Podcasts about food week

Study after study has shown that consumption of sugar sweetened beverages poses clear health risk. So how have the big soda companies, Coke and Pepsi in particular, reacted to this news and to public health policies that have aimed to restrict their business dealings like marketing, labeling, and even taxes? A fascinating and important part of this history has been told in a new book by Dr. Susan Greenhalgh called Soda Science: Making the World Safe for Coca Cola. Dr. Greenhalgh is the John King and Wilma Cannon Fairbank Professor of Chinese Society Emerita at Harvard University. But hold on, what in the heck does China have to do all this? Well, we're about to find out. This will be a very interesting discussion. Interview Summary Let's begin by setting the context for your book, again, on soda science. Back in 2015, the New York Times published a major expose, written by Anahat O'Connor, and a critique of what was called the Global Energy Balance Network (GEBN), that was funded by Coca Cola. Could you explain what this network was? Sure. The GEBN was an international network of researchers that argued that the energy balance framework is the best approach for addressing the obesity epidemic. So that simple framework calls for balancing the energy in the number of calories consumed through eating with a number of calories burned through moving to achieve a healthy weight. While that sounds neutral in practice, in the early 2000s, Coke and the food industry at large, adopted energy balance as their motto. It had several advantages. One is under the banner of "energy balance," the industry and the scientists working with it could say that people could eat whatever they wanted and then exercise it off. Unfortunately, that doesn't work for most people. Second, in practice, the energy balance slogan was used to promote exercise as the priority solution. What the research shows about energy is that exercise helps, but the primary answer to the obesity issue is to eat fewer unhealthy foods. Now the third advantage to the energy balance framework is that talking about energy balance meant the companies and the GEBN didn't need to mention soda taxes, or other legislative and regulatory measures, that worked but that might hurt the industry. So, in my book, I call this body of ideas adopted by the GEBN and the food industry “Soda Science.” That's short for Soda Defense Science - a science created not so much to understand obesity, as to defend the profits of the soda industry. Okay, that all makes sense, and I totally agree with your interpretation of the science that food intake is much more important in the obesity epidemic, in particular, than physical activity. It's not that activity is unimportant, but to divert attention away from the dietary part of it is really a public health misdeed. But one can obviously see the benefit to the industry for making that diversion. So, in that 2015 article, it was highly critical of the conflicts of interest that had been created by the soda industry paying prominent scientists. What benefits did the company reap from making these payments and what happened after that article got published? The GEBN was the product of the 15 years that came before it, of gradually building up this soda science. The GEBN itself lasted only about a year, but during that 15-year period, the industry benefited by having fewer people, fewer specialists, fewer countries talking about soda taxes. But what happened after the GEBN was outed in the New York Times in late 2015 was Coca Cola was absolutely mortified. The revelation that the company had paid for industry-friendly science was just incredibly embarrassing. So, under absolutely withering criticism from scientists and the public, Coke stopped funding the GEBN, which of course led to its collapse. The company also took a major turn in its approach to obesity. Vowing to no longer single-handedly fund scientific research, and by publishing a long so-called transparency list of all the individuals and organizations it had funded over the last 15 years. So, those things helped, but Coke's reputation remains tarnished to this day. But meanwhile, as for the academic scientists behind the GEBN, they saw things differently. They continued to maintain that their science had not been affected by the 20 million dollars that Coke had promised to support their network. Of the four researchers who led the GEBN effort, two stepped down and found wonderful jobs elsewhere. They both have leadership positions in different universities. One retired and the fourth continues to work in his previous position. So, there was no single, discernible impact on these debates within the academy. I know some of the individuals involved. And by the way, I know a good bit of information available to understand what this network was doing came from Freedom of Information requests that various parties made. And your book contains transcripts from emails and things like that, that these various scientists were sharing with the industry. The content of those is extremely interesting and very telling. And the result, it's sort of this good-old-boy-back-slapping-network of people who were kind of winking - let's go get the people that don't like us. It's just interesting. My impression is that some pretty negative consequences befell at least two of those academics afterwards. You know, there was a lot of embarrassment. One basically, I think, had to leave the job he had. Another, suffered some real penalties in his academic life. And so, it wasn't outcome free, or it wasn't penalty free for these scientists at the end of the day. But I do think that your basic point is well made. That lots of people take lots of money from lots of industries on lots of topics. Not just on food, but you know energy and environment and all kinds of things. And very rarely do they pay any kind of a penalty. It only took this investigative report by the New York Times to shed special light on how pernicious this particular one was. But let me ask you a question, and then I kind of have my own thoughts about it. Why don't you think anything more happened to the people that got caught? I don't know if caught is the right word. But at least that they're taking industry money and their favorable science for industry got exposed. Why don't you think more happened about that? The scientists themselves were deeply convinced that they hadn't done anything wrong. They were convinced that their science was not affected by all the money that they had taken from Coke, and the scientific nonprofit working for the industry, over all those years. I think there's a significant fraction of folks in the public health field, or at least in the obesity research field, who think the same thing. There's just a lot of support for them. As I see it, the two people who lost their original jobs have bounced back. I haven't done a survey of the field to ask people what they feel about these researchers, but they did pretty well given what they did. The reason I think that they're convinced that they didn't do anything wrong is they have these practices, I call them “doing ethics,” to assure the world and themselves that their scientific integrity is intact. And one of the practices that these guys used was to constantly say, "This problem of obesity epidemic, it's huge. We have to include the food industry as our partner." And then when you go there, food industry begins to have a huge voice and there's very little you can do to effectively restrain it. You know, it's an interesting way to think about it and consistent with the way I've thought about it over the years. I've done some writing on this topic and it seems to me that scientists have, not all scientists by all means, but a few select ones, get sought out by industry. And then this blind spot ensues where if you ask these scientists sort of, in general, does research get tainted or affected by industry money? They'll say yes. But if you ask does YOUR research get tainted by it? They'll say no. ‘Oh, no, I'm above that. I can be objective We have to change from within.' There's a whole series of rationalizations for taking the money. But do they ever stop and ask, why is industry investing this money? And industry is not stupid. They wouldn't be paying you $50,000 as a consultant, or putting you on boards, or flying you around the world, or funding your research if there was no return from it. And the research on it is absolutely clear. Industry-funded research typically finds industry favorable results. So, all that's been documented. But the scientists who want to get involved with industry and take the money don't kind of interpret it that way. Like ‘I can take money but be free of the temptations to bias the work I do.' May I just interject something here? I think that they believe it's a win-win prospect. Of course, Coke wants to emphasize exercise to make people forget about their sugar. But I've just dug long and hard into those emails, which none of the scientists ever thought would be read and used in scholarly accounts. But in the emails, the leader of the GEBN wanted to fund a major research project that he was promoting, and he's arguing all the reasons that Soda Science was good for Coca Cola. I suspect that he thought that Coke wasn't influencing him. Instead, he was influencing Coke. And in fact he was, but it doesn't matter where the influence comes from because in the end the science is affected. You know, I've often asked myself, if there are negative consequences from this, the question is isn't there a police force out there looking after this kind of thing? And it's hard to know who that would be, because the scientists themselves have shown that enough of them are willing to take the money. And so the scientists aren't policing themselves sufficiently. Their institutions, the universities, tend not to do it because they're taking money from industry, too, in some way, generally. And their university's response to that is you have to disclose that you're taking money from industry. But there's research on disclosure, and that seems to make things worse rather than better. The journals that people publish their work in do the same thing. They make people disclose, but that doesn't have much impact. And professional associations have been investigated every which way by one of the same people who wrote that article in 2015, showing that they take money from industry. So, how can they police their members? So, it seems to me that the police have to be the press and people that do investigative scholarly work like you've done in this book. The book is pretty new. So, it's a little early to say what its impact is going to be. But let's hope that a lot of people read this book. And get more insight into how this works, how people feel when they're involved in this money taking, and what the ultimate impact might be. So let's turn to one particular area of expertise you have. Let's talk about China. So almost all the criticism on industry-funded efforts like the Global Energy Balance Network have been focused on the U.S. But you follow the soda trail to China. So why did you do that and what's the significance of this inquiry? Really significant. The GEBN was part of a much larger corporate project that was absolutely global in scope. So, from the vantage point of the industry, the U.S. has long been a declining market for soda. The important markets for sugary drinks are the large rapidly developing countries in the Global South. So that's where the industry is focusing its efforts to sell product, that is junk food and drinks. And to promote a corporate science and corporate policy that stresses exercise over dietary change in soda taxes. So China. China has 1.4 billion people these days. One billion back in 1980 when Coke set up shop in China. China was the single biggest market for the soda companies. Coke was so keen to get into the China market that it started lobbying early. Actually the mid 1970s, when Mao Zedong was still alive. And in 1978, Coke became the very first Western company to set up shop in China as the country opened up for the first time in 30 years to the market, into the global economy. And another advantage of the Global South, from the point of view of the food industries, is an attitude toward Western firms that's less critical than what you find in the U.S. In the U.S., huge companies are always under suspicion that they will promote corporate interests over socially valued goals. So those attitudes are much less prevalent in many countries in the Global South where big companies are often seen as agents of development, essential agents. In China, big Western companies were celebrated as sources of capital and advanced interests. So, nobody would suspect they were hurting the country. And the industry has lots of ways of dressing this up in a self-serving, positive way, by talking about developing emerging markets, investments in the developing world, and things like this. But it strikes me also as being stunningly similar to what the tobacco companies did when they got hammered in the United States. They simply moved outside the United States and tried to sell as many cigarettes as beyond our borders as they could. And a lot of these same sort of phenomenon take place. Does that seem true to you? Absolutely. So let me ask what actually occurred in China. So, Coke sets its sights on China. It has this kind of process established that's trying to affect policy through connections with scientists. So, what actually took place in China? What was the impact on policies? Well, to understand that, we need to know that the food industry had a magic weapon way back in the late 1970s. The food industry created an industry-funded scientific nonprofit based in DC that was global in scope. And whose job was to sponsor science that served industry needs. Its name was ILSI (International Life Sciences Institute). So, in China, the local branch of ILSI organized a series of major conferences and other activities designed to combat obesity. Over time, the proportion of these anti-obesity activities focusing on exercise rose dramatically, while the proportion focusing on diet sank.What this shows is that the food industry had tilted China's approach to obesity. ILSI China also played a major role in creating China's first and most important policies on obesity. The most important was the National Campaign for Healthy Lifestyles, ironically modeled after the patriotic health campaigns that Mao used to promote in his day. So, that healthy lifestyle campaign drew heavily on the Soda Science created by Coke, ILSI, and their academic friends. So, that ‘healthy lifestyle' campaign prioritized exercise in a number of ways. Said nothing about sugar and soda. And it made the individual, not the government or industry, responsible for fixing the obesity problem. So, with this campaign, ILSI China had smuggled the policy favored by the food industry into China's policies. That's an amazing history that you've documented. And it occurs to me that in the United States, we can celebrate public health victories, like the huge decline in cigarette smoking that occurred. And, the big decline that's occurred in sugared beverage consumption too. And those things are all good. But if this is like a balloon and you're just squeezing the end of it here, but it expands elsewhere in the world, the overall public health impact could be even worse than when you started, not better. And it sounds like the industry-funded front groups have been pretty responsible for making that happen. Yes, they're incredibly effective. In my view, I really took apart ILSI, looking at it as an organizational sociologist. And I think it's just brilliantly designed to make academic-looking science that benefits industry. And to keep everything hidden from sight under that label nonprofit. It's really quite brilliant. They're not very happy with this project. And the work that you've done, and the investigative journalists have done in the U. S., to expose these industry ties can have traction in the U. S. much more so in a country like China. So, it sounds like there's probably not much to put the brakes on this kind of thing in China. Is that right? To tell the truth, there's a younger group of obesity experts, trained in the U.S., who now are based in China and have written major articles. There was a three-part series in The Lancet in 2021 on obesity in China. And they are on board with a critique of the food industry and working in every way they can to bring that to the attention of officials. But the government has a vested interest in the success of Coca Cola. I have to say that Coca Cola, and there's a huge state-owned enterprise called CoffCo, they now have a partnership called CoffCo Coca Cola, that runs the bottlers in 19 provinces, representing something like 60-70 percent of the Chinese population. So, the government has a vested interest in making sure Coca Cola remains happy. Let's talk about that just a bit more. So, Susan, you'd think that the Chinese government would be in a conflicted position with this. On one hand, they want to financially benefit from Coca Cola prospering in their country. And I'm sure officials are benefiting individually from that kind of thing. But the country doesn't benefit because they certainly don't want high rates of diabetes and heart disease and obesity and other things that come from consumption of these products. How do you think that that plays out? Is it just that the short-term financial benefits are prevailing over the longer-term health consequences? I think the government is highly conflicted. It has a number of policy, overarching policy themes, that it has been promoting ever since opening up in the late 70s and early 80s. One of those themes is marketization, growing the economy, advancing the technology in high end industries. And nothing can interfere with the achievement of that goal. China is known around the world for having very sophisticated environmental policies. But when push comes to shove, market goals prevail over environmental goals. I think the very same thing happens with health. It's just astonishing to see how market forces and market logics pervade the health sector. I did a separate piece of research, it's not in this book. But it shows that the major western food companies have been partnering with the Chinese government to carry out China's policies on chronic disease. And that means they're teaching the Chinese people basic notions of good nutrition. And what they're teaching them is not that soda is bad, is that, you know, it's that you can drink soda as long as you go ahead and exercise at all. I think there are major fundamental conflicts here at the level of profound party policy. I think this is going to be very hard to address. I was going to say that's just a stunning observation. That part of the food nutrition education has been turned over to the food industry. Absolutely. And you can, you can read about it in the Chinese media every year. They have, it's called Food Week or Nutrition Week, that's sponsored by the Chinese Nutrition Society, which is nominally independent. And they invite Western food companies to come in and sponsor a big project within that week. And of course they're very happy to do it. Unbelievable. And also, the policies that ILSI created that are very much pro industry, that was back in the 2000s. Those have now been built into central policy. So they continue to impact policy today. So, a chapter of your book is entitled Doing Ethics, the Silent Scream. What do you mean by that? Let me start with just a little bit of background. So, in China, the head of the ILSI branch operated as a virtual health ministry official. Kind of a de facto part of the government. So, no one could question what she did, part of the government, no questioning the government. As I just mentioned, most of the scientists I interviewed believed that Coke and other food and beverage companies were positive forces in China. They loved Coke's corporate social responsibility programs and had them all in their head and regaled me with these stories of schools in the rural areas supported by Coke. They thought everything was above board. They thought that ILSI's science was objective or disinterested. They couldn't imagine that Coke was supporting policies that benefited the corporate bottom line while harming the health of the Chinese people. Now, getting to that chapter, some very senior scientists, folks who had worked in the field before money came to dominate everything in China, they knew in their hearts that the food industry was corrupting China's science and policy. But it was very dangerous for them to talk about it. They certainly didn't volunteer those feelings to me. But when I began to ask really probing questions, they quietly acknowledged that yes, of course, corporate funding shapes the science. But the whole subject caused them just incredible angst. They couldn't talk about it. They certainly couldn't talk about it in public, and they couldn't do anything about it. And so, they issued a silent scream. And this is a really important part of the story of China. There really are voices of resistance, voices that see through the official line that everything's being done correctly. The readers of this book can hear that silent scream in that last chapter. That's a pretty, pretty amazing story. Well, you know, it's heartening in a way that in a country like China, where the government controls so much of what day to day life is like, that there is some activity. At least some pushback, some resistance. So, let's hope ultimately that the objective science prevails. That the industry influence wanes, and the public health will be protected. So, speaking of chapters in your book, the last two chapters are titled, Soda Science Lives On. And then the final chapter, So What and What Now. Tell us more. Oh sure, I'd love to. Soda Science Lives On: that's like the conclusion to the China part. I show how, even to this day, the provisions of Soda Science continue to shape China's policies on obesity and chronic disease more generally. In the last decade, President Xi Jinping has stressed the importance of including health in all policies, which is good. But a close look suggests that his signature policy package, that's called Healthy China 2030, bears the imprint of the Coca Cola company and -promotes ILSI's trademark exercise programs that omit soda taxes. And have a strong market orientation that makes individuals, again, not companies, not even the government, fundamentally responsible for maintaining a healthy weight through their healthy lifestyle choices. This, of course, neglects the importance of China's obesogenic environment and the impact of that environment on the choices available to individuals. So, this part of the book also introduces a group of next generation Chinese scientists who understand the threat posed by big food constantly lobbying the government to introduce policies to restrict its power. I've talked about the impact on China, but I'm also very interested in the impact on America, especially American fitness culture. In the book's conclusion, what I do is I take the short history of Soda Science. And I place that in the context of the much larger history of the post-World War II history of American fitness culture. What I suggest is that Soda Science was instrumental in creating today's Fitbit wearing, step counting, exercise and obesity-obsessed culture that assumes that exercise by itself can take off pounds. That 10,000 steps a day is going to solve all my problems. It won't, but the idea is very much part of our everyday thinking about obesity. There's a lot of work to do. As we all know, those big food companies are some of the wealthiest and most powerful forces in the world. Way richer than any of any fields of science in America. For critical scientists and social scientists, the effort to chip away at their power through the power of expose and documenting the truth often feels quite futile, time consuming and useless. But in fact, our work can make a difference. And I document this in the book. In the last few years, Coca Cola cut its ties with ILSI. That is big because Coca Cola was the founding company behind ILSI. Two other companies have also dropped ILSI. ILSI itself has also undergone a major reorganization and this is big - ILSI China has dissolved. It is no longer. I'd like to think that the in-depth research of the social sciences has exposed what is really going on and left these corporate science organizations little choice but to close shop, or fundamentally change how they work. That's my secret dream. So this, this is progress, yes, but the food industry is still at it, for sure. Especially in the Global South. The industry is focusing its energies on defending junk food and drinks by opposing regulatory measures that have proven successful. You know, taxes, front of package warning labels, marketing restrictions and so on. So even in countries that have developed, often with the assistance of American researchers, really impressive chronic disease prevention programs, the industry has been moving aggressively to weaken, delay, or block them. Our work has just begun. And I really hope some listeners will be, will be encouraged to join the force of all of us working to expose and change how things are happening. BIO Susan Greenhalgh is John King and Wilma Cannon Fairbank Professor of Chinese Society Emerita in the Anthropology Department and Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies at Harvard University. A former Guggenheim fellow, she is a specialist in the social study of science, technology, and medicine, especially as these intersect with questions of policy, governance, and the state. Her latest book, Soda Science: Making the World Safe for Coca-Cola (2024), uncovers the secret strategies by which Big Food, working with allies in academia, created an industry-friendly, “soda-defense” science of obesity that argued that the priority solution to the obesity epidemic is exercise, not dietary restraint, and that soda taxes are not necessary – views few experts accept. For 15 years the “soda scientists” were highly successful in promoting these ideas, eventually getting them built into Chinese policy, where they remain today. An earlier study of the American obesity epidemic, Fat-Talk Nation: The Human Costs of America's War on Fat (2015), illuminates some of the unexpected consequences of the national panic over obesity for the bodies, lives, and selves of vulnerable young people. Under the Medical Gaze: Facts and Fictions of Chronic Pain (2001) presents a case study of iatrogenic injury, illustrating medicine's power to define disease and the self, and manage relationships and lives, and sometime induce suffering.

Foodinsider, associazione di promozione sociale che nasce come osservatorio sulle mense scolastiche e che ogni anno si occupa di monitorare lo stato del servizio di ristorazione scolastica per identificare modelli virtuosi e best practice, lancia anche quest'anno la Green Food Week. Nata prendendo come riferimento l'iniziativa "M'illumino di Meno”, la Giornata Nazionale del Risparmio Energetico e degli Stili di Vita Sostenibili ideata dal programma Caterpillar e Rai Radio2 nel 2005, la Green Food Week vuole valorizzare e diffondere l'alimentazione a basso impatto ambientale all'interno delle mense scolastiche, privilegiando piatti vegetali, ingredienti biologici e locali.

Join us on a tantalizing journey into the heart of culinary competition at the World Food Championship in Dallas, Texas. This episode is flavored with the lively discussions surrounding the thrilling competition that allows chefs and home cooks to showcase their skills on a level playing field. Our guest, Mike McCloud, the marketing director for the Kansas City Barbecue Society and the brainchild behind Sam's Club Barbecue Tour, shares the meaty details of what it takes to organize an event of this magnitude.McCloud peels back the layers of his journey, uncovering the strategic deal with IMG that led to the creation of the World Food Championship. We grill him on his innovative plans to expand the championship, including the introduction of military-style competitions and a "Food Week". McCloud also serves up a reminder that every competitor is a "food champ", reinforcing the inclusive spirit that makes this event a melting pot of culinary enthusiasts.Adding to our recipe for an engaging podcast; Anthony Martorina, a competitive cook and Instagram sensation, joins the conversation. Martorina dishes on his experiences in the competitive culinary world and his Instagram page, which has become a visual feast for food lovers. This episode is a perfect blend of passion, creativity, and love for food, served with a side of enlightening discussions on the importance of cash flow management for successful events. Come, feast on this flavorful discussion that is sure to whet your appetite for all things culinary. Peninsula Foodservice: The Best Beef! Peninsula Foodservice delivers Creekstone Farm beef, with top-quality meats and #1 service for Chefs Support the showThank you for listening to the Walk-In Talk Podcast, hosted by Carl Fiadini and Company. Our show not only explores the exciting and chaotic world of the restaurant business and amazing eateries but also advocates for mental health awareness in the food industry. Recorded on-site at top hotels, restaurants, and farms, our podcast offers a behind-the-scenes look at the industry. Don't miss out on upcoming episodes where we'll continue to cook up thought-provoking discussions on important topics, including mental health awareness. Be sure to visit our website for more food industry-related content, including our very own TV show called Restaurant Recipes were we feature Chefs cooking up their dishes and also The Dirty Dash Cocktail Hour; the focus is mixology and amazing drinks! Thank you for tuning in, and we'll catch you next time on the Walk-In Talk Podcast. www.TheWalkInTalk.com Also rate and review us on IMDb:https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27766644/reference/

Just as the Lord provided for the Israelites in the desert, so He provides for us. Let's talk about what we know about the Lord's provision in our lives.

Dr. Woods Lisenby preaches on the subject, "The Worry Box: Food."

Pat Miller talks with Sarah Claycomb and Janet Katz about Local Food Week. Sarah Claycomb is the host of Local Food Week and also the owner of Health Food Shoppe. Janet Katz is Founding Director of Northeast Indiana Local Food Network   For details on Local Food Week visit NEIFOOD.ORGSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Have you ever wondered what makes food appealing? What senses are activated when we taste something? This week we welcome, Marie Fitrion, food writer and program manager at Foodpreneur Lab; Ann Hui, Globe and Mail food writer and author of "Chop Suey Nation;" Joshna Maharaj, chef and author of "Take Back the Tray;" and Joseph Shawana, chef at ddcx Indigenous Kitchen on Manitoulin Island. Tonight, they discuss what goes into developing a palate and why people prefer the taste of some things more than others.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with Assignment 7 - Reflect and Implement

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with Assignment 6 - Clean

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with Assignment 5 - Fun

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with. Assignment 4 - $5 Venmo

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with Assignment 3 - Your Baby Blues

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with. #2 Say Thank You Again

This week is all about feeding your soul. Each day there will be an assignment for you to complete to feed your soul. At the end of the week you will be astonished at how much goodness you have fueled your self with.

Today on Chompers we'll tell the story of Clementine the Farmer, Olive the Witch and the STINKIEST fruit at the Harvest festival.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Will Clementine the Farmer make it to the Harvest Festival? Find out tonight on Chompers! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Get ready for some YUMMY food-filled riddles on today's Chompers! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What food is like mold? Find out with more tangy, tasty riddles on tonight's Chompers! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tonight we're going to make you chuckle, chortle and crack up with some funny, foodie knock knock jokes! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Time to tickle your funny bone with today's tasty knock knock jokes! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tonight on Chompers we're going to learn about eating a rainbow, super stinky fruits, and more! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today we're talking about FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, and figuring out what the DIFFERENCE is between the two! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It's Food Week on Chompers, and today we're going to find out about all the amazing ways that PLANTS eat! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What's the word for a plant that eats bug? Find out tonight on Chompers! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Are you an herbivore, carnivore or omnivore? Find out in tonight's SONG on Chompers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today we've got a brand new SONG -- about all the things you didn't know were FRUITS! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tonight the answer to our quiz: Which dessert was invented by a DENTIST? Gingerbread, cotton candy, or lollipops?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today on Chompers, we want to know: Which dessert was invented by a DENTIST? Gingerbread, cotton candy, or lollipops?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The trio is back after a week off.  Eric pontificates about traveling in rural America.  Annie discusses Longmont Food Week, new restaurants and a development project that went off the planning log after we spoke of it.  Coincidence?  Thanks for listeningMentions include:Altitude VillageLongmont Restaurant WeekThanks to Andy Eppler for "Nothing but the Rain" as our IntroSend Off MusicThanks to David Cutter Music for "Float Away

Cómo explicarte que bajamos esa fuente en menos de 20 minutos y AL AIRE. Los genios de Mirutaki nos visitaron y MUY bien acompañados para contarnos que del 7 al 14 se va a estar desarrollando la 4ta edición de Gastro Japo Food Week 2022, este año con un pop up para disfrutar de todo el street food japonés Entérate más en @clubjapogastro --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/urbanaplayfm/message

After exclusive polling revealed that one in six people are regularly skipping meals, Matt Chorley looks at the demands on food banks. He hears from Josie Barlow, Manager at Bradford Central Foodbank, Brenda Fogg, who founded the Hope Restored foodbank in Llandudno, and Megan Kelly, a volunteer at Skegoneill Community Foodbank in Belfast.PLUS Robert Crampton and Alice Thomson discuss harvesting and sewage. AND a special appearance from Stig Abell. Our GDPR privacy policy was updated on August 8, 2022. Visit acast.com/privacy for more information.

With so many ups and downs in headlines and our personal lives, what often brings us together is food. Food has a way of supporting, nurturing and healing. To explore the depths of how food connects us, we cook with chef and author Suzanne Barr.Barr teaches us how to make her famous Caribbean curry chicken and reflects on how the dish that's so close to her heart helped launch her cooking career, celebrate her Jamaican culture and encourage more women to take charge in professional kitchens. We hope you not only learn a new recipe, but also how a meal can shape your home and history.It's Food Week here at The Decibel. We take a special look at what keeps us alive – and, some say, makes life worth living. We'll look at food from different angles, from the ethics of eating so-called ‘smart animals', to how the war in Ukraine showed us the fragility of our food system, to the business of potatoes. Plus, we'll take you into the kitchen to cook something delicious.Let us know what you think by emailing us at thedecibel@globeandmail.com.

Potatoes! They're affordable, accessible, ultra-versatile, and most importantly, delicious. But a case of potato warts found on two farms in Prince Edward Island last November has wreaked havoc on the local potato economy. The wart led the Canadian government to restrict exports of all P.E.I. potatoes to the U.S. for months. Even though potato warts aren't unsafe to eat, over 300 million pounds of potatoes were destroyed.Adrian Lee is a content editor at the Globe and Mail's Opinion section, and has come to consider the economic and cultural importance of the spud.It's Food Week here at The Decibel. We take a special look at what keeps us alive – and, some say, makes life worth living. We'll look at food from different angles, from the ethics of eating so-called ‘smart animals', to how the war in Ukraine showed us the fragility of our food system, to the business of potatoes. Plus, we'll take you into the kitchen to cook something delicious.Let us know what you think by emailing us at thedecibel@globeandmail.com.

In the past two years alone, the number of severely food insecure people doubled to 276 million, according to the UN, because of issues like inflation and supply chain problems related to the invasion of Ukraine.Evan Fraser, professor of geography and director of the Arrell Food Institute at the University of Guelph, continues to stay optimistic despite a global food system long plagued with wealth inequality, political instability and the ongoing climate crisis. He tells us how more people can be fed through changes in policies, green innovations in agriculture and other changes to how we farm food.It's Food Week here at The Decibel. We take a special look at what keeps us alive – and, some say, makes life worth living. We'll look at food from different angles, from the ethics of eating so-called ‘smart animals', to how the war in Ukraine showed us the fragility of our food system, to the business of potatoes. Plus, we'll take you into the kitchen to cook something delicious.Let us know what you think by emailing us at thedecibel@globeandmail.com.Correction: An earlier version misspelled the name of the Institute where Dr. Fraser is director. We regret the error.

As the global demand for octopus meat rises, a company in Spain is set to open the world's first ever octopus farm. But scientists and philosophers warn that it would be a mistake to farm these clever cephalopods. By opening the farm, they say, we'd be opening the door to consequences we may not yet even conceive of.Erin Anderssen, a feature writer for the Globe, joins us to talk about what makes the octopus such a compelling character, and why learning about them has challenged the way she thinks about eating meat.This is the first episode of Food Week here at The Decibel. A special look at what keeps us alive – and, some say, makes life worth living. We'll look at food from different angles, from the ethics of eating so-called ‘smart animals', to how the war in Ukraine showed us the fragility of our food system, to the business of potatoes. Plus, we'll take you into the kitchen to cook something delicious.Let us know what you think by emailing us at thedecibel@globeandmail.com.

Bonus episode this week is a double food episode! We have on the world champion eater - Hulk Smash Food. One of the fastest eaters alive! We compete with him in a cannoli eating competition that can't be missed. Then we have our second guest Laleh Mohmedi aka Jacob's Food Diaries; a food artist making some of the best creations out of food you will ever see. We try to show her how good we are by making some food art of our own.Produced by Head On Media. headonmedia.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week we discuss my week long experiment eating Fast Food every day! Was not at all what I though it would be! We also talk about how to prep for and still succeed on VACATION!!!

In order to grow from infant Christians to mature Christians, we must learn discernment. We must train our conscience, our senses, our mind, and our body to distinguish good from evil. Can you recognize temptation before it trap you? Can you tell the difference between a correct use of Scripture and a mistaken one? Life Study Application Bible Dr. Tony Evans Podcast: In God we Trust Anchor by Spotify Gwen C --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/gwendolyn-saffo/message

Week four of the "Good News" series!

It's Food Week on The Swirl! Everybody's (first-or-second) favorite Pandemic Topic. First we do our weekly catch-up with with some big Bryonha news about a San Diego Symphony comeback, a new country to add to the Analytics Check, a This Week In Gaggery on COVID-19 vaccinations you will find informative about how we got our first shots and YOU CAN TOO, and then a geek-out interview with our special guest, Broadway dancer-diva transformed into food guru (@katiewebbernyc) Katie Webber (“The Reset”), who gives us the lowdown on protein in a plant-based life, and the act of Sarah Coopering your way into the next phase of the pandemic. Then it's time for the Bridgerton conversation you didn't know you needed, and this week's anonymous reading that should make it all all right. It's all about the foodjamins, baby! TASTE ‘EM! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/david-goldsmith/support

Good morning City Church! We're so glad you're joining us this morning. We will spend some time in worship and then hear more about what Spiritual Discipline looks like in your daily life. We love hearing from you so comment and say hello!

Good morning City Church! We're so glad you're joining us this morning. We will spend some time in worship and then hear more about what Spiritual Discipline looks like in your daily life. We love hearing from you so comment and say hello!

Good morning City Church! We're so glad you're joining us this morning. We will spend some time in worship and then hear more about what Spiritual Discipline looks like in your daily life. We love hearing from you so comment and say hello!

Good morning and welcome to City Church online! We're so glad you're joining us this morning. We will spend some time in worship and then hear more about what Spiritual Discipline looks like in your daily life. We love hearing from you so comment and say hello!

Welcome to Sunday morning at City Church! We're so glad you're here. We're talking about Spiritual Discipline over the next few weeks. We truly believe it will be life giving and transforming. So, make sure you have your Bible and something to take notes on, it's going to be a great day!

Welcome to Sunday morning at City Church! We're so glad you're here and so excited to start our first teaching series of 2021. We're talking about Spiritual Discipline over the next few weeks. We truly believe it will be life giving and transforming. So, make sure you have your Bible and something to take notes on, it's going to be a great day!