send delegates to the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, and twice rejected ratification in popular referenda — a curiously democratic method for refusing to join a constitutional union founded in part on the premise that pure direct democracy is dangerous. The state's small-farmer and debtor classes, the same constituencies that had backed the paper-money policies that horrified Madison, were deeply suspicious of a strong federal government that would constrain state-issued currency, ban impairment of debt contracts (Article I, Section 10), and override state-level debtor protections.Ratification finally came under the gun: Congress, frustrated by the foot-dragging, was openly threatening to treat Rhode Island as a foreign nation for tariff purposes, which would have devastated the Providence merchants. The convention's narrow margin reflected a hostile deal more than a meeting of constitutional minds.Importantly, Rhode Island's ratification was conditioned on a lengthy list of proposed amendments — many of them mirroring the Bill of Rights that James Madison had already shepherded through Congress in September 1789 and that would be ratified in December 1791. With Rhode Island in, the original Union was at last complete, and the practical question of whether the new federal government could function with one stubborn holdout fell away. The episode is a useful reminder that the constitutional founding was not so much a singular moment as a slow, contested, occasionally coerced bargain — one that ended in Newport on a humid Saturday in May.The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday handed down a narrow 5-4 ruling in Pitchford v. Cain, reviving a Mississippi death row inmate's challenge to the prosecutor's race-based use of peremptory strikes at his 2006 capital trial. Justice Kavanaugh, writing for a majority that included Chief Justice Roberts plus Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, held that the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably applied Batson v. Kentucky's three-step framework for challenges to peremptory strikes.The Court found the trial judge accepted the prosecutor's race-neutral explanations without giving defense counsel a meaningful opportunity to argue that those reasons were pretextual, and the state appellate court compounded the error by treating that omission as a waiver. The prosecutor, Doug Evans, used four of his twelve strikes to remove four of the five Black prospective jurors, leaving a jury of eleven white jurors and one Black juror in a Mississippi county that was then roughly 40 percent Black.The Court leaned heavily on its 2019 Flowers v. Mississippi decision, which involved the same prosecutor and the same trial judge and had already found Evans's pattern of striking Black jurors discriminatory. Federal habeas relief was appropriate because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's deferential “no fair-minded jurist could agree” standard cannot rescue a state-court ruling that simply skips Batson's third step. Justice Gorsuch dissented, joined by Justices Alito, Thomas, and Barrett, arguing the record showed counsel chose silence rather than being denied an opportunity. The case now returns to the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings.Justices Revive Mississippi Death Row Inmate's Batson Claim | Law360Caesars Entertainment agreed Thursday to be acquired by Tilman Fertitta's privately-held Fertitta Entertainment in an all-cash deal valued at roughly $17.6 billion, including the assumption of approximately $11.9 billion of Caesars' outstanding debt. Shareholders will receive $31 per share, a 49 percent premium over Caesars' unaffected share price as of February 25, and the company will be delisted from Nasdaq upon closing. The agreement includes a go-shop period running through approximately July 11 — a Delaware deal-protection mechanism that lets the target board solicit competing bids without triggering a termination fee, and that helps insulate the sale process from a Revlon-flavored fiduciary-duty challenge by signaling the board actively tested the market after signing.Latham & Watkins and Skadden are representing Caesars (the latter on antitrust), White & Case is advising Fertitta, and Freshfields is counseling the Carano family, which holds a roughly 5 percent stake and will roll part of its equity into the combined entity. The combined company would control more than 60 casino resorts and over 200 retail sports betting locations under the William Hill brand. Antitrust review will be the inflection point given the overlap on the Las Vegas Strip — where Caesars operates eight properties — and across digital betting. Funding will come from Fertitta equity and committed debt financing arranged by a syndicate of ten banks.4 Firms Steer Fertitta's $17.6B Caesars Entertainment Buy | Law360The Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday finalized a long-awaited overhaul of the federal Independent Dispute Resolution process under the No Surprises Act of 2021, the statute that pulls most out-of-network billing fights out of the patient's hands and into a baseball-style arbitration between provider and payer. The headline change slashes the per-party administrative fee from $115 to $15 per case, undoing a sharp 2023 hike that providers had successfully challenged in the Eastern District of Texas as having been adopted without notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.The rule also expands batching, so economically similar items and services can be bundled into a single arbitration, which the agency says will cut transaction costs and ease the chronic IDR backlog. HHS is also rolling out a centralized federal dispute portal and a payer registry intended to fix the persistent problem of providers being unable to identify which entity is actually on the hook in any given case. Reactions from physician and radiology groups have been mixed, with broad support for the fee cut but lingering concern that the qualifying payment amount methodology — the benchmark arbitrators must consider — still tilts the field toward insurers. APA Section 706 challenges to portions of the earlier IDR framework remain pending in the Fifth Circuit.US HHS finalizes rule to streamline dispute resolution under No Surprises Act | ReutersABC's New York affiliate WABC-TV filed an objection with the FCC on Thursday, calling Chairman Brendan Carr's April order requiring early license renewals for all eight ABC-owned stations an “unconstitutional” act of viewpoint-based retaliation barred by the First Amendment. WABC submitted its renewal under protest, arguing the agency has not demanded simultaneous early renewals from a commonly owned station group in more than fifty years and that the Media Bureau's stated rationale — possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and the FCC's nondiscrimination rules — is pretext for punishing disfavored editorial speech.The doctrinal hook is the Bantam Books line of cases through last term's NRA v. Vullo, which holds that government officials cannot use the implicit threat of regulatory sanction to coerce private intermediaries into suppressing protected expression. The order followed a separate FCC inquiry into whether “The View” has been violating the agency's equal-time rule for political candidates, and came against the backdrop of repeated White House demands that Disney fire Jimmy Kimmel. Democratic Commissioner Anna Gomez has openly urged Disney not to “flinch.”On the same day, the FCC issued a broader notice warning all broadcasters that licenses could be reviewed early if stations are deemed to be failing their statutory public-interest obligation — a posture that drops the question of broadcast licensing back into Red Lion-era First Amendment territory.FCC Targeting ABC Licenses To Punish Speech, Station Says | Law360 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

The Arbitration period in baseball is always interesting. Dodgers Center Fielder Andy Pages is having a fantastic season and is part of the baseball arbitration. Which whatever the Dodgers pay him he has to take it. LAST MAN STANDING. STRAIGHT UP WITH TRAVIS RODGERS. SHOP TALK Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Neutral's Playbook: Practical Guides for Counsel in Arbitration and Mediation is a four-part series exploring the realities of modern dispute resolution. Featuring experienced arbitration and mediation practitioners, the series delivers action-oriented guidance to counsel navigating complex proceedings. Whether addressing domestic or international disputes, each conversation offers practical insight for lawyers, arbitrators, and emerging practitioners alike.In this episode, IADC Speaks Host Al Vance (Vance Dispute Resolution, PC) chats with Daniela Karollus-Bruner (CMS – Vienna) and Christopher A. Kenney (Bowditch & Dewey, LLP) on how to prepare and manage arbitration. The conversation covers topics such as how to get an arbitrator engaged, the noticeable differences between US and international arbitrations, and primary drivers for the use of arbitration.--Join the IADC for our first International Arbitration Skills Academy {July 4}. This one-day advocacy training will guide attendees in the art of cross-examination as it relates to international arbitration. You'll discuss techniques, watch demonstrations, and participate in a mock hearing. Learn more: https://www.iadclaw.org/events/international-arbitration-skills-academy/

Featuring: Maria Aiello, NextGen Committee Co-Chair and Associate Attorney, The Upper Deck CompanyHost: Landis Barber, Safran Law OfficesIn this episode of Highlight Reel Headlines, host Landis Barber is joined by Maria Aiello for a conversation recorded on site in Chicago at the SLA Annual Conference. The episode opens with the College Sports Commission's arbitration win, including discussion of the arbitrator's findings on “Associated Entities,” valid business purpose requirements, and the warehousing of NIL rights. From there, the conversation turns to former Ohio University football coach Brian Smith's wrongful termination lawsuit. Landis and Maria then examine a significant decision in the Chicago Cubs' ongoing rooftop litigation. In addition, the episode covers the NFL referees' newly approved collective bargaining agreement. Finally, the conversation closes with reflections on the Sports Lawyers Association Annual Conference in Chicago. Join us as we roll through the headlines!

For the agenda for the hearing, see the amended agenda filed the day of the hearing, docket number 35618 here:https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/ftx/Home-DocketInfoThe court's ruling granting the objection to the claim gets into the FTX fraud, how people lost savings, some their families' life savings due to the FTX fraud for which Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted following trial by jury, and sentenced to a 25 year sentence. SBF has appealed his criminal conviction via counsel, seeking a new trial before a new judge.I believe Melamed is typically pronounced Me-LAH-med, not as it is pronounced by the court. The New York City based federal courts tend to do a better job with Jewish surnames than the Delaware federal courts. FTX's bankruptcy proceedings are ongoing in Delaware. SBF is imprisoned in California.MATTERS GOING FORWARD at this May 14, per the amended court agenda:FTX Recovery Trust's Objection to Proofs of Claim Filed by ELD Capital LLC [D.I. 34251, filed on January 2, 2026] Status: The Court will issue a bench ruling on the objection at the hearing.FTX Recovery Trust's Motion to Enforce Prior Orders that Preclude Seth Melamed from Asserting New Claims in Arbitration [D.I. 35243, filed on April 2, 2026] Objection Deadline: April 9, 2026 at 4:00 p.m. (ET); extended to April 20, 2026 for Seth Melamed.

When you signed up for Disney+, you probably signed away your right to sue Disney. Most Americans have — buried in the terms and conditions of many apps is a legal clause called forced arbitration, and it's become corporate America's get-out-of-court-free card.Today on Second Request, Executive Editor Teddy Downey sits down with Brendan Ballou — former special counsel in the DOJ's Antitrust Division and author of the new book When Companies Run the Courts: How Forced Arbitration Became America's Secret Justice System — to discuss the history and impact of forced arbitration in America.

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.What happens when a highly qualified executive finds themselves at the mercy of a toxic corporate culture? Join Mark Carey and his co-host as they unravel the intricate web of employment law in the gripping case of Malkani v. Gartner, Inc., where the stakes are high and the implications for employee rights are profound. This episode dives deep into the harsh realities of sexual harassment, age discrimination, and the dismantling of the corporate ladder, spotlighting Robert Malkani's abrupt career upheaval following a corporate reorganization.Malkani's story serves as a cautionary tale about the hidden dangers lurking within corporate structures, where discrimination based on age and sex can thrive unchecked. His sudden demotion under the toxic management of Eric Potts exemplifies how a hostile work environment can lead to devastating consequences for employees. As the hosts dissect the legal framework surrounding Malkani's claims, they emphasize the critical role of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA), which could potentially expose corporate misconduct that is often swept under the rug in arbitration.Understanding your rights in the workplace is paramount, especially in a landscape where HR departments frequently prioritize risk management over genuine employee protection. This episode not only sheds light on the systemic issues within corporate HR but also equips listeners with the knowledge to navigate employment disputes and advocate for themselves. With a focus on employee empowerment, the conversation touches on crucial topics such as severance negotiation, workplace culture, and the importance of recognizing retaliation and discrimination in all its forms.As the episode wraps up, Mark and his co-host reflect on how recent legal changes may reshape corporate America, urging listeners to stay informed and engaged in the fight against workplace injustices. Whether you're an employee facing challenges in a toxic work environment or simply someone invested in understanding the evolving landscape of employment law, this episode is packed with insights and actionable advice. Tune in and arm yourself with the knowledge to survive and thrive in today's corporate world!Don't miss this essential episode of the Employee Survival Guide®, where we tackle the uncomfortable truths about sexual harassment, discrimination, and the rights of employees in today's workplace. Join us for an enlightening discussion that promises to empower and inform. If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, X and LinkedIn.  We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Leaving a review will help other employees find the Employee Survival Guide.  For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.Disclaimer:  For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice. 

I speak with former federal prosecutor BRENDAN BALLOU about a number of things. His first book was PLUNDER: Private Equity's Plan to Pillage America and we get an update. He's founder and CEO of the Public Integrity Project, which sues those who seek to bribe government officials, as well as officials who seek to be bribed. We check in on that. Ballou was among those who prosecuted the attackers of January 6th so we talk about Trump's corruption & pardoning practices. Finally, we dig into his  latest book, WHEN COMPANIES RUN THE COURTS: Forced Arbitration and America's Secret Justice System. You can learn more at PublicIntegrityProject.org

Forced arbitration clauses are buried in everything from product warranties to bank loans to employment contracts, often requiring consumers and workers to give up their right to sue without realizing it. Brendan Ballou, a former federal prosecutor and co-founder of the Public Integrity Project, says arbitration has become an opaque, parallel legal system that favors corporations and undermines the rule of law. We talk to Ballou about new book, “When Companies Run the Courts,” which looks at why forced arbitration has become so widespread and what states like California are doing to restrict it. Guests: Brendan Ballou, former federal prosecutor; CEO, the Public Integrity Project; author, "When Companies Run the Courts: Forced Arbitration and America's Secret Justice System" Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What employers should know about key developments this week: Arbitration Agreement Drafting Pitfalls: Vague or imprecise language regarding discovery, confidentiality, neutrality, and mutuality can hand employees a roadmap for challenging—or defeating—your arbitration agreements in court. AI-Assisted Drafting Risks: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may generate arbitration agreement language based on existing law but can miss evolving legal arguments in pending cases, making attorney review essential before finalizing any agreement. Strategic Decision-Making for Arbitration Programs: Employers should clearly identify their primary goals for an arbitration program, familiarize themselves with the chosen forum's rules, and ensure consistency across all arbitration provisions company-wide. In this episode of Employment Law This Week®, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jonathan M. Brenner and Victoria Sloan Lin discuss how imprecise drafting can leave arbitration agreements vulnerable to court challenges, why AI-assisted drafting requires careful attorney oversight, and how employers can build a more defensible and strategically sound arbitration program. - Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw434 Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com - Epstein Becker Green is a national law firm that focuses its resources on health care, life sciences, and workforce management solutions, coupled with powerful litigation strategies. This video is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship.  EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and #WorkforceWednesday® are registered trademarks of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. © Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.

Arbitration has emerged as a faster, more streamlined option for parties looking to resolve disputes. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has supercharged arbitration even more.

Arbitration has emerged as a faster, more streamlined option for parties looking to resolve disputes. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has supercharged arbitration even more.

Happer and Snow breaks down the ruling from the Nebraska vs CSC arbitration case.

Matt breaks down the recent ruling from the Nebraska vs CSC Arbitration case.

Filippo Fontanelli - Inadmissibility of Claims in Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration by Audiovisual Library of International Law

Nebraska Football Schedule Thoughts, Players Lose Arbitration Case - May 11th, 5:00pmAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This is the second episode of "Cross-examining AI", HSF Kramer's podcast series on disputes and AI where we unpack the key developments in AI that are shaping litigation. In this episode we give an update on privilege and AI in the US, find out why not to use ChatGPT to develop a corporate strategy, and finally discuss how AI is being used in the world of international arbitration. This episode is hosted by Camilla Macpherson, a knowledge lawyer in our disputes team. Camilla is joined by Alan R. Friedman, a counsel in our New York disputes team, Nick Tonckens, an associate in our New York disputes team and Liz Kantor, a knowledge counsel in our global arbitration team. Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast. • Civil Justice Council publishes consultation on use of AI for preparing court documents https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/litigation/2026-02/civil-justice-council-publishes-consultation-on-use-of-ai-for-preparing-court-documents • New York court finds client chats with generative AI tool Claude are not privileged https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/litigation/2026-02/new-york-court-finds-client-chats-with-generative-ai-tool-claude-are-not-privileged • US courts find privilege applies to use of public AI tools by self-represented litigants https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/litigation/2026-04/us-courts-find-privilege-applies-to-use-of-public-ai-tools-by-self-represented-litigants • Delaware Court of Chancery reinstates seller CEO and extends earnout payment window, as buyer's ChatGPT strategy fails https://www.hsfkramer.com/insights/2026-04/delaware-court-of-chancery-reinstates-seller-ceo-and-extends-earnout-payment-window-as-buyers-chatgpt-strategy-fails • AI-volution in Arbitration: the new Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Guidelines https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/arbitration/2025-03/ai-volution-in-arbitration-the-new-chartered-institute-of-arbitrators-guidelines

In this episode, we have Mario Simonyan of ESQ Go, an attorney who brings a rare operator-first perspective to the table. Having built and sold his own brands, Mario understands the high stakes of the Amazon ecosystem in a way most lawyers don't. He frames arbitration as the "car crash" of the business world. It is a situation most sellers hope to avoid but must understand before a crisis hits. His dual background as a former seller and a legal expert allows him to ground complex strategy in the operational realities of running a high-revenue brand. A major takeaway is that arbitration isn't reserved exclusively for account suspensions. Many cases involve active sellers who are still trading but facing serious issues like missing inventory or frozen capital. This shifts the focus from simply keeping an account live to protecting the assets and cash flow that keep a business solvent. Because the process is long, expensive, and can take over a year to resolve, Mario positions it as a definitive last resort. It is a path to be taken only after standard appeals, executive escalations, and pre-arbitration efforts have been completely exhausted. Looking ahead into 2026, the discussion highlights the necessity of proactive risk management as enforcement around compliance and authenticity tightens. The cost of mistakes is rising, making it vital for sellers to understand their legal pathways before they are forced to use them. Whether through better documentation, channel diversification, or a clearer grasp of the arbitration process, preparation is the best defense. Ultimately, the sellers who treat legal strategy as a core part of their business rather than an afterthought will be the ones best positioned to survive a major dispute.   Episode Notes: 00:09 - Introduction: Amazon Suspensions and the “Afterlife” 01:00 - Why Arbitration Matters for Amazon Sellers 01:41 - Mario's Background as an Amazon Seller Turned Lawyer 02:24 - Arbitration as the Last-Resort “Nuclear Option” 02:49 - Is Arbitration Only for Suspended Seller Accounts? 03:28 - Lost Inventory, Damaged Inventory, and Held Funds 04:06 - Scott's Example: Missing Inventory and Monthly Storage Fees 06:23 - How the Arbitration Process Starts 06:37 - Demand Letter, AAA Filing, and Amazon's Response 08:03 - Arbitrator Selection and Preliminary Hearing 09:55 - Discovery, Documents, and Settlement Signals 10:57 - Pre-Hearing Briefs and Zoom Arbitration Hearings 12:12 - Cross-Examination and Amazon Risk Department Witnesses 13:35 - Policy Questions Around Reselling and Inauthentic Claims 14:28 - Arbitration Timeline and Confidentiality 15:11 - What Sellers Should Do Before Arbitration 15:44 - Plan of Action, Appeals, and Escalations 16:28 - Pre-Arbitration Demand Letters 17:25 - Appealing for Fund Release Instead of Reinstatement 18:31 - Why Arbitration Often Doesn't Make Sense Under $50K 19:39 - 2026 Trends: Resellers, Inauthentic Claims, and Marketplace Pressure 22:20 - Walmart Marketplace Growth and Seller Suspension Issues 23:41 - Walmart Account Access, Category Suspensions, and Seller Center Challenges 26:21 - Private Label Risks: Listing Suspensions, Trademark Issues, and Compliance 27:01 - Closing Thoughts on Arbitration and Seller Risk 28:41 - Final Takeaway: Staying Prepared in 2026   Related Post 10 Jungle Scout Alternatives in 2026 (Free & Paid, Tested)   How to Reach Mario: EMAIL: mario@esqgo.com Website: www.esqgo.com Phone: (424) 363-6233 LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mario-simonyan-a26927176   Scott's Links LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/scott-needham-a8b39813 X: @itsScottNeedham Instagram: @smartestseller YouTube: www.youtube.com/@smartestamazonseller2371 Newsletter: https://www.smartscout.com/newsletter-sign-up Blog: https://www.smartscout.com/blog

Matt talks a bit about the movies he's watched recently before detailing the arbitration case at the University of Nebraska today and how it will impact NIL across the country going forward.

Arbitration can be an attractive alternative to litigation for many clients, as storied practitioner and WilmerHale Partner and Chair of the firm's International Arbitration group Gary Born can attest. He sits down with co-host Felicia Ellsworth in this episode of In the Public Interest to discuss what sets international arbitration apart.Throughout their conversation, Born examines what the current socio-political landscape in the US and abroad indicates about shifting client needs in relation to dispute resolution. He also touches on his recent publications covering both international arbitration and international law in the US courts, with the former providing a valuable resource for newcomers to their field and the latter taking a deep dive into the historical significance international law has had on the US courts.

Often in mediation, parents will disagree on who is actually acting in the best interest of the child. So then how is the best interest of the child decided? Matthew Brickman discusses best interest factors you need to know if you are currently or ever in this position. Matthew Brickman answers your most frequently asked questions about divorce as he goes over several key points:Assume nothing.Know who you are before you get married. Know who you're getting married to. Know the laws and statutes in the state you live in.Don't take advice from anyone who isn't a legal professional in the state in which you're getting married and living in.If you have a matter, disagreement, or dispute you need professional help with then visit iMediate.com - Email mbrickman@ichatmediation or Call (877) 822-1479Matthew Brickman is a Florida Supreme Court certified family and appellate mediator who has worked in the 15th and 19th Judicial Circuit Courts since 2009 and 2006 respectively. But what makes him qualified to speak on the subject of conflict resolution is his own personal experience with divorce.Download Matthew's book on iTunes for FREE:You're Not the Only One - The Agony of Divorce: The Joy of Peaceful ResolutionMatthew Brickman President iMediate Inc. Mediator 20836CFAiMediateInc.comSCHEDULE YOUR MEDIATION: https://ichatmediation.com/calendar/OFFICIAL BLOG: https://ichatmediation.com/podcastOFFICIAL YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/ichatmediationOFFICIAL LINKEDIN: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ichat-mediation/ABOUT MATTHEW BRICKMAN:Matthew Brickman is a Supreme Court of Florida certified county civil family mediator who has worked in the 15th and 19th Judicial Circuit Courts since 2009 and 2006 respectively. He is also an appellate certified mediator who mediates a variety of small claims, civil, and family cases. Mr. Brickman recently graduated both the Harvard Business School Negotiation Mastery Program and the Negotiation Master Class at Harvard Law School. 

Send us Fan MailA “private religious process” sounds harmless until you see what it looks like on paper. We dig into newly public court documents describing Scientology's so-called arbitration system and why experts say it's not arbitration at all. From the Freewinds case involving former Sea Org members to the mechanics of how these clauses get signed today, we lay out what's being used to keep serious claims away from a real judge, a real jury, and basic due process.We also connect the dots to our own lawsuit history and explain the pressure tactics we experienced when facing Scientology in a legal setting: depositions designed to drain you, legal costs inflated on purpose, and the behind-the-scenes role of the Office of Special Affairs. Then we walk through what the documents allege happens inside Scientology's “arbitration” room, including the lack of a neutral decision maker, restrictions on bringing attorneys, bans on recording or note-taking, and methods that appear aimed at humiliation and retraumatization rather than fact-finding.Along the way, we unpack how Scientology's internal ethics and justice procedures resemble a rigged system, why the word arbitration never existed in Hubbard's church policies the way it's being used now, and what this could mean for other pending cases where forced arbitration is the gatekeeper. We wrap with listener questions, a giveaway, and what we're planning next, including an e-meter teardown and more Cult Survivor interviews.If you want more transparent reporting and firsthand breakdowns of Scientology, forced arbitration, Sea Org life, and court accountability, subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review. What part of this process do you think courts should shut down first?Support the showBFG Store - http://blownforgood-shop.fourthwall.com/Blown For Good on Audible - https://www.amazon.com/Blown-for-Good-Marc-Headley-audiobook/dp/B07GC6ZKGQ/ref=tmm_aud_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=Blown For Good Website: http://blownforgood.com/PODCAST INFO:Podcast website: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2131160Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/blown-for-good-behind-the-iron-curtain-of-scientology/id1671284503RSS: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2131160.rssYOUTUBE PLAYLISTS:Spy Files Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWtJfniWLwq4cA-eBNXD...

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.What happens when a toxic workplace culture collides with the legal system? Join us as we unpack the groundbreaking lawsuit filed by Diana Toomey against One Equity Partners (OEP), a Manhattan private equity firm, that challenges the very foundations of forced arbitration in the workplace. This episode of the Employee Survival Guide® dives deep into the alarming allegations of harassment and discrimination that Toomey faced, revealing an archaic mindset on gender roles and a glaring absence of adequate HR support that has left many employees feeling powerless. Mark Carey and his co-host navigate the intricate legal landscape surrounding Toomey's case, discussing the implications of the Ending Forced Arbitration Act (EFAA) and its potential to reshape employee rights in the face of corporate resistance. With forced arbitration often silencing victims of workplace discrimination, this episode sheds light on the pressing need for change and employee empowerment within the realms of employment law. Discover how Toomey's fight against gender discrimination and harassment could set a precedent for future workplace disputes and the importance of understanding your rights as an employee. From the challenges of proving sexual harassment under current laws to the ramifications of corporate arbitration agreements, we break down the complexities that every employee should be aware of. Whether you're navigating a hostile work environment, dealing with retaliation, or facing discrimination based on sex, race, or disability, this episode offers crucial insights into your rights and the resources available to you. As we explore the realities of severance negotiations and employment contracts, we also highlight the importance of advocating for a healthier workplace culture that prioritizes employee well-being and fair treatment. Tune in for insider tips on navigating employment law issues, understanding workplace policies, and empowering yourself in a system that often feels stacked against you. Don't miss this opportunity to learn how to survive and thrive in your career, because knowledge is power and your voice matters. Are you ready to take charge of your workplace experience? Listen now and equip yourself with the tools to navigate the complexities of employment disputes, workplace discrimination, and the ever-evolving landscape of employee rights. This is more than just a podcast; it's your guide to surviving and thriving in today's challenging work environment.  If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, X and LinkedIn.  We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Leaving a review will help other employees find the Employee Survival Guide.  For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.Disclaimer:  For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice. 

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.Have you ever faced the chilling reality of being sidelined in your career just as you're about to reap the rewards of your hard work? Join Mark Carey and his guest as they dissect the harrowing case of Owens v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC, a powerful narrative that exposes the insidious nature of forced arbitration and systemic discrimination lurking within corporate walls. This episode shines a spotlight on the shocking circumstances surrounding Nina Owens, a high-performing executive who found herself pushed out just before her five-year milestone, a move that would have unlocked significant severance benefits and financial security.As we navigate through the complexities of employment contracts, forced arbitration, and the often murky waters of civil rights protections, the discussion reveals how corporate leverage and strategic timing can devastate an employee's career trajectory and financial future. With Owens' allegations of sabotage, bias, and a hostile work environment, we unearth the severe challenges that women in leadership roles face, often feeling the weight of discrimination based on gender, race, and even pregnancy.But it doesn't stop there. We delve into the implications of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, exploring how this landmark legislation ties into Owens' case and underscores the urgent need for employees to understand their rights in the workplace. This episode serves as a crucial guide for anyone navigating the treacherous waters of employment law issues, from workplace discrimination to severance negotiation.With insights on how to advocate for yourself and empower your career, we discuss the vital distinctions between employees and partners, shedding light on the hidden dynamics that can lead to wrongful termination or constructive discharge. We also tackle the realities of remote work challenges and the importance of knowing your rights when facing workplace retaliation or harassment.Join us as we challenge the status quo, offering insider tips for employees and emphasizing the need for a robust understanding of employment law to combat workplace issues effectively. Whether you're dealing with a toxic boss, navigating a hostile work environment, or simply seeking to understand your legal rights, this episode of the Employee Survival Guide® is packed with essential knowledge and empowering strategies for your career survival. Don't miss this opportunity to learn how to stand up against discrimination and advocate for your rights in the workplace! If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, X and LinkedIn.  We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Leaving a review will help other employees find the Employee Survival Guide.  For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.Disclaimer:  For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice. 

Follow Dan on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/cotterdanFollowPat on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/donald-patrick-eckler-610290824/Predictions Sure To Go Wrong:   Pavlovich:Affirm Pung: Reverse Hemani: AffirmPavlovich:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/gw.25-2754.25-2754_04_08_2026.mp3Hemani:https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-1234Pung:https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/25-95

Surprise billing for patients is largely gone, so why are so many self-funded employer health plans still getting hammered by out-of-network costs? We sit down with Scott Bennett, Chief Provider Relations Officer at the PHIA Group, to unpack what the No Surprises Act is doing in the real world and why federal arbitration is starting to look less like a safety valve and more like a payment engine.Scott walks us through the mechanics that matter: QPA as the median contracted rate, the short open negotiation window, and the IDR process where an arbitrator picks one of two numbers. Then we dig into the headline signals from PHIA's national NSA report analyzing more than 1.25 million federal IDR disputes across 23,000-plus providers. When offers land five to six times above QPA and initiating parties win around 80% of the time, it creates a powerful incentive to file early and file often. For employer-sponsored health plans, especially self-funded groups like school districts and public safety employers, that can translate into budget shocks, higher renewals, and rising stop-loss pressure even when members never see a bill.We also explore why a small cluster of providers can drive a disproportionate share of disputes, what hotspots in certain states may be telling us about market power and network penetration, and how brokers and benefits advisors can protect clients with better data, tighter timelines, and a real IDR strategy instead of a reactive scramble. If you advise plan sponsors, this is a must-listen on NSA compliance, healthcare cost containment, fiduciary responsibility, and the evolving economics of out-of-network reimbursement.If this helped you, subscribe, share it with a colleague, and leave a review so more plan sponsors and advisors can find the conversation. What IDR pattern are you seeing in your own claims data?

Tuesday April 7, 2026 When Companies Run the Courts: How Forced Arbitration Became America's Secret Arbitration System

This week, join us as we revisit our episode on Arbitration and Post Decision Inquiries as a refresher! Original Air Date: October 15, 2021. When a liability decision cannot be determined between insurance companies, carries often turn to arbitration to pursue the case further in Arbitration Forums. Filing arbitration is a cost effective and timely way to make a final and binding decision and recuperate a speedy recovery. But is the award always the end? Not necessarily. On this week's installment, Rebecca sits down with arbitration attorney, Ana Zgela, to discuss what exactly occurs when there is an error made by the arbitrator or the panel. They discuss how an appeal can be submitted or when a complete refile is necessary, as well as when a post decision inquiry (PDI) is the right way to address errors found in the award.

We examine the continent's reaction after Senegal's 1‑0 AFCON final win from 18 January was overturned, with the Confederation of African Football (CAF) instead awarding Morocco a 3‑0 victory. CAF's disciplinary committee ruled that Senegal's walk-off protest amounted to a forfeit following Morocco's challenge to the initial decision. Senegal has now appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.And Sudan's civil war is now approaching its third year. The conflict began as a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, and both sides have relied heavily on external support from Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Iran. As Iran escalates attacks on Gulf countries in retaliation for US-Isreal strikes, questions are growing about these countries continued support for the warring parties in Sudan.Presenter : Nkechi Ogbonna Producers: Keikantse Shumba Technical Producer: Mbarak Abdallah Senior Producers: Bella Twine and Blessing Aderogba Editors: Samuel Murunga and Maryam Abdalla

Nebraska heads to arbitration with the CSCSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.