Podcasts about Capital punishment

A heated discussion unfolds over claims of a "botched" firing squad execution in South Carolina, raising questions about media bias, the ethics of capital punishment, and the legal precedent of inmate-chosen methods. With critics decrying cruelty and hosts defending the justice system's integrity, the debate exposes deeper political and moral divides on crime and punishment in America.

What happened in the Mid-East that motivated the second Catholic Crusade? Why did a monk, Bernard of Clairvaux, preach the Crusade? What happened to the armies of King Conrad and King Louis VII along the way over and down to Constantinople and Cappadocia? How did the centuries-old suspicion between Orthodox and Catholic Christians play out during the second Crusade? I examine and answer all those questions in this episode. I also offer an extended reflection on Jesus' famous words, "turn the other cheek." What did he really mean in his first-century context? I also offer an extended thought-piece on why I do not believe either the Bible or Jesus himself were against the godly use of violence and/or war. Oh, and I wonder, what is the etymology of whore? Is it possible that the Arabic word houris—sexified concubines waiting in the afterlife—played into the history of the word whore? Come laugh and think with me about our faith in Christ.

Should we bring back the death penalty? A new poll found a majority support the return of capital punishment for certain crimes. What do you think? Rick spoke to Fionola Meredith Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Text us your questions!Pope Francis, a man who inspired even many Protestants and non-Christians with his refreshingly prophetic voice, has died. The process to select his successor is ongoing as we release this. To help us understand what's happening, as well as its historical significance, we're talking with our friend and returning guest Shaun Blanchard, a Catholic theologian and theological historian. He helps us understand the significance of Francis's papacy and what might come next.As the first Latin American pope, first Jesuit pope, and first non-European pope since the 8th century, Francis broke numerous precedents while embodying what Shaun calls "the first truly post-Vatican II pope." While his predecessors were formed before Vatican II, Francis's entire priestly ministry took place afterward, fundamentally shaping his perspective on church reform.We explore how Francis's pastoral approach differed from Benedict XVI's more theological orientation and how his willingness to "make a mess" by reopening debates on issues like divorce, remarriage, and same-sex blessings represented a sea change in ecclesiastical culture. Francis challenged assumptions across the political and theological spectrum, championing environmental protection and migrant rights while maintaining core Catholic teachings.The conversation turns to the ongoing conclave, where approximately 80% of voting cardinals were appointed by Francis himself. Shaun offers insights into potential candidates including Pietro Parolin, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, and several Asian cardinals, discussing how geopolitical realities might influence the selection process. We also discuss the film "Conclave" and its portrayal of Vatican politics, including how realistic or sensational it was (spoiler warning!).Whether you're Catholic, Protestant, or simply curious about global religious leadership, this conversation illuminates a crucial moment of transition for the world's largest Christian denomination and invites reflection on what spiritual leadership means in our complex global environment.=====Want to support us?The best way is to subscribe to our Patreon. Annual memberships are available for a 10% discount.If you'd rather make a one-time donation, you can contribute through our PayPal. Other important info: Rate & review us on Apple & Spotify Follow us on social media at @PPWBPodcast Watch & comment on YouTube Email us at pastorandphilosopher@gmail.com Cheers!

Bob talks with Will Kuehnle, Associate Director for the Ohio Catholic Conference, about a bill to prohibit public funding for lethal drugs for abortion or assisted suicide, as well as abolishing the death penalty outright in Ohio.  Support the show

In this episode, we dive into the cultural impact of Big Pun's Capital Punishment.

On Wednesday's show: This week marks President Donald Trump's 100th day in office. We reflect on everything that's happened so far and discuss the latest developments in local, state, and national politics in our weekly roundup.Also this hour: Corinna Lain, a legal scholar and former prosecutor, has done extensive research on how the use of lethal injection became widespread in this country. We examine what studies on the bodies of the executed can tell us about capital punishment and other revelations from her resulting book, Secrets of the Killing State.And we reflect on the fall of Saigon, 50 years ago today through the eyes of Roy Vu, the child of Vietnamese immigrants to Houston.

In this episode of Bioethics in the Margins, we delve into the topic of capital punishment by nitrogen gas. Dr. Robert Glatter is Editor at Large for Medscape Emergency Medicine and Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine at Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell. Dr. Peter Papadakos is Professor of Anesthesiology, Surgery, Neurology and Neurosurgery at the University of Rochester, and a Professor of Internal Medicine at Mercer University School of Medicine. Drs. Papadakos and Glatter dissect the harsh realities of suffering and injustice surrounding the execution of Kenneth Smith in Alabama, the first person executed using nitrogen gas. They explore what nitrogen is and its physiological effects and reflect on the inhumane nature of nitrogen hypoxia. The conversation also touches upon the broader issues of botched executions, delayed executions as psychological torture, the absence of definitive DNA evidence in some death row cases. They highlight the point that both the American Medical Association and the American Society of Anesthesiologists as well as many nursing associations state that participating in executions is not the practice of medicine and is prohibited by their members. This means that executions are conducted by non-medical personnel. They also point out that delaying executions, sometimes for decades, falls under the definition of torture under the Geneva conventions. This conversation poses the question; if our society continues to condone these practices, are we civilized?The JAMA editorial mentioned during the podcast can be found here: Evidence Against Use of Nitrogen for the Death Penalty | Neurology | JAMA | JAMA Network

GPPR Podcast Editor, Brennan Gallagher (MPP '27) chats with Cassandra Stubbs about her work as Director of the ACLU's Capital Punishment Project and President Trumps Executive Order "Restoring The Death Penalty And Protecting Public Safety."

Hello again fighty friends!April 5 I was had the opportunity to go commentate in our National capital for the Capital Punishment promotion which is organized by retired (maybe...) professional fighter and now coach, Mr. Ben Pride of Westside Muay Thai in Ottawa, Ontario. I have known Ben ever since June, 2014 when he fought a former fighter of mine on Journey Fight Series (shout out to team Smandych! we miss JFS!!!) in an 8-man tournament, and I have been following Ben ever since! We have a chat about his event - Capital Punishment and what his motivation is to host a fight event, of course we talk about some of the key match ups that went down including the main event for the Muay Thai Canada national title. I ask Ben where and when he found Muay Thai, Ben tells us about some of his adventures in Thailand, why Westside Muay Thai has such a reputation for clinch fighters and - IS BEN LOOKING AT COMING BACK FOR ANOTHER TILT?! - you'll have to listen to the podcast I guess!!!of course I hit Ben with a top 3 question and he cheated with his 1 shout out allowed! haha.ANOTHER example of "knowing" someone for a longtime, but really connecting through the podcast and finding out more about the people driving the Canadian Muay Thai scene forward for all of us. MAN, I am grateful for this lil hobby of mine - SHOUT OUT TO YOU BEN!

In this episode, Steve Wood unpacks Genesis 9 to examine the biblical roots of both pro-life teaching and capital punishment, revealing how these two are not contradictory but deeply connected. Drawing on Scripture and Church teaching, he explores the tension between modern objections to the death penalty and the divine justice seen in the flood, arguing that justice for individual acts of violence may prevent broader judgment. With insights into Church history, the revised Catechism, and prophetic implications, this episode challenges listeners to rethink the role of justice, mercy, and human dignity in a fallen world. Referenced in this episode:  Genesis 9:1, 5–7 Genesis 2:5–6 Genesis 4:10 Romans 13:1, 4 Luke 23:39–41 Acts 25:11 Deuteronomy 21:1–9 We appreciate your interest in learning about biblical prophecy! This podcast remains possible due to the support of our listeners. For more resources, visit us online at www.Luke21.com or www.BibleforCatholics.com.  

Because human beings are made in the image of God, our lives are sacred. How should this direct the way Christians think about capital punishment? Today, R.C. Sproul appeals to a passage in Scripture that answers this question directly. Read the transcript: https://ligonier.org/podcasts/ultimately-with-rc-sproul/is-capital-punishment-biblical/ A donor-supported outreach of Ligonier Ministries. Donate: https://donate.ligonier.org/ Explore all of our podcasts: https://www.ligonier.org/podcasts

He spent many years exposed to the very worst images and videos as part of Bedfordshire Police's Internet Child Abuse Investigation Team.Paul Fitzharris talks about the things he saw, the toll it took on him, and the what can be done to prevent children becoming victims.Proudly sponsored by Gold Seal - suppliers of the highest grade Shilajit and health products in the UK. For a 10% discount on their pure premium Shilajit, Mushroom Capsules, Testosterone Booster and other health supplements, visit:https://goldsealshilajit.com/?oly=liamtuffs&utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=LiamTuffs&utm_campaign=shilajitresins&utm_content=videodescription

Kat & Zach are back this week to discuss the Hurricanes & Capitals brawls that led to 8 ejections, Jalen Chatfield not getting suspended, Nikishin Watch is officially on, the Canes can sweep the Rangers this season, and the 7th straight playoff appearance for your Carolina Hurricanes!

Bill English of Bible and Business and On Path Coaching looks at the tariffs that the President will likely be imposing on this day. What are the trade offs? Will it help? If so, when? Carmen addresses the worldviews behind the rhetoric around the case against Luigi Mangione in the murder of president of a large healthcare company.  Faith Radio podcasts are made possible by your support. Give now: Click here  

A Cory Booker staffer is arrested for caring a gun without a license in a Senate building during his nearly day long "filibuster." Plus, NGOs are paying left wingers to protest at Tesla dealerships. Finally Pam Bondi requests prosecutors seek the death penalty for Luigi Mangione. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Dr Andreea Calude joins Emile Donovan to discuss how lowercase writing reflects a generational shift - and what it means for language. 

Send us a textInterestingly, Canadians have shown their support for capital punishment almost 50 years of polling data. In 2025, Research Co. found that approximately 54 percent of Canadians agree with capital punishment, which has largely remained unchanged since the 1970s. I sit down with Mario Canseco, president of ResearchCo. While Canada abolished the death penalty in 1976, public support remains surprisingly strong. What drives Canadians to favour its reinstatement? Is it justice, deterrence, or economics? Inside GenevaInside Geneva is a podcast about global politics, humanitarian issues, & international aidListen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the showVisit my NEW Website! https://www.christopherbalkaran.comCheck out my Instagram/Tik Tok for daily posts: Instagram @openmindspodTiktok @openmindspodcast

Send us a textJoin James and Drey as they tackle ethical issues, such as capital punishment and IVF, through the lens of theology and scripture.

"Whether we can take 'a life for a life' is one question; whether we should is another. Cain and Abel pose an answer. Rather than taking life for life and delivering a powerful message by killing Cain, God instead banished Cain from the community. To say the least, we must not be cavalier about death penalty decisions." The Author   Genesis 4:13-16 (mark of Cain directly dismisses any death penalty rule)   #IC 62: Protecting Society With, and From, Capital Punishment (7/14/11)  

Bryan Kohberger, accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled for a court appearance today in Boise, Idaho. His defense team has filed motions to suppress key evidence, arguing that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) violated his constitutional rights. They contend that law enforcement's application of IGG, which involves using DNA from public genealogy databases to identify potential suspects, was conducted without proper warrants, rendering the subsequent evidence inadmissible. Additionally, the defense claims that search warrants for Kohberger's phone, car, and residences were obtained through misleading information presented to the court.In a broader strategy to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, Kohberger's attorneys have previously argued that capital punishment violates contemporary standards of decency and international treaties against prisoner torture. They also assert that prolonged periods on death row constitute cruel and unusual punishment. However, these arguments were rejected by the court in November 2024, allowing the death penalty to remain on the table if Kohberger is convicted.   The outcome of today's hearing could significantly impact the admissibility of critical evidence and the overall trajectory of the case as it moves toward trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger looks to dodge death penalty with Lori Vallow's playbook | Fox News

Clint Armitage tackles the complex and controversial topic of the death penalty through the lens of a recent execution in South Carolina. The episode centers around the case of Keith Sigmon, the first inmate in 15 years to be executed by firing squad in the United States, after being convicted of a brutal double homicide in 2001. Clint begins by presenting a gripping news clip detailing the execution process, highlighting the historical significance of this method in the context of modern-day capital punishment. As he unpacks the details surrounding Sigmon's heinous crime, including the tragic impact on the victims' family, Clint encourages listeners to reflect on the moral and ethical implications of the death penalty. Throughout the episode, Clint poses challenging questions about the role of Christians in the conversation surrounding capital punishment. He shares insights from Sigmon's final statement, where Sigmon calls for an end to the death penalty, emphasizing the shift from Old Testament law to the New Testament's message of love and redemption. Clint explores whether Christians should support the death penalty, considering biblical teachings and the nature of justice and mercy. As the discussion unfolds, Clint invites listeners to contemplate the psychological burden faced by correctional officers who volunteer for such executions, prompting deeper reflections on faith, morality, and personal conviction. He also addresses the nuanced nature of sin and justice, emphasizing the importance of understanding both the physical and spiritual consequences of our actions. Tune in to this compelling episode of the Radio Coffee House to engage with these critical questions and discover how faith intersects with some of society's most pressing issues. Join Clint as he navigates the complexities of justice, mercy, and the Christian response to the death penalty.  -----

Scott Turow is a writer and attorney. He is the author of fourteen works of fiction, including Presumed Innocent, and most recently, Presumed Guilty, which hit the shelves in January of this year. All of his novels have been New York Times bestsellers. His works have been the basis for film and television projects…last year Apple TV+ released an eight-part limited series based on Presumed Innocent, starring Jake Gyllenhaal. From 1978 until 1986, Mr. Turow worked as Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois prosecuting several high-profile public corruption cases. He has also served on a number of public bodies, including the Illinois Commission on Capital Punishment, which proposed reforms to Illinois’ death penalty system, and he was the first Chair of Illinois’ Executive Ethics Commission, created in 2004 to regulate executive branch employees in Illinois. SONG 1: “We Shall Overcome”...this is a 1962 live recording that’s been remastered…and re-released on the album Every Morning at Half Past Four in 2020. https://youtu.be/KUbkld3Rq2A?si=Xvtm-4JB5lhXLuGF SONG 2: Kermit the Frog singing "Rainbow Connection" - in the 1979 film The Muppet Movie. https://youtu.be/YRPBUeVOimU?si=Uz2a2ICgc1zf_c7a SONG 3: "Runaway" by Del Shannon released in 1961 on his debut album Runaway with Del Shannon. https://youtu.be/0S13mP_pfEc?si=YPul_1R6i_CpLfZLSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy King hosts your Tuesday Wake Up Call.  KFI White House reporter Jon Decker opens the show talking about tariffs and the economy. ABC News national correspondent Steven Portnoy speaks on Mike Johnson's confidence the Trump-backed funding bill ‘will pass.' ABC News tech reporter Mike Dobuski shares the latest news in the tech world. Bloomberg's Courtney Donohoe updates us on the latest in business and the stock market. The show closes with ABC national journalist Jim Ryan discussing a renews debate over capital punishment.

We are said to be a “Nation of Laws”, but if we don't properly execute the law, we quickly become “Lawless”. In this multi-part series, we are going to look at the Death Penalty and what the Bible says about Capital Punishment or the “Death Penalty”.Please let me say thank you for lisenting to this episode and ask that you please SUBSCRIBE as a way to support this channel and our efforts. Please join our Community at: www.StevenGarofalo.ComBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/reason-for-truth--2774396/support.

ABC's Jim Ryan reports on the last two executions. and how the numbers have dropped off, but also reports on a new method for execution...Nitrogen

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion on February 24, 2025, to preclude the death penalty and implement additional procedures, citing the prosecution's numerous disclosure violations. The defense argues that the State has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to identify, preserve, and timely disclose exculpatory evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair trial. They contend that such suppression of evidence hinders the defense's ability to prepare effectively and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion on February 24, 2025, to preclude the death penalty and implement additional procedures, citing the prosecution's numerous disclosure violations. The defense argues that the State has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to identify, preserve, and timely disclose exculpatory evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair trial. They contend that such suppression of evidence hinders the defense's ability to prepare effectively and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion on February 24, 2025, to preclude the death penalty and implement additional procedures, citing the prosecution's numerous disclosure violations. The defense argues that the State has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to identify, preserve, and timely disclose exculpatory evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair trial. They contend that such suppression of evidence hinders the defense's ability to prepare effectively and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion on February 24, 2025, to preclude the death penalty and implement additional procedures, citing the prosecution's numerous disclosure violations. The defense argues that the State has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to identify, preserve, and timely disclose exculpatory evidence, which is crucial for ensuring a fair trial. They contend that such suppression of evidence hinders the defense's ability to prepare effectively and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

(Friday 03/07/25)Amy King and Neil Saavedra join Bill for Handel on the News. US expands exemptions to Canada and Mexico tariffs. ‘Major powers should not bully the weak', China foreign minister says. Trump preparing to sign order to dismantle Education Department. Gavin Newsom opposes trans-athletes in women's sports. Trump administration ordered to pay debts to USAID partners by Monday. South Carolina man Brad Sigmon is set to become the first murderer executed by firing squad in 15 years.  

The dive into the court documents continues this episode as we are taking a look at several different filings. Namely, the death sentence filing by the prosecution.(commercial at 5:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062623 Notice Pursuant to Idaho Code 18-4004A.pdfsource:062723 PUBLIC Stipulation for Preparation Release of Transcript Records of Grand Jury.pdf (idaho.gov)source:062623 States Request for Time to Respond to Defendants Third Motion to Compel Discovery Supporting Dec.pdf (idaho.gov)source:062923 Motion to Temporarily Seal Exhibit 1 of the States Supplemental Response to Defendants 4th Supplem.pdf (idaho.gov)

Melanie Kalmanson, a partner at Quarlers & Brady, joined Robert to discuss a new Florida statute that requires judges to impose a sentence of death if an "unauthorized alien" commits a capital offense. Melanie and Robert examine potential constitutional issues the law faces under current Supreme Court precedent and how the law will be challenging for trial courts to implement.  921.1426 Sentence of death for capital offense committed by unauthorized alien. —Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the court shall sentence a defendant who is an unauthorized alien and who is convicted or adjudicated guilty of a capital felony to a sentence of death. As used in this section, the term “unauthorized alien” has the same meaning as in s. 908.111. Subscribe to Melanie's substack - Tracking Florida's Death Penalty.Read the full text of the statute here. Please send your questions, comments, and feedback to summarilypod@gmail.com.Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast's advertisers.  This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast's creator is prohibited.

The dive into the court documents continues this episode as we are taking a look at several different filings. Namely, the death sentence filing by the prosecution.(commercial at 5:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062623 Notice Pursuant to Idaho Code 18-4004A.pdfsource:062723 PUBLIC Stipulation for Preparation Release of Transcript Records of Grand Jury.pdf (idaho.gov)source:062623 States Request for Time to Respond to Defendants Third Motion to Compel Discovery Supporting Dec.pdf (idaho.gov)source:062923 Motion to Temporarily Seal Exhibit 1 of the States Supplemental Response to Defendants 4th Supplem.pdf (idaho.gov)

Send us a textIn this thought-provoking episode of That's In The Bible?, we tackle one of the most controversial issues of our time—capital punishment. Is the death penalty supported by scripture? Does the Bible give us clear guidelines on whether the state has the right to take life?Host Eric Sutton is joined by Robert Militello to explore what the Bible really says about capital punishment. Robert Militello digs deep into both the Old Testament and New Testament to understand the biblical foundation for this practice. From the laws found in the Old Testament to the teachings of the New Testament, Robert provides insights that challenge common assumptions and interpretations.Key questions addressed in this episode include:Is capital punishment explicitly sanctioned in the Bible?How does the Old Testament and the New view punishment and justice?How do we grapple with the possibility of an innocent person being wrongfully executed?What about the commandment “Thou shalt not kill”? Does it conflict with the practice of the death penalty?This episode offers a balanced, in-depth look at the biblical perspective on capital punishment. Whether you agree with the practice or are grappling with its complexities, this conversation is one you don't want to miss.***Help us to make our podcast better! Take a few minutes and let your voice be heard. Take our 2025 "That's In The Bible?" Survey. ***Email us at thatsinthebible@gmail.comWebsite: thatsinthebible.comOur podcast theme song "Jesus Is Coming Soon", courtesy of His Reflection a Gospel Quartet from Buckley Road Baptist Church, Liverpool, NY.

We begin our next series, this time on Capital Punishment. We start with the history of crimes throughout written history that justified the death penalty. Then we get into colonial history and how the death penalty was built into the foundations of racist America. Multiple Supreme Court rulings have shifted the landscape. We end with the recent EO attempting to expand the powers of the death penalty.   Death Penalty survey #1: https://forms.gle/S31MTYbM8JNsikpe9    Show Notes:    History of the death penalty: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/history-of-the-death-penalty/  https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/background/history-of-the-death-penalty/early-history-of-the-death-penalty  Timeline of the history of the death penalty: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/history-of-the-death-penalty-timeline  History of the death penalty in USA: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/background/history-of-the-death-penalty  Death penalty in the U.S.: https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-procedure/the-u-s-and-the-death-penalty.html  Capital punishment in the United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States  On Crimes and Punishment by Cesare Bonesana di Beccaria, 1764: https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/cesare-bonesana-di-beccariaon-crimes-and-punishments-1764 Overview of the death penalty and capital trials: History, current status, legal procedures, and cost: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/overview-death-penalty-and-capital-trials-history-current-status  Crimes act of 1790: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes_Act_of_1790 List of women executed in the United States since 1976: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_executed_in_the_United_States_since_1976  Amnesty International resources https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty/ “The Movement to Abolish Capital Punishment in America, 1787-1861” by David Brion Davis: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1847110?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Study reveals racial bias in executions: https://eji.org/news/study-reveals-racial-bias-in-executions/ “I just wanted to … stay alive” Who was WIlliam Furman, the prisoner at the center of a historic legal decision?: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/i-just-wanted-to-stay-alive-who-was-william-henry-furman-the-prisoner-at-the-center-of-a-historic-legal-decision  Furman v Georgia:  https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/408/238.html chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=law-student-publications  Gregg v Georgia: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/428/153.html  HIstorical Federal Executions: https://www.usmarshals.gov/who-we-are/history/historical-reading-room/historical-federal-executions  Judiciary Act of 1789: https://www.usmarshals.gov/who-we-are/history/historical-reading-room/judiciary-act-of-1789-charter-us-marshals-and-deputies  EO on expanded Death Penalty https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-the-death-penalty-and-protecting-public-safety/ https://prismreports.org/2025/02/10/death-penalty-undocumented-immigrants-trump/ https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/florida-lawmakers-push-for-mandatory-death-penalty-in-immigration-crackdown/ Equal Justice Initiative https://eji.org/issues/death-penalty/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice on DP https://www.tdcj.texas.gov/death_row/dr_facts.html McCleskey v. Kemp https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/481/279/ EJI on McCleskey v. Kemp https://eji.org/news/the-legacy-of-mccleskey-v-kemp/ Racial bias in death penalty https://eji.org/news/study-reveals-racial-bias-in-executions/ Furman v Georgia https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/69-5030 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/238/ Wilkerson v Utah https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/99/130/ The Movement to Abolish Capitla Punishment by David Brion Davis https://www.jstor.org/stable/1847110?read-now=1&seq=7#page_scan_tab_contents Abraham Johnstone address https://docsouth.unc.edu/neh/johnstone/johnstone.html Slave Executions in the US https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0362331999800019 Execution statistics in US https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions/executions-overview/executions-in-the-u-s-1608-2002-the-espy-file Thomas Paine opposing execution of Louis XVI https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/paine-opposes-executing-king-1793/ History of lynching in America https://naacp.org/find-resources/history-explained/history-lynching-america#:~:text=Lynchings%20did%20not%20occur%20in,the%20only%20victims%20of%20lynching. Confronting hte legacy of lynching in America https://lynchinginamerica.eji.org/report/ Other appearances: Chris Shelton interviewed us in the beginning of a series on Mormonism: https://youtu.be/gDCeSOr3U-s?si=bjxiWo-jaYtIESKP    Recent Live Show Book Club on Yumi and the Nightmare Painter by Brandon Sanderson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCxAsGWNVXo    Email: glassboxpodcast@gmail.com  Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/GlassBoxPod  Patreon page for documentary: https://www.patreon.com/SeerStonedProductions BlueSky: @glassboxpodcast.bsky.social  Other BlueSky: @bryceblankenagel.bsky.social and @shannongrover.bsky.social  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glassboxpodcast/  Merch store: https://www.redbubble.com/people/exmoapparel/shop Or find the merch store by clicking on “Store” here: https://glassboxpodcast.com/index.html One time Paypal donation: bryceblankenagel@gmail.com  Venmo: Shannon-Grover-10  

Episode: 1328 The medieval character of the wild West.  Today, the wild West holds up a mirror to medieval life.

Bryan Kohberger, accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled for a court appearance today in Boise, Idaho. His defense team has filed motions to suppress key evidence, arguing that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) violated his constitutional rights. They contend that law enforcement's application of IGG, which involves using DNA from public genealogy databases to identify potential suspects, was conducted without proper warrants, rendering the subsequent evidence inadmissible. Additionally, the defense claims that search warrants for Kohberger's phone, car, and residences were obtained through misleading information presented to the court.In a broader strategy to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, Kohberger's attorneys have previously argued that capital punishment violates contemporary standards of decency and international treaties against prisoner torture. They also assert that prolonged periods on death row constitute cruel and unusual punishment. However, these arguments were rejected by the court in November 2024, allowing the death penalty to remain on the table if Kohberger is convicted.   The outcome of today's hearing could significantly impact the admissibility of critical evidence and the overall trajectory of the case as it moves toward trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger looks to dodge death penalty with Lori Vallow's playbook | Fox News

This episode examines the South Carolina Capital punishment. How is it decided whether a murder becomes a capital offense? Who decides whether someone might face the death penalty? Why was Alex Murdaugh not charged with a capital offense? Those questions and more are answered by former U.S. States Attorney for the District of South Carolina, Bill Nettles. Nettles discusses a very interesting case in which he defended a man on death row. Bill Nettles possesses an extraordinary, almost unparalleled depth and breadth of experience. You cannot find an attorney who will be better equipped to provide you with the high-quality representation you deserve. Mr. Nettles was appointed United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina by President Obama and was sworn into that office on May 3, 2010. As the US Attorney, he dramatically overhauled the office to focus on public corruption, fraud and white collar crime, while also greatly increasing resources to the extraordinarily important false claims whistleblower division. Under Mr. Nettles' leadership, the US Attorney's office made white collar crime and public corruption the highest priority of the criminal division's efforts. He also earned national praise for the innovative and intelligent approach his office took to drug crimes. Mr. Nettles was the longest serving US attorney since the 1960's, ensuring he had an extraordinary impact on the personnel and the policies of that important office. Because of his service as the United States Attorney for the entire state of South Carolina he has worked with the heads of the Department of Justice to help shape policy for the last 5 and a half years. Before being appointed a US Attorney, Mr. Nettles graduated from The Citadel and earned his law degree at The Widener University School of Law, where he was on law review and was a member of the moot court honor society. After graduating, he began a career that has taken him into every corner of the legal system. Starting in 2005, he worked at Sanders & Nettles, LLC until being appointed the US Attorney. If you find yourself in need of an experienced lawyer in South Carolina and you want to speak with our attorney about your case, please call the Law Office of Bill Nettles at 803-284-8906 for a free consultation. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kyle Dunnigan returns to the show and they open by discussing Adam's ongoing battle against pepperoni pizza and why Laken Riley's accused killer should get the death penalty. Then, they test Byron's knowledge of American history, “Donald Trump” reacts to some critical clips of him, and “Sly Stallone” auditions for a commercial. Next, Jason “Mayhem” Miller joins to read the news including stories about Costco recalling 80k pounds of butter because the label didn't mention that it contained milk, the Washington Post releasing an article about how to immigrate to other countries in response to the election results, Dwayne Johnson admitting to peeing in bottles on set and being late to filming, and a Catholic woman who was fired for refusing the COVID vaccine winning a $12M settlement. Finally, from The Office, Brian Baumgartner (Kevin) and Ben Silverman (executive producer) stop by to talk about the ever-changing audience of The Office, how writing & performing comedy is much harder than drama, and their new holiday book “The Night Before Christmas at Dunder Mifflin.” For more with Kyle Dunnigan: ● YOUTUBE: youtube.com/@KyleDunniganComedy ● INSTAGRAM: @kyledunnigan1 ● TWITTER/X: @kyledunnigan For more with Brian Baumgartner: ● NEW BOOK: “The Night Before Christmas at Dunder Mifflin” - available now. ● INSTAGRAM, TIKTOK & X: @bbbaumgartner For more with Ben Silverman: ● NEW BOOK: “The Night Before Christmas at Dunder Mifflin” - available now. ● TWITTER/X: @notbensilverman Thank you for supporting our sponsors: ● http://SimpliSafe.com/Adam ● http://Meater.com ● http://OReillyAuto.com/Adam