Podcasts about Arbitration

July 16th, 2026 Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and X Listen to past episodes on The Ticket’s Website And follow The Ticket Top 10 on Apple, Spotify or Amazon MusicSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode of Tip of the Ice-Burgh, Nick Belsky discusses the Pittsburgh Penguins avoiding salary arbitration with forward Nicholas Robertson and where he fits into the team's plans for the upcoming season. He also reacts to the first few games of the Penguins' schedule announced on Wednesday afternoon, Anthony Mantha finally signing in free agency, and more—tune in!   Check out our latest episodes

Arbitration continues to be one of the most important, and most misunderstood, decisions California employers can make when it comes to resolving workplace disputes. In this episode, Jen is joined by employment law attorney and EmployersLawyer co-founder Joe Beachboard to discuss how the legal landscape has changed and why employers should take a fresh look at their arbitration strategy. They examine the potential benefits and drawbacks of arbitration, including cost, efficiency, confidentiality, employee relations, and litigation risk, while offering practical guidance to help employers determine whether arbitration is the right fit for their organization.

Join us for the final episode of our ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 series as Jack Hobbs, Associate at Clarkslegal, and Christopher Howitt, Barrister at Three Stone, explore the abolition of mandatory Terms of Reference. They discuss what this significant change means for arbitration practitioners, as well as its implications for the future of arbitration.In this episode, they cover:The reasons behind removing Terms of Reference from the ICC RulesHow this change affects case management and procedurePractical tips for preparing cases under the new rulesConsiderations for updating dispute resolution clauses in contractsPotential challenges for enforcement of awardsThe emerging role of AI in arbitration and future trendsFor more information or to discuss any of the topics from this episode, please contact Jack Hobbs or Christopher Howitt, who would be delighted to assist you.ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 Podcast SeriesEpisode 1: Overview of the new ICC Arbitration Rules: Key changesEpisode 2: Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC RulesEpisode 3: ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul: The end of Terms of Reference and future trends

In this podcast, Jim Plunkett, shareholder and chair of Ogletree's Government Affairs Practice Group, is joined by Ed Egee, Vice President for Government Relations and Workforce Development at the National Retail Federation, to discuss the Faster Labor Contracts Act, a piece of bipartisan legislation that recently passed the U.S. House of Representatives and would impose mandatory binding arbitration of first contracts on private-sector employers nationwide. The conversation covers how the FLCA would operate in practice, why its proponents argue it addresses bad-faith bargaining, and why opponents believe it undermines both employer flexibility and workers' rights to vote on their own contracts. With the bill now before the Senate and a 60-vote threshold standing between the bill and passage, the speakers outline what employers can do now to make their voices heard.

China has released a critique of the so-called South China Sea Arbitration Award, unveiling its major flaws in legal application, factual findings, and evidence assessment (01:02). China's east coast continues to respond to the intense rainfall from Typhoon Bavi, as the storm moves inland and loses strength (15:17). The US and Iran continue to exchange fire in the Strait of Hormuz and the wider Gulf region (24:48).

①China has rejected a joint statement by several countries marking the 10th anniversary of the so-called South China Sea arbitration ruling. Why is the ruling illegal and invalid? (00:59) ②Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko has stepped down as President Volodymyr Zelensky announced fresh changes to Ukraine's government. What specific strategic shift is Zelensky signaling? (24:58) ③The IMF has downgraded the global growth outlook, but why has it upgraded China's growth forecast? (34:56) ④Hainan has reaffirmed its plan to ban the sale of gasoline-powered vehicles by 2030 and become the first province in China to do so. How ambitious is the goal? (46:52)

OPINION: Arbitration led to China's building of the largest military complex in the SCS | July 13, 2026Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There is one show where insiders share their secrets in this city. One person that they trust and respect. Opinion, reaction and the highest level of informed sports talk in Montreal. Melnick in the Afternoon, with Mitch Melnick.

China has lodged representations against Tokyo's collusion with other nations over the so-called South China Sea arbitration ruling. China said Japan's action challenges the post-war international order, and undermines peace and stability in the South China Sea.

NEWS: PH marks 10th year of arbitration victory | July 11, 2026Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dinner and a show.CW: Gore, intense body horror, dismemberment, ocular destruction, vomiting, discussion of death of family members, familial strife, grief, mind control, vocal mourning, monster sounds, collapsing building/earthquake sounds.Written by Steve Shell and Cam CollinsProduced and edited by Cam Collins and Steve ShellNarrated and performed by Steve ShellSound design by Steve ShellThe voice of Haman Locke: Alex McDonald VillarealThe voice of Marlena Locke: Glenna GrantThe voice of Rachel Harlow: Dax DupuyThe voice of the Railroad Man: Yuri LowenthalIntro music: “The Land Unknown (The Where the Light Don't Reach Verses)” written and performed by Landon BloodOutro music: “Jerry” by Jacob Danielsen-Moore http://jacobdanielsenmoore.bandcamp.com/Additional music: “Actus Tragicus” by Johann Sebastian Bach performed by Ulf NorbergSpecial equipment consideration provided by Lauten Audio.LEARN MORE ABOUT OLD GODS OF APPALACHIA: www.oldgodsofappalachia.comCOMPLETE YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA RITUAL: Facebook Instagram BlueskySUPPORT THE SHOW: Join us over at THE HOLLER to enjoy ad-free episodes, access exclusive storylines and more.Buy t-shirts, hoodies, mugs, and other Old Gods merch. CLASSIC MERCH: merch.oldgodsofappalachia.comTOUR MERCH & SPECIALTY ITEMS: oldgodsmerch.com.Transcripts available on our website at www.oldgodsofappalachia.com/episodes.© 2026 DeepNerd Media. All rights reserved. No part of this audio production or its written transcript may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training artificial intelligence technologies or systems.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/old-gods-of-appalachia. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Paul Hamilton joins to discuss Peyton Krebs filing for arbitration and the potential value of his next contract with the Sabres. They explore the possibility of signing Patrick Kane and the ripple effect of the massive Leo Carlsson offer sheet. The conversation concludes with an analysis of NHL contract values and a look at Kane's peculiar nicknames. 01:07 - Summer Sports Fatigue 03:07 - Peyton Krebs Arbitration 13:11 - Patrick Kane Rumors 17:50 - Carlsson Offer Sheet 23:23 - NHL Contract Value

Welcome to Disputes Over Donuts, our podcast series where we explore the diverse world of dispute resolution with leading experts across various fields. Each episode features different hosts and guests, bringing unique perspectives to the evolving landscape of disputes.   This episode examines the vast range of disputes that can emerge from the world of professional football and the role of arbitration in resolving them. Hosted by Jue Jun Lu, a partner specialising in international arbitration, the episode brings together three members of Charles Russell Speechly's Sports Group: Darren Bailey in London, Benoit Pasquier in Zurich and Serge Vittoz in Geneva.   The discussion provides an overview of some of the issues and disputes specific to professional football, from player, coach and club contracts to disciplinary and integrity issues such as betting, match-fixing, discrimination and off-field conduct. In terms of arbitration, the episode analyses consent to arbitration, challenges to FA arbitration awards through landmark cases, and the role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport as the "supreme court" of world sport.

Join us for episode 2 of our arbitration podcast series, where Jack Hobbs, Associate at Clarkslegal, and Christopher Howitt, Barrister at Three Stone, discuss the key changes in the new ICC Arbitration Rules 2026. This episode explores how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures are reshaping the landscape of dispute resolution.Key topics discussed include:A clear overview of expedited and highly expedited proceduresInsights into the new early determination mechanismPractical implications for parties and practitionersExpert commentary from leading arbitration professionalsStay tuned for next episode, where we'll focus on practical takeaways and actionable advice for practitioners navigating these new rules in their day-to-day work.For more information or to discuss any of the topics from this episode, please contact Jack Hobbs or Christopher Howitt, who would be delighted to assist you.

NHL Insider Sean Shapiro says Jason Robertson wants to be a Dallas Star. He joins Gavin Spittle to discuss the moves the Stars made this past week. They discuss Robertson filing for arbitration, Mavrik Bourque signing with Nashville and Jamie Benn signing a one year deal.

The NHL offseason just took another wild turn.Jason Gregor and Jeff Marek break down the blockbuster offer sheet submitted to Leo Carlsson and debate whether the Anaheim Ducks should match or take the draft pick compensation. What does Pavel Mintyukov's new contract mean for Anaheim's cap situation, and how does Cutter Gauthier fit into the equation?The guys also discuss Utah's decision on Barrett Hayton, why New Jersey's offer sheet was a smart piece of business, and the ripple effects these moves could have around the NHL.Later, they analyze the New Jersey Devils' offseason, the Toronto Maple Leafs' roster overhaul, the best remaining unrestricted free agents led by Anthony Mantha, and the latest on Shane Wright's future in Seattle.Finally, they break down the NHL's arbitration filings, including Jason Robertson, Cole Perfetti, Trevor Zegras, Jamie Drysdale, Connor McMichael, Kirby Dach and more.If you're looking for the latest NHL trade rumors, offer sheet news, free agency updates and offseason analysis, this episode has you covered.CHAPTERS (Filmed July 5th, 7p.m. ET)00:00 - Intro00:30 - Leo Carlsson Offersheet11:40 - Barrett Hayton Offersheet15:00 - Markstrom Trade18:10 - Toronto Maple Leafs22:30 - Anthony Mantha26:45 - Shane Wright33:20 - Buy or Sell40:45 - Chinakhov / Cole Perfetti43:30 - Arbitration + Jason Robertson

It's a heated debate every day… but no one drops the gloves. Get your daily diagnosis on the health of the Habs. The Habs Lunch with Sean Campbell and Mitch Gallo.

July 2, 2026- Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz, a Bronx Democrat, makes the case for collecting information about binding arbitration results between customers and businesses.

Friday June 26, 2026 How Forced Arbitration Became America's Secret Judicial System

Episode #1380: Today we're talking about Amazon's Zoox gearing up for robotaxi production, an Indiana dealer crowdsourcing wholesale transparency with a new arbitration platform, and why Starbucks is investing in frontline leadership instead of just ad...

Buffalo Sabres beat reporter Paul Hamilton (WGR-550) joins the show as the NHL Draft is tomorrow night in Buffalo. Paul explains the Byram & Tuch trades, who are the guys Buffalo can target to replace them? What options can the Sabres do with pick 4? Plus a tour for Bills New Highmark Stadium.

Full Hour 1 in The Sports Bar - Hockey week continues. The NHL Draft is this weekend in Buffalo. Sabres reporter Paul Hamilton joins the show to answer everything Buffalo Sabres: Alex Tuch, Bo Byram, What do the Sabres do with their picks?

Andrew Tetley and Clément Fouchard sit down with Claudia Salomon, President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, for the insider's perspective on the new ICC Arbitration Rules. Cutting through the noise, they explore what has changed, why, and what practitioners need to know now.

We'd love to hear from you. Send us fan mail!Workplace dispute resolution is one of the least discussed and most costly blindspots in executive leadership. In this episode of Shedding the Corporate B!tch, executive coach Bernadette Boas sits down with Felicia Harris Hoss, of Harris Hoss Mediations & Arbitration, a nationally recognized mediator with 30 years of trial law experience, to break down early dispute resolution and why it is one of the most powerful, underutilized tools available to corporate executives and HR leaders.Felicia explains why less than five percent of filed lawsuits ever reach trial, what that means for how executives should be approaching conflict, and why the decision to mediate early is not a sign of weakness, it is a strategic move that preserves relationships, resources, and reputation. She walks through the four Cs of mediation, the questions every executive should be asking their attorney, and how to shift from a reacting posture to a responding one in any dispute.If you lead people, manage HR concerns, or sit in any seat where workplace conflict can escalate into legal action, this conversation will change how you think about resolution. What You Will Learn• What early dispute resolution (EDR) is and why it is ABA official policy• When to engage a mediator before a lawsuit is filed• Why litigation means surrendering control — and what executives can do instead• The four Cs of mediation: confidentiality, control, creativity, certainty• What questions to ask your attorney about workplace disputes and resolution options• How the respond vs. react mindset shifts negotiation outcomes• What 'winning' actually looks like in a corporate dispute Key Quote"If you go to the courthouse, you pass that baton called control to strangers. — Felicia Harris Hoss" Episode Chapters00:00:00 — The Legal Dispute Already Living in Your Organization 00:02:00 — Why Staying in the Room Changes Everything 00:03:00 — Meet Felicia Harris-Hoss: From Trial Partner to Neutral 00:06:00 — What Mediation Actually Is (And Isn't) 00:09:00 — Workplace Scenarios That Call for a Mediator 00:12:00 — Why Early Mediation — Before Positions Harden 00:13:00 — The Human Cost Behind Every Corporate Lawsuit 00:15:00 — Why Early Mediation Wasn't Working — And What Changed 00:17:00 — Ego, Fear, and the Real Reason Leaders Avoid Resolution 00:18:00 — The Courtroom Hands Control to Strangers 00:21:00 — The Four C's of Mediation: Confidentiality, Control, Creativity, Certainty 00:26:00 — Key Questions Every Leader Should Ask Their Attorney 00:27:00 — What to Know Before You Bring a Dispute to HR 00:31:00 — Why Even Lawyers Get Confirmation Bias 00:32:00 — Respond, Don't React: The Mindset That Changes Outcomes 00:34:00 — Bernadette's Takeaways for Every Leader and HR Professional About the GuestFelicia Harris Hoss, of Harris Hoss Mediations & Arbitration, is a 30-year trial attorney and nationally credentialed mediator who specializes in early dispute resolution for executives, corporations, and complex business conflicts. She co-authored Resolution 500 for the American Bar Association, which was unanimously adopted in 2024, making early dispute resolution official ABA policy. She also helped establish the American Arbitration Association's EDR Mediation Panel.Learn more at HarrisHossPLLC| Connect on LinkedIn HERE Related Episodes Employee Engagement Strategies That Actually Move the Needle with Ian Watts— HEREYour Calendar is Lying - The Timer Leadership Framework— HERESlow Down To Go Fast with Loretta Stagnitto — HERE Subscribe CTAIf this conversation gave you a new way to think about conflict, leadership, and control, subscribe to Shedding the Corporate Bitch on YouTube at @ShedtheCorpBitchTV for new episodes every week. You can also DOWNLOAD our free Leadership Gap Diagnostic and identify where your leadership needs the most attention right now. Support the show

Let me ask you this: if fast-track is the answer, then why do we still have the Port of Tauranga problems? Surely I don't need to go through the fine detail of what is one of this country's most embarrassing modern travesties. It's a story in which a successful business wants to expand so they can be more successful, and yet can't because the court process is never-ending. The latest chapter of course involves local Māori wanting compensation. It's not like this business is in nuclear waste or mine tailings. It's simply part of our main way of making money – exports. Selling things to the world. If ever there was a case for an overarching “let's stop the BS and time wasting" law, the Port of Tauranga saga is it. It's hard to know who is at fault more; those who started the scrap, i.e. local Māori, or those who allow it to drag, i.e. the judicial process. But can you not mount a case that if a business cannot be allowed to be a business because they are hindered by argument and the process that allows the argument, at some point a line has to be drawn and an overarching authority (presumably the Government) comes in to settle the matter once and for all? Arbitration is a possibility, including compulsory arbitration. I have for years argued for it in union disputes, especially the ones like teachers and nurses who are constantly scrapping with stop-work meetings and protests and days off. State your case, claim/counter claim, if you're stuck then enter the referee and the call is made. If fast-track was the solution it's patently evident in this case it isn't working and the port are in the fast-track process, having failed in the non-fast-track process. So all the processes and they are still no further ahead. In my system the arbitrator would ask is this legal? Is this societally acceptable and is it beneficial for the country? I would ask that at 8.30am when the hearing starts and I reckon we'd be done by morning tea. If an exporting nation can't expand to export more, how broken and backward are we? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join Luke as he reacts to all the latest Aston Villa transfer news, Aston Villa will take their appeal to formally register 17 year old january signing Brian Madjo to the court of arbitration for sport - Jacob Tanswell the athletic #astonvilla #avfc #premierleague

Lawyers are trained to spot risk. But when it comes to AI, focusing only on risk may cause firms to miss the bigger opportunity. In episode 623 of the Lawyerist Podcast, Zack Glaser sits down with Bridget McCormack to talk about AI arbitration, legal innovation, and why the future of legal work may be less about replacement and more about reinvention.  Bridget reflects on her time as Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, including how the pandemic forced courts to adopt technology faster than anyone expected. She explains why that moment revealed both the limits of traditional legal systems and the potential for more accessible, user-friendly ways to resolve disputes.  Now leading the American Arbitration Association, Bridget shares how AAA is using AI to build tools for clause drafting, self-represented parties, resolution simulation, and even documents-only arbitration. The conversation explores what fairness looks like when AI is involved, why human oversight remains essential, and how legal professionals should think about accountability, bias, and trust.  If AI changes the routine parts of legal work, lawyers will need to rethink what clients actually need from them. This episode offers a practical and future-focused look at arbitration, legal technology, and the new kinds of judgment lawyers will need to bring to the table.  Listen to our previous episodes on Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Legal Practice.  #612 – AI for Lawyers: What You Need to Know Before Your Clients Do, with Cat Casey Apple | Spotify | LTN  #607 – The Future of Law Firm Business Models in the Age of AI, with Jordan Furlong Apple | Spotify | LTN  #619– What Claude Means for Law Firms: AI Skills, Connectors, and Workflow Strategy, with Sam Harden Apple | Spotify | LTN  #590 – Innovating Without Overwhelm: Practical AI Tips for Lawyers, with Graydon Trusler Apple | Spotify | LTN   #587 – Future-Proofing Your Firm in the Age of AI, with Jack Newton Apple | Spotify | LTN   #577 – Rethinking Law Firm Growth in the Age of AI, with Sam Harden Apple | Spotify | LTN  Links from the episode:  https://adr.org/  Have thoughts about today's episode? Join the conversation on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and X!   If today's podcast resonates with you and you haven't read The Small Firm Roadmap Revisited yet, get the first chapter right now for free! Looking for help beyond the book? See if our coaching community is right for you.   Access more resources from Lawyerist at lawyerist.com.   Chapters / Timestamps:  00:00 – Introduction  00:55 – Why Lawyers Should Test Their Own Intake Process03:35 – Meet Bridget McCormack04:25 – Leading Michigan Courts Through COVID05:20 – Why Remote Court Was Already on the Radar06:40 – Moving Trial Courts Online Fast08:45 – Why Legal Systems Are Slow to Change10:33 – From Chief Justice to CEO of AAA13:18 – How Alternative Dispute Resolution Is Evolving14:50 – AI Tools for Arbitration and Self-Represented Parties15:57 – Building AAA's AI Arbitrator17:36 – Resolution Simulation and Faster Settlements19:05 – What Is Left for Lawyers?21:19 – Fairness, Bias, and Human Oversight in AI Arbitration23:45 – Why Legal Disputes Need More Options24:41 – AI Agents and the Future of Legal Infrastructure26:26 – When AI Agents Negotiate Contracts28:30 – Closing Thoughts   

In episode 60 of Law in the Family, host Jen Ryan speaks with Shelly Grossman and Candice Komar about the growing use of arbitration as an alternative to traditional court proceedings in Pennsylvania family law matters. Attorneys Grossman, Komar and Ryan provide firsthand insights into the arbitration process, common misconceptions, and best practices for attorneys representing clients in arbitration. Topics include: the advantages of arbitration, procedural considerations, and strategies for achieving efficient, client-focused resolutions and offer valuable guidance for family law practitioners looking to expand their dispute resolution toolkit.Candice Komar is a founding member of the Pittsburgh law firm of Pollock Begg. She is the next PBA FLS Chair  commencing July 2026.  Shelly Grossman, Esquire, founded the Center for Family Resolution to provide alternative dispute resolution services to parties seeking to resolve their domestic relations issues outside of the court system.  Having spent 15 years in private practice before serving more than 14 years as a Family Court Master in Chester County, Pennsylvania, where she presided over hundreds of equitable distribution matters and custody disputes, Attorney Grossman brings over 30 years of family law experience to her practice.   Host Jennifer R. Ryan is a partner at Boyd & Early Family Law, servicing Montgomery, Bucks, Chester, Philadelphia and Delaware counties. *audio editing, voice over & music by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Nick DeMatteo

A major WWE legal story takes a new turn, Danhausen becomes an unlikely sports hero, and the Georgia indie scene is heating up heading into the weekend.This week, Nick and Myron discuss the Janel Grant vs. Vince McMahon case moving to arbitration and what it means for TKO moving forward. Is this the best-case scenario from a business perspective?The guys also dive into Danhausen's further rise in popularity following the New York Knicks' championship run. With reports that WWE wants to capitalize on his newfound connection to New York sports fans, is Danhausen about to become a much bigger player in WWE's promotional plans?Plus, the hosts tackle the latest CM Punk to AEW rumors and explain why a return to AEW simply doesn't make much sense given the current landscape of wrestling.The guys look back at another loaded weekend of independent wrestling, including:1FW (Gainesville, GA) – Satnam continues to dominate1FW (Buford, GA) – Harley-Davidson hosts an exciting day of actionWrestleMerica (Forsyth, GA) – KJ Impala survives the brutal Unchained Match to retain the WrestleMerica ChampionshipPro Wrestling Domination (Ranburne, AL) – The saga between Dante Diamond and Rebirth continues to escalate1FW TV Taping (McDonough, GA) – The Summer Stage 2 main event picture changes dramaticallyScrappy Championship Wrestling (Royston, GA) – Tower captures the Heavyweight Championship in a shocking title changePlanning your wrestling weekend? We've got you covered:Thursday, June 181FW – Monroe, GAFriday, June 19New Legacy Pro – Franklin, GASaturday, June 20Southern Fried Championship Wrestling: Shindig – Monroe, GA1FW – Hartwell, GAViral Pro Wrestling – Augusta, GAGeorgia Premier Wrestling – Jasper, GASunday, June 21 (Father's Day)Kraken Pro Wrestling – Tifton, GA: Fan Appreciation Night with fan-selected matchesMonday, June 22ACTION Wrestling – Atlanta, GA: Monday at Meehan's

This week on the Experience, Jim previews Dark Side Of The Ring's 7th season with the show's producer! Plus Jim talks about CM Punk rumors, WWE & TKO's legal issues, the last months of Jim Crockett Promotions, Mark Shapiro, and much more! Also, Jim reviews a few things from AEW Dynamite! Thanks to our episode sponsors: SHOPIFY: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial and start selling today at shopify.com/jce WILLIE'S REMEDY: Order now at drinkwillies.com and use code JCE for 20% off your first order + free shipping on orders over $95, and enjoy life in the high country. Follow Jim and Brian on Twitter: @TheJimCornette @GreatBrianLast Join Jim Cornette's College Of Wrestling Knowledge on Patreon to access the archives & more! https://www.patreon.com/Cornette Subscribe to the Official Jim Cornette channel on YouTube! http://www.youtube.com/c/OfficialJimCornette Visit Jim's official site at www.JimCornette.com for merch, live dates, commentaries and more! You can listen to Brian on the 6:05 Superpodcast at 605pod.com or wherever you find your favorite podcasts!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lee Jay Berman began as a full-time mediator 30 years ago, and has successfully mediated over 2,700 matters as, many of which were high profile cases, as a private, independent commercial mediator. Visit his website here: https://mediationtools.com/

In this episode, we discuss the end of the lawsuit between Janel Grant and WWE, TNA Slammiversary and the card taking shape, and WWE Returns for Orton, Punk, McIntyre, and possible John Cena!All this and the rest of the Day's news and Rumors!Don't Forget to Support Our Sponsors:3WA - www.wwwawrestling.comSketchy People - Available now at thegamecrafter.comWrestler Unstoppable - available exclusively through Facebook!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/fro-wrestling-podcast--2103073/support.

Ep. 339: Pope and Pollo Del Mar return to discuss all things In Da Newz including Vince McMahon/Janel Grant, Dustin Rhodes Retirement, Sheamus Injury and more.

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the move by Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE to move their case toward private arbitration and what it means.Plus: Grant comments on the anonymous emails to the WWE board in 2022, depositions by key WWE execs, and WSJ's reporting. The WWE shareholder settles before the trial & all the latest news. 00:00:00 Start00:02:04 Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE jointly seek arbitration 00:15:27 Grant posts about 2022 emails to the Board of Directors00:23:53 Depositions by Nick Khan, Frank Riddick & Michelle McKenna 00:43:11 WWE shareholder lawsuit reaches a settlement agreement 00:49:39 Lawsuit aims to stop UFC Freedom 250 at the White House 00:53:41 AEW v. Ryan Nemeth 00:59:43 Details on Bushiroad's sale of New Japan Pro Wrestling 01:06:16 Conor McGregor accused of using PEDs, per The New York Times Music courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston discuss the move by Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE to move their case toward private arbitration and what it means.VIDEO VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqttCcluHwwPlus: Grant comments on the anonymous emails to the WWE board in 2022, depositions by key WWE execs, and WSJ's reporting. The WWE shareholder settles before the trial & all the latest news. Topics this week include:Janel Grant, Vince McMahon & WWE jointly seek arbitration Grant posts about 2022 emails to the Board of DirectorsDepositions by Nick Khan, Frank Riddick & Michelle McKenna WWE shareholder lawsuit reaches a settlement agreement Lawsuit aims to stop UFC Freedom 250 at the White House AEW v. Ryan Nemeth Details on Bushiroad's sale of New Japan Pro Wrestling Conor McGregor accused of using PEDs, per The New York Times Music courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/wrestlenomics.comAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In January 1860 the New York Times gave its blessing to a new machine: the sewing machine. These "iron needle-women", it wrote, were the only invention that could be claimed “chiefly for women's benefit”. Sewing was women's work in the nineteenth century, rich or poor, and a machine could now do it in a fraction of the time. So did it set women free?Philipp Ager and Davide Coluccia have traced the adoption of the sewing machine in Massachusetts between 1850 and 1900, using census records and digitised business directories to work out who was exposed to it, in the factory and in the home. For poorer women the machine meant work, in garment factories and in boot and shoe production; they married later, had fewer children, and many never married at all. For wealthier women, who had few acceptable jobs open to them, the hours it saved went into earlier marriage and earlier motherhood. Philipp tells Tim Phillips the story of a machine that had very different impacts in different social classes.The research behind this episode:Ager, Philipp, and Davide Coluccia. 2026. "Liberation Technology? The Impact of the Sewing Machine on Women." CEPR Discussion Paper No. 21496. CEPR Press, Paris and London. CEPR Discussion Papers are gated; CEPR members and subscribing institutions can download the paper at the link.To cite this episode:Phillips, Tim, and Philipp Ager. 2026. "Did the Sewing Machine Liberate Women?" VoxTalks Economics (podcast). Assign this as extra listening. The citation above is formatted and ready for a reading list or VLE.About the guestsPhilipp Ager is professor of economics at the University of Mannheim, a Research Fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and an editorial board member at Explorations in Economic History. His research spans the economic history of the United States, technological change, and the long-run effects of crises and disasters; his work on the Great Fire of London of 1666 featured in an earlier episode of VoxTalks Economics.Research and sources cited in this episodeThe Song of the Shirt. Thomas Hood's poem about a destitute seamstress was first published anonymously in Punch in December 1843. Hood based it on the case of Mrs Biddell, a London widow prosecuted after pawning clothes she had been given to sew. Godey's Lady's Book. The most widely read women's magazine in the US at the time crowned the sewing machine "the queen of inventions" in 1860, having calculated that a man's shirt took 20,620 stitches and 14 hours to sew by hand, against an hour and a quarter by machine. Singer and the Sewing Machine: A Capitalist Romance. Ruth Brandon's 1977 biography of Isaac Singer (Google Books) is the source for both Singer quotations read in this episode. .How the Other Half Lives. Jacob Riis, a Danish-born police reporter in New York, published his account of tenement and sweatshop life in 1890 (free at Project Gutenberg). The shirtmaker's testimony read in this episode was given to the State Board of Arbitration during the shirtmakers' strike and reported by Riis in his chapter on the working girls of New York.The household appliance revolution. Philipp contrasts the sewing machine with the washing machines and vacuum cleaners that arrived two generations later, which economists have credited with freeing women to join the workforce; "Engines of Liberation" by Jeremy Greenwood, Ananth Seshadri and Mehmet Yorukoglu, Review of Economic Studies, 2005, covers this topic. The sewing machine saved time in the same way, but in the 1860s far fewer acceptable jobs awaited the women whose time it saved.More VoxTalks Economics episodesThe economic effect of the Great Fire of London. Philipp Ager's previous visit to VoxTalks Economics, with Paul Sharp, on what contemporary records reveal about London's uneven recovery after 1666.Related reading on VoxEUGender norms and the labour market, a VoxEU column on how norms, both internalised and enforced by peers, constrain women's labour market outcomes; the modern counterpart of the stigma that kept married women in Massachusetts out of paid work.

In Part 2 of Episode 155/156, Matthew Brickman speaks with entrepreneur and Best Interest App founder Sol Kennedy for a powerful conversation about how AI and apps are already reshaping the future of family law.Drawing from his own high-conflict divorce experience, Sol explains how the Best Interest App uses AI to help co-parents reduce emotional triggers, filter toxic communication, and stay focused on what truly matters: the best interests of the children.Matthew and Sol dive deep into: The psychology of co-parent conflict  Emotional triggers during divorce  AI-powered communication moderation  Differences between Best Interest and apps like OurFamilyWizard & Talking Parents  Solo-mode communication tools  Parenting plans and mediation  How courts and mediators use co-parenting apps  Why reducing conflict early can change a child's future This episode blends technology, psychology, mediation, and real-world family dynamics into one fascinating discussion about the future of co-parenting support systems.If you're a parent, mediator, attorney, therapist, or simply interested in how AI is transforming human communication, this conversation is a must-listen.

NATHAN B. HOFFMAN is a mediator who has participated in over one hundred mediations is his practice since 1979.Visit his website here: https://www.thehoffmanlawfirm.com/

Tehran's familiar playbook, housing affordability, Supreme Court decisions on arbitration agreements, and the world's oldest working journalist. Plus, Janie B. Cheaney on the dignity of dependence, the navigational design of pigeons, and the Tuesday morning news Support The World and Everything in It today at wng.org/donateAdditional support comes from Pensacola Theological Seminary... Preparing students to preach God's Word. go.pcci.edu/startseminaryFrom Ambassadors Impact Network, a nonprofit investor group that has helped investor members deploy over $26 million into more than 60 companies since 2018. The network seeks growth-stage businesses led by Christians who tangibly show and share the gospel. If you know an investor interested in faith-aligned private company opportunities, encourage them to explore membership at ambassadorsimpact.comAnd from Dordt University, host of the upcoming At Work in the Garden conference, celebrating God's good design of work. Dordt.edu/garden

Forced arbitration clauses have become embedded as a dominant mechanism in technology vendor contracts, shifting legal risk and accountability away from large vendors and reducing recourse options for managed service providers (MSPs) and IT service firms. This structural change, present in agreements with RMM and PSA vendors as well as hyperscalers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, establishes a private dispute resolution system that operates beyond the traditional court system and is typically non-negotiable for smaller partners. The shift is evidenced by data and case studies outlined by Brendan Ballou. According to supplied figures, while consumers win in 89% of small claims court cases, their success rate drops to between 20% and 30% in arbitration, and even less—sometimes as low as 0.2%—for certain arbitration providers. Arbitration clauses are enforced even in extreme cases, as illustrated by a notable instance involving Disney, in which a forced arbitration clause was applied following a consumer's prior account registration. Legal precedent as far back as the 2011 Supreme Court decision referenced by Brendan Ballou has broadened the Federal Arbitration Act well beyond its 1925 origins, further entrenching this system. Additional developments reference increased litigation in the 1980s, often cited as justification for expanding arbitration, though he attributes much of the legal caseload surge to government actions rather than consumer or employee lawsuits. The technology industry's broad adoption of arbitration, especially in contracts where MSPs have little or no room to negotiate, further cements these power imbalances. Alternatives such as mediation are discussed as potentially less risky, but their adoption remains limited. The operational implications for MSPs, IT service providers, and IT leaders include heightened contract risk and reduced leverage in vendor disputes. Arbitration clauses limit access to open legal processes, restrict discovery rights, and are prone to bias in favor of vendors with repeat arbitrator relationships. For MSPs reliant on large platforms and suppliers, this creates ongoing exposure and complicates risk management. Mitigating measures—such as leveraging peer coordination for "mass arbitration" or negotiating for post-dispute mediation rather than pre-dispute forced arbitration—require proactive planning but may remain unavailable in standard vendor agreements. Supported by:MoovilaHaloPSA  

On today's Legally Speaking Podcast, I'm joined by three fantastic guests from the world of disputes. First, Loukas Mistelis, International Arbitration Partner at Clyde & Co, Professor of Transnational Commercial Law and Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London and Co-Chair of London International Disputes Week. Next, returning guest Henrietta (Hetti) Jackson-Stops, mediator, Partner of IPOS Mediation, founder of Simply Resolved, former Allen & Overy litigator, former Government lawyer, and currently leading the LegalTech Showcase at LIDW. And also returning to the show, Emilie Jones, Legal Director and Barrister at Pinsent Masons, Co-Chair of London International Disputes Week, specialising in commercial litigation and leading Pinsent Masons' Litigation and Regulatory practice development function.This episode is all about the modern litigator and arbitrator, and how legal tech and AI are changing dispute resolution in practice, not just in principle. Because the real question is no longer whether change is coming. It is what has actually changed, what is genuinely adding value, and what still depends on human judgment. So today, we are getting into the realities of modern disputes practice, the opportunities, the risks and what great litigators and arbitrators need to look like in 2026.So why should you be listening in? You can hear Rob, Loukas, Hetti and Emilie discussing:- Artificial Intelligence Enhancing Efficiency In Litigation, Arbitration and Mediation- Online Dispute Resolution Expanding Cross-Border Collaboration and Accessibility- Document Review Technology Transforming Complex Case Management- Human Judgment Remaining Essential Despite Rapid Legal Tech Adoption- Legal Professionals Focusing On Practical Value Beyond AI HypeConnect with Emilie Jones here - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emilie-j-a32415162Connect with Loukas Mistelis here - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/prof-loukas-mistelis-fciarb-0a736b1bConnect with Henrietta Jackson-Stops here - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/henrietta-hetti-jackson-stops-2331482

You know it's bad when the New York Times questions if your team is the Best Bad team in baseball or the Worst Good team in baseball. That’s the Padres and they are looking for answers. MLB Union makes first big proposal to owners. MLB News Rays, Braves, Brewers. NBA Playoffs Thunder, Spurs, Knicks. NBA Trade Rumors Thunder, Bulls, Celtics, Lakers, Warriors, Heat. NFL Racism Lawsuit. NFL Trade Rumors Eagles, Rams, Patriots, Chiefs, Jaguars, Chargers. Raiders, Packers, Falcons. NCAA Anti-Trust, Texas Tech, and Sports Gambling. NHL News Kings, Ducks, Maple Leafs. Team USA coach Maurico Pochettino preps for World Cup. Got a question or comment for The Franchise? Drop your take in the live chat on YouTube, X or Facebook. Here's what Lee Hamilton thinks on Thursday, May 28, 2026. 1)…PADRES HEAD OUT ON ROAD-LOOKING FOR ANSWERS “BEST BAD TEAM-WORST GOOD TEAM?” 1A) …MLB UNION MAKES 1ST PROPOSAL…BRUCE MEYER “UNION DEMANDS OF OWNERS” …PLAYERS PAY RAISE …PRE ARB BONUS POOL …SUPER 2-ARBITRATION …FA SERVICE TIME …LUX TAX THRESHOLD …INTEGRITY TAX …TV TAX 1B) …OWNERS PROPOSAL TO UNION…ROB MANFRED “RADICAL MONEY PROPOSAL” …HARD CAP (245M) …HARD FLOOR (171M) …50-50 SPLIT ALL REVENUE …SHARE OF ALL LOCAL TV-RADIO REVENUE …PHASE IN CAP …LARRY BIRD-RETAIN FA RULE 2)…MLB NOTEBOOK “NAMES IN NEWS” WANDER FRANCO BOB HORNER JACOB MISIROWSKI ————- 3)…NBA PLAYOFFS “SUPER TEAM-VS-UPSTART” OKC SPURS NY KNICKS 4)…NBA NOTEBOOK “TRADE RUMORS” OKC-BULLS BOSTON-LAKERS GOLDEN STATE-MIAMI —————- 5)…NFL LOSES IN SUPREME COURT…ROGER GOODELL/BRIAN FLORES “RACISM SUIT TO TRIAL” 6)…NFL NOTEBOOK…EAGLES/AJ BROWN “TRADE OFFERS” LA RAMS …PATRIOTS CHIEFS…JAGUARS CHARGERS-CHIEFS RAMS-RAIDERS PACKERS-FALCONS ============== (HALFTIME…DIXIELINE LUMBER) ============== 7)…CONGRESS-TO DO INTERVENTION ON NCAA PROBLEMS…TEXAS TECH “ANTI TRUST & GAMBLING” ———– 8)…NHL NOTEBOOK…KINGS/DUCKS/LEAFS/CANADIENS “COACHES-GM STORIES” ———— 9)…WORLD CUP ROSTERS SET…TEAM USA/MAURICIO POCHETTINO “TEAM USA-WORLD CUP” ============ #MLB #PADRES #mannymachado #fernandotatisjr #jakecronenworth #robmanfred #MLBPA #BRUCEMEYER #nfl #PATRIOTS #JAGUARS #CHIEFS #CHARGERS #RAIDERS #EAGLES #PACKERS #FALCONS #fernandomendoza #joehortiz #BRIANFLORES #ROGERGOODELL #ROONEYRULE #lakers #knicks #celtics #bucks #thunder #spurs #WARRIORS #BULLS #GIANNISANTETOKOUNMPO #KARLANTHONYTOWNS #VICTORWEMBENYAMA #TEXASTECH #nhl #MAPLELEAFS #DUCKS #KINGS #goldenknights #canadiens #CLAUDELEMIEUX #teamusa #christianpulisic #MauricioPochettino #worldcup2026 Be sure to share this episode with a friend! ☆☆ STAY CONNECTED ☆☆ For more of Hacksaw's Headlines, The Best 15 Minutes, One Man's Opinion, and Hacksaw's Pro Football Notebook: http://www.leehacksawhamilton.com/ SUBSCRIBE on YouTube for more reactions, upcoming shows and more! ► https://www.youtube.com/c/leehacksawhamiltonsports FACEBOOK ➡ https://www.facebook.com/leehacksaw.hamilton.9 TWITTER ➡ https://twitter.com/hacksaw1090 TIKTOK ➡ https://www.tiktok.com/@leehacksawhamilton INSTAGRAM ➡ https://www.instagram.com/leehacksawhamiltonsports/ To get the latest news and information about sports, join Hacksaw’s Insider’s Group. It’s free! https://www.leehacksawhamilton.com/team/ Thank you to our sponsors: Dixieline Lumber and Home Centers https://www.dixieline.com

This Day in Legal History: Rhode Island Ratifies the Constitution, 1790On this day in 1790, Rhode Island became the thirteenth and final original state to ratify the United States Constitution, doing so by a margin of 34 to 32 at a convention in Newport. Rhode Island's hesitation had been considerable: the state refused to send delegates to the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, and twice rejected ratification in popular referenda — a curiously democratic method for refusing to join a constitutional union founded in part on the premise that pure direct democracy is dangerous. The state's small-farmer and debtor classes, the same constituencies that had backed the paper-money policies that horrified Madison, were deeply suspicious of a strong federal government that would constrain state-issued currency, ban impairment of debt contracts (Article I, Section 10), and override state-level debtor protections.Ratification finally came under the gun: Congress, frustrated by the foot-dragging, was openly threatening to treat Rhode Island as a foreign nation for tariff purposes, which would have devastated the Providence merchants. The convention's narrow margin reflected a hostile deal more than a meeting of constitutional minds.Importantly, Rhode Island's ratification was conditioned on a lengthy list of proposed amendments — many of them mirroring the Bill of Rights that James Madison had already shepherded through Congress in September 1789 and that would be ratified in December 1791. With Rhode Island in, the original Union was at last complete, and the practical question of whether the new federal government could function with one stubborn holdout fell away. The episode is a useful reminder that the constitutional founding was not so much a singular moment as a slow, contested, occasionally coerced bargain — one that ended in Newport on a humid Saturday in May.The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday handed down a narrow 5-4 ruling in Pitchford v. Cain, reviving a Mississippi death row inmate's challenge to the prosecutor's race-based use of peremptory strikes at his 2006 capital trial. Justice Kavanaugh, writing for a majority that included Chief Justice Roberts plus Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, held that the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably applied Batson v. Kentucky's three-step framework for challenges to peremptory strikes.The Court found the trial judge accepted the prosecutor's race-neutral explanations without giving defense counsel a meaningful opportunity to argue that those reasons were pretextual, and the state appellate court compounded the error by treating that omission as a waiver. The prosecutor, Doug Evans, used four of his twelve strikes to remove four of the five Black prospective jurors, leaving a jury of eleven white jurors and one Black juror in a Mississippi county that was then roughly 40 percent Black.The Court leaned heavily on its 2019 Flowers v. Mississippi decision, which involved the same prosecutor and the same trial judge and had already found Evans's pattern of striking Black jurors discriminatory. Federal habeas relief was appropriate because the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's deferential “no fair-minded jurist could agree” standard cannot rescue a state-court ruling that simply skips Batson's third step. Justice Gorsuch dissented, joined by Justices Alito, Thomas, and Barrett, arguing the record showed counsel chose silence rather than being denied an opportunity. The case now returns to the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings.Justices Revive Mississippi Death Row Inmate's Batson Claim | Law360Caesars Entertainment agreed Thursday to be acquired by Tilman Fertitta's privately-held Fertitta Entertainment in an all-cash deal valued at roughly $17.6 billion, including the assumption of approximately $11.9 billion of Caesars' outstanding debt. Shareholders will receive $31 per share, a 49 percent premium over Caesars' unaffected share price as of February 25, and the company will be delisted from Nasdaq upon closing. The agreement includes a go-shop period running through approximately July 11 — a Delaware deal-protection mechanism that lets the target board solicit competing bids without triggering a termination fee, and that helps insulate the sale process from a Revlon-flavored fiduciary-duty challenge by signaling the board actively tested the market after signing.Latham & Watkins and Skadden are representing Caesars (the latter on antitrust), White & Case is advising Fertitta, and Freshfields is counseling the Carano family, which holds a roughly 5 percent stake and will roll part of its equity into the combined entity. The combined company would control more than 60 casino resorts and over 200 retail sports betting locations under the William Hill brand. Antitrust review will be the inflection point given the overlap on the Las Vegas Strip — where Caesars operates eight properties — and across digital betting. Funding will come from Fertitta equity and committed debt financing arranged by a syndicate of ten banks.4 Firms Steer Fertitta's $17.6B Caesars Entertainment Buy | Law360The Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday finalized a long-awaited overhaul of the federal Independent Dispute Resolution process under the No Surprises Act of 2021, the statute that pulls most out-of-network billing fights out of the patient's hands and into a baseball-style arbitration between provider and payer. The headline change slashes the per-party administrative fee from $115 to $15 per case, undoing a sharp 2023 hike that providers had successfully challenged in the Eastern District of Texas as having been adopted without notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.The rule also expands batching, so economically similar items and services can be bundled into a single arbitration, which the agency says will cut transaction costs and ease the chronic IDR backlog. HHS is also rolling out a centralized federal dispute portal and a payer registry intended to fix the persistent problem of providers being unable to identify which entity is actually on the hook in any given case. Reactions from physician and radiology groups have been mixed, with broad support for the fee cut but lingering concern that the qualifying payment amount methodology — the benchmark arbitrators must consider — still tilts the field toward insurers. APA Section 706 challenges to portions of the earlier IDR framework remain pending in the Fifth Circuit.US HHS finalizes rule to streamline dispute resolution under No Surprises Act | ReutersABC's New York affiliate WABC-TV filed an objection with the FCC on Thursday, calling Chairman Brendan Carr's April order requiring early license renewals for all eight ABC-owned stations an “unconstitutional” act of viewpoint-based retaliation barred by the First Amendment. WABC submitted its renewal under protest, arguing the agency has not demanded simultaneous early renewals from a commonly owned station group in more than fifty years and that the Media Bureau's stated rationale — possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and the FCC's nondiscrimination rules — is pretext for punishing disfavored editorial speech.The doctrinal hook is the Bantam Books line of cases through last term's NRA v. Vullo, which holds that government officials cannot use the implicit threat of regulatory sanction to coerce private intermediaries into suppressing protected expression. The order followed a separate FCC inquiry into whether “The View” has been violating the agency's equal-time rule for political candidates, and came against the backdrop of repeated White House demands that Disney fire Jimmy Kimmel. Democratic Commissioner Anna Gomez has openly urged Disney not to “flinch.”On the same day, the FCC issued a broader notice warning all broadcasters that licenses could be reviewed early if stations are deemed to be failing their statutory public-interest obligation — a posture that drops the question of broadcast licensing back into Red Lion-era First Amendment territory.FCC Targeting ABC Licenses To Punish Speech, Station Says | Law360 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

The Arbitration period in baseball is always interesting. Dodgers Center Fielder Andy Pages is having a fantastic season and is part of the baseball arbitration. Which whatever the Dodgers pay him he has to take it. LAST MAN STANDING. STRAIGHT UP WITH TRAVIS RODGERS. SHOP TALK Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Forced arbitration clauses are buried in everything from product warranties to bank loans to employment contracts, often requiring consumers and workers to give up their right to sue without realizing it. Brendan Ballou, a former federal prosecutor and co-founder of the Public Integrity Project, says arbitration has become an opaque, parallel legal system that favors corporations and undermines the rule of law. We talk to Ballou about new book, “When Companies Run the Courts,” which looks at why forced arbitration has become so widespread and what states like California are doing to restrict it. Guests: Brendan Ballou, former federal prosecutor; CEO, the Public Integrity Project; author, "When Companies Run the Courts: Forced Arbitration and America's Secret Justice System" Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Happer and Snow breaks down the ruling from the Nebraska vs CSC arbitration case.