Podcast appearances and mentions of nick reiner

Not all guys, but SOME guys aren't acting right. This week, we have Adam Carolla, R. Kelly, Nick Reiner. For fun, some Ariana Grande news to lighten things up.

Yikes, things are getting messy! Department of Child & Family Services petitions for Taylor Frankie Paul's children, claiming abuse and neglect, as she feuds with Whitney Leavitt online. Plus, Rob Reiner's sister is standing behind her nephew Nick Reiner as he faces charges for slaying his parents. And Special Forces announces their new cast with some controversial faces! Hero Bread is offering 10% off your order. Go to https://www.hero.co/ and use code NOFILTER at checkout. The Korean skincare brand everyone is talking about. Our listeners get 20% off their entire order by using code nofilter at https://www.jiyuskin.com/ #JIYU #adIf you want to try Momentous Signature Spec Creatine, head to https://www.livemomentous.com/ and use code NOFILTER for up to 35% off your entire first order.Grab your hydration boost and save 20% off your first order at https://dripdrop.com/ by using the promo code NOFILTER at checkout. Head to https://www.factormeals.com/nofilter50off and use code nofilter50off to get 50% off and free daily greens per box, with new subscription only, while supplies last until 09/27/2026. (See website for more details).Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb Disclaimer: The views expressed in this video, on this YouTube Channel, and on No Filter with Zack Peter are for entertainment purposes only. All content is protected under Fair Use Rights.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

True crime fans love spotting patterns, and this episode hands them three cases to compare at once: Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann. Nancy Guthrie has been missing for six months, and the note her family received remains the detail investigators can't fully explain. Nick Reiner is accused of murdering his parents, Rob and Michele, hours after a fight at a holiday party that other guests noticed and walked away from. Rex Heuermann, already serving three life sentences plus a hundred years, is generating new headlines because of an unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family without disclosing who she really was. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team use these three very different cases to explore a single idea: how warning signs get missed, normalized, or actively hidden, no matter how different the circumstances look on the surface. The show compares how each case has been handled by law enforcement, families, and the people closest to the situation, and asks what it would actually take to catch a warning sign before it becomes a headline. There's also an honest conversation about why true crime audiences are drawn to cases like these in the first place, and what it means to sit with three unresolved, ongoing investigations at once instead of the neat, closed-case stories true crime often gets criticized for favoring. Three cases. Zero clean endings. One pattern that connects all three, whether anyone wants to admit it or not. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrimePodcast #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #SerialKiller #ColdCase 

This episode moves through three cases in one sitting: Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann, and by the end, a single pattern connects them all. Nancy Guthrie remains missing six months after vanishing from her Arizona home, and the note her family received continues to be the piece investigators can't fully explain away. Nick Reiner is accused of murdering his parents, Rob and Michele, hours after a fight at a holiday party that other guests noticed and walked away from anyway. Rex Heuermann, already serving three life sentences plus a hundred years, is back in the conversation because of an unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family and wasn't who she claimed to be. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team break down each case individually before drawing the thread between them: a warning that got missed, a behavior that got normalized, a professional who slipped through without anyone checking. The show also gives listeners an update on where each investigation stands, from the search for Nancy Guthrie, to Nick Reiner's not guilty plea and looming preliminary hearing, to the families still waiting on Rex Heuermann for answers about victims he hasn't been charged with. There's also a conversation about the concept of the "loving critic," someone close enough to say something before a situation goes too far, and why that person is so often missing at the exact moment they're needed most, whether it's a family, a friend group, or a professional relationship built on trust that wasn't earned. Three cases, three very different circumstances, and one uncomfortable question that ties them together. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #ColdCase #TrueCrimeCommunity 

This episode of Hidden Killers Live does something a little different: instead of one deep dive, the team moves through three cases back to back, Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Rex Heuermann, and takes listener questions on all three. Robin Drake, Todd Michaels, and Lisa Hale start with Nancy Guthrie, six months missing from her Arizona home, and answer listener questions about the note her family received and what it might mean. From there, the conversation moves to Nick Reiner, accused of murdering his parents hours after a fight at a party that other guests noticed and did nothing about, including a personal story from Lisa about watching her own son go through a mental health crisis. The episode closes on Rex Heuermann, already sentenced to three life sentences plus a hundred years, and the unlicensed therapist who worked closely with his family while hiding who she really was. Across all three cases, the hosts keep landing on the same theme: someone had a piece of information, a gut feeling, or a front-row seat to a warning sign, and it didn't reach the people who needed it in time. The team also fields tough listener questions about law enforcement's role in cases like these, the real barriers to getting people help before a crisis, and what "closure" actually looks like for families years into an unresolved case. Three cases, one live conversation, and a lot of questions the team doesn't pretend to have easy answers for. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NancyGuthrie #NickReiner #RexHeuermann #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrimePodcast #ListenerQA #GilgoBeach #Brentwood #MissingPersons #ColdCase 

True crime audiences always ask the same question after a case like this: how did nobody see it coming? Nick Reiner's case might be the clearest answer yet, because reportedly, people did see it. They just went home anyway. Nick is accused of stabbing his parents, director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, to death in their own Brentwood home nine months ago. Hours earlier, according to reporting, he and his father argued at a holiday party. Other guests noticed his appearance and behavior. Nobody intervened. Tony Brueski and the Hidden Killers team use this case to talk about how a pattern of behavior, reportedly present since Nick's childhood, becomes so familiar to the people around it that it stops registering as a threat at all. The show also breaks down the legal reality behind an insanity defense, something already being discussed online, and why the standard for proving it in California is close to impossible to meet, even with a documented history of addiction and reported mental health struggles. The team explains what "functional" actually means in a legal sense, and why living an outwardly normal life can work against a defendant trying to argue they didn't understand what they were doing. There's also a broader conversation about compassion, boundaries, and why the parents who love someone the most are so often the ones least able to hold a firm line, plus what role friends, extended family, and even strangers at a party could play if they trusted their own instincts a little more. Nick Reiner has pleaded not guilty. His preliminary hearing is now set for September. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #RobReiner #NickReiner #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrimePodcast #Brentwood #CelebrityCrime #MentalHealth #InsanityDefense #LAcrime #TrueCrimeCommunity 

Nine months after Rob and Michele Reiner were found stabbed to death in their Brentwood home, the Hidden Killers team is still coming back to one detail: what actually happened at the party hours before it happened. Nick Reiner, their son, was arrested the same night. Reports describe a fight between Nick and his father at a holiday gathering, guests who noticed his disheveled appearance and erratic behavior, and a room full of people who ultimately went home without saying anything. Tony Brueski and the team break down why that kind of normalization happens even among people who genuinely love someone, and how a pattern of behavior reportedly stretching back to Nick's childhood got absorbed into family life instead of confronted directly. The show also digs into the legal road ahead. Nick has pleaded not guilty, and an insanity defense is already being discussed publicly, despite a legal standard in California that succeeds in under one percent of cases. The team walks through what that defense would actually require, why prosecutors tend to fight it hard in high-profile cases, and why being "functional" in daily life can work against a defendant trying to prove they didn't understand right from wrong. There's also a conversation about the concept of the "loving critic" — someone close enough to care, but distant enough to be honest — and why families in crisis often lack exactly that voice when they need it most. Nine months of continuances and a change in defense counsel have pushed this case's preliminary hearing to September, with both sides still working through an enormous volume of evidence. This is a hard look at how a warning sign turns invisible, right up until it can't be ignored anymore. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #RobReiner #NickReiner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #Brentwood #CelebrityCrime #LAcrime #MentalHealth #InsanityDefense #TrueCrimeCommunity 

Rob and Michele Reiner were killed in their own home nine months ago, and Hidden Killers Live spent this episode answering the questions listeners can't let go of, starting with the one that stings the most: did anyone see this coming from their son, Nick? Robin Drake, Todd Michaels, and Lisa Hale take listener questions directly, starting with reports that Nick and his father fought at a holiday party hours before the killings, with other guests noticing his behavior and going home anyway. The hosts talk through what it means when a pattern gets normalized inside a family and a friend group, and Lisa shares a personal story about watching her own son go through a frightening, medication-related mental health crisis, and how hard it is to stay firm with someone you love when you're afraid of where firmness might lead. The team also fields listener questions about the insanity defense already being floated publicly, why the legal bar for it is so difficult to clear, and why Nick's documented history of addiction and reported mental health struggles may not be enough on their own to meet that standard. There's a real conversation about domestic violence hotlines, the concept of a "loving critic," and what it might have taken for someone at that party to say something out loud instead of going home. Nick Reiner has pleaded not guilty to murdering both of his parents. With a preliminary hearing now set for September and a defense team that's already changed once, the hosts talk through what comes next, and why cases like this rarely move at the pace people expect. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #RobReiner #NickReiner #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrimePodcast #ListenerQA #Brentwood #MentalHealth #CelebrityCrime #InsanityDefense #TrueCrimeCommunity 

There's a contradiction sitting at the center of the Reiner case, and it's the kind retired FBI behavioral chief Robin Dreeke was built to take apart. Reports describe Nick Reiner as almost childlike in custody — unable to fully grasp where he is or why. Yet other reports claim he's simultaneously plotting a revenge tell-all aimed at the family who tried for years to save him. Both can't be the whole truth. So which is it?This look back brings two expert lenses to a case stalled in limbo. First, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis on the delay itself: a preliminary hearing pushed to the fall, autopsy reports still unfinished months after the deaths, terabytes of discovery in motion, and what all of it signals about the defense's strategy and the near-certainty of a mental health argument given Nick's documented diagnosis and prior conservatorship.Then Robin Dreeke walks through the behavioral profile. We treat the tell-all reporting carefully — it traces to tabloid sources, not the court record — but the contradiction it describes is worth examining: how someone can present as diminished and disconnected while reportedly nursing a calculated grievance. We go through the listener questions you've been sending: about the medication changes before that night, about whether an insanity defense can actually hold here, and about what it means when a family does everything right and still loses everything. We revisit where things stood at the time of our reporting.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #EricFaddis #MentalHealth #InsanityDefense #ReinerCase #HiddenKillers

Nick Reiner pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder with special circumstances in connection with the stabbing deaths of his parents. He remains held without bail, capital punishment has not been ruled out, and his siblings have formally distanced themselves from his defense. This look back examines both the procedural posture of the case and the family dynamics surrounding it.The not guilty plea preserves the defense's options while evaluation continues — potentially a legal insanity claim, a diminished-capacity argument addressing premeditation and the degree of the offense, or a competency determination. The high-profile attorney initially retained withdrew early in the proceedings, and representation passed to the county public defender's office. Reporting indicates the siblings do not intend to participate in the trial, and that the defendant's contact in custody has been limited largely to counsel.The segment situates the siblings' decision within a documented history of long-term intervention — repeated treatment, a prior conservatorship, and recurring crises — and then examines comparable cases for context. It references Peter Lanza's public estrangement from his son following the Sandy Hook attack, the Roof family's withdrawal from public life after the Charleston church murders, and Kerri Rawson's account of reconciling her father's identity as the BTK offender. Throughout, the analysis treats these as illustrative parallels rather than equivalencies, and distinguishes confirmed reporting from family statements and single-source accounts.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #JakeRomyReiner #TrueCrime #FamilyEstrangement #PeterLanza #KerriRawson #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers

Nick Reiner pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder with special circumstances in the stabbing deaths of his parents. He's held without bail, the harshest penalty remains on the table — and his siblings, Jake and Romy, are done. Sources close to the family put it bluntly: Nick's defense is Nick's defense, and they're not part of it.This look back examines where the case stood at the time of our reporting, then turns to the harder human question underneath it. The high-profile attorney the family initially funded withdrew early on, leaving Nick with a public defender. Reports indicate his siblings won't attend the trial, and that in months of incarceration his only visitor has been his lawyer. After years of treatment programs, a conservatorship, repeated crises, and a lifetime of absorbing the fallout, two siblings reached the point where holding on was no longer possible.To understand that moment, this segment looks at three other families who arrived there before them: Peter Lanza, who stepped away from his son and later said he wished he'd never been born; the family who largely withdrew from public view after the Charleston church murders; and Kerri Rawson, who had to grieve her father, the man known as BTK, as two separate people — the dad she loved and the killer he hid.The question this segment asks isn't whether the Reiner siblings made the right call. It's what it cost them to stay as long as they did — and what the families who finally let go can teach the rest of us.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #JakeRomyReiner #TrueCrime #FamilyTragedy #Boundaries #PeterLanza #KerriRawson #HiddenKillers

In months behind bars, sources say Nick Reiner has had exactly one visitor: his attorney. His siblings, Jake and Romy, have stepped away completely — not funding his defense, reportedly not planning to attend his trial. This segment digs into both the legal strategy ahead and the behavioral reality of a family that finally reached its limit.We start with the mechanics. The not guilty plea kept every option open — a possible insanity defense, a diminished-capacity argument aimed at reducing the charge, or a competency challenge. This look back walks through what each path would require and where things stood at the time of our reporting. Then we turn to the people who stepped back: after years of treatment, a conservatorship, and repeated crises at the family home, two siblings decided they could no longer hold on.To make sense of that, we examine three families who faced the same impossible decision. Peter Lanza, who cut contact with his son and later spoke about wishing he'd never been born. The relatives who went largely silent after the Charleston church killings. And Kerri Rawson, whose father lived a double life as the BTK killer, forcing her to grieve two versions of the same man.This is a segment about the psychology of letting go — when love stops being a lifeline and becomes a liability, and what it does to the people who carry that decision for the rest of their lives.#NickReiner #RobReiner #JakeRomyReiner #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #Boundaries #PeterLanza #KerriRawson #FamilyTragedy #HiddenKillers

 "If you really loved me, you wouldn't give up on me." It's the sentence that keeps people in burning buildings — the thing said right before one more chance is requested. This segment uses the Reiner tragedy to examine why love, presence, and devotion sometimes don't change a trajectory at all. They just keep you standing in its path.Rob and Michele Reiner never walked away from their son. Repeated treatment programs. Facilities reportedly costing tens of thousands a month. A guesthouse on their property. A film they made together about recovery. Seventeen years of trying, funding, and hoping. They never stopped — and they died anyway. Their love didn't fix him. Their proximity didn't protect them.This look back goes deep on the behavioral machinery underneath that outcome. We're taught that love means staying and that walking away is abandonment — but unconditional love isn't the same as unconditional proximity. Nick was reportedly told that refusing treatment meant losing the safety net. The boundary never held. Every line got redrawn.We break down the three traps that keep people in place: guilt weaponization, sunk cost, and the fantasy of the final save — the fear that you'll leave right before they were about to change. Rob reportedly brought his adult son to a party because he was afraid to leave him alone. This segment makes a hard, compassionate argument: you're allowed to step back, not because you don't love someone, but because you were never the thing that could save them.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrime #Boundaries #Enabling #AddictionFamily #LovingSomeoneDangerous #HiddenKillers

Alan Jackson — the high-profile defense attorney who secured an acquittal for Karen Read — abruptly withdrew from Nick Reiner's double-murder case, telling the court his team had no choice but to step aside. Nick was left with a deputy public defender he had spoken to for roughly thirty seconds. The reasons, and what the change signals, are the focus of this segment.Jackson stated he was legally and ethically prohibited from explaining his withdrawal, attributing it to circumstances beyond his and his client's control. Outside legal observers speculated that cost was the likely driver, given how quickly Jackson had been retained; Jackson himself, however, publicly disputed any suggestion that a fee or retainer issue was involved. Deputy Public Defender Kimberly Greene, a veteran of the county office, assumed representation, and the arraignment was reset. Nick remained in custody without bail.This look back examines where the matter stood at the time of our reporting and considers the broader implications. Reporting and sources have long described a family that funded extensive treatment and support for their son over many years; this segment weighs commentary suggesting that, with the change in counsel, the resources that once surrounded him may no longer be available in the same way. It also addresses the prosecution's stated confidence in securing a conviction, and the procedural road ahead. Throughout, the analysis distinguishes between what has been confirmed on the record and what remains speculation.#NickReiner #RobReiner #AlanJackson #MicheleReiner #PublicDefender #TrueCrime #KimberlyGreene #ReinerCase #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers

For years, the Reiner family publicly pushed back on the professionals treating their son — at one point even siding with Nick over the counselors who warned that he was lying and manipulating them. This segment makes the case that the experts may have been right, and that the tragedy wasn't a system that failed so much as a patient who allegedly wouldn't let it work.Nick Reiner had elite care: a facility reportedly costing tens of thousands a month, doctors managing his schizophrenia, and a family that never stopped trying. Sources say his medication was changed in the weeks before the killings — but medication only helps if it's taken, and sobriety only holds if it's maintained. Sources also describe his drug use worsening his condition to the point he was, in their words, not in his right mind.This look back examines where the case stood at the time of our reporting and weighs a difficult argument: that an insanity defense, which sources expect, doesn't erase the long chain of choices that came before. It's an opinion-driven segment about accountability and the limits of what love and money can buy. The Reiners gave their son everything the system had to offer. The question this segment puts on the table is whether the failure was the system's — or his.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleReiner #TrueCrime #Accountability #MentalHealth #Addiction #InsanityDefense #ReinerCase #HiddenKillers

Sources say Nick Reiner's defense is heading toward insanity. This segment digs into the behavioral question underneath that strategy: how much of what happened was illness he couldn't control, and how much was a pattern of choices stretching back nearly two decades?Nick had every clinical advantage — a facility reportedly costing tens of thousands of dollars a month, doctors managing a serious diagnosis, and parents who never disengaged. Sources say his medication was changed shortly before his parents died, and that his drug use was actively worsening his condition. We walk through what that combination means for the central question of intent and responsibility, and why the answer is so hard to pin down when serious mental illness and ongoing substance use are layered on top of each other.This look back examines where things stood at the time of our reporting and takes an honest, opinion-driven position: that an insanity claim, if it comes, has to contend with a long history of behavior that preceded that night. It's the most contested space in the whole case — the place where compassion for someone clearly unwell collides with accountability for what was allegedly done. We don't flatten it into a slogan. We sit in the difficulty of it.#NickReiner #RobReiner #InsanityDefense #BehavioralAnalysis #MentalHealth #Addiction #TrueCrime #Accountability #ReinerCase #HiddenKillers

The Reiners had everything that's supposed to protect a family: money, connections, access to the best mental health and addiction care in the country. Their son struggled for seventeen years, and they threw all of it at the problem. None of it worked. Understanding why is the key to this entire case.This look back goes deep on the behavioral and systemic pattern beneath the headlines. Nick Reiner started treatment as a teenager — first program at 15, seventeen by 19, periods of homelessness across multiple states, and eventually a year under a mental health conservatorship. His parents followed every protocol the system laid out. And at one point, warned by counselors that their son was manipulating them, they chose to believe him instead.We examine where things stood at the time of our reporting and the larger question clinicians and families keep colliding with: when someone is both seriously ill and using their autonomy to harm themselves and others, what can anyone actually do? In America, the legal threshold to compel care is narrow and hard to meet, which means families are often left managing danger with no training and no authority. The deinstitutionalization era emptied the hospitals; what replaced them, in many places, was the county jail. The Reiners lived inside that gap for nearly twenty years — and it's the same gap thousands of families are trapped in right now.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MentalHealthCrisis #Conservatorship #Addiction #Deinstitutionalization #TrueCrime #FamiliesInCrisis #MentalHealthReform #HiddenKillers

The not guilty plea entered on Nick Reiner's behalf is one of the most misunderstood moments in this case. Charged with two counts of first-degree murder with a multiple-murder special circumstance in the stabbing deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, he faces a prosecution that has not ruled out seeking the ultimate penalty.Under California procedure, a not guilty plea preserves every defense option while psychiatric evaluation continues. The defense can later pursue legal insanity under the established standard, argue diminished capacity to challenge premeditation and reduce the degree of the offense, or raise the question of competency to proceed. Each carries different evidentiary burdens and different consequences — and the defendant's documented diagnosis and recent medication change are central to all three.This retrospective lays out where the matter stood at the time of our reporting: the procedural posture, the competing legal theories, and the analysis from those who've tried cases like it. It also examines the position of the surviving family members, who hold formal standing as next of kin while simultaneously being related to the accused — a rare and legally complex circumstance. Reporting indicates the siblings have stated their opposition to capital punishment, though prosecutors retain discretion over that decision.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #FirstDegreeMurder #SpecialCircumstances #CompetencyToStandTrial #TrueCrime #Parricide #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers

When Nick Reiner's public defender entered a not guilty plea to two counts of first-degree murder, it sounded like a denial. It wasn't. Under California law, that plea is a strategic placeholder — and understanding why reveals exactly where this case is headed.He's charged in the stabbing deaths of his parents, director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, with a special-circumstance allegation that makes the case eligible for the ultimate penalty. But the defense is sitting on a documented history: a schizophrenia diagnosis, a years-long conservatorship, and a medication change made roughly a month before the killings. That history points to three possible roads — and each one leads somewhere very different.This retrospective breaks down where things stood at the time of our reporting: the legal mechanics behind the plea, what the experts said about each defense path, and why the strongest one may not be the one the headlines assumed. Then we turn to the family. Jake, Romy, and Tracy Reiner aren't just grieving — they're victims, mourners, and the family of the accused, all at once. Romy is the one who found their father.Sources say the siblings have severed contact entirely. Sources also say they're opposing the harshest possible outcome for the brother they've cut off — a decision that says everything about what they're carrying.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #ReinerSiblings #NotGuilty #DiminishedActuality #TrueCrime #Parricide #FamilyTragedy #HiddenKillers

Nick Reiner sat behind glass and let his public defender enter the plea for him: not guilty to killing his parents. But the real story isn't the plea — it's the documented psychiatric history sitting underneath it, and what it could mean when this case reaches a jury.He was diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. He spent a year under a mental health conservatorship. And roughly a month before his parents were found stabbed in their Brentwood home, his medication was changed. We walk through what those facts could support: a full insanity defense, a diminished-capacity argument aimed at reducing the charge, or a competency challenge that could stall the case for years.This look back examines where the case stood at the time of our reporting — the behavioral and clinical questions the legal system is least equipped to answer. When does serious mental illness change what someone is responsible for? And what do we owe a person who refuses help, versus the people they leave behind?Because there are people left behind. Jake, Romy, and Tracy Reiner lost both parents in a single day and inherited a role with no name — mourner, victim, and family of the accused at once. Sources say they've cut their brother off, and still don't want to see him face the harshest penalty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #Schizophrenia #InsanityDefense #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #Parricide #MentalHealth #HiddenKillers

Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take on listener questions across three of the biggest cases in true crime right now: the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping, the Nick Reiner murder charges, and the Alex Murdaugh retrial. One full-length panel discussion covering the details nobody's giving a straight answer on.The Guthrie sheriff told local radio he thinks the FBI arrested people for fake ransom notes — he's not sure. The Reiner case has two popular theories and both have fatal holes. The Murdaugh defense is betting on DNA evidence the state collected and never fully analyzed. In each case, the audience has already decided. In each case, they may have decided too fast.Robin brings decades of FBI behavioral analysis to the discussion. Tony brings the listener questions that cut to the bone. Together they challenge the lazy reads and push into the territory the comments are avoiding. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #NickReiner #NancyGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MurdaughRetrial #HarveyLevin #TrustFund #TrueCrimePanel

Three cases the audience has been fighting about. Three details nobody's giving a straight answer on. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke cover them all in one full-length discussion — Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Alex Murdaugh — and challenge the conclusions the comments have already reached.The Guthrie sheriff only “thinks” the FBI arrested people for fake notes — he doesn't know. The Reiner case has split listeners between mental illness and money, and both explanations have holes. The Murdaugh defense is staking the retrial on unknown male DNA under Maggie's fingernails that SLED collected and shelved. Robin brings decades of behavioral analysis to each one.This is the full, uncut panel. Every listener question. Every competing theory. And the reason the easy answers aren't answers at all. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #NickReiner #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MurdaughRetrial #HarveyLevin #TrustFund #TrueCrimePanel

Full-length panel discussion: Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke cover Nancy Guthrie, Nick Reiner, and Alex Murdaugh in one uncut session. They take listener questions across all three cases and push back on the reads the audience has already settled on.In Guthrie, the sheriff says arrests were made for fake notes — but isn't sure, raising questions about how disconnected the agencies are. In Reiner, neither the illness explanation nor the inheritance theory holds up alone. In Murdaugh, untested DNA under Maggie's fingernails is now the centerpiece of the retrial — but does it actually move the needle when his voice already puts him at the scene?Three cases, three easy answers that fall apart under pressure. Robin and Tony dig into what the audience is missing. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #NickReiner #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MurdaughRetrial #HarveyLevin #TrustFund #TrueCrimePanel

Nick Reiner is charged with two counts of first-degree murder in the stabbing deaths of his parents, director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. He has pleaded not guilty. The audience has already reached two competing verdicts of their own: he was psychotic, or he wanted the money.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke challenge both in this discussion. The trust fund motive falls apart when you learn the money was set to pay out on his birthdays regardless — and that he reportedly never claimed what was already his. The mental illness explanation hits the same wall: millions of people carry the same diagnosis and never do this.The conversation digs into the audience's hardest questions. What does it mean when he files a demand from jail for his parents' money to fund his defense? What happened inside the family when his siblings agreed to pay for his lawyer and then reversed course? And is the clean narrative — his father finally said no, and that “no” set him off — too satisfying to be true? A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #Brentwood #MicheleSingerReiner #MentalHealth #TrustFund #JusticeForRob

Nick Reiner has been charged with stabbing his parents, director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, to death in their Brentwood home. He has pleaded not guilty. And from his jail cell, he has filed a petition demanding over a million dollars from the trust his murdered parents established — money he says he needs to hire private defense counsel.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke sit down to take apart the listener questions driving the debate. The audience is split between two explanations: severe mental illness or cold entitlement. Robin challenges both. The trust money was set to pay out regardless. Nick reportedly never claimed what he was already owed. The schizophrenia diagnosis doesn't explain why millions of others with the same illness never do this.The discussion digs into the details that don't fit either camp: his reported belief that he's a conspiracy target, his surviving siblings reversing their decision to fund his defense, the argument with his father the night before, and whether one rejection from a lifetime of indulgence actually carries the weight people are putting on it. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #Brentwood #MicheleSingerReiner #MentalHealth #TrustFund #JusticeForRob

From a jail cell, Nick Reiner has filed a court petition demanding money from the trust his murdered parents established. Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner were found stabbed to death in their Brentwood home. Their son, charged with killing them, now wants their money to defend himself against the charge.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke work through the listener questions that have split the audience. Half say the schizophrenia diagnosis closes it. Half say it's pure entitlement. Robin says neither holds up on its own — because the money motive collapses when you learn he never claimed what he was owed, and the illness theory doesn't explain why this man, this house, this night.Nick's surviving siblings first agreed to fund his defense, then pulled the money. His father reportedly cut him off after years of indulgence. He reportedly believes he's the target of a conspiracy. Tony and Robin confront whether the audience's split between “sick” and “entitled” is a false choice — and what they're missing by treating it as either-or. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #Brentwood #MicheleSingerReiner #MentalHealth #TrustFund #JusticeForRob

A 136-page probate petition filed on behalf of Nick Reiner in Los Angeles County establishes a timeline that has drawn significant legal scrutiny. The filing identifies the beneficiary's thirtieth birthday — September 14, 2023 — as the date on which a distribution of reportedly more than $750,000 became due under trust terms characterized as “mandatory and unconditional.” The trust settlors, Rob and Michele Reiner, were found dead in their Brentwood residence approximately twenty-seven months later. The petition alleges no distribution was ever made.The incoming trustee, Jodi Montgomery — a licensed professional fiduciary previously appointed to manage Britney Spears' conservatorship — has reportedly requested a meeting with the beneficiary in custody. Defense counsel Alan Jackson's firm has filed a declaration indicating readiness to resume representation upon the release of trust funds.Nick Reiner has pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder. The interplay between California's slayer statute and a distribution obligation that allegedly predated the deaths presents a question of first impression.A look back at the most compelling stories of the week.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #AlanJackson #JodiMontgomery #TrueCrime #SlayerStatute

Rob and Michele Reiner built a trust for their son when he was a baby. They wrote the terms. They chose the language — “mandatory and unconditional.” Half at thirty, the rest at thirty-five. No conditions. No discretion. No off switch. Nick turned thirty in September 2023. The money reportedly never came. Twenty-seven months later, his parents were dead.The 136-page probate petition his lawyers filed reads less like a trust dispute and more like a motive timeline. The new trustee, Jodi Montgomery — known nationally for the Britney Spears conservatorship — has reportedly requested a meeting with Nick in custody. Alan Jackson's defense firm has filed a declaration stating they will return the moment the trust money is released.California's slayer statute is supposed to prevent a killer from profiting off the killing — but the age-thirty distribution was allegedly owed before anyone was killed. The legal question is whether a statute designed to block profit from a crime can reach an obligation that predated the crime. Nick has pleaded not guilty to both counts of murder.A look back at the most compelling stories of the week.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #HiddenKillers #AlanJackson #JodiMontgomery #TrueCrime #SlayerStatute

Nick Reiner's defense team filed a 136-page probate petition demanding the release of more than $1.5 million from a trust his parents created when he was born. The petition lays out a date — September 14, 2023, Nick's thirtieth birthday. A dollar amount — reportedly more than $750,000 owed on that date alone. And two people who controlled the money and ended up dead twenty-seven months later. Nobody on the defense side intended to create a motive timeline. But that's exactly what the filing reads like.The trust language reportedly says “mandatory and unconditional.” No discretion. No conditions. The new trustee, Jodi Montgomery, has reportedly requested to visit Nick in jail. Alan Jackson's firm declared they're ready to come back the moment the check clears. And the question nobody has answered is why Rob and Michele Reiner never paid their son the money their own document said he was owed.Nick has pleaded not guilty. Under the presumption of innocence, the petition argues the money is lawfully his until a jury decides otherwise.A look back at the most compelling stories of the week.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #HiddenKillersLive #AlanJackson #JodiMontgomery #TrueCrime #SlayerStatute

Garrett Morris' eggplant goes viral, Eli Zaret stops by as Dusty May leaves Michigan for the NBA, RIP Clive Davis, Carlos Mencia arrested for tax fraud, Corey Feldman's new song, Richie Sambora drunk tweets, Meghan Markle's manic speech, and everyone hates Al Roker. Drew still hasn't caught has World Cup fever. The US plays a bunch of Turkeys on Thursday. Lionel Messi is pretty good at soccer. Keith Stironek & Deena Centofanti are in our thoughts. Amy Andrews is in our thoughts. Eli Zaret joins the show as Dusty May bails on Michigan for the NBA, Dave Portnoy's thought on the departure, everybody quits on MSU, the Detroit Tigers at a pivotal point in the season, Jahmai Jones sucks at baseball, AJ Hinch sucks at managing baseball, baseball vs nuts part 1, baseball vs nuts part 2, Eli vs gambling part 3,000, update us on some golf nonsense with the US Open, King Charles' horse sucks, UFC Freedom 250 reactions and more. Other Sports: 2-time Super Bowl champ, Mike Pennel, straight up killed a bitch in 2021. Geno Smith is bad at football and bad at being a boyfriend too. Trudi has a lawn of skank. BranDon got a tick and grosses out the room. Comedian Carlos Mencia "forgot" to pay taxes for 5 years. Oops. He's been charged with tax evasion. Joe Rogan wears really stupid ties. Stephen Colbert cost CBS some money on his way out the door. RIP Clive Davis. He didn't get to have a gay young adulthood ... so he lived a wild homo life in his old age. RIP Alan Greenspan. Boring! Rod Stewart is old and needs oxygen on stage. Richie Sambora has a problem Tweeting while drunk. Drew consumes W.A.S.P. content. Olivia Wilde is a BEAST. Corey Feldman has a sweet new track. We check out the making of a Feldman tune. Corey's health has improved since last week. Former SNL cast member, Garrett Morris, shows off his monster dong in a pic with Taraji P. Henson. Nick Reiner is going to sell a book to fund his lawyers. John Hinckley Jr. hopped on Megyn Kelly's podcast. Robert Romanus (Mike Damone) is making the podcast rounds. We learn of a new film with Damone in it. Marc details Dead Man's Wire available now on Netflix. The boring National Archives are going on tour and coming to Detroit. Gorillaz are coming to LCA on October 7. Markleverse: Harry and Meghan are going to get royal treatment again. The couple is likely the reason the Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth died. We watch Markle butcher a speech while introducing Harry at some boring Invictus event. You are still not allowed to see their brat's faces. They are going broke fast. GMA kisses their non-royal asses. Britney Spears continues to her post crazy on Instagram. Jasleen Singh is the worst person ever and destroyed her husband's career. Rosie O'Donnell headlines the replacement hosts for Jimmy Kimmel this summer. She finally saw her loser daughter in jail. Billy Bush HATES Al Roker. Megyn Kelly HATES Al Roker. Al once pooped his pants at the White House. Merch, yo. Check it. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley, BranDon, and Roberto).

Nick Reiner argument Conan O'Brien party — multiple sources reported that Nick and Rob Reiner got into a heated, loud confrontation at a Christmas gathering the night before Rob and Michele were found dead. The argument was reportedly intense enough that Rob and Michele left. Nobody has publicly reported what the fight was about. This episode puts that blank next to everything else we know and asks what fills it.Months of reporting have painted a picture of what was reportedly happening around Nick in the weeks before the killings: a trust fund distribution more than two years overdue, a medication switch that sources say left him erratic and dangerous, and substance use that was reportedly back in play. When you line the argument at the party up against those factors — alongside a lifetime of reported resentment and a $1.5 million entitlement his parents were reportedly withholding — the motive theory builds itself.Tony breaks down whether $1.5 million explains what allegedly happened in Brentwood, why the counterargument that Nick could have sued instead of allegedly killing actually proves the point, and the legal paradox that could let Nick's defense strategy protect the very money that may have been at the center of everything.Nick Reiner has pleaded not guilty. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #ConanOBrien #MurderMotive #BrentwoodMurders #TrustFund #TrueCrime #ReinerCase

Nick Reiner $1.5 million trust — the trust terms reportedly said mandatory. The parents reportedly said no. Twenty-seven months later, Rob and Michele Reiner were found stabbed to death in their own home and their son was arrested the same night. Nobody in law enforcement has publicly connected those two facts. This episode does.Nick's own probate filing created the timeline prosecutors haven't released: a distribution due in September 2023, parents who controlled the trust and chose not to pay, a man living in their guesthouse with a reported psychiatric diagnosis and substance issues, and a medication change weeks before the killings that sources say destroyed whatever stability he had left. The petition was meant to argue Nick deserves his money now. It may have argued something much bigger.Tony walks through the motive theory point by point — why the anger reportedly predated the money by years, why a broken brain doesn't file lawsuits, why twenty-seven months of delay is evidence of fuse length rather than evidence against motive, and why the insanity defense his former attorney was reportedly building is the only strategy that fights the murder charge and potentially protects the trust fund at the same time.All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #MurderMotive #BrentwoodMurders #SlayerStatute #TrueCrime #ProbatePetition

The question at the center of the Reiner trust litigation is not whether Nick Reiner should receive his parents' money. It is whether the legal mechanism designed to prevent exactly that — California's slayer statute — can reach money the trust itself reportedly classified as due before anyone was killed. The 136-page probate petition filed on Nick Reiner's behalf argues that half of his trust distribution came due on September 14th, 2023, his thirtieth birthday, in a payout the trust describes as “mandatory and unconditional.” Rob and Michele Reiner were found dead in their Brentwood home twenty-seven months later. Nick has pleaded not guilty to both murder counts.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the slayer statute's actual mechanics against this timeline. Under California's probate code, a court can apply the statute on a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard — a civil threshold that does not require a criminal conviction. That standard stripped Scott Peterson of his claim to Laci's life insurance before his murder trial concluded. But the statute is built to prevent a killer from gaining through the killing. If the age-thirty distribution was already owed before the deaths, the legal question shifts: can a statute designed to block profit from a crime reach an obligation that predated the crime?Faddis addresses the procedural posture — an unopposed petition reportedly eligible for approval without a hearing — the trustee transition from Paul Kanin to Jodi Montgomery, the frozen family trusts, and whether Jake and Romy Reiner have standing to intervene. He also covers the Murdaugh retrial's newly appointed judge and the significance of her reported professional history with defense counsel.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #SlayerStatute #TrustFund #EricFaddis #MicheleReiner #ScottPeterson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The language in Nick Reiner's trust reportedly leaves no room for interpretation. Half of the fund was due on his thirtieth birthday. The trust itself calls it “mandatory and unconditional.” That birthday was September 14th, 2023 — more than two years before Rob and Michele Reiner were killed. Nick has pleaded not guilty to both counts of murder. And the money his parents' own trust document said he was owed has never been paid.Everyone citing California's slayer statute assumes it settles this. It doesn't — not the way most people think. Eric Faddis explains the two critical distinctions: a probate judge can strip a beneficiary on a “more likely than not” finding without waiting for a criminal conviction — the same mechanism that took Scott Peterson's claim to Laci's life insurance. But a rule designed to prevent someone from profiting through a killing may never reach money that allegedly belonged to Nick before anyone died. The age-thirty distribution is not an inheritance. It's an overdue obligation.Faddis maps every pot of money in play: the overdue age-thirty payout where the law reportedly leans somewhere most people won't like, the age-thirty-five money Nick wants released early, and the larger Reiner family trusts reportedly frozen until a verdict. He explains what the incoming trustee Jodi Montgomery — known for managing Britney Spears' conservatorship — can and cannot do, and gives his six-month prediction on where each dollar lands. The episode also covers Alex Murdaugh's retrial and the reported history between the newly assigned judge and the defense attorney.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EricFaddis #SlayerStatute #ScottPeterson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Alan Jackson walked away from the Nick Reiner murder defense when the money collapsed. His firm has now filed a declaration in a Los Angeles probate case stating they are “ready, willing, and able” to return — the moment more than $1.5 million is released from the trust Rob and Michele Reiner built for their son as a baby. The loyalty of the most high-profile defense attorney this case has seen is, by his own filing, conditional on the check clearing.Eric Faddis has been a felony prosecutor and a criminal defense attorney. He understands exactly what Jackson's declaration means inside the legal fight and what it signals to the court about how this money will be spent. The 136-page probate petition argues the trust's language is unambiguous: half was due on Nick's thirtieth birthday, twenty-seven months before his parents were killed. The petition calls the distribution “mandatory and unconditional.” Nick has pleaded not guilty. Under the presumption of innocence, the petition argues, the money is lawfully his until a jury decides otherwise.Faddis takes both sides apart. The trustee who reportedly questioned Nick's judgment before stepping down. Jodi Montgomery — who managed Britney Spears' conservatorship — stepping in as the new fiduciary and reportedly requesting to visit Nick in jail. The slayer statute's real mechanics versus the version the public assumes. And the scenario that haunts the Reiner family: the money released, spent on defense, and then a conviction — with no path to claw it back. The conversation also covers the Murdaugh retrial's newly assigned judge and the questions her reported history with defense counsel raises.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #ReinerCase #AlanJackson #TrustFund #EricFaddis #JodiMontgomery #SlayerStatute #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

A probate petition filed in Los Angeles County has brought the Nick Reiner murder case into a second courtroom — one where the rules are different and the stakes may be just as high. Nick Reiner, who has pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner, is petitioning for the release of more than $1.5 million held in an individual trust his parents established at his birth in 1993.The filing rests on the trust's own distribution terms, which the petition characterizes as “mandatory and unconditional”: half payable when the beneficiary turned thirty, the balance at thirty-five. Reiner reached the first distribution threshold more than two years prior to his parents' deaths. According to the petition, no funds were distributed. His legal team argues that the money has been owed since that birthday and that withholding it from someone who has not been convicted of any crime constitutes a violation of both the trust's terms and the presumption of innocence.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis conducts a full examination of both the petition's merits and the opposition's tools. On the merits: the enforceability of mandatory distribution language, the relevance of the two-year pre-existing withholding, and the reported procedural pathway in which an unopposed petition may be granted without hearing. On the opposition: the resignation of prior trustee Paul Kanin and his stated concerns about Reiner's capacity, the succession of Jodi Montgomery as fiduciary, the operation of California's slayer statute prior to conviction, the freeze reportedly applied to the larger Reiner family trusts, and the recoverability question that underpins the entire dispute — what happens to funds spent on a defense that ends in a guilty verdict.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #EricFaddis #SlayerStatute #TrueCrime #ProbateCourt #JakeReiner #ReinerCase

A 136-page petition now sitting in a Los Angeles probate court makes one of the most uncomfortable legal arguments in recent memory: Nick Reiner, charged with killing both his parents, says the trust they created for him when he was born owes him more than $1.5 million — and he wants it to mount his defense against their murders.The case turns on four words inside the trust itself: “mandatory and unconditional.” According to the filing, Rob and Michele Reiner locked in the distribution schedule with language that left no room for a trustee's discretion. Half at thirty. The rest at thirty-five. Nick turned thirty more than two years before the killings, and the petition says the money was never distributed. His lawyers argue it was owed regardless of what happened after — and that withholding it from a man who has pleaded not guilty amounts to punishment before a verdict.Eric Faddis has prosecuted and defended cases built on exactly this kind of intersection between trust law and criminal exposure. He traces the fight from the trust language through every available countermove: the departing trustee who cited doubts about Nick's “capacity to make sound decisions” before walking away, the role of California's slayer statute before any conviction is on the table, the freeze reportedly already imposed on the larger Reiner family trusts, and the formal opposition that Jake and Romy Reiner can file to block their brother's petition.Faddis also examines the new trustee stepping in: Jodi Montgomery, formerly Britney Spears' court-appointed conservator, whose team has reportedly requested a meeting with Nick in custody. And he closes on the question framing everything: if the money is released, spent on attorney Alan Jackson's defense, and a conviction follows — can the family recover a single dollar?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #MicheleReiner #ReinerTrust #TrueCrime #SlayerStatute #JodiMontgomery #ReinerCase

Nick Reiner trust payout — his trust reportedly had no clause to stop a distribution after a murder charge. Does your family's trust have one? Most don't.The probate petition filed in the Nick Reiner case exposes something that goes well beyond one family. The trust Rob and Michele Reiner established for their son in 1993 allegedly used the most common settings in estate planning — mandatory distributions at fixed ages, no behavioral conditions, no trustee discretion to withhold. Those default settings are the reason Nick Reiner's legal team can now argue that more than $1.5 million was his before anyone died, and that neither the trustee nor the slayer statute can take it back.According to reporting, the trustee is now preparing to ask a judge to release the funds. A hearing is reportedly on the calendar for August. High-profile defense attorney Alan Jackson has filed a declaration saying he stands ready to return to the case if the money comes through.This is not an episode about the Reiner case alone. It's about the document sitting in your filing cabinet right now. The trust your attorney drafted when your kids were small. The one you haven't opened since you signed it.Three provisions — an indictment freeze, a discretionary trust structure, and a behavioral trigger — are available to any family working with an estate attorney. They don't require predicting violence. They exist for the situations families actually deal with: addiction, instability, irresponsibility. The fact that they also protect against the unimaginable is the entire point.The Reiners reportedly had none of them. Most families don't. This episode walks through all three and explains exactly how each one would have changed the outcome in the Reiner case. Nick Reiner is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EstatePlanning #SlayerStatute #FamilyTrust #NickReinerUpdate #TrueCrime

Nick Reiner case — a trust document written for an infant in 1993 is now reportedly the reason a judge may release more than $1.5 million in the middle of a murder case. And nobody updated it for thirty-two years.Rob and Michele Reiner allegedly created individual trusts for each of their children, funded separately from the larger family estate. The terms for Nick's trust reportedly required mandatory payouts at age thirty and thirty-five — fixed dates, no discretion, no conditions attached. When Nick turned thirty in September 2023, over two years before the alleged murders, the first half was apparently due. According to the petition, it was never released, and no one has explained why. Now his legal team argues the money was already his — and the trustee reportedly agrees.The slayer statute is supposed to prevent killers from profiting off their crimes. But it requires a conviction or a civil finding to activate. In the window between arrest and verdict, the trust document is the only protection. And this trust reportedly had no protection at all.This episode breaks down what should have been in the document. Three provisions — an indictment freeze that locks distributions the moment charges are filed, a discretionary structure that removes automatic payouts, and behavioral triggers that condition distributions on sobriety and stability — each exist in trusts across the country. They're standard tools for families facing addiction and instability. Any one of them would have blocked this petition at the door.The Reiners did what most families do. They set up a trust, picked reasonable ages, and moved on. This isn't about blame. It's about what every family with a trust needs to know. Nick Reiner is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EstatePlanning #ProbateCourt #TrueCrimeCommunity #CaliforniaLaw #ReinerCase

On paper, Nick Reiner is the sole beneficiary of a trust worth more than $1.5 million. In reality, the newest filing in the Nick Reiner trust fund fight says he petitioned a judge partly so he can buy socks. This one starts with the smallest number in the file — the $300 cap on a jail commissary account at Twin Towers that, per the petition, was promised funding and never received a single deposit — and climbs all the way up to the biggest battle in this case outside the murder charges themselves.The petition accuses the trustee of offering “a shifting series of excuses and justifications” for withholding a payout the trust calls mandatory and unconditional. First he reportedly couldn't access the accounts. Then came “concerns” about Nick's competence — without a court order or a doctor's finding behind them. Then the shadow of California's slayer statute. Meanwhile, the filing claims, the consultant brought in to evaluate Nick is being paid presumably out of Nick's own funds — the fight over the money is literally being billed to the money.We break down everything he's actually asking for — the overdue age-30 distribution plus every dollar of interest since 2023, the age-35 money released early, damages from the trustee for breach of trust — and we're honest about which of those asks the law actually supports. Where it leans his way will surprise you. Where it doesn't might surprise you more. And through all of it, one image refuses to leave: a man staring down possible capital charges, heir on paper to Hollywood money, asking a court for hygiene products. True Crime Today follows the file — even when it goes somewhere nobody's comfortable.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TwinTowers #JailCommissary #TrustFund #CourtFiling #TrueCrimeNews #CelebrityCase

Everybody knows the slayer statute, even if they don't know the name — it's the law that kept the Menendez brothers from ever touching their parents' fortune. So when word broke about what happened to Nick Reiner's trust fund — a petition demanding more than a million and a half dollars from a trust his parents built — the internet ruled in one sentence: case closed, he gets nothing. This episode is about why California Probate Code 250 does not work the way most people think it does.Two surprises, and they cut in opposite directions. First, the statute can hit faster than you'd expect: a probate judge doesn't have to wait for a murder conviction. A civil court can strip a beneficiary on a preponderance of the evidence — more likely than not — the same machinery that took Scott Peterson's claim to Laci's life insurance while his criminal appeal was still alive. “Presumed innocent” doesn't bind a probate courtroom. Second, the statute may never reach the heart of this money at all. The slayer rule takes what you'd gain from a death — and according to the petition, half this trust came due on Nick's thirtieth birthday, twenty-seven months before his parents died. You can't lose to that rule what was already yours before anyone was killed.We map all three pots of Reiner money — the frozen family fortune, the age-35 half, the overdue age-30 distribution — and put a verdict on each. Then we sit with the question no statute will ever answer: Rob and Michele were alive for more than two years after that payout came due. Why didn't they make it? Hidden Killers follows the file wherever it leads — and this time, it leads somewhere uncomfortable.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #HiddenKillers #MenendezBrothers #SlayerStatute #MicheleReiner #ProbateCourt #TrueCrimeCommunity #CaliforniaLaw #TrustFund

UFC Freedom 250, Eli Zaret stops by, New York Knicks "fans" celebrate the NBA championship, Emily Ratajkowski needs attention, murderer Chris Watts lover, RIP Gene Shalit, and the worst choke jobs in sports. Eli Zaret drops by as the New York Knicks beat the San Antonio Spurs in the 2026 NBA Finals. Knicks fan reacted accordingly. Victor Wembanyama vs the National Anthem, Donald Trump's birthday battles, Eli declares the Detroit Tigers OVER, the USA wins a soccer game, Dylan Larkin vs Steve Yzerman, Trump vs Stephen A. Smith, Brendan Sorsby's "intervention", Eli's fantastic cocaine idea, and Kevin Love loves marijuana. Drew hates the 1st Amendment. RIP Gene Shalit. Another dude we thought was already dead. We watch his best work. RIP Paul Walker. His daughter goes topless in his honor. We learn that Paul liked 'em young. RIP Melanie Safka... again. Bill Burr continues to drum on his podcast. He's in the Social Network sequel. RIP Larry Fortensky. We miss him. RIP Rob Ford. The new Toronto mayor talks about farts all the time. Michael Jackson's biopic is the highest grossing of all time. Reminder: Michael Jackson was a pedophile. Nick Reiner needs his victim's money right now. The Karmelo Anthony situation won't go away. People aren't being very nice about the verdict. Tiffney Billions makes it all about her. The Anthony parents pop off with little pushback. Jeff Metcalf popped off, but didn't do his family many favors. Mackenzie Shirilla is not a good person or a good driver. George Lopez > George Zimmerman. Alaric Jackson is the latest football player involved in a domestic dispute. Ex-Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Darron Lee has been arrested for murder. RIP James Higginbotham. He was lost in Japan after an argument over ChatGPT and later found dead. RIP Aldon Smith. Marc and family hit up Washington DC last week. He witnessed a crime. Don't act like this in Walmart. More NYC Chaos: This is how New York celebrates championships. Knicks fans sure took it to this school bus. Drew has a list of the worst meltdowns possibly ever in sports. Emily Ratajkowski's brat is destroying her boobs. She stopped putting out for her husband after she pooped out said brat. Chris Watts former mistress is Drew's new crush. She's all Drew's. Shoutout to Trent Bolte. The kid that Tom Brady made out with has graduated high school. Gisele Bundchen, meanwhile, did a photoshoot with W Magazine and looks really mean now. Merch, yo. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley, BranDon, and Roberto).

Save 20% off Honeylove by going to https://honeylove.com/LAWNERD ! #honeylovepod #ad Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at https://www.oneskin.co/LAWNERD #oneskinpod #ad In this episode, Emily provides critical updates on several high-profile legal battles, including a new 1:00 p.m. hearing time for the expansive temporary restraining order in the Bricks & Minifigs v Reckless Ben case. The show also explores Nick Reiner's probate court petition to access a separate trust established in 1993 to fund his criminal defense with attorney Alan Jackson. Additionally, the docket includes an overview of Tyra Banks' 65-page defamation and breach of contract lawsuit against Netflix regarding her portrayal in a recent docuseries, as well as a New York federal court ruling that granted Blake Lively narrow attorney's fees while denying more extensive damages. RESOURCES Bricks & Minifigs v. Reckless Ben Stream - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPD8UXEqMgg  The Queen's Gambit Lawsuit - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veuLh2qlTJ8 Carole Baskin Sues Netflix - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNI86x8JlXE  Buster Murdaugh Sues Netflix - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zan5PlYEeJA Lively v. Wayfarer Case Settled - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZoYl3cF2uA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Nick Reiner case is back in the spotlight as shocking new details emerge about his outrage over his family's inheritance following the brutal double murder of his parents. Investigators and court records paint a troubling picture of escalating demands for money in the weeks surrounding the killings. In this STS true crime breakdown, we examine the latest developments, the inheritance controversy, and the evidence fueling intense public scrutiny. Could financial motive hold the key to understanding what happened in this chilling double homicide case? Support the show & be a part of #STSNation: Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ... VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast Check out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/ Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor Email: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Surviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions. Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories. From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases. Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Megyn Kelly delivers an extensive fact-check of all the lies from Karmelo Anthony's parents after the verdict, the fake racial narrative being pushed by supporters and activists, the family's refusal to show real remorse over Austin Metcalf's murder, and more. Then Jeff Metcalf, Austin Metcalf's father, joins to discuss the racial attacks and harassment his family has faced since the verdict, the disturbing behavior of some Karmelo Anthony supporters, why he wants all people to be part of the solution and not the problem in our culture, the death threats he and his family have faced after the verdict, the false narratives and lies being spread about his son, how his family is doing in this moment, and more. Then Mark Geragos, host of "In The Well," and Arthur Aidala, host of "Arthur Aidala Power Hour," join to discuss why the Karmelo Anthony defense failed to present a viable self-defense argument, the importance of Anthony not testifying in his own defense, the truth about jury selection and whether there was racial bias in this case, the breaking news that Justin Baldoni was ordered to pay Blake Lively's legal fees, the judge dismissing Lively's attempt at punitive damages, Nick Reiner's attempt to access his family trust to pay for his legal defense, the unusual legal questions surrounding this effort when he's on trial for murdering his parents, and more.     Subscribe to MK True Crime to find ALL the shows: Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mk-true-crime/id1829831499 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4o80I2RSC2NvY51TIaKkJW YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MKTrueCrime?sub_confirmation=1 Social: http://mktruecrime.com/   Aidala- https://am970theanswer.com/radioshow/the-arthur-aidala-power-hour Cozy Earth: This Father's Day, visit https://www.CozyEarth.com & Use code MEGYN for up to 20% off Relief Factor: Reclaim your mobility and celebrate your freedom from aches this year by grabbing your $17.76 3-week QuickStart at https://ReliefFactor.com or by calling 800-4-RELIEF. Supersure Insurance: Upgrade your business insurance to a year-round SuperAgency at https://Supersure.com/Megyn Byrna: Go to https://Byrna.com or your local Sportsman's Warehouse today.     Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Henry & Eddie present this week's biggest stories and weirdest news - new Michael Jackson rumors claim he rescued children from Epstein Island, UFO Scientists continue to go missing while hiking, Nick Reiner seeking inheritance funds to pay for defense attorney, the ballad of Looney John Franklin Toon, Meet the 37-Year-Old Woman who posed as 12-Year-Old Autistic Child To Con Family, Eddie vs. Summer House, Listener E-Mails, and MORE! For Live Shows, Merch, and More Visit: www.LastPodcastOnTheLeft.comKevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Subscribe to SiriusXM Podcasts+ to listen to new episodes of Last Podcast on the Left ad-free, plus get Friday episodes a whole week early. Start a free trial now on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Karmelo Anthony is sentenced to 35 years in prison after a Texas jury convicts him of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet - The MK True Crime Show host Dave Aronberg weighs in. Vice President JD Vance refers Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison to the DOJ after a House Oversight report accuses state officials of ignoring fraud warnings and retaliating against whistleblowers. The U.S. and Iran trade fire after President Trump orders retaliatory strikes over the downing of an American Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz. Nick Reiner, accused of murdering his parents Rob and Michele Reiner, is now fighting for access to his inheritance to help fund his legal defense.   The Wellness Company: Don't let a sudden illness derail your summer—secure your peace of mind and save $45 on a Medical Emergency Kit today by visiting https://UrgentCareKit.com/MK and using promo code MK.   Supersure Insurance: Upgrade your business insurance to a year-round SuperAgency at https://Supersure.com/Megyn Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

New York Knicks games are all the rage and their fans are brutal. Karmelo Anthony verdict and fallout, Nick Reiner nepo-greed, ESPN shakeup, Jim's Picks: Metallica, and we survive power outages on this extremely stormy day. Drew lost power today due to all this crazy weather. Karmelo Anthony has been found guilty of murdering Austin Metcalf (who did NOT die in his twin brother's arms). He got 35 years in the slammer. This event has a lot of people divided. Cardi B still has his back. George Zimmerman is an artist now. Bloop. Aaron Imholte of the Steel Toe Morning Show begs for money every day. NBA Finals: Charles Barkley made a Cardi B joke. Knicks fans are being really mean to Spurs fans. Donald Trump went to Game 3. DJ Khaled spent the game on his cell phone. Other Sports: The Tigers broadcast loves rain delays. The Bears are leaving Chicago.  Nick Reiner wants his inheritance. Sure, he murdered his parents in cold blood, but he really needs their money for a lawyer. Alan Jackson is a good lawyer... when you can afford him. Texas Tech's Brendan Sorsby has been granted an injunction and will play in 2026. More layoffs for ESPN. Pat McAfee is set to get PAID. Jim's Picks: Best Metallica Songs. Drew is not a fan of Tom Rizz or his content. Grandmothers must submit to 1st Amendment rights. Crispin Glover is fighting allegations that he had a 'sex slave'. He's always pretty crazy. Bari Weiss is set to take over everything following the Paramount - Warner Bros. merger. Scott Pelley still looks smug. We might have some merch left. Click here to check what's available. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley, BranDon, and Roberto).

Attorney Alan Jackson is once again speaking out in defense of Nick Reiner, as he faces murder charges for slaying his parents Michele and Rob Reiner. West Wilson drops a MAJOR bombshell in the timeline of his relationship with Amanda Batula. And homeless people speak out about being paid to support Nithya Raman, after her shocking landslide win with mail-in ballots in the LA Mayor Primary. Head to https://www.factormeals.com/nofilter50off and use code nofilter50off to get 50% off and free daily greens per box, with new subscription only, while supplies last until 09/27/2026. (See website for more details). Mornings don't have to take forever. Right now, Merit Beauty is offering our listeners their Signature Makeup Bag with your first order at https://www.meritbeauty.com/ Right now, DripDrop is offering podcast listeners 20% off your first order. Go to https://dripdrop.com/ and use promo code NOFILTERVisit https://www.progressive.com to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies.Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb Disclaimer: The views expressed in this video, on this YouTube Channel, and on No Filter with Zack Peter are for entertainment purposes only. All content is protected under Fair Use Rights.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Nick Reiner wants his inheritance, dammit! Plus, JLo miiight be kind of a cooze and a not-so-surprising break-up. If you're ready to finally sleep great and feel like yourself again, head to bioptimizers.com/rosepricks and use our exclusive code ROSEPRICKS to get 15% off any order.