POPULARITY
28 episodes with as dreeke
14 episodes with as dreeke
27 episodes with as dreeke
4 episodes with as dreeke
3 episodes with as dreeke
4 episodes with as dreeke
2 episodes with as dreeke
2 episodes with as dreeke
2 episodes with as dreeke
Ex-FBI Chief SHOCKED by Travis Decker's Psychology: 'The Warning Signs Every Mother Missed' In his most candid interview yet, former FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke admits even he was shocked by the psychological complexity of Travis Decker - the father who murdered his three daughters during a routine custody visit. Now, as authorities close in near Highway 97, Dreeke urgently shares what every mother needs to know about the warning signs we all missed. The dual diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and military PTSD created what Dreeke calls "a psychological time bomb." BPD sufferers have 40 times higher suicide risk, but when combined with combat trauma and custody loss, the result was catastrophic. Dreeke walks through the missed opportunities for intervention: the court's failure to recognize homelessness as a critical risk factor, the significance of "off-grid" isolation periods, and why weekend visitation without overnight stays wasn't enough protection. Most shocking: Decker's calculated preparation. His Google searches about relocating to Canada weren't escape fantasies - they were part of what Dreeke identifies as "terminal planning." The 72-hour window before the murders showed classic pre-familicide behavior that trained professionals should have caught. But this isn't about blame - it's about prevention. Dreeke provides his FBI framework for threat assessment that mothers can use immediately. Learn why certain word choices in texts signal escalation, which behaviors indicate someone has "nothing left to lose," and when supervised visitation becomes non-negotiable. As Dreeke emphasizes: "Your gut instinct plus behavioral science equals saved lives." Hashtags: #TravisDecker #RobinDreeke #FBIanalysis #PsychologyOfMurder #BorderlinePersonality #PTSD #FamilicideWarnings #BehavioralRedFlags #CustodyDanger #MothersIntuition #CrimePsychology #MentalHealthCrisis #PreventionSavesLives #DeckerManhunt #TrueCrimePsychology #ChildProtection #DangerousExPartner #WarningSignsMissed #FBIprofiling #SaveOurChildren Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Ex-FBI Chief SHOCKED by Travis Decker's Psychology: 'The Warning Signs Every Mother Missed' In his most candid interview yet, former FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke admits even he was shocked by the psychological complexity of Travis Decker - the father who murdered his three daughters during a routine custody visit. Now, as authorities close in near Highway 97, Dreeke urgently shares what every mother needs to know about the warning signs we all missed. The dual diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and military PTSD created what Dreeke calls "a psychological time bomb." BPD sufferers have 40 times higher suicide risk, but when combined with combat trauma and custody loss, the result was catastrophic. Dreeke walks through the missed opportunities for intervention: the court's failure to recognize homelessness as a critical risk factor, the significance of "off-grid" isolation periods, and why weekend visitation without overnight stays wasn't enough protection. Most shocking: Decker's calculated preparation. His Google searches about relocating to Canada weren't escape fantasies - they were part of what Dreeke identifies as "terminal planning." The 72-hour window before the murders showed classic pre-familicide behavior that trained professionals should have caught. But this isn't about blame - it's about prevention. Dreeke provides his FBI framework for threat assessment that mothers can use immediately. Learn why certain word choices in texts signal escalation, which behaviors indicate someone has "nothing left to lose," and when supervised visitation becomes non-negotiable. As Dreeke emphasizes: "Your gut instinct plus behavioral science equals saved lives." Hashtags: #TravisDecker #RobinDreeke #FBIanalysis #PsychologyOfMurder #BorderlinePersonality #PTSD #FamilicideWarnings #BehavioralRedFlags #CustodyDanger #MothersIntuition #CrimePsychology #MentalHealthCrisis #PreventionSavesLives #DeckerManhunt #TrueCrimePsychology #ChildProtection #DangerousExPartner #WarningSignsMissed #FBIprofiling #SaveOurChildren Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Ex-FBI Chief SHOCKED by Travis Decker's Psychology: 'The Warning Signs Every Mother Missed' In his most candid interview yet, former FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke admits even he was shocked by the psychological complexity of Travis Decker - the father who murdered his three daughters during a routine custody visit. Now, as authorities close in near Highway 97, Dreeke urgently shares what every mother needs to know about the warning signs we all missed. The dual diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and military PTSD created what Dreeke calls "a psychological time bomb." BPD sufferers have 40 times higher suicide risk, but when combined with combat trauma and custody loss, the result was catastrophic. Dreeke walks through the missed opportunities for intervention: the court's failure to recognize homelessness as a critical risk factor, the significance of "off-grid" isolation periods, and why weekend visitation without overnight stays wasn't enough protection. Most shocking: Decker's calculated preparation. His Google searches about relocating to Canada weren't escape fantasies - they were part of what Dreeke identifies as "terminal planning." The 72-hour window before the murders showed classic pre-familicide behavior that trained professionals should have caught. But this isn't about blame - it's about prevention. Dreeke provides his FBI framework for threat assessment that mothers can use immediately. Learn why certain word choices in texts signal escalation, which behaviors indicate someone has "nothing left to lose," and when supervised visitation becomes non-negotiable. As Dreeke emphasizes: "Your gut instinct plus behavioral science equals saved lives." Hashtags: #TravisDecker #RobinDreeke #FBIanalysis #PsychologyOfMurder #BorderlinePersonality #PTSD #FamilicideWarnings #BehavioralRedFlags #CustodyDanger #MothersIntuition #CrimePsychology #MentalHealthCrisis #PreventionSavesLives #DeckerManhunt #TrueCrimePsychology #ChildProtection #DangerousExPartner #WarningSignsMissed #FBIprofiling #SaveOurChildren Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Was Kohberger Living Out His 'American Psycho' Fantasy, Ret FBI Behavior Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke Weighs In What makes someone go from studying crime to allegedly committing one? In this chilling dive into the mind of alleged Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to peel back the layers of psychology, behavior, and eyebrow-raising decisions. A criminology student who allegedly bought a tactical mask and knife long before the crime. A guy who may or may not have ghosted digitally at just the right time. Someone whose online posts eerily aligned with confidential case details—before the arrest. Sound like a coincidence, or just someone who watched American Psycho one too many times? As Dreeke points out, there's a big difference between fantasizing about crime and acting on it—but when that fantasy escalates into alleged planning and execution, the line gets dangerously blurry. We're talking behavioral patterns, emotional voids, creepy social media parallels, and a fascination with crime that might've gone way too far. Also: who poses in a shower, buttoned to the top, with "Psycho" energy radiating from every pixel? Did Bryan Kohberger allegedly leave a breadcrumb trail of his own making—or was he hiding in plain sight, daring the world to figure him out? What was the real switch that flipped—fantasy, feeling, or full-blown psychopathy? #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminologyGoneWrong #AmericanPsychoVibes #RobinDreekeAnalysis Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
What makes someone go from studying crime to allegedly committing one? In this chilling dive into the mind of alleged Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to peel back the layers of psychology, behavior, and eyebrow-raising decisions. A criminology student who allegedly bought a tactical mask and knife long before the crime. A guy who may or may not have ghosted digitally at just the right time. Someone whose online posts eerily aligned with confidential case details—before the arrest. Sound like a coincidence, or just someone who watched American Psycho one too many times? As Dreeke points out, there's a big difference between fantasizing about crime and acting on it—but when that fantasy escalates into alleged planning and execution, the line gets dangerously blurry. We're talking behavioral patterns, emotional voids, creepy social media parallels, and a fascination with crime that might've gone way too far. Also: who poses in a shower, buttoned to the top, with "Psycho" energy radiating from every pixel? Did Bryan Kohberger allegedly leave a breadcrumb trail of his own making—or was he hiding in plain sight, daring the world to figure him out? What was the real switch that flipped—fantasy, feeling, or full-blown psychopathy? #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminologyGoneWrong #AmericanPsychoVibes #RobinDreekeAnalysis Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Was Kohberger Living Out His 'American Psycho' Fantasy, Ret FBI Behavior Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke Weighs In What makes someone go from studying crime to allegedly committing one? In this chilling dive into the mind of alleged Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to peel back the layers of psychology, behavior, and eyebrow-raising decisions. A criminology student who allegedly bought a tactical mask and knife long before the crime. A guy who may or may not have ghosted digitally at just the right time. Someone whose online posts eerily aligned with confidential case details—before the arrest. Sound like a coincidence, or just someone who watched American Psycho one too many times? As Dreeke points out, there's a big difference between fantasizing about crime and acting on it—but when that fantasy escalates into alleged planning and execution, the line gets dangerously blurry. We're talking behavioral patterns, emotional voids, creepy social media parallels, and a fascination with crime that might've gone way too far. Also: who poses in a shower, buttoned to the top, with "Psycho" energy radiating from every pixel? Did Bryan Kohberger allegedly leave a breadcrumb trail of his own making—or was he hiding in plain sight, daring the world to figure him out? What was the real switch that flipped—fantasy, feeling, or full-blown psychopathy? #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminologyGoneWrong #AmericanPsychoVibes #RobinDreekeAnalysis Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What makes someone go from studying crime to allegedly committing one? In this chilling dive into the mind of alleged Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to peel back the layers of psychology, behavior, and eyebrow-raising decisions. A criminology student who allegedly bought a tactical mask and knife long before the crime. A guy who may or may not have ghosted digitally at just the right time. Someone whose online posts eerily aligned with confidential case details—before the arrest. Sound like a coincidence, or just someone who watched American Psycho one too many times? As Dreeke points out, there's a big difference between fantasizing about crime and acting on it—but when that fantasy escalates into alleged planning and execution, the line gets dangerously blurry. We're talking behavioral patterns, emotional voids, creepy social media parallels, and a fascination with crime that might've gone way too far. Also: who poses in a shower, buttoned to the top, with "Psycho" energy radiating from every pixel? Did Bryan Kohberger allegedly leave a breadcrumb trail of his own making—or was he hiding in plain sight, daring the world to figure him out? What was the real switch that flipped—fantasy, feeling, or full-blown psychopathy? #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminologyGoneWrong #AmericanPsychoVibes #RobinDreekeAnalysis Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Delphi Jury Members Were Only Given Part Of The Richard Allen Story Did Richard Allen truly receive a fair trial, or are we all missing something crucial? The case of the alleged Delphi murderer has been a whirlwind of emotions and disbelief for many, including retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Even after the guilty verdict, questions linger about the evidence — or the glaring lack of it. As Dreeke shares his self-doubt and frustration, one can't help but wonder: How did an unspent bullet and a voice ID without scientific backing hold such sway over a jury? And with judges able to restrict defense arguments, are we comfortable with the power they wield over justice? We saw too much, and maybe that's the problem. But did we see what mattered? #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #CourtroomDrama #JusticeSystem #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Did Richard Allen truly receive a fair trial, or are we all missing something crucial? The case of the alleged Delphi murderer has been a whirlwind of emotions and disbelief for many, including retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Even after the guilty verdict, questions linger about the evidence — or the glaring lack of it. As Dreeke shares his self-doubt and frustration, one can't help but wonder: How did an unspent bullet and a voice ID without scientific backing hold such sway over a jury? And with judges able to restrict defense arguments, are we comfortable with the power they wield over justice? We saw too much, and maybe that's the problem. But did we see what mattered? #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #CourtroomDrama #JusticeSystem #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Did Richard Allen truly receive a fair trial, or are we all missing something crucial? The case of the alleged Delphi murderer has been a whirlwind of emotions and disbelief for many, including retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Even after the guilty verdict, questions linger about the evidence — or the glaring lack of it. As Dreeke shares his self-doubt and frustration, one can't help but wonder: How did an unspent bullet and a voice ID without scientific backing hold such sway over a jury? And with judges able to restrict defense arguments, are we comfortable with the power they wield over justice? We saw too much, and maybe that's the problem. But did we see what mattered? #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #CourtroomDrama #JusticeSystem #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Did Richard Allen truly receive a fair trial, or are we all missing something crucial? The case of the alleged Delphi murderer has been a whirlwind of emotions and disbelief for many, including retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Even after the guilty verdict, questions linger about the evidence — or the glaring lack of it. As Dreeke shares his self-doubt and frustration, one can't help but wonder: How did an unspent bullet and a voice ID without scientific backing hold such sway over a jury? And with judges able to restrict defense arguments, are we comfortable with the power they wield over justice? We saw too much, and maybe that's the problem. But did we see what mattered? #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #CourtroomDrama #JusticeSystem #UnansweredQuestions Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What happens when a parent's dream for their child turns into a nightmare? In this episode, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dive into disturbing allegations against Diddy, who is accused of preying on young talent seeking their big break. At the center is a civil lawsuit claiming Diddy allegedly drugged a 10-year-old aspiring rapper, turning a star-studded opportunity into a tragic story of betrayal. As Dreeke breaks down the unsettling nature of grooming in the industry, the discussion takes a hard look at how "trust" can sometimes be used as a weapon. Are parents unknowingly setting their children up for exploitation? And how can they tell the difference between a genuine opportunity and a potential trap? #DiddyAllegations #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimeToday #ParentalGuidance #ProtectOurKids #RobinDreeke Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
What happens when a parent's dream for their child turns into a nightmare? In this episode, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dive into disturbing allegations against Diddy, who is accused of preying on young talent seeking their big break. At the center is a civil lawsuit claiming Diddy allegedly drugged a 10-year-old aspiring rapper, turning a star-studded opportunity into a tragic story of betrayal. As Dreeke breaks down the unsettling nature of grooming in the industry, the discussion takes a hard look at how "trust" can sometimes be used as a weapon. Are parents unknowingly setting their children up for exploitation? And how can they tell the difference between a genuine opportunity and a potential trap? #DiddyAllegations #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimeToday #ParentalGuidance #ProtectOurKids #RobinDreeke Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
What happens when a parent's dream for their child turns into a nightmare? In this episode, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dive into disturbing allegations against Diddy, who is accused of preying on young talent seeking their big break. At the center is a civil lawsuit claiming Diddy allegedly drugged a 10-year-old aspiring rapper, turning a star-studded opportunity into a tragic story of betrayal. As Dreeke breaks down the unsettling nature of grooming in the industry, the discussion takes a hard look at how "trust" can sometimes be used as a weapon. Are parents unknowingly setting their children up for exploitation? And how can they tell the difference between a genuine opportunity and a potential trap? #DiddyAllegations #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimeToday #ParentalGuidance #ProtectOurKids #RobinDreeke Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What happens when a parent's dream for their child turns into a nightmare? In this episode, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dive into disturbing allegations against Diddy, who is accused of preying on young talent seeking their big break. At the center is a civil lawsuit claiming Diddy allegedly drugged a 10-year-old aspiring rapper, turning a star-studded opportunity into a tragic story of betrayal. As Dreeke breaks down the unsettling nature of grooming in the industry, the discussion takes a hard look at how "trust" can sometimes be used as a weapon. Are parents unknowingly setting their children up for exploitation? And how can they tell the difference between a genuine opportunity and a potential trap? #DiddyAllegations #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimeToday #ParentalGuidance #ProtectOurKids #RobinDreeke Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Did the Menendez brothers really face a justice system that understood their trauma—or just one that saw dollar signs? As a new hearing looms, there's talk that these infamous brothers might be home for the holidays. But after 30 years, are we finally ready to reconsider the effects of alleged sexual abuse in this case? Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to discuss the complex legacy of the Menendez trial. With society's views on abuse evolving, could these brothers be about to find the empathy that eluded them decades ago? Or will public opinion once again tip the scales against them, blinded by wealth and jealousy? As Dreeke dives into how cultural biases shaped their conviction, we're left to wonder: has anything really changed, or is history doomed to repeat itself? #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeReform #SocietalBias #AbuseSurvivors #CrimeAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Did the Menendez brothers really face a justice system that understood their trauma—or just one that saw dollar signs? As a new hearing looms, there's talk that these infamous brothers might be home for the holidays. But after 30 years, are we finally ready to reconsider the effects of alleged sexual abuse in this case? Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to discuss the complex legacy of the Menendez trial. With society's views on abuse evolving, could these brothers be about to find the empathy that eluded them decades ago? Or will public opinion once again tip the scales against them, blinded by wealth and jealousy? As Dreeke dives into how cultural biases shaped their conviction, we're left to wonder: has anything really changed, or is history doomed to repeat itself? #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeReform #SocietalBias #AbuseSurvivors #CrimeAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Did the Menendez brothers really face a justice system that understood their trauma—or just one that saw dollar signs? As a new hearing looms, there's talk that these infamous brothers might be home for the holidays. But after 30 years, are we finally ready to reconsider the effects of alleged sexual abuse in this case? Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to discuss the complex legacy of the Menendez trial. With society's views on abuse evolving, could these brothers be about to find the empathy that eluded them decades ago? Or will public opinion once again tip the scales against them, blinded by wealth and jealousy? As Dreeke dives into how cultural biases shaped their conviction, we're left to wonder: has anything really changed, or is history doomed to repeat itself? #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeReform #SocietalBias #AbuseSurvivors #CrimeAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Ever wonder how we can convince ourselves that something utterly absurd is perfectly normal? Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives deep into the psychology behind dangerous groupthink and how power, influence, and a sense of belonging can lead people down dark paths they'd never walk alone. As Dreeke explores cases of alleged celebrity misconduct, he reveals how environments of influence can twist perceptions, making the unthinkable seem almost ordinary. And when the wealthy and powerful create a space where anything goes, does that make it a safe haven for the worst behaviors, or does it merely cloak them in acceptance? Tune in and find out—just how far can influence go before it consumes us all? #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PsychologyOfPower #CelebrityAllegations #GroupThink #RobinDreeke #DarkTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Ever wonder how we can convince ourselves that something utterly absurd is perfectly normal? Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives deep into the psychology behind dangerous groupthink and how power, influence, and a sense of belonging can lead people down dark paths they'd never walk alone. As Dreeke explores cases of alleged celebrity misconduct, he reveals how environments of influence can twist perceptions, making the unthinkable seem almost ordinary. And when the wealthy and powerful create a space where anything goes, does that make it a safe haven for the worst behaviors, or does it merely cloak them in acceptance? Tune in and find out—just how far can influence go before it consumes us all? #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PsychologyOfPower #CelebrityAllegations #GroupThink #RobinDreeke #DarkTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
Ever wonder how we can convince ourselves that something utterly absurd is perfectly normal? Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives deep into the psychology behind dangerous groupthink and how power, influence, and a sense of belonging can lead people down dark paths they'd never walk alone. As Dreeke explores cases of alleged celebrity misconduct, he reveals how environments of influence can twist perceptions, making the unthinkable seem almost ordinary. And when the wealthy and powerful create a space where anything goes, does that make it a safe haven for the worst behaviors, or does it merely cloak them in acceptance? Tune in and find out—just how far can influence go before it consumes us all? #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PsychologyOfPower #CelebrityAllegations #GroupThink #RobinDreeke #DarkTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Ever wonder how we can convince ourselves that something utterly absurd is perfectly normal? Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives deep into the psychology behind dangerous groupthink and how power, influence, and a sense of belonging can lead people down dark paths they'd never walk alone. As Dreeke explores cases of alleged celebrity misconduct, he reveals how environments of influence can twist perceptions, making the unthinkable seem almost ordinary. And when the wealthy and powerful create a space where anything goes, does that make it a safe haven for the worst behaviors, or does it merely cloak them in acceptance? Tune in and find out—just how far can influence go before it consumes us all? #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PsychologyOfPower #CelebrityAllegations #GroupThink #RobinDreeke #DarkTruth Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a pivotal moment that could reshape our understanding of parental accountability, Jennifer Crumbley, alongside her husband James, faces involuntary manslaughter charges in connection to a tragic school shooting executed by their 15-year-old son, Ethan Crumbley, at Oxford High School in Michigan in November 2021. This case, potentially precedent-setting, challenges us to examine the extent of influence and responsibility parents hold in their children's actions, especially when those actions lead to catastrophic outcomes. Tony Brueski, in his podcast "Hidden Killers," engaged with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to delve into the intricate layers of this case and its possible long-reaching effects, both retrospective and prospective. "How much influence, how much assistance, or lack thereof, did the parents play?" Brueski posed, highlighting the essence of the debate surrounding the Crumbleys. Dreeke emphasized the importance of scrutinizing the roles of those in a child's immediate environment, especially parents who are in a position to observe and respond to warning signs. "There are a lot of signs that unhealthy people give off, and this child was giving off a lot of them, and the parents knew about it," he stated. The case against Jennifer Crumbley is bolstered by evidence, including text messages and her presence at the school on the day of the shooting, raising questions about her awareness of her son's mental health issues and the appropriateness of her response—or lack thereof. This situation invites a broader discussion on parental responsibility and the societal expectation for parents to actively engage in preventing potential harm caused by their children. Dreeke referenced historical practices, such as those during the era of Genghis Khan, where family members shared collective responsibility for the actions of individuals within their household, suggesting a framework where closer scrutiny of family dynamics and accountability might be warranted in modern times. The debate extends beyond the legal ramifications for the Crumbleys to a moral and societal inquiry about the extent to which parents should be held responsible for their children's actions. "You know, people really in our society in the last bunch of years have... shuffled the responsibility of raising their children off on someone else," Dreeke remarked, underlining the need for a return to a more engaged and responsible form of parenting. However, the conversation also acknowledged the complexity of such cases. Not every instance of a child's wrongdoing can be directly attributed to parental negligence or lack of intervention. There are cases where despite a healthy and supportive environment, an individual may still choose a path of violence and destruction. This raises the question of how to distinguish between these scenarios and determine the appropriate level of parental accountability. As the legal proceedings against Jennifer and James Crumbley unfold, the outcome may indeed set a legal precedent, influencing how similar cases are viewed and handled in the future. Yet, as Dreeke and Brueski discussed, the implications of such a precedent are nuanced and multifaceted, encompassing legal, moral, and societal dimensions. The Crumbley case forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about parental responsibility, mental health awareness, and the societal mechanisms in place to prevent such tragedies. As Dreeke concluded, the investigation into Jennifer Crumbley's actions and awareness could offer insights into how society might better address these challenges, focusing not solely on the parental role but on the broader context of awareness and action in the face of potential violence. This case beckons us to ponder: If a precedent is set, where do we draw the line between parental oversight and intrusion, between guidance and control? And crucially, how can society support parents in navigating this complex terrain, ensuring the safety of all while fostering a nurturing and healthy environment for the next generation? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a pivotal moment that could reshape our understanding of parental accountability, Jennifer Crumbley, alongside her husband James, faces involuntary manslaughter charges in connection to a tragic school shooting executed by their 15-year-old son, Ethan Crumbley, at Oxford High School in Michigan in November 2021. This case, potentially precedent-setting, challenges us to examine the extent of influence and responsibility parents hold in their children's actions, especially when those actions lead to catastrophic outcomes. Tony Brueski, in his podcast "Hidden Killers," engaged with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to delve into the intricate layers of this case and its possible long-reaching effects, both retrospective and prospective. "How much influence, how much assistance, or lack thereof, did the parents play?" Brueski posed, highlighting the essence of the debate surrounding the Crumbleys. Dreeke emphasized the importance of scrutinizing the roles of those in a child's immediate environment, especially parents who are in a position to observe and respond to warning signs. "There are a lot of signs that unhealthy people give off, and this child was giving off a lot of them, and the parents knew about it," he stated. The case against Jennifer Crumbley is bolstered by evidence, including text messages and her presence at the school on the day of the shooting, raising questions about her awareness of her son's mental health issues and the appropriateness of her response—or lack thereof. This situation invites a broader discussion on parental responsibility and the societal expectation for parents to actively engage in preventing potential harm caused by their children. Dreeke referenced historical practices, such as those during the era of Genghis Khan, where family members shared collective responsibility for the actions of individuals within their household, suggesting a framework where closer scrutiny of family dynamics and accountability might be warranted in modern times. The debate extends beyond the legal ramifications for the Crumbleys to a moral and societal inquiry about the extent to which parents should be held responsible for their children's actions. "You know, people really in our society in the last bunch of years have... shuffled the responsibility of raising their children off on someone else," Dreeke remarked, underlining the need for a return to a more engaged and responsible form of parenting. However, the conversation also acknowledged the complexity of such cases. Not every instance of a child's wrongdoing can be directly attributed to parental negligence or lack of intervention. There are cases where despite a healthy and supportive environment, an individual may still choose a path of violence and destruction. This raises the question of how to distinguish between these scenarios and determine the appropriate level of parental accountability. As the legal proceedings against Jennifer and James Crumbley unfold, the outcome may indeed set a legal precedent, influencing how similar cases are viewed and handled in the future. Yet, as Dreeke and Brueski discussed, the implications of such a precedent are nuanced and multifaceted, encompassing legal, moral, and societal dimensions. The Crumbley case forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about parental responsibility, mental health awareness, and the societal mechanisms in place to prevent such tragedies. As Dreeke concluded, the investigation into Jennifer Crumbley's actions and awareness could offer insights into how society might better address these challenges, focusing not solely on the parental role but on the broader context of awareness and action in the face of potential violence. This case beckons us to ponder: If a precedent is set, where do we draw the line between parental oversight and intrusion, between guidance and control? And crucially, how can society support parents in navigating this complex terrain, ensuring the safety of all while fostering a nurturing and healthy environment for the next generation? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a pivotal moment that could reshape our understanding of parental accountability, Jennifer Crumbley, alongside her husband James, faces involuntary manslaughter charges in connection to a tragic school shooting executed by their 15-year-old son, Ethan Crumbley, at Oxford High School in Michigan in November 2021. This case, potentially precedent-setting, challenges us to examine the extent of influence and responsibility parents hold in their children's actions, especially when those actions lead to catastrophic outcomes. Tony Brueski, in his podcast "Hidden Killers," engaged with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to delve into the intricate layers of this case and its possible long-reaching effects, both retrospective and prospective. "How much influence, how much assistance, or lack thereof, did the parents play?" Brueski posed, highlighting the essence of the debate surrounding the Crumbleys. Dreeke emphasized the importance of scrutinizing the roles of those in a child's immediate environment, especially parents who are in a position to observe and respond to warning signs. "There are a lot of signs that unhealthy people give off, and this child was giving off a lot of them, and the parents knew about it," he stated. The case against Jennifer Crumbley is bolstered by evidence, including text messages and her presence at the school on the day of the shooting, raising questions about her awareness of her son's mental health issues and the appropriateness of her response—or lack thereof. This situation invites a broader discussion on parental responsibility and the societal expectation for parents to actively engage in preventing potential harm caused by their children. Dreeke referenced historical practices, such as those during the era of Genghis Khan, where family members shared collective responsibility for the actions of individuals within their household, suggesting a framework where closer scrutiny of family dynamics and accountability might be warranted in modern times. The debate extends beyond the legal ramifications for the Crumbleys to a moral and societal inquiry about the extent to which parents should be held responsible for their children's actions. "You know, people really in our society in the last bunch of years have... shuffled the responsibility of raising their children off on someone else," Dreeke remarked, underlining the need for a return to a more engaged and responsible form of parenting. However, the conversation also acknowledged the complexity of such cases. Not every instance of a child's wrongdoing can be directly attributed to parental negligence or lack of intervention. There are cases where despite a healthy and supportive environment, an individual may still choose a path of violence and destruction. This raises the question of how to distinguish between these scenarios and determine the appropriate level of parental accountability. As the legal proceedings against Jennifer and James Crumbley unfold, the outcome may indeed set a legal precedent, influencing how similar cases are viewed and handled in the future. Yet, as Dreeke and Brueski discussed, the implications of such a precedent are nuanced and multifaceted, encompassing legal, moral, and societal dimensions. The Crumbley case forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about parental responsibility, mental health awareness, and the societal mechanisms in place to prevent such tragedies. As Dreeke concluded, the investigation into Jennifer Crumbley's actions and awareness could offer insights into how society might better address these challenges, focusing not solely on the parental role but on the broader context of awareness and action in the face of potential violence. This case beckons us to ponder: If a precedent is set, where do we draw the line between parental oversight and intrusion, between guidance and control? And crucially, how can society support parents in navigating this complex terrain, ensuring the safety of all while fostering a nurturing and healthy environment for the next generation? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a case mired in controversy and legal complexities, the possibility of a second trial for Alex Murdaugh hangs in the balance, casting a shadow of doubt over the justice system's integrity. The pivotal figure in this unfolding drama is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court whose actions are now under intense scrutiny. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into the heart of this legal quagmire with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Their conversation raises critical questions: How far can the missteps of one individual skew the scales of justice? And, in the labyrinth of legal procedures, what does it truly take to undo a verdict? As Dreeke points out, the distinction between unethical behavior and outright illegality is crucial. The case hinges on the allegations of jury tampering against Hill, compounded by her son's wiretapping charges and her own plagiarism admission. But proving that her actions swayed the jury's decision is a formidable challenge. The evidentiary hearing, a prelude to the potential retrial, will not focus on Hill's character but rather on her specific interactions with the jurors. As Dreeke eloquently states, “Just because something's a lot of impropriety and ethical questions doesn't make it illegal.” This statement underscores the complex nature of the case, where ethical breaches and legal violations intertwine. However, the implications of Hill's actions extend beyond legal technicalities. They strike at the heart of public trust in the judicial system. If a court official can so profoundly influence a trial's outcome, what does it say about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process? The upcoming hearing will not only determine Murdaugh's fate but also serve as a litmus test for the judicial system's resilience against internal corruption. As Dreeke emphasizes, the real goal is to ascertain whether justice was served. The situation calls for an objective assessment, untainted by emotional attachment, a task made more challenging by the convoluted nature of the allegations. The conversation also delves into the human aspect of the case, particularly the jurors' experiences. They now face the daunting prospect of revisiting their decisions, potentially under a barrage of public and legal scrutiny. How will their testimonies shape the course of the retrial, and what psychological toll will this reappraisal exact on them? As Brueski and Dreeke explore, the juror's dilemma exemplifies the case's broader implications. It's not just about legal precedents or Murdaugh's guilt or innocence. It's a matter of public confidence in a system designed to be impartial and just. If that confidence is shattered, the ripple effects could be far-reaching, affecting not just Murdaugh's case but the very foundations of judicial trust. In the end, the question remains: Will the truth emerge triumphant in this convoluted saga, or will the shadows of doubt and controversy continue to loom large over the justice system? As we await the evidentiary hearing's outcome, the answers to these questions will not only impact Murdaugh's future but also shape public perception of the legal system for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a case mired in controversy and legal complexities, the possibility of a second trial for Alex Murdaugh hangs in the balance, casting a shadow of doubt over the justice system's integrity. The pivotal figure in this unfolding drama is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court whose actions are now under intense scrutiny. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into the heart of this legal quagmire with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Their conversation raises critical questions: How far can the missteps of one individual skew the scales of justice? And, in the labyrinth of legal procedures, what does it truly take to undo a verdict? As Dreeke points out, the distinction between unethical behavior and outright illegality is crucial. The case hinges on the allegations of jury tampering against Hill, compounded by her son's wiretapping charges and her own plagiarism admission. But proving that her actions swayed the jury's decision is a formidable challenge. The evidentiary hearing, a prelude to the potential retrial, will not focus on Hill's character but rather on her specific interactions with the jurors. As Dreeke eloquently states, “Just because something's a lot of impropriety and ethical questions doesn't make it illegal.” This statement underscores the complex nature of the case, where ethical breaches and legal violations intertwine. However, the implications of Hill's actions extend beyond legal technicalities. They strike at the heart of public trust in the judicial system. If a court official can so profoundly influence a trial's outcome, what does it say about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process? The upcoming hearing will not only determine Murdaugh's fate but also serve as a litmus test for the judicial system's resilience against internal corruption. As Dreeke emphasizes, the real goal is to ascertain whether justice was served. The situation calls for an objective assessment, untainted by emotional attachment, a task made more challenging by the convoluted nature of the allegations. The conversation also delves into the human aspect of the case, particularly the jurors' experiences. They now face the daunting prospect of revisiting their decisions, potentially under a barrage of public and legal scrutiny. How will their testimonies shape the course of the retrial, and what psychological toll will this reappraisal exact on them? As Brueski and Dreeke explore, the juror's dilemma exemplifies the case's broader implications. It's not just about legal precedents or Murdaugh's guilt or innocence. It's a matter of public confidence in a system designed to be impartial and just. If that confidence is shattered, the ripple effects could be far-reaching, affecting not just Murdaugh's case but the very foundations of judicial trust. In the end, the question remains: Will the truth emerge triumphant in this convoluted saga, or will the shadows of doubt and controversy continue to loom large over the justice system? As we await the evidentiary hearing's outcome, the answers to these questions will not only impact Murdaugh's future but also shape public perception of the legal system for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a case mired in controversy and legal complexities, the possibility of a second trial for Alex Murdaugh hangs in the balance, casting a shadow of doubt over the justice system's integrity. The pivotal figure in this unfolding drama is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court whose actions are now under intense scrutiny. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into the heart of this legal quagmire with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Their conversation raises critical questions: How far can the missteps of one individual skew the scales of justice? And, in the labyrinth of legal procedures, what does it truly take to undo a verdict? As Dreeke points out, the distinction between unethical behavior and outright illegality is crucial. The case hinges on the allegations of jury tampering against Hill, compounded by her son's wiretapping charges and her own plagiarism admission. But proving that her actions swayed the jury's decision is a formidable challenge. The evidentiary hearing, a prelude to the potential retrial, will not focus on Hill's character but rather on her specific interactions with the jurors. As Dreeke eloquently states, “Just because something's a lot of impropriety and ethical questions doesn't make it illegal.” This statement underscores the complex nature of the case, where ethical breaches and legal violations intertwine. However, the implications of Hill's actions extend beyond legal technicalities. They strike at the heart of public trust in the judicial system. If a court official can so profoundly influence a trial's outcome, what does it say about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process? The upcoming hearing will not only determine Murdaugh's fate but also serve as a litmus test for the judicial system's resilience against internal corruption. As Dreeke emphasizes, the real goal is to ascertain whether justice was served. The situation calls for an objective assessment, untainted by emotional attachment, a task made more challenging by the convoluted nature of the allegations. The conversation also delves into the human aspect of the case, particularly the jurors' experiences. They now face the daunting prospect of revisiting their decisions, potentially under a barrage of public and legal scrutiny. How will their testimonies shape the course of the retrial, and what psychological toll will this reappraisal exact on them? As Brueski and Dreeke explore, the juror's dilemma exemplifies the case's broader implications. It's not just about legal precedents or Murdaugh's guilt or innocence. It's a matter of public confidence in a system designed to be impartial and just. If that confidence is shattered, the ripple effects could be far-reaching, affecting not just Murdaugh's case but the very foundations of judicial trust. In the end, the question remains: Will the truth emerge triumphant in this convoluted saga, or will the shadows of doubt and controversy continue to loom large over the justice system? As we await the evidentiary hearing's outcome, the answers to these questions will not only impact Murdaugh's future but also shape public perception of the legal system for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a case mired in controversy and legal complexities, the possibility of a second trial for Alex Murdaugh hangs in the balance, casting a shadow of doubt over the justice system's integrity. The pivotal figure in this unfolding drama is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court whose actions are now under intense scrutiny. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into the heart of this legal quagmire with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Their conversation raises critical questions: How far can the missteps of one individual skew the scales of justice? And, in the labyrinth of legal procedures, what does it truly take to undo a verdict? As Dreeke points out, the distinction between unethical behavior and outright illegality is crucial. The case hinges on the allegations of jury tampering against Hill, compounded by her son's wiretapping charges and her own plagiarism admission. But proving that her actions swayed the jury's decision is a formidable challenge. The evidentiary hearing, a prelude to the potential retrial, will not focus on Hill's character but rather on her specific interactions with the jurors. As Dreeke eloquently states, “Just because something's a lot of impropriety and ethical questions doesn't make it illegal.” This statement underscores the complex nature of the case, where ethical breaches and legal violations intertwine. However, the implications of Hill's actions extend beyond legal technicalities. They strike at the heart of public trust in the judicial system. If a court official can so profoundly influence a trial's outcome, what does it say about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process? The upcoming hearing will not only determine Murdaugh's fate but also serve as a litmus test for the judicial system's resilience against internal corruption. As Dreeke emphasizes, the real goal is to ascertain whether justice was served. The situation calls for an objective assessment, untainted by emotional attachment, a task made more challenging by the convoluted nature of the allegations. The conversation also delves into the human aspect of the case, particularly the jurors' experiences. They now face the daunting prospect of revisiting their decisions, potentially under a barrage of public and legal scrutiny. How will their testimonies shape the course of the retrial, and what psychological toll will this reappraisal exact on them? As Brueski and Dreeke explore, the juror's dilemma exemplifies the case's broader implications. It's not just about legal precedents or Murdaugh's guilt or innocence. It's a matter of public confidence in a system designed to be impartial and just. If that confidence is shattered, the ripple effects could be far-reaching, affecting not just Murdaugh's case but the very foundations of judicial trust. In the end, the question remains: Will the truth emerge triumphant in this convoluted saga, or will the shadows of doubt and controversy continue to loom large over the justice system? As we await the evidentiary hearing's outcome, the answers to these questions will not only impact Murdaugh's future but also shape public perception of the legal system for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications. Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims. The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through." What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit. An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims. Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident. The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm. As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars. The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications. Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims. The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through." What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit. An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims. Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident. The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm. As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars. The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications. Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims. The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through." What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit. An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims. Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident. The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm. As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars. The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications. Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims. The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through." What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit. An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims. Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident. The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm. As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars. The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Delphi murder case, involving suspect Richard Allen, has increasingly become a focal point for discussions not only about the crime itself but also about the treatment of the accused in the judicial system. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, exploring the complexities of Allen's situation, both in prison and in the courtroom. At the heart of the matter are allegations of abuse within the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. Robert Baston, a fellow inmate, initially voiced concerns about Allen's mistreatment by staff but later refrained from testifying, citing fears for his safety. Dreeke, with his extensive FBI experience, offered insights into the dynamics at play in such environments. "Prisoners lie sometimes, and especially convicted sex offenders," he stated, acknowledging the difficulty in verifying such claims. The conversation then shifted to the actions of Judge Gull, who recently released a transcript revealing her interactions with Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The document brought to light what many had suspected: a forceful, almost threatening stance by the judge towards the defense lawyers. Dreeke's analysis of the situation was clear: "Judges aren't god," he remarked, emphasizing that while judges hold significant power, their decisions are subject to review and reversal by higher courts. Dreeke also highlighted the importance of checks and balances within the judicial system, noting that increased scrutiny and media attention, like that on the Delphi case, can prompt necessary investigations and corrections. He remained optimistic about the system's ability to self-correct, despite its imperfections and bureaucratic complexities. However, the revelations about Judge Gull's conduct and the alleged prison abuse raise serious questions about the fairness of Allen's trial and the treatment of suspects within the criminal justice system. As Dreeke pointedly noted, "If there was abuse that's going on that is inappropriate, I would think that it's already going to be coming to light." The discussion on "Hidden Killers" brought to the forefront the need for transparency and accountability in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. With the world watching, the manner in which Richard Allen's case is handled could set a precedent for future legal proceedings, especially in cases attracting significant public interest. As the conversation concluded, Brueski and Dreeke agreed on the need for a focus shift back to the core of the case: seeking justice for the victims. The numerous side issues, while important, should not overshadow the primary goal of determining the truth behind the tragic deaths of two young girls. With the Delphi case continuing to unfold, the lingering question remains: Can the justice system navigate its own complexities and ensure a fair and just outcome for all involved? Only time will tell, but the watchful eyes of the public remain fixed on every twist and turn of this compelling and deeply troubling case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Delphi murder case, involving suspect Richard Allen, has increasingly become a focal point for discussions not only about the crime itself but also about the treatment of the accused in the judicial system. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, exploring the complexities of Allen's situation, both in prison and in the courtroom. At the heart of the matter are allegations of abuse within the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. Robert Baston, a fellow inmate, initially voiced concerns about Allen's mistreatment by staff but later refrained from testifying, citing fears for his safety. Dreeke, with his extensive FBI experience, offered insights into the dynamics at play in such environments. "Prisoners lie sometimes, and especially convicted sex offenders," he stated, acknowledging the difficulty in verifying such claims. The conversation then shifted to the actions of Judge Gull, who recently released a transcript revealing her interactions with Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The document brought to light what many had suspected: a forceful, almost threatening stance by the judge towards the defense lawyers. Dreeke's analysis of the situation was clear: "Judges aren't god," he remarked, emphasizing that while judges hold significant power, their decisions are subject to review and reversal by higher courts. Dreeke also highlighted the importance of checks and balances within the judicial system, noting that increased scrutiny and media attention, like that on the Delphi case, can prompt necessary investigations and corrections. He remained optimistic about the system's ability to self-correct, despite its imperfections and bureaucratic complexities. However, the revelations about Judge Gull's conduct and the alleged prison abuse raise serious questions about the fairness of Allen's trial and the treatment of suspects within the criminal justice system. As Dreeke pointedly noted, "If there was abuse that's going on that is inappropriate, I would think that it's already going to be coming to light." The discussion on "Hidden Killers" brought to the forefront the need for transparency and accountability in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. With the world watching, the manner in which Richard Allen's case is handled could set a precedent for future legal proceedings, especially in cases attracting significant public interest. As the conversation concluded, Brueski and Dreeke agreed on the need for a focus shift back to the core of the case: seeking justice for the victims. The numerous side issues, while important, should not overshadow the primary goal of determining the truth behind the tragic deaths of two young girls. With the Delphi case continuing to unfold, the lingering question remains: Can the justice system navigate its own complexities and ensure a fair and just outcome for all involved? Only time will tell, but the watchful eyes of the public remain fixed on every twist and turn of this compelling and deeply troubling case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Delphi murder case, involving suspect Richard Allen, has increasingly become a focal point for discussions not only about the crime itself but also about the treatment of the accused in the judicial system. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, exploring the complexities of Allen's situation, both in prison and in the courtroom. At the heart of the matter are allegations of abuse within the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. Robert Baston, a fellow inmate, initially voiced concerns about Allen's mistreatment by staff but later refrained from testifying, citing fears for his safety. Dreeke, with his extensive FBI experience, offered insights into the dynamics at play in such environments. "Prisoners lie sometimes, and especially convicted sex offenders," he stated, acknowledging the difficulty in verifying such claims. The conversation then shifted to the actions of Judge Gull, who recently released a transcript revealing her interactions with Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The document brought to light what many had suspected: a forceful, almost threatening stance by the judge towards the defense lawyers. Dreeke's analysis of the situation was clear: "Judges aren't god," he remarked, emphasizing that while judges hold significant power, their decisions are subject to review and reversal by higher courts. Dreeke also highlighted the importance of checks and balances within the judicial system, noting that increased scrutiny and media attention, like that on the Delphi case, can prompt necessary investigations and corrections. He remained optimistic about the system's ability to self-correct, despite its imperfections and bureaucratic complexities. However, the revelations about Judge Gull's conduct and the alleged prison abuse raise serious questions about the fairness of Allen's trial and the treatment of suspects within the criminal justice system. As Dreeke pointedly noted, "If there was abuse that's going on that is inappropriate, I would think that it's already going to be coming to light." The discussion on "Hidden Killers" brought to the forefront the need for transparency and accountability in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. With the world watching, the manner in which Richard Allen's case is handled could set a precedent for future legal proceedings, especially in cases attracting significant public interest. As the conversation concluded, Brueski and Dreeke agreed on the need for a focus shift back to the core of the case: seeking justice for the victims. The numerous side issues, while important, should not overshadow the primary goal of determining the truth behind the tragic deaths of two young girls. With the Delphi case continuing to unfold, the lingering question remains: Can the justice system navigate its own complexities and ensure a fair and just outcome for all involved? Only time will tell, but the watchful eyes of the public remain fixed on every twist and turn of this compelling and deeply troubling case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The Delphi murder case, involving suspect Richard Allen, has increasingly become a focal point for discussions not only about the crime itself but also about the treatment of the accused in the judicial system. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, exploring the complexities of Allen's situation, both in prison and in the courtroom. At the heart of the matter are allegations of abuse within the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. Robert Baston, a fellow inmate, initially voiced concerns about Allen's mistreatment by staff but later refrained from testifying, citing fears for his safety. Dreeke, with his extensive FBI experience, offered insights into the dynamics at play in such environments. "Prisoners lie sometimes, and especially convicted sex offenders," he stated, acknowledging the difficulty in verifying such claims. The conversation then shifted to the actions of Judge Gull, who recently released a transcript revealing her interactions with Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. The document brought to light what many had suspected: a forceful, almost threatening stance by the judge towards the defense lawyers. Dreeke's analysis of the situation was clear: "Judges aren't god," he remarked, emphasizing that while judges hold significant power, their decisions are subject to review and reversal by higher courts. Dreeke also highlighted the importance of checks and balances within the judicial system, noting that increased scrutiny and media attention, like that on the Delphi case, can prompt necessary investigations and corrections. He remained optimistic about the system's ability to self-correct, despite its imperfections and bureaucratic complexities. However, the revelations about Judge Gull's conduct and the alleged prison abuse raise serious questions about the fairness of Allen's trial and the treatment of suspects within the criminal justice system. As Dreeke pointedly noted, "If there was abuse that's going on that is inappropriate, I would think that it's already going to be coming to light." The discussion on "Hidden Killers" brought to the forefront the need for transparency and accountability in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. With the world watching, the manner in which Richard Allen's case is handled could set a precedent for future legal proceedings, especially in cases attracting significant public interest. As the conversation concluded, Brueski and Dreeke agreed on the need for a focus shift back to the core of the case: seeking justice for the victims. The numerous side issues, while important, should not overshadow the primary goal of determining the truth behind the tragic deaths of two young girls. With the Delphi case continuing to unfold, the lingering question remains: Can the justice system navigate its own complexities and ensure a fair and just outcome for all involved? Only time will tell, but the watchful eyes of the public remain fixed on every twist and turn of this compelling and deeply troubling case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the perplexing saga of the Gilgo Beach murders, is Rex Heuermann merely a piece of a much larger, more intricate puzzle? This pressing question emerges amidst new developments and allegations surrounding Heuermann and his wife, Asa Ellerup, brought forward by renowned retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Speaking with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Dreeke delved into the latest updates from John Ray, the defense attorney representing some of the Gilgo Beach victims. According to Ray, new witnesses have come forward with signed affidavits detailing Heuermann's involvement in swinging clubs in the late 1990s. This new evidence suggests that Heuermann, along with his wife, might have been part of a disturbing narrative that connects to several murders and the seedy underbelly of sex trafficking. Dreeke highlighted the significance of these developments, noting, "He's got this behavior arc of a stalker of someone looking for victims... and the thing that really struck me was that one of the girls that went to the house was a couple that was supposed to do swapping with Heuermann, his wife, and another girl they brought in, which was one of the victims." This revelation not only implicates Heuermann in more sordid activities but also raises questions about the involvement and knowledge of his wife, Asa. The allegations don't directly accuse her of knowing about the murders, but they do suggest she might have been aware of her husband's deviant behaviors. Furthermore, the involvement of a law enforcement detective from the NYPD in these activities adds another layer of complexity to the case. "This is what's bothered me on this... the allegations that other law enforcement professionals and detectives, not even from Long Island, were part of seeing it," Dreeke expressed his concerns. The recent resignation of Suffolk County Police Commissioner Rodney Harrison, amidst these unfolding events, adds to the intrigue. Brueski pointed out, "It just seems a little odd... Are you getting too close to something far bigger than even Rex Heuermann?" This sudden departure, coupled with the murky history of former police chief James Burke, hints at a potentially deeper corruption within the law enforcement ranks. The case takes another turn with the allegation of Asa Ellerup's presence and possible awareness of Heuermann's actions. "One of the witnesses... alleges she had with Ellerup in the upstairs of their home, as she alleges Rex went downstairs and had sex with her boyfriend," Brueski detailed. This interaction, if true, may shed light on Asa's understanding of her husband's lifestyle and the types of people he associated with. The complexity of the case is further compounded by the lack of transparency and missteps by law enforcement. Dreeke pointed out, "There's something off with how they treated her in that house... when they're all their statements and still are that Asa is innocent and not aware of it, then why did you treat her and her kids and the premises so horrendously?" As new allegations and evidence surface, one can't help but wonder if Rex Heuermann's case is just the tip of an iceberg, hinting at a much larger, darker network. The role of Asa, the involvement of law enforcement, and the sudden resignation of key figures paint a complex picture that demands scrutiny and investigation. As Dreeke and Brueski continue to unravel this tangled web, one question remains: How deep does the rabbit hole of the Gilgo Beach murders go, and what more will we uncover about Rex Heuermann and those connected to him? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In the perplexing saga of the Gilgo Beach murders, is Rex Heuermann merely a piece of a much larger, more intricate puzzle? This pressing question emerges amidst new developments and allegations surrounding Heuermann and his wife, Asa Ellerup, brought forward by renowned retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Speaking with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Dreeke delved into the latest updates from John Ray, the defense attorney representing some of the Gilgo Beach victims. According to Ray, new witnesses have come forward with signed affidavits detailing Heuermann's involvement in swinging clubs in the late 1990s. This new evidence suggests that Heuermann, along with his wife, might have been part of a disturbing narrative that connects to several murders and the seedy underbelly of sex trafficking. Dreeke highlighted the significance of these developments, noting, "He's got this behavior arc of a stalker of someone looking for victims... and the thing that really struck me was that one of the girls that went to the house was a couple that was supposed to do swapping with Heuermann, his wife, and another girl they brought in, which was one of the victims." This revelation not only implicates Heuermann in more sordid activities but also raises questions about the involvement and knowledge of his wife, Asa. The allegations don't directly accuse her of knowing about the murders, but they do suggest she might have been aware of her husband's deviant behaviors. Furthermore, the involvement of a law enforcement detective from the NYPD in these activities adds another layer of complexity to the case. "This is what's bothered me on this... the allegations that other law enforcement professionals and detectives, not even from Long Island, were part of seeing it," Dreeke expressed his concerns. The recent resignation of Suffolk County Police Commissioner Rodney Harrison, amidst these unfolding events, adds to the intrigue. Brueski pointed out, "It just seems a little odd... Are you getting too close to something far bigger than even Rex Heuermann?" This sudden departure, coupled with the murky history of former police chief James Burke, hints at a potentially deeper corruption within the law enforcement ranks. The case takes another turn with the allegation of Asa Ellerup's presence and possible awareness of Heuermann's actions. "One of the witnesses... alleges she had with Ellerup in the upstairs of their home, as she alleges Rex went downstairs and had sex with her boyfriend," Brueski detailed. This interaction, if true, may shed light on Asa's understanding of her husband's lifestyle and the types of people he associated with. The complexity of the case is further compounded by the lack of transparency and missteps by law enforcement. Dreeke pointed out, "There's something off with how they treated her in that house... when they're all their statements and still are that Asa is innocent and not aware of it, then why did you treat her and her kids and the premises so horrendously?" As new allegations and evidence surface, one can't help but wonder if Rex Heuermann's case is just the tip of an iceberg, hinting at a much larger, darker network. The role of Asa, the involvement of law enforcement, and the sudden resignation of key figures paint a complex picture that demands scrutiny and investigation. As Dreeke and Brueski continue to unravel this tangled web, one question remains: How deep does the rabbit hole of the Gilgo Beach murders go, and what more will we uncover about Rex Heuermann and those connected to him? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the perplexing saga of the Gilgo Beach murders, is Rex Heuermann merely a piece of a much larger, more intricate puzzle? This pressing question emerges amidst new developments and allegations surrounding Heuermann and his wife, Asa Ellerup, brought forward by renowned retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke. Speaking with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Dreeke delved into the latest updates from John Ray, the defense attorney representing some of the Gilgo Beach victims. According to Ray, new witnesses have come forward with signed affidavits detailing Heuermann's involvement in swinging clubs in the late 1990s. This new evidence suggests that Heuermann, along with his wife, might have been part of a disturbing narrative that connects to several murders and the seedy underbelly of sex trafficking. Dreeke highlighted the significance of these developments, noting, "He's got this behavior arc of a stalker of someone looking for victims... and the thing that really struck me was that one of the girls that went to the house was a couple that was supposed to do swapping with Heuermann, his wife, and another girl they brought in, which was one of the victims." This revelation not only implicates Heuermann in more sordid activities but also raises questions about the involvement and knowledge of his wife, Asa. The allegations don't directly accuse her of knowing about the murders, but they do suggest she might have been aware of her husband's deviant behaviors. Furthermore, the involvement of a law enforcement detective from the NYPD in these activities adds another layer of complexity to the case. "This is what's bothered me on this... the allegations that other law enforcement professionals and detectives, not even from Long Island, were part of seeing it," Dreeke expressed his concerns. The recent resignation of Suffolk County Police Commissioner Rodney Harrison, amidst these unfolding events, adds to the intrigue. Brueski pointed out, "It just seems a little odd... Are you getting too close to something far bigger than even Rex Heuermann?" This sudden departure, coupled with the murky history of former police chief James Burke, hints at a potentially deeper corruption within the law enforcement ranks. The case takes another turn with the allegation of Asa Ellerup's presence and possible awareness of Heuermann's actions. "One of the witnesses... alleges she had with Ellerup in the upstairs of their home, as she alleges Rex went downstairs and had sex with her boyfriend," Brueski detailed. This interaction, if true, may shed light on Asa's understanding of her husband's lifestyle and the types of people he associated with. The complexity of the case is further compounded by the lack of transparency and missteps by law enforcement. Dreeke pointed out, "There's something off with how they treated her in that house... when they're all their statements and still are that Asa is innocent and not aware of it, then why did you treat her and her kids and the premises so horrendously?" As new allegations and evidence surface, one can't help but wonder if Rex Heuermann's case is just the tip of an iceberg, hinting at a much larger, darker network. The role of Asa, the involvement of law enforcement, and the sudden resignation of key figures paint a complex picture that demands scrutiny and investigation. As Dreeke and Brueski continue to unravel this tangled web, one question remains: How deep does the rabbit hole of the Gilgo Beach murders go, and what more will we uncover about Rex Heuermann and those connected to him? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What if a person's body language could reveal more than their words in the face of overwhelming evidence? This question hovers over the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the enigmatic courtroom demeanor of Bryan Kohberger with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and expert in behavioral analysis. In a riveting conversation, Dreeke decodes the subtleties of Kohberger's behavior, particularly his hand steepling—a gesture often associated with confidence—which struck observers as incongruent with his precarious legal situation. "Having that high steeple... it keeps following the arc of what I have said from the very beginning with him," Dreeke explained. "He's got this aura of I know more than everyone... and he can't believe he got an F because he got caught." The discussion unfolds around the intricate tapestry of Kohberger's alleged actions and the psychological underpinnings that might explain them. Brueski and Dreeke speculate on the possible motivations driving Kohberger, pondering whether his actions were a bid for a form of recognition that had always eluded him. "But why? Why would one want to do this?" Brueski asks, delving into Kohberger's troubled history with women and social interactions. Kohberger's courtroom behavior suggests an individual caught in the web of his grandiosity. As Dreeke points out, "That's not what you want to show a jury." He adds, "Having that kind of arrogance and overconfidence, it's, I think, a fatal flaw of his in that courtroom that day." Their conversation goes deeper, examining a theory that could belong in psychological thrillers: Kohberger's heinous acts could stem from a desperate need for attention, even if it meant attracting it from behind bars—a concept not unheard of but unusual in its application here. "He always has had issues... of not having good relations with women. But very much desiring relationships with women," Brueski muses, building a profile of a man whose actions seem to paint a portrait of deep-seated issues and a craving for notoriety. The podcast delves into Kohberger's academic past, his study of criminal behavior, and how this may have intersected with his alleged criminal acts. The hosts ponder whether his knowledge and research were used as a twisted framework for his actions. "He studied some of the worst people out there... But one thing that most of those people that are behind bars did get after committing crimes? Women. They got attention from women," Brueski continues, highlighting a paradox that Kohberger might have found himself in. Dreeke chimes in with expertise, speculating that Kohberger might be finding new stimulus in the attention his case is generating, especially from women—like his defense attorney—which could be fueling his courtroom confidence. "He's transformed the pleasure and emotional stimulus he was getting from the action of planning the murder, doing the murder. And now that he's getting attention, he's utilizing that as his fuel," Dreeke postulates. The discussion on "Hidden Killers" comes to a close with Brueski and Dreeke questioning the source of Kohberger's courtroom confidence, a confidence seemingly unfounded given the evidence stacking against him. They leave listeners with a chilling question to ponder: "Where is the fuel coming from and why?" This question encapsulates the enigma of Kohberger, inviting audiences to reflect on the nature of criminal confidence and the psychological machinations that drive it. Could it be that Kohberger's actions and his courtroom demeanor are part of a larger, more disturbing narrative, one that we are only beginning to understand? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
What if a person's body language could reveal more than their words in the face of overwhelming evidence? This question hovers over the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the enigmatic courtroom demeanor of Bryan Kohberger with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and expert in behavioral analysis. In a riveting conversation, Dreeke decodes the subtleties of Kohberger's behavior, particularly his hand steepling—a gesture often associated with confidence—which struck observers as incongruent with his precarious legal situation. "Having that high steeple... it keeps following the arc of what I have said from the very beginning with him," Dreeke explained. "He's got this aura of I know more than everyone... and he can't believe he got an F because he got caught." The discussion unfolds around the intricate tapestry of Kohberger's alleged actions and the psychological underpinnings that might explain them. Brueski and Dreeke speculate on the possible motivations driving Kohberger, pondering whether his actions were a bid for a form of recognition that had always eluded him. "But why? Why would one want to do this?" Brueski asks, delving into Kohberger's troubled history with women and social interactions. Kohberger's courtroom behavior suggests an individual caught in the web of his grandiosity. As Dreeke points out, "That's not what you want to show a jury." He adds, "Having that kind of arrogance and overconfidence, it's, I think, a fatal flaw of his in that courtroom that day." Their conversation goes deeper, examining a theory that could belong in psychological thrillers: Kohberger's heinous acts could stem from a desperate need for attention, even if it meant attracting it from behind bars—a concept not unheard of but unusual in its application here. "He always has had issues... of not having good relations with women. But very much desiring relationships with women," Brueski muses, building a profile of a man whose actions seem to paint a portrait of deep-seated issues and a craving for notoriety. The podcast delves into Kohberger's academic past, his study of criminal behavior, and how this may have intersected with his alleged criminal acts. The hosts ponder whether his knowledge and research were used as a twisted framework for his actions. "He studied some of the worst people out there... But one thing that most of those people that are behind bars did get after committing crimes? Women. They got attention from women," Brueski continues, highlighting a paradox that Kohberger might have found himself in. Dreeke chimes in with expertise, speculating that Kohberger might be finding new stimulus in the attention his case is generating, especially from women—like his defense attorney—which could be fueling his courtroom confidence. "He's transformed the pleasure and emotional stimulus he was getting from the action of planning the murder, doing the murder. And now that he's getting attention, he's utilizing that as his fuel," Dreeke postulates. The discussion on "Hidden Killers" comes to a close with Brueski and Dreeke questioning the source of Kohberger's courtroom confidence, a confidence seemingly unfounded given the evidence stacking against him. They leave listeners with a chilling question to ponder: "Where is the fuel coming from and why?" This question encapsulates the enigma of Kohberger, inviting audiences to reflect on the nature of criminal confidence and the psychological machinations that drive it. Could it be that Kohberger's actions and his courtroom demeanor are part of a larger, more disturbing narrative, one that we are only beginning to understand? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What if a person's body language could reveal more than their words in the face of overwhelming evidence? This question hovers over the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the enigmatic courtroom demeanor of Bryan Kohberger with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and expert in behavioral analysis. In a riveting conversation, Dreeke decodes the subtleties of Kohberger's behavior, particularly his hand steepling—a gesture often associated with confidence—which struck observers as incongruent with his precarious legal situation. "Having that high steeple... it keeps following the arc of what I have said from the very beginning with him," Dreeke explained. "He's got this aura of I know more than everyone... and he can't believe he got an F because he got caught." The discussion unfolds around the intricate tapestry of Kohberger's alleged actions and the psychological underpinnings that might explain them. Brueski and Dreeke speculate on the possible motivations driving Kohberger, pondering whether his actions were a bid for a form of recognition that had always eluded him. "But why? Why would one want to do this?" Brueski asks, delving into Kohberger's troubled history with women and social interactions. Kohberger's courtroom behavior suggests an individual caught in the web of his grandiosity. As Dreeke points out, "That's not what you want to show a jury." He adds, "Having that kind of arrogance and overconfidence, it's, I think, a fatal flaw of his in that courtroom that day." Their conversation goes deeper, examining a theory that could belong in psychological thrillers: Kohberger's heinous acts could stem from a desperate need for attention, even if it meant attracting it from behind bars—a concept not unheard of but unusual in its application here. "He always has had issues... of not having good relations with women. But very much desiring relationships with women," Brueski muses, building a profile of a man whose actions seem to paint a portrait of deep-seated issues and a craving for notoriety. The podcast delves into Kohberger's academic past, his study of criminal behavior, and how this may have intersected with his alleged criminal acts. The hosts ponder whether his knowledge and research were used as a twisted framework for his actions. "He studied some of the worst people out there... But one thing that most of those people that are behind bars did get after committing crimes? Women. They got attention from women," Brueski continues, highlighting a paradox that Kohberger might have found himself in. Dreeke chimes in with expertise, speculating that Kohberger might be finding new stimulus in the attention his case is generating, especially from women—like his defense attorney—which could be fueling his courtroom confidence. "He's transformed the pleasure and emotional stimulus he was getting from the action of planning the murder, doing the murder. And now that he's getting attention, he's utilizing that as his fuel," Dreeke postulates. The discussion on "Hidden Killers" comes to a close with Brueski and Dreeke questioning the source of Kohberger's courtroom confidence, a confidence seemingly unfounded given the evidence stacking against him. They leave listeners with a chilling question to ponder: "Where is the fuel coming from and why?" This question encapsulates the enigma of Kohberger, inviting audiences to reflect on the nature of criminal confidence and the psychological machinations that drive it. Could it be that Kohberger's actions and his courtroom demeanor are part of a larger, more disturbing narrative, one that we are only beginning to understand? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
What if a person's body language could reveal more than their words in the face of overwhelming evidence? This question hovers over the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the enigmatic courtroom demeanor of Bryan Kohberger with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and expert in behavioral analysis. In a riveting conversation, Dreeke decodes the subtleties of Kohberger's behavior, particularly his hand steepling—a gesture often associated with confidence—which struck observers as incongruent with his precarious legal situation. "Having that high steeple... it keeps following the arc of what I have said from the very beginning with him," Dreeke explained. "He's got this aura of I know more than everyone... and he can't believe he got an F because he got caught." The discussion unfolds around the intricate tapestry of Kohberger's alleged actions and the psychological underpinnings that might explain them. Brueski and Dreeke speculate on the possible motivations driving Kohberger, pondering whether his actions were a bid for a form of recognition that had always eluded him. "But why? Why would one want to do this?" Brueski asks, delving into Kohberger's troubled history with women and social interactions. Kohberger's courtroom behavior suggests an individual caught in the web of his grandiosity. As Dreeke points out, "That's not what you want to show a jury." He adds, "Having that kind of arrogance and overconfidence, it's, I think, a fatal flaw of his in that courtroom that day." Their conversation goes deeper, examining a theory that could belong in psychological thrillers: Kohberger's heinous acts could stem from a desperate need for attention, even if it meant attracting it from behind bars—a concept not unheard of but unusual in its application here. "He always has had issues... of not having good relations with women. But very much desiring relationships with women," Brueski muses, building a profile of a man whose actions seem to paint a portrait of deep-seated issues and a craving for notoriety. The podcast delves into Kohberger's academic past, his study of criminal behavior, and how this may have intersected with his alleged criminal acts. The hosts ponder whether his knowledge and research were used as a twisted framework for his actions. "He studied some of the worst people out there... But one thing that most of those people that are behind bars did get after committing crimes? Women. They got attention from women," Brueski continues, highlighting a paradox that Kohberger might have found himself in. Dreeke chimes in with expertise, speculating that Kohberger might be finding new stimulus in the attention his case is generating, especially from women—like his defense attorney—which could be fueling his courtroom confidence. "He's transformed the pleasure and emotional stimulus he was getting from the action of planning the murder, doing the murder. And now that he's getting attention, he's utilizing that as his fuel," Dreeke postulates. The discussion on "Hidden Killers" comes to a close with Brueski and Dreeke questioning the source of Kohberger's courtroom confidence, a confidence seemingly unfounded given the evidence stacking against him. They leave listeners with a chilling question to ponder: "Where is the fuel coming from and why?" This question encapsulates the enigma of Kohberger, inviting audiences to reflect on the nature of criminal confidence and the psychological machinations that drive it. Could it be that Kohberger's actions and his courtroom demeanor are part of a larger, more disturbing narrative, one that we are only beginning to understand? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Who would have thought that in an age where surveillance is omnipresent, and technology has seeped into the deepest corners of our lives, a murder case with seemingly significant evidence would remain unsolved? The perplexing story of Rachel Morin, the unfortunate victim found brutally murdered along her jogging path, showcases this very enigma. The tragedy of Morin's death is amplified by the fact that, despite video evidence and DNA samples, the identity of her killer remains unknown. The case was the subject of a deep dive on the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski. He spoke with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to understand the challenges law enforcement faces in such cases. It initially appeared to be a straightforward investigation. "They got some DNA shortly after this horrific crime took place," Brueski began. The DNA sample was matched with evidence from a home invasion in Los Angeles. But this lead, which once seemed promising, went cold as well. Dreeke shed light on the complexities of the investigation, “Even though we didn't have any arrests right along, we had an area where you have people that probably frequent routinely.” He emphasized the non-random nature of many murders, hinting at a potential connection between the killer and Morin via social media or dating sites. “I'm thinking this is someone that was probably tracked,” Dreeke suggested. But the most baffling aspect? The lack of a digital footprint. In an era where nearly everyone's every move is chronicled online, the absence of such evidence is a glaring anomaly. Comparing it to another case, Dreeke explained, “He's existing on the goodwill of being a day labor and family members and friend members. It's easy to stay off the grid.” Adding to the mystery is video footage showing the suspected killer leaving a residence. The man appeared to exit in a non-hostile manner, with someone even closing the door behind him. This begs the question: Was the home invasion not as it seemed? Dreeke seemed equally puzzled, “It looked like someone closed the door behind him. Doesn't seem like any home invasion I've ever heard of.” Despite the mounting challenges, law enforcement remains relentless in their pursuit of the truth. As Dreeke concluded, “I completely believe they're doing a great job of due diligence with the resources.” Still, for Rachel Morin's family and the public, the burning question remains: With so much evidence, why is the killer still at large? If our digital lives are as transparent as they seem, what's enabling this murderer to remain in the shadows? This unsettling paradox is something we all might ponder as we hope for justice in the tragic case of Rachel Morin. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Who would have thought that in an age where surveillance is omnipresent, and technology has seeped into the deepest corners of our lives, a murder case with seemingly significant evidence would remain unsolved? The perplexing story of Rachel Morin, the unfortunate victim found brutally murdered along her jogging path, showcases this very enigma. The tragedy of Morin's death is amplified by the fact that, despite video evidence and DNA samples, the identity of her killer remains unknown. The case was the subject of a deep dive on the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski. He spoke with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to understand the challenges law enforcement faces in such cases. It initially appeared to be a straightforward investigation. "They got some DNA shortly after this horrific crime took place," Brueski began. The DNA sample was matched with evidence from a home invasion in Los Angeles. But this lead, which once seemed promising, went cold as well. Dreeke shed light on the complexities of the investigation, “Even though we didn't have any arrests right along, we had an area where you have people that probably frequent routinely.” He emphasized the non-random nature of many murders, hinting at a potential connection between the killer and Morin via social media or dating sites. “I'm thinking this is someone that was probably tracked,” Dreeke suggested. But the most baffling aspect? The lack of a digital footprint. In an era where nearly everyone's every move is chronicled online, the absence of such evidence is a glaring anomaly. Comparing it to another case, Dreeke explained, “He's existing on the goodwill of being a day labor and family members and friend members. It's easy to stay off the grid.” Adding to the mystery is video footage showing the suspected killer leaving a residence. The man appeared to exit in a non-hostile manner, with someone even closing the door behind him. This begs the question: Was the home invasion not as it seemed? Dreeke seemed equally puzzled, “It looked like someone closed the door behind him. Doesn't seem like any home invasion I've ever heard of.” Despite the mounting challenges, law enforcement remains relentless in their pursuit of the truth. As Dreeke concluded, “I completely believe they're doing a great job of due diligence with the resources.” Still, for Rachel Morin's family and the public, the burning question remains: With so much evidence, why is the killer still at large? If our digital lives are as transparent as they seem, what's enabling this murderer to remain in the shadows? This unsettling paradox is something we all might ponder as we hope for justice in the tragic case of Rachel Morin. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Who would have thought that in an age where surveillance is omnipresent, and technology has seeped into the deepest corners of our lives, a murder case with seemingly significant evidence would remain unsolved? The perplexing story of Rachel Morin, the unfortunate victim found brutally murdered along her jogging path, showcases this very enigma. The tragedy of Morin's death is amplified by the fact that, despite video evidence and DNA samples, the identity of her killer remains unknown. The case was the subject of a deep dive on the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski. He spoke with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to understand the challenges law enforcement faces in such cases. It initially appeared to be a straightforward investigation. "They got some DNA shortly after this horrific crime took place," Brueski began. The DNA sample was matched with evidence from a home invasion in Los Angeles. But this lead, which once seemed promising, went cold as well. Dreeke shed light on the complexities of the investigation, “Even though we didn't have any arrests right along, we had an area where you have people that probably frequent routinely.” He emphasized the non-random nature of many murders, hinting at a potential connection between the killer and Morin via social media or dating sites. “I'm thinking this is someone that was probably tracked,” Dreeke suggested. But the most baffling aspect? The lack of a digital footprint. In an era where nearly everyone's every move is chronicled online, the absence of such evidence is a glaring anomaly. Comparing it to another case, Dreeke explained, “He's existing on the goodwill of being a day labor and family members and friend members. It's easy to stay off the grid.” Adding to the mystery is video footage showing the suspected killer leaving a residence. The man appeared to exit in a non-hostile manner, with someone even closing the door behind him. This begs the question: Was the home invasion not as it seemed? Dreeke seemed equally puzzled, “It looked like someone closed the door behind him. Doesn't seem like any home invasion I've ever heard of.” Despite the mounting challenges, law enforcement remains relentless in their pursuit of the truth. As Dreeke concluded, “I completely believe they're doing a great job of due diligence with the resources.” Still, for Rachel Morin's family and the public, the burning question remains: With so much evidence, why is the killer still at large? If our digital lives are as transparent as they seem, what's enabling this murderer to remain in the shadows? This unsettling paradox is something we all might ponder as we hope for justice in the tragic case of Rachel Morin. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
How far should the law go in holding parents accountable for the tragic actions of their children? This question found a spotlight recently on the podcast "Hidden Killers," when Tony Brueski discussed the emerging trend of parents being charged when their children commit crimes using firearms. Two cases were highlighted. The first concerns a teenager from Michigan who took the lives of his classmates. Here, the boy's parents are facing charges for providing him with access to the firearm, despite being aware of his mental health issues. In the second case, a mother is being charged with a second-degree misdemeanor for leaving a gun unlocked, which her 11-year-old son took to a football practice and fired at his peers. Thankfully, no lives were lost. "These instances point to a concerning trend," Brueski points out. "Though it may seem like common sense that parents would be held accountable for such negligence, surprisingly, this is a somewhat new concept in our justice system." So, what's driving this newfound accountability? Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, argues it stems from a deeper issue: the current state of societal decision-making and problem-solving. "The decision making from the child's point of view is a direct result of what they're learning from their parents," Dreeke states. Essentially, if parents deem it appropriate to leave a firearm unlocked around children, it's indicative of a broader lapse in judgment. Drawing a parallel, Dreeke references laws from the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongol empire, where entire households were held accountable for the actions of one member. He suggests this approach might be making a comeback, especially regarding firearms and things that can harm others. "We've got to start learning how to police our own and stop placing the onus solely on society," he says. Yet, as the conversation shifts, Brueski raises a significant concern: not all households are equipped with the knowledge or tools to instill such values in children. Referring to Dreeke's comprehensive approach to teaching his children about firearm safety, Brueski mentions, "You are the exception to the rule with that level of care." Dreeke acknowledges this disparity, emphasizing the need for grassroots education at all societal levels. From the school system to daycare centers, he believes children should be consistently educated about the ramifications of their actions. As they discuss further, both Brueski and Dreeke concur that the community, educators, and professionals must play a pivotal role in children's lives, stepping in where parental guidance may fall short. Dreeke's wife, a teacher, is cited as an example of someone who can spot when "something's a little off at home" and can thus intervene. In conclusion, while holding parents legally accountable for their children's misdeeds might seem groundbreaking, it perhaps uncovers a broader societal issue. As Dreeke succinctly states, "it takes a great effort and it takes a heck of a lot of courage" to address these problems head-on. Which leaves us pondering: in an age of heightened responsibility, where do we draw the line between parental negligence and unforeseen tragedy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
How far should the law go in holding parents accountable for the tragic actions of their children? This question found a spotlight recently on the podcast "Hidden Killers," when Tony Brueski discussed the emerging trend of parents being charged when their children commit crimes using firearms. Two cases were highlighted. The first concerns a teenager from Michigan who took the lives of his classmates. Here, the boy's parents are facing charges for providing him with access to the firearm, despite being aware of his mental health issues. In the second case, a mother is being charged with a second-degree misdemeanor for leaving a gun unlocked, which her 11-year-old son took to a football practice and fired at his peers. Thankfully, no lives were lost. "These instances point to a concerning trend," Brueski points out. "Though it may seem like common sense that parents would be held accountable for such negligence, surprisingly, this is a somewhat new concept in our justice system." So, what's driving this newfound accountability? Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, argues it stems from a deeper issue: the current state of societal decision-making and problem-solving. "The decision making from the child's point of view is a direct result of what they're learning from their parents," Dreeke states. Essentially, if parents deem it appropriate to leave a firearm unlocked around children, it's indicative of a broader lapse in judgment. Drawing a parallel, Dreeke references laws from the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongol empire, where entire households were held accountable for the actions of one member. He suggests this approach might be making a comeback, especially regarding firearms and things that can harm others. "We've got to start learning how to police our own and stop placing the onus solely on society," he says. Yet, as the conversation shifts, Brueski raises a significant concern: not all households are equipped with the knowledge or tools to instill such values in children. Referring to Dreeke's comprehensive approach to teaching his children about firearm safety, Brueski mentions, "You are the exception to the rule with that level of care." Dreeke acknowledges this disparity, emphasizing the need for grassroots education at all societal levels. From the school system to daycare centers, he believes children should be consistently educated about the ramifications of their actions. As they discuss further, both Brueski and Dreeke concur that the community, educators, and professionals must play a pivotal role in children's lives, stepping in where parental guidance may fall short. Dreeke's wife, a teacher, is cited as an example of someone who can spot when "something's a little off at home" and can thus intervene. In conclusion, while holding parents legally accountable for their children's misdeeds might seem groundbreaking, it perhaps uncovers a broader societal issue. As Dreeke succinctly states, "it takes a great effort and it takes a heck of a lot of courage" to address these problems head-on. Which leaves us pondering: in an age of heightened responsibility, where do we draw the line between parental negligence and unforeseen tragedy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
How far should the law go in holding parents accountable for the tragic actions of their children? This question found a spotlight recently on the podcast "Hidden Killers," when Tony Brueski discussed the emerging trend of parents being charged when their children commit crimes using firearms. Two cases were highlighted. The first concerns a teenager from Michigan who took the lives of his classmates. Here, the boy's parents are facing charges for providing him with access to the firearm, despite being aware of his mental health issues. In the second case, a mother is being charged with a second-degree misdemeanor for leaving a gun unlocked, which her 11-year-old son took to a football practice and fired at his peers. Thankfully, no lives were lost. "These instances point to a concerning trend," Brueski points out. "Though it may seem like common sense that parents would be held accountable for such negligence, surprisingly, this is a somewhat new concept in our justice system." So, what's driving this newfound accountability? Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, argues it stems from a deeper issue: the current state of societal decision-making and problem-solving. "The decision making from the child's point of view is a direct result of what they're learning from their parents," Dreeke states. Essentially, if parents deem it appropriate to leave a firearm unlocked around children, it's indicative of a broader lapse in judgment. Drawing a parallel, Dreeke references laws from the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongol empire, where entire households were held accountable for the actions of one member. He suggests this approach might be making a comeback, especially regarding firearms and things that can harm others. "We've got to start learning how to police our own and stop placing the onus solely on society," he says. Yet, as the conversation shifts, Brueski raises a significant concern: not all households are equipped with the knowledge or tools to instill such values in children. Referring to Dreeke's comprehensive approach to teaching his children about firearm safety, Brueski mentions, "You are the exception to the rule with that level of care." Dreeke acknowledges this disparity, emphasizing the need for grassroots education at all societal levels. From the school system to daycare centers, he believes children should be consistently educated about the ramifications of their actions. As they discuss further, both Brueski and Dreeke concur that the community, educators, and professionals must play a pivotal role in children's lives, stepping in where parental guidance may fall short. Dreeke's wife, a teacher, is cited as an example of someone who can spot when "something's a little off at home" and can thus intervene. In conclusion, while holding parents legally accountable for their children's misdeeds might seem groundbreaking, it perhaps uncovers a broader societal issue. As Dreeke succinctly states, "it takes a great effort and it takes a heck of a lot of courage" to address these problems head-on. Which leaves us pondering: in an age of heightened responsibility, where do we draw the line between parental negligence and unforeseen tragedy? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
"What does it mean to be a survivor, a key witness in a high-profile crime, and then subjected to public scrutiny and judgment?" On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into a conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, regarding the tragic case of Dylan Mortensen and her involvement as a key witness. Dylan Mortensen, a surviving roommate of a heinous crime that transpired in her own residence, has been at the center of public judgment and critique over the past year. While the tragic events have traumatized her, the aftermath of online trolling, criticism, and bullying seems equally harrowing. The crucial question posed was about her role as a witness, specifically regarding the upcoming trial against Bryan Kohberger, the prime suspect in the case. Dreeke underscored her role stating, "She can play a hugely critical role." However, what is disheartening is the trauma Dylan faces in light of public opinion. As Dreeke empathically points out, the trauma of witnessing a murder is profound, something that has an enduring impact on the psyche. Comparing it to the pain of loss through natural causes or even accidents, he elaborates, "Murder is really the most profound way to lose someone." Brueski also touched on a disturbing trend - the inclination for people online to attack victims or those tangentially associated with tragic events. Drawing parallels with conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones targeting the Sandy Hook families, the discussion delved into the psychology behind such behaviors. Dreeke's insights were poignant: those who verbally assault and judge others, especially victims of tragedies, are often acting out their own pain and trauma. The need to "be seen" drives these individuals, amplified by the platforms that social media offers. He said, "When someone's coming at you like that, it's not about you… They're literally just trying to be seen because of their own pain and trauma." He also attributes this behavior to an increasing inability of individuals to cope with personal challenges, leading them to lash out at others as a coping mechanism. The conversation then shifted to the impending trial and the challenges faced by key witnesses like Dylan. Time, memory degradation, and emotional trauma play significant roles in how witnesses are perceived in court, and how defense attorneys might approach their testimonies. While time can indeed erode certain memories, Dreeke confidently affirmed, "When you experience something so traumatic...your memory of it is extremely vivid." Looking ahead at the trial, both Brueski and Dreeke pondered on the strategy that the defense might adopt. Given that Dylan's account of the incident was recorded shortly after it transpired, Dreeke believes it holds significant weight. However, he speculates that the defense might focus on attacking the scientific evidence rather than the emotional testimonies to maintain an emotionally neutral angle. "How will the memories of that traumatic night and the subsequent scrutiny from society shape Dylan Mortensen's testimony, and will the defense's strategies succeed in casting doubt on the credibility of key witnesses like her?" Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
"What does it mean to be a survivor, a key witness in a high-profile crime, and then subjected to public scrutiny and judgment?" On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into a conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, regarding the tragic case of Dylan Mortensen and her involvement as a key witness. Dylan Mortensen, a surviving roommate of a heinous crime that transpired in her own residence, has been at the center of public judgment and critique over the past year. While the tragic events have traumatized her, the aftermath of online trolling, criticism, and bullying seems equally harrowing. The crucial question posed was about her role as a witness, specifically regarding the upcoming trial against Bryan Kohberger, the prime suspect in the case. Dreeke underscored her role stating, "She can play a hugely critical role." However, what is disheartening is the trauma Dylan faces in light of public opinion. As Dreeke empathically points out, the trauma of witnessing a murder is profound, something that has an enduring impact on the psyche. Comparing it to the pain of loss through natural causes or even accidents, he elaborates, "Murder is really the most profound way to lose someone." Brueski also touched on a disturbing trend - the inclination for people online to attack victims or those tangentially associated with tragic events. Drawing parallels with conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones targeting the Sandy Hook families, the discussion delved into the psychology behind such behaviors. Dreeke's insights were poignant: those who verbally assault and judge others, especially victims of tragedies, are often acting out their own pain and trauma. The need to "be seen" drives these individuals, amplified by the platforms that social media offers. He said, "When someone's coming at you like that, it's not about you… They're literally just trying to be seen because of their own pain and trauma." He also attributes this behavior to an increasing inability of individuals to cope with personal challenges, leading them to lash out at others as a coping mechanism. The conversation then shifted to the impending trial and the challenges faced by key witnesses like Dylan. Time, memory degradation, and emotional trauma play significant roles in how witnesses are perceived in court, and how defense attorneys might approach their testimonies. While time can indeed erode certain memories, Dreeke confidently affirmed, "When you experience something so traumatic...your memory of it is extremely vivid." Looking ahead at the trial, both Brueski and Dreeke pondered on the strategy that the defense might adopt. Given that Dylan's account of the incident was recorded shortly after it transpired, Dreeke believes it holds significant weight. However, he speculates that the defense might focus on attacking the scientific evidence rather than the emotional testimonies to maintain an emotionally neutral angle. "How will the memories of that traumatic night and the subsequent scrutiny from society shape Dylan Mortensen's testimony, and will the defense's strategies succeed in casting doubt on the credibility of key witnesses like her?" Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
"What does it mean to be a survivor, a key witness in a high-profile crime, and then subjected to public scrutiny and judgment?" On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into a conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, regarding the tragic case of Dylan Mortensen and her involvement as a key witness. Dylan Mortensen, a surviving roommate of a heinous crime that transpired in her own residence, has been at the center of public judgment and critique over the past year. While the tragic events have traumatized her, the aftermath of online trolling, criticism, and bullying seems equally harrowing. The crucial question posed was about her role as a witness, specifically regarding the upcoming trial against Bryan Kohberger, the prime suspect in the case. Dreeke underscored her role stating, "She can play a hugely critical role." However, what is disheartening is the trauma Dylan faces in light of public opinion. As Dreeke empathically points out, the trauma of witnessing a murder is profound, something that has an enduring impact on the psyche. Comparing it to the pain of loss through natural causes or even accidents, he elaborates, "Murder is really the most profound way to lose someone." Brueski also touched on a disturbing trend - the inclination for people online to attack victims or those tangentially associated with tragic events. Drawing parallels with conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones targeting the Sandy Hook families, the discussion delved into the psychology behind such behaviors. Dreeke's insights were poignant: those who verbally assault and judge others, especially victims of tragedies, are often acting out their own pain and trauma. The need to "be seen" drives these individuals, amplified by the platforms that social media offers. He said, "When someone's coming at you like that, it's not about you… They're literally just trying to be seen because of their own pain and trauma." He also attributes this behavior to an increasing inability of individuals to cope with personal challenges, leading them to lash out at others as a coping mechanism. The conversation then shifted to the impending trial and the challenges faced by key witnesses like Dylan. Time, memory degradation, and emotional trauma play significant roles in how witnesses are perceived in court, and how defense attorneys might approach their testimonies. While time can indeed erode certain memories, Dreeke confidently affirmed, "When you experience something so traumatic...your memory of it is extremely vivid." Looking ahead at the trial, both Brueski and Dreeke pondered on the strategy that the defense might adopt. Given that Dylan's account of the incident was recorded shortly after it transpired, Dreeke believes it holds significant weight. However, he speculates that the defense might focus on attacking the scientific evidence rather than the emotional testimonies to maintain an emotionally neutral angle. "How will the memories of that traumatic night and the subsequent scrutiny from society shape Dylan Mortensen's testimony, and will the defense's strategies succeed in casting doubt on the credibility of key witnesses like her?" Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
"What does it mean to be a survivor, a key witness in a high-profile crime, and then subjected to public scrutiny and judgment?" On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into a conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, regarding the tragic case of Dylan Mortensen and her involvement as a key witness. Dylan Mortensen, a surviving roommate of a heinous crime that transpired in her own residence, has been at the center of public judgment and critique over the past year. While the tragic events have traumatized her, the aftermath of online trolling, criticism, and bullying seems equally harrowing. The crucial question posed was about her role as a witness, specifically regarding the upcoming trial against Bryan Kohberger, the prime suspect in the case. Dreeke underscored her role stating, "She can play a hugely critical role." However, what is disheartening is the trauma Dylan faces in light of public opinion. As Dreeke empathically points out, the trauma of witnessing a murder is profound, something that has an enduring impact on the psyche. Comparing it to the pain of loss through natural causes or even accidents, he elaborates, "Murder is really the most profound way to lose someone." Brueski also touched on a disturbing trend - the inclination for people online to attack victims or those tangentially associated with tragic events. Drawing parallels with conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones targeting the Sandy Hook families, the discussion delved into the psychology behind such behaviors. Dreeke's insights were poignant: those who verbally assault and judge others, especially victims of tragedies, are often acting out their own pain and trauma. The need to "be seen" drives these individuals, amplified by the platforms that social media offers. He said, "When someone's coming at you like that, it's not about you… They're literally just trying to be seen because of their own pain and trauma." He also attributes this behavior to an increasing inability of individuals to cope with personal challenges, leading them to lash out at others as a coping mechanism. The conversation then shifted to the impending trial and the challenges faced by key witnesses like Dylan. Time, memory degradation, and emotional trauma play significant roles in how witnesses are perceived in court, and how defense attorneys might approach their testimonies. While time can indeed erode certain memories, Dreeke confidently affirmed, "When you experience something so traumatic...your memory of it is extremely vivid." Looking ahead at the trial, both Brueski and Dreeke pondered on the strategy that the defense might adopt. Given that Dylan's account of the incident was recorded shortly after it transpired, Dreeke believes it holds significant weight. However, he speculates that the defense might focus on attacking the scientific evidence rather than the emotional testimonies to maintain an emotionally neutral angle. "How will the memories of that traumatic night and the subsequent scrutiny from society shape Dylan Mortensen's testimony, and will the defense's strategies succeed in casting doubt on the credibility of key witnesses like her?" Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, delved into the gripping story of Maya Kowalski and the distressing series of events that unfolded at the renowned John Hopkins Children's Hospital. The situation raises crucial questions: how much power do medical authorities wield, and what happens when that power is misused? The case centers on Maya's family's visit to the hospital. Alarmingly, her parents were accused of abuse and were separated from their daughter for over 90 days, with only highly regulated contact. Amidst this emotionally charged atmosphere, Maya's mother tragically took her own life. Brueski expressed his astonishment, "They were completely ripped away from their daughter... her mother ends up killing herself over the stress." The gravity of this comment underscores the severe emotional impact the ordeal had on the Kowalski family. The decision to take such drastic action against the family is what remains perplexing. Drawing parallels between the incident and other professions, Dreeke points out, "Say you have a traffic stop and you have a patrol officer that has done thousands of car stops. They have a sense of what looks normal, what feels normal." He insinuates the importance of experience in judgment calls, "So the first question I have is for the people at the hospital that made this call, how many reps did they have when they made the call?" A central figure in this controversial case is Dr. Sally Smith, who recently retired and was revealed to have played a role in other problematic cases where children were wrongly removed from families. One such incident led to a father being imprisoned for nearly a year. "Dr. Sally has had more than 3,000 cases that she's worked on over the course of 30 years. So this is not like it's new to her, but these are pretty detrimental screw-ups that she's making with people's lives," says Brueski. The troubling pattern of erroneous decisions by Dr. Smith further adds to the complexity of the issue. What's even more confounding is that the system often bases its decisions largely on one person's judgment, as Dreeke pointed out, "It's just basically the judgment or the opinion of one person. That seems to have extreme effects far more than our legal system is supposed to allow for." However, there's no dismissing the somber reality that Maya's mother, overwhelmed by the sequence of events, took her own life. Dreeke suggests the existence of deeper issues: "The little girl and her being taken from the family for 90 days might have been a straw that broke the camel's back, but there's mental health issues if you're committing suicide." On a closing note, while analyzing the broader implications of the case, the conversation underscores the importance of due diligence when availing medical services. As Dreeke rightly points out, "When you are dealing with the medical community, you're buying a service... we can start making other choices." However, for the Kowalski family, those choices came with profound consequences. In a world that entrusts medical authorities with power and responsibility, the Maya Kowalski case serves as a grave reminder of the potential pitfalls when that trust is misplaced. The pertinent question remains: how do we strike the right balance between safeguarding the welfare of patients and preventing potential abuse of authority? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, delved into the gripping story of Maya Kowalski and the distressing series of events that unfolded at the renowned John Hopkins Children's Hospital. The situation raises crucial questions: how much power do medical authorities wield, and what happens when that power is misused? The case centers on Maya's family's visit to the hospital. Alarmingly, her parents were accused of abuse and were separated from their daughter for over 90 days, with only highly regulated contact. Amidst this emotionally charged atmosphere, Maya's mother tragically took her own life. Brueski expressed his astonishment, "They were completely ripped away from their daughter... her mother ends up killing herself over the stress." The gravity of this comment underscores the severe emotional impact the ordeal had on the Kowalski family. The decision to take such drastic action against the family is what remains perplexing. Drawing parallels between the incident and other professions, Dreeke points out, "Say you have a traffic stop and you have a patrol officer that has done thousands of car stops. They have a sense of what looks normal, what feels normal." He insinuates the importance of experience in judgment calls, "So the first question I have is for the people at the hospital that made this call, how many reps did they have when they made the call?" A central figure in this controversial case is Dr. Sally Smith, who recently retired and was revealed to have played a role in other problematic cases where children were wrongly removed from families. One such incident led to a father being imprisoned for nearly a year. "Dr. Sally has had more than 3,000 cases that she's worked on over the course of 30 years. So this is not like it's new to her, but these are pretty detrimental screw-ups that she's making with people's lives," says Brueski. The troubling pattern of erroneous decisions by Dr. Smith further adds to the complexity of the issue. What's even more confounding is that the system often bases its decisions largely on one person's judgment, as Dreeke pointed out, "It's just basically the judgment or the opinion of one person. That seems to have extreme effects far more than our legal system is supposed to allow for." However, there's no dismissing the somber reality that Maya's mother, overwhelmed by the sequence of events, took her own life. Dreeke suggests the existence of deeper issues: "The little girl and her being taken from the family for 90 days might have been a straw that broke the camel's back, but there's mental health issues if you're committing suicide." On a closing note, while analyzing the broader implications of the case, the conversation underscores the importance of due diligence when availing medical services. As Dreeke rightly points out, "When you are dealing with the medical community, you're buying a service... we can start making other choices." However, for the Kowalski family, those choices came with profound consequences. In a world that entrusts medical authorities with power and responsibility, the Maya Kowalski case serves as a grave reminder of the potential pitfalls when that trust is misplaced. The pertinent question remains: how do we strike the right balance between safeguarding the welfare of patients and preventing potential abuse of authority? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, delved into the gripping story of Maya Kowalski and the distressing series of events that unfolded at the renowned John Hopkins Children's Hospital. The situation raises crucial questions: how much power do medical authorities wield, and what happens when that power is misused? The case centers on Maya's family's visit to the hospital. Alarmingly, her parents were accused of abuse and were separated from their daughter for over 90 days, with only highly regulated contact. Amidst this emotionally charged atmosphere, Maya's mother tragically took her own life. Brueski expressed his astonishment, "They were completely ripped away from their daughter... her mother ends up killing herself over the stress." The gravity of this comment underscores the severe emotional impact the ordeal had on the Kowalski family. The decision to take such drastic action against the family is what remains perplexing. Drawing parallels between the incident and other professions, Dreeke points out, "Say you have a traffic stop and you have a patrol officer that has done thousands of car stops. They have a sense of what looks normal, what feels normal." He insinuates the importance of experience in judgment calls, "So the first question I have is for the people at the hospital that made this call, how many reps did they have when they made the call?" A central figure in this controversial case is Dr. Sally Smith, who recently retired and was revealed to have played a role in other problematic cases where children were wrongly removed from families. One such incident led to a father being imprisoned for nearly a year. "Dr. Sally has had more than 3,000 cases that she's worked on over the course of 30 years. So this is not like it's new to her, but these are pretty detrimental screw-ups that she's making with people's lives," says Brueski. The troubling pattern of erroneous decisions by Dr. Smith further adds to the complexity of the issue. What's even more confounding is that the system often bases its decisions largely on one person's judgment, as Dreeke pointed out, "It's just basically the judgment or the opinion of one person. That seems to have extreme effects far more than our legal system is supposed to allow for." However, there's no dismissing the somber reality that Maya's mother, overwhelmed by the sequence of events, took her own life. Dreeke suggests the existence of deeper issues: "The little girl and her being taken from the family for 90 days might have been a straw that broke the camel's back, but there's mental health issues if you're committing suicide." On a closing note, while analyzing the broader implications of the case, the conversation underscores the importance of due diligence when availing medical services. As Dreeke rightly points out, "When you are dealing with the medical community, you're buying a service... we can start making other choices." However, for the Kowalski family, those choices came with profound consequences. In a world that entrusts medical authorities with power and responsibility, the Maya Kowalski case serves as a grave reminder of the potential pitfalls when that trust is misplaced. The pertinent question remains: how do we strike the right balance between safeguarding the welfare of patients and preventing potential abuse of authority? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Reality TV has penetrated almost every aspect of our daily lives – from culinary competitions to home renovations. But when it dovetails with the gritty world of law enforcement, especially in controversial investigations, how do we separate the genuine from the sensationalist? A recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke, delved into this controversial territory. The Osage County sheriff's office has recently proposed a contract with a television production company to document the everyday workings of Sheriff Eddie Virden and undersheriff Gary Upton. What's especially piquant about this proposal is the potential dive into connections with the BTK (Bind, Torture, Kill) serial killer, a case from the late 20th century that still sends shivers down the spine of many. Brueski initiates the debate questioning the optics of this venture. As he puts it, "The optics... I'm cringing." This sentiment emerges from the potential confluence of real-time investigations and reality TV's penchant for dramatization. Is there a genuine pursuit of justice, or is there a lurking specter of leveraging morbid curiosity for viewership? The waters are further muddied by the fact that the CW network is ready to premiere this series in January. Robin Dreeke, with his substantial background in the FBI and the behavioral team, offers a balanced perspective. On his notes, he scribbled three words that encapsulate the discussion: "ego seeps in." However, he recognizes that such a series can act as a significant recruitment tool for law enforcement agencies. The allure of 'sexy' high-profile investigations can be enticing for potential recruits. Still, Dreeke highlights the paramount importance of balancing ego with serving the community. He posits, "Everything's a dichotomy and a balance." For him, if the intent remains pure and there's robust oversight with checks and balances, the series can potentially benefit everyone involved. The BTK case, even though decades old, resonates profoundly within the community and beyond. Its reexamination can be seen as reopening old wounds, especially for the families directly affected by the killer's crimes. As Brueski mentions, "We're dealing with people's lives here... BTK's crimes took place 20, 30, 40 years ago." While the case intrigues many, the emotional cost to the affected families is immeasurable. However, beyond the case's gravity, there's another angle to this proposed reality series that cannot be ignored. Sheriff Eddie Virden is up for re-election, and the District Attorney, who has been explicitly skeptical of the BTK connections, is supporting Virden's opponent. The reality series, if portrayed in a favorable light, could potentially tilt the scales in the upcoming elections. The conversation loops back to the ethos of law enforcement. As Dreeke sums it up, "The behaviors of trust that people need to display in order to inspire trust are pretty simple... open, honest communication, transparency, and vulnerability." If law enforcement can suspend ego, uphold public trust, and communicate effectively, such a venture might actually strengthen their bond with the community. The episode leaves readers with much to ponder. As Brueski notes, "It would be good to see law enforcement in a good light." Indeed, positive portrayals of diligent officers are needed, especially in today's climate of skepticism. However, the stakes are incredibly high, and the balance between showcasing reality and slipping into sensationalism is precariously thin. So, can reality TV truly serve the cause of justice, or does it threaten to tarnish the sanctity of investigation? As cameras roll and investigations deepen, only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story
Reality TV has penetrated almost every aspect of our daily lives – from culinary competitions to home renovations. But when it dovetails with the gritty world of law enforcement, especially in controversial investigations, how do we separate the genuine from the sensationalist? A recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke, delved into this controversial territory. The Osage County sheriff's office has recently proposed a contract with a television production company to document the everyday workings of Sheriff Eddie Virden and undersheriff Gary Upton. What's especially piquant about this proposal is the potential dive into connections with the BTK (Bind, Torture, Kill) serial killer, a case from the late 20th century that still sends shivers down the spine of many. Brueski initiates the debate questioning the optics of this venture. As he puts it, "The optics... I'm cringing." This sentiment emerges from the potential confluence of real-time investigations and reality TV's penchant for dramatization. Is there a genuine pursuit of justice, or is there a lurking specter of leveraging morbid curiosity for viewership? The waters are further muddied by the fact that the CW network is ready to premiere this series in January. Robin Dreeke, with his substantial background in the FBI and the behavioral team, offers a balanced perspective. On his notes, he scribbled three words that encapsulate the discussion: "ego seeps in." However, he recognizes that such a series can act as a significant recruitment tool for law enforcement agencies. The allure of 'sexy' high-profile investigations can be enticing for potential recruits. Still, Dreeke highlights the paramount importance of balancing ego with serving the community. He posits, "Everything's a dichotomy and a balance." For him, if the intent remains pure and there's robust oversight with checks and balances, the series can potentially benefit everyone involved. The BTK case, even though decades old, resonates profoundly within the community and beyond. Its reexamination can be seen as reopening old wounds, especially for the families directly affected by the killer's crimes. As Brueski mentions, "We're dealing with people's lives here... BTK's crimes took place 20, 30, 40 years ago." While the case intrigues many, the emotional cost to the affected families is immeasurable. However, beyond the case's gravity, there's another angle to this proposed reality series that cannot be ignored. Sheriff Eddie Virden is up for re-election, and the District Attorney, who has been explicitly skeptical of the BTK connections, is supporting Virden's opponent. The reality series, if portrayed in a favorable light, could potentially tilt the scales in the upcoming elections. The conversation loops back to the ethos of law enforcement. As Dreeke sums it up, "The behaviors of trust that people need to display in order to inspire trust are pretty simple... open, honest communication, transparency, and vulnerability." If law enforcement can suspend ego, uphold public trust, and communicate effectively, such a venture might actually strengthen their bond with the community. The episode leaves readers with much to ponder. As Brueski notes, "It would be good to see law enforcement in a good light." Indeed, positive portrayals of diligent officers are needed, especially in today's climate of skepticism. However, the stakes are incredibly high, and the balance between showcasing reality and slipping into sensationalism is precariously thin. So, can reality TV truly serve the cause of justice, or does it threaten to tarnish the sanctity of investigation? As cameras roll and investigations deepen, only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Reality TV has penetrated almost every aspect of our daily lives – from culinary competitions to home renovations. But when it dovetails with the gritty world of law enforcement, especially in controversial investigations, how do we separate the genuine from the sensationalist? A recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke, delved into this controversial territory. The Osage County sheriff's office has recently proposed a contract with a television production company to document the everyday workings of Sheriff Eddie Virden and undersheriff Gary Upton. What's especially piquant about this proposal is the potential dive into connections with the BTK (Bind, Torture, Kill) serial killer, a case from the late 20th century that still sends shivers down the spine of many. Brueski initiates the debate questioning the optics of this venture. As he puts it, "The optics... I'm cringing." This sentiment emerges from the potential confluence of real-time investigations and reality TV's penchant for dramatization. Is there a genuine pursuit of justice, or is there a lurking specter of leveraging morbid curiosity for viewership? The waters are further muddied by the fact that the CW network is ready to premiere this series in January. Robin Dreeke, with his substantial background in the FBI and the behavioral team, offers a balanced perspective. On his notes, he scribbled three words that encapsulate the discussion: "ego seeps in." However, he recognizes that such a series can act as a significant recruitment tool for law enforcement agencies. The allure of 'sexy' high-profile investigations can be enticing for potential recruits. Still, Dreeke highlights the paramount importance of balancing ego with serving the community. He posits, "Everything's a dichotomy and a balance." For him, if the intent remains pure and there's robust oversight with checks and balances, the series can potentially benefit everyone involved. The BTK case, even though decades old, resonates profoundly within the community and beyond. Its reexamination can be seen as reopening old wounds, especially for the families directly affected by the killer's crimes. As Brueski mentions, "We're dealing with people's lives here... BTK's crimes took place 20, 30, 40 years ago." While the case intrigues many, the emotional cost to the affected families is immeasurable. However, beyond the case's gravity, there's another angle to this proposed reality series that cannot be ignored. Sheriff Eddie Virden is up for re-election, and the District Attorney, who has been explicitly skeptical of the BTK connections, is supporting Virden's opponent. The reality series, if portrayed in a favorable light, could potentially tilt the scales in the upcoming elections. The conversation loops back to the ethos of law enforcement. As Dreeke sums it up, "The behaviors of trust that people need to display in order to inspire trust are pretty simple... open, honest communication, transparency, and vulnerability." If law enforcement can suspend ego, uphold public trust, and communicate effectively, such a venture might actually strengthen their bond with the community. The episode leaves readers with much to ponder. As Brueski notes, "It would be good to see law enforcement in a good light." Indeed, positive portrayals of diligent officers are needed, especially in today's climate of skepticism. However, the stakes are incredibly high, and the balance between showcasing reality and slipping into sensationalism is precariously thin. So, can reality TV truly serve the cause of justice, or does it threaten to tarnish the sanctity of investigation? As cameras roll and investigations deepen, only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Is notorious serial killer Dennis Rader, better known as BTK, responsible for even more unsolved disappearances? A deep dive into the concerns over evidence collection and the heart-wrenching quest for answers unveils the true complexity of such high-profile cases. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, featuring retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, provides a rare window into the professional and emotional challenges investigators face. In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a significant point of contention arose surrounding BTK's potential link to the 1976 disappearance of Cynthia Kinney. The District Attorney for Osage and Pawnee counties, Mike Fisher, voiced his reservations about implicating Dennis Rader in the case, due to the lack of substantial evidence to press charges. Meanwhile, Sheriff Eddie Virden of Osage County, having spearheaded a nationwide task force, seems convinced of Rader's involvement in not just Kinney's disappearance, but potentially other cold cases. The heart of the matter, as presented by hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, revolves around two central issues. Firstly, there's the concern of procedural integrity. The manner in which evidence has been collected, especially as the Osage County Sheriff's Office apparently stepped outside their jurisdiction, raises serious questions. Are the obtained search warrants valid? Would the evidence be admissible in court, given the concerns about how it was collected? Robin Dreeke touched upon the nuances, emphasizing, "If it's been done that way, yeah, that's a concern." He further elaborated on the danger of investigators becoming overly emotionally invested in cases, potentially leading to oversights or missteps in the process. In a particularly poignant moment, Dreeke noted, "Emotionally being invested in this versus being professionally invested in this and doing things the right way... there's much bigger things that could go wrong here." In light of such concerns, the episode delved into the quintessential challenge of balancing the pursuit of justice with procedural propriety. While the pressing urgency to "right wrongs in society" is paramount, there are processes and rules designed to ensure that justice isn't just served, but served right. Further adding to the conundrum is the revelation that some leads, directly linked to BTK, have been gathering dust for years. The existence of "trophies" — a chilling term used by killers to refer to mementos from their victims — buried in Rader's backyard shed was noted in a 2008 letter. Yet, it took until 2023 for any action to be taken on this information. One could argue, why the delay? Dreeke offers a simple, albeit troubling, answer: resources. "There are not nearly enough people working these things to do it all," he states. The demands of prioritizing, often driven by public and media outcry, means some cases, or leads, are left by the wayside. Reflecting on his time with the FBI, Dreeke offers insight into the agonizing choices that law enforcement personnel must make daily, juggling a multitude of "urgent" tasks. They're in a perpetual race against time, forced to make heart-wrenching decisions about where to allocate their attention. While the public's cries for justice echo loudly, law enforcement is constrained by the practicalities of resource allocation and the ever-present, towering backlog of cases. It's a haunting reminder that behind every unresolved case, there's a team of individuals grappling with the knowledge that they couldn't do it all. As Dreeke poignantly remarked, referencing the film "The Guardian": "Sometimes you just can't do it all." The pursuit of justice is never black and white, and as the podcast episode reveals, even the most notorious cases aren't exempt from the shadows of uncertainty. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes | The Dennis Rader Story
Is notorious serial killer Dennis Rader, better known as BTK, responsible for even more unsolved disappearances? A deep dive into the concerns over evidence collection and the heart-wrenching quest for answers unveils the true complexity of such high-profile cases. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, featuring retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, provides a rare window into the professional and emotional challenges investigators face. In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a significant point of contention arose surrounding BTK's potential link to the 1976 disappearance of Cynthia Kinney. The District Attorney for Osage and Pawnee counties, Mike Fisher, voiced his reservations about implicating Dennis Rader in the case, due to the lack of substantial evidence to press charges. Meanwhile, Sheriff Eddie Virden of Osage County, having spearheaded a nationwide task force, seems convinced of Rader's involvement in not just Kinney's disappearance, but potentially other cold cases. The heart of the matter, as presented by hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, revolves around two central issues. Firstly, there's the concern of procedural integrity. The manner in which evidence has been collected, especially as the Osage County Sheriff's Office apparently stepped outside their jurisdiction, raises serious questions. Are the obtained search warrants valid? Would the evidence be admissible in court, given the concerns about how it was collected? Robin Dreeke touched upon the nuances, emphasizing, "If it's been done that way, yeah, that's a concern." He further elaborated on the danger of investigators becoming overly emotionally invested in cases, potentially leading to oversights or missteps in the process. In a particularly poignant moment, Dreeke noted, "Emotionally being invested in this versus being professionally invested in this and doing things the right way... there's much bigger things that could go wrong here." In light of such concerns, the episode delved into the quintessential challenge of balancing the pursuit of justice with procedural propriety. While the pressing urgency to "right wrongs in society" is paramount, there are processes and rules designed to ensure that justice isn't just served, but served right. Further adding to the conundrum is the revelation that some leads, directly linked to BTK, have been gathering dust for years. The existence of "trophies" — a chilling term used by killers to refer to mementos from their victims — buried in Rader's backyard shed was noted in a 2008 letter. Yet, it took until 2023 for any action to be taken on this information. One could argue, why the delay? Dreeke offers a simple, albeit troubling, answer: resources. "There are not nearly enough people working these things to do it all," he states. The demands of prioritizing, often driven by public and media outcry, means some cases, or leads, are left by the wayside. Reflecting on his time with the FBI, Dreeke offers insight into the agonizing choices that law enforcement personnel must make daily, juggling a multitude of "urgent" tasks. They're in a perpetual race against time, forced to make heart-wrenching decisions about where to allocate their attention. While the public's cries for justice echo loudly, law enforcement is constrained by the practicalities of resource allocation and the ever-present, towering backlog of cases. It's a haunting reminder that behind every unresolved case, there's a team of individuals grappling with the knowledge that they couldn't do it all. As Dreeke poignantly remarked, referencing the film "The Guardian": "Sometimes you just can't do it all." The pursuit of justice is never black and white, and as the podcast episode reveals, even the most notorious cases aren't exempt from the shadows of uncertainty. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Is notorious serial killer Dennis Rader, better known as BTK, responsible for even more unsolved disappearances? A deep dive into the concerns over evidence collection and the heart-wrenching quest for answers unveils the true complexity of such high-profile cases. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, featuring retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, provides a rare window into the professional and emotional challenges investigators face. In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a significant point of contention arose surrounding BTK's potential link to the 1976 disappearance of Cynthia Kinney. The District Attorney for Osage and Pawnee counties, Mike Fisher, voiced his reservations about implicating Dennis Rader in the case, due to the lack of substantial evidence to press charges. Meanwhile, Sheriff Eddie Virden of Osage County, having spearheaded a nationwide task force, seems convinced of Rader's involvement in not just Kinney's disappearance, but potentially other cold cases. The heart of the matter, as presented by hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, revolves around two central issues. Firstly, there's the concern of procedural integrity. The manner in which evidence has been collected, especially as the Osage County Sheriff's Office apparently stepped outside their jurisdiction, raises serious questions. Are the obtained search warrants valid? Would the evidence be admissible in court, given the concerns about how it was collected? Robin Dreeke touched upon the nuances, emphasizing, "If it's been done that way, yeah, that's a concern." He further elaborated on the danger of investigators becoming overly emotionally invested in cases, potentially leading to oversights or missteps in the process. In a particularly poignant moment, Dreeke noted, "Emotionally being invested in this versus being professionally invested in this and doing things the right way... there's much bigger things that could go wrong here." In light of such concerns, the episode delved into the quintessential challenge of balancing the pursuit of justice with procedural propriety. While the pressing urgency to "right wrongs in society" is paramount, there are processes and rules designed to ensure that justice isn't just served, but served right. Further adding to the conundrum is the revelation that some leads, directly linked to BTK, have been gathering dust for years. The existence of "trophies" — a chilling term used by killers to refer to mementos from their victims — buried in Rader's backyard shed was noted in a 2008 letter. Yet, it took until 2023 for any action to be taken on this information. One could argue, why the delay? Dreeke offers a simple, albeit troubling, answer: resources. "There are not nearly enough people working these things to do it all," he states. The demands of prioritizing, often driven by public and media outcry, means some cases, or leads, are left by the wayside. Reflecting on his time with the FBI, Dreeke offers insight into the agonizing choices that law enforcement personnel must make daily, juggling a multitude of "urgent" tasks. They're in a perpetual race against time, forced to make heart-wrenching decisions about where to allocate their attention. While the public's cries for justice echo loudly, law enforcement is constrained by the practicalities of resource allocation and the ever-present, towering backlog of cases. It's a haunting reminder that behind every unresolved case, there's a team of individuals grappling with the knowledge that they couldn't do it all. As Dreeke poignantly remarked, referencing the film "The Guardian": "Sometimes you just can't do it all." The pursuit of justice is never black and white, and as the podcast episode reveals, even the most notorious cases aren't exempt from the shadows of uncertainty. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Is South Carolina's justice system rotting from the inside? Startling allegations of jury tampering against a clerk of courts have surfaced, casting shadows on the very integrity of the system. But this could just be the tip of an iceberg, hinting at deeper, systemic problems plaguing the courts. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski held a revealing conversation with retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. The discussion centered around the shocking instance of an accused clerk from South Carolina's court system allegedly tampering with jury decisions. "The public servant, the clerk, is not serving the public, serving themselves, and it completely undermined the case," remarked Brueski. The gravity of the situation becomes even more palpable when considering the alleged misbehavior came from the clerk of courts, an integral component of the court's structure, responsible for ensuring justice. With such a pivotal role compromised, questions arise about the integrity of other elements within the system. "Should there be a further investigation into the rest of this machine there in South Carolina... all the way down to judges to anybody involved in this process?" Brueski probes. Dreeke adds weight to this line of thought, emphasizing the need for systemic introspection. “I think you're absolutely right," he concurs, highlighting the nonchalant attitude displayed by the accused and the suspiciously timed release of her book about the case. This kind of behavior, he suggests, doesn't emerge in isolation but is born from a culture where individual gains are prioritized over justice and integrity. "How did it get in her mind that that's appropriate right now? It came from on top that that behavior was okay," Dreeke opines. Drawing parallels to another incident, Brueski refers to a convict who recently escaped from a Pennsylvania jail, attributing his escape to poor leadership. He juxtaposes the strong leadership shown by Lt. Colonel Bivens of the state police in recapturing the escapee, against the lackluster administration at the prison. "Leadership. And so when you look at this situation, you fast forward it down to South Carolina, how can a public servant publish a book that fast?" Brueski asks. Echoing this sentiment, Dreeke illustrates that unchecked leadership could potentially harbor a culture of corruption. To uproot such corruption, targeting individuals isn't enough. "You got to go for the top," he states, suggesting an overhaul of the leadership and infrastructure as the only means to affect real change. A worrying pattern emerges from the conversation. An environment where unethical behavior becomes normalized, where bending rules is not just condoned but also encouraged. As Dreeke describes, it's a setting where "groupthink gets infused in everything," leading individuals to believe such behavior is not only acceptable but entirely regular. He offers a chilling comparison to a recent scandal involving a former FBI senior executive named Charlie McGonigal, charged and found guilty of receiving a hefty sum from Albanians and undermining Russian sanctions. Such acts make one wonder: how can high-ranking officials consider these actions permissible? “That's a culture," Dreeke asserts, “that says we can do this." The conversation on "Hidden Killers" raises disconcerting concerns. If individuals at the core of the justice system, whether in South Carolina or elsewhere, perceive rule-breaking as an ingrained part of their culture, the very foundations of the system are at risk. As the investigation into South Carolina's alleged jury tampering unfolds, one can only hope it serves as a wake-up call, urging reform not just in one state but throughout any system vulnerable to corruption. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Is South Carolina's justice system rotting from the inside? Startling allegations of jury tampering against a clerk of courts have surfaced, casting shadows on the very integrity of the system. But this could just be the tip of an iceberg, hinting at deeper, systemic problems plaguing the courts. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski held a revealing conversation with retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. The discussion centered around the shocking instance of an accused clerk from South Carolina's court system allegedly tampering with jury decisions. "The public servant, the clerk, is not serving the public, serving themselves, and it completely undermined the case," remarked Brueski. The gravity of the situation becomes even more palpable when considering the alleged misbehavior came from the clerk of courts, an integral component of the court's structure, responsible for ensuring justice. With such a pivotal role compromised, questions arise about the integrity of other elements within the system. "Should there be a further investigation into the rest of this machine there in South Carolina... all the way down to judges to anybody involved in this process?" Brueski probes. Dreeke adds weight to this line of thought, emphasizing the need for systemic introspection. “I think you're absolutely right," he concurs, highlighting the nonchalant attitude displayed by the accused and the suspiciously timed release of her book about the case. This kind of behavior, he suggests, doesn't emerge in isolation but is born from a culture where individual gains are prioritized over justice and integrity. "How did it get in her mind that that's appropriate right now? It came from on top that that behavior was okay," Dreeke opines. Drawing parallels to another incident, Brueski refers to a convict who recently escaped from a Pennsylvania jail, attributing his escape to poor leadership. He juxtaposes the strong leadership shown by Lt. Colonel Bivens of the state police in recapturing the escapee, against the lackluster administration at the prison. "Leadership. And so when you look at this situation, you fast forward it down to South Carolina, how can a public servant publish a book that fast?" Brueski asks. Echoing this sentiment, Dreeke illustrates that unchecked leadership could potentially harbor a culture of corruption. To uproot such corruption, targeting individuals isn't enough. "You got to go for the top," he states, suggesting an overhaul of the leadership and infrastructure as the only means to affect real change. A worrying pattern emerges from the conversation. An environment where unethical behavior becomes normalized, where bending rules is not just condoned but also encouraged. As Dreeke describes, it's a setting where "groupthink gets infused in everything," leading individuals to believe such behavior is not only acceptable but entirely regular. He offers a chilling comparison to a recent scandal involving a former FBI senior executive named Charlie McGonigal, charged and found guilty of receiving a hefty sum from Albanians and undermining Russian sanctions. Such acts make one wonder: how can high-ranking officials consider these actions permissible? “That's a culture," Dreeke asserts, “that says we can do this." The conversation on "Hidden Killers" raises disconcerting concerns. If individuals at the core of the justice system, whether in South Carolina or elsewhere, perceive rule-breaking as an ingrained part of their culture, the very foundations of the system are at risk. As the investigation into South Carolina's alleged jury tampering unfolds, one can only hope it serves as a wake-up call, urging reform not just in one state but throughout any system vulnerable to corruption. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Is South Carolina's justice system rotting from the inside? Startling allegations of jury tampering against a clerk of courts have surfaced, casting shadows on the very integrity of the system. But this could just be the tip of an iceberg, hinting at deeper, systemic problems plaguing the courts. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski held a revealing conversation with retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. The discussion centered around the shocking instance of an accused clerk from South Carolina's court system allegedly tampering with jury decisions. "The public servant, the clerk, is not serving the public, serving themselves, and it completely undermined the case," remarked Brueski. The gravity of the situation becomes even more palpable when considering the alleged misbehavior came from the clerk of courts, an integral component of the court's structure, responsible for ensuring justice. With such a pivotal role compromised, questions arise about the integrity of other elements within the system. "Should there be a further investigation into the rest of this machine there in South Carolina... all the way down to judges to anybody involved in this process?" Brueski probes. Dreeke adds weight to this line of thought, emphasizing the need for systemic introspection. “I think you're absolutely right," he concurs, highlighting the nonchalant attitude displayed by the accused and the suspiciously timed release of her book about the case. This kind of behavior, he suggests, doesn't emerge in isolation but is born from a culture where individual gains are prioritized over justice and integrity. "How did it get in her mind that that's appropriate right now? It came from on top that that behavior was okay," Dreeke opines. Drawing parallels to another incident, Brueski refers to a convict who recently escaped from a Pennsylvania jail, attributing his escape to poor leadership. He juxtaposes the strong leadership shown by Lt. Colonel Bivens of the state police in recapturing the escapee, against the lackluster administration at the prison. "Leadership. And so when you look at this situation, you fast forward it down to South Carolina, how can a public servant publish a book that fast?" Brueski asks. Echoing this sentiment, Dreeke illustrates that unchecked leadership could potentially harbor a culture of corruption. To uproot such corruption, targeting individuals isn't enough. "You got to go for the top," he states, suggesting an overhaul of the leadership and infrastructure as the only means to affect real change. A worrying pattern emerges from the conversation. An environment where unethical behavior becomes normalized, where bending rules is not just condoned but also encouraged. As Dreeke describes, it's a setting where "groupthink gets infused in everything," leading individuals to believe such behavior is not only acceptable but entirely regular. He offers a chilling comparison to a recent scandal involving a former FBI senior executive named Charlie McGonigal, charged and found guilty of receiving a hefty sum from Albanians and undermining Russian sanctions. Such acts make one wonder: how can high-ranking officials consider these actions permissible? “That's a culture," Dreeke asserts, “that says we can do this." The conversation on "Hidden Killers" raises disconcerting concerns. If individuals at the core of the justice system, whether in South Carolina or elsewhere, perceive rule-breaking as an ingrained part of their culture, the very foundations of the system are at risk. As the investigation into South Carolina's alleged jury tampering unfolds, one can only hope it serves as a wake-up call, urging reform not just in one state but throughout any system vulnerable to corruption. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Public perceptions play a crucial role in high-profile criminal cases. In the recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent, unveils the intricate dynamics surrounding Asa Ellerup, wife of the suspected serial killer, Rex Heuermann. Their conversation sheds light on Ellerup's peculiar requests and actions following her husband's arrest, raising unsettling questions about her relationship with Heuermann and the nature of her public appearances. "Ever since all this transpired, we've been keenly observing his family, especially since they've been so prominently visible," Brueski remarked. One peculiar detail that emerged was Ellerup's request to retrieve the hundreds of guns confiscated from their property. "She claims they're marital property, potentially worth hundreds of thousands," Brueski notes. However, with an active investigation on her husband in the backdrop, such a demand seems out of place. Ellerup's motivations and the nature of her relationship with Heuermann remain shrouded in mystery. "I don't find it strange that she's in need of money or is attempting to reclaim property," Brueski contemplates. "But the essence of their relationship, its intricacies, that's what's truly baffling." Brueski further recalled a report illustrating Heuermann's concerning behavior, where he obsessively stalked a co-worker. This raises pressing questions about Ellerup's awareness or involvement in her husband's actions. Dreeke chimes in with a compelling theory: "Could it be trauma bonding?" This psychological phenomenon occurs when victims develop a sense of loyalty or affection (often mistaken for love) towards their abusers due to the cycle of violence. Dreeke observes, "We're only getting small glimpses of her, mostly when she's raising complaints. We need to understand her motivations, her background, her life's arc." This perspective is essential, especially when public optics present her mostly as a victim. The conversation takes a turn as they delve deeper into Heuermann's choice in Ellerup as a partner. Dreeke postulates, "To maintain his façade, he would need a partner who's non-emotional, pragmatic, and importantly, not a deep thinker." This leads to an understanding that Ellerup was potentially chosen as she was less likely to question or challenge Heuermann's behaviors. Another intriguing revelation is Ellerup's swift decision to divorce Heuermann once his alleged crimes came to light. "Was the divorce a reaction to public disclosure, or was it her realization of his true nature?" Brueski ponders. The duo surmise that while Ellerup might be attempting to use public opinion for sympathy, her strategies might be backfiring due to a lack of experience. Despite the numerous theories, the true nature of their relationship remains speculative. As Dreeke aptly summarizes, "It's easy to armchair quarterback this, but the optics thus far haven't been very favorable." The "Hidden Killers" podcast episode offers a unique perspective into the complex layers surrounding high-profile criminal cases. Beyond the primary suspect, the lives and actions of their close family members also come under scrutiny, leading to a web of theories and speculations. Asa Ellerup, with her puzzling requests and opaque motivations, undoubtedly adds another layer of mystery to the enigma that is the Heuermann case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Public perceptions play a crucial role in high-profile criminal cases. In the recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent, unveils the intricate dynamics surrounding Asa Ellerup, wife of the suspected serial killer, Rex Heuermann. Their conversation sheds light on Ellerup's peculiar requests and actions following her husband's arrest, raising unsettling questions about her relationship with Heuermann and the nature of her public appearances. "Ever since all this transpired, we've been keenly observing his family, especially since they've been so prominently visible," Brueski remarked. One peculiar detail that emerged was Ellerup's request to retrieve the hundreds of guns confiscated from their property. "She claims they're marital property, potentially worth hundreds of thousands," Brueski notes. However, with an active investigation on her husband in the backdrop, such a demand seems out of place. Ellerup's motivations and the nature of her relationship with Heuermann remain shrouded in mystery. "I don't find it strange that she's in need of money or is attempting to reclaim property," Brueski contemplates. "But the essence of their relationship, its intricacies, that's what's truly baffling." Brueski further recalled a report illustrating Heuermann's concerning behavior, where he obsessively stalked a co-worker. This raises pressing questions about Ellerup's awareness or involvement in her husband's actions. Dreeke chimes in with a compelling theory: "Could it be trauma bonding?" This psychological phenomenon occurs when victims develop a sense of loyalty or affection (often mistaken for love) towards their abusers due to the cycle of violence. Dreeke observes, "We're only getting small glimpses of her, mostly when she's raising complaints. We need to understand her motivations, her background, her life's arc." This perspective is essential, especially when public optics present her mostly as a victim. The conversation takes a turn as they delve deeper into Heuermann's choice in Ellerup as a partner. Dreeke postulates, "To maintain his façade, he would need a partner who's non-emotional, pragmatic, and importantly, not a deep thinker." This leads to an understanding that Ellerup was potentially chosen as she was less likely to question or challenge Heuermann's behaviors. Another intriguing revelation is Ellerup's swift decision to divorce Heuermann once his alleged crimes came to light. "Was the divorce a reaction to public disclosure, or was it her realization of his true nature?" Brueski ponders. The duo surmise that while Ellerup might be attempting to use public opinion for sympathy, her strategies might be backfiring due to a lack of experience. Despite the numerous theories, the true nature of their relationship remains speculative. As Dreeke aptly summarizes, "It's easy to armchair quarterback this, but the optics thus far haven't been very favorable." The "Hidden Killers" podcast episode offers a unique perspective into the complex layers surrounding high-profile criminal cases. Beyond the primary suspect, the lives and actions of their close family members also come under scrutiny, leading to a web of theories and speculations. Asa Ellerup, with her puzzling requests and opaque motivations, undoubtedly adds another layer of mystery to the enigma that is the Heuermann case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Public perceptions play a crucial role in high-profile criminal cases. In the recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, in conversation with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent, unveils the intricate dynamics surrounding Asa Ellerup, wife of the suspected serial killer, Rex Heuermann. Their conversation sheds light on Ellerup's peculiar requests and actions following her husband's arrest, raising unsettling questions about her relationship with Heuermann and the nature of her public appearances. "Ever since all this transpired, we've been keenly observing his family, especially since they've been so prominently visible," Brueski remarked. One peculiar detail that emerged was Ellerup's request to retrieve the hundreds of guns confiscated from their property. "She claims they're marital property, potentially worth hundreds of thousands," Brueski notes. However, with an active investigation on her husband in the backdrop, such a demand seems out of place. Ellerup's motivations and the nature of her relationship with Heuermann remain shrouded in mystery. "I don't find it strange that she's in need of money or is attempting to reclaim property," Brueski contemplates. "But the essence of their relationship, its intricacies, that's what's truly baffling." Brueski further recalled a report illustrating Heuermann's concerning behavior, where he obsessively stalked a co-worker. This raises pressing questions about Ellerup's awareness or involvement in her husband's actions. Dreeke chimes in with a compelling theory: "Could it be trauma bonding?" This psychological phenomenon occurs when victims develop a sense of loyalty or affection (often mistaken for love) towards their abusers due to the cycle of violence. Dreeke observes, "We're only getting small glimpses of her, mostly when she's raising complaints. We need to understand her motivations, her background, her life's arc." This perspective is essential, especially when public optics present her mostly as a victim. The conversation takes a turn as they delve deeper into Heuermann's choice in Ellerup as a partner. Dreeke postulates, "To maintain his façade, he would need a partner who's non-emotional, pragmatic, and importantly, not a deep thinker." This leads to an understanding that Ellerup was potentially chosen as she was less likely to question or challenge Heuermann's behaviors. Another intriguing revelation is Ellerup's swift decision to divorce Heuermann once his alleged crimes came to light. "Was the divorce a reaction to public disclosure, or was it her realization of his true nature?" Brueski ponders. The duo surmise that while Ellerup might be attempting to use public opinion for sympathy, her strategies might be backfiring due to a lack of experience. Despite the numerous theories, the true nature of their relationship remains speculative. As Dreeke aptly summarizes, "It's easy to armchair quarterback this, but the optics thus far haven't been very favorable." The "Hidden Killers" podcast episode offers a unique perspective into the complex layers surrounding high-profile criminal cases. Beyond the primary suspect, the lives and actions of their close family members also come under scrutiny, leading to a web of theories and speculations. Asa Ellerup, with her puzzling requests and opaque motivations, undoubtedly adds another layer of mystery to the enigma that is the Heuermann case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the acclaimed "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski joins forces with the sagacious mind of retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. As they peel back the layers of the Rex Heuermann case, a saga brimming with allegations, speculations, and alleged injustices, the narrative takes unexpected turns, particularly when the involvement and treatment of Heuermann's family come under the spotlight. Rex Heuermann's recent arrest has thrust him into the limelight, sparking a nationwide debate and presenting a myriad of questions regarding the repercussions on his family. Tony Brueski poses a poignant reflection on this aspect, referencing "talk and speculation about the family themselves," especially concerning Heuermann's children and his soon-to-be ex-wife. This family angle has grown in significance with John Ray, the attorney for the victims of the Gilgo Beach incident, suggesting a deeper dive into the family's potential ties. Brueski encapsulates Ray's sentiments, saying there's a call for "a closer look at this family, not just immediately wiping them away." The family's legal representation swiftly counters, asserting that "these allegations shouldn't even be dignified with a response." Yet, the discourse isn't merely about pointing fingers or sowing seeds of doubt. Robin Dreeke, with his reservoir of FBI experience, brings a nuanced perspective to the table. For Dreeke, investigations have always been about breadth and depth. "You know, as investigators, you investigate everything," he underscores. His contention isn't about implicating the family but valuing their proximity to Heuermann, which could unravel previously overlooked facets of the case. Drawing on statistical probabilities, Dreeke elaborates, "the chances of them being aware of anything [criminal] are slim to none." However, their long-standing association with Heuermann could make them instrumental in shading in the missing parts of the puzzle. Such invaluable insights aren't novel in crime investigations. Dreeke cites the instance of the BTK killer, emphasizing the revelation potential when law enforcement fosters open dialogues with family members. "They might be aware of trips he took during time periods that might coincide with other murders, with other missing people and things like that," Dreeke articulates, pushing for a more inclusive approach to investigations. Yet, the Heuermann narrative isn't a linear tale of chasing leads. It's a tapestry woven with allegations of mistreatment meted out to the family by law enforcement. Brueski pulls no punches as he touches upon how the family's residence was "destroyed" during the investigative process. Such adversarial stances, Dreeke postulates, run the risk of "making an enemy out of your possible allies and resources." Intriguingly, as the conversation pivots to the underpinnings of such oversight, one term recurrently emerges: "Leadership." Dreeke, connecting the dots from past events, such as escapes from Pennsylvania prisons, opines that systemic inadequacies often trace back to the leadership helm. Brueski, sharing this sentiment, remarks, "I think the thing that tainted this years ago was that chief [who] has now been arrested." But the podcast episode doesn't merely chronicle the specifics of the case; it morphs into a broader rumination on the ethos of law enforcement. Dreeke broaches the inherent biases officers might harbor due to their incessant brushes with society's underbelly. "Your first inclination a lot of times is not, 'Hey, let's partner with these people'," he observes, stressing the need for collaboration, especially with those connected to the accused. In the final analysis, Brueski and Dreeke accentuate the imperative for a holistic and humane approach to investigations. Their call to arms isn't just for thoroughness but also for empathy. As Dreeke envisions a dedicated "point person" to bridge law enforcement and the family, the overarching message is clear: investigations must be both incisive and inclusive, ensuring justice doesn't become a casualty in the pursuit of truth.
In a riveting episode of the acclaimed "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski joins forces with the sagacious mind of retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. As they peel back the layers of the Rex Heuermann case, a saga brimming with allegations, speculations, and alleged injustices, the narrative takes unexpected turns, particularly when the involvement and treatment of Heuermann's family come under the spotlight. Rex Heuermann's recent arrest has thrust him into the limelight, sparking a nationwide debate and presenting a myriad of questions regarding the repercussions on his family. Tony Brueski poses a poignant reflection on this aspect, referencing "talk and speculation about the family themselves," especially concerning Heuermann's children and his soon-to-be ex-wife. This family angle has grown in significance with John Ray, the attorney for the victims of the Gilgo Beach incident, suggesting a deeper dive into the family's potential ties. Brueski encapsulates Ray's sentiments, saying there's a call for "a closer look at this family, not just immediately wiping them away." The family's legal representation swiftly counters, asserting that "these allegations shouldn't even be dignified with a response." Yet, the discourse isn't merely about pointing fingers or sowing seeds of doubt. Robin Dreeke, with his reservoir of FBI experience, brings a nuanced perspective to the table. For Dreeke, investigations have always been about breadth and depth. "You know, as investigators, you investigate everything," he underscores. His contention isn't about implicating the family but valuing their proximity to Heuermann, which could unravel previously overlooked facets of the case. Drawing on statistical probabilities, Dreeke elaborates, "the chances of them being aware of anything [criminal] are slim to none." However, their long-standing association with Heuermann could make them instrumental in shading in the missing parts of the puzzle. Such invaluable insights aren't novel in crime investigations. Dreeke cites the instance of the BTK killer, emphasizing the revelation potential when law enforcement fosters open dialogues with family members. "They might be aware of trips he took during time periods that might coincide with other murders, with other missing people and things like that," Dreeke articulates, pushing for a more inclusive approach to investigations. Yet, the Heuermann narrative isn't a linear tale of chasing leads. It's a tapestry woven with allegations of mistreatment meted out to the family by law enforcement. Brueski pulls no punches as he touches upon how the family's residence was "destroyed" during the investigative process. Such adversarial stances, Dreeke postulates, run the risk of "making an enemy out of your possible allies and resources." Intriguingly, as the conversation pivots to the underpinnings of such oversight, one term recurrently emerges: "Leadership." Dreeke, connecting the dots from past events, such as escapes from Pennsylvania prisons, opines that systemic inadequacies often trace back to the leadership helm. Brueski, sharing this sentiment, remarks, "I think the thing that tainted this years ago was that chief [who] has now been arrested." But the podcast episode doesn't merely chronicle the specifics of the case; it morphs into a broader rumination on the ethos of law enforcement. Dreeke broaches the inherent biases officers might harbor due to their incessant brushes with society's underbelly. "Your first inclination a lot of times is not, 'Hey, let's partner with these people'," he observes, stressing the need for collaboration, especially with those connected to the accused. In the final analysis, Brueski and Dreeke accentuate the imperative for a holistic and humane approach to investigations. Their call to arms isn't just for thoroughness but also for empathy. As Dreeke envisions a dedicated "point person" to bridge law enforcement and the family, the overarching message is clear: investigations must be both incisive and inclusive, ensuring justice doesn't become a casualty in the pursuit of truth.
In a riveting episode of the acclaimed "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski joins forces with the sagacious mind of retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. As they peel back the layers of the Rex Heuermann case, a saga brimming with allegations, speculations, and alleged injustices, the narrative takes unexpected turns, particularly when the involvement and treatment of Heuermann's family come under the spotlight. Rex Heuermann's recent arrest has thrust him into the limelight, sparking a nationwide debate and presenting a myriad of questions regarding the repercussions on his family. Tony Brueski poses a poignant reflection on this aspect, referencing "talk and speculation about the family themselves," especially concerning Heuermann's children and his soon-to-be ex-wife. This family angle has grown in significance with John Ray, the attorney for the victims of the Gilgo Beach incident, suggesting a deeper dive into the family's potential ties. Brueski encapsulates Ray's sentiments, saying there's a call for "a closer look at this family, not just immediately wiping them away." The family's legal representation swiftly counters, asserting that "these allegations shouldn't even be dignified with a response." Yet, the discourse isn't merely about pointing fingers or sowing seeds of doubt. Robin Dreeke, with his reservoir of FBI experience, brings a nuanced perspective to the table. For Dreeke, investigations have always been about breadth and depth. "You know, as investigators, you investigate everything," he underscores. His contention isn't about implicating the family but valuing their proximity to Heuermann, which could unravel previously overlooked facets of the case. Drawing on statistical probabilities, Dreeke elaborates, "the chances of them being aware of anything [criminal] are slim to none." However, their long-standing association with Heuermann could make them instrumental in shading in the missing parts of the puzzle. Such invaluable insights aren't novel in crime investigations. Dreeke cites the instance of the BTK killer, emphasizing the revelation potential when law enforcement fosters open dialogues with family members. "They might be aware of trips he took during time periods that might coincide with other murders, with other missing people and things like that," Dreeke articulates, pushing for a more inclusive approach to investigations. Yet, the Heuermann narrative isn't a linear tale of chasing leads. It's a tapestry woven with allegations of mistreatment meted out to the family by law enforcement. Brueski pulls no punches as he touches upon how the family's residence was "destroyed" during the investigative process. Such adversarial stances, Dreeke postulates, run the risk of "making an enemy out of your possible allies and resources." Intriguingly, as the conversation pivots to the underpinnings of such oversight, one term recurrently emerges: "Leadership." Dreeke, connecting the dots from past events, such as escapes from Pennsylvania prisons, opines that systemic inadequacies often trace back to the leadership helm. Brueski, sharing this sentiment, remarks, "I think the thing that tainted this years ago was that chief [who] has now been arrested." But the podcast episode doesn't merely chronicle the specifics of the case; it morphs into a broader rumination on the ethos of law enforcement. Dreeke broaches the inherent biases officers might harbor due to their incessant brushes with society's underbelly. "Your first inclination a lot of times is not, 'Hey, let's partner with these people'," he observes, stressing the need for collaboration, especially with those connected to the accused. In the final analysis, Brueski and Dreeke accentuate the imperative for a holistic and humane approach to investigations. Their call to arms isn't just for thoroughness but also for empathy. As Dreeke envisions a dedicated "point person" to bridge law enforcement and the family, the overarching message is clear: investigations must be both incisive and inclusive, ensuring justice doesn't become a casualty in the pursuit of truth.
In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, a heated discussion was brought to the forefront regarding an expert witness who had allegedly recanted their testimony. Special guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, joined in to unpack the complexities surrounding the bizarre twists and turns of the case. Brueski began, "So what does one do when the expert witness that you hired to come testify goes back to office workplace and starts recanting their testimony to coworkers? Allegedly." It's a perplexing scenario, especially considering the gravity of the case at hand. This unexpected development even led to a visit from the FBI to one of the individuals in the Kohberger expert witness camp. Dreeke, who specializes in behavior and counterintelligence, expressed his confusion: "And yet the biggest thing that struck me with this one, I don't know why the FBI interviewed them. This is not an FBI investigation." Why would the prosecutor ask two FBI agents to interview Gabriela Vargas, the expert in question, instead of local authorities or state officials handling the matter? Brueski added, "It sounds real official. It sounds, oh, we're gonna get to the bottom of this because we're sending two FBI agents to go and question her about it." However, the more they delved into the situation, the more unanswered questions seemed to emerge. Another element adding to the puzzling nature of the case is Anne Taylor, who seems to be making a significant issue out of certain aspects. As Dreeke pointed out, "I think she does all she can, she's part of it, you know, she's the writer, he's the author, and they're coming up with their methodologies." Could there be underlying reasons for their strategies? In another bizarre twist, there's speculation over a video clip that apparently shows Brian Kohberger entering the courtroom with his fly partially zipped. Brueski remarked, "Are they just kind of grasping at anything and trying to get the cameras out with any reason they can possibly go for right now?" Dreeke concurred, saying that the defense seems to be "shooting a shotgun and hoping one of the pellets hits." Drawing on his expertise in human behavior, Dreeke posited that the defense's tactic is consistent: "They're going to continue to do it right up until I think the trial. Because this is their behavior arc of constantly picking, going." They aim to sow doubt in the jury, hoping that amidst the plethora of information, one seed might resonate with a juror. Brueski raised another pertinent question, "So delaying this now and who knows when it will end up actually going to trial next year, the following?" Both agreed that delaying the trial could be a strategic move by the defense. As Dreeke said, "That also gives them more time to try and get death off the table. I think so." In conclusion, the Kohberger case continues to confound, raising more questions than answers. From expert witnesses recanting their testimonies to questionable FBI involvement, each twist makes the path to justice increasingly complex. With the trial's future still uncertain, one can only hope that clarity will eventually prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, a heated discussion was brought to the forefront regarding an expert witness who had allegedly recanted their testimony. Special guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, joined in to unpack the complexities surrounding the bizarre twists and turns of the case. Brueski began, "So what does one do when the expert witness that you hired to come testify goes back to office workplace and starts recanting their testimony to coworkers? Allegedly." It's a perplexing scenario, especially considering the gravity of the case at hand. This unexpected development even led to a visit from the FBI to one of the individuals in the Kohberger expert witness camp. Dreeke, who specializes in behavior and counterintelligence, expressed his confusion: "And yet the biggest thing that struck me with this one, I don't know why the FBI interviewed them. This is not an FBI investigation." Why would the prosecutor ask two FBI agents to interview Gabriela Vargas, the expert in question, instead of local authorities or state officials handling the matter? Brueski added, "It sounds real official. It sounds, oh, we're gonna get to the bottom of this because we're sending two FBI agents to go and question her about it." However, the more they delved into the situation, the more unanswered questions seemed to emerge. Another element adding to the puzzling nature of the case is Anne Taylor, who seems to be making a significant issue out of certain aspects. As Dreeke pointed out, "I think she does all she can, she's part of it, you know, she's the writer, he's the author, and they're coming up with their methodologies." Could there be underlying reasons for their strategies? In another bizarre twist, there's speculation over a video clip that apparently shows Brian Kohberger entering the courtroom with his fly partially zipped. Brueski remarked, "Are they just kind of grasping at anything and trying to get the cameras out with any reason they can possibly go for right now?" Dreeke concurred, saying that the defense seems to be "shooting a shotgun and hoping one of the pellets hits." Drawing on his expertise in human behavior, Dreeke posited that the defense's tactic is consistent: "They're going to continue to do it right up until I think the trial. Because this is their behavior arc of constantly picking, going." They aim to sow doubt in the jury, hoping that amidst the plethora of information, one seed might resonate with a juror. Brueski raised another pertinent question, "So delaying this now and who knows when it will end up actually going to trial next year, the following?" Both agreed that delaying the trial could be a strategic move by the defense. As Dreeke said, "That also gives them more time to try and get death off the table. I think so." In conclusion, the Kohberger case continues to confound, raising more questions than answers. From expert witnesses recanting their testimonies to questionable FBI involvement, each twist makes the path to justice increasingly complex. With the trial's future still uncertain, one can only hope that clarity will eventually prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, a heated discussion was brought to the forefront regarding an expert witness who had allegedly recanted their testimony. Special guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, joined in to unpack the complexities surrounding the bizarre twists and turns of the case. Brueski began, "So what does one do when the expert witness that you hired to come testify goes back to office workplace and starts recanting their testimony to coworkers? Allegedly." It's a perplexing scenario, especially considering the gravity of the case at hand. This unexpected development even led to a visit from the FBI to one of the individuals in the Kohberger expert witness camp. Dreeke, who specializes in behavior and counterintelligence, expressed his confusion: "And yet the biggest thing that struck me with this one, I don't know why the FBI interviewed them. This is not an FBI investigation." Why would the prosecutor ask two FBI agents to interview Gabriela Vargas, the expert in question, instead of local authorities or state officials handling the matter? Brueski added, "It sounds real official. It sounds, oh, we're gonna get to the bottom of this because we're sending two FBI agents to go and question her about it." However, the more they delved into the situation, the more unanswered questions seemed to emerge. Another element adding to the puzzling nature of the case is Anne Taylor, who seems to be making a significant issue out of certain aspects. As Dreeke pointed out, "I think she does all she can, she's part of it, you know, she's the writer, he's the author, and they're coming up with their methodologies." Could there be underlying reasons for their strategies? In another bizarre twist, there's speculation over a video clip that apparently shows Brian Kohberger entering the courtroom with his fly partially zipped. Brueski remarked, "Are they just kind of grasping at anything and trying to get the cameras out with any reason they can possibly go for right now?" Dreeke concurred, saying that the defense seems to be "shooting a shotgun and hoping one of the pellets hits." Drawing on his expertise in human behavior, Dreeke posited that the defense's tactic is consistent: "They're going to continue to do it right up until I think the trial. Because this is their behavior arc of constantly picking, going." They aim to sow doubt in the jury, hoping that amidst the plethora of information, one seed might resonate with a juror. Brueski raised another pertinent question, "So delaying this now and who knows when it will end up actually going to trial next year, the following?" Both agreed that delaying the trial could be a strategic move by the defense. As Dreeke said, "That also gives them more time to try and get death off the table. I think so." In conclusion, the Kohberger case continues to confound, raising more questions than answers. From expert witnesses recanting their testimonies to questionable FBI involvement, each twist makes the path to justice increasingly complex. With the trial's future still uncertain, one can only hope that clarity will eventually prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Recent revelations surrounding the Rex Heuermann case have left many perplexed, especially after the sudden removal of the suspect from suicide watch. On the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski seeks insight from retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. Rex Heuermann, an older individual facing mounting evidence against him, had recently been taken off suicide watch, sparking a flurry of questions from the public. Addressing the issue, Brueski asked, "Is this a good idea to take someone like that off of a suicide watch or is it really very stressful on resources to really keep somebody on there for a long period of time?" Dreeke responded by emphasizing the surprising nature of Heuermann's initial placement on suicide watch. "So let's look at serial killers. One of the driving motivations of them is sensationalism fantasy seeking, and since they all edge up high in psychopathy, they're about grandiosity and notoriety," he stated. Serial killers, according to Dreeke, are not typically inclined towards self-harm due to their desire for attention and recognition. But with Heuermann, it appears that nothing is simple. As Dreeke mentioned, "It's gonna be interesting because, you know, I listened to his lawyer speak earlier today and it was interesting because he, the lawyer seems as convinced as he can be that Rex is innocent." Further complicating matters is the shocking discovery of Heuermann's wife's hair on three of the alleged victims' bodies. "It's a very hard one to explain away," Dreeke noted. There's been significant debate about whether this evidence necessarily ties Heuermann's wife to the crimes. "It's interesting, especially given that her DNA, because of the hair, was found with the bodies," remarked Dreeke. However, as of the recording, law enforcement had not interviewed the wife, which has only intensified public speculation. Brueski probed further, asking why law enforcement hadn't sought a conversation with Heuermann's wife, given the circumstances. "You would think if her DNA was found with the deceased bodies that she would at least be interviewed early," Dreeke responded. Surprisingly, Dreeke suggested that there might be a strategic reason behind law enforcement's choice to avoid an immediate interview. "There's gotta be a reason and a strategy that they're not interviewing her or haven't interviewed yet," Dreeke mused. He also mentioned her undergoing cancer treatment, indicating that health concerns might be a factor in the decision. Despite the uncertainties surrounding the Heuermann case, one thing is clear: the public's desire for answers remains unsatisfied. With Heuermann's wife set to appear on a news segment soon, many are hopeful that some clarity will finally emerge. As Dreeke aptly summed up the current state of the investigation: "It'll be interesting because I think she's going on the news coming up. And so I think we'll probably learn more about what she says on TV than we do from law enforcement, maybe." With many questions still unanswered, the public can only wait and see how the Rex Heuermann case unfolds, hoping for justice to be served for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Recent revelations surrounding the Rex Heuermann case have left many perplexed, especially after the sudden removal of the suspect from suicide watch. On the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski seeks insight from retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. Rex Heuermann, an older individual facing mounting evidence against him, had recently been taken off suicide watch, sparking a flurry of questions from the public. Addressing the issue, Brueski asked, "Is this a good idea to take someone like that off of a suicide watch or is it really very stressful on resources to really keep somebody on there for a long period of time?" Dreeke responded by emphasizing the surprising nature of Heuermann's initial placement on suicide watch. "So let's look at serial killers. One of the driving motivations of them is sensationalism fantasy seeking, and since they all edge up high in psychopathy, they're about grandiosity and notoriety," he stated. Serial killers, according to Dreeke, are not typically inclined towards self-harm due to their desire for attention and recognition. But with Heuermann, it appears that nothing is simple. As Dreeke mentioned, "It's gonna be interesting because, you know, I listened to his lawyer speak earlier today and it was interesting because he, the lawyer seems as convinced as he can be that Rex is innocent." Further complicating matters is the shocking discovery of Heuermann's wife's hair on three of the alleged victims' bodies. "It's a very hard one to explain away," Dreeke noted. There's been significant debate about whether this evidence necessarily ties Heuermann's wife to the crimes. "It's interesting, especially given that her DNA, because of the hair, was found with the bodies," remarked Dreeke. However, as of the recording, law enforcement had not interviewed the wife, which has only intensified public speculation. Brueski probed further, asking why law enforcement hadn't sought a conversation with Heuermann's wife, given the circumstances. "You would think if her DNA was found with the deceased bodies that she would at least be interviewed early," Dreeke responded. Surprisingly, Dreeke suggested that there might be a strategic reason behind law enforcement's choice to avoid an immediate interview. "There's gotta be a reason and a strategy that they're not interviewing her or haven't interviewed yet," Dreeke mused. He also mentioned her undergoing cancer treatment, indicating that health concerns might be a factor in the decision. Despite the uncertainties surrounding the Heuermann case, one thing is clear: the public's desire for answers remains unsatisfied. With Heuermann's wife set to appear on a news segment soon, many are hopeful that some clarity will finally emerge. As Dreeke aptly summed up the current state of the investigation: "It'll be interesting because I think she's going on the news coming up. And so I think we'll probably learn more about what she says on TV than we do from law enforcement, maybe." With many questions still unanswered, the public can only wait and see how the Rex Heuermann case unfolds, hoping for justice to be served for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Recent revelations surrounding the Rex Heuermann case have left many perplexed, especially after the sudden removal of the suspect from suicide watch. On the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski seeks insight from retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. Rex Heuermann, an older individual facing mounting evidence against him, had recently been taken off suicide watch, sparking a flurry of questions from the public. Addressing the issue, Brueski asked, "Is this a good idea to take someone like that off of a suicide watch or is it really very stressful on resources to really keep somebody on there for a long period of time?" Dreeke responded by emphasizing the surprising nature of Heuermann's initial placement on suicide watch. "So let's look at serial killers. One of the driving motivations of them is sensationalism fantasy seeking, and since they all edge up high in psychopathy, they're about grandiosity and notoriety," he stated. Serial killers, according to Dreeke, are not typically inclined towards self-harm due to their desire for attention and recognition. But with Heuermann, it appears that nothing is simple. As Dreeke mentioned, "It's gonna be interesting because, you know, I listened to his lawyer speak earlier today and it was interesting because he, the lawyer seems as convinced as he can be that Rex is innocent." Further complicating matters is the shocking discovery of Heuermann's wife's hair on three of the alleged victims' bodies. "It's a very hard one to explain away," Dreeke noted. There's been significant debate about whether this evidence necessarily ties Heuermann's wife to the crimes. "It's interesting, especially given that her DNA, because of the hair, was found with the bodies," remarked Dreeke. However, as of the recording, law enforcement had not interviewed the wife, which has only intensified public speculation. Brueski probed further, asking why law enforcement hadn't sought a conversation with Heuermann's wife, given the circumstances. "You would think if her DNA was found with the deceased bodies that she would at least be interviewed early," Dreeke responded. Surprisingly, Dreeke suggested that there might be a strategic reason behind law enforcement's choice to avoid an immediate interview. "There's gotta be a reason and a strategy that they're not interviewing her or haven't interviewed yet," Dreeke mused. He also mentioned her undergoing cancer treatment, indicating that health concerns might be a factor in the decision. Despite the uncertainties surrounding the Heuermann case, one thing is clear: the public's desire for answers remains unsatisfied. With Heuermann's wife set to appear on a news segment soon, many are hopeful that some clarity will finally emerge. As Dreeke aptly summed up the current state of the investigation: "It'll be interesting because I think she's going on the news coming up. And so I think we'll probably learn more about what she says on TV than we do from law enforcement, maybe." With many questions still unanswered, the public can only wait and see how the Rex Heuermann case unfolds, hoping for justice to be served for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, to dissect the intriguing psychological makeup of Thomas Randolph. Known infamously for the mysterious deaths of four of his six wives, Randolph's past and behaviors present a perplexing enigma for crime analysts. Randolph, often termed the 'Tiger King of true crime', has continually maintained his innocence regarding the deaths of his wives. However, his past conviction, although later overturned on technicalities, casts a heavy shadow of doubt over his claims. Dreeke, providing insights based on his extensive experience, noted, "He is a horrendous, fascinating human being. He likes really outlandish experiences." A striking point of contention is the financial aspect. Randolph appears to have no clear source of income, leading many, including Dreeke, to believe that his livelihood is built upon insurance money obtained posthumously from his deceased spouses. "I don't think he has a living except killing people for their insurance money," stated Dreeke. Dreeke was particularly taken by Randolph's interviews and demeanor, observing that the man shows no evident distress or change in affect, regardless of the context – be it a discussion of death, his potential culpability, or even the possibility of his own death. This flat affect suggests a potential disconnect with emotions that are usually associated with death or accusations of murder. One of the most discussed pieces of evidence was a video where Randolph leads the police through a vivid reenactment of the crime scene. Dreeke commented on this, saying, "His body language was extremely congruent with someone describing an actual event." However, he was quick to note the inconsistencies between Randolph's dramatized narrative and forensic evidence. Elaborating further on this display, Dreeke introduced the idea of 'method acting': "Method acting is you are, you've actually experienced the things that you're playing out, but you're modifying the details to a degree that you believe them." Randolph's act seems to be a blend of reality and fiction, making his account seem genuine, albeit misleading. Dreeke pointed out another fascinating trait of Randolph's – his tendency to remain distanced from the actual act of murder. "He seems to like to be distanced from the death itself, yet like to be close enough, I think, for the novelty of it," Dreeke analyzed. This behavior starkly contrasts with many serial killers, who often seek intimate involvement in the act of killing. In examining Randolph's ability to continually draw people – especially women – into his orbit, Dreeke mentioned, "He's got reps in manipulation, charisma, and showmanship." He also highlighted Randolph's skill in selecting his victims, which isn't limited to potential spouses but extends to individuals he manipulates into committing crimes for him. In conclusion, the complex character of Thomas Randolph, with his unique blend of charisma, manipulation, and dark intentions, makes for a chilling study in true crime. As Dreeke aptly summed up, "He's literally, he's an entertainer. He is entertaining himself and he is entertaining everyone who wants to watch him." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, to dissect the intriguing psychological makeup of Thomas Randolph. Known infamously for the mysterious deaths of four of his six wives, Randolph's past and behaviors present a perplexing enigma for crime analysts. Randolph, often termed the 'Tiger King of true crime', has continually maintained his innocence regarding the deaths of his wives. However, his past conviction, although later overturned on technicalities, casts a heavy shadow of doubt over his claims. Dreeke, providing insights based on his extensive experience, noted, "He is a horrendous, fascinating human being. He likes really outlandish experiences." A striking point of contention is the financial aspect. Randolph appears to have no clear source of income, leading many, including Dreeke, to believe that his livelihood is built upon insurance money obtained posthumously from his deceased spouses. "I don't think he has a living except killing people for their insurance money," stated Dreeke. Dreeke was particularly taken by Randolph's interviews and demeanor, observing that the man shows no evident distress or change in affect, regardless of the context – be it a discussion of death, his potential culpability, or even the possibility of his own death. This flat affect suggests a potential disconnect with emotions that are usually associated with death or accusations of murder. One of the most discussed pieces of evidence was a video where Randolph leads the police through a vivid reenactment of the crime scene. Dreeke commented on this, saying, "His body language was extremely congruent with someone describing an actual event." However, he was quick to note the inconsistencies between Randolph's dramatized narrative and forensic evidence. Elaborating further on this display, Dreeke introduced the idea of 'method acting': "Method acting is you are, you've actually experienced the things that you're playing out, but you're modifying the details to a degree that you believe them." Randolph's act seems to be a blend of reality and fiction, making his account seem genuine, albeit misleading. Dreeke pointed out another fascinating trait of Randolph's – his tendency to remain distanced from the actual act of murder. "He seems to like to be distanced from the death itself, yet like to be close enough, I think, for the novelty of it," Dreeke analyzed. This behavior starkly contrasts with many serial killers, who often seek intimate involvement in the act of killing. In examining Randolph's ability to continually draw people – especially women – into his orbit, Dreeke mentioned, "He's got reps in manipulation, charisma, and showmanship." He also highlighted Randolph's skill in selecting his victims, which isn't limited to potential spouses but extends to individuals he manipulates into committing crimes for him. In conclusion, the complex character of Thomas Randolph, with his unique blend of charisma, manipulation, and dark intentions, makes for a chilling study in true crime. As Dreeke aptly summed up, "He's literally, he's an entertainer. He is entertaining himself and he is entertaining everyone who wants to watch him." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski had an engaging discussion with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The subject of their conversation? The defense strategy of Anne Taylor, attorney for Brian Kohberger. Tony Brueski kicked off the conversation, commenting on the curious trend where people with limited or no expertise in a given field seem to be more confident in challenging experts than ever before. As he put it, "It seems to be a very bizarre thing we have right now where expert opinion doesn't really matter." This was framed within the context of Kohberger possibly influencing his own defense strategy despite lacking a legal background. Dreeke weighed in on this societal shift, suggesting that the overriding of experts might be "more of a reflection of the mistrust of authority than anything else." This mistrust, he argued, could place undue pressure on professionals to bend to the whims of those who are less informed, lest they face accusations of incompetence or negligence. One of the main points of contention is the decision by Anne Taylor to challenge cell phone data triangulation as a means to place Kohberger at the scene of the alleged crime. Brueski speculates, "They're gonna poke holes or… really show that [the triangulation] is not accurate." In essence, if Taylor can create enough doubt around the cell phone data – which might place Kohberger near the scene – then the primary piece of physical evidence against him, a knife sheath, would stand alone. Dreeke shared this sentiment, emphasizing that Taylor's methodology might be to "plant reasonable doubt." He further noted that if there are inconsistencies in the cell phone data, even if they can be attributed to technology's inherent limitations, it might be enough to sway at least one juror. Dreeke alluded to the psychological aspect of this strategy. Drawing on Robert Green's "Laws of Human Nature", he points out that people often gravitate towards information that validates their own self-perception. If Taylor can tap into this human trait and make jurors feel uniquely perceptive or intelligent for doubting the accepted norm, she could foster a skepticism that benefits her client. "That's an effective strategy," Dreeke opined. While the duo jested that they might inadvertently be providing Taylor with more ammunition for her defense, they touched on a more profound point about the art of courtroom litigation. As Dreeke insightfully observed, courtroom lawyers, whether prosecutors or defenders, are storytellers. They must balance hard facts with the softer touch of emotion, weaving a narrative that resonates with jurors. For those like Taylor, who may be "light on facts and data", the onus is on them to lean into emotion and sentiment to tip the scales in their favor. In conclusion, as the legal proceedings in the Brian Kohberger case unfold, it serves as a potent reminder of the dynamic interplay between expertise and public opinion, fact and emotion, in our justice system. The implications of this balance could, as Dreeke and Brueski suggest, have far-reaching consequences for both the accused and the broader public's faith in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski had an engaging discussion with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The subject of their conversation? The defense strategy of Anne Taylor, attorney for Brian Kohberger. Tony Brueski kicked off the conversation, commenting on the curious trend where people with limited or no expertise in a given field seem to be more confident in challenging experts than ever before. As he put it, "It seems to be a very bizarre thing we have right now where expert opinion doesn't really matter." This was framed within the context of Kohberger possibly influencing his own defense strategy despite lacking a legal background. Dreeke weighed in on this societal shift, suggesting that the overriding of experts might be "more of a reflection of the mistrust of authority than anything else." This mistrust, he argued, could place undue pressure on professionals to bend to the whims of those who are less informed, lest they face accusations of incompetence or negligence. One of the main points of contention is the decision by Anne Taylor to challenge cell phone data triangulation as a means to place Kohberger at the scene of the alleged crime. Brueski speculates, "They're gonna poke holes or… really show that [the triangulation] is not accurate." In essence, if Taylor can create enough doubt around the cell phone data – which might place Kohberger near the scene – then the primary piece of physical evidence against him, a knife sheath, would stand alone. Dreeke shared this sentiment, emphasizing that Taylor's methodology might be to "plant reasonable doubt." He further noted that if there are inconsistencies in the cell phone data, even if they can be attributed to technology's inherent limitations, it might be enough to sway at least one juror. Dreeke alluded to the psychological aspect of this strategy. Drawing on Robert Green's "Laws of Human Nature", he points out that people often gravitate towards information that validates their own self-perception. If Taylor can tap into this human trait and make jurors feel uniquely perceptive or intelligent for doubting the accepted norm, she could foster a skepticism that benefits her client. "That's an effective strategy," Dreeke opined. While the duo jested that they might inadvertently be providing Taylor with more ammunition for her defense, they touched on a more profound point about the art of courtroom litigation. As Dreeke insightfully observed, courtroom lawyers, whether prosecutors or defenders, are storytellers. They must balance hard facts with the softer touch of emotion, weaving a narrative that resonates with jurors. For those like Taylor, who may be "light on facts and data", the onus is on them to lean into emotion and sentiment to tip the scales in their favor. In conclusion, as the legal proceedings in the Brian Kohberger case unfold, it serves as a potent reminder of the dynamic interplay between expertise and public opinion, fact and emotion, in our justice system. The implications of this balance could, as Dreeke and Brueski suggest, have far-reaching consequences for both the accused and the broader public's faith in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski had an engaging discussion with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The subject of their conversation? The defense strategy of Anne Taylor, attorney for Brian Kohberger. Tony Brueski kicked off the conversation, commenting on the curious trend where people with limited or no expertise in a given field seem to be more confident in challenging experts than ever before. As he put it, "It seems to be a very bizarre thing we have right now where expert opinion doesn't really matter." This was framed within the context of Kohberger possibly influencing his own defense strategy despite lacking a legal background. Dreeke weighed in on this societal shift, suggesting that the overriding of experts might be "more of a reflection of the mistrust of authority than anything else." This mistrust, he argued, could place undue pressure on professionals to bend to the whims of those who are less informed, lest they face accusations of incompetence or negligence. One of the main points of contention is the decision by Anne Taylor to challenge cell phone data triangulation as a means to place Kohberger at the scene of the alleged crime. Brueski speculates, "They're gonna poke holes or… really show that [the triangulation] is not accurate." In essence, if Taylor can create enough doubt around the cell phone data – which might place Kohberger near the scene – then the primary piece of physical evidence against him, a knife sheath, would stand alone. Dreeke shared this sentiment, emphasizing that Taylor's methodology might be to "plant reasonable doubt." He further noted that if there are inconsistencies in the cell phone data, even if they can be attributed to technology's inherent limitations, it might be enough to sway at least one juror. Dreeke alluded to the psychological aspect of this strategy. Drawing on Robert Green's "Laws of Human Nature", he points out that people often gravitate towards information that validates their own self-perception. If Taylor can tap into this human trait and make jurors feel uniquely perceptive or intelligent for doubting the accepted norm, she could foster a skepticism that benefits her client. "That's an effective strategy," Dreeke opined. While the duo jested that they might inadvertently be providing Taylor with more ammunition for her defense, they touched on a more profound point about the art of courtroom litigation. As Dreeke insightfully observed, courtroom lawyers, whether prosecutors or defenders, are storytellers. They must balance hard facts with the softer touch of emotion, weaving a narrative that resonates with jurors. For those like Taylor, who may be "light on facts and data", the onus is on them to lean into emotion and sentiment to tip the scales in their favor. In conclusion, as the legal proceedings in the Brian Kohberger case unfold, it serves as a potent reminder of the dynamic interplay between expertise and public opinion, fact and emotion, in our justice system. The implications of this balance could, as Dreeke and Brueski suggest, have far-reaching consequences for both the accused and the broader public's faith in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sits down with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to shed light on a deeply unsettling case. The story unfolds of a man audacious enough to create a makeshift cell in his garage, a setting for heinous crimes. With the dissection of the case, Dreeke helps uncover the intricacies of the offender's psyche, signaling a larger issue at play in society. Dreeke emphasizes the profound failure of the justice system, noting that the man had been "charged and convicted multiple times of sexual assaults." Such a track record paints a concerning picture about his potential to repeat offenses. As Brueski highlighted, the criminal's method of evasion was frequently moving from one place to another, a common trait of serial rapists. A striking pattern observed is their inability to sustain an income, prompting them to form relationships primarily for financial gain. The offender's focus on targeting sex workers isn't unique. Dreeke highlights the tragic reality that many sex workers are victims of trafficking, often being groomed and trafficked as teenagers. His statistic is harrowing: "68% of the sex workers that are trafficked have been raped." While the extent of the damage this particular criminal has inflicted is yet unknown, Dreeke theorizes that there could be "victims in the hundreds." What brought the man's operations to light was the heroics of a single, tenacious victim who managed to escape. Dreeke notes the man's lack of finesse and planning in constructing his cell, suggesting he was "not that bright of a guy," relying heavily on "force, coercion, and fear as a lever of manipulation." Intriguingly, there's a blatant grandiosity in the man's actions. Brueski points to his appearance on the TV show "Judge Judy," an appearance the man willingly made. Such a public display, according to Dreeke, showcases a "major flaunting of control over others." This behavior, combined with his extreme methods, such as masquerading as an undercover officer, indicates a high degree of manipulation and grandiosity, typical signs of psychopathy. Dreeke draws a chilling distinction between serial rapists and serial killers. Though serial killers may have fewer victims due to the death toll, serial rapists cast a long shadow of trauma, potentially affecting hundreds. The PTSD and trauma induced by a serial rapist ripple outward, affecting a wider audience. Despite the gravity of his crimes, this man operated in plain sight in a typical neighborhood. Brueski remarks on the man's numerous violations of Homeowners' Association (HOA) rules, but no one suspects the extent of his operations. This revelation raises alarming questions about community safety and the hidden threats that could be lurking next door. Dreeke concludes with a note on the offender's age, stating that the late twenties is when "serial killers and rapists really start coming into their own." His early prolific record only foretells the dangers he could have continued to pose. As Dreeke succinctly put it, such individuals are "massive manipulators using fear and shame to keep people from taking action against them." This discussion uncovers the disturbing psychology of a criminal and underscores the need for vigilance and reformation in the justice system. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sits down with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to shed light on a deeply unsettling case. The story unfolds of a man audacious enough to create a makeshift cell in his garage, a setting for heinous crimes. With the dissection of the case, Dreeke helps uncover the intricacies of the offender's psyche, signaling a larger issue at play in society. Dreeke emphasizes the profound failure of the justice system, noting that the man had been "charged and convicted multiple times of sexual assaults." Such a track record paints a concerning picture about his potential to repeat offenses. As Brueski highlighted, the criminal's method of evasion was frequently moving from one place to another, a common trait of serial rapists. A striking pattern observed is their inability to sustain an income, prompting them to form relationships primarily for financial gain. The offender's focus on targeting sex workers isn't unique. Dreeke highlights the tragic reality that many sex workers are victims of trafficking, often being groomed and trafficked as teenagers. His statistic is harrowing: "68% of the sex workers that are trafficked have been raped." While the extent of the damage this particular criminal has inflicted is yet unknown, Dreeke theorizes that there could be "victims in the hundreds." What brought the man's operations to light was the heroics of a single, tenacious victim who managed to escape. Dreeke notes the man's lack of finesse and planning in constructing his cell, suggesting he was "not that bright of a guy," relying heavily on "force, coercion, and fear as a lever of manipulation." Intriguingly, there's a blatant grandiosity in the man's actions. Brueski points to his appearance on the TV show "Judge Judy," an appearance the man willingly made. Such a public display, according to Dreeke, showcases a "major flaunting of control over others." This behavior, combined with his extreme methods, such as masquerading as an undercover officer, indicates a high degree of manipulation and grandiosity, typical signs of psychopathy. Dreeke draws a chilling distinction between serial rapists and serial killers. Though serial killers may have fewer victims due to the death toll, serial rapists cast a long shadow of trauma, potentially affecting hundreds. The PTSD and trauma induced by a serial rapist ripple outward, affecting a wider audience. Despite the gravity of his crimes, this man operated in plain sight in a typical neighborhood. Brueski remarks on the man's numerous violations of Homeowners' Association (HOA) rules, but no one suspects the extent of his operations. This revelation raises alarming questions about community safety and the hidden threats that could be lurking next door. Dreeke concludes with a note on the offender's age, stating that the late twenties is when "serial killers and rapists really start coming into their own." His early prolific record only foretells the dangers he could have continued to pose. As Dreeke succinctly put it, such individuals are "massive manipulators using fear and shame to keep people from taking action against them." This discussion uncovers the disturbing psychology of a criminal and underscores the need for vigilance and reformation in the justice system. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, discussed the peculiar happenings in the courtroom during the sentencing of the infamous Lori Vallow Debell. The conversation centered not only on Vallow's delusional behavior but also focused on the unexpected defense presented by her attorney during the hearing. Vallow, convicted of multiple murders, made what Brueski referred to as a "bizarre rant" during her trial. As Dreeke noted, her speech showed that Vallow has "massively rationalized her behavior to a huge extent and degree." This seemingly deluded self-perception, paired with her shocking crimes, painted a troubling picture of the woman at the center of this widely publicized trial. However, it was not only Vallow's speech that raised eyebrows during the hearing but also the comments made by her attorney. Brueski was initially perplexed by the lawyer's portrayal of Vallow as someone who was all about "love, smart, witty, and insightful." The incongruity between the defense's description and Vallow's public perception was stark. Dreeke offered his perspective on the lawyer's remarks, suggesting that the attorney was not attempting to absolve Vallow of her crimes but rather trying to give the court a deeper understanding of her character from her perspective. He stated, "He wasn't saying that she's good... He was given a context of who she is from her perspective...He gave an accurate assessment in an articulate way of what Lori thinks of herself." As Dreeke points out, the attorney's job is to "know his client so well that he can defend that client from that client's point of view," which, in this case, included combining Vallow's perspective with the factual events of the case. Brueski, initially interpreting the attorney's comments as unreasonably flattering, began to see things through Dreeke's lens, seeing the attorney's attempt to humanize Vallow in the eyes of the court, presenting her as a "broken individual beneath everything." While the public's perception of Vallow is understandably negative due to the severity and nature of her crimes, the attorney's representation of her in court aimed to provide a fuller, more nuanced image of her. His statements attempted to reconcile Vallow's horrific acts with the person he came to understand through his professional interactions with her. Ultimately, Brueski and Dreeke concluded that the lawyer's portrayal was not an attempt to whitewash Vallow's crimes but rather a bid to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tragic figure she had become. The discourse around this case continues to evoke strong emotions and raise important questions about the legal defense, mental health, and the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, discussed the peculiar happenings in the courtroom during the sentencing of the infamous Lori Vallow Debell. The conversation centered not only on Vallow's delusional behavior but also focused on the unexpected defense presented by her attorney during the hearing. Vallow, convicted of multiple murders, made what Brueski referred to as a "bizarre rant" during her trial. As Dreeke noted, her speech showed that Vallow has "massively rationalized her behavior to a huge extent and degree." This seemingly deluded self-perception, paired with her shocking crimes, painted a troubling picture of the woman at the center of this widely publicized trial. However, it was not only Vallow's speech that raised eyebrows during the hearing but also the comments made by her attorney. Brueski was initially perplexed by the lawyer's portrayal of Vallow as someone who was all about "love, smart, witty, and insightful." The incongruity between the defense's description and Vallow's public perception was stark. Dreeke offered his perspective on the lawyer's remarks, suggesting that the attorney was not attempting to absolve Vallow of her crimes but rather trying to give the court a deeper understanding of her character from her perspective. He stated, "He wasn't saying that she's good... He was given a context of who she is from her perspective...He gave an accurate assessment in an articulate way of what Lori thinks of herself." As Dreeke points out, the attorney's job is to "know his client so well that he can defend that client from that client's point of view," which, in this case, included combining Vallow's perspective with the factual events of the case. Brueski, initially interpreting the attorney's comments as unreasonably flattering, began to see things through Dreeke's lens, seeing the attorney's attempt to humanize Vallow in the eyes of the court, presenting her as a "broken individual beneath everything." While the public's perception of Vallow is understandably negative due to the severity and nature of her crimes, the attorney's representation of her in court aimed to provide a fuller, more nuanced image of her. His statements attempted to reconcile Vallow's horrific acts with the person he came to understand through his professional interactions with her. Ultimately, Brueski and Dreeke concluded that the lawyer's portrayal was not an attempt to whitewash Vallow's crimes but rather a bid to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tragic figure she had become. The discourse around this case continues to evoke strong emotions and raise important questions about the legal defense, mental health, and the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, discussed the peculiar happenings in the courtroom during the sentencing of the infamous Lori Vallow Debell. The conversation centered not only on Vallow's delusional behavior but also focused on the unexpected defense presented by her attorney during the hearing. Vallow, convicted of multiple murders, made what Brueski referred to as a "bizarre rant" during her trial. As Dreeke noted, her speech showed that Vallow has "massively rationalized her behavior to a huge extent and degree." This seemingly deluded self-perception, paired with her shocking crimes, painted a troubling picture of the woman at the center of this widely publicized trial. However, it was not only Vallow's speech that raised eyebrows during the hearing but also the comments made by her attorney. Brueski was initially perplexed by the lawyer's portrayal of Vallow as someone who was all about "love, smart, witty, and insightful." The incongruity between the defense's description and Vallow's public perception was stark. Dreeke offered his perspective on the lawyer's remarks, suggesting that the attorney was not attempting to absolve Vallow of her crimes but rather trying to give the court a deeper understanding of her character from her perspective. He stated, "He wasn't saying that she's good... He was given a context of who she is from her perspective...He gave an accurate assessment in an articulate way of what Lori thinks of herself." As Dreeke points out, the attorney's job is to "know his client so well that he can defend that client from that client's point of view," which, in this case, included combining Vallow's perspective with the factual events of the case. Brueski, initially interpreting the attorney's comments as unreasonably flattering, began to see things through Dreeke's lens, seeing the attorney's attempt to humanize Vallow in the eyes of the court, presenting her as a "broken individual beneath everything." While the public's perception of Vallow is understandably negative due to the severity and nature of her crimes, the attorney's representation of her in court aimed to provide a fuller, more nuanced image of her. His statements attempted to reconcile Vallow's horrific acts with the person he came to understand through his professional interactions with her. Ultimately, Brueski and Dreeke concluded that the lawyer's portrayal was not an attempt to whitewash Vallow's crimes but rather a bid to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the tragic figure she had become. The discourse around this case continues to evoke strong emotions and raise important questions about the legal defense, mental health, and the pursuit of justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined host Tony Brueski for an in-depth analysis of Lori Vallow Daybell's recent court appearance. The discussion revolved around Daybell's disturbing courtroom statements and her ability to rationalize her alleged crimes, sparking questions about her mental health and the future of her trials. Daybell's trial has gripped the nation due to its shocking nature. As Dreeke noted, "if you look at it technically, she ranks up there as a serial killer." The difference lies in the psychological make-up, though. While traditional serial killers often display psychopathy, deriving pleasure from their heinous acts, Daybell's case presents differently. "She was really, and still is, massively rationalizing her behavior to a huge extent and degree," Dreeke stated. What struck Dreeke most about Daybell's statements was her absolute conviction in her own narrative, despite the gravity of the crimes she's accused of - primarily the murder of her own children. She seems to have constructed a fantasy world in which she is blameless. As Brueski remarked, "She made the statement, 'Jesus Christ knows that no one was murdered.' She just, she dug herself deeper and deeper into that world of delusion." Daybell's delusion extends to a bizarre belief system surrounding her victims' afterlife activities. Brueski shared, "She was telling herself all the way to the extreme of my friend Tammy Daybell and talking about how busy she is in her work schedule in heaven and how her kids are working too." Unfortunately, as Dreeke pointed out, the absence of remorse or any sign of understanding the gravity of her crimes only exacerbates the pain for the victims' families. They yearn for the closure that typically comes from witnessing discomfort or regret on the part of the offender - something they may never receive from Daybell. "They're never gonna see it from her," Dreeke said. The families' quest for justice prompts difficult questions about Daybell's impending murder trial in Arizona. Brueski queried whether a deeply delusional individual like Daybell, who appears so far detached from reality, should even stand another trial. Dreeke acknowledged this, pointing out the strain it could put on court resources and the emotional toll on the families, who may not find the closure they seek, even if Daybell is tried again and found guilty. However, Dreeke was quick to highlight the resilience of the justice system, noting, "Our justice system [has] a very high bar for incompetence to stand trial mentally." The issue of Daybell's competence is paramount, given the serious nature of her alleged crimes. But as the podcast hosts concluded, there's a fine balance between seeking justice and prolonging the trauma for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Demise Of the Daybells | The Lori Vallow Daybell & Chad Daybell Story
In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined host Tony Brueski for an in-depth analysis of Lori Vallow Daybell's recent court appearance. The discussion revolved around Daybell's disturbing courtroom statements and her ability to rationalize her alleged crimes, sparking questions about her mental health and the future of her trials. Daybell's trial has gripped the nation due to its shocking nature. As Dreeke noted, "if you look at it technically, she ranks up there as a serial killer." The difference lies in the psychological make-up, though. While traditional serial killers often display psychopathy, deriving pleasure from their heinous acts, Daybell's case presents differently. "She was really, and still is, massively rationalizing her behavior to a huge extent and degree," Dreeke stated. What struck Dreeke most about Daybell's statements was her absolute conviction in her own narrative, despite the gravity of the crimes she's accused of - primarily the murder of her own children. She seems to have constructed a fantasy world in which she is blameless. As Brueski remarked, "She made the statement, 'Jesus Christ knows that no one was murdered.' She just, she dug herself deeper and deeper into that world of delusion." Daybell's delusion extends to a bizarre belief system surrounding her victims' afterlife activities. Brueski shared, "She was telling herself all the way to the extreme of my friend Tammy Daybell and talking about how busy she is in her work schedule in heaven and how her kids are working too." Unfortunately, as Dreeke pointed out, the absence of remorse or any sign of understanding the gravity of her crimes only exacerbates the pain for the victims' families. They yearn for the closure that typically comes from witnessing discomfort or regret on the part of the offender - something they may never receive from Daybell. "They're never gonna see it from her," Dreeke said. The families' quest for justice prompts difficult questions about Daybell's impending murder trial in Arizona. Brueski queried whether a deeply delusional individual like Daybell, who appears so far detached from reality, should even stand another trial. Dreeke acknowledged this, pointing out the strain it could put on court resources and the emotional toll on the families, who may not find the closure they seek, even if Daybell is tried again and found guilty. However, Dreeke was quick to highlight the resilience of the justice system, noting, "Our justice system [has] a very high bar for incompetence to stand trial mentally." The issue of Daybell's competence is paramount, given the serious nature of her alleged crimes. But as the podcast hosts concluded, there's a fine balance between seeking justice and prolonging the trauma for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined host Tony Brueski for an in-depth analysis of Lori Vallow Daybell's recent court appearance. The discussion revolved around Daybell's disturbing courtroom statements and her ability to rationalize her alleged crimes, sparking questions about her mental health and the future of her trials. Daybell's trial has gripped the nation due to its shocking nature. As Dreeke noted, "if you look at it technically, she ranks up there as a serial killer." The difference lies in the psychological make-up, though. While traditional serial killers often display psychopathy, deriving pleasure from their heinous acts, Daybell's case presents differently. "She was really, and still is, massively rationalizing her behavior to a huge extent and degree," Dreeke stated. What struck Dreeke most about Daybell's statements was her absolute conviction in her own narrative, despite the gravity of the crimes she's accused of - primarily the murder of her own children. She seems to have constructed a fantasy world in which she is blameless. As Brueski remarked, "She made the statement, 'Jesus Christ knows that no one was murdered.' She just, she dug herself deeper and deeper into that world of delusion." Daybell's delusion extends to a bizarre belief system surrounding her victims' afterlife activities. Brueski shared, "She was telling herself all the way to the extreme of my friend Tammy Daybell and talking about how busy she is in her work schedule in heaven and how her kids are working too." Unfortunately, as Dreeke pointed out, the absence of remorse or any sign of understanding the gravity of her crimes only exacerbates the pain for the victims' families. They yearn for the closure that typically comes from witnessing discomfort or regret on the part of the offender - something they may never receive from Daybell. "They're never gonna see it from her," Dreeke said. The families' quest for justice prompts difficult questions about Daybell's impending murder trial in Arizona. Brueski queried whether a deeply delusional individual like Daybell, who appears so far detached from reality, should even stand another trial. Dreeke acknowledged this, pointing out the strain it could put on court resources and the emotional toll on the families, who may not find the closure they seek, even if Daybell is tried again and found guilty. However, Dreeke was quick to highlight the resilience of the justice system, noting, "Our justice system [has] a very high bar for incompetence to stand trial mentally." The issue of Daybell's competence is paramount, given the serious nature of her alleged crimes. But as the podcast hosts concluded, there's a fine balance between seeking justice and prolonging the trauma for all involved. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
On a recent episode of the Hidden Killers podcast, Tony Brueski, alongside retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Robin Dreeke, dove deep into the chilling trial of Taylor Schabusiness. Their conversation dissected the harrowing details of the case while raising poignant questions about the mental competence of the accused. The trial of Taylor Schabusiness, accused of murder and dismemberment in Green Bay, Wisconsin, has shocked and horrified the nation. Her questionable behavior in the courtroom, coupled with the gruesome details of the crime, has led to a public debate on her mental competence to stand trial. The hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast, having closely followed the trial, voiced their concerns over the adequacy of the ruling that deemed her competent. Brueski began the conversation, expressing his doubt over the decision to let Schabusiness stand trial. "I've been shaking my head at this trial from day one," he confessed. "Looking at Taylor and her reactions... they have deemed her competent to stand trial. But I don't know how good of a decision that actually was." Dreeke, a seasoned FBI agent, echoed Brueski's sentiment, arguing that while he advocates for accountability, Schabusiness's irrational behavior and the episode of her attacking her attorney in the courtroom might suggest she's not mentally fit to stand trial. He opined, "this woman seems off the rails. It's hard to imagine there's anything really knocking around up there... I think they need to reevaluate her on... her competency to stand well." The hosts then dove into the ramifications of declaring Schabusiness mentally competent. Brueski pondered the decision's repercussions on her eventual sentence and prison life, "What point do we look at this and go, this person is very damaged. We can find them guilty, that's fine, but this just doesn't seem to be the right course of action." Dreeke agreed, speculating whether her standing trial would change the outcome of her sentence and the treatment she'd receive behind bars. He said, "if she stands trial or doesn't stand trial, depending on her mental capacity to stand trial, does the outcome change? And in other words, she'll be, when she's put away, will her treatment... and the way she's taken care of in the prison system change?" The conversation then took a darker turn as the hosts discussed the apparent lack of empathy and remorse displayed by Schabusiness. Brueski admitted to describing her as a "blob of flesh," highlighting her inhuman behavior. In response, Dreeke posited, "I think the soul in there, if we wanna go down that evil or good side, I think it's been locked away." In conclusion, the hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast called into question the legal system's approach to assessing mental competence in a trial that involves such a complex interplay of nature and nurture. As Dreeke noted, it's crucial to understand that while individuals like Schabusiness might seem "evil," their behavior is often the result of various detrimental factors coming together in a "volatile, horrible combination." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
On a recent episode of the Hidden Killers podcast, Tony Brueski, alongside retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Robin Dreeke, dove deep into the chilling trial of Taylor Schabusiness. Their conversation dissected the harrowing details of the case while raising poignant questions about the mental competence of the accused. The trial of Taylor Schabusiness, accused of murder and dismemberment in Green Bay, Wisconsin, has shocked and horrified the nation. Her questionable behavior in the courtroom, coupled with the gruesome details of the crime, has led to a public debate on her mental competence to stand trial. The hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast, having closely followed the trial, voiced their concerns over the adequacy of the ruling that deemed her competent. Brueski began the conversation, expressing his doubt over the decision to let Schabusiness stand trial. "I've been shaking my head at this trial from day one," he confessed. "Looking at Taylor and her reactions... they have deemed her competent to stand trial. But I don't know how good of a decision that actually was." Dreeke, a seasoned FBI agent, echoed Brueski's sentiment, arguing that while he advocates for accountability, Schabusiness's irrational behavior and the episode of her attacking her attorney in the courtroom might suggest she's not mentally fit to stand trial. He opined, "this woman seems off the rails. It's hard to imagine there's anything really knocking around up there... I think they need to reevaluate her on... her competency to stand well." The hosts then dove into the ramifications of declaring Schabusiness mentally competent. Brueski pondered the decision's repercussions on her eventual sentence and prison life, "What point do we look at this and go, this person is very damaged. We can find them guilty, that's fine, but this just doesn't seem to be the right course of action." Dreeke agreed, speculating whether her standing trial would change the outcome of her sentence and the treatment she'd receive behind bars. He said, "if she stands trial or doesn't stand trial, depending on her mental capacity to stand trial, does the outcome change? And in other words, she'll be, when she's put away, will her treatment... and the way she's taken care of in the prison system change?" The conversation then took a darker turn as the hosts discussed the apparent lack of empathy and remorse displayed by Schabusiness. Brueski admitted to describing her as a "blob of flesh," highlighting her inhuman behavior. In response, Dreeke posited, "I think the soul in there, if we wanna go down that evil or good side, I think it's been locked away." In conclusion, the hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast called into question the legal system's approach to assessing mental competence in a trial that involves such a complex interplay of nature and nurture. As Dreeke noted, it's crucial to understand that while individuals like Schabusiness might seem "evil," their behavior is often the result of various detrimental factors coming together in a "volatile, horrible combination." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
On a recent episode of the Hidden Killers podcast, Tony Brueski, alongside retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Robin Dreeke, dove deep into the chilling trial of Taylor Schabusiness. Their conversation dissected the harrowing details of the case while raising poignant questions about the mental competence of the accused. The trial of Taylor Schabusiness, accused of murder and dismemberment in Green Bay, Wisconsin, has shocked and horrified the nation. Her questionable behavior in the courtroom, coupled with the gruesome details of the crime, has led to a public debate on her mental competence to stand trial. The hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast, having closely followed the trial, voiced their concerns over the adequacy of the ruling that deemed her competent. Brueski began the conversation, expressing his doubt over the decision to let Schabusiness stand trial. "I've been shaking my head at this trial from day one," he confessed. "Looking at Taylor and her reactions... they have deemed her competent to stand trial. But I don't know how good of a decision that actually was." Dreeke, a seasoned FBI agent, echoed Brueski's sentiment, arguing that while he advocates for accountability, Schabusiness's irrational behavior and the episode of her attacking her attorney in the courtroom might suggest she's not mentally fit to stand trial. He opined, "this woman seems off the rails. It's hard to imagine there's anything really knocking around up there... I think they need to reevaluate her on... her competency to stand well." The hosts then dove into the ramifications of declaring Schabusiness mentally competent. Brueski pondered the decision's repercussions on her eventual sentence and prison life, "What point do we look at this and go, this person is very damaged. We can find them guilty, that's fine, but this just doesn't seem to be the right course of action." Dreeke agreed, speculating whether her standing trial would change the outcome of her sentence and the treatment she'd receive behind bars. He said, "if she stands trial or doesn't stand trial, depending on her mental capacity to stand trial, does the outcome change? And in other words, she'll be, when she's put away, will her treatment... and the way she's taken care of in the prison system change?" The conversation then took a darker turn as the hosts discussed the apparent lack of empathy and remorse displayed by Schabusiness. Brueski admitted to describing her as a "blob of flesh," highlighting her inhuman behavior. In response, Dreeke posited, "I think the soul in there, if we wanna go down that evil or good side, I think it's been locked away." In conclusion, the hosts of the Hidden Killers podcast called into question the legal system's approach to assessing mental competence in a trial that involves such a complex interplay of nature and nurture. As Dreeke noted, it's crucial to understand that while individuals like Schabusiness might seem "evil," their behavior is often the result of various detrimental factors coming together in a "volatile, horrible combination." Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the Hidden Killers Podcast, host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the intricate and disturbing allegations against Rex Heuermann, suspected of being the infamous Gilgo Beach murderer. For over 13 years, the Long Island community was haunted by the unknown identity of a serial killer whose crimes began and seemingly ended without a clear perpetrator. With the surfacing allegations against Heuermann, the mystery may finally be resolved. One of the key elements scrutinized in the podcast was Heuermann's alarming internet search history. As Brueski referred to it, this digital fingerprint presented a disturbing insight into Heuermann's mind. Disturbing searches for violent, explicit, and underage content were cited, offering a potential window into Heuerman's psyche. According to Brueski, the search history alone could be sufficient grounds for significant legal repercussions. As a former FBI agent, Dreeke contributed expert insights into understanding Heuermann's behavioral patterns and potential motivations. He drew attention to Heuermann's life arc, curious about what traumatic experiences or influences might have led to his current behavioral patterns. As Dreeke argued, this path likely started early and evolved over time, allowing Heuermann to become highly efficient and effective at hiding his dark secret. He postulated that this secrecy might have been an important aspect of the sense of control and power that Heuermann sought to exert. The pair also discussed the alleged harassment of the victims' families by Heuerman. They received calls from the phones of their loved ones, often accompanied by horrendous claims and taunts, a pattern which Dreeke attributed to Heuerman's desire to exert power and control. Dreeke pointed out this consistent theme of control and power as an indicative marker of Heuermann's behavior and his deviation from societal norms. During the investigation, Brueski and Dreeke also examined the peculiar items removed from Heuermann's home, including a haunting doll in a case. This odd collection led them to speculate on Heuermann's 'trophy room' and his success in normalizing abnormal behavior within his household. Dreeke suggested that Heuermann may have been conducting 'experiments' to satisfy his psychological needs, using deviant behaviors as tools. Finally, the discussion veered toward the impending legal proceedings. Heuermann's protestations of innocence were not unexpected, and Dreeke anticipated that Heuermann would continue to deny his involvement, leveraging his well-practiced ability to hide his shameful actions. However, Dreeke expressed confidence that the mounting evidence would likely lead to a conviction, effectively removing Heuermann from society. The conversation between Brueski and Dreeke provided a sobering insight into the complex and troubling case against Rex Heuermann. As the legal proceedings progress, the allegations against him will be thoroughly examined, and, if found guilty, Heuermann will be held accountable for his horrifying actions. Regardless of the outcome, this case is a stark reminder of society's often hidden yet persistently menacing undercurrents. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a riveting episode of the Hidden Killers Podcast, host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the intricate and disturbing allegations against Rex Heuermann, suspected of being the infamous Gilgo Beach murderer. For over 13 years, the Long Island community was haunted by the unknown identity of a serial killer whose crimes began and seemingly ended without a clear perpetrator. With the surfacing allegations against Heuermann, the mystery may finally be resolved. One of the key elements scrutinized in the podcast was Heuermann's alarming internet search history. As Brueski referred to it, this digital fingerprint presented a disturbing insight into Heuermann's mind. Disturbing searches for violent, explicit, and underage content were cited, offering a potential window into Heuerman's psyche. According to Brueski, the search history alone could be sufficient grounds for significant legal repercussions. As a former FBI agent, Dreeke contributed expert insights into understanding Heuermann's behavioral patterns and potential motivations. He drew attention to Heuermann's life arc, curious about what traumatic experiences or influences might have led to his current behavioral patterns. As Dreeke argued, this path likely started early and evolved over time, allowing Heuermann to become highly efficient and effective at hiding his dark secret. He postulated that this secrecy might have been an important aspect of the sense of control and power that Heuermann sought to exert. The pair also discussed the alleged harassment of the victims' families by Heuerman. They received calls from the phones of their loved ones, often accompanied by horrendous claims and taunts, a pattern which Dreeke attributed to Heuerman's desire to exert power and control. Dreeke pointed out this consistent theme of control and power as an indicative marker of Heuermann's behavior and his deviation from societal norms. During the investigation, Brueski and Dreeke also examined the peculiar items removed from Heuermann's home, including a haunting doll in a case. This odd collection led them to speculate on Heuermann's 'trophy room' and his success in normalizing abnormal behavior within his household. Dreeke suggested that Heuermann may have been conducting 'experiments' to satisfy his psychological needs, using deviant behaviors as tools. Finally, the discussion veered toward the impending legal proceedings. Heuermann's protestations of innocence were not unexpected, and Dreeke anticipated that Heuermann would continue to deny his involvement, leveraging his well-practiced ability to hide his shameful actions. However, Dreeke expressed confidence that the mounting evidence would likely lead to a conviction, effectively removing Heuermann from society. The conversation between Brueski and Dreeke provided a sobering insight into the complex and troubling case against Rex Heuermann. As the legal proceedings progress, the allegations against him will be thoroughly examined, and, if found guilty, Heuermann will be held accountable for his horrifying actions. Regardless of the outcome, this case is a stark reminder of society's often hidden yet persistently menacing undercurrents. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
