Podcasts about Markel

Donna Adelson GUILTY: Courtroom Meltdown, Prison Reality & Why Wendi May Be Next This complete segment covers the full arc of a pivotal day in the Dan Markel murder case—from the moment a jury found Donna Adelson guilty on all counts, to the hard questions now circling Wendi Adelson. We start inside the courtroom on September 4, when the verdict was read and audible gasps followed. Donna's stunned reaction—described as the realization that the “chess game” was over—sets the tone for a sweeping analysis of consequence and next steps. With retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, we break down what a life sentence looks like for a 75-year-old high-profile inmate: notoriety risks, why protective segregation may be considered, how inmate dynamics and broken promises can shadow reputation, and why age offers little insulation behind bars. From there, the discussion turns to appeal prospects—particularly ineffective assistance of counsel—why such claims rarely win new trials, and why this strategy is more long-shot than lifeline. The second half pivots to the question driving true crime watchers: Is Wendi Adelson next? We unpack what prosecutors need to prove a conspiracy—the value of “overt acts,” timeline decisions, communications, and the significance of the “swimming” schedule change on the day Dan Markel was killed. We look at testimony tone (evasive “I don't remembers”), and why writing-class passages now surfacing online—cold, detached language about her ex-husband—could matter if charges are ever filed. Finally, the conversation widens to the human toll: the Markel grandparents' limited access to their grandchildren and the extraordinary steps required just to secure visits—an outcome that continues to resonate with audiences seeking justice and accountability. If you follow the Adelson trial, the Dan Markel case, or broader true crime and courtroom developments, this is your complete, fact-driven recap—part breaking news, part investigative podcast—designed to keep you fully informed on what just happened and what may come next. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #WendiAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #Courtroom #LifeSentence #Appeal #JusticeForDan #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

As Donna Adelson faces life behind bars, attention now turns to her daughter, Wendi Adelson. Could she be the next member of the family charged in the conspiracy to kill Dan Markel? In this gripping segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer explore the unanswered questions surrounding Wendi and whether prosecutors are preparing their case. We begin with speculation about Harvey Adelson, who appears less vulnerable legally, before shifting to the stronger case looming around Wendi. What are “overt acts” in a conspiracy charge, and how do prosecutors use them to build a case? From Wendi's sudden change of plans about a swimming trip on the day of the murder to her communications with Charlie Adelson, we examine how even subtle decisions can become crucial puzzle pieces. The conversation also highlights Wendi's evasive testimony — her repeated “I don't remembers” — and whether that strategy helps or hurts her in the long run. More troubling are her writing-class entries, now public, that paint a chillingly cold and detached view of her ex-husband. These revelations, combined with her mother's manipulation, may create a disturbing narrative that prosecutors could lean on if charges come. The fallout doesn't stop with Wendi. The Markel grandparents' heartbreaking fight to see their grandchildren, restricted for years while the Adelsons maintained custody, underscores the human toll of this case. Brueski and Coffindaffer unpack how the system allowed such injustice, and why this resonates so deeply with those following the trial. With every new detail, the case grows darker — from extortion risks behind bars to the possibility of new indictments. This segment leaves listeners with a haunting question: how far does the Adelson family's web of control and silence truly stretch? Hashtags: #WendiAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyToMurder #JusticeForDan #FamilySecrets #CourtroomDrama #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson GUILTY: Courtroom Meltdown, Prison Reality & Why Wendi May Be Next This complete segment covers the full arc of a pivotal day in the Dan Markel murder case—from the moment a jury found Donna Adelson guilty on all counts, to the hard questions now circling Wendi Adelson. We start inside the courtroom on September 4, when the verdict was read and audible gasps followed. Donna's stunned reaction—described as the realization that the “chess game” was over—sets the tone for a sweeping analysis of consequence and next steps. With retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, we break down what a life sentence looks like for a 75-year-old high-profile inmate: notoriety risks, why protective segregation may be considered, how inmate dynamics and broken promises can shadow reputation, and why age offers little insulation behind bars. From there, the discussion turns to appeal prospects—particularly ineffective assistance of counsel—why such claims rarely win new trials, and why this strategy is more long-shot than lifeline. The second half pivots to the question driving true crime watchers: Is Wendi Adelson next? We unpack what prosecutors need to prove a conspiracy—the value of “overt acts,” timeline decisions, communications, and the significance of the “swimming” schedule change on the day Dan Markel was killed. We look at testimony tone (evasive “I don't remembers”), and why writing-class passages now surfacing online—cold, detached language about her ex-husband—could matter if charges are ever filed. Finally, the conversation widens to the human toll: the Markel grandparents' limited access to their grandchildren and the extraordinary steps required just to secure visits—an outcome that continues to resonate with audiences seeking justice and accountability. If you follow the Adelson trial, the Dan Markel case, or broader true crime and courtroom developments, this is your complete, fact-driven recap—part breaking news, part investigative podcast—designed to keep you fully informed on what just happened and what may come next. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #WendiAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #Courtroom #LifeSentence #Appeal #JusticeForDan #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

As Donna Adelson faces life behind bars, attention now turns to her daughter, Wendi Adelson. Could she be the next member of the family charged in the conspiracy to kill Dan Markel? In this gripping segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer explore the unanswered questions surrounding Wendi and whether prosecutors are preparing their case. We begin with speculation about Harvey Adelson, who appears less vulnerable legally, before shifting to the stronger case looming around Wendi. What are “overt acts” in a conspiracy charge, and how do prosecutors use them to build a case? From Wendi's sudden change of plans about a swimming trip on the day of the murder to her communications with Charlie Adelson, we examine how even subtle decisions can become crucial puzzle pieces. The conversation also highlights Wendi's evasive testimony — her repeated “I don't remembers” — and whether that strategy helps or hurts her in the long run. More troubling are her writing-class entries, now public, that paint a chillingly cold and detached view of her ex-husband. These revelations, combined with her mother's manipulation, may create a disturbing narrative that prosecutors could lean on if charges come. The fallout doesn't stop with Wendi. The Markel grandparents' heartbreaking fight to see their grandchildren, restricted for years while the Adelsons maintained custody, underscores the human toll of this case. Brueski and Coffindaffer unpack how the system allowed such injustice, and why this resonates so deeply with those following the trial. With every new detail, the case grows darker — from extortion risks behind bars to the possibility of new indictments. This segment leaves listeners with a haunting question: how far does the Adelson family's web of control and silence truly stretch? Hashtags: #WendiAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyToMurder #JusticeForDan #FamilySecrets #CourtroomDrama #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Adelson Family Fallout: What Did Harvey Know & Who's Next to Face Justice? With Donna Adelson convicted and Wendy under growing scrutiny, one question remains: what about Harvey Adelson? The patriarch of the family sat silently through his wife's trial, his face betraying little. But how much did he know about the plot to murder Dan Markel? And how much responsibility does he bear for the fallout now consuming his family? In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, Bob Motta joins to explore Harvey's role and the broader implications for the Adelson family. Was he a passive bystander, or did he knowingly enable the conspiracy? Did he simply turn a blind eye to his wife and children's actions, or was he part of the planning from the beginning? The conversation also examines the devastating impact on the Markel family, who continue to fight for access to Dan's children, as well as the systemic issues exposed by the case. The Adelson saga is not just about on e murder — it's about power, control, and the lengths some families will go to in order to maintain both. Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Adelson Family Fallout: What Did Harvey Know & Who's Next to Face Justice? With Donna Adelson convicted and Wendy under growing scrutiny, one question remains: what about Harvey Adelson? The patriarch of the family sat silently through his wife's trial, his face betraying little. But how much did he know about the plot to murder Dan Markel? And how much responsibility does he bear for the fallout now consuming his family? In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, Bob Motta joins to explore Harvey's role and the broader implications for the Adelson family. Was he a passive bystander, or did he knowingly enable the conspiracy? Did he simply turn a blind eye to his wife and children's actions, or was he part of the planning from the beginning? The conversation also examines the devastating impact on the Markel family, who continue to fight for access to Dan's children, as well as the systemic issues exposed by the case. The Adelson saga is not just about on e murder — it's about power, control, and the lengths some families will go to in order to maintain both. Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alison Galvani returns to the channel to give an update on her mother Nancy's cold case murder. Write to DA Wagstaffe: swagstaffe@smcgov.org. Here's a template you can use to copy and paste into your email. DA Wagstaffe,I'm writing to urge you to move forward and indict and prosecute the murderer of Nancy Galvani. The perpetrator of Nancy's cruel premeditated murder has enjoyed decades of undeserved freedom while Nancy's family has watched and waited for those in power to act. Please give Nancy's family the justice they deserve.Sincerely,(Your name) We return to the testimony Wendi Adelson gave under a limited immunity deal. Ms. Adelson's testimony was contradictory and hard to believe and frequently refuted with evidence provided by the State. Wendi Adelson remains one of two unindicted co-conspirators in the murder of Dan Markel. Today, we look at her testimony in her mother Donna Adelson's murder trial and her brother Charlie Adelson's murder trial. Both Donna and Charlie Adelson were convicted by a jury after under four hours of deliberation. Does this easy conviction of Wendi's mother & brother give the State's Attorney the confidence to finally indict Wendi Adelson for the murder of her ex—husband, Dan Markel. Or will she always remain a strange anomaly in this case- an unidicted member of the Adelson family who benefited the most from Markel's murder?Get access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereport Throw a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglass Support Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglass Become a channnel member for custom Emojis, first looks and exclusive streams here: https://youtube.com/@robertaglass/join Thank you Patrons! Rockstar60, Carol Mumumeci, Therese Tunks, JC, Lizzy D, Elizabeth Drake, Texas Mimi, Barb, Deborah Shults, Debra Ratliff, Stephanie Lamberson, Maryellen Sudol, Mona, Karen Pacini, Jen Buell, Marie Horton, ER, Rosie Grace, B. Rabbit, Sally Merrick, Amanda D, Mary B, Mrs Jones, Amy Gill, Eileen, Wesley Loves Octoberfest, Erin (Kitties1993), Anna Quint, Cici Guteriez, Sandra Loves GatsbyHannna, Christy, Jen Buell, Elle Solari, Carol Cardella, Jennifer Harmon, DoxieMama65, Carol Holderman, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Johnny Jay, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown, Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff, Kayce Taylor, Alice, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, T.B., Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines and Toni Natalie.

The Adelson Family Fallout: What Did Harvey Know & Who's Next to Face Justice? With Donna Adelson convicted and Wendy under growing scrutiny, one question remains: what about Harvey Adelson? The patriarch of the family sat silently through his wife's trial, his face betraying little. But how much did he know about the plot to murder Dan Markel? And how much responsibility does he bear for the fallout now consuming his family? In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, Bob Motta joins to explore Harvey's role and the broader implications for the Adelson family. Was he a passive bystander, or did he knowingly enable the conspiracy? Did he simply turn a blind eye to his wife and children's actions, or was he part of the planning from the beginning? The conversation also examines the devastating impact on the Markel family, who continue to fight for access to Dan's children, as well as the systemic issues exposed by the case. The Adelson saga is not just about on e murder — it's about power, control, and the lengths some families will go to in order to maintain both. Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson GUILTY: Inside the Verdict That Rocked the Markel Murder Case After years of speculation and investigation, Donna Adelson has been found guilty in the murder-for-hire plot that ended the life of Florida State law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors argued that the Adelson family conspired to eliminate Markel so Donna's daughter, Wendy, could relocate her children to South Florida. In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, defense attorney and podcaster Bob Motta joins to unpack the verdict. What evidence sealed Donna's fate? How did the jury interpret her courtroom demeanor? And why did her defense strategy collapse in the face of overwhelming circumstantial evidence? From wiretapped conversations to incriminating text messages, the prosecution built a powerful narrative that placed Donna at the center of the conspiracy. The courtroom strategy to dress her as a “sweet grandmother” failed, as her behavior came across to jurors as manipulative rather than sympathetic. This verdict is a milestone in the long-running Markel case, but it may also open the door to further prosecutions. With Donna convicted, all eyes now turn to Wendy and Harvey Adelson. Will they be next? Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeCommunity #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson GUILTY: Inside the Verdict That Rocked the Markel Murder Case After years of speculation and investigation, Donna Adelson has been found guilty in the murder-for-hire plot that ended the life of Florida State law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors argued that the Adelson family conspired to eliminate Markel so Donna's daughter, Wendy, could relocate her children to South Florida. In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, defense attorney and podcaster Bob Motta joins to unpack the verdict. What evidence sealed Donna's fate? How did the jury interpret her courtroom demeanor? And why did her defense strategy collapse in the face of overwhelming circumstantial evidence? From wiretapped conversations to incriminating text messages, the prosecution built a powerful narrative that placed Donna at the center of the conspiracy. The courtroom strategy to dress her as a “sweet grandmother” failed, as her behavior came across to jurors as manipulative rather than sympathetic. This verdict is a milestone in the long-running Markel case, but it may also open the door to further prosecutions. With Donna convicted, all eyes now turn to Wendy and Harvey Adelson. Will they be next? Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeCommunity #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendi Adelson remains one of two unindicted co-conspirators in the murder of Dan Markel. Today, we look at her testimony in her mother Donna Adelson's murder trial. Donna Adelson was convicted after the jury deliberated for less than 4 hours. Does this easy conviction of her mother give the State's Attorney the confidence to finally indict Wendi Adelson for the murder of her ex—husband, Dan Markel. Or will she always remain a strange anomaly in this case- an unidicted member of the Adelson family who benefited the most from Markel's murder?Get access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereportThrow a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassSupport Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglassBecome a channnel member for custom Emojis, first looks and exclusive streams here: https://youtube.com/@robertaglass/joinThank you Patrons!Rockstar60, Carol Mumumeci, Therese Tunks, JC, Lizzy D, Elizabeth Drake, Texas Mimi, Barb, Deborah Shults, Debra Ratliff, Stephanie Lamberson, Maryellen Sudol, Mona, Karen Pacini, Jen Buell, Marie Horton, ER, Rosie Grace, B. Rabbit, Sally Merrick, Amanda D, Mary B, Mrs Jones, Amy Gill, Eileen, Wesley Loves Octoberfest, Erin (Kitties1993), Anna Quint, Cici Guteriez, Sandra Loves GatsbyHannna, Christy, Jen Buell, Elle Solari, Carol Cardella, Jennifer Harmon, DoxieMama65, Carol Holderman, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Johnny Jay, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown, Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff, Kayce Taylor, Alice, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, T.B., Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines and Toni Natalie.

Donna Adelson GUILTY: Inside the Verdict That Rocked the Markel Murder Case After years of speculation and investigation, Donna Adelson has been found guilty in the murder-for-hire plot that ended the life of Florida State law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors argued that the Adelson family conspired to eliminate Markel so Donna's daughter, Wendy, could relocate her children to South Florida. In this segment of Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brueski, defense attorney and podcaster Bob Motta joins to unpack the verdict. What evidence sealed Donna's fate? How did the jury interpret her courtroom demeanor? And why did her defense strategy collapse in the face of overwhelming circumstantial evidence? From wiretapped conversations to incriminating text messages, the prosecution built a powerful narrative that placed Donna at the center of the conspiracy. The courtroom strategy to dress her as a “sweet grandmother” failed, as her behavior came across to jurors as manipulative rather than sympathetic. This verdict is a milestone in the long-running Markel case, but it may also open the door to further prosecutions. With Donna convicted, all eyes now turn to Wendy and Harvey Adelson. Will they be next? Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JusticeForDan #MurderTrial #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeCommunity #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

MURDER FOR HIRE: REDUX In 2014, the shocking murder of Florida State law professor Dan Markel stunned the Tallahassee community and sparked one of the most complex criminal investigations in recent memory. At the center of the case: the Adelson family, whose bitter custody battle with Markel became the backdrop for an alleged murder-for-hire plot. Last year, we brought you Murder for Hire, an in-depth look at the Donna Adelson case — a story of family loyalty, secrecy, and the chilling lengths some will go to when desperation turns deadly. Now, we're bringing that episode back, because there have been stunning new developments. The kind of developments that could reshape everything we thought we knew about this case. We can't say more just yet, but in our next bonus episode, we'll break down what's happened and why it matters. For now, revisit the tangled web of the Adelson family and the murder of Dan Markel — because the next chapter is finally here. Follow & Connect     •    Follow us on Instagram: @eviocreative (https://instagram.com/eviocreative)     •    For press & inquiries: info@eviocreative.com     •    Don't forget to rate, review, and follow Criminal Mischief wherever you get your podcasts.

It's finally happened!!--I'm honored to welcome back Caroline Markel, Founder and CEO of Safe in Harm's Way, for an in-depth conversation that's both exciting and, yes!...exclusive! Over the past two-and-a-half years, Caroline and her organization have been evolving in significant ways, and this episode offers a rare, behind-the-scenes look at the changes, developments, and forward-thinking initiatives that few people outside her immediate circle have been privy to. In this episode, Caroline shares her perspectives with openness and transparency, discussing not only what has changed with Safe in Harm's Way but also the plans for the future that are poised to make a real impact in the world of rape and sexual assault advocacy. Her insights and strategies highlight the importance of proactive, survivor-focused approaches to justice, and the conversation is packed with actionable ideas and hope for victims and survivors. Listening to Caroline's vision for the organization is both inspiring and energizing, giving us a glimpse of what's to come and the difference one dedicated advocate can make. I want to extend my deepest gratitude to Caroline for joining me once again and for providing such an informative and impactful discussion. The work she and Safe in Harm's Way are doing is critically important, and the implementation of these forthcoming changes promises to bring even more tangible support and justice to victims and survivors of rape and sexual assault. Her commitment, foresight, and passion are genuinely admirable. It's why she's on this show so frequently! For my listeners, I hope this episode leaves you with not only a sense of excitement about Caroline's plans but also a renewed sense of the power that advocacy and action can have in the lives of survivors. Sharing this episode helps amplify these important conversations, supports the critical work of Safe in Harm's Way, and contributes to the ongoing effort to normalize the conversation around sexual assault and rape. Every donation and share strengthens the ability of organizations like Safe in Harm's Way to make a lasting impact and bring justice to those who need it most. An important side note: if you're finding value in these episodes, please take a moment to leave a 5-star rating on your podcast platform. AND, please send me a note of support. I can't tell you how much your emails mean to me—they fuel my passion to keep this podcast going. Here's my email address:   Thank you to all of you who have reached out to me already; and, if you're interested in guesting on the show, please mention that in your email or text, and provide me with a phone number where I can reach you. Please keep those emails and texts coming…I truly look forward to hearing from you!   My email address: As mentioned and emphasized, it's time to Normalize the Conversation.™ And please remember to Start by Believing…because we all know someone whose life has been impacted by rape or sexual assault. Thank you for tuning in.

The very recent case of Dan Markel, a bright, ambitious family man whose life was cut short by a family of monstrous people.

Big Breakdown - Donna Adelson's Bad Week In Court Donna Adelson just had the kind of week in court you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy—unless your last name happens to be Markel. In this Big Breakdown, we take you inside the courtroom for a front-row seat to one of the most revealing stretches in Donna Adelson's murder-for-hire trial. The prosecution came out swinging with bombshells that shook the courtroom—from incriminating testimony and surveillance clips to undercover FBI tactics that turned up the pressure. And Donna? Her reactions say just as much as her defense does. This episode dives into why this past week might be a turning point in the case. We explore how the prosecution methodically dismantled the defense narrative, what psychological tells we saw from Donna in court, and what experts believe about the strategy behind both sides. It's not just about what was said—it's about what wasn't said, and how the jury might interpret it. Tony Brueski is joined by top-tier analysts and legal insiders to unpack the most damning testimony, the emotional tone in the courtroom, and the optics that could influence the outcome of the trial. If you've been following the saga of the Adelson family and the murder of Dan Markel, this is a pivotal moment. And if you're just tuning in, now's the time to catch up—because things are only getting more intense from here. Subscribe for daily true crime breakdowns and expert insight you won't find anywhere else. #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #MurderForHire #TrialUpdate #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson Testimony, “Soft Memory,” and Prosecutors' Next Moves Wendy Adelson has always been at the center of motive in the Dan Markel murder case—but so far, she's avoided charges. In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer take a closer look at Wendy's latest courtroom performance and the evidence stacking around her. On the stand, Wendy's testimony was a showcase of selective memory—she couldn't recall conversations, details, or context that anyone else would find unforgettable. Yet her ex-boyfriend testified that she openly admitted Charlie had looked into hiring a hitman. She denied direct involvement, but admitted she despised her ex, adding fuel to suspicions. Overlay that with Donna's potential to flip if convicted, and Wendy's position looks perilous. Donna knows the family conspiracy better than anyone, and she could sink both Harvey and Wendy if she chooses. For prosecutors, that's leverage. Coffindaffer explains how investigators evaluate testimony like Wendy's—when “I don't recall” crosses from strategy into obstruction, and why prosecutors might be building a case quietly in the background. Are they already monitoring her communications, waiting for a mistake? Is Wendy truly untouchable, or simply next in line once Donna's trial concludes? Wendy benefited the most from Markel's death—custody, freedom, financial stability—but her credibility continues to erode. This conversation cuts through the evasions to ask: will Wendy finally face charges, or can she keep dancing on the line? Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer Keywords: Wendy Adelson, Dan Markel case, Donna Adelson trial, Charlie Adelson, testimony analysis, selective memory, ex-boyfriend testimony, law professor, prosecution strategy, Hidden Killers Hashtags: #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Testimony #Investigation #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown - Donna Adelson's Bad Week In Court Donna Adelson just had the kind of week in court you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy—unless your last name happens to be Markel. In this Big Breakdown, we take you inside the courtroom for a front-row seat to one of the most revealing stretches in Donna Adelson's murder-for-hire trial. The prosecution came out swinging with bombshells that shook the courtroom—from incriminating testimony and surveillance clips to undercover FBI tactics that turned up the pressure. And Donna? Her reactions say just as much as her defense does. This episode dives into why this past week might be a turning point in the case. We explore how the prosecution methodically dismantled the defense narrative, what psychological tells we saw from Donna in court, and what experts believe about the strategy behind both sides. It's not just about what was said—it's about what wasn't said, and how the jury might interpret it. Tony Brueski is joined by top-tier analysts and legal insiders to unpack the most damning testimony, the emotional tone in the courtroom, and the optics that could influence the outcome of the trial. If you've been following the saga of the Adelson family and the murder of Dan Markel, this is a pivotal moment. And if you're just tuning in, now's the time to catch up—because things are only getting more intense from here. Subscribe for daily true crime breakdowns and expert insight you won't find anywhere else. #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #MurderForHire #TrialUpdate #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson Testimony, “Soft Memory,” and Prosecutors' Next Moves Wendy Adelson has always been at the center of motive in the Dan Markel murder case—but so far, she's avoided charges. In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer take a closer look at Wendy's latest courtroom performance and the evidence stacking around her. On the stand, Wendy's testimony was a showcase of selective memory—she couldn't recall conversations, details, or context that anyone else would find unforgettable. Yet her ex-boyfriend testified that she openly admitted Charlie had looked into hiring a hitman. She denied direct involvement, but admitted she despised her ex, adding fuel to suspicions. Overlay that with Donna's potential to flip if convicted, and Wendy's position looks perilous. Donna knows the family conspiracy better than anyone, and she could sink both Harvey and Wendy if she chooses. For prosecutors, that's leverage. Coffindaffer explains how investigators evaluate testimony like Wendy's—when “I don't recall” crosses from strategy into obstruction, and why prosecutors might be building a case quietly in the background. Are they already monitoring her communications, waiting for a mistake? Is Wendy truly untouchable, or simply next in line once Donna's trial concludes? Wendy benefited the most from Markel's death—custody, freedom, financial stability—but her credibility continues to erode. This conversation cuts through the evasions to ask: will Wendy finally face charges, or can she keep dancing on the line? Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer Keywords: Wendy Adelson, Dan Markel case, Donna Adelson trial, Charlie Adelson, testimony analysis, selective memory, ex-boyfriend testimony, law professor, prosecution strategy, Hidden Killers Hashtags: #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Testimony #Investigation #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson Testimony, “Soft Memory,” and Prosecutors' Next Moves Wendy Adelson has always been at the center of motive in the Dan Markel murder case—but so far, she's avoided charges. In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer take a closer look at Wendy's latest courtroom performance and the evidence stacking around her. On the stand, Wendy's testimony was a showcase of selective memory—she couldn't recall conversations, details, or context that anyone else would find unforgettable. Yet her ex-boyfriend testified that she openly admitted Charlie had looked into hiring a hitman. She denied direct involvement, but admitted she despised her ex, adding fuel to suspicions. Overlay that with Donna's potential to flip if convicted, and Wendy's position looks perilous. Donna knows the family conspiracy better than anyone, and she could sink both Harvey and Wendy if she chooses. For prosecutors, that's leverage. Coffindaffer explains how investigators evaluate testimony like Wendy's—when “I don't recall” crosses from strategy into obstruction, and why prosecutors might be building a case quietly in the background. Are they already monitoring her communications, waiting for a mistake? Is Wendy truly untouchable, or simply next in line once Donna's trial concludes? Wendy benefited the most from Markel's death—custody, freedom, financial stability—but her credibility continues to erode. This conversation cuts through the evasions to ask: will Wendy finally face charges, or can she keep dancing on the line? Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer Keywords: Wendy Adelson, Dan Markel case, Donna Adelson trial, Charlie Adelson, testimony analysis, selective memory, ex-boyfriend testimony, law professor, prosecution strategy, Hidden Killers Hashtags: #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Testimony #Investigation #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on  ⁨The Emily D Baker⁩ YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/R1zhYkOKL1U Day 8 of the Donna Adelson trial happened on September 3, 2025 and the main question was whether Donna Adelson would testify? Ultimately, she did not, after attempting to get more time from the court to make her decision. The defense rested their case, and the prosecution will not be bringing a rebuttal. Closing arguments are scheduled for tomorrow morning, September 4, 2025.A significant portion of the day was spent discussing a second violation of the witness sequestration order by the defense. The judge expressed frustration that her instructions were not being followed, as a defense expert witness was present in the courtroom during another witness's testimony. Despite the prosecution's request for exclusion, the judge reserved her ruling, noting that exclusion is an extreme remedy and could create appellate issues if Donna Adelson is convicted. The defense called two witnesses: Kristin Adamson, Wendi's Previous Family Law Attorney and Linda Bailey, a Family Law Attorney Expert, to discuss the Markel divorce case. Their aim seemed to be to downplay the contentious nature of the divorce, arguing it was a "normal" case and not as emotionally charged as the prosecution portrayed. However, the prosecution's cross-examination highlighted that even routine legal matters can be highly impactful and emotionally charged for the litigants involved, echoing Donna Adelson's own emails about the divorce being critical. With the defense and prosecution both resting, the court moved to the charging conference to finalize jury instructions for charges including first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and solicitation of murder. The trial saw 27 witnesses for the prosecution and 12 for the defense over eight days. The upcoming closing arguments are expected to be lengthy, and deliberations could begin tomorrow. Donna Adelson's decision not to testify was likely strategic, as her testimony could have potentially hurt her case. The argument that she needed more time to decide on testifying is dismissed as unlikely to succeed on appeal, given the extensive time and continuances already provided to the defense. RESOURCES Donna Adelson Road So Far - https://youtu.be/rlN7cBdTikw Donna Adelson Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL0_OPy2AliqyEjGcI8QzBu Donna Adelson Trial Daily Case Briefs - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFdNnRZUqH62ToyQCgLbRavztmRy0ohXN Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Adelson Phone Records, Coded Texts, and Vietnam Attempt For years, Harvey Adelson has been the quietest figure in the sprawling Markel murder saga. While Donna, Charlie, and Wendy took center stage in the courtroom, Harvey stayed in the background—silent, still, never taking the stand. But newly highlighted evidence is pushing him out of the shadows. In this segment of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examine the case threads connecting Harvey to the conspiracy. Phone records show contact between Harvey's phone and hitman Sigfredo Garcia weeks before Dan Markel's murder. Was this coincidence—or a direct link? Investigators also point to Harvey's alleged attempt to book a one-way ticket to Vietnam, suggesting flight and consciousness of guilt. Add in the Dolce Vita recording, where Harvey is present during family conversations prosecutors say were about the crime, and suddenly his “silent father” role looks a lot more active. Coffindaffer breaks down how investigators weigh circumstantial evidence against someone like Harvey. How do you prove intent in coded conversations? How do you read travel attempts through the lens of guilt? And does Harvey's calm, almost dazed courtroom demeanor reflect ignorance—or the quiet stress of a man who knows he may be next? This is not a murder-trial case against Harvey, but the pieces point toward potential accessory charges and deeper involvement than he's ever admitted. Silence doesn't equal innocence, and Harvey's silence may finally be catching up with him. Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer Keywords: Harvey Adelson, Dan Markel murder, Dolce Vita recording, Vietnam ticket, Sigfredo Garcia, accessory after the fact, Donna Adelson, Charlie Adelson, Hidden Killers Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Evidence #DolceVita #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson's Ex Reveals Chilling Confession About Charlie's Murder Plot In this episode of Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels dig deep into one of the most revealing moments in the Dan Markel murder investigation: the police interrogation of Wendy Adelson's ex-boyfriend, Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste. Recorded in the aftermath of early arrests tied to the hit on FSU law professor Dan Markel, the interrogation showcases how detectives worked to separate suspicion from truth. At first, Lacoste himself was under the microscope. But what unfolded quickly redirected focus onto the Adelson family—Wendy, Charlie, and their controlling matriarch, Donna. Lacoste recalled haunting conversations with Wendy, including one where she confided that Charlie Adelson had “legitimately explored” hiring someone to kill Markel. Not a joke, not an offhand remark, but a chillingly serious disclosure. His statement matched courtroom testimony years later, but in this raw police interview, the gravity hits even harder. Our panel breaks down credibility cues, body language, and tempo of disclosure, explaining why Lacoste read as a highly reliable source—even while acknowledging his lingering attachment to Wendy, which slightly complicated his objectivity. We also explore his sharp memory for details, dates, and conversations, and why the one moment he couldn't precisely recall raises questions worth unpacking. The interrogation also highlights Charlie Adelson's bizarre behavior—bragging about his connections to Green Berets and surrounding himself with militant types, despite being a wealthy South Florida dentist. Was this insecurity? Narcissism? A desperate attempt to project toughness after years under his mother's thumb? With convictions already secured against Charlie Adelson, Sigfredo Garcia, and Katherine Magbanua, attention now turns to Wendy and Donna. The Lacoste interrogation remains a critical piece of the puzzle in exposing the family's role in this murder-for-hire plot. Join us as we dissect the interrogation line by line, revealing the psychology, the family dynamics, and the chilling implications for everyone tied to Dan Markel's death. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacoste #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #ForensicPsychology #MurderForHire #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson's Ex Reveals Chilling Confession About Charlie's Murder Plot In this episode of Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels dig deep into one of the most revealing moments in the Dan Markel murder investigation: the police interrogation of Wendy Adelson's ex-boyfriend, Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste. Recorded in the aftermath of early arrests tied to the hit on FSU law professor Dan Markel, the interrogation showcases how detectives worked to separate suspicion from truth. At first, Lacoste himself was under the microscope. But what unfolded quickly redirected focus onto the Adelson family—Wendy, Charlie, and their controlling matriarch, Donna. Lacoste recalled haunting conversations with Wendy, including one where she confided that Charlie Adelson had “legitimately explored” hiring someone to kill Markel. Not a joke, not an offhand remark, but a chillingly serious disclosure. His statement matched courtroom testimony years later, but in this raw police interview, the gravity hits even harder. Our panel breaks down credibility cues, body language, and tempo of disclosure, explaining why Lacoste read as a highly reliable source—even while acknowledging his lingering attachment to Wendy, which slightly complicated his objectivity. We also explore his sharp memory for details, dates, and conversations, and why the one moment he couldn't precisely recall raises questions worth unpacking. The interrogation also highlights Charlie Adelson's bizarre behavior—bragging about his connections to Green Berets and surrounding himself with militant types, despite being a wealthy South Florida dentist. Was this insecurity? Narcissism? A desperate attempt to project toughness after years under his mother's thumb? With convictions already secured against Charlie Adelson, Sigfredo Garcia, and Katherine Magbanua, attention now turns to Wendy and Donna. The Lacoste interrogation remains a critical piece of the puzzle in exposing the family's role in this murder-for-hire plot. Join us as we dissect the interrogation line by line, revealing the psychology, the family dynamics, and the chilling implications for everyone tied to Dan Markel's death. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacoste #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #ForensicPsychology #MurderForHire #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Harvey Adelson Phone Records, Coded Texts, and Vietnam Attempt For years, Harvey Adelson has been the quietest figure in the sprawling Markel murder saga. While Donna, Charlie, and Wendy took center stage in the courtroom, Harvey stayed in the background—silent, still, never taking the stand. But newly highlighted evidence is pushing him out of the shadows. In this segment of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examine the case threads connecting Harvey to the conspiracy. Phone records show contact between Harvey's phone and hitman Sigfredo Garcia weeks before Dan Markel's murder. Was this coincidence—or a direct link? Investigators also point to Harvey's alleged attempt to book a one-way ticket to Vietnam, suggesting flight and consciousness of guilt. Add in the Dolce Vita recording, where Harvey is present during family conversations prosecutors say were about the crime, and suddenly his “silent father” role looks a lot more active. Coffindaffer breaks down how investigators weigh circumstantial evidence against someone like Harvey. How do you prove intent in coded conversations? How do you read travel attempts through the lens of guilt? And does Harvey's calm, almost dazed courtroom demeanor reflect ignorance—or the quiet stress of a man who knows he may be next? This is not a murder-trial case against Harvey, but the pieces point toward potential accessory charges and deeper involvement than he's ever admitted. Silence doesn't equal innocence, and Harvey's silence may finally be catching up with him. Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer Keywords: Harvey Adelson, Dan Markel murder, Dolce Vita recording, Vietnam ticket, Sigfredo Garcia, accessory after the fact, Donna Adelson, Charlie Adelson, Hidden Killers Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Evidence #DolceVita #Conspiracy Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Wendy Adelson's Ex Reveals Chilling Confession About Charlie's Murder Plot In this episode of Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels dig deep into one of the most revealing moments in the Dan Markel murder investigation: the police interrogation of Wendy Adelson's ex-boyfriend, Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste. Recorded in the aftermath of early arrests tied to the hit on FSU law professor Dan Markel, the interrogation showcases how detectives worked to separate suspicion from truth. At first, Lacoste himself was under the microscope. But what unfolded quickly redirected focus onto the Adelson family—Wendy, Charlie, and their controlling matriarch, Donna. Lacoste recalled haunting conversations with Wendy, including one where she confided that Charlie Adelson had “legitimately explored” hiring someone to kill Markel. Not a joke, not an offhand remark, but a chillingly serious disclosure. His statement matched courtroom testimony years later, but in this raw police interview, the gravity hits even harder. Our panel breaks down credibility cues, body language, and tempo of disclosure, explaining why Lacoste read as a highly reliable source—even while acknowledging his lingering attachment to Wendy, which slightly complicated his objectivity. We also explore his sharp memory for details, dates, and conversations, and why the one moment he couldn't precisely recall raises questions worth unpacking. The interrogation also highlights Charlie Adelson's bizarre behavior—bragging about his connections to Green Berets and surrounding himself with militant types, despite being a wealthy South Florida dentist. Was this insecurity? Narcissism? A desperate attempt to project toughness after years under his mother's thumb? With convictions already secured against Charlie Adelson, Sigfredo Garcia, and Katherine Magbanua, attention now turns to Wendy and Donna. The Lacoste interrogation remains a critical piece of the puzzle in exposing the family's role in this murder-for-hire plot. Join us as we dissect the interrogation line by line, revealing the psychology, the family dynamics, and the chilling implications for everyone tied to Dan Markel's death. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacoste #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #ForensicPsychology #MurderForHire #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson, the grandmother accused of conspiring with her family to murder her Florida State University law school professor Dan Markel, is on trial in Tallahassee. Adelson maintains she was not part of a conspiracy to murder Markel over custody of her grandchildren. But prosecutors have presented a trove of evidence, including wiretaps, her day planner, text messages, and testimony from her own children and jailhouse snitches. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy goes through all of it in this episode of Crime Fix.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:If you're ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can submit a claim in 8 clicks or less without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: https://www.forthepeople.com/CrimeFixHost:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Producer:Jordan ChaconCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Donna Adelson Trial — Tim Kelly (Realtor) Says Family Looked at Tallahassee Homes In this raw courtroom clip from the Donna Adelson Trial, Tallahassee realtor Tim Kelly takes the stand and lays out a detail the defense wants front and center: back in 2011, he showed homes to Donna and Harvey Adelson—appointments he says were set up at Dan Markel's request. Kelly methodically explains when the showings happened, the neighborhoods he toured with the Adelsons, and the ordinary, practical tone of those conversations. It's not flashy testimony, but it's the kind that makes jurors pause: if Donna and Harvey were considering a move to Tallahassee years before Markel's 2014 murder, how does that square with the state's theory that the family was fixated on getting Wendi and the kids out of Tallahassee? Why it matters: motive. Prosecutors have framed this case around family conflict, relocation pressures, and control. Kelly's testimony can't rewrite the larger timeline—but it complicates it. The defense is using him to suggest the Adelsons' priorities weren't a one-way street. If jurors conclude the family at one time explored living near Markel instead of removing the children from him, that nuance could seed reasonable doubt around the state's overarching motive story. Watch for the specifics: who contacted whom (Kelly says Markel), how the showings unfolded, and how the search ultimately fizzled. The defense is aiming for a simple takeaway—this was normal family logistics, not a breadcrumb trail toward violence. The prosecution, for its part, will argue the 2011 showings are a blip with little bearing on the decisions and communications that followed years later. Bottom line: Kelly adds a quiet but strategic brick to the defense wall. It's not the kind of testimony that makes headlines, but it's exactly the kind that jurors revisit when they're sorting motive from speculation. #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TimKelly #TrueCrime #Tallahassee #MurderForHire #Courtroom #TrialUpdate #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Wendi Adelson's Former Divorce Attorney Says the Divorce Was “Not Contentious”   In today's testimony Kristin Adamson—the family-law attorney who represented Wendi Adelson during her divorce from Dan Markel—told jurors the initial divorce proceedings were “not contentious.” Her account undercuts the notion that the legal split itself was a nonstop conflagration; instead, Adamson drew a distinction between a relatively typical divorce process and what came after it. Under further questioning, she acknowledged that post-divorce filings by Markel became more personal and hostile, a shift the state says fed resentment and control battles that ultimately form the backdrop to this murder conspiracy case. Why it matters: motive and narrative framing. Prosecutors have long argued that a bitter custody fight and relocation dispute set the stage for the homicidal plot that killed Markel in 2014. If the jury accepts Adamson's framing—that the core divorce looked fairly standard while later filings grew heated—it subtly reshapes where the real friction lived and when it peaked. That matters for assigning intent and pressure points to the Adelson family's decisions in the months leading up to the murder.  Adamson also faced questions about parental involvement in divorce logistics (how often parents attend client meetings, who shows up in hearings), as the defense tries to downplay the idea of Donna Adelson meddling in legal strategy—arguing that what looked like interference may have been normal family presence during a stressful time. The prosecution, by contrast, wants jurors to see those same moments as control—a pattern consistent with its broader theory of a family mobilized to remove Markel as an obstacle. For viewers tracking continuity across witnesses, this clip is a calibration tool: it doesn't prove or disprove the murder-for-hire plot, but it helps jurors locate the temperature of the Adelson–Markel legal conflict on a timeline—cooler during the divorce itself, hotter in the aftermath. That timeline will echo through testimony about relocation, custody, wiretaps, and alleged conspirators, as the court weighs whether Donna Adelson crossed the line from family advocacy to criminal orchestration. (Donna Adelson is on trial for first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation; she has pleaded not guilty.) #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #WendiAdelson #KristinAdamson #TrueCrime #CustodyBattle #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom #MurderForHire #Tallahassee Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“I'd Like to Kill That MF” Charlie Adelson's Chilling Repeated Threats In this gripping analysis from Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels, examine one of the most damning sections of Jeffrey Lacasse's interrogation—the part where Charlie Adelson's casual threats, reckless talk, and family dynamics intersect with murder-for-hire reality. According to Lacasse, Charlie Adelson wasn't shy about voicing his hatred for Dan Markel. These weren't offhand grumbles; they were repeated, venomous statements—“I'd like to kill that motherf***er”—said so often they stuck in Lacasse's memory. Unlike normal venting, Charlie went further, asking how much it would cost. That step from emotional ranting into cost-benefit analysis marked a chilling escalation. The panel dissects why this behavior fit a pattern: Charlie's lack of impulse control, a trait he likely inherited from Donna Adelson, combined with years of unchecked arrogance. In his safe family bubble, he felt untouchable, rehearsing bravado for immediate gratification with no thought of repercussions. This impulsivity, coupled with Donna's enmeshment and Wendy's complicity, set the stage for tragedy. We also examine Charlie's strange double life: a wealthy South Florida dentist with a Ferrari, yet constantly surrounding himself with “tough” gym buddies, ex-military acquaintances, and shady characters. Was this insecurity, narcissistic posturing, or a deliberate attempt to outsource the dirty work he lacked the nerve to do himself? Adding to the suspicion is Wendy's sudden no-contact email to Lacasse, allegedly at her therapist's direction, just days before Dan Markel was killed. Was this standard breakup strategy, or part of an Adelson plot to frame Lacasse as the “abusive male” and potential fall guy? The timing is hard to ignore. This episode also explores how family enmeshment and narcissistic validation needs created a toxic system where Charlie and Wendy were extensions of Donna's will. The Adelsons may have rationalized their plot as a crusade to “protect the children,” but to outsiders, it was reckless and criminal. From hot tub bragging about hiding money to leaked threats overheard by boyfriends, Charlie's downfall was paved by his own mouth. As Lacasse says, within 20 seconds of hearing about Markel's murder, he thought of Charlie. That instinctive reaction speaks volumes. Hashtags #CharlieAdelson #WendyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #MurderForHire #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ForensicPsychology #CourtroomDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Georgia Cappleman's Blistering Cross of Defense Legal Expert on “Contentious” Divorce  This raw courtroom clip captures Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman going toe-to-toe with defense family-law expert Linda Bailey over one deceptively simple question: Was the Wendi Adelson–Dan Markel divorce “contentious” or just another typical case in the trenches of family court? Bailey, called by the defense to cool the temperature, testified that the divorce looked much more amicable than many she's seen and that nothing in Donna Adelson's involvement struck her as unusual. Cappleman then launched into a pointed, methodical cross—pressing Bailey on whether “contentiousness” can look very different to lawyers than it does to the actual people living it, and whether high-stakes motions (like the so-called “grandmother motion”) might land as a five-alarm fire to a layperson even if an attorney views it as routine. You'll hear the prosecution challenge the expert's framing, arguing that in the real world—outside the safe confines of legal jargon—custody, relocation, and grandparent access can feel like the “most important thing in the whole wide world.” Bailey holds the line, reaffirming her view that the divorce was fundamentally typical and that the grandmother-related filing wasn't likely to succeed or restrict Donna's unsupervised time. The exchange matters because the state's motive theory leans on a heated backdrop: long-running conflict, relocation battles, and a family culture of control. If jurors accept Bailey's narrative, the defense gains leverage to argue the divorce itself was not a powder keg. If they embrace Cappleman's, the emotional stakes around Markel's parenting and Wendi's move remain powerful context for what happened next. This segment also unfolds amid a procedural wrinkle: outside the jury's presence, the court addressed concerns that Bailey had watched prior testimony (a no-no under the witness rule). Judge Stephen Everett ultimately allowed her to testify, and the jury returned to hear Cappleman's cross in full. That backdrop adds a layer of credibility chess to what you're watching: the prosecution probing not just what the expert believes, but how she arrived there and whether that lens truly matches the lived experience of the people at the center of this case. For trial-trackers focused on motive, credibility, and juror perception, this is one to study—tight questions, firm answers, and the kind of back-and-forth that can tilt how a jury reads every email, motion, and text that comes next. (Donna Adelson is charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation, and has pleaded not guilty.) #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #GeorgiaCappleman #LindaBailey #TrueCrime #CustodyBattle #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom #TrialUpdate #Tallahassee Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“It'd Be Easier If Dan Wasn't Here”: Wendy Adelson Leak Explained by Jeffrey Lacasse In this deep-dive, we analyze a pivotal stretch of the Jeffrey Lacasse police interrogation and the candid round-table that follows—unpacking what it reveals about Wendy Adelson, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson in the Dan Markel case. The conversation focuses on behavioral forensics: emotional regulation, “leakage,” narcissistic injury, family systems, and coercive control—terms that help map motive and mindset without relying on speculation alone. Lacasse recounts late-night talks in which Wendy lamented feeling trapped in Tallahassee by custody litigation and let slip a chilling line: life would be “more convenient” if Dan weren't around. He adds that Wendy referenced Charlie looking into “how it would be done” and “how much it would cost.” In the interrogation room, these statements land with weight—not as jokes, but as actionable disclosures that align with later courtroom narratives. We break down why Lacasse reads as credible: consistent tempo of disclosure, congruent affect, and high recall—alongside the caveat that his lingering attachment to Wendy could color certain interpretations. The panel then probes Charlie Adelson's persona construction—his habit of posturing with “tough” circles, talk of military-adjacent acquaintances, and proximity to people comfortable with criminal enterprise. Is this insecurity, narcissism, or a lifelong rehearsal of dominance learned at home? We examine how Donna Adelson's alleged top-down control may have shaped the siblings' communication style—emotion-first, consequence-later—and why that can result in catastrophic “leakage” (unguarded admissions, careless phone chatter, reckless bravado). We also discuss cognitive dissonance inside tightly bound families: why challenging the matriarch would threaten the children's own identity narratives, and how “safety” can be misdefined as allegiance to dysfunction. Finally, we situate these insights within the legal framework—murder-for-hire theory, motive arising from custody and relocation conflict, and credibility markers detectives scrutinize in major-case interrogations. If you follow the Markel murder timeline, this segment adds crucial psychological context to evidence already tested in court. It's a guided tour through behavior, motive, and family dynamics—where every “offhand” comment may carry forensic weight. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #BehavioralAnalysis #LegalAnalysis #Interrogation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Wendi Adelson's Former Divorce Attorney Says the Divorce Was “Not Contentious”   In today's testimony Kristin Adamson—the family-law attorney who represented Wendi Adelson during her divorce from Dan Markel—told jurors the initial divorce proceedings were “not contentious.” Her account undercuts the notion that the legal split itself was a nonstop conflagration; instead, Adamson drew a distinction between a relatively typical divorce process and what came after it. Under further questioning, she acknowledged that post-divorce filings by Markel became more personal and hostile, a shift the state says fed resentment and control battles that ultimately form the backdrop to this murder conspiracy case. Why it matters: motive and narrative framing. Prosecutors have long argued that a bitter custody fight and relocation dispute set the stage for the homicidal plot that killed Markel in 2014. If the jury accepts Adamson's framing—that the core divorce looked fairly standard while later filings grew heated—it subtly reshapes where the real friction lived and when it peaked. That matters for assigning intent and pressure points to the Adelson family's decisions in the months leading up to the murder. Adamson also faced questions about parental involvement in divorce logistics (how often parents attend client meetings, who shows up in hearings), as the defense tries to downplay the idea of Donna Adelson meddling in legal strategy—arguing that what looked like interference may have been normal family presence during a stressful time. The prosecution, by contrast, wants jurors to see those same moments as control—a pattern consistent with its broader theory of a family mobilized to remove Markel as an obstacle. For viewers tracking continuity across witnesses, this clip is a calibration tool: it doesn't prove or disprove the murder-for-hire plot, but it helps jurors locate the temperature of the Adelson–Markel legal conflict on a timeline—cooler during the divorce itself, hotter in the aftermath. That timeline will echo through testimony about relocation, custody, wiretaps, and alleged conspirators, as the court weighs whether Donna Adelson crossed the line from family advocacy to criminal orchestration. (Donna Adelson is on trial for first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation; she has pleaded not guilty.) #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #WendiAdelson #KristinAdamson #TrueCrime #CustodyBattle #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom #MurderForHire #Tallahassee Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“I'd Like to Kill That MF” Charlie Adelson's Chilling Repeated Threats In this gripping analysis from Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels, examine one of the most damning sections of Jeffrey Lacasse's interrogation—the part where Charlie Adelson's casual threats, reckless talk, and family dynamics intersect with murder-for-hire reality. According to Lacasse, Charlie Adelson wasn't shy about voicing his hatred for Dan Markel. These weren't offhand grumbles; they were repeated, venomous statements—“I'd like to kill that motherf***er”—said so often they stuck in Lacasse's memory. Unlike normal venting, Charlie went further, asking how much it would cost. That step from emotional ranting into cost-benefit analysis marked a chilling escalation. The panel dissects why this behavior fit a pattern: Charlie's lack of impulse control, a trait he likely inherited from Donna Adelson, combined with years of unchecked arrogance. In his safe family bubble, he felt untouchable, rehearsing bravado for immediate gratification with no thought of repercussions. This impulsivity, coupled with Donna's enmeshment and Wendy's complicity, set the stage for tragedy. We also examine Charlie's strange double life: a wealthy South Florida dentist with a Ferrari, yet constantly surrounding himself with “tough” gym buddies, ex-military acquaintances, and shady characters. Was this insecurity, narcissistic posturing, or a deliberate attempt to outsource the dirty work he lacked the nerve to do himself? Adding to the suspicion is Wendy's sudden no-contact email to Lacasse, allegedly at her therapist's direction, just days before Dan Markel was killed. Was this standard breakup strategy, or part of an Adelson plot to frame Lacasse as the “abusive male” and potential fall guy? The timing is hard to ignore. This episode also explores how family enmeshment and narcissistic validation needs created a toxic system where Charlie and Wendy were extensions of Donna's will. The Adelsons may have rationalized their plot as a crusade to “protect the children,” but to outsiders, it was reckless and criminal. From hot tub bragging about hiding money to leaked threats overheard by boyfriends, Charlie's downfall was paved by his own mouth. As Lacasse says, within 20 seconds of hearing about Markel's murder, he thought of Charlie. That instinctive reaction speaks volumes. Hashtags #CharlieAdelson #WendyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #MurderForHire #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ForensicPsychology #CourtroomDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Georgia Cappleman's Blistering Cross of Defense Legal Expert on “Contentious” Divorce  This raw courtroom clip captures Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman going toe-to-toe with defense family-law expert Linda Bailey over one deceptively simple question: Was the Wendi Adelson–Dan Markel divorce “contentious” or just another typical case in the trenches of family court? Bailey, called by the defense to cool the temperature, testified that the divorce looked much more amicable than many she's seen and that nothing in Donna Adelson's involvement struck her as unusual. Cappleman then launched into a pointed, methodical cross—pressing Bailey on whether “contentiousness” can look very different to lawyers than it does to the actual people living it, and whether high-stakes motions (like the so-called “grandmother motion”) might land as a five-alarm fire to a layperson even if an attorney views it as routine. You'll hear the prosecution challenge the expert's framing, arguing that in the real world—outside the safe confines of legal jargon—custody, relocation, and grandparent access can feel like the “most important thing in the whole wide world.” Bailey holds the line, reaffirming her view that the divorce was fundamentally typical and that the grandmother-related filing wasn't likely to succeed or restrict Donna's unsupervised time. The exchange matters because the state's motive theory leans on a heated backdrop: long-running conflict, relocation battles, and a family culture of control. If jurors accept Bailey's narrative, the defense gains leverage to argue the divorce itself was not a powder keg. If they embrace Cappleman's, the emotional stakes around Markel's parenting and Wendi's move remain powerful context for what happened next. This segment also unfolds amid a procedural wrinkle: outside the jury's presence, the court addressed concerns that Bailey had watched prior testimony (a no-no under the witness rule). Judge Stephen Everett ultimately allowed her to testify, and the jury returned to hear Cappleman's cross in full. That backdrop adds a layer of credibility chess to what you're watching: the prosecution probing not just what the expert believes, but how she arrived there and whether that lens truly matches the lived experience of the people at the center of this case. For trial-trackers focused on motive, credibility, and juror perception, this is one to study—tight questions, firm answers, and the kind of back-and-forth that can tilt how a jury reads every email, motion, and text that comes next. (Donna Adelson is charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation, and has pleaded not guilty.) #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #GeorgiaCappleman #LindaBailey #TrueCrime #CustodyBattle #LegalAnalysis #Courtroom #TrialUpdate #Tallahassee Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“It'd Be Easier If Dan Wasn't Here”: Wendy Adelson Leak Explained by Jeffrey Lacasse In this deep-dive, we analyze a pivotal stretch of the Jeffrey Lacasse police interrogation and the candid round-table that follows—unpacking what it reveals about Wendy Adelson, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson in the Dan Markel case. The conversation focuses on behavioral forensics: emotional regulation, “leakage,” narcissistic injury, family systems, and coercive control—terms that help map motive and mindset without relying on speculation alone. Lacasse recounts late-night talks in which Wendy lamented feeling trapped in Tallahassee by custody litigation and let slip a chilling line: life would be “more convenient” if Dan weren't around. He adds that Wendy referenced Charlie looking into “how it would be done” and “how much it would cost.” In the interrogation room, these statements land with weight—not as jokes, but as actionable disclosures that align with later courtroom narratives. We break down why Lacasse reads as credible: consistent tempo of disclosure, congruent affect, and high recall—alongside the caveat that his lingering attachment to Wendy could color certain interpretations. The panel then probes Charlie Adelson's persona construction—his habit of posturing with “tough” circles, talk of military-adjacent acquaintances, and proximity to people comfortable with criminal enterprise. Is this insecurity, narcissism, or a lifelong rehearsal of dominance learned at home? We examine how Donna Adelson's alleged top-down control may have shaped the siblings' communication style—emotion-first, consequence-later—and why that can result in catastrophic “leakage” (unguarded admissions, careless phone chatter, reckless bravado). We also discuss cognitive dissonance inside tightly bound families: why challenging the matriarch would threaten the children's own identity narratives, and how “safety” can be misdefined as allegiance to dysfunction. Finally, we situate these insights within the legal framework—murder-for-hire theory, motive arising from custody and relocation conflict, and credibility markers detectives scrutinize in major-case interrogations. If you follow the Markel murder timeline, this segment adds crucial psychological context to evidence already tested in court. It's a guided tour through behavior, motive, and family dynamics—where every “offhand” comment may carry forensic weight. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #BehavioralAnalysis #LegalAnalysis #Interrogation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Tim Kelly (Realtor) Says Family Looked at Tallahassee Homes In this raw courtroom clip from the Donna Adelson Trial, Tallahassee realtor Tim Kelly takes the stand and lays out a detail the defense wants front and center: back in 2011, he showed homes to Donna and Harvey Adelson—appointments he says were set up at Dan Markel's request. Kelly methodically explains when the showings happened, the neighborhoods he toured with the Adelsons, and the ordinary, practical tone of those conversations. It's not flashy testimony, but it's the kind that makes jurors pause: if Donna and Harvey were considering a move to Tallahassee years before Markel's 2014 murder, how does that square with the state's theory that the family was fixated on getting Wendi and the kids out of Tallahassee? Why it matters: motive. Prosecutors have framed this case around family conflict, relocation pressures, and control. Kelly's testimony can't rewrite the larger timeline—but it complicates it. The defense is using him to suggest the Adelsons' priorities weren't a one-way street. If jurors conclude the family at one time explored living near Markel instead of removing the children from him, that nuance could seed reasonable doubt around the state's overarching motive story. Watch for the specifics: who contacted whom (Kelly says Markel), how the showings unfolded, and how the search ultimately fizzled. The defense is aiming for a simple takeaway—this was normal family logistics, not a breadcrumb trail toward violence. The prosecution, for its part, will argue the 2011 showings are a blip with little bearing on the decisions and communications that followed years later. Bottom line: Kelly adds a quiet but strategic brick to the defense wall. It's not the kind of testimony that makes headlines, but it's exactly the kind that jurors revisit when they're sorting motive from speculation. #hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TimKelly #TrueCrime #Tallahassee #MurderForHire #Courtroom #TrialUpdate #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“It'd Be Easier If Dan Wasn't Here”: Wendy Adelson Leak Explained by Jeffrey Lacasse In this deep-dive, we analyze a pivotal stretch of the Jeffrey Lacasse police interrogation and the candid round-table that follows—unpacking what it reveals about Wendy Adelson, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson in the Dan Markel case. The conversation focuses on behavioral forensics: emotional regulation, “leakage,” narcissistic injury, family systems, and coercive control—terms that help map motive and mindset without relying on speculation alone. Lacasse recounts late-night talks in which Wendy lamented feeling trapped in Tallahassee by custody litigation and let slip a chilling line: life would be “more convenient” if Dan weren't around. He adds that Wendy referenced Charlie looking into “how it would be done” and “how much it would cost.” In the interrogation room, these statements land with weight—not as jokes, but as actionable disclosures that align with later courtroom narratives. We break down why Lacasse reads as credible: consistent tempo of disclosure, congruent affect, and high recall—alongside the caveat that his lingering attachment to Wendy could color certain interpretations. The panel then probes Charlie Adelson's persona construction—his habit of posturing with “tough” circles, talk of military-adjacent acquaintances, and proximity to people comfortable with criminal enterprise. Is this insecurity, narcissism, or a lifelong rehearsal of dominance learned at home? We examine how Donna Adelson's alleged top-down control may have shaped the siblings' communication style—emotion-first, consequence-later—and why that can result in catastrophic “leakage” (unguarded admissions, careless phone chatter, reckless bravado). We also discuss cognitive dissonance inside tightly bound families: why challenging the matriarch would threaten the children's own identity narratives, and how “safety” can be misdefined as allegiance to dysfunction. Finally, we situate these insights within the legal framework—murder-for-hire theory, motive arising from custody and relocation conflict, and credibility markers detectives scrutinize in major-case interrogations. If you follow the Markel murder timeline, this segment adds crucial psychological context to evidence already tested in court. It's a guided tour through behavior, motive, and family dynamics—where every “offhand” comment may carry forensic weight. Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #BehavioralAnalysis #LegalAnalysis #Interrogation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“I'd Like to Kill That MF” Charlie Adelson's Chilling Repeated Threats In this gripping analysis from Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels, examine one of the most damning sections of Jeffrey Lacasse's interrogation—the part where Charlie Adelson's casual threats, reckless talk, and family dynamics intersect with murder-for-hire reality. According to Lacasse, Charlie Adelson wasn't shy about voicing his hatred for Dan Markel. These weren't offhand grumbles; they were repeated, venomous statements—“I'd like to kill that motherf***er”—said so often they stuck in Lacasse's memory. Unlike normal venting, Charlie went further, asking how much it would cost. That step from emotional ranting into cost-benefit analysis marked a chilling escalation. The panel dissects why this behavior fit a pattern: Charlie's lack of impulse control, a trait he likely inherited from Donna Adelson, combined with years of unchecked arrogance. In his safe family bubble, he felt untouchable, rehearsing bravado for immediate gratification with no thought of repercussions. This impulsivity, coupled with Donna's enmeshment and Wendy's complicity, set the stage for tragedy. We also examine Charlie's strange double life: a wealthy South Florida dentist with a Ferrari, yet constantly surrounding himself with “tough” gym buddies, ex-military acquaintances, and shady characters. Was this insecurity, narcissistic posturing, or a deliberate attempt to outsource the dirty work he lacked the nerve to do himself? Adding to the suspicion is Wendy's sudden no-contact email to Lacasse, allegedly at her therapist's direction, just days before Dan Markel was killed. Was this standard breakup strategy, or part of an Adelson plot to frame Lacasse as the “abusive male” and potential fall guy? The timing is hard to ignore. This episode also explores how family enmeshment and narcissistic validation needs created a toxic system where Charlie and Wendy were extensions of Donna's will. The Adelsons may have rationalized their plot as a crusade to “protect the children,” but to outsiders, it was reckless and criminal. From hot tub bragging about hiding money to leaked threats overheard by boyfriends, Charlie's downfall was paved by his own mouth. As Lacasse says, within 20 seconds of hearing about Markel's murder, he thought of Charlie. That instinctive reaction speaks volumes. Hashtags #CharlieAdelson #WendyAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #MurderForHire #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ForensicPsychology #CourtroomDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Jurors in Donna Adelson's murder-for-hire trial are getting a front-row seat to some of the most damning evidence yet: her own words caught on FBI wiretaps, and the undercover operation known as the “bump” that rattled her family to the core. In this episode, we break down both. First, the wiretaps. Donna Adelson is heard talking about buying cemetery plots, worrying that her son Charlie is “on trial for his life,” and even discussing non-extradition countries as escape options. At one point, she doesn't hang up after Charlie leaves the line, and the recorder captures her muttering—raw, unguarded, and deeply revealing. Prosecutors say it's not just idle talk; it's proof of a consciousness of guilt. Then comes the “bump.” In a bold undercover move, an FBI agent slipped Donna a note on a public street, pretending to be a former cellmate of hitman Sigfredo Garcia. The message? He knew about the murder plot and wanted $5,000 to keep quiet. From there, the pressure campaign escalated—phone calls, texts, and even contact with the family's dental practice. The aftermath was telling: Charlie Adelson scrambled to buy concert tickets and a limo for Katherine “Katie” Magbanua and Garcia, trying to keep them close and under control. Together, the wiretaps and the bump form a devastating narrative: this wasn't a family blindsided by false accusations, but one already planning escapes and bracing for exposure. Donna Adelson, now 75, stands accused of orchestrating the 2014 murder-for-hire of her former son-in-law, Florida State University law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors argue she conspired with her son Charlie and others to eliminate Markel so her daughter and grandchildren could live freely in Miami. Charlie Adelson was convicted in 2023 and sentenced to life. Donna was arrested that same year at the Miami airport with a one-way ticket to Vietnam. Her trial in Tallahassee is expected to continue through September 5. Stay tuned as we unpack every detail. Hashtags #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #TrialCoverage #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #FBI #WiretapEvidence #TrueCrimeCommunity

Donna Adelson Trial: Friend Testifies Donna Was “Hysterical” After Dan Markel's Murder In the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense called their very first witness to the stand: longtime family friend Anne Elizabeth Cunningham. With roots tracing back to her friendship with Donna and Harvey Adelson since 2009, Cunningham painted a picture of Donna not as a criminal mastermind, but as a distraught mother and grandmother in shock after Dan Markel's murder. Cunningham testified that Donna was “quite hysterical” in the aftermath of Markel's killing. Her words aimed to humanize Donna, showing her in a state of emotional unraveling rather than cold calculation. For jurors, this testimony matters because it's the first real glimpse into how the defense plans to counter the prosecution's theory that Donna orchestrated the murder-for-hire plot. By emphasizing Donna's grief and confusion, the defense is trying to suggest she was blindsided by the events just like everyone else. But there's more here than just emotion. Every word is carefully chosen to influence perception. Cunningham's testimony isn't just about character—it's about planting seeds of doubt in jurors' minds. Was Donna truly the matriarch pulling strings, or was she just another family member swept up in tragedy? This clip captures Cunningham's full testimony, a pivotal moment marking the official start of the defense case in one of Florida's most closely watched trials. #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #CourtroomTestimony #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #DefenseWitness #TrialCoverage #JusticeForDan #LegalDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Caught on Tape: Wiretaps + FBI Undercover “Bump” Revealed Jurors in Donna Adelson's murder-for-hire trial are getting a front-row seat to some of the most damning evidence yet: her own words caught on FBI wiretaps, and the undercover operation known as the “bump” that rattled her family to the core. In this episode, we break down both. First, the wiretaps. Donna Adelson is heard talking about buying cemetery plots, worrying that her son Charlie is “on trial for his life,” and even discussing non-extradition countries as escape options. At one point, she doesn't hang up after Charlie leaves the line, and the recorder captures her muttering—raw, unguarded, and deeply revealing. Prosecutors say it's not just idle talk; it's proof of a consciousness of guilt. Then comes the “bump.” In a bold undercover move, an FBI agent slipped Donna a note on a public street, pretending to be a former cellmate of hitman Sigfredo Garcia. The message? He knew about the murder plot and wanted $5,000 to keep quiet. From there, the pressure campaign escalated—phone calls, texts, and even contact with the family's dental practice. The aftermath was telling: Charlie Adelson scrambled to buy concert tickets and a limo for Katherine “Katie” Magbanua and Garcia, trying to keep them close and under control. Together, the wiretaps and the bump form a devastating narrative: this wasn't a family blindsided by false accusations, but one already planning escapes and bracing for exposure. Donna Adelson, now 75, stands accused of orchestrating the 2014 murder-for-hire of her former son-in-law, Florida State University law professor Dan Markel. Prosecutors argue she conspired with her son Charlie and others to eliminate Markel so her daughter and grandchildren could live freely in Miami. Charlie Adelson was convicted in 2023 and sentenced to life. Donna was arrested that same year at the Miami airport with a one-way ticket to Vietnam. Her trial in Tallahassee is expected to continue through September 5. Stay tuned as we unpack every detail. Hashtags #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #TrialCoverage #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #FBI #WiretapEvidence #TrueCrimeCommunity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Friend Testifies Donna Was “Hysterical” After Dan Markel's Murder In the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense called their very first witness to the stand: longtime family friend Anne Elizabeth Cunningham. With roots tracing back to her friendship with Donna and Harvey Adelson since 2009, Cunningham painted a picture of Donna not as a criminal mastermind, but as a distraught mother and grandmother in shock after Dan Markel's murder. Cunningham testified that Donna was “quite hysterical” in the aftermath of Markel's killing. Her words aimed to humanize Donna, showing her in a state of emotional unraveling rather than cold calculation. For jurors, this testimony matters because it's the first real glimpse into how the defense plans to counter the prosecution's theory that Donna orchestrated the murder-for-hire plot. By emphasizing Donna's grief and confusion, the defense is trying to suggest she was blindsided by the events just like everyone else. But there's more here than just emotion. Every word is carefully chosen to influence perception. Cunningham's testimony isn't just about character—it's about planting seeds of doubt in jurors' minds. Was Donna truly the matriarch pulling strings, or was she just another family member swept up in tragedy? This clip captures Cunningham's full testimony, a pivotal moment marking the official start of the defense case in one of Florida's most closely watched trials. #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #CourtroomTestimony #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #DefenseWitness #TrialCoverage #JusticeForDan #LegalDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

New Evidence Could Finally Implicate Donna Adelson and Family in Dan Markel Murder Trial. Donna Adelson's high-profile trial continues to reveal shocking new details, with prosecutors presenting crucial evidence that could directly implicate not only Donna but also other members of the Adelson family in the murder of beloved FSU law professor Dan Markel. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #Bestguests in all of #TrueCrime. In this STS episode, Emmy Award-Winning Host Joel Waldman is joined by 3 attorneys who work in Tallahassee and knew Dan Markel, and Donna Adelson's court attorneys. They'll weigh in on the big evidence, the trial so far, and what's ahead in the road for #justicefordanmarkel. This important evidence has the potential to connect the family to the murder-for-hire plot that has long gripped national attention. As the trial unfolds, every new piece of digital proof, testimony, and detail brings the case closer to uncovering the full truth and delivering long-awaited justice for Dan Markel and his two young sons. With Donna Adelson facing charges of first-degree murder and conspiracy, this trial may finally answer the question of who was truly behind Markel's tragic death.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation! Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor

Donna Adelson Trial: Detective Maps July 18th Phone Calls Before Dan Markel's Murder The jury in the Trial of Donna Adelson was riveted today as Tallahassee Police Sergeant Christopher Corbitt traced the timeline of phone calls on July 18, 2014—the very morning Dan Markel was shot in his driveway. This wasn't just a list of calls. It was a carefully woven narrative of how the alleged conspiracy operated in real time, connecting the hitmen, Katherine Magbanua, Charlie Adelson, and ultimately Donna Adelson herself. Corbitt walked the jury through the early-morning hours, showing how Magbanua and Charlie Adelson exchanged a flurry of calls while the hitmen's phones pinged near their Tallahassee motel. At 1:02 a.m., Charlie called his mother, Donna, pulling her directly into the communications chain just hours before the murder. By mid-morning, calls bounced between Donna, Wendi, and Charlie, with Wendi speaking to both her brother and her mother minutes before Markel was due to arrive home. Then came the chilling detail: at 11:22 a.m., barely 30 minutes after Markel was shot, Charlie Adelson placed a 7-minute call to Donna. Prosecutors argue this wasn't coincidence—it was coordination, a family scrambling in the aftermath of a hit they helped arrange. Why does this matter? Because phone records don't forget, and they don't get confused on the stand. These logs provide jurors with a roadmap of connection—showing not only who called whom, but when and how often. Combined with other testimony, this timeline suggests the Adelsons weren't just worried relatives but active participants in orchestrating and managing the murder-for-hire plot. For the prosecution, Corbitt's testimony is about more than phone numbers. It's about establishing a pattern of conspiracy—a trail of calls that prosecutors say leads straight back to Donna Adelson. #DonnaAdelsonTrial #ChristopherCorbitt #DanMarkel #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #KatherineMagbanua #TrueCrime #FloridaTrial #CourtroomDrama #JusticeForDan Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Detective Maps July 18th Phone Calls Before Dan Markel's Murder The jury in the Trial of Donna Adelson was riveted today as Tallahassee Police Sergeant Christopher Corbitt traced the timeline of phone calls on July 18, 2014—the very morning Dan Markel was shot in his driveway. This wasn't just a list of calls. It was a carefully woven narrative of how the alleged conspiracy operated in real time, connecting the hitmen, Katherine Magbanua, Charlie Adelson, and ultimately Donna Adelson herself. Corbitt walked the jury through the early-morning hours, showing how Magbanua and Charlie Adelson exchanged a flurry of calls while the hitmen's phones pinged near their Tallahassee motel. At 1:02 a.m., Charlie called his mother, Donna, pulling her directly into the communications chain just hours before the murder. By mid-morning, calls bounced between Donna, Wendi, and Charlie, with Wendi speaking to both her brother and her mother minutes before Markel was due to arrive home. Then came the chilling detail: at 11:22 a.m., barely 30 minutes after Markel was shot, Charlie Adelson placed a 7-minute call to Donna. Prosecutors argue this wasn't coincidence—it was coordination, a family scrambling in the aftermath of a hit they helped arrange. Why does this matter? Because phone records don't forget, and they don't get confused on the stand. These logs provide jurors with a roadmap of connection—showing not only who called whom, but when and how often. Combined with other testimony, this timeline suggests the Adelsons weren't just worried relatives but active participants in orchestrating and managing the murder-for-hire plot. For the prosecution, Corbitt's testimony is about more than phone numbers. It's about establishing a pattern of conspiracy—a trail of calls that prosecutors say leads straight back to Donna Adelson. #DonnaAdelsonTrial #ChristopherCorbitt #DanMarkel #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #KatherineMagbanua #TrueCrime #FloridaTrial #CourtroomDrama #JusticeForDan Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson's Children, Wendy & Robert TURN on Their Mother Court! The Donna Adelson murder-for-hire trial has taken a shocking turn — with two days of testimony that could change everything. On the stand, Donna's daughter Wendy Adelson, her eldest son Robert, and Wendy's ex-boyfriend Jeffrey Lacasse each delivered damning statements that prosecutors say tie the Adelson family directly to the 2014 killing of Florida State law professor Dan Markel. Wendy Adelson, testifying under subpoena with immunity, admitted that her mother pushed her relentlessly during the divorce — urging her to “put on a performance” in court, to fake a conversion of her children to Catholicism, even to use psychological tricks to “take control” of Markel. Emails shown to the jury revealed Donna calling Markel names, proposing a $1 million bribe, and demanding relocation as “non-negotiable.” Then came Robert Adelson, who described his mother as “controlling” and “overly involved.” He recalled Donna renting Wendy an apartment to escape Markel, working on court filings, and, most disturbingly, showing zero curiosity after the murder. When Robert asked Donna what she thought had happened, she told him, “I don't know and I don't care. It doesn't concern me.” He also testified that she warned him not to speak with police. But perhaps the most devastating testimony came from Wendy's ex, Jeffrey Lacasse. He described Wendy canceling a vacation just weeks before the murder with an odd explanation. He testified that Wendy told him “the only way I'll ever relocate is if something happens to Danny” — and that Charlie had looked into “all options” to handle the “Dan Markel problem,” including hiring a hitman for $15,000. Lacasse said this was no joke — “it made my stomach flip.” With testimony like this, prosecutors are building a case that Donna Adelson wasn't just a worried mother. She was the architect of a conspiracy. Watch as we break down every key moment from Wendy, Robert, and Jeffrey's testimony — and what it could mean for Donna Adelson's future. Hashtags #DonnaAdelson #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #CourtTV #HiddenKillers #RobertAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #KarenReadTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity #CrimeNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Jeffrey LaCasse Testifies About Wendi Adelson & TV Repair Story In a pivotal day of testimony, the jury in the Trial of Donna Adelson heard from Jeffrey LaCasse, the former boyfriend of Wendi Adelson. LaCasse delivered striking recollections about conversations he had with Wendi in the aftermath of her divorce from Dan Markel, and in the months leading up to his murder. One of the most memorable details was his account of Wendi telling him that her brother, Charlie Adelson, had “looked into all options” when it came to solving the family's custody frustrations—words that now carry chilling weight in the courtroom. LaCasse also addressed the infamous “TV repair story,” a tale prosecutors argue was concocted to provide cover for suspicious behavior in the days following Markel's killing. His testimony painted a picture of subtle but deliberate messaging within the Adelson family, suggesting that explanations were crafted in advance to shield themselves from suspicion. Why does this matter? Because LaCasse's words don't just provide color—they give jurors a glimpse into Wendi's mindset and the broader family conversations that may have revealed motive. By confirming the stories Wendi told him, LaCasse connected personal anecdotes to the larger web prosecutors say tied Donna, Charlie, and Wendi together in orchestrating the plot. His testimony brought the focus back to Donna's influence, showing how deep her family's entanglement in the case runs. #TrueCrime #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLaCasse #CourtroomDrama #CharlieAdelson #TVRepairStory #FloridaJustice #CrimeWatch Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Jeffrey LaCasse Testifies About Wendi Adelson & TV Repair Story In a pivotal day of testimony, the jury in the Trial of Donna Adelson heard from Jeffrey LaCasse, the former boyfriend of Wendi Adelson. LaCasse delivered striking recollections about conversations he had with Wendi in the aftermath of her divorce from Dan Markel, and in the months leading up to his murder. One of the most memorable details was his account of Wendi telling him that her brother, Charlie Adelson, had “looked into all options” when it came to solving the family's custody frustrations—words that now carry chilling weight in the courtroom. LaCasse also addressed the infamous “TV repair story,” a tale prosecutors argue was concocted to provide cover for suspicious behavior in the days following Markel's killing. His testimony painted a picture of subtle but deliberate messaging within the Adelson family, suggesting that explanations were crafted in advance to shield themselves from suspicion. Why does this matter? Because LaCasse's words don't just provide color—they give jurors a glimpse into Wendi's mindset and the broader family conversations that may have revealed motive. By confirming the stories Wendi told him, LaCasse connected personal anecdotes to the larger web prosecutors say tied Donna, Charlie, and Wendi together in orchestrating the plot. His testimony brought the focus back to Donna's influence, showing how deep her family's entanglement in the case runs. #TrueCrime #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLaCasse #CourtroomDrama #CharlieAdelson #TVRepairStory #FloridaJustice #CrimeWatch Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson's Children, Wendy & Robert TURN on Their Mother Court! The Donna Adelson murder-for-hire trial has taken a shocking turn — with two days of testimony that could change everything. On the stand, Donna's daughter Wendy Adelson, her eldest son Robert, and Wendy's ex-boyfriend Jeffrey Lacasse each delivered damning statements that prosecutors say tie the Adelson family directly to the 2014 killing of Florida State law professor Dan Markel. Wendy Adelson, testifying under subpoena with immunity, admitted that her mother pushed her relentlessly during the divorce — urging her to “put on a performance” in court, to fake a conversion of her children to Catholicism, even to use psychological tricks to “take control” of Markel. Emails shown to the jury revealed Donna calling Markel names, proposing a $1 million bribe, and demanding relocation as “non-negotiable.” Then came Robert Adelson, who described his mother as “controlling” and “overly involved.” He recalled Donna renting Wendy an apartment to escape Markel, working on court filings, and, most disturbingly, showing zero curiosity after the murder. When Robert asked Donna what she thought had happened, she told him, “I don't know and I don't care. It doesn't concern me.” He also testified that she warned him not to speak with police. But perhaps the most devastating testimony came from Wendy's ex, Jeffrey Lacasse. He described Wendy canceling a vacation just weeks before the murder with an odd explanation. He testified that Wendy told him “the only way I'll ever relocate is if something happens to Danny” — and that Charlie had looked into “all options” to handle the “Dan Markel problem,” including hiring a hitman for $15,000. Lacasse said this was no joke — “it made my stomach flip.” With testimony like this, prosecutors are building a case that Donna Adelson wasn't just a worried mother. She was the architect of a conspiracy. Watch as we break down every key moment from Wendy, Robert, and Jeffrey's testimony — and what it could mean for Donna Adelson's future. Hashtags #DonnaAdelson #WendyAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #CourtTV #HiddenKillers #RobertAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #KarenReadTrial #TrueCrimeCommunity #CrimeNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872