Podcast appearances and mentions of gloria satterfield

As a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, Valerie Bauerlein had a front-row seat to the most captivating murder trial since OJ Simpson. But Bauerlein did more than file dispatches to her newspaper during Alex Murdaugh's trial: She wrote the definitive narrative of not just the Murdaugh story, but the roots of the generational power the Murdaugh family wielded in Hampton County for more than a century as they made problems go away by making lies look like the truth. In The Devil at His Elbow: Alex Murdaugh and the Fall of a Southern Dynasty, Bauerlein delivers a masterpiece of reporting, organization and storytelling.  Bauerlein, a national reporter who writes about small-town America and Southern politics, economics and culture, joins The Dubcast to reflect not just on her process of writing the book but also some fascinating parts of the backstory that didn't make the final edit -- including an early-1900s march on the Horseshoe in Columbia by Randolph Murdaugh Sr. to bring back football after it was banned. Bauerlein also explores some questions that remain unanswered even as Alex is in prison for the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul: Did Alex have help in carrying out the murders? How close was Alex to averting a guilty verdict? Where is all the money he stole from people who most needed it, including the family of Gloria Satterfield? Bauerlein lives in the Raleigh area with her husband and two children. Before joining the Journal in 2005, she worked as a congressional correspondent for the News & Observer in Raleigh, a legislative reporter at The State in Columbia, and a cops reporter at the Winston-Salem Journal.

A South Carolina federal judge has ordered Alex Murdaugh and his accomplice, Cory Fleming, to pay millions for orchestrating an insurance fraud scheme that stole over $4 million meant for the family of Murdaugh's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Judge Richard Gergel issued a $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh and a $3.75 million judgment against Fleming, a former attorney and longtime friend of Murdaugh. These judgments followed a civil trial brought by Nautilus Insurance Company, which sought damages from the fraudulent scheme. The case began after Satterfield's fatal fall on the front steps of Murdaugh's hunting estate, Moselle. Murdaugh convinced Satterfield's sons to file a claim against his insurance, promising compensation. Instead, Murdaugh and Fleming embezzled the settlement funds, leaving the family empty-handed. Murdaugh admitted to fabricating a story about his dogs causing Satterfield's death to create liability and secure insurance payouts. “He intended to, and did in fact, steal,” Judge Gergel noted in his January 2 ruling. Fleming faced trial for his role in facilitating the fraud. The court found that he committed “multiple acts of unfair and deceptive practices” and acted willfully in violating the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. While a jury initially awarded $1.25 million in damages, Gergel tripled the amount to $3.75 million, citing the severity of Fleming's actions. “Fleming's unfair and deceptive acts played a critical role in Murdaugh's ability to ultimately steal over $4 million in settlement funds,” Gergel stated in the settlement order. The fraudulent settlement funds were part of over 100 financial crimes tied to Murdaugh, including millions stolen from his law firm clients. These crimes have compounded the disgraced attorney's legal troubles. Murdaugh is already serving two life sentences for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Prosecutors argued the murders were a distraction to hide his mounting financial crimes. While Murdaugh appeals his double murder convictions, the financial fraud cases continue to unfold. Nautilus Insurance Company's lawsuit against other entities linked to the Satterfield scheme remains active. The Gloria Satterfield case has become a cornerstone of the unraveling Murdaugh crime saga, symbolizing the betrayal of trust by two lawyers who exploited a grieving family for personal gain. #AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #InsuranceFraud #CoryFleming #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #LegalNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A South Carolina federal judge has ordered Alex Murdaugh and his accomplice, Cory Fleming, to pay millions for orchestrating an insurance fraud scheme that stole over $4 million meant for the family of Murdaugh's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Judge Richard Gergel issued a $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh and a $3.75 million judgment against Fleming, a former attorney and longtime friend of Murdaugh. These judgments followed a civil trial brought by Nautilus Insurance Company, which sought damages from the fraudulent scheme. The case began after Satterfield's fatal fall on the front steps of Murdaugh's hunting estate, Moselle. Murdaugh convinced Satterfield's sons to file a claim against his insurance, promising compensation. Instead, Murdaugh and Fleming embezzled the settlement funds, leaving the family empty-handed. Murdaugh admitted to fabricating a story about his dogs causing Satterfield's death to create liability and secure insurance payouts. “He intended to, and did in fact, steal,” Judge Gergel noted in his January 2 ruling. Fleming faced trial for his role in facilitating the fraud. The court found that he committed “multiple acts of unfair and deceptive practices” and acted willfully in violating the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. While a jury initially awarded $1.25 million in damages, Gergel tripled the amount to $3.75 million, citing the severity of Fleming's actions. “Fleming's unfair and deceptive acts played a critical role in Murdaugh's ability to ultimately steal over $4 million in settlement funds,” Gergel stated in the settlement order. The fraudulent settlement funds were part of over 100 financial crimes tied to Murdaugh, including millions stolen from his law firm clients. These crimes have compounded the disgraced attorney's legal troubles. Murdaugh is already serving two life sentences for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Prosecutors argued the murders were a distraction to hide his mounting financial crimes. While Murdaugh appeals his double murder convictions, the financial fraud cases continue to unfold. Nautilus Insurance Company's lawsuit against other entities linked to the Satterfield scheme remains active. The Gloria Satterfield case has become a cornerstone of the unraveling Murdaugh crime saga, symbolizing the betrayal of trust by two lawyers who exploited a grieving family for personal gain. #AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #InsuranceFraud #CoryFleming #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #LegalNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A South Carolina federal judge has ordered Alex Murdaugh and his accomplice, Cory Fleming, to pay millions for orchestrating an insurance fraud scheme that stole over $4 million meant for the family of Murdaugh's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Judge Richard Gergel issued a $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh and a $3.75 million judgment against Fleming, a former attorney and longtime friend of Murdaugh. These judgments followed a civil trial brought by Nautilus Insurance Company, which sought damages from the fraudulent scheme. The case began after Satterfield's fatal fall on the front steps of Murdaugh's hunting estate, Moselle. Murdaugh convinced Satterfield's sons to file a claim against his insurance, promising compensation. Instead, Murdaugh and Fleming embezzled the settlement funds, leaving the family empty-handed. Murdaugh admitted to fabricating a story about his dogs causing Satterfield's death to create liability and secure insurance payouts. “He intended to, and did in fact, steal,” Judge Gergel noted in his January 2 ruling. Fleming faced trial for his role in facilitating the fraud. The court found that he committed “multiple acts of unfair and deceptive practices” and acted willfully in violating the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. While a jury initially awarded $1.25 million in damages, Gergel tripled the amount to $3.75 million, citing the severity of Fleming's actions. “Fleming's unfair and deceptive acts played a critical role in Murdaugh's ability to ultimately steal over $4 million in settlement funds,” Gergel stated in the settlement order. The fraudulent settlement funds were part of over 100 financial crimes tied to Murdaugh, including millions stolen from his law firm clients. These crimes have compounded the disgraced attorney's legal troubles. Murdaugh is already serving two life sentences for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Prosecutors argued the murders were a distraction to hide his mounting financial crimes. While Murdaugh appeals his double murder convictions, the financial fraud cases continue to unfold. Nautilus Insurance Company's lawsuit against other entities linked to the Satterfield scheme remains active. The Gloria Satterfield case has become a cornerstone of the unraveling Murdaugh crime saga, symbolizing the betrayal of trust by two lawyers who exploited a grieving family for personal gain. #AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #InsuranceFraud #CoryFleming #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #LegalNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A South Carolina federal judge has ordered Alex Murdaugh and his accomplice, Cory Fleming, to pay millions for orchestrating an insurance fraud scheme that stole over $4 million meant for the family of Murdaugh's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Judge Richard Gergel issued a $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh and a $3.75 million judgment against Fleming, a former attorney and longtime friend of Murdaugh. These judgments followed a civil trial brought by Nautilus Insurance Company, which sought damages from the fraudulent scheme. The case began after Satterfield's fatal fall on the front steps of Murdaugh's hunting estate, Moselle. Murdaugh convinced Satterfield's sons to file a claim against his insurance, promising compensation. Instead, Murdaugh and Fleming embezzled the settlement funds, leaving the family empty-handed. Murdaugh admitted to fabricating a story about his dogs causing Satterfield's death to create liability and secure insurance payouts. “He intended to, and did in fact, steal,” Judge Gergel noted in his January 2 ruling. Fleming faced trial for his role in facilitating the fraud. The court found that he committed “multiple acts of unfair and deceptive practices” and acted willfully in violating the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act. While a jury initially awarded $1.25 million in damages, Gergel tripled the amount to $3.75 million, citing the severity of Fleming's actions. “Fleming's unfair and deceptive acts played a critical role in Murdaugh's ability to ultimately steal over $4 million in settlement funds,” Gergel stated in the settlement order. The fraudulent settlement funds were part of over 100 financial crimes tied to Murdaugh, including millions stolen from his law firm clients. These crimes have compounded the disgraced attorney's legal troubles. Murdaugh is already serving two life sentences for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Prosecutors argued the murders were a distraction to hide his mounting financial crimes. While Murdaugh appeals his double murder convictions, the financial fraud cases continue to unfold. Nautilus Insurance Company's lawsuit against other entities linked to the Satterfield scheme remains active. The Gloria Satterfield case has become a cornerstone of the unraveling Murdaugh crime saga, symbolizing the betrayal of trust by two lawyers who exploited a grieving family for personal gain. #AlexMurdaugh #GloriaSatterfield #InsuranceFraud #CoryFleming #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #LegalNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell and attorney Eric Bland talk about the horrors of the Los Angeles wildfires and how Big Insurance, as well as systemic failures in government preparation have made a catastrophic situation even worse.  Closer to home, the three talk about the success of Luna Shark's billboard blitz in the hopes of seeking answers in the Stephen Smith case (not to mention Sandy Smith's decision to increase the reward to $50,000 for information leading to arrests in her son's murder case).  Also on the show, a federal jury found Cory Fleming liable for his part in Alex Murdaugh's scheme to steal millions from Gloria Satterfield's family, but is HE the biggest loser to emerge from the Nautilus trial? Or did the insurance company waste untold amounts of time and money in launching an easily predictable losing battle over something that may ultimately be their own fault?  Plus, the latest in the Mica Francis case: Emails and texts show that JP MIller — and his right hand woman Tricia Ross — accused an Horry County Police Department officer of being at fault for Mica's death. AND Wayne Miller's odd real estate connection to Mica's divorce attorney Regina Ward — who also represented Mica's family in the fight over who would be personal representative for Mica. 

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh, a once-powerful attorney whose life unraveled into a whirlwind of scandal, deceit, and tragedy, has been ordered to pay $14.8 million to Nautilus Insurance Company. This federal court judgment underscores the far-reaching consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent schemes, including one involving the tragic death of his family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. For many, this marks a critical chapter in the ongoing saga of a man whose actions have left a trail of financial ruin, broken trust, and unanswered questions. The judgment, issued by a federal court, followed Murdaugh's decision not to contest the lawsuit filed by Nautilus. His admission that he could not pay the judgment and that mounting a defense would be a waste of the court's time speaks volumes about his current state—a sharp fall from grace for a man once revered in South Carolina's legal circles. This latest development centers on an insurance claim Murdaugh orchestrated after Satterfield's death in 2018. According to court records, Satterfield died following a fall at the Murdaugh residence, an incident that Murdaugh falsely attributed to the family's dogs to secure a hefty insurance payout. The funds, however, never reached Satterfield's heirs; instead, they were funneled into Murdaugh's personal accounts. Fraudulent Claim and Legal Fallout The circumstances surrounding Gloria Satterfield's death and the subsequent insurance claim reveal the depth of Murdaugh's deceit. Satterfield, a longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family, reportedly tripped over the family's dogs and suffered fatal injuries. Murdaugh, presenting himself as a grieving employer, encouraged Satterfield's sons to sue him for insurance money, claiming it would provide them financial support. Behind the scenes, Murdaugh had already devised a plan to pocket the settlement funds. Nautilus Insurance Company, which issued the $4.3 million policy payout, later discovered Murdaugh's fraudulent activities and filed a lawsuit to recover the funds. The lawsuit accused Murdaugh of “entering a complex web of deceit” to enrich himself at the expense of the Satterfield family and the insurer. With the federal court's default judgment, Nautilus secured not only the repayment of the original settlement but also additional damages and legal fees, bringing the total to $14.8 million. Murdaugh's Response In court, Murdaugh's response was strikingly subdued. He acknowledged his inability to pay the judgment and refrained from contesting the claims, suggesting that doing so would only prolong the inevitable. His legal strategy, or lack thereof, highlights the precarious position he now finds himself in—a stark contrast to the powerful and well-connected lawyer he once was. Murdaugh's decision not to mount a defense could also be seen as a tacit admission of guilt, further solidifying the damning narrative that has emerged over the past few years. A History of Scandal and Deception The Nautilus judgment is only the latest chapter in Murdaugh's long and sordid history of legal and financial troubles. Once a respected figure in South Carolina's Lowcountry, Murdaugh's reputation began to crumble in 2021 when he was implicated in a series of financial crimes. These included embezzling millions of dollars from his law firm, clients, and even family members. The revelations came to light following the shocking murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family's hunting estate. Initially presenting himself as a grieving husband and father, Murdaugh's involvement in their deaths led to his eventual conviction and life sentence for murder. Murdaugh's financial crimes came to light in part because of the Satterfield case. Her sons—believing they were due the insurance settlement—questioned why they had never received the money. Their inquiries prompted legal scrutiny, ultimately unraveling the intricate web of fraud Murdaugh had woven. In addition to the Nautilus lawsuit, Murdaugh faces numerous other civil and criminal cases, ranging from embezzlement to conspiracy. Implications of the Judgment The $14.8 million judgment against Murdaugh carries significant implications, not just for him but also for ongoing investigations and related legal proceedings. Financially, the judgment adds another layer of debt to Murdaugh's already crumbling estate. With his assets frozen and his once-lucrative career in ruins, the likelihood of Nautilus recovering the full amount seems slim. However, the judgment sends a clear message about the consequences of Murdaugh's fraudulent actions and serves as a vindication for Satterfield's family, who have long sought justice. Legally, the judgment could influence other cases involving Murdaugh. It establishes a precedent for holding him accountable for his financial misdeeds, potentially strengthening the positions of other plaintiffs seeking restitution. Moreover, it underscores the broader impact of Murdaugh's actions, which have left a lasting scar on South Carolina's legal and financial landscape. Broader Context: The Murdaugh Legacy To fully grasp the significance of the Nautilus judgment, one must understand the broader context of the Murdaugh family's legacy. For decades, the Murdaughs wielded considerable influence in South Carolina's Lowcountry, with generations of family members serving as solicitors, the region's equivalent of district attorneys. Their name was synonymous with power, wealth, and legal expertise. Alex Murdaugh, the scion of this dynasty, inherited not only the family's legal acumen but also its darker tendencies—a penchant for bending the rules and exploiting their privileged position. The unraveling of the Murdaugh legacy began with the death of Paul Murdaugh's friend Mallory Beach in a 2019 boating accident. Paul, who was allegedly intoxicated at the time, faced criminal charges, but the family's influence initially shielded him from accountability. The incident set off a chain of events that would ultimately expose Alex Murdaugh's criminal activities and lead to his downfall. From the Satterfield case to the financial crimes and the double homicide, the Murdaugh story is one of a family brought low by its own hubris and greed. Psychological and Social Ramifications Beyond the legal and financial consequences, the Murdaugh saga raises profound psychological and social questions. What drives a man like Alex Murdaugh—a product of privilege and power—to engage in such destructive behavior? Was it a sense of entitlement, a desperate attempt to maintain his lifestyle, or something darker? The case also sheds light on the vulnerabilities in legal and financial systems that allowed Murdaugh to perpetrate his schemes for so long. It is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the human cost of corruption. Looking Ahead As the legal proceedings against Alex Murdaugh continue, the $14.8 million judgment serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching impact of his actions. For the Satterfield family, it is a step toward closure, though the financial and emotional toll remains immeasurable. For South Carolina's legal community, it is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic failures that enabled Murdaugh's crimes and to implement safeguards against future abuses of power. The story of Alex Murdaugh is far from over. With each new revelation, the complex web of deceit and betrayal grows more tangled, leaving a legacy that will be studied and debated for years to come. In the end, the judgment against Murdaugh is not just about money; it is about accountability, justice, and the hope that even in the darkest of times, the truth will prevail. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

The Murdaugh Murders: Unveiling a Dynasty's Dark SecretsIn today's episode, we delve deep into the Murdaugh murders, exploring the intricate details beyond just the headlines. This saga isn't just about the tragic deaths of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh; it's about the collapse of a powerful dynasty that held significant influence for over a century. We trace the family's history, including their roles as top prosecutors and the rumours of corruption that have long surrounded them. Key events like the 2019 boat crash involving Alex Murdaugh's son Paul, which shattered their image, are dissected, alongside the suspicious deaths of Stephen Smith and Gloria Satterfield. The script outlines how these events serve as warning signs leading up to the brutal murders, with revelations about Alex Murdaugh's financial schemes and drug addiction adding layers to the story. The episode also covers Alex's attempted staged suicide and the subsequent criminal trial that gripped the nation. The podcast reflects on the broader societal implications, such as issues of power, privilege, the opioid crisis, and the functioning of the justice system. As the trial concludes with Alex's conviction, we explore how these shocking events have affected the victims, the Murdaugh family, and the wider community. Join us as we continue to seek answers, learn from these tragedies, and think critically about the larger issues highlighted by this case.00:00 Introduction to the Murdaugh Murders00:21 The Murdaugh Dynasty and Its Fall00:57 Unraveling Suspicious Deaths02:26 The Boat Crash and Its Aftermath03:25 Alex Murdaugh's Financial Crimes04:12 The Fake Suicide Attempt05:11 The Trial and Verdict09:14 Reflections and Broader Implications11:20 Final Thoughts and Takeaways Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this heart-wrenching episode, we turn our attention to the mysterious death of Gloria Satterfield, the beloved housekeeper who worked for the Murdaugh family for over two decades. Gloria died in 2018 after a reported "trip and fall" at the Murdaugh's estate, a tragedy that raised more questions than answers. As her sons grieved, Alex Murdaugh offered to help—but instead, he allegedly orchestrated a scheme to steal the millions meant for her family. Was her death truly an accident, or is there more to the story? We unravel the inconsistencies, explore the investigation into her fall, and follow the money trail that revealed deeper layers of deceit. This episode takes you on a journey through betrayal, grief, and a quest for justice in the wake of Gloria Satterfield's untimely death.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this heart-wrenching episode, we turn our attention to the mysterious death of Gloria Satterfield, the beloved housekeeper who worked for the Murdaugh family for over two decades. Gloria died in 2018 after a reported "trip and fall" at the Murdaugh's estate, a tragedy that raised more questions than answers. As her sons grieved, Alex Murdaugh offered to help—but instead, he allegedly orchestrated a scheme to steal the millions meant for her family. Was her death truly an accident, or is there more to the story? We unravel the inconsistencies, explore the investigation into her fall, and follow the money trail that revealed deeper layers of deceit. This episode takes you on a journey through betrayal, grief, and a quest for justice in the wake of Gloria Satterfield's untimely death.   Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this heart-wrenching episode, we turn our attention to the mysterious death of Gloria Satterfield, the beloved housekeeper who worked for the Murdaugh family for over two decades. Gloria died in 2018 after a reported "trip and fall" at the Murdaugh's estate, a tragedy that raised more questions than answers. As her sons grieved, Alex Murdaugh offered to help—but instead, he allegedly orchestrated a scheme to steal the millions meant for her family. Was her death truly an accident, or is there more to the story? We unravel the inconsistencies, explore the investigation into her fall, and follow the money trail that revealed deeper layers of deceit. This episode takes you on a journey through betrayal, grief, and a quest for justice in the wake of Gloria Satterfield's untimely death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this gripping sixth episode of Exposed: Scandalous Files of the Elite, Jim Chapman discusses the tragic death of Gloria Satterfield, longtime housekeeper for the Murdaugh family. Jim examines the chaotic 911 call made by Maggie and Paul Murdaugh reporting her severe injuries, and the questionable role of Alex Murdaugh in suggesting Gloria's sons hire his associate for their wrongful death claim.Jim reveals the alarming embezzlement of over $4 million in insurance payouts meant for Gloria's heirs, leaving her family devastated. Featuring poignant testimony from her son, Michael "Tony" Satterfield, this episode highlights the deep betrayal and corruption within the Murdaugh circle as he seeks to uncover the truth behind Gloria's untimely death.#murdaugh #gloriasatterfield #crime #criminal #exposed #podcast #jimchapman The “Gloria Satterfield case details” may be disturbing for some listeners. Exposed: Scandalous Files of the Elite provides the “latest update on the Gloria Satterfield case” throughout its ”Murdaugh” series podcast. Discover “the impact of the Murdaugh trial on the Gloria Satterfield case” by subscribing wherever you listen to your podcasts.  Timestamps01:23 Gloria Satterfield's Tragic Fall05:21 Investigating the 911 Call08:55 The Aftermath of Gloria's Death15:01 Insurance Claims and Deception22:49 Testimony from Gloria's Son30:43 The Role of Alex Murdaugh36:53 A Family Betrayed47:15 The Final Words of a Victim's Family Join us on Patreon for commercial free early releases, bonus content and more by clicking HERE Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/exposed-scandalous-files-of-the-elite--6073723/support.

This is a story about love, loss, and betrayal. For over 20 years, Gloria Satterfield was more than just a housekeeper for the Murdaugh family - she was a trusted friend, a second mother to their children, and a cherished part of their lives. But her tragic death in 2018, ruled an accident at the time, set off a chain of events that would uncover dark secrets and expose a web of deceit that shocked a community. This is a story about the lengths some will go to hide the truth and the fight for justice for those who are left behind. After Gloria's passing, the Murdaugh family, a prominent name in the South Carolina Lowcountry, pledged to take care of her sons, promising them a hefty settlement from their homeowner's insurance. But the money never came. Instead, it was allegedly stolen by the very people entrusted to help them. This is the story of Gloria Satterfield's sons, Tony and Brian, and their unwavering pursuit of the truth behind their mother's death and the justice they seek for her memory. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Gloria Satterfield Gloria Satterfield wasn't just the Murdaugh family's housekeeper; she was a trusted figure, deeply loved by the Murdaugh children and close to the family for decades. But her sudden and mysterious death raised unsettling questions. In this episode, we delve into Gloria's life, her untimely passing, and the legal battle that unfolded afterward, as her family struggled to uncover the truth behind the wrongful death settlement that was allegedly stolen by Alex Murdaugh himself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell — formerly of Murdaugh Murders Podcast — give an update on the latest drama involving Alex Murdaugh. His remaining son, Buster Murdaugh, filed a defamation lawsuit this week against major networks over documentaries they ran, which he said falsely insinuated he had something to do with Stephen Smith's death. He is also suing a Hampton County reporter and his newspaper company for that same thing. Also, a federal judge issues an order in the Nautilus case, in which the insurance company who issued a multi-million dollar payout to Cory Fleming in Gloria Satterfield's death is suing to get their money back. In his ruling, Judge Richard Gergel notes that the insurance company KNEW that something fishy was going on with the Satterfield case and yet STILL gave Cory that money. Why? The insurance company feared the payout would be worse if it went to a Hampton County jury. Also on the show, Mandy and Liz continue to connect dots in the Mica Francis case as Mica's estranged husband, John-Paul Miller, continues to make TikTok videos in the hopes of putting out his own narrative about what their marriage was like. Plus, the disturbing patterns in JP's parents' divorce in 2002 and what it tells us about JP's upbringing. Episode Resources: Mica's List & Mica's Law, Documents Mica's Attorney, Regina Ward's, Press Conference Luna Shark Premium Member Resources - Click Here for Access: Buster Murdaugh's Defamation Lawsuit Nautilus vs Murdaugh et al, Judge Gergel's Order Reginald Wayne Miller x Susan Miller Divorce Documents 2001-2009  Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ If you are in crisis, please call, text or chat with the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988, or contact the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741. Learn more about how you can help us fund FOIA's, dive deeper into cases and experience the investigation first-hand on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. In June we're offering your first month of Soak Up The Sun membership with a $6.00 discount. Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. Or become a Premiere Member on YouTube for exclusive videos and ad-free episodes. SUNscribe to our free email list to get that special offer for first time members, receive alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP Visit our new events page Lunasharkmedia.com/events where you can learn about the upcoming in-person and virtual appearances from hosts! And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! *** ALERT: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! *** For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Former attorney Alex Murdaugh received a 40-year prison sentence in federal court for his financial crimes.United States District Judge Richard M. Gergel handed down the sentence on April 1 at the United States District Courthouse in Charleston.In this latest episode, Anne Emerson, Drew Tripp, and Charlie Condon discuss new information learned from the federal sentencing, which includes $6 million in missing money, 11 new unknown victims, and an alleged unnamed codefendant to Murdaugh's crimes.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Former attorney Alex Murdaugh received a 40-year prison sentence in federal court for his financial crimes.United States District Judge Richard M. Gergel handed down the sentence on April 1 at the United States District Courthouse in Charleston.In this latest episode, Anne Emerson, Drew Tripp, and Charlie Condon discuss new information learned from the federal sentencing, which includes $6 million in missing money, 11 new unknown victims, and an alleged unnamed codefendant to Murdaugh's crimes.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Alex Murdaugh's bid for a retrial falls short as Justice Jean Toal rules Becky Hill's likely improper contact with jurors didn't rise to the level of prejudicial jury tampering. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Alex Murdaugh's defense team entered the ring throwing haymakers in a pre-hearing status conference on January 16th, hoping to bludgeon open a clear path to a retrial in Murdaugh's murder case. But retired South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal, the newly appointed judge on the case, parried and rebuffed Murdaugh's ambitious volleys in stunning and decisive fashion. Now Murdaugh's opening to land the decisive blow against his dual murder convictions and life sentence appears vanishingly small.Join Anne Emerson, Charlie Condon and Drew Tripp as they recap the important day in court and preview Murdaugh's upcoming evidentiary hearing on the controversial jury tampering allegations.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Did Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill have improper communications with jurors during Alex Murdaugh's murder trial? If so, did she create bias or prejudice among jurors potentially influencing their verdict and warranting a retrial?Those are the two primary questions needing answers when state prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense lawyers meet in court January 29 in a pivotal hearing to decide if Murdaugh's dual convictions for the murders of his wife and son were fair and will stand.Murdaugh's defense lawyers in a brief filed ahead of the hearing adamantly argue the answer to both questions is “Yes,” while the team of prosecutors for the S.C. Attorney General's Office argue they still feel Murdaugh shouldn't even be getting a hearing.Join Anne Emerson, Charlie Condon and Drew Tripp as they break down the legal battles taking shape.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

State investigators have found evidence linking a Colleton County government wiretapping scandal involving Jeffrey Hill to a public ethics complaint against his mother, the county's elected clerk of court, Becky Hill.In this episode, former S.C. Attorney General Charlie Condon tells hosts Anne Emerson and Drew Tripp how the ethics complaint and attacks on Hill's character might impact a potential retrial for convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh. BACKGROUND: The date of the wiretapping incident involving Jeffrey Hill came in late July 2023, about a month after someone filed an ethics complaint against his mother with the State Ethics Commission.Becky Hill's county-issued cell phone was confiscated as part of the ongoing investigation. A public corruption investigation tied to the wiretapping incident has now been escalated to the S.C. Attorney General's Office.The original ethics complaint against Becky Hill, dated June 2023, alleges that during the Murdaugh murder trial and afterward, she "utilized her authority, the Colleton County Courthouse and taxpayer's money outside the scope of routine court business."In documents dated August 2023 reported by FITSNews, Hill categorically denies many of the allegations made in the original June 26 ethics complaint, and alleges other accusations have been crafted to exclude important context and other details to intentionally make her actions appear nefarious.MORE: Source says Colleton wiretapping & corruption probe linked to court clerk ethics complaintSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In a courtroom drama that could rival any television series, disgraced attorney Alex Murdaugh's latest court appearance has left the public and legal community reeling. But was this just another scene in the spectacle of his downfall, or a calculated move by a man well-versed in the art of persuasion? In a recent "Hidden Killers" podcast episode, Tony Brueski sat down with Eric Bland, an attorney representing many of Murdaugh's victims, to peel back the layers of Murdaugh's courtroom 'infomercial'.    Eric Bland, whose name has become synonymous with the pursuit of justice in the wake of Alex Murdaugh's crimes, did not mince words as he shared his courtroom experience. "I wouldn't call it a speech. I would call it an infomercial," Bland declared, expressing his disbelief at Murdaugh's attempt to reshape public perception during what was supposed to be his moment of reckoning for financial crimes.    Murdaugh's 'infomercial' wasn't just a meandering soliloquy; it was a strategic performance aimed at influencing everyone within earshot, from his estranged son Buster to the very victims he had defrauded. "He had a captive audience... He went way beyond the charges that he was pleading guilty to," Bland explained, underscoring the opportunistic nature of Murdaugh's lengthy diatribe.    Murdaugh's statements in court were a study in narcissism, as Bland pointed out, particularly when addressing the family of Gloria Satterfield. "He turned to me and he said, 'I raised my sons,'" Bland recounted, highlighting the audacity with which Murdaugh dismissed the significant role Satterfield played in his family's life. It was a moment that not only 'teed off' Bland but also revealed the deep chasm between Murdaugh's perception and reality.    The public and media response to Murdaugh's display was one of collective horror, a sentiment echoed by Bland. "It rang hollow... I have not heard anybody say that they thought he moved the needle more to his side to feel empathy for him," Bland remarked, reflecting the general consensus that Murdaugh's performance did nothing to engender sympathy or shift public opinion.    But the implications of Murdaugh's courtroom behavior extend beyond the immediate reactions. Bland's representation of the jurors from Murdaugh's trial brought another layer to the discussion. "I also represent four of the jurors... so we're pretty knee-deep in all matters Murdaugh," Bland stated, revealing his comprehensive involvement in the case and signaling the broader ramifications of Murdaugh's actions on the judicial process.    As Bland dissected Murdaugh's tactics and their fallout, he painted a picture of a man who, despite facing the consequences of his actions, remains steadfast in his manipulative narrative. The podcast episode with Bland provides a sobering reminder of the damage inflicted by Murdaugh's actions – not just financially, but emotionally and psychologically, on the victims and the community at large.    The article concludes by posing a critical question to the reader: With Murdaugh's trial and personal antics continuing to unravel, how much more will be exposed before the final gavel falls? Will the relentless pursuit of truth by attorneys like Eric Bland lead to a resolution, or is this just another chapter in a saga that seems to defy closure? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a courtroom drama that could rival any television series, disgraced attorney Alex Murdaugh's latest court appearance has left the public and legal community reeling. But was this just another scene in the spectacle of his downfall, or a calculated move by a man well-versed in the art of persuasion? In a recent "Hidden Killers" podcast episode, Tony Brueski sat down with Eric Bland, an attorney representing many of Murdaugh's victims, to peel back the layers of Murdaugh's courtroom 'infomercial'.    Eric Bland, whose name has become synonymous with the pursuit of justice in the wake of Alex Murdaugh's crimes, did not mince words as he shared his courtroom experience. "I wouldn't call it a speech. I would call it an infomercial," Bland declared, expressing his disbelief at Murdaugh's attempt to reshape public perception during what was supposed to be his moment of reckoning for financial crimes.    Murdaugh's 'infomercial' wasn't just a meandering soliloquy; it was a strategic performance aimed at influencing everyone within earshot, from his estranged son Buster to the very victims he had defrauded. "He had a captive audience... He went way beyond the charges that he was pleading guilty to," Bland explained, underscoring the opportunistic nature of Murdaugh's lengthy diatribe.    Murdaugh's statements in court were a study in narcissism, as Bland pointed out, particularly when addressing the family of Gloria Satterfield. "He turned to me and he said, 'I raised my sons,'" Bland recounted, highlighting the audacity with which Murdaugh dismissed the significant role Satterfield played in his family's life. It was a moment that not only 'teed off' Bland but also revealed the deep chasm between Murdaugh's perception and reality.    The public and media response to Murdaugh's display was one of collective horror, a sentiment echoed by Bland. "It rang hollow... I have not heard anybody say that they thought he moved the needle more to his side to feel empathy for him," Bland remarked, reflecting the general consensus that Murdaugh's performance did nothing to engender sympathy or shift public opinion.    But the implications of Murdaugh's courtroom behavior extend beyond the immediate reactions. Bland's representation of the jurors from Murdaugh's trial brought another layer to the discussion. "I also represent four of the jurors... so we're pretty knee-deep in all matters Murdaugh," Bland stated, revealing his comprehensive involvement in the case and signaling the broader ramifications of Murdaugh's actions on the judicial process.    As Bland dissected Murdaugh's tactics and their fallout, he painted a picture of a man who, despite facing the consequences of his actions, remains steadfast in his manipulative narrative. The podcast episode with Bland provides a sobering reminder of the damage inflicted by Murdaugh's actions – not just financially, but emotionally and psychologically, on the victims and the community at large.    The article concludes by posing a critical question to the reader: With Murdaugh's trial and personal antics continuing to unravel, how much more will be exposed before the final gavel falls? Will the relentless pursuit of truth by attorneys like Eric Bland lead to a resolution, or is this just another chapter in a saga that seems to defy closure? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a courtroom drama that could rival any television series, disgraced attorney Alex Murdaugh's latest court appearance has left the public and legal community reeling. But was this just another scene in the spectacle of his downfall, or a calculated move by a man well-versed in the art of persuasion? In a recent "Hidden Killers" podcast episode, Tony Brueski sat down with Eric Bland, an attorney representing many of Murdaugh's victims, to peel back the layers of Murdaugh's courtroom 'infomercial'.    Eric Bland, whose name has become synonymous with the pursuit of justice in the wake of Alex Murdaugh's crimes, did not mince words as he shared his courtroom experience. "I wouldn't call it a speech. I would call it an infomercial," Bland declared, expressing his disbelief at Murdaugh's attempt to reshape public perception during what was supposed to be his moment of reckoning for financial crimes.    Murdaugh's 'infomercial' wasn't just a meandering soliloquy; it was a strategic performance aimed at influencing everyone within earshot, from his estranged son Buster to the very victims he had defrauded. "He had a captive audience... He went way beyond the charges that he was pleading guilty to," Bland explained, underscoring the opportunistic nature of Murdaugh's lengthy diatribe.    Murdaugh's statements in court were a study in narcissism, as Bland pointed out, particularly when addressing the family of Gloria Satterfield. "He turned to me and he said, 'I raised my sons,'" Bland recounted, highlighting the audacity with which Murdaugh dismissed the significant role Satterfield played in his family's life. It was a moment that not only 'teed off' Bland but also revealed the deep chasm between Murdaugh's perception and reality.    The public and media response to Murdaugh's display was one of collective horror, a sentiment echoed by Bland. "It rang hollow... I have not heard anybody say that they thought he moved the needle more to his side to feel empathy for him," Bland remarked, reflecting the general consensus that Murdaugh's performance did nothing to engender sympathy or shift public opinion.    But the implications of Murdaugh's courtroom behavior extend beyond the immediate reactions. Bland's representation of the jurors from Murdaugh's trial brought another layer to the discussion. "I also represent four of the jurors... so we're pretty knee-deep in all matters Murdaugh," Bland stated, revealing his comprehensive involvement in the case and signaling the broader ramifications of Murdaugh's actions on the judicial process.    As Bland dissected Murdaugh's tactics and their fallout, he painted a picture of a man who, despite facing the consequences of his actions, remains steadfast in his manipulative narrative. The podcast episode with Bland provides a sobering reminder of the damage inflicted by Murdaugh's actions – not just financially, but emotionally and psychologically, on the victims and the community at large.    The article concludes by posing a critical question to the reader: With Murdaugh's trial and personal antics continuing to unravel, how much more will be exposed before the final gavel falls? Will the relentless pursuit of truth by attorneys like Eric Bland lead to a resolution, or is this just another chapter in a saga that seems to defy closure? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can justice be as elusive as the morning mist, disappearing before our eyes just when we think we've grasped it? This question hovers over the recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, where Tony Brueski engages in a thought-provoking conversation with Eric Bland, the attorney spearheading the charge against Alex Murdaugh on behalf of several victims, including the family of Gloria Satterfield and the mother of the late Stephen Smith. The discussion offers a glimpse into the potential for a retrial in the Murdaugh saga and the ever-evolving narrative that surrounds this complex case.    Eric Bland, known for his staunch advocacy for the victims of Alex Murdaugh, provides an incisive update on the intricacies of the potential retrial. The conversation begins with a sharp critique of Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his 'correction' of the Satterfield family's statements during victim impact testimonies. "That was not the time or place to go, well, I mean, just obviously very disconnected," Bland remarked, shedding light on Murdaugh's apparent lack of empathy.    As Brueski delves deeper, Bland touches on the curious case of Stephen Smith, whose tragic demise years ago still haunts his family. The case has seen "rumblings" of a connection to the Murdaughs, though no charges have ever been formally brought against them. However, the conversation takes a significant turn when discussing Gloria Satterfield, whose death narrative, long held as an accident caused by the family dogs, was questioned in a recent court admission by Murdaugh himself.    "Isn't that the story when he made up the story? Wasn't that still the story that he's been sticking with all this time?" Brueski probes, seeking clarity on Murdaugh's statement that seemed to suggest an alternate version of events leading to Satterfield's death. Bland's response indicates a disconcerting possibility that Murdaugh's recent courtroom narrative may be an intentional deviation from his previous statements, casting further shadows of doubt on his credibility.    The discussion shifts to the broader implications of a retrial, hinging on an evidentiary hearing that may unravel due to potential jury tampering allegations against Becky Hill. Bland's portrayal of the jurors' stance is one of indignation and firm resolve to protect their verdict, a direct refutation of the manipulation they are accused of succumbing to. "These are some very smart people," Bland asserts, emphasizing the jurors' commitment to justice as they served in the high-profile case.    Bland expresses initial confidence that a retrial would not be granted solely on the basis of jury tampering claims. However, the conversation takes a darker turn as he brings up the recent ethical charges against Becky Hill and the wiretapping allegations involving her son. These developments, according to Bland, could undermine Hill's credibility and, by extension, impact the proceedings of a potential retrial.    Brueski and Bland traverse the murky waters of legal proceedings and the complex human emotions intertwined with them. As Bland narrates the emotional toll on the Satterfield family and the ongoing search for answers in Stephen Smith's murder, the podcast serves as a reminder of the human cost of legal battles.    In the closing moments, Bland articulates a poignant sense of urgency for the truth. "Sandy doesn't want blood," he says, referring to Stephen Smith's mother. "She's not looking for somebody to be convicted of murder, which she's looking for answers." It's a powerful testament to a mother's relentless pursuit of justice for her son, a quest that has endured agonizingly since 2015.    The article concludes by leaving readers with a haunting thought: As new evidence surfaces and the potential for a retrial looms, will the hidden human condition, with all its complexities and contradictions, finally yield the clarity and resolution these families seek? Or will the mists of justice recede once again, leaving them grasping for closure that remains just out of reach? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The shocking saga of former attorney Alex Murdaugh continues to unfold as he pleads guilty to a string of financial crimes that left families across the state betrayed and suffering. Among these families is that of Gloria Satterfield, a beloved housekeeper, whose legacy has inspired a foundation aimed at helping those in need.    Gloria Satterfield, a dedicated mother and devoted worker, tragically lost her life in a fall at the Murdaughs' Moselle property on February 2, 2018. In the aftermath of her passing, Alex Murdaugh, the family's attorney and friend, approached Gloria's loved ones with promises of support.    "He said he would make sure the boys were taken care of," recalls Gloria's sister, Ginger Hadwin. "He was just looking out for the boys because he thought a lot of Gloria and he was just going to make sure [her sons] Brian and Tony were taken care of, and to show his appreciation for all the years that Gloria had shown her love, looking out for his family and his boys."    With Murdaugh's guidance, the family pursued wrongful death and survival claims. However, their trust was shattered when they discovered that their case had been settled for a staggering sum of over $4 million, a fact that Murdaugh had concealed from them.    "It made me sick to my stomach," says Tony, Gloria's son.    The extent of Alex Murdaugh's deceit became evident when he was arrested in October 2021, facing more than 100 financial crime charges, revealing that Satterfield's family was not the only victim of his fraudulent actions.    Last month, Murdaugh, already serving a life sentence for the murder of his wife Maggie and son Paul in June 2021, pleaded guilty to 22 financial crimes, including money laundering, breach of trust, and financial fraud. Prosecutors disclosed that Murdaugh had defrauded over 18 clients of millions over a decade.    Creighton Waters, the lead prosecutor in both Murdaugh's financial crimes and murder cases, emphasized the devastating impact of Murdaugh's deception. Waters stated, "The wreckage that was left is unprecedented. This was as egregious as it comes."    Waters added that Alex Murdaugh had used "trust" as a "weapon," exploiting his charismatic and friendly demeanor to deceive numerous victims. He remarked, "the reality is there is not one person out there who knew who he really was."    Ginger Hadwin, who spoke at Murdaugh's sentencing for financial crimes, expressed the profound pain inflicted on her family and others. "I not only felt the pain of my family, of being betrayed, I felt the pain of the other family members that were betrayed by Alex," she said.    Despite the anguish, Gloria Satterfield's family is determined to honor her memory through positive action. They established the Gloria's Gifts Foundation, with a mission to ensure that underprivileged children receive at least one gift for Christmas.    "We just want to help people because she struggled, and we just want to help people that struggle," says Ginger.    Gloria's son Tony added, "It's her legacy. It shows that she didn't die in vain, that her death had a purpose. Now we can smile when we hear the name Gloria."    The case of Alex Murdaugh serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, trust, and accountability in the legal profession and the enduring impact of deception on victims' lives.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent court proceedings in the Alex Murdaugh case have unfolded like scenes from a suspense-filled legal drama, raising profound questions about justice, manipulation, and human behavior. As Murdaugh faced the victims of his financial crimes, his actions and responses in court drew attention and analysis from legal experts and the public alike. Joining Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Defense Attorney and Podcast Host Bob Motta offered his insights into the latest developments.    Murdaugh, already a figure of intense scrutiny due to the murder allegations he faces, made a significant move in court by admitting his guilt in numerous financial crimes. However, his courtroom demeanor, as observed by Brueski and Motta, was a mix of accepting responsibility and deflecting blame. Murdaugh's reaction to victim impact statements highlighted his complex psychological makeup. He showed a tendency to challenge narratives and details that he felt misrepresented him, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of his wrongdoing.    One particular instance that stood out was Murdaugh's interaction with a friend he had wronged, who, in his victim impact statement, labeled Murdaugh a murderer. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, emphasizing his innocence in the murder charges. This reaction underlines Murdaugh's strategy of compartmentalizing his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while vehemently denying any involvement in the murders.    The case's emotional impact was palpable, especially in the testimonies of Murdaugh's former clients. As Motta pointed out, hearing these victims articulate the depth of their betrayal and loss was gut-wrenching. Unlike victim impact statements in murder trials, these testimonies focused on the devastation wrought by financial exploitation, adding another layer of tragedy to the Murdaugh saga.    Speculation about Murdaugh's involvement in the murders continues to swirl, with Motta suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly committing them. This theory aligns with Murdaugh's pattern of manipulating events to his advantage while maintaining a veneer of innocence.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his reaction to the Satterfield family's statements, further demonstrated his disconnection from the emotional gravity of the situation. His insistence on clarifying minor details, like his role in raising his children, seemed out of place amid the serious allegations he faces.    A striking moment in the proceedings was Murdaugh's mention of "making up the story" about how Gloria Satterfield died. This admission, whether intentional or a slip, raises new questions about the circumstances surrounding Satterfield's death and Murdaugh's role in it.    As the case progresses, the possibility of Murdaugh's early release looms large. Despite the severity of his crimes, the plea deal he struck for his financial offenses could see him free in his seventies, a prospect that seemed unthinkable when the case first broke. This development raises concerns about the efficacy of the justice system in holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly in high-profile cases like Murdaugh's.    In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta sheds light on the multifaceted nature of the Murdaugh case. From courtroom dynamics to the psychological complexities of the accused, the case continues to captivate and confound observers. As we await further developments, one question remains: Will justice be served in the end, or will the twists and turns of this legal labyrinth lead to an unexpected outcome? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent court proceedings in the Alex Murdaugh case have unfolded like scenes from a suspense-filled legal drama, raising profound questions about justice, manipulation, and human behavior. As Murdaugh faced the victims of his financial crimes, his actions and responses in court drew attention and analysis from legal experts and the public alike. Joining Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Defense Attorney and Podcast Host Bob Motta offered his insights into the latest developments.    Murdaugh, already a figure of intense scrutiny due to the murder allegations he faces, made a significant move in court by admitting his guilt in numerous financial crimes. However, his courtroom demeanor, as observed by Brueski and Motta, was a mix of accepting responsibility and deflecting blame. Murdaugh's reaction to victim impact statements highlighted his complex psychological makeup. He showed a tendency to challenge narratives and details that he felt misrepresented him, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of his wrongdoing.    One particular instance that stood out was Murdaugh's interaction with a friend he had wronged, who, in his victim impact statement, labeled Murdaugh a murderer. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, emphasizing his innocence in the murder charges. This reaction underlines Murdaugh's strategy of compartmentalizing his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while vehemently denying any involvement in the murders.    The case's emotional impact was palpable, especially in the testimonies of Murdaugh's former clients. As Motta pointed out, hearing these victims articulate the depth of their betrayal and loss was gut-wrenching. Unlike victim impact statements in murder trials, these testimonies focused on the devastation wrought by financial exploitation, adding another layer of tragedy to the Murdaugh saga.    Speculation about Murdaugh's involvement in the murders continues to swirl, with Motta suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly committing them. This theory aligns with Murdaugh's pattern of manipulating events to his advantage while maintaining a veneer of innocence.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his reaction to the Satterfield family's statements, further demonstrated his disconnection from the emotional gravity of the situation. His insistence on clarifying minor details, like his role in raising his children, seemed out of place amid the serious allegations he faces.    A striking moment in the proceedings was Murdaugh's mention of "making up the story" about how Gloria Satterfield died. This admission, whether intentional or a slip, raises new questions about the circumstances surrounding Satterfield's death and Murdaugh's role in it.    As the case progresses, the possibility of Murdaugh's early release looms large. Despite the severity of his crimes, the plea deal he struck for his financial offenses could see him free in his seventies, a prospect that seemed unthinkable when the case first broke. This development raises concerns about the efficacy of the justice system in holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly in high-profile cases like Murdaugh's.    In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta sheds light on the multifaceted nature of the Murdaugh case. From courtroom dynamics to the psychological complexities of the accused, the case continues to captivate and confound observers. As we await further developments, one question remains: Will justice be served in the end, or will the twists and turns of this legal labyrinth lead to an unexpected outcome? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The shocking saga of former attorney Alex Murdaugh continues to unfold as he pleads guilty to a string of financial crimes that left families across the state betrayed and suffering. Among these families is that of Gloria Satterfield, a beloved housekeeper, whose legacy has inspired a foundation aimed at helping those in need.    Gloria Satterfield, a dedicated mother and devoted worker, tragically lost her life in a fall at the Murdaughs' Moselle property on February 2, 2018. In the aftermath of her passing, Alex Murdaugh, the family's attorney and friend, approached Gloria's loved ones with promises of support.    "He said he would make sure the boys were taken care of," recalls Gloria's sister, Ginger Hadwin. "He was just looking out for the boys because he thought a lot of Gloria and he was just going to make sure [her sons] Brian and Tony were taken care of, and to show his appreciation for all the years that Gloria had shown her love, looking out for his family and his boys."    With Murdaugh's guidance, the family pursued wrongful death and survival claims. However, their trust was shattered when they discovered that their case had been settled for a staggering sum of over $4 million, a fact that Murdaugh had concealed from them.    "It made me sick to my stomach," says Tony, Gloria's son.    The extent of Alex Murdaugh's deceit became evident when he was arrested in October 2021, facing more than 100 financial crime charges, revealing that Satterfield's family was not the only victim of his fraudulent actions.    Last month, Murdaugh, already serving a life sentence for the murder of his wife Maggie and son Paul in June 2021, pleaded guilty to 22 financial crimes, including money laundering, breach of trust, and financial fraud. Prosecutors disclosed that Murdaugh had defrauded over 18 clients of millions over a decade.    Creighton Waters, the lead prosecutor in both Murdaugh's financial crimes and murder cases, emphasized the devastating impact of Murdaugh's deception. Waters stated, "The wreckage that was left is unprecedented. This was as egregious as it comes."    Waters added that Alex Murdaugh had used "trust" as a "weapon," exploiting his charismatic and friendly demeanor to deceive numerous victims. He remarked, "the reality is there is not one person out there who knew who he really was."    Ginger Hadwin, who spoke at Murdaugh's sentencing for financial crimes, expressed the profound pain inflicted on her family and others. "I not only felt the pain of my family, of being betrayed, I felt the pain of the other family members that were betrayed by Alex," she said.    Despite the anguish, Gloria Satterfield's family is determined to honor her memory through positive action. They established the Gloria's Gifts Foundation, with a mission to ensure that underprivileged children receive at least one gift for Christmas.    "We just want to help people because she struggled, and we just want to help people that struggle," says Ginger.    Gloria's son Tony added, "It's her legacy. It shows that she didn't die in vain, that her death had a purpose. Now we can smile when we hear the name Gloria."    The case of Alex Murdaugh serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, trust, and accountability in the legal profession and the enduring impact of deception on victims' lives.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can justice be as elusive as the morning mist, disappearing before our eyes just when we think we've grasped it? This question hovers over the recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, where Tony Brueski engages in a thought-provoking conversation with Eric Bland, the attorney spearheading the charge against Alex Murdaugh on behalf of several victims, including the family of Gloria Satterfield and the mother of the late Stephen Smith. The discussion offers a glimpse into the potential for a retrial in the Murdaugh saga and the ever-evolving narrative that surrounds this complex case.    Eric Bland, known for his staunch advocacy for the victims of Alex Murdaugh, provides an incisive update on the intricacies of the potential retrial. The conversation begins with a sharp critique of Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his 'correction' of the Satterfield family's statements during victim impact testimonies. "That was not the time or place to go, well, I mean, just obviously very disconnected," Bland remarked, shedding light on Murdaugh's apparent lack of empathy.    As Brueski delves deeper, Bland touches on the curious case of Stephen Smith, whose tragic demise years ago still haunts his family. The case has seen "rumblings" of a connection to the Murdaughs, though no charges have ever been formally brought against them. However, the conversation takes a significant turn when discussing Gloria Satterfield, whose death narrative, long held as an accident caused by the family dogs, was questioned in a recent court admission by Murdaugh himself.    "Isn't that the story when he made up the story? Wasn't that still the story that he's been sticking with all this time?" Brueski probes, seeking clarity on Murdaugh's statement that seemed to suggest an alternate version of events leading to Satterfield's death. Bland's response indicates a disconcerting possibility that Murdaugh's recent courtroom narrative may be an intentional deviation from his previous statements, casting further shadows of doubt on his credibility.    The discussion shifts to the broader implications of a retrial, hinging on an evidentiary hearing that may unravel due to potential jury tampering allegations against Becky Hill. Bland's portrayal of the jurors' stance is one of indignation and firm resolve to protect their verdict, a direct refutation of the manipulation they are accused of succumbing to. "These are some very smart people," Bland asserts, emphasizing the jurors' commitment to justice as they served in the high-profile case.    Bland expresses initial confidence that a retrial would not be granted solely on the basis of jury tampering claims. However, the conversation takes a darker turn as he brings up the recent ethical charges against Becky Hill and the wiretapping allegations involving her son. These developments, according to Bland, could undermine Hill's credibility and, by extension, impact the proceedings of a potential retrial.    Brueski and Bland traverse the murky waters of legal proceedings and the complex human emotions intertwined with them. As Bland narrates the emotional toll on the Satterfield family and the ongoing search for answers in Stephen Smith's murder, the podcast serves as a reminder of the human cost of legal battles.    In the closing moments, Bland articulates a poignant sense of urgency for the truth. "Sandy doesn't want blood," he says, referring to Stephen Smith's mother. "She's not looking for somebody to be convicted of murder, which she's looking for answers." It's a powerful testament to a mother's relentless pursuit of justice for her son, a quest that has endured agonizingly since 2015.    The article concludes by leaving readers with a haunting thought: As new evidence surfaces and the potential for a retrial looms, will the hidden human condition, with all its complexities and contradictions, finally yield the clarity and resolution these families seek? Or will the mists of justice recede once again, leaving them grasping for closure that remains just out of reach? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the pursuit of justice an ever-winding road? In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski, alongside attorney Eric Bland, tackles the ongoing complexities of the Alex Murdaugh saga, with a specific focus on the potential for a retrial in light of new developments. Bland, representing several victims of Murdaugh's actions, including Gloria Satterfield's family, provides an update that may hold the key to unlocking new chapters in this legal thriller.    Eric Bland paints a picture of a legal landscape dramatically altered by the potential of a retrial for Alex Murdaugh. "The possibility of an Alex Murdaugh murder retrial is a scary thing," Bland begins, setting the tone for a discussion rife with legal twists and turns. As he elaborates on the complexity of the evidentiary hearing needed to render an impartial verdict, he underlines the importance of fair judicial processes, stating, "The reason our system works is because the worst of us get the same procedures that the best of us get."    As Bland dissects the intricacies of the case, he points to the impact of recent accusations against Becky Hill, who faces allegations of jury tampering. The plot thickens with the arrest of her son, Jeffrey Colton Hill, for wiretapping, further entangling the Murdaugh name in a web of potential criminal activities. These events, as Bland suggests, could play a pivotal role in determining the course of a new trial.    "The investigation is very much alive," Bland reassures, despite the temporary diversion of investigative resources due to Murdaugh's other legal battles. He hints at the presence of the Murdaugh name in the case file over 41 times and the ongoing quest for answers in the death of Stephen Smith. Bland shares insights from a recent conversation with Chief Mark Keel, indicating the renewed focus on Smith's case and the hope for breakthroughs from digital evidence yet to be confirmed by SLED.    The conversation takes a turn as Bland addresses the curious dynamics between Sandy Smith's recollection of events and the conflicting accounts provided by the Murdaughs. He expresses optimism for progress, given the active engagement of law enforcement officials, despite the complexities introduced by the wiretapping charges against Hill's son and the ethical inquiries into Becky Hill's conduct.    The discussion with Brueski traverses the sensitive terrain of the jurors' experiences, the anticipated procedures of the evidentiary hearing, and the potential implications of Becky Hill's compromised credibility. Bland's seasoned perspective sheds light on the jurors' determination to protect their verdict and the challenge posed by the snowballing allegations against Hill.    As Bland delves into the details, including the peculiarities surrounding the wiretapping incident and its possible connection to jury tampering, listeners are left pondering the depth of the Murdaugh family's influence. "I was thinking there's not a chance this is going to work if we were just strictly talking on the jury tampering issues," Bland states, but he acknowledges the escalating situation: "But then the son came up, and then all the other things came up, and it's like this is turning into a snowball that didn't need to take place."    As the podcast episode concludes, Bland reflects on the judicial shifts, including Judge Newman's recusal, and the implications for the Murdaugh case. With a combination of legal acumen and a touch of human empathy, Bland and Brueski leave listeners with a lingering question: What will be the next turn in this convoluted path to justice?    In the search for truth and accountability, the narrative of Alex Murdaugh continues to captivate and confound. As Bland succinctly puts it, "We'll have to see exactly how that all plays out." Will the potential retrial unravel further secrets, or will it lead to more questions than answers? Only time, and the gavel of justice, will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the pursuit of justice an ever-winding road? In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski, alongside attorney Eric Bland, tackles the ongoing complexities of the Alex Murdaugh saga, with a specific focus on the potential for a retrial in light of new developments. Bland, representing several victims of Murdaugh's actions, including Gloria Satterfield's family, provides an update that may hold the key to unlocking new chapters in this legal thriller.    Eric Bland paints a picture of a legal landscape dramatically altered by the potential of a retrial for Alex Murdaugh. "The possibility of an Alex Murdaugh murder retrial is a scary thing," Bland begins, setting the tone for a discussion rife with legal twists and turns. As he elaborates on the complexity of the evidentiary hearing needed to render an impartial verdict, he underlines the importance of fair judicial processes, stating, "The reason our system works is because the worst of us get the same procedures that the best of us get."    As Bland dissects the intricacies of the case, he points to the impact of recent accusations against Becky Hill, who faces allegations of jury tampering. The plot thickens with the arrest of her son, Jeffrey Colton Hill, for wiretapping, further entangling the Murdaugh name in a web of potential criminal activities. These events, as Bland suggests, could play a pivotal role in determining the course of a new trial.    "The investigation is very much alive," Bland reassures, despite the temporary diversion of investigative resources due to Murdaugh's other legal battles. He hints at the presence of the Murdaugh name in the case file over 41 times and the ongoing quest for answers in the death of Stephen Smith. Bland shares insights from a recent conversation with Chief Mark Keel, indicating the renewed focus on Smith's case and the hope for breakthroughs from digital evidence yet to be confirmed by SLED.    The conversation takes a turn as Bland addresses the curious dynamics between Sandy Smith's recollection of events and the conflicting accounts provided by the Murdaughs. He expresses optimism for progress, given the active engagement of law enforcement officials, despite the complexities introduced by the wiretapping charges against Hill's son and the ethical inquiries into Becky Hill's conduct.    The discussion with Brueski traverses the sensitive terrain of the jurors' experiences, the anticipated procedures of the evidentiary hearing, and the potential implications of Becky Hill's compromised credibility. Bland's seasoned perspective sheds light on the jurors' determination to protect their verdict and the challenge posed by the snowballing allegations against Hill.    As Bland delves into the details, including the peculiarities surrounding the wiretapping incident and its possible connection to jury tampering, listeners are left pondering the depth of the Murdaugh family's influence. "I was thinking there's not a chance this is going to work if we were just strictly talking on the jury tampering issues," Bland states, but he acknowledges the escalating situation: "But then the son came up, and then all the other things came up, and it's like this is turning into a snowball that didn't need to take place."    As the podcast episode concludes, Bland reflects on the judicial shifts, including Judge Newman's recusal, and the implications for the Murdaugh case. With a combination of legal acumen and a touch of human empathy, Bland and Brueski leave listeners with a lingering question: What will be the next turn in this convoluted path to justice?    In the search for truth and accountability, the narrative of Alex Murdaugh continues to captivate and confound. As Bland succinctly puts it, "We'll have to see exactly how that all plays out." Will the potential retrial unravel further secrets, or will it lead to more questions than answers? Only time, and the gavel of justice, will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims.    The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through."    What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit.    An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims.    Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident.    The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm.    As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars.    The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest turn of events in the Alex Murdaugh saga, the disgraced lawyer recently faced his financial crime victims in court, where he was sentenced to 27 years behind bars. This development, while significant, has sparked discussions about the possibility of Murdaugh's eventual release and the ongoing complexities surrounding his case. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these recent courtroom occurrences and their implications.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his responses to the victim impact statements, has raised eyebrows. Dreeke expressed astonishment at the spectacle, particularly how Murdaugh's statements overshadowed the powerful testimonies of his victims. Murdaugh's approach was a mix of confession and deflection, as he admitted to financial crimes while simultaneously challenging the narratives presented by his victims.    The extent of Murdaugh's depravity was laid bare as he wronged not just strangers, but close, lifelong friends and associates. Dreeke noted, "It kind of shows the degree of deprivation that pervades his psyche, because he wronged people that were very close, like lifelong friends and the sons of people that worked for him forever that were close. It was horrible to go through."    What struck Dreeke most was Murdaugh's focus on himself during his courtroom speech. He pointed out how Murdaugh's use of "I statements" demonstrated a profound lack of empathy and an inability to shift the focus from himself to his victims. This behavior is indicative of extreme manipulation, where Murdaugh used the empathy of others against them for his own benefit.    An interesting point raised in the podcast was Murdaugh's physical demeanor, which indicated stress despite his apparent confidence. "He had dry mouth going, which indicates a huge indicator of stress. So he was under stress," Dreeke observed. This stress, however, did not translate into genuine remorse or empathy for his victims.    Brueski and Dreeke also delved into a potential Freudian slip made by Murdaugh in court, where he mentioned fabricating the story about the dogs causing Gloria Satterfield's fall. This statement could imply deeper, more sinister truths behind Satterfield's death, previously believed to be an accident.    The discussion also touched upon the broader implications of the Murdaugh case, particularly in relation to other high-profile cases. Dreeke drew parallels with Lori Daybell, noting a pattern of chaos and death surrounding such individuals. He emphasized the need to scrutinize these patterns, as they deviate significantly from the norm.    As the podcast concluded, Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future of the Murdaugh case. With the specter of a possible retrial looming, due to allegations of jury tampering and wiretapping involving Becky Hill and her son, the complexity of the case only deepens. Murdaugh's actions in court, far from providing clarity, have only added to the enigma surrounding his character and his potential future behind bars.    The Alex Murdaugh case continues to be a convoluted journey through the darker aspects of human behavior, manipulation, and the justice system. As Dreeke aptly put it, "When it becomes a pattern, you gotta give it a look and say, what is going on here that's creating chaos around this human being, because it's not normal." Will Murdaugh's manipulative tactics ultimately impact his fate? Only time will tell, but for now, the case remains a riveting yet troubling narrative of crime and deception. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh saga, a recent courtroom appearance has stirred widespread discussion and analysis, particularly concerning his response to victim impact statements. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, along with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, delve into Murdaugh's behavior, revealing a complex tapestry of narcissism and self-victimization.    Murdaugh, who stands accused of financial crimes, has been the subject of intense scrutiny. During his recent court appearance, he was given the opportunity to respond to victim impact statements. This response, however, veered into what Coffindaffer describes as "self-serving statements," aligning with a classic narcissist's playbook. "He should have gone to Hollywood," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting Murdaugh's persuasive speaking skills, which she believes overshadow the genuine, heartfelt statements of the true victims.    This courtroom episode has left many perplexed and divided. Some viewers found Murdaugh's speech moving, while others, including Coffindaffer, remain convinced of his guilt in the associated murder case. Brueski notes that most people find it challenging to comprehend how someone could commit such heinous acts against their own family, contributing to the divided public opinion. "We live with people like Alex Murdaugh. They're out there all the time," he asserts, acknowledging the unsettling reality of such personalities in society.    The stark contrast between Murdaugh's statements and those of the actual victims was apparent. The victims spoke sincerely, directly from the heart, lacking Murdaugh's level of manipulation. This juxtaposition, as Coffindaffer points out, served to emphasize Murdaugh's theatricality and lack of genuine remorse. Brueski also expresses surprise at the amount of time Judge Clifton Newman allowed Murdaugh to speak, which turned the courtroom into a stage for Murdaugh's performance.    Murdaugh's courtroom demeanor was characterized by a striking lack of empathy and a tendency to correct the narratives of his victims. In one instance, he insisted that it was solely he and his wife, Maggie, who raised their children, directly contradicting statements made by others about Gloria Satterfield's significant role in the children's upbringing. Coffindaffer observes, "He just can't help that narcissistic 'it's me, it's what we did, it's I.'"    The episode culminated in Judge Newman's blunt assessment of Murdaugh as an "empty human being." This sentiment echoed throughout the courtroom, particularly in moments where Murdaugh sought to interject and 'correct' the perceptions of his victims. Coffindaffer reflects on this, noting the lack of genuine empathy for the victims and Murdaugh's persistent self-aggrandizement.    In closing, Brueski poses a lingering question: What does this latest courtroom spectacle reveal about the true nature of Alex Murdaugh, and how will it influence public perception as his legal battles continue? As the case unfolds, the public and legal communities remain riveted, seeking answers in a story that consistently defies expectations and norms. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh saga, a recent courtroom appearance has stirred widespread discussion and analysis, particularly concerning his response to victim impact statements. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, along with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, delve into Murdaugh's behavior, revealing a complex tapestry of narcissism and self-victimization.    Murdaugh, who stands accused of financial crimes, has been the subject of intense scrutiny. During his recent court appearance, he was given the opportunity to respond to victim impact statements. This response, however, veered into what Coffindaffer describes as "self-serving statements," aligning with a classic narcissist's playbook. "He should have gone to Hollywood," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting Murdaugh's persuasive speaking skills, which she believes overshadow the genuine, heartfelt statements of the true victims.    This courtroom episode has left many perplexed and divided. Some viewers found Murdaugh's speech moving, while others, including Coffindaffer, remain convinced of his guilt in the associated murder case. Brueski notes that most people find it challenging to comprehend how someone could commit such heinous acts against their own family, contributing to the divided public opinion. "We live with people like Alex Murdaugh. They're out there all the time," he asserts, acknowledging the unsettling reality of such personalities in society.    The stark contrast between Murdaugh's statements and those of the actual victims was apparent. The victims spoke sincerely, directly from the heart, lacking Murdaugh's level of manipulation. This juxtaposition, as Coffindaffer points out, served to emphasize Murdaugh's theatricality and lack of genuine remorse. Brueski also expresses surprise at the amount of time Judge Clifton Newman allowed Murdaugh to speak, which turned the courtroom into a stage for Murdaugh's performance.    Murdaugh's courtroom demeanor was characterized by a striking lack of empathy and a tendency to correct the narratives of his victims. In one instance, he insisted that it was solely he and his wife, Maggie, who raised their children, directly contradicting statements made by others about Gloria Satterfield's significant role in the children's upbringing. Coffindaffer observes, "He just can't help that narcissistic 'it's me, it's what we did, it's I.'"    The episode culminated in Judge Newman's blunt assessment of Murdaugh as an "empty human being." This sentiment echoed throughout the courtroom, particularly in moments where Murdaugh sought to interject and 'correct' the perceptions of his victims. Coffindaffer reflects on this, noting the lack of genuine empathy for the victims and Murdaugh's persistent self-aggrandizement.    In closing, Brueski poses a lingering question: What does this latest courtroom spectacle reveal about the true nature of Alex Murdaugh, and how will it influence public perception as his legal battles continue? As the case unfolds, the public and legal communities remain riveted, seeking answers in a story that consistently defies expectations and norms. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent court proceedings in the Alex Murdaugh case have unfolded like scenes from a suspense-filled legal drama, raising profound questions about justice, manipulation, and human behavior. As Murdaugh faced the victims of his financial crimes, his actions and responses in court drew attention and analysis from legal experts and the public alike. Joining Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Defense Attorney and Podcast Host Bob Motta offered his insights into the latest developments.    Murdaugh, already a figure of intense scrutiny due to the murder allegations he faces, made a significant move in court by admitting his guilt in numerous financial crimes. However, his courtroom demeanor, as observed by Brueski and Motta, was a mix of accepting responsibility and deflecting blame. Murdaugh's reaction to victim impact statements highlighted his complex psychological makeup. He showed a tendency to challenge narratives and details that he felt misrepresented him, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of his wrongdoing.    One particular instance that stood out was Murdaugh's interaction with a friend he had wronged, who, in his victim impact statement, labeled Murdaugh a murderer. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, emphasizing his innocence in the murder charges. This reaction underlines Murdaugh's strategy of compartmentalizing his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while vehemently denying any involvement in the murders.    The case's emotional impact was palpable, especially in the testimonies of Murdaugh's former clients. As Motta pointed out, hearing these victims articulate the depth of their betrayal and loss was gut-wrenching. Unlike victim impact statements in murder trials, these testimonies focused on the devastation wrought by financial exploitation, adding another layer of tragedy to the Murdaugh saga.    Speculation about Murdaugh's involvement in the murders continues to swirl, with Motta suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly committing them. This theory aligns with Murdaugh's pattern of manipulating events to his advantage while maintaining a veneer of innocence.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his reaction to the Satterfield family's statements, further demonstrated his disconnection from the emotional gravity of the situation. His insistence on clarifying minor details, like his role in raising his children, seemed out of place amid the serious allegations he faces.    A striking moment in the proceedings was Murdaugh's mention of "making up the story" about how Gloria Satterfield died. This admission, whether intentional or a slip, raises new questions about the circumstances surrounding Satterfield's death and Murdaugh's role in it.    As the case progresses, the possibility of Murdaugh's early release looms large. Despite the severity of his crimes, the plea deal he struck for his financial offenses could see him free in his seventies, a prospect that seemed unthinkable when the case first broke. This development raises concerns about the efficacy of the justice system in holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly in high-profile cases like Murdaugh's.    In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta sheds light on the multifaceted nature of the Murdaugh case. From courtroom dynamics to the psychological complexities of the accused, the case continues to captivate and confound observers. As we await further developments, one question remains: Will justice be served in the end, or will the twists and turns of this legal labyrinth lead to an unexpected outcome? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent court proceedings in the Alex Murdaugh case have unfolded like scenes from a suspense-filled legal drama, raising profound questions about justice, manipulation, and human behavior. As Murdaugh faced the victims of his financial crimes, his actions and responses in court drew attention and analysis from legal experts and the public alike. Joining Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Defense Attorney and Podcast Host Bob Motta offered his insights into the latest developments.    Murdaugh, already a figure of intense scrutiny due to the murder allegations he faces, made a significant move in court by admitting his guilt in numerous financial crimes. However, his courtroom demeanor, as observed by Brueski and Motta, was a mix of accepting responsibility and deflecting blame. Murdaugh's reaction to victim impact statements highlighted his complex psychological makeup. He showed a tendency to challenge narratives and details that he felt misrepresented him, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of his wrongdoing.    One particular instance that stood out was Murdaugh's interaction with a friend he had wronged, who, in his victim impact statement, labeled Murdaugh a murderer. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, emphasizing his innocence in the murder charges. This reaction underlines Murdaugh's strategy of compartmentalizing his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while vehemently denying any involvement in the murders.    The case's emotional impact was palpable, especially in the testimonies of Murdaugh's former clients. As Motta pointed out, hearing these victims articulate the depth of their betrayal and loss was gut-wrenching. Unlike victim impact statements in murder trials, these testimonies focused on the devastation wrought by financial exploitation, adding another layer of tragedy to the Murdaugh saga.    Speculation about Murdaugh's involvement in the murders continues to swirl, with Motta suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly committing them. This theory aligns with Murdaugh's pattern of manipulating events to his advantage while maintaining a veneer of innocence.    Murdaugh's courtroom behavior, particularly his reaction to the Satterfield family's statements, further demonstrated his disconnection from the emotional gravity of the situation. His insistence on clarifying minor details, like his role in raising his children, seemed out of place amid the serious allegations he faces.    A striking moment in the proceedings was Murdaugh's mention of "making up the story" about how Gloria Satterfield died. This admission, whether intentional or a slip, raises new questions about the circumstances surrounding Satterfield's death and Murdaugh's role in it.    As the case progresses, the possibility of Murdaugh's early release looms large. Despite the severity of his crimes, the plea deal he struck for his financial offenses could see him free in his seventies, a prospect that seemed unthinkable when the case first broke. This development raises concerns about the efficacy of the justice system in holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly in high-profile cases like Murdaugh's.    In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta sheds light on the multifaceted nature of the Murdaugh case. From courtroom dynamics to the psychological complexities of the accused, the case continues to captivate and confound observers. As we await further developments, one question remains: Will justice be served in the end, or will the twists and turns of this legal labyrinth lead to an unexpected outcome? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a courtroom packed with victims and spectators, former South Carolina attorney Alex Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in prison for his egregious theft of approximately $12 million from clients who had placed their trust in him. The courtroom drama unfolded as victims shared their emotional testimonies, revealing the profound impact of Murdaugh's betrayal.    Murdaugh, once a respected figure in the legal community and a prominent name in Hampton County for generations, faced sentencing for his extensive financial crimes. Over nearly a decade, he exploited the trust of his clients, promising assistance with medical bills and settlements, only to misappropriate the funds for his personal use.    Jordan Jinks, a friend of Murdaugh's since childhood, expressed his anguish, saying, "I'm not crying for what he stole from me. I'm crying for what he did to everybody." Many victims, like Jinks, entrusted Murdaugh with their financial well-being, only to be left financially ruined and emotionally devastated.    Prosecutor Creighton Waters provided a detailed account of Murdaugh's thefts, highlighting how he manipulated more than $12 million to evade detection over nearly a decade. Murdaugh used the trust of his family name and legal credentials to perpetuate his theft, accruing significant sums to pay off loans and credit card bills, which eventually spiraled out of control.    Under the plea deal, Murdaugh faced 22 financial crimes related to his clients, including breach of trust, money laundering, and tax evasion. His victims included individuals like Gloria Satterfield, a longtime family maid who died in a fall at the Murdaugh home. Murdaugh promised to take care of her family but later admitted to stealing every penny of the insurance settlement he obtained on her behalf.    Sandra Taylor, another victim, lost her life in a crash with a drunk driver, leaving behind three children. Murdaugh falsely claimed he could secure only a $30,000 settlement for her estate and secretly pocketed $150,000.    Throughout the sentencing hearing, Murdaugh repeatedly apologized to his family, victims, and those he had wronged. He attributed his actions to a drug addiction to painkillers, expressing remorse for bringing shame and dishonor upon his loved ones.    Judge Clifton Newman, who presided over the murder trial that resulted in Murdaugh's life sentence without parole for killing his wife, Maggie, and younger son, Paul, in June 2021, accepted the plea deal for the financial crimes. Newman described Murdaugh as having "the emptiest soul" he had encountered in his 23 years on the bench.    Despite Murdaugh's persistent claims of innocence in the murder case, his lawyers are seeking a new trial, alleging jury tampering by the court clerk. A different judge will decide whether to grant a hearing to question jurors, the clerk, and potentially Judge Newman under oath.    The sentencing for Murdaugh's financial crimes serves as a precautionary measure to prevent his release if his murder conviction is ever overturned. Under South Carolina law, he will have to serve nearly 23 years of the sentence, even with good behavior, before becoming eligible for release, making him 76 years old upon potential release. As part of the deal, Murdaugh relinquished his rights to appeal.    The courtroom proceedings mark another chapter in the stunning fall from grace of Alex Murdaugh, once a legal luminary, whose alleged crimes have garnered attention in true crime podcasts and online discussions. His case continues as he awaits sentencing on federal financial crime charges and faces additional local charges related to insurance fraud.    While Murdaugh expressed remorse during the hearing and offered apologies to his victims, the enduring impact of his actions on the lives of those he defrauded remains a poignant reminder of the devastating consequences of betrayal and deceit within the legal profession. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a courtroom packed with victims and spectators, former South Carolina attorney Alex Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in prison for his egregious theft of approximately $12 million from clients who had placed their trust in him. The courtroom drama unfolded as victims shared their emotional testimonies, revealing the profound impact of Murdaugh's betrayal.    Murdaugh, once a respected figure in the legal community and a prominent name in Hampton County for generations, faced sentencing for his extensive financial crimes. Over nearly a decade, he exploited the trust of his clients, promising assistance with medical bills and settlements, only to misappropriate the funds for his personal use.    Jordan Jinks, a friend of Murdaugh's since childhood, expressed his anguish, saying, "I'm not crying for what he stole from me. I'm crying for what he did to everybody." Many victims, like Jinks, entrusted Murdaugh with their financial well-being, only to be left financially ruined and emotionally devastated.    Prosecutor Creighton Waters provided a detailed account of Murdaugh's thefts, highlighting how he manipulated more than $12 million to evade detection over nearly a decade. Murdaugh used the trust of his family name and legal credentials to perpetuate his theft, accruing significant sums to pay off loans and credit card bills, which eventually spiraled out of control.    Under the plea deal, Murdaugh faced 22 financial crimes related to his clients, including breach of trust, money laundering, and tax evasion. His victims included individuals like Gloria Satterfield, a longtime family maid who died in a fall at the Murdaugh home. Murdaugh promised to take care of her family but later admitted to stealing every penny of the insurance settlement he obtained on her behalf.    Sandra Taylor, another victim, lost her life in a crash with a drunk driver, leaving behind three children. Murdaugh falsely claimed he could secure only a $30,000 settlement for her estate and secretly pocketed $150,000.    Throughout the sentencing hearing, Murdaugh repeatedly apologized to his family, victims, and those he had wronged. He attributed his actions to a drug addiction to painkillers, expressing remorse for bringing shame and dishonor upon his loved ones.    Judge Clifton Newman, who presided over the murder trial that resulted in Murdaugh's life sentence without parole for killing his wife, Maggie, and younger son, Paul, in June 2021, accepted the plea deal for the financial crimes. Newman described Murdaugh as having "the emptiest soul" he had encountered in his 23 years on the bench.    Despite Murdaugh's persistent claims of innocence in the murder case, his lawyers are seeking a new trial, alleging jury tampering by the court clerk. A different judge will decide whether to grant a hearing to question jurors, the clerk, and potentially Judge Newman under oath.    The sentencing for Murdaugh's financial crimes serves as a precautionary measure to prevent his release if his murder conviction is ever overturned. Under South Carolina law, he will have to serve nearly 23 years of the sentence, even with good behavior, before becoming eligible for release, making him 76 years old upon potential release. As part of the deal, Murdaugh relinquished his rights to appeal.    The courtroom proceedings mark another chapter in the stunning fall from grace of Alex Murdaugh, once a legal luminary, whose alleged crimes have garnered attention in true crime podcasts and online discussions. His case continues as he awaits sentencing on federal financial crime charges and faces additional local charges related to insurance fraud.    While Murdaugh expressed remorse during the hearing and offered apologies to his victims, the enduring impact of his actions on the lives of those he defrauded remains a poignant reminder of the devastating consequences of betrayal and deceit within the legal profession. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A tenuous sense of finality has spread across the South Carolina Lowcountry like a late November cold front as another chapter in Alex Murdaugh's seemingly unending criminal saga comes to a close. Getting there, the world heard for the first time this week the raw emotional catharsis of several families victimized by Alex Murdaugh's beguiling treachery. Friends, peers and clients alike unleashed years of pent-up anger and disappointment in Murdaugh Tuesday as he was formally sentenced to 27 years in prison for his many frauds, thefts, forgeries and lies. To some, the sentence only serves to further stoke the fire of their anger as it seems to them not nearly enough. Others are simply glad to turn from the last page a dark chapter in their lives — more interested in peace and forgiveness than vengeance.But what would this historic day be without the enigmatic and vexing Murdaugh once again attempting to seize the spotlight away from those owed justice to shine the attention on himself instead?Join host Anne Emerson, legal analyst Charlie Condon and producer Drew Tripp for this jam-packed retrospective on Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes plea deal and sentencing.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On February 24, 2019, a 19-year-old woman and her friends are on a private boat ride in the very early hours of the morning near Beaufort, South Carolina. The carefree night turns ugly when the 19-year-old skipper crashes the boat into a bridge, killing the young woman. The saga that follows is something, few people could have predicted. Two more people close to the case end up losing their lives in a brutal double slaying, before other previous deaths in the community soon become linked to a prominent local family at the center of the investigation. In episode 275, Jac and Alexis detail the tragic deaths of Gloria Satterfield, Stephen Smith, and Mallory Beach, followed by the shocking murders of Paul Murdaugh and his mother Maggie, the latter two orchestrated by their husband and father, local attorney Alex. This is a story about how all the power, prestige, and privilege in the world don't make us untouchable when it comes to the law, and what happens when someone is brought to account by those whose job it is to expose the truth, no matter the risk.

Alex Murdaugh, already serving two consecutive life terms for the murder of his wife and son, has agreed to a plea deal, admitting guilt in various financial crimes just days before the scheduled start of his trial. Murdaugh, who is currently serving two consecutive life sentences for the murders of his wife and son, pled guilty to multiple counts, including embezzlement of insurance settlement funds in the case of the Murdaugh family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Appearing in Beaufort County Court before Circuit Court Judge Clifton Newman, a shackled and orange-jumpsuit-clad Murdaugh expressed his readiness to accept the guilty plea, stating, "I am happy to be pleading guilty to these charges for a number of reasons." Chief prosecutor Creighton Waters, representing the state attorney general's office, recommended a 27-year prison sentence for Murdaugh's financial crimes. However, the final determination of the sentence will be made during a November 28 sentencing hearing, during which Judge Newman "fully intends" to accept Murdaugh's guilty plea after hearing from victims. Waters provided an overview of the various cases against Murdaugh, describing his actions as driven by an "insatiable need for money." Despite Murdaugh's stoic demeanor in the nearly empty courtroom, the charges against him included 101 financial-related counts and an alleged loss of $8.8 million to those affected by his schemes, both clients and his family's law firm. While Murdaugh indicated that he disagreed with certain aspects of the narrative presented by Waters, he did not dispute the central facts of the cases. The plea deal marked a significant development in a sprawling legal saga that has garnered widespread attention. Murdaugh's murder trial earlier this year attracted intense media coverage, given his prominent legal family background and the complex circumstances surrounding the deaths of his wife and son. Initially classified as an unsolved double homicide, the case unraveled into allegations of financial fraud, a suspected murder-for-hire plot, and drug addiction. It also reignited investigations into other suspicious deaths linked to the Murdaugh family. Notably, Murdaugh has maintained his innocence in the murder of his wife and son, with prosecutors alleging he committed the murders to gain sympathy before being exposed for his financial crimes. In addition to his state charges, Murdaugh pleaded guilty in federal court in September to nearly two dozen counts of financial fraud and money laundering. This plea deal requires him to make restitution to all identifiable victims, totaling approximately $9 million. He may also be subject to a polygraph test and may need to testify fully and truthfully before grand juries and in other proceedings. Importantly, Murdaugh's federal sentence must run concurrently with any sentence imposed in his state case, ensuring that he serves the prison time for both convictions simultaneously. Following the hearing, Murdaugh's defense team stated that their client had never denied committing financial crimes, which he generally admitted to during his murder trial. They emphasized his willingness to serve time for crimes he acknowledges but maintained his innocence in the murders of his wife and son, for which he is seeking a new trial. The allegations of jury tampering made by his defense team continue to be a point of contention in the ongoing legal proceedings. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh, already serving two consecutive life terms for the murder of his wife and son, has agreed to a plea deal, admitting guilt in various financial crimes just days before the scheduled start of his trial. Murdaugh, who is currently serving two consecutive life sentences for the murders of his wife and son, pled guilty to multiple counts, including embezzlement of insurance settlement funds in the case of the Murdaugh family's housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Appearing in Beaufort County Court before Circuit Court Judge Clifton Newman, a shackled and orange-jumpsuit-clad Murdaugh expressed his readiness to accept the guilty plea, stating, "I am happy to be pleading guilty to these charges for a number of reasons." Chief prosecutor Creighton Waters, representing the state attorney general's office, recommended a 27-year prison sentence for Murdaugh's financial crimes. However, the final determination of the sentence will be made during a November 28 sentencing hearing, during which Judge Newman "fully intends" to accept Murdaugh's guilty plea after hearing from victims. Waters provided an overview of the various cases against Murdaugh, describing his actions as driven by an "insatiable need for money." Despite Murdaugh's stoic demeanor in the nearly empty courtroom, the charges against him included 101 financial-related counts and an alleged loss of $8.8 million to those affected by his schemes, both clients and his family's law firm. While Murdaugh indicated that he disagreed with certain aspects of the narrative presented by Waters, he did not dispute the central facts of the cases. The plea deal marked a significant development in a sprawling legal saga that has garnered widespread attention. Murdaugh's murder trial earlier this year attracted intense media coverage, given his prominent legal family background and the complex circumstances surrounding the deaths of his wife and son. Initially classified as an unsolved double homicide, the case unraveled into allegations of financial fraud, a suspected murder-for-hire plot, and drug addiction. It also reignited investigations into other suspicious deaths linked to the Murdaugh family. Notably, Murdaugh has maintained his innocence in the murder of his wife and son, with prosecutors alleging he committed the murders to gain sympathy before being exposed for his financial crimes. Importantly, Murdaugh's federal sentence must run concurrently with any sentence imposed in his state case, ensuring that he serves the prison time for both convictions simultaneously. Following the hearing, Murdaugh's defense team stated that their client had never denied committing financial crimes, which he generally admitted to during his murder trial. They emphasized his willingness to serve time for crimes he acknowledges but maintained his innocence in the murders of his wife and son, for which he is seeking a new trial. The allegations of jury tampering made by his defense team continue to be a point of contention in the ongoing legal proceedings. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the ever-evolving legal saga of Alex Murdaugh, the question of whether a retrial is warranted looms large, especially considering recent allegations of jury tampering. On the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discussed the intricate details surrounding these allegations and the potential implications for Murdaugh's upcoming trials.    The focus of the discussion was on the allegations against Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill, who has been accused of having improper, possibly influential contact with jurors during Alex Murdaugh's murder trial. Hill has denied these allegations, and most jurors have echoed this denial in sworn affidavits. However, the revelation that a few jurors have not yet given their statements adds a layer of uncertainty to the situation.    Coffindaffer, with her expertise in law enforcement, stressed the importance of an impartial trial, saying, "Judge Newman was fantastic. He seems so fair, and knowledgeable. Really heard both sides before making any ruling." Yet, she also acknowledged the potential conflict of interest due to Newman's connection to Hill and his post-trial public comments.    The debate about whether Judge Clifton Newman should continue presiding over Murdaugh's cases hinges not only on the alleged jury tampering but also on Newman's own public statements about Murdaugh. Coffindaffer expressed concern that Newman's impartiality might be questioned, especially considering his close professional relationship with Hill and his expressed views on Murdaugh. “He shouldn't be on this with Satterfield,” she stated, referring to another Murdaugh case involving the death of Gloria Satterfield.    The potential for an appellate issue was a key point of discussion. Coffindaffer emphasized the need for judicial impartiality to avoid retrials and further appeals, saying, "You want justice to be served, and you don't want an appellate issue to come up where it's overturned and now you're retrying everything all over again." She advocated for Newman's recusal to ensure the fairness of future proceedings.    Regarding the jury tampering allegations, Coffindaffer suggested a comprehensive hearing where each juror is questioned under oath. This process would provide clarity on whether Hill's alleged comments influenced the jury's verdict. “They need to put each juror under oath and they need to be questioned by both sides,” she advised.    The challenge of determining the impact of Hill's alleged comments on the jury's decision was highlighted. Even if jurors claim they were not influenced, the mere fact that such comments were made could cast doubt on the trial's fairness. Coffindaffer pointed out the difficulty in ascertaining the true extent of influence, stating, “They can say all they want, it didn't influence them, but did it really?”    In conclusion, Coffindaffer's insights shed light on the complexities of Murdaugh's legal battles and the broader implications for the justice system. As the possibility of a retrial hangs in the balance, the integrity of the judicial process remains a paramount concern. The question that now emerges is: Can a new trial, devoid of the shadow of alleged jury tampering and potential judicial bias, bring forth a verdict that stands unchallenged in the court of public opinion? The answer to this will not only shape Murdaugh's fate but also set a precedent for the sanctity of judicial impartiality. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The first co-conspirator of Alex Murdaugh is finally behind bars! True Sunlight co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell attended Cory Fleming's sentencing hearing this week in Charleston, South Carolina, where they watched Fleming — a former attorney who took advantage of Gloria Satterfield's family — throw himself on the mercy of the court. The two share highlights from the hearing and explore new questions, such as: Was this a real display of remorse? Or did this just get worse? Did the federal government get played by Alex Murdaugh's former best friend? As mentioned on Cup Of Justice, Fleming will serve 46 months in federal prison and pay $102,221 in restitution for his involvement in the scheme to steal millions from the Satterfield family. Moments after Judge Richard Gergel announced his sentence on August 15, Fleming voluntarily surrendered and was escorted out of the U.S. District Court in Charleston by U.S. Marshals. Plus Mandy Matney's new book Blood On Their Hands will be available in book stores near you on November 14th! Learn more and pre-order your copy at bloodontheirhandsbook.com or lunasharkmedia.com/book. Premium members will also get access to a ton of new content matched with each chapter when the book releases in November.  And this week we've got a special update from reporter Beth Braden on the Grant Solomon case exclusively for Premium members. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. Through lunasharkmedia.com, Premium Members get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts - all in one place.  We all want to drink from the same Cup Of Justice — and it starts with learning about our legal system. By popular demand, Cup of Justice has launched as its own weekly show. Go to cupofjusticepod.com to learn more or click the link in the episode description to get a hot cup of justice wherever you get your podcasts! Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cup-of-justice/id1668668400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Itp67SQTZEHQGgrX0TYTl?si=39ff6a0cc34140f3 SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, Simplisafe, and others. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/murdaughmurderspod/ Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

After Alex Murdaugh suggested the insurance company he defrauded in his housekeeper's 2018 death go to HER family to recover the money HE stole, Gloria Satterfield's family is fighting back. True Sunlight co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell reveal the best moments in an epic response by the Satterfields' attorneys — none other than their Cup of Justice co-host Eric Bland and his law partner Ronnie Richter. Also in the episode: A look at the state's broken sentencing system and a deeper dive into cases handled by Judge Casey Manning during his final year on the bench. Want to take action? Contact SC Alan Wilson's Office at 803-734-3970 https://www.scag.gov/about-the-office/contact-us/ Contact the SC governor's office HERE: Email a member of the governor's staff 803.734.2100 Contact the SC Bar at (803) 799-6653 https://www.scbar.org/about-us/contact-us/ Consider joining our Luna Shark Premium Membership community to help us SHINE THE SUNLIGHT! CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE We all want to drink from the same Cup Of Justice — and it starts with learning about our legal system. By popular demand, Cup of Justice has launched as its own weekly show. Go to cupofjusticepod.com to learn more or click the link in the episode description to get a hot cup of justice wherever you get your podcasts! Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cup-of-justice/id1668668400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Itp67SQTZEHQGgrX0TYTl?si=39ff6a0cc34140f3 SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, Simplisafe, and others. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! Find us on social media: facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/murdaughmurderspod/ Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/c/MurdaughMurders Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Only one person alive knows what really happened to Gloria Satterfield the day she was found bleeding from the head at Moselle in February 2018. And we all know who that is...  Murdaugh Murders Podcast co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell unwind the latest filing from Alex Murdaugh's attorneys in which the convicted murderer now admits to lying about how Gloria Satterfield died. Also on the show: the boat crash case starts heating up and Dick and Jim beg the court for money.  On Tuesday May 9, Sandy Smith and I will be speaking among several special guests at the Victims Matter Rally at the Statehouse in Columbia South Carolina. As we have talked about time and time again on this podcast, our justice system so often prioritizes the privileged and fails victims of violent crime. And too many of our lawmakers are working for the bad guys.  As we are working on expanding our reach to focus on cases across the nation and maybe eventually the world where Crime Meets Corruption — we want to ensure that the pressure continues right here at home in South Carolina.  We hope to see you at the SC Statehouse on Tuesday... and let's get into it... Soak Up The Sun MMP Premium Members were able to reconvene as we broadcast today's hearing live and we'll share another link soon with complete audio. Consider joining our MMP Premium Membership community to help us SHINE THE SUNLIGHT! CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE Or you can watch the SC Supreme Court's original broadcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAnfDa1nYSM We'll explore much more about the Jeroid Price and secret hearings in South Carolina on Monday's Cup of Justice - Listen with the links below or wherever you get your podcasts. Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cup-of-justice/id1668668400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Itp67SQTZEHQGgrX0TYTl?si=39ff6a0cc34140f3 We all want to drink from the same Cup Of Justice — and it starts with learning about our legal system. By popular demand, Cup of Justice has launched as its own weekly show. Go to cupofjusticepod.com to learn more or click the link in the episode description to get a hot cup of justice wherever you get your podcasts! You can still find a link to the Green Squares we are using here: MurdaughMurdersPodcast.com/stephen. We encourage you to share JusticeForStephen.com and Tips@sled.sc.gov in your twitter, facebook, instagram tik tok or posts on other platforms. To learn more about the Independent Exhumation, Autopsy and Investigation for Stephen, click here: http://bit.ly/3JGacec SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, Simplisafe, and others. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! Find us on social media: Facebook.com/MurdaughPod/ Instagram.com/murdaughmurderspod/ Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell YouTube.com/c/MurdaughMurders Support Our Podcast at: https://murdaughmurderspodcast.com/support-the-show Please consider sharing your support by leaving a review for MMP on Apple at the following link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/murdaugh-murders-podcast/id1573560247 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices