Podcasts about Walshe

In this episode of the Onc Now Podcast, host Jonathan Sackier is joined by Janice Walshe, Consultant Medical Oncologist at St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. They explore the economic realities of cancer diagnostics, fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer, and the impact of international collaboration on the future of clinical trials.  Timestamps:    00:00 – Introduction  03:25 – Economic disparities and oncology care in Ireland  07:20 – Neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer  10:13 – Spotlight on invasive lobular carcinoma  12:36 – Fertility preservation in breast cancer  15:20 – Menopause after cancer  19:09 – The latest clinical trials in Ireland  21:50 – International trials and research projects  23:50 – Walshe's three wishes for healthcare 

Netflix's new four-part crime drama Adolescence has generated acclaim and positive reviews - and it's sparked discussions about online radicalisation and toxic masculinity. The series deals with the fallout after a 13-year-old boy stabs a teenage girl to death - while addressing the factors that can warp young people's perspectives about the world around them. St Kevins College principal Jo Walshe says this series is an 'important' piece of art. "It's something that's going to stimulate an enormous amount of conversation, it's something that is probably going to get through to people in a way that's going to be a lot better than people like me standing up and telling families not to allow their young kids to have social media." LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Michael Proctor's Career of Alleged Cover-Ups In Memoriam Michael Proctor had everything a cop could want—respect, power, and a reputation that, for years, seemed untouchable. But by March 2025, he wasn't just out of a job—he was a liability. Fired. Disgraced. Publicly humiliated in a way few law enforcement officers ever are. And it all comes back to one thing: the way he handled the Karen Read case. Or rather, how spectacularly he mishandled it. Proctor's downfall wasn't a quick and clean dismissal. This wasn't one of those “effective immediately” situations where a cop gets caught doing something catastrophic and is gone by the next morning. No, this was a slow-motion train wreck. A case study in watching someone who thought they were untouchable get tangled in their own arrogance, their own bias, and their own mistakes. It started with a mistrial in July 2024—a high-profile, publicly scrutinized moment where Proctor didn't just look bad on the stand, he became the story. His testimony wasn't just shaky; it was an unmitigated disaster. Prosecutors must have known it was coming because the moment his text messages came out, it was game over. These weren't just any texts. Proctor, the lead investigator in the Karen Read case, the man responsible for gathering evidence and ensuring a fair and unbiased investigation, repeatedly called the defendant a "wack-job ct," openly mocked her, laughed about digging through her phone for nude photos, and, in one of the most damning moments, said he hoped she would kill herself.** Think about that for a second. The guy responsible for finding out what actually happened had already made up his mind before the investigation even started. And he wasn't keeping that bias to himself—he was texting it to people. Joking about it. Making it impossible to argue that he had conducted an objective investigation. And that wasn't even the worst of it. Proctor had undisclosed personal connections to key people involved in the case. His own sister was friends with members of the Albert family—the same family that owned the house where John O'Keefe was last seen alive. His family knew them socially. And yet, he never disclosed this. He took the case, took control of the evidence, and built a case against Karen Read while having direct ties to the very people who could have been alternative suspects. Then there was the taillight evidence. The prosecution's whole theory hinged on the idea that Karen Read backed into John O'Keefe with her SUV, breaking her taillight and leaving him outside to die in the snow. But the glass fragments that allegedly proved this theory didn't make it to the crime lab for six weeks. Six weeks. And guess who was in charge of that evidence? Michael Proctor. When asked about the delay, there was no good answer. No chain of custody explanation that made sense. No reasonable justification for why a critical piece of forensic evidence in a high-profile murder case sat around for over a month before it was analyzed. The defense didn't even need to prove that the evidence had been planted—they just had to point out how incompetent and sloppy the investigation was. And Proctor had done all of their work for them. The mistrial was a disaster. But the fallout was worse. Within hours of the decision, Proctor was suspended. That was the first clue that even his own department knew he was a problem. The Massachusetts State Police don't just throw their own under the bus. It takes serious misconduct for them to cut someone loose. And by this point, they had no choice. Because once Proctor went down, he took a whole lot of other cases with him. One of the first dominoes to fall? The Ana Walshe murder trial. This was another major case where Proctor had been deeply involved—investigating the disappearance and presumed murder of Walshe by her husband, Brian. But after the Read mistrial, prosecutors dropped Proctor from their witness list. They weren't even willing to put him on the stand. Think about what that means. Prosecutors, who normally go to great lengths to protect their investigators, decided it was better to move forward without their lead detective rather than risk having him testify. Then came the defense attorneys lining up to challenge other convictions. Proctor had worked on multiple murder cases, and now, anyone convicted in those cases had a potential argument for appeal. If Proctor had lied, manipulated evidence, or acted with bias in the Read case, who's to say he hadn't done it before? By late 2024, the Massachusetts State Police were scrambling. They launched internal investigations not just into Proctor, but **into his superiors—**the people who had allowed him to operate without oversight. They needed to figure out who knew what and when. And once they started digging, it became clear that Proctor wasn't the only problem. The truth is, he was never operating alone. And that brings us back to Sandra Birchmore. Sandra Birchmore was 23 years old, pregnant, and terrified. She had been manipulated for years by a man with a badge—Officer Matthew Farwell, a cop she had known since she was a teenager, a man who had groomed her since she was 13 or 14 years old under the guise of a police mentorship program. By 2021, she was pregnant with Farwell's child. Days later, she was found dead in her apartment. The official cause? Suicide. The police wasted no time shutting the case down. No suspicious circumstances. No deep dive into her relationship with Farwell. Just a quick, convenient conclusion that kept everything under wraps. And guess who oversaw that investigation? The same Massachusetts State Police unit that Michael Proctor worked for. It would take three years for the truth to come out. When federal investigators finally stepped in, they re-examined the crime scene, the autopsy, and Birchmore's relationship with Farwell. What they found contradicted the original ruling completely. Sandra Birchmore hadn't died by suicide. She had been strangled. Her death had been staged. The scene manipulated to look like something it wasn't. And when that became undeniable, Matthew Farwell was arrested and charged with murder in August 2024. This should have been the moment when the Massachusetts State Police admitted failure. But instead, they scrambled to explain how they had gotten it so wrong. And that's where things start to look uncomfortably familiar. The same people involved in burying the Birchmore case had direct ties to the Read investigation. Lieutenant John Fanning, Detective Brian Tully, and Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik—all senior officers **in Proctor's chain of command during the Read case—**had connections to the Stoughton Police Department, the same department where Farwell worked. This wasn't a coincidence. By the time Proctor was fired in March 2025, it wasn't about just him anymore. It was about all the people who had allowed him to operate unchecked for years. And the fallout was just beginning. Because once people started asking who had protected Proctor, they started realizing he was just one piece of a much bigger problem. A problem that wasn't going away. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Michael Proctor's Career of Alleged Cover-Ups In Memoriam Michael Proctor had everything a cop could want—respect, power, and a reputation that, for years, seemed untouchable. But by March 2025, he wasn't just out of a job—he was a liability. Fired. Disgraced. Publicly humiliated in a way few law enforcement officers ever are. And it all comes back to one thing: the way he handled the Karen Read case. Or rather, how spectacularly he mishandled it. Proctor's downfall wasn't a quick and clean dismissal. This wasn't one of those “effective immediately” situations where a cop gets caught doing something catastrophic and is gone by the next morning. No, this was a slow-motion train wreck. A case study in watching someone who thought they were untouchable get tangled in their own arrogance, their own bias, and their own mistakes. It started with a mistrial in July 2024—a high-profile, publicly scrutinized moment where Proctor didn't just look bad on the stand, he became the story. His testimony wasn't just shaky; it was an unmitigated disaster. Prosecutors must have known it was coming because the moment his text messages came out, it was game over. These weren't just any texts. Proctor, the lead investigator in the Karen Read case, the man responsible for gathering evidence and ensuring a fair and unbiased investigation, repeatedly called the defendant a "wack-job ct," openly mocked her, laughed about digging through her phone for nude photos, and, in one of the most damning moments, said he hoped she would kill herself.** Think about that for a second. The guy responsible for finding out what actually happened had already made up his mind before the investigation even started. And he wasn't keeping that bias to himself—he was texting it to people. Joking about it. Making it impossible to argue that he had conducted an objective investigation. And that wasn't even the worst of it. Proctor had undisclosed personal connections to key people involved in the case. His own sister was friends with members of the Albert family—the same family that owned the house where John O'Keefe was last seen alive. His family knew them socially. And yet, he never disclosed this. He took the case, took control of the evidence, and built a case against Karen Read while having direct ties to the very people who could have been alternative suspects. Then there was the taillight evidence. The prosecution's whole theory hinged on the idea that Karen Read backed into John O'Keefe with her SUV, breaking her taillight and leaving him outside to die in the snow. But the glass fragments that allegedly proved this theory didn't make it to the crime lab for six weeks. Six weeks. And guess who was in charge of that evidence? Michael Proctor. When asked about the delay, there was no good answer. No chain of custody explanation that made sense. No reasonable justification for why a critical piece of forensic evidence in a high-profile murder case sat around for over a month before it was analyzed. The defense didn't even need to prove that the evidence had been planted—they just had to point out how incompetent and sloppy the investigation was. And Proctor had done all of their work for them. The mistrial was a disaster. But the fallout was worse. Within hours of the decision, Proctor was suspended. That was the first clue that even his own department knew he was a problem. The Massachusetts State Police don't just throw their own under the bus. It takes serious misconduct for them to cut someone loose. And by this point, they had no choice. Because once Proctor went down, he took a whole lot of other cases with him. One of the first dominoes to fall? The Ana Walshe murder trial. This was another major case where Proctor had been deeply involved—investigating the disappearance and presumed murder of Walshe by her husband, Brian. But after the Read mistrial, prosecutors dropped Proctor from their witness list. They weren't even willing to put him on the stand. Think about what that means. Prosecutors, who normally go to great lengths to protect their investigators, decided it was better to move forward without their lead detective rather than risk having him testify. Then came the defense attorneys lining up to challenge other convictions. Proctor had worked on multiple murder cases, and now, anyone convicted in those cases had a potential argument for appeal. If Proctor had lied, manipulated evidence, or acted with bias in the Read case, who's to say he hadn't done it before? By late 2024, the Massachusetts State Police were scrambling. They launched internal investigations not just into Proctor, but **into his superiors—**the people who had allowed him to operate without oversight. They needed to figure out who knew what and when. And once they started digging, it became clear that Proctor wasn't the only problem. The truth is, he was never operating alone. And that brings us back to Sandra Birchmore. Sandra Birchmore was 23 years old, pregnant, and terrified. She had been manipulated for years by a man with a badge—Officer Matthew Farwell, a cop she had known since she was a teenager, a man who had groomed her since she was 13 or 14 years old under the guise of a police mentorship program. By 2021, she was pregnant with Farwell's child. Days later, she was found dead in her apartment. The official cause? Suicide. The police wasted no time shutting the case down. No suspicious circumstances. No deep dive into her relationship with Farwell. Just a quick, convenient conclusion that kept everything under wraps. And guess who oversaw that investigation? The same Massachusetts State Police unit that Michael Proctor worked for. It would take three years for the truth to come out. When federal investigators finally stepped in, they re-examined the crime scene, the autopsy, and Birchmore's relationship with Farwell. What they found contradicted the original ruling completely. Sandra Birchmore hadn't died by suicide. She had been strangled. Her death had been staged. The scene manipulated to look like something it wasn't. And when that became undeniable, Matthew Farwell was arrested and charged with murder in August 2024. This should have been the moment when the Massachusetts State Police admitted failure. But instead, they scrambled to explain how they had gotten it so wrong. And that's where things start to look uncomfortably familiar. The same people involved in burying the Birchmore case had direct ties to the Read investigation. Lieutenant John Fanning, Detective Brian Tully, and Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik—all senior officers **in Proctor's chain of command during the Read case—**had connections to the Stoughton Police Department, the same department where Farwell worked. This wasn't a coincidence. By the time Proctor was fired in March 2025, it wasn't about just him anymore. It was about all the people who had allowed him to operate unchecked for years. And the fallout was just beginning. Because once people started asking who had protected Proctor, they started realizing he was just one piece of a much bigger problem. A problem that wasn't going away. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Michael Proctor had everything a cop could want—respect, power, and a reputation that, for years, seemed untouchable. But by March 2025, he wasn't just out of a job—he was a liability. Fired. Disgraced. Publicly humiliated in a way few law enforcement officers ever are. And it all comes back to one thing: the way he handled the Karen Read case. Or rather, how spectacularly he mishandled it. Proctor's downfall wasn't a quick and clean dismissal. This wasn't one of those “effective immediately” situations where a cop gets caught doing something catastrophic and is gone by the next morning. No, this was a slow-motion train wreck. A case study in watching someone who thought they were untouchable get tangled in their own arrogance, their own bias, and their own mistakes. It started with a mistrial in July 2024—a high-profile, publicly scrutinized moment where Proctor didn't just look bad on the stand, he became the story. His testimony wasn't just shaky; it was an unmitigated disaster. Prosecutors must have known it was coming because the moment his text messages came out, it was game over. These weren't just any texts. Proctor, the lead investigator in the Karen Read case, the man responsible for gathering evidence and ensuring a fair and unbiased investigation, repeatedly called the defendant a "wack-job ct," openly mocked her, laughed about digging through her phone for nude photos, and, in one of the most damning moments, said he hoped she would kill herself.** Think about that for a second. The guy responsible for finding out what actually happened had already made up his mind before the investigation even started. And he wasn't keeping that bias to himself—he was texting it to people. Joking about it. Making it impossible to argue that he had conducted an objective investigation. And that wasn't even the worst of it. Proctor had undisclosed personal connections to key people involved in the case. His own sister was friends with members of the Albert family—the same family that owned the house where John O'Keefe was last seen alive. His family knew them socially. And yet, he never disclosed this. He took the case, took control of the evidence, and built a case against Karen Read while having direct ties to the very people who could have been alternative suspects. Then there was the taillight evidence. The prosecution's whole theory hinged on the idea that Karen Read backed into John O'Keefe with her SUV, breaking her taillight and leaving him outside to die in the snow. But the glass fragments that allegedly proved this theory didn't make it to the crime lab for six weeks. Six weeks. And guess who was in charge of that evidence? Michael Proctor. When asked about the delay, there was no good answer. No chain of custody explanation that made sense. No reasonable justification for why a critical piece of forensic evidence in a high-profile murder case sat around for over a month before it was analyzed. The defense didn't even need to prove that the evidence had been planted—they just had to point out how incompetent and sloppy the investigation was. And Proctor had done all of their work for them. The mistrial was a disaster. But the fallout was worse. Within hours of the decision, Proctor was suspended. That was the first clue that even his own department knew he was a problem. The Massachusetts State Police don't just throw their own under the bus. It takes serious misconduct for them to cut someone loose. And by this point, they had no choice. Because once Proctor went down, he took a whole lot of other cases with him. One of the first dominoes to fall? The Ana Walshe murder trial. This was another major case where Proctor had been deeply involved—investigating the disappearance and presumed murder of Walshe by her husband, Brian. But after the Read mistrial, prosecutors dropped Proctor from their witness list. They weren't even willing to put him on the stand. Think about what that means. Prosecutors, who normally go to great lengths to protect their investigators, decided it was better to move forward without their lead detective rather than risk having him testify. Then came the defense attorneys lining up to challenge other convictions. Proctor had worked on multiple murder cases, and now, anyone convicted in those cases had a potential argument for appeal. If Proctor had lied, manipulated evidence, or acted with bias in the Read case, who's to say he hadn't done it before? By late 2024, the Massachusetts State Police were scrambling. They launched internal investigations not just into Proctor, but **into his superiors—**the people who had allowed him to operate without oversight. They needed to figure out who knew what and when. And once they started digging, it became clear that Proctor wasn't the only problem. The truth is, he was never operating alone. And that brings us back to Sandra Birchmore. Sandra Birchmore was 23 years old, pregnant, and terrified. She had been manipulated for years by a man with a badge—Officer Matthew Farwell, a cop she had known since she was a teenager, a man who had groomed her since she was 13 or 14 years old under the guise of a police mentorship program. By 2021, she was pregnant with Farwell's child. Days later, she was found dead in her apartment. The official cause? Suicide. The police wasted no time shutting the case down. No suspicious circumstances. No deep dive into her relationship with Farwell. Just a quick, convenient conclusion that kept everything under wraps. And guess who oversaw that investigation? The same Massachusetts State Police unit that Michael Proctor worked for. It would take three years for the truth to come out. When federal investigators finally stepped in, they re-examined the crime scene, the autopsy, and Birchmore's relationship with Farwell. What they found contradicted the original ruling completely. Sandra Birchmore hadn't died by suicide. She had been strangled. Her death had been staged. The scene manipulated to look like something it wasn't. And when that became undeniable, Matthew Farwell was arrested and charged with murder in August 2024. This should have been the moment when the Massachusetts State Police admitted failure. But instead, they scrambled to explain how they had gotten it so wrong. And that's where things start to look uncomfortably familiar. The same people involved in burying the Birchmore case had direct ties to the Read investigation. Lieutenant John Fanning, Detective Brian Tully, and Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik—all senior officers **in Proctor's chain of command during the Read case—**had connections to the Stoughton Police Department, the same department where Farwell worked. This wasn't a coincidence. By the time Proctor was fired in March 2025, it wasn't about just him anymore. It was about all the people who had allowed him to operate unchecked for years. And the fallout was just beginning. Because once people started asking who had protected Proctor, they started realizing he was just one piece of a much bigger problem. A problem that wasn't going away. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Michael Proctor's Career of Alleged Cover-Ups In Memoriam Michael Proctor had everything a cop could want—respect, power, and a reputation that, for years, seemed untouchable. But by March 2025, he wasn't just out of a job—he was a liability. Fired. Disgraced. Publicly humiliated in a way few law enforcement officers ever are. And it all comes back to one thing: the way he handled the Karen Read case. Or rather, how spectacularly he mishandled it. Proctor's downfall wasn't a quick and clean dismissal. This wasn't one of those “effective immediately” situations where a cop gets caught doing something catastrophic and is gone by the next morning. No, this was a slow-motion train wreck. A case study in watching someone who thought they were untouchable get tangled in their own arrogance, their own bias, and their own mistakes. It started with a mistrial in July 2024—a high-profile, publicly scrutinized moment where Proctor didn't just look bad on the stand, he became the story. His testimony wasn't just shaky; it was an unmitigated disaster. Prosecutors must have known it was coming because the moment his text messages came out, it was game over. These weren't just any texts. Proctor, the lead investigator in the Karen Read case, the man responsible for gathering evidence and ensuring a fair and unbiased investigation, repeatedly called the defendant a "wack-job ct," openly mocked her, laughed about digging through her phone for nude photos, and, in one of the most damning moments, said he hoped she would kill herself.** Think about that for a second. The guy responsible for finding out what actually happened had already made up his mind before the investigation even started. And he wasn't keeping that bias to himself—he was texting it to people. Joking about it. Making it impossible to argue that he had conducted an objective investigation. And that wasn't even the worst of it. Proctor had undisclosed personal connections to key people involved in the case. His own sister was friends with members of the Albert family—the same family that owned the house where John O'Keefe was last seen alive. His family knew them socially. And yet, he never disclosed this. He took the case, took control of the evidence, and built a case against Karen Read while having direct ties to the very people who could have been alternative suspects. Then there was the taillight evidence. The prosecution's whole theory hinged on the idea that Karen Read backed into John O'Keefe with her SUV, breaking her taillight and leaving him outside to die in the snow. But the glass fragments that allegedly proved this theory didn't make it to the crime lab for six weeks. Six weeks. And guess who was in charge of that evidence? Michael Proctor. When asked about the delay, there was no good answer. No chain of custody explanation that made sense. No reasonable justification for why a critical piece of forensic evidence in a high-profile murder case sat around for over a month before it was analyzed. The defense didn't even need to prove that the evidence had been planted—they just had to point out how incompetent and sloppy the investigation was. And Proctor had done all of their work for them. The mistrial was a disaster. But the fallout was worse. Within hours of the decision, Proctor was suspended. That was the first clue that even his own department knew he was a problem. The Massachusetts State Police don't just throw their own under the bus. It takes serious misconduct for them to cut someone loose. And by this point, they had no choice. Because once Proctor went down, he took a whole lot of other cases with him. One of the first dominoes to fall? The Ana Walshe murder trial. This was another major case where Proctor had been deeply involved—investigating the disappearance and presumed murder of Walshe by her husband, Brian. But after the Read mistrial, prosecutors dropped Proctor from their witness list. They weren't even willing to put him on the stand. Think about what that means. Prosecutors, who normally go to great lengths to protect their investigators, decided it was better to move forward without their lead detective rather than risk having him testify. Then came the defense attorneys lining up to challenge other convictions. Proctor had worked on multiple murder cases, and now, anyone convicted in those cases had a potential argument for appeal. If Proctor had lied, manipulated evidence, or acted with bias in the Read case, who's to say he hadn't done it before? By late 2024, the Massachusetts State Police were scrambling. They launched internal investigations not just into Proctor, but **into his superiors—**the people who had allowed him to operate without oversight. They needed to figure out who knew what and when. And once they started digging, it became clear that Proctor wasn't the only problem. The truth is, he was never operating alone. And that brings us back to Sandra Birchmore. Sandra Birchmore was 23 years old, pregnant, and terrified. She had been manipulated for years by a man with a badge—Officer Matthew Farwell, a cop she had known since she was a teenager, a man who had groomed her since she was 13 or 14 years old under the guise of a police mentorship program. By 2021, she was pregnant with Farwell's child. Days later, she was found dead in her apartment. The official cause? Suicide. The police wasted no time shutting the case down. No suspicious circumstances. No deep dive into her relationship with Farwell. Just a quick, convenient conclusion that kept everything under wraps. And guess who oversaw that investigation? The same Massachusetts State Police unit that Michael Proctor worked for. It would take three years for the truth to come out. When federal investigators finally stepped in, they re-examined the crime scene, the autopsy, and Birchmore's relationship with Farwell. What they found contradicted the original ruling completely. Sandra Birchmore hadn't died by suicide. She had been strangled. Her death had been staged. The scene manipulated to look like something it wasn't. And when that became undeniable, Matthew Farwell was arrested and charged with murder in August 2024. This should have been the moment when the Massachusetts State Police admitted failure. But instead, they scrambled to explain how they had gotten it so wrong. And that's where things start to look uncomfortably familiar. The same people involved in burying the Birchmore case had direct ties to the Read investigation. Lieutenant John Fanning, Detective Brian Tully, and Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik—all senior officers **in Proctor's chain of command during the Read case—**had connections to the Stoughton Police Department, the same department where Farwell worked. This wasn't a coincidence. By the time Proctor was fired in March 2025, it wasn't about just him anymore. It was about all the people who had allowed him to operate unchecked for years. And the fallout was just beginning. Because once people started asking who had protected Proctor, they started realizing he was just one piece of a much bigger problem. A problem that wasn't going away. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Dublin-born Jennifer Walshe is one of the world's most bold and imaginative contemporary classical composers, and holds the prestigious post of professor of composition at Oxford University. Whether it is Barbie dolls or recipe books, the mundane and strange materials of life are central to Walshe's work. Now, for the Irish National Opera, she is developing a major new work set on Mars. Walshe's opera will respond to astrophysics data, Martian meteorites, trashy sci-fi, eco-anxiety in young people, and tech billionaires' obsession with conquering space. Broadcaster Katie Derham tracks Walshe as she launches into the project, with months of immersive intergalactic research.

Andy welcomes listeners back to the show for this episode in which he sits down with Larry Walshe, founder and CEO of Larry Walshe Studios, a world-renowned floral and event designer with studios in London, Lake Como, and New York City! Larry's impressive portfolio includes collaborations with top-tier names like Rihanna, Adele, Benedict Cumberbatch, and even royal households. He is truly a trailblazer in the industry, known especially for his 100% plastic-free luxury floral service, Bloom, and his Elite Furniture Hire venture! Listen as Larry discusses his creative journey, beginning with his artistic upbringing, an unexpected career shift after an accident, and how he eventually carved out his niche in the events industry. He shares some insights into the challenges of balancing creativity with running a successful business, stressing the importance of staying true to his artistic vision while ensuring that each event delivers a seamless experience. Larry also opens up about his process, from sketching ideas in the moment to interpreting clients' needs into breathtaking designs. He touches upon the essential role of a dedicated team, managing the stress of high-pressure events, and how overcoming challenges has shaped his career. He even touches on his personal passions outside of the floral world, like photography, which helped him cope during difficult times. Andy had such a great time chatting with Larry and hopes that you enjoy listening to the conversation! If so, then please don't keep it to yourself! Andy asks that you please share it with at least three colleagues you know who would benefit from hearing this episode, and be sure to also leave a top review wherever you listen because that really helps Andy and the show out!   Have you heard about Stop and Smell the Roses with Preston Bailey on The Wedding Biz Network? Listen as Preston shares the secrets, tools, and technologies behind his extraordinary ability to create a theatrical environment out of any space. Also, don't forget about Sean Low's podcast The Business of Being Creative, where Sean discusses the power of being niched, pricing strategies, metrics of success, and so much more. You can find both shows on The Wedding Biz Network.   SUPPORTING THE WEDDING BIZ Become a patron and support Andy and the show! If you are so inspired, contribute!   Time Stamps [0:29] - We learn that today's guest is Larry Walshe of Larry Walshe Studios! [1:40] - Larry's artistic background and a career shift led him to create his own vision for events. [3:55] - Andy reflects on having started his band business in 1990, driven by a desire for creative expression. [5:33] - Hear how Larry's frustration with industry standards and a gap in the UK market led to a new vision. [8:21] - Larry quit his job with only a small amount of money to start a business when he realized that his ideas could be his own. [11:42] - Larry's first wedding project gave him valuable experience, which he then leveraged to build his business. [15:09] - Larry combines practicality with design and listens closely to clients and their preferences. [18:32] - A disconnect between design and words led Larry to quickly adapt and sketch a new concept. [20:52] - How does Larry make use of his team? [23:25] - Larry strives to balance creativity and logistics while constantly pushing for something unique. [25:51] - Larry learned early that balancing creativity with business viability is incredibly important, especially after COVID. [28:34] - We learn that Larry charges for design proposals, uses inspiration from everyday life, and constantly saves ideas. [31:37] - Larry admits that he doesn't have a great balance between his work life and personal life but loves what he does. [33:28] - We learn that Larry loves photography and that buying a camera during COVID was beneficial to his mental health. [36:04] - How would Larry define success? [37:04] - Reflecting on unique projects like wrapping a jet in Santa style reminds Larry of his unusual work. [39:34] - Andy reveals where Larry can be found online.   RESOURCES Find Larry: Larry's WebsiteLarry's Retail SiteLarry's Instagram PageLarry's Facebook PageElite Furniture Hire - Website Follow The Wedding Biz on Social: The Wedding Biz The Wedding Biz on Instagram: @theweddingbiz The Wedding Biz on Facebook: @theweddingbiz The Wedding Biz Network The Music Makers   Support The Wedding Biz by clicking here.   Title Sponsor: This episode is sponsored by Kushner Entertainment.  

Brian Walshe is set to go to trial this year. Hear analysis from NBC10 Boston's legal expert, Michael Coyne, on why the Walshe defense team may be closely watching the Karen Read playbook of law enforcement scrutiny, and how her retrial this spring could impact Walshe's trial in the fall.For updates to the case as they happen, visit nbcboston.com/tag/ana-walshe. And you can keep up with us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and BlueSky for updates on this case and all the biggest, most interesting news happening in Boston and beyond.

Evan Walshe joins us in the studio for our first podcast episode of the New Year.On this week's show - proudly sponsored by MatchdayLive:How did Evan spend the holiday season outside of Basketball?Where is the UK's oldest pub?Evan Walshe on his goals and targets for 2025 and the rest of the season. We discuss the upcoming SLB Trophy Final on January 26Evan lifts the lid on what it's like to represent Great Britain in both 5v5 and 3x3 BasketballWhat would it take to see more GB players play professionally in the SLB?lEvan takes on the fans' questions from the mailbagWrong answers only + a round up of the latest news over the festive period.The Bristol Flyers Podcast brings supporters a unique perspective from behind the scenes, and is available to listen on all major podcast providers, including Spotify and Apple Podcasts and also available to watch on YouTube!The Flyers Podcast is proudly sponsored by MatchdayLive, a product of UK-based sport media and technology company Matchday Media. Their origin sees the coming together of a Bristol-based specialist in sports video production and broadcast, and experienced media and technology partners. Through their first and flagship product MatchdayLive, the company have set out to democratise the ability for clubs and leagues across the globe to deliver broadcast quality, live and on-demand content, directly to their fans.

The Fall of Trooper Michael Proctor: A Trail of Misconduct and Broken Trust On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Fall of Trooper Michael Proctor: A Trail of Misconduct and Broken Trust On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Send us a textEpisode 117: New Year, New Murder?  The Ana Walshe Casewww.newspapers.comhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/timeline-of-ana-walshes-disappearance-and-brian-walshes-arresthttps://www.foxnews.com/us/missing-mom-ana-walshes-former-massachusetts-home-burns-firehttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/brian-walshes-murder-trial-scheduled-for-october-2025/vi-AA1v9ikK?ocid=BingNewsSerphttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/trial-date-set-for-brian-walshe-accused-of-murdering-missing-real-estate-executive-wife/ar-AA1vbjQL?ocid=BingNewsSerphttps://www.newsweek.com/brian-walshe-husband-charged-murder-updates-ana-court-1962240#:~:text=Brian%20Walshe%2C%2049%2C%20reported%20his%20wife%20Ana%20Walshe%2C,arrested%20four%20days%20later%20for%20misleading%20the%20police.https://www.foxnews.com/us/missing-mom-ana-walshes-former-massachusetts-home-burns-firehttps://lawandcrime.com/crime/husband-of-missing-massachusetts-mother-of-three-arrested-for-allegedly-misleading-police/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11630043/Brian-Walshe-threatened-KILL-wife-Ana-years-went-missing.htmlhttps://www.the-sun.com/news/7126252/missing-ana-walshe-brian-threatened-kill/https://www.wgbh.org/news/local/2023-01-17/no-body-crime-can-a-person-be-charged-with-murder-if-police-dont-find-a-bodyThe Boston Globe, “Alleged online searches by Walshe detailed” By John R. Ellement & Travis AndersonThe Boston Globe, “In troubled marriage, suspicion of affair” By John R. Ellement & Nick StoicoThe Boston Globe, “Ransom Note About Ana Walshe sent to detective early in case” By Shannon Larsonhttps://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2024/11/12/owner-home-where-ana-walshe-allegedly-killed-suing-brian-walshe-mother/Patreon Supporter: https://www.patreon.com/operationevilpodcastFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/operationevil Email us! Operationevilpodcast@gmail.com Support the show

In this replay from an earlier conversation, Bill Walshe, a global hospitality leader and the former CEO of The Viceroy Hotel Group, shares a tradition he developed that we all can learn from.Listen to my earlier episodes with Bill: What Guests Are Looking For In Luxury and Hospitality TodayHow "Prideology" Helped Me Inspire My Teams as CEOCreating A Culture of Belonging To Enable Consistent IndividualitySend Josiah a text Take my State of Hotel Industry Survey now to get insights on challenges, priorities, and opportunities in hospitality today.A few more resources: If you're new to Hospitality Daily, start here. You can send me a message here with questions, comments, or guest suggestions If you want to get my summary and actionable insights from each episode delivered to your inbox each day, subscribe here for free. Follow Hospitality Daily and join the conversation on YouTube, LinkedIn, and Instagram. If you want to advertise on Hospitality Daily, here are the ways we can work together. If you found this episode interesting or helpful, send it to someone on your team so you can turn the ideas into action and benefit your business and the people you serve! Music for this show is produced by Clay Bassford of Bespoke Sound: Music Identity Design for Hospitality Brands

Best of the underground, week of Dec 24, 2024: Christmas Eve. Invisible art. (All podcasts are on www.hlycrp.com, and you can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Spotify, and Apple Podcasts.)  

In this replay from an earlier conversation, Bill Walshe, a global hospitality leader and the former CEO of The Viceroy Hotel Group, shares thoughts about the power of generosity in hospitality.Listen to my earlier episodes with Bill: What Guests Are Looking For In Luxury and Hospitality TodayHow "Prideology" Helped Me Inspire My Teams as CEOCreating A Culture of Belonging To Enable Consistent IndividualitySend Josiah a text Take my State of Hotel Industry Survey now to get insights on challenges, priorities, and opportunities in hospitality today.A few more resources: If you're new to Hospitality Daily, start here. You can send me a message here with questions, comments, or guest suggestions If you want to get my summary and actionable insights from each episode delivered to your inbox each day, subscribe here for free. Follow Hospitality Daily and join the conversation on YouTube, LinkedIn, and Instagram. If you want to advertise on Hospitality Daily, here are the ways we can work together. If you found this episode interesting or helpful, send it to someone on your team so you can turn the ideas into action and benefit your business and the people you serve! Music for this show is produced by Clay Bassford of Bespoke Sound: Music Identity Design for Hospitality Brands

Sermon One (in Walshe, Complete Mystical Works) has become known as capturing the essence of Meister Eckhart's thought. “Here, in time, we are celebrating the eternal birth which God the Father bore and bears unceasingly in eternity, because this same birth is now born in time, in human nature.” And why does this lofty thought matter? “What does it avail me that this birth is happening, if it does not happen in me? That it should happen in me is what matters.”Eckhart, therefore, offers a corrective to the way Christianity and indeed Christmas is usually articulated today. Where does this birth take place? Not in Bethlehem, not in a stable, not around 4BC, not even from Mary, but primarily “in the very purest, loftiest, subtlest part that the soul is capable of”.Only, is this itself not only too rarefied a form of Christianity, but one inadequate to our times, in denial of moral imperatives or simply a gospel of spiritual bypassing?In fact, precisely the opposite is the case. Without that birth of the Word in the soul, Christianity's moral meaning is lost, its injunctions become pathways to demoralisation, with the happiness promised transitory or elusive.Eckhart, therefore, has crucial things to say to a church dedicated to filling people up with experiences and demands, as well as a time keen on practices that miss the stillness and silence he argues is fundamental.Rather, alongside the author of The Cloud of Unknowing and Mother Julian, Eckhart preaches the direct and easy path, that depends not on our efforts but on a capacity to not know and stay before the ground from which the Word is born.Unity with God is the purpose and promise of life - the secret that I feel is regularly absent in presentations of Christianity, though so much sought and needed.

There's a new judge overseeing the Ana Walshe murder case, and she's pushing to get it moving along faster — in fact, she set a trial date before the end of 2025. To better understand Judge Diane Freniere's approach to the Walshe case, we sat down with NBC10 legal analyst Michael Coyne, who pointed out that "time is a real thief" when it comes to testimony in murder trials. He also shared what he thinks is the most damning evidence presented so far (it's not the infamous Google searches), and what the hold-up has been in the defense's request for evidence on the lead investigator that's tied to the Karen Read case.For updates to the case as they happen, visit nbcboston.com/tag/ana-walshe. And you can keep up with us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and BlueSky for updates on this case and all the biggest, most interesting news happening in Boston and beyond.

A trial date has been set for Brian Walshe, the 48-year-old man accused of killing his wife, Ana, and dismembering her body in early 2023. Judge Diana Freniere, newly assigned to oversee the case, confirmed that jury selection will begin on October 20, 2025, and the trial will last approximately three to four weeks. Brian Walshe has been in custody without bail since January 18, 2023, when he was arrested following the disappearance of his wife. Ana Walshe, a 39-year-old mother of three, was last seen leaving their Cohasset, Massachusetts, home on New Year's Day in 2023. Although her body has never been recovered, prosecutors allege that Brian killed Ana, dismembered her body, and discarded her remains in a trash dump. During a recent motion hearing in Norfolk Superior Court, Judge Freniere expressed her belief that the case could be expedited to trial sooner than anticipated. “I think that it's reasonable that a case such as this one will be tried within two years from indictment. On the present schedule you suggest, I think it's looking closer to the three-year mark. And I think that's a little unnecessary,” the judge remarked, pushing for a more efficient process. The trial is now set to begin in 2025. The prosecution's case hinges heavily on digital evidence. Investigators revealed that Brian Walshe made a series of suspicious Google searches on their son's iPad, including inquiries about how to dispose of a body. Prosecutors are also relying on physical evidence, including a hacksaw found in a dumpster near Brian's mother's house, which contained a bone fragment. Additionally, pieces of clothing and jewelry, which prosecutors say were worn by Ana when she left her home, were discovered in the same location. However, the case has faced significant delays due to legal disputes over evidence. At the heart of these delays is a request from Walshe's defense team for documents related to Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator on both the Walshe case and the high-profile Karen Read murder investigation. Walshe's attorneys have requested email and text message correspondence from Proctor, hoping to find any communications that might suggest bias or unprofessional behavior in the investigation. Proctor, who has been suspended without pay after admitting to unprofessional conduct in the Read case, is under scrutiny for his involvement in both investigations. “There are concerns about the integrity of the investigation,” said Walshe's attorney during the hearing. “We need to know whether any records exist that could suggest bias or lost information.” In addition to the legal wrangling over evidence, the prosecution has indicated that they are still awaiting DNA testing results from a private lab. These tests are crucial as they could provide critical evidence to link Walshe to the crime, but the results have been delayed due to disputes over the costs of testing and concerns about the potential destruction of key evidence. Throughout the proceedings, the prosecution has made it clear that the absence of Ana's body will not undermine their case. “The digital evidence, along with physical findings like the hacksaw and the clothing, are critical components of the investigation,” said a prosecutor following the hearing. “This case is not just about finding the body. It's about connecting the dots through the evidence we have.” As the legal battle over evidence continues, Brian Walshe's defense team remains adamant that the charges against him are baseless, pleading not guilty to all charges, including murder, obstruction of justice, and improper conveyance of a human body. Despite the lack of a body, prosecutors are confident that they have a strong case to secure a conviction. The trial, which is expected to draw significant attention given its high-profile nature, will focus on the digital and physical evidence that ties Brian Walshe to the alleged crime. While the road to trial has been long and fraught with legal hurdles, both sides are preparing for what is expected to be a highly scrutinized and lengthy trial in 2025. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrialDate #Cohasset #MurderCase #MissingWife #KarenRead #DigitalEvidence #Prosecutor #Defense Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A trial date has been set for Brian Walshe, the 48-year-old man accused of killing his wife, Ana, and dismembering her body in early 2023. Judge Diana Freniere, newly assigned to oversee the case, confirmed that jury selection will begin on October 20, 2025, and the trial will last approximately three to four weeks. Brian Walshe has been in custody without bail since January 18, 2023, when he was arrested following the disappearance of his wife. Ana Walshe, a 39-year-old mother of three, was last seen leaving their Cohasset, Massachusetts, home on New Year's Day in 2023. Although her body has never been recovered, prosecutors allege that Brian killed Ana, dismembered her body, and discarded her remains in a trash dump. During a recent motion hearing in Norfolk Superior Court, Judge Freniere expressed her belief that the case could be expedited to trial sooner than anticipated. “I think that it's reasonable that a case such as this one will be tried within two years from indictment. On the present schedule you suggest, I think it's looking closer to the three-year mark. And I think that's a little unnecessary,” the judge remarked, pushing for a more efficient process. The trial is now set to begin in 2025. The prosecution's case hinges heavily on digital evidence. Investigators revealed that Brian Walshe made a series of suspicious Google searches on their son's iPad, including inquiries about how to dispose of a body. Prosecutors are also relying on physical evidence, including a hacksaw found in a dumpster near Brian's mother's house, which contained a bone fragment. Additionally, pieces of clothing and jewelry, which prosecutors say were worn by Ana when she left her home, were discovered in the same location. However, the case has faced significant delays due to legal disputes over evidence. At the heart of these delays is a request from Walshe's defense team for documents related to Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator on both the Walshe case and the high-profile Karen Read murder investigation. Walshe's attorneys have requested email and text message correspondence from Proctor, hoping to find any communications that might suggest bias or unprofessional behavior in the investigation. Proctor, who has been suspended without pay after admitting to unprofessional conduct in the Read case, is under scrutiny for his involvement in both investigations. “There are concerns about the integrity of the investigation,” said Walshe's attorney during the hearing. “We need to know whether any records exist that could suggest bias or lost information.” In addition to the legal wrangling over evidence, the prosecution has indicated that they are still awaiting DNA testing results from a private lab. These tests are crucial as they could provide critical evidence to link Walshe to the crime, but the results have been delayed due to disputes over the costs of testing and concerns about the potential destruction of key evidence. Throughout the proceedings, the prosecution has made it clear that the absence of Ana's body will not undermine their case. “The digital evidence, along with physical findings like the hacksaw and the clothing, are critical components of the investigation,” said a prosecutor following the hearing. “This case is not just about finding the body. It's about connecting the dots through the evidence we have.” As the legal battle over evidence continues, Brian Walshe's defense team remains adamant that the charges against him are baseless, pleading not guilty to all charges, including murder, obstruction of justice, and improper conveyance of a human body. Despite the lack of a body, prosecutors are confident that they have a strong case to secure a conviction. The trial, which is expected to draw significant attention given its high-profile nature, will focus on the digital and physical evidence that ties Brian Walshe to the alleged crime. While the road to trial has been long and fraught with legal hurdles, both sides are preparing for what is expected to be a highly scrutinized and lengthy trial in 2025. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrialDate #Cohasset #MurderCase #MissingWife #KarenRead #DigitalEvidence #Prosecutor #Defense Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A trial date has been set for Brian Walshe, the 48-year-old man accused of killing his wife, Ana, and dismembering her body in early 2023. Judge Diana Freniere, newly assigned to oversee the case, confirmed that jury selection will begin on October 20, 2025, and the trial will last approximately three to four weeks. Brian Walshe has been in custody without bail since January 18, 2023, when he was arrested following the disappearance of his wife. Ana Walshe, a 39-year-old mother of three, was last seen leaving their Cohasset, Massachusetts, home on New Year's Day in 2023. Although her body has never been recovered, prosecutors allege that Brian killed Ana, dismembered her body, and discarded her remains in a trash dump. During a recent motion hearing in Norfolk Superior Court, Judge Freniere expressed her belief that the case could be expedited to trial sooner than anticipated. “I think that it's reasonable that a case such as this one will be tried within two years from indictment. On the present schedule you suggest, I think it's looking closer to the three-year mark. And I think that's a little unnecessary,” the judge remarked, pushing for a more efficient process. The trial is now set to begin in 2025. The prosecution's case hinges heavily on digital evidence. Investigators revealed that Brian Walshe made a series of suspicious Google searches on their son's iPad, including inquiries about how to dispose of a body. Prosecutors are also relying on physical evidence, including a hacksaw found in a dumpster near Brian's mother's house, which contained a bone fragment. Additionally, pieces of clothing and jewelry, which prosecutors say were worn by Ana when she left her home, were discovered in the same location. However, the case has faced significant delays due to legal disputes over evidence. At the heart of these delays is a request from Walshe's defense team for documents related to Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator on both the Walshe case and the high-profile Karen Read murder investigation. Walshe's attorneys have requested email and text message correspondence from Proctor, hoping to find any communications that might suggest bias or unprofessional behavior in the investigation. Proctor, who has been suspended without pay after admitting to unprofessional conduct in the Read case, is under scrutiny for his involvement in both investigations. “There are concerns about the integrity of the investigation,” said Walshe's attorney during the hearing. “We need to know whether any records exist that could suggest bias or lost information.” In addition to the legal wrangling over evidence, the prosecution has indicated that they are still awaiting DNA testing results from a private lab. These tests are crucial as they could provide critical evidence to link Walshe to the crime, but the results have been delayed due to disputes over the costs of testing and concerns about the potential destruction of key evidence. Throughout the proceedings, the prosecution has made it clear that the absence of Ana's body will not undermine their case. “The digital evidence, along with physical findings like the hacksaw and the clothing, are critical components of the investigation,” said a prosecutor following the hearing. “This case is not just about finding the body. It's about connecting the dots through the evidence we have.” As the legal battle over evidence continues, Brian Walshe's defense team remains adamant that the charges against him are baseless, pleading not guilty to all charges, including murder, obstruction of justice, and improper conveyance of a human body. Despite the lack of a body, prosecutors are confident that they have a strong case to secure a conviction. The trial, which is expected to draw significant attention given its high-profile nature, will focus on the digital and physical evidence that ties Brian Walshe to the alleged crime. While the road to trial has been long and fraught with legal hurdles, both sides are preparing for what is expected to be a highly scrutinized and lengthy trial in 2025. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrialDate #Cohasset #MurderCase #MissingWife #KarenRead #DigitalEvidence #Prosecutor #Defense Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Questions Covered: 03:10 – What happens if someone commits a mortal sin under baptism of desire? 05:28 – When Pope Pius XII issued liturgical forms to include vernacular, what was the purpose of that? 08:04 – Can Latin Mass societies begin the Easter Vigil Mass at a different time than is standard today? 12:49 – Is it okay for me to use the New Oxford Bible translation for a Catholic Bible study? 16:12 – How can we be so sure that Jesus wasn't just using symbolic language during the last supper? 29:16 – What is your advice on what I can do since I can’t participate in the sacraments as a non-Catholic? 33:59 – Would a person that has to go to RCIA classes have to pay for the classes? 46:17 – The World Health Organization says that no amount of alcohol is good for a person. How does this square with the Catholic religion and their use of alcohol? …

In the highly competitive world of luxury events and weddings, relationships are not just advantageous—they are indispensable. In this episode, Adam engages into a fascinating discussion with Larry Walshe, an internationally acclaimed florist and creative entrepreneur. Starting his journey accidentally, Larry transitioned from musical theater to the floristry world, where he quickly established an empire renowned for its opulent designs and high-profile clientele. From working with fashion houses like Dior and Valentino to servicing music icons like Adele and Rihanna, Larry's success story is a testament to his tenacity, creativity, and business acumen. Balancing Creativity and Salesmanship: Larry emphasizes the need for blending creativity with strong sales skills to excel in the floristry and events industry. Power of Networking: Building lasting relationships with clients and industry peers is crucial for sustained business growth. Vision and Determination: Larry's success is attributed to his ability to envision bold ideas and bring them to fruition, even under pressure. Resilience in Entrepreneurship: Overcoming initial challenges through resilience and hustle can set the foundation for future success. Importance of Branding: Maintaining a consistent, high-quality brand image through visual content can significantly impact business visibility and reputation. Get your Business Growth Secrets SUCCESS PLANNER for FREE and profit like a pro: https://adamstottplanner.com/free-book47315172 Adam's website: https://adamstott.com/?el=Pod Watch the Episode on Adam's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/adamstottcoach?el=Pod Connect with Adam on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adamstottcoach/?el=Pod Join Adam's network on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-stott-coach/?el=Pod Coaches, consultants, and business owners - lower your marketing costs, increase ticket prices, and get more high-ticket clients: https://3daybrandbuilderworkshop.com/start-here?el=Pod

Rigel Walshe is an OG Bitcoiner, metalhead, and all-around awesome guy! We were joined by Rigel live at Baltic Honeybadger 2024 in Riga.  Rigel delves into his journey from playing in a metal band to becoming a notable figure in the Bitcoin community. He discusses his experiences with Bitcoin since 2014, his transition into the tech world, and the similarities he's observed between subcultures in metal music and Bitcoin.  The discussion covers the evolution of Bitcoin conferences, the integrity of the Bitcoin community, and the rise of Nostr as a decentralized communication protocol. Join us as we explore the intricacies of Bitcoin culture, the balance between signal and noise in the community, and the philosophical underpinnings of this revolutionary technology. Connect with Rigel:  https://primal.net/p/npub1n0strmeta93fwxkdz5k2nquvpnjtwxcst2jdkspavyzd3g4ch22qjrhlw3 https://x.com/CoinsureNZ   Connect with Us: https://www.bitcoininfinityshow.com/ https://bitcoininfinitystore.com https://primal.net/freedom https://primal.net/knut https://primal.net/luke https://twitter.com/BtcInfinityShow https://twitter.com/knutsvanholm https://twitter.com/lukedewolf Thanks to our sponsors - check out their websites for info: BitBox: https://bitbox.swiss/infinity StampSeed: https://www.stampseed.com/shop/21m-titanium-seed-plate.html Bitcoin Adviser: https://content.thebitcoinadviser.com/freedom ShopInBit: https://shopinbit.com/bitcoininfinity - Use code INFINITY for a €5 discount!    The Bitcoin Infinity Show is a Bitcoin podcast hosted by Knut Svanholm and Luke de Wolf.

We were in court, along with Brian Walshe, at his latest hearing, where his defense team moved to uncover records on embattled Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator in both the Walshe and John O'Keefe murder investigations.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Brian Walshe, accused of killing and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe, is facing new developments in his murder trial as his defense team raises concerns about the impartiality of the investigation. Walshe's attorneys are demanding access to documents from two other high-profile Massachusetts murder cases, citing potential bias from former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, who led the investigation into both Walshe's and Karen Read's cases. Walshe, 48, was arrested in January 2023 and indicted on multiple charges, including murder, misleading a police investigation, and improper conveyance of a human body. He remains in custody without bail as his legal team works to challenge aspects of the investigation. The defense team is particularly focused on Michael Proctor, the former state trooper who led the inquiry into Walshe's case. Proctor's involvement in another high-profile case—the investigation into Karen Read—has come under scrutiny. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. Proctor's conduct in Read's case, which ended in a mistrial, led to his suspension following testimony that revealed unprofessional behavior, including disparaging text messages about Read. During her trial, Proctor referred to Read as a “whack job” and used an expletive, later apologizing to the jury for his comments.   Citing this behavior, Walshe's defense team is questioning whether Proctor may have held a similar bias against their client. “Proctor's text messages about Karen Read reveal bias,” Walshe's attorney, Larry Tipton, said during a recent hearing. “We want to ensure there was no bias in Brian Walshe's case, and that's why we're requesting access to these documents.” The defense has asked for a comprehensive list of records related to Proctor's work, including his cellphone data, internet account details, and more than 3,000 pages from an ongoing federal investigation. Walshe's team is also seeking documents tied to Proctor's role in the investigation of Sandra Birchmore, another case where Proctor's actions have come under scrutiny. While Walshe's lawyers have not found concrete evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct so far, they are pushing for transparency. “And I was going to explain why we filed such a detailed memorandum of law,” Tipton stated, “but I don't think I need to waste the court's time with that.” The Norfolk County district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Walshe, has stated that it will share any information relevant to the case, but they will not turn over sensitive information from other ongoing investigations. In a filing, the office noted that releasing Proctor's phone and work cloud data could expose criminal offender records, confidential informant information, and private data from grand jury proceedings. Prosecutors have made it clear that they do not plan to call Proctor as a witness in Walshe's trial. Instead, Cohasset Police Sgt. Harrison Schmidt has taken on Proctor's role in the investigation. "Dozens" of officers from the Massachusetts State Police and Cohasset Police Department were involved in the case, according to the district attorney's office, which argues that Proctor's absence will not impact the trial. The defense and prosecution are expected to reconvene in December after Walshe's legal team has reviewed the documents provided by the prosecution. As the trial approaches, the defense is continuing to build its case, hoping to uncover any signs of bias or misconduct that could impact the outcome of this highly publicized murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, accused of killing and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe, is facing new developments in his murder trial as his defense team raises concerns about the impartiality of the investigation. Walshe's attorneys are demanding access to documents from two other high-profile Massachusetts murder cases, citing potential bias from former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, who led the investigation into both Walshe's and Karen Read's cases. Walshe, 48, was arrested in January 2023 and indicted on multiple charges, including murder, misleading a police investigation, and improper conveyance of a human body. He remains in custody without bail as his legal team works to challenge aspects of the investigation. The defense team is particularly focused on Michael Proctor, the former state trooper who led the inquiry into Walshe's case. Proctor's involvement in another high-profile case—the investigation into Karen Read—has come under scrutiny. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. Proctor's conduct in Read's case, which ended in a mistrial, led to his suspension following testimony that revealed unprofessional behavior, including disparaging text messages about Read. During her trial, Proctor referred to Read as a “whack job” and used an expletive, later apologizing to the jury for his comments.   Citing this behavior, Walshe's defense team is questioning whether Proctor may have held a similar bias against their client. “Proctor's text messages about Karen Read reveal bias,” Walshe's attorney, Larry Tipton, said during a recent hearing. “We want to ensure there was no bias in Brian Walshe's case, and that's why we're requesting access to these documents.” The defense has asked for a comprehensive list of records related to Proctor's work, including his cellphone data, internet account details, and more than 3,000 pages from an ongoing federal investigation. Walshe's team is also seeking documents tied to Proctor's role in the investigation of Sandra Birchmore, another case where Proctor's actions have come under scrutiny. While Walshe's lawyers have not found concrete evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct so far, they are pushing for transparency. “And I was going to explain why we filed such a detailed memorandum of law,” Tipton stated, “but I don't think I need to waste the court's time with that.” The Norfolk County district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Walshe, has stated that it will share any information relevant to the case, but they will not turn over sensitive information from other ongoing investigations. In a filing, the office noted that releasing Proctor's phone and work cloud data could expose criminal offender records, confidential informant information, and private data from grand jury proceedings. Prosecutors have made it clear that they do not plan to call Proctor as a witness in Walshe's trial. Instead, Cohasset Police Sgt. Harrison Schmidt has taken on Proctor's role in the investigation. "Dozens" of officers from the Massachusetts State Police and Cohasset Police Department were involved in the case, according to the district attorney's office, which argues that Proctor's absence will not impact the trial. The defense and prosecution are expected to reconvene in December after Walshe's legal team has reviewed the documents provided by the prosecution. As the trial approaches, the defense is continuing to build its case, hoping to uncover any signs of bias or misconduct that could impact the outcome of this highly publicized murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, accused of killing and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe, is facing new developments in his murder trial as his defense team raises concerns about the impartiality of the investigation. Walshe's attorneys are demanding access to documents from two other high-profile Massachusetts murder cases, citing potential bias from former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, who led the investigation into both Walshe's and Karen Read's cases. Walshe, 48, was arrested in January 2023 and indicted on multiple charges, including murder, misleading a police investigation, and improper conveyance of a human body. He remains in custody without bail as his legal team works to challenge aspects of the investigation. The defense team is particularly focused on Michael Proctor, the former state trooper who led the inquiry into Walshe's case. Proctor's involvement in another high-profile case—the investigation into Karen Read—has come under scrutiny. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. Proctor's conduct in Read's case, which ended in a mistrial, led to his suspension following testimony that revealed unprofessional behavior, including disparaging text messages about Read. During her trial, Proctor referred to Read as a “whack job” and used an expletive, later apologizing to the jury for his comments.   Citing this behavior, Walshe's defense team is questioning whether Proctor may have held a similar bias against their client. “Proctor's text messages about Karen Read reveal bias,” Walshe's attorney, Larry Tipton, said during a recent hearing. “We want to ensure there was no bias in Brian Walshe's case, and that's why we're requesting access to these documents.” The defense has asked for a comprehensive list of records related to Proctor's work, including his cellphone data, internet account details, and more than 3,000 pages from an ongoing federal investigation. Walshe's team is also seeking documents tied to Proctor's role in the investigation of Sandra Birchmore, another case where Proctor's actions have come under scrutiny. While Walshe's lawyers have not found concrete evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct so far, they are pushing for transparency. “And I was going to explain why we filed such a detailed memorandum of law,” Tipton stated, “but I don't think I need to waste the court's time with that.” The Norfolk County district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Walshe, has stated that it will share any information relevant to the case, but they will not turn over sensitive information from other ongoing investigations. In a filing, the office noted that releasing Proctor's phone and work cloud data could expose criminal offender records, confidential informant information, and private data from grand jury proceedings. Prosecutors have made it clear that they do not plan to call Proctor as a witness in Walshe's trial. Instead, Cohasset Police Sgt. Harrison Schmidt has taken on Proctor's role in the investigation. "Dozens" of officers from the Massachusetts State Police and Cohasset Police Department were involved in the case, according to the district attorney's office, which argues that Proctor's absence will not impact the trial. The defense and prosecution are expected to reconvene in December after Walshe's legal team has reviewed the documents provided by the prosecution. As the trial approaches, the defense is continuing to build its case, hoping to uncover any signs of bias or misconduct that could impact the outcome of this highly publicized murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, accused of killing and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe, is facing new developments in his murder trial as his defense team raises concerns about the impartiality of the investigation. Walshe's attorneys are demanding access to documents from two other high-profile Massachusetts murder cases, citing potential bias from former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, who led the investigation into both Walshe's and Karen Read's cases. Walshe, 48, was arrested in January 2023 and indicted on multiple charges, including murder, misleading a police investigation, and improper conveyance of a human body. He remains in custody without bail as his legal team works to challenge aspects of the investigation. The defense team is particularly focused on Michael Proctor, the former state trooper who led the inquiry into Walshe's case. Proctor's involvement in another high-profile case—the investigation into Karen Read—has come under scrutiny. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. Proctor's conduct in Read's case, which ended in a mistrial, led to his suspension following testimony that revealed unprofessional behavior, including disparaging text messages about Read. During her trial, Proctor referred to Read as a “whack job” and used an expletive, later apologizing to the jury for his comments.   Citing this behavior, Walshe's defense team is questioning whether Proctor may have held a similar bias against their client. “Proctor's text messages about Karen Read reveal bias,” Walshe's attorney, Larry Tipton, said during a recent hearing. “We want to ensure there was no bias in Brian Walshe's case, and that's why we're requesting access to these documents.” The defense has asked for a comprehensive list of records related to Proctor's work, including his cellphone data, internet account details, and more than 3,000 pages from an ongoing federal investigation. Walshe's team is also seeking documents tied to Proctor's role in the investigation of Sandra Birchmore, another case where Proctor's actions have come under scrutiny. While Walshe's lawyers have not found concrete evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct so far, they are pushing for transparency. “And I was going to explain why we filed such a detailed memorandum of law,” Tipton stated, “but I don't think I need to waste the court's time with that.” The Norfolk County district attorney's office, which is prosecuting Walshe, has stated that it will share any information relevant to the case, but they will not turn over sensitive information from other ongoing investigations. In a filing, the office noted that releasing Proctor's phone and work cloud data could expose criminal offender records, confidential informant information, and private data from grand jury proceedings. Prosecutors have made it clear that they do not plan to call Proctor as a witness in Walshe's trial. Instead, Cohasset Police Sgt. Harrison Schmidt has taken on Proctor's role in the investigation. "Dozens" of officers from the Massachusetts State Police and Cohasset Police Department were involved in the case, according to the district attorney's office, which argues that Proctor's absence will not impact the trial. The defense and prosecution are expected to reconvene in December after Walshe's legal team has reviewed the documents provided by the prosecution. As the trial approaches, the defense is continuing to build its case, hoping to uncover any signs of bias or misconduct that could impact the outcome of this highly publicized murder case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

This week on Firelink, Marty, Nick, and JM8 are joined by Dean Walshe, 3D Art Lead & Technical Artist on the new indie Wild Bastards.Second Wind is fully independent, employee-owned and fan-funded. Consider supporting us on Patreon for as little as $1/month at patreon.com/SecondWindGroup

In this special crossover episode, NBC10 Boston legal analyst Michael Coyne breaks down the Norfolk district attorney's filing in the murder case involving Ana and Brian Walshe that his office doesn't plan to call the lead investigator, embattled Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor, who became the subject of controversy for his role in the Karen Read murder trial. The episode is also being published on our show "The Searches for Ana Walshe," which covers the Walshe case. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this special crossover episode, NBC10 Boston legal analyst Michael Coyne breaks down the Norfolk district attorney's filing in the Walshe case that his office doesn't plan to call the lead investigator, embattled Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor, who became the subject of controversy for his role in the Karen Read murder trial. The episode is also being published on our show "Canton Confidential," which covers the Read case. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Bright on Buddhism - Episode 95 - Do Buddhists reject the world? Do Buddhists believe that life is nothing but suffering? Are Buddhists fatalists or nihilists? Resources: Davis, Bret W. 2004. "Zen After Zarathustra: The Problem of the Will in the Confrontation Between Nietzsche and Buddhism." Journal of Nietzsche Studies 28:89–138. p. 107.; Amaro, Ajahn (7 May 2015) [2008]. "A Dhamma article by Ajahn Amaro – The View from the Centre". Amaravati Buddhist Monastery. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2019.; Alagaddupama Sutta, The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha (PDF). Translated by Nanamoli, Bikkhu; Bodhi, Bikkhu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-26. Retrieved 2019-06-24.; https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.02.0.than.html; Ñāṇamoli, Bhikkhu (trans.) and Bodhi, Bhikkhu (ed.) (2001). The Middle-Length Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-072-X.; Thanissaro Bhikkhu (trans.) (1997). Samaññaphala Sutta: The Fruits of the Contemplative Life (DN 2).; Walshe, Maurice O'Connell (trans.) (1995). The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Dīgha Nikāya. Somerville: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-103-3. Do you have a question about Buddhism that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by tweeting to us @BrightBuddhism, emailing us at Bright.On.Buddhism@gmail.com, or joining us on our discord server, Hidden Sangha ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://discord.gg/tEwcVpu⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! Credits: Nick Bright: Script, Cover Art, Music, Voice of Hearer, Co-Host Proven Paradox: Editing, mixing and mastering, social media, Voice of Hermit, Co-Host

Questions Covered: 05:30 – I'm protestant. What did the Church Fathers believe about Mary's assumption? 11:31 – Why is the Church not receptive to canton marriages? 15:53 – How would you respond with my reason for not returning to the Church? I won’t return because of how the priest sex scandal was handled. 21:18 – Why do we have to go right up to the borderline of worshiping the saints? 33:08 – What’s the logic on assigning day to indulgences? 38:35 – Is there salvation outside the visible Church? 47:57 – Is the Protestant bible missing any book from the canon? 52:54 – I heard your story on the Journey Home. Could you repeat the story of your mother. …

A hearing was held this week in the Walshe case, and state prosecutors gave an update on the evidence testing process.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Hidden in the stillness of southern California's desert mountains, St. Michael's Abbey goes about a timeless and supernatural mission: the common worship of God. The Abbot Circle Podcast is an extension of the Norbertine mission to bring Christ into a world that too often rejects Him.Our content is available to friends, family, loved ones, and all those in need of an encounter with the staggering beauty of the Gospel and the relentless love of Christ. For access to all digital content, please visit theabbotscircle.com/lp/gs/pod

Questions Covered:  37:07 What's the difference from myself as a Baptized Catholic to someone who isn't Catholic, but living a similar type of life? …

Hidden in the stillness of southern California's desert mountains, St. Michael's Abbey goes about a timeless and supernatural mission: the common worship of God. The Abbot Circle Podcast is an extension of the Norbertine mission to bring Christ into a world that too often rejects Him.Our content is available to friends, family, loved ones, and all those in need of an encounter with the staggering beauty of the Gospel and the relentless love of Christ. For access to all digital content, please visit theabbotscircle.com/lp/gs/pod

Hidden in the stillness of southern California's desert mountains, St. Michael's Abbey goes about a timeless and supernatural mission: the common worship of God. The Abbot Circle Podcast is an extension of the Norbertine mission to bring Christ into a world that too often rejects Him.Our content is available to friends, family, loved ones, and all those in need of an encounter with the staggering beauty of the Gospel and the relentless love of Christ. For access to all digital content, please visit theabbotscircle.com/lp/gs/pod

Questions Covered: 11:24 – If you leave the Church due to lack of knowledge, is that sinful? 18:45 – After returning to the Church after 5 decades, was it ok for a priest to forgive me from past sins even those that I might not have been aware of? 25:06 – Is it licit for the congregation to sing an amen after the gospel? 31:30 – How did we get from receiving communion reverently at the altar rail to receive communion in the hand and in line? 37:25 – Were Mary and Joseph validly married since they were betrothed? Did Mary die? 41:33 – Is it allowed for there to be no music during the preparation of gifts at mass so the congregations can hear the prayers the priest is saying? 45:48 – What's the Catholic perspective on Jn 14:2 regarding eternal security? 49:19 – How much historical evidence for the crucifixion is there? 53:45 – Is there an obligation to go to your closest parish? …

Brian Walshe, a 49-year-old Massachusetts man, has been sentenced to 37 months in prison for his involvement in a fraudulent art scheme selling counterfeit Andy Warhol paintings, announced the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston. The sentencing comes amidst pending state charges against Walshe, including first-degree murder, related to the disappearance of his wife, Ana Walshe. In a federal case, Walshe pleaded guilty in 2021 to charges of wire fraud, interstate transportation for a scheme to defraud, and unlawful monetary transaction. These charges stem from what prosecutors described as "a years-long, multi-faceted art fraud scheme," wherein Walshe advertised and sold fake Andy Warhol "Shadows" paintings. Ana Walshe was last seen on New Year's Day 2023 at her home in Cohasset, according to police reports. While her body has never been found, Brian Walshe faces allegations of her murder, with a criminal complaint suggesting he killed her that day and disposed of her remains. The fraudulent art scheme centered around two abstract paintings that Walshe claimed to be authentic Warhol "Shadows," which he sold for $80,000 outside of eBay in 2016. Court documents reveal that the genuine Warhol paintings belonged to the family of a former classmate of Walshe's from Carnegie Mellon University in the 1990s. Prosecutors allege that Walshe never intended to return the authentic Warhol pieces to their rightful owners, as evidenced by excerpts from his diary at the time. Entries suggest a premeditated intent to defraud, with statements indicating a callous disregard for the victims. Despite the federal sentencing, Walshe's legal troubles are far from over. He awaits trial on state charges related to his wife's disappearance and alleged murder. Prosecutors have pointed to disturbing internet search history, including inquiries about disposing of a body and stopping decomposition, as evidence against him. Walshe's attorneys sought a more lenient sentence of time served and three years of supervised release, but prosecutors pushed for the 37-month term, which the judge ultimately imposed. Meanwhile, Walshe maintains his innocence in the state murder case and remains in custody without bail. As the legal proceedings unfold, the fate of Ana Walshe and the true extent of Brian Walshe's alleged crimes continue to hang in the balance, leaving both law enforcement and the community eagerly awaiting justice and closure. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, a 49-year-old Massachusetts man, has been sentenced to 37 months in prison for his involvement in a fraudulent art scheme selling counterfeit Andy Warhol paintings, announced the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston. The sentencing comes amidst pending state charges against Walshe, including first-degree murder, related to the disappearance of his wife, Ana Walshe. In a federal case, Walshe pleaded guilty in 2021 to charges of wire fraud, interstate transportation for a scheme to defraud, and unlawful monetary transaction. These charges stem from what prosecutors described as "a years-long, multi-faceted art fraud scheme," wherein Walshe advertised and sold fake Andy Warhol "Shadows" paintings. Ana Walshe was last seen on New Year's Day 2023 at her home in Cohasset, according to police reports. While her body has never been found, Brian Walshe faces allegations of her murder, with a criminal complaint suggesting he killed her that day and disposed of her remains. The fraudulent art scheme centered around two abstract paintings that Walshe claimed to be authentic Warhol "Shadows," which he sold for $80,000 outside of eBay in 2016. Court documents reveal that the genuine Warhol paintings belonged to the family of a former classmate of Walshe's from Carnegie Mellon University in the 1990s. Prosecutors allege that Walshe never intended to return the authentic Warhol pieces to their rightful owners, as evidenced by excerpts from his diary at the time. Entries suggest a premeditated intent to defraud, with statements indicating a callous disregard for the victims. Despite the federal sentencing, Walshe's legal troubles are far from over. He awaits trial on state charges related to his wife's disappearance and alleged murder. Prosecutors have pointed to disturbing internet search history, including inquiries about disposing of a body and stopping decomposition, as evidence against him. Walshe's attorneys sought a more lenient sentence of time served and three years of supervised release, but prosecutors pushed for the 37-month term, which the judge ultimately imposed. Meanwhile, Walshe maintains his innocence in the state murder case and remains in custody without bail. As the legal proceedings unfold, the fate of Ana Walshe and the true extent of Brian Walshe's alleged crimes continue to hang in the balance, leaving both law enforcement and the community eagerly awaiting justice and closure. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, who is facing charges related to the alleged murder of his wife Ana Walshe, is scheduled to be sentenced next month in a federal art fraud case. The decision comes as a result of an agreement reached between his defense lawyer and the prosecutor, aimed at resolving the impact of accusations regarding his theft from his father's estate on his federal sentence. Walshe, a resident of Cohasset, was charged with the sale of two counterfeit Andy Warhol paintings in 2016. Investigators believe that he obtained authentic paintings from a friend and attempted to sell replicas on eBay using photographs. He entered a guilty plea in 2021 in connection with this case. However, the sentencing process was delayed due to allegations that he had embezzled over $100,000 from his father's bank accounts approximately three months after his father's demise in 2018, as previously reported by Boston.com. During a recent brief hearing, Walshe's criminal lawyer, Tracy Miner, and prosecutor Timothy Moran informed the judge of their intention to present facts related to the probate issue. They sought a decision from the judge regarding whether these actions amounted to obstruction of justice in connection with the federal case. Brian Walshe's final sentencing in the federal art fraud case is currently scheduled for February 22. However, he was not present in court during the recent hearing. Walshe remains in custody, facing charges related to the alleged murder of his wife and the disposal of her body. The case continues to garner attention as it combines allegations of art fraud with more serious charges related to the suspected murder of Ana Walshe. The legal proceedings will determine the outcome of both cases, shedding light on the extent of his involvement in the alleged art fraud and the circumstances surrounding his wife's tragic death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Brian Walshe, who is facing charges related to the alleged murder of his wife Ana Walshe, is scheduled to be sentenced next month in a federal art fraud case. The decision comes as a result of an agreement reached between his defense lawyer and the prosecutor, aimed at resolving the impact of accusations regarding his theft from his father's estate on his federal sentence. Walshe, a resident of Cohasset, was charged with the sale of two counterfeit Andy Warhol paintings in 2016. Investigators believe that he obtained authentic paintings from a friend and attempted to sell replicas on eBay using photographs. He entered a guilty plea in 2021 in connection with this case. However, the sentencing process was delayed due to allegations that he had embezzled over $100,000 from his father's bank accounts approximately three months after his father's demise in 2018, as previously reported by Boston.com. During a recent brief hearing, Walshe's criminal lawyer, Tracy Miner, and prosecutor Timothy Moran informed the judge of their intention to present facts related to the probate issue. They sought a decision from the judge regarding whether these actions amounted to obstruction of justice in connection with the federal case. Brian Walshe's final sentencing in the federal art fraud case is currently scheduled for February 22. However, he was not present in court during the recent hearing. Walshe remains in custody, facing charges related to the alleged murder of his wife and the disposal of her body. The case continues to garner attention as it combines allegations of art fraud with more serious charges related to the suspected murder of Ana Walshe. The legal proceedings will determine the outcome of both cases, shedding light on the extent of his involvement in the alleged art fraud and the circumstances surrounding his wife's tragic death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com