Podcasts about international political theory

2014 von Schweden ins Leben gerufen, erhitzt die sogenannte "Feministische Außenpolitik" die Gemüter. Richtig und wichtig oder unnötig? Und vor allem: Was soll das überhaupt sein? All das in dieser Folge!Timestamp: Von 2:34-7:16 geht es um die Geschichte des Feminismus.Quellen:Aggestam, K., Bergman Rosamond, A., & Kronsell, A. (2019). Theorising feminist foreignpolicy. International Relations, 33(1), 23-39.Aggestam, K., & Bergman Rosamond, A. (2019). Feminist foreign policy 3.0: advancing ethicsand gender equality in global politics. SAIS Rev. International Affairs, 39(1), 37-48.Auswärtiges Amt (2023). Leitlinien für feministische Außenpolitik: Außenpolitik für alle. Abgerufen unter:https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/leitlinien-ffp/2584950Brennan, C. (2019). White feminism falls short. ESSAI, 17(1), 13-17.Dinkel, S., Schirwon, D., & Stamm, L. (2022). Feministische Außenpolitik kann Deutschlands erste Nationale Sicherheitsstrategie prägen, (DGAP Policy Brief, 24), Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V., 24, 1-9.Femina Politica, R. (2022). Feministische Außenpolitik: Friedenssicherung durch Stärkung der Menschenrechte und Abbau weltweiter Ungerechtigkeiten. Interview mit Kristina Lunz. Femina Politica–Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft, 31(2), 1-7.Fröhlich, M. & Hauschild, A. (2023). FEMINISTISCHE AUẞENPOLITIK - Hintergründe und Praxis. AUS POLITIK UND ZEITGESCHICHTE - Deutsche Außenpolitik. ZEITSCHRIFT DER BUNDESZENTRALE FÜR POLITISCHE BILDUNG, 73(17), 34-39.Liska, S. (2015). Talking back to White feminism: An intersectional review. Liberated Arts: a journal for undergraduate research, 1(1), 1-8.Mohajan, H. (2022). Four Waves of Feminism: A Blessing for Global Humanity. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(2), 1-8.Moolakkattu, J. S. (2009). Robert W. Cox and critical theory of international relations. International Studies, 46(4), 439-456.Peterson, V. S. (1992). Transgressing boundaries: Theories of knowledge, gender and international relations. Millennium, 21(2), 183-206.Rampton, M. (2015). Four waves of feminism. Pacific University Oregon, 25, 1-10. Robinson, F. (2021). Feminist foreign policy as ethical foreign policy? A care ethicsperspective. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(1), 20-37.Ruppert, U. (2022). Ein bisschen Feminismus im Krieg? Über das Paradoxe feministischerAußenpolitik. PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 52(208), 499-507. Scheyer, V., & Kumskova, M. (2019). Feminist Foreign Policy. Journal of InternationalAffairs, 72(2), 57-76.Thomson, J. (2020). What's feminist about feminist foreign policy? Sweden's and Canada'sforeign policy agendas. International Studies Perspectives, 21(4), 424-437. Thompson, L., Ahmed, S., & Khokhar, T. (2021). Defining feminist foreign policy: A 2021Update. International Center for Research on Women, 1-31.True, J. (2005). Feminism. In: Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit and Jacqui True (Eds.). Theories of International Relations, 213-234.Zilla, C. (2022). Feministische Außenpolitik: Konzepte, Kernelemente und Kontroversen. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit, 50, 1-9.GEMAfreie Musik von https://audiohub.de Kontakt:Instagram: @powileaksEmail: info@powileaks.com

Richard Ned Lebow speaks on deterrence, its failures, and relations between the US and China. Lebow is Professor Emeritus of International Political Theory in the Department of War Studies, King’s […] The post Deterrence, its failures, and relations between the US and China appeared first on KKFI.

Richard Ned Lebow discusses national defense including deterrence. Lebow is Professor Emeritus of International Political Theory in the Department of War Studies, King’s College London and James O. Freedman Presidential […] The post Richard Ned Lebow on national defense including deterrence appeared first on KKFI.

In this episode, Friederike talks to political philosopher Darrel Moellendorf on Global Climate Justice. Darrel Moellendorf is Professor for International Political Theory and Philosophy at Goethe University and member of the excellence cluster "Normative Orders". In his work, Darrel focuses on the philosohpy of the environment and moral philosophy. He's the author of four books: Darrel has written two books on global justice called Cosmopolitan Justice and Global Inequality matters and two books on climate justice called The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change and his most recent work: Mobilizing Hope: Climate Change and Global Poverty. Today, we will be talking about his latest work. His current research project is called Hope for Human Prospects in the Anthropocene. Shownotes Darrell Moellendorf's newest book "Mobilizing Hope: Climate Change and Global Justice"  is published by Oxford University Press, 2022. For more on our podcast and to listen to all of our episodes go to our website: Talk Social Science To Me or visit us on Instagram and Twitter @talksoscience Out latest episodes: Was ist soziologische Alter(n)sforschung? mit Anna Wanka, Milena Feldmann und Karla Wazinski.  Was sind »Commons«? mit Luki Schmitz. Was ist Parteienforschung? mit Vicente Pons Marti und Niklas Lehrke. What are »Democratic Innovations«? with Rikki Dean.

This interview with Richard Ned Lebow, Professor of International Political Theory at the Department of War Studies at King's College in London, was taken, just before Russia invaded Ukraine. We talked about trust in international relations, about the view that asking Ukraine to renounce membership of NATO is dangerous (which he does not agree with), a discussion that rendered moot with the news about Russia invading Ukraine. Trust is an important element in diplomacy mentioning three famous examples in history. Trust in diplomacy should be distinguished from trust in nations. He talks about the role of disinformation during World War II. Russia was not the only country using disinformation (“maskirovka”) in warfare. General Patton of the Allied Forces staged a non-existent army in Kent, including radio traffic as if it was a real army to strengthen the German belief that an allied invasion would start in the French Port of Calais. He comments on Stanford professor Larry Diamond's view that we see a trend of a “democratic depression”, about deterrence and realist models of International relations assuming that trust is in short supply.  

I was pleased to invite Steven Slaughter into the virtual studio to discuss the Indo-Pacific and the changing role for Australia. I wanted to get Steven's take on recent Australian foreign policy moves, Australia's decision to join with the UK and the United States in Aukus whereby Australia will purchase nuclear submarines and nuclear technology from the UK and the US and displace an agreement with France to purchase conventional submarines. Aukus created quite the crisis among Australia's allies. I was also quite interested in understanding what Australia saw as the future of the Quad (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue) which in the fall saw the first leaders' summit – Australia, India, Japan and the United States. This leaders' level gathering event marked a milestone for the group. Steven Slaughter is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. Steven is a researcher who works within the fields of International Relations, Global Political Economy, and International Political Theory with respect to the political implications of globalisation and global governance. He also follows the efforts of the G20. Come join Steven and I as we discuss the Indo-Pacific and strategic changes being undertaken in arguably the most important region of the globe.

In this episode we are joined by Professor Robin Celikates to discuss the big “method” question in critical theory: What is it doing, and why? Since Marx, this tradition has had a special connection to emancipatory struggles, so we talk about how that works (or doesn't) in relation to contemporary debates about civil disobedience and migration.  patreon.com/leftofphilosophy | @leftofphilReferences:Robin Celikates, 2019. “Constituent Power Beyond Exceptionalism: Irregular migration, disobedience, and (re-)constitution,” Journal of International Political Theory 15(1): 67-81.Robin Celikates. 2018. “Slow Learners? On Moral Progress, Social Struggle, and Whig History,”  "Forms of Life, Progress, and Social Struggle", in Amy Allen/ Eduardo Mendieta (eds.), From Alienation to Forms of Life, University Park: Penn State University Press, 137-155. Robin Celikates, “Radical Civility: Social Struggles and the Domestication of Dissent” (forthcoming).Music: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

On August 15, following the swift withdrawal of US military forces in Afghanistan, the city of Kabul was taken over by the Taliban. 20 years since the start of the American offensive against the Taliban, as a response to the 9/11 attacks by Al Qaeda, Joe Biden did what his two predecessors had promised, but failed to follow through: he ended America's military involvement in Afghanistan. But the immediate collapse of the Afghan government and military that the US had spent years supporting, and the ominous return of the Taliban in power puts into question whether Biden's decision was the right one. Is putting an end to war always the just thing to do? Should the costs and sacrifices suffered during a war determine whether the war should continue or end? Or should a war only end when its original aims have been achieved? Darrel Moellendorf holds the Chair for International Political Theory and Philosophy at Goethe University in Frankfurt am Mein, and is one of the few philosophers to engage not only with the question of what makes a war morally justifiable, but more importantly, under what conditions is ending a war the morally right thing to do.   Leave us a review on Apple Podcasts. This podcast is created in partnership with The Philosopher, the UK's longest running public philosophy journal: https://www.thephilosopher1923.org Artwork by Nick HallidayMusic by Rowan Mcilvride

The subject of this episode is ‘Exporting Constitutions', considering how constitutions and constitutional ideas have been transported or transferred from their place of origin to a new one. Discussants are Harshan Kumarasingham (Senior Lecturer in British Politics, University of Edinburgh and co-convenor of Arthur Berriedale Keith Forum on Commonwealth Constitutionalism.), Anthony Lang (Professor of International Political Theory, University of St Andrews and one of the founding editors of the scholarly journal, Global Constitutionalism) and Nicola McEwen (Professor of Territorial Politics; Co-Director of the Centre on Constitutional Change, University of Edinburgh; and Senior Research Fellow with the ESRC initiaitive, UK in a Changing Europe). The episode is chaired by John Hudson (Professor of Legal History, University of St Andrews).

Episode 20: This month, we are joined by professor Simon Mabon, Lancaster University. We discuss his research on identity, (de-)sectarianism, and mobilization in Bahrain and the Middle East. Simon's research comprises two main strands: The first is the contestation of sovereign power across the region, where he is interested in relations between rulers and ruled, biopolitics, resistance, and the Arab Uprisings. The second is the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran, where he is particularly interested in the rivalry, its impact on states, identities, and communities across the Middle East (and beyond), and the re-ordering of space. His work falls at the intersection of Middle East Studies, International Relations, and (International) Political Theory. Simon is Director of SEPAD, the Sectarianism, Proxies, and De-Sectarianization Project, which looks at how the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran shapes sectarianism and politics across the Middle East. More about Simon: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/ppr/about-us/people/simon-mabon

Why and how should we study Diaspora Jews' relation to Israel? In this talk, Dr. Ilan Baron makes a case for why studying Diaspora Jews' relationship with Israel ought to be done using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. However, instead of making the case using a methodologically and philosophically abstract argument, he does so by going over empirical and related theoretical conclusions from his work on this topic. These include discussing recent fieldwork in California, his book 'Obligation in Exile: the Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique', and a forthcoming article in the Journal of International Political Theory. As he argues, for those Jews who feel a connection with Israel, or find that having such a connection is important for being Jewish, Israel matters not necessarily ideologically but phenomenologically, as a part of their being-in-the-world as Jews. Dr. Baron suggests that the evidence for how Israel features in the construction of contemporary Jewish identity is in how debates about Israel are not about Israel so much as they are about what it means to be Jewish. Consequently, what is especially important for researchers to explore are the types of meaning that Israel provides for Diaspora Jews and the implications of this meaning.

Why and how should we study Diaspora Jews' relation to Israel? In this talk, Dr. Ilan Baron makes a case for why studying Diaspora Jews' relationship with Israel ought to be done using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. However, instead of making the case using a methodologically and philosophically abstract argument, he does so by going over empirical and related theoretical conclusions from his work on this topic. These include discussing recent fieldwork in California, his book 'Obligation in Exile: the Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique', and a forthcoming article in the Journal of International Political Theory. As he argues, for those Jews who feel a connection with Israel, or find that having such a connection is important for being Jewish, Israel matters not necessarily ideologically but phenomenologically, as a part of their being-in-the-world as Jews. Dr. Baron suggests that the evidence for how Israel features in the construction of contemporary Jewish identity is in how debates about Israel are not about Israel so much as they are about what it means to be Jewish. Consequently, what is especially important for researchers to explore are the types of meaning that Israel provides for Diaspora Jews and the implications of this meaning.

Dr. Jonathan Havercroft is Associate Professor of International Political Theory at the University of Southampton. He has published work on the historical development and transformation of state sovereignty, 17th century and 20th century political philosophy, space weaponization and security, global dimensions of indigenous politics and hermeneutics. He is currently working on the ethical dimensions of international norms, theories of political affect, and the role of agreement in democratic theory and practice. His book Captives of Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2011) looks at the historical origins of state sovereignty, critiques its philosophical assumptions and offers a way to move contemporary critiques of sovereignty beyond their current impasse. # Notes Why Jonathan loves betting on the ponies (00:06). I'm cool with eating animals because animals eat animals and would eat me (00:14). Academics who sell-out their expertise are pretty lame, but I have a plan (00:24). Why self-help gurus are usually full of shit but sometimes useful (00:40). Academic efficiency stuff (47:00). What Jonathan learned from hiring a personal trainer (00:55). Jonathan's kettlebell routines (00:59). Running and high-intensity intervals, pros and cons regarding stress (1:12). Jonathan's proposal for a national house-cleaning service to overthrow the patriarchy; fully automated luxury communism, etc. (1:35).

Dr. Jonathan Havercroft is Associate Professor of International Political Theory at the University of Southampton. He has published work on the historical development and transformation of state sovereignty, 17th century and 20th century political philosophy, space weaponization and security, global dimensions of indigenous politics and hermeneutics. He is currently working on the ethical dimensions of international norms, theories of political affect, and the role of agreement in democratic theory and practice. His book Captives of Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2011) looks at the historical origins of state sovereignty, critiques its philosophical assumptions and offers a way to move contemporary critiques of sovereignty beyond their current impasse. Notes How I'm trying to achieve absolute disalienation and why Jonathan thinks I'm crazy; living in the UK vs. the US; childhood; why it's good to have goals even if you know you can't achieve them; Caitlyn Jenner; bathroom gender laws; is the news worth reading?; how and why my dad used to get in fights and hitchhike but I never did; the tv show Cops and cultural change since the 1990s; the rise of after school activities as social control; whether I should want to have kids and Jonathan refusing to give me advice; how to live in the most revolutionary way; the problem of charismatic power and cults; the life of Wittgenstein; left-wing stupidities; Michael Oakeshott; why Jonathan thinks I'm going to become a conservative; gambling, etc.

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Obligation in Exile: The Jewish Diaspora, Israel and Critique (Edinburgh University Press, 2015), Ilan Baron, Lecturer in International Political Theory in the School of Government and International Affairs and Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University, explores the transnational political obligation of Diaspora Jewry to have a relationship with Israel, including one of critique. The book, featuring Baron’s interviews about the Israel-Diaspora relationship with key figures and community leaders in North America, the UK, and Israel, combines empirical work with political theory. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices