POPULARITY
In a case that has captured national attention, former professional ballerina, Ashley Benefield stands accused of second-degree murder in her husband Douglas Benefield's death. Her defense pivots on the controversial 'Stand Your Ground' law in Florida, creating a complex and emotionally charged narrative. But how strong is Ashley Benefield's Stand Your Ground claim? As applied in Florida, the Stand Your Ground law allows individuals to use lethal force in self-defense when they perceive an imminent threat to their safety without the obligation to retreat. Ashley Benefield's defense team contends that she was a victim of domestic abuse, forced to take drastic action in the face of an immediate threat to her life. However, proving this defense is a complex undertaking. For a successful Stand Your Ground claim, it is imperative to establish that the defendant genuinely perceived an imminent danger to their life, and their response was proportional to the threat. While Ashley has alleged her husband's violent behavior, the investigators have reported no evidence to support abuse claims. Even more damning, they suggested that Douglas was not facing Ashley when the fatal shots were fired, potentially undermining the argument of immediate threat. The legal history between Ashley and Douglas also complicates the situation. Before Douglas's death, Ashley had filed multiple domestic violence claims against him. Though investigators found no evidence to validate these claims, their existence might be used to construct a narrative of fear and constant threat. However, without solid evidence to back up the allegations, these claims might also be seen as an effort to isolate Douglas from their child, as suggested by the police. Another factor contributing to the strength of Ashley's Stand Your Ground claim is her behavior following the shooting. The refusal to make a statement to the police, except for an offhand remark about her ears ringing, could be interpreted by some as an attempt to avoid self-incrimination. Others, however, might view it as the stunned response of a traumatized victim, further clouding the picture. In this emotionally charged scenario, the strength of Ashley Benefield's Stand Your Ground claim hinges largely on interpreting circumstantial evidence and character assessments. Can her legal team paint a compelling and believable portrait of a woman so driven to the edge by fear that she believed her only option was to take lethal action against her husband? To conclude, Ashley Benefield's Stand Your Ground claim in her husband's murder is fraught with challenges, due to lack of clear-cut evidence supporting her self-defense narrative. The strength of her claim will ultimately depend on her ability to convince a court of law that her fear was real and that her response, given the circumstances, was justified. As we wait for the verdict, this case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and heart-rending realities involved in domestic violence allegations and the assertion of self-defense Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The news of Leslie Van Houten's release, a former follower of the infamous Charles Manson, has stirred up a storm of debate and concern, prompting many to ask: can someone so deeply influenced by a cult leader like Manson ever genuinely be rehabilitated? Van Houten, once the youngest member of the Manson "family," was a central figure in the gruesome murder spree that horrified America in the late 1960s. Her subsequent incarceration, repeated parole rejections, and eventual release have sparked discourse about the effectiveness of rehabilitation for individuals involved in such severe criminal acts. Rehabilitation within the criminal justice system is premised on the belief that individuals can change, acknowledging the potential for personal growth and transformation even among those who have committed heinous acts. However, public sentiment often clashes with these ideals when considering high-profile cases like Van Houten's. The nature of Van Houten's crimes, carried out under Manson's influence, has been a significant factor in skepticism about her potential for rehabilitation. The Manson "family" operated much like a cult, with members demonstrating an alarming level of commitment and obedience to their leader, Charles Manson. This loyalty was on gruesome display in the 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders, which Van Houten participated in at Manson's behest. The capacity for someone as deeply indoctrinated as Van Houten to rehabilitate depends heavily on their ability to break free from the cult's influence and confront their actions. It involves a profound deprogramming process, psychological therapy, self-reflection, and sincere remorse. According to prison reports, Van Houten has apparently made significant strides toward rehabilitation during her incarceration. She earned her bachelor's and master's degrees, led self-help groups for fellow inmates, and worked as a tutor. Moreover, she has consistently expressed remorse for her actions, acknowledging the pain and suffering she inflicted. However, the shadow of her past looms, casting doubt over whether her rehabilitation is genuine or an orchestrated attempt to secure parole. Rehabilitation is inherently a deeply personal process, difficult to evaluate objectively. It's especially challenging in high-profile cases like Van Houten's, where public opinion and the media often sway perception. The concept of rehabilitation assumes an individual's potential for change, but public skepticism increases when dealing with high-profile violent crimes. For some, Van Houten's violent past is insurmountable, and her release sends a troubling message about accountability for serious crimes. For others, her case represents the power of rehabilitation and the potential for redemption. At the heart of this debate is the broader question of what society wants from its criminal justice system: strict retribution or a chance for rehabilitation and eventual reintegration. These differing perspectives reflect fundamental tensions in our views about justice, punishment, and the human capacity for change. In the case of Leslie Van Houten, only time will tell if her rehabilitation is genuine and whether she can navigate life outside of prison successfully. As we observe her journey, we are reminded of the complexity and challenges inherent in the rehabilitation process, particularly for those with a history as charged and violent as Van Houten's. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In an ill-conceived twist of judicial decisions that have left many cynical and aghast, Leslie Van Houten, former acolyte of the notorious Charles Manson, has been set free, leaving us questioning whether justice has truly been served. Van Houten, convicted for her part in the notorious Manson family murders, has been paroled after almost half a century behind bars. This decision represents a dangerous precedent, a slap in the face to the memory of the victims, and a stark reminder of a justice system that can often seem more concerned with the welfare of the criminal than the pain and suffering of the victims and their families. Van Houten, just a teenager when she participated in the brutal slayings of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca in 1969, has reportedly been a "model prisoner." She earned two college degrees during her imprisonment and even chaired the prison's self-help programming. Admirable accomplishments, perhaps, if one can momentarily forget the bloody legacy she left outside the prison walls. The parole board's decision to release Van Houten appears to be grounded in the belief that she has been rehabilitated. She apologized, expressed remorse, and evidently turned her life around. Yet, one cannot help but ask, does a transformed life in prison wipe the slate clean? Can any number of prison programs or degrees earned absolve someone of such gruesome crimes? The board's decision has been met with a chilling reception, understandably so. It's as though the gruesome memories of the Manson family's reign of terror have been dismissed, relegated to mere footnotes of the past. It's a move that leaves a bitter taste in the mouth and a cold pit in the stomach, fueling a nagging sense of disquiet and disillusionment with the system. Families of the victims are left with the raw, open wound of their loss, only further aggravated by Van Houten's release. They must grapple with their ongoing grief and the painful reality that the woman who played a role in the violent death of their loved ones now walks free. And what of the broader societal implications? The message this sends to victims of violent crime is chilling. It signals that even the most heinous criminals can walk free and that the horrors they've inflicted can be seemingly forgotten. If Van Houten has truly changed and truly regrets her actions, then perhaps her freedom is her worst punishment. She will now have to live in a world that knows what she has done and will never forget or forgive. Yet, the fact remains: for the families of the LaBiancas and for those who still shudder at the memory of the Manson family's bloody rampage, this is not justice. This is a macabre parody of it. In the end, the cynical echo of Van Houten's release underscores a disturbing reality: in our judicial system, it seems, even the most brutal crimes can be forgiven, the most horrifying pasts rehabilitated, and justice, it appears, can be a woefully malleable term. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a chilling development, Thomas Ross Gatewood, a 51-year-old man from Wichita, Kansas, already facing murder charges in connection with the death of his 8-year-old daughter, has now been slapped with multiple child sex crime charges, escalating the severity of his case. This horrific incident underscores the urgency to safeguard our children and confront child abuse in our society. According to court records, Gatewood, who stood in the Sedgwick County District Court on Tuesday, has been indicted with one count of rape of a child under 14, two counts of aggravated criminal sodomy of a child under 14, and aggravated indecent liberties with a child, purportedly committed in 2018. While attorneys or law enforcement officials have not publicly disclosed the specifics of the case, each of these charges carries a life imprisonment sentence, further intensifying the grim fate awaiting Gatewood. On June 27, Gatewood was indicted with first-degree felony murder relating to his daughter's death, Jeanetta Gatewood. In addition to this, he faced charges of child abuse, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated endangering of a child, and aggravated intimidation of a witness or victim. Jeanetta's tragic death occurred on May 8 at their residence in Wichita, with charges alleging Gatewood to have tortured or cruelly beaten his daughter, leading to her demise. These alarming revelations have cast a pall over the community, as residents grapple with the monstrous crimes allegedly committed by one of their own. A long-time neighbor, requesting anonymity, offered a glimpse into Gatewood's private life, recalling seeing Gatewood regularly but only seeing one of his daughters once. Gatewood's history paints a disturbing pattern of abuse. In 2006, an investigation in Minneapolis into Gatewood and his wife following the death of a child from meningitis revealed that the child had bruises, skull fractures, and rib injuries and was never taken to the hospital. No charges were filed despite the detective's request to charge Gatewood and his wife with medical neglect. By 2009, Gatewood's family had moved to Oklahoma, where officials removed two children from the family home following the discovery of severe bruises on the toddler, who was unable to walk and talk. The toddler had not received medical attention for her injuries, a decision justified by Gatewood's wife due to fear of her children being taken away. Gatewood admitted to bruising the toddler while spanking her excessively. Gatewood received a one-year jail sentence in the Bartlesville case, while his wife was convicted of enabling child abuse by injury, receiving a sentence of 180 days in jail. Court documents reveal that Gatewood had a criminal history dating back to the 1990s, including charges of aggravated battery, aggravated assault, and battery in Wichita or Riley counties. As the case unfolds, our thoughts remain with the victims of these horrifying crimes. It's a stern reminder for us all that vigilance and prompt action are essential in combating child abuse and protecting our most vulnerable members. Hopefully, justice will be served for the innocent lives tragically affected by these crimes. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The New York Post recently reported that in the early hours of a seemingly ordinary Friday morning on July 14, real estate agent Jeffrey St. Arromand's daily routine was abruptly shattered by a phone call that sent shockwaves through his world. The voice on the other end of the line was one of his clients, her voice shaking, breathless, and scared. The news had just broken that the notorious Gilgo Beach serial killer, who had evaded capture for over a decade, had been arrested. The suspect was Rex Heuermann, an architect she had worked closely with over the past year on a Brooklyn brownstone project. Jeffrey, of Serhant, vividly recalled his interactions with Heuermann, yet it was his client's chilling experiences with Heuermann that drew a cold veil of shock over their past professional associations. Speaking anonymously, she recounted her baffling encounters with Heuermann, which dated back to 2002 when she had purchased her Crown Heights home. Fast-forward two decades later, in 2022, Heuermann played a significant role in renovating her property as the expeditor and architect, which was ultimately sold. "She drove him home once because she relocated to Long Island," St. Arromand told The Post, hinting at a journey along a "dark and desolate." Reflecting on that eerie drive home, the client revealed a haunting conversation that had taken place between them. "At one point on the drive, we talked about the Gilgo Beach murders — we even discussed the burlap and why someone would use that. In retrospect, thinking about that conversation, it's just bone-chilling," she confessed. She noted his peculiar behavior as she delved further into her interactions with Heuermann during the renovation. "Throughout the transaction, he was becoming very difficult to work with, even belligerent sometimes. He was constantly arguing with the plumber on the job and questioning his work. Just very odd behavior," she said. "For some reason, in this transaction, he would constantly say, 'I'm not doing anything to get a fine or open an investigation of my license.'" After the finalization of the property sale, her distaste for Heuermann had grown so much that she preferred him not to attend the closing. “When we ultimately were able to close on the property, I had such a bad experience with Rex that I told him not to attend the closing,” she said. Regardless, he was still owed a balance of payment and made a separate trip to the attorney's office to pick it up. "Apparently he had some disagreement with one of the women associates at the firm. This associate was so uncomfortable with her exchange with Rex that she refused to be in the office when he picked up the check. Ultimately the partner at the firm gave the check to Rex when he arrived with his daughter," she explained. St. Arromand shared that the property was eventually sold to a celebrity buyer whose identity remains a secret. Despite the troubling interactions with Heuermann, his client had always spoken highly of his work. “She's someone that really supported this guy,” St. Arromand expressed. "She needed the weekend just to decompress," he added, as she grappled with the shocking revelation of Heuermann's arrest. The Friday discovery marked a shocking turn of events, leaving St. Arromand and his client to grapple with the chilling reality that a man they thought they knew well could be capable of such horrendous acts. This narrative is a sobering reminder of how little we might know about those we interact with daily and the mysteries that might lurk beneath the surface. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
A glance into the developing defense strategy of the alleged University of Idaho killer, Bryan Kohberger, sparks intrigue in legal circles. As new court filings trickle in, they shed light on the complexities and potential cracks in the prosecution's case, primarily revolving around the DNA evidence. The primary shocker in this saga is DNA evidence from three men at the murder scene, a revelation made by defense attorney Jay Weston Logsdon. In an objection to the state's motion for a protective order, Logsdon brought this to the forefront, stating that the investigators discovered DNA from two men inside the house and a third outside, all contained on a glove. However, none of this DNA belonged to Kohberger. Moreover, Logsdon points out that the investigators never ran these samples through the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) to find a potential match. The defense, spearheaded by Kohberger and his lawyer, vehemently sought a detailed account of the use of genetic genealogy. This technique, deployed by the FBI, was instrumental in initially identifying Kohberger as a person of interest in the case. The state, however, dismissed these results. They argue that the match between the DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene and the DNA from a buccal swab provided by Kohberger renders the genetic genealogy irrelevant to the trial, thereby ignoring its potential role in establishing the suspect's innocence or guilt. In response to the state's position, the defense outlines its perception of the holes in the case, with the DNA conundrum being the first to be pointed out. The presence of multiple DNA samples from different men at the crime scene could potentially account for the six weeks it took to apprehend Kohberger. During this time, many potential suspects were under investigation, their DNA samples collected, and their personal belongings examined for potential evidence. Moreover, the defense makes a startling claim. Despite the ongoing investigations and DNA examinations, there was a total absence of DNA evidence linking the victims to Kohberger's apartment, office, home, or vehicle. This allegation casts a shadow over the prosecution's claims and raises significant questions. According to the defense, another significant potential hole in the prosecution's case is the identification of the suspect's car. The probable cause affidavit vaguely mentions a "white sedan" but fails to disclose its make or model. Logsdon reveals that only one sighting of the vehicle could definitively link it to a Hyundai Elantra, the model-driven and owned by Kohberger. The uncertainty over how the police concluded that the car was an Elantra adds to the growing list of questions. An FBI report dated March 21, 2023, heavily relied on video footage of a car moving in the wrong direction and at the wrong time on Ridge Rd. However, the details of this connection remain shrouded in ambiguity. Amid all these doubts and as Kohberger delays providing an alibi, the prosecution appears to be dragging their feet when establishing a clear motive, adding more ambiguity to the proceedings. Logsdon points out that, as of his filing the objection, the prosecutors have failed to present any evidence of a connection between Kohberger and the victims. This entire chain of events and revelations has made this case a subject of national attention. The interest intensified over the six weeks it took to arrest Kohberger and has continued to grow. The case took an unexpected turn when Kohberger was finally apprehended at his childhood home in Pennsylvania in the early morning of Dec. 30. Authorities found the bodies of four University of Idaho students in a house just off the school's Moscow campus in November. In the following weeks, as the case unfolded, they matched DNA from trash pulled from Kohberger's home to DNA found on a knife sheath discovered at the murder scene with the help of genetic genealogy. Despite the gripping revelations and legal maneuvers, one key piece of evidence remains missing - the weapon that killed Madison Mogen, 21; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Ethan Chapin, 20. With the trial set to commence soon and the judge yet to rule on the state's motion for a protective order, everyone involved in the investigation and trial is holding their breath. As the world watches, the question is, will Bryan Kohberger walk free, or will justice be served? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The echoes of past scandals continue to resound in the present as the Murdaugh family saga unfolds. This South Carolina legal dynasty's corruption seems to have seeped through its generational roots, tainting their understanding of rules, regulations, and rational thinking. The patriarch, Randolph Murdaugh Sr., set the stage as a formidable solicitor in the early 20th century. His practices, while ostensibly legal, raised eyebrows even then, hinting at a pattern of privilege and power that would define the Murdaughs for generations to come. Fast forward to the present day, and the family's once-hallowed name is mired in scandal, with Alex Murdaugh at the epicenter. Accused of orchestrating the brutal murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, Alex has shocked the nation, leading many to question how corruption has passed through the Murdaugh lineage. Robin Dreeke, former head of the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Program, and Tony Brueski, renowned podcast host, have examined the Murdaugh case extensively. They point to a troubling connection between the family's long-standing sense of entitlement and the seemingly irrational decisions leading to their downfall. According to Dreeke, when individuals are continually shielded from consequences due to wealth, power, or influence, it can lead to distorted thinking. The rules, as they apply to the rest of society, start to lose meaning for such individuals. This insulation from the real world can potentially lead to irrational behavior and impaired decision-making. In Murdaugh's case, their vast legal connections and influence in the South Carolina Lowcountry seemingly provided them with a unique immunity, fostering a belief that they were above the law. From the controversial cases tied to the Murdaugh law firm to the alleged theft of settlement money, the family's actions reflect a dismissive attitude towards legal and ethical boundaries. Brueski suggests that this warped perspective could have been a contributing factor in the shocking crimes Alex Murdaugh stands accused of today. Accustomed to bending the rules without repercussions, he may have believed he could orchestrate a brutal crime and escape detection. The impact of generational corruption on rational thinking is not limited to the Murdaughs. Still, their case provides a chillingly clear example of how unchecked privilege can breed arrogance, irrationality, and potentially, criminal behavior. As South Carolina grapples with the fallout of the Murdaugh scandal, it's clear that the family's century-long legacy of power and privilege has left a stain on the state's legal landscape. As investigations continue, there's hope that justice will finally be served, signaling an end to the era where the "rules didn't apply" to the Murdaugh family. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the riveting and chilling Bryan Kohberger case, one question remains at the forefront of public consciousness: What kind of alibi will Kohberger's defense present during their 37-day stay? Legal analyst Jennifer Coffindaffer provides her insights in a candid conversation with Tony Brueski. The Alibi Conundrum In any criminal defense strategy, an alibi can be a game-changer. The golden ticket can steer a case away from the suspect. However, crafting a plausible alibi for Kohberger could be a monumental challenge. Given the gravity of the charges against him and the damning DNA evidence, the defense must construct an alibi that's as foolproof as it is compelling. A 37-Day Timeline: Every Second Counts What happened during those 37 days? This is the multi-million-dollar question that the defense team will have to answer convincingly. Time, in this case, is both an enemy and an ally. While the period provides room for maneuvering, it also necessitates a comprehensive account of Kohberger's activities, whereabouts, and interactions. A single inconsistency could cause the entire alibi to collapse. Jennifer Coffindaffer's Perspective As a seasoned legal analyst, Jennifer Coffindaffer has seen it all. In her view, the defense's challenge lies in correlating Kohberger's activities during those 37 days with the murder timeline. The absence of a clear link between Kohberger and the victims complicates this task. However, Coffindaffer emphasizes that unexpected evidence can always come to light in complex cases such as this one. Tony Brueski's Take: The Role of Public Perception Brueski brings another dimension to the conversation - public perception. An alibi isn't just about convincing the court; it's also about shaping public opinion. In the court of public opinion, a believable alibi could soften the impact of incriminating evidence, casting doubt on Kohberger's culpability. Possible Alibi Scenarios: What Could Be on the Cards? What could Kohberger's alibi look like? From asserting his presence elsewhere during the time of the murders to providing credible witnesses who can vouch for his actions during the critical timeline, there are various scenarios that the defense could explore. However, each scenario comes with its own set of challenges, requiring a delicate balance of proof and persuasion. Weighing the Probability: The DNA Factor In this case, the pivotal role of DNA evidence adds an extra layer of complexity to the defense's task. Can they provide an alibi that withstands the scrutiny of the DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene? That's a tall order that could make or break their case. Conclusion: A Legal Labyrinth As the 37-day period unfolds, the defense's task in crafting a believable alibi for Bryan Kohberger appears daunting. The collective insights of Jennifer Coffindaffer and Tony Brueski shed light on the challenges and possible strategies that lie ahead. As observers of this legal drama, we can only watch, wait, and wonder. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a chilling revelation, a woman recently stepped forward to share her alarming encounter with Rex Heuermann, a man indicted on serious charges connected to the infamous Long Island Serial Killer case. Her candid account, detailing the distinct discomfort she experienced during their encounter, provides a grim glimpse into the man now facing charges in a decade-long series of unsolved murders. The woman, whose identity remains anonymous, recalls her encounter with Heuermann between 2014 and 2016. They had met at a seafood restaurant in Port Jefferson. From the outset, the date was cloaked in a foreboding atmosphere that she chose to ignore. It wasn't long, however, before her discomfort grew impossible to overlook. During their dinner, the conversation turned to true crime – a topic of mutual interest. The woman recounts how Heuermann appeared excited to discuss the then-unsolved case of the Gilgo Beach Killer, an infamous murderer who had terrified Long Island residents for years. The warning signs, she says, were evident. As Heuermann delved into the case's specifics, his words seemed to betray an unsettling familiarity. He spoke in the plural pronoun "they," insinuating the involvement of multiple people. His demeanor changed, too, with disturbing exhilaration and relaxation as he spoke about the case in graphic detail. The most troubling moment, however, came when Heuermann mentioned an unreported victim of the Gilgo Beach Killer – information that, to her knowledge, hadn't been released to the public. This revelation and his previously disturbing behavior solidified her apprehension and set her on high alert. Desperate to change the subject and expedite the date's conclusion, the woman declined dessert and sought an escape route. However, Heuermann's insistence on her accompanying him back to his place further alarmed her. His agitation when she refused to leave her car and join him in his vehicle confirmed her instincts – it was time to leave. Thankfully, she trusted her gut instincts, promptly paid her check, and left, never to have contact with Heuermann again. Looking back now, she realizes the enormity of her close brush with a man accused of horrific crimes, a chilling reminder of the importance of trusting one's intuition. Rex Heuermann, as of now, stands accused of a series of heinous crimes linked to the Long Island Serial Killer case, including the alleged murders of Maureen Brainard-Barnes, Melissa Barthelemy, Megan Waterman, and Amber Costello. The charges against him are severe, and as the investigation continues, more disturbing details about his life and actions continue to surface. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Rex Heuermann, a former public official, faces serious charges linked to the unsolved Long Island Serial Killer case. The charges were brought forward due to an exhaustive investigation that utilized advanced forensic techniques and leveraged digital footprints Heuermann left behind. The initial link to Heuermann was made through comprehensive cell tower data analysis, connecting him to calls made to victims' families using what has been referred to as the Barthelemy Phone. Suspicious activities on this phone, including calls to victims' families and unusual cessation of activity, coincided with Heuermann's travel schedule. Further investigation revealed Heuermann's illicit use of burner phones and online accounts under fictitious names. These were primarily used to engage with sex workers and conduct disturbing searches related to sadistic, torture-related, and child pornography. Additionally, these burner accounts were used to track developments in the investigation into the serial murders, revealing Heuermann's attempt to stay one step ahead of the investigators. In a significant discovery, a burner email account linked to Heuermann, registered under the pseudonym "Thomas Hawk," was found to have conducted thousands of searches about sex workers, disturbing pornography, and ongoing serial killer investigations. Heuermann's residence has also been implicated in the investigation. Forensic investigations revealed that DNA samples from his residence matched those found on female hairs on three of the victims, effectively linking the crimes directly to his household. These DNA profiles were matched with a high degree of certainty, excluding most of the North American population. Another damning piece of evidence was the recovery of a male hair from one of the victim's burlap wrappings. Advanced DNA analysis matched this hair to Heuermann, further solidifying his involvement in the crimes. The evidence indicates that Heuermann not only had direct contact with the victims but also went to great lengths to evade detection, including using burner phones, fake online accounts, and careful monitoring of the ongoing investigation. Rex Heuermann is in custody, facing multiple charges related to the Long Island Serial Killer case. If convicted, he will likely spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the cruel capacity of individuals and the vital importance of ongoing advancements in forensic and investigative techniques. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Murdaugh family, a powerful legal dynasty in South Carolina, has been shrouded in controversy for more than a century. Amidst allegations of deep-seated corruption and criminal activity, there are claims that the family has consistently received preferential treatment from the justice system, spotlighting an imbalance of power that favors the well-connected. The family's patriarch, Randolph Murdaugh Sr., launched the dynasty's stronghold in the early 20th century as the solicitor for the 14th judicial district. His influence, which extended to the highest echelons of South Carolina's political scene, allegedly enabled him to manipulate legal outcomes and consolidate the family's power. Murdaugh Sr.'s successor, Randolph Murdaugh Jr., was also caught in a cloud of scandal. Despite federal accusations of running a significant bootlegging scheme in the mid-20th century, Murdaugh Jr. walked free, a fact that critics attribute to the family's ability to tip the scales of justice in their favor. Fast forward to the recent saga of Alex Murdaugh, Randolph Sr.'s grandson, and the pattern of special treatment appears to persist. Accused of crimes ranging from embezzlement to murder, Alex Murdaugh's initial handling by authorities raised eyebrows. Despite mounting evidence, Murdaugh remained free for a considerable period, fueling public suspicion of favoritism. In 2019, Alex's son, Paul Murdaugh, was involved in a fatal boat crash that resulted in the death of a passenger, Mallory Beach. Despite being drunk and allegedly at the helm, Paul faced lenient treatment from law enforcement. Officers failed to perform sobriety tests or gather blood samples promptly, further exacerbating allegations of preferential treatment for the Murdaughs. The authorities handling of the subsequent murder case of Alex's wife and son also sparked outrage. Although Alex became a prime suspect, critics argue that the pace and nature of the investigation indicated an implicit bias favoring the prominent attorney. This perceived special treatment of the Murdaughs extends beyond criminal proceedings. Their law firm, founded in 1910, has consistently represented plaintiffs in most civil jury cases in Hampton County. Critics argue that the family's profound influence on the local judiciary and law enforcement creates an uneven playing field that disproportionately favors their clients. The Murdaugh family's legacy has cast a long and controversial shadow over South Carolina's legal landscape. As the public demands transparency and equal treatment under the law, the Murdaugh saga stands as a stark reminder of the power dynamics that can influence justice. The recent conviction of Alex Murdaugh signals a potential shift toward accountability. However, the question remains: Can South Carolina genuinely rectify systemic imbalances, or will power and privilege continue to skew the scales of justice? Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The enigmatic case of Ellen Greenberg's death has cast a dark shadow over a decade, leaving her family and the broader public grappling with an enduring question: Who ended Ellen's life, and who is striving to keep the truth under wraps? This tragic tale, riddled with inconsistencies and unanswered queries, stirs profound empathy and a relentless call for justice. Ellen Greenberg, a vibrant, loved, 27-year-old Philadelphia schoolteacher, was found dead in her apartment on a cold January evening in 2011. The gruesome scene, showcasing a shocking 20 stab wounds, initially led investigators to classify her death as a homicide. However, in a bewildering turn of events, the ruling abruptly changed to suicide a month later, sparking outrage and confusion. Since then, Ellen's parents, Joshua and Sandra Greenberg, have been on a relentless quest for answers. This journey to unmask the truth behind their daughter's untimely demise isn't just about their personal closure—it's also a fight against an opaque system that seems to be sheltering reality. But why would anyone want to suppress the truth about Ellen's death? Some speculate it could be an attempt to evade public scrutiny, while others suggest an underlying conspiracy to protect the reputation of certain individuals or institutions. Regardless of the motives, this perceived obfuscation has only fueled public demand for transparency and accountability in Ellen's case. As time ticks on, the Greenbergs remain resolute, undeterred by the legal and bureaucratic roadblocks they've encountered. Backed by renowned forensic experts, they've disputed the suicide ruling, citing the implausibility of Ellen inflicting so many, including ten fatal, wounds upon herself. An important point of contention is the mysterious knife wound in Ellen's neck, allegedly inflicted post-mortem—a claim that, if true, strongly counters the suicide theory. A key figure in this mystery is Ellen's fiancé, who was the only other person in the apartment that evening. While no direct evidence implicates him, some question his behavior and statements following Ellen's death. However, law enforcement has not considered him a suspect in the case. The actions—or perceived inaction—of the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office and the Philadelphia Police Department have also raised eyebrows. The quick shift in their stance from homicide to suicide, coupled with an alleged reluctance to re-open the case despite new evidence, has fueled suspicion of a cover-up. Media and public scrutiny have further amplified calls for a transparent, unbiased re-investigation into Ellen's case. Social media campaigns, petitions, and news coverage have echoed the Greenberg's plea for justice, highlighting the public's demand for the truth. Amidst the cloud of uncertainty surrounding Ellen's tragic end, one thing remains crystal clear: the relentless determination of a grieving family who deserve to know what truly happened to their beloved daughter. Ellen's story compels us to confront uncomfortable truths about our justice system while highlighting the power of collective resilience and determination. As the quest for truth continues, Ellen Greenberg's case is a stark reminder of the fight for justice many families face when their loved ones' stories are left untold or misrepresented. It's a call to action for transparency, truth, and justice for Ellen and others who may find themselves entangled in a similarly frustrating battle with a system meant to protect them. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a world where justice and accountability are often considered two sides of the same coin, a bewildering case from South Carolina challenges our shared sense of what these terms mean. The matter in question involves the tragic February 2019 boat crash, allegedly caused by Alex Murdaugh's son Paul, that led to the death of 19-year-old Mallory Beach and injured several others. In an unexpected twist, the $15 million settlement reportedly reached in the lawsuits that arose from this horrific event now poses questions about who is truly bearing the cost of these legal settlements. Alex Murdaugh, the infamous South Carolina attorney, found himself at the center of a tangled web of litigation following the boat accident near Parris Island. As per local news reports, most of the settlement sum is intended for Beach's family, whose lives have been irrevocably altered by this tragedy. Remarkably, others on the boat at the time of the crash, all passengers who survived the calamity, joined forces with Beach's relatives to launch their lawsuits. What's peculiar is that the legal action was not solely directed at Murdaugh because he owned the boat. Parker's, a store where Paul Murdaugh, underage at the time, allegedly purchased alcohol using a fake ID before the crash, was also targeted in the lawsuits. This highlights the extent of accountability that retailers are expected to bear when minors manage to acquire their products unlawfully. Mark Tinsley, the attorney representing the Beach family, provided a statement in which he underlined this responsibility. He argued that this settlement should serve as a stern warning to all retailers who may contemplate or unwittingly facilitate the illegal sale of alcohol to a minor. The stakes are high, and they will be held accountable for any resulting misconduct. As the dust begins to settle, an unsettling detail emerges. The legal teams for Parker's suggested that the insurers opt for settlement instead of a trial. It was feared that Alex Murdaugh's notoriety, following his conviction for the June 2021 murders of his wife, Margaret, and son Paul, might lead to a more considerable award if the case proceeded to trial. A chilling realization of how a case as convoluted as this one can be influenced by external factors, such as the public perception of a central figure like Murdaugh. For context, Paul Murdaugh was seen in a store security video buying alcohol the night of the accident. He was only 19 and not legally allowed to purchase alcohol, leading investigators to believe he used his older brother's ID for the transaction. That fateful night, he reportedly drank with his friends, including Mallory Beach, before taking them on a fatal ride in his father's boat, ultimately leading to the tragic accident. In the aftermath of the boat crash, Paul Murdaugh faced legal proceedings for Beach's death, during which he was out on bail. However, his life and his mother's were abruptly cut short in a shocking murder incident at their family home. In a twist of events that seems lifted from the pages of a gripping crime novel, Alex Murdaugh was convicted of the murders of his wife and son in March. Prosecutors argued that he orchestrated the killings as a diversionary tactic after being caught stealing millions from his law firm. This intricate plot is now the subject of documentaries on HBO and Netflix. In this case, the absurdity of who will bear the settlement costs underscores the convoluted nature of accountability in our legal system. A system that, in its quest for justice, sometimes raises more questions than it answers. . Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a shocking twist that has left victims' families aghast, Leslie Van Houten, a former member of the infamous Manson Family, has been released from prison. Van Houten, who was convicted for her role in the notorious Manson Family murders that rocked the nation in 1969, was granted parole recently after serving more than five decades behind bars. Van Houten, once a homecoming princess, was just 19 years old when she became embroiled in the brutal killings masterminded by Charles Manson. The slayings, known as the LaBianca Murders, marked a dark chapter in American history, sending shockwaves of horror and disbelief throughout the country. Van Houten's release has drawn sharp criticism, particularly from the families of the victims, who had to relive the nightmarish ordeal each time her parole was considered. They have expressed their profound disappointment and fear at the decision to release someone involved in such horrific crimes. Van Houten was the youngest member of the Manson cult and participated in the murder of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca, a day after other Manson followers murdered Sharon Tate, who was eight months pregnant, and four others. Van Houten was convicted of stabbing Rosemary LaBianca over a dozen times after she was already dead. The decision to grant parole to Van Houten has also been met with a flurry of criticism from the law enforcement community and the public. Critics argue that the magnitude of the crimes committed by the Manson Family, and Van Houten's participation in them, should outweigh any efforts she made to rehabilitate herself in prison. Despite her good conduct in prison, earning bachelor's and master's degrees, and her work in prison programs, many argue that the severity of her crimes cannot be overlooked. As one critic noted, "Her actions, driven by a malevolent ideology, resulted in the senseless and brutal death of innocent people. This cannot be undone by good behavior in prison." As the news of Van Houten's release reverberates, the memory of the Manson Family murders returns to the public consciousness, reigniting the debate about justice, rehabilitation, and the possibility of redemption. The horrifying nature of the Manson Family crimes remains etched in the nation's memory, underscoring the pain and trauma endured by the victims' families. Their voices echo the chilling reminder that justice for such monstrous acts should never be diluted by the passage of time. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a controversial and widely debated decision, Leslie Van Houten, a former follower of the infamous Charles Manson, has been granted parole after more than five decades behind bars. This decision has ignited discussions on the effectiveness and consequences of the justice system's treatment of individuals who have committed heinous acts. Among the voices rising in this crucial discourse is that of ex-FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit expert Robin Dreeke, whose analysis of the case brings a unique perspective to the unfolding narrative. Van Houten, a participant in the horrifying Manson Family murders that rocked the nation, has been incarcerated for her crimes since the late 1960s. Her recent parole release has triggered a wave of concerns about the balance between rehabilitation and punishment in our penal system. Dreeke's viewpoint, stemming from years of experience in criminal behavioral analysis, presents an intriguing insight into these concerns. With his extensive knowledge of criminal behavior, Dreeke could argue that the decision to parole Van Houten might set a concerning precedent, implying that even those involved in extreme acts of violence can eventually gain freedom. This perception could lead to public questioning of the judicial system's approach to severe crimes. While the legal system does support the potential for rehabilitation, it is also crucial to consider the magnitude and heinous nature of the crimes committed. Van Houten's involvement in the brutal Manson Family murders is a chilling reminder of this balance. According to experts like Dreeke, the parole decision could inadvertently convey a message of leniency towards serious criminal acts, affecting future judicial proceedings. Such viewpoints reflect a shared concern about the treatment of high-profile cases. The Manson Family murders represent a deeply distressing period in American history. To see Van Houten, one of the key players in these gruesome murders, walk free, can stir societal anxiety and debate about justice, punishment, and rehabilitation. This debate's complexity highlights the need for ongoing discourse about how the justice system handles individuals convicted of severe crimes. Can they truly be rehabilitated? And if so, should they reintegrate into society? While these questions may not have definitive answers, they underline the intricate nature of criminal justice in cases such as Van Houten's. The decision to parole Van Houten brings to light the broad consequences of such rulings on society's perception of justice. It reminds us that the echoes of past atrocities continue to resonate and that these decisions can shape our future justice system's trajectory. With the release of Van Houten, we are reminded of the importance of maintaining a critical dialogue about our justice system's decisions. As we grapple with the complexities of such cases, perspectives like those of Dreeke remain critical in ensuring we continue to evaluate and question the decisions that shape our societal perception of justice. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
For over a century, the Murdaugh family has held sway over the legal landscape of South Carolina's Lowcountry, wielding an influence that has often blurred the lines of justice. The recent unraveling of Alex Murdaugh's criminal deeds has exposed long-buried secrets and raised questions about a legacy of corruption that dates back generations. Randolph Murdaugh Sr., the patriarch of the legal dynasty, served as the 14th judicial district's circuit solicitor from 1920 until his death in 1940. During his tenure, he represented and prosecuted high-profile cases, filling courtrooms with spectators. However, beneath this seemingly unblemished record, lurked whispers of impropriety. As early as 1920, Murdaugh Sr. prosecuted corrupt county auditors, leading to their removal from office. While hailed as a triumph of justice, some insiders suggest this was more a consolidation of power than an act of moral duty. Murdaugh Sr., they argue, used these cases to eliminate rivals and tighten his family's grip on the region's political apparatus. Yet, the most telling evidence of early Murdaugh family corruption surrounds Randolph Murdaugh Jr. Federal prosecutors accused him of masterminding a bootlegging and protection scheme across Colleton County in the mid-20th century. The scheme, a brazen defiance of federal law, allegedly enjoyed local authorities' implicit support and reflected the extent of Murdaugh influence in the region. Despite substantial allegations, Murdaugh Jr. was acquitted – a testament, critics say, to the family's sway over local justice. Fast-forward to the 21st century, Alex Murdaugh, Randolph Sr.'s grandson, has been convicted of a litany of crimes that span embezzlement, fraud, and murder. The once-respected attorney capitalized on his family's influence to commit egregious acts of theft and violence. Murdaugh's brazen criminality, it seems, didn't spring from a vacuum. The family's century-long stranglehold on power and its reputation for skirting the boundaries of legality provided fertile ground for such malfeasance. As the legal system finally brings a rogue member of the Murdaugh family to justice, the roots of corruption seem to go deeper than Alex Murdaugh's crimes. The twisted tale of the Murdaughs, entwined with South Carolina's legal and social history, reveals a family legacy tainted by allegations of corruption, unbridled power, and judicial manipulation. As South Carolina grapples with this unsettling revelation, many hope this signals an end to an era of unchecked power and privilege. The Murdaugh family saga stands as a stark reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and equality in the pursuit of justice. Yet, the question remains: Can South Carolina truly break free from the shadows of its past? The unfolding Murdaugh saga, spanning over a century, serves as a litmus test for justice in the region, challenging the age-old belief that some families can exist above the law. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a bewildering turn of events, the woman dating James Craig, a Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife, opened up about her bewildering experience. She insists that she was unaware of James Craig's marital status during their brief relationship. Karin Cain, who became entwined in this disturbing tale of alleged deceit and murder, shared her narrative in an exclusive interview with ABC News, maintaining she never foresaw the chilling revelations that would follow their encounters. According to Cain, her brief association with James Craig was not the motive behind Angela Craig's alleged poisoning, contradicting what one might naturally assume given the circumstances. Cain insists she had no plans for a future with Craig; they had been dating for a mere three weeks when the incident occurred. She reiterated that Craig had led her to believe he and his wife were separated. She unequivocally stated, "If I had known what was true, I would not have been with this person." Cain, a Texas resident, is still grappling with the magnitude of the ordeal involving James Craig, who was charged with first-degree murder following his wife's untimely death due to suspected arsenic poisoning. James, arrested in March, is set to attend a preliminary hearing soon. His wife Angela, 43, and mother to his children was hospitalized thrice over a ten-day span before her life tragically ended. The details surrounding Angela's death point to a complicated family dynamic. According to an affidavit, Angela's sister alleged that James Craig had multiple affairs. The situation becomes murkier when we consider Cain's account of her relationship with James. They met at a dentist conference in February, where Cain, in the midst of her own divorce, connected with Craig over shared experiences. She claims Craig lied about his marital status, telling her he was also going through a divorce and living separately from his wife. However, authorities assert that James Craig poisoned his wife's protein shakes, leading to her demise. Investigators found that he allegedly created a new email address on a computer at his dental practice and conducted online searches that included phrases like "How many grams of pure arsenic will kill a human" and "Is arsenic detectable in autopsy." Moreover, he allegedly purchased arsenic online, and the shipment arrived at his home shortly before Angela started showing symptoms of illness. One of the more disturbing details from the affidavit is a text exchange between Angela and James Craig, where Angela expressed feeling dizzy and drugged. James Craig responded with an apparent assurance that he hadn't drugged her, yet Angela's sister disclosed to investigators that Angela had been drugged in the past, allegedly by her husband. The narrative reaches a chilling climax when, during Angela's final hospitalization, James' business partner reveals an unusual delivery of potassium cyanide to their dental practice. This disclosure led to a nurse alerting the police, adding a sinister twist to the investigation. During this complicated case, Cain visited James Craig in Colorado. She recalls his stressed and anxious demeanor during their dinners, oblivious to the grim developments back at home. Cain, who maintains that their relationship was never consummated, expressed profound remorse for the victims and the family. She remains haunted by the realization of her unsuspecting role in this tragic saga, one that is a chilling reminder of how deeply intertwined our lives can become in the deceit of others. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the complicated, tragic saga of Ashley Benefield, a former professional ballerina accused of murdering her husband, Douglas Benefield, one question has gripped the public's attention: what will it take for her to prove she acted in self-defense? The answer to this question lies within the details of self-defense law, the presented evidence, and the narratives spun by both the prosecution and defense in the courtroom. First and foremost, understanding the concept of self-defense within the legal framework is critical. In Florida, where the alleged crime occurred, the Stand Your Ground law gives individuals the right to use force, even deadly force, to defend themselves without any requirement to evade or retreat from a dangerous situation. However, this force is only justified if the person genuinely perceives an imminent threat of bodily harm or death. Thus, Ashley's defense team needs to establish that she reasonably believed her life was in danger when she shot her husband. Evidence and witness testimony play a paramount role in self-defense cases. Ashley's defense team has filed a motion for dismissal, in which they laid out their narrative of events leading to the deadly encounter. They argue that Douglas Benefield exhibited violent behavior, even admitting to certain violent actions in depositions. If these claims can be substantiated, they could serve as crucial evidence to support Ashley's self-defense argument. However, the Manatee County Sheriff's Office stated that they found no evidence supporting Ashley's allegations of abuse. They also determined that Douglas did not appear to be facing Ashley when she began shooting, which could complicate her claim of imminent danger. For the self-defense claim to stand, Ashley's legal team will have to address these inconsistencies convincingly. Another aspect to consider is the legal history between Ashley and Douglas. Court records indicate that Ashley filed several petitions accusing Douglas of domestic violence. While these allegations, if true, could help paint a picture of a tumultuous and potentially abusive relationship, investigators say they found no evidence supporting them. In this context, Ashley's team would need to provide compelling evidence to back up these claims. Finally, Ashley's own behavior and statements can impact the validity of her self-defense claim. After the shooting, her refusal to make a statement to the police, except for a spontaneous remark about her ears ringing, might raise questions about her actions and motivations. To prove that she acted in self-defense, Ashley Benefield and her defense team face the daunting task of convincingly presenting a narrative of fear and imminent threat. They must back up this narrative with credible evidence, successfully challenge contradictory evidence presented by the prosecution, and navigate the complexities of Florida's self-defense laws. The outcome will undoubtedly set a significant precedent for future self-defense claims in the state, making the case a landmark in Florida's legal history. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Bryan Kohberger's case has become a national spectacle. A complex web of heinous crimes, the obscure connection to a once studious criminology Ph.D. student, and a defense case that seems to be threading the needle. So, let's dive into the abyss - what 'problems' might the defense find in handling Kohberger's prosecution? The Complexity of Charges Kohberger faces severe charges - four counts of first-degree murder. The prosecution must show he acted with premeditation, a bar set notoriously high. Any inconsistencies in this area will be a gaping problem, just waiting for the defense to leap at. Can they conclusively prove premeditation? That's a thorny question that's yet to be answered. The DNA Dilemma Forensic evidence is the pivot of this case, but can it be trusted entirely? The defense may latch onto the 'problems' inherent in DNA collection and analysis, probing for inconsistencies and questionable practices. Any lapses in this 'perfect' system, and the defense has a fighting chance. After all, science isn't always foolproof. The Genetic Genealogy Conundrum Intriguingly, genetic genealogy was utilized, a relatively fresh face in the courtroom. This novel method might be an Achilles heel for the prosecution. Given the novelty of the field, the defense could question the reliability of genetic genealogy. Will the court accept this evidence without hesitation, or will it crumble under scrutiny? The Death Penalty Debate With the prosecution seeking the death penalty, Pandora's box of ethical and moral questions comes into play. The defense could exploit this emotionally charged terrain, triggering public sympathy and questioning the ethics of capital punishment. Will society's moral compass veer towards an eye for an eye, or will mercy prevail? Kohberger's Connection to Victims Here's a riddle - what connects a criminology Ph.D. student to four undergrads from another university? Apparently, not much. The defense argues that there's "no connection" between Kohberger and the victims. The defense has an opening if the prosecution fails to construct a solid bridge linking Kohberger to the victims. Conclusion Each move could make or break the case in the chess game of court trials. Bryan Kohberger's defense is gearing up to expose the 'problems' in the prosecution's approach. It's a daunting task, no doubt. Yet, every crack in the prosecution's strategy is a potential lifeline for the defense. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The story of Rudy Farias, the Houston man reported missing for eight years but allegedly kept captive in his mother's home, has sparked a wave of speculation and intrigue. Among the emerging theories is whether Janie Santana, Rudy's mother, might have been grappling with a lesser-known form of child abuse, known as Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSbP). For those unfamiliar with the term, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, also called Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another, is a psychological disorder where a caregiver fabricates, exaggerates, or induces health problems in those under their care, usually for attention or sympathy. With Rudy's case gaining nationwide attention, questions are being raised about whether his mother's behavior aligns with the symptoms of MSbP. Farias' detailed account of his life at home paints a grim picture of mental manipulation and control, elements often associated with Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Farias claimed that his mother held him against his will, not physically but mentally. He described how she bombarded him with negative thoughts and emotionally manipulated him to the extent that he felt imprisoned in his own home. The suggestion of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy in this case does not come lightly. This severe form of child abuse, primarily characterized by a caregiver making up or causing illness or injury in a person under their care, is both dangerous and difficult to detect. The abuse is primarily psychological, with the caregiver imposing an ill identity onto the child, often leading to unnecessary medical treatments and, in some cases, significant physical harm. While Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy typically involves physical ailments, mental and behavioral issues may also be falsified or induced, blurring the lines further and making detection even more challenging. This is particularly relevant in Farias' case, as his imprisonment was psychological rather than physical. Indeed, the fact that Farias was an adult during his alleged captivity adds another layer of complexity to the case. While MSbP is most often associated with caregivers of children, cases involving adult victims are not unheard of. Regardless of the victim's age, the abusive behavior often stems from the perpetrator's need for attention or control. It is important to note that at this stage, the suggestion of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy in the Rudy Farias case is purely speculative. Without a comprehensive psychological evaluation of Janie Santana and a thorough investigation of the situation, it is impossible to make a definitive diagnosis. Yet, the mere possibility of such a severe form of abuse raises important questions about how society and law enforcement can better detect and address such insidious forms of psychological manipulation. As the Rudy Farias saga continues to unravel, one can only hope it will shed more light on the hidden abuses some endure and underscore the importance of mental health awareness and intervention in our society. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a tale as puzzling as it is tragic, the figure of Bryan Kohberger stands at the heart of a complex murder investigation. The discourse surrounding the Latah County man's involvement in a series of heinous crimes has taken a turn towards mental health, with many questioning when and where things went awry for Kohberger. Known to friends and acquaintances as a generally calm and amiable person, the allegations against Kohberger have shocked the community. Accused of brutal acts of violence, this dark portrayal seems a stark contrast to the man they once knew. As legal proceedings continue, many are left wondering whether mental health issues contributed to the stark transformation of Bryan Kohberger. Kohberger, currently fighting allegations related to his involvement in murder charges, recently shocked the court by filing a motion to stay proceedings in his case. Citing a substantial failure to comply with selection procedures for a grand jury, Kohberger's move hints at a desperate attempt to fight the charges. But, for those who have followed the case closely, this move brings up the question: Does this motion reflect a legitimate concern or a carefully orchestrated distraction from the truth? The proceedings have reignited discussions about Kohberger's past. Friends and family members recall a drastic change in his behavior over the years. What once was a jovial and outgoing personality started to become reclusive and unpredictable. Instances of paranoia, intense mood swings, and irrational fear began to surface, leaving those close to him worried and perplexed. While it is essential not to rush to conclusions about mental health based solely on public speculation, the shifts in Kohberger's behavior raise questions about whether he had been silently battling a mental health disorder. Did this potential struggle contribute to the unimaginable acts he stands accused of? And if so, when did the first signs of his mental health issues begin to appear, and were there missed opportunities to intervene? Unfortunately, as is often the case with mental health disorders, the signs can be easily overlooked until a significant incident brings them to light. In Kohberger's case, the alleged crimes have acted as that significant incident, casting a spotlight on his past behavior and prompting a community-wide search for answers. Efforts to understand the role mental health played in this case are not only crucial for Kohberger's trial but could also provide invaluable insights into the intersection of mental health and crime. By investigating where and when things began to unravel for Kohberger, society can work towards better identifying and treating mental health issues before they escalate into dire situations. As the search for truth continues, it is essential to remember that mental health struggles do not excuse violent behavior. However, understanding the context in which such behaviors arise can help develop more effective interventions and prevention strategies in the future. The case of Bryan Kohberger serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of mental health awareness and care in our society. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod
In a world of baffling contradictions and paradoxes, the case of Rex Heuermann, the man charged with three of the heinous Gilgo Beach murders, stands out. A respected architect, a loving husband, and a dedicated father accused of chilling crimes that would make one's blood run cold. The 59-year-old's portrayal by his lawyer, Michael Brown, is a heartwarming rendition of a hardworking professional, who meticulously designs cityscapes by day while cherishing his family life by night. He's a man with a squeaky-clean record, the epitome of an ideal citizen, Brown insists. But it's a sunny story drenched in chilling irony, given the monstrous allegations the architect now faces. Heuermann's professional and family man façade crumbles away as Suffolk County District Attorney Ray Tierney steps in to paint a grotesque picture. In this chilling version of reality, Heuermann is not the beacon of society, but a lurking predator, using the absence of his family to perpetrate horrifying murders. We are pulled into the depths of the infamous Gilgo Beach murders, a case that began in December 2010 with the discovery of Melissa Barthelemy's remains. The plot thickened as more bodies, all connected to sex work, were uncovered, casting a long, dark shadow over Long Island. A breakthrough in the case came in 2022 when a newly formed task force linked Heuermann to a Chevrolet Avalanche - the vehicle previously associated with some victims' last known locations. Suddenly, our everyday architect found himself in the glaring spotlight of suspicion, his perfect alibi unraveling. The real kicker is the technology that helped crack the case. Advanced DNA testing and mobile phone tracking, which seem more fitting in a sci-fi flick, were used to construct a damning case against Heuermann. One can't help but marvel at the ironic twist of fate. Here's a man, living in an age of unprecedented technological advancement, and this very technology lands him in the middle of a murder investigation. In an even more cinematic twist, Heuermann's home garbage bin, usually a symbol of routine domestic life, becomes the source of damning DNA evidence. Discarded bottles, partially eaten pizza crusts, all mundanely everyday items, suddenly assumed a sinister significance. The investigation also unearthed a dark digital trail - burner phones, fake email addresses, violent pornography searches, and alleged arrangements for sexual encounters. This is a striking contrast to Heuermann's public persona as a committed family man and professional architect. Heuermann's story ends, for now, with his arrest on a Thursday night, carrying one of the infamous burner phones. The irony of the situation is both chilling and thought-provoking. The architect who spent his career building structures may have, in the end, built his downfall. The Rex Heuermann case is a true testament to the strange, sometimes contradictory world we live in. It's a tale of dual lives, a study in irony, and an exploration of the darkest depths of humanity. Above all, it's a stark reminder that sometimes, reality is stranger and more horrifying than fiction. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the heart of South Carolina's Lowcountry, a long line of influential attorneys has its roots with the enigmatic Randolph Murdaugh Sr. Understanding the history and origins of this family is key to unraveling the complex story surrounding Alex Murdaugh, a figure currently in the spotlight due to recent allegations of misconduct. Randolph Murdaugh Sr. was born in 1887 in Varnville, South Carolina, into a wealthy family with deep ties to the region. His father, a Confederate States Army veteran and businessman, instilled a dedication to public service and business acumen. It was this familial influence that shaped young Randolph's future. After receiving a public-school education and attending the US Naval Academy, Murdaugh Sr. graduated from the University of South Carolina (USC) with a Bachelor of Arts in 1908, followed by a law degree in 1910. The same year, he set up a law firm in Hampton, South Carolina, paving the way for what would become an influential family dynasty in South Carolina's legal circles. He then served as the town attorney and took on various civic roles, including appointments to the school board and delegate positions for the Democratic Party. By 1920, he was elected as the circuit solicitor for the 14th judicial circuit, a position he held until his untimely death in 1940. While serving as a solicitor, Murdaugh Sr. gained a reputation as a formidable prosecutor, handling high-profile cases, including prosecuting corrupt county officials and even representing a governor. His charismatic courtroom presence often filled the courthouse galleries during murder trials. The family line continued with Randolph "Buster" Murdaugh Jr., one of Randolph Murdaugh Sr.'s two sons. Following in his father's footsteps, Buster continued the family's legal legacy, often filling in for his ailing father in court. The Murdaugh name remained prominent in South Carolina's legal circles for nearly a century until Alex Murdaugh, Randolph Sr.'s great-grandson, found himself embroiled in a string of scandals. The recent controversies surrounding Alex Murdaugh have brought renewed attention to the family's long and intricate history. As investigations into Alex Murdaugh's alleged misconduct unfold, understanding the historical context and the family's origins can provide valuable insights. The Murdaugh family's rise to prominence in South Carolina began with a dedication to public service and a love for the law, qualities that are essential to understanding the legacy that Alex Murdaugh inherited and now threatens to tarnish. From Randolph Murdaugh Sr.'s founding of a law firm in Hampton to the present-day scandal surrounding Alex Murdaugh, the Murdaugh family's story is a tale of influence, power, and ultimately, a legacy on the brink. As new details continue to emerge, the historical role of the Murdaughs in South Carolina's legal community will undoubtedly be scrutinized further, casting new light on a family that has shaped the state's legal landscape for decades. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith
In a shocking case that has rocked Virginia, former University of Richmond basketball star, Kassceen Weaver, began his trial on Monday for the alleged murder of his young son and the subsequent concealment of the body in a freezer for several years. Weaver, now 50 years old, has been indicted with felony murder, felony child neglect, and concealing a dead body. This harrowing case underscores the severity of domestic violence and child abuse, subjects that need immediate and uncompromising attention in our society. In May 2021, the tranquility of Weaver's Chesterfield home was shattered when the police discovered the body of Eliel Adon Weaver, also known as Adon, hidden in a freezer in the garage. Authorities estimate that Adon, the youngest son of Kassceen and Dina Weaver, was under five years old at the time of his death. As the trial proceedings got underway, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Joshua Loren laid out the grim circumstances leading to Adon's tragic death. The discovery of Adon's body was prompted by a tip-off from his maternal uncle, who had been alerted to the disturbing secret by Adon's mother. Police later uncovered the child's body, sealed in a vacuum bag, and stashed away in a storage bin within a large freezer. Autopsy reports on Adon presented a horrifying picture of the child's final moments, revealing multiple instances of blunt force trauma, including a skull fracture and numerous rib fractures. These findings implicated Weaver, a stay-at-home father and primary caregiver, who was responsible for Adon's well-being and home-schooling. The defense, led by attorney Emilee Hasbrouck, painted a different picture, arguing that Weaver's actions were driven by grief, not malice. The defense suggested that Weaver, devastated by his son's death, chose to preserve Adon's remains in the freezer. This, according to Hasbrouck, was a desperate attempt to hold onto a piece of his son, rather than a nefarious attempt to hide evidence of wrongdoing. During the trial, the court heard testimony from Adon's mother, Dina Weaver. She recounted the chilling events of October 23, 2018, when she received a call from Kassceen. He had told her that Adon had passed out and was not breathing. Despite her pleas to take Adon to a hospital, Kassceen resisted, allegedly due to fear of losing their other child due to Adon's apparent bruises. The shocking revelations surrounding Adon's death have left the community in shock and mourning. The tragic tale of Adon Weaver serves as a stark reminder of the insidious nature of domestic violence and child abuse, as well as the urgent need for societal and institutional vigilance against these horrors. As the trial continues, our thoughts remain with those affected by this tragic event. Kassceen Weaver, once celebrated for his athletic prowess, now stands in the shadow of these grave allegations. As the community awaits justice for Adon, this story reinforces the fact that behind closed doors, even seemingly normal families can harbor disturbing secrets. Whether Weaver will choose to testify in his own defense remains to be seen. This case, with its layers of sorrow and controversy, underscores the importance of maintaining a vigilant eye on potential signs of child abuse and domestic violence in our communities. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith
As the trial of Bryan Kohberger, the accused in the 2022 Idaho student murders, gains momentum, one question that continues to intrigue legal observers and the public alike is the nature of the defense strategy that has been adopted to prove Kohberger's innocence. Kohberger, a former Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, faces charges of four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The case, marked by its shocking brutality and the mystery surrounding Kohberger's alleged involvement, has become a focal point of national attention. At the crux of his defense is the assertion that there is "no connection" between Kohberger and the victims. His defense team, led by attorney Jay Logsdon, has challenged the prosecution's DNA collection methods and use of genetic genealogy. In a recent court filing, the defense highlighted that DNA from three unidentified males was found at the crime scene, including on a glove outside the home. Furthermore, the defense has cast doubt on the surveillance and tracking of a white Hyundai sedan that authorities claim links Kohberger to the murders. Kohberger's team argues that the evidence provided, whether it be the car or genetic genealogy, has so far yielded "precious little" connection between their client and the crime. Despite the prosecution's claim that DNA from a knife sheath found at the crime scene matches Kohberger's, the defense maintains their stance on the lack of concrete evidence tying Kohberger directly to the murders. This argument appears to be a central pillar of their strategy, seeking to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury. Moreover, the defense team's portrayal of Kohberger's demeanor and character has been highlighted. His lawyer, Jason LaBar, has described him as calm and intelligent, with Kohberger himself expressing confidence in his eventual exoneration. The focus on alleged procedural flaws in the investigation and the emphasis on the absence of a direct link between Kohberger and the victims suggest a strategy of discrediting the prosecution's evidence. This tactic often hinges on creating sufficient doubt about the reliability and validity of the prosecution's case to prevent a guilty verdict. However, the defense strategy also brings into focus the challenge of countering substantial physical evidence, such as the DNA alleged to be Kohberger's. The upcoming trial, set to begin on October 2, will test the strength of this defense. As the court proceedings continue, the effectiveness of Kohberger's defense strategy remains to be seen. It will be the jury's responsibility to evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether the defense has successfully created reasonable doubt about Kohberger's guilt. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly set a precedent for future trials involving similar defense strategies. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith
Long Island, New York - In an unexpected twist to the notorious Gilgo Beach murder investigation, Rex Heuermann, a 59-year-old architect, was arrested and charged with the decade-old crimes. The Long Island resident had, until recently, led an ostensibly unassuming life as a husband, father, and respected professional in Manhattan. Heuermann is alleged to be the man behind the gruesome Gilgo Beach murders, which took the lives of at least four women, leaving a trail of mystery in their wake. The victims, now known as the "Gilgo Four," were wrapped in burlap sacks along Ocean Parkway near Gilgo State Park in December 2010. Sources close to the investigation revealed that Heuermann had been identified as a person of interest more than a year ago, following a crucial DNA match. The DNA was retrieved from a pizza crust discarded by Heuermann and later tested in the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory. The results indicated Heuermann could not be ruled out as a contributor to the male hair found on the burlap used to transport victim Megan Waterman. Adding to the web of evidence was Heuermann's suspicious online activity, which included searches related to the Gilgo Beach murders and family members of the victims, as per statements made by District Attorney Raymond Tierney. News of the arrest has shocked those who knew Heuermann. "He looked like an everyday guy, a regular neighbor," said Barry Auslander, a local resident. A former classmate of Berner High School, where Heuermann graduated in 1981, expressed disbelief, calling him a person who "flew under the radar." Interestingly, records indicate that during the times when victims Melissa Barthelemy, Megan Waterman, and Amber Costello disappeared, Heuermann's wife, Asa Ellerup, was either out of the country or in New York state. The couple has two children, and Victoria, their daughter, was previously listed as an employee of her father's architecture firm, RH Architects. Heuermann's arrest has given renewed hope to the victims' families and reopened old wounds. Sherre Gilbert, the sister of Shannan Gilbert, whose disappearance led to the discovery of the Gilgo Four, said she was relieved at the arrest, adding that Heuermann "deserves to rot in prison." As the residents of the tranquil suburb grapple with the revelations, questions linger about the seemingly ordinary man living amongst them. Rex Heuermann, now unmasked as the Long Island Serial Killer, continues to be the subject of intense scrutiny as the legal proceedings unfold. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The intricate and enigmatic case surrounding Rudy Farias baffles experts and the public, keeping everyone riveted. A profound analysis of the case from former FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and Tony Brueski offers fresh perspectives on the unfolding narrative. The ordeal of Rudy Farias has been a topic of much contention and fascination, with the alleged victim claiming that his home was akin to a prison. As per his narrative, he lived under the emotional and psychological control of his mother, Janie Santana, making for a seemingly harrowing tale of captivity. The question remains: Will we ever uncover the actual Rudy Farias story? Ex-FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and Tony Brueski attempted to shed some light on this perplexing case, discussing the intricacies and implications of the narrative presented by Rudy. Rudy's tale is rife with elements of control, deception, and an alleged existence cloaked in secrecy. Jennifer Coffindaffer, with her years of experience in the FBI, provides a seasoned perspective on these aspects. Her examination of the case lends credence to the need for a thorough investigation, considering the gravity of the allegations raised by Rudy. The idea of 'truth' is inherently subjective, particularly in cases like this, where contrasting narratives exist. Tony Brueski's analysis highlights this inherent subjectivity. He posits that the 'true' story of Rudy Farias might lie somewhere between the narratives presented by Rudy himself and his mother, Janie Santana. The alleged ordeal endured by Rudy and the events leading up to his surprising reappearance raises questions about the overall reliability of the presented narratives. Are the accounts of captivity and emotional control accurate, or are they an elaborate ruse meant to divert attention from another, undisclosed truth? Is there another side to the story that remains untold? Jennifer Coffindaffer's professional background offers an insightful examination of the possibility of concealed facts. With her understanding of human behavior, she articulates the possible motivations and actions of all parties involved in this bewildering case. Tony Brueski's exploration of the case brings to light the complexities of familial dynamics and the possibilities of hidden motives. Both experts' analysis underscores the importance of a thorough and comprehensive investigation to reveal the 'true' Rudy Farias story. As this saga unfolds, the interest surrounding the Rudy Farias case remains at an all-time high. The ex-FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and Tony Brueski's exploration provides fresh insights into the intricate narrative, leaving audiences eagerly awaiting the truth behind the captivating story of Rudy Farias. As the search for the 'truth' continues, the world watches and waits. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The saga of the "Long Island Serial Killer," an enigma that has engrossed the public and confounded investigators for over a decade, might be nearing its end. Manhattan architect Rex Heuermann is now in custody, facing charges concerning the gruesome Gilgo Beach murders. However, the journey to this critical turning point was long and arduous, demonstrating the tenacity required to solve cold cases and the innovative methods investigators must deploy. The use of familial DNA, a technique that has grown in prominence over the past few years, was pivotal in advancing this investigation. Familial DNA testing involves comparing the DNA profile of an unknown suspect left at a crime scene with profiles in databases to find potential relatives, thus narrowing down the suspect list. Retired FBI agent Jennifer Coffindfer, who has years of experience in cracking cold cases, has recently emphasized the importance of this technique. "Familial DNA testing is a remarkable tool that can breathe new life into cold cases," Coffindfer stated. However, the use of this method is not without its challenges. It requires exhaustive resources and considerable time, considering the vastness of the data that needs to be processed. Privacy concerns also surface as DNA databases often contain information from individuals not involved in any criminal activity. Balancing law enforcement's need to solve crimes and individuals' right to privacy is a delicate act that still requires comprehensive legal and ethical guidelines. In the Long Island Serial Killer case, investigators had to meticulously collect and analyze the DNA evidence associated with the crime scenes. They had to trace back familial connections, carefully navigating the vast and complex web of genetic information. It was a painstaking process, but the potential payoff was immense: identifying a suspect in a series of crimes that had remained unsolved for over ten years. The arrest of Rex Heuermann may be a testament to the power of familial DNA testing that Coffindfer alluded to. Though it took over a decade to identify a suspect, the steadfast dedication of the investigators and the advanced technology at their disposal have potentially brought a measure of closure to a community haunted by uncertainty. While it's essential to remember that Heuermann is a suspect and that his guilt or innocence is a matter for the courts to decide, there's no denying that the development, in this case, has shone a spotlight on the critical role that familial DNA testing can play in modern investigative work. As we continue to advance in genetic science and refine its use within law enforcement, it will be interesting to see how many more cold cases can be revisited and possibly solved. The decade-long pursuit of the Long Island Serial Killer underscores the perseverance of law enforcement and the invaluable contribution of scientific advancements like familial DNA. It serves as a beacon of hope for countless other cold cases, proving that with time, dedication, and the right tools, no case is ever truly forgotten. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
As the gruesome Idaho student murders case continues, the question of whether to pursue the death penalty for suspect Bryan Kohberger has prompted a deeper discussion on its financial implications. According to a recent report, pursuing the death penalty rather than life imprisonment could potentially cost taxpayers an additional $1 million if Kohberger is convicted. In June, Latah County Prosecuting Attorney Bill Thompson announced his intention to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is found guilty in the 2022 slayings of four University of Idaho students. The economics of this decision are now under scrutiny, given the potential additional burden on Idaho taxpayers. The substantial financial impact comes from the extended incarceration period of inmates on death row and their associated healthcare costs. For instance, Gerald Pizzuto, an inmate on death row in Idaho since 1986, has reportedly racked up over $1.3 million in medical bills due to various health conditions. This underscores the potential long-term cost implications of death row convictions. Further adding to the cost and complexity of death sentences, a shortage of lethal injections has prompted Idaho to reinstate the firing squad as an execution method earlier this year. At the center of this debate is Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University. He is charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, following the horrific murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Authorities have yet to reveal a potential motive for the massacre, but the heinous nature of the crimes has led to the push for the death penalty. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and Los Angeles-based trial attorney, stated, "This is one of the most heinous murders in Idaho state history. There are many aggravating factors supporting the imposition of the death penalty, including multiple victims who were brutally and senselessly stabbed." However, the decision to pursue the death penalty has drawn criticism from some quarters due to the potentially significant additional cost to taxpayers. This concern highlights the ongoing debate around the fiscal and ethical implications of capital punishment. Despite the potential additional costs, the pursuit of the death penalty reflects the gravity of the charges against Kohberger and the profound impact of the crimes on the victims' families and the community. As the trial progresses, scheduled to begin on Oct. 2, public attention will not only be on the outcome of the case but also on the broader discussion around the financial implications of the death penalty. Ultimately, the decision weighs the pursuit of what some see as fitting justice against the additional cost to taxpayers. With this high-profile case, the discussion about the price of justice is sure to continue in Idaho and beyond. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Former model and ballet company founder, Ashley Benefield, is facing a motion hearing on allegations of second-degree murder, a case that has captured national attention. Benefield, 31, is charged in the 2020 fatal shooting of her husband, Douglas Benefield, 58, at their residence in Lakewood Ranch, Florida. The couple, who met at a Republican fundraiser in 2016 and married two weeks later, had a tumultuous relationship marked by allegations of domestic abuse. Ashley's defense team claims that Douglas, a recently widowed Navy veteran, was abusive, and that the fatal shooting was an act of self-defense. They have filed a motion for dismissal of the case. Their relationship started with promise. Ashley, a 24-year-old model and ballerina, and Douglas, a technology consultant and entrepreneur, had embarked on a joint venture to establish "The American National Ballet" in Charleston, South Carolina. However, the venture quickly failed, and Ashley became pregnant. Following a challenging pregnancy, the relationship deteriorated and a contentious custody battle ensued. According to court documents, Ashley repeatedly sought to keep Douglas away from their child, filing multiple claims of domestic violence. However, judges found no substantial evidence to support her allegations. The shooting occurred on September 27, 2020. Responding to a 911 call, Manatee County officials arrived at the scene to find Douglas had been shot twice. Ashley was the one to call for help, claiming her husband had attacked her. Court documents indicate that Douglas's wounds suggest he was not facing Ashley when she started shooting. A warrant was issued for Ashley's arrest on November 4, 2020. The arrest affidavit describes Ashley as motivated to keep Douglas away from their child, even after exhausting all legal means. Ashley's defense team, however, paints a different picture. They allege that on the day of the shooting, Douglas physically assaulted Ashley, leading her to fear for her life. They argue that Ashley, then preparing to move to Maryland with her daughter, acted in self-defense when Douglas continued to advance on her despite her warnings. In a striking twist to the case, Douglas's daughter from his previous marriage, Eva Benefield, has used social media to voice her views on Ashley. In a series of TikTok videos, which have amassed over 3.1 million likes, Eva shares her personal trauma and frustration with the ongoing legal proceedings. The pretrial immunity hearing on the motion for dismissal is scheduled for July 6 and 7 at the Manatee County Judicial Center in Bradenton, with Circuit Court Judge Matt Whyte presiding. This case continues to unfold, offering a glimpse into a troubled relationship, the complexities of self-defense claims, and the contentious arena of domestic violence allegations. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
During a conversation with Tony Brueski, Josh Greenberg, the father of Ellen Greenberg, shared his belief that he knows who is responsible for his daughter's tragic death. This assertion, though not accompanied by a specific name, adds another layer of mystery to Ellen's case. Josh emphasized his strong conviction that his daughter's death was not a suicide, as officially reported. His certainty points towards possible suspects in Ellen's life, further intensifying the need for a thorough reevaluation of the case. Sign the petition: https://www.change.org/p/justice-for-ellen-rae-greenberg-justiceforellen Call The Mayor Of Philadelphia And DEMAND The Case Be Reexamined: (215) 686-2181 Email - https://www.phila.gov/departments/mayor/mayors-correspondence-form/ Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith
In an astounding development in a case that has held the nation's attention for over a decade, the "Long Island Serial Killer" investigation took a dramatic turn. Manhattan architect, Rex Heuermann, has been apprehended in connection to the infamous Gilgo Beach serial murders. This shocking revelation has cast a chilling light on the seemingly ordinary Massapequa Park resident. Heuermann, 59, is now under intense scrutiny following his arrest. He has been charged with six counts of murder, three in the first degree and three in the second. His alleged victims include Megan Waterman, Melissa Barthelemy, and Amber Costello. These women are part of the mournfully named "Gilgo Four," whose bodies were found in 2010 along a stretch of Ocean Parkway in Long Island. The documents presented in the court state that Heuermann is also the “prime suspect” in the murder of the fourth woman in that group, Maureen Brainard-Barnes. However, he is not currently facing charges related to her death. The enigmatic "Long Island Serial Killer" had been previously linked to up to eleven victims, their remains discovered in Suffolk County over a decade ago. The police press conference that followed the arrest was a solemn affair, presenting a portrait of a monster hidden in plain sight. "Rex Heuermann is a demon that walks among us. He is a predator who ruined families," Suffolk County Police Commissioner Rodney Harrison declared with grim certainty. He affirmed that this arrest is merely the first stride towards serving justice to the victims' families. Heuermann's court appearance was marked by an adamant denial of the charges. With a claim of innocence and tears in his eyes, he reportedly told his attorney, "I didn't do this." Regardless, Heuermann was ordered to be held without bail, indicating the severity of the charges against him. The turning point in the investigation came when law enforcement connected Heuermann's first-generation Chevrolet Avalanche to the case. A witness reportedly spotted the vehicle around the time of Costello's disappearance. In a meticulous operation, over 300 subpoenas and search warrants were served, leading to the discovery of cellphone records for burner phones used to arrange meetings with three of the “Gilgo Four” victims. This breakthrough in the case of the "Long Island Serial Killer" is a sobering reminder of the complexities and the chilling reality of such investigations. As the community grapples with the reveal of Heuermann as the suspected serial killer, the path to justice for the victims and their families is now finally within reach. Yet, the road ahead is still fraught with questions and the quest for a full closure. As Heuermann's case unfolds, the world watches, hoping for answers that have been elusive for over a decade. This investigation's milestone reinforces the importance of perseverance and advanced technology in solving complex cases, offering hope for other cold cases. As the "Long Island Serial Killer" case unravels, it serves as a stark reminder of the persistent menace that sometimes lurks within the most unsuspected corners of our society. FAQs Who is the Long Island Serial Killer? The "Long Island Serial Killer" is an unidentified suspected serial killer linked to up to eleven victims found in Suffolk County over a decade ago. The latest suspect in the case is Manhattan architect Rex Heuermann. What is Rex Heuermann charged with? Rex Heuermann is charged with six counts of murder - three counts of murder in the first degree and three in the second degree. Who are the victims associated with Heuermann? Heuermann's alleged victims include Megan Waterman, Melissa Barthelemy, and Amber Costello. These women are part of the "Gilgo Four." What was the turning point in the investigation? The turning point in the investigation came when Heuermann's first-generation Chevrolet Avalanche was connected to the case. What did Heuermann say in court? In court, Heuermann pleaded not guilty to the charges. He reportedly told his attorney, "I didn't do this." Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the unfolding saga of South Carolina's famed Murdaugh family, a pivotal courtroom battle took place recently, bringing to the fore the case of the tragic boat crash in 2019 that resulted in the untimely death of 19-year-old Mallory Beach. Beach's family has lodged a wrongful death lawsuit against Alex Murdaugh and Greg Parker, owners of the Parker's Kitchen convenience store chain. As the litigations proceed, the nexus of the Murdaugh family's alleged misconduct and the fatal accident becomes ever more pronounced. The boat crash occurred in the wee hours of February 24, 2019, when Paul Murdaugh, in an intoxicated state, reportedly crashed the boat into a bridge. Tragically, Beach was thrown off the boat, and her body was recovered a week later; she had drowned. It was later discovered that Paul had unlawfully purchased alcohol at Parker's using his older brother's ID hours before the crash. In the ensuing legal battle, some parties implicated in the Beach family's suit have chosen to settle, including Buster Murdaugh and the estate of Maggie Murdaugh. However, Alex Murdaugh and Parker's Kitchen opted to face the trial, which is set to commence on August 14th. A significant development occurred during the recent hearing when the presiding judge consented to dismiss the claims against the late Paul Murdaugh's estate. The Beach family's attorney, Mark Tinsley, revealed that it was found that there were no concealed assets in Paul's estate. The courtroom drama further escalated when lawyers representing Parker's presented a motion to sever their case from that of Alex Murdaugh's and also sought to transfer the trial venue away from Hampton County. This county is the same location where Alex was previously tried and convicted for the murders of his youngest son and wife. The legal team for Parker's argued that the plaintiff aimed to conjoin their case with Alex's to incite the jury's anger and to utilize the substantial financial resources of Parker's for compensation. In an intriguing turn of events, the judge denied Parker's motions for severance and a change of venue after a brief recess. This marked the second time Parker's sought a severance. Initially, the Court agreed with Parker's assessment of the potential prejudice of facing trial with the Murdaugh defendants. However, this decision was later reversed without a clear explanation. Reflecting on the day's rulings, PK Shere, attorney for Parker's, stated their disappointment but reiterated their anticipation of presenting their case at the trial the following month. He expressed concern over the adverse effects of the "continuing media blitz surrounding the Murdaughs" on the forthcoming trial. This legal drama epitomizes the intricate nexus of power, influence, and tragedy encapsulating South Carolina's legal landscape. It invites keen observers and justice-seekers to understand the breadth of the issues that underpin these events. With the trial date on the horizon, we anticipate that this complex narrative of the Murdaugh family's controversies, and their implications on the broader South Carolina community, will continue to unravel. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on: Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Sign the petition to RE-OPEN this case and get justice for Ellen Greenberg: https://www.change.org/p/justice-for-ellen-rae-greenberg-justiceforellen Tony Brueski and attorney Eric Faddis engaged in a thought-provoking discussion on the requirements to re-open the murder case of Ellen Greenberg, a controversial suicide ruling. They analyzed the necessity for new, compelling evidence or information that could significantly contradict the original findings. The experts also highlighted the critical role of an advocative legal team ready to fight for justice. Lastly, they underscored the power of public pressure and media attention in influencing the reevaluation of such cases. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith
Tony Brueski brought together Adam Cox and Rex Conner, brother and uncle of Lori Vallow Daybell, to provide their personal reactions to the shocking murders linked to Lori. During their heart-wrenching discussion, Cox and Conner revealed their initial disbelief, and their struggle to reconcile the Lori they knew with the heinous acts she was associated with. They spoke candidly about the profound pain and loss they experienced as the horrific events unfolded. Their emotional conversation provided listeners with an intimate look into the impact of these tragedies on Lori's family. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (All Cases) – https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary True Crime Today (All Cases)- https://audioboom.com/channels/5001260-true-crime-today-a-true-crime-podcast Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Nurse of Death: The Lucy Letby Story - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Murder in the Morning- https://audioboom.com/channels/5078367-murder-in-the-morning-daily-true-crime-news The Case Against Kouri Richins- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107367-the-case-against-kouri-richins Justice For Harmony | The Trials of Adam Montgomery- https://audioboom.com/channels/5107366-justice-for-harmony-the-trials-of-adam-montgomery The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury- https://audioboom.com/channels/5109276-the-murder-of-madeline-kingsbury The Murder of Stephen Smith- https://audioboom.com/channels/5099407-the-murder-of-stephen-smith