Podcasts about Mica

LM publica cómo los Reales Decretos-ley imponen un intervencionismo con fallos técnicos y errores conceptuales que generan grave inseguridad jurídica.

Send us Fan Mail Mica Miller's Death and “The Sex Is For Men” Problem The tragic Mica Miller documentary The Death of a Pastor's Wife reveals a deeply evil pastor husband with entitled, misogynistic views about sex. But those views didn't come out of nowhere. In this interview that Sheila did with Called to Peace Ministries, she connects the dots of how evangelical teaching around sex centers the male experience, feeds entitlement, and creates breeding grounds for abuse.BARE MARRIAGE ANNOUNCEMENTSPreorder Fawn, Sheila's New BookOur Spanish Site is live!TO SUPPORT US: Join our Patreon for as little as $5 a month to support our work (and get access to the book club!)And check out our Merch, or any of our courses!Give to the Good Fruit Faith Initiative of the Bosko FoundationJoin our email list!LINKS MENTIONED: Called to Peace MinistriesCalled to Peace on FacebookCalled to Peace on InstagramThe Whole Story Sex and Puberty CourseFriday Roundup on the Miller caseSupport the showJoin Sheila at Bare Marriage.com!Check out her books:The Great Sex Rescue She Deserves BetterThe Marriage You Want and the Study Guide The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex and The Good Guy's Guide to Great SexAnd she has an Orgasm Course and a Libido course too!Check out all her courses, FREE resources, social media, books, and so much more at Sheila's LinkTree.

LM publica cómo implica más control sobre el propietario, restricciones en los contratos, obstáculos para recuperar una vivienda y nuevos castigos.

Bitcoin remains around $84,000 even as the 10-year Treasury yield pushes above 5.3%, its highest level since 2002. August PCE inflation came in cooler than expected, while Bitcoin ETFs recorded roughly $139 million in net outflows. Citi nevertheless raised its 12-month Bitcoin target from $82,000 to $113,000 and its Ethereum target from $2,240 to $3,028. The Treasury's expanded long-duration bond buyback program is also feeding a larger debate about debt management, liquidity and the growing role stablecoin issuers could play as buyers of short-term government debt.European regulators are scrutinizing Binance's operations under MiCA, while the Swiss National Bank is warning that large-scale stablecoin adoption could weaken traditional monetary-policy transmission. The prediction-market regulatory fight is also intensifying in Washington, MetaMask is precautionarily exiting affected Ethereum validators following misdirected block rewards, and DogeOS is developing an EVM-compatible environment that could expand Dogecoin into smart contracts, DeFi and other applications. Bitcoin itself remains stuck in the same basic structure, with $80K to $82K as the key floor and $87K as the next major level to reclaim.Happy HODLing Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Rahn Marion was born in Memphis, Tennessee, in September 1993. He attended MICA, the Maryland Institute College of Art, in Baltimore, Maryland, majoring in Painting with a concentration in Film, and has taught at the University of Memphis since 2023.As a young working artist, Rahn has sought out jobs that keep him close to the arts scene in Memphis. He's worked at a local, family-owned frame shop, always staying within arm's length of creative work that supports or inspires his own practice, and has worked as production personnel for other artists on commission, as well as in welding alongside his studio practice. He formerly served as Minister of Art and Resident with First Congregational Church, an experience that has shaped his artistic practice and his ongoing journey into mysticism, theology, and identity.In recent years, Rahn's practice has moved decisively onto the national stage. He is represented by Monya Rowe Gallery in New York and Sheet Cake Gallery in Memphis, Tennessee. In 2024, he presented his first New York solo exhibition, Medieval Jazz, at Monya Rowe Gallery — a body of work reworking Medieval and society-portrait iconography through a queer, Black Southern lens. He followed this in 2025 with a second solo exhibition at Monya Rowe Gallery, Where Spirit Meets Bone. Sheet Cake Gallery has also featured Marion's work in two art fairs: The Armory Show in 2025 and the Atlanta Art Fair in 2024.Rahn currently teaches oil painting at the University of Memphis, continuing to shape the next generation of artists in the city that raised him.www.rahnmarionart.com www.instagram.com/rahn_marionFollow Martin Benson for more insights:*To stay updated on the podcast and related content, check out ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠my website⁠www.martinLbenson.com⁠*To support the show and access exclusive content, consider subscribing for $0.99/month on Instagram (link available from website).Credits: Special thanks to Matthew Blankenship of ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Sometimes Island⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ for our podcast theme music!Support this podcast: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/martin-l-benson/support⁠⁠⁠⁠

Hoy hablaremos sobre la decisión del Banco de la República de subir la tasa de interés, del aumento del desempleo en agosto y de lo que dijo el Minhacienda de la próxima ley de rescate económicoPatrocinado | Asiste al Advertising Week LATAM. Regístrate aquí: https://advertisingweek.com/awlatam-2026/ Sitio web:https://www.bloomberglinea.com/latinoamerica/colombia/WhatsApp:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4POHt6WaKhONGGhi38YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@BloombergLineaInstagram:https://www.instagram.com/bloomberglineacolombia/X (Twitter):https://x.com/BloombergLineaCMaría C. Suárezhttps://x.com/Mariacasuarez     Newsletters de Bloomberg Línea: https://www.bloomberglinea.com/newsletter/

Pastor J.P. Miller preached about marriage, submission, and a wife's duty to her husband while his own wife, Mica Miller, was desperately trying to escape him. Mica accused J.P. of tracking her movements, harassing her with dozens of calls, interfering with her finances, sabotaging her car, and posting a nude photo of her online. Then, just days after filing for separation, 30-year-old Mica was found dead from a gunshot wound in a remote state park. Her tragic death was ruled a suicide, and authorities found no evidence J.P. was involved. But what investigators uncovered about the months leading up to Mica's death would eventually land the controversial pastor at the center of a federal criminal case—and expose allegations of a marriage far darker than anything he preached about from the pulpit.FOLLOW/SUBSCRIBE wherever you are listening!Join our Patreon family! (Patreon.com/Psychopediapod) AD FREE episodes, exclusive true crime content, Girl On Gore Season 2, BTS pics/vids, group chats, a place to request cases, and much more! FOLLOW ME EVERYWHERE!YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@investigatorslater Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/investigatorslater/?hl=enTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@investigatorslaterPatreon: http://www.patreon.com/PsychopediaPod Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2LBNRJG9B8vrruJNAuHsxp?si=b9ecd0d712b44c4bApple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/psychopedia-true-crime-criminal-psychology/id1677222172Website: https://www.psychopediapod.com/Quince: Make your summer wardrobe feel easier. Go to Quince for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.BetterHelp: Sign up and get 10% off at BetterHelpBioma: If you're ready for a natural way to feel fuller longer, visit Bioma and use code PSYCHOPEDIA for an extra 15% off your order.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Federico repasa con Luis Fernando Quintero toda la actualidad económica, centrada en la ministra de Vivienda, Isabel Rodríguez.

Mica Miller's story has brought coercive control into the public conversation, but this episode is not about speculating about her death or turning her life into another true crime story.It is about learning to recognize the pattern.When we look at each behavior separately, the seriousness can be easy to miss. A tracking device. Repeated messages and calls. Financial control. Public humiliation. Sexual coercion. Using mental health systems against someone. One incident may not tell us the whole story, but together they can reveal a pattern designed to take away a person's autonomy, stability, and ability to safely leave.Mica also reportedly reached out for help multiple times. Yet she encountered misunderstanding, legal limitations, and systems that seemed to conclude there was little or nothing they could do.We talk about:The patterns of coercive control reportedly present in Mica's storyWhy these behaviors are often minimized when viewed one at a timeWhat may happen when professionals recognize an incident but miss the patternThe red tape and legal limitations survivors can face when they ask for helpWhy “nothing can be done” should never mean nothing else is offeredWhat professionals, family members, faith communities, and support systems can learn moving forwardWe may not always have the legal remedy a survivor needs. But we can believe her fear, document the pattern, help her understand her options, connect her with additional support, and make sure she does not leave believing that “nothing can be done” means no one can help.Mica's story should push all of us to learn more, listen differently, and get better at recognizing coercive control before it is too late.Content note: This episode includes discussion of domestic violence, coercive control, stalking, sexual abuse, and suicide. If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis, call or text 988 in the United States. For domestic violence support, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-SAFE or text START to 88788.Please leave us a review or rating and follow/subscribe to the show. This helps the show get out to more people.If you want to chat more about this topic, I would love to continue our conversation over on Instagram! @risingbeyondpcIf you want to support the show, you may do so here at Buy Me A Coffee. Thank you! We love being able to make this information accessible to you and your community.If you've been looking for a supportive community of women going through the topics we cover, head over to our website to learn more about the Rising Beyond Community. - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/Wondering where to start? Check out our top free resources - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/resources.htmlIf you're interested in guesting on the show, please fill out this form - https://forms.gle/CSvLWWyZxmJ8GGQu7Where to find more from Rising Beyond:Rising Beyond FacebookRising Beyond LinkedInRising Beyond Pinterest 

In this episode of Behind the Genes, we explore Black communities and health research. Our guests discuss why some people feel research is not intended for them, how historical mistrust affects participation, and what needs to change to make research more inclusive, transparent and beneficial for everyone.  Our host, Sharon Jones, is joined by:  Professor Segun Fatumo - Professor and Chair of Genomic Diversity at Queen Mary's Hospital Christella Matoko - Project manager at Genomics England Hazel Attua - member of the Participant Panel at Genomics England We also hear from Mica and Mary, who took part in the Our health, our stories video on YouTube, who share their reflections on why taking part in research matters for Black communities.  As mentioned in the episode, you can also listen to our latest Genomics 101 episode, What is equity in healthcare?, to learn more about what equity means and why it matters in health research and care.  “Engaging in research is bigger than you. It shapes your community, and it shapes the lives of the children coming in the future.”  You can read the transcript below. Sharon Jones: [00:00:00] Hello, and welcome to Behind the Genes, the podcast that brings you the stories, research, and innovations shaping the future of genomic healthcare. Today, we're exploring Black communities and health research. Why do some Black people feel that research isn't intended for them? What role does trust play in participation? Sharon Jones: And what needs to change to improve health outcomes now and in the future? I'm Sharon Jones, and joining me today are Christella Matoko from Genomics England, [00:00:30] Segun Fatumo, Professor and Chair of Genomic Diversity at Queen Mary's Hospital, London, whose work focuses on improving representation and equity in genomic research, and Hazel Attua, who's a member of the Participant Panel at Genomics England. Sharon Jones: A warm welcome to everyone. So before we dive into these topics, let's start first to try and understand how people perceive research and how that can often influence whether they feel it's something for them. So Christella, I'd love to come to you [00:01:00] first. What comes to mind when you hear the words health research? Christella: I think when I'm talking about health research, what comes to mind is the opportunities to understand certain health conditions in different communities, and it's about understanding that we can get better treatments, and these treatments can prevent health inequalities. Although I might look at it from this lens, the whole of the Black community might not. Christella: I have the knowledge of medical care. I work in Genomics England, [00:01:30] so I understand the benefits of, um, health research and how it can improve outcomes within the healthcare. But when you speak about it in terms of the Black community, research doesn't necessarily sit naturally because of all of the historical mistrust that we've, you know, encountered. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Christella: So for me, good healthcare research should ultimately lead to better outcomes for everyone. And I think when I hear [00:02:00] health research, that's like what I like to think about. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for sharing that. And, and Hazel, like coming to you, does that reflect what you've seen or experienced? Sharon Jones: You know, do you feel that research feels relevant to Black communities and why do you think some people may feel hesitant in, in taking part? Hazel: Yeah, I mean, I completely agree with Christella. I think it's difficult for people in the Black community to sometimes trust when research comes out [00:02:30] because previously there's been a lot of mistrust around research because there hasn't always been a lot of research within the Black communities. Hazel: Like when we talk about research, when we talk about, um, for example, with National Genomic Research Library, so when I used to do work with Genomics England- Christella: Mm. Hazel: I specifically was, um, working on the National Genomic Research Library within, um, diverse data. [00:03:00] And so our role was to get more diverse data into the National Genomic Research Library. Hazel: And so for those that don't know what that is, it's like a biobank. And so a biobank is essentially, um, where you help collect samples. So if you've decided to get into research, it's collecting samples, processing samples. So when we decided to do the initiative or when Genomics England decided to do this initiative, I thought it was [00:03:30] amazing because essentially not that much research was done previously for the Black communities. Hazel: And specifically for sickle cell. So to be able to do this, to be able to help understand the background for sickle cell for the Black communities, it's amazing. To be able to get more treatments and interventions, it's great. But like Christella is saying, like, it's interesting to see different people's [00:04:00] perspectives because, again, the trust and the misconceptions around research is different in everybody's eyes because of the, the lack of research that's been done before. Hazel: And so the hesitation around it is like, "Why, why is it only coming about now?" Like, "Why are we doing it now?" But that's the thing about the UK, we're such a diverse population, and it's amazing. So research needs to reflect that. [00:04:30]And so I think hopefully going forward, it actually does do that because we do need treatments and interventions that actually reflect the community. Hazel: Otherwise, we're not gonna get anywhere when it comes to medications, like, health data that actually reflects everyone. Sharon Jones: So we're gonna hear from Mary now, who's a research nurse and midwife, who shares her thoughts on why people [00:05:00] may be hesitant in taking part in research. Mary (Clip): Within the Black community, historically, the lack of participation in research stems from a lack of trust. Historically, I guess the best way to put it is why would I go to a party I've never been invited to? And it's trying to get people to understand that narrative has changed. The lack of trust should never be dismissed. Mary (Clip): It's not a, a myth. It stems from [00:05:30] somewhere. However, there's been so, so, so much change, and I'm hoping that people can see that there are people that really want to make this change for you, for me, for us, for our community. It's so important that, yes, we still hold on to the history of where research is coming from, but we need to paint the picture of the future. Sharon Jones: So Mary's analogy of being invited to a party you've never been to really gets to the heart of that question around trust. So [00:06:00] Segun, I'd love to bring you in at this point. From your experience working to improve representation in genomic research? Sharon Jones: Can you explain to listeners why historically Black communities have felt disconnected to research, and what needs to change to make it feel like it's something for the community rather than something that's being done to the Black community? Segun: So I think we need to get to a point where we acknowledge that there's mistrust. Segun: So some Black community are fed the old, kind of research that is being done on them and not being done with them. You cannot just show up in a community and start asking for their blood sample or asking for their data, and you just do research on them without, uh, proper community [00:07:00] engagement, without getting them involved, without asking them what are the things that are really very, very important, uh, to them. Segun: I think, uh, we researchers and also institution and as well as a nation, UK, where we are taking a lead in global genomics, needs to get to a point where we understand that the trust h-has gone, and, uh, we should not expect the Black community to [00:07:30] give us their trust. Segun: We need to get to a point that where we earn that trust from them, and we're able to do our study on them. So currently in the UK, if you look at some of those, uh, very successful, uh, Black community is really underrepresented. And one of the reason why you hear that is they say that the Black community, they are very hard to reach. Segun: So they're hard to reach because of the same issue. Community engagement has to [00:08:00] be done in a proper way. Yeah, you need to do research in a way that you go to those Black community and don't expect them to come to you. Segun: And we see a lot of that during, uh, during COVID. You see that many, uh, Black community were very hesitant to participate in any vaccine. So we need to get to a point where Black community earn our trust. Sharon Jones: Thank you. Christella, [00:08:30] what do you think about the role that trust plays in deciding whether to participate in research? Sharon Jones: You, you know, given that you've worked on the Generation Study. Christella: I think trust has to be earned, and I think Segun has said it perfectly here in terms of working with the community and coming into the community to understand how the community works. This mistrust that we're talking about is not something of today. Christella: It's something which has been reported on. It's something which we have seen. It's something which has-- it's not a made-up thing. [00:09:00] So when, um, when organisations say Black communities are harder to reach, there is reason for it. That cannot be an excuse not to actually participate with those people in the community to show the difference in which we have made over the years, to understand that we are making changes with the transparency of what we do, you know, creating, um, work which you know where your data is going, because at the end of the day, I'm giving away my [00:09:30] sample. Christella: I want to know who will have access to that sample, where that sample will go. And until we get to a point where we understand that trust has to be earned, it's always gonna be quite difficult if we think Black community are just gonna participate because there's a research available. Sharon Jones: And that's a really fair point. And what do you think, given your sort of experience, what do you think helps build that trust in practice? Christella: I think first of [00:10:00] all, um, not telling and actually going into communities and understanding. So when we talk about the Black community, it's not just a small group of people. Christella: There are Black Caribbeans, there are Black Africans, there are people from different tribes within different countries. So it's not just a, a one-size-fits-all kind of thing here. Yeah. So it's understanding what you're actually trying to achieve, going into places where the Black community [00:10:30] actually congregate, so whether that is church, whether that's community events, whether that's, uh, Black-based events, actually going in and understanding what is it that you would like us to do to show that we are not the research of, you know, the, the early 19th century? Christella: What have we done to show that we are progressing in terms of equality? What have we done in terms of how we're using your data? All those things there, it's not about [00:11:00] things being done to the Black community. It's the, it's the partnership, I think, that needs to be at the forefront of what we do now. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Yeah, and Hazel, coming to you, what do you think enables that participation? Hazel: Again, 100% agree with Chrisella and Segun that it's all about coming to the community and building that trust because it's, it's difficult, and it's about showing up and not just [00:11:30] showing up once. Hazel: It's about consistently showing up and consistently building that trust because it's easy to do a workshop or do an engagement once and tell everyone this is what you're trying to achieve. But if you consistently show everyone who you are, what the research that you're trying to do is, it's not just about telling them about the research, it's understanding who they are before you actually trying to gauge them about the research because, like, [00:12:00] it's breaking down their walls and breaking down their barriers. Hazel: As a Black community, we build up these walls, and I say it as we because we've been let down so many times and- Hazel: like, I say this from my experience, from times where, from the sickle cell community, for example We had treatments that were brought in, so there was, for example, crizanlizumab and [00:12:30] voxelotor that were brought in, and they were approved in, uh, like, 2023, 2024. Hazel: But then in 2024, they were then taken away. So early '24, crizanlizumab was then taken off the shelf. Sharon Jones: Right. Hazel: And then late September, October, voxelotor was then taken off the shelf, and that's very disheartening for patients with sickle cell. And in the Black community, you can see how also people have been let down [00:13:00] again and again Sharon Jones: Yeah. Hazel: in not just healthcare, but in general, like the stigma, the discrimination. And so to come in and just ask people to just get involved in research and then done and dusted- Sharon Jones: Mm-hmm ... Hazel: it's all about treating them as people before asking them to get involved in research. We have to be treated as people before we get involved in anything. Hazel: So it's, I think that's how you get [00:13:30] people to be involved and enable them to get involved in research. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Hazel: It's just treating them as people before anything else. Sharon Jones: And were there any factors for you that, you know, at first you might not have felt comfortable taking part, and what were sort of deciding factors that made you to get involved and participate? Hazel: So for me, coming from, like, a personal point of view, 'cause I was on voxelotor, um, for me It, again, it was very disheartening- Mm-hmm ... um, when it was taken off the shelf, [00:14:00] and it was done very quickly overnight. Sharon Jones: Right. Hazel: And so for me, it's kind of one of those things where it's like, hmm, what do I do? Do I just not trust the system anymore? Sharon Jones: Yeah. Hazel: But then, like the flip side to that is, okay, we've had this drug, and it actually worked for me very well. And the look of that is, okay, so we've had this drug. It was amazing. The potential is we'll get more drugs that will be like this. And so [00:14:30] going into the Diverse Data program and thinking about how we approach people to say, "If you can get involved in this study, the likelihood is we actually might get more drugs, more treatments, more interventions that are going to be as amazing as Voxzelator was." Hazel: Because the likelihood is we've had a drug that was great, and we could actually get more drugs that could be available. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Hazel: But we need research to do it because at the end of the [00:15:00] day, it's research. It's gonna take time, and the results are always gonna shift up and down. So yes, it can be disheartening, but at the end of the day, we've got to keep trying. Hazel: Otherwise, if we don't keep trying, then we're not gonna get anywhere. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Hazel: So I had to ... You have to bite the bullet sometimes, and that's all you can do. So yeah, I think that was what shifted my mindset from not [00:15:30] -from being upset about it to then actually looking at the positives around it. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that is a difficult reframe when something that is working so effectively is suddenly kind of shelved, uh, very quickly like that. Sharon Jones: So changing your mindset couldn't have been, couldn't have been easy. Christella? Christella: When we're talking about what, what, um, Hazel has just said in terms of something was available to everyone and then it wasn't available, and then that goes again to what I say about [00:16:00] transparency. I think if there was more transparency about what was happening with this particular drug in the community, there would be that, that trust that would have, there would be more of an understanding, there would be more of a, like Hazel's taken the, the stance of, "Okay, I will still trust in the research because I believe something better will come along." Christella: It's because of also her knowledge within the research. She's been around- she's been around Genomics England, she's been with people that research has really helped. But those in the [00:16:30] community who haven't, they feel disheartened about this, and this is why I say transpare- transparency about what is happening is so important with our community 'cause we-- so we don't feel like things are just being done to us, we actually understand the reasons behind it. Christella: So for me, there's a few points. It's having people who represent the community actually being clinicians, um, being researchers, you know, leading in these community spaces, the transparency, the [00:17:00] long-term relationship that Hazel was talking about within the community. It's not you come in once and then, you know, you get what you want, and then you leave again. Christella: It's also sharing the findings, and it's also having a trusted message constantly in order for the Black community to actually participate in these research. Sharon Jones: Thank you, Christella. So we've got these themes of, like, consistency around trust, around communication, transparency. So Segun, I wanted to come to you now. Sharon Jones: So why-- if people at [00:17:30] home are still trying to understand why this is important, can you explain to them why representation matters in research, and what happens when communities are not adequately represented in research? What is the impact, and how does that show up? Segun: So representation matters in research because eventually a decision about our health will need to be made, uh, with this. Segun: I give you an example of, uh, a, a drug that we have today, medication we have today that is helping to lower cholesterol. So that medication came to be because some African ancestry individuals were involved in a study. So in that study, they found that those African individual, they have, uh, some genetic variation that is helping them to naturally, uh, lower their cholesterol. Segun: So because they included those African ancestry individuals, so we had, uh, PCSK9 inhibitor where the medication was derived. Now this medication is not only useful for, uh, people of, uh, Black community, but for everybody globally. So helping to lower cholesterol and prevent heart attack. Segun: So we are doing ourself harm if we continue to exclude some people from, uh, from res- from research. Diagnosis is very important. So some tool for [00:19:00] diagnosis might not be appropriate for an ethnic group or, or ancestry or maybe, for example, in this case, a, a Black community. Segun: In a research where we get the right diagnosis, uh, the right treatment, uh, for the right people, for the right community. So we cannot just do, uh, all the research on one particular community, and it posts the finding on another community. So representation is really, really very important, not only among, uh, people that participate in research and also in research leadership. Segun: It is much more easier for Black community, uh, to show interest in research if they see somebody that look like them. So the, the representation has to be at every layer, both the [00:18:42] participant and also at the, at the leadership level. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Segun: I give an example for, for my study, uh, genetic risk score, in most of the study that we've done, we've seen that where you develop a genetic risk score from one population, and you try to, uh, transfer that, uh, genetic risk score to a Black community, they do very poorly. Segun: So we need to include-- We need to be able to get to a point where we involve a Black community adequately in studies so that we can [00:20:30] be able to develop, uh, the right genetic risk score to every, every community. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Segun: So represent-representation is really, is really key. Uh, it's not just about fairness. Segun: It's about the, you know, accuracy. It's about, uh, you know, precision. It's about better healthcare. Sharon Jones: Yeah, and it's like you say, it's sort of holistically, it's from participants, but also for people who are working in research that also aids the sort of uptake in participation if you see people who look like you. Sharon Jones: We're now gonna hear from Mica, who is a mum who took part in a Generation study, and she's gonna talk about why getting involved was so important. Mica (Clip): I think as a Black woman, as a Black person, put yourself forward because the narrative at the moment is there's not enough research, and we're getting all these sort of doom and gloom headlines about, you know, Black maternal outcomes, Black men and prostate cancer, for example. And I feel like if we as a community don't put ourselves out there and make ourselves available for research, that narrative isn't gonna change. Sharon Jones: So, Segun, I'd like to come back to you again. On the flip side of that, how can research organisations better involve Black communities? And are there concerns that we've talked [00:20:38] about today that have, uh, been acknowledged and addressed effectively? Segun: So the first thing is that we need to acknowledge there's a problem. Sharon Jones: Yeah. Segun: And we see the Black people are not really, you know, participating in research because of trust. So how do we overcome that? One major thing is relationship or what I call, uh, community engagement. So community engagement is not community consultation. You know, you want to do research, you just [00:22:30] show up at that time you want to do research. Segun: You know, take people's blood sample and go away. So community engagement starts much more years ahead before... So when you have the right relationship with the community, it's much more easier to be able to do research with them. Segun: So we have to ensure that, uh, people that are doing the research are also well represented. So we have people that, that look similar, people that understand the community, uh, people that live among the community, so it's much more easier to help, help us to boost the trust. So the third one that people don't talk a lot about is benefit. Segun: I've done a lot about recruiting people into research [00:21:43] in, in Africa, and there's a benefit sharing component. What we, what we have done in Uganda is that if you have high blood pressure, we have medication. We refer you to, uh, the clinic that is under our own control. Segun: So we support you with your diabetes, support you with your high blood pressure or whatever thing that you have. If we cannot take care of you, that is where we now refer you to either to a doctor or a general, uh, general hospital. This is [00:25:00] really very important that there's a benefit. And also, uh, recently we've been working with, uh, some, uh, big pharmacy company, and we talk about benefit sharing. Segun: Uh, for example, if we done some study, uh, we find some drug and med-medication, and the, the company had make millions of, of USD. So what come back to the community? So now we talk about, okay, can you now build an hospital here in this, uh, village? So we have to think about an appropriate benefit sharing also for the Black community in the UK. Sharon Jones: Thank you. And I know, Christella, you touched upon some of those similar points that Segun made there. What does meaningful community engagement look like for you? Christella: The benefit sharing is so important because we have to understand there is a problem, first and foremost, okay? And we have to understand the impact of that problem. Christella: We have to bring solutions for that problem, but we also need to show those benefits in these communities that we're actually trying to engage with. And for me, when I'm talking about engagement, I'm really looking at co-designing, you know, not just consulting and telling them what to do, but the real difference is between being able to actually co-design the studies around Black people, so you can understand the nuances within the, the communities. Christella: So understanding how to actually engage with these communities is, is really important And I think it's also being honest about the limitations that we have, that we've seen in the past. Christella: You know? It's not about creating engagement which says you are the knight in shining armour and, and you're here to, you know, put a magic wand and [00:24:00] make everything okay. It's literally being honest about, you know, the preconceptions that people have. You know, what you're trying to achieve in the community, that you're actually trying to benefit the community. Christella: It's important that those who are creating these studies don't go into a room and assume how these communities work. It's really about understanding the experience of Black people and letting them be experts of their own experience, using that to then find ways to better engage with, with communities. Sharon Jones: Thank you. And Hazel, is there anything you would like to add? Hazel: I think Cristella and Segun have hit the nail completely on the head. I think co-design is so important when it comes to engaging with the Black community. And I also think that [00:24:49] when it comes to research, it shouldn't just be about the research. Hazel: It should be about, like, essentially giving back to the community as well. So e- exactly what Segun and Cristella were saying. So if we're talking about we need to do questionnaires or giving samples, the community, whoever is, whoever this research is for, should be able to [00:28:30] see results from this. It shouldn't just be a couple of years down the line they still don't know what is coming from this research. Hazel: Because sometimes we do research and people don't understand what's happened to, to this research, and sometimes that is off-putting to people. Sharon Jones: Thanks, Hazel, and we're gonna hear again from Mica, who captures that idea so powerfully Mica (Clip): The research isn't for the NHS, it isn't for any medical institution, it's not for the government. It's for our community. We're at the heart of that research, and, like, we've got a chance to do something about it, and if you're not gonna put yourself out there, then who else is going to? Sharon Jones: So, Segun, how can we ensure the future of healthcare innovations benefit everybody and they don't deepen health inequalities? Segun: I would say that, so what is the benefit of, uh, innovation, if it does not benefit everyone, particularly people that need it the most? Uh, give an example, maybe Hazel will know a lot about this. Segun: So now we have a sickle cell gene therapy. Of course, a few people have benefited, so this probably costs about, uh, millions of USD for one person. This is a great innovation, but who can benefit from it? It's too expensive. No-nobody's able to afford that. So we need to get a point where, so the so-called innovation can get to the right people, people that actually need it, and it's actually cost-effective. Segun: In my own, uh, domain of work, we're trying to develop a new, uh, gene-genomic test or genetic risk score. So what we have seen from the data that is currently available is that, you know, when you develop this, the score from one particular population, it doesn't transfer to other population. So it-- the genetic testing, uh, is a great innovation, but it doesn't, it doesn't really do well in the, in the Black community. Segun: So I think we should have to think much more at the beginning of innovation, uh, whether who is this innovation being prepared for? Who is going to benefit from this innovation? If innovation is not gonna, uh, benefit people that need it most, it doesn't really make any sense. Sharon Jones: That's a good point. And Christella, you also had an example of what happens when communities are not adequately represented in research. Christella: Yeah. So recently, um, in the NHS, they've started to, um, test for [00:27:45] a specific enzyme, which is, which is found in the Black community, um, for cancer patients going through chemotherapy. Originally, there were four enzyme that they tested for, um, in the genes, and they found that there's actually a fifth one which affects Black people within the community. Christella: And it's so important that this happened because Black patients were having, you know, severe side effects to the chemotherapy, and some patients unfortunately passed away due to this particular enzyme. So understanding that our genes do have variants in it and some, as Segun said, some things which work in one community will not always work, um, in a different community. Christella: So now before anyone undergoes a chemotherapy, the cancer patients across England undergo genetic testing, which can then lead into a change of treatment and reduce adverse, um, side effects for the chemo. Now that the NHS can test for this, it's gonna bring better outcomes to those in the Black community going through chemotherapy. Christella: We all know chemotherapy is hard enough to go through, so making it a little bit better for those in our community that are going through it is so important, and that's why we need to be part of this research, 'cause without us, they won't know what's best for us. Sharon Jones: Thank you for sharing that. And if you'd like to understand more about equity, please listen to our Explainer podcast, What Is Equity? Sharon Jones: So let's hear from Mary with a message she'd like listeners to leave with today. Mary (Clip): Thinking about my experiences, I would love listeners to take away the fact that engaging in research is bigger than you. It shapes your community, and it shapes the lives of the children coming in the future. Black communities, we need to know our baseline. Mary (Clip): We need to know where we are starting. It's bigger than us. My engagement helps the granddaughter I don't have, and that's what I need people to know. Sharon Jones: And given what Mary said, I'd like to ask you all, what message would you [00:29:34] like to leave for listeners who are interested in learning about research? I'll come to Christella first . Christella: I think first of all, we have to acknowledge that the questions and the hesitations within the community are very valid, and we have to understand that this makes sense given the history of research. Christella: But I would love listeners to be left with the knowledge that history shouldn't be the final word of our relationship with research. We ask the hard questions that we need to ask and invite those who need to also benefit from this research. And like Mary said, "I'm helping my grandchild that I don't even have yet." Christella: And I think that's how we need to look at it. It's not so much just about us, but it's the future generation. It's about having better outcomes for each and every one of us, and that includes the Black community. So help shape further research, and medicine will actually benefit us in the future. Sharon Jones: Hazel, what message would you like to leave listeners today? Hazel: I think going into research can sometimes be hard. However, I do think research is incredibly important, [00:31:14] especially for the younger generation. Hazel: So I do think that we should get involved. Sharon Jones: Thank you. And Segun? Segun: Yeah, I would like to, uh, recall what, uh, Christella was saying, uh, particularly saying that for everybody, uh, listening to me right now, if you are invited to participate in the research, please participate, you know. Segun: Ask the right question, "What is the research for?" And, uh, how does it benefit you? Maybe not you directly, maybe your children or maybe your grandchildren. Everyone should remember that, uh, so research is ultimately for the people, for better healthcare. Segun: So our contribution really matter. So you're contributing your sample really matter and can change, uh, somebody's life, can change generation. Every participant has something valuable, which is really key. So I would encourage all the listener to participate in research if you are invited. Segun: Thank you. Sharon Jones: I think that's a very salient point. We'll wrap up there. We've covered a lot today, from trust to participation and what is needed to change to ensure that healthcare is for everyone. A huge thank you to our guests, Christella, Segun, and Hazel, for joining me today as we discussed how Black communities are being served in health research. Sharon Jones: If you enjoyed this episode and you'd like to hear more, please subscribe to Behind the Genes on your favourite podcast app. Thank you for listening. I've been your host, Sharon Jones, and Behind the Jeans is produced by Deanna Barac, Sophie McLachlan, Katie Revell, Adam Wavy, and Patrick Wallace at Bespoken Media. Sharon Jones: Thank you for listening.  

Confira nesta edição do JR 24 horas: As agências da Caixa voltaram a funcionar normalmente nesta quarta-feira (30) em todo o país. A retomada aconteceu depois que o Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST), determinou na última terça-feira (29), o fim da greve dos funcionários do banco, iniciada no dia 10 de setembro. Os sindicatos não terão que pagar multa, mas os trabalhadores vão precisar compensar os dias parados. Eles terão reajuste salarial pelo INPC, mais o ganho real de 0,6%. E ainda: Tropas dos Estados Unidos deixam o Iraque após 20 anos.

437 milliards de dollars. C'est ce qu'a perdu, en deux ans, l'entreprise qui fabrique le médicament le plus désiré du monde.***

Atenção (disclaimer): Os dados aqui apresentados representam minha opinião pessoal.Não são de forma alguma indicações de compra ou venda de ativos no mercado financeiro.Seleção das partes mais interessantes das Lives de segunda.Live 389 - Visão do Estrategistahttps://youtube.com/live/HBQ2UkRC7M8

podcast recorded with enacast.com

Conversamos con el Ing. Erick López, de Laboratorio Ecoquimsa, sobre cómo la innovación química y el monitoreo ambiental ayudan a las empresas a comprender mejor sus procesos, tomar decisiones y fortalecer su desempeño ambiental.Durante el episodio, exploramos el valor de los análisis como herramientas para orientar la estrategia ambiental de las empresas. Erick nos comparte cómo los resultados del monitoreo pueden convertirse en una base para identificar oportunidades de mejora y definir acciones que vayan más allá del cumplimiento de los requisitos ambientales.También conocemos avances en las metodologías y los equipos utilizados para el monitoreo de aguas, incluyendo sistemas automáticos que permiten una toma de muestras más precisa y tecnologías que reducen los tiempos de trabajo y facilitan las mediciones. Conversamos sobre cómo esta información puede ayudar a aprovechar mejor los recursos y avanzar hacia una operación más eficiente.Una conversación para descubrir el valor de transformar los datos ambientales en decisiones y mejoras concretas. ¡Les invitamos a conocer esta experiencia en CIRCULARIDAD!¡Les invitamos a conocer esta experiencia y sus aprendizajes en CIRCULARIDAD!Intro: sonidos ambientales grabados en la Reserva Natural Privada Renace.Las opiniones e información compartidas en este episodio son responsabilidad exclusiva de sus emisores y no reflejan necesariamente la postura del CGP+L, encargado de la producción y administración del podcast CIRCULARIDAD.

Het kabinet wil af van belasting op papieren winst, maar crypto in je eigen wallet lijkt juist buiten de boot te vallen. In deze aflevering van de Autonomie Show duiken Leandro en Chhay Lin Lim in de nieuwe Box 3-plannen: het heffingsvrij vermogen dat bijna halveert, het verschil tussen crypto in eigen beheer en crypto bij een broker, en waarom juist de middenklasse de rekening lijkt te krijgen.Daarna goed nieuws: Monflo komt met een eigen Monflo-kaart. We lopen de overstap van de huidige kaart door en Chhay geeft een live demo van de vernieuwde Monflo-app: van IBAN-storting naar on-chain swap, terugboeken naar je gewone bank en je kaart beheren in de app.We sluiten af met een opvallende les over wie Monflo eigenlijk gebruikt, wat MiCA heeft opgeruimd in de cryptomarkt, en waarom "Don't trust, verify" meer is dan een slogan.

¿Qué se va a encontrar el público en esta nueva edición de Los Encuentros de Pamplona / Iruñeko Topaketak y cuáles son las principales citas del programa? Hablamos con Berta Ares, Subdirectora de Programación de los Encuentros de Pamplona/Iruñeko Topaketak

Sin Privilegios - Masculinidad y Precariedad Económica by Radiotelevisión de Veracruz

Most crypto exchanges are built like casinos: they chase the next hot token, prediction market, or trading product. Relai is building a different category—a savings brand for people who want to accumulate Bitcoin, hold it in self-custody, and build wealth over the long run. Julian Liniger explains why serving patient savers requires a different product, message, and business model.The conversation also explores why rising living costs are pushing Europeans to rethink ordinary savings, and why the temptation to get rich quickly can drive people toward momentum trading and leverage. Julian makes the case for a longer time horizon: Bitcoin savings is less about chasing the next move and more about consistently building a position through changing market conditions.Supporting context includes Relai's MiCA compliance journey, where regulatory overhead is costly but can also raise the bar for smaller competitors. Julian also discusses the company's self-custody model and reports more than 100,000 users holding over 20,000 BTC in their own wallets—not under Relai management. The episode covers how a Bitcoin-only company can earn revenue through services around long-term ownership while keeping the savings proposition at the center.Timestamps:00:01 — Europe's Cost of Living Squeeze03:11 — Why Europeans Still Don't Get Bitcoin07:37 — High Time Preference & Get-Rich-Quick10:31 — Bitcoin Needs Patience Again10:54 — AI Hype vs Bitcoin as Savings14:58 — Bitcoin Is Where You Keep Your Winnings21:42 — Leverage, Treasury Cos & Risk23:46 — Relai Private Loans in Europe29:03 — MiCA: Overhead and Moat33:11 — Bitcoin Savings vs Casino Exchanges35:26 — 100k Users, 20k+ BTC Self-Custody37:49 — Retail App vs Relai Private40:00 — Self-Custody Phone Wallet42:58 — Seven-Figure Raise in a Bear Market45:12 — AI for Building and Securing Relai50:00 — Living Costs Drive Bitcoin SearchLinks: https://x.com/julian_linigerhttps://x.com/relai_appStephan Livera links:Follow me on X: @stephanliveraSubscribe to the podcastSubscribe to Substack

In 1981, a 19-year-old named Arne Cheyenne Johnson stabbed his landlord to death in Connecticut and told the court a demon did it. Judge Robert Callahan threw the defense out before the jury heard a word of it, calling it “irrelative and unscientific.” Johnson was convicted of first-degree manslaughter. That set the template.Michael Taylor killed his wife after an all-night exorcism in England — the court reclassified the claim as mental illness. David Berkowitz blamed demons for the Son of Sam killings and later admitted in prison he'd invented the story to confuse investigators. Sean Sellers claimed Satanic possession drove him to kill his parents and a convenience store clerk — he was executed in 1999. Jason Dalton killed six people between Uber rides in Kalamazoo and blamed a demonic symbol in the app — life without parole.The record is perfect. Every defendant who has blamed a demon in an American courtroom has walked out convicted.JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking and false-statement charges in Florence, South Carolina, with a trial set for January 2027 after six continuances. He told his Solid Rock Church congregation in October 2023 that demons were coming out of him — the same month his affair with Suzie Skinner was discovered. The indictment alleges a tire deflation device, a tracker on Mica Miller's car, and lies to the FBI.In a sworn affidavit, Mica's brother Nate says JP wrote his wife an email that read: “I just attack and try to cause pain.” That was his language when no congregation was listening.He married Suzie Skinner in June 2025 and started a new church. The demons left. The federal charges stayed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #TrueCrimeToday #DemonDefense #FederalTrial #Cyberstalking #TrueCrime #MyrtleBeach #SolidRockChurch #JusticeForMica

JP Miller told his congregation at Solid Rock Church that he was going to deliverance three times a week and that demons were coming out of him. His stepfather-in-law Michael Honeycutt — who helped raise Mica from about age 12 — prayed over JP and says the word that came out was “deliverance.” Ten minutes later, Honeycutt says Mica called, with JP, upset and asking whether Honeycutt was saying JP was possessed.That was October 2023. Mica's friend Bruna Pabon told Robbie Harvey that September 2023 is when Mica found out about JP and Suzie Skinner. The timing is the story: the demon showed up the same month the affair did.From the pulpit, JP Miller called the 18 people Mica confided in demons. He texted her closest friend that listening to Mica was a greater sin than anything he could have committed. Former elder Bernard Kenerson says JP convinced the church leadership that Mica had been in a months-long psychotic episode and nothing she said could be trusted. The word “demon” pointed at everyone except the man saying it.But in a sworn affidavit, Mica's brother Nate says JP wrote Mica an email with different language: “When someone hurts me, I try to hurt them back rather than forgive” and “I just attack and try to cause pain.”No American court has ever accepted demonic possession as a defense. Arne Johnson tried it in 1981 — the judge threw it out. Berkowitz invented his demon story. Sellers was executed and Dalton got life.JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking and false-statement charges in Florence, with a trial set for January 2027. He married Suzie Skinner in June 2025. The demons left. The charges didn't.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #HiddenKillers #DemonDefense #FederalTrial #TrueCrime #Cyberstalking #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #JusticeForMica

Federico repasa con Luis Fernando Quintero toda la actualidad económica, centrada en la indefensión de los propietarios tras el "decreto Maricarmen".

Cris Blanco is chief strategy officer at Beldex, the privacy-first layer one that began in 2018 as a fork of Monero and now runs a suite of privacy applications for messaging, browsing, networking and payments. He has spent more than 15 years across Web3, frontier technology and digital platforms, working at founding-team and senior-leadership level on go-to-market, ecosystem strategy and partnerships. Most recently he was part of the founding team at Humanity Protocol, where he helped scale testnet adoption to more than three million users in 90 days. Why you should listen Blanco has moved from a project about proving who you are to one about keeping that private, and he argues the two are the same problem. His work on identity convinced him that people want to prove specific facts about themselves without exposing everything else, and that privacy has to be part of a system's architecture from the start. He applies the same logic to crypto itself. Blockchains solved verification without a middleman, he says, but verifying that a transaction is valid does not require publishing everyone's balance, salary and coffee purchases to the world permanently. That view explains why Beldex builds a whole stack rather than a single app. Blanco points out that privacy fails at the weakest layer: an encrypted chat tied to a phone number, a hidden IP address undone by a public payment. So alongside private BDX payments, Beldex offers BChat for messaging without a phone number or email, BelNet as a decentralized VPN, the Beldex Browser, and a naming service for human-readable addresses. Blanco says BChat accounts for roughly two thirds of the ecosystem's 1.5 million installs, which he reads as evidence that messaging, not payments, is the easiest way to bring non-crypto users into privacy tools. On the tension between privacy coins and regulators, he argues that banks and hospitals hold sensitive data without publishing it and still comply with the law. Exchanges and fiat gateways carry the compliance obligations, and users should be able to disclose specific information to specific parties. Beldex has published a MiCA white paper to that end. AI, he argues, makes the case stronger. People already hand AI assistants their documents and private thoughts, and as businesses route payroll and payments through agents the exposure grows. Blanco says Beldex is testing encrypted agent-to-agent communication as a next product. In the hot take round, he describes success in ten years as the point where nobody talks about privacy because it has become as standard as HTTPS, and explains why rereading Isaac Asimov's three laws of robotics feels different in the age of AI alignment. Supporting links Stabull Finance Beldex Beldex on X Cris Blanco on LinkedIn Andy on X Brave New Coin on X Brave New Coin Enjoyed the episode? Please give us a five-star review. It helps other people find the show.

Aimar Bretos entrevista a Iñaki Viejo, bombero de Madrid y miembro de la asociación bomberos contra los desahucios. En estos días en los que toda España está indignada con los desahucios y a escasas horas de conocer si el Gobierno consigue presentar su nuevo decreto de vivienda en el Consejo de Ministros, hay algunos actores obligados que ya no quieren salir más en la foto de estos desalojos desahucios. Es el caso de muchos bomberos como Iñaki.

In this episode, Allie looks at the Netflix docuseries “Death of the Pastor's Wife” which investigates the tragic death of Mica Miller and her marriage to Pastor John Paul “JP” Miller.  Allie makes the important distinction that JP's abuse didn't stem from biblical alignment, but complete disregard of scripture to satisfy his own lustful desires. Addressing his past which in no way displays a life in submission to scripture, Allie looks at both complementarianism and egalitarianism and why they are not to blame for JPs abuse or Mica's death. Furthermore, Allie looks at the biblical structure of authority seen in scripture and how JP's church should have exercised discipline towards him long before Mica's death. Do you have a question for Allie? Leave a voicemail at 844-755-5252  Share the Arrows 2026 is on October 10 in Dallas, Texas! Tickets are on sale now at: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://sharethearrows.com⁠⁠⁠ Share the Arrows is sponsored by: A'del Natural Cosmetics: AdelNaturalCosmetics.com Range Leather: RangeLeather.com/ALLIE We Heart Nutrition: WeHeartNutrition.com – Time Codes – Today's Sponsors: Good Ranchers | For a limited time, you can get a free Ground Beef bundle with your first Good Ranchers or just visit https://goodranchers.com/allie to claim your free Ground Beef Bundle. Seven Weeks Coffee | Go to https://sevenweekscoffee.com and save 15% forever when you subscribe, plus get a free gift with your order! Use code ALLIE for an extra 10% off your first order. Every Life | Visit https://Everylife.com , and use promo code “ALLIE10” to get 10% off your first order today!  World Watch News | Visit https://worldwatch.news/allie or use promo code ALLIE to start your free trial today. PreBorn | To donate, dial #250 and say the keyword BABY. Or visit https://Preborn.com/ALLIE . Episodes You May Like: The Mysterious Death of Mica Miller | Ep 1005 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBPvkYBi49w  The Cult-Like NAR Church That Nearly Destroyed John Cooper | Ep 1397 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HReTd-JbnZo   'He's a Warlock:' Kathryn Krick's Spiritual Father's Dark Secrets | Ep 1385 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeTHtTlWfYc  --- ► Buy Allie's book "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion": ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.toxicempathy.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ► Buy Allie's book "You're Not Enough (& That's Okay): Escaping the Toxic Culture of Self-Love": https://alliebethstuckey.com/book ► Subscribe to the podcast: iTunes: https://apple.co/2UVssnP Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2FwkXxj ► Connect with Allie on social media:  https://twitter.com/conservmillen https://www.instagram.com/alliebstuckey/ https://facebook.com/allieBlazeTV/ ► "Relatable" merchandise — use promo code ALLIE10 for a discount: https://shop.blazemedia.com/collections/allie-stuckey

Mica Francis died trying to leave John Paul Miller. She documented what was happening to her, called the Police at least 14 times, retained an attorney and filed for divorce. Less than a day after Mica's death, John-Paul Miller stood before his congregation and announced her death, while simultaneously shaping a narrative about Mica and her mental health. Serious alarm bells went off for both Laura and award-winning investigative journalist and NewsNation correspondent, Rich McHugh.  Former NBC investigative producer Rich McHugh, working with Ronan Farrow, exposed Harvey Weinstein at great personal and professional cost. You will hear more about that in this episode as well as how Rich quickly gained the trust of Mica's family and ultimately secured an extraordinary sit-down interview with John-Paul Miller in July 2024.  In this episode you will learn:   How Rich's previous investigations into Harvey Weinstein and Hillsong influenced his response when Mica's story first emerged  Why victim-centred reporting matters and how Rich approached Mica's family  The starkly different narratives Rich heard from Mica's family and John-Paul Miller  How Rich secured the interview with Miller after months of communication  What Miller sent Rich privately before the interview  Why Rich decided to let Miller talk rather than begin with confrontational questions  What Rich noticed about Miller before he had even asked his first question  Why Miller may have wanted to speak publicly and control the narrative  Laura's behavioural analysis of key moments during the interview  What happened when Rich asked Miller whether he felt partly responsible  The anger Rich believed he detected beneath Miller's response  Miller's claims about Mica's mental health and why it matters who controls the narrative when a victim can no longer speak for herself  Mica's efforts to separate, seek help and regain control of her life  The failures and gaps in protection surrounding coercive control, stalking and post-separation abuse  Why, despite doing so much to try to protect herself, Mica was still left without the safety she was seeking  This is Part 1 of Laura's interview with Rich McHugh. The conversation continues in Part 2.  TAKE ACTION: Mica's Law -Coercive Control and Stalking Laws in South Carolina   You can contact South Carolina lawmakers and ask them to support stronger legal recognition and protection for victims experiencing coercive control, stalking and post-separation abuse.   Full action links, letter template and resources are available in the Crime Analyst Squad.   Watch The Death of the Pastor's Wife   More from Investigative Correspondent Rich McHugh   Twitter: richmchugh  Insta: richmchughnews  Tiktok @richmchugh     Crime Analyst Coverage  Crime Analyst: Mica Francis Series  Mica Francis: Breaking Down the Federal Charges Against JP Miller with Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell  Huge News in Mica Francis' Case. John Paul Miller Has Been Indicted Finally…   #MicaFrancis #MicaMiller #JusticeForMica #CrimeAnalyst #HarveyWeinstein #CoerciveControl #Stalking #DomesticAbuse #PostSeparationAbuse #SexualCoercion #EconomicAbuse #MicasList #ThePreachersWife #Femicide #DomesticViolence #PowerAndControl #AbuseIsAPattern #JohnPaulMiller #JPMiller #RichMcHugh #InvestigativeJournalism #LauraRichards #BehaviouralAnalysis #ExpertAnalysis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #VictimCenteredReporting #NewsNation   Clip https://www.instagram.com/reel/DczwA3LuSA9/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&stkn=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==  Sources   Rich McHugh and JP Miller interview Watch The Death of the Pastor's Wife   https://www.abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/mica-millers-family-press-conference-suicide-lumber-river-state-park-robeson-county-death-investigation-fbi-john-paul-pastor-solid-rock-church-estate-documents-abuse-hide-assets-sierra-nathaniel-francis-911-call-security-footage-timeline   https://www.facebook.com/therobbieharvey/posts/heres-the-full-text-exchange-between-charlotte-mica-miller-and-john-paul-miller-/484282057505382/     Link to Cross Over episode with Mandy and Laura on Cup of Justice Ep #86:   Apple Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coj-86-crime-analyst-expert-laura-richards-joins-mandy/id1668668400?i=1000659373717   Spotify Link   https://open.spotify.com/episode/10P6t5LmMxF3YHUdgxPcm9?si=e3832e105dc1430d   Links to Episodes about Mica Francis   Mica Francis separated from John Paul Miller. She was desperate for help..  Mica Francis: Have you heard the term coercive control?   Ep 303: Mica Francis: Analyzing the Federal Charges Against John Paul Miller with Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell     Thank You to Crime Analyst Sponsors Who Make the Show Possible. Support The Show Through the Sponsors:    Get your new everyday favorites with 20% off your first order at thrivecausemetics.com/ANALYSTS. Download the Quince app or go to Quince.com for free shipping and 365-day returns. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, choose Crime Analyst. It's one of the best ways to support the show.    CRIME ANALYST Socials   www.dashriskchecklist.com   www.thelaurarichards.com          Subscribe to Crime Analyst YouTube: @crimeanalyst          Facebook: Crime Analyst Podcast          Instagram: @crimeanalyst, @laurarichards999          Threads: @crimeanalyst          X (Twitter): @thecrimeanalyst, @laurarichards999          TikTok: @crimeanalystpod          Website: www.crime-analyst.com          If you found this episode valuable, please consider leaving a five star review wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Federico repasa con Luis Fernando Quintero toda la actualidad económica, centrada en el blindaje del Ministerio de Hacienda a Zapatero.

Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-mananero-radio--3086101/support.

Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/el-mananero-radio--3086101/support.

Yordi Rosado y Manolo Fernández regalan pases dobles para ver a Maroon 5, el homenaje a Mecano, la película Matchbox y el Festival Multiverso, con un juego imperdible de por medio.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ignatius Farray, cómico y escritor, estalla contra los fondos buitre: "A ver si son capaces de imaginarse una moral más grande que simplemente la explotación económica". Desde la Puerta del Sol en Madrid, cientos de manifestantes acampan por el desahucio de Mari Carmen, entre ellos el cómico Ignatius Farray, quien califica de "orgullo y alegría" la acampada organizada por el Sindicato de Inquilinas.El cómico sostiene que "no es una cosa premeditada, sino el orgullo y corazón de la gente" lo que ha llevado a esta manifestación de demandas por la crisis de vivienda. Según Ignatius esto es "imparable" y "ojalá muchas más noches" acampando por estas demandas sociales.Ignatius carga contra Ayuso, Almeida y Pedro Sánchez: "tienen que hacerse responsables de esto, y más allá de palabras bonitas: atender a lo que dice la calle, porque esta indignación existía durante todos estos meses".Escuchar audio

Se negocia el Decreto de vivienda a raíz del descontento generalizado por el desahucio de Maricarmen...¿Tomará medidas la clase política? Lo analizamos con Miguel Córdoba, profesor de economía y finanzas de la CEU San Pablo; Juan Carlos Martinez Lázaro, profesor de Economia de IE University, y Aurelio Garcia del Barrio, director del Global MBA del IEB.

José Márcio Camargo, economista-chefe da Genial, fala sobre os assuntos que estão movimentando a economia, o mercado e a política, com os destaques da semana e desdobramentos futuros. Ouça o conteúdo, entenda o cenário atual brasileiro e comece a semana bem informado.

Send us Fan MailEp. 87 | Especial: Doença metabólica óssea e disfunção do VE na sepse do prematuroOssos que não mineralizam. Um ventrículo que falha em silêncio durante a sepse. Dois problemas que afetam os prematuros mais vulneráveis — e que a equipe da UTI neonatal precisa reconhecer cedo.Neste episódio especial, A Incubadora traz dois artigos que colocam em discussão o que sabemos, o que ainda não sabemos e o que isso significa para a prática nas nossas unidades.Para neonatologistas, pediatras e toda a equipe que acompanha o prematuro de alto risco.1. Prevention and management of metabolic bone disease of prematurity: a systematic review - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42374148/2. Cardiopulmonary Physiology of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Among Preterm Infants with Septic Shock - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39510164/Lembrando que  está chegando o CINEO 2026 – Congresso Internacional de Neonatologia do Distrito Federal acontece nos dias 26, 27 e 28 de novembro, em Brasília (DF), reunindo profissionais de todo o país para discutir os principais avanços, desafios e tendências da neonatologia.Serão três dias de atualização científica, palestras com especialistas renomados, apresentação de trabalhos científicos, workshops práticos e muito networking entre médicos, enfermeiros, fisioterapeutas, fonoaudiólogos, nutricionistas, residentes e demais profissionais da área.O CINEO é uma oportunidade única para ampliar conhecimentos, trocar experiências e fortalecer a assistência ao recém-nascido.Inscrições abertas. Saiba mais em https://cineo.com.br Não esqueça: você  pode ter acesso aos artigos do nosso Journal Club no nosso site: https://www.the-incubator.org/podcast-1Lembrando que o Podcast está no Instagram, @incubadora.podcast, onde a gente posta as figuras e tabelas de alguns artigos. Se estiver gostando do nosso Podcast, por favor dedique um pouquinho do seu tempo para deixar sua avaliação no seu aplicativo favorito e compartilhe com seus colegas. Isso é importante para a gente poder continuar produzindo os episódios. O nosso objetivo é democratizar a informação.Se quiser entrar em contato, nos mandar sugestões, comentários, críticas e elogios, manda um e-mail pra gente: incubadora@the-incubator.orgEvidência, cuidado e contexto brasileiro - esse é o nosso roteiro.

Bitcoin a été déclaré mort près de 480 fois, par Wired, le Washington Post, le Financial Times et même le prix Nobel Paul Krugman. Depuis avril 2024, son cours en dollars a doublé, perdu plus de la moitié de sa valeur, puis rebondi. Mais ce qui a vraiment changé, ce sont les mains qui le détiennent : BlackRock, des banques, des entreprises et même des États.Mounir reçoit Hasheur pour mener l'enquête, des ETF de BlackRock au risque quantique : Bitcoin est-il devenu moins risqué, ou encore pire ?***

In this episode of The Truth In This Art, accomplished actress, artist, writer, director, and New York Times bestselling author Victoria Rowell is here!About Victoria Rowell: Victoria Rowell is a multi-disciplinary creator widely known for her television roles on Diagnosis Murder and The Young and the Restless. Driven by an innate love of movement and a childhood immersed in the arts by her foster mother, she has built a dynamic creative life spanning classical ballet, acting, and independent filmmaking. She is the artistic force behind "A Woman Becomes," a solo photography exhibition at the Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA) exploring the timeline between girlhood and womanhood, as well as the invisible strengths of the female anatomy.In my conversation, Victoria revisits how her early years on a working farm in Maine and a pivotal ballet scholarship shaped her resilience in the face of the entertainment industry's hustle. She walks through her transition from classical ballet into television — and why maintaining a diverse "bouquet of friends" is exactly what is needed to navigate the highs and lows of a creative life.Victoria gets into the experience she is crafting with "A Woman Becomes..." — expanding beyond standard photography in favor of incorporating mixed media, found street objects, and inherited items like rosary beads that honor her foster mother, Agatha. She speaks to how a chance drive past MICA led to a partnership with the institution, giving her exhibition a home that matches the artistic vision she has been building toward.Be sure to follow Victoria Rowell on Instagram at @victoriarowell to stay up with her work. For everything regarding Victoria Rowell: A Woman Becomes…, running from September 25th through October 11th, visit the Maryland Institute College of Art website and check out the show notes for more details. The Truth In This Art is supported by William G. Baker, Jr. Memorial Fund, the Maryland State Arts Council's Creativity Grant and Mayor's Individual Artist Award - Creative Baltimore Fund (Baltimore). Host: Rob LeeMusic: Original music by Daniel Alexis Music with additional music from Chipzard and TeTresSeis.Production:Produced by Rob Lee & Daniel AlexisEdited by Daniel AlexisShow Notes courtesy of Rob Lee and TransistorPhotos:Rob Lee photos by Vicente Martin for The Truth In This Art and Contrarian Aquarian Media.Guest photos courtesy of the guest, unless otherwise noted.Support the podcastThe Truth In This Art Podcast Fractured Atlas (Fundraising): https://www.fracturedatlas.orgThe Truth In This Art Podcast Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/thetruthinthisart.bsky.socialThe Truth In This Art Podcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/truthinthisart/?hl=enThe Truth In This Art Podcast Website: https://www.thetruthinthisart.com/The Truth In This Art Podcast Shop: Merch from Redbubble ★ Support this podcast ★

Rosana Laviada repasa con Luis Fernando Quintero toda la actualidad económica centrada en las mentiras del Gobierno sobre el desahucio de Maricarmen.

Canada is launching a stablecoin on Solana to cut its dependence on American banks, payment processors and other U.S. middlemen. We break down what that means for USDC, the dollar's dominance, and whether Canada just took crypto market share from the United States.~This episode is sponsored by iTrust Capital~iTrustCapital | Get $100 Funding Reward + No Monthly Fees when you sign up using our custom link! ➜ https://bit.ly/iTrustPaul00:00 Intro00:10 Sponsor: iTrust Capital01:10 Canada chooses solana02:00 CADD02:45 Solana upgrade03:10 Six Banks04:20 HOOD and COIN join Canada05:00 US equity buying Canada's payments processors05:30 Canada x Europe06:00 MiCA exchanges06:55 Carney 8 years ago08:15 Kevin O'Leary bullish on Canada09:30 Kevin's new narrative10:40 Post CLARITY Rally11:35 ZCSH $1B12:00 Tom Lee: Next 6 months#Solana #crypto #canada ~Canada Just Declared War On U.S. Banks

Investigative journalists ⁠⁠Mandy Matney and ⁠Liz Farrell⁠⁠  are joined by Beth Braden to break down another wild Friday of filings.  First: Greg Parker's team fires off a 38-page response in the Beach case that mentions Mandy 27 times — complete with bitchy footnotes, italicized accusations of "targeted advocacy," and [sic]s for the crime of typing "yall" — proving once again that in South Carolina, the system punishes the people who call it out.  Then, disturbing developments in the Mica Francis Miller story: an anonymous Facebook page pushing JP's "proof," Mica's mother appealing the probate court's estate ruling, and the police reports Horry County ignored while Mica begged for help. Finally, Beth introduces her new podcast, Time of Death, investigating the case of Gary Wayne Sutton — a Tennessee man facing a December 3 execution even though the state stipulated it has no eyewitnesses, no confession, and no physical evidence tying him to the crime. Give Beth a follow on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, or TikTok ☕ Cups Up! ⚖️ Join LUNASHARK Premium on Patreon Support Our Legal Defense GoFundMe: Help Journalist Mandy Matney Fight $176,500 Contempt Order Or support our reporting: ⁠https://lunashark.supercast.com/donations/new⁠ Lawyers & Judges: Send legal suggestions or offers for Pro Hac / Pro Bono representation to legal@lunasharkmedia.com Episode References Check out Beth's podcast “Time of Death” on Apple or Spotify

Caleb Flynn told the world he loved his wife. John-Paul Miller told his congregation he was a man of God. Prosecutors in two separate cases allege both men were hiding lives that their wives and communities never saw. Caleb Flynn is on trial in Miami County, Ohio, for the February 2026 murder of his wife Ashley, 37. He faces 11 charges including aggravated murder. Prosecutors allege he shot her twice in the head inside their Tipp City home and staged the scene as a home invasion. He was arrested within 82 hours. His alleged mistress and his two young daughters are set to testify against him. He is held on $3.5 million bond. John-Paul Miller faces federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators. A December 2025 indictment alleges years of harassment against his estranged wife Mica. GPS trackers. Dozens of calls in a day. Intimate images posted without consent. Financial interference. The alleged campaign ran from November 2022 until her death on April 27, 2024. Mica's death was ruled a suicide. Solid Rock Church closed after protests erupted. The Netflix documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife brought the case to a national audience in August 2026. Miller's trial is set for October 2026. Robin Dreeke and Jennifer Coffindaffer examine the evidence in both cases and the federal strategy unfolding around Miller. Both men have pleaded not guilty.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #JPMiller #AshleyFlynn #MicaMiller #CalebFlynnTrial #JohnPaulMiller #RobinDreeke #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

One was a worship leader in small-town Ohio who told American Idol cameras he loved his wife more than anything. The other was a Myrtle Beach megachurch pastor whose congregation shielded him while his estranged wife allegedly lived in fear. Caleb Flynn is on trial in Miami County, Ohio, for the aggravated murder of his wife Ashley, 37, who was shot twice in the head inside their Tipp City home on February 16, 2026. Prosecutors allege he staged the scene as a home invasion and put on a performance for the 911 dispatcher. Investigators saw through it within hours. He was arrested in 82 hours and indicted on 11 charges. His bond was set at $3.5 million. His alleged mistress and his own daughters are set to testify for the prosecution. John-Paul Miller faces federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators. The indictment alleges he tracked Mica Miller's vehicle, called her more than 50 times in a day, and posted intimate images without her consent. The alleged harassment ran from November 2022 until her death on April 27, 2024. Mica's death was ruled a suicide. Solid Rock Church is closed. Miller's trial is set for October 2026. Robin Dreeke and Jennifer Coffindaffer break down the prosecution's evidence against Flynn, what the defense is working with, and the FBI's strategy in the Miller investigation. Both men have pleaded not guilty to all charges.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #JPMiller #AshleyFlynn #MicaMiller #CalebFlynnTrial #JohnPaulMiller #RobinDreeke #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and ⁠Liz Farrell continue sharing details from the Mica Francis Miller case that the new Netflix documentary "Death of the Pastor's Wife" didn't include.  In Part Two of True Sunlight #165, Mandy and Liz talk about what went down when Pastor JP Miller's most prized church member assets — a couple in law enforcement — finally saw the light. JP not only seemed to think the Horry County Police Department existed to promptly respond to his needs and accept his version of the truth, he seemed to believe he could turn the department against one of their own in retaliation. In 2024, JP and faithful sidekick Tricia Ross went after a former church member's job at HCPD — because the officer allegedly sinned by gossiping about "God's anointed". They appealed to now-former Deputy Chief Brandon Strickland — he who was “working in the shadows” of the Scott Spivey investigation — and Brandon apparently hopped to it.  Let's Dive In…

In this episode of Serial Streamers Jami invites Aimée Baker and Vanessa Cicarelli, hosts of hit podcast “She Goes by Jane,” to help her break down the Netflix documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife. This three-part docuseries chronicles the case of Mica Miller, a 30-year old devout Christian woman whose body was found in a remote forest having apparently died by suicide. Jami, Aimée and Vanessa break down the strange aspects of this case, and also discuss the apparent abuse Mica suffered at the hands of her estranged husband, pastor John-Paul (“JP”) Miller, before their separation and how it might be evidence of him potentially playing a role in her death. The ladies all agree there are more questions than answers in this tragic and peculiar case. Follow Jami Rice on IG, TikTok and YouTube @jamionair. Follow She Goes by Jane on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/p/She-Goes-by-Jane-100089745836263/, IG @she_goes_by_jane and in any podcast app at ‘She Goes by Jane.' Watch Serial Streamers on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@jamionair and subscribe so you don't miss out on the latest documentary recaps. Sponsors: Shopify: shopify.com/murderish - sign up for your free trial today Quince: quince.com/jami - get free shipping and 365 day returns Check out Jami's other podcasts: Bravo's Most Wanted:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bravos-most-wanted-with-jami-rice-and-katie-ginella/id1896791981 Dirty Money Moves: Women in White Collar Crime: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dirty-money-moves-women-in-white-collar-crime/id1619521092 Want to advertise on this podcast? We've partnered with Cloud10 Media to handle our advertising requests. If you're interested in advertising on MURDERISH, send an email to Sahiba Krieger sahiba@cloud10.fm with a copy to jami@murderish.com.  Visit Murderish.com for more info about the show and Creator/Host, Jami Rice. Remember …cults are stupid, Ted Bundy is ugly, scammers suck at life, and binge-watching true crime documentaries IS self care! Stay safe out there! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mica Francis did everything right: she documented what was happening, reported to police and repeatedly asked for help. But what happens when the behaviours creating fear, entrapment and risk are not adequately recognised by the law?  In Laura's interview with Mica's attorney, Regina Ward, the focus turns to the systemic failures that left Mica without the protection she needed - and the fight to change law in South Carolina in Mica's name.  Laura and Regina examine why repeated attempts to introduce coercive control legislation in South Carolina have failed, the gaps that remain for victims experiencing patterns of stalking and coercive control, and next steps.  Laura and Regina discuss:  Why Mica's repeated reports and documentation matter  The fight to introduce effective coercive control legislation in South Carolina  Why understanding individual incidents without recognising the pattern leaves victims unprotected  Mica's List and what it reveals about the cumulative impact of coercive control  The importance of preserving evidence when an abuser attempts to destroy or control it  How religion, submission, sexual entitlement and stalking are weaponised as tools of control  What listeners can do to support Mica's Law and help create change  TAKE ACTION: Mica's Law -Coercive Control and Stalking Laws in South Carolina  You can contact South Carolina lawmakers and ask them to support stronger legal recognition and protection for victims experiencing coercive control, stalking and post-separation abuse.  Full action links, letter template and resources are available in the Crime Analyst Squad.  Watch The Death of the Pastor's Wife  More from Attorney Regina Ward  Website YouTube  TikTok    Crime Analyst Coverage Crime Analyst: Mica Francis Series Mica Francis: Breaking Down the Federal Charges Against JP Miller with Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell Huge News in Mica Francis' Case. John Paul Miller Has Been Indicted Finally…  #MicaFrancis #MicaMiller #JusticeForMica #CrimeAnalyst #CoerciveControl #Stalking #DomesticAbuse #PostSeparationAbuse #SexualCoercion #EconomicAbuse #MicasList #ThePreachersWife #ReginaWard #Femicide #DomesticViolence #PowerAndControl #AbuseIsAPattern #LauraRichards #BehaviouralAnalysis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #ExpertAnalysis   Join the conversation on social media and in the Crime Analyst Squad www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst  #MicaFrancis #MicaMiller #JusticeForMica #CrimeAnalyst #CoerciveControl #Stalking #DomesticAbuse #PostSeparationAbuse #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #ExpertAnalysis  Clips https://www.facebook.com/NewsNationNow/videos/1585198026735228/  Sources Watch The Death of the Pastor's Wife  https://www.abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/mica-millers-family-press-conference-suicide-lumber-river-state-park-robeson-county-death-investigation-fbi-john-paul-pastor-solid-rock-church-estate-documents-abuse-hide-assets-sierra-nathaniel-francis-911-call-security-footage-timeline  https://www.facebook.com/therobbieharvey/posts/heres-the-full-text-exchange-between-charlotte-mica-miller-and-john-paul-miller-/484282057505382/   Link to Cross Over episode with Mandy and Laura on Cup of Justice Ep #86:  Apple Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coj-86-crime-analyst-expert-laura-richards-joins-mandy/id1668668400?i=1000659373717  Spotify Link  https://open.spotify.com/episode/10P6t5LmMxF3YHUdgxPcm9?si=e3832e105dc1430d  Links to Episodes about Mica Francis  Mica Francis separated from John Paul Miller. She was desperate for help.. Mica Francis: Have you heard the term coercive control?  Ep 303: Mica Francis: Analyzing the Federal Charges Against John Paul Miller with Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell   Thank You to Crime Analyst Sponsors Who Make the Show Possible. Support The Show Through the Sponsors:  Visit TAKELEAN.com and enter CRIMEANALYST for your discount.   CRIME ANALYST Socials  www.dashriskchecklist.com   www.thelaurarichards.com         Subscribe to Crime Analyst YouTube: @crimeanalyst         Facebook: Crime Analyst Podcast         Instagram: @crimeanalyst, @laurarichards999         Threads: @crimeanalyst         X (Twitter): @thecrimeanalyst, @laurarichards999         TikTok: @crimeanalystpod         Website: www.crime-analyst.com         If you found this episode valuable, please consider leaving a five star review wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott keeps this combined episode focused on the pattern Mica Miller's family says the law repeatedly failed to capture. Mica left journals, diaries and police reports describing alleged control over medication, unwanted injections, sleep deprivation, tracking and harassment. Scott explains why coercive control is often missed when institutions evaluate each incident on its own instead of asking whether one person is steadily stripping away another person's choices. That is the problem Mica's Law is designed to address. South Carolina's SB 702 would add coercive control to the state's domestic-violence framework and make repeated controlling behavior a criminal offense. The bill stalled during the 2026 session and remains unpassed. Scott examines what that gap means for families who can describe an entire pattern but cannot point to one statute that names it. JP Miller is now charged federally with cyberstalking and making false statements. Prosecutors allege that from November 2022 through April 27, 2024, he repeatedly contacted Mica, interfered with her finances and daily activities, damaged her tires, posted an intimate image without consent and caused tracking devices to be placed on her vehicle. JP has pleaded not guilty and has not been charged in connection with Mica's death. His case is scheduled for the October 2026 federal trial term. The second half of the episode looks at what came next. JP married Suzie Skinner in June 2025. Suzie's former husband Chris Skinner died in a pool in September 2021, and authorities ruled the drowning accidental. His family has publicly questioned that ruling, while reporting says the case has been revisited. No one has been charged in Chris Skinner's death. Netflix interviewees have alleged JP and Suzie were involved before Mica died; JP has denied that and said the relationship began later. Scott looks at why a new relationship can become part of an alleged controller's public reset while making clear that remarriage itself proves nothing about criminal conduct. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #MicasLaw #CoerciveControl #SuzieSkinner #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #TrueCrime 

John-Paul Miller's defense attorneys have asked for and received multiple continuances since he pleaded not guilty in January 2026 to federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements. The trial is set for the October 2026 term. But a federal investigation doesn't pause because the courtroom does. Miller was indicted in December 2025. Prosecutors allege a campaign of harassment against his estranged wife Mica from November 2022 until her death in April 2024. GPS trackers. More than 50 calls in a single day. Intimate images posted without consent. Financial interference. Damaged tires. Mica was found dead at Lumber River State Park in Robeson County, North Carolina. Her death was ruled a suicide. Miller admitted to investigators that he hired a private investigator — telling them it was to prevent Mica from purchasing firearms. Prosecutors allege the true purpose was surveillance of his wife. He was released on $100,000 bond with electronic monitoring. Solid Rock Church is closed. The Netflix documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife hit the platform in August 2026 and put the allegations in front of millions. Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the FBI's investigative strategy during trial delays. The approach to former associates. The hunt for financial trails. And the brutal reality facing anyone who participated in the alleged harassment and thinks silence will protect them. Miller has pleaded not guilty.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #JohnPaulMiller #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #FBIInvestigation #Cyberstalking #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

John-Paul Miller's federal trial is set for October 2026, but the investigation didn't take the summer off. Miller was indicted in December 2025 on federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators. The indictment alleges a sustained campaign of harassment against his estranged wife Mica that ran from November 2022 until her death on April 27, 2024. GPS trackers on her car. More than 50 calls in a single day. Intimate images posted without her consent. Interference with her daily life and her finances. Tire damage. Mica was found dead at Lumber River State Park in Robeson County, North Carolina. Her death was ruled a suicide. Miller was released on $100,000 bond with electronic monitoring and ordered to surrender his passport. Solid Rock Church — the Myrtle Beach ministry at the center of everything — closed after public protests erupted following Mica's death. The Netflix documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife brought the allegations to millions in August 2026. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down what federal investigators do when a case goes quiet publicly. How they flip enablers. How they track digital footprints and build financial cases alongside the criminal one. And whether the people who allegedly helped Miller understand what a federal investigation means for them. Miller has pleaded not guilty. He faces up to seven years in prison if convicted on both counts.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #JohnPaulMiller #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #FBIInvestigation #Cyberstalking #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott is at the center of this episode because the story is bigger than a federal indictment. She examines the pattern Mica Miller's family says she documented herself: medication allegedly controlled by someone else, unwanted injections, sleep deprivation and repeated police reports. Her family says the systems around her never saw the whole picture at once. That pattern is why Mica's family has backed a South Carolina coercive-control bill known as Mica's Law. The latest proposal, SB 702, sought to make coercive control unlawful and expand what courts and police can recognize inside an intimate relationship. It stalled during the 2026 legislative session and has not become law. Scott explains why that matters: a person can experience domination as one continuous reality while the legal system keeps sorting it into disconnected incidents. JP Miller now faces federal cyberstalking and false-statement charges tied to alleged conduct from November 2022 through Mica's death on April 27, 2024. Prosecutors allege unwanted contact, tracking devices, interference with her finances and daily activities, tire damage and an intimate image posted without consent. He has pleaded not guilty and has not been charged in connection with her death. His federal case is set for the October 2026 trial term. While Mica's family pushed for a new law, JP moved into a new marriage. He married Suzie Skinner in June 2025. Suzie's former husband, Chris Skinner, an Army veteran who became quadriplegic after a vehicle crash, died in a pool in September 2021. The death was ruled accidental. His family has raised questions publicly, and the matter has reportedly been revisited. No one has been charged in his death. Netflix interviewees have alleged JP and Suzie were involved before Mica died. JP denies that and has said they began dating later. Scott's lane is the behavior around that transition: how alleged controllers can reframe the past, build a new public identity and leave the people around them arguing over what the previous relationship actually was. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #MicasLaw #CoerciveControl #SuzieSkinner #Cyberstalking #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime 

Investigative journalists  Mandy Matney and  Liz Farrell continue sharing details from the Mica Francis Miller case that the new Netflix documentary "Death of the Pastor's Wife" didn't include.  Part One of True Sunlight #165 looks at the friends, acquaintances and assets JP had in his apparent mission to punish Mica for trying to leave him on her terms … not his. When Mandy and Liz first reported on this case in 2024, they knew Horry County Police Department was — how do we put this? — not good.  Police reports obtained through FOIA told the story of a woman repeatedly reaching out for help and being told there was nothing they could do. But after nearly two years covering the Scott Spivey case and HCPD's corrupt investigation, Mandy and Liz have a whole new perspective: it wasn't just bad policing … it was policing from an agency known for helping out their friends.  Between church members in law enforcement and JP's employee Tricia Ross, Mica wasn't just up against her powerful pastor husband … she was up against his flock of wolves in police clothing.  Let's Dive In…