Podcasts about Bioethics

“I don't need to track it. I just listen to my body,” says Ezekiel J. Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., Ms.C.  Dr. Emanuel is an oncologist and world leader in health policy and bioethics. He is the Vice Provost for Global Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, and holds appointments in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy in the Perelman School of Medicine and the Department of Health Care Management in the Wharton School. He is Special Advisor to the Director General of the WHO, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He was founding chair of the Department of Bioethics at the NIH. He served as a Special Advisor on Health Policy to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and National Economic Council. In this role, he was instrumental in drafting the Affordable Care Act. He served on the Biden-Harris Transition Covid Advisory Board. Dr. Emanuel is the most widely cited bioethicist in history with over 350 publications. He has authored or edited 16 books. His newest book, Eat Your Ice Cream, is out now.  00:00 - When tracking our health goes overboard 06:19 - The health markers worth testing 08:03 - Daily nutrition habits 09:34 - What it means to “eat your ice cream” 14:15 - The importance of social connection 19:12 - Why willpower fails & habits win 24:47 - Everest, introverts, & grip strength 27:52 - How purpose is linked to health 31:06 - Why & how the Emanuel brothers succeeded  35:21 - Rethinking retirement for brain health 36:42 - Age-old health wins (& that's a relief) 40:10 - Favorite ice cream shops Referenced in the episode:  For more about Emanuel, visit his website: https://www.ezekielemanuel.com/  Buy Eat Your Ice Cream here: https://www.amazon.com/Eat-Your-Ice-Cream-Healthy/dp/1324117532/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?tag=mind0a3-20  Find our episode on the rabbit cholesterol here: https://youtu.be/er3k40nlCh8?si=MxeG7IxEVnirxIoX We hope you enjoy this episode, and feel free to watch the full video on YouTube! Whether it's an article or podcast, we want to know what we can do to help here at mindbodygreen. Let us know at: podcast@mindbodygreen.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode, we speak to Tee Wee Ang, program specialist for bioethics and ethics of science and technology at UNESCO. AI is advancing faster than governments can regulate it. Just this week, an Anthropic researcher resigned over concerns about AI safety. And Bill Gates warned that governments are not adequately prepared for the disruption ahead. So, are policymakers already falling behind? And who should be held responsible if AI goes wrong?

This hour we take a look at some of the stories making headlines before connecting with Karen Covell, Founding Director of the Hollywood Prayer Network. Karen will give us very specific ways to pray for those serving in the largest group of influencers in the world. Then, Wesley Smith, from the Center for Human Exceptionalism will discuss the profitability of the “assisted dying” movement. Join us to think biblically and critically.Become a Parshall Partner: http://moodyradio.org/donateto/inthemarket/partnersSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wesley J. Smith of the Discovery Institute Wesley Smith's National Review Columns Culture of Death: The Age of “Do Harm” Medicine Forced Exit: Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and the New Duty to Die The post A Bioethics Update – Wesley Smith, 9/8/26 (2512) first appeared on Issues, Etc..

Jeremy Heffner, MD, FACS is a board-certified trauma surgeon, former Chair of Surgery at Lima Memorial Health System, and cofounder of Surgery Unified, one of the largest physician-led communities in surgery. His perspective carries weight because he has spent decades inside operating rooms, hospital leadership, physician culture, and the growing collision between medicine and corporate healthcare. He grew up in a blue-collar Ohio family of firefighters, railroad workers, police officers, and tradespeople. Medicine represented something rare: a career that combined service, stability, and purpose. He pursued engineering, earned his medical degree, completed trauma surgery fellowship training at the University of Michigan, and entered a profession that taught physicians to sacrifice themselves for patients.Then the rules changed.This conversation traces the gap between the medicine physicians were trained to practice and the healthcare industry that emerged around them. Administrative burden expanded. Insurance companies gained influence over treatment decisions. Prior authorization became routine. Hospital systems consolidated. Physicians retained responsibility for outcomes while losing authority over the conditions required to achieve them.Heffner describes watching colleagues struggle with burnout, moral injury, PTSD, and growing frustration with a system that increasingly inserts business incentives between clinicians and patients. He explains why younger physicians are entering medicine with a level of visibility that previous generations never had. They see the paperwork, the denials, the loss of autonomy, and the personal cost before they ever finish training.The discussion moves beyond physician dissatisfaction and into the broader consequences for patients. When insurers delay care, hospitals absorb costs, clinicians absorb stress, and patients absorb uncertainty. The financial incentives remain intact while trust erodes across every level of the healthcare system.At its core, this episode examines what happens when a profession built around service finds itself operating inside an industry built around extraction. The result affects physicians, nurses, caregivers, and every patient forced to navigate the consequences.RELATED LINKSJeremy Heffner⁠Surgery Unified⁠SurgeOn⁠University of Michigan Department of Surgery⁠KevinMD⁠Suck It Up Buttercup⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In 1971, the National Cancer Act transformed cancer into a national research priority. More than 50 years later, the next frontier is no longer defined solely by scientific discovery, but by how quickly knowledge, lived experience, and patient voices can reshape healthcare itself.The concluding chapter of The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship explores how the cancer advocacy movement continues to evolve in an era of digital communities, social media, precision medicine, and grassroots activism. Building on the work of pioneers such as Mary Lasker, Rose Kushner, and the generations of survivors who followed, today's advocates are expanding the movement beyond awareness to demand health equity, trusted information, patient-centered research, and meaningful representation in healthcare decision-making.The episode examines how technology has transformed advocacy from local support groups into global communities capable of organizing in real time. Researchers, policymakers, nonprofit leaders, and survivors reflect on the growing influence of digital storytelling, online education, and peer-to-peer networks that connect patients across diagnoses, generations, and geographic boundaries. At the same time, they acknowledge new responsibilities: ensuring accurate medical information, combating misinformation, protecting trust, and keeping patients at the center of innovation.The story also looks ahead to the next generation of advocates. Young leaders are applying lessons learned from decades of cancer activism while drawing inspiration from broader movements for social justice, public health, and community organizing. Their work reflects a simple but enduring truth: meaningful change rarely begins inside institutions. It begins when ordinary people refuse to accept that the system cannot improve.Cancer survivorship has never been a finished story. Every generation inherits the progress achieved by those who came before while confronting challenges uniquely its own. The future of survivorship will be shaped not only by scientific breakthroughs, but by those willing to listen, organize, educate, and ensure that every patient's voice helps define what comes next.RELATED LINKSNational Cancer Institute⁠Cancer Moonshot⁠Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | Division of Cancer Prevention and Control⁠HopeLab⁠Tigerlily Foundation⁠Stupid Cancer⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Knowledge of good health practices often does not change health behaviors. This session will share proven ways to motivate people to change their health behaviors using non-financial incentives as demonstrated in a community health program that has changed the health of 1.2 million people. These techniques are applicable in both the USA and abroad.

Dr. Matthew Eppinette encourages Christians to approach difficult end-of-life questions with a biblical view of human dignity, emphasizing that life remains valuable even in weakness, suffering, and dependence on others. He highlights the importance of compassionate care, community support, and faithful preparation for medical decisions rather than viewing death as a solution to hardship. Throughout the discussion, he calls believers to trust God's purposes and to see meaning even in seasons of suffering.

In 1987, Mary P. Lovato, a member of Kewa Pueblo in New Mexico, was diagnosed with acute leukemia. To receive a bone marrow transplant, she had to travel more than 800 miles from home because specialized cancer care was unavailable through the Indian Health Service. When she returned, she discovered another obstacle: many in her community feared cancer so deeply that they avoided speaking about it altogether.This episode examines how cancer survivorship exposed profound inequities in the American healthcare system. Long before health equity became a national priority, advocates from underserved communities were confronting disparities rooted in geography, poverty, racism, language, underfunded healthcare systems, and historical mistrust of medical institutions. Their work demonstrated that scientific advances alone cannot improve survival if patients cannot reach, afford, or trust the care available to them.The story follows pioneers including Mary P. Lovato, who built the first national Native-led cancer support and education program for Indigenous communities, and Maimah Karmo, founder of the Tigerlily Foundation, whose breast cancer diagnosis inspired a movement to improve early detection, clinical trial participation, and representation for Black women. Their advocacy challenged longstanding barriers to culturally competent care while highlighting persistent inequities in access to screening, fertility preservation, navigation, and innovative treatments.The episode also explores why diversity in clinical research matters. For decades, many cancer clinical trials disproportionately enrolled White patients, limiting both access to promising therapies and the scientific understanding of how treatments perform across different populations. Researchers, patient advocates, and community leaders responded by redesigning outreach, improving patient navigation, reducing logistical barriers, and insisting that affected communities help shape the research itself.Cancer survivorship cannot be measured solely by scientific breakthroughs. It also depends on whether every patient has a meaningful opportunity to benefit from them. The pursuit of health equity remains one of the defining challenges and enduring responsibilities of modern oncology.RELATED LINKSNational Cancer Institute | Cancer Health Disparities⁠Indian Health Service⁠Tigerlily Foundation⁠National Cancer Institute | Cancer Clinical Trials⁠American Indian Cancer Foundation⁠Abramson Cancer Center | University of Pennsylvania⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

My guest today on the Online for Authors podcast is Jane Hartsock, author of the book Fan Base. Jane writes psychological literary fiction set in the American Midwest that centers the agency and experiences of women. Her first novel Load Bearing (2024) tells the story of a young woman who become obsessed with the long-dead architect of the 1920s mansion she and her husband are renovating. Fan Base (2025) involves a widow who is unexpectedly reunited with the washed-up celebrity she slept with once in college and is then subjected to relentless cyber-bullying from his toxic fandom. Jane also has a forthcoming biography about the Midwestern father-daughter team that were the first to translate an ancient Egyptian medical text (2027). Her current project is a novel that involves the Salem Witch Trials (anticipated 2028). Her work has been anthologized in several fiction and non-fiction publications.   Jane holds a BA in English with a concentration in creative writing from Butler University, an MA in Philosophy with a concentration in Bioethics, and a JD all from Indiana University. When she's not writing, you can find Jane hanging with her family and friends (and amazing writing groups) in Indianapolis and teaching Medical Humanities and Bioethics at Indiana University Indianapolis where her research focus includes the use of literature to develop ethical sensitivity, as well as the ethically informed use of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine.   In my book review, I stated Fan Base is a psychological thriller by Jane Hartsock. And this is one you won't want to miss.   It starts out like any slightly steamy romance. Babs, who lost her husband three years earlier to an accident and then loses her job due to her lackluster performance while grieving, meets Austin Lewis. Meets again, actually. Their one-day fling 25-years earlier has always stayed in the back of her mind.   Austin was a teen heart-throb. Babs was unfazed by this fact. They met. They connected. She quickly moved on, became a lawyer, married, and had two children. Austin's fame waned, but he found the business side of Hollywood and moved forward. When they reconnect in a coffeeshop, it seems like fate.   Soon, Babs learns of the Lewnatics - a group of super fans who continue to follow and harrass Austin. And now, the Lewnatics are after her. To make matters worse, her sister, Margot, is part of this crazy group. As things heat up - both in the bedroom and with the crazies - Babs wonders who she can trust.   But you can trust me - the ending will leave your mouth gaping!   Subscribe to Online for Authors to learn about more great books! https://www.youtube.com/@onlineforauthors?sub_confirmation=1   You can follow Author Jane Hartsock Website: https://janehartsock.com/ IG: @writejanewrite   Purchase Fan Base on Amazon: Paperback: https://amzn.to/4wCE80b Ebook: https://amzn.to/44l9mgz   Teri M Brown, Author and Podcast Host: https://www.terimbrown.com FB: @TeriMBrownAuthor IG: @terimbrown_author X: @terimbrown1   Want to be a guest on Online for Authors? Send Teri M Brown a message on PodMatch, here: https://www.podmatch.com/member/onlineforauthors   #janehartsock #fanbase #thriller #terimbrownauthor #authorpodcast #onlineforauthors #characterdriven #researchjunkie #awardwinningauthor #podcasthost #podcast #readerpodcast #bookpodcast #writerpodcast #author #books #goodreads #bookclub #fiction #writer #bookreview *As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Once upon a time, or so we've been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met. Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors. Nothing is value-free. In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics. Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics. This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Once upon a time, or so we've been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met. Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors. Nothing is value-free. In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics. Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics. This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/jewish-studies

Once upon a time, or so we've been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met. Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors. Nothing is value-free. In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics. Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics. This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/medicine

Once upon a time, or so we've been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met. Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors. Nothing is value-free. In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics. Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics. This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/israel-studies

Once upon a time, or so we've been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met. Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors. Nothing is value-free. In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics. Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics. This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

In 2000, Katie Couric underwent a live colonoscopy on national television following the death of her husband, Jay Monahan, from colorectal cancer at age 42. The broadcast demystified a procedure many Americans feared, led to an estimated 20% increase in colonoscopy screenings, and became one of the clearest examples of how public storytelling can change healthcare behavior.This episode examines how celebrities, journalists, filmmakers, and entertainers helped reshape the public conversation about cancer during a period when survivorship was becoming increasingly visible. As breakthroughs in targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and early detection allowed more people to live beyond cancer, public figures used their platforms to encourage screening, reduce stigma, and accelerate research. Their influence extended far beyond awareness campaigns, helping transform cancer from a private diagnosis into a national public health conversation.Central to this story is Laura Ziskin, the Hollywood producer behind Pretty Woman and the Spider-Man films, whose metastatic breast cancer diagnosis inspired the creation of Stand Up To Cancer. Working alongside Couric and leaders from entertainment, journalism, and biomedical research, Ziskin championed a new funding model that required multidisciplinary scientific collaboration, helping accelerate discoveries that contributed to multiple FDA-approved cancer therapies. The episode also highlights the advocacy of actor Patrick Dempsey, whose family's experience with ovarian cancer led to the creation of the Dempsey Center, expanding support for patients and caregivers beyond medical treatment.The story also asks what celebrity advocacy often leaves unsaid. Financial toxicity, caregiver burden, chronic pain, mental health, and the long-term effects of treatment rarely receive the same attention as dramatic diagnoses or breakthrough cures. As cancer survivorship continues to evolve, the greatest challenge may not be convincing people to care about cancer, but helping them understand what it truly means to live with and beyond it.RELATED LINKSStand Up To Cancer⁠Katie Couric Media⁠Dempsey Center⁠American Association for Cancer Research⁠National Cancer Institute⁠Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Adult Survivorship Program⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In 2006, a landmark report titled Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer confirmed what young survivors had been saying for years. While survival rates for children and older adults had steadily improved, adolescents and young adults had experienced decades of stalled progress. They had become cancer's lost generation.This episode explores how young adult survivors transformed their shared isolation into one of the most influential grassroots movements in cancer advocacy. Diagnosed during the years typically devoted to education, careers, relationships, and starting families, patients between the ages of 15 and 39 confronted challenges that extended far beyond treatment. Fertility preservation, sexual health, employment, financial toxicity, insurance, and long-term quality of life were rarely discussed in oncology clinics, leaving many to navigate survivorship alone.The episode follows advocates including Tamika Felder, Lindsay Avner, Heidi Adams, Doug Ulman, and Dr. Archie Bleyer, whose research and advocacy fundamentally changed how medicine understands adolescent and young adult cancer. Through organizations including Planet Cancer, Fertile Hope, the Lance Armstrong Foundation, and later Stupid Cancer, survivors built online communities, educational resources, conferences, and national partnerships that challenged long-standing assumptions about cancer care. Their work helped establish fertility preservation as a standard discussion before treatment, expanded research dedicated to adolescent and young adult oncology, and elevated quality of life as a critical clinical outcome alongside survival.The movement also demonstrated the power of lived experience to reshape medicine. Survivors became researchers, educators, nonprofit founders, and policy advocates, insisting that cancer care account not only for years of life saved, but for the lives patients hoped to build afterward.What began as a search for peers evolved into a national movement that permanently transformed adolescent and young adult oncology. Today, dedicated research programs, clinical fellowships, survivorship resources, and patient advocacy organizations continue to build on the foundation these young cancer mavericks created.RELATED LINKSNational Cancer Institute | Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Program⁠Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer⁠American Society of Clinical Oncology | Fertility Preservation Guidelines⁠Stupid Cancer⁠Livestrong Foundation⁠Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Co-hosts Ryan Piansky, a patient advocate living with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic asthma, and Holly Knotowicz, a speech-language pathologist living with EoE who serves on APFED's Health Science Advisory Council, interview Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE, an allergy and immunology attending physician with a joint faculty position at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Disclaimer: The information provided in this podcast is designed to support, not replace, the relationship between listeners and their healthcare providers. Opinions, information, and recommendations shared in this podcast are not a substitute for medical advice. Decisions related to medical care should be made with your healthcare provider. Opinions and views of guests and co-hosts are their own.   Key Takeaways: [00:48] Co-host Ryan Piansky introduces this episode, brought to you thanks to the support of APFED's Education Partners AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda.   [1:04] Ryan introduces co-host Holly Knotowicz. Ryan just returned from APFED's 24th Annual EOS Connection Patient Education Conference. It was a wonderful time. Listeners can still check out the resources on demand online.   [1:26] Ryan mentions that a handful of people came up to him at the conference to say how much they appreciate the Real Talk podcast. It was wonderful to hear how impactful the podcast has been for them.   [1:53] Holly introduces today's topic: how parents and caregivers can help children and teens with eosinophilic disorders build the skills and confidence they need to manage their health as they grow and navigate transitions from pediatric to adult care teams.   [2:06] Holly introduces and welcomes today's guest, Dr. Timothy Buckey, an allergist and immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.   [2:14] Dr. Buckey's research interests include eosinophilic esophagitis, food allergy, medical ethics, and improving access to medical care for vulnerable populations.   [2:24] Dr. Buckey thanks Ryan and Holly for having him on the program. He's a long-time listener and is looking forward to the conversation on this important topic.   [2:32] Holly comments on Dr. Buckey working with children and adults. Dr. Buckey says he sees patients of all ages, from a few days old at the Children's Hospital through the end of life at the adult hospital. He loves that there's no patient he cannot see.   [3:10] Dr. Buckey says, in addition to seeing patients as an allergist/immunologist, he is also a medical ethicist or bioethicist. He is trained in medical ethics, and he utilizes that approach in shared decision-making, trying to understand his patients' goals and values for their health, and making a plan that works for them.   [3:31] Holly says her allergist/immunologist at Massachusetts General also sees teens and adults.    [3:53] Dr. Buckey says a special aspect of the relationship he has with his patients is that he has been in a fairly similar position, as someone who has dealt with many different allergic or atopic conditions for his whole life.   [4:08] Dr. Buckey says his conditions started with asthma as a young child, which he still manages, allergic rhinitis, and environmental allergies. He has been on allergy shots. He deals with atopic dermatitis, or eczema. He has seen an allergist/immunologist his whole life. It feels like full circle to be one now.   [4:29] Ryan feels like it's easier from a patient perspective if your physician gets it and can understand what you're going through.   [4:41] Ryan says that eosinophilic disorders generally require lifelong management, especially when diagnosed in children. Over time, a patient may need to transition from being treated by a pediatric care team to an adult care team.   [4:57] Ryan says that Dr. Buckey, through his work with the University of Pennsylvania, provides a lot of support for young adults going through that transition. Ryan asks Dr. Buckey to explain the importance of transition of care.   [5:14] Dr. Buckey breaks down the term into its two words: transition and care.   [5:24] Transition of care is a process in which we are shifting from a pediatric health model, in which a parent or guardian is the primary historian, or person managing the patient's care, to one in which the patient becomes the primary point of contact.   [5:49] Dr. Buckey says that during this process, our overarching goal is for an individual to begin to develop ownership of their health so that they can take care of their medications, schedule appointments, and know their bodies.   [6:05] Dr. Buckey says the second part is care. Not only medical care, but it is a period of life of going through a lot of personal growth. Dr. Buckey's goal is for patients to know themselves and learn to support themselves as independent individuals.   [6:30] Holly appreciates that Dr. Buckey talked about the transition at that age when there are so many things going on with becoming an adult.   [6:40] Holly says when she worked at the Children's Hospital of Colorado, we thought about this a lot.   [7:00] Holly said that when she interacted with patients, she tried to look at them, even if they were little. If they were three or four, she asked them what their favorite foods were.   [7:17] Holly says she was trying, as young as possible, to have them feel that they have some say and control over their health, and they can start developing how to be a historian of their medical journey.   [7:36] Dr. Buckey says every person matures or develops at different times. Having a strict age cutoff may ignore the unique aspects of each person and their history. Dr. Buckey generally begins that conversation in the teenage years through the early 20s.   [8:02] Dr. Buckey says that with some kids, he will introduce the idea earlier than a teenager, based on how much they understand about their health. As they start to switch to adult care, he emphasizes that the transition process is not over at their first adult visit.   [8:24] Dr. Buckey says it takes additional visits for that person to understand themselves, to know how to request a refill of their medication, to know how to make the appointment, and to know how to contact Dr. Buckey if they have questions.    [8:38] Dr. Buckey says it is a continual process, and it doesn't just stop at that first visit with an adult doctor.   [8:45] Holly agrees that people reach maturity at different ages. Holly remembers that when she was in college, she asked her mom to schedule her dentist and doctor appointments.    [9:17] Dr. Buckey says it's overwhelming and it can be quite scary. It takes a team.   [9:30] Holly notes there are age ranges on the Healthcare Transition Timeline Toolkit for what the provider should be doing to help the patient get ready for transition, and what the caregiver and the patient should be doing. She invites listeners to check it out at eoscare.apfed.org.   [9:45] Holly asks about ages when a child would meet alone with their physician for part of the appointment to talk about things they don't want to say in front of their parent.   [10:18] Dr. Buckey says it depends on age and individual factors. He says he has met some very mature 10-year-olds and some not-as-mature 17-year-olds.   [10:38] Dr. Buckey says he understands how it might be nerve-wracking for parents to ask them to step out, but it is an important part of that person starting to know their own body.   [10:50] Dr. Buckey says if he's seeing an individual with asthma, he will have the parents step out briefly from the clinic room so he can have a conversation about possible triggers they may not be comfortable talking to their parents about, such as vaping or cigarette use, and if they have tried them or friends have tried them.   [11:20] Dr. Buckey says they will discuss that, and that's not something they always feel comfortable sharing with their parents because they feel like they may be disappointing them. The doctor needs to know it to keep them healthy.   [11:44] Holly says in her practice, a lot of teenagers will ask to meet with her if they have IgE-mediated food allergies on top of eosinophilic-related disease.   [11:51] They want to know if it's safe to kiss a person if they've eaten this or what to do to protect themselves. If they get this symptom, what should they do? They feel comfortable asking Holly. She's trying to coach them to feel confident in their bodies.   [12:22] Ryan comments that he's gone through the transition of care process relatively recently. The conversation has touched on so many things he remembers from the last 10 years of trying to transition.   [12:28] Even before that, at eight or nine, when the doctor asked what medications Ryan was on, his mother looked at him and said, You should know this; you take them every day. What medications are you on?   [12:43] Ryan says that was super helpful to him, as a young patient, that his parents supported him in making sure he was aware of his health, his treatment options, and was able to guide his own medical appointments, with supervision.   [12:57] Ryan had had no idea that he was choking on food or taking extra time to chew. It felt normal, so it was helpful to have a caregiver in the office. His caregiver would say it takes him half an hour to have a handful of crackers. That should not be happening.   [13:20] Ryan asked about caregivers helping with appointment management and prescription management. Until recently, Ryan's parents helped him.    [13:50] Ryan says, even into your 20s, that transition process is still happening. Ryan asks Dr. Buckey for advice on teens and young adults making their own appointments and dealing with healthcare systems.   [14:04] Dr. Buckey says it's difficult to navigate our healthcare system. There are questions about insurance and what is in-network vs. out-of-network. How do you get prescriptions filled? What's covered? Cost? So it's complicated.   [14:21] Dr. Buckey emphasizes that when we're talking about this transition process, sometimes a part can get misconstrued: that we don't want parents or caregivers involved. We do.   [14:35] Dr. Buckey says his goal is for people to have the community, however they define that, to still be a part of their healthcare. What he is aiming for with this transition is that the individual starts to take control of their own health.   [14:50] If making appointments is something they still need some help from their parents, that is them recognizing what they need. [14:57] If they want to come to the visit but have Mom or Dad or their significant other on the phone, because that is the support that they need, then absolutely do that.    [15:08] Dr. Buckey says, as we are generally switching over, at 18 into our early 20s, recognizing the support you need is an important part of knowing your own body.   [15:20] Holly says that's an important stage, and she got there later. She needed help when she was younger; then, in her teens, she said, "No, I've got it." Now, in her 40s, she would like some help again.   [15:37] Holly says it's OK to ask for help when you're feeling overwhelmed, and you can't navigate all these chronic diseases on your own.   [15:42] Ryan says this is a topic we're both passionate about. At APFED, we see younger patients stop seeing their care team when they get to their college years.   [15:54] Ryan says part of it is they get busy and are not able to engage with the patient advocacy community as much, and part of it is they drop out of care. It's important to have caregivers or your community to support you through that process.   [16:07] Ryan says, whatever it takes to stay in care and make sure you're healthy is super important.   [16:14] Ryan brings up legal age cutoffs. In his 20s, he has access to his medical records; his parents don't. He still wants their take on some stuff. After he gets an endoscopy, he pulls up MyChart to show his parents his results.   [16:38] Dr. Buckey says once we turn 18, we are legally adults. At that point, the patient is the owner of their health and their information. They have to provide access to their parents to be able to see it. That can be done in several different ways.   [16:55] If you have an electronic health record, sometimes you can add a proxy, or you can just pull up the results and choose to show your parents.   [17:05] Dr. Buckey says if he is seeing an 18-, 19-, or 20-year-old at the Children's Hospital, he will tell them that once they turn 18, he only communicates results to them.   [17:16] Of course, they can have their parents, caregiver, or significant other present. That is their choice to invite them into that conversation. That is very helpful for many people.   [17:30] Dr. Buckey is a proxy for his parents. Holly is also a proxy for her parents.   [17:41] Holly says that having somebody who is in your corner to talk about your results with and talk about the next stages of treatment is always important because it can be overwhelming.   [17:51] Dr. Buckey gives kudos to pediatric providers. They are so wonderful, and they build such a great relationship that it makes it hard for us to want to leave.   [18:03] When Dr. Buckey was at the point of applying to medical school, his pediatrician told him they needed to have him see an adult doctor. He was reluctant to transition. His pediatrician inspired Dr. Buckey to go into medicine.   [18:25] Ryan says it can be a hard transition, with so much else going on that you want to stay in that familiar environment.   [18:31] Ryan shares how he recently dealt with transitioning insurance plans.   [18:55] Dr. Buckey says the general rule is that you can stay on your parents' health insurance until you are 26. There are caveats for individual persons and individual insurance plans.   [19:05] Some people start working and may get health insurance through their job, so you may have your own health insurance at 18 and no longer be on your parents' insurance.   [19:16] When you're 16 or 17, it's an important time to talk to your parents, or whoever's insurance you are on, about what's going to happen when you turn 18.   [19:26] Ryan says it's specific to each medical plan. He says when he went to college, he was offered a student health insurance plan, but his specialty medications, like biologics, were not covered, only hospitalizations.   [20:00] Ryan says it's always good to double-check what your plan options are and what those plans cover, to make sure that you're able to maintain the care you need.   [20:12] Holly says that something really helpful is to sit down with the family and help them identify an adult care team that will fit them best as they transition.   [20:33] Dr. Buckey says sitting down and having that conversation is an important part of the visit. Talk to patients about where they will live. If you're living away at college or moving away for a job, what geographic area are you moving to?   [20:53] If you're going to be on a different coast or city, do you want to switch your care over to that area? Or do you want to keep your care in the area where your parents live and come back during your breaks and see your physician?   [21:09] Dr. Buckey says it's also important to have a local provider to go to if something comes up. Talk to your pediatric provider about whether they know adult clinicians who care for the condition that you have in the area where you will be living.   [21:30] Dr. Buckey says another important thing to think about is,  when we are in pediatric care, we are often follow-up or return patients. Visits may be of a different duration. Sometimes it's easier to schedule a follow-up visit than a new patient visit.   [21:48] Planning that new patient visit in your new area, sometimes weeks or months ahead, is an important part of this transition process to ensure that there are no gaps in the care you're going to be having.   [22:08] Holly mentions the APFED Specialist Finder on the APFED website. It's a tool for when you are not part of a multidisciplinary setting or wherever you're going, no one knows who they would recommend in that part of the country.   [22:25] There are a lot of good people listed on the APFED Specialist Finder if you are going to be moving somewhere else or getting your care in another place. Dr. Buckey proudly shared that he is on that Specialist Finder. So is Holly.   [22:51] Ryan recently moved to California, and he is trying to find care teams there that specialize in EoE.   [23:12] Ryan asks if patients transitioning to a new doctor typically need a referral from their existing physician, or do you chat with your insurance company first to help find new care teams?   [23:25] Dr. Buckey says some insurance policies do require a referral for each visit you are going to have with your provider. For many policies, you can look online to see who is in-network vs. out-of-network.   [23:52] Sometimes there are different costs to see someone who is in-network vs. out-of-network. The differences can be dramatic. Discuss it with your physician or clinician, but also with your insurance company.   [24:13] Dr. Buckey says make sure there's no lapse in care. We don't want someone to go without their medication. If you're no longer seeing your pediatric provider, make plans to see an adult provider who can continue your prescriptions.   [24:45] Ryan says we see a lot of patients who have an EGID and also other conditions. We see a lot of comorbidities within our community. We have multiple things going on, which can make this transition process especially complicated.   [25:15] Dr. Buckey says many people are experiencing different things and may need to see more than one clinician. They probably also have a primary care doctor. They are going to have to switch from each of those clinicians to an adult provider.   [25:38] That transition takes time and effort. It can sometimes be a long wait. Beginning that process early will only set you up for success. Dr. Buckey says different health systems will accept different insurances.   [26:01] Dr. Buckey says sometimes for specialty medicines, when you switch health systems, the specialty medication may be provided by a different specialty pharmacy than it was when you were seeing a pediatric healthcare team.   [26:13] How you schedule appointments, how you speak to someone if you're having new symptoms, all changes as you're switching to adult care. Dr. Buckey says because this is complicated, we do worry that sometimes things can get lost during the transition.   [26:37] Planning will only set you up for success, so that nothing gets missed in the switchover process; you have no lapse in medications or procedures that you need, and you can continue to see the clinicians you need to keep you healthy for your best life.   [27:03] Holly has learned from her healthcare and working in different hospitals to ask, before picking a specialist, what electronic medical records (EMR) the practice uses. Some can communicate with each other, and it makes the transition smoother.   [27:25] Holly says some places have EMRs that don't communicate with other places, and that makes sharing information tricky. Holly has experience dealing with EMRs that do not talk to each other at all.   [28:05] Dr. Buckey says if you use an EMR that communicates with others, your care can easily be accessed at different institutions. Dr. Buckey explains how that helps make the transition smooth if transferring to adult care or switching healthcare systems.   [28:56] Dr. Buckey says things you need for a helpful transition are to know your medical history, your diagnoses and how they were made, your current medications and dosing, and medications or therapies you tried before that weren't successful for you.   [29:31] Dr. Buckey says, as we approach the era of precision medicine where we are treating each person in a different way, knowing what did or did not work for you is so helpful for your clinician so they can continue to help you feel good.   [29:49] Holly suggests a role-play. For example, if she's going to see Dr. Buckey with her records from Maine, which do not communicate with his EMR. What should she physically bring to the visit?   [30:23] Dr. Buckey says to know what health conditions she is being treated for. In Holly's case, they will talk about asthma and EoE.   [30:33] Dr. Buckey would like to know if Holly has ever been hospitalized for asthma, what inhalers she takes, what inhalers she tried before, and if she is on any biologic medicines, the doses and the frequency, and what she tried in the past.   [30:53] Dr. Buckey would ask if she's ever had breathing tests, called spirometry or pulmonary function tests.   [30:58] Having paper copies is wonderful. You can bring them in, and he will review them at the visit. Dr. Buckey always appreciates it when patients send them to him ahead of time, so he can review them and prepare for a successful first visit for both of them.   [31:18] Dr. Buckey says if we're talking about EoE, he will ask when the diagnosis was made, what symptoms led her or her parents to do that first endoscopy or see an allergist, immunologist, or gastroenterologist, when the most recent endoscopy was, and what medications she was on when she had her different endoscopies.   [31:40] Dr. Buckey says usually clinicians are keeping track of this, so Holly could ask them for copies of procedures she has had, the last two or three office visits, which are usually pretty comprehensive, and a list of any medications Holly takes.   [32:00] Holly appreciates having the ability to send paper records in advance. When Holly sets an appointment, she will fax Dr. Buckey some of her tests and important facts to look at before her appointment.   [32:20] Holly says some places won't look at the reports in advance, so she brings a bullet list with her of all the things Dr. Buckey listed for them to look at when she checks in to the appointment.   [32:39] Dr. Buckey responds that healthcare is very busy and some clinicians don't have the time to look at reports ahead of the visit, but can take five or ten minutes to look at them at the start of the visit to be successful and have a comprehensive visit.   [32:59] Ryan appreciates Holly's point to bring a bulleted list to the visit. Ryan is grateful that his parents kept his records organized throughout his life. For any caregivers listening, set your patients up for success by keeping track of these things over time.   [33:24] Ryan has a one-page summary he gives to all new providers of all his hospitalizations over the last 20 years, the medications he has been on, with date ranges, his diagnoses with dates, and different procedures and endoscopies.   [33:46] Ryan says that one-page summary is in 6-point font to squish it down to one page. It's helpful to have all that information organized together.   [33:55] Ryan invites caregivers: If you have a young patient and you're starting to think about the transition process, start keeping track of all that if you haven't before.   [34:03] Dr. Buckey says our health can be complicated. We can have periods when we're feeling great and periods when we're having more symptoms. Having it written down is an easy way to keep track so things don't get forgotten or lost.   [34:22] Dr. Buckey often says he appreciates when patients come in with that sort of list of their history because it shows how invested you are in your health and keeping yourself healthy. It's a wonderful way that you can be proactive.   [34:40] Ryan says it can feel like a big undertaking if you start now and you're in your 20s. Whenever you can start keeping track of how you're feeling and why, what treatment and symptoms you're having, it's good to have more information than less.   [34:58] Dr. Buckey says there's never a period when it's too late. If you are in your 30s or 40s and just starting out, it's very helpful. The provider can prompt you with questions that will help you recall things you had in the past and add them to the document.   [35:21] Ryan says it's a very collaborative process. Discuss it with your clinician, who may point out symptoms you should note.   [35:40] Ryan asks, when you are transitioning from pediatric to adult care, is it typical for an adult care provider to call a pediatric care provider with questions? Dr. Buckey says in his system, doctors have those conversations, which is a great asset to patients.   [36:33] Dr. Buckey says, for example, if I were not their pediatric allergist, but I would become their adult allergist, I would reach out to their pediatric allergist and ask details about their history. I would also reach out to their dermatologist and gastroenterologist.   [36:59] It's helpful to ask each other questions, know things to look out for, or things in a person's history that might be helpful as therapies and medications continue to advance that might be a good fit. It helps us to have a good comprehensive plan in place.   [37:26] Dr. Buckey says talking to each other helps to provide good longitudinal care.    [37:39] Ryan asks about having procedures and allergy testing in a pediatric setting and switching to a new provider. Do adult providers typically want to repeat testing?   [38:04] Dr. Buckey says it will depend on each person, when they were performed, and what was performed. If Dr. Buckey is seeing someone for food allergies, was skin or blood testing done last year or 10 or 20 years ago? Last year is pretty current. If it was 20 years ago and you're 22, your body is very different from when you were two.   [38:40] Dr. Buckey says if you have asthma and you had a breathing test two weeks ago, that's very recent. If you have not had a breathing test done in 10 years, I probably would repeat it on your first or second visit.   [38:56] Dr. Buckey says, for endoscopies, if you have EoE of another EGID, it would depend on timing. Was this done recently or in the remote past? Was it done on the current regimen you are on? Was it done on a different regimen?   [39:14] Dr. Buckey says I'm going to ask you if you're having any changes in symptoms recently. If anything has changed how you're feeling, it's probably going to prompt me to do a new set of testing and not just rely on the ones you had before.   [39:31] Dr. Buckey says, if you could bring the previous tests to me, I can compare. I can see what your endoscopy looks like now vs. two years ago. It's helpful to have that baseline to compare to.   [39:48] Dr. Buckey adds that knowing how you're feeling, or what's been done before, or your medical history, helps clinicians to take care of you as best we can.   [40:15] Holly says this is such a needed conversation. It will be helpful for our listeners, both practicing physicians and patients.   [40:37] Holly asks what advice Dr. Buckey gives for navigating challenges during the transition of care.   [40:51] Dr. Buckey says for every new EoE patient visit, he shares a link to the APFED website because there are such wonderful resources and references there. He explains to them what APFED is, and he provides resources to other websites or research that he thinks is helpful for them, depending on what each person is looking for.   [41:31] Talking with your doctor about what you are looking for is very helpful.   [41:38] In terms of the transition process, it's an exciting period. We're often going through a lot of big life changes. It could be our first time living away from our parents, having a job, or going to college.   [42:05] Know your own health. Learn about your body. We are the best advocates for ourselves. Only you know what you are feeling. Only you can tell your doctor what you're feeling. Taking ownership of your health will set you up for success for a healthy, long life, achieving your goals. Holly says that sums it up beautifully.    [42:40] Holly says for listeners who are feeling overwhelmed, unsure, or want to find out more about the transition, eoscare.apfed.org is a great site that helps you navigate healthcare for eosinophilic conditions. It also has a tab for building a care team.   [43:05] Ryan says it's great when the guest plugs APFED resources! For those who are looking to learn more about transition of care, please visit apfed.org and check out the links in the show notes below.   [43:25] If you're looking to find specialists, as you're going through this transition process, who treat eosinophilic disorders, we encourage you to use APFED's Specialist Finder, available at apfed.org/specialist.   [43:36] If you would like to hear some recent sessions from the 24th annual Eos Connection conference, we had a session focused on transition of care. Those are available on demand online.    [43:50] If you'd like to connect with others impacted by eosinophilic diseases, please join APFED's online community on the Inspire Network at apfed.org/connections.   [44:00] If you have personally been impacted by eosinophilic disorders and are interested in sharing your experiences, please check out apfed.org/shareyourstory.   [44:09] Ryan thanks Dr. Buckey for joining us today. It was such a great conversation. This will be so helpful for the community. Dr. Buckey says the work of this podcast and of APFED as a whole is so important.   [44:36] Dr. Buckey thanks all the patients and colleagues that he has. He has a job where he walks with a smile on his face every day. It's a privilege to take care of his patients and work with his colleagues. Thank you all for listening today.   [44:56] Holly thanks APFED's Education Partners AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda for supporting this episode.   Mentioned in This Episode:   APFED on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram Real Talk: Eosinophilic Diseases Podcast apfed.orgapfed.org/specialist apfed.org/connections eoscare.apfed.org Eos Connection 2026 Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy Healthcare Transition Timeline Toolkit Education Partners: This episode of APFED's podcast is brought to you thanks to the support of AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Takeda.   Tweetables (Edited):   "I am trained in medical ethics, and I utilize that approach, particularly in shared decision-making, trying to understand my patients' goals and values for their health, … and making a plan that works for them." — Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE   "During this [transition] process, our overarching goal is for an individual to begin to develop ownership of their health so that they can take care of their medications, schedule appointments, and know their bodies." — Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE   "Having a strict age cutoff may ignore the unique aspects of each person and their history. I generally begin that conversation [about transition of care] in the teenage years through the early 20s." — Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE   "Healthcare is very busy, and some clinicians don't have the time to look [at reports] ahead of time, but often, we can take five or ten minutes to look at them at the start of the visit … to be successful and have a comprehensive visit." — Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE   "We are the best advocates for ourselves. Only you know what you are feeling inside. Only you can tell your doctor what you're feeling. Taking ownership of your health will set you up for success for a healthy long life, achieving your goals." — Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE   Guest Bio: Timothy Buckey, MD, MBE, is an allergy and immunology attending physician with a joint faculty position at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and a secondary academic appointment in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Dr. Buckey completed his allergy and immunology fellowship training at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. He attended Georgetown University School of Medicine. He also received a Master of Bioethics from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.   Several of Dr. Buckey's research interests include eosinophilic esophagitis, food allergy, medical ethics, and improving access to medical care for vulnerable populations. He was the lead author on one of the largest studies evaluating the rate of eosinophilic esophagitis during food allergy oral immunotherapy. Dr. Buckey was also the lead author on the pivotal 2024 food allergy study, which utilized allergist-performed oral food challenges to demonstrate there are no differences in food allergy outcomes based on race or ethnicity. Dr Buckey has also become a pioneer in investigating the intersection of medical ethics with allergy and immunology. Dr. Buckey developed the first comprehensive ethical framework for the specialty of allergy and immunology to assist clinicians with navigating ethically complex decisions in their clinical practices. He utilizes this patient-centered approach in the clinic when caring for patients with allergic and immunologic conditions of all ages.   Website profile: pennmedicine.org/providers/timothy-buckey

Assisted suicide is a contested issue in American law and medicine, raising questions over individual autonomy, patient rights, medical ethics, and government interests in protecting life. Federal law prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for services intended to cause or assist a death, but this prohibition does not apply to ordinary palliative care.With several states legalizing physician-assisted suicide and more considering doing the same, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requested information in a recent proposed rule on the overlap between “medical aid in dying” (MAID) and Medicare-funded hospice care. CMS sought information about how it can ensure compliance with federal law, promote program integrity, and safeguard against fraud in states where assisted suicide is legal.This raises broader questions, including about how policymakers distinguish between comfort care at the end of life and practices intended to hasten death. Join us for a panel examining the current legal and regulatory landscape surrounding assisted suicide in the United States.Featuring:Alexander Raikin, Visiting Fellow in Bioethics, Ethics and Public Policy CenterDr. Jeffrey A. Singer, Senior Fellow, Cato Institute(Moderator) Dan Troy, Managing Director, Berkeley Research Group

Today's Guests: Ann Bauer - Novelist, essayist and co-founder of Storylīz Charlie Camosy - Professor of Moral Theology & Bioethics, author, and editor Lauren Lintner - "Week in Review"See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 2006, the Institute of Medicine published From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, concluding that millions of Americans were surviving cancer only to find themselves navigating a healthcare system unprepared for life after treatment. The report challenged oncology to recognize that curing cancer was not the end of care, but the beginning of survivorship.This episode explores how the growing cancer survivorship movement exposed the long-term consequences of cancer treatment that medicine had largely overlooked. As survival rates improved following the National Cancer Act of 1971, millions of survivors faced chronic fatigue, neuropathy, infertility, cognitive impairment, financial hardship, employment discrimination, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. These were not rare complications. They became defining features of survivorship for many patients.Drawing on the work of oncologist Dr. Patricia Ganz, survivor advocate Ellen Stovall, and researchers, clinicians, and survivors across the country, the episode examines how survivorship research expanded beyond recurrence and mortality to include quality of life, psychosocial care, rehabilitation, and long-term follow-up. Their efforts helped establish survivorship care plans, multidisciplinary survivorship clinics, and a broader understanding that cancer affects every aspect of a person's life long after treatment ends.The episode also confronts persistent inequities in survivorship care. Insurance coverage often ends when treatment stops, supportive services remain inconsistent, financial toxicity continues to drive medical hardship, and racial, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities still influence who receives comprehensive follow-up care. For many survivors, finishing treatment simply marks the beginning of another struggle.Modern oncology increasingly recognizes that surviving cancer is measured by more than years of life. It is also measured by quality of life, dignity, access to care, and the ability to rebuild a future after treatment. That evolution remains one of the most significant legacies of the cancer survivorship movement.RELATED LINKSNational Academy of Medicine | ⁠From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition⁠National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Survivorship⁠American Society of Clinical Oncology | Survivorship Compendium⁠CancerCare⁠HopeWell Cancer Support⁠National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this session, attendees will be equipped to navigate the discernment process of identifying the best-fit sending agency for them.

In 1967, breast surgeon Dr. Harold P. Freeman arrived at Harlem Hospital expecting to treat cancer. Instead, he confronted a healthcare system where poverty, racism, lack of insurance, and institutional barriers often determined who lived long enough to receive treatment. Patients frequently arrived with advanced disease, not because medicine lacked answers, but because access to care had failed them.This episode explores how cancer survivorship expanded beyond medical breakthroughs to include healthcare access, health equity, and organized advocacy. Building on the early work of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS), it examines the recognition that surviving cancer depended not only on research, but also on whether patients could navigate a fragmented healthcare system.Freeman responded by creating one of the nation's first patient navigation programs at Harlem Hospital in 1990. Community-based navigators helped patients overcome practical barriers including insurance, transportation, appointments, communication, and fear. The model dramatically improved timely diagnosis and treatment, increased breast cancer survival in Harlem, and ultimately inspired the Patient Navigator Outreach and Chronic Disease Prevention Act of 2005, establishing navigation as a cornerstone of modern oncology care.The episode also follows cancer survivor Ellen Stovall, whose leadership transformed survivorship into a national policy movement. Through the NCCS, she united advocates across cancer types, fought for insurance protections, expanded access to clinical trials, helped shape the creation of the Office of Cancer Survivorship at the National Cancer Institute, and organized the landmark 1998 National March for Cancer Survivorship in Washington, D.C. Her work reframed survivorship as a public policy issue rather than a personal experience.Together, Freeman and Stovall demonstrated that scientific progress alone could not eliminate disparities in cancer outcomes. Their work established two enduring principles that continue to shape oncology today: patients need someone to help them navigate care, and survivors must have a voice in the policies that govern it. Modern cancer survivorship depends on both.RELATED LINKSNational Coalition for Cancer Survivorship⁠Harold P. Freeman Patient Navigation Institute⁠National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Survivorship⁠Patient Navigator Outreach and Chronic Disease Prevention Act of 2005⁠American Cancer Society⁠Tuskegee Study Timeline | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Tuesday, August 18, 2026 It's Tuesday and we have a great show in store for you. Host Kerby Anderson opens the show with a couple of stories from the headlines, and then he speaks with Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, Director of Bioethics, Technology, and Human Flourishing Program at Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC). They'll talk […]

This seminar, which originally aired on April 4, 2025, explores common epistemological frameworks underpinning global health initiatives in the Global South. These frameworks raise ethical concerns, as they often sustain research, education, and medical delivery that generate conflicts with local realities shaped by distinct worldviews. Drawing from liberation theology, which emphasizes the preferential option for the poor and the liberation of marginalized communities from systemic oppression, the presentation highlights the need for an "epistemic liberation" built in a process from below. This involves challenging dominant Western paradigms and embracing locally rooted knowledge systems. The presentation raises the question of whether such an epistemic liberation is necessary for global health initiatives to truly promote health in a way that empowers and fosters the independence of local communities. Alexandre A. Martins is a Brazilian theologian and bioethicist, serving as an associate professor in the Department of Theology and the College of Nursing at Marquette University in Wisconsin. His research focuses on bioethics and global health from a liberating perspective, specializing in healthcare ethics and social ethics, particularly in public health, global health, community-based approaches, and Catholic social teaching. His scholarship spans diverse areas, with his most recent books including Christology and Global Ethics: Encountering the Poor in a Pluralist Reality (Paulist Press, 2023) and A Prophet to the People: Paul Farmer's Witness and Theological Ethics (Pickwick Press, 2023), co-edited with Jannie W. Block and M. Therese Lysaught. He is currently working on the project, Bioethics from a New Lens: Foundations, Liberation, and Global Public Health, and serving as president of the Brazilian Society of Moral Theology.

In this TMC Seminar, live-streamed October 6, 2023 from TMC's annual conference Practice & Presence, Dr. Devah Stahl is interviewed by Dr. Warren Kinghorn, Co-Director of the Theology, Medicine, and Culture Initiative at Duke Divinity School. Devan Stahl is an Associate Professor of Bioethics and Religion at Baylor University and Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Education, Innovation, and Technology at the Baylor College of Medicine. She received her Ph.D. in Health Care Ethics from St. Louis University and her M.Div. from Vanderbilt University. She specializes in disability theology, bioethics, and the visual arts within medicine. Dr. Stahl also volunteers clinical ethicist consultant for the Supportive and Palliative Care Team at Baylor, Scott, and White Hillcrest and has trained as a hospital chaplain. She is the author of, Disability's Challenge to Theology: Genes, Eugenics, and the Metaphysics of Modern Medicine (Notre Dame Press), which develops a Christian response to genetic technologies using the insights of disability scholars. Dr. Stahl also hosts the popular podcast Bioethics for the People, which explores the work of bioethicists for a general audience.

Welcome to a very, very, very special bonus episode of Out of Patients, and one unlike anything published on this feed before. For nearly 20 years, Matthew Zachary has handed these microphones to patients, caregivers, doctors, advocates, troublemakers, and people with something worth saying. This time, he handed them to his daughter. Hannah Greenzweig grew up around this show, and now she has commandeered the studio with 3 of her wonderfully creative high school friends to talk about something they built entirely themselves. There is an enormous amount of Dad Pride baked into this episode, along with the strange and wonderful realization that sometimes your kid grows up, takes your chair, takes your microphone, and produces a better show without you.Hannah Greenzweig, Michael Aidinov, Gwendolyn Baldini, and Astronomy are student artists from the Roundabout Youth Ensemble at James Madison High School in Brooklyn. Working alongside teaching artists from Roundabout Theatre Company, they spent a school year creating an original play from the ground up, writing every scene, developing every character, and producing the performance themselves.Instead of discussing a Broadway production, they dissect one they invented.Their play, Subject Matter, began with a room full of improbable ideas. Murderous bounce houses, pirate family sagas, underwater adventures, courtroom dance battles, and birthday parties at math museums all competed before the group settled on an absurd rivalry between New York's fictional History Museum and Math Museum. From there, they built a fully staged comedy about institutional competition, sabotage, oversized personalities, and the unexpected discovery that history and mathematics need each other more than either side wants to admit.The conversation pulls back the curtain on a creative process most audiences never see. The students explain how scenes evolved through constant rewrites, how characters emerged from improvisation, how costumes came together with last minute ingenuity, and how rehearsals often collapsed into uncontrollable laughter. They recount cutting favorite ideas, solving production problems with limited resources, and trusting each other enough to keep rewriting until the story worked.The episode also captures something harder to script: teenagers speaking honestly about collaboration without adults translating their experience. They celebrate classmates who stepped into unexpected roles, teachers who quietly held the production together, and the strange joy of creating something that exists only because everyone showed up.It is a conversation about theater, friendship, education, creativity, and what happens when 4 young artists get the microphones and the adults get out of the way.RELATED LINKSRoundabout Theatre CompanyRoundabout Youth EnsembleJames Madison High SchoolFEEDBACKLike this bonus episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Today, Brent is joined by Dr. Arthur Caplan, a leading bioethicist, to discuss how ethics should shape the future of longevity medicine, artificial intelligence, and healthcare innovation. They discuss the promise and pitfalls of extending human lifespan, the responsibilities that come with new medical breakthroughs, and why scientific progress is only meaningful if it improves people's lives. The conversation also tackles controversial topics like organ donation, health misinformation, and government-mandated COVID vaccines, as Dr. Caplan shares his perspective on how society should navigate the next generation of medical advances. He's a terrific guest, hope you enjoy.

In this episode, Kim Daniels, Michael Baggot, Erin D. Dumbacher, and Brian Green discuss Pope Leo XIV's encyclical on artificial intelligence and human dignity.   Host: Kim Daniels, Director, Initiative on Catholic Social Thought and Public Life, Georgetown University   Guests: Michael Baggot, Associate Professor of Bioethics, Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum; Adjunct Professor of Theology, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas-Angelicum   Erin D. Dumbacher, Stanton Nuclear Security Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations   Brian Green, Director of Technology Ethics at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University   Want more comprehensive analysis of global news and events sent straight to your inbox? Subscribe to CFR's The World This Week newsletter.   To keep tabs on all CFR events, visit cfr.org/event. To watch this event, please visit it on our YouTube channel: CFR 7/30 Religion and Foreign Policy Webinar: Pope Leo XIV and Human Dignity in the Age of AI

A man is struck by a car on the streets of Los Angeles. In the emergency department, a CT scan ordered to look for traumatic injuries reveals something nobody expected: a mass in his colon. Days later, sitting across from Dr. Belinda Waltman, he calls the accident “a blessing in disguise.” Then he changes the subject. He is less worried about cancer than about whether he can afford to miss another day of work. In this season finale of Standard Deviation, host Dr. Oliver Bogler explores what happens when biomedical science collides with the realities of the healthcare safety net. Dr. Waltman, a primary care physician in Los Angeles County, specializes in expedited cancer workups for uninsured and underinsured patients. Every diagnosis arrives carrying another set of questions about housing, transportation, food insecurity, wages, and survival that rarely appear in medical records or scientific literature. For years, Waltman carried those stories without knowing how to bring them into the academic record. As a full-time clinician without a research lab, grant funding, or publication pipeline, she faced barriers familiar to many working scientists and physicians whose most important observations happen outside traditional research settings. With support from the Life Science Editors Foundation's JEDI program, those experiences became The Margins Matter, a narrative medicine essay published in JAMA that argues the social realities surrounding cancer care are not background details. They are part of the disease itself. Bogler traces how editorial mentorship transformed lived clinical experience into published scholarship while asking a larger question about who gets to shape the scientific record. The conversation examines cancer care, Medicaid, health-related social needs, medical publishing, and the structural incentives that determine which stories become evidence and which disappear from view.The result is a conversation about documentation, visibility, and why the margins of medicine often determine who survives long enough to benefit from its advances.RELATED LINKSDr. Belinda Waltman⁠The Margins Matter | JAMA⁠The Margins Matter | PubMed⁠Life Science Editors Foundation⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Guest host Rebekah Haynie talks with Heather Zeiger of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity the case of Baby Gabriel, a child who was brought to be through a surrogacy. But since he has a heart defect, the couple who would receive the baby requested him to be aborted before he was born.  The carrying mother refused and fled.  From a Christian viewpoint, what are the moral and ethical issues.  Licensed counselor Debra Fileta, author of "People Skills," helps us work on our listening skills.  You can learn to listen better! The Reconnect with Carmen and all Faith Radio podcasts are made possible by your support. Give now: Click here

In 1986, 23 survivors, physicians, nurses, attorneys, and community organizers gathered in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for a weekend that would permanently change the language and politics of cancer. Working late into the night, they debated not only strategy, but identity, ultimately declaring that from the moment of diagnosis, every person with cancer is a survivor.This episode traces the social and political forces that gave birth to the modern cancer survivorship movement. As advances in early detection and treatment allowed more people to live beyond cancer, survivors discovered that finishing treatment did not mean returning to normal life. Many faced employment discrimination, loss of insurance, social stigma, infertility, chronic health complications, and a healthcare system that viewed survival as the end of care rather than the beginning of a new chapter.Against the backdrop of the civil rights, disability rights, and community health movements of the 1960s and 1970s, physicians, activists, and survivors challenged medicine's paternalistic culture and demanded a greater voice in decisions affecting their lives. Central to this story are physician and survivor Dr. Fitzhugh Mullan, whose landmark 1985 essay, Seasons of Survival, redefined survivorship as a lifelong continuum, and community organizer Katherine Logan, whose determination united dozens of grassroots organizations into what became the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.The coalition's founding established principles that continue to shape oncology today. Survivors were no longer defined solely by disease or treatment outcomes. Their experiences became evidence. Their voices became essential to clinical research, healthcare policy, and patient advocacy. By redefining survivorship as an ongoing experience rather than a destination, the movement challenged medicine to recognize the lasting physical, emotional, financial, and social consequences of cancer.The ideas forged during that weekend in Albuquerque became the foundation of modern cancer survivorship. Nearly 40 years later, the coalition's defining principle, that survivorship begins at diagnosis, continues to influence cancer care, research, policy, and the way millions of people understand life after cancer.RELATED LINKSNational Coalition for Cancer Survivorship⁠National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Survivorship⁠The New England Journal of Medicine⁠Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA.gov)⁠Library of Congress | Civil Rights History Project⁠White Coat, Clenched Fist by Fitzhugh Mullan⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This special episode features the Munk Debate on the Gene Editing, held before a live audience of 800 students and faculty at Deerfield Academy in April 2026.Arguing in favour of the motion was the biophysicist, best-selling author, biotechnology entrepreneur, and the former director of the Program on Medicine, Technology and Society at UCLA School of Medicine, Gregory Stock. His debate partner was the internationally acclaimed strategic philosopher and pioneering transhumanist Max More. Arguing against the motion was the prominent American bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel, Special Advisor to the Director General of the WHO and a former founding chair of the Department of Bioethics at the NIH. His debate partner wass the award-winning educator, author, and Professor of Reproductive Science at University College London, Joyce Harper.Become a Munk Donor ($50 annually) to get 72-hour advanced access to the full length editions of Friday Focus and Munk Dialogues. Go to www.munkdebates.com to sign up. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a world that feels more anxious, divided, and uncertain than ever, many of us are searching for a way to find calm, clarity, and inner peace. Dr. Stephen Post offers a science-based roadmap to cultivating love, resilience, and harmony. He draws on decades of research, real-world examples, and practical exercises, to show how embracing the power of unconditional love —. toward ourselves and others — can transform not just our hearts, but our communities and the world. Dr. Post is a researcher, speaker, and author, whose work has inspired countless people to live with more meaning, compassion, and connection. He is the founder and President of the Institute for Research on Unlimited Love, and the founding Director of the Center for Medical Humanities, Compassionate Care, and Bioethics at the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University. His new book is, Pure Unlimited Love: Science and the Seven Paths to Inner Peace

In 1971, President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act, transforming cancer research with an unprecedented federal investment and launching what became known as the War on Cancer. The legislation did not emerge from scientific discovery alone. It was the culmination of decades of relentless advocacy by researchers, philanthropists, journalists, and patients who believed cancer demanded the same national commitment that had put astronauts on the Moon.This episode traces the origins of the cancer survivorship movement by returning to a time when cancer was rarely discussed in public, many physicians withheld diagnoses from their patients, and surgery offered few lasting cures. It follows the pioneering work of pathologist Dr. Sidney Farber, whose early chemotherapy research challenged conventional thinking, and Mary Lasker, whose political strategy, fundraising, and public campaigns helped transform cancer from a private tragedy into a national public health priority. Together, they built the coalition that reshaped federal support for oncology research and forever changed the relationship between science, government, and the American public.The story then turns to journalist and breast cancer survivor Rose Kushner, whose refusal to accept the standard one-step radical mastectomy challenged nearly a century of surgical dogma. Working alongside surgeon Dr. Bernard Fisher, Kushner helped bring evidence-based medicine to breast cancer treatment through randomized clinical trials that demonstrated less invasive surgery could achieve equivalent outcomes. Their efforts changed clinical practice, strengthened informed consent, and helped establish the principle that patients should participate in decisions about their own care.The breakthroughs explored in this episode extended far beyond new treatments. They redefined the role of patients in medicine, accelerated clinical research, and laid the foundation for modern cancer survivorship. The movement that followed would not simply help more people live longer. It would change what surviving cancer meant.RELATED LINKSNational Cancer Institute⁠National Cancer Act of 1971⁠American Cancer Society⁠Dana-Farber Cancer Institute⁠National Library of Medicine⁠The New England Journal of Medicine⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Please send any questions to podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

by Christian Medical & Dental Associations® In this episode of Faith in Healthcare, we’re sharing a talk Dr. Brick Lantz, CMDA’s Vice President of Advocacy and Bioethics, delivered at the Colson Center National Conference in Knoxville, Tennessee. His subject is one every healthcare professional has felt firsthand: the erosion of trust in American medicine, especially in the years since the pandemic. Rather than pointing to better policies or messaging as the fix, Brick argues that rebuilding trust begins with something deeper, a return to a biblical understanding of truth and the conviction that every patient bears the image of God. Grounded in Scripture and shaped by his years in clinical practice, this message will challenge and encourage you wherever you serve.

Civic friendship is not a nicety. For self-governing people, it is a necessity. What happens to a democracy when citizens stop seeing each other as citizens at all? Robert P. George is Princeton's McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions (and known for his enduring friendship with Cornel West) argues that “the collapse of civic friendship is a catastrophic threat to public life.” In this bonus segment from his November 2020 conversation with Evan Rosa, Robert George presents the difference between civility and mere ‘politesse; the habit of wrapping our emotions so tightly around our convictions that we assume a posture of infallibility; and the intellectual humility it takes to consider that a political enemy might have something to teach us as a civic friend. They also discuss the courage required to break ranks—George recounts how he and West, from opposite political poles, each found themselves treated as heretics in 2016 for declining to back their respective party's nominee—and why he urges his students and his own children to cultivate humility, open-mindedness, and courage, knowing exactly what it can cost to stand by a conscientious belief. Episode Highlights ”Civic friendship is actually important for all sorts of policies, but for a self-governing people, for a democratic people, civic friendship is really critically important.” ”But if we do, as we are prone to do, wrap our emotions too tightly around our convictions, then we become dogmatists. Then we become unwilling to consider the possibility that we might be wrong and that a critic might be right.” ”This is hard, but it takes humility to recognize that I might be wrong, not merely about the less important superficial and more trivial things of life, but I might be wrong even about the most important things.” ”Civic friendship, civility is not just politesse … Civility is something deeper. It is genuinely listening to the guy who disagrees with you … listening with an openness to learning, considering whether in fact he might be right.” ”You can't have an open mind unless you have intellectual humility.” ”You can become a heretic very fast by breaking ranks, even on a single issue, if the issue was even moderately important.” ”So I really encourage my young people … to try to develop the virtues of intellectual humility, open-mindedness, and courage, because sometimes courage is going to be needed.” About Robert P. George Robert P. George is the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. A legal philosopher and public intellectual, he has chaired the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and served on the President's Council on Bioethics and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. His books include ”Making Men Moral,” ”In Defense of Natural Law,” and ”Seeking Truth and Speaking Truth,” and, with Cornel West, ”Truth Matters,” a dialogue on fruitful disagreement. A West Virginia native, he plays bluegrass banjo and guitar. Helpful Links and Resources Civic Friendship, Courageous Humility, and Seeking Truth Together, Episode 38 and the full interview for this clip: https://faith.yale.edu/media/civic-friendship-courageous-humility-and-seeking-truth-together Robert P. George's website: https://robertpgeorge.com/ Robert P. George on X: https://twitter.com/McCormickProf Seeking Truth and Speaking Truth: Law and Morality in Our Cultural Moment, George's most recent book: https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/seeking-truth-speaking-truth/ Truth Matters: A Dialogue on Fruitful Disagreement in an Age of Division, by Robert P. George and Cornel West: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Truth-Matters/Robert-P-George/9798888451700 Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality, George's best-known scholarly book: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/making-men-moral-9780198260240 Election of 1800, from the Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia at Monticello: https://www.monticello.org/encyclopedia/election-1800 Show Notes Civic friendship: indispensable and necessary for a self-governing people Fellow citizens recast as enemies to be defeated and destroyed Are elections as existential contests?—with the losing side expecting retaliation, the winning side claiming the norms Breakdown near the founding of the Republic The election of 1800, incumbent John Adams against Thomas Jefferson: https://www.monticello.org/encyclopedia/election-1800 Federalists seeing Jeffersonians as carriers of the French Revolution; Jeffersonians seeing Federalists as would-be British monarchists Antebellum America: North and South unable to imagine sharing one republic Is our identity constructed around belief? Emotional investment in conviction as a good thing in itself Wrapping emotions too tightly, and the slide into dogmatism A practical posture of infallibility Disagreement recoded as moral defect, and friendship ruled out Intellectual humility as the missing virtue Being wrong about the most important things, not just the trivial ones Civility as more than politesse Listening with an openness to learning, not waiting for a turn to speak Honoring the other as a rational creature with something to teach Open-mindedness without paralysis A conservative and a democratic socialist as frequent interlocutors: https://www.cornelwest.com/about/ Courage as a civic virtue Tribalism in formal institutions and informal friend circles alike Becoming a heretic by breaking ranks on a single issue Excommunication, suspicion, and the social cost of independent thought Two friends at opposite poles, both out of step in 2016 Counsel to students and to his own children: humility, open-mindedness, courage #CivicFriendship #IntellectualHumility #Civility #Polarization #RobertPGeorge #CornelWest #FaithAndCulture #ForTheLifeOfTheWorld Production Notes This podcast featured Robert George Hosted and Produced by Evan Rosa Production assistance and editing by Noah Senthil A Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/about Support For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/give

Long before cancer survivors organized into a movement, Hollywood had already shaped how Americans understood the disease. Films rarely used the word “cancer,” physicians often withheld diagnoses from patients, and the people who survived were almost nowhere to be found on screen.Recorded before The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship became a documentary series, this bonus conversation explores where the project first began. Matthew Zachary sits down with his mother, Roz Greenzweig, a retired educator and lifelong film enthusiast whose memories of classic cinema became an unexpected lens for understanding how cancer was portrayed throughout the twentieth century.Together, they revisit landmark films including Dark Victory, Love Story, and other iconic portrayals that reflected an era when cancer was treated as unspeakable, inevitable, and almost always fatal. Their conversation contrasts those carefully constructed Hollywood narratives with the lived reality of a family confronting a brain cancer diagnosis in 1995, revealing how popular culture both reflected and reinforced the fears surrounding the disease.The discussion also foreshadows many of the themes explored throughout the documentary series: the evolution of patient advocacy, the emergence of cancer survivorship, the role of caregivers, and the power of storytelling to influence public understanding. Before policy changed, before advocacy organizations grew into national movements, conversations like these were already challenging long-held assumptions about what cancer looked like and who had the right to tell its story.Consider this the prologue to The Cancer Mavericks. Before the movement found its history, it began with a family trying to make sense of the stories they had inherited.RELATED LINKSAmerican Cancer Society⁠National Cancer Institute⁠American Film Institute⁠ER (NBC)⁠50/50 (Official)⁠Chasing Life (ABC Family Archive)⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review The Cancer Mavericks: A History of Survivorship on your favorite podcast platform. For more information, visit CancerMavericks.com. Questions? Email podcasts@matthewzachary.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Adam Lane Smith sits down with Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, psychiatrist, medical ethicist, and author of Making the Cut, to break down what modern psychiatry is getting catastrophically wrong, why the chemical imbalance model is not just incomplete but actively harmful, and what actually heals people when medications and therapy alone are not enough. What you will learn in this video: 1- Why reducing mental illness to a chemical imbalance in the brain has produced a generation of people who believe they will never get better  2- Why psychiatrists are seeing numbers on a sheet instead of people and what the system that created that looks like from the inside  3- Why physical activity four times a week is as effective as antidepressants for mild to moderate depression and why nobody tells patients that  4- Why relationships are the single strongest predictor of outcomes even in the most severe mental illnesses including schizophrenia  5- Why people in third world countries with schizophrenia often do better than people in industrialized nations and what that reveals  6- Why modern life has become voluntary solitary confinement and why dopamine binges have replaced human connection  7- Why the loneliness epidemic cannot be solved by more therapists and what actually has to happen instead  8- What Dr. Kheriaty would change about American psychiatry if he had absolute power and control If you have ever been handed a prescription and sent home and felt like something essential was being missed, this conversation will show you exactly what that something was.

My returning guest this week is Jeff Sebo, associate professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliated Professor of Bioethics, Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and Law, Director of the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection, Director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy, and Co-Director of the Wild Animal Welfare Program at New York University. He's recently coauthored two articles on AI Welfare, taking AI welfare seriously in 2024 and Studying AI Welfare Empirically. We discuss the challenges of getting people to care about this issue and what it might mean if non-sentient AI are still moral patients.Taking AI Welfare Seriously: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00986Studying AI Welfare Empirically: https://nonhumanminds.org/studying-ai-welfare-empirically/?trk=public_post_comment-textMusic by GW RodriguezEditing by Adam WikSibling Pod:Philosophers in Space: https://0gphilosophy.libsyn.com/Support us at Patreon.com/EmbraceTheVoidIf you enjoy the show, please Like and Review us on your pod app, especially iTunes. It really helps!This show is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.org.Next Episode: Moral Realism with Allegedly Ian

Rebecca Bloom is a former employee benefits and executive compensation attorney who spent more than 25 years helping women navigate cancer, work, insurance, disability coverage, and financial survival. She is the founder and author of When Women Get Sick, a book built from decades inside the legal, workplace, and patient advocacy systems most people only discover after diagnosis.Bloom started in Big Law at Simpson Thacher handling employee benefits and compensation work she originally chose to pay off student loans. Then her mother was diagnosed with breast cancer. Suddenly the language she used in corporate law offices became the language of survival at home. Explanation of benefits forms. Coverage disputes. Second opinions. Disability protections. Medical leave. Bills no one could explain.That collision changed the direction of her life.In this episode, Bloom explains how serious illness quietly turns patients into unpaid administrators managing paperwork, logistics, financial risk, and emotional labor while trying to survive treatment. She breaks down how employer based health insurance shapes nearly every aspect of cancer care in America and why women often carry the invisible burden of protecting everyone else from discomfort while they themselves fall apart.The conversation digs into workplace power, the illusion of the healthcare “safety net,” caregiver exhaustion, and the class divide hiding underneath patient empowerment culture. Bloom explains why educated, insured women with resources still struggle to navigate healthcare bureaucracy and what happens to patients without those advantages.This episode explores cancer care, health insurance, employee benefits, patient advocacy, workplace protections, caregiving, and the structural incentives that force sick people to become project managers of their own survival.RELATED LINKSRebecca BloomWhen Women Get SickBay Area Cancer ConnectionsSimpson Thacher & BartlettFEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Wesley J. Smith of the Discovery Institute Wesley Smith’s National Review Columns Culture of Death: The Age of “Do Harm” Medicine Forced Exit: Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and the New Duty to DieThe post A Bioethics Update – Wesley Smith, 7/23/26 (2043) first appeared on Issues, Etc..

Heather Zeiger of Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity joins to talk about the latest updates on recent health headlines, such as flash flooding in Texas, the air quality in northern Minnesota and Canada, and the cyclosporiasis outbreak. Josh Moody closes the show with a conversation about his new book, "Unframed: Conversations that Take the Gospel out of the Box." This book deconstructs faith and presents it honestly. In a culture that is constantly rebranding Christianity, we need to present it as it is—with the true Gospel message.  The Reconnect with Carmen and all Faith Radio are made possible by your support. Give now: Click here

Vasanta Pundarika built her career inside healthcare investment banking before launching Lotuspring, an advisory firm focused on women's health and behavioral health. She spent nearly 20 years advising healthcare systems, treatment providers, and growth stage companies on mergers, financing, and operational strategy while watching the industry repeatedly misunderstand the people it claimed to serve.The conversation starts unexpectedly with anthropology, bread, and language. Vasanta explains how she spent years changing the pronunciation of her own name to make other people comfortable before eventually reclaiming it. That thread opens into a much larger discussion about adaptation, identity, and what institutions quietly train people to tolerate.From there, the discussion moves into behavioral health, women delaying care, and the invisible labor that healthcare business models routinely ignore. During COVID, Vasanta noticed men's behavioral health units refilled faster than women's units. The reason had nothing to do with demand. Women were still home managing caregiving responsibilities, children, aging parents, and households while their own mental health collapsed in the background.The episode examines what happens when healthcare companies become “snazzy big brands” before building real clinical substance underneath. Vasanta describes the tension between mission and margin inside healthcare startups, private equity backed care models, and behavioral health expansion. The conversation pushes on who benefits when healthcare scales aggressively, who absorbs the operational pressure, and how patient trust erodes long before executives notice it on a dashboard.They also discuss patient advocacy culture, anthropology as systems analysis, healthcare capitalism, prior authorization, investor language, and why some clinically excellent companies never survive long enough to scale.RELATED LINKSVasanta PundarikaLotuspringWomen's Health HorizonsSakhi for South Asian SurvivorsNACDPrinceton University Anthropology DepartmentFEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Marking the 135th anniversary of Rerum novarum (reh-rum no-va-rum), Pope Leo the 14th released his first encyclical, entitled ‘Magnifica humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence.'Father Michael Baggot, Associate Professor of Bioethics at the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum (Pon-ti-fi-cal Athen-nee-um Regeena A-posto-lorum) and P. Bracy Bersnak, Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and Economics at Christendom College joined us for this timely and important conversion on AI and the Pope.Support the show

On this episode of The Karol Markowicz Show, Karol sits down with Jonathan Hammel—physician, novelist, composer, and host of the Blood Flow podcast—to discuss his powerful new novel, The Jewish Hospital. Inspired by the real-life experiences of Hamill's grandmother, who served as a nurse in Berlin's Jewish Hospital during World War II, the conversation explores one of history's lesser-known stories: how a Jewish hospital continued operating in Nazi Berlin while doctors, nurses, and patients lived under constant threat of deportation. Jonathan explains how years of research, family interviews, and historical records shaped the novel, while also examining the difficult ethical questions medical professionals faced under unimaginable circumstances. He also discusses why the book is being taught in medical bioethics programs, what modern healthcare can learn from history, and why he believes authentic human creativity will remain essential—even in the age of artificial intelligence.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Brad Power spent years advising major corporations on systems design, process engineering, and decision making before lymphoma shoved him into the patient side of American healthcare. Instead of accepting the experience at face value, he started reverse engineering the machinery around cancer itself. Brad is the founder of Cancer Patient Lab and Open Cancer AI, two projects built around a blunt reality most patients discover too late: the healthcare system rewards people who know how to navigate it. Everyone else risks getting steamrolled by information asymmetry, insurance barriers, administrative friction, and institutional incentives designed around efficiency instead of human survival.The conversation starts with Harvard Business Review and Tumblr blogs before moving directly into the darker architecture underneath modern cancer care. Power explains how hospitals optimize for throughput, how insurance companies reward operational consistency over personalized medicine, and why many patients quietly end up needing a crash course in oncology, reimbursement policy, and behavioral psychology while fighting for their lives.The discussion digs into CAR-T therapy, functional testing, AI assisted decision support, and the growing collision between personalized medicine and standardized care pathways. Power argues that engaged patients often get better outcomes because they learn how to push for off guideline treatments, contest denials, and ask smarter questions. The counterpoint lands hard: patients should never have needed to become experts in the first place.The episode also explores the cultural consequences of AI entering cancer care. OpenAI advertising, data privacy, trust erosion, pharmaceutical influence, and “agentic AI” all collide inside a healthcare economy already drowning in distrust. Power sees artificial intelligence as a force multiplier for patient literacy and access. The larger system still decides who gets approved, who gets delayed, and who gets left behind.By the end, the conversation lands exactly where modern healthcare keeps forcing people to land: survival increasingly depends on learning how the machine works before the machine works on you.RELATED LINKSBrad PowerCancer Patient LabOpen Cancer AIHarvard Business ReviewResearch to the PeopleCAR T Cell TherapyFEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Learning Leader Show with Ryan Hawk www.LearningLeader.com New Book - The Price of Becoming - www.LearningLeader.com/Becoming This is brought to you by Insight Global. If you need to hire one person, hire a team of people, or transform your business through Talent or Technical Services, Insight Global's team of 30,000 people around the world has the hustle and grit to deliver. My guest: Ezekiel J. "Zeke" Emanuel, MD, PhD, is a prominent oncologist, bioethicist, and health policy expert. Currently Vice Provost for Global Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, he was instrumental in shaping the Affordable Care Act and served as the founding chair of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health. Key Learnings Zeke's dad was called "Speedy." He was a Chicago pediatrician who worked 24-hour call, walked so fast the nurses had to run to keep up, and had a rule: the fourth child in any family was free. He recognized the financial strain on families and just wouldn't charge. Zeke's mom was the definition of the anti-helicopter parent. At the playground, she sat on the bench. At the beach, she dropped the boys off with a blanket and a snack. "You go play. Something goes wrong? Okay, that's how it goes." That's how three future powerhouse leaders learned to negotiate, create, and figure it out. The Emanuel brothers' group text is full of bragging. Zeke posted his 51.9 VO2 max score at 68 years old, asking, "Do I win in the family?" His kids replied that they don't even read the articles Zeke and Rahm forward anymore. Close doesn't mean uncompetitive. A dozen years ago, Zeke wrote his most famous article, "Why I Hope to Die at 75." He still stands by it. The point wasn't that he wants to die. The point is that after 75, he won't take medical treatments meant to prolong life.  By age 75, 30% of adults have Alzheimer's or cognitive impairment. By 80, it's 40%. Zeke doesn't want to be remembered as a doddering old man who can't recognize his own family. Living a long time is a means, not an end. It's not the goal of life. It's what allows you to be present, engaged, and useful for the years you have. Biohacking is a lie: It suggests you know better than millions of years of evolution and the entire medical profession. The body isn't about maxing. It's about balance. Too much immune response gives you autoimmunity. Too little makes you sick. The body finds health in the median. You're not going to be perfect over decades. Wellness isn't a four-minute figure skating routine graded on execution. It's a lifetime practice. So build habits you enjoy and can sustain without thinking about them. Zeke's six simple rules for a long and healthy life: Don't be a schmuck. Avoid activities riskier than driving. Smoking, vaping, base jumping, climbing Everest. Talk to people. The number one predictor of a long, happy life. Expand your mind. Travel. Talk to the chef. Learn something new. Eat your ice cream. Moderation over perfection. Fermented foods and fiber. Move. Aerobic, strength, and flexibility. All three. Sleep like a baby. You can't will it. But you can create the conditions. The Harvard Adult Development Study followed people for 85 years. John F. Kennedy was in it. Ben Bradlee was in it. The finding: close friends and being married correlated with the healthiest, longest, happiest lives. Not exercise. Not diet. Relationships. Having no close friends is equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day. That's how bad loneliness is for you. It's not just psychological. It's physical. Introverts get the same happiness boost from social interaction as extroverts. A University of Chicago study by Nicholas Epley found that introverts assume they won't enjoy talking to strangers on their commute. They were wrong. When they did it, they were just as happy as extroverts. Take the headphones off. Zeke has been telling people this since the iPod era. Random encounters increase your surface area for luck, learning, and connection. You never know who you're going to meet or what they might tell you. To be interesting, you have to be interested. Zeke asks to meet the chef at every great restaurant. He asks his Ethiopian Uber driver which tribe he's from. He talks to the person on the plane. It's virtuous. Good for you AND good for them. Zeke's hero is Ben Franklin. Franklin came back to America at 80 after negotiating the end of the Revolutionary War. The first thing he did was build a library for his curiosity and a dining room for his social dinners. That's the way to live. The wellness trifecta: hosting a dinner party with curious people. You're eating good food. You're getting together with people. Your mind is being stretched by great conversation. Three benefits from one activity. Zeke is anti-wellness-industrial-complex. Peptides from your corner store: disaster, unregulated, no idea what's in them. Testosterone replacement therapy without a real deficiency: bad idea, accelerates prostate cancer. Growth hormone for aging: promotes cancers. That's being a schmuck. Sleep is the one wellness practice you can't will yourself into. You can only build the conditions for it. Dark room. Cool temperature. No caffeine or alcohol eight hours before bed. Phone in another room. Read a book. Everything else is up to your body. Ice cream actually decreases your risk of type 2 diabetes. The fat content softens the glycemic response. Plus, you usually eat it with other people. Social eating matters. Zeke's champagne moment a year from now: finishing his next book on how to fix the American healthcare system, and turning 70. Reflection Questions Are you optimizing for length of life, or for the quality of years you actually get?  When was the last time you turned your headphones off, introduced yourself to a stranger, or asked to meet the chef?  Who are the friends you rely on for social interaction? Not casual acquaintances, but the ones who lift your health, longevity, and happiness. When did you last make plans with them? More Learning #607 - Dr. Meg Meeker - Raising Resilient Kids (Strong Fathers, Strong Daughters) #690 - Austin Kleon - Why Activated Leaders Win #682 - Will Guidara - Adversity is a Terrible Thing to Waste

By the time the paper hit version 71, Dr. Nirosha Murugan had already done the hard part. The data were real. The experiment had worked. A team of researchers had used a wearable bioreactor to trigger limb regeneration in frogs, a result with obvious implications for regenerative medicine. But the science still wasn't getting over the line. The problem wasn't the work. It was the translation.On this episode of Standard Deviation, host Oliver Bogler talks with Dr. Nirosha Murugan, a biophysicist and Tier II Canada Research Chair in Tissue Biophysics at Wilfrid Laurier University, about what happens when a scientist working at the edges of quantum biology, bioelectricity, and tissue regeneration runs headfirst into the unwritten rules of academic publishing. Murugan's research asks biologists to think beyond molecules and chemistry alone, and to consider the physical signals, electromagnetic fields, and invisible forces that shape development and healing. It is ambitious science. It is also exactly the kind of work that can make gatekeepers nervous.Bogler follows Murugan through the less glamorous part of discovery: the hidden curriculum of getting a paper published, securing scientific credibility, and learning that data do not simply “speak for themselves.” Murugan describes how jargon buried the pitch of her own work, how a lack of editorial support left her at a disadvantage, and how the JEDI program at the Life Science Editors Foundation paired her with a former journal editor who taught her how to structure a manuscript, write a cover letter, and survive peer review.The result was publication in Science Advances, but the larger story is about power. Who gets taught the rules of biomedical research. Who has access to grant writers, editors, and institutional polish. Who is left to brute-force their way through the maze. And how one scientist, having finally found the map, now makes sure her own trainees do not have to learn it the hard way.RELATED LINKSDr. Nirosha Murugan⁠Wilfrid Laurier University⁠Life Science Editors Foundation⁠JEDI Program⁠Science Advances paper on limb regeneration⁠FEEDBACKLike this episode? Rate and review Out of Patients on your favorite podcast platform. For guest suggestions or sponsorship email podcasts@matthewzachary.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.