Podcasts about Fallacy

Brendan and KVV begin this Friday episode with some clean up on the sweeping changes announced from the PGA Tour this week, including the initial “reporting” and subsequent freak out that places like Pine Valley, Cypress Point, and Seminole could host the re-imagined PGA Tour Championship. They discuss some Travelers odds and ends, where Scottie’s missing belt is a big story, and this also leads to a devastating drive by of Arch Manning. Then they discuss video of Rory McIlroy playing Birkdale on the day of a PGA Tour Signature event and reporting from Bob Harig that he has received a special discretionary exemption to maintain his membership even though he will not meet the minimum number of starts after another skip this week. Nelly Korda’s early start at the Women’s PGA is also discussed, as well as her embrace of being the star of that tour. They also discuss the new pronunciation of Turkey or Türkiye before getting to a Flashback Friday on another U.S. Open rules classic, namely the double chip of TC Chen that lost him the 1985 U.S. Open. They close answering a handful of Golf Advice questions on buddies trips, ride along watchers, and awkward pairings. Use the code FRIEDEGG at eightsleep.com/friedegg for up to $500 off. The 4th of July sale ends July 12. To learn more about how T-Mobile supports the USGA inside the ropes and provides exclusive benefits to its members outside, visit https://t-mobile.com/usga.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Your team cannot read your mind. And if you never gave clear instructions, the failure starts with you. In this episode of The Level Up Podcast, Paul Alex breaks down the mind reading fallacy and why unclear communication destroys execution inside a business. Let's be real… If you give vague directions… Send a one sentence message… Fail to define the outcome… And then get angry when the result is wrong… That is not leadership. That is poor communication. In this episode, you'll learn: Why “common sense” is not a real operating system How vague instructions create confusion, mistakes, and delays Why leaders must clearly define the finish line How overcommunication builds trust, speed, and execution The truth is simple: Your team cannot execute a vision they do not understand. They need the standard. They need the target. They need the details. They need to know exactly what success looks like. High-level leaders do not assume people know what they mean. They clarify. They document. They explain the outcome. They communicate so clearly that there is no room for guessing. Because ambiguity creates failure. Clarity creates momentum. Stop expecting your team to read your mind. Write the script. Set the standard. Clarify the vision. And keep leveling up. Your Network is your NETWORTH! Make sure to add me on all SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS: Instagram: https://jo.my/paulalex2024Facebook: https://jo.my/fbpaulalex2024YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGhDAD1JyGGzSQUPD9lc9HQLinkedIn: https://jo.my/inpaulalex2024 Looking for a secondary source of income or want to become an entrepreneur? Check out one of my companies below to see if we can help you: www.CashSwipe.com FREE Copy of my book “Blue to Digital Gold - The New American Dream”www.officialPaulAlex.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

3pm - I WAS THINKING:  The Fallacy of the phrase “Our country has never been more divided” // 1858 - Lincoln warns America becoming “a house divided” // Parent falls for AI call from his “son”, loses $6,000 // Can we convincingly clone John’s voice? // People Who Enjoy Dark Humor Might Be Smarter Than Everyone Else, According to Science

6pm - I WAS THINKING:  The Fallacy of the phrase “Our country has never been more divided” // 1858 - Lincoln warns America becoming “a house divided” // Parent falls for AI call from his “son”, loses $6,000 // Can we convincingly clone John’s voice? // People Who Enjoy Dark Humor Might Be Smarter Than Everyone Else, According to Science 

Welcome back, friends! On this episode I chat with Diego Hidalgo, known as the Skeptical Physio online. Diego published a fanastic paper a while back over "The Fallacy of Osteopathic Anatomical Possibilism." We talk about why it's important to embrace critical thinking to challenge these narratives.  Diego calls healthcare providers to balance clinical passion with scientific skepticism to improve patient care. Enjoy! Clinical Athlete FB Community: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/18fek6q4UW/

https://youtu.be/2m_QoQ9gv0w

A 7-1 German demolition, a tactical masterclass turned substitution disaster for the Netherlands, and a goalscorer apologizing to his father's nation. Welcome back to the drama! Welcome to FUT IN REVIEW | World Cup Daily. Day 4 of the World Cup 2026 is officially in the books, and Shaq and John (who is battling the ultimate reverse-life jetlag) are here to break down a massive four-game slate completely unfiltered.The Bliss & The Bully: 78-year-old Dick Advocaat crying in the dugout during Curaçao's historic debut. Jurensley Comenancia scoring an unforgettable equalizer to rattle Germany for 10 glorious minutes, before Julian Nagelsmann's side turned ruthless in a 7-1 blowout.Koeman's Substitution Disaster: Recapping the 2-2 thriller between the Netherlands and Japan. John rants about Ronald Koeman throwing away a 2-1 lead during the commercial water break by subbing off all his speed (Malen, Summerville, Gakpo) for Memphis Depay and a defensive block.The Ivorian Diamond: How Ivory Coast broke Ecuador's 18-match unbeaten streak with a 1-1 thriller, featuring an electric performance from Jan Diamonde on the right wing.The Drama of Yasin Ayari: The 22-year-old Brighton midfielder scoring a thunderbolt for Sweden against Tunisia—the country of his father—and refusing to celebrate, before sealing a dominant 5-1 win.Day 5 Quick Predictions: Looking ahead to Spain vs. Cabo Verde, Belgium vs. Egypt, and Saudi Arabia trying to replicate their giant-killing magic against Uruguay.Unlock Every Episode Instantly: Don't miss a single second of our daily tournament coverage! Join our Patreon to unlock the daily episodes the exact second we finish recording, plus full access to our active Discord, Predictor Leagues, and the official World Cup Sweepstakes. Check us out at patreon.com/futinreview.Wake Up GPM's Office: Take 10 seconds to hit that 5-star review button on Spotify or Apple Podcasts. Every single review sets off a massive buzzer in Chris's house and keeps him awake to watch more live games!Pass the Aux Cord: Share this episode with a mate who is currently complaining about Ronald Koeman's tactical choices or buzzing over Sweden's firepower.Instagram: @futinreviewTikTok: @futinreviewpodcastWebsite: futinreview.comSee you tomorrow for Day 5 as Spain, Belgium, and Uruguay enter the chat. Goodbye!00:00 - Apologizing to Tunisia: The 15-Second Hook00:30 - Welcome to Day Four: John's Brutal Reverse-Life Jetlag01:09 - Game 1: Germany 7 - 1 Curaçao (Historical Tears & 10 Minutes of Bliss)02:34 - Age Gap: 78-Year-Old Dick Advocaat vs. 38-Year-Old Julian Nagelsmann03:52 - Is Joshua Kimmich at Right-Back Germany's Only Weakness?05:12 - Game 2: Netherlands 2 - 2 Japan (Tactical Chess & Sideways Passing)08:26 - Five At The Back: How Zion Suzuki Kept Japan Alive in the First Half10:52 - The Collapse: How the Commercial Hydration Break Cost Oranje the Match12:24 - Game 3: Ivory Coast 1 - 0 Ecuador (Breaking the 18-Match Unbeaten Streak)14:30 - Electric Jan Diamonde & Amad Diallo's Match-Winning Instincts16:18 - Game 4: Sweden 5 - 1 Tunisia (Graham Potter's Two-Striker Firepower)17:53 - Isak & Gyökeres Dominance: Rating the African Nations So Far19:54 - Baller of the Day: Jurensley Comenancia & Felix Nmecha's Dribbling Class22:11 - Bottler of the Day: Ronald Koeman Leaving Out Frimpong & Subbing Fit Strikers25:40 - The Fallacy of "Total Football" in Modern Tactical Zone Defenses27:49 - The Drama: Yasin Ayari (Sweden) Facing His Heritage & Classy Non-Celebrations29:10 - John's Unpopular Take: Football is Emotion, You MUST Celebrate inside the World Cup!30:32 - Day 5 Blockbuster Previews: Spain vs. Cabo Verde & Belgium vs. Egypt31:21 - Saudi Arabia vs. Uruguay: Can the Giant-Killers Do It Again?31:38 - Outro: Follow the Socials, Hit the 5-Star Button & See You Tomorrow!

FDD Executive Director Jon Schanzer delivers timely situational updates and analysis, followed by a conversation with Haviv Rettig Gur, host of the Ask Haviv Anything podcast and Middle East Analyst at The Free Press.Learn more at: https://www.fdd.org/fddmorningbrief

We've had a couple of guests on recently to talk about how we can fix government and democracy, but no one has worked on this so much as Edmund Maklouf. His audio is a bit quiet due to his setup, but listen carefully, and we'll question things like voting, how we decide who the leaders are, and what the group should do, and how we scale that to entire societies using ancient principles. His new book, The Majority Myth: How Voting Really Works, Why It Is Failing, and How We Can Fix It questions the math of the majority and why majority rule may not be the way forward.

In the one-hundred-and-ninety-fifth episode, we look at the Exact Definition Fallacy, starting with Trump pretending he doesn't know what DEI means, and pretending Biden doesn't know what carbon means, then we hear Marsha Blackburn try to dunk on Ketanji Brown Jackson.In Mark's British Politics Corner, we look at Catherine McKinnell and Jacob Rees-Mogg's very different definitions of fairness, and Michael Gove questioning existence.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from A Few Good Men and Jordan Peterson.Jim and Mark go head-to-head in Fake News, the game in which Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes was made up by Jim.Then we talk about the new acting Director of National Intelligence.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft195 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

James 1:26-27, Either/Or Fallacy: Religion or Relationship?, Pastor Matt Watson by MVBC

In this segment, the hosts break down the mass confusion surrounding the Trump administration's erratic diplomatic statements regarding the ongoing war with Iran. The discussion zeroes in on a dizzying 24-hour news cycle where President Trump alternately threatened ferocious bombing campaigns and then abruptly declared the war "over," claiming to have reached a conceptual memorandum of understanding. The commentary highlights a stark disconnect between the White House and global reality, as Middle Eastern allies like Egypt and Israel, along with Iranian state media, quickly denied any knowledge of a finalized settlement. While Trump claims a breakthrough is on the horizon, the reality on the ground tells a far different story: the Ayatollah has publicly rejected the proposal, cyber warfare groups have breached digital infrastructure, and Iranian forces have resumed drone and missile attacks on commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. The host concludes with a poignant warning from national security experts, emphasizing that a weak diplomatic framework fails to address Iran and China's hostile actions against American service members. Iran conflict, Donald Trump, Strait of Hormuz, Foreign policy, National security, Ayatollah Khamenei, Fox News, Drone warfare, Cyber attacks, Middle East diplomacy

Jay Shepard, Author, joins Kurt & Anthony to discuss his book: "The Fallacy of the Rational Voter".

Orlando R. Kelm is a retired professor from the University of Texas at Austin. He served in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese and the McCombs School of Business for over 37 years, teaching courses in Portuguese and Spanish language and linguistics. His research and publications focused on the cultural aspects of cross-cultural communication and the creative use of technology in language learning. Orlando was born in Calgary, Alberta, raised in Taylorsville, Utah, and educated at Brigham Young University and the University of California at Berkeley. He served in the São Paulo Norte Brazil mission, and his three favorite hobbies are studying foreign languages, acoustic guitar, and astrophotography and nature photography. Orlando recently published the book It's a Patriarchal Blessing!. Links It’s a Patriarchal Blessing Email Before a Patriarchal Blessing (Microsoft Word format) Email Before a Patriarchal Blessing (PDF format) Transcript available with the video in the Zion Lab community Watch the video and share your thoughts in the Zion Lab community Highlights Orlando discusses his experiences as a patriarch and the significance of patriarchal blessings. He emphasizes the importance of viewing these blessings as affirmations of identity and divine potential rather than as mere checklists or warnings. 00:02:28 – Orlando’s Calling as a Patriarch 00:03:52 – Challenges of Starting as a Patriarch 00:04:48 – Training and Preparation for Patriarchs 00:05:41 – The Pressure of Giving a Blessing 00:06:29 – Communicating First-Time Blessings 00:07:06 – Orlando’s Role as the Only Patriarch 00:07:55 – Impact on Gospel Study and Preparation 00:08:34 – Revelation and Inspiration in Preparation 00:09:40 – The Importance of Compassion 00:10:37 – Note-Taking for Blessings 00:12:00 – Reviewing and Editing Blessings 00:13:27 – The Nature of Patriarchal Blessings 00:14:35 – Preparing Candidates for Blessings 00:17:30 – Helping Candidates Feel Comfortable 00:19:06 – The Role of Patriarchs in the Church 00:20:10 – The Blessing Aspect of Patriarchal Blessings 00:21:09 – Avoiding a Checklist Mentality 00:22:32 – The Role of Personal Agency 00:23:36 – Orlando’s List of Recommended Talks 00:24:45 – Reducing Anxiety for Candidates 00:26:07 – The Experience of Giving Blessings 00:27:30 – The Importance of Seeing Potential 00:28:59 – Understanding Lineage in Blessings 00:30:33 – The Significance of Covenant and Gathering 00:31:47 – Contributions of Different Tribes 00:33:44 – The Role of Personal Revelation 00:35:58 – Flexibility in Interpreting Blessings 00:37:09 – The Lifelong Relevance of Blessings Key Insights The Nature of Patriarchal Blessings: These blessings should be viewed fundamentally as a positive source of love and divine identity. Orlando emphasizes that they are not patriarchal warnings, admonitions, or “chewing outs,” but rather tools to help individuals understand their divine worth. Preparation as a Patriarch: The process involves intense, ongoing spiritual preparation. Orlando explains that he often feels like a “faucet that cannot be turned off” in the days leading up to a blessing, as he studies scriptures and topics prompted by the Holy Ghost to prepare his mind to receive impressions. Mortal Delivery of Revelation: Patriarchs receive inspiration, but they must articulate it using their own mortal capacity, vocabulary, and understanding. Consequently, a patriarchal blessing is a collaboration between the Spirit and the patriarch’s mortal expression. The Fallacy of the “Checklist”: Recipients should avoid viewing their blessings as a list of required events (e.g., marriage, missions, children) to be checked off. Instead, they should see the blessing as a resource to be applied to all of life’s decisions, challenges, and experiences. Understanding Lineage: The declaration of lineage is not a DNA test but an invitation to participate in the Abrahamic covenant and the gathering of Israel. Each tribe's unique description provides a different “skill set” for how an individual can contribute to the Lord’s work. Leadership Applications Alleviate Anxiety: Leaders can help reduce the nervousness people feel about visiting a patriarch by fostering opportunities for the patriarch to interact with ward members (e.g., firesides, sacrament meetings, or activities) beforehand, making him a familiar figure rather than a stranger. Foster a Broad Interpretation: Bishops and leaders should encourage members to interpret their patriarchal blessings with flexibility. When members feel confused by their blessing, leaders can help them understand that the meanings may evolve and deepen as they face different stages and challenges in life. The award-winning Leading Saints Podcast is one of the top independent Latter-day Saints podcasts as part of nonprofit Leading Saints’ mission to help Latter-day Saints be better prepared to lead. Find Leadership Tools, Courses, and Community for Latter-day Saint leaders in the Zion Lab community. Learn more and listen to any of the past episodes for free at LeadingSaints.org. Past guests include Emily Belle Freeman, David Butler, Hank Smith, John Bytheway, Reyna and Elena Aburto, Liz Wiseman, Stephen M. R. Covey, Benjamin Hardy, Elder Alvin F. Meredith III, Julie Beck, Brad Wilcox, Jody Moore, Tony Overbay, John H. Groberg, Elaine Dalton, Tad R. Callister, Lynn G. Robbins, J. Devn Cornish, Bonnie Oscarson, Dennis B. Neuenschwander, Kirby Heyborne, Taysom Hill, Coaches Jennifer Rockwood and Brandon Doman, Anthony Sweat, John Hilton III, Barbara Morgan Gardner, Blair Hodges, Whitney Johnson, Ryan Gottfredson, Greg McKeown, Ganel-Lyn Condie, Michael Goodman, Wendy Ulrich, Richard Ostler, and many more in over 800 episodes. Discover podcasts, articles, virtual conferences, and live events related to callings such as the bishopric, Relief Society, elders quorum, Primary, youth leadership, stake leadership, ward mission, ward council, young adults, ministering, and teaching.

Join Angel Horvat, Founder and CEO of AI Readi, for a candid evaluation of why the corporate rush into generative AI is grinding to an unexpected halt. Despite massive infrastructure investments, the enterprise journey is hitting a hard wall: while 88% of organizations have initiated AI pilots, a staggering 94% remain permanently trapped in pilot purgatory. Drawing on his years leading AI and data strategy at Nike (EMEA) and Gartner, Angel reveals that these failures are almost never a failure of the tech—they are structural failures of the organization itself. In this episode, we discover how to bridge the gap between initial demo and scaled business value.

In the one-hundred-and-ninety-fourth episode, we look at the Appeal to Definition, starting with Trump relying on specific definitions of MAGA and 86.In Mark's British Politics Corner, we look at Boris Johnson and Theresa May relying on specific definitions .In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from Taskmaster, Autechre, and Bill Clinton's deposition.Jim and Mark go head-to-head in Fake News, the game in which Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes was made up by Jim.Then we talk about the incredible prosecutorial misconduct in the Broadview Six case.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft194 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Coach Ted talks about moderation being the obstacle to accomplishment. (Originally aired 09-03-2025)

Part 1 in a teaching series called "Think Again" You can watch this service on YouTube: https://youtu.be/xlVquFcMi2A If you had questions during the message, text them to 567-246-0807 and we will contact you to discuss your thoughts. *Closing Song is: "Open The Eyes Of My Heart" - Paul Baloche - Lyrics: Paul Baloche - © 1997 Integrity's Hosanna! Music; Leadworship Songs *Song used in this service are performed by the WCC band with permission under CCS License #4935

In the one-hundred-and-ninety-third episode, we look at the Definist Fallacy, starting with Trump redefining profit, temperament, and his opponents.In Mark's British Politics Corner, we look at definitions of socialism from Jeremy Corbyn, Mick Lynch, Kier Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Jonathan Reynolds, and James Cleverly.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from Friends, Babylon 5, and Andy Ngo on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast.Jim and Mark go head-to-head in Fake News, the game in which Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes was made up by Jim.Then we talk about the insane "settlement agreement" between Trump and the DoJ.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft193 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In Episode 154 of the Metal Maniacs Podcast, host Jay Ingersoll sits down with Michigan metal veterans Withhold The Blood to break down over 16 years of grinding through the underground scene. From their early inception around 2010 to their latest 2026 single Nation of Fallacy, this episode dives deep into evolution, persistence, and crushing riffs.We talk about the current lineup featuring Jesse (vocals), Eli (drums), and Brandon (guitar), and how the band has stayed alive through lineup changes, limited online presence, and years between releases. Despite the chaos, the passion for heavy music never left.We revisit their early work including the 2014 EP Detached From Reality, featuring long-form songwriting, massive riffs, and vocal highs reminiscent of Randy Blythe. Tracks like “The Chosen” and “Eye For Misery” showcase their early blend of groove, melody, and raw aggression.Then we dig into 2018's Aberration, where the band leveled up—introducing heavier tones, tighter production, double bass intensity, and stronger deathcore influences. Songs like “Impulse to Kill,” “Broken Dreams,” and “Empty Confessions” highlight their growth in songwriting, rhythm, and technicality.Their newest release, “Nation of Fallacy” (2026), pushes even further—leaning harder into deathcore with relentless vocals, sharp melodic experimentation, and standout guitar work. This track feels like a natural evolution of Aberration while carving a heavier, more refined identity.We also cover:The band's origin and what kept them going for over a decadeLineup changes including past drummers like Levi Smith, Gary Swaggerty, and Mike MillerTheir writing process, riff development, and solo decisionsProduction approach, tone, gear, and tuning choicesLive shows, touring history (including 2019 runs), and recent gigs with VestigialPractice routines and collaboration dynamicsLife outside music, gaming, and influences they're listening to nowWhat's next for Withhold The BloodThis is a must-listen for fans of metalcore, deathcore, groove metal, and underground heavy music culture.

Lai Ching-te's tenure as the head of the Democratic Progressive Party authorities of China's Taiwan region has been marked by a series of missteps and failures that have not only strained cross-Strait relations but also undermined the island's development prospects.Contrary to his shameless claim in a speech on Wednesday marking the two-year anniversary of his tenure that he has maintained the status quo of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, the DPP authorities have stubbornly adhered to a "Taiwan independence" stance, peddled separatist fallacies and obstructed cross-Strait exchanges.That speech was a response, if not a desperate "don't desert me" plea, to US President Donald Trump's Friday interview, in which the US leader stated, "We're not looking to have somebody say, 'Let's go independent because the United States is backing us'." This remark dealt a heavy blow to Lai.In his speech — yet another litany of lies and deceit — Lai openly groveled to Washington, begging for an opportunity to tell the US leader that he wishes to continue purchasing US weapons, which he misleadingly labeled as essential to peace. Ironically, he tried to assure his audience that the island's future would not be determined by external forces just moments after trying to solicit US support.In an attempt to conceal his secessionist nature, Lai peddled a so-called "Taiwan subject mentality" in his speech, openly seeking to sever the island from the Chinese motherland.This "soft independence" is hidden and pernicious, no less harming than the DPP authorities' overt political separatist sloganeering.Evidently anxious over the US leader's remarks, Lai posted a so-called "five-point speech" on Facebook on Sunday, in which he called black white, barefacedly claiming that his authorities are the protectors of regional peace. Yet to his horror, that "carefully worded" message failed to elicit the hoped for response from Washington — explaining why Lai doubled down on his efforts to appeal to the US not to give up on him.If Lai truly intends to show the world that he is not a secessionist and that he is committed to peace and stability, he should simply pledge his support for the 1992 Consensus and stop fawning over the US.The true color of his secessionist feather is laid bare by the extraordinary lengths he has gone to in an attempt to conceal his separatist nature — and his fear of losing US support for his political agenda.The predicament Taiwan faces today stems from the DPP authorities' long-standing practice of placing ideological manipulation above reality, staking the island's security on the will of the US, and tying the future of Taiwan people to the dangerous path of seeking "Taiwan independence" through reliance on external forces. Once Washington shows even signs of shifting priorities, that layer of illusion surrounding the DPP authorities' reckless approach will be stripped away. In short, "Taiwan independence" is a dead end.Lai's latest remarks do not signal any abandonment of "Taiwan independence", but rather a repackaging of it in more carefully crafted rhetoric."Taiwan independence" is fundamentally incompatible with peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. The expansion of separatist forces advocating "Taiwan independence" will ultimately push Taiwan toward a dangerous abyss — a trajectory that runs counter not only to the interests of the Chinese nation, but also to the strategic interests of the US. In this sense, curbing "Taiwan independence" separatist activities and maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait serve the shared interests of both China and the US. Lai's remarks further underscore the reality that "Taiwan independence" has become a common challenge confronting both Beijing and Washington.There is but one China in the world and that Taiwan is part of China. No matter what Lai says or does, he will not stop the historical trend toward reunification, which is unstoppable, as a spokesperson for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office said on Wednesday.Secessionist /sɪˈseʃənɪst/分裂主义者，脱离联邦者• Fallacy /ˈfæləsi/谬论，谬误• Litany /ˈlɪtəni/唠叨，一连串（枯燥的叙述或抱怨）• Grovel /ˈɡrɒvl/卑躬屈膝，摇尾乞怜• Solicit /səˈlɪsɪt/乞求，争取，征求• Pernicious /pəˈnɪʃəs/有害的，恶性的，流毒深远的• Barefacedly /ˈbeəfeɪsɪdli/厚颜无耻地，公然地• Fawn /fɔːn/阿谀奉承，巴结• Predicament /prɪˈdɪkəmənt/困境，窘境• Trajectory /trəˈdʒektəri/轨迹，弹道

Send us Fan Mail

What happens when a society's pursuit of pure rationality and radical individualism actually threatens to dissolve the trust that holds it together? Notre Dame University's Paul G. Kimball Professor of Arts and Letters, Dr. Vittorio Hösle, joins host PJ Wehry to discuss the overlooked genius of Giambattista Vico and the hidden dangers of modern rationalism. Dr. Hösle explores the philosophical foundations of the human sciences through his book Vico's New Science of the Intersubjective World. They examine why projecting modern thought onto ancient history fundamentally distorts our understanding of the past, and how recognizing the cyclical nature of civilizations can warn us against our own potential decay. In this conversation they explore: How Vico established a rigorous "new science" focused on the common nature of nations, effectively laying the groundwork for modern sociology and the human sciences. The profound realization that archaic humans experienced the world through sensual metaphors and mythic wisdom rather than abstract concepts or romantic love. The crucial discovery of the fallacy of anachronism—and why erudite scholars constantly make the mistake of projecting their own modern mindset onto the past. Why pure rationality and universal rational egoism, termed the "barbarism of reflection," can dissolve societal trust and lead to civilizational collapse. The sobering reality that historical progress is not guaranteed, and that the collapse of high civilization remains a persistent threat even today. Vico's method of conceptually understanding archaic societies by comparing epochs, even when directly empathizing with their foreign mindset is impossible. This is a conversation for anyone interested in philosophy, sociology, and history who wants to understand the foundational forces that shape human societies and the historical blind spots of the modern age. Make sure to check out Dr. Hösle's book: Vico's New Science of the Intersubjective World

Does Surah 2:135 Commit the Fallacy of Equivocation? Debate between: C. L. Edwards & Pastor Olin Giles Website: https://RadicalTruth.net Donate: https://RadicalTruth.net/Donate ** ALL Donations are Tax-Deductible **

In this episode, Dustin gives us all a horrifying modern story of violence, warfare, and pseudo-redemption.Then, Whitney breaks down the historical horrors of capitalism through the perspective of one of the best to do it. As always, our humor is not suitable for most people. Enjoy!

Last week, my son and I stumbled across a "financial guru" on YouTube making an "interesting" claim: if you make $1M over 20 years, you've only made $50k a year...but if you make $1M in a month, you've made $12M in a year. While we had a good laugh at the empty logic, it highlighted the dangerous trend of being sold the promise of success rather than being guided on how to achieve it. The current culture has us swept up in a "Frictionless Fallacy," believing AI has somehow defeated the laws of business physics and that we can now manufacture success from thin air. In my final episode of our Fortifying Organizational Fragility series, I'm dismantling the promise of a new frictionless world. I'm breaking down why gravity doesn't care about your LLM and why so many people are "automating a loss" by chasing AI lottery tickets at the expense of their most non-renewable resource: Time.The Declassification: The Mirage of the Infinite GlitchI expose the two structural delusions currently draining our strategic resilience:The Dopamine of the Artifact: AI makes it easy to build "whiz-bangs," apps, and prompts that feel like progress but solve zero real-world problems. I share the story of a client who spent countless hours building six apps that would take dozens of lifetimes to provide a return on the time invested in them. The 24-Hour Wall: Despite the hype, AI has not changed the fact that we only have 24 hours in a day. Drawing on my experience growing up in a funeral home, I discuss why recognizing our finite time should make us relentlessly intentional, rather than desperate gamblers surrendering our legacy for "vibe-coded" paperweights. The "Now What": 3 Surgical Moves to Reclaim Strategic SovereigntyAI is an amplifier and an accelerant, not a magic powder; it can turn a small mistake into a total catastrophe if your logic is broken. Here is how you hit the brakes: The Objective Opportunity Cost Audit: Be honest about your hourly rate. If you are spending weeks "fiddling" to solve a problem that isn't in the black, you are bankrupting your own future. The Physics-First Test: Strip the word "AI" out of your pitch. If the business logic doesn't work with a real pencil and paper, the technology isn't going to save a lost cause. The Subscription Purge: Stop the "Cord-Cutter" trap of piling up duplicate AI widgets. If an app hasn't generated a measurable gain in 30 days, cancel it and stop funding the ruse. By the end of this series, my goal is to help you move past the "AI slop" and toward true agency. Sovereignty isn't about chasing more technology; it's about owning your time and your strategy before the bill comes due.⸻If this conversation helps you think more clearly about the future we're building, make sure to like, share, and subscribe. You can also support the show by buying me a coffee at buymeacoffee.com/christopherlind.And if your organization is wrestling with how to lead responsibly in the AI era—balancing performance, technology, and people—that's the work I do every day through my consulting and coaching. Learn more at christopherlind.co.⸻Chapters00:00 – The YouTube Guru & The Infinite Money Glitch 03:10 – Closing the Series: The Ruse of the Frictionless World 05:02 – Segment 1: Why Business Physics Still Apply 08:08 – The Dopamine Hit: Building Artifacts vs. Building Value 10:15 – The Six-App Trap: Automating a Lifetime Loss 16:00 – Segment 2: The 24-Hour Wall & The Funeral Home Perspective 19:40 – The "I'll Just Sell It" Justification 22:45 – The Trade-Off: Vibe-Coding vs. Legacy 26:50 – Step 1: The Objective Opportunity Cost Audit 30:10 – Step 2: The Physics-First Test (No AI Allowed) 32:30 – Step 3: The Subscription Purge 35:00 – Series Conclusion: Sovereignty Over the Ruse #FutureFocused #Leadership #BusinessPhysics #AI #OrganizationalFragility #TimeManagement #VibeCoding #Sovereignty #StrategicDiscipline #ChristopherLind

The AI fallacy is thinking the transformation is only in the tool. AI is already transforming education and work; not just because of what it can do, but because of what people believe it can do. Students, workers, managers, universities, and companies are all changing their behavior around AI, sometimes rationally, sometimes badly, and often before they even fully understand it. The AI paradox is that it is both a technology and a social event. It is a technology because it is something we install, manage, govern, and use. But it is also a social event because it functions as a moment in history, one that is already altering how people learn, work, teach, hire, manage, and make decisions. Treating AI only as technology leads to the fallacy: the mistaken belief that because a challenge is technical, the solution must also be purely technical. My guest is Professor Gerald C. "Jerry" Kane. Prof. Kane is the C. Herman and Mary Virginia Terry Chair in Business Administration and Professor of Management Information Systems at the University of Georgia's Terry College of Business, he has also served as a Visiting Scholar at Harvard Business School, a Guest Editor at MIT Sloan Management Review, and a Senior Editor at MIS Quarterly. Jerry's research explores the role of digital technologies in business strategy, organizational culture, and talent development, with a particular focus on how people and organizations respond to digital disruption. He is also the author of two books on that topic: The Technology Fallacy and The Transformation Myth: Leading Your Organization Through Uncertain Times. I had Jerry on the podcast before. This time, I wanted to talk to him because he sits in both worlds: he studies how companies adapt to digital transformation, and he is also a professor watching AI hit higher education in real time, not as a theory, but in his classroom, with his students, right now. Treating AI as a software update rather than a cultural shift results in 'bolted-on' systems that people neither trust nor understand. Some highlights from the episode. 02:13 Meet Professor Jerry Kane 07:12 How fast AI hit campus 13:22 The university policy divide 14:19 Workplace tools and incentives 17:36 Young minds and the outsourcing of thinking 20:20 Teach the basics first, then add AI 24:22 Degrees vs. lifelong upskilling 29:34 Curation as the new core skill 31:50 AI pushback from artists and creators 32:47 Ethical use over refusal 33:18 What's actually happening inside companies 34:13 Building a coalition of the willing 36:13 Shadow AI and the risks of unsanctioned use 38:25 Efficiency vs. transformation 40:44 Layoffs and AI washing 42:12 Middle managers and org structure 43:27 Adoption steps and safety 47:29 Minimal viable governance 55:35 Jobs anxiety vs. reality 58:30 Bullish long-term, uncertain short-term 1:00:49 Chatbots and attention traps Enjoy! For show notes and more, visit https://www.larryweeks.com/podcasts/

In the one-hundred-and-ninety-second episode, we look at the Didactic Fallacy, starting with Trump talking about assassinations and tariffs.In Mark's British Politics Corner, we look at Jacob Rees-Mogg reminiscing about the Empire, Boris Johnson waxing lyrical on Thatcher, and Kemi Badenoch missing the point of Bloody Sunday.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from Brooklyn Nine Nine, Babylon 5, historian Margaret MacMillan, and journalist Eva Ladipo.Jim and Mark go head to head in Fake News, the game in which Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes was made up by Jim.Then we talk about the latest insane filing in Trump's ballroom lawsuit.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft192 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Luck egalitarians fallaciously declare property and wealth to be illegitimate or at least suspect due to a mysterious, unquantifiable force called luck. Their arguments fail even if what they claim about luck is true.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/luck-fallacy-and-luck-egalitarianism

Luck egalitarians fallaciously declare property and wealth to be illegitimate or at least suspect due to a mysterious, unquantifiable force called luck. Their arguments fail even if what they claim about luck is true.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/luck-fallacy-and-luck-egalitarianism

On this episode, Harold Green tackles one of the biggest obstacles to retiring early: taxes. He discusses why standard "tax the rich" plans rarely hit the real wealthy and often end up targeting professionals and small business owners instead.  Harold explains how the ultra-wealthy legally minimize taxes through smart financial structures—and how you can borrow these strategies to grow and protect your own money. If you want to keep more of what you earn, build lasting wealth, and move closer to early retirement, you won't want to miss this. Tune in for straightforward tips and real-world examples that could help you stop working sooner and start living life on your terms. Show Highlights: Discover the hidden truth behind the tax illusion [01:03] Do you think high earners and the truly wealthy are the same? [02:26] Find out how the tax code encourages investment like no other [06:48] Explore the mobility of money across borders [10:14] What to do when the tax code changes? [11:14] This is why attempts to tax the rich create political drama [14:37] Why does the system reward ownership more than labor? [15:32] Learn how to protect your income and create a flexible plan [18:33]

If you're an INFP, you know the feeling of putting all of your heart, your values, and your time into a project, a job, or a relationship. Then, when it's clearly not working, the thought of quitting feels like betrayal.It feels like we're failing a part of ourselves.That's the Sunken Cost Fallacy. We sacrifice our future self because we don't want to admit our past self was wrong. We confuse our identity (tied to our Soul - Fi) with the time we invested.It keeps us stuck in dead ends, feeling guilty, and unable to pivot.But what if that time wasn't wasted? What if you could stop beating yourself up about quitting?In this video, I break down the exact mindset shift I needed to stop letting past effort control my future.As I put it in the video: "i've learned skills that i've needed to level up into the next level of my life because i went through that stuff."

Teach me Sweden är en podcast om svensk historia med komikerna Jonathan Rollins (US) och Erik Broström (SE). Varje vecka läser en av dem för den andra om en händelse i svensk historia som förmodligen ingen av dem hört tidigare.In this episode, Jonathan continues his Fallacy of Neutrality series with this report on the Swedish Stay Behind Network, a brainchild of the US CIA. Enjoy!Support this podcast at www.patreon.com/teachmesweden Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the one-hundred-and-ninety-first episode, we take another look at the Galileo Fallacy, starting with Trump being compared to Galileo and Einstein, Karoline Leavitt defending RFK Jr, and Rick Perry denying climate change.In Mark's British Politics Corner, we look at Farage misquoting Gandhi, Jonathan Dimbleby defending the BBC, and Zia Yusuf attacking Zack Polanski.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from The Newsroom, Smallville, and Monty Python's Flying Circus.Jim and Mark go head to head in Fake News, the game in which Mark has to guess which of three Trump quotes was made up by Jim.Then we talk about FEMA official Gregg Phillips and his claims of teleportation.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft191 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The Usual Tuesday Podcast is a show that brings you a series of conversations with the purpose of causing a couple laughs, to drive civil discourse, increase your daily entertainment and thought. Your hosts are the humble and powerful Korpsx, Zero% and SAVE1.We are a listener supported podcast! There is a link below where you can go and drop some love to help us improve your listening experience. I want to say thank you in advance for all the contributions, shares, likes, comments and subscriptions to the show.Make sure you check out all the links below!Enjoy the Show!https://linktr.ee/korpsxcollection

The American Radicals Podcast discusses pitfalls related to artificial intelligence, data centers, and college. Check us out on Spotify! https://open.spotify.com/show/09AZ2WuYnWbZ2941wsb6jW?si=76c005605dc64dc1 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/opinion/wall-street-markets-iran-ai.html https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/g-s1-117729/data-center-disputes-local-midterms https://thehighwire.com/editorial/hot-data-what-the-ai-boom-is-doing-to-the-land-around-us/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2026/04/19/accelerated-college-degree-hacking/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/04/19/yale-report-shows-colleges-universities-face-reckoning/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/04/09/ai-robot-senior-care-abi/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/04/16/ai-powered-robots-seniors-make-some-uncomfortable-not-all/

Dr. Killeen shares a powerful idea from Rory Sutherland that highlights a common mistake in business. When we focus only on what is easy to measure, we can miss the deeper value happening right in front of us. What looks like a simple role or task often carries layers of impact that are not immediately visible. This shows up when we prioritize efficiency and numbers without recognizing the human elements that truly shape the patient experience. The small interactions, the personal touches, and the awareness of a great team member often create far more value than what shows up on a report. Look beyond the obvious metrics and appreciate the hidden contributions within your practice. Sometimes the most important parts of your business are the ones that are hardest to measure.

New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 155 Underneath the hood of Fascism is a heavy insistence that its program aligns with various aspects of Nature. Generally, the belief that something being "natural" (right or wrong in the assessment) means that it is also good is referred to as the "naturalistic fallacy." That means it is an error. That something is "natural" does not necessarily imply that it is good. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay addresses the weird appeals to Nature in Fascist ideologies. Join him to understand the mentality! Latest from New Discourses Press! The Queering of the American Child: https://queeringbook.com/ Support New Discourses: https://newdiscourses.com/support Follow New Discourses on other platforms: https://newdiscourses.com/subscribe Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames © 2026 New Discourses. All rights reserved. #NewDiscourses #JamesLindsay #Fascism

"How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." — Marcus Aurelius.In the relentless 24-hour cycle of the "Black Mirror," we have been seduced by a dangerous trend: the belief that the volume of our outrage is a measure of our goodness. We shout into the digital void, “Look how angry I am,” as if a flash of passion could ever equate to a steady life of virtue.But the Stoic knows that anger is a blinding passion, not a moral compass. Justice is found in steady reason and deliberate action, not in the performative fire of the mob. If your "goodness" relies entirely on the display of your fury, you aren't seeking justice—you're just following a trend.Tune in to The Sunday Smoke as we break down the "Vulcan Check" and learn to separate true virtue from the noise of the 24-hour cycle.#TheSundaySmoke #StoicWisdom #OutrageCulture #VirtueEthics

In the one-hundred-and-ninetieth episode (in which we swap roles Freaky-Friday-style), we explore the Spin Doctoring Fallacy, starting with Trump and co lying about the murders of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti by ICE and CBP thugs.In Jim's British Politics Corner, we look at Keir Starmer avoiding a question, and Jo Moore's ill-advised attempts to bury bad news.In the Fallacy in the Wild section, we check out examples from Men in Black, Family Guy, and Yes, Minister.Mark and Jim go head to head in Fake News, the game in which Jim has to guess which one of three Kemi Badenoch quotes Mark made up.Then we talk about the timeline for ending the Iran war.And finally, we round up some of the other crazy Trump stories from the past week.The full show notes for this episode can be found at https://fallacioustrump.com/ft190 You can contact the guys at pod@fallacioustrump.com, on BlueSky @FallaciousTrump, Discord at fallacioustrump.com/discord or facebook at facebook.com/groups/fallacioustrumpAnd you can buy our T-shirts here: https://fallacioustrump.com/teeSubscribe to Fallacious Trump to make sure you never miss a logical fallacy. Rather than just mindless anti-Trump rhetoric, we apply skepticism and critical thinking to our Donald Trump analysis by exploring his liberal use of logical fallacies and cognitive biases, along with a bit of humor and news about US politics. (But there is also some of that much needed anti-Trump rhetoric.)Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The conversation delves into the controversy surrounding medical marijuana, highlighting the lack of scientific evidence, safety studies, and expert acceptance. It also explores the implications of THC concentration and the state's approval of marijuana for medical use.TakeawaysMedical marijuana lacks standardized chemistry and reproducibility.Inadequate safety and efficacy studies undermine the credibility of medical marijuana.Chapters00:00 Medical Marijuana vs. Cannabis07:03 Inadequate Safety Studies13:34 Lack of Expert Acceptance18:44 Prop 65 and State Approval

Dom and Charles bring you one of their patented updates on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, and how it's looking in these times of war. Plus, should Australia's defense specialists be taking a leaf from Iran's book?---Listen AD FREE: https://thechaserreport.supercast.com/ Follow us on Instagram: @chaserwarSpam Dom's socials: @dom_knightSend Charles voicemails: @charlesfirthEmail us: podcast@chaser.com.auChaser CEO's Super-yacht upgrade Fund: https://chaser.com.au/support/ Send complaints to: mediawatch@abc.net.au Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Supreme Court determined that individuals with intellectual disabilities are less culpable and should not face capital punishment.  Diminished Capacity is also applied in non-capital sentencings. In Hamm v. Smith, the Supreme Court is revisiting the 70 IQ cutoff because of new understandings about errors in measurement. But the bigger problem is IQ tests fail to measure key cognitive deficits tied directly to moral and criminal responsibility.   Therefore, it's time for courts to move beyond IQ as the sole measure of brain functioning.   IN THIS EPISODE: Five misconceptions about whether IQ is a valid reflection of impaired cognitive functioning; A list of all cognitive deficits IQ tests do NOT measure; "The Practice Effect" and other measurement errors in IQ testing; Atkins in the context of Autism – the rationale for Atkins is the same, but the standard is useless; The curious case of Phineas Gage – frontal lobe damage doesn't always impact IQ; Traumatic brain injury doesn't always impact IQ; The right testing to measure cognitive deficits.   CONTACT INFO FOR DR. LIDSKY:   732-580-6157  |  tlidsky@gmail.com   LINKS: A deep dive into Hamm v. Smith on Scotus Blog:   https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/hamm-v-smith-and-the-future-of-capital-punishment/   Other Set for Sentencing Ep. with Dr. Ted Lidsky:  Ep. 81:  A Child's Poison       

In this episode, Jon and Adam explore one of the most common reasoning errors in golf instruction: false dichotomies. Many debates in golf are framed as “either/or” arguments—technique vs feel, steep vs shallow, mechanics vs athleticism—when the reality is far more nuanced. Jon and Adam break down how these faulty binaries show up in instruction, social media discussions, and the way golfers interpret advice. They explain why this type of thinking can slow improvement and create unnecessary confusion for players trying to get better. The episode offers a more balanced framework for evaluating golf ideas without falling into the trap of choosing sides. Thank you to our show sponsors Pockethose and Ethos Life Insurance This episode is brought to you by Pocket Hose, the world's #1 expandable hose. The Pocket Hose Copper Head swivels 360° to prevent kinks and expands instantly for full water flow—then shrinks back down for easy storage when you're done. For a limited time, text SWEET to 64000 to get a FREE pocket pivot and 10-pattern sprayer with the purchase of any size Copper Head hose. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details. • Protect your family's financial future with life insurance through Ethos. Ethos makes the process simple and 100% online—you can get a quote in seconds and apply in as little as 10 minutes, with coverage options up to $3 million and some policies starting around $30 per month. There's no medical exam required—just answer a few health questions online to get started. Learn more and get your free quote at https://ethos.com/SWEETSPOT Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What happens when basic human decency disappears from public life? When power replaces restraint, the line between stability and chaos grows dangerously thin.

It's another ACP Round Table! Erin has recused herself, so Weer'd, David, and Oddball discuss: a study done by Dr. John Lott on transgender shooters that doesn't live up to his standards; a shooting at a nightclub in Austin, Texas; Virginia citizens buying guns in advance of new firearm prohibition laws; the D.C. Court of Appeals ruling that magazine bans are unconstitutional; the Florida Attorney General taking action against state workers who created a concealed carry registry; Casey Harrington's post on lead exposure; and a lawsuit against the Faderal Switchblade Act is gaining traction. Did you know that we have a Patreon? Join now for the low, low cost of $4/month (that's $1/podcast) and you'll get to listen to our podcast on Friday instead of Mondays, as well as patron-only content like mag dump episodes, our hilarious blooper reels and film tracks. Show Notes: Shooting Attacks—In 2024, for active shooters, at Least 12 Times Their Share of the Population What to know about the deadly shooting at a Texas bar and the gunman Virginia Gun Sales Surge as Democrats Move Dozens of New Restrictions DC's Highest Court Strikes Down Ammo Magazine Ban DC Mag Ban Update Florida AG Suing City Over List of Gun Owners Lead Safety While Shooting Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 340 Knife Rights Federal Switchblade Act lawsuit appellate court oral argument on April 1  

How much do Catholics and Protestants actually agree about what is considered to be the "word of God"? Reformed pastor Adriel Sanchez responds to  @TheCounselofTrent  and his video "The Protestant 'Word of God' Fallacy." PARTNER WITH US - https://solamedia.org/partner/?sc=AS2502V When you become a partner today, you'll receive two remarkable books as our thanks: Rediscovering the Holy Spirit by Dr. Michael Horton and Praying with Jesus by Pastor Adriel Sanchez. We believe these books can guide you into a clearer understanding of the Spirit's work and a richer prayer life. FOLLOW US YouTube | Instagram | X/Twitter | Facebook | Newsletter WHO WE ARE Sola is home to White Horse Inn, Core Christianity, Modern Reformation, and Theo Global. Our mission is to serve today's global church by producing resources for reformation grounded in the historic Christian faith. Our vision is to see reformation in hearts, homes, and churches around the world. Learn more: https://solamedia.org/

Karo and Matt discuss the “friend group fallacy” – the belief that a tight knit crew is preferable to and more common than strong one-on-one bonds. They unpack how sitcoms, social media, and comparison culture distort our expectations, and why a constellation of close individual friendships can be just as meaningful as any group text thread. Check out our new Audible Original THE BUDDY SYSTEM Watch this episode on YouTube! Get MOTY merch at manoftheyearpodcast.com Man of the Year on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok Matt Ritter on Instagram, TikTok, and X Aaron Karo on Instagram, TikTok, and X Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

#1133 - The Protestant "Word of God" Fallacy by Catholic Answers