Podcasts about Jukin Media

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #CrimeTalk #courtnews  The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is now in the hands of the jury. After weeks of testimony, prosecutors and the defense delivered sharply different closing arguments over the central question in the case: Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible when she killed her three children, or was she suffering from a mental disease or defect that left her legally not responsible? Prosecutors argued the killings were planned, deliberate and carried out by someone who understood that what she was doing was wrong. The defense argued Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness and psychosis that fundamentally altered her perception of reality. Jurors must now consider first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter and the issue of criminal responsibility. Scott Reisch breaks down the closing arguments, the legal instructions and the difficult decisions now facing the jury.

The Lindsay Clancy trial entered Day 20 with prosecutors continuing their rebuttal of the defense's postpartum psychosis claim. Dr. Kirk Heilbrun maintained that Clancy was seriously mentally ill but still understood that killing her children was wrong and remained criminally responsible. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington aggressively challenged his qualifications, methodology, and roughly $54,000 in fees. Prosecutors then called forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff, who questioned Clancy's claim that a male voice suddenly appeared during the killings, repeatedly ordered her to kill her children, and then disappeared afterward. Saathoff will return Wednesday to finish his testimony, with closing arguments currently expected Thursday. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #CrimeTalk #TrueCrime

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #CrimeTalk  The prosecution's rebuttal case in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial put two mental health experts at the center of the fight over criminal responsibility. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington continued his tense cross-examination of psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack, challenging his experience, methodology, prior forensic work, and conclusions about Clancy's mental state. Mack maintained that Clancy was suffering from a serious depressive illness but was not psychotic and remained capable of understanding right from wrong and controlling her conduct. Then forensic psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun offered a different diagnosis — Bipolar II disorder — while reaching a similar conclusion on the key legal issue. Heilbrun testified that he did not believe Clancy was experiencing acute psychosis or genuine command hallucinations when she killed her three children. But the testimony also produced another courtroom confrontation. Heilbrun referenced Clancy's Catholic upbringing while discussing her thinking surrounding suicide, prompting Reddington to move for a mistrial. Judge William Sullivan denied the motion, called the religious testimony inappropriate, and instructed jurors to disregard it. In this episode of Crime Talk, Scott Reisch breaks down the performances of Mack and Heilbrun, Reddington's aggressive cross-examination, which expert may have connected better with the jury, and whether the prosecution gained ground against the defense's insanity case. With testimony nearing an end and closing arguments expected later this week, the battle over Lindsay Clancy's mental state — and whether she was legally criminally responsible — is approaching its conclusion.

Karmelo Anthony has scored a significant procedural victory in his fight for a new trial. The Texas judge who presided over Anthony's murder trial, State District Judge John Roach Jr., has been recused from the case after Anthony's new legal team argued that Roach's post-trial comments and other actions raised questions about whether he could fairly consider allegations that serious mistakes occurred during the original trial. Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the recusal Wednesday, and Judge Michael B. Chitty has now been assigned to the case. Anthony, now 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a confrontation at a high-school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Jurors rejected Anthony's self-defense argument, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Anthony's new attorneys are now asking for the entire conviction to be set aside and a new trial granted. Among their arguments are allegations involving restrictions on public and media access to the courtroom, rulings affecting Anthony's defense, and disputes surrounding what evidence could be presented to jurors. The defense also focused heavily on a television interview Roach gave shortly after the verdict in which he defended the trial and indicated agreement with the jury's decision. But this is an important distinction: Karmelo Anthony has NOT been granted a new trial. His murder conviction and 35-year sentence remain in place. What he has won is the first major battle in his post-trial challenge: the judge deciding whether serious errors occurred during John Roach's trial will no longer be John Roach himself. Scott Reisch breaks down what the judge's removal means, the arguments Anthony's attorneys are making, and whether any of them could actually be enough to get Karmelo Anthony back in front of another jury. What do you think? Was removing Judge Roach the right decision — and does Anthony have a legitimate argument for a new trial?

Luigi Mangione's New York state trial has been postponed as his defense launches a potentially case-ending double-jeopardy challenge following his federal guilty plea. Judge Gregory Carro canceled the September 8 trial date and gave Manhattan prosecutors until October 9 to respond. The court will take up the issue on December 10, just days before Mangione's December 18 federal sentencing. Mangione pleaded guilty to two federal stalking charges and admitted that he followed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson to New York and shot him. Federal prosecutors say they will seek life imprisonment, although the federal sentencing guidelines currently calculate a range of roughly 24 to 30 years. The major question now is whether New York can continue with its own murder and weapons prosecution. Mangione's attorneys argue that New York's unusually broad statutory double-jeopardy protections prohibit another prosecution arising from the same criminal transaction. Manhattan prosecutors argue the state offenses involve different legal elements and interests, and the statute itself contains exceptions that could permit the case to continue. Meanwhile, the defense case in the Lindsay Clancy trial is underway. Susan Clancy testified that Lindsay's mental health deteriorated dramatically in the months before the deaths of her three children and told jurors that Lindsay was "begging for help." Defense psychiatrist Dr. Donald Condie also criticized portions of her treatment records as sparse and testified about symptoms reflected in those records. The defense argues that severe postpartum mental illness left Lindsay Clancy not criminally responsible. Prosecutors maintain that she understood what she was doing and deliberately planned the killings. The jury will ultimately determine whether she was criminally responsible. Join criminal defense attorney Scott Reisch for analysis of the latest courtroom developments, the legal arguments and what happens next. What do you think? Should New York's broader double-jeopardy law prevent the state from prosecuting Mangione after his federal guilty plea? And does the testimony that Lindsay Clancy was "begging for help" strengthen her defense?

Nearly 30 years after Tupac Shakur was fatally shot in Las Vegas, the trial of Duane "Keffe D" Davis is underway. Prosecutors opened the case by telling jurors that Davis helped plan the attack and that some of the most important evidence will come from Davis himself — including years of interviews, statements to investigators, and his memoir. Davis has pleaded not guilty. His defense argues that prosecutors are treating stories and exaggerations as fact and says there is not enough independent evidence to corroborate Davis' claims. Crime Talk breaks down the opening statements, the prosecution's theory, the defense strategy, the evidence surrounding Keffe D's own words, and what jurors heard as testimony began in one of the most closely watched criminal cases in decades. Witness testimony also began Monday following the opening statements. Join Scott Reisch for legal analysis, courtroom coverage, and discussion of the Tupac Shakur case. #Tupac #TupacShakur #KeffeD #DuaneDavis #TupacTrial #CrimeTalk #TrueCrime #Courtroom #Trial #LegalNews

Luigi Mangione pleaded guilty in federal court—and then said the words prosecutors wanted on the record. The 28-year-old admitted he shot Brian Thompson in Manhattan. Now sentencing is set, and the legal fight shifts to punishment, strategy, and what comes next. Scott breaks down the plea, the admission, and the consequences. Watch, comment, and subscribe for more legal analysis. #LuigiMangione, #BrianThompson, #CrimeTalk, #FederalCourt, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis

A guilty plea is reportedly expected Friday in Luigi Mangione's federal case. If it happens, the fallout could reshape the entire legal strategy. Scott breaks down what prosecutors gain, what the defense may be avoiding, and whether the New York case is now at risk. This is the legal angle that matters: leverage, exposure, and what happens next. Watch to the end and tell us if this changes the whole case. #LuigiMangione, #TrueCrime, #CrimeTalk, #LegalAnalysis, #FederalCourt, #BreakingNews

Nick Reiner's case just became much more serious. A Los Angeles County grand jury indictment now alleges murder by lying in wait in the deaths of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. That special circumstance could mean life without parole or a potential death penalty decision. Scott breaks down what prosecutors must prove, what the defense will attack, and why skipping the preliminary hearing matters. Watch to the end and comment: should prosecutors seek death if they can prove it? #NickReiner, #RobReiner, #TrueCrime, #CrimeTalk, #LegalAnalysis, #CaliforniaLaw

Chris Watts may be headed toward marriage from behind bars. Reports say Watts is in a serious prison relationship with frequent visits, a possible marriage request, and a name-change twist. But there is still no confirmation he is legally married, and prison approval would be required. Scott breaks down what's reported, what's confirmed, and what this says about prison relationships and public fascination with notorious killers. Watch to the end and tell us what you think. #ChrisWatts, #TrueCrime, #CrimeTalk, #PrisonRomance, #ScottReisch, #TrueCrimeNews

Lauren Boebert's adult son, Tyler Boebert, is facing new felony child sexual exploitation charges. Court records say he was arrested in Garfield County and released after posting a $10,000 bond. The new case comes while he is awaiting sentencing in two unrelated criminal cases. Scott breaks down the charges, the bond issue, and what happens next in court. Watch to the end and tell us whether the court treats this like a major warning sign. #LaurenBoebert, #TylerBoebert, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #Colorado

The Lindsay Clancy trial just took another dramatic turn. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington says someone on the prosecution team was caught on a hot mic saying "shut her up" while Clancy cried during autopsy testimony. We also break down the McLean psychiatrist's testimony and what it does—and does not—do for the postpartum-psychosis defense. Scott explains the legal stakes, what the judge could do next, and why this matters now. Watch to the end and tell us: if the allegation is confirmed, how should the court respond? #LindsayClancy, #ClancyTrial, #TrueCrime, #CourtroomDrama, #LegalAnalysis, #CrimeTalk

Alex Murdaugh's convictions were tossed. His $600,000 lawsuit against Becky Hill was not. A federal judge dismissed the claim, ruling Hill's misconduct did not legally cause his defense costs. That is the legal split: constitutional violation in one courtroom, no proximate cause in another. Scott breaks down the ruling, the appeal, and what it means before the April 5 retrial. Should Becky Hill have to pay? Watch, comment, and stay for what happens next. #AlexMurdaugh, #BeckyHill, #MurdaughTrial, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CrimeTalk 

Bryan Kohberger has a new lawyer and wants to withdraw the guilty plea that spared him death row. Meanwhile, Lindsay Clancy broke down as jurors saw nanny video of baby Callan during her murder trial. One case turns on coercion and ineffective assistance. The other turns on criminal responsibility. Scott breaks down what each court has to decide next — and what could blow up legally. Comment: Should Kohberger get to withdraw his plea, and does Clancy's reaction help her defense? #BryanKohberger, #LindsayClancy, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CourtroomDrama

Sixteen children were allegedly found confined in deplorable conditions. Now Elizabeth Siders is asking an Ohio court for a competency evaluation—and possibly an insanity evaluation. We also break down Lindsay Clancy, Courtney Clenney's plea deal, and Luigi Mangione's public-trial demand. Scott explains what these legal moves actually mean and what happens next. Watch, comment, and subscribe for the legal breakdown behind the headlines. #CrimeTalk, #ElizabethSiders, #LindsayClancy, #CourtneyClenney, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis

When minors are involved, the legal system has no room for excuses. Today we're looking at several cases where children are connected to the facts, the filings, or the failures. What did investigators, courts, agencies, or adults allegedly miss? Scott breaks down the legal questions, accountability issues, and what happens next. Watch, comment, and subscribe for more legal analysis from Crime Talk. #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #ChildSafety, #CourtCases, #ScottReisch

Two homes. Two horrifying cases. Two very different legal fights. In the Lindsay Clancy trial, jurors toured key locations tied to the prosecution's timeline. In Ohio, three Siders defendants now face competency evaluations after 16 children were allegedly found in severe neglect. Scott breaks down what the jury saw, what competency really means, and what happens next. Watch to the end and tell us which legal issue matters most. #CrimeTalk, #LindsayClancy, #SidersCase, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CourtTV

New jail footage has surfaced in the Ohio "House of Horrors" child endangerment case. Elizabeth Siders, Gary Siders Jr., Christina Siders, and Gary Siders Sr. face 16 felony counts after authorities say 16 children were found in severe squalor. The defense says this is poverty being criminalized. Prosecutors say the conditions crossed a very serious legal line. Scott breaks down the charges, the defense strategy, the gag order, and what happens next. Watch to the end and tell us: poverty case, criminal case, or both? #ElizabethSiders, #OhioHouseOfHorrors, #ChildEndangerment, #CrimeTalk, #LegalAnalysis, #TrueCrime

Lindsay Clancy broke down as jurors heard her husband's 911 call. Bryan Kohberger is now trying to withdraw his guilty plea, pointing to disputed hair evidence. Scott breaks down the insanity defense, plea-withdrawal fight, and what courts actually care about. Watch to the end and tell us which legal battle faces the bigger uphill climb. #CrimeTalk, #LindsayClancy, #BryanKohberger, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CourtroomNews

Chris Watts' alleged second mistress is now giving a much fuller account. Amanda McMahon claims the relationship started earlier and lasted longer than she told police. But the texts remain unverified, Watts denied knowing her, and the DA has not publicly commented. Scott breaks down what matters legally—and what is still just an allegation. Watch to the end and tell us: does this change anything, or just expose more chaos? #ChrisWatts, #AmandaMcMahon, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #ColoradoCrime

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is underway, with prosecutors arguing intent and the defense arguing she was not criminally responsible. Meanwhile, Bryan Kohberger now claims innocence and wants to withdraw the guilty plea that spared him the death penalty. Scott breaks down the legal reality: mental state, jury pressure, plea withdrawal, and the long odds ahead. Watch and comment: which case has the harder legal hill to climb? #LindsayClancy, #BryanKohberger, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #Courtroom

The Ohio Siders case now has two competing stories: "feral children" versus "extreme poverty." Elizabeth Siders' attorney disputes the state's language, while prosecutors allege 16 children were endangered in horrific conditions. Scott breaks down what is fact, what is argument, and what actually matters in court. Watch to the end and tell us where poverty ends and criminal neglect begins. #CrimeTalk, #SidersCase, #OhioHouseOfHorrors, #ElizabethSiders, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis

The D4vd murder hearing is now focused on online purchases, aliases, and search evidence. David Anthony Burke has pleaded not guilty, and the defense says he did not cause Celeste Rivas Hernandez's death. Scott breaks down what the chain saws, body bag, and unused burn box could mean at a probable cause hearing. Watch to understand what the judge is really deciding before this case can go to trial. #D4vd, #CelesteRivasHernandez, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #PreliminaryHearing

Jury selection is underway in Lindsay Clancy's Massachusetts murder trial, with 18 jurors sought for a case expected to last weeks. The defense argues postpartum psychosis means she was not criminally responsible; prosecutors say the evidence shows planning. Scott breaks down why juror bias, media exposure, expert testimony, and landmark insanity cases may shape the verdict. Watch and comment: is this a murder case, a mental health case, or the hardest legal line to draw? #LindsayClancy, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #InsanityDefense, #PostpartumPsychosis

Andrew and Tristan Tate were arrested in Miami as UK prosecutors seek extradition. They now face a wave of UK allegations, including rape, trafficking, assault, and illegal image offenses, all of which they deny. Their attorney calls it a political hit. Prosecutors call it a criminal case. Scott breaks down what actually matters: extradition, evidence, treaty rules, and what happens next. Watch to the end and comment: can they fight this, or is the UK getting them back? #AndrewTate, #TristanTate, #TateBrothers, #Extradition, #TrueCrime, #CrimeTalk

00:00 Docket 00:59 Intro 02:52 Defense Seeks New Trial for Karmelo Anthony 10:55 R. Kelly Formally Petitions President Trump for Commutation  14:16 70-Year-Old Arrested in 1987 Cold Case Murder 16:51 'Just Unlucky': Sentenced to Life for 12th DWI Conviction 21:13 NJ Babysitter Blames Toddler  23:47 Las Vegas Man Sentenced for Stabbing Girlfriend 26:08 Legal History 27:37 Quote of the Day 28:32 Questions from Subscribers 30:11 Dumb Criminal of the Day Karmelo Anthony wants a new trial after his murder conviction. His defense says an off-the-record deal, courtroom access limits, and alleged judicial bias tainted the process. Prosecutors say the trial was fair and the verdict should stand. Scott breaks down whether this is a real legal issue—or just a long-shot post-trial swing. Watch, comment, and stay to the end. #KarmeloAnthony, #AustinMetcalf, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CrimeTalk, #NewTrial

A capital murder case does not come cheap. Tyler Robinson, accused in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, has been deemed indigent and is entitled to a specialized defense team. Now Utah taxpayers could be looking at a legal bill that may climb past $10 million. Scott breaks down why death penalty cases cost so much, how defense strategy works, and what happens next. Watch, comment, and subscribe for sharp legal analysis without the courtroom fog machine. #CharlieKirk, #TylerRobinson, #CrimeTalk, #LegalAnalysis, #DeathPenalty, #Utah

00:00 Docket 01:15 Intro 03:16 Charlie Kirk Shooting 10:31 New Evidence in Scott Peterson Case 19:24 Ashlee Buzzard gets to use a stress ball in court 21:52 OnlyFans Model Seeks Domestic Violence Proof for trial 25:07 What Do You Do to Get 120 Years? This Case Answers It 28:28 8 Shots Fired in PlayStation Return Dispute 29:51 WD-40 Murder Plot 32:00 Legal History 34:00 Quote of the Day 34:51 Questions from Subscribers 37:58 Dumb Criminal of the Day What do you do to get 120 years? This case gives the court a very clear answer. Timothy J. Dubois Jr. was sentenced after a knifepoint abduction and sexual assault tied to a Starbucks parking lot. Investigators used Apple Watch data, DNA, forensic genealogy, and a recorded confession. Scott breaks down the evidence, the sentencing math, and why the defense's plea for leniency failed. Watch to the end and tell us: was 120 years the right sentence? #CrimeTalk, #ScottReisch, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #TimothyDubois, #DNAEvidence

Karmelo Anthony's new legal team is going after the conviction—and the judge. Two new motions seek a new trial and Judge John Roach's removal from post-trial proceedings. After a 35-year sentence, the legal fight has moved from the jury room to alleged constitutional and trial errors. Scott breaks down what these motions actually mean—and whether they have a real legal path forward. Watch to the end and tell us: serious appellate issue or a post-trial legal Hail Mary? Hashtags: #KarmeloAnthony, #AustinMetcalf, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CourtNews, #CrimeTalk

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers broadly discuss the quarter millennium of American Empire.    

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers discuss the quiet emergency persisting within men's mental health.(Recorded June 9th) In honor of Men's Mental Health Month, we examine the lives of three cultural titans who battled severe psychological struggles behind their public personas: the soulful brilliance of Donny Hathaway, the hyper-masculine facade of Ernest Hemingway, and the immense artistic dedication of Heath Ledger. With men facing a suicide rate nearly quadruple that of women, the necessity of dismantling these stigmas and pursuing professional intervention has never been more pressing. Wealth, status, and talent provide no immunity, and it's time to break the societal silence. Sources: https://wordinblack.com/2025/12/mental-illness-donnita-hathaway-call-for-healing/ https://ground.news/article/progressive-nithya-raman-advances-to-november-runoff-against-los-angeles-mayor-karen-bass https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/bills/1095.htm https://www.brut.media/us/videos/us/politics/republican-senator-got-heated-after-lawmakers-advance-near-total-abortion-ban https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/how-mental-health-struggles-wrote-ernest-hemingways-final-chapter   Resource: https://www.nami.org/stay-connected/events/awareness-events/mens-health-month/      

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers discuss the dismantling of the voters rights act, the end of spirit airlines, and much more!

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers discuss late stage capitalism and it's implications, the prolific D4VD pedo-murder case of Celeste Rivas Hernandez, US-Israeli War on Iran, NBA playoffs, and NEW SPECIAL CLOTH TALK MERCH now available     

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers discuss the impact of the war in Iran. Humanitarian, economical, and military ramifications are discussed, as well as our views on the conflict. Offset got shot in a casino? Tiger woods DUI? all that and more on this episode of Special Cloth Talk.  

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers discuss the current war in Iran, and the ramifications we'll all feel economically soon. We also discuss Bam Adebayos historic 83 point performance.     

On this episode of Special Cloth Talk, the SCT brothers do an unconventional episode with no topic, just casual conversation. Hope you all enjoy.    

Who is in charge in Protestantism? Catholics often argue that Protestantism fails because it lacks a single visible authority like the Pope. In this video, Christian Barrett responds to that claim and explains how Protestants understand church authority, Scripture, councils, and tradition by answering a recent objection made by  ⁨@CameronRiecker⁩  Christian walks through infant baptism, denominational differences, Sola Scriptura, differences in Roman Catholicism, and the reasons for disagreements in both Protestantism and Roman Catholicism.If you've ever wondered who decides doctrine in Protestant Christianity, how Protestants answer doctrinal disputes, or what authority looks like without a Pope, this video is for you.Topics covered:– Protestant vs Catholic authority– Who is in charge in Protestantism– Sola Scriptura and Tradition– Church councils and Acts 15– Infant Baptism– Ministerial vs Magesterial Authority of the Church00:00 – Who Is in Charge in Protestantism?00:10 – Protestant vs Catholic Authority Explained03:44 – Responding to Cameron Rieker on Church Authority07:24 – The Roman Catholic Argument Against Protestantism (Summary)09:48 – Does Infant Baptism Save?12:47 – Does Church Authority Come From Tradition?14:55 – Baptists vs Lutherans: Protestant Differences18:01 – Acts 15 and the Council of Jerusalem Explained21:01 – The Role of Christian Councils22:50 – Sola Scriptura and Tradition27:00 – Disagreements in Roman Catholicism29:25 – Ministerial Authority of the ChurchFair Use Disclaimer:This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. All clips used are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code. This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting. Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).#Protestantism #ChurchAuthority #SolaScriptura #ChristianTheology #CatholicVsProtestant #BibleTeaching

On this episode the Special Cloth brothers discuss Andrew Schultz recent apology for his endorsement of Trump for the 2024 election. We also discuss Nicki Minaj's recent controversial decisions, release of more Epstein files, and more 

In this video, Christian and Ross explore the urgent need for discipleship in the church today. Starting with Donald Trump's shocking comment about heaven, they unpack the issues shaping Christianity — from the rise of AI, to “TikTok theology,” to the cost of truly following Jesus.The next generation is asking big questions: How do I get into heaven? Why do we settle for shallow theology? What does it really mean to be a disciple of Christ? Their discussion tackles these challenges head-on and points back to the only solution — knowing Christ, living as His disciples, and thinking like Christians.Donald Trump Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYhRZZp4P1cSupport Emet Ministries, so we can continue to provide content and resources to help disciples become disciplers: https://veritas-ministry-415223.churchcenter.com/givingChristian's reading list:⁠ https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/74696644-christian-barrett01:55 – What the Next Generation of Christians Really Needs05:50 – The Danger of Artificial Intelligence for Faith & the Church11:09 – Is Donald Trump Going to Heaven?13:35 – How Do We Actually Get Into Heaven?19:45 – How the Church Ended Up With Bad Theology21:07 – Why So Many Turn to “TikTok Theology”26:37 – Truly Knowing God vs. Knowing About Him30:00 – Practical Steps: How to Do Discipleship in Daily Life36:45 – Why Sound Theology Is Essential for the Church42:00 – The Real Cost of Following JesusFair Use Disclaimer: This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. All clips used are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code. This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting. Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).#DonaldTrump #Heaven #Discipleship #Christianity #Theology #TikTokTheology #ArtificialIntelligence #Church #NextGeneration #Faith #FollowingJesus #BadTheology

The collapse of the Democrat establishment is accelerating—from the implosion of ActBlue and USAID to the mass exodus from legacy media. Once-powerful funding and propaganda networks are crumbling, and the American public is waking up to a new political reality. Featuring insights from Bret Weinstein and Joe Rogan, plus breaking news of yet another party defection and the surging GOP economy, this episode breaks it all down.--Head to http://twc.health/turley and use code TURLEY to SAVE $75 off plus Free Shipping*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984Highlights:“Media trust is at an all-time low. Seven in 10 Americans distrust the legacy media.”“The Atlanta Fed, one of the 12 regional banks that make up the Federal Reserve System, is now predicting that the real GDP growth for Q2 is going to hit 4.6%... The economy is exploding!”“This is a new health report that's making the rounds on social media: those who are purported to be in excellent mental health are 51% conservative, all the while those who are in poor mental health, neurotics, are purported to be 45% liberal.”Timestamps: [00:21] Bret Weinstein and Joe Rogan's take on the fall of Democrat-backed institutions[02:53] Media trust implodes, plus their complicity in covering up Biden's decline[05:36] The poll showing the fallout from the total implosion in the Democrat infrastructure[08:38] The populist realignment of working-class voters[12:44] Kentucky Democrat Robin Webb's party switch to GOP--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

MSNBC humiliates itself in its coverage of the Colorado Terror Attack, describing the illegal migrant suspected of the attack as a white male! Learn the latest on the legacy media's fails in covering the woke left's descent into madness, Also, Poland turns to the right! In an absolute thriller yesterday, the nationalist-populist Trump-backed candidate, Karol Nawrocki, defeated their pro-EU Soros-backed candidate Rafał Trzaskowski. We've got the latest on what this amazing victory means for Poland and the future of the EU!--Get CHOQ today! At http://choq.com , Promo Code TURLEY you can text or call them at 50-CHOQ-3000.*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Go Beyond the Video—Get Exclusive Show Notes Delivered Straight to Your Inbox https://turley.pub/turleyrecapHighlights:“Not only are we seeing a consistent pattern of violence from leftwing activists, but we're seeing a consistent downplaying of the significance of the violence from the legacy media.”“Poland is currently going through a culture war very much akin to what we've been experiencing here in the States, but like here, back in November, the good guys won in Poland.”Timestamps: [00:21] Media bias in the reporting of left-wing violence [02:47] FBI's use of “ideologically motivated terrorism” classification and how it makes the media mad[05:05] The legacy media's use of “progressive realism”[09:28] Poland's nationalist resurgence with Nawrocki's victory--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

(Note: This is a clip from our Monday night livestream.)Join my weekly Monday Night UNCENSORED Q&A to ask me any question you'd like by clicking here: https://fight.turleytalks.com/monday-qa--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

A stunning drone strike deep inside Russian territory—2,500 miles from the front—has reshaped the geopolitical chessboard. On June 1, 2025, Ukraine launched its boldest and most far-reaching attack yet, destroying over 40 Russian aircraft and dealing a blow worth billions. But with peace talks simultaneously unfolding in Istanbul and U.S. senators visiting Kyiv just hours prior, the question arises: was this escalation part of a larger plan? This episode explores the timing, motives, and potential fallout of what some are calling Russia's Pearl Harbor—and what it means for the future of the war.--Go to http://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley to try their Liver Health Formula and get a FREE 1-month's supply of Blood Sugar Formula!*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984Highlights:“Why, in the midst of Istanbul negotiations, would Graham be advocating a military escalation?”“The Russian frontlines have become one big massive killing machine that patiently waits for Ukraine to deplete enough of its forces before it cries uncle.”“What's the only way they can give Ukraine leverage and reawaken NATO? It's by provoking Russia to attack NATO.”“This conflict ends, for right or for wrong, on Putin's terms and no one else's.”Timestamps: [00:21] Details of Ukraine's large-scale drone strike inside Russia[02:20] The timing of the attack with renewed peace talks in Istanbul[03:01] The role of U.S. senators, particularly Lindsey Graham, in the escalation [07:03] Analysis of Ukraine's negotiation position and the risk of NATO involvement--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Speaker Mike Johnson just unveiled President Trump's sweeping new economic package - a $4.5 trillion tax cut plan to restore American prosperity. From eliminating taxes on tips and overtime to boosting American manufacturing and shipbuilding, this bold strategy is already igniting the markets. In this episode, my guest Troy Noonan and I discuss what this means for your paycheck, investments, and financial future, and how everyday Americans can capitalize on this economic surge before it's too late.To Get More Info with Troy on The Golden Age Click Here! https://backpacktrader.com/turley*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* --Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Stay ahead of the spin. Go to https://ground.news/steve to cut through media bias and see the full picture. Use my link to get 40% off the unlimited access Vantage plan.*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Go to https://hometitlelock.com/turleytalks and use promo code TURLEYTALKS to get a FREE title history report so you can find out if you're already a victim AND 14 days of protection for FREE! And make sure to check out the Million Dollar TripleLock protection details when you get there! Exclusions apply. For details, visit https://hometitlelock.com/warranty.*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In this episode, I talk about the fiery exchange between Jordan Peterson and a roomful of atheists during a Jubilee event. But the real issue wasn't belief—it was a fundamental misunderstanding of religion itself. Learn what Peterson should have said and why our entire cultural framework, including that of self-proclaimed atheists, is deeply rooted in Christianity. --Go to http://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley to try their Liver Health Formula and get a FREE 1-month supply of Blood Sugar Formula!*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984Highlights:“What Peterson should have said, when asked: ‘either you're a Christian or you're not, which is it?', the answer is simple: ‘Of course, I'm a Christian, and not only that, so are you!'... ‘Yes, I'm a Christian, and guess what, so are you! And so are (most likely) all 19 other so-called atheists in this room.”“Whenever people debate religion, either side rarely stops to define precisely what they mean by this term ‘religion'. Cultural anthropologists have argued now for over a century that religion is fundamentally a social order.”Timestamps: [00:21] Jordan Peterson's debated identity as a Christian[05:40] Why both atheists and believers misunderstand religion[06:57] The anthropological definition of religion as a social order[12:05] How Western atheism is rooted in Christian tradition --Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Mainstream media zeroes in on a so-called scandal involving President Trump and a jet from Qatar, while ignoring the historic economic wins he secured during a high-stakes tour through the Middle East. In this episode, we talk about the staggering investments Trump brought back, media manipulation tactics, and what these developments mean for America's future. Financial expert Jonathan Rose joins the conversation to unpack how everyday Americans can benefit from these massive global deals.Visit http://TurleyTalksCrypto.com today and claim up to $2,500 in funding bonuses!*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*--Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalksSign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.