Podcasts about cmbr

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਕਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ, ‘‘ਮੈਂ ਤੈਨੂੰ ਗਿਆਨ ਤੇ ਬੁੱਧੀ (ਸਿਆਣਪ) ਦੇ ਬਾਰੇ ਵਿੱਚਸਮਝਾਵਾਂਗਾ। ਜਦੋਂ ਤੂੰ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਸਮਝ ਜਾਵੇਂਗਾ ਤਾਂ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਅੱਗੇ ਇਸ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਮਝਣ ਯੋਗ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ'' (7.2)। ਗਿਆਨ ਤੇ ਬੁੱਧੀ ਹੀ ਇਕ ਉਹ ਮਾਰਗ ਹੈ ਜਿਹੜਾ ਮਨ ਨੂੰ ਜਿੱਤਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਭਗਤ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਲਈ ਢੁਕਵਾਂ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਕਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਨ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਦਿਲ ਦੀ ਮੰਨਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਭਗਤ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਨੂੰ, ‘‘ਖੁਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਣੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਤੇ ਸਾਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਣੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਖੁਦ ਨੂੰ ਵੇਖਣ ਅਤੇ ਹਰ ਥਾਂ ਤੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਦੇਖਣਾਂ'' ਦਾ ਮਾਰਗ ਸੁਝਾਇਆ ਸੀ (6.29)। ਜੋ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਜਾਣ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣਨ ਲਈ ਕੁਝ ਵੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਚਦਾ।ਵਰਤਮਾਨ ਦਾ ਵਿਗਿਆਨਕ ਨਿਚੋੜ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਸਿਫਰ ਤੋਂ ਸਾਰੇ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਦੀਸਿਰਜਣਾ ਹੰੁਦੀ ਹੈ। ਸਾਡਾ ਵਿਸਥਾਰ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੋਇਆ ਇਹ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ 13.8 ਅਰਬ ਸਾਲ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਇਕ ਬਿੱਗ ਬੈਂਗ (big bang) ਵਿੱਚ ਬਣਿਆ ਸੀ।ਕਾਜ਼ਮਿਕ ਮਾਈਕਰੋਵੇਵ ਬੈਕਗਰਾਊਂਡ ਰੇਡੀਏਸ਼ਨ (CMBR) ਦਾ ਹਵਾਲਾ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਇਹ ਤਰਕ ਸਿਰਜਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਵਰਤਮਾਨ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਵੀ ਇਕ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਸੀ। ਅਜਿਹਾ ਵੀ ਅਨੁਮਾਨ ਲਾਇਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੁਝ ਸਮੇਂ ਬਾਦ ਇਹ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਫੈਲ ਕੇ ਤਿਤਰ ਬਿਤਰ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਸਿਫਰ ਦੇ ਬਰਾਬਰ ਹੋ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ ਅਤੇ ਖਾਲੀ ਥਾਂ ਵਾਲੀ ਊਰਜਾ ਇਕ ਹੋਰ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਦਾ ਨਿਰਮਾਣ ਕਰੇਗੀ। ਇਸ ਦਾ ਅਰਥ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਸਿਰਜਣ ਤੇ ਪਰਲੋ ਦੀ ਇਕ ਚੱਕਰਵਾਤੀ ਪ੍ਰਕਿਰਿਆ ਹੈ।ਇਹ ਪਿੱਠਭੂਮੀ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਇਹ ਸਮਝਣ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੱਦਦ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ, ਜਦੋਂ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਕਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਨਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ, ਕਿ ‘‘ਉਹ ਪੂਰੇ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਦੀ ਉਤਪਤੀ ਤੇ ਪਰਲੋ ਹੈ'' (7.6)। ਪਹਿਲਾ ਸੰਕੇਤ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਇਕ ਚੱਕਰਦਾਰ ਪ੍ਰਕਿਰਿਆ ਹੈ। ਦੂਜਾ ਕਿ ਸਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਟੀ ਸਿਰਜਣ ਤੇ ਵਿਨਾਸ ਦੋਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਏਕਤਾ ਹੈ। ਧਿਆਨ ਦੇਣ ਯੋਗ ਗੱਲ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਹਰ ਇਕਸੱਭਿਆਚਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਭਗਵਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਇਹ ਸਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਟੀ ਕਰਤਾ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਹੈ। ਪਰ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਤਮਾ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਕਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਨ ਘੋਸ਼ਣਾ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਸਿ੍ਰਸ਼ਟੀ ਕਰਤਾ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਨਾਲ ਵਿਨਾਸ਼ਕਾਰੀ ਜਾਂ ਅਘਾਤਕ ਵੀ ਹਨ। ਉਹ ਅੱਗੇ ਦੱਸਦੇ ਹਨ, ‘‘ਮੇਰੇ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਦੂਜਾ ਕੋਈ ਵੀ ਪਰਮ ਕਾਰਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ।ਇਹ ਸੰਪੂਰਣ ਜਗਤ ਸੂਤਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੂਤਰ ਦੀਆਂ ਮਣੀਆਂ (ਮਣਕੇ) ਵਾਂਗੂੰ ਮੇਰੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਰੋਇਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ'' (7.7)। ਪ੍ਰਗਟ (ਮਣੀ) ਅਤੇ ਅਪ੍ਰਗਟ (ਸੂਤਰ) ਨੂੰ ਸਮਝਾਉਣ ਲਈ ਅਕਸਰ ਮਣਕਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਮਾਲਾ ਦੇ ਉਦਾਹਰਨ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਹੈ। ਸੂਤਰ ਅਦਿੱਖ (ਅਦ੍ਰਿਸ਼) ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਸੂਤਰ ਦੀ ਸਹਾਇਤਾ ਤੋਂ ਬਿਨਾ ਮਣਕੇ ਕੋਈ ਸੁੰਦਰ ਮਾਲਾ (ਗਹਿਣਾ) ਨਹੀਂ ਬਣ ਸਕਦੇ। ਇਹ ਉਸ ਦਰਖਤ ਦੀ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਅਦਿੱਖ ਜੜਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਬਗੈਰ ਜੀਵਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਹਿ ਸਕਦਾ। ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡ ਵੀ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਤਮਾ ਦੇ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਮੌਜੂਦ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋ ਸਕਦਾ।

Join astrophysicist Hugh Ross and one of America's most famous cosmologists, Brian Keating, as they discuss new discoveries taking place at the frontiers of science that have theological and philosophical implications, including the reality of God's existence Hugh and Brian discuss research on the polarization signals in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR)—the radiation left over from the cosmic creation event—that Brian conducted on the BICEP, BICEP2, POLARBEAR2, and Simons Array telescopes. They also discuss the significance of the polarization signals in establishing what kind of inflation event occurred at the tiniest fraction of a second after the universe's beginning and the ongoing quest to gather more data on the polarization of the CMBR as a tool to learn more about the beginning and design of the universe. Brian also briefly describes his spiritual journey: a member of a Catholic church during his youth, becoming an atheist, and now a devout Jew in practice but an agnostic in belief. Links and Resources Losing the Nobel Prize: A Story of Cosmology, Ambition, and the Perils of Science's Highest Honor Into the Impossible: Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner  

We continue our discussion about the Hubble Constant and delve into a few other cosmic anomalies, including the assumption Albert Einstein made regarding the speed of light. And, somehow, we also ended up talking about Noah's flood and the Whopper Sand. You'll have to listen to the end to find out how that happened! Come and see how we think it all points to the glory and majesty of God. Dan's very short video on the whooper sand.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r9COYBra94   The following links are not meant to imply the ideas contained therein reflect those of Good Heavens! or Watchman Fellowship, Inc. All of these, with the exception of Danny Faulkner, are presented from a completely secular perspective of the universe Veritasium Video on the one-way speed of light problem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27k More in-depth on the Hubble Constant - Interview with Christian astronomer Dr. Danny Faulkner on the Hubble Constant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqUkhyxCbPE Cosmological constant (not the same as the Hubble constant, but related).  https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html Hubble constant - two different ways to measure (from 2020).  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-a-dispute-over-a-single-number-became-a-cosmological-crisis/ Three ways to measure Hubble constant.  https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/hubble-constant-explained  Brian Keating short video about using magnetism to measure the Hubble constant  https://youtu.be/kBdtvURyJ8Q?si=-wlE-9D1emA-NP1- Dr. Becky most recent video on the crisis.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKmPJmaeP8A Adam Riese from the Space Telescope Science Institute who won the Nobel Prize in the late 90s for discovering the universe expansion was (allegedly) accelerating. His SH0ES team measured the Hubble constant at 74 km/s/mpsc, far above Wendy Freedman's 69.8 and the CMBR at 67.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmDszPExepc   Scientific American article on the HC from October 2023.  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-possible-crisis-in-the-cosmos-could-lead-to-a-new-understanding-of-the-universe/   Wendy Freedman's initial project of measuring HC using the HST to measure Cepheids.  https://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/shst2/freedmanw.html Historical background on the HC from STScI. (2020)  https://www.stsci.edu/contents/newsletters/2020-volume-37-issue-02/hubble-and-the-constant-the-next-and-the-next-generation Good Heavens! Is a production of Watchman Fellowship, Inc. For more information on our ministry and our sister podcast Apologetics Profile, visit Watchman.org today! Contact Wayne and Dan at  Psalm1968@gmail.com    Podbean enables our podcast to be on Apple Podcasts and other major podcast platforms.  To support Good Heavens! on Podbean as a patron, you can use the Podbean app, or go to https://patron.podbean.com/goodheavens.  This goes to Wayne Spencer. If you would like to give to the ministry of Watchman Fellowship or to Daniel Ray, you can donate at https://www.watchman.org/daniel. Donations to Watchman are tax deductible.

Probably the only thing that is constant about the Hubble Constant is that it keeps changing! What is it? Why is it such a hot topic in cosmology today and why are some even calling it a "crisis"? Come along with Wayne and Dan as they dive into the quest for the elusive magic number. What does it mean for cosmology and what might it all have to do with the way God made the universe? The following links are not meant to imply the ideas contained therein reflect those of Good Heavens! or Watchman Fellowship, Inc. All of these, with the exception of Danny Faulkner, are presented from a completely secular perspective of the universe More in-depth on the Hubble Constant - Interview with Christian astronomer Dr. Danny Faulkner on the Hubble Constant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqUkhyxCbPE Cosmological constant (not the same as the Hubble constant, but related).  https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html Hubble constant - two different ways to measure.  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-a-dispute-over-a-single-number-became-a-cosmological-crisis/ Three ways to measure Hubble constant. https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/hubble-constant-explained  Brian Keating short video about using magnetism to measure the Hubble constant  https://youtu.be/kBdtvURyJ8Q?si=-wlE-9D1emA-NP1- Dr. Becky most recent video on the crisis. https://youtu.be/yKmPJmaeP8A?si=Wf6ajm4qGuC5CZX6 Adam Riese from the Space Telescope Science Institute who won the Nobel Prize in the late 90s for discovering the universe expansion was (allegedly) accelerating. His SH0ES team measured the Hubble constant at 74 km/s/mpsc, far above Wendy Freedman's 69.8 and the CMBR at 67. https://youtu.be/JmDszPExepc?si=03HqPi3RU5uRkSSl Technical  power point slides from Dr. Jo Dunkley on the PLANK CMBR data on the Hubble constant.  https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/primocosmo13/dunkley/pdf/Dunkley_PrimoCosmo13_KITP.pdf Scientific American article on the HC from October 2023.  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-possible-crisis-in-the-cosmos-could-lead-to-a-new-understanding-of-the-universe/ Wendy Freedman's initial project of measuring HC using the HST to measure Cepheids.  https://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/shst2/freedmanw.html Historical background on the HC from STScI. (2020)  https://www.stsci.edu/contents/newsletters/2020-volume-37-issue-02/hubble-and-the-constant-the-next-and-the-next-generation Good Heavens! Is a production of Watchman Fellowship, Inc. For more information on our ministry and our sister podcast Apologetics Profile, visit Watchman.org today! Contact Wayne and Dan!    Psalm1968@gmail.com    Podbean enables our podcast to be on Apple Podcasts and other major podcast platforms.  To support Good Heavens! on Podbean as a patron, you can use the Podbean app, or go to https://patron.podbean.com/goodheavens.  This goes to Wayne Spencer. If you would like to give to the ministry of Watchman Fellowship or to Daniel Ray, you can donate at https://www.watchman.org/daniel. Donations to Watchman are tax deductible.

Episode 185 of the #AskAbhijit show: Ask me interesting questions in the comments, and I shall answer them. A Masterclass on Understanding Geopolitics: Geopolitics From First Principles Enroll here: https://www.ac.university For business/collaboration, email at business.chavda@gmail.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - OUTLINE BY RAMALAKSHMI VV: 0:00 Countdown- Intro Music 1:15 Introduction - Hello Everybody 3:54 Why does inflation (10^-36seconds after big bang) have a high uncertainty? Even after CMBR imaging?.. 15:01 What is cosmic dawn and epoch of reionization in cosmology? 22:50 Under Brane cosmology, how much does sir think the ekpyrotic universe makes sense? Is it supported by Mathematics? 35:14 How does Pulsar Timing Array, someone says he has read a paper about confirmation of gravitational wave background existing in fabric of space.. 42:49 What is oscillating in a matter wave?.. 49:14 Why is the primary focus on reducing CO2 when there are other potent greenhouse gases like methane, nitrogen oxides? How are we addressing the e waste generated from solar technology?.. 56:50 Are there any non human living organism that exhibit suicidal tendencies or engage in self destructive behaviour leading to their own death? 1:02:40 How would the world change if OpenAI or google created AGI today, making them more powerful than governments? What would be the impact on industries, the economy, and society? 1:06:34 Does sir think we can see AI like Skynet which can be threat to us in few years from now as the advancements are very rapid? Dangers of AI.... 1:12:02 Why oceans deep inside are cold but as we deeper in land it becomes hot? 1:16:27 As sir said jet engine development is complicated to develop jet blades from single crystal, if we have rocket tech in isro, high temperature resistant materials are used in rockets, why can we use that in jet engine? 1:22:04 Hypothetically, if we put the entire universe into a large container, what would be outside the container?... 1:24:38 What is anti-gravity? Can it some how exist? 1:25:37 How space looks like, does it look exactly as images released by NASA or will it look different if we see a nebula with a naked eye 1:29:49 What does sir think about possibility of antimatter propulsion for future space travel, and what kind of restrictions does it currently face? 1:31:30 What are god particle and why are they so important to understand 1:33:47 Thoughts on Terrance howard 1:35:12 Someone asks sir to rate khan academy as an educational platform 1:35:36 Do we have any gravitational anomalies discovered on earth just like in movie interstellar? 1:36:40 Are we made of particles or waves 1:37:41 Can sir structure of photon 1:39:17 If light has no mass then how blackholes gravity affects it?? 1:39:59 Have sir watched big bang theory 1:40:15 Why space agencies pursuing a nuclear powered spacecraft? 1:40:55 Have sir figured out new types of battery tech? 1:41:59 Microplastics un avoidable? 1:42:52 How does gravity reacts when we reach absolute zero 1:43:36 Sir's thoughts on Vasuki indicus 1:44:30 Someone says Microplastics are everywhere, bottom of ocean, organs, .... 1:45:31 What is we could transfer our consciousness into an ai model? What makes us human, is it our consciousness or our body 1:48:13 Can humans ever see UV rays 1:48:42 Can neutron stars have habitable planets? 1:50:15 Conclusion- Thanks Everybody

Welcome to the 1st Ep of Season 3! What is the connection between the Universe, the Big Bang, and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)? Tony Rothman tried to explain it factually and efficiently in his book "A Little Book About The Big Bang" 's chapter 5. Jump in on a journey with me through this chapter to anticipate the release of the next episode where I will share my views on CMBR, the Big Bang, and how it is 'determining' the 'shape' of the Universe. Note: This episode will create the primary layer of understanding these hard terms and what goes around these to understand the next episode better where these won't be discussed any further. Credits to Mr. Rothman for writing such an amazing book.

The CMBR discovery was the reason Penzias and Wilson won the Nobel Prize. It truly was that year's greatest scientific discovery. And to think that Robert Dicke was actively looking for it at the same time as their accidental discovery is one of the greatest scientific twists of fate!I did another episode on the Big Bang. I'll link to it here:https://www.spreaker.com/episode/48420126Have a need to ask about this or discuss it further? Email me at astrostephenson11@gmail.comor Twitter me at @astrostephenson

Brian Keating is an observational cosmology whose work has focused on measuring a possible imprint on the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) that could have come from the earliest moments of the Big Bang, and could even give possible indirect evidence for a multiverse. Indeed, an experiment he worked, called BICEP 2, in 2014 announced a possible result which electrified the science community, and clearly would have resulted in at least one Nobel Prize, had it been verified by other experiments. Unfortunately it turned out that the observed signal was due to an unanticipated dust background in our Galaxy. Brian has written about this experience in a book. Brian has not given up the search however, and is spearheading a new major observatory, supported by the Simons Foundation, to push observations of the CMBR to continue to probe for primordial signatures of Inflation. In addition to his scientific work, Brian is engaged in a host of projects aimed at improving the public's understanding of science, including his own podcast, and also work he has done in San Diego to help excite kids about mathematics—running programs that I have been fortunate enough to be involved in. We discuss all of these activities as well as his own rather unique background in a refreshing discussion about the ups and downs of science, the importance of public understanding, and also the exciting possibilities for the future of cosmology. And we have the kind of give and take discussion between a theorist and experimentalist that may be useful for non-scientists to listen to. As always, an ad-free video version of this podcast is also available to paid Critical Mass subscribers. Your subscriptions support the non-profit Origins Project Foundation, which produces the podcast. The audio version is available free on the Critical Mass site and on all podcast sites, and the video version will also be available on the Origins Project Youtube channel as well. Get full access to Critical Mass at lawrencekrauss.substack.com/subscribe

Building on last week, Will Barlow continues to describe and analyze issues with the Big Bang Theory. He considers standard biblical and scientific objections brought forward by young earth creationists. After responding to these objections, he shows how each of the main Christian views of origins deals with the Big Bang. Listen to this episode on Spotify or Apple Podcasts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yonfcv5mf6I&feature=emb_imp_woyt The Big Bang In basic terms, what does the Big Bang theory say? • The Universe began approximately 13.7 billion years ago• Space and matter have been expanding and cooling since then What is the current state of the Big Bang? • We will never be able to travel back in time to observe the beginning• Physicists used high-energy collisions to test hypotheses related to the Big Bang• There is a physical restriction on understanding the first moment of the Big Bang Are there viable alternatives to the Big Bang? • Oscillating universe — Universes expand and contract until the right one pops out• Multiple Universes — Infinite number of Universes exist beyond our ability to observe them• Inflationary models• Hawking's theory YEC and the Big Bang How does YEC view the Big Bang? • In short, YEC reject several aspects of the Big Bang• YEC make both Scriptural and scientific arguments to defend their positionScriptural Objections What objections do YEC make about the Big Bang from Scripture?“The Bible tells us that God created heaven, earth, and everything within them in the span of six days (Exodus 20:11) and rested on the seventh day. This is the basis for our work week (Exodus 20:8). In contrast, the big bang model claims that the universe and earth formed over billions of years.” “Genesis tells us that God created the stars on the fourth day—three days after the earth was created. In contrast, the big bang model claims that stars existed billions of years before the earth.” “The Bible tells us that the earth was made from water (2 Peter 3:5; Genesis 1:2–9; Psalm 24:2), but the standard secular model teaches that the earth began as a molten planet which cooled over millions of years, and that the oceans were the result of asteroid or meteor impacts, or from dissolution of comets as they entered earth's atmosphere.” Scientific Objections What objections do YEC make about the Big Bang from science?Missing Monopoles: The Big Bang should have produced massive particles with only one charge (either positive or negative) Too Little Antimatter: The Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, but instead, slightly more matter than antimatter exists. No Population III Stars: The Big Bang should have produced only hydrogen, helium, and lithium. These theoretically combined to form the first stars, but we can't find any. No Evidence for Inflation: One problem with the cosmic microwave background radiation is that it appears to have reached an impossible thermal equilibrium. Inflation theories have been proposed to solve this but there's no evidence for rapid early inflation. Scientific Objections How do YEC explain the distant light reaching us? • Exponential decay of the speed of light• Used historical sources cataloguing the speed of light• Propose that light reached its final speed in 1960 Answering YEC Scriptural Objections Creation in six 24-hour days, not 13.7 billion years • Day-Age: Each day could be longer• Gap: 13.7 billion years between vs. 1 and 2• Walton: ANE people not interested in physical creation Creation of Earth before Sun • Day-Age: Perspective of Earth observer• Gap: Reconstitution of Sun on day 4, could be function/purpose oriented• Walton: Creation is function oriented Earth made from water • Day-Age: This is not meant to be a physical description• Gap: Reconstitution of Sun on day 4, could be function/purpose oriented• Walton: Fits ANE understanding of the world Missing monopoles and CMBR problems • Rapid early inflation would dilute the monopoles, making them harder for us to observe• This also solves the cosmic microwave background radiation problem Too little antimatter • This actually just refutes an atheistic Big Bang model• OEC believe that God's hand guided creation, so this result is what a OEC would expect to see No population III stars • Actually, scientists have found metal-light stars already (at the far edge of what we can observe) - one generation removed from population III• Just because we haven't observed something does not mean that it doesn't exist “Appearance of Age” and the Big Bang • The “Appearance of Age” YEC view will agree with the scientific evidence• They will say that God is testing us to choose between His Word and science• The Day-Age view will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• Schroeder's model actually uses the Big Bang and general relativity Gap Theory and the Big Bang • The Gap Theory view will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• No reason to argue against the scientific evidence when a long time could have elapsed between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 Non-Literal Views and the Big Bang • Collins will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• Walton's Temple view does not even think about modern cosmology, so he doesn't really care Choices • Attack the scientific evidence for the Big Bang and hold a YEC view• Accept the scientific evidence for the Big Bang and hold an OEC view• Attack or accept the scientific evidence and hold a non-literal view

This week the Naked Scientists have been in the City of Science - Trieste - to take part in their annual science festival and speak to some of the researchers pushing back the frontiers of knowledge in this beautiful part of northeastern Italy. Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

What happened before The Big Bang? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comic co-host Matt Kirshen answer questions about inflation theory, multiverses, the cosmic microwave background, and the possible end of the scientific method with cosmologist Brian KeatingNOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can watch or listen to this entire episode commercial-free here: https://startalkmedia.com/show/cosmic-queries-big-bang-bonanza-with-brian-keating/Thanks to our Patrons Jack McCarty, Mira Killian, David, Colleen OLeary, Kelia Hamilton, Lucas Charlston, Brad Z, Clueless Gamer, Billy, and larry hall for supporting us this week.Photo Credit: NASA/Goddard/WMAP Science Team, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

咱 ê 地球 毋是恬恬 chhāi tī 遐 ê。伊是踅 太陽 leh 行 ê。太陽是踅 銀河系 中心 leh 行 ê。銀河系是踅 本星系群 leh 行 ê。本星系群是落 tùi 室女座星系團 ê 方向去。毋閣 in leh 行 ê 速度，是比 規陣天體 相對 宇宙微波背景輻射 (CMBR) leh 行 ê 速度，閣較慢。這張是 COBE 宇宙背景探測衛星 tī 1993 年翕 ê 全天圖。微波光 tī 地球 ê 運動方向是 藍移，所以會較熱。毋閣伊 tī 天頂另外一个方向是 紅移，所以會較冷。這張 圖 暗示講，本星系群 用相對 原始輻射 一秒鐘 600 公里緊 ê 速度 leh 行。上開始根本 to̍h 無想到會看著 遮爾緊 ê 速度，而且到今嘛猶無法度解說是按怎會遮爾光。是按怎咱會行遮爾緊？到底是啥物物件 tī 遐 leh kā 咱影響？ ——— 這是 NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day ê 台語文 podcast 原文版：https://apod.nasa.gov/ 台文版：https://apod.tw/ 今仔日 ê 文章： https://apod.tw/daily/20220403/ 影像：DMR, COBE, NASA, Four-Year Sky Map 音樂：P!SCO - 鼎鼎 聲優：阿錕 翻譯：An-Li Tsai (NCU) 原文：https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap220403.html Powered by Firstory Hosting

On this ID the Future, physicist Brian Miller looks at various attempts to evade the mounting evidence that the universe had a beginning, a Big Bang. Miller and host Casey Luskin first review the fascinating history of how the eternal universe model of the nineteenth century gave way to the Big Bang model. Then Miller walks through about a half a dozen attempts to evade a cosmic beginning after the Big Bang model had won the day. These evasions include the steady state model, the idea of an eternal cyclical universe, and the string landscape model. According to this model, our universe exists in a multi-dimensional brane (not “brain”) which exists in a higher dimensional space, and our multi-dimensional brane Read More › Source

For thousands of years, humans have been trying to figure out the universe and determine its true extent. And there have been a lot of assumptions and theories. during the 1960s, astronomers became aware of microwave background radiation that was detectable in all directions. Known as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the existence of this radiation has helped to hone our understanding of how the Universe began. The cosmic microwave background (CMB, CMBR) is faint electromagnetic radiation that is a remnant from an early stage of the universe, filling all space. It represents the heat leftover from the Big Bang and radiation is most visible in the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum hence the name CMB.

Welcome back, Spherical Cow Moonions! This week we are discussing the surface of last scattering and cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). We will be talking about what CMBR is, how it was discovered and how measurements of CMBR agree with observations of our universe. To view our sources please see our website - https://www.podpage.com/spherical-cow/ N.B. This episode was recorded virtually so the audio quality might be different to normal.

Captain Monica Rambeau, an agent of S.W.O.R.D., returns to life following the Blip[b] to find her mother Maria has died of cancer. Three weeks later, Monica returns to work and is sent by Acting Director Tyler Hayward to help FBI agent Jimmy Woo with a missing persons case in Westview, New Jersey. They discover a hexagonal static CMBR field surrounding the town, which Monica is pulled into. Within 24 hours, S.W.O.R.D. establishes a base around the town and sends drones and an agent in to investigate. Dr. Darcy Lewis studies the phenomena and discovers broadcast signals for the sitcom WandaVision. They use these to observe events inside the town, learning that real residents have been "cast" in the sitcom and seeing Monica appear as "Geraldine". Darcy and Jimmy unsuccessfully attempt to use the radio to contact Wanda. When Monica mentions Ultron, Wanda casts her out of the town. Wanda then temporarily sees Vision appear as he did when he died, before settling back into her sitcom life with him.

Especial WandaVision: Episodio 4. Diana Su hace un repaso de todo lo que sucedió: easter eggs, teorías, referencias, preguntas y respuestas. Invitada especial: Vicky Reptile. Hablamos de Monica Rambeau, Jimmy Woo, Darcy Lewis, S.W.O.R.D., Tyler Hyward, CMBR, la inclusión de Los Cuatro Fantásticos y más.

Captain Monica Rambeau, an agent of S.W.O.R.D., returns to life following the Blip[a] to find her mother, Maria, has died of cancer three years prior. Three weeks later, Monica returns to work and is told by Acting Director Tyler Hayward that she will be referred to terrestrial missions only, as outlined by her mother before her death. She is subsequently sent to help FBI agent Jimmy Woo with a missing persons case in Westview, New Jersey. They speak to two police officers from Eastview, who insist that Westview does not exist, despite the town's presence behind them. Woo explains to Monica that he can not physically enter the town due to an unknown force. They discover a hexagonal static CMBR field surrounding the town, which Monica is pulled into. Within 24 hours, S.W.O.R.D. establishes a base around the town and send drones to investigate. Dr. Darcy Lewis, now studying astrophysics, is asked to study the phenomena and discovers broadcast signals for the sitcom WandaVision using vintage televisions. They use these to observe events inside the town, learning that the real residents have been "cast" as characters in the sitcom, and Monica has disguised herself as "Geraldine". Darcy and Woo unsuccessfully attempt to use the radio to contact Wanda Maximoff. Meanwhile, as Agent Franklin crawls through the sewer system into Westview, his containment suit transforms into beekeeper attire, and his tether detaches and turns into a jump rope. When Monica mentions Ultron, Wanda casts her out of the town. During this, Darcy and Woo discover that the broadcast is being censored. The sitcom illusion disappears, and Wanda sees that her husband Vision is actually a corpse. Horrified, she restores the illusion. Monica wakes up at the S.W.O.R.D. base and states that Wanda is controlling the illusion.

Brandish your acutest angles and prepare your panties to vorticitate because this week, for our ninth season premier we go in so hard and so deep that when you suddenly awaken every surface on your body will be bending and sliding through all points and places simultaneously subtended by angles incomprehensible to laypeople!On this extra nerdy episode we discuss:-The Platonic Solids-Is Time the 4th dimension?-Calabi Yau Manifolds-The Mobius Strip-WTF is time?-Why aliens are scary-Are rocks alive?-Explaining the 5th dimension-Edwin A. Abbot's “Flatland”-The Timaeus-The SimsOn this VERY extended episode we also discuss:-The Dimensionality of the 22 Hebrew Letters-Entropy-The Red Shift-The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation-Dark Energy and Dark Matter-Peter Carroll's “Apophenion”-Non-Big-Bang Cosmology-Explaining the Hypersphere Universe-The Participatory Universe of CHAOS!Sources:A Universe of 10 Dimensions:https://phys.org/news/2014-12-universe-dimensions.htmlPlatonic Solids:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr2sIoD7eeUFlatland: A Romance of many Dimensions:https://www.amazon.com/Flatland-Romance-Dimensions-Thrift-Editions/dp/048627263XApophenion by Peter Carroll:https://www.amazon.com/Apophenion-Chaos-Magick-Paradigm/dp/1869928652iTunes:https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-whole-rabbit/id1457163771Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/0AnJZhmPzaby04afmEWOAVInstagram:https://www.instagram.com/the_whole_rabbit_/Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/thewholerabbit)

The concept of the Big Bounce envisions the Big Bang as the beginning of a period of expansion that followed a period of contraction. We seek Big questions with Big answers. Keywords: Big Bang, Big Bounce, Cosmic Microwave Background, Lemaitre, Edwin Hubble**Free Science & Astronomy: https://www.facebook.com/freeastroscience***Patreon: If you ever feel like supporting my project: https://www.patreon.com/ScienceWeSpeakMusic: Yiruma- River flows in you

The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation is the earliest moment in the Universe that we can see with our telescopes, just a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang itself. What will it take for us to be able to fill in the missing gap? To see closer to the beginning of time itself?

551: Missing Epochs - Observing before the CMBR Astronomy Cast 551: Missing Epochs - Observing before the CMBR by Fraser Cain & Dr. Pamela Gay The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation is the earliest moment in the Universe that we can see with our telescopes, just a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang itself. What will it take for us to be able to fill in the missing gap? To see closer to the beginning of time itself?

The Big Bang Theory and Stephen Hawking News: Beloved Physicist Stephen Hawking passed away on March 14 at his home in Cambridge, England. He was 76. There is general relativity, which beautifully accounts for gravity and all of the things it dominates: orbiting planets, colliding galaxies, the dynamics of the expanding universe as a whole. That's big. Then there is quantum mechanics, which handles the other three forces—electromagnetism and the two nuclear forces. He meant to bridge these two and find a field of physics that can explain them both with the same laws He also did research on today’s topic, The Big Bang Theory, but let’s learn more about this Theory before we discuss his findings Born on 300-year anniversary of Galileo’s death Died on Einstein’s birthday Theory of Everything   Today’s Topic: The Big Bang Theory   The Big Bang Theory is currently the most widely agreed upon explanation about how the universe began. It says that at one point, all of the matter in our universe was smushed into one tiny subatomic particle, called a singularity. Something unknown caused the universe to explode or BANG and the universe inflated over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.     History   First, an explosion in space, then something like a hundredth of a billionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, it expanded. During this expansion, or inflation, the universe grew exponentially and doubled in size at least 90 times. This period was very brief, only about 10-35 seconds (that's 0.00000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds in "long-hand") but in that time it is thought that the Universe expanded by a factor of around 1060 (1 million million million million million million million million million million times!). From the Planck Mission website: "Imagine a golf ball, around 5cm in diameter with dimples around 4mm wide and 0.2mm deep. Most people would agree that a golf ball is quite bumpy. The golf ball can be thought of as the early Universe and the dimples are the tiny fluctuations in it. Now let's blow up the golf ball to the size of the Earth, an increase of around 250,000,000 times. Now we have a ball the size of the Earth, with dimples 1000km wide and 50km deep, making it much smoother than the actual Earth. Since the Universe expanded so quickly during Inflation, faster than the speed of light in fact, we can only see a tiny fraction. In fact the region we can see is, in our analogy, still only about the size of a golf ball, and is now much smoother that the golf ball was to start with." About 3 minutes after the Big Bang, the Universe was still at a temperature of aroung a billion degrees.  By this time, however, the matter which makes up the Universe was fixed: about 75% hydrogen and 25% quarter helium.  We still see this proportion today for the most part, though it has changed slightly over time as stars have burnt hydrogen and helium and made heavier elements. Around 400,000 years after the Big Bang, the Universe had cooled to around 3000 Kelvin, allowing atoms to form without being ripped apart by the intense radiation and allowing electrons and protons to combine, creating the first light of the universe The light in the Universe was then free the travel through space, and we see this light today as the Cosmic Microwave Background, or CMBR.  Over time, the Universe has expanded,causing the wavelengths of all the light in it to get stretched out. 400 thousand - 400 million years after the Big Bang is known as the Dark Ages Stars formed around 180 million years after First Galaxies by 1 billion yaers, colliding and creating huge ones 9 billion years after; our sun formed     Other theories   Steady State Universe Where matter is constantly being created Pretty sure its not true Eternal Inflation It inflated early on and is still inflating today Oscillating Universe Bing Bangs and Big Crunches, also known as the Cyclic model   Hawking suggests that before the Big Bang, there wasn’t nothing, that there was never nothing. Only that time was bent — "It was always reaching closer to nothing but didn't become nothing," Essentially, "there was never a Big Bang that produced something from nothing. It just seemed that way from mankind's point of perspective."   Subscribe Rate Review Social Media Patreon   Tagline  

This week, the discovery rocking the world of physics: gravitational waves! But what are they, and why are they set to change how we see the Universe in the future? Plus we take a look at the week's leading science breakthroughs, including a new way to see heart attacks before they happen, fighting superbugs with door knobs, and is there such a thing as being right- or left-brained? Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

This week, the discovery rocking the world of physics: gravitational waves! But what are they, and why are they set to change how we see the Universe in the future? Plus we take a look at the week's leading science breakthroughs, including a new way to see heart attacks before they happen, fighting superbugs with door knobs, and is there such a thing as being right- or left-brained? Like this podcast? Please help us by supporting the Naked Scientists

]] __begin__ [[ Welcome to SynTalk ]] 13.8 billion years in 150 seconds. All sound, no music. Hypnopompic. A little weird. Sometimes noisy. Bittersweet. Disorienting, & meekly harmonic. Incessant. Drone. Dawn. The Big Bang, after all. CMBR. 4.5 billion years ago. Earth. Earthquakes. Murmurs (of volcanoes). Pulsation. 3.5 billion years ago. & then life. Heart beat(s). Organic. Thud. Bird songs. Many many. Green grass & trees; swaying. Lawns. Bright sunshine. Oh, cars. Highways. Asphalt. That’s us. Human beings. Bird songs. People. Poised. Alone ]] ]] __end__ [[ The __begin__ soundtrack ‘back masked‘. Rewind in 150 seconds, & replay. Bird songs. Speeding cars. People. Mynahs. Less weird. May be. Hypnagogic, & drowsy. Life to non life. Crescendo. Inorganic. Infinite loop. Swirling whirlpool. Singularity. The Big Crunch ]]

]] __begin__ [[ Welcome to SynTalk ]] 13.8 billion years in 150 seconds. All sound, no music. Hypnopompic. A little weird. Sometimes noisy. Bittersweet. Disorienting, & meekly harmonic. Incessant. Drone. Dawn. The Big Bang, after all. CMBR. 4.5 billion years ago. Earth. Earthquakes. Murmurs (of volcanoes). Pulsation. 3.5 billion years ago. & then life. Heart beat(s). Organic. Thud. Bird songs. Many many. Green grass & trees; swaying. Lawns. Bright sunshine. Oh, cars. Highways. Asphalt. That’s us. Human beings. Bird songs. People. Poised. Alone ]] ]] __end__ [[ The __begin__ soundtrack ‘back masked‘. Rewind in 150 seconds, & replay. Bird songs. Speeding cars. People. Mynahs. Less weird. May be. Hypnagogic, & drowsy. Life to non life. Crescendo. Inorganic. Infinite loop. Swirling whirlpool. Singularity. The Big Crunch ]]

SynTalk thinks about Vacuum and asks why is there something rather than nothing? Is empty space really empty? Does vacuum exist in the natural universe or is it merely a theoretical abstract conception? Is absolute vacuum possible? The concepts are derived off / from Hindu thought (eternal recurrence), Bible (genesis, void), Aristotle, Newton, Einstein, Copenhagen interpretation, Sommerfeld (fine structure constant), Maxwell, Heidegger (PEQ), Casimir (pair production), Biermann (solar wind) and Parker (solar wind model), among others. We marvel at the beauty of nature via CMBR, pole wandering (did dinosaurs die because of this?), magnetic reconnection, cosmological constant, dark matter / energy, dipoles, plasma (a la fire?), and absolute zero. How virtual particles come into ‘being’. What is happening in upper atmosphere (~70,000 kms above earth)? What does an ‘agitated’ sun do to earth’s atmosphere? Whether the laws of causation break down with quantum mechanics and sub-micron distance scales. How do neutrinos / muons reach us via empty space? Has Quantum Field Theory (QFT) left us in a state of limbo, and do we need to reformulate our conception of God? How empty space is bubbling. How would a ride to the sun be? The SynTalkrs are: Prof. Sunil Mukhi (particle physics, IISER, Pune), Prof. Kuruvilla Pandikattu (philosophy & theology, Jnana-Deep Vidyapeeth (JDV), Pune), & Prof. R.V. Reddy (plasma physics, Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Navi Mumbai)