Podcast appearances and mentions of John Jay

Anybody else dreaming of a farm? Or having KFC? ANYWHO, Today On The Show, HAPPY WEDNESDAY! We have a DRUNK DIAL so random it led us to today's SHOCK COLLAR TRIVIA but under the name ROCKIN and SHOCKIN. Then, an update on Johnjay's EMF necklace has his doctor friend SHUTTING KYLE DOWN! Plus, we ask you to tell us YOUR SIDE HUSTLES! Lots to get to today so BUCKLE IN, all of this and MORE today on Johnjay and Rich!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

#LOVEPUP Family Fest is right around the corner! So, who better to feature that the creators themselves!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

TODAY ON THE SHOW: Dating DRAMA! WAR of the ROSES! Johnjay's new necklace is...good? 2nd DATE UPDATE! Kyle's video for her husband LEAKED. + SOmuchMORE!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: John Jay First SCOTUSOn November 6, 1789, John Jay was sworn in as the first Chief Justice of the United States, marking a foundational moment in the development of the federal judiciary. Appointed by President George Washington, Jay was a prominent figure in the American founding, having co-authored The Federalist Papers and served as President of the Continental Congress. His confirmation by the Senate came just weeks after the Judiciary Act of 1789 formally established the structure of the federal court system, including the Supreme Court. At the time of his appointment, the Court held limited power and prestige, lacking even a permanent home or a defined role within the balance of government.Jay's tenure as Chief Justice lasted from 1789 to 1795 and was characterized more by circuit riding—traveling to preside over lower federal courts—than by Supreme Court rulings. Nonetheless, he helped lay the procedural and institutional groundwork for the Court's future authority. One of his few significant decisions came in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), which asserted that states could be sued in federal court, a holding that was quickly overturned by the Eleventh Amendment. Jay also took on diplomatic duties, most notably negotiating the controversial Jay Treaty with Great Britain in 1794, which aimed to resolve lingering tensions from the Revolutionary War.Though his judicial legacy on the bench was modest, Jay's influence as the Court's inaugural leader was crucial in legitimizing the judiciary as a coequal branch of government. He later declined a reappointment to the position in 1800, citing the Court's lack of power and institutional independence. The role of Chief Justice would eventually evolve into a central force in constitutional interpretation, but it was Jay who first gave the office its shape. This milestone in legal history underscores the slow and deliberate construction of American judicial authority, which did not arrive fully formed but was built case by case, institution by institution.The Supreme Court is currently reviewing Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump, a case that raises major constitutional and statutory questions about the scope of presidential power—particularly in the context of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). At the heart of the dispute is whether the word “regulate” in IEEPA grants the president the authority to impose tariffs without explicit congressional approval. The case touches on foundational issues in constitutional law, including statutory interpretation, the nondelegation doctrine, emergency powers, and the “major questions” doctrine. The Court must assess not just what the statute says, but also how to interpret the silence—IEEPA never mentions “tariffs” or “taxes”—in light of Congress's constitutional power to impose taxes and regulate foreign commerce.From a textualist standpoint, the omission of “tariffs” suggests Congress did not intend to delegate that taxing authority to the executive. From a purposivist view, the debate turns on whether Congress meant to arm the president with broad economic tools to respond to emergencies or to narrowly limit those powers to national security concerns. Additional arguments center on legislative history and the principle of avoiding surplusage, as opponents claim interpreting “regulate” to include “tariff” would render other statutes that explicitly mention tariffs redundant.The nondelegation doctrine also plays a key role. If IEEPA is read to permit the president to impose tariffs, critics argue it may represent an unconstitutional transfer of legislative power—particularly taxing power—absent a clear “intelligible principle” to guide executive discretion. The Court is also being asked to consider whether the president's determination of an “emergency” under IEEPA is reviewable and whether actions taken in response to such emergencies must still adhere to constitutional limits. The outcome of this case could significantly redefine the boundary between congressional authority and executive power in trade and economic policy.The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on November 5, 2025, in a case challenging President Donald Trump's use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Justices from across the ideological spectrum questioned whether Trump had exceeded his authority by bypassing Congress to enact tariffs, which are traditionally under legislative control. The legal debate centered on whether IEEPA's grant of authority to “regulate importation” includes the power to impose long-term tariffs, and whether doing so constitutes a “major question” requiring explicit congressional authorization.Chief Justice John Roberts, among others, expressed concern that Trump's use of IEEPA effectively allowed the executive to impose taxes—a core congressional function. Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked whether there was any precedent for interpreting “regulate importation” as tariff-imposing authority, while Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasized that IEEPA was designed to limit, not expand, presidential power. Some conservative justices, like Brett Kavanaugh, were more receptive, referencing historical precedents like Nixon's use of similar powers.The administration argued the tariffs were necessary to respond to trade deficits and national security threats and warned that removing them could lead to economic harm. But critics, including business representatives and Democratic-led states, warned of a dangerous shift in power toward the executive. Justice Neil Gorsuch suggested such an interpretation of IEEPA could permanently shift trade powers away from Congress, violating constitutional checks and balances.Lawyer for Trump faces tough Supreme Court questions over legality of tariffs | ReutersThe U.S. Senate confirmed Eric Tung to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a 52-45 party-line vote, making him President Donald Trump's sixth appellate court appointee in his second term. Tung, a former federal prosecutor and Justice Department lawyer, most recently worked at Jones Day, where he focused on commercial litigation and frequently represented cryptocurrency interests. His confirmation came over the objections of California's Democratic senators, who criticized his past statements and writings on issues such as abortion, same-sex marriage, and gender roles.Tung has been a vocal legal advocate for controversial positions, including support for the independent state legislature theory and the argument that stablecoin sales fall outside SEC regulation. While he pledged to follow Supreme Court precedent, critics raised concerns about his originalist approach to constitutional rights. He faced intense scrutiny during his confirmation hearings for remarks made at a Federalist Society event and earlier in life, including statements about gender roles that drew fire from Senator Alex Padilla.Despite these concerns, Tung's legal career earned strong endorsements from colleagues and conservative legal allies. He clerked for Justices Antonin Scalia and Neil Gorsuch and has experience handling judicial nominations from within DOJ. Tung fills the seat vacated by Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta, a fellow conservative, ensuring ideological continuity on the Ninth Circuit.Former DOJ, Jones Day Lawyer Confirmed as Ninth Circuit JudgeThe California Republican Party filed a federal lawsuit against Governor Gavin Newsom, seeking to block the implementation of new congressional maps approved by voters just a day earlier via Proposition 50. The measure, backed by Newsom and passed by wide margins, suspends the state's independent redistricting commission and installs a Democratic-leaning map that could endanger five Republican-held congressional seats. Newsom has framed the move as a direct response to Texas' mid-cycle redistricting, which is expected to boost Republican power in the 2026 midterms.The GOP lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, argues that the new maps violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by using race as the primary factor in redrawing districts to favor Hispanic voters. The plaintiffs, represented by attorney Mike Columbo of the Dhillon Law Group, claim the state legislature lacked sufficient justification to use race in this way and failed to meet the legal standards required under the Voting Rights Act.Republicans also contend that Proposition 50 diminishes the political voice of non-Hispanic groups and constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. The suit, Tangipa v. Newsom, is backed by the National Republican Congressional Committee and includes Republican lawmakers and candidates as plaintiffs. It mirrors legal challenges in Texas, where courts are evaluating claims of racial bias in redistricting. The outcome of these cases could significantly affect congressional control heading into the latter half of President Trump's second term.California Republicans Sue to Block New Congressional Maps (1) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kyle was left vulnerable and EXPOSED! Today on the Show, Google Gemini led Noah on a wild goose chase to LAS VEGAS?!?? Payton is getting a SECOND JOB? And we ALMOSTTTT had A WINNER FOR MINUTE TO WIN IT! THE CLOSEST YET! But First, an ALL NEW SECOND DATE UPDATE! And this guy was a handful, I'll tell you ahead of time.. good golly. ALL OF THIS PLUS REMEMBER THE TIME AND MORE today on Johnjay and Rich!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

HAPPY MONDAY! Today on the Show, NEW MONTH NEW US! Let's hear about everyone's Halloween recaps and transition into JJR WINTER. THIS YEAR FLEW BY and it's all FUN AND GAMES to the finish line! We got this! ALSO, DRUNK DIAL LOUNGE, NOISE MACHINE, and SO MUCH MORE!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

And if you got a peak on Johnjay's Instagram Stories SHUT UP, NO YA DIDN'T! Lol! TODAY ON THE SHOW, Naomi is flabbergasted at Spirit Halloween find out why! ALSO, a BRAND NEW WAR OF THE ROSES! Then, how many demerits does PAYTON RACK UP in TODAY'S SHOCK TRIVIA! But first, did you know HALLOWEEN IS A LONELY DAY FOR SINGLE PEOPLE?!? Are you embracing the holiday or DUCKING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION??? Happy HallowEVE

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Newt discusses the life and contributions of John Jay, a pivotal figure in American history. Born in 1745 in New York City, Jay's early life was shaped by his family's quest for religious freedom and his education at King's College. Initially advocating for reconciliation with Britain, Jay's political journey saw him evolve into a staunch supporter of American independence. As a member of the Continental Congress, he contributed to the Olive Branch Petition and played a significant role in drafting the New York State Constitution. Jay's diplomatic efforts included serving as an ambassador to Spain and negotiating the controversial Jay's Treaty with Britain. His legal acumen was evident during his tenure as the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, notably in the Chisholm v. Georgia case. Jay's political career also included serving as the Governor of New York, where he enacted the gradual abolition of slavery. Despite facing challenges and controversies, Jay's legacy as a founding father is marked by his dedication to establishing a robust and balanced government, as reflected in his contributions to the Federalist Papers and his advocacy for the separation of powers. His life exemplifies the complexities and commitments of the early American statesmen in shaping the nation.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See what I did there?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Will Rich LOSE IT ALL?!?! Probably... Jk. TODAY ON THE SHOW, It's TUESDAY which means an ALL NEW SECOND DATE UPDATE. But first, Jill has a workplace injury and our old friend NICKI FROM TOKYO calls in with a JURY DUTY LIE!!!! Also, HORROR VILLANS, the top 25! Plus, Johnjay has the most unrelatable story which makes it even funnier, as per usual. STREAM TODAY'S EPISODE FOR ALL THE TEA!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

No shame in this economy! LOL JK. TODAY ON THE SHOW, QUIT SCAMMING! But first, Easton made a comment on Kyle's BUTT and Addy had her BIRTHDAY SURPRISE! Thank you Chandler Mall SEPHORA!! SHOUTOUT TO YOU!! Also, Drunk Dial Lounge today has us SQUEALING. Then, What happened between Johnjay and Kevin Costner?? Who walked away?? All the drama and more today on Johnjay and Rich!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – When the Founding Fathers established this union, they did not expect the citizens to be passive participants but active in its operation. Rather than expecting others to protect their rights, they wanted people to defend their own rights. Our first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay, told us how we could do that...

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – When the Founding Fathers established this union, they did not expect the citizens to be passive participants but active in its operation. Rather than expecting others to protect their rights, they wanted people to defend their own rights. Our first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay, told us how we could do that...

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Well that tinny effect from Friday wasn't just us it was NATIONWIDE and that system is DOWN so today the show is RAW AUDIO ONLY! The quality should be fine, but you may notice spikes in volume and not as many music/sound effects as usual. BUT ANYWAYS, THE SHOW MUST GO ON! Starting strong we have THE CELEBRATION OF "THE HAISLEY" STACEY BERRA's NEW BUSINESS and Phoenix Pride and Johnjay's Monday FRENCH GAME! Plus, we ask you for HR ADVICE due to an office rumor that has gotten OUT OF CONTROL! All of this INCLUDING MONSTER MATCH AND MORE today on JOHNJAY AND RICH! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Addy returned again today to play ARE YOU SMARTER THAN A FIFTH GRADER... and to answer the question, we are... not. TODAY ON THE SHOW, it's Thursday and that means an ALL NEW WAR OF THE ROSES but first Payton is LOCKED OUT OF STORAGE and the hot streak with Minute To Win It is OVER and we are back to one, two questions before FAILURE! UNREAL! Also, has Johnjay's AI Obsession gotten out of hand? All this and MORE today on Johnjay and Rich!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

NOT KIDDING, that call sent us for a LOOP! Today on the Show, KITCHEN INJURIES! Plus, it's NATIONAL TACO TUESDAY and that means an ALL NEW SECOND DATE UPDATE! Also, we have an EXTENDED SHOW FOR YOU TODAY featuring the 18th annual return of THE MONSTER MATCH and Johnjay has MONKEY TRIVIA that will shock MULTIPLE PEOPLE TODAY! All of this and MUCH MORE, including TAYLOR SWIFT on JIMMY FALLON!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

TODAY ON THE SHOW, Johnjay let loose on his diet for ONE DAY! Here's what he ate. Also, MINUTE TO WIN IT RECORD BROKEN TODAY! Can you get to question #10? Plus, our final thoughts on the Taylor Swift album and the movie, A DIRTY LITTLE SECRET, and MUCH MORESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

By making him do something he DEFINITELY doesn't want to do...See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's FRIDAY! Johnjay's got a game for you!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Johnjay's got a game for you!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What is the TRUE definition for a backhanded compliment? Usually an insult BUT NOT JOHNJAYS! We'll explain. TODAY ON THE SHOW, we hear from GRANT INMAN!!! Also, WHERE'S PAYTON?!? Then, Johnjay's CAR TRIVIA (who will be ZAPPED TODAY??!?) Will someone WIN MINUTE TO WIN IT? Spoiler, they did not. At this point, I'll tell you when they do. PLUS, Lonnie's teacher brain sparks a reasonable question, Noise Machine, and MUCH MUCH MORE!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.