Podcasts about exceptions

Daf Yomi Zevachim 43Episode 2123Babble on Talmud with Sruli RappsJoin the chat: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LMbsU3a5f4Y3b61DxFRsqfSefaria: https://www.sefaria.org.il/Zevachim.43a?lang=heEmail: sruli@babbleontalmud.comInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/babble_on_talmudFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/p/Babble-on-Talmud-100080258961218/#dafyomi #talmud00:00 Intro01:52 The pigul exceptions17:09 When a kometz falls from the mizbeach41:34 When a tamei person eats kodashim meat51:53 When a tamei person eats terumah or ma'aser01:01:59 Conclusion

Welcome solo and group practice owners! We are Liath Dalton and Evan Dumas, your co-hosts of Group Practice Tech. In our latest episode, we have an update for you on what's changed with teletherapy coverage for Medicare clients. We discuss: Our free 90 minute webinar that goes deeper into this topic What is still covered for behavioral/mental health services What has changed for behavioral/mental health services Who is considered an established client or a new client Exceptions to the in-person visit requirement Next steps to take to prepare for this change in your practice Medicare Advantage plans and Medicaid Listen here: https://personcenteredtech.com/group/podcast/ For more, visit our website.

This conversation delves into the core doctrines of evidence law, focusing on burdens of proof, judicial notice, privileges, and hearsay exceptions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles and policies that govern these legal concepts, providing listeners with a comprehensive framework for navigating evidence law in exams and practical applications.Imagine standing in a courtroom, the stakes high, and the truth hanging in the balance. Evidence law is the backbone of this scenario, ensuring fairness and justice. In this post, we delve into the intricacies of burdens of proof, judicial notice, and privileges, unraveling their significance in the legal landscape.Burdens of Proof: At the heart of any legal proceeding lies the burden of proof, a party's responsibility to substantiate their claims. This burden is twofold: the burden of production, which requires presenting enough evidence to establish a prima facie case, and the burden of persuasion, which demands convincing the judge or jury of the truth of the claim. The dynamic nature of these burdens, especially in negligence cases, highlights the delicate balance between fairness and efficiency in trials.Judicial Notice: Judicial notice serves as a powerful tool for efficiency in the courtroom, allowing certain facts to be accepted as true without formal proof. Governed by F.R.E. 201, it distinguishes between adjudicative facts, which relate directly to the case, and legislative facts, which inform the law itself. The Lincoln Almanac trial exemplifies the strategic use of judicial notice, showcasing its potential to sway a case without additional testimony.Privileges: Privileges in evidence law represent a deliberate choice to exclude relevant evidence to protect vital relationships and societal values. The spousal privileges, for instance, safeguard marital harmony and confidential communication, reflecting the law's prioritization of personal relationships over complete transparency. Understanding these privileges, along with others like attorney-client and psychotherapist-patient, is crucial for navigating the legal landscape.Evidence law is a complex tapestry woven from the threads of fairness, efficiency, and truth. As you continue your legal journey, consider how these elements shape the pursuit of justice, balancing the scales between individual rights and societal interests. Subscribe now to stay informed on the latest insights in legal studies.TakeawaysThe goal is to understand the why behind evidence rules.Trial fairness is a constant balancing act with other societal values.The burden of proof is a party's responsibility to prove their claims.There are two components to the burden of proof: production and persuasion.The burden of production can shift between parties during a trial.The burden of persuasion never shifts from the party who originally had it.Different standards of persuasion exist: preponderance, clear and convincing, and beyond a reasonable doubt.Judicial notice allows courts to accept certain facts as true without formal proof.Privileges protect certain relationships even at the cost of excluding relevant evidence.Hearsay exceptions require the declarant to be unavailable for certain statements to be admissible.evidence law, burdens of proof, judicial notice, hearsay exceptions, legal privileges, trial fairness, standards of persuasion, legal education

This conversation delves into the complexities of hearsay in legal evidence, focusing on Federal Rule of Evidence 803 and its exceptions. The discussion provides a systematic approach to understanding hearsay, emphasizing the importance of context, spontaneity, and the reliability of statements. Key exceptions such as present sense impression, excited utterance, and business records are explored in detail, along with their requirements and limitations. The conversation also touches on the implications of modern technology on hearsay rules and the evolving nature of legal evidence.In the world of law, hearsay is often seen as a daunting topic, especially for students preparing for exams or the bar. The complexity lies not just in the definitions but in the myriad exceptions that exist within the Federal Rules of Evidence. This post aims to demystify Rule 803, focusing on exceptions where the declarant's availability is immaterial.Understanding Rule 803: Rule 803 outlines exceptions to the hearsay rule, emphasizing circumstances that inherently guarantee the reliability of a statement. These exceptions are crucial for legal practitioners to understand, as they often appear in exams and real-world cases.Key Exceptions:Present Sense Impression (PSI): This exception allows statements made during or immediately after an event to be admissible, provided they describe or explain the event. The immediacy of the statement is key to its reliability.Excited Utterance: Unlike PSI, this exception relies on the declarant's state of shock or stress. The statement must relate to a startling event and be made while the declarant is still under the influence of that stress.Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition: Statements reflecting the declarant's current state of mind or physical condition are admissible, provided they don't attempt to prove past events.Practical Application: Understanding these exceptions is not just about memorizing rules but grasping the rationale behind them. The law seeks to balance the ideal of live testimony with the practical need to admit reliable evidence. As technology evolves, so too does the interpretation of these rules, particularly in how spontaneous statements are viewed in the digital age.Mastering hearsay exceptions requires a structured approach and a deep understanding of the underlying principles. By focusing on the rationale and systematically analyzing each element, legal practitioners can effectively navigate this complex area of law.Subscribe now to stay updated on more insights into the intricacies of legal evidence and other foundational topics.TakeawaysHearsay is universally seen as the toughest topic in evidence.Understanding the context is crucial for analyzing hearsay.Five mandatory steps must be followed for hearsay analysis.The risk of insincerity is minimized in spontaneous statements.Timing is critical for present sense impressions.Excited utterances require a startling event to be admissible.Statements about current feelings are admissible under Rule 803.Business records must meet strict criteria for admissibility.Emails may not qualify as business records if not systematic.Modern technology challenges traditional hearsay rules. hearsay, evidence, law, Federal Rule of Evidence 803, legal analysis, law school, exam preparation, legal exceptions, courtroom evidence, hearsay exceptions

In this episode of Selwyn's Law, host Selwyn Whitehead discusses the impact of the 2025 Government Shutdown on our Federal Courts, particularly on the Bankruptcy Courts. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We are in the debt of teachers and grandparents and mentors who didn't treat us as the average but as the extraordinary individual we were and thus gave us individual treatment. Don't your kids deserve that, too?

To skip over Jim and Chris chatting about the government shutdown delaying Social Security and Medicare announcements, and Jim's upcoming travel plans—including concerns about flight delays and his upcoming elk hunt in Utah you can skip ahead to (8:15). Chris's SummaryJim and I walk through common IRA rollover mistakes and clarify the once-per-year rollover rule, […] The post IRA Rollover Mistakes and Exceptions: EDU #2542 appeared first on The Retirement and IRA Show.

This episode dives into the complexities of evidence law, focusing on the rules surrounding character, habit, and policy exclusions. It covers the notorious rules 404, 406, 407, and 408, providing an analytical roadmap to help listeners decode these rules and maximize their exam points. The discussion includes the forbidden propensity inference, the distinction between character and habit, and the MIMIC exceptions, all while emphasizing the importance of understanding the inferential chain and the Huddleston protections.Navigating the labyrinth of evidence law can be daunting, especially when preparing for exams or the bar. Imagine standing at the crossroads of character, habit, and policy exclusions, each path fraught with its own challenges. This episode unravels the intricacies of rules 404, 406, 407, and 408, offering a roadmap to conquer these legal hurdles.Decoding the Rules:Rule 404: The gatekeeper against propensity reasoning, ensuring that character evidence isn't used to suggest a person acted in conformity with that character on a specific occasion. Rule 406: Differentiates character from habit, treating the latter as a reliable indicator of behavior due to its repetitive nature. Rules 407 and 408: Policy-driven exclusions that prioritize societal goals over individual case outcomes, encouraging safety improvements and candid settlement negotiations.The Forbidden Propensity Inference: Understanding the line between using evidence for a proper non-propensity reason and the forbidden character inference is crucial. The episode delves into the nuances of this distinction, emphasizing the importance of mastering the MIMIC exceptions—motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity, and common plan or scheme.Huddleston Protections: These safeguards are essential in preventing unfair prejudice. The episode outlines the four Huddleston hurdles, ensuring evidence is admitted for a proper purpose, is relevant, and its probative value isn't substantially outweighed by the risk of prejudice.Philosophical Tensions: At the heart of evidence law lies a philosophical debate: Can jurors truly separate past bad acts from the current charges? The episode explores this tension, questioning whether the bright line against propensity reasoning can ever be perfectly maintained.Mastering evidence law requires a systematic approach, one that balances legal principles with practical application. This episode provides the tools needed to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring fairness and clarity in the adversarial system.TakeawaysDecode rules 404, 406, 407, and 408 for exams.Understand the forbidden propensity inference.Distinguish between character and habit evidence.Master the MIMIC exceptions for non-propensity purposes.Apply the Huddleston protections to safeguard against prejudice.Recognize the policy rationale behind rules 407 and 408.Identify the exceptions to subsequent remedial measures.Navigate the complexities of compromise offers and negotiations.Analyze the inferential chain to avoid propensity reasoning.Embrace the philosophical tension in evidence law.Title OptionsMastering Evidence Law: Rules 404, 406, 407, 408Navigating Character and Habit in Evidence LawDecoding the MIMIC Exceptions for ExamsUnderstanding Policy Exclusions in Evidence LawThe Analytical Roadmap to Evidence Law MasteryAvoiding the Forbidden Propensity InferenceCharacter vs. Habit: A Legal DistinctionDecode rules for exam success. Avoid forbidden propensity inference. Character vs. habit: key distinction. Master MIMIC exceptions for exams. Huddleston protections prevent prejudice. Policy rationale behind rules 407, 408. Exceptions to subsequent remedial measures. Complexities of compromise offers. Inferential chain avoids propensity. Philosophical tension in evidence law.evidence law, character, habit, policy exclusions, rule 404, rule 406, rule 407, rule 408, propensity inference, MIMIC exceptions, Huddleston protections

This episode dives deep into the complexities of character evidence in law, focusing on Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 405. It explores the strategic considerations, exceptions, and the balance between fairness and truth in legal proceedings.In the intricate world of evidence law, character evidence stands as one of the most challenging areas for law students and practitioners alike. This blog post delves into the nuances of character evidence, focusing on Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 404 and 405, and the strategic considerations involved.Understanding the Basics: Character evidence generally refers to using a person's character or traits to prove they acted in a certain way on a specific occasion. Under FRE 404, such evidence is typically inadmissible due to the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, and distraction from the main issues. The rule aims to prevent trials from devolving into character assassinations rather than focusing on the crime charged.Exceptions to the Rule: Despite the general prohibition, there are exceptions where character evidence can be admitted. These include the defendant's right to introduce evidence of their own pertinent character trait (FRE 404A2A), evidence of the victim's character in certain cases (FRE 404A2B), and when character is an essential element of a claim or defense (FRE 405B).Strategic Considerations: Introducing character evidence can be a double-edged sword. While it may bolster a defense, it also opens the door for the prosecution to introduce rebuttal evidence. Lawyers must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the risks of prejudice and distraction.Character evidence remains a contentious and complex area of law, balancing the need for fairness with the pursuit of truth. As legal professionals navigate these waters, understanding the strategic implications and exceptions is crucial for effective advocacy.TakeawaysCharacter evidence is generally inadmissible to prove conduct on a specific occasion.FRE 404 prohibits character evidence due to risks of unfair prejudice and confusion.Exceptions include the defendant's pertinent character trait and victim's character in certain cases.Character evidence can open the door for rebuttal evidence from the prosecution.FRE 405B allows character evidence when it's an essential element of a claim or defense.Strategic use of character evidence requires careful consideration of potential risks.The doctrine of chances is a debated non-propensity purpose under FRE 404B.FRE 412, the rape shield law, protects victims' past sexual history from being used in court.FRE 413, 414, and 415 allow prior similar acts in sex offense cases for propensity inference.Understanding the framework of character evidence is crucial for legal practitioners.Character evidence is generally inadmissible. FRE 404 prohibits character evidence. Exceptions include the defendant's character trait. Character evidence can open the door for rebuttal. FRE 405B allows character evidence as an essential element. Strategic use requires careful consideration. The doctrine of chances is debated. FRE 412 protects victims' past sexual history. FRE 413 allows prior similar acts for propensity. Understanding character evidence is crucial.character evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, FRE 404, FRE 405, legal strategy

10-11-25See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week, we're covering the new H-1B visa fee, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC's) closure of disparate impact cases, and recent key labor appointments. New Fee for H-1B Visas Employers must now pay $100,000 for each first-time H-1B petition filed on or after September 21, 2025. Current visa holders are not affected. Exceptions may apply, but details are limited. EEOC Shuts Down Disparate Impact Cases The EEOC has closed nearly all disparate impact cases following a recent executive order. These claims can still be pursued in court. The agency will also dissolve its Office of Enterprise Data and Analytics, although EEO-1 reporting requirements appear unchanged. Key Labor Roles Confirmed The Senate has confirmed Daniel Aronowitz as Assistant Secretary of Labor for the Employee Benefits Security Administration. Additionally, the Senate has confirmed over 100 other labor-related appointments—including 11 top labor positions—restoring a quorum at both the EEOC and the Merit Systems Protection Board. Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw407 Download our Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app: https://www.ebglaw.com/wage-hour-guide-for-employers-app. Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.    

This conversation delves into the critical doctrines of contract law, specifically the Statute of Frauds (SOF) and the Parole Evidence Rule (PER). It explores their roles in determining enforceability and the terms of contracts, respectively. The discussion highlights the UCC's exceptions, common law principles, and the philosophical debates surrounding formalism versus contextualism in contract law. Through case studies and practical applications, the conversation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of these doctrines and their implications for legal practice.In the world of contract law, the Statute of Frauds (SOF) stands as a crucial doctrine, acting as a gatekeeper to determine whether a contract is enforceable. This legal principle requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be legally binding, ensuring clarity and preventing fraudulent claims.The Origins and Purpose of the Statute of FraudsThe Statute of Frauds dates back to 17th century England, designed to curb fraudulent practices by requiring written evidence for specific agreements. Its primary purpose is to prevent perjury and misunderstandings in contractual obligations, providing a safeguard against false claims based on oral agreements.Key Contracts Under the Statute of FraudsThe SOF typically applies to contracts involving significant transactions, such as:Agreements for the sale of goods over a certain value, often $500 or more. Contracts that cannot be performed within one year. Real estate transactions. Promises to pay another's debt.These categories ensure that substantial agreements are documented, reducing the risk of disputes and providing a clear record of the parties' intentions.Exceptions and FlexibilityWhile the SOF mandates written contracts for certain agreements, it also allows for exceptions. For instance, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides flexibility, permitting oral contracts in some cases if there is sufficient evidence of the agreement, such as partial performance or admissions in court.The Balance Between Formalism and FairnessThe application of the SOF often reflects a balance between formalism and fairness. Formalists emphasize the importance of written agreements for predictability and certainty, while contextualists advocate for considering the parties' true intentions, even if not perfectly documented.Conclusion: The SOF's Role in Modern Contract LawThe Statute of Frauds remains a vital component of contract law, ensuring that significant agreements are documented and enforceable. By requiring written evidence, it protects parties from fraudulent claims and misunderstandings, while also allowing for flexibility in certain situations. Understanding the SOF is essential for anyone navigating the complexities of contract law, as it underscores the importance of clarity and documentation in legal agreements.Subscribe now to stay informed about the latest insights in contract law and other legal topics.TakeawaysThe Statute of Frauds determines if a contract requires a writing.The Parole Evidence Rule governs the admissibility of evidence regarding contract terms.UCC Section 2201 sets a low bar for writing requirements in goods contracts.Exceptions to SOF include specially manufactured goods and admissions in court.Integration levels (complete, partial, not integrated) affect the application of PER.Merger clauses indicate intent for complete integration of terms.Extrinsic evidence cannot contradict express terms in a written contract.Contextualism in contract law seeks to uncover true intent of the parties.Judicial intervention can alter contracts based on unforeseen circumstances.The balance between predictability and fairness is a core tension in contract law.contract law, statute of frauds, parole evidence rule, UCC, legal doctrines, enforceability, contract terms, legal exceptions, common law, promissory estoppel

They say rules are meant to be broken - but in retirement planning, some rules are designed with exceptions that can actually work in your favor. In this episode, we explore where flexibility exists in the retirement system: - IRA & Roth IRA: Special contribution and RMD exceptions that could save you money. - 401(k)s: When you can contribute or withdraw outside the standard rules. - Social Security: Situations where exceptions unlock additional benefits. Whether you're a “rule follower” or a “rule breaker,” understanding these exceptions can help you make smarter, legally sound decisions to strengthen your retirement plan. Listen in.  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  LET'S CONNECT Show website: https://www.providencefinancialpodcast.com Find us at: https://www.providencefinancialinc.com Get to know Anthony: https://anthonysaccaro.com Anthony's book: https://morelifethanmoneybook.com Amazon Author Page: https://amazon/author/anthonysaccaro YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/AnthonySaccaro/featured Radio: https://www.providencefinancialradio.com Yelp: https://www.yelp.com/biz/providence-financial-and-insurance-services-inc-woodland-hills Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Providence.FinancialInc/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AnthonySaccaro LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonysaccaro/

PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey (***TIMESTAMPS in description below) ~ Nathan Apffel and Chris Ayoub are the creators of The Religion Business, a multi-part docuseries exposing the financial practices and lack of accountability in Western religion. Beyond filmmaking, Apffel and Ayoub are building tech-driven solutions to push for transparency, ethical governance, and redirecting resources toward real issues like poverty and homelessness. RELIGION BUSINESS LINKS: The Religion Business Website - https://www.thereligionbusiness.com IG: https://www.instagram.com/nathan_apffel/# IG: https://www.instagram.com/religionbusiness YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkynle-j4cDBB-5_bAp81mQ FOLLOW JULIAN DOREY INSTAGRAM (Podcast): https://www.instagram.com/juliandoreypodcast/ INSTAGRAM (Personal): https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/ X: https://twitter.com/julianddorey JULIAN YT CHANNELS - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Clips YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juliandoreyclips - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Daily YT: https://www.youtube.com/@JulianDoreyDaily - SUBSCRIBE to Best of JDP: https://www.youtube.com/@bestofJDP ****TIMESTAMPS**** 00:00 - Intro 01:13 – Tommy G, Religion Business, Nate's Accident, $1 Trillion Christianity, Daughter's Birth 10:00 – Chris Intro, Christianity, Institutions, Saints Built Orphanages, Can It Stay Pure? 20:43 – Cyclical, Gateway Church, Secular vs Religious Nonprofits, 14 Points, Hells Angels, IRS 30:48 – Scientology, Vatican, Good Intentions to Hell, Tithing, Middle Man, Matthew 25 43:20 – Gift Giving, Transparency, Senator Hatfield, ECFA, Mailers = Money 50:12 – Kenneth Copeland, MLM?, Fear Engine, Mega Pastors Opposite of Jesus 01:01:54 – Blessing?, Mosaic Laws, Leviticus, Black Israelites, Churches as Enterprises 01:10:33 – Clergy Demoralized, Buildings, Parishes, YOU Are the Temple 01:22:20 – Faith in Faith, Mega Pastors, Ignorance, Only 13% Read Bible, Chris Reads as History 01:31:33 – Fooled by Pastors, Self-Focus, Military, Quitting Drinking, Hero Journey = Jesus 01:39:33 – Civilian Life, Missing Danger, Holy Spirit, Everything on the Altar 01:47:01 – Not a Poor Gospel, Parables vs Exceptions, Read Genesis to Revelation 01:51:34 – Socialism, Communism, Republic, Capitalism, Christ's Social Message, Tribe 01:59:47 – Demons, Stardust, S3xual Energy Transfer, Angels, Humility 02:09:01 – Atheist vs Christian, CIA, 14 Points Control, Religion + Politics = Death Rattle 02:19:21 – Christianity & Gov, Moral Authority, Islam vs Christianity, Johnson Amendment 02:25:00 – Johnson Amendment, Netanyahu, Religion + Politics, Abdication, Read Bible 02:35:00 – Paying Congregation?, No Full-Time Pastors, Traditions as Doctrine 02:39:58 – Charlie Kirk Shot, No Hope, Religion Online, Baby Christians, Revival? 02:52:20 – Murder Charlotte, Beast Train, Hate & Homelessness, Tommy G, Copeland Recap 03:05:37 – Copeland $700M, Debate Pastors, Cayman Drops, Religion Business Beginning 03:16:25 – Christ & Truth Arbiter CREDITS: - Host, Editor & Producer: Julian Dorey - COO, Producer & Editor: Alessi Allaman - https://www.youtube.com/@UCyLKzv5fKxGmVQg3cMJJzyQ - In-Studio Producer: Joey Deef - https://www.instagram.com/joeydeef/ Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 340 - Religion Business Music by Artlist.io Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome solo and group practice owners! We are Liath Dalton and Evan Dumas, your co-hosts of Group Practice Tech. In our latest episode, we share what's actually changing for therapists regarding the Medicare telehealth “cliff” after October 1st 2025, so you can prepare without panic. We discuss: Why telehealth coverage is changing for Medicare providers after 10/1 Which changes do not apply to therapists The in-person visit requirement that does apply to therapists When you would need to see both established and not established Medicare clients in-person Exceptions to the in-person visit requirement  The time frame you have to make a plan for these changes in your practice Steps you can take now to prepare for these changes Dual eligibility clients Our upcoming free Q+A on these changes with Medicare expert Gabrielle Juliano Villani Listen here: https://personcenteredtech.com/group/podcast/ For more, visit our website. PCT Resources: Free Info Session + Q&A: Medicare & Teletherapy After October 1st: What Therapists Need to Know (Whatever Happens in Congress) Join Liath Dalton and Gabrielle Juliano-Villani, LCSW on October 17th for a live (and recorded) session clarifying what's changing, what isn't, and how to stay compliant and confident at the intersections of Medicare, Teletherapy, and HIPAA in practice. On-demand Trainings (not designated as CE) presented by Gabrielle: Introduction To Medicare And Medicare Credentialing and Medicare Billing Group Practice Care Premium weekly (live & recorded) direct support & consultation service, Group Practice Office Hours — including monthly session with therapist attorney Eric Ström, JD PhD LMHC + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Bring Your Own Device training + access to Device Security Center with step-by-step device-specific tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting all personally owned & practice-provided devices (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Remote Workspaces training for all team members + access to Remote Workspace Center with step-by-step tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting Remote Workspaces (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + more Resources: APA Services article: The Telehealth Waiver: What Psychologists Need to Know National Consortium of Telehealth Resource Centers: The Telehealth Policy Cliff: Preparing for October 1, 2025 ATA Action statement: Urging Congress to Dodge the Telehealth Cliff Medicare Consulting for Therapists

Dans cet épisode, l'équipe d'OVNI reçoit Hortense Goulard (Les Échos), fraîchement revenue de quatre ans à San Francisco. Elle raconte le basculement de la tech US du boom NFTs/métavers vers l'IA générative, l'ambiance très transactionnelle de la Valley, et ce que change concrètement le “être sur place” pour l'accès au capital, aux talents et à l'information. On parle choix d'implantation (San Francisco vs Valley vs New York/Boston), rythme de travail avec l'Europe, et réalités très pratiques (coworking, recrutement, salaires).Côté tendances, l'épisode plonge dans la “physical AI” (robots + IA), la défense devenue hype dans la Silicon Valley, et un quantique qui revient en force, tout en abordant souveraineté, semi-conducteurs (CHIPS Act, TSMC), et virages politico-réglementaires (Biden, Lina Khan/FTC, Trump). Hortense partage des conseils pour les fondateurs européens qui visent les US, des cas d'usage industriels (drones, maintenance, sécurité), et des sources à suivre (The Information, Platformer) pour garder une longueur d'avance.[00:00:00]: Introduction[00:01:00]: Retour d'Hortense des États-Unis[00:01:20]: France vs USA: ambiances et constats terrain[00:02:18]: San Francisco post-pandémie: centre-ville et SDF[00:02:47]: Le “bureau” des Echos à SF: coworking[00:03:26]: Salaire et coût de la vie à SF[00:03:38]: France “fin de Startup Nation” vs SF à fond[00:04:40]: Télétravail, retours à SF, Miami et Austin[00:05:37]: Faut-il être à SF pour la deeptech?[00:06:38]: Hubs sectoriels: LA, Denver, New York[00:07:04]: YC, Delaware, Texas, et la maison mère[00:08:01]: Défense: nécessité d'une entité américaine[00:09:22]: Culture du temps: ponctualité et rendez-vous courts[00:10:17]: Networking transactionnel et small talk à SF[00:11:40]: “Les Echos, le WSJ français” pour expliquer[00:12:27]: Vagues: NFTs, argent facile, puis licenciements[00:13:50]: Choc ChatGPT: bascule totale vers l'IA[00:16:58]: Curiosité US vs prudence européenne[00:18:36]: Indépendance éditoriale et sponsoring aux USA[00:20:09]: Mur pub/rédaction: grands médias vs influenceurs[00:20:41]: Washington Post, Bezos et la ligne éditoriale[00:22:48]: Réelle politique, Lina Khan et la FTC[00:23:53]: Entrepreneurs vs VCs; IPOs et M&A gelés[00:24:34]: Pourquoi la tech préfère Trump récemment[00:26:03]: Passage obligé par les USA pour scaler?[00:27:07]: IPO US, taille de marché et clients[00:28:17]: S'implanter: recrutements US et écueils[00:28:59]: New York ou San Francisco?[00:29:25]: Exceptions et hubs: Datadog, biotechs à Boston[00:30:41]: Recruter à SF: forte communauté européenne[00:31:40]: Souveraineté vs intérêt business, le débat[00:32:05]: Décalage horaire: routines et organisation[00:35:30]: Physical AI: robots qui comprennent et agissent[00:36:26]: Vision, action et interactions robotisées[00:36:41]: NVIDIA GTC: démos robots et débuts[00:37:32]: “Cerveau” universel pour robots, cas Boston Dynamics[00:38:12]: Infra IA robotique et présence européenne[00:39:33]: Entraînement virtuel et “Dull, Dirty, Dangerous”[00:42:00]: Le quantique coté, retour en force US[00:42:25]: Communications quantiques et navigation sans GPS[00:44:24]: Early stage: pourquoi préférer San Francisco[00:46:00]: Coliving d'entrepreneurs et scènes locales[00:46:27]: Défense: tabou levé et boom des investissements[00:47:12]: Palantir, milliardaires et réorientation des contrats[00:48:35]: DoD: filiale 100% US et contraintes[00:49:04]: Chips Act, relocalisation et souveraineté US[00:50:23]: TSMC Arizona: clashs culturels et Trump[00:51:05]: Europe et usines de puces, batteries[00:51:23]: OVNI doit-il s'installer à SF?[00:51:36]: Recommandation: s'établir à San Francisco[00:52:14]: Souveraineté vs meilleur produit pour clients[00:53:20]: Cloud, Patriot Act et données sensibles[00:56:46]: Platformer de Casey Newton conseillé[00:57:07]: Magma, tendances et souvenirs NFT[00:58:01]: Conclusion et remerciementsHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of the First Amendment, focusing on its key principles, historical context, and the evolution of its interpretation. The discussion covers the incorporation doctrine, freedom of speech, the distinction between content-based and content-neutral restrictions, and the various tiers of scrutiny applied in legal analysis. Imagine sitting in your constitutional law class, surrounded by casebooks and notes, with the First Amendment staring back at you like a complex puzzle. This cornerstone of our legal system is not only fundamental to understanding American law but also a critical component of law school exams and the bar. Let's delve into the key principles of the First Amendment and how they apply in legal exams.Understanding the Text: The First Amendment guarantees fundamental freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It begins with the phrase, "Congress shall make no law," explicitly limiting federal legislative power. However, the Supreme Court has recognized implied rights beyond the explicit text, such as the freedom of association and belief, which are crucial for exam analysis.Incorporation Doctrine: Initially, the Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, applied only to the federal government. The incorporation doctrine, through the Fourteenth Amendment, extended these protections to state and local governments. Understanding this historical context is vital for a complete legal analysis.Freedom of Speech: The bedrock principle of freedom of speech is that it is generally presumed to be protected unless it falls within specific exceptions. This presumption is rooted in the idea of a marketplace of ideas, where the government cannot restrict expression based on its message, ideas, subject matter, or content.Content-Based vs. Content-Neutral Restrictions: A critical aspect of First Amendment analysis is distinguishing between content-based and content-neutral restrictions. Content-based restrictions regulate speech because of its message and are presumptively unconstitutional, facing strict scrutiny. Content-neutral restrictions regulate something other than the content and are subject to intermediate scrutiny.Forum Analysis: The physical location of speech profoundly impacts its protection. Traditional public forums, like streets and parks, receive the strongest protections, while non-public forums, like military bases, receive the least. Understanding forum analysis is crucial for setting up exam analysis.Exceptions to Protected Speech: Certain categories of speech, such as incitement to imminent lawless action, true threats, and obscenity, receive no or limited First Amendment protection. Knowing these exceptions is essential for tackling First Amendment hypotheticals.Freedom of Religion: The First Amendment also encompasses the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses, which have evolved significantly. The Establishment Clause prohibits government promotion of religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects individual religious liberty. Understanding the dynamic interpretation of these clauses is key for exams.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest legal insights and exam tips!TakeawaysThe First Amendment is foundational to American law.Historical context is crucial for understanding constitutional rights.Incorporation doctrine applies federal rights to state actions.Freedom of speech is generally protected unless it falls into specific exceptions.Content-based restrictions face strict scrutiny, while content-neutral ones face intermediate scrutiny.Forum analysis is essential for determining speech protections.Certain categories of speech are unprotected or less protected.First Amendment, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, constitutional law, legal analysis, incorporation doctrine, speech restrictions, public forums, commercial speech, government speech

Connecticut is the latest state to ban marriage between first cousins, joining a growing list of states tightening restrictions on familial unions. But where is it still legal and what is the law in Utah? Greg and Holly discuss this with Lois Collins from the Deseret News. 

In episode 35, I talk about the voluntary martyrs of Córdoba, the Jewish convert Bodo, the Black musician Ziryab, the situation of the Abbasid Caliphate from its foundation to the year 861, and how Islamic justice worked. SUPPORT NEW HISTORY OF SPAIN: Patreon: https://patreon.com/newhistoryspain  Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/newhistoryspain PayPal: https://paypal.me/lahistoriaespana Bitcoin donation: bc1q64qs58s5c5kp5amhw5hn7vp9fvtekeq96sf4au Ethereum donation: 0xE3C423625953eCDAA8e57D34f5Ce027dd1902374 Join the DISCORD: https://discord.gg/jUvtdRKxUC Follow the show for updates on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/newhistoryspain.com Or Twitter/X: https://x.com/newhistoryspain YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/@newhistoryspain Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/new-history-of-spain/id1749528700 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7hstfgSYFfFPXhjps08IYi Spotify (video version): https://open.spotify.com/show/2OFZ00DSgMAEle9vngg537 Spanish show 'La Historia de España-Memorias Hispánicas': https://www.youtube.com/@lahistoriaespana TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Hook 00:25 The Martyrs of Córdoba 08:35 Bodo, the Deacon who Became a Jew 11:25 Ziryab, the Influencer of Abd al-Rahman II's Court 18:01 The Abbasid Caliphate up to 861 25:03 Maliki Islamic Law and the Ulema 36:04 The Verdict: The Danger of Focusing on Exceptions 37:19 Outro

Today, we are replaying one of my favorite conversations with Sam Hinkie. Sam worked for more than a decade in the NBA with the Houston Rockets and then as the President and GM of the Philadelphia 76ers. And now, after years of personal investing, he has launched his own venture capital firm, 87 Capital. Every conversation I have with Sam is alive with insight, and this one is no different. We explore the idea of studying the "breadcrumbs" that someone leaves behind as a way to track their progress and trajectory, finding and attracting the right people into one's orbit, and the lessons from the NBA that most shape his investing career. Sam has taught me the most about the topic of building trust, which we cover here as well. I am excited to share my conversation with Sam with all of you. Please enjoy! For the full show notes, transcript, and links to mentioned content, check out the episode page ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ----- This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ramp's mission is to help companies manage their spend in a way that reduces expenses and frees up time for teams to work on more valuable projects. Go to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ramp.com/invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to sign up for free and get a $250 welcome bonus. – This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Ridgeline⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Ridgeline has built a complete, real-time, modern operating system for investment managers. It handles trading, portfolio management, compliance, customer reporting, and much more through an all-in-one real-time cloud platform. Head to⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ridgelineapps.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to learn more about the platform. – This episode is brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AlphaSense⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. AlphaSense has completely transformed the research process with cutting-edge AI technology and a vast collection of top-tier, reliable business content. Invest Like the Best listeners can get a free trial now at⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Alpha-Sense.com/Invest⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and experience firsthand how AlphaSense and Tegus help you make smarter decisions faster. ----- Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://thepodcastconsultant.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠). Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome to Invest Like the Best (3:48) Conducting a good interview (5:58) Drilling into topics to learn more about people (10:36) Interest in digital breadcrumbs and how to follow them (14:02) Building context around founders vs analyzing their pitch decks (17:20) A real world example of the bread crumb strategy, Houston Rockets GM (23:07) Shifting to a people-first focus (28:24) Most amazing thing someone did in early days of working with Sam (30:18) Lessons from sports that he carries with him (32:31) Exceptions to relationships being a key to success (36:07) Avoiding transactional type people (37:04) Most effective lessons he brought to sports from the investing world (40:01) Ideas from the sports world he is bringing to the investing world (50:33) Lessons learned from watching them build trust (52:26) Market areas that have his attention (54:13) Fascination into API's (1:01:26) Playing the long game (1:04:29) Calling it 87 Capital (1:06:52) What can Caro teach us about the long game (1:12:58) The power of breadcrumbs and how people can start to lay them out

Send us a textINTRODUCTION:In this episode, De'Vannon delves deep into the symbolism of the Three, Four, and Five of Wands tarot cards, drawing parallels between personal spiritual journeys and earthly challenges. They explore themes of embracing new beginnings, spiritual planning and growth, and how to handle conflicts along the journey. The narrative weaves in personal reflections on the spiritual significance of deserts, the Holy Trinity, enlightenment, and maintaining faith amidst scientific discoveries. Additionally, the host discusses dealing with familial and workplace conflicts and emphasizes the importance of forgiveness, mercy, and maintaining a strong relationship with God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost.Playlists: https://music.apple.com/profile/DeVannonSeraphinoWebsite: https://www.SexDrugsAndJesus.comINCLUDED IN THIS EPISODE (But not limited to):·      Tarot Study Of The Suit Of Wands. (Three Of Wands thru Five Of Wands)·      The Journey Of A Thousand Miles.·      Coming Full Circle.·      True Enlightenment.·      Why We Are More Than Stardust.·      Exceptions to Science. ·      Let God Lay Your Foundation.·      Let Go Of Everything. CONNECT WITH DE'VANNON SERÁPHINO:TikTok: https://shorturl.at/nqyJ4YouTube: https://bit.ly/3daTqCMLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/devannonEmail: SDJPodcastNewYork@Gmail.com REFERENCES:https://astrostyle.com/tarot/suit-of-wands/Thanks for listening!!! Please follow us on YouTube + TikTok @SexDrugsAndJesusPodcast

Are there times were we should strive not to be present or in the moment? As we enter the month of Elul and approach the High Holidays, many of us instinctively tighten our grip on spiritual practices. We double down on prayer, intensify our focus, and strive for flawless kavanah (intention). But what if true holiness sometimes emerges when we loosen our hold? In this week's Torah portion, Ki Teitze, we encounter a surprising perspective on mitzvot (commandments) that challenges our assumptions about intentionality and control. Let's explore how embracing the unintentional might deepen our spiritual practice and transform our relationship with the Divine. Key Takeaways The nuanced approach to returning lost objects and when it's okay to "hide your eyes” How the agricultural law of forgotten sheaves (shichecha) relates to selective memory during the High Holidays The serendipitous nature of the bird's nest commandment and its character and environmental implications Timestamps [00:00:00] Holiness in forgetting and letting go [00:02:07] Rabbi joins from Italy [00:03:00] Announcements and upcoming live event [00:04:00] Returning lost objects in Deuteronomy [00:06:03] The subway lesson: looking away [00:09:00] Exceptions to returning lost items [00:12:00] The mitzvah of forgetting sheaves in the field [00:17:00] Selective memory and Rosh Hashanah [00:22:00] The bird's nest commandment [00:28:00] Wrapping up: intentional vs. unintentional holiness Links & Learnings Sign up for free and get more from our weekly newsletter https://madlik.com/ Safaria Source Sheet: https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/672300 Transcript here: https://madlik.substack.com/  

What exceptions do you make to moral rules HR 1 full 2297 Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:48:47 +0000 WRpUdCIrrwNHsbahgp7i8clnLK0FVxaW news MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER news What exceptions do you make to moral rules HR 1 From local news & politics, to what's trending, sports & personal stories...MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER will get you through the middle of your day! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-l

While we prepare for Season 15 of the podcast, Tim will be giving weekly rapid reactions to audio articles from The Fire Time Magazine. In this week's episode, Tim reacts to an article by Zack Estes titled, "Exceptions Create Chaos, Standards Create Clarity" (released in the ⁠⁠May 2025 issue of The Fire Time Magazine⁠)⁠. ------ Become a supporter of The Fire Time Network and get access to awesome rewards: ⁠⁠⁠https://itsfiretime.com/join⁠⁠⁠ To hear more audio articles from our magazine, subscribe to the Fire Time Magazine Podcast: ⁠⁠⁠https://www.itsfiretime.com/magazine⁠⁠⁠. Read The Fire Time Magazine Reader Edition online: ⁠⁠⁠https://magazine.itsfiretime.com⁠⁠⁠. Download The Fire Time Magazine app to get full access to the magazine (for free): ⁠⁠⁠https://www.itsfiretime.com/app⁠⁠⁠.

Join the Get Organized HQ Virtual Conference - FOR FREE!!!Thanks for the listeners who have asked what to do when life happens and you need to make exceptions to your minimalism? Living life as a minimalist is all about knowing your values and balancing that with your desire for minimalism, which sometimes means having items you need for a season or reason.Sometimes you need to have excess to cater for the season of life that you're in. More sheets, more toys, more clothes etc. When you're unsure what to keep or how much of something to keep, go back to your values and make intentional decisions that fit with your stage of life and current need.Join the Get Organized HQ Virtual Conference - FOR FREE!!!Claim your FREE ticket hereJoin our community Leave a Google ReviewFollow me on InstagramFollow me on FacebookJoin my Facebook groupLeave a review on Apple PodcastThank you to my sound engineer, Jarred from Four4ty Studio. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This conversation delves into the Best Evidence Rule (BER), a crucial aspect of evidence law that is often misunderstood by law students. The discussion covers the core principles of the BER, its application in various contexts, and the exceptions that allow for secondary evidence. It also addresses modern challenges posed by digital evidence and social media, as well as strategies for effectively tackling evidence exam questions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the nuances of the BER for both academic success and practical legal application.TakeawaysThe Best Evidence Rule is critical for law school exams.Understanding the BER can save time on complex exam questions.The rule requires the original document to prove its content.The BER applies broadly to various forms of evidence, including digital.Exceptions to the BER allow for secondary evidence in specific situations.Modern challenges include the authenticity of digital evidence.Exam strategies should focus on spotting the BER issue quickly.Independent knowledge can exempt testimony from the BER.The jury decides factual questions related to the BER.Mastering the BER is essential for success in law school and the bar.Best Evidence Rule, law school, evidence exam, legal principles, Federal Rules of Evidence, exam strategies, digital evidence, authentication, legal education, law students

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of hearsay and its exceptions, particularly focusing on spontaneous statements and business records under the federal rules of evidence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the nuances of hearsay, the practical applications of these rules in legal settings, and the challenges posed by modern communication methods. Key themes include the reliability of statements made under stress, the foundational requirements for business records, and the implications of the confrontation clause in criminal cases. The conversation also highlights strategies for law students to effectively navigate these complex topics in exams and real-world scenarios.Dive into the intricate world of hearsay and its exceptions with our latest episode, "Understanding Hearsay and Its Exceptions." Designed specifically for law students, this episode unpacks critical hearsay exceptions under the federal rules of evidence, focusing on spontaneous statements and business records. Gain clarity on how these exceptions allow out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence, and learn practical insights for exams and the bar. Join us as we explore the balance between reliability and the need for cross-examination, providing you with the tools to navigate this complex area of law with confidence.TakeawaysObjection hearsay is a common legal term.Understanding hearsay exceptions is crucial for law students.Immediacy in statements increases their trustworthiness.Excited utterances are driven by emotional stress.The confrontation clause impacts hearsay admissibility.Business records rely on routine and accuracy.Double hearsay can complicate evidence admission.Emails are not automatically considered business records.Custodians of records must meet specific standards.Future evidence law may need to adapt to digital communication.hearsay, law students, evidence, spontaneous statements, business records, confrontation clause, legal exceptions, courtroom, federal rules of evidence, legal education

In the world of law, the hearsay rule stands as a pivotal principle, shaping the way evidence is presented and evaluated in courtrooms. Imagine a trial where every piece of gossip or second-hand information could sway the verdict. The hearsay rule prevents this chaos, ensuring that only reliable evidence is considered. But what exactly is hearsay, and why is it so crucial?What is the Hearsay Rule? The hearsay rule is a legal doctrine that excludes out-of-court statements from being admitted as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. This rule is grounded in the belief that such statements are inherently unreliable, as they are not subject to cross-examination, and the declarant's credibility cannot be assessed by the jury.Why is the Hearsay Rule Important?Ensures Reliability: By excluding hearsay, the rule ensures that only evidence that can be tested for accuracy and truthfulness is presented in court. Protects the Right to Cross-Examine: The rule upholds a defendant's right to confront their accuser, a fundamental aspect of a fair trial. Maintains Judicial Efficiency: By filtering out unreliable evidence, the hearsay rule helps streamline legal proceedings, focusing on facts that can be substantiated.Exceptions to the Rule: While the hearsay rule is stringent, there are notable exceptions where hearsay can be admitted, such as statements made under the belief of impending death or those that are part of a business record. These exceptions are carefully crafted to balance the need for reliable evidence with practical considerations.Conclusion: The hearsay rule is more than just a legal technicality; it is a safeguard that upholds the integrity of the judicial process. By understanding its nuances and exceptions, legal professionals and the public alike can appreciate its role in ensuring justice is served.Stay informed about legal principles that impact our justice system. Subscribe now for more insights into the world of law and its intricacies.TakeawaysHearsay is a foundational pillar of the adversarial system.The hearsay rule is designed to ensure reliability and fairness in legal proceedings.A statement is defined broadly under the hearsay rule, including nonverbal conduct.The purpose for which a statement is offered is crucial in determining hearsay.Declarants must be human beings for the hearsay rule to apply.The hearsay rule addresses four principal risks: sincerity, narration, memory, and perception.Understanding the missing safeguards of hearsay is vital for grasping its application.Non-hearsay uses include showing the effect on the listener and verbal acts.Hearsay exceptions exist to allow certain statements deemed inherently reliable.A systematic approach to analyzing hearsay is essential for legal success.hearsay, evidence law, legal education, courtroom, trial, law school, hearsay exceptions, legal analysis, evidence admissibility, legal principles

Episode 92: The Swiss Army Knife of Investment Accounts

In this episode of the EMS One-Stop podcast, host Rob Lawrence climbs back onto his soapbox to discuss two topics that directly impact on every EMS agency in America — the CAAS Ground Vehicle Standards (GVS) 4.0 and the simple, inexpensive steps we can take to stop ambulance theft. Joining Rob is longtime EMS leader and current CAAS GVS Administrator Mark Postma, who walks us through the origins of the standards, their national adoption and what's new in the latest update. From ambulance remounting, to structural safety testing, Mark explains how GVS 4.0 has evolved to keep pace with manufacturing realities, supply chain delays and operational needs. The conversation then shifts to a shared passion for protecting fleet assets. Rob and Mark dissect the shockingly frequent problem of ambulance theft and how a $200 automatic immobilization device can prevent a $250,000 vehicle from disappearing — without relying on crews to remember to lock it. Additional resources: CAAS GVS V4.0 – Ground Vehicle Standard Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) – The New Standard in Mobile Healthcare Ambulance thefts in the U.S. surge: Over 40 stolen rigs in 18 months 6 ways to safety-proof your EMS fleet Memorable quotes "It's no good going to City Council or to your board of directors on day 365 and saying, ‘I need a new truck for New Year day one' — that's not going to happen." — Rob Lawrence "The ground vehicle standard has become the standard that most vehicles are being built to and that state EMS officials are using." — Mark Postma "We spend a lot of time thinking about where things go in the box … add one more thing to your checklist: can the vehicle indeed be immobilized?" — Rob Lawrence "There's just no reason why ambulances are being stolen with the current technology that's out there." — Mark Postma Episode timeline 00:45 – Rob introduces the topic: GVS 4.0 and ambulance theft concerns 01:34 – Mark introduction and CAAS GVS role 04:11 – How the CAAS standards were developed and adopted by 35-plus states 06:09 – Comparing CAAS GVS to NFPA ambulance standards 06:48 – The rise of remounting, especially during COVID supply shortages 10:26 – Discussion of ongoing vehicle delivery delays and need for replacement planning 15:04 – What's new in GVS 4.0 — major changes and safety structure updates 19:38 – Ambulance theft statistics and the GVS anti-theft requirement 22:28 – Automatic immobilization and why manual systems fail 23:57 – Mark shares success story: zero thefts since installing devices 26:17 – Exceptions in standards and why state inspectors must enforce anti-theft 27:42 – Final thoughts on making anti-theft part of fleet planning Enjoying the show? Email editor@ems1.com to share feedback and suggest future guests. 

In this episode of Nurses Uncorked, Nurse Erica discusses the potential for a medical draft of healthcare professionals in the event of a national emergency. Current global events create uncertainty in the healthcare landscape. She explores the historical context of nursing during wartime, particularly during World War II. The episode also touches on the Healthcare Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) standby plan and exceptions, exemptions and postponements. The Enema Award highlights a recent case that raises concerns about accountability and the justice system. Sponsors: Thank you to Nurses Uncorked Sponsor, EKO HEALTH. You've haven't experienced a stethoscope until you've used an Eko stethoscope! Visit: ekohealth.com/uncorked for $50 off and a free chest piece cover!    Thank you to Nurses Uncorked Sponsor, Dr. Lorre Laws PhD, RN. Healers Heart Assessment and Healers Heart Academy:  https://drlorrelaws.com  Nursing our Healer's Heart: A Recovery Guide for Nurse Trauma & Burnout, by Dr. Lorre Laws PhD, RN:  Buy on Amazon   Interested in Sponsoring the Show? Email with the subject NURSES UNCORKED SPONSOR to: nursesuncorked@nursesuncorked.com Support the Show: Help keep Nurses Uncorked going and become an official Patron! Gain early access to episodes, exclusive bonus content, giveaways, Zoom parties, shout-outs, and much more. Become a Wine Cork, Wine Bottle, Decanter, Grand Preserve, or even a Vineyard Member: https://patron.podbean.com/nursesuncorkedpodcast   Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 02:15 Liquor versus Liqueur 03:35 Cocktail of the Week 05:20 Medical Draft 07:20 Who is Included 08:08 Historical Context of Nursing in Wartime 14:05 HCPDS Standby Plan 16:19 Exceptions, Exemptions and Postponement 19:20 The Enema of the Week Award: A Justice System Failure   Cocktail of the Week: Tequila Sunrise 1 part Tequila Splash of Lemon Juice 2 parts Orange Juice Add grenadine to filter down through juice (do not mix) Pour over ice in highball glass and garnish with Maraschino cherry or orange slice.   More Information available at: https://www.sss.gov/about/return-to-draft/   Help the podcast grow by giving episodes a like, download, follow and a 5 ⭐️ star rating! Please follow Nurses Uncorked at: tiktok.com/nurses-uncorked https://youtube.com/@NursesUncorkedL facebook.com/Nurses-Uncorked You can listen to the podcast at: podcasts.apple/nursesuncorked spotify.com/nursesuncorked podbean.com/nursesuncorked https://nursesuncorked.com DISCLAIMER: This Podcast and all related content published or distributed by or on behalf of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked Podcast is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes only and may include information that is general in nature and that is not specific to you. Any information or opinions expressed or contained herein are not intended to serve as legal advice, or replace medical advice, nor to diagnose, prescribe or treat any disease, condition, illness or injury, and you should consult the health care professional of your choice regarding all matters concerning your health, including before beginning any exercise, weight loss, or health care program. If you have, or suspect you may have, a health-care emergency, please contact a qualified health care professional for treatment. The views and opinions expressed on Nurses Uncorked do not reflect the views of our employers, professional organizations or affiliates. Any information or opinions provided by guest experts or hosts featured within website or on Nurses Uncorked Podcast are their own; not those of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked LLC. Accordingly, Nurse Erica and Nurses Uncorked cannot be responsible for any results or consequences or actions you may take based on such information or opinions. All content is the sole property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC. All copyrights are reserved and the exclusive property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC.

In this unapologetically clear episode, Antoinette Wolf—a former corporate executive turned entrepreneur, mother, and philanthropist—dives into why alignment is no longer a luxury for today's executive leaders.This episode is exclusively for adults who come from college-educated households or families that emphasized higher education, and who now lead—or are building careers—in corporate executive spaces.Antoinette unpacks:Why personal and professional alignment with other accredited executives is non-negotiableThe legacy risk of associating with misaligned individualsWhat Silicon Valley giants Satya Nadella (CEO of Microsoft) and Sundar Pichai (CEO of Alphabet & Google) say about deep expertise, AI, and the future of leadershipWhy protecting the investment in your children's private education starts with who you allow into your circleThis is the room for leaders who were raised with structure, vision, and standards—and who are done making exceptions.Tune in. Stand firm. Align intentionally.New episodes drop every Wednesday at 9 PM PST.

Trump reaches agreement with E.U. to impose 15% tariff, with exceptions for key industries. Ghislaine Maxwell received limited immunity during meetings with deputy attorney general. Passengers flee smoking jet on emergency slide after apparent landing gear problem at Denver airport. Sydney Sweeney's new campaign draws fire for racial undertones. The latest disturbing Tik Tok trend. Trump rejects Netanyahu's claim that kids in Gaza aren't starving.

We kick off our latest accounting podcast miniseries on revenue accounting with a foundational discussion on revenue recognition. In this episode, we tackle recognizing revenue —the final step of the ASC 606 model—and examine how to determine whether performance obligations are satisfied over time or at a point in time.In this episode, we discuss:0:54 – Overview of the ASC 606 revenue model5:30 – Identifying performance obligations satisfied over time11:15 – Identifying performance obligations satisfied at a point in time21:19 – Measures of progress to determine the timing of revenue recognition33:45 – Exceptions to over-time revenue recognitionFor more information, see chapter 6 of our Revenue from contracts with customers guide.Be sure to follow this podcast on your favorite podcast app and subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay in the loop.About our guestsPat Durbin is a PwC National Office Deputy Chief Accountant. He has over 30 years of experience consulting with our clients and engagement teams on complex accounting matters, including issues related to revenue, compensation, income taxes, and inventory under both US GAAP and IFRS.Mike Coleman is a partner in PwC's National Office who specializes in accounting for revenue and software arrangements and has served technology clients for much of his career. In addition, Mike has represented the firm on the AICPA Software Task Force.About our guest hostGuest host Diana Stoltzfus is a partner in the National Office who helps to shape PwC's perspectives on regulatory matters, responses to rulemakings and policy development, and implementation related to significant new rules and regulations. Prior to rejoining PwC, Diana was the Deputy Chief Accountant in the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) at the SEC where she led the activities of the OCA's Professional Practices Group.Transcripts available upon request for individuals who may need a disability-related accommodation. Please send requests to us_podcast@pwc.comDid you enjoy this episode? Text us your thoughts and be sure to include the episode name.

HR3 - Besides a few exceptions the Heisman trophy will continue to be QB award In hour three Abe Gordon, filling in for Mike Johnson, Beau Morgan, and Ali Mac let listeners call in and talk about what their dating red flags are, and what their ideal first date is in the Wake Up Call! Then, Abe, Beau, and Ali react to an article from CBS Sports that lists the top Heisman contender for every team in CBS Sports' post-spring top 25 ahead of the 2025 college football season. The Morning Shift crew also explains why they think that the only non-quarterbacks that could win the Heisman trophy this year are Ohio State wide receiver Jeremiah Smith and Alabama wide receiver Ryan Williams. Abe, Beau, and Ali also talk to Bob Ibach of Nicko Sports about a special Atlanta All-Star game commemorative bat that you have a chance to get. Finally, The Morning Shift crew closes out hour three by diving into the life of Beau “Squidbilly” Morgan in The Life of Squid!

Washington Presbyterian ChurchSermon Date: July 6, 2025Speaker: Mike BowenTitle: More Gracious Exceptions to the “Ban”Bible Text: Joshua 9:1–27 https://archive.org/download/sermon-2025-07-06/sermon%202025%2007%2006.mp3

Today's Lake and Shed framed conversation is about J. K. Rowling's first adult novel and one Nick and John think she may have been writing before she was inspired to write Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. It's that autobiographical, a transparency of sorts for the several unhappy women Jo Rowling Murray has been. Nick explains all the projects we now know she was working on between 2007 and 2012, the dates of Deathly Hallows and Casual Vacancy's respective publication dates, as well as the degree to which readers can assume that the novel's Simon Price is a fictional portrait of her father, Peter Rowling. John describes the three Gospel parables embedded in Casual Vacancy and why he thinks the book was a project the author was working on before the Hogwarts Saga as well as why it reflects a religious crisis akin to Harry's ‘struggle to believe' in Deathly Hallows.New to the Lake and Shed Kanreki Birthday series? Here's what we're doing:On 31 July 2025, Joanne Murray, aka J. K. Rowling and Robert Galbraith, will be celebrating her 60th birthday. This celebration is considered a ‘second birth' in Japan or Kanreki because it is the completion of the oriental astrological cycle. To mark JKR's Kanreki, Dr John Granger and Nick Jeffery, both Nipponophiles, are reading through Rowling's twenty-one published works and reviewing them in light of the author's writing process, her ‘Lake and Shed' metaphor. The ‘Lake' is the biographical source of her inspiration; the ‘Shed' is the alocal place of her intentional artistry, in which garage she transforms the biographical stuff provided by her subconscious mind into the archetypal stories that have made her the most important author of her age. You can hear Nick and John discuss this process and their birthday project at the first entry in this series of posts: Happy Birthday, JKR! A Lake and Shed Celebration of her Life and Work.The seven HogwartsProfessor birthday videos posted thus far in this series can be read at the links below:* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince* A Lake and Shed Reading of Harry Potter and the Deathly HallowsTomorrow? It's Cuckoo's Calling, the first Comoran Strike publication in Rowling's oeuvre (or ‘in Robert Galbraith's, if you prefer the second of Mrs. Murray's pseudonyms), in which Nick reveals the real-life Deeby Mac to whom the book is dedicated and John talks about the parallels between the first and seventh Strike novels. See you then!Links from today's Lake and Shed conversation for further reading:* ‘Bad Dad:' A History of Rowling's Relationship with Peter Rowling, Her Father; * ‘Christmas Pig 1: Jack Jones, Peter, and John,' Rowling's Use of the Names ‘Peter' and ‘Simon' for Bad Guys in Her Stories;* ‘Exceptions to the Peter-John Rule: John Bristow, Dolores Umbridge, Matt Cunliffe;'* Casual Vacancy: The Characters Derived from Rowling's Life and Why the Book Should Not Be Read through a Biographical Lens;* The Christian Hypocrites and Sympathetic Sikhs in Casual Vacancy;* The Review of Casual Vacancy in Christianity Today (2012);* The Casual Vacancy and the ‘Good Samaritan' Gospel Parable; and* J. K. Rowling on the ‘Good Samaritan' Event in Casual Vacancy Get full access to Hogwarts Professor at hogwartsprofessor.substack.com/subscribe

Is there really one person out there you're destined to marry? Or is that just something we've been told by movies, culture, and even church?In this episode, we take a clear, honest look at the idea of “the one” and where it actually comes from. Spoiler: it's not the Bible.Questions we're breaking down in this episode: Can you “miss” your person forever by making one wrong choice? If you married the wrong person, is your whole life off course now?Where did the idea of “the one” even come from?Do arranged marriages disprove the idea of “soulmates”?Why do so many people marry “the one”… and still get divorced?Is “God told me you're the one” just Christian manipulation?Does God choose our spouse, or do we? And what's our role in that decision?How do you decide if someone is “the one” for you?You'll also hear Daniel's personal story about how waiting for “the one” made this dating life difficult, examples from arranged marriages, and practical ways to shift from chasing perfection to building real connection.If you've ever wrestled with questions like “Did I miss it?” or “What if I marry the wrong person?”, this conversation brings clarity, biblical perspective, and hope.God gave you a mind, a community, and the ability to choose. Let's talk about how to use them.=============================⏰ Timecodes ⏰=============================(0:00) - Trailer(1:50) - Intro(2:33) - The ONE(2:44) - Does God have just one person for everyone?(3:03) - Your Calling might mean less options?(4:27) - Believers should marry believers(5:03) - There are WRONG options(7:04) - Can you MISS your person?(8:00) - Could it be a poverty mindset?(9:10) - What happens if you marry the wrong one?(9:29) - The right one is the one YOU choose(11:46) - Compatibility(12:35) - Outliers & Exceptions(14:30) - Where did this concept even come from??(16:34) - “God told me…”(16:38) - Why is the Bible silent?!!(19:18) - You are a powerful person!(20:03) - Subscribe(20:48) - What about arranged marriages?(22:38) - Soulmates(23:31) - The One and divorce? Selfishness(24:32) - Manipulation(26:06) - Daniel's Story(28:17) - There is NO prescription(28:58) - HOW do you make the decision?(31:40) - TikTok: Steve Harvey(33:45) - What motivates your choice?(37:31) - Becoming the One(39:54) - “Your person”(43:01) - Compatibility over Perfection(47:40) - Leave a comment=============================Miss the last episode? Catch it here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6hM1x2Rj1w5EjwibZnYnlU?si=39c3e1556b324ac3=============================Connect with us:➡︎ YouTube: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@MoralRevolutionInc⁠➡︎ IG: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/moralrevolution/ ⁠➡︎ TikTok: ⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@moralrev⁠➡︎ Website: ⁠http://www.moralrevolution.com 

Sometimes you think you know a game before you've played it. Sometimes all your assumptions were correct, and it works its way into your heart anyway. Tara (Tara's Bad Luck Club) joins us to talk about games that won us over despite being decidedly not our type. Kenan tells us about the trick-taker that helped him make sense of trick-taking. Alba quizzes us on our knowledge on non-existent bands. Then we reveal the exceptions to our rules and all of yours. Topics include tapping into nostalgia, family gaming traditions, My Favorite Things, Ra, For Sale, Power Grid, Rising Sun, pacing in bidding games, grudges that extend into replays, Landmarks, Codenames, limited communication, the entertainment value of miscommunication, putting a map on it, games that depend on shared references, gaming with moms, Magic Maze, real-time games, Bullet, buyer's remorse, QE, Nidavellir, whether set collection is for babies, big teaches, whether word association is for normies, Bohnanza and negotiation, One Night Ultimate Werewolf and Blood on the Clocktower and Shifted and Feed the Kraken and social deduction, Invincible and bag-building and IP's, That's Not a Hat and party games, Spirit Island and Sky Team and Last Bastion and co-op games, whether memory is for babies, whether you should ever play three card monte (spoiler: no), whether life is a game worth playing (spoiler: yes), whether exceptions prove rules (spoiler: sorta), and whether our biases need to be re-examined (spoiler: no). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Jennifer Ruelens, broker/owner at One Focus Property Management and founder of Hold It with PM Jen, talks about how she picks and prepares the right real estate investors to fit into her machine. She delves into the importance of standardizing processes, but still making room to accommodate edge cases and make them successful with her company.

Today's episode is part two of our miniseries about staying out of court and I mean that literally, not as a metaphor. I'm breaking down why it's so important to avoid the legal system, even if you think you're right in what you're doing. Courts can mess up your life, so trust me, you don't want to go there. If you missed yesterday's episode, go listen to it first, then come back and we'll dive deeper. Show Notes:  [02:07]#4 Exceptions don't prove the rule, being right can cost you everything. [09:34]#5 Why do so many people get law degrees?  [12:53]#6 Courts run on money.  [20:48]Recap Episodes Mentioned: 2167: Being "Right" Vs Being Accurate [They're NOT The Same] 3261: The First 3 Laws Of Economics 195: My Virtual Mentors Vol 1: Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs Next Steps: ---

Let's talk about the “exclusive remedy,” what it means, why Workers' Comp matters, and the exceptions. The concept of exclusive remedy is based on the principle that in exchange for care and benefits, a worker injured on the job may surrender some options for additional remedies.  If you're covered by Workers' Comp, the ability to challenge the employer in court for injuries and pain and suffering may be limited. Workers' Comp is the remedy. We are covered by Workers' Compensation because that can be a good thing, but we may give up the right to sue. Ideally, it's a fair deal for workers and employers. “The Great Bargain.” But there are twists and turns. Negligence, bad faith, family medical leave needs, disabilities, “double compensation,” and third-party interests all add to the puzzle. When does an injured worker get the “green light” to seek compensation outside of the exclusive remedy?  And what about non-injury damages like defamation, malicious prosecution, slander, or mental anguish? Or what if a “leased” employee (think temp agencies) is hurt? While the exclusive remedy simplifies the management of workplace injuries in many cases, it's not always as clear as it seems, and it's important to know where the exceptions lurk. The goal is always to make injured workers whole. Every case matters.  If you have thoughts on Workers' Comp law or an idea for a topic or guest you'd like to hear, contact us at JPierce@ppnlaw.com or APierce@ppnlaw.com.  Mentioned in This Episode: Green v. Wyman-Gordon Foley v. Polaroid Longever v. Revere Copper & Brass Inc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Few issues polarize this country like abortion. Most Americans believe these intensely personal decisions should be made by families and doctors, not politicians. But even those who call themselves “pro-life” usually believe some exceptions should be made — in the case of rape, when it's a matter of saving the mother's life, or when doctors determine the fetus has no chance of survival.But we've seen time and time again that “exceptions” don't work.Right now, in Georgia, a tragedy is playing out before our eyes. A young woman named Adriana Smith suffered multiple blood clots in February and was declared brain dead, but because she was 9 weeks pregnant at the time, the hospital is keeping her hooked up to machines until doctors believe her fetus can survive on its own.It's important to know that Adriana isn't in a coma or even a vegetative state — legally and medically, she's dead. Her body is being kept alive by more machines and medicines than you can imagine, all because of Georgia's 6-week abortion ban. Imagine being Adriana's mother. Watching your daughter's body hooked up to all those machines, kept in this horrible middle space between life and death, not for days or weeks but for months. In interviews, she's called it “torture.” And her family was never given a choice.If Adriana, or Amanda Zurawski, or a ten-year-old rape victim aren't exceptions to abortion laws, who is? And why should politicians get to decide? We can't change the Dobbs decision, but we can push for an end to state abortion bans. We've already seen it work, like a 2023 constitutional amendment in Ohio. It isn't easy, but we owe it to Adriana, Amanda, and all of the women whose stories have yet to be written.For a transcript of this episode, please email comms@redwine.blue. You can learn more about us at www.redwine.blue or follow us on social media! Twitter: @TheSWPpod and @RedWineBlueUSA Instagram: @RedWineBlueUSA Facebook: @RedWineBlueUSA YouTube: @RedWineBlueUSA

Few issues polarize this country like abortion. Most Americans believe these intensely personal decisions should be made by families and doctors, not politicians. But even those who call themselves “pro-life” usually believe some exceptions should be made — in the case of rape, when it's a matter of saving the mother's life, or when doctors determine the fetus has no chance of survival.But we've seen time and time again that “exceptions” don't work.Right now, in Georgia, a tragedy is playing out before our eyes. A young woman named Adriana Smith suffered multiple blood clots in February and was declared brain dead, but because she was 9 weeks pregnant at the time, the hospital is keeping her hooked up to machines until doctors believe her fetus can survive on its own.It's important to know that Adriana isn't in a coma or even a vegetative state — legally and medically, she's dead. Her body is being kept alive by more machines and medicines than you can imagine, all because of Georgia's 6-week abortion ban. Imagine being Adriana's mother. Watching your daughter's body hooked up to all those machines, kept in this horrible middle space between life and death, not for days or weeks but for months. In interviews, she's called it “torture.” And her family was never given a choice.If Adriana, or Amanda Zurawski, or a ten-year-old rape victim aren't exceptions to abortion laws, who is? And why should politicians get to decide? We can't change the Dobbs decision, but we can push for an end to state abortion bans. We've already seen it work, like a 2023 constitutional amendment in Ohio. It isn't easy, but we owe it to Adriana, Amanda, and all of the women whose stories have yet to be written.

AP correspondent Ed Donahue reports a bill to provide more details about an abortion ban in Texas.

Sometimes the strongest writing technique isn't the strongest in our story.  Every writing rule has exceptions, and here's a discussion on when to make exceptions.  Also, how to create a strong title for our novel and short story. Support the show

Can you really just take out part of the bladder? It's one of the most common questions bladder cancer surgeons hear—and in this episode of Bladder Cancer Matters, host Rick Bangs sits down with renowned urologic oncologist Dr. John Gore to break it all down. From TURBTs to partial cystectomies, they explore when bladder-sparing approaches are appropriate, what the real risks and benefits are, and how treatment choices affect long-term outcomes. Whether you're a patient, caregiver, or advocate, this episode is packed with the kind of honest, expert insight that can help you make more informed decisions.

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! Today we're focusing on another topic from Criminal Law -- namely, accomplice liability. We're covering the three elements of establishing accomplice liability, situations where accomplice liability doesn't apply, and what defenses a person charged as an accomplice can assert. We also apply these concepts to several hypothetical scenarios. In this episode, we discuss: Elements of accomplice liability Exceptions and defenses to accomplice liability Analysis of three criminal law hypotheticals Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://barexamtoolbox.com/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-archive-by-topic/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-explaining-individual-mee-and-california-bar-essay-questions/#listen-learn) Podcast Episode 70: Tackling a California Bar Exam Essay: Criminal Law and Procedure (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-70-tackling-a-california-bar-exam-essay-criminal-law-and-procedure/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-310-listen-and-learn-accomplice-liability-criminal-law/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found Click On Picture To See Larger Picture Biden's labor market is weakening, the labor market stats were a lie from the beginning and now its falling apart. Honda will build it's cars in the US instead of Mexico. BOI is dead, it was shutdown by the Bessent and Trump. Now is the time to hold onto gold and crypto. Trump has trapped the EU, they are now divided and half want peace and the other wants war. NATO is not what is seems, this the [DS] NATO World Order. Money laundering tracker is currently being built to track down who is receiving the funds. This is the biggest sting operation the world has ever seen.   (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Economy https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1896564574318698817   of Americans claiming jobs are hard to get jumped to 16%, the 3rd-highest since 2021. Americans believe the labor market is deteriorating. https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1896543299923857636 Treasury Department Suspends the Enforcement of BOI that Forces Small Businesses to Report Personal Details About Their Owners to the Feds   The U.S. Treasury Department announced on March 2 that it will cease enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its associated Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirements. This decision follows conservative comedian and entrepreneur Terrence K. Williams tagging Elon Musk on X, urging him to take action against the burdensome Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) rule. On Saturday, Williams wrote: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1896005328338371043?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1896005328338371043%7Ctwgr%5E6801261efa6a133a8538aef39a6b77bf312e22e4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F03%2Ftreasury-department-suspends-enforcement-boi-that-forces-small%2F Key Provisions of the CTA: Beneficial Ownership Reporting Businesses must report individuals who own or control at least 25% of the company or exert significant control over it. Report includes full name, date of birth, address, and a unique identifying number (e.g., passport or driver's license). Who Must Report? Most small and medium-sized businesses formed in the U.S. or registered to do business in the U.S. Exceptions include larger companies (with more than 20 full-time employees and over $5 million in revenue) and certain regulated industries (e.g., banks, investment firms). Reporting Deadlines: Companies formed before Jan. 1, 2024 must file by Jan. 1, 2025. New businesses formed in 2024 have 90 days from registration. New businesses formed after 2024 have 30 days to report. Penalties for Non-Compliance: Fines up to $500 per day for failure to report. Criminal penalties including fines up to $10,000 and up to 2 years in prison for willfully providing false information Source: thegatewaypundit.com  Treasury secretary says he'll 'appoint an affordability czar,' create 'affordability council' "I think President Trump said that he'll own the economy in six or 12 months. But I can tell you that we are working to get these prices down every day," Bessent says Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced  that he plans to appoint an "affordability czar" and create an "affordability council." Bessent also blasted the mainstream press, arguing that their coverage largely described the economy as "great" in the last year and a half of Biden's term. "What I find interesting is,