Attempt to persuade or to determine the truth of a conclusion
POPULARITY
Categories
88 episodes with argue
114 episodes with argue
76 episodes with argue
281 episodes with argue
49 episodes with argue
54 episodes with argue
133 episodes with argue
57 episodes with argue
13 episodes with argue
15 episodes with argue
11 episodes with argue
13 episodes with argue
9 episodes with argue
47 episodes with argue
9 episodes with argue
37 episodes with argue
23 episodes with argue
12 episodes with argue
21 episodes with argue
27 episodes with argue
7 episodes with argue
16 episodes with argue
179 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
10 episodes with argue
18 episodes with argue
13 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
8 episodes with argue
8 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
7 episodes with argue
7 episodes with argue
13 episodes with argue
5 episodes with argue
5 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
5 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
7 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
11 episodes with argue
8 episodes with argue
12 episodes with argue
10 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
5 episodes with argue
6 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
10 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
4 episodes with argue
2 episodes with argue
8 episodes with argue
3 episodes with argue
Is there any way to argue today that attacking Iran was anything but a mistake? Chad opens the hour with that discussion after confirmed reports that the American helicopter was shot down by fire from Iran.
Plus, President Trump confirms that a U.S. Army helicopter went down near the Gulf of Oman, Plano is taking the next step toward building a billion dollar arena and entertainment district for the Dallas Stars, business leaders in Dallas are trying to predict ways the new arena for the Dallas Mavericks will transform the neighborhood around the former site of Valley View Mall, and more!
Decades of House Ag bipartisanship was already declining, but election-year politics seems to have done it in last week.
They debate whether it is easier to mimic a professional baseball player or a golfer, with Leroy arguing that golf's consistency makes it impossible to fake. The conversation compares the difficulty of hitting a major league fastball to playing four rounds of professional golf. Additionally, they recap Nelly Korda's U.S. Women's Open win. 02:00 - Golf Tournament Recap 04:22 - Pro Athlete Fakeability Debate 12:15 - Scheffler Versus Alcantara 23:08 - Marlins Victory Over Rays
Writers want sharp dialogue, compelling conflict, and characters with enough tension to keep readers turning pages. But the problem is that conflict can easily get stuck. Characters snipe at each other, trade sarcasm, or argue at the same emotional level for too long. The scene has energy, but it does not move. The relationship does not shift. The reader starts to feel like the conversation is circling instead of building. In this episode, Laura Humm coaches Tony Maxwell on how to make character conflict escalate, de-escalate, and actually change the relationship between characters. They discuss how to balance prose and dialogue, how to use the "zipper" technique to check the rhythm of a conversation, and how to move an enemies-to-allies dynamic from hostility into vulnerability. They also dig into how to write an arrogant protagonist without making readers hate him, how to give both characters expertise and agency, and how to use specialized knowledge—like veterinary medicine—without turning the scene into an info dump. You'll learn how to make dialogue feel like a tennis match, how to hide exposition inside conflict, how to use vulnerability to shift a relationship, and how to make every joke, barb, and emotional landing serve the scene. Watch this episode if your characters have great banter but the scene still feels flat, if your exposition keeps slowing the story down, or if you're trying to write conflict that actually changes something. For more on writing dialogue, come to DialogueDoctor.com. For the Fiction Makers Conference, come to FictionMakers.Live
As we approach our nation's 250th birthday, there's a question we've heard: Have we forgotten how to argue with ourselves? Now we all know how to argue -- at least how to scream over each other -- that's pretty obvious. But what about actual debate and actual discussion that helps us find common ground and a common path forward? For today's America250 coverage, Inside Sources discusses this question with Sam Abrams, a contributor for the Deseret News and a professor of politics at Sarah Lawrence College.
Send us Fan MailWe start with NBA Finals heat, then pull the thread into a bigger talk about pressure, image, and what “hype” actually proves. From First Sergeant culture to Freemasons hazing stories to advice for brand new Master Sergeants, we keep coming back to one question: are you performing leadership or practicing it? • Spurs vs Knicks series reactions, Brunson as the matchup problem, Wemby frustration and inexperience • NBA Finals comeback history, the weight of losing two home games, “league narrative” talk • why the First Sergeant chant feels disconnected, when traditions fit, and why messing it up looks terrible • Freemasons recruitment story, initiation vs hazing, hygiene and respect as non-negotiables • First Sergeant Academy takes, why awards can promote fake behavior, what the school can and can't teach • guidance for new Master Sergeants, mentorship expectations, mess dress standard, leading without selfies • what to tell great people who don't get promoted, controlling the 24 hours after the list drops • Pentagon vs unit timing, learning your craft before trying to shape policy • meet-and-greet ethics, paying for celebrities, autograph-on-the-back debate, fan boundaries You can always leave us a voicemail as well, uh, and just ask questions or give comments.
Supervisors in Cochise County are debating who should be in the room when they meet behind closed doors — and whether staff and attorneys are there to help, or to hover.Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
EDIT: the audio was fixed from first publish, sorry! way too long lolWe are back, baby! Back and not taking a break for a bit so buckle up, it's monster hunting time! If Bigfoot is the best at hide-and-seek, who or what else is out there, unseen and secreted away, underground, in a cave, out of sight? Tons of things, it turns out!Intro chat includes horror movies portraying podcasters, why passkeys/passwords are the worst and technology sucks, and other random thoughts, then we dive into Greek Myth! Ever heard of the Minotaur? And are mazes like labyrinths, could you have a corn labyrinth??Next it's on to some Norse lore, and the landvaettir land spirits that live in Iceland mostly. They guard the land and live in it too. To top it off, the Tatzelwurm! this mountain dragon dude has many names but only 2 little legs and big eyes! Like a Toothless, he kinda sounds cute, no? You can catch a peek if you are in the Alps, so bring your skis to see this mystical cryptid! Thanks for listening and tune in next time for true crime-pranks and petty hoaxes!Darkcast Promo of the Week: Conspiring to Argue
Hulk Hogan throws a fit when The Macho Man randy Savage cuts a deal without Hogan's knowledge. Ric Flair battles an old foe when he defends his WCW World Heavyweight Championship against Sting. But that's not the Main Event as Hogan closes the show against the almighty Meng. The Four Horsemen conduct business as they strike a deal with the Dungeon of Doom. Sting continues to be the most clueless man in professional wrestling. Follow us on Instagram @GetItAgainPodcast Got 2 (or more) words for us? Email us at GetItAgainPodcast@gmail.com
Let's revisit an episode from 2023!Lindsie is joined by, the one and only, Nannie Faye to give us some good ol' grandmotherly advice! Nannie discusses her thoughts on always choosing your partner before your friends, how she's always been honest with all her grandchildren, the differences in the younger generations, and shares her advice to other grandparents when it comes to dealing with their grandchildren.Nannie also answers listener questions, talks about the time she used her Harvard Medical Journal to diagnose a sickness, and after a scandalous Weekly Tea, reminds us about God's intentions with marriage. Follow us @TheSouthernTeaPodcast for more!Thank you to our sponsors!Quince: Go to Quince.com/tea for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
(13) Peter Berkowitz examines two distinct intellectual critiques of the United States as it approaches its 250th anniversary: the postmodern progressives and the post-liberal right. The progressives argue that America is mired in systemic oppression and that its founding principles are the actual cause of its problems. The post-liberal right, conversely, views the nation as decadent and corrupt because it fails to recognize a higher religious authority. Both groups advocate for fundamental changes, with the right-wing critique specifically calling for the government to take a more active role in leading citizens toward virtue and salvation.1671NEW AMSTERDAM
Send us Fan MailWe play a listener voicemail, catch up on our weekend sports stories, and argue about the moment ticket prices cross the line from memorable to ridiculous. Then we dig into Brockmire Season 1 Episode 5 and how the show turns viral outrage, podcast culture, and “authentic” fandom into a weird kind of salvation for a struggling team. • reacting to a listener voicemail and the “Smitty and Two Legs” joke • weekend recap with minor league baseball wins, rainouts, and theme nights • Negro Leagues celebration and why Josh Gibson still matters • sticker shock on Stanley Cup ticket prices and what we would pay for • building a home watch party with a projector instead of buying seats • Brockmire S1E5 highlights from the Heart To Heart parody to the viral clips • the ASMR rant and how fast internet trends age out • the podcast and NPR angle with This American Life style fans • the fracking company threat and how popularity shifts leverage Make sure you go to YouTube, watch this because we are also here recording this, and hit the subscribe button on YouTube. We are trying to get to a thousand followers on our YouTube channel. Support the showMake sure to follow the Dad Hat Chronicles: https://linktr.ee/TheDadHatChronicles
(2) Continuing their debate, Gaius and Germanicus debunk the "Thucydides Trap," labeling it a modern "literary invention" rather than a historical law. They argue the Peloponnesian War was not an inevitable clash but was triggered by Pericles baiting Sparta into conflict. Germanicus critiques the theory for creating a self-fulfilling prophecy lacking scientific basis. They contrast the long-term endurance of civilizations like Persia and China with the transient dominance of Greek city-states. Ultimately, they observe that Sparta's supremacy ended not through total destruction, but through the profound battlefield shame of being defeated by the city of Thebes.1717
Working women, "big dogs" who want a soft life. Are UFOs real? Go and forgive your mother, and overcome fear.
(11) Jeff McCausland analyzes the tense naval standoff between U.S. and Iranian forces in the Strait of Hormuz. Critics argue the administration failed to anticipate the blockade or effectively address regional Iranian proxies.KNOSSOS CRETE
Fred wants to know what's the stupidest reason you've argued with your partner.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A police officer wrote a ticket to a woman for texting using her phone in her right hand while driving. Only issue is, she doesn't have a right hand. Plus, Fred wants to know what's the stupidest reason you've argued with your partner.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Well, you would have done well to heed Nicola Willis's warnings ahead of this Budget that there would be no spend-up, because there is no spend-up. There is no money for - well, there is money for the important stuff. You've got the schools and the classrooms, and the hospitals, and the Waikato Expressway, and Winston Peters' pet projects. But everywhere else, there is just no new money. It is tight. Now, that is exactly how it should be. And in fact, I would say this still doesn't go far enough. For the third Nicola Willis Budget in a row, it isn't tight enough because we haven't even hit our debt peak yet. We are still going up that peak mountain. That is still two years away, which means that interest payments are already at $9 billion and they're only going to go up. It's going to take us to about 2040, roughly, before debt is back to where Bill English left it as a proportion of GDP. And that is just the most optimistic scenario. The rest of the scenario is basically never getting back down to where Bill English left it. Nicola Willis is making a virtue today of the fact that she's getting the books back in black by 2028/29, which she says is earlier than expected. But that is a little bit of game-playing that's going on, because it was always going to be 2028/29 until December. Then in December it changed, then it became 2029/30. Now it's just been brought back again to where it was about six months ago. And that is only, by the way, because Nicola Willis is using a made-up measure, OBEGALX, which makes surplus appear a year earlier than the standard old measure, which basically would have had surplus arriving only in 2030 or thereabouts. And by the way, all of this is a broken promise, because Nicola Willis promised the country that if you voted for National at the last election, she would have the books back in the black. When? Today. This year. But after three Budgets, I think we've learned to temper our expectations on that front. Now, on the bright side though, she has decided to borrow $6 billion less than she had planned to. I will take that. And while there is a lot of poor spending that continues, at least there isn't new, more poor spending. And for that, I suppose you have to give the Budget a solid holding-pattern score of 6 out of 10. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Well, you would have done well to heed Nicola Willis's warnings ahead of this Budget that there would be no spend-up, because there is no spend-up. There is no money for - well, there is money for the important stuff. You've got the schools and the classrooms, and the hospitals, and the Waikato Expressway, and Winston Peters' pet projects. But everywhere else, there is just no new money. It is tight. Now, that is exactly how it should be. And in fact, I would say this still doesn't go far enough. For the third Nicola Willis Budget in a row, it isn't tight enough because we haven't even hit our debt peak yet. We are still going up that peak mountain. That is still two years away, which means that interest payments are already at $9 billion and they're only going to go up. It's going to take us to about 2040, roughly, before debt is back to where Bill English left it as a proportion of GDP. And that is just the most optimistic scenario. The rest of the scenario is basically never getting back down to where Bill English left it. Nicola Willis is making a virtue today of the fact that she's getting the books back in black by 2028/29, which she says is earlier than expected. But that is a little bit of game-playing that's going on, because it was always going to be 2028/29 until December. Then in December it changed, then it became 2029/30. Now it's just been brought back again to where it was about six months ago. And that is only, by the way, because Nicola Willis is using a made-up measure, OBEGALX, which makes surplus appear a year earlier than the standard old measure, which basically would have had surplus arriving only in 2030 or thereabouts. And by the way, all of this is a broken promise, because Nicola Willis promised the country that if you voted for National at the last election, she would have the books back in the black. When? Today. This year. But after three Budgets, I think we've learned to temper our expectations on that front. Now, on the bright side though, she has decided to borrow $6 billion less than she had planned to. I will take that. And while there is a lot of poor spending that continues, at least there isn't new, more poor spending. And for that, I suppose you have to give the Budget a solid holding-pattern score of 6 out of 10. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tonight's conversation walks straight into a relational nerve most people would rather medicate with gender slogans, therapy language, or moral superiority: what happens when a man becomes happy without needing a woman to authorize, regulate, rescue, validate, inspire, approve, or emotionally complete that happiness? Alison Armstrong's provocation does not merely ask whether women “attack happy men.” That phrasing gives the room something to argue about. The deeper wound asks whether some women feel unconsciously displaced when male happiness no longer orbits around female emotional centrality. If his striving once proved devotion, if his need once confirmed her importance, if his instability once gave her a role, if his pursuit once made the relationship feel alive, then his peace may not register as health. It may register as loss of influence, loss of necessity, loss of proof. This is not an indictment of women. It is an indictment of unconscious dependency contracts hiding inside intimacy. Men do it too. Parents do it. Lovers do it. Communities do it. Entire cultures train people to confuse being needed with being loved. But tonight we place the spotlight where the clip places it: on the possibility that certain women may unconsciously experience a self-sourced man as less reachable, less governable, less emotionally available, or less relationally useful precisely because he no longer needs suffering to prove connection. The psychological question becomes brutal: do we love people, or do we love the role their incompleteness gives us? The spiritual question cuts deeper: can love survive when it no longer feeds the ego's need to matter? And the cultural question may disturb everybody: if modern intimacy has been built on pursuit, proof, emotional labor, and mutual insecurity, what happens when one person finally becomes free? That is tonight's investigation: when happiness stops needing permission, who loses power? Allison's Bio: Alison Armstrong is a relationship educator and workshop facilitator who studies relationship patterns between men and women through observation and lived experience—not through clinical psychology or psychiatry. She does not present herself as a psychologist, therapist, neuroscientist, or academic researcher. Her work focuses on how men and women often misinterpret each other's emotional signals, communication styles, and expressions of connection. Her perspective is phenomenological and experiential rather than clinical doctrine.
How early is too early to leave a towel out on a chair? Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Roy Keane and Bruno Fernandes continue their war of words which is just lovely, while Brazilian midfielder Ederson agrees terms to join United. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Addressing public fear, AI Valley uses historical analogies to argue for moderate regulation to build trust. Gary Rivlincompares AI to the automobile; early cars lacked seatbelts and killed thousands, yet society did not revert to horse-and-buggy travel. Similarly, 19th-century railroads only gained public confidence once government standards ensured safety and reliability. Currently, most Americans remain fearful of AI, making policy debates essential for building long-term trust in the technology. Rivlin also highlights the geopolitical dimension, noting China's goal to dominate AI by 2030. He argues society should focus on immediate dangers, such as autonomous AI in warfare, rather than Hollywood-style scenarios. (4/8)1902 LA
"Virtual Reali-Tea" co-hosts Danny Murphy and Evan Real are recapping season one, episode nine of "The Real Housewives of Rhode Island." Ashley Iaconetti breaks down after Rosie Woods DiMare and Kelsey Swanson's feud continues at her trivia event. Tensions rise between Liz McGraw and Alicia Carmody as the ladies revisit Alicia's claims of homelessness. "Real Housewives of Rhode Island" airs Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on Bravo. Follow us on Instagram! Sign up for our newsletter! Check us out on YouTube! Head to our show page for more tea! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
If three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals rule the search of Richard Allen's home was unconstitutional, Indiana cannot use the .40-caliber pistol again. Not in this case. Not in a retrial. Not ever.That is the consequence sitting underneath the search warrant issue in the Delphi appeal. It is also the reason the de novo standard of review on that issue matters so much. De novo means the appellate panel owes no deference to Special Judge Fran Gull. They review the warrant afresh, as if no court had ever looked at it before. That is one of the few flaws in this case that cannot be cured by deference, by waiver, or by the harmless error framework the State has built its appellate brief around.And that is the forced choice three judges now have in front of them. Rule on the warrant and collapse the State's most important piece of physical evidence. Rule on a narrower ground and dodge that landmine, knowing the State will use any narrower ruling to walk Allen straight back into a retrial where the pistol still gets to come in.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski for Part Three of a three-part panel on where the Richard Allen appeal actually stands. They walk through the strategic geometry sitting in front of the panel. They get into the motion for oral arguments — filed by the defense, not joined by the State — and what that asymmetry says about which side feels good about its written record. They sit with the practical reality of an appellate panel that has all the power it needs to take this conviction apart at a structural level.Three judges. One warrant. A decision that could rewrite the entire case.LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #SearchWarrant #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #DeNovoReview #AbbyAndLibby #TrueCrime
Send us Fan MailYou just had a fight about the dishwasher. Or the thermostat. Or the vacation your partner keeps putting off. Spoiler: it wasn't about any of those things.Most arguments couples have about money are actually about something much deeper, and once you learn to spot it, you can't unsee it.In this episode, Jessica and Brandon break down how couples argue about money without ever actually talking about money. They share their own real-life examples, including Jessica's recent "I want to save $100,000" moment (and what was really underneath it), the time Brandon left Jessica's stocking empty on Christmas, and how they finally got on the same page about paying for their kids' college.You'll also learn the DREAM framework, their 5-step approach to decoding what your money arguments are really about and having the conversations that actually fix them.What you'll learn:Why fights about Target runs, utility bills, and vacation planning are rarely about the moneyHow scarcity mindsets and childhood money memories show up in your relationship right nowThe exact phrase that helps you peel back what a money argument is really aboutWhen to pause mid-fight and how to schedule a money date that actually worksHow tools like Monarch Money can eliminate the visibility gaps that fuel conflictFree resource: Grab their Dream Money Conversations guideSubscribe to The Sugar Daddy Podcast newsletterExplore The Sugar Daddy Podcast Stan Store — Downloadables, tools, and more to level up your money game together!Head over to our YouTube channel to catch this episode in full video form.Apply to be a guest on the show.You can also email us at: hello@thesugardaddypodcast.comConnect with us on Instagram We're most active over at @thesugardaddypodcastChat with BrandonWant to work together? Learn more about BrandonBook a free 30-min call to see if it's a fit.Show us some love, hit subscribe, leave a five star rating, and drop a quick review!Money, relationships, and the mindset to master both. Hosted by financial advisor Brandon and his wife Jessica, The Sugar Daddy Podcast breaks down how to build wealth, unpack old money beliefs, and have real conversations about love and finances. Their mission? To help couples and individuals grow rich in every sense of the word: emotionally, relationally and financially....
Send us Fan MailFast food opinions get personal fast, and we lean all the way into it. We start with the big four chains and rank Wendy's, McDonald's, Burger King, and Arby's based on what actually keeps people coming back: breakfast consistency, app deals, coupons that save your wallet, and whether the food matches the hype. If you care about McDonald's breakfast, Wendy's hit-or-miss streaks, or why Burger King “isn't hitting like it used to,” you'll feel seen.Then we widen the lane into the best fast food burgers conversation. We debate premium picks like Five Guys, talk Wendy's as a reliable burger option, and get into regional fast food legends, including In N Out Burger animal style, Checkers and Rally's, Culver's butter burger, and Whataburger. We also tackle the “are sandwich chains fast food” question, from Jersey Mike's and Subway to Penn Station and the difference between a chain sub and a true local deli sandwich.Nostalgia shows up big with McDonald's play places, Happy Meals, collectible toys, and the nuggets vs burger debate, plus a side quest into pickles that gets surprisingly heated. We finish with modern convenience and how DoorDash changes the whole fast food experience, then close on the only proper finale: milkshakes from McDonald's or Arby's versus a Wendy's Frosty, with a very real reminder that the McDonald's machine may never be working when you need it.Subscribe for more Ride Home Rants, share this with the friend who always orders the same thing, and leave a review with your most controversial fast food take.All music brought to you by former guest of the show SpeedoSubscribe for exclusive content: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1530455/support Buzzsprout - Let's get your podcast launched!Start for FREETactical BrotherhoodThe Tactical Brotherhood is a movement to support America.Dubby EnergyFROM GAMERS TO GYM JUNKIES TO ENTREPRENEURS, OUR PRODUCT IS FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO BE BETTER.ShankitgolfOur goal here at Shankitgolf is for everyone to have a great time on and off the golf courseSweet Hands SportsElevate your game with Sweet Hands Sports! Our sports gloves are designed for champions,Buddy's Beard CareBuddy's Beard Care provides premium men's grooming products at an affordable price.Deemed FitBe a part of our movement to instill confidence motivation and a willingness to keep pushing forwardWebb WesternWebb Western is for those who roll up their sleeves and do what it takes to get the job done. Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the showFollow us on all social mediaX: @mikebonocomedyInstagram: @mikebonocomedy@tiktok: @mikebono_comedianFacebook: @mikebonocomedy
Send us Fan Mail"Argue with reality, you'll suffer." In this powerful conversation, Brad Axelrad from Face Your Dragon podcast, explores the growing sense of disconnection many people have experienced in the post-COVID world and why fear often sits at the center of personal struggle and transformation. Together, the discussion dives into the five core fears that can keep people stuck, disconnected, and hesitant to fully step into their purpose."Your fears are your friend." Brad shares how facing fear instead of avoiding it can become a gateway to freedom, fulfillment, deeper connection, and authentic personal growth. The episode also highlights the importance of self-regulation, emotional awareness, and practical daily habits that support longevity, well-being, and resilience during rapidly changing times.This conversation offers a grounded and practical spiritual perspective on navigating uncertainty, building meaningful connections, and learning how small consistent steps can create lasting transformation. "Everything happens for a reason." You can find Brad here:Get Me On Podcasts - https://getmeonpodcast.com/Face Your Dragon Podcast - https://podcasts.apple.comEnlightened (HBO Show) - https://www.hbo.com/enlightenedJoin this monthly membership for steady support right where you are today, while gaining the clarity and awareness needed to move through the world feeling grounded and confident. Use code TNT20 to receive 20% off the membership.Enter ReAwaken Here Ready to FEEL more FREEDOM within? Access the FREE video series created by The Wayshowers College here! Enjoy the first chapter of The Soul Quake Survival Guide here!Support the showHi! I'm Teresa. I have created this podcast to support "unseen" aspects of your life. You can call this the spiritual side. The podcast offers interviews of authors, healers, and thought leaders, for a positive higher spiritual perspective. Including ourselves! Our mission is to stimulate your inner wisdom, meaning, and enthusiasm for your unique journey. My husband Tom and I are also certified Spiritual Educators, and Consultants, who help make spirituality practical. We work spiritual awareness and sensitivity in all areas of our life for positive living. Through TNT ( Teresa n' Tom :) SpiritWorks, we can help you tap into your own Inner Guidance system on a daily basis, create a healthy balance between Thought and Feeling, and discover a stronger connection between you and your personal Spirit Guides through your Inner and Outer communication system: your Four Spiritual Gifts. Unlock ways to make the spiritual part of life practical. Connect with us at TNT SpiritWorks today!Follow us on:
What is the real goal when conflict shows up in a marriage—winning the argument or finding resolution? Why do so many disagreements spiral out of control when two people who love each other simply see things differently? In this installment of Ron + Hope: Unfiltered, Pastors Ron and Hope get candid about the reality that every relationship will face tension, but healthy couples learn how to handle disagreement without turning it into a damaging argument.Drawing from their own marriage journey—from early financial struggles and family boundary issues to parenting decisions and everyday frustrations—they share honest stories and practical wisdom about communication, emotions, and conflict. Pastor Ron also breaks down simple but powerful steps for navigating disagreements: stick to the issue, manage your emotions, step away when tensions rise, and focus on resolution rather than proving who is right. If you want practical insight on how to protect your relationship and turn conflict into growth instead of division, you won't want to miss this episode of Ron + Hope: Unfiltered.Thank you to our Partner... GreenChef - Head to http://www.Greenchef.com/50RonAndHope and use code 50ronandhope to get fifty percent off your first month, then twenty percent off for two months.S5E13 (#211) Are there any topics you'd like us to discuss?Do you have any questions you'd like us to answer?Send them to unfiltered@ronandhope.com.Follow Ron Carpenter at https://www.instagram.com/ron.carpenter/Follow Hope Carpenter at https://www.instagram.com/pastorhope.carpenter/Subscribe to Ron's YouTube page at https://www.youtube.com/user/pastorroncarpenterSubscribe to Hope's YouTube page at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1TUxyS_-elLEOORZ2YiunA Website:http://www.ronandhope.com #RonCarpenter#HopeCarpenter#UnfilteredPodcastSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Proverbs 29:9-10. Don't argue with a cynic, what's wrong with Twitter, hate the sin and not the sinner.
Confirmation bias is shaping your decisions right now. Not occasionally. Every day. And the unsettling part is that the smarter you are, the harder it is to see it happening. By the end of this episode you'll know exactly what confirmation bias is. How to recognize when it has taken over a room. And three specific practices that actually work. Not borrowed frameworks, but what forty years of high-stakes decisions has taught me. Let's get into it. What Is Confirmation Bias? Confirmation bias is your brain's tendency to seek out, favor, and remember information that confirms what you already believe, filtering out everything that contradicts it. Most people think that just means seeking out information that agrees with them. That's part of it. But here's what makes it truly dangerous. Once you form a strong belief, three things happen automatically. Unequal Evaluation. Picture two studies landing on your desk. One says your strategy is working. One says it isn't. You read the first and nod. You read the second and start looking for the flaw: the methodology, the sample size, the funding source. Selective Memory. Your brain doesn't store evidence equally. What supports your belief stays accessible. What contradicts it becomes harder to recall the longer you hold the belief. The Backfire Effect. When someone directly challenges a belief you hold, your brain treats it as a threat. The response isn't reconsideration. It's defense. Studies show you actually leave the argument more convinced than when you entered it. Together, the longer you hold a belief and the more it matters to you, the harder it becomes to change, no matter how much evidence says you should. Confirmation Bias in Today's World Confirmation bias has always been part of human thinking. What's changed is the environment around it. Algorithms feed you content that matches what you already believe. Social media shows you opinions from people who think like you. Search engines rank results based on what you've clicked before. Every system you interact with daily is built to confirm your existing views. Not by accident, but because confirmation keeps you engaged. The result compounds. The more confirming information you consume, the stronger your existing beliefs become. The stronger your beliefs become, the more your brain filters out opposing information. The more that information gets filtered, the harder it becomes to update your thinking, even when updating is exactly what the situation demands. This is mindjacking in action. The systematic replacement of your thinking by systems built to do it for you. And confirmation bias is one of its most powerful tools. It's visible everywhere. In public discourse where people can no longer agree on basic facts. In organizations that keep funding failing strategies long after the evidence says stop. In leaders who build teams designed to tell them what they want to hear. You might assume that smarter, more experienced people are less susceptible to this. The research says otherwise. The Smartest Person in the Room Gets It Wrong Here's what surprises most people. Confirmation bias doesn't get weaker as you get smarter. It gets stronger. Dan Kahan at Yale ran a study. He gave people a math problem where the correct answer contradicted their political beliefs. The smarter the person, the more likely they were to get the answer wrong, in the direction that protected their belief. More intelligence, applied more effectively, in service of the conclusion they'd already reached. A smart person who has formed a wrong belief is better at defending it. They find flaws in the opposing data faster. They construct more sophisticated arguments. They're more convincing to others and to themselves. I watched this play out in a board meeting. A CEO had championed a major strategy. Three separate analyses came back contradicting it. Each time, he found a different flaw in the methodology. By the end of the meeting he'd convinced the room the data was unreliable. The strategy continued. The outcome was exactly what the data predicted. He wasn't dishonest. He was skilled. His intelligence was working against him. And everyone in that room let it happen. If you're intelligent, experienced, and confident in your judgment, you are not immune to confirmation bias. You are more vulnerable to it. If you know someone who is always the smartest person in the room, send them this episode. They need it more than most. How to Overcome Confirmation Bias: What Actually Works Knowing about confirmation bias doesn't stop it. I know this from experience, not from research. I've been in rooms where everyone understood exactly what was happening and it happened anyway. What works is different from what you've probably been taught. Catch It in Yourself: The Flip Debate The moment I've most reliably caught confirmation bias operating in myself hasn't come from a checklist or a framework. It's come from a specific kind of conversation. I keep a small group of trusted advisors, people I call my kitchen cabinet. These aren't peers. They're almost never inside the organization. They have no stake in the outcome and no incentive to tell me what I want to hear. When I'm about to make a significant decision and I feel the pull of certainty, I take it to one of them. The conversation has a specific structure. I argue my position, fully and genuinely, the strongest version I can make. Then I stop. And I argue the opposite. Not a token acknowledgment of the other side. A real debate. I take the side I'm most resistant to and make the best case I can for it. What happens in that second argument is where confirmation bias shows up. The gaps. The assumptions I'd been protecting. The evidence I'd felt the urge to dismiss. When you're forced to argue a case you don't believe, you find the things you didn't want to see when you were arguing the one you do. An outside advisor is essential. Someone who will push back, ask hard questions, and notice when the flip argument is being faked. You can't do this with someone who needs something from you. The absence of stakes is what makes the honesty possible. Catch It in a Room: Two Signals to Watch For I've learned to watch for two signals that tell me confirmation bias has taken over a room. Both are visible before the decision is made. Almost everyone misses them. The first signal is the unwillingness to debate the other side. When a room has really decided, before the discussion is officially over, nobody wants to argue the opposing position. Not even hypothetically. Raise the other side and watch what happens. Eyes go flat. The conversation moves on. Someone changes the subject. If a room can't genuinely engage with the strongest case against the preferred direction, confirmation bias is driving. The second signal is circular justification. Listen for reasoning that keeps returning to its own starting point. The evidence for the decision is the decision itself. When you can't find an external reason, just a restatement of the conclusion, confirmation bias is driving. When I hear circular justification in a room, I stop the conversation. Not to embarrass anyone. To name what's happening. "We're not evaluating anymore. We're confirming. Let's go back to the evidence." That single intervention has changed the outcome of more decisions than any framework I've ever been taught. Change How You Decide: Full Options, Real Challenge Here's the most consistent change I've made in my own decision-making, and it comes directly from watching what confirmation bias costs people: I force a full pros and cons analysis on every serious option. Not just the one I'm leaning toward. This sounds obvious. Almost nobody does it. The natural pull is to build the case for the option that already feels right and compare it against the weaknesses of the alternatives. That's confirmation bias disguised as analysis. What I do instead is give every option on the table the same treatment. The best case for it. The best case against it. Without knowing in advance which one I'm going to choose. For decisions that carry real weight, I take it further. I bring in my brain trust: direct reports who will tell me what I don't want to hear, kitchen cabinet advisors, trusted board members. I ask specifically for the challenges. Not validation. Not enthusiasm. The places where the thinking is weak, the assumptions that might not hold, the evidence I might have filtered out. One question has changed how I approach every major decision: what am I not seeing? The answers, from people who have no incentive to protect my view, are exactly where the confirmation bias lives. Confirmation Bias Exercise: Try This Today This week, before you finalize any decision you've already started leaning toward, do one thing. Find one person outside your organization, someone with no stake in the outcome, and run the flip debate. Argue your position fully. Then stop and argue the opposite, with the same effort and commitment. Don't summarize the other side. Argue it. Make the best case you can for the view you're most resistant to. Notice what comes up in that second argument. The gaps. The assumptions. The evidence you'd been setting aside. That's where your confirmation bias is living. Run that exercise this week. Not once. Every time you feel the pull of certainty on a decision that matters. The Benefits of Overcoming Confirmation Bias The payoff from these practices compounds over time. Examined beliefs are more reliable than accumulated ones. Decisions that accounted for opposing evidence hold up better than decisions that filtered it out. Judgment that evaluates rather than confirms earns a different kind of trust from the people around you. Beyond your own decisions, catching confirmation bias makes you harder to capture. Every algorithm, every platform, and every persuader around you is built to exploit it. Seeing it operate in yourself reduces their leverage over your thinking. That's what these practices build. Not certainty. Something better. Examined confidence.
On a Monday Drive WD talks about the Hurricanes and Flyers matchup, teh NBA game 7's from over the weekend, Juke Harris commits to Tennessee, talks the top-5 Star Wars movies in No Rules Top-5, and teh NBA Draft lottery projections.
Welcome to the Celestial Insights Podcast, the show that brings the stars down to Earth! Each week, astrologer, coach, and intuitive Celeste Brooks of Astrology by Celeste will be your guide. Her website is astrologybyceleste.com.
Has someone told you, “Don't judge me.” Or something like that? Are we to judge others? Paul makes it clear that he has already judged the man who is having sexual relations with his stepmom and he isn't even present! The church at Corinth was boasting about this sin instead of dealing with and Paul tells them to get rid of the leaven because it is affecting the entire lump of dough. Jesus talks about judging others. He says we will be judged by the same measure we judge others. What is that measure? It is the word of God! God has set the standard and guess what...we all fall short! We are all guilty and we all need a Redeemer!
The hunter never raised his rifle, never raised his voice, and somehow still got called the villain.LISTEN ON PODCAST APPS: Look for this podcast on YouTube Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio, Amazon Music, Pandora, TuneIn Radio, and other apps. Get the full list of options here for Weird Darkness: https://pod.link/1078714736. For Church of the Undead episodes specifically, you can find a list of apps here: https://pod.link/1651062114.*No AI Voices Are Used In The Narration Of This Podcast*WeirdDarkness® is a registered trademark. Copyright ©2026, Weird Darkness.Originally aired: April 26, 2026SOURCES & TRANSCRIPT: https://weirddarkness.com/cotu-hownottoarguewithacryptid
Welcome to Day 2846 of Wisdom-Trek. Thank you for joining me. This is Guthrie Chamberlain, Your Guide to Wisdom. Day 2846 – Wisdom Nuggets – Psalm 119:153-160 – Daily Wisdom Wisdom-Trek Podcast Script - Day 2847 Welcome to Wisdom-Trek with Gramps! I am Guthrie Chamberlain, and we are on Day 2847 of our Trek. The Purpose of Wisdom-Trek is to create a legacy of wisdom, to seek out discernment and insights, and to boldly grow where few have chosen to grow before. The Title for Today's Wisdom-Trek is: The Resh of Revival – The Divine Advocate in the Cosmic Courtroom In our previous episode on this grand expedition, we hiked through the nineteenth stanza of Psalm One Hundred Nineteen, known as the "Qoph" section. We sat with the psalmist during the terrifying, vulnerable hours of the night watch. We heard his wholehearted cry for rescue as the lawless ones drew near. But in the midst of that approaching darkness, we discovered a breathtaking reality: the enemy may be close, but the Creator is closer. We learned to anticipate the dawn, anchoring our exhausted souls to the eternal, unshakeable laws of the King. Today, we take a deep breath, brush the dust from our boots, and take our next deliberate step upward. We are entering the twentieth stanza of this magnificent, alphabetical mountain. We are exploring the "Resh" section, covering Psalm One Hundred Nineteen, verses one hundred fifty-three through one hundred sixty, in the New Living Translation. In the ancient Hebrew alphabet, the letter "Resh" was depicted as the head of a man. It represents that which is chief, the summit, the beginning, or the highest authority. This imagery is woven brilliantly into the fabric of these verses. The psalmist is exhausted from the relentless attacks of his enemies, and he realizes that he cannot win this battle in the earthly courts of public opinion. He needs to go straight to the top. He appeals to the highest authority in the cosmos, asking the Supreme Judge of the Divine Council to act as his personal defense attorney. Let us step onto the trail, and enter the cosmic courtroom. The First Segment is: The The Plea for the Divine Advocate Psalm One Hundred Nineteen: verses one hundred fifty-three and one hundred fifty-four. Look down upon my sorrows and rescue me, for I have not forgotten your instructions. Argue my case; take my side! Protect my life as you promised. The stanza opens with a desperate, deeply personal petition. "Look down upon my sorrows and rescue me, for I have not forgotten your instructions." The psalmist is carrying an immense burden of affliction. The Hebrew word for "sorrows" implies a state of being completely wretched, humbled, and beaten down by external circumstances. He asks Yahweh to look down from the heavenly throne room and witness his misery. But he does not just ask for pity; he grounds his request in his covenant loyalty. He says, "I have not forgotten your instructions." Despite the intense pressure to compromise with the rebel gods of the surrounding culture, he has maintained his allegiance to the cosmic blueprint. Because he has remained loyal, he dares to make a staggering legal demand in verse one hundred fifty-four: "Argue my case; take my side! Protect my life as you promised." To fully grasp the magnitude of this request, we must understand the Ancient Israelite worldview. The psalmist is standing in the spiritual courtroom of the Divine Council. The Accuser, representing the hostile, chaotic forces of the world, is standing against him, demanding his destruction. The psalmist knows he cannot adequately defend himself against these dark, supernatural principalities. So, he calls upon Yahweh to act as his Go'el. In ancient Israel, a Go'el was a kinsman-redeemer, a powerful family member who would step into a legal dispute, pay off debts, and advocate for a vulnerable relative. The psalmist is essentially saying, "Lord, step down from the judge's bench, walk over to the defense table, and act as my Advocate. Plead my cause! Fight my legal battle against the rebel forces, and redeem my life, just as Your covenant promises!" He is asking the highest authority in the universe to take his side. The Second Segment is: The Great Chasm of Mercy Psalm One Hundred Nineteen: verses one hundred fifty-five and one hundred fifty-six. The wicked are far from rescue, for they do not bother with your decrees. Lord, how great is your mercy; let me be revived by your regulations. As the psalmist looks around the cosmic courtroom, he observes the tragic fate of his oppressors. "The wicked are far from rescue, for they do not bother with your decrees." The rebel forces, and the arrogant humans who serve them, believe they are autonomous. They think they can orchestrate their own salvation through wealth, military might, and political deception. But the psalmist reveals the objective reality: they are incredibly far from rescue. Why? Because salvation is not a magic trick; it is a byproduct of alignment with the Creator. Because the wicked "do not bother" to seek out God's decrees, they have completely disconnected themselves from the only Source of life. They have built their fortress on a fault line, and their destruction is inevitable. In sharp, beautiful contrast to the distance of the wicked, the psalmist marvels at the proximity of God's compassion. "Lord, how great is your mercy; let me be revived by your regulations." The Hebrew word for mercy here is rachamim, which we have seen before. It is rooted in the word for a mother's womb, implying a fierce, protective, nurturing compassion. The psalmist says that God's mercies are "great," or exceedingly abundant. The rebel gods are cruel, demanding, and distant, but Yahweh is overflowing with tender compassion for His exhausted exiles. Because of this abundant mercy, he asks to be "revived." He needs the breath of life—chayah—to be pumped back into his fainting soul. He recognizes that God's regulations are not just rigid legal codes; they are the very mechanism of revival. The Word of the Advocate brings the defendant back to life. The third segment is: Standing Firm in the Face of Treason Psalm One Hundred Nineteen: verses one hundred fifty-seven and one hundred fifty-eight. Many persecute and trouble me, yet I have not swerved from your laws. Seeing these traitors makes me sick at heart, because they care nothing for your word. The psalmist reminds the Divine Advocate of the sheer volume of the opposition. "Many persecute and trouble me, yet I have not swerved from your laws." He is not just fighting a single adversary; he is facing a swarm. The persecutors are the earthly proxies of the dark realm, and they are relentlessly trying to push him off the path. But he testifies to his own stubborn resilience. "I have not swerved." He has not compromised his integrity. He has kept his eyes fixed on the "Resh"—the Head, the Chief Authority—and refused to bow to the idols of the culture. But this resilience comes with a heavy emotional cost. He confesses in verse one hundred fifty-eight: "Seeing these traitors makes me sick at heart, because they care nothing for your word." Other translations say, "I look at the faithless with disgust," or "I behold the transgressors, and am grieved." The word "traitors" is incredibly important. In the biblical worldview, humanity was created to image God, to partner with the Creator in ruling the earth. When humans abandon that high calling, and align themselves with the destructive, chaotic forces of the rebel gods, they are committing cosmic treason. When the psalmist looks at these traitors, he does not feel a smug, self-righteous superiority. He feels sick at heart. He is overcome with grief and nausea. Why? Because he loves the Creator so deeply, that it physically hurts him to watch people vandalize God's beautiful design. He feels the very grief of the Holy Spirit. He is mourning the fact that these individuals care absolutely nothing for the life-giving Word of the King. The fourth segment is: The Sum of All Truth Psalm One Hundred Nineteen: verses one hundred fifty-nine and one hundred sixty. See how I love your commandments, Lord. Give back my life because of your unfailing love. The very essence of your words is truth; all your just regulations will stand forever. As the stanza draws to a close, the psalmist
If you believe in the resurrection, can you deny the Eucharist? This challenges how we understand miracles and faith.Morning Offering, April 24, 2026Every morning, join Father Brad as he begins the day with prayer and reflection. In a few short minutes, Father Brad guides you in prayer, shares a brief reflection grounding your day in the Church's rhythm of feast days and liturgy, and provides you with the encouragement necessary to go forward with peace and strength. Disclaimer: The ads shown before, during, or after this video have no affiliation with Morning Offering and are controlled by YouTubeLet us do as the saints urge and begin our days in prayer together so as a community of believers we may join the Psalmist in saying, “In the morning, Lord, you hear my voice; in the morning I lay my requests before you and wait expectantly.” (Psalm 5:3-4)________________
What is the point of studying Classics today? Mary Beard explains why the ancient world still shocks, challenges, and reshapes how we think. Discover how Greek and Roman history can change your perspective, without offering easy answers. In this conversation, renowned classicist Mary Beard explores how ancient Greece and Rome remain deeply relevant today, not as a guidebook for life, but as a way to see modern problems differently. You'll learn how to approach classical history without intimidation, why “the shock of the old” still matters, and how anyone can join the conversation.If you've ever wondered how ancient history connects to today's world, this episode will change how you think about the past and the present. KEY IDEAS: • Why studying Classics isn't about finding “answers” • The idea of “The Shock of the Old” and why it still matters • How ancient texts like Medea continue to unsettle us • The danger of over-revering Greek and Roman history • How Classics helps challenge modern “presentism”• Can the ancient world teach us anything useful today? • How to get into Classics without knowing Latin or Greek • Why Classics has no single political agenda • How the past has been used by both left and right movements • Finding wonder (“thauma”) in ancient historyTIMESTAMPS00:00 Introduction to Mary Beard & Talking Classics 00:23 Why the Classics still matter 01:24 Why we should revere the ancient world less 02:39 The “shock” of ancient culture (Medea example) 04:48 Wonder and awe in the ancient world 05:44 The Egyptian bread story (first encounter with history) 07:29 Making Classics accessible to everyone 08:43 Do the Greeks and Romans offer life lessons? 10:06 Using Classics to rethink modern problems 11:37 Presentism vs learning from the past 13:22 How to start engaging with Classics 15:04 Podcasts, media, and entry points into history 16:20 Seeing the classical world all around us 19:08 Technology (VR) and experiencing the past 21:05 Is Classics political? 22:25 How different ideologies use ancient history 24:48 Classics and democracy, revolution, and reform 25:38 Who “owns” the past? 26:18 Final thoughts If you enjoyed this conversation, make sure to subscribe for more deep dives into history and ideas. Learn More! Check out these LINKS
11. Joe Pistrito and Phil Swan analyze the success of the Artemis 2 mission. They argue the space race with China drives NASA priorities, despite technical disagreements regarding commercial versus government-centric architectures.1890 USS NAHANT,
Philippians 2:12-18 (ESV)Isack and Edwin discuss what Paul means when he tells us to do everything without grumbling and disputing.Read the written devo that goes along with this episode by clicking here. Let us know what you are learning or any questions you have. Email us at TextTalk@ChristiansMeetHere.org. Join the Facebook community and join the conversation by clicking here. We'd love to meet you. Be a guest among the Christians who meet on Livingston Avenue. Click here to find out more. Michael Eldridge sang all four parts of our theme song. Find more from him by clicking here. Thanks for talking about the text with us today.________________________________________________If the hyperlinks do not work, copy the following addresses and paste them into the URL bar of your web browser: Daily Written Devo: https://readthebiblemakedisciples.wordpress.com/?p=25223The Christians Who Meet on Livingston Avenue: http://www.christiansmeethere.org/Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TalkAboutTheTextFacebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/texttalkMichael Eldridge: https://acapeldridge.com/
In this episode, Jefferson Fisher discusses how to have better conversations by learning to argue less and listen more. Jefferson emphasizes that winning arguments is counterproductive, as it damages relationships and breeds contempt. Instead, he advocates for approaching conversations with curiosity and a goal of mutual understanding. Key strategies include proper timing, emotional self-awareness, creating conversational “frames” to set clear expectations, and avoiding over-explanation. Fisher also highlights the importance of acknowledging your emotional state and traveling light by addressing lingering issues calmly rather than carrying unnecessary emotional baggage. If you've ever felt stuck, overwhelmed, or frustrated by your inability to follow through, this episode offers a grounded, actionable path forward, one small step at a time. Exciting News!!! Coming in March, 2026, my new book, How a Little Becomes a Lot: The Art of Small Changes for a More Meaningful Life is now available for pre-orders! Key Takeaways: The concept that winning an argument is not the goal; understanding is more important. Viewing arguments as knots to be untangled rather than battles to be won. Strategies for effectively handling difficult conversations, including timing and emotional awareness. The importance of acknowledging and validating feelings during discussions. The role of patience in resolving complex issues over time. The significance of timing in initiating difficult conversations. The impact of over-explaining and the importance of being succinct in communication. The three rules for better conversations: control, confidence, and connection. The concept of creating a “frame” for conversations to set clear expectations and reduce anxiety. For full show notes: click here! If you enjoyed this conversation with Jefferson Fisher, check out these other episodes: How We Can Improve Communication in Polarized Times with Charles Duhigg How to Unlock the Power of Deeper Connections with David Brooks By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed, and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you! This episode is sponsored by: Rocket Money Let Rocket Money help you reach your financial goals faster. Join at rocketmoney.com/feed. Pebl – an AI-powered platform that helps companies hire and manage global teams in 185+ countries. Get a free estimate at hipebl.ai Hello Fresh – Get 10 free meals + a FREE Zwilling Knife (a $144.99 value) on your third box. Offer valid while supplies last. David Protein bars deliver up to 28g of protein for just 150 calories—without sacrificing taste! For a limited time, our listeners can receive this special deal: buy 4 cartons and get the 5th free when you go to www.davidprotein.com/FEED Brodo Broth: Shop the best broth on the planet with Brodo. Head to Brodo.com/TOYF for 20% off your first subscription order and use code TOYF for an additional $10 off. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
11. CHINESE ESPIONAGE AND THE ROBOTICS THREAT. DAVID SHEDD AND JACK BURNHAM. Experts examine the Schumer-Cotton bill targeting Chinese robotics, warning that these technologies contain software egress points for data theft. They argue this follows a long-standing pattern of intellectual property larceny. (11)1850 PERSIAN EMPIRE
11. The Tuesday Deadline and the Survival of the Islamic RepublicGuest: Edmund Fitton-Brown and Bill Roggio Summary: President Trump has set a final Tuesday deadline for an Iranian ceasefire, which the IRGC is likely to ignore. Experts argue the regime views concessions as defeat, choosing to outlast U.S. patience and military efforts.,, (11)1891 ACROSS PERSIA
Anthony Lima admits he can no longer defend the Cleveland Cavaliers against fan frustration following a sloppy performance against the Memphis Grizzlies. Ken Carman counters by highlighting the team's injury woes and their elite performance metrics when the roster is fully healthy. They also discuss the team's favorable path to the Eastern Conference Finals despite recent struggles.
3. Drawing from the biblical narrative of the crucifixion, they interpret Pontius Pilate's hand-washing as a recognition of Rome's imperial limitations, a concept they argue Washington currently ignores. Unlike Rome's historical success in assimilating conquered peoples as equals, the U.S. has isolated itself by treating international partners with condescension and contempt. Consequently, international organizations like NATO remain absent from the conflict, leading to a predicted humiliating reckoning for the American court as energy costs continue to climb. (3)1650 PALM SUNDAY
2. The Craft of Translating Virgil into Iambic Pentameter Guest Authors: Scott McGill and Susanna Wright (3)The translators explain their pivotal decision to render Virgil's dactylic hexameter into English iambic pentameter. They argue this meter serves as a cultural equivalent to heroic verse in English, providing a structured yet accessible feel for modern readers. The discussion highlights technical challenges, such as replicating Virgil's use of alliteration, assonance, and purposeful repetition to maintain the poem's musicality and thematic links. A key example is their translation of "fortune defends the daring," chosen through collaborative debate to capture the specific military and thematic nuances surrounding the character Turnus in a Roman context. (4)1450 VIRGIL READING THE AENEID TO AUGUSTUS
Here's your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecGo to https://www.patriotmobile.com/poso or call 972-PATRIOT and get a FREE MONTH of service with promo code POSO. Go to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO for 20% OFF your first order.Support the show
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
