This week we discuss Right to Life of Michigan's recently Pregnancy Center Grant Tour in Metro Detroit. We also discuss what new strategies the RFFA sponsors are using to promote Proposal 3, especially in their ads. We end the episode with a "Things Pro-aborts Say" featuring Stacy Abrams.
This week we discuss the Michigan Supreme Court sending the anything-goes amendment to the November ballot. We also discuss Judge Gleicher's recent ruling this week that magically created a right to abortion in Michigan. We ended the epsiode talking about abortion when the life of the mother is threatened.
Today we discuss the ProLife movement in the state of Illinois & how it's impacted by the overturning of (Roe Vs. Wade) & the influence of the current Governor on making that state an Abortion hub for nearby states with Amy Gehrke the Executive Director of Illinois Right To Life. Including strategies her & her organization will be implementing in the hopes of changes the hearts & minds of the citizens as well as the state legislation that not only allows but promotes such atrocities as Abortion. For further information on Amy Gehrke & her organizations work please click on the following link: https://illinoisrighttolife.org/our-executive-director/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/conservativeatheist1970/message
Dr. John Seago, president of Texas Right to Life, joined WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" radio program on Thursday morning. Twitter: https://twitter.com/TXRightToLife Veterans Affairs says it will provide abortions — even in Texas https://www.texastribune.org/2022/09/02/va-abortions-veterans-texas/ Texas Trigger Law Takes Effect, But Local Prosecutors Have Vowed To Hamper Enforcement https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/25/texas-abortion-trigger-law-prosecutors-enforcement/ For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, visit www.WMAL.com, download the WMAL app or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 FM from 5-9 AM ET. To join the conversation, check us out on Twitter: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @Jgunlock, and @patricepinkfile. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In the second hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Mariela Roca talked to Texas Right to Life's Dr. John Seago. They also discussed AOC's fabulous GQ profile, study on nine year olds failing to read, a local principal in trouble and Britney Spears coming out as an atheist. For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, visit www.WMAL.com, download the WMAL app or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 FM from 5-9 AM ET. To join the conversation, check us out on Twitter: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @Jgunlock, @patricepinkfile and @heatherhunterdc.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode of Life Matters, Commissioner Johnston returns to the subject of public opinion polls and Americans' real attitudes regarding the legalization of human abortion. Johnston reminds us that we must focus on what the right to life debate is. It is not about emotions, or feelings, how much we like babies, or our personal religious upbringing. Very specifically, it is a legal question, as all questions of “rights” actually are. It is essential to understand that this debate of the last 50 years regarding the legality of abortion and the impact of the Roe versus Wade decision, is a matter of legal judgment. And therefore, public opinion must be viewed as a question of what legal protections ought to be offered to which human beings (babies in the womb), at which times, and under which specific legal conditions. This very particular and incisive understanding of the debate is required now. This is required for each and every pro-life individual, and specifically in each and every state, because the Dobbs decision has returned the authority of each and every state and its legislatures to determine the laws of that particular jurisdiction, that particular state. As demonstrated in the previous program on this subject: 287: Public Opinion Polls, the nature of the question and the language used by the questioner will often determine the answer given by the respondent. Because of this, many news outlets which seek to mold public opinion rather than inform, will use misleading and incomplete language. This is done in order to have the respondent come to a conclusion which the news outlet desires to see in all Americans. When it comes to the abortion question and specific terms and references to the law, specific terms are often used. Words such as ‘choice,' ‘freedom to choose', ‘reproductive rights', and even ‘Roe v. Wade', specifically because Roe v. Wade has rarely been accurately described and explained to the public. These vague generalities are by no means capable of determining an American individual's actual sentiments regarding appropriate abortion law. There are however many polls which do respect the specific details of an issue: When is the abortion done? At what gestation is that child? For what reason is that child's life being ended? These are very important determinative legal issues that the law applies to every legally questioned action. Again the issue of the right to life is, at its heart, a legal question. California is often considered one of the most progressive and “pro-choice“ states in the nation. But the old LA Times/California pool which was changed in the 1990s, had indeed asked detailed specific questions after its first generic pro-choice or pro-life question. For some reason that pool no longer exists in that iteration. The most popular league reporting on California polls is taken from the Pew Charitable Trust which was discussed in depth in the previous program. A recent Rasmussen poll once again asked average California voters specific details of abortion law, and specific questions regarding what type of abortion law these Californians felt to be appropriate. This Rasmussen poll and its specific questions can be viewed here: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/most_california_voters_support_limits_on_abortion The popular, dominant media culture does not like these polling results. And rarely if ever will make such results a dominant aspect of their reportage. But these results are extremely common and demonstrated in the most recent of national Gallup polls please see the Gallup survey here: https://news.gallup.com/poll/235469/trimesters-key-abortion-views.aspx The same parallel opinions of all Americans are reflected as well in the recent Marist Poll, which can be seen here: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/marist-poll-most-americans-want-abortion-limits-that-roe-casey-wont-allow/ Polls across the nation, and yes even in California, demonstrate that the average thinking person does not regard abortion on demand, abortion at any time in pregnancy for any reason, or no reason in particular (just for choice), or unlimited abortion as a desirable legal outcome. The typical support level is 13 to 18% of the populace. When asked, the vast majority of the public have consistently demonstrated a desire for legal restrictions on abortion, when they are done, and on the reasons for doing them. The average American when asked and informed, wants to see abortion limited, or in the words of the Democrat party of the 1980s: “safe, legal, and rare.“ Now that Roe has been overturn and each state can indeed exercise its authority to protect the right to life, laws that will in fact make abortions very rare can indeed be put into place. The question is: Will that phrase merely be a slogan or will it indeed take on the force of law? That legal question is the real issue of the Right To Life.
This months Faith in Life episode features Pastor Doug Barnes from Grace United Reformed Church in Alto Michigan. Pastor Barnes and Thom Powell sit down to discuss the prolife movement within Pastor Barne's church and they also touch on some theological questions regarding abortion.
On the heels of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe V. Wade and return the issue to the States, some are already to moving to protect life. Unfortunately, others are moving to destroy life. In California, SB 1142, AB 2223, and Proposition 1 seek to legalize infanticide up to 28 days AFTER birth, a Constitutional right to abortion, and make the tax payers across the country pay all expenses for women to travel to such states to commit the murder. Susan Swift Arnall is a pro life attorney with the Right to Life League and she is fighting to protect life in California. Don't miss this program as we talk courts, law, and rights.Guest Bio:California PolitiChick Susan Swift is a lawyer, author, wife and one conservative mother of seven children. She is currently the Director of Outreach and Engagement at the Right to Life League, American's first pro-life organization. Susan is addicted to the politics of today and always looking out for her little ones' futures. Susan is tough as nails...proud Texan, loves Guns, Freedom, and her right to use Free Speech how she sees fit. And, as a former actress in Hollywood, she always has an opinion about the politics running that town. For more on Susan visit her website at www.RealSusanSwift.com. Follow on social media @RealSusanSwiftFollow us on your podcast platform, rumble, and gab tv @DontTreadonLibertyCheck out our website at www.DontTreadonLiberty.com Merch Store My Patriot Supply The original Patriot survival company. My Patriot Supply was founded by people with a passion for seDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the show
We speak today about the relationship between the human right to life and the right to religious freedom. Our freedoms of thought, conscience, and religion are natural and interdependent rights, and when rightly understood, they serve to elevate our conception of the meaning and purpose of human life—the goods we recognize that are a part of the created order, and what this created order suggests about our origins and our destiny. The human right to life is the first and more fundamental of all human rights, but the human right to religious freedom matters, too, because to be human is to pursue the truth. Today we speak with Amb. Sam Brownback, who served most recently as the United States Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom and continues to work with coalitions around the globe to promote and protect the right to religious liberty. He is currently serving as a fellow at the Center for Religous Studies at The Catholic University of America. Before his appointment as U.S. Ambassador, Brownback previously served as a U.S. Senator and the 26th Governor of Kansas. Amb. Brownback is a prolific attorney, politician and diplomat and we speak with him about the importance of religous liberty, the human right to life, and what faith means to him personally. Amb. Sam Brownback on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Brownback National Committee for Religious Freedom https://thencrf.org/ International Religious Freedom Summit (IRF) https://irfsummit.org/
In this episode, Cal Thomas, our 2022 Illinois Right to Life Action Speaker discusses why it is so important to him to defend life, how to make life a winning issue during election season, and so much more. Save the date for Friday, October 14th to hear him speak at our Illinois Right to Life Action Banquet!
The political director for a powerful anti-abortion group, Luke Bowen has been arrested and charged with solicitation of a minor online. Hang out with me and receive special discounts and bonus content by becoming a monthly or yearly supporter of the show: SUPERCAST: https://rawnewsandpolitics.supercast.com Leave me a one-time tip to let me know you like the show: VENMO: https://account.venmo.com/u/Gina-Bonanno-Lemos PAYPAL: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ginabonannolemos Connect with me on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ginabonannolemos Connect with me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RawNewsAndPolitics Connect with me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ginabonannolemos/ Connect with me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/GinaBLemos Watch the show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/RawNewsAndPolitics Watch or listen to the show on Supercast or your favorite podcast platform: https://rawnewsandpolitics.supercast.com Discover what the government and most doctors won't tell you about disease and how corporate interests are destroying our health and the planet in my award-winning book, What The Fork? The Secret Cause of Disease: https://amzn.to/2SC3uhf Amazon associate links, like those above, help fund the show, so I can continue to share valuable news and information with you without relying on sponsors and being subject to censorship. Thank you for clicking and shopping!
This week we discuss Tudor Dixon picking Shane Hernandez for her running mate. We also discussed the several states that had a life-affirming trigger law go into effect this week. We ended the episode with a segment of "Things Pro-aborts Say."
Jack Hibbs and David Fiorazo discuss the confusion over Proposition 1, legislation in CA voters will be deciding on in November. This radical amendment to California's Consitution is a referendum that pro-abortion extremists hope will permanently enshrine murder of the pre-born at any stage of pregnancy for any reason in the state. Daily podcast, relevant articles on issues pertaining to Christians and more can be found on Stand Up For The Truth.
This week we discuss the ruling from Judge Cunningham that will keep abortion legal in Michigan and bar county prosecutors from enforcing the 1931 law. We also discussed NARAL's opinion on the prolife presence in media and ended the epsiode on a postitive note.
This week we take a deep dive into how and why society today is against pregnancy resource centers. This feature includes information on the group Jane's Revenge, pregnacy aid in Michigan being vetoed, California's recent requirement for centers, and President Biden denying insurance coverage to post-partum women.
In this episode of Life Matters, Commissioner Johnston examines the meaning of the right to life. Why does this have to be about the law? Where did this right to life come from? Did it begin at America's founding, or is it a deeper, more widely recognized, universal truth - a self evident truth - that everyone should take the time and interest to deliberate? The American founders strongly felt this was so. They proclaimed to the world that they would form a new form of government that appealed to this universal, higher law, view of life and society. Now, with the Dobbs decision, the entire issue is laid at our feet. Individual states which comprise the United States, are now free to exercise the explicit God-given and constitutionally-explained authority to protect or take lives within their own borders. If a state determines that a human life can legally be taken within its borders it is authorizing capital punishment. The state itself must outline the specific rules and procedures to be followed so that that individuals life has had the due process of law. A trial, with evidence, with adequate defense, with right to appeal - the law must protect even that person's life from being taken unjustly. Similarly, if a human life is taken outside of the law (extra-judicially) the state must also outline how and under what circumstances the appropriate protective measure can be taken. For this reason, each state has proscribed various forms of homicide - levels of severity, and appropriate punishments for these extrajudicial killings. The Dobbs decision, in overturning Roe v. Wade, which licensed abortionists to kill at any time they decided, now gives the authority over life and death back to the states, from which it had been taken. Each state now will determine how a child in the womb is to be protected: at what stage of pregnancy, what standards of evidence, what conditions, who is authorized to take this child's life. Each of these determinations will now be set state by state. In many states, these measures are being contemplated in the summer of 2022. Perhaps, most importantly, the November elections of 2022 will determine the nature of the lawmakers who will make these laws. Federal government lawmakers - the Congress and Senate, are already trying to prohibit individual states from exercising this authority. Yet, this is an authority granted, in fact, instructed by the United States Constitution. Dobbs, rather than ending the abortion debate, has brought it home to every citizen. They must determine whom they should elect. They must determine what ideas should guide the lawmakers within their own states, and given the approach of Planned Parenthood et al., even local communities and their elected officials will be addressing the abortion mentality in their counties, cities, and schools. The elections of 2022 are critical for enacting the laws which will reflect the self-evident truth: that every innocent human life should be protected under the law. Such laws must be enacted if that law is in fact the law of a just government. “To ensure these rights, governments are instituted among men.” The laws and elections of 2022 are critical. Brian gives in-depth insights into the danger of being mislead at this moment, misled by those who would lie and misrepresent the killing of human babies. The state of Indiana offers just one example. There, lawmakers asserted SB 1 would protect babies in Indiana, but in fact the deceitful and misleading language which they presented was craftily worded and specifically designed to allow abortions. Brian reminds listeners and readers to consult the works of many insightful authors on this subject such as Orwell and Kafka, but in particular C.S. Lewis, and his book, the Screwtape Letters. In Screwtape, Lewis describes the genuinely demonic twisting of language and meanings and feelings to accomplish truly evil ends. “We are now in a very serious battle of ideas, and ideas have consequences,” says Brian. “This battle of ideas is not far away, and we often considers ideas as removed and far from physical reality, but the battle is now on us. And we must apply ourselves to these elections and these laws as if the sanctity of every life is at stake, because in fact it is.”
This week we give an update on Planned Parenthood and Governor Whitmer lawsuits that resulted in an injunction on the 1931 abortion ban. We also give a recap of the primary elections. We ended the epsiode with a segment of "Things Pro-aborts Say," along with an udpate on the coalition campaigns.
This months Faith in Life episode features Pastor Garth Hutchinson from Little Black Lake Bapist Church in Norton Shores, MI. Thom Powell sits down with Pastor Hutchinson to talk about how to answer hard questions about abortion through a christian lens.
We finally finish our discussion on the topic of abortion in this third and final episode. We begin by responding to some popular criticisms of those who are anti-abortionists. Criticisms such as: 1. "What do we do when a woman is pregnant as a result of rape?" 2. A fetus is "just a clump of cells" Next we look at what it looks like to fully walk out the title of "pro-life." What should we be doing to support ALL life as a community and as individuals? Finally we end this whole discussion with a message of hope and forgiveness for anyone who has had an abortion. A hope that can only come from Jesus Christ. All episodes can be found at www.switchinglensespodcast.com Music by Brian Buchanan Photo by Bardo Luna from Pexels
The media that supports abortion (which is a large portion of popular media), has always misrepresented what Roe versus Wade did. Roe versus Wade never gave women the authority to kill their children. Roe versus Wade never ‘freed women to do as they wish.' Justice Blackmun's words were explicit, and Brian quotes directly from Roe, “…the court has never recognized such a right.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself, in trying to explain Roe to radical feminists, reiterated that the decision never gave women the right to choose. “It was not woman-centered it was physician-centered.” But that did not stop radical feminists from claiming that right anyway. It did not stop the media from gaslighting, (lying directly and outrageously about objective facts,) in order to confuse you and the general public. The Dobbs decision of June 24, 2022 overturned Roe versus Wade and made very clear and concise what it would do. Roe had given all authority to determine which human lives should be killed in the course of abortion to doctors alone. Only the physician was given authority in the issue of abortion, not the woman. The Dobbs decision said that authority over just life and death decisions is given by the Constitution to each and every state. Under the Constitution, each and every state is given very specific authority. One of the primary purposes of the state is to protect the lives of those within its jurisdiction. The Constitution refers to this as the states' “compelling state interest to protect life.” There was never a constitutional right to abortion. Roe had falsely taken the authority of state government and given it to abortionists alone to decide if a child should be killed. In the Dobbs decision, the authority of each and every state was returned to that state. It is now therefore, the responsibility of the state legislatures to determine within that jurisdiction, where and how to protect the lives of vulnerable children in the womb. Unfortunately, many do not fully understand what that means in their state. Right now there is a compelling duty of pro-life citizens to be actively and assertively involved in civics - to make sure that their state will indeed perform its duty to protect innocent human lives in the womb. This can only be affected by those who hold elective office. This can only be done by lawmakers. The pro-life movement needs to understand the overriding importance of electing pro-life lawmakers in this election cycle. The lies about Roe, then and now, have distorted the abortion issue. The United States Congress controlled by Nancy Pelosi and radical pro-abortion lobbyists, has already voted to strike down the laws of each and every state and to federalize abortion far beyond what Roe v. Wade did. They have voted to prohibit states from any kind of laws that would protect mothers and their children. Fortunately, it appears the U.S. Senate will not pass this measure. But, in the election of 2022, if the Senate loses any more seats to the Democrats, that will no longer be the case in the legislative cycle of 2023! The elections of November 2022 are crucial! It is crucially important to realize - contrary to the media analysis – that each and every pro-life law that has been proposed or passed, first and foremost protects the mother, the life of that woman and her health. In so doing, it also protects the life of a child in her womb. Every pro-life law, whether it be informed consent, parental notice before an abortion, or laws against distribution of RU-486: the abortion chemical drug, is designed to protect that vulnerable woman from the procedure that will invade her body in order to attempt to kill that child. The abortion drug RU-486 is now being widely used but few understand that it operates by attacking the woman's body. Powerful artificial steroids in two different procedures are used to seriously alter a woman's physiology and a very risky and in a blood inducing manner. The first dosage tells the woman's body to not allow nature to operate as it does in transforming her physical body, preparing it for motherhood. The drug stops her body with a shock of chemical and unnatural dynamic. Days later, a second drug: progesterone, gives instructions to her body to expel anything in her uterus. This will happen without her control. She is not in charge. The deadly chemical will kick in with a shock to her body. It is hoped that she at least will get to a bathroom. Regardless, she will see the baby that is expelled. The drug can only be used after she had missed two periods - ten weeks. She will likely be alone. Vast amounts of blood and hemorrhaging occur and much of the blood is hers as well as the child's. Women have died from this powerful artificial steroidal concoction. But the media does not discuss this. Pro-life laws are established first to protect mothers and secondly the obvious life at risk - the child. In this new political environment where the laws of each state determine whether certain human beings will be protected, it is not unlike our nation's history in dealing with slavery. In the Dred Scott decision, Justice Taney asserted each and every states' authority to enact laws of their jurisdiction. It also allowed slave states to enter free states, to enforce the slavery laws of that slave holding state. Similarly, the Dobbs decision, by asserting the authority of each and every state, also authorizes the intermeddling of a pro-abortion state with pro-life states. The states of California, Oregon and Washington fully intend to promote and encourage such intermeddling in pro-life states. California in particular has pledged vast sums of money to both promote and transport pregnant mothers to have their children killed within the jurisdiction of California. All expenses are paid, including missed pay and any other expense that the mother might see monetarily. This intermeddling of one state in the authority of another has grave implications for our nation and for the protection of innocent lives. The right to life debate is far from over.
This week we discuss how Governor Whitmer vetoed over $20 million in funding for pregnancy aid in the 2023 state budget. We also discuss her ulterior motives in promoting abortion so radically in Michigan. We end the epsiode by giving an update on the anything-goes abortion amendment and how it will legalize anyone and everyone committing abortions.
The scope, the breadth, the depth, the width, of the right to life movement... In this episode of Life Matters, Brian shares interviews from the National Right Life Convention, 2022. It was during this convention that the Dobbs Supreme Court decision was handed down. More specifically, Brian spends time exploring the fact that the right to life impacts all aspects of our life and society. While there is a conscious effort by elites in our culture to define ‘choice' as meaning ‘abortion,' Brian reminds listeners that there are in fact numerous, life-affirming choices available. The simplistic and uncaring answer of severing that unique baby's body into pieces and discarding it has numerous and diverse alternatives. In discussing adoption, Brian retells the true story of Jack Nicholson, the actor. Few people realize that Mr. Nicholson is outspokenly pro-life. He knows that this is contrary to many in his industry and even perhaps many of his fans. Nicholson discovered that he had been adopted when he was thirty-seven years old when a Time magazine reporter called him in a “gotcha” interview. It turns out that the woman whom Jack thought was his mother was in fact his grandmother. The woman he thought to be his sister was in fact his mother. They never explained the actual details to him. They merely loved him. Nicholson now says, “Of course, I'm pro-life. I understand I wouldn't be alive. I'm sorry if you don't like it, but I have to be pro-life.” Brian explains that this unique form of adoption is just one of many, many possible choices and that there are several legal types of adoption: closed, agency, partially open and completely open adoption. Each of these have a different story and way of proceeding relative to the mother and the unique child and family. If this debate is in fact about choice, why are these other choices not described or more publicly discussed? Why does the word ‘choice' now simply mean ‘abortion'? In the second part of the program. Brian discusses the many and profound religious impacts of the abortion issue. The fact is that most pro-life individuals are from some religious background or faith. Brian explains the National Pro-life Religious Council's purpose and nature. He has a specific interview with Concerned Methodists for Life, an organization of lay Methodists determined to assert the principles of the Christian faith and the hope and virtues of affirming life within their own, challenged denomination.
Rachel Alexander and Bobby Lopez talk about the impact and meaning of the Dobbs case, which has overturned Roe v. Wade: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdfAs veterans of the conservative cause, we have so many questions to ask about this. We want to rejoice, of course!And then we need to look frankly at why this took 50 years. Who is accountable for the inordinate delay and the 65,000,000 babies that died while conservatives could not get their act together?
Quantum Nurse www.quantumnurse.life presents Freedom International Livestream On July 14, 2022 Thursday @ 12:00 PM EST 5:00 PM UK 6:00 PM Germany Guest: Atty Susan Swift Topic: Right to Life: Protect pregnancy centers and homes from trouble. https://righttolifeleague.org/ www.realsusanswift.net Bio: Susan Swift is an Attorney with the Right To Life League, which is the oldest ProLife organization in America. She can give your viewers the legal perspective of what the upcoming ruling from the Supreme Court amounts to in America and the lives of women and babies. She is an excellent resource from both a legal and personal perspective having 7 children herself. Susan Swift is also the Vice President of Legal Affairs at The Right to Life League. Prior to working in pro-life, Susan enjoyed a career in television and films. She served as a litigation attorney at a prominent international law firm in downtown Los Angeles. Susan is the mother of seven children dedicated to using her speaking and legal skills to champion civil rights for the unborn. Author: Good Guys With Guns At Home, and Good Guys With Guns Abroad, Interview Panel Grace Asagra, RN MA (Holistic Nurse, US, originally from the Phil) Podcast: Quantum Nurse: Out of the Rabbit Hole from Stress to Bless Quantum Nurse - Bichute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/nDjE6Ciyg0ED/ Quantum Nurse – Apple https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/quantum-nurse-out-of-the-rabbit-hole-from-stress-to-bliss/id1522579988 Quantum Nurse Earth Heroes TVhttp://www.earthheroestv.com/categories/the-freedom-broadcasters?via=grace Quantum Nurse Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-764837 Dr. Jayne Marquis, ND Podcast: INpowered https://linktr.ee/INpoweredhealth Hartmut Schumacher Podcast: GO YOUR OWN PATH https://anchor.fm/hartmut-schumacher-path
This week we discuss recent rumors that the RFFA petition received 800,000 signatures. We also discuss Biden and Whitmer's latest radical efforts to promote abortion. We end the episode by clearing up confusion that has been floating around in the last week about ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, and abortion.
HOST: Adam Sommer Twitter: @Adam_Sommer85 GUEST: Crystal Quade Twitter: @crystal_quade To help:https://www.mohousedems.com/ABORTION IN MISSOURIConfusion across the boardWhat can we doWhat can we expectWhat about federal level v. State level?What's the most realistic solution you see for Missourians? Why is a bottom up rebuild so important? Missouri statute for “Right To Life” of an unborn child https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=188.017&bid=47548&hl=abortion%u2044Abortion Definitionshttps://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=188.015&bid=47547Abortion by Physician ONLYhttps://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=188.020&bid=9355Mifepristone with physician onlyhttps://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=188.021&bid=34832Mifeprisone info: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/mifeprex-mifepristone-informationRape Report Requirementhttps://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=188.023&bid=9357https://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills191/hlrbillspdf/0461H.01I.pdf https://heartlandpod.com/Twitter: @TheHeartlandPOD"Change The Conversation"
The overturning of Roe v. Wade continues to send shockwaves through not only the United States of America, but also our allies internationally. For the first time, many are discovering that the overturning of Roe and the ending of our extreme abortion jurisprudence actually doesn't change that much on the ground in states that will continue to be pro-abortion, and that in states that are embracing pro-life law and policy, most American pro-life law mirrors European-style protections—for instance, Mississippi's law which the U.S. Supreme Court just upheld protects life at 15 weeks of a preborn child's life. This means that Mississippi's abortion laws are, actually, more liberal than the abortion laws on the books in nations like Italy, France, or most other European allies. If Roe's reversal means that even pro-life states will generally mimic European-style laws, where killing is still permissible throughout the first months of a child's life, does this represent a true pro-life victory? No. There's more to be done—Americans United for Life will continue to call upon the Executive, Legisltive, and Judicial branches to clarify that abortion is fundamentally incompatible with constitutional justice. We will continue to call upon the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify that natural human rights precede the letter of any constitution, and that our first and most fundamental of all human rights—the human right to life—means that unborn children are entitled to the equal protection of the laws. Today we feature an important conversation hosted by our friends at Live Action on June 24th, 2022, the day of the release of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision and its reversal of Roe v. Wade. Catherine Glenn Foster, President & CEO of Americans United for Life speaks on what true constitutional justice looks like, and how the pro-life movement can cast a vision of a truly brighter future for all. Catherine is joined by Josh Craddock, Affiliated Scholar at the James Wilson Institute and Noah Brandt, Director of Government Affairs at Live Action. Live Action on Twitter Spaces: Dobbs Decision and the 14th Amendment https://mobile.twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkJzbmrApwJv
(rebroadcast of 39)Apparently the Supreme Court believes the individual states should be making the decisions about legal abortions. This rebroadcast offers some important considerations for those state lawmakers. Eventually we individual citizens will be deciding for ourselves if those new laws are acceptable.audio edited by: http://JayPrescott.com
We sit down and we talk Roe V Wade being overturned by the US Supreme Court. What does this now mean? Is abortion officially outlawed? Was it pre planned at just the right time? Does the right to abort your child fall within the guidelines of US law? And perhaps the biggest question not being asked, why was it ruled in the first place back in 1973? We ask the questions
Parental Warning: This is not an episode to listen to with children.In times with so much turmoil in our nation, this truth gives me such great hope. God could have chosen you to be a mom and friend at any time, in any place, in all of history, and He chose this time and place with these people, because this is where He is going to use you. With so much going on in our nation about abortion and women's rights in the midst of a month that was already waving celebrations of sin all around us, we must be prepared to lead our children and our friends in truth. You are going to leave this time challenged, encouraged, and empowered to lead boldly in this time that God has called you to be His disciple! Visit the SEEK WHOLLY LIVING website (for Encouragement, Information, and Fun for all things Mom!)https://seekwhollyliving.comSIGN UP to receive updates & my free special printable:***THE 3 MOST IMPORTANT CHANGES YOU CAN MAKE TODAY TO BE A BETTER MOM*** ☕ CONNECT with US:INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/seekwhollylivingFACEBOOK: https://facebook.com/seekwhollyliving
Attorney Susan Swift is the Vice President of The Right to Life League | She sits down with April Moss to discuss the Roe v Wade Supreme Court decision, and the truths behind the sinister abortion cartel. *******************SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM**************Order Dr. Zelenko's Early Treatment Protocol supplements and save $ on every order here: www.zstacklife.com/APRILhttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AprilMossTVTrouble with arthritis, high blood pressure, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or ANY OTHER AILMENT? Try Hydrogen therapy at home www.holyhydrogen.com/aprilPROTECT YOUR WEALTH AGAINST RISING INFLATIONWealth Management Private Advisors- Dr. Kirk Elliotthttps://kirkelliottphd.com/april/SLEEP BETTER THAN YOU EVER HAVE!www.MyPillow.com Use Promo Code APRIL for up to 66% off at checkout.DITCH YOUR BLUE STATE! OKLAHOMA IS RED HOT!Shaw Homes www.shawhomes.com is offering for April's followers an EXCLUSIVE offer! Click this link https://shawhomes.com/contact-us/ and enter Promo Code: APRIL to receive either $11,000 in FREE Upgrades OR The Deluxe Kitchen Package AND $4,000 Closing Costs Paid.Get your immune system STRONG with Naturopathic Dr. Mark Sherwood**Download your 100% FREE e-book TODAY at www.sherwood.tv/facethefactsAttention PARENTS!! Want to teach your kids about free markets and the dangers of socialism in a fun and easy way? You've got to check out the Tuttle Twins series of books.Use my special link here:https://tuttletwins.com/?ap_id=AprilMossTV for 35% off of children's booksApril Moss is styled by Culture of Life 1972- a chic, on-point, classy Pro-Life Christian Online Fashion Boutique! All items are MADE IN THE USA! Shop here for women's clothing, jewelry, bags, and trendy accessories, plus, you'll be supporting small businesses.www.col1972.com Promo code: APRIL for 10% off your order!Follow Face The Facts with April Moss on the following channels and SUBSCRIBE:BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Os6e...Rumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?ty...CloutHub: https://clthb.co/W95Gbhum2iY6JNfX8Telegram: https://t.me/aprilmosstvTwitter: @AprilMossTVGETTR: @aprilmosstvInstagram: @aprilmosstvFacebook: @aprilmosstvGab: @aprilmosstvSupport the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/AprilMossTV)Support the show
Talking While Married with Hosts DrRon & Linda – The U.S. Supreme Court rules that NY's 2nd Amendment restrictions on concealed carry are unconstitutional, paving the way for more law-abiding citizens nationwide to become armed for their personal protection. Next, the high court overturns Roe v. Wade in a common-sense ruling that is a victory for...
In the episode we continue the conversation from the previous episode addressing the topic of abortion and look specifically at pro-abortion reasoning. We respond to the following arguments: - Personal autonomy- "My body, my rules" - The underlying assumption of "the right to be as sexually active as desired" - "The baby doesn't feel pain during the abortion" We end the episode beginning a defense of some of the claims made against those who oppose abortion. We tackle the questions made about mothers in tough economic situations and then perhaps the most widely-used argument of pregnancy from rape. All episodes can be found at www.switchinglensespodcast.com Music by Brian Buchanan Photo by Thirdman from Pexels
In this episode of Life Matters, Commissioner Johnston continues in his incisive examination of the creep of relativism into the pro-life movement. In an earlier episode Brian explained how the social teachings of the Seamless Garment, a common Roman Catholic misunderstanding of the place of the abortion issue, has led to great confusion and destruction. While many seamless garment advocates suggest that they will elevate abortion as a dominant topic of all the social issues, it in fact makes the Right To Life issue and the subject of abortion a relativistic portion of a confused moral morass of issues. It is not, in fact, the actual teaching of the Catholic Catechism. In ignoring the actual teachings of natural law and of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which clearly states that society has an intrinsic duty to protect innocent lives, and that this issue of legal protection of the innocent is a foundational element of society, the seamless garment has weakened many in their understanding. In particular, the many so-called Roman Catholic leaders of the pro-abortion movement who simultaneously claim that they are good Catholics as they lead the advocacy of the culture of Death! While this grouping of the right to life with issues of the Left clearly minimizes its true significance as an essential premise for all society, it is also being done on the Right. There are many who consider the abortion issue part of a constellation or a group of social issues - issues of great moral, ethical, and legal concern, like pornography, homosexuality, teaching of trans rights, etc. These moral advocates on the Right will make the same assertion as seamless garment advocates on the Left: “We will join in the fight and we will consider abortion the big one of all the issues.” This generic and confused use of “set theory” is a deep error. Brian examines the mathematical logic of set theory and why it actually is a false logic and even if well intentioned, is a confused thinking to apply to the abortion issue. Once again, Brian reminds people that Lincoln clearly demonstrated the moral truth regarding the evil of slavery only when he could demonstrate the facts of mathematically and logically describing what a moral truth is. Whereas all of his opponents were also claiming to be moral and ethical in declaring that the ownership of slave was legally permissible and ethical. Lincoln's open demand that the logic of Euclid's proofs - QED “Quod Erat Demonstrandum” (That which has been demonstrated) is the only permissible use of asserting that a conclusion is indeed demonstrably true and a valid point to build upon. Lawyers routinely make statements that are emotionally charged but full of deceit and have no truth in them. They are merely assertions and the speaker expects them to be treated as facts. An assertion is not a fact. Lincoln understood that and Lincoln understood that facts must be demonstrable before they can allow to be continued to be considered as valid. Brian explains how many people, even some conservative Christians, will group abortion as part of a set of moral issues. There is much passionate feelings in Christians. But as it says in Hebrews, they must mature and be able to reason. Feelings are not enough. In the Scriptures, God invites Christians to leave behind their own mindsets to engage in reason. And like a child's math class that groups coins together and each coin has value and significance but they may insist the largest is clearly the silver dollar: they will declare abortion is the “biggest” of the many social issues. Such a grouping is a great disservice if one does not understand that abortion is not merely a big issue among many. It is transcendent. It is comparable to a gold bar itself. While also metal and also of value, it is of transcendent worth in contrast to the relativity meager social issues- the coins. Even calling the silver dollar the biggest, or also calling abortion issue the biggest, does not recognize the overarching transcendent quality of what the right to life actually is. It is the gold of the gold standard. It is of transcendent nature and significance. This program also introduces a new sponsor who has been persecuted for his pro-life commitments, Mike Lindell's My Pillow. Purchasers of My Pillow products that use the discount code: “LIFE”, will get the deepest of discounts and that's very exciting indeed!
In this episode of Life Matters, Commissioner Johnston pulls back the covers the relativistic social teaching that has crept into the pro-life movement called “The Seamless Garment.” Also referred to as “the consistent life ethic“ The seamless garment asserts that the right to life of unborn children is merely one of many life issues and that a focus needs to be spent on all of the plethora of these issues. Contrary to adding to the protection of innocent life, the seamless garment has been used to undercut the protection of innocent life. Catholics routinely invoke it in the public sector, and especially to justify the leaders of the abortion movement who are Catholic. This includes individuals such as Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and Gavin Newsom. One of the clearest thinkers and spokesmen for the Catholic faith, Cardinal Mueller, is eloquent in declaring the seamless garment a false doctrine, and repudiating it for its evil and confusing nature. He rightly calls it “intellectually dishonest.” https://www.ncregister.com/blog/intellectual-dishonesty-and-the-seamless-garment-argument The tragedy of the seamless garment is that many well-meaning Catholics can be confused by this false teaching. We know that many Catholics continue to vote for pro-abortion Democrats, and we know that the pro-abortion democrat leadership proudly says that it's a very Catholic position. This includes the recent statements by Nancy Pelosi in rebuking her own archbishop who had reminded her of the serious evil of intentionally supporting laws that allow the killing and disposal of innocent human lives. Failure to make distinctions on these important moral ethical and legal issues is in fact failure to clarify the issues at stake. It gives great license and literally it gives the culture a lawlessness - for if the innocent cannot be protected by the law, what is the purpose of the law? Catholics are not the only religious entity to have slipped into this religious moral relativism. And Brian's future focus will be on the widespread moral relativism that has crept into even those churches who claim to be “biblically-based.” The battle of our culture is very real and the values of a godless culture are already relativistic. When churches who claim to speak for a higher law, for the “laws of nature and nature‘s God,” promote moral relativist teaching institutions they must be rebuked. Society itself is at stake when we discuss the issue of the right to life. It is not merely a passing moral ‘opinion.' It is the very fabric of what allows individuals to function together in society. The right to life must be firmly asserted and clearly explained. It must be defended and protected if the innocent child, the elderly, the infirm or anyone who is physically under the power or control of other individuals is to be protected from deadly intent.