POPULARITY
Categories
205 episodes with Intellectual
174 episodes with Intellectual
312 episodes with Intellectual
235 episodes with Intellectual
97 episodes with Intellectual
112 episodes with Intellectual
50 episodes with Intellectual
43 episodes with Intellectual
93 episodes with Intellectual
101 episodes with Intellectual
39 episodes with Intellectual
81 episodes with Intellectual
45 episodes with Intellectual
31 episodes with Intellectual
53 episodes with Intellectual
37 episodes with Intellectual
29 episodes with Intellectual
31 episodes with Intellectual
15 episodes with Intellectual
25 episodes with Intellectual
25 episodes with Intellectual
46 episodes with Intellectual
47 episodes with Intellectual
34 episodes with Intellectual
35 episodes with Intellectual
19 episodes with Intellectual
32 episodes with Intellectual
36 episodes with Intellectual
35 episodes with Intellectual
17 episodes with Intellectual
16 episodes with Intellectual
17 episodes with Intellectual
9 episodes with Intellectual
37 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
9 episodes with Intellectual
21 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
43 episodes with Intellectual
42 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
19 episodes with Intellectual
12 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
12 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
11 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
13 episodes with Intellectual
13 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
19 episodes with Intellectual
9 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
34 episodes with Intellectual
11 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
16 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
13 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
13 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
11 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
12 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
7 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
6 episodes with Intellectual
10 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
8 episodes with Intellectual
9 episodes with Intellectual
4 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
3 episodes with Intellectual
5 episodes with Intellectual
2 episodes with Intellectual
Let's keep celebrating the semiquincentennial by tackling the remarkable history of our most inspirational founding document. Historian and Hoover Institution fellow Michael Auslin joins the podcast to discuss National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America. He and Chris cover the document's chaotic creation, its less-than-ideal preservation, and its enduring impact on almost ten […]
Your child isn't choosing to melt down. By the time behavior shows up, the brain has already decided, and the thinking brain is out of the room. Dr. Lisa Riegel explains why schools most often miss this, and what to do instead. Tune in to learn: Why context comes before any behavior plan Harold and Bob: a simple brain story any child can learn Why sending a child to the principal keeps the behavior going What intellectual safety means, and why endless "pre-academic" classrooms fail it About Lisa: Dr. Lisa Riegel is an educator, researcher, and author of NeuroWell and Aspirations to Operations. She has spent two decades helping schools apply brain science.
We attempt to interpret the Legacy, Triumphs & Failures of our great literary Grandcestor Paul Laurence Dunbar. peopleactivityradio.com The Tragic Legacy Of Acting Black Ep.4 | Paul Laurence Dunbar & TheToxic Burden Of Black Intellectual Expression • TheTragicLegacyOfActingBlackEp.4 Paul Laur... #wewearthemask #paullaurencedunbar #fba #mayaangelou #thecodeistheleader #producejustice #peopleactivityradio #anegrolovesong #poetry #shortstories #rap #hiphop
Send us your feedback In this episode of Election 2026, Partner and Head of our IP team Christopher Young is joined by Daniel Fielding, Special Counsel, and Michael O'Brien, Solicitor, from our Public Law team to explore New Zealand's election advertising regime. They discuss the broad definition of election advertising, the intellectual property and advertising law issues that can arise during campaigns, and the key Electoral Act rules that political parties, candidates and third parties need to understand.[00:10] Chris introduces the episode and its focus on election year advertising and the rules surrounding it. What is means, who can do it, and where people can get themselves into trouble.[01:10] Daniel and Michael explain the surprisingly broad definition of election advertising and discuss why an advertisement can be captured by electoral law even when influencing voter behaviour was not its intended purpose. They also explore the policy reasons behind regulating political advertising, including its impact on democratic participation and public decision-making.[05:21] Chris discusses the intellectual property issues that can arise during election campaigns, including trademarks, branding, copyright infringement and the use of music in campaign advertising. The conversation covers artist objections, moral rights, endorsement risks, and the lessons political parties can learn from previous disputes in New Zealand and overseas.[14:28] They discuss the different complaint pathways available for election advertising, including the roles of the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA). Daniel and Michael explain how complaints are assessed, discuss recent examples involving political parties, and consider how AI-generated campaign content may create new challenges in future elections.[20:57] Daniel outlines some of the most important Electoral Act requirements affecting election advertising, including promoter statements, third-party promoters, campaign spending thresholds and election hoardings. They also discuss how local council bylaws interact with election signage and the compliance issues that can arise during the campaign period.[28:12] They examine the rules governing election broadcasts outside the formal election period, the offence of publishing false statements immediately before election day, and the restrictions that apply to political advertising once voting is underway. The episode finishes with a discussion on social media, election day campaigning, and why some of New Zealand's electoral rules continue to generate debate.Information in this podcast is correct as at the date of recording, 10 August 2026. Please contact Christopher Young, Daniel Fielding, our Public law team, or our Intellectual property team, if you need legal advice and guidance on any of the topics discussed in this episode.Don't forget to rate, review or follow MinterEllisonRuddWatts wherever you get your podcasts.You can also email us directly at website.enquiries@minterellison.co.nz and sign up to receive election updates via your inbox here. Additional resourcesWe're proud to again support Policy.nz – a free, independent, non-partisan platform that helps voters compare parties and policies in one place. The site has the latest election information, making it easier to cut through the noise and understand where parties stand on the issues that matter most.For show notes and additional resources visit minterellison.co.nz/podcasts
Press a button. Coffee in three seconds.Or: grind, measure, tamp, froth, wait.Which morning do you actually want?THE ARTICLE THAT STARTED ITHana Kabele Gala, PhD wrote "Screw Your Efficient Mornings."She had a fully automatic espresso machine. Then a Nespresso. Five or six cups a morning, because it was so easy.Then she stayed with friends in Germany who owned no coffee machine at all. Just a small percolator."Time slowed down. We were just there. It wasn't giving me anxiety. It felt like freedom.""I had pushed the efficiency so far that I had killed the one part of the ritual that was actually mine.""I don't want my coffee faster. I want the minutes back."FOUR AREAS THAT MAKE US HUMANIdeally a morning touches all four. Realistically, one or two. That is enough.PHYSICAL. 15 to 20 minutes. Jumping jacks to wake the body up, then arms, belly, legs. No fixed plan. "I feel my body, I feel grounded, and it's really beautiful."Over the summer it was the mountain behind the house instead. 30 minutes up, 350 metres, then the lake, the birds, the wood cracking.SPIRITUAL. "For me, spirituality is often connected to nature."Not a religious person. But: "there are things which I can't explain, and there is this belief that there's something which is bigger than us."Last week in Wrexham, North Wales, a sign at the cathedral door: people of all faiths and no faith are welcome.EMOTIONAL. One or two minutes lying in bed. Grateful to wake up, to feel the body, to embrace yourself before the day starts.Then the people. A habit borrowed from a friend: a short Monday morning message to those closest to you."Even if you live alone, think about the people who check in with you, the people who are there for you whenever you need them."INTELLECTUAL. Bernhard built his own morning briefing app. AI, coaching, executive education.Plus one item deliberately outside his field every day. Recently: the fine networks fungi use to communicate across a forest."I find it always fascinating to learn something new every single day."THE EXPERIMENTSeveral coaching clients turned up stressed. Powering on with energy, but it was showing in their reactions.Bernhard asked about their mornings. Several had no routine at all.So he set them a two-week experiment."After two weeks they came to me and said: Bernhard, wow, that is really amazing. It changed so much of what I'm doing and how I feel on that day."Not ninety minutes. Ten or fifteen."When you run out of your home in the morning completely stressed, I can promise you that your day won't get less stressful, rather the opposite.""But when you find yourself again in the morning, when you're grounded, when you are yourself, your resilience will increase massively."YOUR TURNStart today. Not next week. Ten minutes.Run it for two weeks, then assess. Did anything change?And write in. Bernhard would like to share listeners' morning routines on the podcast.HANA'S ARTICLE: hanakabelegala.substack.com/p/screw-your-efficient-morningsHANA ON LINKEDIN: linkedin.com/in/hanakabelegalaLINKS: bernhardkerres.com | roleplays.ai#MorningRoutine #Rituals #Leadership #Coaching #Resilience #Coffee
Traditional Franciscan priest Fr. Mary-Isaac Relyea joins John-Henry Westen to address what he describes as a crisis of silence within the Catholic hierarchy. Drawing on St. John Eudes and St. Gregory the Great, Relyea argues that priests and bishops have a grave obligation to defend Catholic doctrine and warn souls against sin. He sharply criticizes Pope Leo XIV and other prelates whom he believes have failed in that responsibility, a failure that, he warns, invites damnation.The discussion addresses reception of Holy Communion, homosexuality, modernism, Vatican II, and the SSPX. Relyea argues that Catholics must remain faithful to what they understand as perennial Catholic teaching even amid opposition from Church authorities or their own families. The silence of the shepherds is not neutral; it is complicity.Relyea turns to the spiritual practices Catholics need to persevere: the Rosary, the sacraments, spiritual Communion, mental prayer, penance, fasting, and studying the lives of the saints. Mental prayer is an intimate conversation with God. Intellectual knowledge of the faith is not enough—Catholics must live it through prayer and heroic virtue.On the SSPX controversy, Relyea rejects warnings that Catholics associated with the Society are endangering their salvation. He defends resistance to commands he considers contrary to the faith and urges Catholics not to succumb to fear of persecution or condemnation. The silence must be broken. The faith must be defended. And the time to act is now.Make the switch today to iCatholicMobile today!iCatholic Mobile—supporting the Catholic faith with every connection.https://www.facebook.com/icatholicmobile https://www.icatholicmobile.com/ HELP SUPPORT WORK LIKE THIS: https://give.lifesitenews.com/?utm_source=SOCIAL U.S. residents! Create a will with LifeSiteNews: https://www.mylegacywill.com/lifesitenews ****PROTECT Your Wealth with gold, silver, and precious metals: https://sjp.stjosephpartners.com/lifesitenews +++SHOP ALL YOUR FUN AND FAVORITE LIFESITE MERCH! https://shop.lifesitenews.com/ +++Connect with John-Henry Westen and all of LifeSiteNews on social media:LifeSite: https://linktr.ee/lifesitenewsJohn-Henry Westen: https://linktr.ee/jhwesten Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More than three decades after The End of History and the Last Man made Francis Fukuyama one of the world's best-known political thinkers, he is still correcting misconceptions about what he actually meant. In a wide-ranging conversation with host Gideon Rachman, Fukuyama revisits his original thesis and explores how resentment and the search for recognition are reshaping liberal democracy. They also discuss whether US institutions can withstand Donald Trump's authoritarian impulses, why Fukuyama remains optimistic about American democracy, China and Russia's quest for status, and his own intellectual journey away from neoconservatism. Cip: BBCFree links to read more on this topic:In the Realm of the Last Man — how the future disappeared from politicsA German election result heard around the worldA spreading war threatens Trump and MBSSupreme Court rejects Donald Trump's restrictions on mail-in ballots for midtermsSubscribe to The Rachman Review wherever you get your podcasts — please listen, rate and subscribe.Presented by Gideon Rachman. Produced by Clare Williamson. Executive producer is Manuela Saragosa. Sound design is by Breen TurnerRead a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
William Davies joins James to consider what distinguishes intellectuals from the technocrats, academics, experts, polemicists, thought leaders, gurus and utopians who compete for our attention, and to ask whether there's still a role for them in the public realm. They look back to Weber's and Gramsci's ideas about the autonomy and responsibility of the intellectual and discuss the ways in which Hayek's anti-intellectualism has shaped discourse up to the present day. Where do politicians look for ideas and does the modern marketplace of algorithmic video platforms pose a challenge to independent thought? From the LRB Subscribe to the LRB: https://lrb.me/subslrbpod Close Readings podcast: https://lrb.me/crlrbpod LRB Audiobooks: https://lrb.me/audiobookslrbpod Bags, binders and more at the LRB Store: https://lrb.me/storelrbpod Get in touch: podcasts@lrb.co.uk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Israeli born Shai Davidai, former professor at Columbia University, has written a scathing indictment of antisemitism within North American higher education. In this compelling interview, he shares with Eve Harow his October 7th's brutal awakening and subsequent deep dive into documenting the development of this major threat to free society. One of the most prominent and influential voices calling out campus support for terrorism and rising antisemitism, Shai will not shy away, in any forum, from exposing the radical forces shaping universities and beyond. If you refuse to be intimidated by the ideological extremism attacking the West then read this book to understand how we got here, and perhaps how we can stop the disaster before it's too late.
The Basic Due Diligence Process Hello, this is Hall T. Martin with the Startup Funding Espresso -- your daily shot of startup funding and investing. Investors funding a startup must first complete the due diligence process. The objective is to understand all the particulars about the company and the team. Here is the list of the basic due diligence process: The investment. This includes the term sheet, other investors in the round, and dilution impact. Financials. This includes the income statement and balance sheet. If they have revenue, then how much is recognized and when? Do they have debt on the books? What do the financial projections look like for the coming 3 to 5 years? Tax returns if there are any. Team. Who is on the team, and what does their CV look like? Background checks should be run on the key personnel. Contracts. What contracts have been signed for generating revenue? Employee contracts and IP assignments are in this category. Corporate What legal entity is the business filed under? C-Corp, LLC, other? Intellectual property What patents were filed and when? Sales and Marketing What are the current sales channels, revenue, and marketing programs? What are the main products the company sells? Consider this basic list of due diligence for your next investment. Thank you for joining us for the Startup Funding Espresso where we help startups and investors connect for funding. Let's go startup something today. _________________________________________________________ For more episodes from Investor Connect, please visit the site at: http://investorconnect.org Check out our other podcasts here: https://investorconnect.org/ For Investors check out: https://tencapital.group/investor-landing/ For Startups check out: https://tencapital.group/company-landing/ For eGuides check out: https://tencapital.group/education/ For upcoming Events, check out https://tencapital.group/events/ For Feedback please contact info@tencapital.group Please follow, share, and leave a review. Music courtesy of Bensound.
Will Dissolving Israel and returning to Galus save the Jewish People? Are you nuts?
Send us Fan MailIn the latest episode of the Exit Insights Podcast, Darryl Bates-Brownsword is joined by Kevin Harrington to explore a question every business owner should be asking long before they plan to exit:Why would someone buy your business instead of building what you have themselves?Many owners focus on revenue, EBITDA and traditional valuation multiples.Those numbers matter.But they aren't the whole story.A buyer may place a significantly higher value on a business because of what it enables them to achieve.Access to customers.A strong market position.Intellectual property.Recurring revenue.A proven management team.A geographic footprint.A trusted brand.Specialist expertise.Systems and processes.These are the intangible assets that can turn an ordinary business into a strategically attractive acquisition.Listen in as we discuss:
Outline: “Power Encounters” I. Opening and Introduction Welcome, blessing, and encouragement to the congregation. Emphasis on being part of a church family. Lighthearted interaction with the congregation. Encouragement to bring physical Bibles rather than relying solely on phones. Avoid distractions from texting and social media. Introduction of the sermon title: “Power Encounters.” II. What Is a Power Encounter? A power encounter is described as experiencing God's power in a real and tangible way. It moves beyond intellectual or philosophical arguments into an experience of God's authority. Biblical power encounters demonstrate Jesus Christ's authority over spiritual forces. The Book of Acts provides examples of God's power confronting darkness, wickedness, and demonic oppression. III. The Reality of Spiritual Battle The sermon identifies an ongoing conflict between: Light and darkness. Truth and deception. Good and evil. Holiness and sin. Christians are encouraged to recognize that spiritual opposition exists. Personal example: A church prayer gathering for the nation was met with opposition from an atheist organization. Main point: As the church moves forward, the preacher believes spiritual opposition will attempt to resist its progress. Christians should not respond with fear but with awareness and preparation. IV. Being Forewarned and Forearmed Reference to 2 Corinthians 2:11: Christians should not be ignorant of the enemy's devices. Warning signs are presented as preparation rather than reasons for fear. Ephesians 6:10: “Be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might.” The believer's strength comes from: God. God's Word. God's presence. Spiritual battles cannot ultimately be fought through human strength. V. The Purpose and Message of Acts Acts records the beginning and expansion of the Christian church. The Gospel spreads: From Jerusalem. Throughout the Roman Empire. Ultimately toward the nations. Paul continues preaching even while imprisoned. The church's mission is to proclaim the Gospel. The Gospel offers: Forgiveness of sins. A new relationship with God. A transformed life. The Gospel continues despite opposition. VI. Dependence on the Holy Spirit The church's work depends completely on the Holy Spirit. God uses ordinary people to accomplish extraordinary things. The disciples' transformation illustrates this: Before Pentecost: fear, self-doubt, shame, and hiding. After receiving the Holy Spirit: boldness, conviction, and courage. Central question: What made the difference? Answer: The power of the Holy Spirit. VII. Spiritual Power for Spiritual Battles Believers need spiritual power to: Serve God. Serve the church. Witness to Jesus. Face spiritual opposition. Psalm 144:1 is used to describe God training believers for spiritual battle. Spiritual strength and victory are developed through: Scripture. Prayer. Learning to operate spiritually. VIII. Fighting From a Place of Victory Christians are encouraged not to fight from a mindset of defeat. Instead, they should recognize the victory already accomplished through Christ. Illustration: the preacher's childhood baseball team His team was undefeated. Although he was not the strongest player, he had confidence because he knew astrong team was behind him. He pitched a one-hit game. Application: Confidence comes from knowing who is behind you. Christians can face spiritual battles because Christ has already won the victory. IX. Christ's Victory Over Spiritual Powers Colossians 2 is used to explain Christ's victory. Christ: Removed the record of sin. Nailed it to the cross. Disarmed principalities and powers. Triumphed over them. The cross appeared to be defeat but ultimately represented Christ's victory. Because Christ has victory, believers can fight from a position of victory rather than defeat. X. The Power of the Holy Spirit vs. Human Wisdom 1 Corinthians 2 is introduced. Paul emphasizes that his ministry did not depend on: Human wisdom. Persuasive speech. Intellectual ability. Instead, it depended upon: Demonstration of the Spirit. God's power. The goal is for faith to rest in God's power rather than human wisdom. XI. Personal Encounter With God The preacher encourages listeners to experience God personally. Personal experience is presented as something that cannot easily be argued away. The emphasis is not on: Emotionalism. Fanaticism. Sensationalism. Rather, the emphasis is on a genuine personal encounter with the living God. XII. Keep Moving Forward Believers are encouraged not to stop serving because of: Hurt. Offense. Betrayal. Disappointment. Discussion of “church hurt.” The church is made up of imperfect people. Jesus is the only perfect person. God works through imperfect people who can understand and sympathize with oneanother. Main exhortation: Keep serving. Keep coming. Keep giving. Keep helping. Keep blessing. Keep moving forward. Illustration: Things that stop moving eventually weaken, deteriorate, or become unusable. Spiritual growth likewise requires continued movement, even if it is only a small step. XIII. God's Presence and Manifestation God is described as omnipresent—present everywhere. However, the preacher distinguishes God's general presence from moments when God makes His presence especially evident. The early church experienced God in a powerful and tangible way. Christianity is presented as more than doctrinal statements: It is a living relationship with God. It involves experiencing His presence. XIV. Three Results of a Power Encounter 1. Reality God's presence and power make His reality tangible. 1 Corinthians 2: faith should rest in God's power. Luke 24:32: the disciples' hearts “burned” as Jesus opened the Scriptures. The preacher desires listeners to experience a similar spiritual awakening. Psalm 34:8: “Taste and see that the Lord is good.” Faith is presented as something to be personally experienced, not merely intellectually observed. Worship creates an atmosphere for people to seek God's presence. 2. Refreshment Spiritual encounters bring renewal and refreshing. Acts is referenced regarding “times of refreshing” from God's presence. Believers can become weary through: Spiritual battles. Job difficulties. Sickness. Discouragement. Old patterns of thinking. God's presence provides renewed strength. Key idea: New levels require new strength. 3. Restoration God restores the soul. The preacher connects restoration with bringing something back to its proper condition—and ultimately making it better. God can restore: Joy. Peace. Spiritual strength. What has been lost or stolen. Believers are encouraged to seek a fresh touch from God. XV. Closing Prayer and Invitation The congregation is asked to stand. The worship team returns. Prayer for: The Holy Spirit's presence. Hunger and thirst for God. Spiritual strength. Refreshment. Awareness of spiritual opposition. Congregants are invited to: Leave their seats. Pray. Kneel. Seek the Holy Spirit. Receive prayer from the ministry/prayer team. Final emphasis: “Lord, I need Your Holy Spirit.” “Lord, I need Your touch.” Central Message Believers should seek a personal encounter with the power of the Holy Spirit, recognize that Christ has already won the victory, and continue moving forward in faith, receiving God's strength, refreshment, and restoration.
Today's message is from scripture 2 Corinthians 5:16-21 NLT.
In this episode, Cindy Esliger discusses why so many of us move from one task to the next without stopping to acknowledge what we have accomplished. Big workplace wins can be inconsistent. Promotions get delayed, exciting projects get shelved, and sometimes the scoreboard just doesn't reflect the effort we're putting into our work. When that happens, small wins matter more, not less. Cindy explains why tracking an accomplishment isn't the same as celebrating it and why deciding in advance how to treat ourselves when a win shows up can help us stop and appreciate it instead of letting it evaporate into thin air.Waiting for someone else to notice our good work can leave us feeling invisible, so Cindy encourages us to make our accomplishments visible on purpose and become more comfortable saying what we do well. She also challenges us to shift from focusing only on outcomes to recognizing effort-focused wins, because we can control our level of effort every day. A daily or weekly ritual of asking, “What's one thing that went right?” can train our brains to look for evidence that things are working instead of focusing only on what's broken or unfinished. Small wins build big careers, and acknowledging them isn't a detour from productivity. It's part of what makes the next stretch of effort possible and much more enjoyable.Work, however, is only one part of an integrated life, and Cindy reminds us that balance doesn't require giving everything equal amounts of time and energy. What matters more is alignment, making intentional choices about the most important things in every moment, and accepting the trade-offs that come with those choices. Cindy identifies seven areas where we can look for small victories: 1. Mental health, 2. Physical health, 3. Social health, 4. Intellectual health, 5. Financial health, 6. Spiritual health, and 7. Professional health. When a workplace win is scarce, that doesn't mean a win isn't available today. It may simply mean we need to look somewhere else for it, then actually celebrate it when we find it.Key Moments:00:00:07 Why We Overlook Our Small Wins00:01:25 When the Big Wins Are on Hold00:02:43 Stop Waiting for Someone Else to Notice00:05:15 Shift From Outcome-Focused to Effort-Focused Wins00:06:39 Create a Daily or Weekly Win Ritual00:08:07 Your Job Is Not Your Whole Identity00:09:29 Choose Priorities and Make Intentional Trade-Offs00:11:59 Focus on What You Are Gaining00:13:21 Seven Areas to Find Small Victories00:18:54 Pick One Small Win and Actually Celebrate It Resources discussed in this episode:Guide to Recognizing Your ProgressAstronomic AudioConfidence Collective—Contact Cindy Esliger Career Confidence Coaching: website | instagram | facebook | linkedin | email Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
pWotD Episode 3424: Macklemore Welcome to popular Wiki of the Day, spotlighting Wikipedia's most visited pages, giving you a peek into what the world is curious about today.With 213,767 views on Wednesday, 16 September 2026 our article of the day is Macklemore.Benjamin Hammond Haggerty (born June 19, 1983), better known by his stage name Macklemore ( MAK-lə-mor; formerly Professor Macklemore), is an American rapper. A native of Seattle, Washington, he started his career in 2000 as an independent artist releasing: Open Your Eyes (2000), The Language of My World (2005), and The Unplanned Mixtape (2009). He rose to international success collaborating with producer Ryan Lewis as the duo Macklemore & Ryan Lewis (2009–2016).Macklemore & Ryan Lewis's 2012 single "Thrift Shop" (featuring Wanz) became the first self-released song to peak the Billboard Hot 100 in 11 years. Their second single, "Can't Hold Us" (featuring Ray Dalton), also peaked on chart, making Macklemore and Lewis the first duo in the chart's history to have their first two singles both reach the peak position. Their debut studio album The Heist (2012) peaked at number 2 on the U. S. Billboard 200. The duo entered into a slightly unusual 3-month, one-album contract with Warner Bros.'s independent distribution arm, ADA, which allowed them to retain control over their Intellectual property and maintain their "artistic integrity". At the 56th Annual Grammy Awards, the duo won Best New Artist, Best Rap Album (The Heist), Best Rap Song ("Same Love") and Best Rap Performance ("Thrift Shop"). The duo's second album, This Unruly Mess I've Made (2016), followed thereafter.In June 2017, Macklemore released the single "Glorious" (featuring Skylar Grey), which marked his return to the music industry as well as his first major single produced without Lewis since his mainstream breakthrough. Macklemore released his second solo studio album, Gemini, in September of that year, peaking at number 2 on the Billboard 200. On March 3, 2023, he released his third album Ben, which peaked at number 18.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 02:31 UTC on Thursday, 17 September 2026.For the full current version of the article, see Macklemore on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm neural Gregory.
What does it means to know enough, and why do so many of us have our sense of self-worth tangled up with the need to appear certain, informed, and never wrong? The common obstacles of perfectionism, yearning for power and to feel "special," along with anxiety are fueled by a world of constant information, public scrutiny, and the subtle pressure to prove our intelligence. It makes a tough environment to come back to the wisdom Socrates shared 2,500 years ago: real wisdom lives in knowing what you don't know. The good news: getting comfortable with being wrong is a practice, not a personality trait. And the more you do it (starting small and safe), then the more your nervous system learns that doubt isn't dangerous. About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek. Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible). Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app: Spotify | Apple | YouTube Full transcript here Sources and Notes for Our Element of Enoughness: Related Joy Lab Episodes: Ep. 215: Are You Curious to Learn or Confirm? Ep. 285: Why Doing Enough Is Enough + Why Perfectionism Predicts Burnout, Depression, & Anxiety, Not Performance Ep. 284: Having Enough: Why Acquiring More Will Never Fill the Hole in Your Self-Worth Ep. 283: You Are Enough: The Science and Practices of Enoughness Bellam, S., Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Stoeber, J. (2025). Perfectionism and work performance: A meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12570 Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007002 Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.392 Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). Reaping the benefits of pursuing self-esteem without the costs? Reply to Schmuck and Sheldon (2004), Sheldon et al. (2004), Pyszczynski et al. (2004), and Kernis (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.430 Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.507 Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.473 Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Bujold Steed, L., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018). Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324 Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456 Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262 Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 411–436). Blackwell. Leary, M. R. (2000). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000045 Maslach, C. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205 Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2005). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277030 Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435 Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966406 Lynn Twist's Book: The Soul of Money Questions this episode was made for: Q: Why do I feel like I have to know everything and never be wrong... and how do I stop? A: This episode traces the drive to perform knowledge back to things like anxiety about judgment and the desire for specialness, along with the amygdala hijack that makes being wrong feel like a survival threat, and offers a practical strategy: exposure. Practice being wrong in small, safe ways until your nervous system recalibrates and realizes it isn't catastrophic. Q: Can you actually be too certain? Isn't confidence a good thing? A: Being too certain can be detrimental. This episode unpacks the differences between genuine knowledge, intellectual humility, and the performance of certainty for reasons outside of genuine knowledge. Key moments: [00:30] Setting the scene: Athens, 2,500 years ago — a friend asks the Oracle of Delphi who is the wisest person in the city [02:30] Socrates' conclusion: maybe he was wiser because he knew what he didn't know, and didn't shy away from that unknowing; kept asking questions [03:30] Intellectual humility: holding your beliefs loosely, staying curious, genuinely believing you might be wrong [04:00] The Enoughness layer: the belief that you have to prove your knowledge to be worthy; knowing more makes you enough [05:00] It's exhausting to feel like you need to know all the answers, to be right all the time — and none of us can actually succeed at it [05:30] Two drivers: anxiety (fear of being judged for being wrong) and the desire for power or certainty as protection from vulnerability [07:00] The desire for specialness: inflating self-esteem through the performance of knowing it all [07:30] Research on narcissism and conspiratorial thinking: conspiracy theories offer the feeling of uniqueness — "I know something you don't" [10:00] Henry: a small pitch for narcissism — a little bit isn't bad; we all want to feel special sometimes; full-blown narcissists wouldn't be listening to this anyway [11:00] The belonging need: we don't have to stand out to belong, but we do need to be seen as worthy of inclusion — so we avoid sticking our neck out and being wrong in front of others [11:30] Social media amplifies this: anything put out publicly can be validated or challenged — rarely challenged without feeling diminished [14:00] The internet requires a new kind of resilience and emotional regulation we haven't trained before in human history — much of which is what Joy Lab works on [15:30] Being wrong is so often worse in our heads than in real life — especially when we're willing to admit it; humility actually strengthens connection [17:30] Henry: when the fear of being wrong tips into clinical anxiety or mood problems — perfectionism creates a downward spiral [18:00] The amygdala hijack: the midbrain can't distinguish between a perceived threat (being wrong in front of others) and a real physical threat — fight or flight activates as though lives are at stake [18:30] How to get out: exposure — practice being wrong in small, safe ways; when your nervous system learns it isn't catastrophic, it recalibrates [20:30] Good news: we have many opportunities every day to practice being wrong — the more you check in, the more you notice them [21:00] The Experiment for this episode works on getting more comfortable with being wrong If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts! Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program. Please see our terms for more information. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org. Find more mental health resources here.
What if the problem isn't that you're too much—but that you've spent years trying to fit into environments that don't understand your intensity? Diann Wingert and Imi Lo explore what emotional and intellectual intensity can look like, and why it often gets confused with ADHD, autism, giftedness, or other labels.If you've ever felt misunderstood for feeling deeply, thinking intensely, asking too many questions, or struggling inside conventional systems, this conversation offers a different lens. You'll learn how self-awareness, skillful communication, radical self-acceptance, and finding the right environments can help you work with your intensity rather than constantly judging yourself for it.EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS & TIMESTAMPS:00:00 - Introduction to Emotional and Intellectual Intensity in Business05:52 - Navigating ADHD Entrepreneurship and High-Stakes Decisions11:45 - The Role of ADHD Executive Function in Business Strategy17:37 - Managing Cognitive Load and Avoiding ADHD Burnout23:30 - Scaling a Business with ADHD and Team Leadership Dynamics29:22 - How to Build a Sustainable Systems and ADHD Business Operations35:15 - Fostering ADHD Self-Trust and Overcoming Imposter Syndrome41:07 - Integrating Emotional Intensity for Long-Term ADHD Founder Success Key takeaways: Intensity is multi-dimensional: Intensity can be emotional (feeling deeply and persistently), intellectual (a hunger for knowledge and depth), or moral (strong principles and sensitivity to injustice). These can be visible or invisible and are often misunderstood by others.Context matters more than labels: Before seeking a diagnosis or label, ask yourself if the real issue is a misfit with your environment. As Imi Lo shares, "Nothing is wrong with a plant that's not growing in the wrong soil."Strength & struggle go hand in hand: Intensity can lead to profound levels of creativity, empathy, and insight—but also overwhelm, isolation, and shame if not recognized or managed. The solution isn't to shrink yourself, but to find (or create) environments where intensity is seen as an asset.If you have internalized the message that you are "too much," consider this: Maybe your environment - not you - is the problem. Radical self acceptance, and the courage to stop apologizing for your intensity—could be your first step toward thriving. Mentioned during this episode: Imi's article “The Compulsion to Correct”Emotional Labor Performative Humility Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Stoicism Today's guest, Imi Lo:With three master's degrees in Mental Health, Buddhist Studies, and Global Cultures., Imi Lo has over fifteen years of clinical experience as a psychotherapist and art therapist. She has published three books: “Emotional Sensitivity and Intensity” (translated into seven languages), “The Gift of Intensity,” and “The Gift of Empathy.”Connect with Imi: Visit Imi's WebsiteContact Imi about working together Your ADHD-ish™ host, Diann Wingert Diann Wingert brings decades of experience as a psychotherapist and serial business owner and is now a sought-after coach to entrepreneurs with ADHD traits. Her style is direct and strategic, with a dash of humor, and filled with the insights of someone who lives and breathes the neurodivergent experience.Diann is the creator of the ADHD-ish™ Method and host of the top-rated ADHD-ish™ podcast.Want to align your business with your neurodivergent intensity? Book a free consultation with Diann and let's talk about how I can help. © 2026 ADHD-ish™ Podcast. Intro music by Ishan Dincer / Melody Loops / Outro music by Vladimir / Bobi Music / All rights reserved.
Intellectual property (IP) is an important consideration in all software development, but what is it? Contrux's Steve Tockey has spent significant time looking into IP and how it impacts software development. Steve is joined by Construx's Earl Beede and Mark Griffin as they Inspect & Adapt the different categories of IP and their impact on software.
The enemy wants more than anything for you to be ignorant of both Spiritual and natural laws.“My people perish for a lack of knowledge.”- Hosea 4:7For some of you it's time to SUE! Pray this helps and you PURSUE! Go get your stuff! Yes you can. Keep going. #GoForth✝️
What if the problem isn't that you're too much—but that you've spent years trying to fit into environments that don't understand your intensity? Diann Wingert and Imi Lo explore what emotional and intellectual intensity can look like, and why it often gets confused with ADHD, autism, giftedness, or other labels.If you've ever felt misunderstood for feeling deeply, thinking intensely, asking too many questions, or struggling inside conventional systems, this conversation offers a different lens. You'll learn how self-awareness, skillful communication, radical self-acceptance, and finding the right environments can help you work with your intensity rather than constantly judging yourself for it.EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS & TIMESTAMPS:00:00 - Introduction to Emotional and Intellectual Intensity in Business05:52 - Navigating ADHD Entrepreneurship and High-Stakes Decisions11:45 - The Role of ADHD Executive Function in Business Strategy17:37 - Managing Cognitive Load and Avoiding ADHD Burnout23:30 - Scaling a Business with ADHD and Team Leadership Dynamics29:22 - How to Build a Sustainable Systems and ADHD Business Operations35:15 - Fostering ADHD Self-Trust and Overcoming Imposter Syndrome41:07 - Integrating Emotional Intensity for Long-Term ADHD Founder Success Key takeaways: Intensity is multi-dimensional: Intensity can be emotional (feeling deeply and persistently), intellectual (a hunger for knowledge and depth), or moral (strong principles and sensitivity to injustice). These can be visible or invisible and are often misunderstood by others.Context matters more than labels: Before seeking a diagnosis or label, ask yourself if the real issue is a misfit with your environment. As Imi Lo shares, "Nothing is wrong with a plant that's not growing in the wrong soil."Strength & struggle go hand in hand: Intensity can lead to profound levels of creativity, empathy, and insight—but also overwhelm, isolation, and shame if not recognized or managed. The solution isn't to shrink yourself, but to find (or create) environments where intensity is seen as an asset.If you have internalized the message that you are "too much," consider this: Maybe your environment - not you - is the problem. Radical self acceptance, and the courage to stop apologizing for your intensity—could be your first step toward thriving. Mentioned during this episode: Imi's article “The Compulsion to Correct”Emotional Labor Performative Humility Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Stoicism Today's guest, Imi Lo:With three master's degrees in Mental Health, Buddhist Studies, and Global Cultures., Imi Lo has over fifteen years of clinical experience as a psychotherapist and art therapist. She has published three books: “Emotional Sensitivity and Intensity” (translated into seven languages), “The Gift of Intensity,” and “The Gift of Empathy.”Connect with Imi: Visit Imi's WebsiteContact Imi about working together Your ADHD-ish™ host, Diann Wingert Diann Wingert brings decades of experience as a psychotherapist and serial business owner and is now a sought-after coach to entrepreneurs with ADHD traits. Her style is direct and strategic, with a dash of humor, and filled with the insights of someone who lives and breathes the neurodivergent experience.Diann is the creator of the ADHD-ish™ Method and host of the top-rated ADHD-ish™ podcast.Want to align your business with your neurodivergent intensity? Book a free consultation with Diann and let's talk about how I can help. © 2026 ADHD-ish™ Podcast. Intro music by Ishan Dincer / Melody Loops / Outro music by Vladimir / Bobi Music / All rights reserved.
Acclaimed poet and philosopher David Whyte has come to believe a single line of poetry is enough to change your life. David grew up amongst the moors and fields of West Yorkshire, with an English father and an Irish mother who had a gift for lyricism and language.He started writing poems at just seven years old, but it wasn't until he was working as a guide in the Galapagos Islands that David truly understood what poetry was and what it could do for us.A near-death experience there prepared him for life as a poet by teaching him to pay attention to what lay right in front of him at any given time.For David, the power of poetry lies in its unmatched ability to meditate and focus on what's right in front of us, whether it's a mountain, a loved one, or our own reflection.First broadcast in 2025Further informationDavid's latest collection of poems and essays is Consolations II, published by Canongate.This episode of Conversations was produced by Meggie Morris, the Executive Producer was Carmel Rooney.It explores, poetry, poems, near death experiences, mothers, sons, family, Ireland, meditation, Zen, love, heartbreak, anxiety, time, happiness, the Galapagos Islands, family, grief, memory, spirituality, Christianity, language, England.To binge even more great episodes of the Conversations podcast with Richard Fidler and Sarah Kanowski go the ABC listen app (Australia) or wherever you get your podcasts. There you'll find hundreds of the best thought-provoking interviews with authors, writers, artists, politicians, psychologists, musicians, and celebrities.
Dave turned 40 this week, one day before they hit record, and he wants it understood that he has been looking forward to this. Thirty was a bummer. Forty is different. He expects his forties to be a decade of proficiency instead of a decade of learning how to do everything for the first time: better father, better disciplinarian, better coach, better husband, better at the farm. A decade of potency, he called it, which Adam immediately took in the least charitable direction available and turned into a bit about donating blood and testosterone at the same time. Before that, though, there was a real moment. Adam asked how his spiritual life was and Dave told the truth. He has been in a down recently, the kind where things you have always known to be sinful start to look not that bad, and the only thing that held the line was habit. Intellectual habit, built over years, doing exactly what habit is supposed to do when feeling has gone quiet. Then the piglets. Adam has been building a pig pen since last fall, thinking it through all winter, and Dave finally called to say his sow's litter was ready. Adam ran hot wire that morning, got everything set, and had the sense to put just one pig in first to see what would happen. The pig touched the hot wire, did not get shocked, backed up four steps, ran, and cleared the boards. Twenty seconds. It landed close enough that Adam caught it by a back leg. Welcome to the swine herd community.Sponsor: Amen app (from the Augustine Institute) Free, no paywall, no subscription. It is how Adam and Dave get their kids ready to receive the Gospel before Mass even starts, plus free access to Divine Mercy in My Soul and True Devotion to Mary. Download the Amen app.Sponsor: Select International Tours When Adam and Dave went looking for help leading their first pilgrimage, everyone they asked pointed to the same name: Select International Tours. Having used them, the guys can vouch for it. Wherever in the world you want to go, whether leading a pilgrimage or joining one, head to selectinternationaltours.com and see what they have ready for you.The pour is Pabst Blue Ribbon, which won a blue ribbon at some point a long time ago and has been telling everyone about it ever since. Adam will defend it. Not as a great beer, but as a beer that belongs in the category of things you can hand a man who walks into your house without apologizing. Oklahoma has been over 100 degrees for something like seventy straight days, all of July and all of August, and on a day like that PBR is exactly right.Then the main topic. Wendell Berry died August 31 at home in Port Royal, Kentucky, at 92. Kentucky farmer, novelist, poet, essayist, five generations on the same ground his family had worked since the early 1800s. He took degrees from the University of Kentucky, went off to the city to be a writer, got everything a young writer is supposed to want, and decided quickly that it was not what he wanted. So he went home. He farmed with horses long after he could afford a tractor. His writing cabin, 16 by 20 feet on stilts over the Kentucky River, had no electric light. He never owned a television or a computer and never sent an email in his life. He answered his mail by hand, including letters from strangers, at length, signing every one "your friend, Wendell Berry."Dave once told Adam that Berry is his favorite person to read with whom he disagrees, and that line has stuck. Dave is not a pacifist. There are foundational places where he and Berry part ways. But reading Berry sharpened his own thinking precisely because the case on the other side was so well made, so obviously pondered and re-pondered over decades. Not rookie opinions. Not virgin thoughts. Which raises a question worth sitting with: who do you read that you disagree with? Most men cannot answer it, and that is the problem.Berry's own account of what the land taught him: patience, because the crop keeps its own schedule and will not wait for you. Consequence, because there is no control-Z on a hillside. He plowed and dug a pond on sloping Kentucky ground and then watched it wash out, taking with it topsoil that had taken a thousand years to accumulate a millimeter at a time. Scale, because the land you keep is known intimately by you and nobody else, which spots bloom first, which die first, and holding that in your head is closer to a virtue than a skill. The body as a means of knowing, because the health of the mind proves itself in physical work. And fidelity to one place over time. Asked by NPR in 1998 what he would tell young people, he said stop some place and stay there, and learn the history of it, the names of the plants and the animals and your neighbors.Adam brought in Josef Pieper to name what that is. Working hard is not the opposite of sloth. The opposite of sloth is the glad acceptance of your own life. A man can be busy at every hour of the day and still be a slothful man, because the busyness is a way of refusing the life he actually has.Dave read The World-Ending Fire on Adam's recommendation and could not get past a passage early on about the difference between a path and a road. A path is submissive to the terrain. It yields to creation, goes through the trees, puts you in nature instead of over it. A path is almost a virtue, a habit of travel, a memory you relive, an inheritance you walk because others walked it first. A road does violence to it. You level the ground and go through instead of being part of it.Which sets up the essay. In 1987 Berry published "Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer," and it went on to become the most reprinted thing he ever wrote, which is its own joke. He gave nine standards a new tool ought to meet: cheaper than what it replaces, no bigger in scale, demonstrably better at the work, less energy, ideally powered by something like the body, repairable by a person of ordinary intelligence with ordinary tools, purchasable and repairable near home, sold by a small shop that will take it back, and the hard one, number nine: it should not replace or disrupt anything good that already exists, including family and community relationships. We have almost entirely stopped asking that one. We look at output and never at cost, and technology almost always charges its cost in person-to-person contact.His three reasons were dependence, household, and self-deception. Dependence on strip-mined Kentucky coal to run the thing. Household, because the model being discarded was his wife, Tanya, his editor, his critic, his closest reader and fellow worker, and going up to date as a writer would have meant sacrificing an association he treasured and depended on. That reason is what critics went after hardest, feminism being what it was in 1987, and he answered them in print. Self-deception last, and best: he simply did not believe anyone writes better with a computer than with a pencil. Show him work demonstrably better than Dante's, demonstrably attributable to the machine, and he would speak of computers in a more respectful tone of voice, though he still would not buy one.The guys are fair to it and to themselves. Dante is not a fair standard, since nobody in the 300 years before the computer wrote as well as Dante either. But the point underneath it holds. Berry wrote in pencil because when you cross out a word and write another above it, the path you traveled is still visible in front of you, the way a footpath is. And there is something sacramental about it. The pencil hitting the paper is the incarnation of a thought. The labor is not an obstacle to the writing. The labor is the writing, and the satisfaction of finally getting a sentence to say what you actually meant is only available to the man who did the wrestling.Which is where AI comes in, one week after the guys spent a whole episode on it. You do not appreciate a well-kept lawn until you have kept one. You do not appreciate a tomato until you have grown one. You do not appreciate writing until you have done it. Hand the wrestling to a word-guessing machine and the sentence still arrives, but it is sterile, generic, recognizable on sight to anyone who has ever fought for a line. AI is contraceptive language. There is no fecundity in it. The guys expect a backlash, the same pullback that is already happening with social media among the young, once enough people notice what got traded away. Berry's whole vocation was to turn our minds back toward the ground. Which, as Dave pointed out, is where the first man got both his name and his job: adam from adamah, formed out of the earth and made for the earth, a husband to the soil before there was ever any sin to explain it. That is not nostalgia. That is the job. Go read him. You will not agree with everything. Neither do they. Protect the labor. Provide something you actually made. Establish a place and stay in it. May the mad farmer rest with the eternal farmer. Raise your glass.TOPICS COVEREDWhether a man actually gets wiser as he gets older, and why a sinful life makes him dumber insteadDave turning 40 and why he was looking forward to it in a way he never looked forward to 30The forties as a decade of proficiency and self-mastery instead of learning everything for the first timeA spiritual down, and relying on intellectual habit when things you know to be sinful start looking not that badAdam's two piglets from Dave's sow, and a pig pen contemplated since last fallA piglet clearing the boards twenty seconds after being let in, and getting caught by a back legBeer of the week: Pabst Blue Ribbon, and the case for beer that
Wes Wheless got laid off twice inside a few years. COVID, then the tech downturn. He wasn't angry about the second one. He just didn't have the energy to go attach himself to somebody else's mission again and wait for it to get taken away.He didn't have a plan. He took a couple months, picked up some contract work to hold him over, and then a light bulb went off: if he could find enough of these, he might never need a full-time job again.Four years later he's got a practice serving independent consultants and a book, The Expert's Privilege, that I told him he should have written before I left corporate.The core idea is three stacked pieces:You've built real, transferable expertise over your decades in corporate.That expertise has been inefficiently deployed inside the corporate machine.You can deploy it far better on your own.His metaphor for point two is the one that stuck with me. Imagine running a cruise line with a hundred ships and fifty of them permanently tied up in port. That's what corporate does with what you know.We also get into the stuff nobody tells you. Why hourly pricing punishes you for being good. What happens when a client pigeonholes you before you open your mouth. How he figured out which part of his own service people actually valued, and then sold only that. And the thing I keep running into with Gen Xers: deeply experienced people who sit down, look at twenty-five years of work, and say "I don't know what I know."In this episode:Two layoffs, and the one that changed his mind about going backClient zero, and why hourly was the wrong modelGetting pigeonholed as "a writer" and the pricing that comes with itThe coach question that triggered his pivot: do you actually like doing this work?Writing daily for two years before there was a bookWhy he deliberately left AI out of the bookThe Expert's Privilege, definedIntellectual headshots, and how asking former clients one question reshaped his businessInvesting in yourself when corporate always paid for it beforeTIMESTAMPS00:00 — Intro01:43 — Two layoffs, and why he didn't want another corporate role03:26 — Why almost nobody who gets out wants to go back04:32 — He didn't know solo consulting was even an option06:43 — What the work actually was: executive ghostwriting and content strategy08:22 — Client zero, and the first lesson about hourly rates09:18 — Project fees, and putting guardrails on your availability10:44 — Getting pigeonholed as "a writer" before the conversation starts12:14 — When the business model started breaking13:11 — The coach's question: do you actually like doing this work?13:41 — The pivot to serving independent consultants14:59 — Brett's own winding path out of corporate15:53 — The three-tier offer, and why clients almost always pick the middle16:50 — Helping people map their lane while they're still employed17:47 — "I never gave serious thought that I could take the reins myself"20:18 — Building authority from zero, and writing daily for two years21:44 — You turn around and there's a library there22:34 — The self-doubt going into the book23:10 — Not the book. A book. Your first book.26:11 — Brett's stuck manuscript problem26:33 — The North Star workshop and the parachute metaphor27:44 — Why he left AI out on purpose30:04 — The Expert's Privilege, the three stacked ideas30:53 — A hundred ships and fifty of them tied up in port32:10 — In the corner four months ago, desperate for his brain today34:00 — Most businesses need level one help, not level three36:28 — "I don't know what I know," and why that trap is so common37:34 — Start with the problem, not with yourself38:48 — Need-to-solve versus nice-to-solve39:26 — Brett on chasing energy as the compass40:31 — Intellectual headshots, and the one question that created them42:08 — Saying no, and the add-on that killed Brett's margin43:18 — Investing in yourself when corporate always covered it45:39 — Laid off tomorrow: square one, or a head start?48:05 — You're a business with one client. Is that a good deal?49:28 — Where to find Wes and the bookQUOTES"I wasn't angry. I just didn't have the energy to attach myself to someone else's mission again, just for it to get taken away in a couple of years." — Wes"Imagine you had a cruise line with a hundred ships and fifty of them were tied up in port permanently. That's how we are in corporate." — Wes"I was that person four months ago that was getting put in the corner. And here, in a different context, they're desperate to know what I know." — Wes"If you're good at something, an hourly rate doesn't do you any favors." — Wes"Don't think of it as the book. Think of it as a book. Even easier, your first book." — Wes, on the advice that unstuck him"I don't know what I know. I've done so many things that I feel like I can't do any of them." — Wes, on what he hears constantly"Think of your current job like you're a small business owner with one client. Is that a good deal for you?" — Brett"If you were laid off tomorrow, do you want to start from square one, or do you want to feel like you had a head start?" — WesABOUT THE GUESTWes Wheless is the author of The Expert's Privilege: A Self-Deployment Guide to Leaving Corporate and Going Solo (July 2026). After two layoffs, including one from the tech education company Reforge, he built an independent practice helping solo consultants pull their expertise out of their heads and turn it into visual frameworks, something he calls intellectual headshots. He now also works with people still inside corporate who want to map and pressure-test a consulting lane before they need one.LINKSThe book The Expert's Privilege: A Self-Deployment Guide to Leaving Corporate and Going Solo https://theexpertsprivilege.com/ Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Experts-Privilege-Self-Deployment-Leaving-Corporate/dp/1788464028Wes's site and services https://bio.site/weswhelessWes on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/wwheless/The Collective https://trp-collective.circle.soQuestions or guest ideas? bt@bretttrainor.com
Sharon Toerek is a marketing and intellectual property attorney who helps independent marketing, digital, PR, and creative agencies protect their assets and turn their ideas into revenue. She is the founder of Toerek Law, a firm dedicated to marketing agencies, where she focuses on intellectual property, smart contracts, and regulatory compliance. Sharon also hosts The Innovative Agency podcast and serves as a trusted legal partner to agencies and communities across the United States. In this episode, Sharon Toerek shares insights on how agencies can leverage legal strategies to protect their assets, increase profitability, and navigate the evolving landscape of AI and data privacy regulations.Key Takeaways:- AI legal implications and recent changes- Building strong legal foundations for agencies- Intellectual property protection and monetizationEpisode Timeline:1:45 How Sharon chose her focus on IP law3:40 Interesting clients and creative work in IP law5:00 Agency legal blind spots and risk areas6:45 Legal implications of AI in marketing8:10 Recent legal changes in AI and copyright law9:20 The parallel between AI regulation and data privacy law11:00Concerns about AI-generated content and copyright infringement13:25Future of licensing and copyright in AI15:45Legal as a profit center for agencies16:23How smarter contracts protect IP and increase profitability19:29Tod's copywriting pitches23:35Conducting a legal audit to eliminate risksThis episode's guest:• Sharon Toerek on LinkedIn• Legal+Creative's website• The Innovative Agency podcastSubscribe and leave a 5-star review: https://pod.link/1496390646Contact Us!•Join the conversation by leaving a comment!•Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn!Thanks for listening! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Dear Friends, In this episode of Gateways to Awakening, I sit down with my new friend, David Lorimer, writer, poet, philosopher, Programme Director of the Scientific and Medical Network, and Chair of the Galileo Commission. We recently met in the South of France, while I was on Dr. Nicola Amadora's Mary Magdalene tour. For decades, David has been at the forefront of conversations exploring consciousness, science, spirituality, near-death experiences, and the deeper nature of reality.We begin with David's lifelong “quest for wisdom” and why true wisdom cannot be separated from love, compassion, discernment, and direct experience. We also dive into the research surrounding near-death experiences, survival of consciousness, and the possibility that death is not an ending, but a transition into another mode of consciousness. David shares decades of experience studying these phenomena and the recurring patterns reported by people who have come close to death.“We have to wake up, and we have to try to use our lives to contribute to the larger common good, and to grow in love and wisdom.”— David LorimerKey Takeaways- Wisdom is more than knowledge. True wisdom integrates discernment and deeper understanding with love and compassion.- Intuition is fundamental to discovery. Major scientific breakthroughs often begin with intuitive insight before the analytical mind works out the science.- Our current scientific understanding of consciousness may be incomplete, opening the door to a much larger exploration of the nature of mind and reality.- Death may be a transition rather than an ending. Near-death experiences show striking recurring patterns, including peace, out-of-body experiences, beings of light, and life reviews.- We may be expressions of one consciousness, raising profound questions about interconnectedness and the nature of the self.- The mind and heart need to develop together. Intellectual or spiritual knowledge alone does not necessarily create an integrated human being.- Mary Magdalene offers another lens on the Divine Feminine and the integration of sacred masculine and feminine principles.Our lives can serve something larger. The invitation is to wake up, expand our consciousness, contribute to the common good, and continue growing in love and wisdom.Thank you for listening! We're now opening a private Community membership for those interested in processing the podcast and joining live monthly calls to discuss the content. Learn more here. If this episode resonates with you, you may also enjoy Yasmeen's work through the Inner Knowing School, where she teaches intuition, energetic mastery, multidimensional awareness, and nervous system regulation through private immersions and executive cohorts. You can also explore Yasmeen's latest book, A Glitch in the Matrix: 10 Energy Codes to Become the Main Character of Your Life, available on Audible, Kindle, and in print. The book explores intuition, consciousness, timelines, emotional regulation, and how to manage your energy instead of your time.For all resoures, check here: https://linktr.ee/gatewaystoawakening
Neuroplasticity is the brain's incredible ability to rewire and form new neural pathways in response to information, experience, and repeated thought patterns. The "Renewed Mind" is a mind rewired by a deep commitment to rightly understand, meditate on, and submit to God's Word.
The “trend” of intellectual influencers is growing, and I'm so excited about it! I've noticed more and more people on social platforms creating communities around their intellectual expertise, experience, knowledge, and niche. So, let's talk about it!Connect with me:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/annamaluskitzmann/Breathe with me:https://www.tinyspacetobreathe.comPlant trees: https://onetreeplanted.org/Energy reading & healing: https://annamalus.co/Original Music for the podcast was created by Jacek Jendrasik.Key takeaways:* Understanding solar and lunar eclipses and their emotional significance.* How eclipses can trigger self-reflection and healing.* The rise of intellectual influencers and their impact on social media.* Tips for curating your social media feed for deeper, more meaningful content.Timestamps:00:00 Introduction00:27 Eclipse season overview01:52 Emotional triggers during eclipses02:50 The role of influencers in today's social media06:10 Embracing intellectual content10:35 How to curate your social media12:57 Engaging with new types of influencers15:44 Final thoughts and reflectionsWhat's your biggest challenge with navigating emotional shifts during eclipse season? Drop it in the comments!Subscribe for weekly insights on living a more aligned and juicy life!#EclipseSeason #JuicyLifePodcast #EmotionalGrowthDisclaimer: The content shared in this podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as medical, psychological, therapeutic, legal, or professional advice. The host is not a licensed medical or mental health professional, and the information provided is not a substitute for professional care, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider or other licensed professional with any questions you may have regarding a medical or mental health condition. Never disregard or delay seeking professional advice because of something you heard on this podcast. Participation in this podcast and any practices, suggestions, or reflections discussed is voluntary, and you assume full responsibility for your choices, actions, and results. Advertising & Endorsements: This podcast may include advertisements, sponsorships, affiliate links, or paid partnerships. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the host and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of sponsors or advertisers. While products or services may be mentioned or recommended, these references do not constitute guarantees, endorsements, or claims of effectiveness. You are encouraged to do your own research and use your own judgment before purchasing or engaging with any product or service mentioned.
Sylvain Rochon is the co-founder and vice president of the Alliance for Extraterrestrial Diplomatic Contact (AEDC), a Canadian futurist, and a serial entrepreneur in technology. His companies include a psychometric company called CykoMetrix, the Canadian Institute of Mass Communication and the think tank Intellectual. An educator for over 20 years, through his initiatives, Sylvain tries to change how humanity thinks of itself, in the hope to help it transition towards a golden age of understanding, in which we will start having regular official contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations. To help prepare humanity for this big leap, Sylvain published dozens of articles in multiple online magazines, including Data Driven Investor, Becoming Human and Director Today, and in 2018 published a non-fiction book entitled, "Engineering Paradise: Are You Ready?". Sylvain holds bachelor's degrees in biochemistry, chemical engineering and education, and lives in Ottawa, Canada. United Public Radio & UFO Paranormal Radio www.uprntalkradio.com
Scholar, distinguished professor, author, leading public intellectual, and special contributor, Dr. Cornel West, shares his thoughts about the unfortunate and controversial death of college professor Jason Arday and more.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tavis-smiley--6286410/support.
Become a Patron - https://www.patreon.com/thecomicspals?fan_landing=true Subscribe on YouTube - youtube.com/thecomicspals?sub_confirm... Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/6RAX3sT [00:00:00] Opening [00:07:50] Robert Kirkman Calls "Intellectual" Comics Boring [00:32:08] @comicsaredope 's defense of Kirkman's underlying point [01:21:22] Highlight a Book: Marco [01:33:34] Batman Month: Favorite Villains #2 [01:43:47] Jean Grey Miniseries Announced [01:52:24] Marvel Incursions Announced [02:03:18] Ram V's New Gods Returning [02:07:30] Community announcements and channel updates [02:12:06] Highlight a Book: Tyler with DIE: Reloaded [02:20:37] Listener call-in session [03:04:41] Closing Watch us LIVE on YouTube every: Monday at 1PM EST for Pals Previews Thursday at 8 PM EST for Pals Pulls Saturday at 10:15 AM EST for The Comics Pals Podcast Grab some merch here: https://streamlabs.com/thecomicspals/merch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PodBean: https://thecomicspals.podbean.com/ X: https://twitter.com/thecomicspals Bluesky: @thecomicspals.bsky.social Instagram: https://instagram.com/thecomicspals ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pals: Sean: @SeansSoapbox Tyler: @TheTylerOlson Marco: @mrmarcoanimoto
When do we begin aging?Most people would answer somewhere in middle age. Some would say retirement. Others would point to the first gray hair or aching knee.But what if aging well actually begins in childhood?In this episode, Dr. Jeff Armstrong and co-host Corbin Bruton explore one of the foundational ideas behind Well-Centered Fitness and why healthy aging is not a collection of habits adopted after fifty but a lifelong process of becoming.Drawing from the SPIES Framework—Spiritual, Physical, Intellectual, Emotional, and Social health—they examine how childhood experiences shape resilience, purpose, identity, relationships, movement, and lifelong flourishing. Rather than viewing fitness as something we do, they explore fitness as the ongoing formation of the whole person.Whether you're raising children, influencing grandchildren, teaching students, or simply hoping to age well yourself, this conversation offers a compelling new perspective: the best time to begin preparing for healthy aging is the beginning of life.Please, support The Aging Well Podcast by hitting the ‘like' button, subscribing/following the podcast, sharing with a friend, and….Tip Jar! All donations support this podcast to keep it going. https://paypal.me/theagingwellpodcastBUY the products you need to… age well from our trusted affiliates and support the mission of The Aging Well Podcast. (We receive commission on these purchases. Thank you.)The Aging Well Podcast merchandise | Show how you are aging well | Use the promo code AGING WELL for free shipping on orders over $75 | https://theagingwellpodcast-shop.fourthwall.com/promo/AGINGWELLAuro Wellness | Glutaryl—Antioxidant spray that delivers high doses of glutathione (“Master Antioxidant”) and the new Copper Tripeptide (GHK-Cu) | 10% off Code: AGINGWELL at https://aurowellness.com/agingwellpodcastNutritional Biochemical Inc. (NBI) | Trusted supplement. NBI stands 100% behind the quality of their formulations and the science on which they're based. | Click the following link and use the discount code AGINGWELL for 10% off: https://shop.nbihealth.com/agingwellJigsaw Health | Trusted supplements. “It's fun to feel good.” | Click the following link and use the discount code AGINGWELL for 10% off: https://bit.ly/4ks3Y0OBerkeley Life | Optimize nitric oxide levels | Purchase your starter kit at a 15% discount | Use the promo code: AGINGWELL15 | https://berkeleylife.pxf.io/c/6475525/3226696/31118Oxford Healthspan | Primeadine®, a plant-derived spermidine supplement | 10% off code: AGINGWELL | https://www.oxfordhealthspan.com/AGINGWELLKneeMo® | A smart device programmed to reduce your knee pain and keep you moving. | Click the following link and use the discount code AGINGWELL15 for 15% off: https://thekneemo.com/ref/agingwellProlon | The Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD) is a revolutionary five-day nutrition program scientifically formulated to mimic the effects of a prolonged water fast while still allowing nourishment - supporting the benefits of fasting without the challenges and risks that come from water-only fasts. | For the best available discount always use this link: https://prolonlife.com/theagingwellpodcastThrive25 | Your personal longevity advisor | https://www.thrive25.com/early-access?via=william-jeffreyFusionary Formulas | Combining Ayurvedic wisdom with Western science for optimal health support. | 15% off Code: AGINGWELL | https://fusionaryformulas.com?sca_ref=9678325.IHg5xYhdOzzke8ZrDr Lewis Nutrition | Fight neurodegeneration and cognitive decline with Daily Brain Care by Dr Lewis Nutrition—a proven daily formula designed to protect and restore brain function. | 10% off code: AGINGWELL or use the link: https://drlewisnutrition.com/AGINGWELL
Peter Berkowitz reflects on the 30th anniversary of Alan Sokal's famous academic hoax, which exposed the intellectual decline within higher education humanities. Berkowitz critiques contemporary humanities departments for their ideological hypocrisy: professors claim objective truth is subjective while simultaneously insisting that their own political claims are absolute truths. He references a report from Vanderbilt and Washington University confirming that significant contingents of humanities faculty in core disciplines subordinate scholarship to political activism. Finally, Berkowitz notes that this progressive ideological capture is concentrated among college-educated voters in elite university towns, warning that treating education as political indoctrination severely perverts liberal education. (2)
Superforecaster and conservative writer Stevie Miller (@zagrebbi) explains who the Groypers are and why they are campaigning against Vivek Ramaswamy. Timestamps 0:25: Groypers 1:22: Disclaimer 3:58: Interview begins 4:40: How Miller and Chougule met 5:04: Curtis Yarvin 10:57: Intellectual influence in Washington 11:39: Manifest conference 12:32: Miller's involvement with forecasting 14:02: Public intellectuals 16:39: Miller transfer to Columbia 17:24: Ramaswamy's primary win 19:16: Casey Putsch 21:46: Groypers 21:55: Streaming 23:16: Alleged cancellation of Fuentes 24:57: Fuentes at Boston University 31:09: Chris Brunet 31:31: narrative of persecution 31:53: Fuentes as self-made outsider 34:46: Fuentes-Dinesh D'Souza debate 37:30: Ben Shapiro 39:58: Changing conservative audiences 40:12: Tucker Carlson 41:29: Fuentes mentions of Miller 42:46: Bronze Age Pervert 43:17: Fuentes's anti-semitism 45:00: Ben Shapiro in college 45:58: The Right Stuff 47:29: Fuentes's anti-Zionism 49:14: Fuentes's opposition to GOP 50:33: Fuentes's on Newsom 54:05: Fuentes's anti-Indianism 55:09: Fuentes's Catholic worldview 57:28: Fuentes's social conservatism 58:27: Fuentes's populism 1:01:23: Fuentes's working class worldview 1:01:59: Fuentes's views on economic policy 1:04:38: Fuentes's opposition to Trump 1:14:08: Ohio governor race 1:15:23: Why Groypers are upset with Ramaswamy 1:17:27: High-skilled immigration 1:22:59: Groyper impact on Ohio governor race Follow Star Spangled Gamblers on Twitter/X: @ssgamblers Trade on the Ohio Governor Race at Polymarket.com, the world's largest prediction market. https://polymarket.com/event/ohio-governor-winner-2026#sRoyoIW
In this episode, Justin Wales, Chief Legal Officer for Crypto.com makes a second visit to the podcast. This time around, he discusses his new book, The AI Legal Handbook, the emerging regulatory landscape, liability frameworks, and practical applications of artificial intelligence. Justin outlines how attorneys and regulators should approach modern AI models, the mechanics behind AI, and the effect of generative AI on legal education. The discussion covers key regulatory principles, the balance between strict liability and negligence frameworks, copyright issues in machine learning training, and the governance challenges of artificial general intelligence (AGI). Things We Talk About in this Episode Transitioning from cryptocurrency regulation to developing a unified framework for artificial intelligence law The importance of legal professionals understanding underlying model mechanics and token prediction to evaluate hallucination risks Generative AI's disruption of law school assessments and the pedagogical shift from written assignments to oral examinations The convergence of cryptocurrency rails, agentic AI systems, and decentralized compute infrastructure Foundational principles for AI regulation, emphasizing proportional oversight, human-centered accountability, and transparency over outright bans Managing the "black box problem" and balancing algorithm explainability with technical efficiency Comparative analysis of sector-specific guidelines versus federal mandates and the adaptability of existing rules of professional conduct Evaluating legal liability standards: applying negligence versus strict liability to autonomous vehicles, healthcare diagnostic tools, and AI chatbots Intellectual property considerations, fair use, and style mimicry in generative model training data Preparing legal, economic, and governance frameworks for artificial general intelligence (AGI) Where to buy The AI Legal Handbook: JustinWales.com or Amazon. Episode Credits Editing and Production: Grant Blackstock Theme Music: Home Base (Instrumental Version) by TA2MI
Distinguished scholar, author, leading public intellectual, and special contributor Dr. Cornel West discusses President Trump's declaration for the Strait of Hormuz, Black men becoming independent voters, and moreBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tavis-smiley--6286410/support.
Support the podcast! Http://tappingqanda.com/support Subscribe in: Apple Podcast | iPhone | Spotify | Pandora | Amazon Music | iHeartRadio | YouTube Limiting beliefs are one of the most common obstacles I hear about from people in the tapping community, and they are also one of the things tapping is best equipped to address. In nearly two decades of working with clients and students, tapping for limiting beliefs has become one of my favorite applications of EFT, because the results are direct, fast, and felt immediately in daily life. TL;DR / Key Takeaways A limiting belief is a subconscious affirmation about how the world works that exists to keep you safe, not to hold you back. It only becomes a problem when it is disproportionate to actual risk or based on inaccurate information. Intellectual understanding alone cannot clear a limiting belief. Transformation requires working at the subconscious level, which is exactly where EFT tapping operates through a process called memory reconsolidation. The five-step tapping process for limiting beliefs takes under three minutes and can be used immediately on any belief that is getting in your way. Fighting or dismissing a limiting belief makes it dig in harder. The key is to first acknowledge the belief's protective intention, then show it how it is working against you. Replacing a limiting belief requires a statement the subconscious can actually accept. Overclaiming ("everything will be perfect") creates resistance. A grounded permission statement creates movement. Why Limiting Beliefs Are So Hard to Shake Limiting beliefs are hard to shake because they are not flaws in your thinking. They are features of your protective system doing exactly what they were designed to do. Your subconscious mind holds on to these beliefs precisely because it believes they are keeping you safe. Think about it this way: I do not jump into the tiger cage at the zoo. That is a limiting belief. But I do not experience it as one because it is proportionate to real danger. The limiting beliefs that cause us problems work the same way on the inside. They generate resistance to protect us from what they perceive as threat, whether that threat is rejection, failure, judgment, or loss. This is why willpower and positive thinking rarely work on their own. If you try to override a protective belief by force, the subconscious mind digs its heels in. The resistance is not an enemy. It is a misguided guardian. What Is a Limiting Belief, Really? A limiting belief is a subconscious affirmation about how the world works that is either inaccurate, disproportionate, or based on outdated information. It exists to create protective resistance, not to punish you. This definition matters because it completely changes how you approach the work. Most people treat their limiting beliefs as character defects or signs that something is fundamentally broken in them. But a limiting belief is just a story your subconscious mind wrote, probably a long time ago, with the information it had available at the time. The story made sense once. It just has not been updated. Key insight: "Limiting beliefs are always going to get the best of us. They keep us safe. What we're really frustrated by is the fact that the limiting belief has gotten in the way of us doing the thing we want because it's not doing it in a way that's proportionate or that is well informed." Every limiting belief you carry is trying to protect you from something. The question is never whether the protection is well-intentioned. It always is. The question is whether it is accurate and proportionate to the actual situation in front of you right now. Why Tapping for Limiting Beliefs Works When Willpower Doesn't Tapping works on limiting beliefs because it targets the subconscious level where those beliefs actually live, through a neurological process called memory reconsolidation. Willpower operates at the conscious level and cannot reach them. Memory reconsolidation is the process by which stored memories and the emotional responses attached to them are retrieved, modified, and re-saved. When you tap while focusing on a limiting belief, you are not just thinking differently about a problem. You are creating the conditions for the subconscious story to be rewritten and stored again in a new form. This is what makes tapping categorically different from affirmations, journaling, or talk therapy alone, all of which are enormously valuable but operate primarily at the conscious level. Key insight: "It is not enough to simply intellectually understand that the limiting belief you are carrying is not true. If all it required for you to transform a limiting belief was to know that it was not true, then the only thing we would need for healing and transformation are bumper stickers and posters of kitty cats hanging in there." This is why knowing better is not enough. You can know, with full certainty, that your fear of rejection is irrational, and still feel the brakes go on every time you try to put yourself out there. Tapping is one of the few tools that reaches both the conscious and subconscious levels simultaneously. If you want to understand more about why the subconscious mind resists change even when you consciously want it, this episode on the subconscious tug of war goes deep on that dynamic. The 5-Step Tapping Process for Limiting Beliefs The five-step tapping process for limiting beliefs takes under three minutes and can be applied immediately to any belief that is currently getting in your way. You do not need to have all the steps memorized. A reasonable guess at each one is enough to get results. To illustrate each step, I will use a concrete example: the belief that says "I can't ask this person to partner with me because they're going to reject me and I'll feel foolish." Step 1: Wordless Tapping Start with one full minute of tapping with no words at all. Move from point to point at your own pace, taking a deep breath as you begin. If you do not want to set a timer, three or four rounds of six to seven taps per point will cover it. Wordless tapping does two things: it settles your nervous system and brings you into your body before you begin the heavier cognitive work. Starting a limiting belief session already activated makes every subsequent step harder. This first step is short, but skipping it costs you. For a deeper look at how content-free tapping works and when to use it, see this episode on eight ways to use content-free tapping. Step 2: Name the Belief and Its Impact Tap through the points while saying out loud what the belief is and what it is causing you to do (or not do). Something like: "I recognize that I am carrying this belief, and the belief is [your belief here], and this limiting belief is preventing me from taking action, making me hesitant, and stopping me from doing what I want." Naming the belief out loud does something important: it moves it from a vague background feeling into a specific, examinable object. You cannot address what you cannot clearly see. Step 3: Honor the Belief's Protective Intent Still tapping, shift to acknowledging what the belief is trying to do for you: "I recognize that this limiting belief exists because it is simply trying to keep me safe. It does not want me to rush in, be judged, be rejected, or do something foolish. And I appreciate the fact that it is holding me back in an effort to keep me safe." This step is not about agreeing that the belief is correct. It is about getting your subconscious mind on board with the process. Key insight: "It's kind of like a handshake with the subconscious mind saying we're on the same team. If I say, subconscious mind, you're wrong, it's going to dig its heels in." Skipping this step is one of the most common reasons tapping on limiting beliefs stalls. The subconscious mind will not release a belief it thinks you are attacking. This episode on turning intellectual pushback into tapping progress explores this pattern in more detail. Step 4: Show the Belief How It's Backfiring Now, still tapping, let the belief know that its protective strategy is producing the opposite of what it intends: "Even though you are trying to keep me safe, you are actually doing the exact opposite. You are making the world more dangerous because you are preventing me from doing the things that will help me grow, evolve, and move forward." This step works because it speaks the subconscious mind's language. You are not telling it it is wrong. You are showing it that its own goal, your safety and wellbeing, is better served by loosening its grip. Step 5: Replace It with a Credible Truth Finally, tap while offering a realistic replacement: "I appreciate the fact that it is possible for me, in thoughtful and deliberate ways, to move forward safely. This does not mean I am going to be thoughtless or reckless. I am engaging with this in thoughtful and deliberate ways, and I give myself permission to trust that I can move forward safely." Notice what this step does not say. It does not say "everything will work out perfectly" or "there is nothing to worry about." Those statements are not believable to the subconscious mind, and an unbelievable affirmation creates resistance rather than releasing it. The goal is a truth the subconscious can accept, a permission statement that says: I can move, and moving does not mean abandoning care. Why You Can't Just Think Your Way Out of a Limiting Belief Thinking alone cannot clear a limiting belief because the belief does not live in your thinking mind. It lives in the subconscious, and the subconscious does not respond to logic. Reading the right book, understanding why a belief is irrational, or receiving encouragement can all be genuinely useful. But none of them reach the level where the belief is actually stored. They inform the conscious mind without rewriting the subconscious story. Tapping works at both levels simultaneously. You hold the belief in conscious focus while the physical act of tapping sends a calming signal to the amygdala, the brain's threat-detection center. That combination allows the memory to be accessed, modified, and re-stored. The belief does not just get quieter. It gets rewritten. If intellectual understanding has been your primary tool and you keep hitting the same walls, this episode on why you resist taking healthy action is a useful companion read. How to Use This Process for Any Limiting Belief Tapping for limiting beliefs is effective on any belief that is disproportionate to actual risk or based on outdated information. The example used throughout this post was the fear of rejection in a partnership conversation, but the same five steps apply to beliefs about money, visibility, worthiness, health, creative work, or any other domain where you feel stuck. Key insight: "The only way I can create a life that I love is if I actually take action. Nothing happens until we move. Limiting beliefs prevent us from taking action and moving. Therefore, when a limiting belief is disproportionate or misinformed, it prevents us from creating the life that is meant for us." You do not need to have the belief perfectly identified before you start. Begin with what you know. If you feel the resistance but cannot fully name what is driving it, start with wordless tapping and let the clarity come as you move through the steps. If you want to track your tapping practice and build consistency with this kind of work, Tapping Tracker is a simple tool designed to help you do exactly that. For more on how tapping and affirmations work together once a belief has been cleared, see this episode on tapping and affirmations as a transformation duo. Frequently Asked Questions What is a limiting belief in EFT tapping? In EFT, a limiting belief is a subconscious story about how the world works that creates resistance to action. It is not a character flaw. It is a protective mechanism that becomes problematic when it is disproportionate to actual risk or based on outdated information. Tapping works on limiting beliefs by accessing the subconscious level where they are stored. Can tapping really clear a limiting belief in a few minutes? Yes, particularly for beliefs that are clearly defined and moderately activated. The five-step process described here takes under three minutes and is designed to produce immediate relief from the resistance the belief generates. Deeper or more complex beliefs, especially those rooted in significant past experiences, may benefit from multiple sessions or work with a practitioner. Why do limiting beliefs come back after tapping? A limiting belief can resurface if it has multiple layers, if the root experience has not been fully addressed, or if the replacement truth offered in step five was not fully believable to the subconscious mind. When a belief returns, that is useful information. It points to a deeper layer or a related belief that is also worth tapping on. What is memory reconsolidation and how does it relate to tapping? Memory reconsolidation is the neurological process by which stored memories are retrieved, modified, and re-saved with new emotional content. EFT tapping leverages this process by pairing focused attention on a belief with the calming input of tapping on acupressure points, creating conditions for the subconscious story to be rewritten rather than suppressed. Do I have to know exactly what my limiting belief is before I start tapping? No. You can begin with wordless tapping and a general sense of where the resistance is. Clarity often emerges during the tapping process itself, particularly after step one settles the nervous system. Start with what you know, even if it is just "I feel stuck about this." How is tapping for limiting beliefs different from affirmations? Affirmations work at the conscious level and are most effective after a limiting belief has already been cleared or softened. Tapping works at the subconscious level, where the belief is actually stored, through the physical act of stimulating acupressure points while holding the belief in focus. Used together, after tapping clears the resistance, affirmations can reinforce the new story. This episode on tapping and affirmations explains how to sequence them effectively. What is the fear of rejection example in this episode about? The fear of rejection example illustrates a belief that says "If I ask this person to partner with me, they will reject me and I will feel foolish." Gene uses this example to walk through each of the five tapping steps in real time, demonstrating how the process addresses both the specific fear and the underlying protective mechanism driving it. For a deeper dive into tapping for rejection specifically, see this post on breaking free from the fear of rejection.
Intellectual honesty demands facing the truth. There was a time when talk radio was a dominant force in swaying public opinion. The truth is those numbers are beginning to slide. Even shortwave radio had a huge impact on the world, but today in 2026, it is increasingly a diminishing and declining asset. Like it or not, the world has moved to podcasts and streaming, and those trends will only continue to accelerate. If you want to reach where the people are, you must make your claim in that medium. And with upwards of 200-million Americans listening to at least one podcast per week, who are they hearing? How to we get this message to them?Now, do you believe in this ministry? If you do, you can keep us on the air as a radio program and podcast by visiting our website. It is vastly more urgent than ever that you do. https://truth2ponder.com/support. You can also mail a check payable to Ancient Word Radio, P.O. Box 7037, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34985. Thank you in advance for your faithfulness to this ministry.
Welcome to Season 12! We start off looking at a movie that came right on the heals of the Social Network frenzy. The movie probes the moral questions like: Intellectual property, friendship and money. How accurate is the movie versus reality? Why are friendships more important than monetary gain? Join as we begin this season with a bang.
Built on the grounds of a former cotton plantation, the Tuskegee Institute, founded by Booker T. Washington, offered agricultural and industrial education as a strategy for Black self-determination. There―and in many other communities in the U.S. South, the Caribbean, and Central America―Black people repurposed and regenerated what had been a place of enslavement into a site for imagining alternative futures. Jarvis C. McInnis charts a new account of Black modernity by centering Tuskegee'svision of agrarian worldmaking. He traces the diasporic ties and networks of exchange that linked Black communities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Although Washington is often regarded as an accommodationist, McInnis shows how artists, intellectuals, and political leaders―including George Washington Carver, Jean Price-Mars, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay, and Marcus Garvey―adapted Tuskegee's methods into dynamic strategies for liberation in places like Cuba, Puerto Rico, Haiti, and Jamaica. Even as the legacy of the plantation continued to circumscribe Black life, these thinkers found resources in its ruins to forge new theories and practices of progress, aesthetic innovation, and freedom that contributed to the New Negro Movement of the 1920s and 1930s. In contrast to traditional understandings of Black modernity as urban and premised on northward migration, McInnis foregrounds rural settings and practices of place making, rootedness, and liberatory agriculture. Shedding new light on the transnational influence of a historically Black institution in the U.S. South, Afterlives of the Plantation remaps Black cultural, intellectual, and political histories down to the very soil. Afterlives of the Plantation: Plotting Agrarian Futures in the Global Black South (Columbia University Press, 2025) is an award-winning monograph earning recognition as a winner of the 2026 S-USIH Annual Book Prize by the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, 2026 Pauli Murray Book Prize in Black Intellectual History by the African American Intellectual History Society, and the 2026 ASALH Book Prize by the Association for the Study of African American Life and History Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/african-american-studies
Built on the grounds of a former cotton plantation, the Tuskegee Institute, founded by Booker T. Washington, offered agricultural and industrial education as a strategy for Black self-determination. There―and in many other communities in the U.S. South, the Caribbean, and Central America―Black people repurposed and regenerated what had been a place of enslavement into a site for imagining alternative futures. Jarvis C. McInnis charts a new account of Black modernity by centering Tuskegee'svision of agrarian worldmaking. He traces the diasporic ties and networks of exchange that linked Black communities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Although Washington is often regarded as an accommodationist, McInnis shows how artists, intellectuals, and political leaders―including George Washington Carver, Jean Price-Mars, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay, and Marcus Garvey―adapted Tuskegee's methods into dynamic strategies for liberation in places like Cuba, Puerto Rico, Haiti, and Jamaica. Even as the legacy of the plantation continued to circumscribe Black life, these thinkers found resources in its ruins to forge new theories and practices of progress, aesthetic innovation, and freedom that contributed to the New Negro Movement of the 1920s and 1930s. In contrast to traditional understandings of Black modernity as urban and premised on northward migration, McInnis foregrounds rural settings and practices of place making, rootedness, and liberatory agriculture. Shedding new light on the transnational influence of a historically Black institution in the U.S. South, Afterlives of the Plantation remaps Black cultural, intellectual, and political histories down to the very soil. Afterlives of the Plantation: Plotting Agrarian Futures in the Global Black South (Columbia University Press, 2025) is an award-winning monograph earning recognition as a winner of the 2026 S-USIH Annual Book Prize by the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, 2026 Pauli Murray Book Prize in Black Intellectual History by the African American Intellectual History Society, and the 2026 ASALH Book Prize by the Association for the Study of African American Life and History Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Built on the grounds of a former cotton plantation, the Tuskegee Institute, founded by Booker T. Washington, offered agricultural and industrial education as a strategy for Black self-determination. There―and in many other communities in the U.S. South, the Caribbean, and Central America―Black people repurposed and regenerated what had been a place of enslavement into a site for imagining alternative futures. Jarvis C. McInnis charts a new account of Black modernity by centering Tuskegee'svision of agrarian worldmaking. He traces the diasporic ties and networks of exchange that linked Black communities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Although Washington is often regarded as an accommodationist, McInnis shows how artists, intellectuals, and political leaders―including George Washington Carver, Jean Price-Mars, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay, and Marcus Garvey―adapted Tuskegee's methods into dynamic strategies for liberation in places like Cuba, Puerto Rico, Haiti, and Jamaica. Even as the legacy of the plantation continued to circumscribe Black life, these thinkers found resources in its ruins to forge new theories and practices of progress, aesthetic innovation, and freedom that contributed to the New Negro Movement of the 1920s and 1930s. In contrast to traditional understandings of Black modernity as urban and premised on northward migration, McInnis foregrounds rural settings and practices of place making, rootedness, and liberatory agriculture. Shedding new light on the transnational influence of a historically Black institution in the U.S. South, Afterlives of the Plantation remaps Black cultural, intellectual, and political histories down to the very soil. Afterlives of the Plantation: Plotting Agrarian Futures in the Global Black South (Columbia University Press, 2025) is an award-winning monograph earning recognition as a winner of the 2026 S-USIH Annual Book Prize by the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, 2026 Pauli Murray Book Prize in Black Intellectual History by the African American Intellectual History Society, and the 2026 ASALH Book Prize by the Association for the Study of African American Life and History Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies
Built on the grounds of a former cotton plantation, the Tuskegee Institute, founded by Booker T. Washington, offered agricultural and industrial education as a strategy for Black self-determination. There―and in many other communities in the U.S. South, the Caribbean, and Central America―Black people repurposed and regenerated what had been a place of enslavement into a site for imagining alternative futures. Jarvis C. McInnis charts a new account of Black modernity by centering Tuskegee'svision of agrarian worldmaking. He traces the diasporic ties and networks of exchange that linked Black communities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Although Washington is often regarded as an accommodationist, McInnis shows how artists, intellectuals, and political leaders―including George Washington Carver, Jean Price-Mars, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay, and Marcus Garvey―adapted Tuskegee's methods into dynamic strategies for liberation in places like Cuba, Puerto Rico, Haiti, and Jamaica. Even as the legacy of the plantation continued to circumscribe Black life, these thinkers found resources in its ruins to forge new theories and practices of progress, aesthetic innovation, and freedom that contributed to the New Negro Movement of the 1920s and 1930s. In contrast to traditional understandings of Black modernity as urban and premised on northward migration, McInnis foregrounds rural settings and practices of place making, rootedness, and liberatory agriculture. Shedding new light on the transnational influence of a historically Black institution in the U.S. South, Afterlives of the Plantation remaps Black cultural, intellectual, and political histories down to the very soil. Afterlives of the Plantation: Plotting Agrarian Futures in the Global Black South (Columbia University Press, 2025) is an award-winning monograph earning recognition as a winner of the 2026 S-USIH Annual Book Prize by the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, 2026 Pauli Murray Book Prize in Black Intellectual History by the African American Intellectual History Society, and the 2026 ASALH Book Prize by the Association for the Study of African American Life and History Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/environmental-studies
Built on the grounds of a former cotton plantation, the Tuskegee Institute, founded by Booker T. Washington, offered agricultural and industrial education as a strategy for Black self-determination. There―and in many other communities in the U.S. South, the Caribbean, and Central America―Black people repurposed and regenerated what had been a place of enslavement into a site for imagining alternative futures. Jarvis C. McInnis charts a new account of Black modernity by centering Tuskegee'svision of agrarian worldmaking. He traces the diasporic ties and networks of exchange that linked Black communities in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Although Washington is often regarded as an accommodationist, McInnis shows how artists, intellectuals, and political leaders―including George Washington Carver, Jean Price-Mars, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay, and Marcus Garvey―adapted Tuskegee's methods into dynamic strategies for liberation in places like Cuba, Puerto Rico, Haiti, and Jamaica. Even as the legacy of the plantation continued to circumscribe Black life, these thinkers found resources in its ruins to forge new theories and practices of progress, aesthetic innovation, and freedom that contributed to the New Negro Movement of the 1920s and 1930s. In contrast to traditional understandings of Black modernity as urban and premised on northward migration, McInnis foregrounds rural settings and practices of place making, rootedness, and liberatory agriculture. Shedding new light on the transnational influence of a historically Black institution in the U.S. South, Afterlives of the Plantation remaps Black cultural, intellectual, and political histories down to the very soil. Afterlives of the Plantation: Plotting Agrarian Futures in the Global Black South (Columbia University Press, 2025) is an award-winning monograph earning recognition as a winner of the 2026 S-USIH Annual Book Prize by the Society for U.S. Intellectual History, 2026 Pauli Murray Book Prize in Black Intellectual History by the African American Intellectual History Society, and the 2026 ASALH Book Prize by the Association for the Study of African American Life and History Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history
Today, Mike and Tim talk with Alex Wolf, director and content developer at Hope Heals, about her journey from pastor's kid and missionary to one of the key theological voices shaping Hope Heals' work. The conversation centers on how proximity to disability reorients faith, why disability is not a niche category but a universal human story, and what the church misses when it treats accessibility as a program instead of a posture.How does something like Hope Heals embody a kind of disruption to normal church life? How does belonging differ from hospitality, and how does co-creation matter more than merely making room for people?Timestamps:00:00 - Intro07:30 - Introducing Alex Wolf and her connection to Hope Heals12:00 - Growing up in a pastor's home and early faith formation13:00 - Missionary work overseas and the questions that started to surface14:00 - Family, trusted guides, and the freedom to question15:35 - Intellectual and existential wrestling in her 20s17:33 - How Alex first said yes to Hope Heals20:46 - Space to doubt inside a faith-centered parachurch organization20:46 - Space to doubt inside a faith-centered parachurch organization23:00 - Proximity to disability and a new understanding of the Beatitudes25:00 - Why Alex began writing theology of disability31:36 - Invisible wheelchairs and the many forms of hidden limitation39:00 - Why disability should not be treated as a program49:35 - Alex names the lack of ego as the secret ingredient at Hope Heals54:00 - Closing gratitude and final remarksPraxis Thesis: Valuing People With Disabilities as a Gift to SocietyHope Heals WebsiteHope Heals on Instagram: @hopehealsHope Heals Camp WebsiteThe GoodHard Story Podcast on Apple Podcasts and SpotifyTreasures in the Dark: 90 Reflections for Finding Bright Hope Hidden in the Hurting by Katherine Wolf and Alex WolfAs always, we encourage and would love discussion as we pursue. Feel free to email in questions to hello@voxpodcast.com, and to engage the conversation on Facebook and Instagram.We're on YouTube (if you're into that kinda thing): VOXOLOGY TV.Our Merch Store! EtsyLearn more about the Voxology PodcastSubscribe on iTunes or SpotifySupport the Voxology Podcast on PatreonThe Voxology Spotify channel can be found here: Voxology RadioFollow us on Instagram: @voxologypodcast and "like" us on FacebookFollow Mike on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mikeerreMusic in this episode by Timothy John StaffordInstagram & Twitter: @GoneTimothy
Steve Hayes is joined by Jonah Goldberg and Kevin Williamson to discuss Ross Douthat's departure from the New York Times to CBS News and reflect on the times in their careers where they got an issue wrong.The Agenda:—Who Will Replace Ross Douthat?—MAGA representation in media—Intellectual honesty vs. partisan loyalty—Dangers of political journalism—What Kevin's got wrong—What Jonah's got wrong—What Steve's got wrong—NWYT: Good adviceShow notes:—George Will: Defeating Trump should be top priority of conservatives—Kevin: Why I Was Wrong About Head Start—Steve's Florida piece—Nick Catoggio: Which Republicans are deserting Trump? And why? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Civic friendship is not a nicety. For self-governing people, it is a necessity. What happens to a democracy when citizens stop seeing each other as citizens at all? Robert P. George is Princeton's McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions (and known for his enduring friendship with Cornel West) argues that “the collapse of civic friendship is a catastrophic threat to public life.” In this bonus segment from his November 2020 conversation with Evan Rosa, Robert George presents the difference between civility and mere ‘politesse; the habit of wrapping our emotions so tightly around our convictions that we assume a posture of infallibility; and the intellectual humility it takes to consider that a political enemy might have something to teach us as a civic friend. They also discuss the courage required to break ranks—George recounts how he and West, from opposite political poles, each found themselves treated as heretics in 2016 for declining to back their respective party's nominee—and why he urges his students and his own children to cultivate humility, open-mindedness, and courage, knowing exactly what it can cost to stand by a conscientious belief. Episode Highlights ”Civic friendship is actually important for all sorts of policies, but for a self-governing people, for a democratic people, civic friendship is really critically important.” ”But if we do, as we are prone to do, wrap our emotions too tightly around our convictions, then we become dogmatists. Then we become unwilling to consider the possibility that we might be wrong and that a critic might be right.” ”This is hard, but it takes humility to recognize that I might be wrong, not merely about the less important superficial and more trivial things of life, but I might be wrong even about the most important things.” ”Civic friendship, civility is not just politesse … Civility is something deeper. It is genuinely listening to the guy who disagrees with you … listening with an openness to learning, considering whether in fact he might be right.” ”You can't have an open mind unless you have intellectual humility.” ”You can become a heretic very fast by breaking ranks, even on a single issue, if the issue was even moderately important.” ”So I really encourage my young people … to try to develop the virtues of intellectual humility, open-mindedness, and courage, because sometimes courage is going to be needed.” About Robert P. George Robert P. George is the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. A legal philosopher and public intellectual, he has chaired the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and served on the President's Council on Bioethics and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. His books include ”Making Men Moral,” ”In Defense of Natural Law,” and ”Seeking Truth and Speaking Truth,” and, with Cornel West, ”Truth Matters,” a dialogue on fruitful disagreement. A West Virginia native, he plays bluegrass banjo and guitar. Helpful Links and Resources Civic Friendship, Courageous Humility, and Seeking Truth Together, Episode 38 and the full interview for this clip: https://faith.yale.edu/media/civic-friendship-courageous-humility-and-seeking-truth-together Robert P. George's website: https://robertpgeorge.com/ Robert P. George on X: https://twitter.com/McCormickProf Seeking Truth and Speaking Truth: Law and Morality in Our Cultural Moment, George's most recent book: https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/seeking-truth-speaking-truth/ Truth Matters: A Dialogue on Fruitful Disagreement in an Age of Division, by Robert P. George and Cornel West: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Truth-Matters/Robert-P-George/9798888451700 Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality, George's best-known scholarly book: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/making-men-moral-9780198260240 Election of 1800, from the Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia at Monticello: https://www.monticello.org/encyclopedia/election-1800 Show Notes Civic friendship: indispensable and necessary for a self-governing people Fellow citizens recast as enemies to be defeated and destroyed Are elections as existential contests?—with the losing side expecting retaliation, the winning side claiming the norms Breakdown near the founding of the Republic The election of 1800, incumbent John Adams against Thomas Jefferson: https://www.monticello.org/encyclopedia/election-1800 Federalists seeing Jeffersonians as carriers of the French Revolution; Jeffersonians seeing Federalists as would-be British monarchists Antebellum America: North and South unable to imagine sharing one republic Is our identity constructed around belief? Emotional investment in conviction as a good thing in itself Wrapping emotions too tightly, and the slide into dogmatism A practical posture of infallibility Disagreement recoded as moral defect, and friendship ruled out Intellectual humility as the missing virtue Being wrong about the most important things, not just the trivial ones Civility as more than politesse Listening with an openness to learning, not waiting for a turn to speak Honoring the other as a rational creature with something to teach Open-mindedness without paralysis A conservative and a democratic socialist as frequent interlocutors: https://www.cornelwest.com/about/ Courage as a civic virtue Tribalism in formal institutions and informal friend circles alike Becoming a heretic by breaking ranks on a single issue Excommunication, suspicion, and the social cost of independent thought Two friends at opposite poles, both out of step in 2016 Counsel to students and to his own children: humility, open-mindedness, courage #CivicFriendship #IntellectualHumility #Civility #Polarization #RobertPGeorge #CornelWest #FaithAndCulture #ForTheLifeOfTheWorld Production Notes This podcast featured Robert George Hosted and Produced by Evan Rosa Production assistance and editing by Noah Senthil A Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/about Support For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/give
Dr. Kirk Honda answers listener questions about psychotherapy and the therapeutic relationship. Topics include whether intellectual clients are harder to treat, the principles of person-centered therapy and phenomenological listening, how therapists answer: ‘what is therapy', and the benefits and risks of individual sessions within couple therapy. July 31, 2026This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/KIRK to get 10% off your first month.Support us by... Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/joinBecome a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattleContact us/more info... Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contactAbout Dr. Kirk: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/about-dr-kirk-hondaWebsite: https://www.psychologyinseattle.comGet stuff... Merch: https://psychologyinseattle-shop.fourthwall.com/KIRKgram (like Cameo): https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/kirkgramThe Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being. Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
Get your free training from First In Nutrition: https://www.firstinnutrition.com/jppod More from JP Dinnell: https://www.jpdinnell.com/ Therapeutic Recreation Group: https://www.therapeuticrg.org Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therapeutic_rec_group/ Echelon Front Leadership Assessment: https://tinyurl.com/y3v22car Join the conversation on instagram JP Dinnell: http://instagram.com/jpdinnell/ Lucas Pinckard: https://www.instagram.com/lucaspinckard Bruiser Arms: https://www.instagram.com/bruiserarms Echelon Front: https://echelonfront.com/ Little Cattle Co: http://littlecattle.co On The Path Printing: https://www.instagram.com/onthepathprinting What do you do when no one is watching? That's the question at the heart of this episode of the JP Dinnell Podcast. In this Q&A episode, JP Dinnell and Lucas answer listener questions that range from fitness and career growth to leadership, recognition, workplace relationships, and intellectual property. While the questions seem unrelated at first, they all point to one central principle: character is revealed by the decisions you make when taking the shortcut would be easier. JP explains why chasing recognition can quietly become an ego problem, why comparing yourself to others steals both joy and progress, and why the strongest leaders focus on serving others instead of seeking credit. Whether you're leading a business, managing a team, raising a family, or pursuing personal growth, this episode offers practical wisdom for making decisions rooted in integrity rather than convenience. One of the most compelling conversations centers around a listener who created valuable intellectual property while employed by a company. Instead of asking, "What can I legally take?" JP reframes the question: "What is the right thing to do?" His answer highlights the difference between legal rights and ethical leadership, encouraging listeners to think beyond short-term gain and consider reputation, trust, and long-term relationships. JP also discusses: Why recognition shouldn't be your motivation. How to avoid the comparison trap. The importance of building relationships with everyone—not just people who can advance your career. Taking care of your physical health with consistency rather than chasing trends. Choosing integrity even when nobody would know otherwise. This episode is a reminder that leadership begins long before someone gives you a title. It begins with everyday choices, humility, and the willingness to do what is right even when it's difficult. Whether you're a business owner, manager, entrepreneur, military veteran, coach, or someone striving to become a better husband, father, teammate, or leader, this conversation will challenge you to think differently about success, reputation, and character. In this episode: Leadership through integrity Why ego holds people back Building lasting relationships Fitness and longevity Career growth and humility Intellectual property and ethics Making decisions with long-term perspective Character under pressure If this episode encouraged you, consider subscribing to the JP Dinnell Podcast and sharing it with someone who values leadership, ownership, and living with integrity. 00:00 Introduction and Personal Updates 02:47 The Importance of Community Support 06:07 Preparing for Physical Challenges 09:01 Injury Prevention and Recovery Strategies 14:57 The Role of Nutrition and Rest 22:02 Overcoming Comparison and Celebrating Others 25:01 Navigating Personal Growth and Adversity 25:52 Navigating Workplace Recognition and Ego 29:48 The Importance of Building Relationships 30:33 Performance vs. Relationship in the Workplace 34:10 Ethics in Intellectual Property 42:11 Choosing Integrity Over Temptation
Republican Opposition: The Intellectual Force of Robert Taft and the Rise of McCarthy GUEST: Nick BunkerSenator Robert Taft, known as "Mr. Conservative," was a dominant intellectual force in the Republican Party, preparing for a potential 1952 presidential run. Moving away from pre-war isolationism, Taft became a staunch "Asia first" advocate, pushing for the defense of Taiwan with the U.S. Navy. This stance created a sharp divide with Dean Acheson, who feared being branded an "imperialist power." While Taft provided the intellectual foundation for Republican policy, Joe McCarthy emerged as the "wild side" of this movement. Driven by pure ambition, McCarthy hijacked the Republican agenda by shifting the focus from domestic "socialism" to communist subversion within the State Department. Meanwhile, Dwight D. Eisenhower, then president of Columbia University, watched from the sidelines with despair. He worried about the "chaos and confusion" in Washington, the demoralization of the military due to budget cuts, and the lack of a clear strategy for Asia. (3)
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
