Podcasts about comstock act

{ Discover more at ChainsawHistory.com — access our full episode list, delve into bonus content, and click the logo in the center of the page to support our show with a paid subscription! }Jamie and Bambi are at it again! Anthony Comstock persecuted New York smut dealers and tavern owners until he found his target of choice—women who advocate for freedom, education, and equality. When ruining things for people in New York was not enough he pushed the Comstock Act into federal law—which is how the authors of Project 2025 plan to ban pornography and access to information about abortion. He persecuted trailblazing women like Victoria Woodhull and Margaret Sanger fueled by his weird obsessions and religious guilt.In this episode we encourage you to consider a donation to Planned Parenthood, which provides education and support services for sexual and gender related health. Learn all the ways they assist men, women and families at www.plannedparenthood.org.

Andrea Jenelle, HRS's first-ever returning guest, comes on to sample SPINE OF STEEL, the first installment of the Suffragette Uprising series. Andrea talks about her inspiration for the series, her writing process, and historical research. Learn about her connection to women's rights, her favorite writing techniques, and what makes her historical romances unique.   00:00 Welcome to the Historical Romance Sampler Podcast 00:33 Introducing Returning Guest Andrea Jenelle 02:20 Andrea Jenelle's New Series: Suffragette Uprising 04:27 Reading from SPINE OF STEEL 14:12 Discussion on the Comstock Act and Its Relevance 23:26 Love It or Leave It: Fun Rapid-Fire Questions 27:34 Upcoming Releases and Final Thoughts   Find out more about Andrea Jenelle at https://www.andreajenelleromance.com/   THANK YOU TO THIS EPISODE'S SPONSORS: Historical Romance Book Deals - https://historicalromancebookdeals.com/   HRS is an affiliate of Libro.fm! Sign up for a new monthly membership and get three audiobooks for the price of one with code HISTORICAL! (As an affiliate, HRS may earn a portion of your purchase, for which we thank you!) Check out the official HRS playlist at: https://tidd.ly/4hgCquh   Find out more about your host Katherine Grant: Instagram (@katherine_grant_romance) TikTok (@katherinegrantromance) Facebook (@Katherinegrantromanceauthor) Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/19872840.Katherine_Grant) Bookbub (https://www.bookbub.com/authors/katherine-grant)   Follow HRS on social media! TikTok (@historicalromancesampler) Instagram (@historicalromancesampler)

Scared? Got Questions about the continued assault on your reproductive rights? THE FBK LINES ARE OPEN! Just call or text (201) 574-7402, leave your questions or concerns, and Lizz and Moji will pick a few to address on the pod! Ken Paxton is at it again—arresting a midwife and two colleagues for allegedly providing abortions—so we're shredding him to filth and exposing the absolute horror show Texas is cooking up with its latest anti-abortion bill. And guess what? NO ONE is talking about it! We're diving in. But it's not all doom! We've got Dr. Jamila Taylor, President & CEO of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, breaking down their latest study on how abortion bans are reshaping the workforce—turns out, 1 in 5 people of reproductive age are relocating and demanding their employers step up on repro care. PLUS: JOY ALERT! The one and only Jean Grae is here to kiki about their new memoir, In My Remaining Years. Friendship, mortality, creative genius—we get into it all! And we even give you something to celebrate! Colorado and Maryland? They just scored some major abortion access wins and we have all the deets you need to know.  Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead IG: @LizzWinstead Bluesky: @LizzWinstead.bsky.socialMoji Alawode-El IG: @Mojilocks Bluesky: @Mojilocks.bsky.social SPECIAL GUESTS:Jean Grae IG: @jeanniegrigio Bluesky: @jeanofthegraes.bsky.social Dr. Jamila Taylor IG: @TheIWP GUEST LINKS:IWPR Report on Employee Expectations on Reproductive HealthThe Institute for Women's Policy Research Website (IWPR) Center for Reproductive RightsJean Grae's LinktreeBUY: Jean Grae's Memoir “In My Remaining Years”AUDIOBOOK: Jean Grae's Memoir “In My Remaining Years”The Rise of “Extreme Embalming”Jean Grae's Substack NEWS DUMP:Ohio Anti-abortion Rights Lobby Files Complaint Against Company for Telehealth Abortion ServicesNothing Is Compassionate About Forcing Invasive Procedures on Wyoming WomenFive Things to Know About the Minnesota Senator Accused of Soliciting a Teen for SexA New Texas Bill Is Coming After Online Abortion PillsURGENT: The Texas ‘Exceptions' Bill Is a Trojan HorseBreaking: Texas Midwife Arrested on Felony Abortion ChargesColorado Is Projected to Save Money by Covering Abortions for Medicaid, Child Health Plan Plus RecipientsMaryland Poised to Become First State to Use Insurance Surcharge for Abortions EPISODE LINKS:TICKETS: 4/3 Boom! Buzzkilled in DC at The Black CatVOLUNTEER: Join us in Washington DC on 4/2 at SCOTUSADOPT-A-CLINIC: Toledo Abortion Escorts Amazon WishlistThe Conjuring RoomAbortion Fund of ArizonaPlan C PillsAid AccessHey JaneIf/When/HowFIND YOUR REP IN TEXAS VOTE NO: SB2880 / VOTE YES: SB31Operation Save AbortionSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActEMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist SHOULD I BE SCARED? Text or call us with the abortion news that is scaring you: (201) 574-7402FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK PodcastInstagram ~ @AbortionFrontBluesky ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE! When BS is poppin', we pop off!

We have a treat this week—double the attorneys! Lawyers and writers David S. Cohen and Carole Joffe join the pod to talk about their newest book, 'After Dobbs.'They chat with Jess and Imani about the legal battle over abortion pills, the Comstock Act, the importance of abortion care advocates, and what's next in the abortion fight.Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means that episodes like this one are only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that's exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

We have a treat this week—double the attorneys! Lawyers and writers David S. Cohen and Carole Joffe join the pod to talk about their newest book, 'After Dobbs.'They chat with Jess and Imani about the legal battle over abortion pills, the Comstock Act, the importance of abortion care advocates, and what's next in the abortion fight.Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means that episodes like this one are only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that's exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

This week, Scott sat down with his colleagues Tyler McBrien and Roger Parloff, as well as special guest Claire Meynial, U.S. correspondent for Le Point, to talk over the week's big national security news, including:“Make Europe Aghast Again.” Vice President J.D. Vance stunned the Munich Security Conference last week with remarks that criticized European allies for suppressing far-right and anti-immigration voices while playing down threats from China and Russia. Combined with the Trump administration's past hostility to Transatlantic relationships, many are taking Vance's as a sign of a downgrade in the U.S.-Europe relationship. But is this overstating things? And how far can the Trump administration adjust the relationship on its own, even if it wanted to?“I Would Do Anything for Bove, but I Won't Do That.” (Credit to Robert Anderson, via Mike Stern.) The resignation of seven Justice Department attorneys over their refusal to move to dismiss charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams at the direction of acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove has brought national attention to the Trump administration's apparent intent to use its discretion over criminal prosecution as a policy tool to advance its immigration and potentially other agendas. But what do these recent events tell us about the potential for—and limits on—such a strategy? “Animus Instinct.” The legal challenge to President Trump's executive order banning transgender individuals from military service and halting gender-affirming care finally had a hearing in federal court this week. And in a barnburner, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes raked the Justice Department over the coals, querying whether the ban was the result of “animus.” But how big a difference will her line of inquiry make in the end? Is there any realistic chance the courts will intervene?For object lessons, Roger recommended a visit to the Holocaust Museum as an opportunity for a sober reflection. Tyler passed along Noah Schachtman's portrait of the players in the Eric Adams resignation scandal in Vanity Fair. Scott passed along his new favorite vegetarian pasta recipe, pasta al sugo finto. And Claire discussed some of her work on abortion rights in advance of International Women's Day on March 8, including research into the Comstock Act. We value your feedback! Help us improve by sharing your thoughts at lawfaremedia.org/survey. Your input ensures that we deliver what matters most to you. Thank you for your support—and, as always, for listening!To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Use promo code RATIONALSECURITY at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan:https://incogni.com/rationalsecuritySupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, Scott sat down with his colleagues Tyler McBrien and Roger Parloff, as well as special guest Claire Meynial, U.S. correspondent for Le Point, to talk over the week's big national security news, including:“Make Europe Aghast Again.” Vice President J.D. Vance stunned the Munich Security Conference last week with remarks that criticized European allies for suppressing far-right and anti-immigration voices while playing down threats from China and Russia. Combined with the Trump administration's past hostility to Transatlantic relationships, many are taking Vance's as a sign of a downgrade in the U.S.-Europe relationship. But is this overstating things? And how far can the Trump administration adjust the relationship on its own, even if it wanted to?“I Would Do Anything for Bove, but I Won't Do That.” (Credit to Robert Anderson, via Mike Stern.) The resignation of seven Justice Department attorneys over their refusal to move to dismiss charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams at the direction of acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove has brought national attention to the Trump administration's apparent intent to use its discretion over criminal prosecution as a policy tool to advance its immigration and potentially other agendas. But what do these recent events tell us about the potential for—and limits on—such a strategy? “Animus Instinct.” The legal challenge to President Trump's executive order banning transgender individuals from military service and halting gender-affirming care finally had a hearing in federal court this week. And in a barnburner, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes raked the Justice Department over the coals, querying whether the ban was the result of “animus.” But how big a difference will her line of inquiry make in the end? Is there any realistic chance the courts will intervene?For object lessons, Roger recommended a visit to the Holocaust Museum as an opportunity for a sober reflection. Tyler passed along Noah Schachtman's portrait of the players in the Eric Adams resignation scandal in Vanity Fair. Scott passed along his new favorite vegetarian pasta recipe, pasta al sugo finto. And Claire discussed some of her work on abortion rights in advance of International Women's Day on March 8, including research into the Comstock Act. We value your feedback! Help us improve by sharing your thoughts at lawfaremedia.org/survey. Your input ensures that we deliver what matters most to you. Thank you for your support—and, as always, for listening!To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Use promo code RATIONALSECURITY at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan:https://incogni.com/rationalsecurity Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode we stroll down the corridors of power in high heels, paint the White House pink and take up residence in the OVARY Office. We' tell the story of women attempting to enter the White House via the Electoral College and the trouble that brings.We've got special guest star appearances from the likes of Harpers Weekly, Thomas Nast, Victoria Woodhull, Marx and Engel's, Demosthenes, Fredrick Douglass, President Grant, The Equal Rights Party, Anthony Comstock, United States Postal Inspector, Union Army, Civil War, Confederates, The Comstock Act of 1873, Mifepristone, US Mail, Donald Trump, Project 2025, Bernie Sanders, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, North Carolina, Public Policy Polling, Republicans, Obama, Rapture, Americans, Floridians, Ted Cruz, Zodiac Killer, Up Front in the Prophetic Radio Show, Allen Fodsick, Francine Fodsick, Pokémon, Michelle Obama, J.K. Rowling, Alex Jones, Nancy Pelosi, John McCain, January 6th, Capitol Building, Mike Pence, MAGA, Republican Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina Mark Robinson, Martin Luther King,  #666 #SketchComedy #Sketch #Comedy #Sketch Comedy #Atheist #Science #History #Atheism #Antitheist #ConspiracyTheory #Conspiracy #Conspiracies #Sceptical #Scepticism #Mythology #Religion #Devil #Satan #Satanism #Satanist #Skeptic #Debunk #Illuminati #Podcast #funny #sketch #skit #comedy #comedyshow #comedyskits #HeavyMetal #weird #leftist #SatanIsMySuperhero  

Full episode transcript HERE. Roses are red, violets are blue, we're ready to fuck some shit up – how about you? Nothing says “love” like living through the current soul scorchings and still showing up every day to make a difference! On this week's pod, your Feminist Buzzkills are diving deep into Indiana gutting HIPAA for abortion patients, redefining and coming after birth control, and how some badass Indiana doctors are fighting back! What does that mean for the rest of us not living there? A whole hell of a lot! PLUS, remember that New York doctor who prescribed a pregnant person in Dallas abortion pills? Well, Louisiana and Texas are in full-on hater mode, and we've got some big updates on the case. AND WE'VE GOT GUESTS! Who are our V-Day partners in crime this week? Everyone's fav witchy Valentine, Bitch is in the house! The legendary musician, writer, and performance artist sits down with your Buzzkills to yap about her new show, “B*TCHCRAFT,” moving forward in Trump's hellscape, and healing and resisting through art and community! Valentine #2, Amy Merrill, is here too! We break down the recent flurry of assaults on medication abortion with the Co-Founder and Co-Director of Plan C. Amy helps us navigate the case of the NY doctor being sued for sending abortion pills through the mail, and how abobo patients can better protect themselves – especially as we are heading into the abortion upside down. Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our five-part OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead IG: @LizzWinstead Bluesky: @LizzWinstead.bsky.socialMoji Alawode-El IG: @Mojilocks Bluesky: @Mojilocks.bsky.social SPECIAL GUESTS:Bitch IG: @BitchMusic TikTok: @Bitch_Music Amy Merrill  IG: @AmyJMerrill / @PlanCPills TW/TikTok: @PlanCPills BlueSky: @PlanCPills.bsky.social GUEST LINKS:Plan C Pills WebsiteDONATE: Plan CYou Always Have Options WebsiteJulie Care WebsiteMiscarriage + Abortion HotlineIf/When/How: Lawyers for Reproductive CareBitch Music WebsiteBitch's LinktreeTICKETS: B*tchcraft Tour NEWS DUMP:SAVE Act Would Undermine Voter Registration for All AmericansTrump State Department Official Has Repeatedly Called for Mass Sterilization of ‘Low-IQ Trash'Pine Needles Shown to Cause Abortions in CowsIndiana Abortion Providers Sue to Keep State Records PrivateCondoms, IUDs Removed From Indiana Bill Seeking to Expand Birth Control AccessTexas Judge Fines New York Doctor for Prescribing Abortion Pills to a Woman Near DallasShield Laws for Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care: A State Law GuideWhat to Know About Stocking up on the Abortion Pill EPISODE LINKS:Adopt-A-Clinic: Women's Health Center of Maryland Amazon WishlistBuy a Michael Shannon & Jason Narducy Tour Poster to Benefit AAF!ACTION: Mutual Aid LASTREAM: No One Asked You on JoltEMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsOperation Save AbortionSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK Podcast Instagram ~ @AbortionFrontBluesky ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFront TALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

Abortion, and dildos, and porn, oh my! No but actually, there's a dusty old law on the books that could unravel reproductive health access for years to come—the Comstock Act. And it's just waiting for someone like the recently-confirmed U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to enforce it. On today's episode of Boom! Lawyered, Imani and Jess revisit how the Trump administration could effectively ban abortion without input from Congress—all thanks to the 19th century anti-obscenity law. The pair break down how Comstock became a strong tool for the anti-choice movement and how aggressive enforcement by Attorney General Pam Bondi could upend access to contraception and even dildos.Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means that episodes like this one are only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that's exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

Abortion, and dildos, and porn, oh my! No but actually, there's a dusty old law on the books that could unravel reproductive health access for years to come—the Comstock Act. And it's just waiting for someone like the recently-confirmed U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to enforce it. On today's episode of Boom! Lawyered, Imani and Jess revisit how the Trump administration could effectively ban abortion without input from Congress—all thanks to the 19th century anti-obscenity law. The pair break down how Comstock became a strong tool for the anti-choice movement and how aggressive enforcement by Attorney General Pam Bondi could upend access to contraception and even dildos.Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means that episodes like this one are only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that's exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

Full episode transcript HERE.  The first awful week ends with March for Madness – IT'S HEAVY ON THE MADNESS! Your Feminist Buzzkils are out here using facts and belly laughs to break down the early returns of how the anti-abobo gorgons will fuck with our rights. Let's snap you out of your facism fatigue, stat! Every one of you is an abobo warrior, and we salute you (in a very normal human way). Trump's first week ended with the anti-abortion mayhem known as the March for Life, AKA Unbornaroo. For 52 years they have taken over the Capital for their annual patriarchal parade of fetus worship and ovarian oppression. BUT, as always, we've got the play by play! We're bringing y'all: their lies and their plans on where they will prioritize creating policy to further destroy access to abortion care. AND, joining us is Constitutional law scholar Dr. Michele Goodwin to explain the devastating blows we can expect from their shenanigans. From plans to reinstate the Global Gag rule to how Christian legal firms have spent DECADES turning the courts into dogma distribution centers, one judge at a time.  All this, PLUS, the latest on the anti-abortion “terrorists” Trump pardoned this week and all of the abobo-related news you need to know. Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking  HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead IG: @LizzWinstead Bluesky: @LizzWinstead.bsky.socialMoji Alawode-El IG: @Mojilocks Bluesky: @Mojilocks.bsky.social SPECIAL GUEST:Dr. Michele Goodwin IG/X: @MicheleBGoodwin Bluesky: @MicheleBGoodwin.bsky.social GUEST LINKS:Dr. Michele Goodwin Website“On the Issues with Michele Goodwin” Podcast “Policing the Womb” by Michele Goodwin NEWS DUMP:Lawsuit Alleges Vermont Tracks Pregnant Women Deemed Unsuitable for ParenthoodMississippi Politician Files ‘Contraception Begins at Erection Act'Instagram Censors and Blurs Aid Access PostsGovernment Website Offering Reproductive Health Information Goes OfflineWhat Is the Global Gag Rule?What Leaving the Who Means for the US And the WorldDefending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal GovernmentSenate Dems Block ‘Deliberately Misleading' GOP Bill Attacking Reproductive Care EPISODE LINKS:Hypocrites Unmasked WebsiteExpose Fake Clinics1/27 WEBINAR: Gender Liberation Movement Mass CallADOPT-A-CLINIC WISHLIST: Joan G Lovering Health CenterSTREAM: No One Asked You on JoltOperation Save AbortionSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActEMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK PodcastInstagram ~ @AbortionFrontBluesky ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of the U.S. government, crafted with the next Republican president in mind.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillared initiative: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of a new administration. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn both intense scrutiny and fervent support from different quarters of the political spectrum.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's structure and operations. The project advocates for a significant centralization of power in the White House, aligning with the unitary executive theory. This means that independent federal agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), would lose their independence and come under direct presidential control. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."This centralization is not limited to executive agencies; it also extends to the Department of State. Project 2025 proposes dismissing all Department of State employees in leadership roles by January 20, 2025, and replacing them with "acting" leaders who do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter, believes most current employees are too left-wing and need to be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president.The project's impact on education is equally profound. It envisions a dramatic reduction in the federal government's role in education, advocating for the elimination of the Department of Education and transferring its programs to the Department of Health and Human Services or terminating them altogether. The federal government would be relegated to a statistics-keeping role, with states taking over the responsibility for education. This includes allowing states to opt out of federal programs or standards and converting public funds into school vouchers that can be used for private or religious schools. As Project 2025 states, "Education is a private rather than a public good."Healthcare and social welfare programs are also in the crosshairs. The project proposes cutting Medicare and Medicaid, rejecting abortion as healthcare, and eliminating coverage for emergency contraception. It even suggests using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader agenda that includes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.Environmental and climate policies are another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. It recommends reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, stopping NIH funding for research involving embryonic stem cells, and preventing the EPA from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections. Mandy Gunasekara, former chief of staff at the EPA, argues that the agency's current approach has been "misused for political purposes."The project's science policy proposals are equally telling. It prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current DOE programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It also proposes restricting academic and technology exchanges with countries like China, which are labeled as adversaries. Lindsey Burke, director of the Center for Education Policy at the Heritage Foundation, suggests capping indirect research costs for universities, which would force them to cover more of their current overhead costs themselves.In the realm of media and communication, Project 2025 proposes defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and reconsidering the accommodations given to White House Press Corps members. It also entertains the idea of revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status and forcing them to relocate from their current FM dial positions. The project advocates for more media consolidation by changing FCC rules, allowing local news programs to be converted into national ones.The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked intense debate. Democrats have been vocal in their criticism, with former President Biden accusing the initiative of being a plan "written for Trump" that "should scare every single American." Vice President Kamala Harris has described it as a "plan to return America to a dark past."Despite these criticisms, Project 2025's backers argue that their vision is necessary to correct what they see as a drift towards liberalism in government policies. As the project's documentation emphasizes, the goal is to ensure that "any research conducted with taxpayer dollars serves the national interest in a concrete way in line with conservative principles."As we move forward, it is clear that Project 2025 represents a critical juncture in American governance. Whether its proposals will be implemented remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the stakes are high, and the potential impacts on various aspects of American life are profound. As the nation approaches the next presidential administration, the decisions made regarding Project 2025 will shape the future of federal agencies, social policies, and the very fabric of American democracy.In the coming months, we will witness whether this blueprint will become the guiding force behind a new administration or if it will face significant resistance from Congress, the judiciary, and the public. One thing is clear, however: Project 2025 is not just a policy document; it is a call to action that promises to redefine the contours of American governance in ways that will be felt for generations to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive blueprint crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this conservative initiative. Unveiled in April 2023, Project 2025 is more than just a policy guide; it is a vision for a radical overhaul of American governance, federal agencies, and the very fabric of societal policies.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to serve as a roadmap for the next Republican president, outlining sweeping changes across various sectors. The project is built around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for future administration members, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to dramatically reshape the federal government's structure and function. The plan advocates for the dismantling of several major agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Education. The Department of Education, in particular, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred to other departments, such as the Department of Health and Human Services, or terminated outright. This move is part of a broader strategy to reduce the federal government's role in education, promoting instead a system where education is largely managed by the states[1].The impact on education would be profound. Federal funding for low-income students under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 would be allowed to expire, and public funds would be redirected as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. The Head Start program, a cornerstone for services to children of low-income families, would be eliminated. This shift reflects the project's underlying philosophy that education is a private rather than a public good[1].Project 2025 also envisions significant changes in the realm of healthcare and social services. It proposes cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan goes further by advocating for the elimination of coverage for emergency contraception and the use of the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader effort to align healthcare policies with conservative principles, as evident in the project's call to reduce funding for research involving embryonic stem cells and to make the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent[1].The project's approach to environmental and climate policies is equally contentious. It recommends reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, and proposes that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should not use "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts. The EPA would also be required to obtain clear congressional authorization for any science activity, and Congress would be urged to reform or repeal the 1990 law that created the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), which the project argues has been "misused for political purposes"[4].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. The Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, while programs focused on energy technology development and climate change would be eliminated. Additionally, the project proposes restricting academic and technology exchanges with countries labeled as adversaries, particularly China, in the name of tightening research security[4].The expansion of presidential powers is another central theme of Project 2025. The project advocates for a unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. This would involve placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts encapsulates this vision, arguing that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].This push for centralized control extends to the State Department, where Project 2025 proposes dismissing all employees in leadership roles by January 20, 2025, and replacing them with "acting" leaders who do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter, believes most State Department employees are too left-wing and should be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president[1].The project's impact on civil rights and social issues is also significant. It proposes removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Instead, the DOJ would be tasked with prosecuting "anti-white racism." The project also calls for criminalizing pornography and imprisoning those who produce it, and for deploying the military for domestic law enforcement[1].In the realm of media and communication, Project 2025 suggests defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status. It also proposes allowing more media consolidation by changing FCC rules, which could lead to the conversion of local news programs into national ones. Social media companies would be required to not remove "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, and the project even entertains the idea of banning TikTok[1].As I navigated through the extensive policy proposals of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a set of recommendations but a comprehensive vision for reshaping American governance. While former President Trump has attempted to distance himself from the project, many of its authors and contributors are former members of his administration, and the proposals align closely with his past policies and current campaign promises[3].The potential implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching and multifaceted. Critics argue that the project's vision for expanded executive power and the dismantling of key agencies could undermine the checks and balances that are fundamental to American democracy. The project's stance on education, healthcare, and environmental policies could have profound effects on vulnerable populations and the nation's long-term sustainability.As we move forward, it is crucial to monitor the developments surrounding Project 2025. With the next presidential administration on the horizon, the implementation of these policies could become a reality. The upcoming months will be pivotal, as the nation grapples with the possibility of a second American Revolution, as described by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts—a revolution that, if realized, would be anything but bloodless.In the end, Project 2025 serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing debates and divisions within American society. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary correction or a dangerous overreach, it is undeniable that its proposals have the potential to reshape the very fabric of American governance and society. As we approach the next milestones in this journey, it remains to be seen how these ambitious plans will unfold and what their ultimate impact will be on the nation.

John Gerardi and Jonathan Keller dissect California's legislative chaos, the abortion pill, and the influence of lobbyists in Sacramento. With humor and insight, they tackle the bizarre processes shaping the state's laws.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, economic policies, and social structures.At its core, Project 2025 is the brainchild of over 400 scholars and policy experts from the conservative movement. It is led by figures such as Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Spencer Chretien, a former special assistant to President Trump. The project's advisory board includes more than 100 conservative groups, lending it significant weight within Republican circles[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's executive branch. The project advocates for a unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. This means eliminating the independence of key agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].This centralization of power extends to the Department of State, where Project 2025 proposes dismissing all leadership employees by January 20, 2025, and replacing them with "acting" roles that do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter, believes most current employees are too left-wing and should be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president[1].The project's economic and social policy proposals are equally far-reaching. It calls for significant tax cuts, though its authors are divided on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face substantial cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and to use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. Additionally, it proposes criminalizing pornography and removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity[1].Environmental and climate policies are another critical area of focus. Project 2025 recommends repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, which allocated $370 billion for clean technology, and closing key offices at the Department of Energy focused on climate change mitigation. The plan supports Arctic drilling, blocks the expansion of the national electrical grid, and stymies the transition to renewable energy. Mandy Gunasekara, a contributor to the project, acknowledges climate change but considers it politicized and overstated. The report even suggests reversing a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, thereby preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions[1].The project's stance on climate change has been met with criticism from within the Republican party itself. Republican climate advocates like Sarah E. Hunt and John Curtis have expressed disagreement with Project 2025's climate policies, emphasizing the importance of supporting good energy and climate policy. Benji Backer of the American Conservation Coalition noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change, calling the project "wrongheaded"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be subject to closer oversight by political appointees, and its research activities would require clear congressional authorization. The report also suggests capping indirect research costs for universities and directing more R&D funding towards small businesses[5].The implications of these proposals are profound. By centralizing executive power and dismantling independent agencies, Project 2025 challenges the traditional checks and balances of American governance. The elimination of key environmental and climate regulations could have long-term consequences for public health and the environment. The project's stance on social issues, such as abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, could lead to significant legal and social battles.As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 will be a pivotal document in the upcoming political landscape. With its detailed blueprint for the first 180 days of a new Republican administration, it sets the stage for a potentially transformative period in American politics. Whether these proposals will be implemented in full remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 represents a bold and contentious vision for the future of American governance.As the country approaches the next presidential term, the debate over Project 2025's policies will only intensify. The project's authors and supporters see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated and inefficient federal government. Critics, however, view it as a dangerous erosion of democratic norms and a retreat from critical social and environmental responsibilities.Whatever the outcome, Project 2025 has already sparked a critical national conversation about the role of government, the balance of power, and the future of American society. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it is imperative to engage with the project's proposals thoughtfully, considering both their stated goals and the potential consequences of their implementation. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will shape the country for generations to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, should a Republican president, potentially Donald Trump, take office.At its core, Project 2025 is built around four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of the new administration. The project is led by former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, which has led critics to tie it closely to Trump's reelection campaign, despite his public disavowal[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's structure and function. The initiative advocates for a "unitary executive theory," which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. This means placing the entire federal bureaucracy, including independent agencies like the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission, under direct presidential control. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts encapsulates this vision, arguing that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].The project's impact on federal agencies is profound. For instance, it proposes dismantling the Department of Homeland Security and abolishing the Department of Education, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Education's elimination is part of a broader push to reduce the federal government's role in education, instead elevating school choice and parental rights. This would involve allowing states to opt out of federal programs or standards and transferring responsibilities like those under the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act to the Department of Health and Human Services[1][2].In education, Project 2025 criticizes what it calls "woke propaganda" in public schools and seeks to curtail federal enforcement of civil rights in schools. It rejects the pursuit of racial parity in school discipline indicators, prioritizing student safety over equity. The project also proposes the elimination of the Head Start program, which serves over 833,000 children living in poverty, and the expiration of a $18 billion federal fund for low-income students. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools[1][2].The initiative's stance on healthcare and social issues is equally contentious. It calls for cutting Medicare and Medicaid, rejecting abortion as healthcare, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception. The project even suggests using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. It proposes criminalizing pornography and removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs would be terminated, with the DOJ instead prosecuting what it terms "anti-white racism"[1].On immigration, Project 2025 is stark in its proposals. It recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S. and suggests deploying the military for domestic law enforcement. The project also promotes capital punishment and the speedy finality of those sentences, reflecting a broader emphasis on law and order[1].The project's approach to science and research is another critical area. It prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. For example, the Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, while programs focused on climate change would be significantly reduced. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using "unrealistic" climate change projections and would require clear congressional authorization for any science activity. Academic and technology exchanges with countries like China would also be restricted[4].Project 2025's economic policies are designed to favor conservative principles. It proposes tax cuts, though its writers disagree on protectionism. The initiative seeks to reduce environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that aligns with its broader skepticism towards climate science. Research funding would be capped for universities, requiring them to cover more of their indirect research costs, and more R&D funding would be directed towards small businesses[1][4].Despite its detailed blueprint, Project 2025 has faced significant criticism and public disavowal from Donald Trump himself. In a social media post, Trump stated, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."[3]However, the involvement of former Trump administration officials and the alignment of many proposals with Trump's past policies and current campaign promises suggest a closer connection than Trump admits. Ben Carson, John Ratcliffe, and Peter Navarro, all former Trump officials, are listed as authors or contributors to the policy agenda, further blurring the lines between the project and the Trump campaign[3].As we approach the 2025 milestones, the implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching. If implemented, these policies would fundamentally reshape American governance, from the structure of federal agencies to the priorities of scientific research and social policies. The project's emphasis on centralizing executive power, reducing federal oversight in education and healthcare, and rolling back environmental regulations would mark a significant shift in the country's political landscape.In the coming months, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided by the outcome of the presidential election and the subsequent actions of the new administration. Whether or not these proposals become reality, they represent a clear and ambitious vision for a conservative future in America—a vision that is both deeply divisive and profoundly transformative. As the nation navigates these uncertain times, the debate over Project 2025 serves as a stark reminder of the enduring and often contentious nature of American politics.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its proposed changes to American governance. This is not just a policy blueprint; it is a vision for a fundamentally different United States, one that aligns closely with conservative ideals and the legacy of the Trump administration.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillar initiative: a policy guide for the next Republican president, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn both intense scrutiny and fervent support, depending on one's political leanings[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its call for a radical restructuring of federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its responsibilities devolved to the states. This move is part of a broader push for school choice and parental control over education, reflecting a belief that education is a private rather than a public good. The federal government's role would be reduced to a mere statistics-keeping organization, with significant curtailment of civil rights enforcement in schools. The proposal explicitly rejects the pursuit of racial parity in school discipline, prioritizing student safety over equitable treatment[1].The Department of Homeland Security would also face significant changes, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This would be accompanied by a stringent immigration policy, including the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. The project's authors argue that such measures are necessary to restore order and enforce the rule of law, but critics see these proposals as draconian and inhumane[1][2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes substantial cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, while urging the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader effort to align healthcare policy with conservative moral values, a move that has sparked fierce opposition from reproductive rights advocates[1].The project's vision for science and research is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over applied science, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. Climate change research would be significantly curtailed, with the U.S. Global Change and Research Program facing critical analysis and potential dismantling. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using certain climate change projections, and its scientific activities would require clear congressional authorization. These changes reflect a skepticism towards climate science and a preference for fossil fuels over renewable energy[4].Project 2025 also seeks to centralize executive power, advocating for the elimination of civil service protections and the placement of the entire federal bureaucracy under direct presidential control. This is based on the unitary executive theory, which argues for a more streamlined and efficient government. However, critics warn that this could lead to a dangerous concentration of power in the White House, undermining the independence of critical agencies like the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission[1][2].The impact on civil rights is another area of significant concern. Project 2025 labels diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" that must be erased. It proposes banning funding for critical race theory, twisting civil rights laws to protect white men from employment discrimination, and shutting down federal DEIA offices. This approach has been condemned by civil rights groups, who see it as a rollback of hard-won protections for marginalized communities[5].As I navigated through the dense documentation of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a set of policy proposals but a manifesto for a conservative revolution in American governance. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts encapsulates this vision when he says, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]Despite the fervor with which Project 2025 has been received by some conservatives, it has also drawn intense criticism. Democrats have linked the initiative to Trump's reelection campaign, despite his attempts to distance himself. In a statement, former President Biden accused Trump of lying about his connections to the project, saying it "should scare every single American."[3]As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 stands as a critical point of contention. Its proposals, if implemented, would reshape the fabric of American governance, from education and healthcare to science and civil rights. Whether this vision will become a reality remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the debate over Project 2025 will continue to be a defining issue in the ongoing struggle for the future of America.In the coming months, as the election unfolds and new leadership takes the helm, the fate of Project 2025 will be decided. Will its ambitious plans for restructuring federal agencies and aligning policy with conservative principles become the blueprint for a new era in American governance? Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the implications are far-reaching. As the nation navigates this pivotal moment, the choices made will shape the course of American history for generations to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2023, outlines a radical transformation of American governance, touching on virtually every aspect of federal policy, from education and healthcare to technology and environmental regulation.At its core, Project 2025 is a manifesto for a conservative revolution, envisioning a federal government reshaped in the image of a strong, centralized executive branch. The project's architects argue that the current system of independent federal agencies undermines the democratic republic, and they propose placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to dismantle and reconfigure several key federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. Education would be left to the states, with federal funding for low-income students, such as Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, allowed to expire. Instead, public funds would be channeled into school vouchers, even for private or religious schools, reflecting the project's belief that education is a private rather than a public good[1].The Department of Homeland Security would also face significant changes, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to reshape national security and immigration policies, including the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes drastic cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and it urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader agenda to roll back reproductive rights and impose conservative moral values on healthcare policy[1].The project's vision for science and research is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over applied research, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. Climate change research would be significantly curtailed, with the U.S. Global Change and Research Program facing critical analysis and potential rejection of its assessments prepared under the Biden administration. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts, and its science activities would require clear congressional authorization[4].Project 2025 also targets the tech and media landscape, proposing significant reforms to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The plan includes increasing agency accountability, reducing wasteful spending, and promoting national security and economic prosperity. It suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills, to support the expansion of 5G and satellite connectivity. Additionally, the project advocates for revising Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, limiting social media's ability to moderate content and ban individuals from their platforms[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked intense debate. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, undermining the system of checks and balances that is foundational to American democracy. As one analysis notes, "Project 2025 would destroy the U.S. system of checks and balances and create an imperial presidency," giving the president almost unlimited power to implement policies without significant oversight[5].The project's stance on civil rights is particularly contentious. It rejects diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" and proposes banning funding for critical race theory. The Department of Justice and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would be used to undermine protections for LGBTQ employees and to prosecute private employers that support DEIA in their workplaces[2].As I navigated the complex web of policies outlined in Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a collection of policy proposals but a coherent vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's backers see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the "totalitarian cult" of the "Great Awokening," a term they use to describe the cultural and political shifts of recent years[3].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, many of its authors have close ties to his administration. The connection is evident in the overlap between Project 2025's recommendations and Trump's own policy agenda. For example, Trump has called for NPR funding to be rescinded, echoing Project 2025's criticism of public broadcasting as a "liberal disinformation machine"[3].As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the potential implementation of Project 2025's policies looms large. The project's authors envision an "army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared" personnel ready to execute these reforms swiftly. If realized, these changes would mark a seismic shift in American governance, one that could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and other institutions of government.In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of Project 2025 will remain a critical point of contention. Whether its proposals are adopted in whole or in part, one thing is certain: the initiative has already sparked a national conversation about the future of American democracy and the role of the federal government in shaping that future. As we move forward, it will be essential to closely monitor these developments and consider the profound implications they hold for the country's governance, civil rights, and societal values.

Anthony Comstock might be the most significant American that it's entirely possible you've never heard of. A zealous Christian crusader against so-called "obscenity" in the late 19th century, he is the namesake of the Comstock Act, the interstate commerce law that the Heritage Foundation plans to use to curb access to abortion pills and pornography. Born in Connecticut in the mid-1800s, Anthony Comstock grew up with regressive Victorian ideals in a puritanical New England household. His self-loathing and religious zeal lead to a life of bullying and persecuting countless men and (more often) women, driving many to suicide and tallying up hundreds of years in prison sentences. The radical social dynamics at the time in many ways echo our current culture wars, and since Anthony Comstock is about to play a major role in American life again, we thought it would be useful to talk a bit about his life and times. Much of the information for this episode was drawn from Amy Sohn's book The Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship, and Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age Also helpful were the biography of Comstock from the Smithsonian's National Postal Museum and TheFire.org's Why the 1873 Comstock Act still matters today

In this year-end episode, John and Jonathan review the biggest pro-life stories of 2024, from Trump's reelection to Gavin Newsom's relentless pro-choice campaigns. The hosts dissect the growing significance of abortion pills, RFK Jr.'s surprising pro-life commitments, and what to expect from California legislators in 2025.

Full episode transcript HERE. HOE-HOE-HOLY shit, it was a wild year, Buzzkillianas! *Mariah Carey voice* IT'S TIIIIIIIIME… For our annual year-in-review! It's been a hellacious year in abortlandia, and on this last pod of 2024, the Feminist Buzzkills are re-crapping the year in all things repro! Fueled by lethally spiked eggnog, we made our lists and checked them twice, figured out what stories were the naughtiest, the nicest and the bizarre AF-est!  And the best part? We're bringing it to you with the help of Feminist Buzzkills elves – AAF and FBK Writer/performers, Alyssa “Dooks” Al-Dookhi and Molly Gaebe. PLUS, YOU get to be part of our favorite HOEliday tradition – OUR SECRET SATAN GIFT EXCHANGE! This crew is bringing the crème de la crème AND the crème de la crap of this year's abortion news!  Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our five-part OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead IG: @LizzWinstead Bluesky: @LizzWinstead.bsky.socialMoji Alawode-El IG: @Mojilocks Bluesky: @Mojilocks.bsky.socialAlyssa Al-Dookhi IG: @thedookness Bluesky: @TheDookness.bsky.socialMolly Gaebe IG: @MollyGaebe Bluesky: @MollyGaebe.bsky.social WORST NEWS OF 2024:5. EMTALA Case: Federal Court Divided Over Idaho's Abortion Ban and Emergency Care Fight4. Study Estimates 64,000 Pregnancies From Rape in States That Enacted Abortion Bans Post-roe3.  Florida's Abortion Ban Will Reach Well Beyond Florida2. The 2024 Presidential Election Was Close, Not a Landslide1.ProPublica's “Life of the Mother” Series: How Abortion Bans Lead to Preventable Deaths  BEST NEWS OF 2024:3. Research at the Heart of a Federal Case Against the Abortion Pill Has Been Retracted2. France Makes Abortion a Constitutional Right1. Abortion Rights Ballot Measures Win in 7 Out of 10 Us States WEIRDEST NEWS OF 2024:3. Alabama Supreme Court Rules IVF Embryos Are Protected Under Wrongful Death of a Minor Act2. Wisconsin Republican Fancies Himself An Abortion Expert Because He's A Veterinarian + Anti-Abortion Wisconsin Republicans Have Some Thoughts About Women1. West Virginia GOP State Sen. Mike Azinger Pushes Anti-Abortion Propaganda With Lies WHITE ELEPHANT GIFTS:Lizz to Dooks: Donald Trump Elon Musk Christmas Ornament, Joel Webbon's Christ is King Conference & Branch Davidian Memorial Park TourDooks to Moji: Black Preborn Lives Matter Button, Kash Patel's New Boo & Pro-Life John's Jokes BookMoji to Molly: Kash Patel Christmas Hoodie, Autographed Pete Hegseth Book & Counter Culture Children's Book Bundle  Molly to Lizz: An Executive Producer Credit on Anti-abortion Queen Janet Porter's Self-Made Sitcom “What's a Girl to Do?” EPISODE LINKS:JUSTICE FOR SURVIVORS: Michigan Email TemplatesI Was Maced by Nick Fuentes InterviewADOPT-A-CLINIC: Blue Mountain ClinicTICKETS: Lizz's Project 2024 at The Parkway TheaterSTREAM: No One Asked You on JoltOperation Save AbortionSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActBUY: Reproductive Rights Wall Art!EMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK PodcastInstagram ~ @AbortionFrontTwitter ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

How might a Trump administration effectively ban abortion without actually signing a national abortion ban into law?  Abortion advocates are sounding the alarm over a 1873 law known as the Comstock Act.  Lindsay Langholz joins Christopher Wright Durocher to take a critical look at this zombie law - why it was passed, how it has historically been used, and how an incoming Trump administration might take advantage of this dusty section of the United States Code.  Join the Progressive Legal Movement Today: ACSLaw.orgHost: Christopher Wright Durocher, Vice President of Policy and ProgramGuest: Lindsay Langholz, Senior Director of Policy and Program, ACSLink: Trump Allies Plan New Sweeping Abortion Restrictions, by Lisa Lerer and Elizabeth Dias Link: Ten Actions Dems Can Take to Protect Abortion Before Trump Takes Office, by Jessica ValentiLink: Comstockery: How Government Censorship Gave Birth to the Law of Sexual and Reproductive Freedom, and May Again Threaten It, by Reva Siegel and Mary ZieglerVisit the Podcast Website: Broken Law PodcastEmail the Show: Podcast@ACSLaw.orgFollow ACS on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube-----------------Broken Law: About the law, who it serves, and who it doesn't.----------------- Production House: Flint Stone Media Copyright of American Constitution Society 2024.

The November election will undoubtedly send sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice (SRHRJ) spiraling. Erin Matson, Co-Founder, President, and CEO of Reproaction, sits down to talk with us about the devastating consequences of a second Trump administration and what actions can be taken now before inauguration day.Top of mind is the implementation of Project 2025 and the Life at Conception Act, which would institute federal fetal personhood and override state law to act as a federal abortion ban. It would also ban contraception, invitro fertilization (IVF), and fertility treatment. There is also a likelihood that pregnancy criminalization will increase and attacks to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) and the abortion pill, mifepristone, will increase. Mass application of the Comstock Act, a 150-year-old-law that could ban mailing of the abortion pill and the gutting of regulatory agencies are also on the table. There are some protective actions the Biden administration can take before January. You can also find additional ways to take personal action in our Take Action section.Well, Now: Slate's podcast about health and wellnessSupport the showFollow Us on Social: Twitter: @rePROsFightBack Instagram: @reprosfbFacebook: rePROs Fight Back Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.comRate and Review on Apple PodcastThanks for listening & keep fighting back!

Inspired by the those who turned to us post-election and shared that relationships have become frayed or severed by the current political environment. So we decided to present a possible solution ... just in time for Thanksgiving: We called a family meeting. In the first annual SmartHER News Family Meeting, we address the tough topics head on - taking your questions on president-elect Trump and crime, abortion, gay marriage and beyond - carefully dissecting the issues at play so you can see the news clearly.  We report about what to know, why it matters and share some needed insight about the different angles to these hot-button issues. ---  ✓ 2:00: Why a Family Meeting?  ✓ 3:00: A solution in news.  ✓ 6:00: A quick disclaimer – tough topics for young ears.   ✓ 8:00: Breaking news re: Pres-Elect Trump's Cabinet and insight into our editorial choices at SmartHER News.   ✓ 14:00: Navigating the nuances of family dynamics and political conversations.   ✓ 23:00: Context on Pres-Elect Trump and sexual assault allegations.   ✓ 30:00: Is Pres-Elect Trump a felon? For now yes, but ...   ✓ 37:00: Abortion and Women's Healthcare: Executive Action, Supreme Court Decisions, States' Rights, Miscarriages and Gestational Care.   ✓ 1:06:00: What is the Comstock Act; why are we talking about it now?  ✓ 1:15:00: Constituional Rights. Your concerns regarding changes to Marriage Equality and Gay Marriage.  ✓ 1:30:00: Checks and balances.  ✓ 1:31:00: The gift of historical context, marking an important anniversary this week.    SHOW NOTES  “Why Infant Deaths and Abortions Are Both Rising After Roe's Reversal” (Bloomberg)  Many OBGYNs in States With Abortion Bans or Restrictions Report Constraints on Miscarriage Care and Concern About Legal Risk (KKP) “Gettysburg Address” (SmartHER News)    SUPPORT OUR MISSION     If you'd like to help support SmartHER News' mission of a free, independent, nonpartisan press – here's how you can become a SCOOP insider: https://www.scoop.smarthernews.com/get-the-inside-scoop/     Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/smarthernews/  Website: https://smarthernews.com/  YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/smarthernews 

Welcome back to a jam-packed conversation at The Bar! From navigator funding for the ACA to reproductive health care, the election of 2024 will likely have wide ranging effects on employer group health plans. Join us as JD and Kerri break down how high risk pools, Medicaid reform, and even the Comstock Act might be part of the conversation over the next four years. Also, what do the new administration's Cabinet picks mean for health care? And what about prescription drug prices? In Last Call, JD highlights some of the lesser known questions on the ballot.

Boris Johnson warns that some Republicans have a 'Weird Homoerotic Fascination' with Russia's Vladimir Putin. Also why women are hoarding birth control medicine as well as mifepristone thanks to the antiquated Comstock Act. Will the new regime enforce it as well as putting the hammer down on porn?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Passing Judgment, we dive into the immediate aftermath of the 2024 election results. Jessica discusses the implications of President Trump's return to the Oval Office, the Republican trifecta in controlling the White House, Senate, and likely the House of Representatives. Join us as Jessica unpacks the pending federal and state legal cases against Trump, explores possible legal challenges and strategies over the next four years, and examines significant legal issues such as federal power, immigration, the Department of Justice, environmental policies and more. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:1️⃣ Legal Cases Against Trump: Federal cases against Trump, including the DC election interference and Mar-a-Lago documents cases, may be dismissed when Trump regains office and appoints new officials.2️⃣ Federal Power and Separation of Powers: With Republicans potentially controlling both legislative branches, there might be more legislation rather than executive orders.3️⃣ Organizational Framework for Legal Issues: The episode discussed potential changes to laws, executive orders, judicial appointments, and expansions of executive power, highlighting their hypothetical nature and the need for ongoing monitoring.

A PA judge allows Elon Musk's $1 million voter giveaway; All eyes on AZ this Election Day, but experts warn of harmful misinformation; To call or not to call? The election night question; Election Day raises new fears over Comstock Act, reproductive rights.

A PA judge allows Elon Musk's $1 million voter giveaway; All eyes on AZ this Election Day, but experts warn of harmful misinformation; To call or not to call? The election night question; Election Day raises new fears over Comstock Act, reproductive rights.

Full episode transcript HERE. ATTENTION BUZZKILLIANS: It's our last podcast before the possible end of Democracy, so we (plus a couple of special guests) are dropping our two cents on why y'all should be FLEXING THAT VOTER MUSCLE! Got the right to vote? GO EXERCISE THAT SHI! AND OBVI, rage levels spiked this week as we stumbled across something called the “Aryan Nation Freedom Fest.” It's exactly what it sounds like – PLOT TWIST: Wait till you hear how it is connected to anti-abortion maternity homes. In more exciting news – An Arizona abortion provider has found a way to legally provide abortion care to patients suffering miscarriages outside of the state's 15-week abortion ban, and we are THRILLED to deliver this glimmer of joy and hope to your earholes. GUEST ROLL CALL:We got to kiki with actor, activist and philanthropist Torrey DeVitto! The womb warrior and One Tree Hill/Chicago Med/Vampire Diaries star chats with us on being LOUD AF about her activism and values, clapping back to the haters as a soon-to-be-parent for abortion access, her latest IG live series “Stream of Consciousness,” and telling her abortion story in People Magazine. PLUS! Renee Bracey Sherman, Co-Author of Liberating Abortion and Founder/Executive Director of We Testify is BACK with the Buzzkills to spill all the guts on her extraordinary, must-read book that deep dives into the history of abortion through re-centering the experiences of the Black and Brown folks who have had abortions and the leaders of the Reproductive Justice movement who continue to pave the path to bodily autonomy.  Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our five-part OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead @LizzWinsteadMoji Alawode-El @MojiLocks SPECIAL GUESTS:Renee Bracey Sherman IG/TikTok: @ReneeBraceySherman TW: @RBraceyShermanTorrey DeVitto IG: @TorreyDeVitto GUEST LINKS: Liberating Abortion WebsiteRenee Bracey Sherman WebsiteWe TestifyThe A-Files: Secret History of AbortionFrom Back Alley to the BorderUndue BurdenTorrey DeVitto FacebookMatrescence by Lucy Jones NEWS DUMP:Anti-abortion Groups Want Supreme Court to Get Rid of Protest-Free Zones at ClinicsAbortion Laws Are Straining the Ob-Gyn Workforce in Texas: ReportMedication Abortion “Reversal” Is Not Supported by ScienceThe Arizona Abortion Clinic Testing the Limits of the State's BanCamelback ClinicMeet George Raymond Haynie III and Shannon Ashley Haynie: “Aryan Fest” Hosts and Neo-Nazi Pregnancy Crisis Housing OrganizersAbout: Schatzkind ServicesThese Maternity Homes Offer Sanctuary, but It Can Feel Oppressive EPISODE LINKS:COMSTOCK V. SENATOR TINA SMITH DEBATECALL TO ACTION 11/19: The Spell of Red RiverSTREAM: No One Asked You on JoltOperation Save AbortionSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActBUY: Reproductive Rights Wall Art!EMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK PodcastInstagram ~ @AbortionFrontTwitter ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

FULL TRANSCRIPT HERE.  WE DID A THING! Get your ear holes ready for our must-listen training sesh, Operation Save Abortion: Ballot Initiatives! November's election is creeping up, and we want to make sure YOU are geared up to protect abortion wherever you are. We've rallied together an all-star trifecta of folks who put in the WORK for pro-abortion ballot initiative campaigns from two of the TEN states that have abortion on their ballot, PLUS a guest from a state whose abortion amendment won last year! You're about to get ALLLLL the tea from ballot initiative experts and abobo-loving activists about how the process works, the challenges they face, and – most importantly – how YOU can plug in to help no matter where you live! Who's fighting the fight with us this week?Chris Love, Spokesperson from Arizona for Abortion Access, leads the conversation on all things ballot initiative in The Grand Canyon State. Kellie Copeland, Executive Director of Abortion Forward, representing Ohio, chats with us on their AMAZING win earlier this year and delivers hope for all of the ten abobo amendments on the November ballot. AND, Karen Middleton, President of Cobalt Advocates, drops her knowledge on what's next for Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom. Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu.  HOSTS:Lizz Winstead @LizzWinsteadMoji Alawode-El @MojiLocks SPECIAL GUESTS:Chris Love IG: @MsChrisLove TW: @LegallyLoveKellie Copeland TW: @KellCope IG/TW/TikTok: @abortionforwardKaren Middleton IG: @KarenSMiddleton BALLOT INITIATIVE LINKS: Arizona: Arizona for Abortion Access IG/TikTok: @arizonaforabortionaccess TW: @azforaccessColorado: Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom IG/TW: @co4reproFlorida: Floridians Protecting Freedom IG: @floridareprofreedom @yes4Florida TW/TikTok: @yes4florida Maryland: Freedom in Reproduction – Maryland (FIRM) IG/TW: @mdreprofreedomMissouri: Missourians for Constitutional Freedom IG: @moconstitutionalfreedom TW: @Missourians4CFMontana: Montanans Securing Reproductive Rights IG/TW/TikTok: @mtreprorightsNebraska: Protect Our Rights IG/TikTok: @protectourrights2024 TW: @POR2024South Dakota: Dakotans for Health IG: @dakotansforhealth TW: @ForDakotansNevada: Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom IG/TW: @nv4reprofreedomNew York: New Yorkers for Equal Rights IG/TW: @Yesonprop1ny EPISODE LINKS:OpSave TOOLKITSOperation Save AbortionAbortion ForwardCitizens Not PoliticiansSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActBUY: Reproductive Rights Wall Art!EMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK PodcastInstagram ~ @AbortionFrontTwitter ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

Bill talks with David Noll, one of the co-authors of Vigilante Nation. How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy. The new and important book examines the threat of state-sponsored vigilantism in the United States. The book traces the history of vigilantism in America, such as the Fugitive Slave Act, and Noll argues that the MAGA movement is now trying to institutionalize and normalize the use of vigilante power to enforce its agenda. Examples include Texas' bounty system for reporting on abortion providers, laws in states like Florida and Georgia that enable citizens to challenge voter eligibility, and efforts in states like Indiana and Florida to enable vigilantes to police teachers and libraries. Noll says these state-level experiments with vigilantism could be a blueprint for a future Trump administration to nationalize and further empower vigilante groups, such as by aggressively enforcing the Comstock Act to restrict access to abortion pills. When bill asks Noel what can be done he calls for Blue state legislatures to more actively push back against these state-level efforts to enable vigilantism, rather than leaving it unchallenged.Today's Bill Press Pod is supported by The United food and Commercial Workers Union. More information at UFCW.orgSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

SO MANY MISOGYNISTS, SO LITTLE TIME! This week, we're spilling tea on how Ron DeSATAN is preparing for November's election by sending his doorknocking harassholes (AKA Florida cops) to scare the shit out of people who signed the abortion ballot petition. PLUS, this week laid out a Smorgasbord of Smug online and we highlight and drag the most foul of the white guy “abortion bans don't kill people” takes. AND OMG! We're debuting a new game this episode, muahaha! PLUS WE'VE GOT GUESTS!! Legal genius, and Strict Scrutiny podcast co-host, Kate Shaw, digs into the nooks and crannies of Project 2025 and drops her 411 on what this dystopian nightmare would mean for abortion access. We're asking all the Q's and Kate's delivering all the A's.  Serotonin boost? Hilarious comedian, writer, and actor Zainab Johnson's got you! The Upload and Hijabs Off (Amazon Prime) star blabs with the Buzzkills about her latest comedy special, relishing in Muslim joy, and why she decided to kick chasing perfectionism to the curb.  Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu. OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our five-part OpSave pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead @LizzWinsteadMoji Alawode-El @MojiLocks SPECIAL GUESTS:Kate Shaw IG: @KateaShawZainab Johnson IG/TW: @ZainabJohnson TikTok: @TheZainabJohnson  GUEST LINKS: Strict Scrutiny Podcast IG: @StrictScrutinyPodcast TW: @StrictScrutiny_STREAM: Zainab's special “Hijabs Off” Watch Zainab on Upload on Amazon PrimeStream to Zainab's I'm Reasonable PodcastZainab Johnson's Website NEWS DUMP:Senate Dems' Emergency Abortion Care BlitzJudge Sides With North Dakota Catholic Diocese, Suspends Abortion, IVF and LGBTQ ProtectionsLittle-Known East Texas Church Paid Legal Bills for a Prominent Anti-abortion LawyerFlorida Law Enforcers Are Investigating the State's Abortion Ballot InitiativeWomen on TikTok Are Schooling a Trump Ally Who Denied People Are “Bleeding Out” Due to Abortion Bans EPISODE LINKS:COMSTOCKTOBER WebsiteACTIVATE: 10/8 Operation Save Abortion: Ballot Initiative Training ACTIVATE 10/1 VIRTUAL ACTION: Religion & Repro TrainingSIGN: Repeal the Comstock ActBUY: Reproductive Rights Wall Art!EMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK Podcast Instagram ~ @AbortionFrontTwitter ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFrontTALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!

Annie Laurie reports on religiously motivated abortion referenda in seven states around the country, as well as the repressive 19th-century Comstock Act that is still invoked today to limit women's rights as it did with Margaret Sanger. We hear Dan Barker's tribute song to Margaret Sanger called "No Gods, No Masters." Then we speak with scholar Matthew D. Taylor about his new book about the January 6 insurrection, The Violent Take it By Force: The Christian Movement that is Threatening Our Democracy.

Anthony Comstock (1844-1915) would be nothing more than a footnote from an ugly, retrograde, and bygone period of American history, except that Dobbs made the laws that bear his name suddenly relevant again. But who was Comstock? What made him such a woman-hating weirdo? Why did he hold sway for so long, and how was Comstockery defeated? Amy Sohn, the author of  “The Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship & Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age,” talks to Greg Olear about all things Comstock: who he was; how he rose to power; what laws he enacted; how he's similar to Leonard Leo, Donald Trump, and other current weirdos; and the remarkable women who were his adversaries.Amy Sohn is the New York Times-bestselling author of 13 books, including the novels “Prospect Park West,” “Motherland,” and “The Actress”; the parodic parable “CBD!”; and “Brooklyn Bailey, the Missing Dog,” her first book for children. She has also written two screenplays, “Spin the Bottle” and “Pagans,” as well as “Avenue Amy,” one of the first original programs to air on Oxygen, in which she also starred. In 1996, a year after graduating from Brown University, she launched an autobiographical dating diary, “Female Trouble,” in the downtown weekly New York Press. She subsequently wrote a column at the New York Post and was a contributing editor at New York magazine. As a freelance journalist, she has written for the New York Times, The New York Times Book Review, Slate, Details, Harper's Bazaar, Elle, Men's Journal, Playboy, and many others. Her latest book, “The Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship & Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age,” was published July 6, 2021 with Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Follow Amy:https://x.com/amysohnBuy “The man Who Hated Women”:https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250174819/themanwhohatedwomenCheck out her other books:https://www.amazon.com/stores/Amy-Sohn/author/B004NA8V0EMore about Amy:https://www.amysohn.com/bio/ Prevail is sponsored by BetterHelp. Get 10% off your first month at http://betterhelp.com/greg Subscribe to The Five 8:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0BRnRwe7yDZXIaF-QZfvhACheck out ROUGH BEAST, Greg's new book:https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D47CMX17ROUGH BEAST is now available as an audiobook:https://www.audible.com/pd/Rough-Beast-Audiobook/B0D8K41S3T Would you like to tell us more about you? http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short

Kate and Leah speak with Rebecca Nagle, author of By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land about the battlefield that is federal Indian law. Then, all three hosts speak with law professors Reva Siegel and Mary Ziegler about their paper for the Yale Law Journal, Comstockery: How Government Censorship Gave Birth to the Law of Sexual and Reproductive Freedom, and May Again Threaten It. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Threads, and Bluesky

Under a second Donald Trump presidency, The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 would provide a blueprint for carrying out extreme policies. But in many parts of the country, these restrictive policies are already in effect and Project 2025 would simply expand these threats to multiple facets of American life. In this first episode of How to Win's series, “The Threat of Project 2025,” Ali Velshi unpacks the alarming agenda for reproductive rights, including the criminalization of mailing abortion pills and eliminating the Department of Health and Human Services. Ali speaks with Amanda Zurawski, who nearly lost her life when she was denied an emergency abortion in Texas, and Georgetown law professor Dr. Michele Goodwin highlights the history of policing women's reproductive rights, underscoring the broader threat to American democracy. Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. As a subscriber you'll also be able to get occasional bonus content from this and other shows.

Joe Sudbay is in for John once again. He talks about Trump's ever changing stance on abortion and the Tim Walz & Kamala Harris interview on CNN. Then, he chats with political strategist Max Burns on the Trump train running out of steam and how Kamala is leading in America's housing crisis. Next, Joe interviews journalist Joan McCarter on Gwen Walz responding to JD Vance, Trump's comments on abortion, and the Comstock Act. And finally, he take calls from Charles in California on Trump reaching new lows and making sure Kamala wins in 2024 and also Manesh in New Jersey on the upcoming Kamala/Trump debate and people trolling Trump on billboards in Bedminster.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Comstock Act of the 1800s is still affecting us today, especially Utah & Idaho abortion laws. Dr Amanda Hendrix-Komoto from Montana State University discusses current abortion fights in Utah and Idaho and how history influences us today. Check out our conversation... https://youtu.be/YBMowwjTbJ8 Don't miss our other conversations with Amanda: https://gospeltangents.com/people/amanda-hendrix-komoto/ Comstock Act Today Idaho's Abortion Fight   Utah's Abortion Fight Widespread Agreement on Abortion   Tragic Late-Term Abortion Story Why Amanda Writes about Hard Things Last Thoughts   Ina Coolbrith & Minerva Teichert   Copyright © 2024 Gospel Tangents All Rights Reserved Except for book reviews, no content may be reproduced without written permission. transcript to follow Copyright © 2024 Gospel Tangents All Rights Reserved Except for book reviews, no content may be reproduced without written permission.

Abortion and reproductive health issues headlined the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, as expected. But what Vice President Kamala Harris has in mind for other health policies as the Democratic nominee remains something of a mystery. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump says he would not use the 19th-century Comstock Act to impose, in effect, a national ban on abortion, which angered his anti-abortion backers. Alice Miranda Ollstein of Politico, Joanne Kenen of Politico and Johns Hopkins University, and Shefali Luthra of The 19th join KFF Health News' Julie Rovner to discuss these stories and more. Also this week, Rovner interviews KFF Health News' Tony Leys, who reported and wrote the latest KFF Health News-NPR “Bill of the Month” feature about a woman who fought back after being charged for two surgeries despite undergoing only one. Plus, for “extra credit” the panelists suggest health policy stories they read this week that they think you should read, too: Julie Rovner: The New York Times' “Hot Summer Threatens Efficacy of Mail-Order Medications,” by Emily Baumgaertner. Joanne Kenen: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's “Who Is Gus Walz and What Is a Non-Verbal Learning Disorder?” by Natalie Eilbert. Alice Miranda Ollstein: The Wall Street Journal's “The Fight Against DEI Programs Shifts to Medical Care,” by Theo Francis and Melanie Evans. Shefali Luthra: The Washington Post's “Weight-Loss Drugs Are a Hot Commodity. But Not in Low-Income Neighborhoods,” by Ariana Eunjung Cha. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After Texas passed a six-week abortion ban and Roe v. Wade was overturned, many abortion clinics had to close in the Lone Star state. Some providers considered opening clinics in eastern New Mexico, so that they could keep providing services to women from Texas and other states where abortion is banned. But some neighbors in eastern New Mexico were not so welcoming to this idea. In this episode of our continuing series “The Latino Factor: How We Vote,” we travel to eastern New Mexico to meet Latinas and Latinos who have mobilized politically for and against abortion in the region. We also learn about how the anti-abortion movement is trying to revive an obscure law from the 19th Century, the Comstock Act, to stop clinics from opening by passing local ordinances.  You can read more about the episode here. Subscribe to our newsletter by going to the top of our homepage. 

In this, the penultimate episode of Season 7 of the PREVAIL podcast, Greg Olear discusses (for a solid 20 minutes, which is probably too long, if we're being honest) the events of the week: Donald's earsay, Joe's departure, Kamala's ascension.Then, he welcomes Jessica Cale, the host of the DIRTY SEXY HISTORY podcast, to talk about her background as a novelist and historian, the castles of Wales, piracy, syphilis, medieval penitentials, the Oneida colony, the Comstock Act vis a vis Project 2025, the history of abortion, and more. Plus: the safety is off.Jessica Cale is the host of Dirty Sexy History, a podcast that looks beyond the sanitized and the idealized to the dirty reality of human history. She's the author of ten works of historical fiction, including the Southwark Saga, and numerous nonfiction pieces. She earned degrees in Ancient History, Medieval Studies, and Creative and Media Writing at Swansea University while climbing castles and photographing mines for BBC History magazine. She appears in Netflix's The Lost Pirate Kingdom.Follow Jessica:https://x.com/DrtySexyHistoryListen to DIRTY SEXY HISTORY:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dirty-sexy-history/id1568066159About her podcast:https://dirtysexyhistory.com/welcome/Buy her books:https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B00PVDV9EW/ Subscribe to The Five 8:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0BRnRwe7yDZXIaF-QZfvhACheck out ROUGH BEAST, Greg's new book:https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D47CMX17ROUGH BEAST is now available as an audiobook:https://www.audible.com/pd/Rough-Beast-Audiobook/B0D8K41S3T Would you like to tell us more about you? http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short

Anthony Comstock (March 7, 1844 – September 21, 1915) was an American anti-vice activist, United States Postal Inspector, and secretary of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice (NYSSV), who was dedicated to upholding Christian morality. He opposed obscene literature, abortion, contraception, masturbation, gambling, prostitution, and patent medicine. The terms comstockery and comstockism refer to his extensive censorship campaign of materials that he considered obscene, including birth control advertised or sent by mail. He used his positions in the U.S. Postal Service and the NYSSV (in association with the New York police) to make numerous arrests for obscenity and gambling. Besides these pursuits, he was also involved in efforts to suppress fraudulent banking schemes, mail swindles, and medical quackery.[2]

Come to Umami mommy as Erin is under lock and key by Jigsaw, and we learn the difference between epsom salts and regular salts. Bryan takes us on a journey through Pornhub's relative searches by state and we discuss what "vintage cowboys" and "hard pigs" might be. Plus, Erin tells us about Minnesota Senator Tina Smith's plan to repeal the Comstock Act which restricts abortion-related materials from being sent through the mail as the GOP attempts to restrict abortion-related care nationwide. For hours of bonus content visit www.patreon.com/attitudes Join us on Discord for episode discussions and Wednesday Night Watch Parties! https://discord.gg/gK2eZHCSM7See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Some Democrats are trying to repeal the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that they worry could be used by the GOP to restrict abortion nationwide. Washington Post reporter Dan Diamond explains. Apple News In Conversation explores the real reason so many people are getting cosmetic surgery. CNN looks into how the “song of the summer” became a cultural phenomenon. Today’s episode was guest-hosted by Yasmeen Khan.

What do you call a case where there's no standing and yet the lawsuit is still standing? FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine AKA the mifepristone case, AKA the case that tried to raise a zombie law from the dead, and will now continue to roam the lower courts in search of a national abortion ban.  While the Comstock Act was not mentioned in the US Supreme Court's unanimous decision to maintain the legal status quo on abortion pills, the overton window just got wedged open a little wider. In this Opinionpalooza extra episode of Amicus, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss SCOTUS' abortion pill decision in depth and explore the consequences of a case that was doomed to fail before even this Supreme Court, but is also doomed to return to haunt us. This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate's coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. We kicked things off this year by explaining How Originalism Ate the Law. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus. (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch!) This episode is member-exclusive. Listen to it now by subscribing to Slate Plus. By joining, not only will you unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes of Amicus, but you'll also access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jill Wine-Banks hosts #SistersInLaw live in Chicago to share their takeaways from Trump's election interference trial and review its evidence, witness testimonies, and potential verdicts.  Then the #Sisters discuss Trump's repeated violations of his gag order, the consequences so far, and whether his continued contempt of the court violates the conditions of his pretrial release. They also cover the revival of the Comstock Act and other threats to abortion rights after Dobbs, explore the legal patchwork of state restrictions, and take questions on everything from presidential immunity to SCOTUS ethics. #SistersInlaw LIVE: Get tickets now - politicon.com/tour May 9 - Detroit - Royal Oak Music Theatre May 30 - Boston - Shubert Theatre politicon.com/tour Get your #SistersInLaw merchandise at politicon.com/merch WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon.  Please Support This Week's Sponsors: Aura Frames: With Mother's Day coming up, showcase your favorite memories and get $30 off plus free shipping on their best-selling digital frame at auraframes.com with the code: SISTERS Fast Growing Trees: Get the perfect trees and plants to transform your environment with additional fifteen percent off at fastgrowingtrees.com/sisters with the code: SISTERS Aura:  Explore the effectiveness of Aura's parental controls with a free 14-day trial when you go to aura.com/sisters Mentioned By The #Sisters: From Kim on how to handle Trump's contempt for the courts Get Barb's New Book:  Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America Barb's Book Tour  Get More From #SistersInLaw Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | Unbound Newsletter Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC

Erin is on the move to Vancouver for work, and Bryan saw two “innings” of a Brooklyn Nets game. Erin details the horrors of the Arizona Supreme Court's decision to enforce the 1864 Comstock Act which effectively bans abortion in the state. Bryan pokes fun of Fox News' Jeanine Pirro's latest irritation - Woke Scrabble.  For our Dateline and Columbo Recap episodes, visit www.patreon.com/attitudes Join us on Discord for episode discussions and Wednesday night Watch Parties! https://discord.gg/gK2eZHCSM7See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vote for #SisterInLaw: Webby Awards People's Voice #SistersInlaw LIVE: Get tickets now - politicon.com/tour May 2 - Chicago - Athenaeum Center May 9 - Detroit - Royal Oak Music Theatre May 30 - Boston - Shubert Theatre politicon.com/tour Barb McQuade hosts #SistersInLaw to explain what to expect when Trump's election interference trial begins.  The #Sisters review the witness list, dismiss Trump's delay attempts, lay out the conditions necessary to prove election interference, and explain how the jurors will be selected.  Then the #Sisters preview upcoming SCOTUS cases that will decide whether Trump's J6 actions fall under presidential immunity, and whether a payment after the fact is considered a bribe under public corruption statutes.  They also discuss the revival of Arizona's 1864 abortion ban, the Comstock Act, and if we should fear nationwide restrictions. Get your #SistersInLaw gear or the perfect gift at politicon.com/merch WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast #SistersInlaw LIVE: Get tickets now - politicon.com/tour May 2 - Chicago - Athenaeum Center May 9 - Detroit - Royal Oak Music Theatre May 30 - Boston - Shubert Theatre politicon.com/tour Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon.  Please Support This Week's Sponsors: Aura:  Explore the effectiveness of Aura's parental controls with a free 14-day trial when you go to aura.com/sisters LolaVie:  Get 15% off LolaVie with the code SISTERS at https://www.lolavie.com/ #lolaviepod Blueland: For 15% off your order of green cleaning products, go to blueland.com/sisters Osea Malibu: Start glowing with 10% off your order of clean beauty products from OSEA Malibu when you go to oseamalibu.com and use promo code: SISTERS Get Barb's New Book:  Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America Barb's Book Tour  Get More From #SistersInLaw Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | Unbound Newsletter Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC