Podcasts about closing arguments

"He won't take no for an answer," said prosecutor Christy Slavik. She said it over and over during a summation that lasted more than four hours. She argued that the "common purpose" of Combs and his "inner circle" -- his chief of staff, his bodyguards, and some of his assistants -- was to protect him from bad press and law enforcement. And she recounted the dramatic stories told in the courtroom in the past six weeks: Goodfellas-type scenes of alleged bribery, arson, and kidnapping.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blasts the media for downplaying the success of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, accusing reporters of anti-Trump bias and relying on misleading leaks. The Trump administration plans to restrict Congress's access to classified intel. Prosecutors in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial tell jurors the rapper led a criminal enterprise, pointing to drug distribution, arson, and sex trafficking as predicate crimes. Republican consultant Ryan Girdusky gives an exclusive deep dive on 33-year-old Muslim democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, Democrat nominee for NYC mayor. Cozy Earth: Luxury shouldn't be out of reach. Go to https://cozyearth.com/MEGYNfor up to 40% off Cozy Earth's best-selling temperature-regulating sheets, apparel, and more. FYSI: https://FYSI.com/Megyn or call 800-877-4000

In the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, the government reminded jurors of the complex web of witnesses and evidence it has presented over the past month and a half to try to prove racketeering and sex trafficking charges. The defense team will make its closing arguments Friday.  ABC News legal contributors Channa Lloyd and Bernarda Villalona join Brian Buckmire to break down how prosecutors made their case. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Diddy's defense team delivers powerful closing arguments calling the sex‑trafficking charges ‘badly exaggerated' and alleging this is all "driven by financial motives." Defense said this is a story about domestic violence and urged jurors to see Combs' swinger lifestyle as consensual--not criminal. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. In this episode Emmy-award winning host Joel Waldman brings you the best recap and highlights key moments from today's defense closing arguments in Diddy's 2025 trial. Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing serious time in a high-profile sex trafficking and racketeering trial that has captivated national attention. If convicted, Diddy could face decades in prison for allegedly running a criminal enterprise involving sexual exploitation, drug trafficking, and financial coercion. The prosecution has called several bombshell witnesses, including former girlfriend Cassie Ventura's testimony along with ex-bodyguard Roger Bonds, and multiple Jane Does who detailed disturbing allegations of abuse and control. These explosive testimonies have painted a picture of a dark underworld behind Combs' glamorous image. With the stakes this high, the Diddy trial is one of the most watched celebrity legal battles in years, and the verdict could change the hip-hop mogul's life forever.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#diddytrial #diddy #truestory #celebrity #new #criminaljustice #trial #hiphopnews #stsnation

Full Breakdown Of Diddy's Closing Arguments, Will It Be Enough To Save Him In a gripping courtroom finale, Sean "Diddy" Combs's defense team delivered powerful closing arguments, painting a dramatically different picture than what prosecutors had portrayed throughout the high-stakes federal trial. Lead defense attorney Marc Agnifilo passionately characterized the government's case as a "badly exaggerated" and misleading narrative—branding it as a "false trial" born from prosecutorial overreach. Rather than a ruthless criminal kingpin, the jury heard about a self-made entrepreneur, a committed family man, and a generous individual whose success uplifted many others. Highlighting Combs's decades-long record of supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion well ahead of social trends, Agnifilo urged jurors to see beyond sensationalized claims. He carefully pointed out Combs's ongoing support for family and friends, showcasing genuine relationships—even referencing direct financial support for a former partner who attended court proceedings. The defense underscored the difference between moral missteps or personal failings and serious federal crimes, challenging the jury to reject sensationalism and uphold true justice. Will jurors be convinced by the defense's portrayal of Combs as a misunderstood, flawed, yet fundamentally decent man unfairly targeted? Or will the prosecution's allegations prove too compelling to ignore? Join us as we break down every crucial detail of this critical courtroom moment, exploring precisely how the defense team strategically sought to dismantle the narrative of criminal enterprise. This is an essential episode for anyone following this landmark trial, providing deep insights into how high-powered defense tactics unfold in real-time and highlighting what it could mean for celebrity accountability moving forward. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #FederalCourt #CourtroomDrama #DefenseStrategy #MarcAgnifilo #CelebrityJustice #TrueCrimePodcast #HighProfileTrial #LegalAnalysis  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Full Breakdown Of Diddy's Closing Arguments, Will It Be Enough To Save Him In a gripping courtroom finale, Sean "Diddy" Combs's defense team delivered powerful closing arguments, painting a dramatically different picture than what prosecutors had portrayed throughout the high-stakes federal trial. Lead defense attorney Marc Agnifilo passionately characterized the government's case as a "badly exaggerated" and misleading narrative—branding it as a "false trial" born from prosecutorial overreach. Rather than a ruthless criminal kingpin, the jury heard about a self-made entrepreneur, a committed family man, and a generous individual whose success uplifted many others. Highlighting Combs's decades-long record of supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion well ahead of social trends, Agnifilo urged jurors to see beyond sensationalized claims. He carefully pointed out Combs's ongoing support for family and friends, showcasing genuine relationships—even referencing direct financial support for a former partner who attended court proceedings. The defense underscored the difference between moral missteps or personal failings and serious federal crimes, challenging the jury to reject sensationalism and uphold true justice. Will jurors be convinced by the defense's portrayal of Combs as a misunderstood, flawed, yet fundamentally decent man unfairly targeted? Or will the prosecution's allegations prove too compelling to ignore? Join us as we break down every crucial detail of this critical courtroom moment, exploring precisely how the defense team strategically sought to dismantle the narrative of criminal enterprise. This is an essential episode for anyone following this landmark trial, providing deep insights into how high-powered defense tactics unfold in real-time and highlighting what it could mean for celebrity accountability moving forward. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #FederalCourt #CourtroomDrama #DefenseStrategy #MarcAgnifilo #CelebrityJustice #TrueCrimePodcast #HighProfileTrial #LegalAnalysis  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Diddy Closing Arguments: 5 Damning Hours From Prosecution! The federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs has captivated the nation, laying bare unsettling allegations involving racketeering, sex trafficking, coercion, and interstate prostitution. Federal prosecutors argue that the iconic music mogul orchestrated a sinister criminal enterprise, using his fame and wealth to manipulate, coerce, and exploit vulnerable individuals under the guise of extravagant lifestyle parties. Yet, despite presenting graphic video evidence, explicit text messages, financial documents, and emotionally-charged testimonies from alleged victims such as Cassie Ventura, the prosecution surprisingly dropped significant charges—kidnapping and arson—just before closing arguments. This shocking courtroom twist has raised pressing questions about the strength and integrity of their case. Defense attorneys, in an unexpected and risky maneuver, chose not to call any witnesses—not even Sean Combs himself—to rebut the serious accusations. This bold silence raises intriguing legal and psychological questions: Did the defense confidently bet on prosecutorial overreach, or was this strategic silence a desperate attempt to avoid further incrimination? In this compelling video, we dive deep into the trial's most troubling and confusing aspects. We explore psychological dynamics at play, including coercive control, celebrity influence, and juror biases. Expert analysis from legal insiders sheds light on critical courtroom strategies, jury decision-making processes, and the implications of dropped charges on jury deliberations. Whether Diddy walks free or spends life behind bars hinges on jurors interpreting complex laws like RICO and sex trafficking statutes. Viewers will gain a thorough understanding of the intricate interplay between celebrity privilege, legal accountability, and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Don't miss this comprehensive breakdown of one of the most intriguing celebrity trials in recent history, packed with revelations, mysteries, and profound implications for justice and accountability. Stay tuned and subscribe for updates, expert analysis, and real-time developments from the courtroom. Hashtags: #SeanCombs #DiddyTrial #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #CelebrityCrime #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #CourtroomDrama #LegalAnalysis #PsychologyOfCrime Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

"He won't take no for an answer," said prosecutor Christy Slavik. She said it over and over during a summation that lasted more than four hours. She argued that the "common purpose" of Combs and his "inner circle" -- his chief of staff, his bodyguards, and some of his assistants -- was to protect him from bad press and law enforcement. And she recounted the dramatic stories told in the courtroom in the past six weeks: Goodfellas-type scenes of alleged bribery, arson, and kidnapping.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy https://www.nbcnews.com/diddy-on-trial

It was the verdict heard around the world: Karen Read not guilty of the murder of Officer John O'Keefe. Before jurors began deliberating, they heard compelling closing arguments from both sides. This episode of the Court TV Podcast features those closings in full from 6/13/2025, just days before the jury delivered their verdict in the retrial of the century. For more on the case against Karen Read, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

This week, both the prosecution and the defense rested their cases in the trial of rapper Sean 'Diddy' Combs. The government called 34 witnesses to testify during the trial, while the defense called none. Combs faces charges of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, transportation to engage in prostitution, and racketeering conspiracy. Closing arguments begin today. FOX News National Correspondent CB Cotton joins from outside the Manhattan Federal Court to recap the explosive case. Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno If you have a story or topic we should feature on the FOX True Crime Podcast, send us an email at: truecrimepodcast@fox.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The closing arguments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking trial are set to begin on Thursday, with prosecutors poised to argue that he coerced his former girlfriends into participating in sexual acts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Ochelli Effect 6-25-2025 NEWS aEver consider that the timing of the Iran Strikes was meant to avoid Market flux? Also Also, what is the real agenda behind the "12-Day-WAR? PROOF Positive, Conspiracy Theorists need to, "Follow The Money", and keep an eye on the esoteric symbols if they still wish to decode the LIES of the MSM and the Puppet Regime's. The big question we all need to ask among those of us unsatisfied to be sheep on The Orange Jesus pasture or the controlled fully bogus opposition, Is the number of us who don't accept the shadows on the cave wall large enough to bother telling others the images before them are just to keep them busy? Or has everyone's desire for reality been obliterated along with alleged Nuclear Sites in the 12 Day 2 I's WAR that had no significant impact but must be restacked and restocked by the Military Industrial Complex.Big Bombs cost big BUCKS , and you gotta make sure BIG OI doesn't lose out on ripping all the little people off like the TECHNOCRASY, ELON and the many 5 families that run every sector. After all, what's wrong with you? COMMUNIST!---Willing to accept FOOD for LinksorThe World according to HAARP and anyone who figured out HOW 2 sign-up 4 Substack How High does shit stack, and are Substackers High?https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/the-return-of-trump-this-time-itshttps://jessicar.substack.com/p/misc-was-created-when-the-covid-19?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=155546852https://thekennedybeacon.substack.com/p/our-public-health-system-is-broken?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1712557&post_id=155557981https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/will-trump-side-with-the-hardliners?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1377040&post_id=155544182https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/larry-ellison-sells-stargate-ai-driven?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=155534140https://jfkfacts.substack.com/p/ask-not-what-your-country-can-do?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=315632&post_id=155391358https://deanhenderson.substack.com/p/when-the-rothschilds-dial-911-1fe?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1211836&post_id=155461900https://ken9yvonne.substack.com/p/roygbiv?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1448200&post_id=166831334https://wewereliedtoabout911.substack.com/p/nyers-and-911-first-responders-were?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1724201&post_id=166836165---The Tariff Giraffe and elephants in your HOUSES!Good Luck if you run a business and are attempting to plan for holidays. Ask your seasonal business friends NOT destroyed by Walmart and Amazon, They may have some valid ideas, If there are any of them left... If Ochelli hit the Lottery He'd change the world and make the blood money into Life-changing uplifts along with making real education exist and make the audio art of a new wave of modern talk radio be more than outrage chains and fabricated opposition support noise for the terminally stupid and the tragically ignorant---Closing Arguments begin Tomorrow in The I'll Bet Trump Pardons Him Diddy Kong Kingpin CaseUntil Then...The TV Comedy/drama/shiny shit for the mentally challenged/Biblical Bait Switch and DitchMini-Serieshttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/25/live-israel-iran-truce-holds-us-did-not-destroy-iranian-nuclear-programmeSeason 3https://www.aljazeera.com/tag/israel-palestine-conflict/Season 14https://www.aljazeera.com/tag/ukraine-russia-crisis/Stupid Children Programinghttps://www.youtube.com/c/LionelNationMOVIESGladiator 2 sucks actual Monkey Balls, and that's The Good PartNO VIDEO or LINK REQUIRED, Just Skip ItON THE SPECTRUMhttps://www.max.com/movies/minecraft-movie/05eee581-3112-4515-b17f-219ff6265ef8---System Of A Down- B.Y.O.B.https://youtu.be/3qBPoFFKmQk?si=bRMIWSkiM7OUrx0Z6/24/25 Hell & High Water with Meria and Chuck Ochellihttps://meria.net/2025/06/hell-high-water-with-meria-chuck-ochelli-5/---OCHELLI Dot Com is Broke!Anything is a blessing if you have the meansTHANKS TO ALL who have kept us Going over the yearsWithout YOUR support we go silent.PayPalhttps://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ochelliEmail blindjfkresearcher@gmail.comBE THE EFFECTOchelli Link Treehttps://linktr.ee/chuckochelli---NOVEMBER IN DALLAS LANCER CONFERENCEDISCOUNT FOR YOU10 % OFF code = Ochelli10https://assassinationconference.com/Coming SOON Room Discount Details The Fairmont Dallas hotel 1717 N Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. situated with easy access to Dealey Plaza

Mike Marza and ABC News Legal Contributor Bernarda Villalona recap a big day in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Federal prosecutors are no longer including attempted kidnapping and attempted arson as underlying crimes in the alleged racketeering conspiracy charge against Sean Combs. Prosecutors disclosed in a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian that they would “no longer proceed on these theories” when they deliberated closing arguments, which are scheduled to begin Thursday. Instead, prosecutors signaled that they would push sex trafficking and forced labor as primary predicate acts that the jury could find to convict Combs of racketeering conspiracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The prosecution's nearly five-hour closing argument in the racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking trial of Sean Combs ended with federal prosecutor Christy Slavik imploring the jury to convict the defendant as charged. “Up until today, the defendant was able to get away with his crimes because of his money, power and influence,” Slavik claimed. “It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. It's time to find the defendant guilty.” Slavik told jurors that a lot of the evidence presented during the trial was difficult to witness but, she argued, that evidence “proves to you that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” She asserted that Combs “ran his criminal enterprise with total control” and with the support of an inner circle whose “one job was to say yes to the defendant.” The defense closing argument is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. ET Friday morning. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Diddy prosecution rests. Then, after just 23 minutes, the defense rests, in the ongoing federal racketeering/sex trafficking trial. Closing arguments are set to begin Thursday. A man convicted of a brutal rape and murder in Florida has been executed, ending a case that haunted Orlando for over 30 years. Lori Paige’s dad dies in jail before facing trial for the rape and murder of his 12-year-old daughter. An Irvine, California dog trainer is arrested after at least 11 dogs in his care die, many secretly cremated without their owners’ consent. Drew Nelson reports.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Julie Grant discusses how Hank Brennan and Alan Jackson delivered their closing arguments in Karen Read's murder retrial. Plus, she examines what the future may hold for Read if she is convicted.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

In this bonus episode, we're breaking down Hank Brennan's full closing argument in the Karen Read trial—and y'all, it's a ride. From “she was drunk so she must've done it” to “she didn't mean to hit him… but maybe she was enraged and wanted the last word,” Brennan makes some bold claims—and we're analyzing every twist. We'll walk through the key contradictions, the missing proof points, and the prosecutor's surprising strategy that left many wondering if he accidentally made the defense's case. We're talking: Brennan's boulder-off-a-bridge analogy

Karen Read Trial: Jury From & Closing Argument Breakdown In this comprehensive episode, we break down the crucial jury instructions and analyze the dramatically different closing arguments presented in the Karen Read murder retrial. After 31 days of testimony from 50 witnesses, Judge Beverly Cannone spent over an hour instructing the jury on how to apply the law to the facts of this case that has captivated Massachusetts and beyond. We examine the specific jury instructions given for each charge Karen Read faces: second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. The episode details how Judge Cannone explained the concept of reasonable doubt, the Commonwealth's burden of proof, and what elements must be proven for each charge. We discuss how the judge instructed jurors to consider evidence of intoxication, intent, and whether Read's actions directly caused John O'Keefe's death on that snowy January night in 2022. The episode then provides a detailed comparison of the closing arguments. Defense attorney Alan Jackson's hour and twenty-six minute presentation began with him declaring three times "there was no collision" and painting a picture of police corruption and cover-up. In contrast, prosecutor Hank Brennan's closing repeatedly emphasized that Read was "drunk, she hit him, then she left him to die," focusing on physical evidence and Read's own statements at the scene. We analyze the strategic decisions made by both sides, including Jackson's heavy focus on discredited investigator Michael Proctor versus Brennan's emphasis on cell phone data showing O'Keefe never entered the Albert home. The discussion covers how each attorney addressed the controversial evidence, from taillight pieces to dog bite theories, and how they framed Read's "I hit him" statements - as either confused questions or guilty admissions. #KarenRead #JuryInstructions #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #JudgeCannone #AlanJackson #HankBrennan #JuryDeliberations #SecondDegreeMurder #Manslaughter #ReasonableDoubt #TrialAnalysis #LegalBreakdown #BostonPolice #CantonMA #BigBreakdown #VerdictWatch Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial: Jury From & Closing Argument Breakdown In this comprehensive episode, we break down the crucial jury instructions and analyze the dramatically different closing arguments presented in the Karen Read murder retrial. After 31 days of testimony from 50 witnesses, Judge Beverly Cannone spent over an hour instructing the jury on how to apply the law to the facts of this case that has captivated Massachusetts and beyond. We examine the specific jury instructions given for each charge Karen Read faces: second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. The episode details how Judge Cannone explained the concept of reasonable doubt, the Commonwealth's burden of proof, and what elements must be proven for each charge. We discuss how the judge instructed jurors to consider evidence of intoxication, intent, and whether Read's actions directly caused John O'Keefe's death on that snowy January night in 2022. The episode then provides a detailed comparison of the closing arguments. Defense attorney Alan Jackson's hour and twenty-six minute presentation began with him declaring three times "there was no collision" and painting a picture of police corruption and cover-up. In contrast, prosecutor Hank Brennan's closing repeatedly emphasized that Read was "drunk, she hit him, then she left him to die," focusing on physical evidence and Read's own statements at the scene. We analyze the strategic decisions made by both sides, including Jackson's heavy focus on discredited investigator Michael Proctor versus Brennan's emphasis on cell phone data showing O'Keefe never entered the Albert home. The discussion covers how each attorney addressed the controversial evidence, from taillight pieces to dog bite theories, and how they framed Read's "I hit him" statements - as either confused questions or guilty admissions. #KarenRead #JuryInstructions #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #JudgeCannone #AlanJackson #HankBrennan #JuryDeliberations #SecondDegreeMurder #Manslaughter #ReasonableDoubt #TrialAnalysis #LegalBreakdown #BostonPolice #CantonMA #BigBreakdown #VerdictWatch Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial: Jury From & Closing Argument Breakdown In this comprehensive episode, we break down the crucial jury instructions and analyze the dramatically different closing arguments presented in the Karen Read murder retrial. After 31 days of testimony from 50 witnesses, Judge Beverly Cannone spent over an hour instructing the jury on how to apply the law to the facts of this case that has captivated Massachusetts and beyond. We examine the specific jury instructions given for each charge Karen Read faces: second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death. The episode details how Judge Cannone explained the concept of reasonable doubt, the Commonwealth's burden of proof, and what elements must be proven for each charge. We discuss how the judge instructed jurors to consider evidence of intoxication, intent, and whether Read's actions directly caused John O'Keefe's death on that snowy January night in 2022. The episode then provides a detailed comparison of the closing arguments. Defense attorney Alan Jackson's hour and twenty-six minute presentation began with him declaring three times "there was no collision" and painting a picture of police corruption and cover-up. In contrast, prosecutor Hank Brennan's closing repeatedly emphasized that Read was "drunk, she hit him, then she left him to die," focusing on physical evidence and Read's own statements at the scene. We analyze the strategic decisions made by both sides, including Jackson's heavy focus on discredited investigator Michael Proctor versus Brennan's emphasis on cell phone data showing O'Keefe never entered the Albert home. The discussion covers how each attorney addressed the controversial evidence, from taillight pieces to dog bite theories, and how they framed Read's "I hit him" statements - as either confused questions or guilty admissions. #KarenRead #JuryInstructions #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #JudgeCannone #AlanJackson #HankBrennan #JuryDeliberations #SecondDegreeMurder #Manslaughter #ReasonableDoubt #TrialAnalysis #LegalBreakdown #BostonPolice #CantonMA #BigBreakdown #VerdictWatch Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code [LYK] at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod View the entire Karen Read playlist here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTjIJ7zrQ_srydOiVW-PI91fo7meanz3z

Listen to our first KR bonus episode!

Listen to our second KR bonus episode!

Send us a textLast week's episode was insane, and can you believe that in this episode we're already at CLOSING ARGUMENTS? Only 2 episodes left, y'all! 

Who won the heart of the jurors yesterday in Karen Read's retrial? Did Alan Jackson win for the defense or did Hank Brennan hit it out of the park?! Let's talk about it!Get access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereportThrow a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassSupport Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglassBecome a channnel member for custom Emojis, first looks and exclusive streams here: https://youtube.com/@robertaglass/joinThank you Patrons!Barb, Deborah Shults, Debra Ratliff, Stephanie Lamberson, Maryellen Sudol, Mona, Karen Pacini, Jen Buell, Marie Horton, ER, Rosie Grace, B. Rabbit, Sally Merrick, Amanda D, Mary B, Mrs Jones, Amy Gill, Eileen, Wesley Loves Octoberfest, Erin (Kitties1993), Anna Quint, Cici Guteriez, Sandra Loves GatsbyHannna, Christy, Jen Buell, Elle Solari, Carol Cardella, Jennifer Harmon, DoxieMama65, Carol Holderman, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Johnny Jay, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown, Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff, Kayce Taylor, Alice, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, T.B., Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines and Toni Natalie.

In this bonus episode, Tyrella breaks down the entire defense closing argument from this morning in the Karen Read trial. Defense attorney Alan Jackson pulled no punches — calling out the lack of hard evidence, inconsistencies in the investigation, and what the defense claims is a rush to judgment. You'll hear: The full audio of the defense's closing argument Key arguments and standout moments My thoughts and commentary as the jury prepares to deliberate What it all means for the future of this case Whether you've been following the trial daily or just checking in now, this bonus episode gives you everything you need to know about the defense's final push for reasonable doubt.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/4wSJeNZph94Day 33 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 13, 2025. The Defense's closing argument, delivered by Jackson, focused on the lack of collision and the integrity of the investigation. The Prosecution's closing argument, delivered by Hank Brennan, focused on Karen Read's actions and the data.After lunch, the court read the jury instructions. The court did not include the defense's requested instruction regarding John O'Keefe's hoodie but did include a straight DUI as a lesser included charge.The jury began deliberations just after 2:39 PM local time and deliberated for a little under two hours before asking to go home for the weekend. They were instructed not to discuss the case with anyone, conduct independent research, or follow news about the case over the weekend. Deliberations will resume on Monday morning.RESOURCESKaren Read Retrial Day 32 - https://youtube.com/live/N1az5x1PEkMWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 1 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 4 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 3 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 2 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 1 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 4 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 3 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – CLOSING ARGUMENTS  Part 2 This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend's home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

We're officially on verdict watch. The Karen Read trial wrapped with explosive closing arguments, emotional moments in the courtroom, and a final week that could change everything. Let's break down the most powerful moments and what happens next. We're going on tour - AGAIN!! Tickets go on sale TODAY at 9am PST! Grab yours at www.annieelise.com

Attorney Mark Bederow joins the show to talk about the closing arguments and how long it will take for a decision to come back. Then, an early addition of Police Blotter Fax Friday. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Turtleboy joins the show to discuss closing arguments, says it's weird the way he portrayed the McAlberts and crew.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Today was the day for closing arguments in the Karen Read trial and Hank Brennan analogized the case, then he brought up ham sandwich's.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Karen Read Closing Arguments In Full From Defense Attorney Alan Jackson In this comprehensive episode, we present defense attorney Alan Jackson's complete closing argument in the Karen Read murder retrial, where he attempts to counter the prosecution's evidence that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV in January 2022. Jackson, known for his theatrical courtroom style, delivered an hour and twenty-six minute presentation that challenged the Commonwealth's case while the prosecution maintains Read was intoxicated and left O'Keefe to die in the snow. Jackson opened by repeating three times: "There was no collision," directly contradicting the prosecution's physical evidence including taillight fragments found at the scene and damage to Read's vehicle. The defense attorney focused heavily on attacking the credibility of lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was terminated for misconduct after the first trial. However, prosecutors argue that Proctor's personal failings don't negate the physical evidence or witness testimony supporting their case. Jackson attempted to explain away Read's own statements at the scene, where multiple first responders heard her say "I hit him." While Jackson characterized these as confused questions, prosecutors maintain these were admissions of guilt from someone who knew what she had done. The defense presented an alternative theory involving a fight inside the Albert home, though prosecutors note that O'Keefe's phone data shows he never entered the house and stopped moving outside where his body was found. Jackson concluded dramatically: "Find Karen Read not guilty, not guilty, not guilty." Throughout the retrial, prosecutors have presented forensic evidence, witness testimony, and Read's own angry voicemails to O'Keefe that night, building their case that she struck him during a drunken rage. This episode provides viewers with Jackson's full defense strategy as the jury weighs whether the prosecution has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. #KarenRead #AlanJackson #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #BostonPolice #CantonMA #TrueCrime #Retrial #CommonwealthVsRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Prosecution #Defense #TrialCoverage #VehicularHomicide #NorfolkCounty #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial FULL Closing Arguments From Hank Brennan Prosecution In this critical episode, we present Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan's complete closing argument in the Karen Read murder retrial, where he methodically builds the Commonwealth's case that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV in January 2022. Brennan, the seasoned attorney brought in specifically for the retrial, delivered an hour and twenty minute presentation that wove together witness testimony, forensic evidence, and Read's own words to argue she committed second-degree murder. "She was drunk, she hit him, and she left him to die," Brennan stated emphatically, repeating this phrase multiple times throughout his closing. The prosecutor painted O'Keefe as "a good man" who "helped people," noting how he took in his orphaned niece and nephew, before arguing that on the night of his death, it was O'Keefe who needed help—and Read chose to abandon him. Central to Brennan's argument was the physical and digital evidence. He presented data from Read's Lexus showing she reversed at 24 mph with 74% throttle pressure, combined with O'Keefe's phone data showing he exited the vehicle and never moved again after the alleged collision. "We know in that window she hits him, because he never moves again," Brennan argued, using the technical data to pinpoint the exact moment of impact. He emphasized the debris field of taillight fragments found at the scene as irrefutable proof of a collision. Brennan effectively used Read's own statements against her, playing video clips from her media interviews where she questioned "Could I have hit him? Did I hit him?" and acknowledged she could have "clipped him." He contrasted this with multiple first responders who testified they heard Read repeatedly say "I hit him" at the scene. The prosecutor argued these weren't questions but admissions from someone "coming to terms with the moment." Addressing the defense's conspiracy theory head-on, Brennan acknowledged former lead investigator Michael Proctor's "distasteful" and "dishonorable" conduct but argued it didn't negate the physical evidence or testimony from "independent core people" who witnessed Read's statements. He dismissed claims of a cover-up as incompatible with the testimony of paramedics and firefighters he called "heroes" who were simply doing their jobs. In his powerful conclusion, Brennan displayed a photo of O'Keefe and declared: "John O'Keefe is not a body. John O'Keefe is not a buffalo on a prairie. He was a person, and he was murdered by Karen Read." This complete presentation showcases Brennan's prosecutorial strategy of combining technical evidence with emotional appeals to secure a conviction. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #ClosingArguments #Prosecution #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #Commonwealth #SecondDegreeMurder #BostonPolice #CantonMA #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Retrial #VehicularHomicide #ForensicEvidence #TrialCoverage #NorfolkCounty #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Closing Arguments In Full From Defense Attorney Alan Jackson In this comprehensive episode, we present defense attorney Alan Jackson's complete closing argument in the Karen Read murder retrial, where he attempts to counter the prosecution's evidence that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV in January 2022. Jackson, known for his theatrical courtroom style, delivered an hour and twenty-six minute presentation that challenged the Commonwealth's case while the prosecution maintains Read was intoxicated and left O'Keefe to die in the snow. Jackson opened by repeating three times: "There was no collision," directly contradicting the prosecution's physical evidence including taillight fragments found at the scene and damage to Read's vehicle. The defense attorney focused heavily on attacking the credibility of lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was terminated for misconduct after the first trial. However, prosecutors argue that Proctor's personal failings don't negate the physical evidence or witness testimony supporting their case. Jackson attempted to explain away Read's own statements at the scene, where multiple first responders heard her say "I hit him." While Jackson characterized these as confused questions, prosecutors maintain these were admissions of guilt from someone who knew what she had done. The defense presented an alternative theory involving a fight inside the Albert home, though prosecutors note that O'Keefe's phone data shows he never entered the house and stopped moving outside where his body was found. Jackson concluded dramatically: "Find Karen Read not guilty, not guilty, not guilty." Throughout the retrial, prosecutors have presented forensic evidence, witness testimony, and Read's own angry voicemails to O'Keefe that night, building their case that she struck him during a drunken rage. This episode provides viewers with Jackson's full defense strategy as the jury weighs whether the prosecution has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. #KarenRead #AlanJackson #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #BostonPolice #CantonMA #TrueCrime #Retrial #CommonwealthVsRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Prosecution #Defense #TrialCoverage #VehicularHomicide #NorfolkCounty #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial FULL Closing Arguments From Hank Brennan Prosecution In this critical episode, we present Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan's complete closing argument in the Karen Read murder retrial, where he methodically builds the Commonwealth's case that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV in January 2022. Brennan, the seasoned attorney brought in specifically for the retrial, delivered an hour and twenty minute presentation that wove together witness testimony, forensic evidence, and Read's own words to argue she committed second-degree murder. "She was drunk, she hit him, and she left him to die," Brennan stated emphatically, repeating this phrase multiple times throughout his closing. The prosecutor painted O'Keefe as "a good man" who "helped people," noting how he took in his orphaned niece and nephew, before arguing that on the night of his death, it was O'Keefe who needed help—and Read chose to abandon him. Central to Brennan's argument was the physical and digital evidence. He presented data from Read's Lexus showing she reversed at 24 mph with 74% throttle pressure, combined with O'Keefe's phone data showing he exited the vehicle and never moved again after the alleged collision. "We know in that window she hits him, because he never moves again," Brennan argued, using the technical data to pinpoint the exact moment of impact. He emphasized the debris field of taillight fragments found at the scene as irrefutable proof of a collision. Brennan effectively used Read's own statements against her, playing video clips from her media interviews where she questioned "Could I have hit him? Did I hit him?" and acknowledged she could have "clipped him." He contrasted this with multiple first responders who testified they heard Read repeatedly say "I hit him" at the scene. The prosecutor argued these weren't questions but admissions from someone "coming to terms with the moment." Addressing the defense's conspiracy theory head-on, Brennan acknowledged former lead investigator Michael Proctor's "distasteful" and "dishonorable" conduct but argued it didn't negate the physical evidence or testimony from "independent core people" who witnessed Read's statements. He dismissed claims of a cover-up as incompatible with the testimony of paramedics and firefighters he called "heroes" who were simply doing their jobs. In his powerful conclusion, Brennan displayed a photo of O'Keefe and declared: "John O'Keefe is not a body. John O'Keefe is not a buffalo on a prairie. He was a person, and he was murdered by Karen Read." This complete presentation showcases Brennan's prosecutorial strategy of combining technical evidence with emotional appeals to secure a conviction. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #ClosingArguments #Prosecution #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #Commonwealth #SecondDegreeMurder #BostonPolice #CantonMA #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Retrial #VehicularHomicide #ForensicEvidence #TrialCoverage #NorfolkCounty #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Israel launches an attack on Iran. Also, new details on the Air India plane crash that killed all but one passenger. Plus, closing arguments get underway today in the Karen Read re-trial. And, new ways to cope as the rainy weekends continue. 

On Friday morning, closing arguments in the Karen Read murder trial are taking place, with the jury anticipated to start their deliberations later in the day.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.