Podcasts about megrahi

Lockerbie: A Search for Truth Dr. Jim Swire searches for justice following the death of his daughter Flora in one of the worst air disasters in history: the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. On December 21, 1988, 259 passengers and crew, as well as 11 residents on the ground, were killed when a plane exploded over the quiet town of Lockerbie, Scotland. Thirteen years later, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was convicted of the crime and later released on compassionate grounds. In the wake of Flora's death, Jim is named head of the UK victims' group and, after years of relentless campaigning, becomes instrumental in bringing Megrahi to trial. However, Jim's absolute trust in the justice system is sullied forever when he comes to believe, to his horror, that Megrahi could be innocent. As the truth shifts under Jim's feet, his life starts to crumble, losing his job and ignoring his living family for this crusade for truth and his desire to find those responsible for her death (TVNZ+ and TVNZ1 from Sunday). Friends Like Her In the wake of a catastrophic earthquake, a friendship between two women in Kaikoura turns toxic when a surrogacy deal goes wrong (Netflix). High Potential Morgan, a single mom with three kids and an exceptional mind, helps solve an unsolvable crime when she rearranges some evidence during her shift as a cleaner for the police department. When they discover she has a knack for putting things in order because of her high intellectual potential, she is brought on as a consultant to work with a by-the-book seasoned detective, Karadec. Together they form an unusual and unstoppable team (Disney+). LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Lockerbie Bombing IndictmentsOn November 11, 1991, indictments were formally announced in the notorious Lockerbie bombing case, marking a significant milestone in international criminal justice. U.S. and U.K. prosecutors indicted two Libyan nationals—Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi and Lamin Khalifah Fhimah—in connection with the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The attack took place on December 21, 1988, when the plane exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing all 259 people on board and 11 residents on the ground. This tragedy led to a complex, multi-year investigation involving multiple countries and was one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in the West prior to September 11, 2001.The indictments represented a significant moment in the use of international legal cooperation to address terrorism, as both the U.S. and U.K. sought justice for their citizens. The two men were accused of planting a bomb in the cargo hold, allegedly on behalf of Libyan intelligence services. However, for nearly a decade after the indictments, Libya resisted extradition requests, prompting years of diplomatic pressure and international sanctions.Finally, in 1999, Libya agreed to turn over Megrahi and Fhimah for trial in a specially created Scottish court seated in the Netherlands. This arrangement respected Libyan sovereignty while ensuring an impartial setting for the trial. After extensive proceedings, Megrahi was found guilty in 2001 of the murders, receiving a life sentence, while Fhimah was acquitted. The trial itself remains a significant example of international criminal law in action, setting a precedent for how nations can pursue justice in politically sensitive, cross-border terrorism cases. The Lockerbie bombing case also raised ongoing questions about evidence reliability and political influences in terrorism prosecutions, as Megrahi's conviction remained controversial, leading to a compassionate release in 2009 due to his terminal illness.This legal landmark underscored both the complexities of prosecuting international terrorism and the power of coordinated legal frameworks to address global threats.A New York judge, Justice Juan Merchan, will soon decide if President-elect Donald Trump's criminal conviction for falsifying business records related to hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels should be overturned. This decision follows a July U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, which Trump's lawyers argue should apply to his case, asserting that the conviction should be dismissed. Merchan is also considering whether to proceed with sentencing Trump on Nov. 26, although legal experts believe this is unlikely before his Jan. 20 inauguration. If Merchan rules favorably on immunity or delays sentencing, Trump may assume the presidency without immediate legal encumbrances. Meanwhile, federal cases against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith are expected to be paused due to Justice Department policies against prosecuting sitting presidents. However, a separate Georgia state case remains unresolved. Trump, who maintains his innocence in all four cases, argues these prosecutions are politically motivated. Manhattan prosecutors counter that the Supreme Court's immunity decision doesn't apply since Trump's case involves non-official conduct, not covered by presidential immunity. Experts note that even if the conviction stands, Trump's team will likely seek to delay sentencing, which could potentially involve up to four years in prison, although fines or probation are more likely.Judge to decide whether Trump's hush money conviction can stand | ReutersDonald Trump's upcoming administration aims to drastically cut federal regulations, but recent Supreme Court rulings, including the end of Chevron deference, could complicate these efforts. Chevron deference, which previously allowed agencies flexibility in interpreting vague laws, was struck down in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Without this precedent, Trump's regulatory changes may face increased legal scrutiny, with courts more likely to question whether agencies are acting beyond Congress's intent. Despite these obstacles, Trump will likely have Senate support for his deregulation goals, especially as the ruling requires more specific legislative language—a challenge in a closely divided Congress.Lobbyists expect Trump's administration to focus on rolling back labor, environmental, and financial regulations. However, advocacy groups are poised to use the Supreme Court's ruling to defend Biden-era rules, arguing against the administration's authority under the revised legal framework. Trump may opt for informal guidance, like advisory memos or circulars, rather than formal rule-making, as these are harder to legally challenge. Corporate and industry groups generally support deregulation, though the ongoing legal and policy shifts could create near-term uncertainty. To establish lasting changes, Trump and Congress would need to pass new legislation, avoiding the “ping pong effect” of policies fluctuating with each administration change.Trump's Push to Deregulate Faces Challenges in Post-Chevron EraLaw firms saw a substantial profit increase of 11.2% in the third quarter of 2024, largely due to high lawyer productivity, strong billing rates, and controlled expenses, as reported by the Thomson Reuters Institute's Law Firm Financial Index. This index, which aggregates financial metrics from 195 large and midsize firms, recorded its second-highest score since inception, highlighting broad-based demand growth across multiple practice areas. Litigation demand rose by 4%, with gains also in corporate, real estate, labor, employment, and bankruptcy practices, while only intellectual property showed a slight decline.The report contrasts 2024's strong, diversified demand with the post-2021 demand slump, suggesting more stable long-term profitability for law firms. With Donald Trump's recent election win, firms anticipate additional work in areas such as regulation, compliance, antitrust, and energy. Although declining inflation may limit future billing rate increases, firms remain optimistic about the potential for new legal work stemming from significant regulatory changes expected in early 2025.Law firm profits soared in third quarter of 2024, report finds | ReutersThe National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has overturned a 40-year-old precedent, ruling that employers can no longer generally warn workers that unionization will harm their relationship with management. This ruling came from a case involving Starbucks, where the company allegedly made unlawful threats to employees during a union drive at its Seattle Roastery, warning them that unionizing could lead to reduced benefits and suggesting it would be futile. The board's decision revisits the 1985 Tri-Cast Inc. ruling, which had allowed employers to legally imply that unionizing would alter employees' direct relationships with management. Although the NLRB ultimately found that Starbucks' statements encouraging a "no" vote to maintain open communication with managers did not directly violate the law, it changed the standards for such statements going forward. The board's Democratic majority explained that the earlier precedent was incorrect in permitting nearly any statement that unionizing would affect the employee-manager relationship. This decision reinforces the NLRB's recent actions against Starbucks in its efforts to unionize over 500 locations nationwide, requiring the company to stop unlawful behavior and delete certain social media posts.NLRB Tosses 40-Year Stance on Manager Unionization Threats This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In this episode, we provide an in-depth examination of the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 on December 21, 1988. The discussion spans the immediate aftermath and meticulous investigation led by Britain's smallest police force, which uncovered pivotal evidence linking the bombing to Libyan intelligence officers. We delve into the legal odyssey culminating in the historic trial and conviction of Abdel Baset al-Megrahi. Furthermore, the episode covers al-Megrahi's controversial release, the profound impact on global aviation security, and the unwavering advocacy of victims' families. The ongoing legacy and broader implications on international terrorism and justice are also explored.Tom and Simon will discuss this and the rest of this weeks episode in this Sunday's episode.00:00 Introduction to the Lockerbie Bombing00:32 The Fateful Night of December 21, 198801:07 The Immediate Aftermath and Investigation01:34 Uncovering the Truth: A Deliberate Act of Terrorism02:06 The Massive Investigation Effort03:05 Crucial Clues: Clothing Fragments and the Malta Connection03:57 Identifying the Suspects: Libyan Intelligence Officers05:06 Connecting the Timer to Libya05:47 The Long Road to Indictments06:24 Diplomatic Breakthrough and Trial07:33 The Verdict and Its Aftermath08:07 Al Megrahi's Release and Controversy08:52 Legacy of the Lockerbie Bombing Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Day in Legal History: Libya Surrenders NationalsOn April 5, 1999, a pivotal moment in the annals of international law and aviation security unfolded as the Libyan government surrendered two of its nationals, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, to British authorities. These individuals were implicated in one of the most devastating acts of terrorism in history—the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, on December 21, 1988. This tragedy not only claimed the lives of 270 people, including 11 on the ground but also marked a profound moment of grief and outrage across the globe.The surrender of the accused to the British government was a culmination of years of diplomatic negotiations and international sanctions against Libya, reflecting the persistent efforts of the victims' families and international community to seek justice. The trial, which began on May 3, 2000, at a special court in the Netherlands, was notable for being held under Scottish law—a unique legal arrangement that underscored the international dimensions of the case.The court proceedings were meticulous and exhaustive, drawing upon a wealth of evidence that included forensic analysis, witness testimonies, and the intricate tracing of the bomb's components. After extensive deliberations, the verdict was pronounced: Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah was acquitted and returned to Libya, a decision that stirred a mix of reactions worldwide. Conversely, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, a conviction that would later be mired in controversy and calls for re-examination.Megrahi's conviction did not close the chapter on the Lockerbie bombing; it instead opened further debate and investigation, including questions about the evidence, the legitimacy of the trial, and the role of other potential co-conspirators. His release in 2009 on compassionate grounds, due to terminal cancer, sparked further international debate and diplomatic tensions.This day in legal history underscores the complexities of achieving justice in the wake of terrorism, the challenges of international cooperation in legal matters, and the enduring impact of the Lockerbie bombing on the fields of aviation security and international law.The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is at the center of controversies involving attempts to move high-profile cases out of its jurisdiction, potentially preventing the court from ruling on matters of national importance. This situation arises as questions are raised about the appropriateness of filing certain legal challenges, particularly against government actions, in Texas courts. The ongoing scrutiny aims to determine if these cases genuinely belong in the jurisdictions where they were filed, amidst concerns over "judge shopping"—the practice of selecting courts thought to be favorable to the case.The Fifth Circuit is deliberating on whether to block lower court decisions that would transfer cases involving the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Elon Musk's SpaceX to other federal courts. These moves are challenged under the premise that they could dilute the Fifth Circuit's ability to influence significant legal questions. Transfers are finalized once a case is docketed in the new jurisdiction, which then assumes authority, complicating any attempts to revert the transfer unless the new presiding judge consents.Appeals to prevent these transfers hinge on the high threshold for a writ of mandamus, a rare form of relief requiring clear evidence of a lower court's abuse of discretion. The scrutiny extends to the public perception of the Fifth Circuit's motivations, with some experts warning that aggressive efforts to retain cases could reflect poorly on the judiciary's impartiality.Historically, the Fifth Circuit has encountered issues with jurisdiction after cases were moved, as seen in a dispute involving a "ghost gun" company, highlighting the practical consequences of losing authority over transferred cases. The court's involvement in the SpaceX case, including a rare inquiry into the conduct of NLRB lawyers, further underscores the tension between maintaining jurisdiction and adhering to procedural norms.Judicial decisions on venue transfers, such as the recent ruling to move a lawsuit from Texas to Washington, D.C., reflect broader concerns about judge shopping and the integrity of case assignments. This ongoing saga emphasizes the complex interplay between legal strategy, jurisdictional authority, and the quest for a fair and appropriate venue for high-stakes litigation.Fifth Circuit Risks Losing Big Cases Amid Judge Shopping WorriesTerraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon are set to present their final arguments in a civil fraud trial, responding to charges from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that they deceived investors about the stability of their stablecoin, TerraUSD, and its underlying technology. The SEC's allegations include false claims about Terraform's blockchain being utilized in a popular Korean payment app, aiming to secure civil penalties and industry bans for Kwon and Terraform. Despite Kwon's absence from the trial due to his arrest in Montenegro on separate charges, Terraform's defense contends that the SEC's case relies on out-of-context statements and incentivized whistleblowers. The collapse of TerraUSD in May 2022, which the SEC attributes to manipulated market actions by Kwon and his company, resulted in a $40 billion investor loss and significant disruptions in the broader cryptocurrency market.Terraform Labs to make final pitch to jury as civil fraud trial wraps | ReutersA New York judge has scheduled a hearing for April 22 to scrutinize the $175 million bond posted by former U.S. President Donald Trump. This bond was a condition for pausing a $454 million fraud judgment against him while he appeals the decision. The New York Attorney General, Letitia James, raised questions about the sufficiency of the assets of Knight Specialty Insurance Company—the firm Trump used for the bond—prompting the need for proof that it can cover the bond if Trump's appeal fails. Trump's bond was facilitated by the insurance company owned by Don Hankey, a California businessman known for his dealings in subprime car loans. Faced with a "practical impossibility" of raising the full amount initially required for the bond, Trump's team secured Knight Specialty's services after an appeals court provided a lifeline by granting an extension and reducing the bond amount. Hankey, dubbed "the king of subprime car loans," has a reputation for lending to individuals with poor credit at high rates and aggressive debt collection practices. Despite his wealth, evidenced by his ranking on Forbes's lists, and his history of significant Republican donations and financial dealings with Trump-related properties through Axos Bank, concerns about the sufficiency of assets stem from the specialized, high-risk nature of his business ventures. Knight Specialty's involvement, driven by a blend of business decision-making and political support for Trump, underscores the complexities and potential risks of securing such a substantial bond, especially given the magnitude of Trump's legal and financial challenges.This development adds another layer to Trump's legal challenges, which include efforts to dismiss criminal charges in Georgia related to the 2020 election and classified records handling, as well as a New York criminal trial on hush money payments set to begin a week before the bond hearing. Trump, who faces four indictments amidst his presidential campaign, has pleaded not guilty in all criminal cases.The fraud judgment by Judge Arthur Engoron in February, which Trump is appealing, found him liable for significantly overstating his assets' value. Trump's legal team has dismissed concerns over the bond as baseless, while representatives from Knight Specialty Insurance have not commented on the matter. According to a court filing, Knight claims to have $539 million in assets, including $26.8 million in cash, as it faces scrutiny over its ability to support Trump's bond amidst his multifaceted legal battles.Trump's $175 million bond questioned by New York AG, hearing scheduled | ReutersNew York AG Questions if $175 Million Bond Insurer Can Save TrumpThat Guy Who Backed Trump's Bond? He May Not Have the MoneyHow did Trump pay his $175m fraud bond – and who helped him?This week's closing theme is by Robert Schumann.Robert Schumann stands as one of the quintessential figures in the Romantic era of classical music, renowned for his richly expressive compositions that spanned piano, chamber music, lieder (those are art songs), and orchestral works. Born in Zwickau, Saxony, in 1810, Schumann initially intended to pursue a career in law, following the wishes of his family–but we're all glad he didn't. His deep passion for music, coupled with a hand injury that thwarted his ambitions of becoming a virtuoso pianist, led him down the path of composition and music criticism. Schumann's compositions are celebrated for their emotional depth, innovative harmonies, and poetic inspirations, reflecting the complex inner world of an artist who struggled with mental health issues throughout his life.In 1841, a year marked by newfound confidence and creativity for Schumann, he composed his Symphony No. 1 in B-flat major, Op. 38, commonly known as the "Spring" Symphony. Inspired by the poem "Spring" by Adolf Böttger, the symphony bursts with the freshness, vitality, and optimism of the season. The work was Schumann's bold entry into the world of symphonic music, encouraged by his wife, the eminent pianist and composer Clara Wieck Schumann. It was completed in just four days in January, a testament to Schumann's intense creative fervor during this period.The "Spring" Symphony premiered on March 31, 1841, in Leipzig, conducted by Felix Mendelssohn, a close friend and champion of Schumann's music. The reception was overwhelmingly positive, with the symphony hailed as a vibrant and joyful ode to spring. Its success established Schumann's reputation as a master of the symphonic form, a remarkable feat for someone who had previously been known primarily for his piano works and songs.The opening movement, "Andante un poco maestoso – Allegro molto vivace," immediately sets the tone of awakening and renewal. It begins with a slow, majestic introduction that evokes the first stirrings of spring, before launching into the lively and exuberant main Allegro section. This movement is characterized by its rhythmic vitality and melodic inventiveness, featuring a recurring fanfare motif that Schumann described as the "call of awakening" for spring. The energy and optimism of the Allegro perfectly capture the essence of the season, making it a fitting introduction to a symphony that remains one of Schumann's most beloved works.Schumann's Symphony No. 1, with its vivid depiction of spring's arrival and rejuvenation, not only solidified his place among the great symphonists of the Romantic era but also offered a deeply personal reflection of the composer's own sense of renewal and hope. Through the "Spring" Symphony, and particularly its spirited Allegro, Schumann invites listeners to share in the joy and boundless possibilities of the season, making it a timeless piece that continues to enchant and inspire.Without further ado, Robert Schumann's Symphony no. 1 in B flat 'Spring', Op. 38, the fourth movement, the allegro. Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

At the end of the show a question from Gerry Mulvenna. Recommendations: David: The Pigeon Tunnel - Apple TV Academy Award-winning documentarian Errol Morris pulls back the curtain on the storied life and career of former British spy David Cornwell — better known as John le Carré, author of such classic espionage novels as The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and The Constant Gardener. Set against the turbulent backdrop of the Cold War leading into present day, the film spans six decades as le Carré delivers his final and most candid interview, punctuated with rare archival footage and dramatized vignettes. "The Pigeon Tunnel" is a deeply human and engaging exploration of le Carré's extraordinary journey and the paper-thin membrane between fact and fiction. https://www.apple.com/uk/tv-pr/originals/the-pigeon-tunnel/  The Pigeon Tunnel: Stories from My Life (Paperback) https://www.waterstones.com/book/the-pigeon-tunnel/john-le-carre/9780241976890  Stuart: The Boat Story - BBC Two strangers. One boat. Nothing to lose. An unexpected discovery could mean a second chance - or a bloody end. Dark comic thriller with Paterson Joseph and Daisy Haggard. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p0glbknc/boat-story Eamonn: Lockerbie - Sky LOCKERBIE, a new mini-series that will be based on the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 and the search for justice by Dr Jim Swire and his wife Jane who lost their beloved daughter, Flora, in the air disaster in 1988. The five-part series will be written by Academy Award nominees Jim Sheridan (In The Name of The Father, My Left Foot) and Kirsten Sheridan (In America, Dollhouse). All 259 passengers and crew were killed when the bomb exploded over Lockerbie 38 minutes after take-off, with a further 11 residents losing their life as the plane came down over the quiet, Scottish town. Thirteen years later, in 2001, Libyan national Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was convicted of the crime and later released on compassionate grounds in 2009. Shortly after the Lockerbie bombing, one of the worst terrorist attacks in history, some families of the victims joined together to launch a campaign for truth and justice. Among them was Dr Jim Swire whose campaign has taken him to the sand dunes of Libya to meet face-to-face with Colonel Gaddafi, to 10 Downing Street to meet with successive Prime Ministers and to the corridors of power in the US where he worked with the American victims' groups to mount pressure on Washington for tighter airport security, well before 9/11. The moving series will explore events from 1988 to the present day, while providing an intimate account of a man, a husband, and a father who pushes his marriage, his health, and his sanity to the edge. https://www.sky.com/watch/title/series/8a3430f6-066b-3397-abec-1d72b380ed90 

Former First Minister of Scotland, Alex Salmond (Geoff's old boss) is on the podcast. He responds to the news of Nicola Sturgeon's arrest and analyses where the SNP stands. He talks about uniting independence-backing parties together ahead of the general election and next Scottish election. He and Geoff reminisce telling never-heard-before stories of the independence referendum campaign - including a near disaster in a helicopter - the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi - and an odd phone call from Donald Trump. Leave your reviews and send us your emails: hello@holyroodsources.com. Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/holyroodsources. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"呼吁联合国选择Lockerbie Bomb审判法庭 吉姆·斯威尔（Jim Swire）博士说，审判不应在美国或苏格兰进行 一位领先的竞选人说，这名在美国被指控成为洛克比轰炸机的人应在联合国选出的法院中进行审判。 吉姆·斯威尔（Jim Swire）博士" "-Start AD- #TheMummichogBlogoFmalta Amazon Top和Flash Deals（会员链接 - 如果您通过以下链接购买，您将支持我们的翻译）-https：//amzn.to/3feogyg 仅在一次搜索中比较所有顶级旅行网站，以在酒店库存的最佳酒店交易中找到世界上最佳酒店价格比较网站。 （会员链接 - 如果您通过以下链接购买，您将支持我们的翻译）-https：//www.hotelscombined.com/?a_aid=20558 “因此，无论您希望别人对您做什么，也对他们做，因为这是法律和先知。”“ #Jesus #Catholic。 “从受孕的时刻，必须绝对尊重和保护人类的生活。从他生存的第一刻起，必须将一个人承认为拥有一个人的权利 - 其中每种无辜者都是无辜的权利。”天主教教堂的教理2270。 堕胎杀死了两次。它杀死了婴儿的身体，并杀死了母亲的科学。堕胎是深刻的反妇女。它的受害者中有三个季节是女性：一半的婴儿和所有母亲。 流畅的马耳他无线电是马耳他的第一号数字广播电台，演奏您的轻松最爱 - Smooth提供了“无混乱”的混音，吸引了35-59个核心观众，提供柔和的成人现代经典。我们操作一个流行曲目的播放列表，并定期更新。 https://smooth.com.mt/listen/ 关注电报：https：//t.me/themummichogblogdotcom Tumblr：https：//www.tumblr.com/themummichogblogofmalta blogspot：https：//themummichogblogofmalta.blogspot.com/ 论坛：https：//groups.google.com/g/themummichogblog Facebook：https：//www.facebook.com/groups/chinesecommunitymalta 结束广告---" "SE女儿Flora于1988年轰炸了Pan AM 103爆炸，表示该审判不应在美国或苏格兰进行。 阿布·阿吉拉·马苏德（Abu Agila Masud）被指控制造炸弹炸死270人。 预计他将于周一晚些时候在华盛顿特区出庭。 其他家庭欢迎他在美国受到审判的消息。 Abdelbaset al-Megrahi仍然是唯一因袭击而被定罪的人，但Swire博士怀疑Megrahi和Masud都参与了轰炸。 洛克比炸弹嫌疑人在美国拘留中 时间表：储物柜轰炸 LOCKERBIE-潘AM航班103号的城镇 Swire博士告诉BBC广播电台的早晨苏格兰，纳尔逊·曼德拉（Nelson Mandela）曾说过，“在洛克比爆炸案中，没有一个国家应该是投诉人，检察官和法官”。 他在1997年在爱丁堡举行的英联邦政府会议主管进行了干预。 “有很多松散的目的，以至于这个可怕的案件中悬挂着很大程度上的美国，我认为我们应该记住曼德拉对世界和我们当时对我们说的话，并寻求一个没有直接向任何国家的法院参与暴行本身，” Swire博士说。 他补充说：“我认为（审判）不应该在美国进行。我认为，鉴于我们现在对苏格兰如何处理此案的了解，它不应在苏格兰进行。” 他说，联合国应该选择一个“合适的”法院来进行Masud的审判，并审查针对Megrahi的证据。 他补充说：“我们在英国亲戚中一直追求的是真理，而不是似乎正在取代真相的捏造。” PAN AM的残骸103航班 图像来源，路透社 图像标题， 圣诞节前几天，泛am的航班被轰炸了 储物柜炸弹爆炸是在英国土地上发生的最致命的恐怖分子。 波音747号从伦敦驶向纽约的747名乘客和机组人员在残骸摧毁他们的房屋时在洛克比丧生，又有11人被杀。 梅格拉希（Megrahi）因终身监禁，但在被诊断出患有癌症后于2009年由苏格兰政府以同情的理由释放。他于2012年在利比亚去世。 上个月，据报道，马苏德在利比亚被一个民兵团体绑架，导致猜测他将移交给美国当局接受审判。 一位美国司法部发言人告诉路透社通讯社，马苏德将在华盛顿的联邦法院首次露面。 卡拉·威普（Kara Weipz） 图像标题， 卡拉·魏茨（Kara Weipz 卡拉·韦兹（Kara Weipz）的兄弟理查德·莫内蒂（Richard Monetti）在暴行中被杀，他说，家庭对亲人感到正义。 韦兹女士在与英国广播公司苏格兰的讲话中说：“这是家庭一直在为近34年而战的斗争 - 他们一直在争取正义，看到那些犯有这种罪行的人要负责。 “要知道现在将要进行审判……最终对我们的亲人有一种正义感。 “从这个意义上讲，这是一次胜利。与此同时，这并没有改变我们所爱的人被谋杀，他们不在我们这里的事实。” 魏茨女士还说，受害者家庭中有强烈的愿望，要求根据美国法律审判任何嫌疑犯。 她说：“这不是对苏格兰法律的不尊重，这就是我们所知道的。这是我们的系统，这是对美国航空公司的恐怖袭击，飞机上有190名美国人。 “这也是对美国的恐怖袭击 - 我们历史上的第二大袭击。我认为，根据我们的法律，在美国进行此审判对我们来说非常重要 - 这对美国家庭意味着一切。” 她的父亲鲍勃·莫内蒂（Bob Monetti）说，他们面临着追踪荷兰梅格拉希审判的困难 他补充说：“如果是在美国，尤其是华盛顿特区，将会有很多新闻报道，人们会听到发生的事情。发生的事情不会混淆。” 媒体标题， Newsnight的Kirsty Wark回忆起1988年12月21日晚上到达Lockerbie 五年前，Masud因炸弹制造而在利比亚服刑。 据称，在这段时间里，他承认与梅格拉希（Megrahi）的阴谋炸毁了飞行。 Megrahi的律师Aamer Anwar说，Masud实际上是在战争主的拘留所“被广泛谴责为侵犯人权行为”。 他说，在美国或苏格兰法院，提取这种供认的情况将“强烈反对”。 梅格拉希（Megrahi）总是宣布自己的纯真，他针对他的27年徒刑发起了两次上诉。一个是不成功的，另一个被抛弃了。 一位英国亲戚约翰·莫西牧师的女儿赫尔加（Helga）在轰炸中死亡，他质疑马苏德（Masud）为什么在美国面临审判。 他告诉英国广播公司：“他在美国做什么？这是苏格兰土壤上方犯下的犯罪。” https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-63937640 "

In 1988, a routine flight took off from London Heathrow. It was the second leg of a transatlantic flight that would stop in JFK, before heading even further west, to Detroit. In fact, Flight 103 had started off in Frankfurt. But something got on the flight in the German airport that shouldn't have. It was a brown samsonite suitcase, filled with clothing and a Toshiba cassette tape player. Inside the electronics was a pound of semtex and a timer. Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over the Scottish countryside, killing everyone aboard, 11 people on the ground, and scattering debris for miles around the countryside. But who had planted the bomb? Find us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/mensreapod/) or Twitter (https://twitter.com/MensReaPod) ! With thanks to our supporters on Patreon! If you would like to support the podcast, head on over to Patreon.com (https://www.patreon.com/MensReaPod) Theme Music: Quinn’s Song: The Dance Begins by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Sources: Kenny MacAskill, The Lockerbie Bombing: The search for justice (London: Biteback Publishing, 2016) Purchase here (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lockerbie-Bombing-Search-Justice-ebook/dp/B01FK4R1Z2/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1559845878&sr=8-1) Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103#Compassionate_release_and_controversy  Syracuse University- Lockerbie Air Disaster Archives https://panam103.syr.edu/2008exhibit.php  Report on the accident to Boeing 747-121, N739PA at Lockerbie, Dumfriesshire, Scotland on 21 December 10988 Air Accidents Investigation Branch (Department of Transport) 2/90 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5422f36ee5274a1317000489/2-1990_N739PA.pdf  DIA documents: https://web.archive.org/web/20080308085805/http://www.dia.mil/publicaffairs/Foia/panam103.pdf  "Lockerbie bomber's conviction to be reviewed” from BBC.com https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-43987079 (3 May 2018)  Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission https://www.sccrc.co.uk/conviction  Lucy Adams and Josh Aston, “Lockerbie Exclusive: we publish the report that could have cleared Megrahi” in The Herald Scotland https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13051748.lockerbie-exclusive-we-publish-the-report-that-could-have-cleared-megrahi/ (24 March 2012)  Robert Black QC Lockerbie Blog: http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/2015/03/sccrc-2007-megrahi-report-enters-public.html  SCCRC report http://login.heraldscotland.com/SCCRC-Statement-of-Reasons-red.pdf  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vincennes_(CG-49)

On this episode of The Sofa King Podcast, we look at the deaths, political intrigue, and conspiracy theories surrounding the infamous bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. Called The Lockerbie Bombing due to the destruction caused by the plane crashing over that Scottish city, the plane was brought down by a bomb placed in the nose of the plane. Who would want to bring this plane down and why? That’s what we aimed to find out through our research. On December 21, 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 exploded 31,000 feet over Lockerbie. On board, 259 people died, and on the ground, 11 people died in the horrible fireball caused by the ignition of 200,000 pounds of jet fuel. The bomb was small and easy to conceal. It was a cutting-edge Symtec bomb hidden in a radio and smuggled into a suitcase (the alleged bombers weren’t on board). The bomb was so advanced that security screeners weren’t trained to look for its kind until 11 months after this bombing. So who placed the bomb? The official report is that it was two Libyans who possibly worked for Libyan intelligence. Abdelbeset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifah Fhimah were implicated, and after everything from embargoes to threats, the United Nations got Colonel Gadhafi to extradite them for trial. During the incredibly lengthy and thorough investigation, the CIA pointed the bomb fragments to a Libyan group, and detectives did a crazy patchwork of information, pulling evidence from a crazy weather wizard, a tailor with a seemingly photographic memory, and a person who hung Christmas lights. Needless to say, the evidence is a bit shaky. One of the Libyans was convicted and the other got off. However, some very reputable journalistic sources from Frontline to Time Magazine came to question the official stories. Some point to Iran and some strange plans that dealt with the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Others point to the CIA who was revealed to be allowing Syrians to smuggle heroin on Pan Am in exchange for intelligence on terrorist networks. Either way, the story of the bombing, the horrible details, and the final death of the bomber of Pan Am Flight 103 are a very interesting tale. The PBS Frontline article on alternative theories of the bombing: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/lockerbie-the-alternate-theories/

In 2009, then Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill controversially granted the release on compassionate grounds of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only man ever convicted for the Lockerbie Bombing in 1988. Now MacAskill has written his own account of the terrorist attack, the trial and the turmoil that has ensued. With forensic detail he explores the forces at play and why some questions continue to remain unanswered. In this event recorded live at the 2016 Edinburgh International Book Festival, he discusses his contentious book with Ruth Wishart.

Brit Dee and Tom Secker discuss... the death of supposed Lockerbie Bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi; the widow of an alleged 7/7 London bomber, Samantha Lewthwaite, currently wanted on terrorism charges in Kenya; and the ongoing trial of Anders Behring Breivik in Norway. (If I have run out of bandwidth and you cannot listen to this podcast, download it here instead: http://www.resistradio.com/podcasts/brit-dee-and-tom-secker-discuss-may-23rd)

Brit covers the latest news, including: death of supposed Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi; US protesters call out war criminal Blair: shameful support for monarchy in the UK.  Originally broadcast May 21st.

Brit Dee and Tom Secker discuss... the death of supposed Lockerbie Bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi; the widow of an alleged 7/7 London bomber, Samantha Lewthwaite, currently wanted on terrorism charges in Kenya; and the ongoing trial of Anders Behring Breivik in Norway.

It is a year since Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish jail on compassionate grounds. Since then voices here and abroad have questioned how ill he really was, if money and oil were the real reasons for his release and whether he was in fact guilty of causing the Lockerbie tragedy. James Silver looks into the claims and investigates why they have emerged.

In this week's podcast: David Cameron faces trying questions on his first visit to America as UK PM, about the Lockerbie bomber Mr Megrahi and the possible involvement of BP in the lobbying for his release; Chilcot inquiry update following the former director-general of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller's statement on Monday that Blair ignored her advice about going to war with Iraq; aid distribution and corruption in Afghanistan; Iran and its nuclear programme, which may not be as advanced as first thought. Presented by Gideon Rachman with guests in the studio James Blitz, the FT's defence and diplomatic editor and David Blair, the FT's Middle East and Africa news editor. Helen Warrell reports on Afghan aid. Produced by LJ Filotrani See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Scotland has released the only man convicted of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. Critics claim the British government was motivated by interest in Libya's oil reserves. Meantime, some observers still question the 2001 conviction of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, who's now being treated in Libya for terminal prostate cancer. How much will ever be known about the actual Lockerbie incident and the release of the man sentenced to life in prison for the deaths of 270 people? Sara Terry guest hosts. Also, NATO airstrikes in Afghanistan kill scores of people, and reading, writing – and politics.