German American anarcho-capitalist philosopher (born 1949)
POPULARITY
4 episodes with hans hoppe
6 episodes with hans hoppe
4 episodes with hans hoppe
3 episodes with hans hoppe
4 episodes with hans hoppe
3 episodes with hans hoppe
2 episodes with hans hoppe
Adam Haman returns to discuss perhaps the most difficult problem in libertarian legal theory: the treatment of children. The discussion then spills over onto the treatment of animals and even AI.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:The YouTube version of this conversation.BMS 182 which laid out the trust approach.Bob (and Gene Callahan)'s critique of Hans Hoppe's argumentation ethics.The HamanNature substack.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.
Adam Haman joins Bob to discuss the recent debate between Hans Hoppe and Javier Milei over closing the Argentina central bank.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:The YouTube version of this episode.Hans Hoppe's critique of Milei. Milei's vehement response.Bob's interview of Nicolas Cachanosky, a co-author of Argentina's dollarization plan.The Haman Nature page.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.
Bob continues his miniseries, focusing on John 1: 1-5. Bob makes the case that we should be marveling at the unreasonable effectiveness of semantics in the social sciences. There is meaning packed into every field of human inquiry, and this sheds light on the prologue to the gospel of John.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:The previous episode in this series, i.e. BMS ep 304, installment 1, introduction.Dawkins talking to Steve Pinker on language acquisition.Bob's conversation with GPT-4."Why Math Works."A video on imaginary interest rates (relevant to Euler's identity). A video from the same series on Euler's formula.BMS ep 138, "Why the Left Hates Christianity." BMS ep 303, "Jonathan Bartlett on Random Mutations Not Being So Random." BMS ep 257 on Hans Hoppe and synthetic a priori.An excellent introduction to how Large Language Models work. How neural networks work (example of reading handwritten numerals).A good example of a cool YouTube video on the Mandelbrot set.Study notes for Daniel Dennett's Consciousness Explained.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.
https://youtu.be/erJAXzZ2IrE It is absurd to believe that an agency which may tax without consent can be a property protector. Likewise, it is absurd to believe that an agency with legislative powers can preserve law and order. – Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ph.D., Democracy: The God That Failed Dave Smith Comedy Tour Dates: Comicdavesmith.com Watch on BitChute
Dave Smith Tour Dates: https://comicdavesmith.com/ Domestic Imperialism: Nine Reasons I Left Progressivism: https://libertarianinstitute.org/books/domestic-imperialism-nine-reasons-i-left-progressivism/
Bob launches a new miniseries, and starts by summarizing his chapter for a Festschrift in honor of Walter Block.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:[As of release, no information was available on the actual collection in honor of Walter. RPM will update when available.]Callahan and Murphy's critique of Hans Hoppe's argumentation ethics.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.
Hans Hoppe theorized that monarchs, as opposed to democratically-elected political authorities, would have lower time preferences and would be less likely to engage in reckless government spending. Unfortunately, at least one Medieval Danish king acted like a modern politician. Original Article: Do Monarchs Always Have Low Time Preferences?
Hans Hoppe theorized that monarchs, as opposed to democratically-elected political authorities, would have lower time preferences and would be less likely to engage in reckless government spending. Unfortunately, at least one Medieval Danish king acted like a modern politician. Original Article: Do Monarchs Always Have Low Time Preferences?
Hans Hoppe theorized that monarchs, as opposed to democratically-elected political authorities, would have lower time preferences and would be less likely to engage in reckless government spending. Unfortunately, at least one Medieval Danish king acted like a modern politician. Narrated by Millian Quinteros.
Hans Hoppe theorized that monarchs, as opposed to democratically-elected political authorities, would have lower time preferences and would be less likely to engage in reckless government spending. Unfortunately, at least one Medieval Danish king acted like a modern politician. Original Article: Do Monarchs Always Have Low Time Preferences?
Compra BTC en Relai (descuento de un 0.5% con código ALBERTOMERA)Usa este enlaceBuscas un monedero frío? Yo te recomiendo BitboxUsa este enlace para comprarlo (5% de descuento con código UPSB al final del carrito)Enlace para comprar BTC en PeachSi quieres disfrutar de breves vídeos con curiosidades que te permitan quedar bien en cualquier conversación sobre economía, bitcoin, política, energía... Echa un vistazo al canal de Youtube del podcast.INVITADO DE HOY:Divulgador del libertarismo y la verdadera economía. Editor en la web de Hans Hoppe y Menos Estado.Twitter¿Quieres ver el pod en directo? Vente a TwitchA través de Patreon puedes apoyar al podcast desde 5€ al mes. Lo que vienen siendo unos pocos satoshis. También puedes hacerlo comprando en la tienda de Un Podcast Sobre Bitcoin y beber en la taza oficial del podcast mientras lo escuchas. :)Recuerda que también puedes ayudarme dejando una review y compartiendo!Enlaces tratados en el episodio:Menos Estado Youtube Libro Democracy: The god that failedSupport the showDudas y preguntas: TwitterRecuerda que puedes escuchar el podcast en Fountain y recibir algunos sats!Descargo de responsabilidad: Todo lo discutido en este episodio debe ser considerado como entretenimiento solamente y jamás como consejo de inversión. Nada de lo dicho aquí tiene un propósito de asesoramiento financiero o recomendación.
We can be sure that the "natural elites" of which Hans Hoppe wrote are not among the Davos crowd. That group of "elites" has an agenda, and it is not liberty and free markets. Original Article: "The Attack of the Subversive Elites" This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon.
We can be sure that the "natural elites" of which Hans Hoppe wrote are not among the Davos crowd. That group of "elites" has an agenda, and it is not liberty and free markets. Original Article: "The Attack of the Subversive Elites" This Audio Mises Wire is generously sponsored by Christopher Condon.
Bob walks through Hans Hoppe's argument that Mises' action axiom extended Kantian epistemology by solving the mind/body problem.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:Hoppe's booklet, Economic Science and the Austrian Method.David Gordon's lecture on the method of praxeology.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.The audio production for this episode was provided by Podsworth Media.
"People hold money to hedge against future uncertainty. This is why it is so crucial for a monetary system to optimize for minimizing its own uncertainty. Bitcoin's purchasing power is an external quantitative risk that can be insured against, not an internal qualitative uncertainty." - Pierre Rochard Link to the read: https://pierre-rochard.medium.com/the-utility-of-saving-c56f7c170fc1 Check out Pierre on Twitter: twitter.com/bitcoinpierre Dig deeper into these ideas with an excellent piece from Hans Hoppe we covered ages ago on the podcast: The Yield From Money Held Reconsidered: https://open.spotify.com/episode/67dqOHWLX9NRmAs4S0G9XQ?si=866f483f885a43e0 Check out our amazing sponsors below, they are among my most used products and services in Bitcoin, and have exclusive discounts and offers for the Audionauts: Become sovereign, hold your keys, be censorship resistant with the Bitbox02 hardware wallet. Get 5% off everything in the store with code GUY (guyswann.com/bitbox) Stack sats automatically, withdraw automatically, and learn or get help from the best team of Bitcoiners out there with Swan Bitcoin. (swanbitcoin.com/guy) Gets sats back every time you dump fiat at a store, to pay your bills, everything in your fiat life pays you sats with the Fold Debit Card and FoldApp. 20% OFF with code BITCOINAUDIBLE (guyswann.com/fold) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
"People hold money to hedge against future uncertainty. This is why it is so crucial for a monetary system to optimize for minimizing its own uncertainty. Bitcoin's purchasing power is an external quantitative risk that can be insured against, not an internal qualitative uncertainty." - Pierre Rochard Link to the read: https://pierre-rochard.medium.com/the-utility-of-saving-c56f7c170fc1 Check out Pierre on Twitter: twitter.com/bitcoinpierre Dig deeper into these ideas with an excellent piece from Hans Hoppe we covered ages ago on the podcast: The Yield From Money Held Reconsidered: https://open.spotify.com/episode/67dqOHWLX9NRmAs4S0G9XQ?si=866f483f885a43e0 Check out our amazing sponsors below, they are among my most used products and services in Bitcoin, and have exclusive discounts and offers for the Audionauts: Become sovereign, hold your keys, be censorship resistant with the Bitbox02 hardware wallet. Get 5% off everything in the store with code GUY (guyswann.com/bitbox) Stack sats automatically, withdraw automatically, and learn or get help from the best team of Bitcoiners out there with Swan Bitcoin. (swanbitcoin.com/guy) Gets sats back every time you dump fiat at a store, to pay your bills, everything in your fiat life pays you sats with the Fold Debit Card and FoldApp. 20% OFF with code BITCOINAUDIBLE (guyswann.com/fold) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bitcoinaudible/message
The Mises Institute's Joe Becker, who studied economics at UNLV under Murray Rothbard and Hans Hoppe and worked in numerous capacities for Ron Paul, discusses a major new project from the Mises Institute that people have been wanting for a long time.
At the 's supporters summit over the weekend, Institute president Jeff Deist and I had an informal discussion after dinner in front of the assembled attendees, and reviewed Hans Hoppe's essay "What Must Be Done" as the springboard for our discussion. Warning: zingy.
Recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 21 July 2021. Download the slides from this lecture at Mises.org/MU21_PPT_25.
Recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 21 July 2021. Download the slides from this lecture at Mises.org/MU21_PPT_25.
Links Politica, dinero y banca de Hans Hoppe ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80oZpfyRq_U Amos del Dinero https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r_-4GsEUzc Seguime en: Twitter @terapia_liberal Instagram: @terapialiberal Youtube: Terapia Liberal https://terapialiberal.wixsite.com/misitio #libertario #liberalismo #libertad #terapialiberal #podcast #argentina #capitalismo #libremercado
Links rnnPolitica, dinero y banca de Hans Hoppe rnn://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80oZpfyRq_UrnnAmos del Dinerornn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r_-4GsEUzc rnnSeguime en: rnnTwitter @terapia_liberal Instagram: @terapialiberal rnnYoutube: Terapia Liberal rnnhttps://terapialiberal.wixsite.com/misitio rnn #libertario #liberalismo #libertad #terapialiberal #podcast #argentina #capitalismo #libremercadorn
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 320. From my recent appearance on Stephan Livera's bitcoin-focused podcast, SLP249 BITCOIN PATENTS & OPEN CRYPTO ALLIANCE WITH STEPHAN KINSELLA AND JED GRANT (recorded Feb. 2, 2021; released Feb. 5, 2021). [Update: See transcript here, and appended below] From the show notes: Stephan Kinsella and Jed Grant join me to chat about Open Crypto Alliance. We talk: Why IP laws are anti-liberty and anti-progress How progress has been delayed by improper concepts of property rights How Patent laws could hinder the Bitcoin industry The asymmetry of attack vs defense here How to stop overly broad patents How to support OCA Guest links: Site: https://www.opencryptoalliance.org/ Stephan twitter: @NSKinsella Jed twitter: @JediGrant Prior episodes: SLP15 – Intellectual Property, Bitcoin, and Internet Censorship, with Stephan Kinsella SLP211 Steve Lee – Bitcoin Grants, Design & Crypto Patents (COPA) *** Transcript Podcast Transcript: dcasStephan Livera: Stephan and Jed, welcome to the show. Jed Grant: Thank you. Thanks for having us. Stephan Kinsella: Thanks Stephan. Stephan Livera: Today. We're going to talk a little bit about intellectual property and what it means in terms of Bitcoin and property rights as well. I think many listeners of the show are libertarians themselves, but not all of them. And so I think it might be good. Well, firstly let's talk, let's hear a little bit about each of you just a little bit on your background. Jed, if you want to start? Jed Grant: Sure. Yeah, I'm a technologist I've been in tech. Well, since the eighties, when I got my hands on an Apple II and started writing code I've always been interested in cryptography. Somewhat of a cypherpunk, ended up at NATO running their deployment of TCP IP in the nineties and been an entrepreneur for the last 20, 22 years, more or less and focused on, on security and crypto and technology in that space. So Bitcoin is something that I've been following since basically when the white paper came out as a novelty and really liked the tech and want to see it change the world. So that's sort of my focus. For my professional side. I run a company called KYC 3 and I set out to change the way we do KYC because it's fundamentally broken. So somewhat similar to what Stephan's going to say. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm a KYC guy, but I'm anti KYC. So there you have it. Stephan Livera: And Stephan, just for listeners who maybe they haven't heard you before. Can you tell us a little bit about yourself? Stephan Kinsella: Sure yeah, I'm a patent attorney in Houston and Texas, I'm from Louisiana originally and I'm a libertarian and I've been interested in libertarian theory and intellectual property stuff for a long time now. And got interested in Bitcoin when it came out and started buying it when I lost a bet to Vijay Boyapati, because I thought in 2012 that the government would kill it. So I lost that bet had to buy some Bitcoins to pay them off. So I bought some for me at the same time. So those Bitcoins are now worth 90,000 or now, $120,000 that I gave him. Stephan Livera: Yeah, that's great. Vijay our mutual friend, he's a regular guest on my show. And for listeners who aren't familiar, Stephan is a really leading thinker in the libertarian world especially in the areas of intellectual property. And also just generally in terms of private property theory and explaining some of the thought of some of the leading lights of the Austrian libertarian world, such as Hans Hoppe and others. I think maybe we can start there as well, because I think for some people they might not be as familiar with this way of thinking and they might be thinking, well, hang on. I thought these people put in work to create intellectual property. So why shouldn't that also be respected as a quote unquote private property, right?
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 302. From The Human Action Podcast, Oct. 23, 2020, with Jeff Deist, discussing Hans-Hermann Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed, chapters 5-8. Transcript below. From the Mises.org shownotes: Lawyer and libertarian theorist Stephan Kinsella joins the show to discuss the middle chapters of Hoppe's Democracy, The God That Failed—in particular dealing with "desocialization" of collective property, immigration, and free trade. These are the most controversial and widely-discussed parts of the book, and Kinsella provides a fascinating analysis of property vs. wealth, the problems with public ownership and forced integration, and the concept of rule-setting for state property. And don't miss the final part of the show for his explanation of "Hoppephobia." Kinsella's article on LewRockwell.com: www.lewrockwell.com/2005/09/stephan-kinsella/a-simple-libertarian-argument/ Read Stephan Kinsella's Against Intellectual Property at Mises.org/KinsellaBook Use the code HAPOD for a discount on Democracy: The God That Failed from our bookstore: Mises.org/BuyHoppe Mises Institute original video: Jeff Deist and Stephan Kinsella on Hoppe's Democracy Transcript 00:00:03 JEFF DEIST: This is Jeff Deist, and you're listening to the Human Action podcast. Hey, ladies and gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us, and welcome back once again to the Human Action podcast, a show we do every week where we are not afraid of books, even the 900-page books. And that's really what the show is all about is working our way through what we consider important or seminal works in the broad, let's say, Austro-libertarian landscape, and then by doing so, hopefully encouraging you to read these books, to tackle these books and also helping you through them as you go. 00:00:38 So that's the goal, and as you know, we have recently started with Hans-Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed, and we chose this purposely because we had three weeks left until the election, so we're breaking it up into three sections. And last week we were lucky to be joined by my friend, Jayant Bhandari, and we had a great talk about things like time preference and civilization and capital at the beginning of that book. And in the mid part of this book where Hoppe gets into the discussion of centralization and trade and immigration, I thought there would be nobody better to invite on the show than Stephan Kinsella with whom most of you are already familiar no doubt. 00:01:19 He is a patent attorney. He has written extensively on not just libertarian theory but I would say more narrowly libertarian legal theory, which is a bit of a different animal. And also, of course, he's perhaps best known for his work on IP, and we will link to at least one article of his, which we shall discuss during the show. We will link to his book, Against Intellectual Property, at the mises.org site. If you haven't read it, and you – or maybe you don't have developed thoughts about IP in the digital age, you should read it. You can read it easily over a weekend, and I very much encourage you to do so regardless of where you fall on that debate. I – my personal feelings are in line with Kinsella on that topic, by the way. So all that said, Stephan, thanks for joining. 00:02:08 STEPHAN KINSELLA: Glad to be here, Jeff. 00:02:09 JEFF DEIST: Well, I want to ask you before we get into the book, it came out in 2001. Unfortunately, the Mises Institute doesn't own this book, wish we did. So where were you? What were you doing in 2001? Where were you living? How did you become aware of Hoppe or this book? 00:02:25 STEPHAN KINSELLA: Oh 2001. That's a good question. I remember that because that was the year of 9/11. I was back in Houston. I'm from Louisiana. I had moved to Houston as a lawyer in 1992 and moved to Philadelphia in '94 and been there for a few years and moved back to Houston. And I remember in 2001,
With an ugly presidential election just three weeks away, we dive into Hans Hoppe's classic Democracy: The God That Failed to puncture some of the myths surrounding democracy and voting. Jayant Bhandari joins the show to discuss Hoppe's controversial thesis concerning monarchy and democracy, time preference and its manifestation in the two systems, the forces constraining monarchs, and the terrible incentives created for democratic rulers. This is a must-listen show for anyone interested in Hoppe's most famous work and its application to the problems western states face today. Find more from Jayant Bhandari on his website (JayantGhandari.com) and his Twitter account (@JayantBhandari5). Use the code HAPOD for a discount on Democracy: The God That Failed from our bookstore: Mises.org/BuyHoppe
With an ugly presidential election just three weeks away, we dive into Hans Hoppe's classic Democracy: The God That Failed to puncture some of the myths surrounding democracy and voting. Jayant Bhandari joins the show to discuss Hoppe's controversial thesis concerning monarchy and democracy, time preference and its manifestation in the two systems, the forces constraining monarchs, and the terrible incentives created for democratic rulers. This is a must-listen show for anyone interested in Hoppe's most famous work and its application to the problems western states face today. Find more from Jayant Bhandari on his website (JayantGhandari.com) and his Twitter account (@JayantBhandari5). Use the code HAPOD for a discount on Democracy: The God That Failed from our bookstore: Mises.org/BuyHoppe ]]>
With an ugly presidential election just three weeks away, we dive into Hans Hoppe's classic Democracy: The God That Failed to puncture some of the myths surrounding democracy and voting. Jayant Bhandari joins the show to discuss Hoppe's controversial thesis concerning monarchy and democracy, time preference and its manifestation in the two systems, the forces constraining monarchs, and the terrible incentives created for democratic rulers. This is a must-listen show for anyone interested in Hoppe's most famous work and its application to the problems western states face today. Find more from Jayant Bhandari on his website (JayantGhandari.com) and his Twitter account (@JayantBhandari5). Use the code HAPOD for a discount on Democracy: The God That Failed from our bookstore: Mises.org/BuyHoppe
With an ugly presidential election just three weeks away, we dive into Hans Hoppe's classic Democracy: The God That Failed to puncture some of the myths surrounding democracy and voting. Jayant Bhandari joins the show to discuss Hoppe's controversial thesis concerning monarchy and democracy, time preference and its manifestation in the two systems, the forces constraining monarchs, and the terrible incentives created for democratic rulers. This is a must-listen show for anyone interested in Hoppe's most famous work and its application to the problems western states face today. Find more from Jayant Bhandari on his website (JayantGhandari.com) and his Twitter account (@JayantBhandari5). Use the code HAPOD for a discount on Democracy: The God That Failed from our bookstore: Mises.org/BuyHoppe
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 278. I was a guest on Episode 79 of The Bob Murphy Show, entitled "Stephan Kinsella and Bob Murphy Debate Hans Hoppe's “Argumentation Ethics”. Back in June we discussed IP and related issues [KOL268 | Bob Murphy Show: Law Without the State, and the Illegitimacy of IP]. We had intended to discuss argumentation ethics but ran out of time. So we did it in this episode. I think it turned out very well. [Update: Ep. 86 Further Thoughts on Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics and Essays on Praxeology ] From Bob's show notes: By popular demand, Bob brings Stephan back on the podcast, this time to debate Hans Hoppe's famous “argumentation ethics” case for libertarianism. Stephan defends Hoppe's claim that any attempt to justify a NON-libertarian system would result in a performative contradiction, while Bob clarifies the argument and raises concerns about it. Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest: The YouTube video for this interview. Hans Hoppe's talk on argumentation ethics at his Property & Freedom Society. The 1988 Liberty symposium on Hoppe's argumentation ethics. Stephan Kinsella's concise guide to Hoppe's argument and its critics. Bob Murphy and Gene Callahan's critique of argumentation ethics in the Journal of Libertarian Studies, and Stephan Kinsella's response. Stephan's earlier appearance on ep. 39 of the Bob Murphy Show, talking about private law and Intellectual Property. Help support the Bob Murphy Show. See also: “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights,” in The Dialectics of Liberty (Lexington Books, 2019) Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics and Its Critics, StephanKinsella.com (Aug. 11, 2015) Lecture 3 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “The Social Theory of Hoppe” (slides here) Lecture 2 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society” (slides here) The Genesis of Estoppel: My Libertarian Rights Theory, StephanKinsella.com (March 22, 2016) Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan, Anti-state.com (Sept. 19, 2002) “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide,” Mises Daily (May 27, 2011)
By popular demand, Bob brings Stephan back on the podcast, this time to debate Hans Hoppe’s famous “argumentation ethics” case for libertarianism. Stephan defends Hoppe’s claim that any attempt to justify a NON-libertarian system would result in a performative contradiction, while Bob clarifies the argument and raises concerns about it.
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 278. I was a guest on Episode 79 of The Bob Murphy Show, entitled "Stephan Kinsella and Bob Murphy Debate Hans Hoppe’s “Argumentation Ethics”. Back in June we discussed IP and related issues [KOL268 | Bob Murphy Show: Law Without the State, and the Illegitimacy of IP]. We had intended to discuss argumentation ethics but ran out of time. So we did it in this episode. I think it turned out very well. [Update: Ep. 86 Further Thoughts on Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics and Essays on Praxeology ] From Bob's show notes: By popular demand, Bob brings Stephan back on the podcast, this time to debate Hans Hoppe’s famous “argumentation ethics” case for libertarianism. Stephan defends Hoppe’s claim that any attempt to justify a NON-libertarian system would result in a performative contradiction, while Bob clarifies the argument and raises concerns about it. Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest: The YouTube video for this interview. Hans Hoppe’s talk on argumentation ethics at his Property & Freedom Society. The 1988 Liberty symposium on Hoppe’s argumentation ethics. Stephan Kinsella’s concise guide to Hoppe’s argument and its critics. Bob Murphy and Gene Callahan’s critique of argumentation ethics in the Journal of Libertarian Studies, and Stephan Kinsella’s response. Stephan’s earlier appearance on ep. 39 of the Bob Murphy Show, talking about private law and Intellectual Property. Help support the Bob Murphy Show. See also: “Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights,” in The Dialectics of Liberty (Lexington Books, 2019) Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics and Its Critics, StephanKinsella.com (Aug. 11, 2015) Lecture 3 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “The Social Theory of Hoppe” (slides here) Lecture 2 of my 2011 Mises Academy course, “Libertarian Legal Theory: Property, Conflict, and Society” (slides here) The Genesis of Estoppel: My Libertarian Rights Theory, StephanKinsella.com (March 22, 2016) Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan, Anti-state.com (Sept. 19, 2002) “Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide,” Mises Daily (May 27, 2011)
By popular demand, Bob brings Stephan back on the podcast, this time to debate Hans Hoppe's famous "argumentation ethics" case for libertarianism. Stephan defends Hoppe's claim that any attempt to justify a NON-libertarian system would result in a performative contradiction, while Bob clarifies the argument and raises concerns about it. Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest: The YouTube video (https://youtu.be/KYtbn1isI5s) for this interview. Hans Hoppe's talk (http://propertyandfreedom.org/2016/10/hans-hermann-hoppe-on-the-ethics-of-argumentation-pfs-2016/) on argumentation ethics at his Property & Freedom Society. The 1988 Liberty symposium (http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_November_1988.pdf) on Hoppe's argumentation ethics. Stephan Kinsella's concise guide (https://mises.org/library/argumentation-ethics-and-liberty-concise-guide) to Hoppe's argument and its critics. Bob Murphy and Gene Callahan's Stephan Kinsella's response (http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/defending-argumentation-ethics/) . Stephan's earlier appearance on ep. 39 of the Bob Murphy Show (https://www.bobmurphyshow.com/episodes/ep-39-stephan-kinsella-discusses-law-without-the-state-and-the-illegitimacy-of-ip/) , talking about private law and Intellectual Property. Help support (http://bobmurphyshow.com/contribute) the Bob Murphy Show. The audio production for this episode was provided by Podsworth Media (http://podsworth.com/) .
I discuss how the US elites have failed and what we can do. I discuss Hans Hoppe and Austrian class theory, and Tucker Carlson's, and Anthony Codevilla's books on the US ruling class.
46 Minutes Suitable for all Ages Pete welcomes C.Jay Engel to the show. C.Jay is the proprietor of the Austro-Libertarian website as well as the host of the Austro-Libertarian Podcast. C.Jay recently released and article entitled 'The Memeification of Hans Hoppe" which Pete thought made points he has been making for a while. they talk about the legacy of Hoppe, and those who are damaging it by misinterpreting it. AustroLibertarian.com The Memification of Hans Hoppe C.Jay on Twitter Democracy: The God That Failed The Theory of Socialism and Capitalism What Must Be Done Pete's Patreon Pete's Bitbacker Pete's Books on Amazon Pete's Books Available for Crypto Pete on Facebook Pete on Twitter
Having just met with the Property & Freedom Society of Hans Hoppe, I share my thoughts on law and justice in a free society involving a combination of self-governing militia and private, market-based security providers. Pick up a tactical pen and get our training guide as a bonus: shop.everydaysamurai.life Get into fitness & flexibility: www.everydaysamurai.life/Progress Get the coaching you need to prevail in life: www.everydaysamurai.life/success Learn more about the Igensho approach to training: https://www.tacticalstudiesgroup.com/
Having just met with the Property & Freedom Society of Hans Hoppe, I share my thoughts on law and justice in a free society involving a combination of self-governing militia and private, market-based security providers. Pick up a tactical pen and get our training guide as a bonus: shop.everydaysamurai.life Get into fitness & flexibility: www.everydaysamurai.life/Progress Get the coaching you need to prevail in life: www.everydaysamurai.life/success Learn more about the Igensho approach to training: https://www.tacticalstudiesgroup.com/
Liberty Weekly - Libertarian, Ancap, & Voluntaryist Legal Theory from a Rothbardian Perspective
In this scholarly episode of the podcast, I explain how a post from The Principled Libertarian led me down a rabbithole where I discovered the libertarian "Title Theory" of contracts. I explain, then compare and contrast, the orthodox consideration-based contract theory with the libertarian title-based theory. Please Consider Supporting Projects on DonorSee Episode 88 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by: The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today! Our Nord VPN Affiliate Link Our Liberty Classroom Affiliate Link Show Notes: Walter Block discusses Murray Rothbard, Hans Hoppe, and John Locke's theory of property Liberty Weekly and the Constitution of No Authority Ep. 28 Foundations of Real Property Law: Present and Concurrent Estates Ep. 76 "The Ethics of Liberty" by: Murray Rothbard (Chapter 19) A Libertarian Theory of Contract: Title Transfer, Binding Promises, Inalienability by: Stephan Kinsella Barbri Contracts Outline
Debating Wright Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 234. This is a debate on IP between me and a noted Bitcoin expert, Craig Wright, hosted and moderated by the Vin Armani show. Transcript below. After the debate I was in London to attend the inaugural 2018 meeting of Mises UK and to hang with my boys Lee Iglody, Jeff Barr, Doug French, and Hans Hoppe, and had challenged Wright to a debate during a few twitter run-ins (still on-going); I accepted and since I happened to be in London, Wright set it up and we did it at a local studio, with Armani moderating from Vegas. Further comments appear on my Facebook post and also on the Youtube post (below). Update [7/17/19]: I had my buddies Jeff Barr and Doug French in the room watching, and after the debate, invited Craig to drinks in the hotel bar. We had an interesting, if a bit bizarre and intense, discussion for an hour or so. But in the ensuing weeks, things between us devolved on Twitter. Wright had promised to produce "proof" of patents stimulating innovation during the debate, and apparently, like with many of his promises to produce something, never came through. I pointed that out on Twitter and he eventually ended up blocking me, as well as the podcast's host, Vin Armani, who at the time was, with Wright, a fellow BCH advocate (Vin is still a BCHer but Craig has split off again with his BSV). Of course, in the meantime, Wright has amped up his risible claims to be Satoshi and has been involved in a number of controversial issues in the bitcoin/crypto community. What a character. Also: during the debate I referred to him as Dr. Wright, since he claims to have several PhDs, but now I am not sure he has any legitimate PhDs, other perhaps than one in "theology", so I should not have called him "Dr." That was too deferential. On the other hand, he did pay for the venue and related costs, so I was being polite. Youtube (with captions): https://youtu.be/5ckcdnD9lFw Original Youtube (which contains a large number of comments; see below): ❧ TRANSCRIPT Intellectual Property Debate: Stephan Kinsella vs. Craig Wright Stephan Kinsella, Craig Wright, and Vin Armani Vin Armani Show, London and Las Vegas, Jan. 27, 2018 00:00:00 VIN ARMANI: Welcome everyone to today's debate. We are debating intellectual property. The two opponents are Stephan Kinsella and Craig Wright. Stephan Kinsella is an attorney in Houston, director of the Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom and editor of Libertarian Papers. He is one of the foremost libertarian experts on intellectual property. 00:00:23 And Dr. Craig Wright is an inventor, computer scientist, and businessman who is one of the earliest minds behind Bitcoin. He's the chief scientist at nChain research and development company involved in Bitcoin and blockchain technologies. So today what we are going to be debating is the following resolution resolved. Intellectual property law is a legitimate and useful institution that belongs in the emerging global sphere of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. 00:00:54 Craig Wright will be arguing for the resolution, and Stephan Kinsella will be arguing against. This debate is going to consist of a series of five-minute statements and rebuttals, a series of rounds. The first round is going to be an opening statement from each of the debaters. We are going to start with – did we say we're starting with Craig Wright? So we will start with Craig Wright who is arguing for the resolution. Dr. Wright, if you will. 00:01:26 CRAIG WRIGHT: Thank you. So basically what we're looking at is the idea that intellectual property has no value from other people. Now, I would argue it does, not because of the common constraints and whatever else people put about scarcity and what they think about copying but for a number of reasons first as the scarcity of good ideas. There are many ideas out there in the world,
Debating Wright Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 234. This is a debate on IP between me and a noted Bitcoin expert, Dr. Craig Wright, hosted and moderated by the Vin Armani show. After the debate I was in London to attend the inaugural 2018 meeting of Mises UK and to hang with my boys Lee Iglody, Jeff Barr, Doug French, and Hans Hoppe, and had challenged Wright to a debate during a few twitter run-ins (still on-going); I accepted and since I happened to be in London, Wright set it up and we did it at a local studio, with Armani moderating from Vegas. Further comments appear on my Facebook post and also on the Youtube post (below). Update [7/17/19]: I had my buddies Jeff Barr and Doug French in the room watching, and after the debate, invited Craig to drinks in the hotel bar. We had an interesting, if a bit bizarre and intense, discussion for an hour or so. But in the ensuing weeks, things between us devolved on Twitter. Wright had promised to produce "proof" of patents stimulating innovation during the debate, and apparently, like with many of his promises to produce something, never came through. I pointed that out on Twitter and he eventually ended up blocking me, as well as the podcast's host, Vin Armani, who at the time was, with Wright, a fellow BCH advocate (Vin is still a BCHer but Craig has split off again with his BSV). Of course, in the meantime, Wright has amped up his risible claims to be Satoshi and has been involved in a number of controversial issues in the bitcoin/crypto community. What a character. Also: during the debate I referred to him as Dr. Wright, since he claims to have several PhDs, but now I am not sure he has any legitimate PhDs, other perhaps than one in "theology", so I should not have called him "Dr." That was too deferential. On the other hand, he did pay for the venue and related costs, so I was being polite.
In this episode I review the history of rights theories in the West from the Middle Ages through the 20th century. Expect to hear about the medieval canonists, the late scholastics, John Locke, Murray Rothbard, and Hans Hoppe, among others.
Tom discusses the work of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (who doesn't really do audio interviews anymore, by the way)
Berlin provides us with an example that comes as close to that of a controlled social experiment as one could probably hope to get, writes Hans Hoppe.This audio Mises Daily is narrated by Keith Hocker.
Archived from the live Mises.tv broadcast, this lecture by Hans Hoppe was presented at the 2011 Mises University in Auburn, Alabama.
In a world without copyright, content creators would find ways to connect with fans and give them reasons to buy Authors: Beware of Copyright by Jeffrey A. Tucker http://www.lewrockwell.com/tucker/tucker121.html The corporate structure wouldn't exist in a free market, so corporate "policy" and litigiousness would disappear There is no reason for books to be out of print in the digital age, other than publishers having copyright of course Creative Commons (http://creativecommons.org) is a good step to the elimination of copyright, although it still relies on it I released Complete Liberty into the public domain; lawyers and legislators be damned Complete Liberty IP Chapter: http://completeliberty.com/chapter6.php audio version: http://completeliberty.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=208107 People in general like giving credit where credit is due Only with governmental "officials" is lying, cheating, and stealing considered normal and ok At some point or another, people will naturally stop obeying IP edicts Most people who enjoy creative content want to reward its producers, not the corporate/legal entities in between All Property Is Intellectual by Russell Madden http://www.russellmadden.com/property_is_intellectual.html The Fallacy of Intellectual Property by Daniel Krawisz http://mises.org/story/3631 Property rights are ascribed based on usage of technological units Owning the Technological Unit: Land and Air (within Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution) by Murray Rothbard http://mises.org/daily/2120#10 Intellectual Property Versus Real Property: What Are Copyrights and What Do They Mean for Liberty? by Sheldon Richman http://fee.org/articles/tgif/intellectual-property/ A free marketplace contains incentives to be honest and reputable and disincentives to defraud and plagiarize Honesty--alignment with reality--is a key virtue for human beings; it enables them to trust themselves and others Ultimately all aspects of our world that can be owned should be owned; "public property" is a contradiction in terms (noted Rand) Ownership creates accountability and value in the marketplace, as well as efficient allocation of resources Duplication without conflict (i.e., using one's own property) is the main principle for understanding the fallacy of IP Fraud charges don't rely on IP, because they deal with deceptive transactions (lack of disclosure) and thus invalid title transfers You can't "own" your reputation in the marketplace; libel and slander laws are invalid On Property and Exploitation by Hans Hoppe and Walter Block http://mises.org/etexts/propertyexploitation.pdf To reduce scarcity and to value more and more things is to flourish as human beings Anarchy means no rulers, no group called "government" presuming to "govern" individuals against their wills and their rights to property Supplemental reading... The 100-Year Sentence by Jeffrey A. Tucker http://www.lewrockwell.com/tucker/tucker145.html If You Believe in IP, How Do You Teach Others? by Jeffrey A. Tucker http://mises.org/daily/3864 The New Frontier in IP by Jeffrey A. Tucker http://www.lewrockwell.com/tucker/tucker123.html Anti-taxation activism videos from 12/10/09 in San Diego, CA... Governmental extortion via property tax (part 1 of 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6NCwmsfe4E Governmental extortion via property tax (part 2 of 2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMyOWqwpfyE Freedom is about being able to make your own choices in the marketplace and respecting property rights bumper music "Meet Your Master" by Nine Inch Nails http://nin.com/ to comment, please go to http://completeliberty.com/magazine/category/91697
People protest a lot of things about government, but rarely its monopolization of so-called justice Governmental tyranny boils down to violating property rights If those in government were truly concerned about your rights, they wouldn't be the first ones to infringe on them The epic myth of Libertarian slavery by Kevin Joseph Tull http://www.libertyforall.net/?p=3018 BIG UPDATE regarding Daniel's enslavement in the Navy (HE'S BEEN RELEASED): http://immoralityofwar.blogspot.com/2009/09/day-131-end-of-my-military-enslavement.html Military contracts are invalid, as they are not based on freedom GTMO prisoners who are depraved of due process are used as a tool for political fear-mongering The U.S. military, via politicians, creates blowback threats to Americans, while violating their (and others') property rights in the process The real issue is the rights-violations perpetrated by those in government; government itself is the main problem regarding threats to our lives and well-being Psych 101: Locking up individuals for years without any due process would naturally foster homicidal (and suicidal) thoughts in them All rights originate from property, first and foremost self-ownership Imagine government running the cell phone industry...of course, the FCC and lobbyists have done a number on it already The FCC extortionist and regulatory racket, which ultimately costs consumers billions and results in greatly inferior services: http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_factsheet&id=73 http://cases.som.yale.edu/spectrum/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9955376-7.html The fantasy of monopolistic justice will remain so Returning to the four pieces of paper (the USC) won't fix the moral contradiction of government You cannot be required to obey a contract once you disagree with it, which would be acting as if you no longer have volition In other words, you can't sign--and bind yourself to--a valid contract without your consent throughout the entire contractual term Walter Block's monstrous contractual contradiction: Privatizing Rivers and Voluntary Slave Contracts by Walter Block http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block134.html (links to his other papers within) Using volition to deny volition involves concept-stealing: http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/stolen_concept--fallacy_of.html You have to be exercising volition in order to keep a contract, so a contract of enslavement is both unjust and epistemologically absurd Clarity of concepts is key... http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/epistemology.html http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/definitions.html People who use, or advocate the use of, initiatory force against others (or even themselves) exempt themselves from rational, volitional discussion Excluding competition in the realm of justice is itself a form of injustice - http://www.logicallearning.net/libertylaissez-f.html Why are you doing this to me? Why do you hate me so much? by samadamscw http://www.dailypaul.com/node/105656 Jan Helfeld checkmates Bill Richardson on Government and Rights http://www.janhelfeld.com/video/35/bill-richardson-on-goverment-and-rights.html Stefan Molyneux checkmates Jan Helfeld on the contradictions of minarchism: http://www.anarchism-wow.com/2009/08/30/fdr1445-stefan-molyneux-jan-helfeld-debate-anarchism-versis-minarchism/ http://www.freedomainradio.com/Traffic_Jams/FDR_1445_jan_helfeld_debate.mp3 No one possesses the right to initiate force against others, so it can't be delegated to those in government either Miniarchism is statism in principle, so advocating it means that the irrational, immoral, unjust meme of government remains intact Dear Robert Ringer, by Carl Watner http://www.voluntaryist.com/forthcoming/anopenletter.php Bill of Law by Michael van Notten - http://completeliberty.com/chapter8.php#153 Root striking Hans Hoppe: http://www.lewrockwell.com/podcast/?p=episode&name=2009-08-18_130_the_economics_of_world_government.mp3 Either you have property rights or you don't; public property is a contradiction in terms When government exists, disobedience is the ultimate crime Once the "legitimacy" of government is shattered, the people in it have nothing left but violence (just like a petty thug on the street) "The mark of a truly civilized society should be 'the triumph of persuasion over force'" C.W. If you advocate coercion, you're advocating a worse off life for yourself Let's have protection without violation of our rights! Fears, lack of trust, and obedience to authority all contribute to pseudo self-esteem and controlling others Government is the last link in the corrupt philosophical chain, representing a culture of mediocrity What's good for the individual is good for the collective, but not vice versa Brett's new educational podcast and site - http://schoolsucks.podomatic.com and http://edu-lu-tion.com Visit http://warisimmoral.com for more info from Daniel True justice agencies will focus on restoring victims, not creating them To buy a print edition of CL, visit: http://www.lulu.com/content/687618 bumper music "You Want What We Got" by Twisted Sister http://www.twistedsister.com/ http://www.myspace.com/twistedsister to comment, please go to http://completeliberty.com/magazine/category/91697
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
