POPULARITY
TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) ButcherBox (1:05) Rarebird Coffee (2:10) Ekster (3:00) New scenery (4:05) Recent Riverside wildfires (9:40) What the hell is reality? (11:15) Goof moves (13:10) Stubbing your toe (15:00) Hitting your 30s (27:05) The deviated septum (29:30) Outro SPONSORS BUTCHERBOX: Choose the high-quality, sustainably sourced meat you want for FREE in every order for a year, PLUS $20 off your first box by using code 2AMPODCAST or by clicking the link here: https://shop.butcherbox.com/2ampodcast EKSTER: Get the highest quality smart wallets, dufflebags, and accessories on the market for up to 30% off using code 2AM in combination with this link here: https://shop.ekster.com/2ampodcast RAREBIRD PARAXANTHINE COFFEE: Elevate your mental wellness and cognitive health with the caffeine-like benefits of paraxanthine coffee (But without jitters, anxiety or insomnia): Use code 2AM for 20% off! https://rarebird-coffee.myshopify.com
Featuring Holly Stubbing, President and CEO of E4E, a social enterprise that offers employee relief programs for global companies and communities. (Recorded 4/10/24)
How many times have you stumbled around in the dark looking for something, or stubbed your toe on the leg of the bed in the middle of the night? Stubbing your toe in the dark is one thing. Crashing into a spiritual or emotional wall in the darkness of life is quite another. Jesus promises to be the light in such darkness. But what does that mean in real life? How can we walk in the light when the darkness is closing in?
Is There A Solution? Is Coffee Good Or Bad For You? Does Anyone Know Definitively? What Happened To Cookies? The Fig Newton Dilemma. I'll Never Click The Link In Your 'Bio'. My Desktop Is Clean Enough, Thank You. I'm Not Interested In Entertainment Because It's Not Entertaining. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/trevor-david-houchen/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/trevor-david-houchen/support
IntroAt the gracious invitation of AI Safety Twitter-fluencer Sarah Hastings-Woodhouse, I appeared on the very first episode of her new podcast “Consistently Candid” to debate moral realism (or something kinda like that, I guess; see below) with fellow philosophy nerd and EA Twitter aficionado Max Alexander, alongside Sarah as moderator and judge of sorts.What I believeIn spite of the name of the episode and the best of my knowledge/understanding a few days ago, it turns out my stance may not be ~genuine~ moral realism. Here's my basic meta-ethical take:* Descriptive statements that concern objective relative goodness or badness (e.g., "it is objectively for Sam to donate $20 than to buy an expensive meal that costs $20 more than a similar, less fancy meal”) can be and sometimes are true; but* Genuinely normative claims like “Sam should (!) donate $20 and should not buy that fancy meal” are never objectively true.Of course the label per se doesn't really matter. But for a bunch of reasons it still seems wise to figure out which label really does work best.Some definitionsStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Moral realists are those who think that, in these respects, things should be taken at face value—moral claims do purport to report facts and are true if they get the facts right. Moreover, they hold, at least some moral claims actually are true. That much is the common and more or less defining ground of moral realism (although some accounts of moral realism see it as involving additional commitments, say to the independence of the moral facts from human thought and practice, or to those facts being objective in some specified way).Wikipedia:The robust model of moral realism commits moral realists to three theses:* The semantic thesis: The primary semantic role of moral predicates (such as "right" and "wrong") is to refer to moral properties (such as rightness and wrongness), so that moral statements (such as "honesty is good" and "slavery is unjust") purport to represent moral facts, and express propositions that are true or false (or approximately true, largely false, and so on).* The alethic thesis: Some moral propositions are in fact true.* The metaphysical thesis: Moral propositions are true when actions and other objects of moral assessment have the relevant moral properties (so that the relevant moral facts obtain), where these facts and properties are robust: their metaphysical status, whatever it is, is not relevantly different from that of (certain types of) ordinary non-moral facts and properties.And to settle the matter, here's what some LLM have to say.My prompt:Suppose a person believes the following:1: Descriptive statements that concern objective relative goodness or badness (e.g., "it is objectively for Sam to donate $20 than to buy an expensive meal that costs $20 more than a similar, less fancy meal”) can be and sometimes are true; but 2: Genuinely normative claims like “Sam should donate $20 and should not buy that fancy meal” are never objectively true.Is this person best categorized as a moral realist?ChatGPTGiven these two beliefs, the person's stance doesn't align completely with traditional moral realism, which typically asserts that there are objective truths about both moral facts (like the goodness or badness of actions) and moral duties (what one should or should not do). However, it also doesn't fully align with moral anti-realism, since the person believes in some form of objective truth regarding moral value.One possible categorization for this stance could be a form of "value realism" combined with "normative anti-realism" or "normative subjectivism." This would mean that the person believes in objective truths about what is better or worse (value realism) but thinks that what one ought to do (normative claims) is not a matter of objective truth but perhaps of subjective judgment or societal conventions.This position is quite sophisticated and might be best understood as a hybrid or intermediate position in the landscape of moral philosophy, rather than fitting neatly into the category of moral realism or its standard alternatives.Great, so much for trying to fit things into nice little buckets.Claude, fortunately, is more definitive:No, the view described is not best categorized as moral realism. Here's why:Moral realism is the view that there are objective moral facts or truths. A moral realist believes that some moral claims, including normative claims about what one should or shouldn't do, can be objectively and mind-independently true.The view in the example accepts that there can be objective truths about relative degrees of goodness or badness (claim 1). However, it denies that there are objective normative truths about what one should or shouldn't do (claim 2). By rejecting that genuine normative 'should/shouldn't' claims can be objectively true, the view denies a key commitment of moral realism - namely that moral claims can state objective normative facts. At best it allows for objective evaluative facts about goodness/badness, not prescriptive facts about obligations.So this view would be more accurately categorized as a form of moral anti-realism like non-cognitivism or error theory. It does not qualify as moral realism because of its rejection of the existence of objective normative truths that could make strong normative claims justified or true. The commitment to objective evaluative facts alone does not sufficiently qualify the view as realist in the metaethical sense.In summary, the view accepts objective "good/bad" facts but denies objective "should/shouldn't" facts. This combination puts it at odds with core commitments of moral realism, so it is better seen as an anti-realist view.I'm gonna disagree with Claude here, at least in that the bolded claim above (objective normative facts are a key part of moral realism) just seems…wrong? Like all the definitions could replace the term “moral fact” or “moral claim” with “normative fact” and “normative claim” but they do not!So I really don't have a great answer to which label works best. One of two ~human level chatbots giving me a definitive-sounding “anti-realism” answer is too much evidence for me, whose only formal philosophy training is an undergrad minor, to rule that one out. There are also good arguments, I think, for the “realist label,” as well as for “neither” (i.e., ‘secret third thing'). In fact all of these seem pretty similar in terms of argument convincingness/correctness. So, in sum,
Why is Elizabeth defending paper cuts?
Why is Elizabeth defending paper cuts?
90-åriga modellen Birgitta Stubbing berättar för programledare Erik Blix om sitt liv i P4 Extra Gästen. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play.
On this week's episode of Deep Dive, Pulitzer Prize winner David Leonhardt joins host and Playbook co-author Ryan Lizza to talk about his new book and what it says about how Democrats can save their relationship with working class voters. Ryan Lizza is a Playbook co-author for POLITICO. David Leonhardt is a senior writer for the New York Times and the author of "Ours Was the Shining Future: The Story of the American Dream." Kara Tabor is a producer for POLITICO audio. Alex Keeney is a senior producer for POLITICO audio.
9/22/23 H1: FSU Football, Gut Feeling on Clemson, Lee Sterling - Paramount Sports, Stubbing Your Toe Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Stubbing your toe on the bed - information was missing - there is a bed right there and now you know it. You didn't and now you do. Painful but information was delivered.I had expectations of how a person would behave in a situation and the person behaved differently. I felt painful, disappointing, upsetting, ,saddening. I was missing information about that person . I didn't know the exact way they would react in this situation and NOW I do. But I didn't . The only reason it hurts is because I was missing this information.Knowing this eases my pain. Knowing this actually has me searching for the information I was missing. Knowing this gets me to accept this information sooner. Knowing this gets me to see that I actually don't want to accept this new information. Knowing this helps me see my own judgement of this new information. And it is painful.But seeing this as simply information about the world, specifically about this other person - helps me learn and next time not have the same pain. I am always here to help you connect with yourself and your son, sign up for a free mini session here to get coached and get that amazing relationship for yourself. or email me at natalia@coachingnatalia.com https://coachingnatalia.com/schedule-an-appointment/
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
When a crisis hits someone’s life, the effects aren’t limited to home. Personal, communal, or even global crises can have a significant impact on someone’s stress levels. In situations where a crisis or tragedy has occurred, there’s likely little you can do to ‘fix’ the situation; however, there are steps every manager can take to help support their team members during these difficult and uncertain times. Today’s guest is Holly Welch Stubbing. Holly currently serves as President and CEO of E4E Relief. She has over 25 years of experience in HR, endowment investments and disaster relief. Her organization E4E Relief is an employee relief fund that works with global companies like Salesforce and Wells Fargo to relieve employees when it’s needed most. Holly also serves on the Forbes Human Resources Council and shares her philanthropic vision with fellow executives. She is a thought leader in ESG, philanthropy, and corporate social responsibility and speaks on ESG investment portfolios and strategies, CSR strategies, philanthropy, social enterprise and tax-exempt legal matters. Holly and I talk about how we as managers can best support our colleagues when a tragedy occurs - this could be a natural disaster, a death in the family, political upheaval in their city. She shares what employees care about, what we can do, and why it’s important to support people through these difficult moments. Members of the Modern Manager community get a Free Disaster Worksheet, “Things to Consider When Responding to a Crisis.” This worksheet will lay out the stakeholders (employees, communities, etc.) to consider, partners to establish, and funding to set aside for navigating an unforeseen event impacting your people or your business. Get it when you join the Modern Manager community. Subscribe to my newsletter to get episodes, articles and free mini-guides delivered to your inbox. Read the related blog article: How to Support Your Team in Times of Crisis KEEP UP WITH HOLLY Website: https://employeerelieffund.org/ Key Takeaways: Since the pandemic, managers are taking on more responsibility to support their teams during times of crisis. Personal, local, national, and global crises can have a significant impact on people. This includes a death in the family, political unrest, natural disasters (flooding, fires, hurricanes, etc), violence in a community, and more. Update or create a comprehensive benefits plan that includes crisis support, mental health, and hybrid/flexibility needs. Make sure employees in all locations receive benefits they need to navigate a crisis
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Stubbing your toe hurts. We ramble on from there. Enjoy!
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Socials: @DaveandMahoney Voice Mail: 833-Yo-Dummy https://www.twitch.tv/daveandmahoney Additional Content: daveandmahoney.com
OneStream is a unique and powerful single source, intelligent financial platform. And with that, there are some unique terms when it comes to using the software. One such term is “Stubbing Out”. In this special edition of the OneStream Podcast, Peter Fugere leads a panel discussion about what exactly “Stubbing Out” means, and when it should be used. Joining Peter for this round table are fellow OneStreamers Matt Kerslake, Manager, Technical Content Development and Distinguished Architects Chul Smith and Tony Dimitrie. From Design and Implementation to Training, this is a comprehensive discussion on an often asked about topic, “Stubbing Out”.
Avec Bastiaan & Yvan, l'émission qui fait revivre les titres oubliés et méconnus sur PiratesRadio.ch tous les lundi soir.
Note: Today's YBT Sunday Shiur (12/4/22) is a "Take #2" of a shiur I gave on 5/20/22 as part of my "Machshavah Lab" series for women.Synopsis: It would be great to give a comprehensive shiur about how hashgachah pratis, reward and punishment, and Divine justice work. The problem is that these topics are WAY too broad and WAY too deep and WAY too beyond my knowledge level. However, there are many statements of Chazal which seem to presuppose that the average Jew WILL be able to frame the day to day events in their lives in the framework of the Torah's metaphysics. What, exactly, do Chazal expect us to do? Surely they don't expect everyone to ONLY apply these perspectives based on a full working knowledge of such lofty matters. That is the dilemma which led to this shiur. Instead of a comprehensive treatment, we will focus on a single statement of Chazal about what to think when you stub (or scrape) your toe. The challenge will be to explain how we're supposed to think about that statement, given our very limited knowledge of how God operates.----------מקורות:חולין דף ז עמוד באוהלות א:חרמב"ם – מורה הנבוכים ג:כחנרבוני - שםאפודי - שםר' מקבילי - שםמאירי – בית הבחירה חולין דף ז עמוב באבות ב:זמאירי – אבות א:ידספר החינוך – מעקה (מצוה תקמו)ספר החינוך – הנהגת המצרע וכל מטמאי אדם בפריעה ופרימה (מצוה קעא)רמב"ם - מורה הנבוכים ב:מחתהלים פרק לזרש"י שםאבן עזרא שםרד"ק שםמשלי כ:כדרבינו יונה שםמאירי שםכתובות דף ל עמוד א-בתוספות שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלוריטב"א שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלומאירי – בית הבחירה בבא בתרא דף י עמוד במשלי ו:טז-יטHashgachah Clarification from the Rosh ha'Yeshiva: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1478911/10038754
Note: Today's YBT Sunday Shiur (12/4/22) is a "Take #2" of a shiur I gave on 5/20/22 as part of my "Machshavah Lab" series for women.Synopsis: It would be great to give a comprehensive shiur about how hashgachah pratis, reward and punishment, and Divine justice work. The problem is that these topics are WAY too broad and WAY too deep and WAY too beyond my knowledge level. However, there are many statements of Chazal which seem to presuppose that the average Jew WILL be able to frame the day to day events in their lives in the framework of the Torah's metaphysics. What, exactly, do Chazal expect us to do? Surely they don't expect everyone to ONLY apply these perspectives based on a full working knowledge of such lofty matters. That is the dilemma which led to this shiur. Instead of a comprehensive treatment, we will focus on a single statement of Chazal about what to think when you stub (or scrape) your toe. The challenge will be to explain how we're supposed to think about that statement, given our very limited knowledge of how God operates. ----------מקורות:חולין דף ז עמוד באוהלות א:חרמב"ם – מורה הנבוכים ג:כחנרבוני - שםאפודי - שםר' מקבילי - שםמאירי – בית הבחירה חולין דף ז עמוב באבות ב:זמאירי – אבות א:ידספר החינוך – מעקה (מצוה תקמו)ספר החינוך – הנהגת המצרע וכל מטמאי אדם בפריעה ופרימה (מצוה קעא)רמב"ם - מורה הנבוכים ב:מחתהלים פרק לזרש"י שםאבן עזרא שםרד"ק שםמשלי כ:כדרבינו יונה שםמאירי שםכתובות דף ל עמוד א-בתוספות שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלוריטב"א שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלומאירי – בית הבחירה בבא בתרא דף י עמוד במשלי ו:טז-יטHashgachah Clarification from the Rosh ha'Yeshiva: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1478911/10038754 -----The Torah content for the month of Kislev has been sponsored by Serena and Paul Koppel, who want to be makir tov and express gratitude.-----If you have questions, comments, or feedback, I would love to hear from you! Please feel free to contact me at rabbischneeweiss at gmail.-----Substack: rabbischneeweiss.substack.com/Patreon: patreon.com/rabbischneeweissYouTube Channel: youtube.com/rabbischneeweissBlog: kolhaseridim.blogspot.com/"The Mishlei Podcast": mishlei.buzzsprout.com"The Stoic Jew" Podcast: thestoicjew.buzzsprout.com"Rambam Bekius" Podcast: rambambekius.buzzsprout.com"Machshavah Lab" Podcast: machshavahlab.buzzsprout.com"The Tefilah Podcast": tefilah.buzzsprout.comWhatsApp Group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GEB1EPIAarsELfHWuI2k0HAmazon Wishlist: amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/Y72CSP86S24W?ref_=wl_sharel
Nudist resorts? Flying someone out,favorite nba,nfl team .stepping on lego or stubbing toe. lion or sharks. Burn to death or drowning. and more...
The Parsha In My Life - By Rabbi Reuven Wolf - Maayon Yisroel
The Parsha In My Life - By Rabbi Reuven Wolf - Maayon Yisroel
Subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. Leave a 5 Star review to help us get more visibility! Be sure to follow us on Instagram and Facebook @thepunctuallylateshow and feel free to interact with us!Support the show
This morning (5/20/22), in our "Machshavah Lab" series for women, I gave an experimental shiur about hashgachah. It would be great to give a shiur on how hashgachah pratis, reward and punishment, and Divine justice work. The problem is that these topics are WAY too broad and WAY too deep and WAY too beyond my knowledge level. However, there are many statements of Chazal which seem to presuppose that the average Jew WILL be able to frame the day to day events in their lives in the framework of the Torah's metaphysics. What, exactly, do Chazal expect us to do? Surely they don't expect everyone to ONLY apply these perspectives based on a full working knowledge of such lofty matters. This is the type of thinking that gave rise to this shiur. In particular, shiur focused on a single statement of Chazal about what to think when you stub (or scrape) your toe. The challenge was to explain how we're supposed to think about that statement, given our very limited knowledge of how God operates. Did we succeed? You'll be the judge of that! ----------מקורות:חולין דף ז עמוד באוהלות א:חרמב"ם – מורה הנבוכים ג:כחמאירי – בית הבחירה חולין דף ז עמוב באבות ב:זמאירי – אבות א:ידספר החינוך – מעקה (מצוה תקמו)מאירי - משלי י:גרמב"ם - מורה הנבוכים ב:מחתהלים פרק לזרש"י שםאבן עזרא שםרד"ק שםמשלי כ:כדרבינו יונה שםמאירי שםכתובות דף ל עמוד א-בריטב"א שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלותוספות שם ד"ה דין ד' מיתות לא בטלו מאירי – בית הבחירה בבא בתרא דף י עמוד במשלי ו:טז-יט----------The Torah content from now through Lag ba'Omer has been sponsored by Adam and Estee Goldberg in honor of Savta Shoshana Sham'eh bat Menachem. May her memory be a blessing.----------If you've gained from what you've learned here, please consider contributing to my Patreon at www.patreon.com/rabbischneeweiss. Alternatively, if you would like to make a direct contribution to the "Rabbi Schneeweiss Torah Content Fund," my Venmo is @Matt-Schneeweiss, and my Zelle and PayPal are mattschneeweiss at gmail.com. Even a small contribution goes a long way to covering the costs of my podcasts, and will provide me with the financial freedom to produce even more Torah content for you.If you would like to sponsor a day's or a week's worth of content, or if you are interested in enlisting my services as a teacher or tutor, you can reach me at rabbischneeweiss at gmail.com. Thank you to my listeners for listening, thank you to my readers for reading, and thank you to my supporters for supporting my efforts to make Torah ideas available and accessible to everyone.----------Patreon: patreon.com/rabbischneeweissYouTube Channel: youtube.com/rabbischneeweissBlog: kolhaseridim.blogspot.com/"The Mishlei Podcast": mishlei.buzzsprout.com"The Stoic Jew" Podcast: thestoicjew.buzzsprout.com"Rambam Bekius" Podcast: rambambekius.buzzsprout.com"Machshavah Lab" Podcast: machshavahlab.buzzsprout.com"The Tefilah Podcast": tefilah.buzzsprout.comGuide to the Torah Content of Rabbi Matt Schneeweiss: kolhaseridim.blogspot.com/2021/04/links-to-torah-content-of-rabbi-matt.htmlAmazon : amazon.com/hz/wishli
*Today's Shiur is Sponsored by* Chanie Rapp In honor of all the amazing programs Living Chassidus arranges. *Sponsor a Morning Shiur* In honor or memory of anything. Torah learning is the best way to celebrate a birthday, yertzeit or momentous occasion. $36 - Class $360 - Full Series Click on any of the links below: https://cash.app/$livingchassidus http://Paypal.me/livingchassidus https://livingchassidus.org/donate/
Stubbing your toe, a papercut - THE WORST! (photo credit Getty Images)
There's hardly anything new to say about sex but theres infinite perspectives on how it feels, how you should make it feel for others and how we handle a lifetime filled with it. This is one of those moments that are rarely shared from a mens point of view and Porter talks to you like there's nobody else in the room.
I started dating when I was 30yrs old living in Los Angeles working in the television business. I stayed single for 15yrs before settling down. I learned more than a few things along the way and all of it is still relevant. Men need guidance whether they admit it or not and women need to listen to men without interpreting, whether they think they do or not. Press play and see for yourself...
This week we're talking about the little things! Best and Worst. Stubbing your toe, locking your keys in your car, or sleeping in and rainstorms. Tune in every Monday for new episodes and subscribe to stay up to date on the podcast! Follow us on Instagram: @siblingsessionspodcast @paultravis_who @hanharmon_ @spacemoose_ Cover art by @tamaytka on Instagram
Grant Thornton LLP is a leading Canadian accounting and advisory firm providing audit, tax and advisory services to private and public organizations. They help dynamic organizations unlock their potential for growth by providing meaningful, actionable advice through a broad range of services. Grant Thornton LLP is a Canadian member of Grant Thornton International Ltd, whose member firms operate in over 100 countries worldwide.Learn more about Mike and Grant Thornton LLP by visiting: www.grantthornton.caLinks to organizations and initiatives referenced:Greater Victoria Public Library: www.gvpl.caThe Beach House Restaurant: www.beachhousevictoria.comFor more local news impacting business, visit:Website: www.businessexaminer.ca Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.