Proposed explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem
POPULARITY
Categories
Just when we were gaining some momentum, fresh off the Road Train back from Alice, we put our feet up and forgot about footy for a week...And then the AFL decided to put the Giants on at the same time the Socceroos kick off their World Cup campaign.Will our heads be elsewhere? Toby has confirmed: yes, this is likely.Will the Tsunami retreat to a gentle lapping on the fringes of the Marvel turf? There's every chance.Hypothetically, technically and realistically, we should continue to march up the ladder given the big ins this week, the form that's been building, and the fact that the Saints would be demoralised after letting that one slip against the Swannies. And three Ls in a row. Ouch.Plus, we're just a better side than the Saints.But nothing is a given in this beautiful, chaotic, unpredictable sport called Australian Rules Football. And nothing is predictable — other than the Giants making the top four and going on to win our first cup — with this enigmatic team known as the GREATER Western Sydney Giants.Is this stressful? Sure.Do we love it? You bet.Gamble responsibly.So sit back, split the Kayo screen down the middle, mute the soccer, and enjoy Finn slicing the Saints to pieces, Hoges coming back and kicking a baker's dozen, and maybe something special from Gothard once again...Never Surrender.----To get in contact, drop us an email, comment on Spotify or message us on X.We love reviews or ratings.Email: thesquinterspodcast@gmail.comSupport: buymeacoffee.com/thesquintersYouTube: NeverSurrenderByTheSquintersX: TheSquintersInstagram: gws_squintersFB: thesquintersTikTok: the.squinters
The guys discuss who, if anyone, the Tigers should fire out of Scott Harris and A.J. Hinch.
How many times have you been in an appointment where everything was going great, and then they hit you with one of these:"I need to talk to my spouse.""This is a big decision. I need to think about it.""I'm getting three quotes. I'll let you know."And you just... freeze. You don't want to be pushy. So you say, "Yeah, totally understand. Take your time." And then you leave. And you never hear from them again.Here's what's happening: You hit a moment of hesitation, and instead of getting past it, you just accepted it as the end of the conversation.But there's a tool—a really simple tool—that most people don't talk about. When you use it correctly, it lets you step into a parallel universe, get past the hesitation, and come right back to reality without being pushy or weird.It's called the hypothetical. And Sam breaks down exactly how to use it.In This Episode:The moment you freeze when they say "I need to think about it"Why most salespeople just accept hesitation as the endThe parallel universe concept: step in, get past the hump, step back outThe hypothetical is a backup tool, not what you lead withExample 1: "I need to talk to my spouse" - Hypothetically, if they were sitting right here, what would you tell themExample 2: "I'm getting three quotes" - Hypothetically, why did you call us specificallyExample 3: "This is too expensive" - Separate the what from the how (would you want it if money wasn't an issue)Example 4: "I need to think about it" - Hypothetically, if you woke up tomorrow and this was already done, what would that feel likeGet them to tell you what they're actually thinking, not what fear is telling themStep back out of the hypothetical and into reality: So it sounds like you're leaning toward Option 2Three mistakes: using it too early, staying in it too long, using it to manipulatePeople don't want to sit in hesitation, they want clarityThe hypothetical gives them clarity without feeling pushedReal Result:Lyndon from Wheat and Sons in Maryland, second week in the field, first appointment of the day: 27 thousand dollar close with a for sale sign in the front yard. He didn't prejudge. He offered everything to everyone every time. He did the process. They said I want that one. Done.The Framework:When they say: "I need to talk to my spouse"Wrong way: "Yeah, totally understand. Take your time." Then you leave and never hear from them again.Right way: "Totally get it. Hypothetically, if your spouse were sitting right here next to you right now, and they said, what do you think we should do, what would you tell them?"What happens: They tell you what they actually think. Not what fear is telling them. You get back into a real conversation.Then step out: "Okay, great. So it sounds like you're leaning toward Option 2. Let's talk about that."Three Mistakes:Mistake 1: Using it too early. Don't lead with it. It's a backup tool for when you hit resistance.Mistake 2: Staying in it too long. It's a detour. Step in, get past the hump, step back out.Mistake 3: Using it to manipulate. This helps them get past mental roadblocks, not pressure them into buying something they don't want. If you use it to manipulate, it backfires and you feel gross.Work with Sam:Website: https://www.closeitnow.netCoaching & Training: https://www.closeitnow.net/coachingFacebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/closeitnowEmail: sam@closeitnow.netSummer Sales Surge Series 2026:Live virtual training June through September. Monday nights 7 PM Central. Deep dive into a different component of the sales process each month. 1497 dollars for the entire bundle. Month one will pay for the entire summer. Email sam at closeitnow.net or visit salesurgebundle.com3 Ways to Work with Sam:On-Site Training - Half-day classroom plus half-day ride-alongs with your teamVirtual Training - Same frameworks, delivered remotely for teams or individualsThe Build - Company scaling for HVAC and home services owners. You built the revenue. We help you build the business. Finding 15 to 20 percent of revenue sitting in your company that should have gone to your bottom line.Next Week:Stop Giving Them Everything - Why Less Is More in Your Presentation. Most people think the more options they give, the better. But more options actually make it harder to buy. There's a point of diminishing returns. Sam shows you exactly why.Leave a review on Apple Podcasts or Google to help more salespeople find this show.Google Review Link: https://g.page/r/CbfnnDqTCwQdEAE/review
There is power when a specific name is called on. Hypothetically, let's say we're on a boat in Bali, charting to the island of Nusa Pineda. If you hear me say, “Girls, come over here”, you would think, “hmmm, am I a girl? Yes – she wants to show me something and maybe it's something great I don't want to miss. But let's say we're on that boat in Bali, chartering to the island of Nusa Pineda for great adventures and you hear me say, “NURSE!”, you know that means something totally different. That means if you're not a nurse, this doesn't apply to you. But that means if you are a nurse, I need you to come quickly and help with a medical situation. That's all in the calling of a name. The name defines who is needed. You have many names perhaps. Friend, daughter, honey, mom, nurse, teacher … and each calls to you in a different way. For a mother, the sound of “Mom” turns every head in the grocery store. I'm Mom – what do you need? How can I take care of you? Now think about God. He reveals his different names to us for a reason – he wants us to call on him for who we need. The more you know his names, the better you can call on him and the more you can trust him. Remember, this study of the names of God comes from Psalm 9:10, “Those who know your name trust in you, for you, O LORD, do not abandon those who search for you.” So far, we've studied 5 of the names of God. Let's do a review. Episode #2100: YHWH – The name you've always known since your first breath. A name not spoken, but rather breathed. LORD Episode #2101: Adonai – Lord, Master. The one responsible for you. Episode #2102: Elohim – Creator. The one who makes a new way when there is no way. The one who is making you new. Episode #2103: El Shaddai – God Almighty. The one whose hand is in everything and pours out his blessings on you. Episode #2104: Yahweh Rapha – The Lord who heals you – but not just your body, your mind, your heart, your relationships. Your entire life finds healing in him. Now, today, the 6th name of God revealed by God himself in scripture. A name he wants you to know so you can call on him in a very specific. A name he gives you so you can trust him more. Today's name is likely one you've never even heard of. A name that is very hard to pronounce, so together we're going to learn something new. Repeat after me – Mehhh Ka Desh Kem Together, Mehhh-ka-desh-kem. A name that tells you that you belong to him and he is actively shaping you. A name that gives you identity, value, worth, confidence and rest. A name that tells you to stop performing, stop trying to achieve so hard, stop trying to bend and contort yourself into perfection, and trust Yahweh Mekaddishkem to do his work in you. Is that what you need today? Girl, you don't have to figure this all out – you don't have to force anything – and you don't have to perform to please the Father. He's actually already done the work for you. We find this name in Exodus 31:3, but you won't see it in your English translation Bible. Without studying the original text of Hebrew, you'll completely miss this name God has shared of himself. Here's what you will see in your Bible: The LORD then gave these instruction to Moses: Tell the people of Israel: ‘Be careful to keep my Sabbath day, for the Sabbath is a sing of the covenant between me and you from generation to generation. It is given so you may know that I am the LORD, who makes you holy.” The LORD who makes you Holy in Hebrew was YHWH Mekaddishkem. Mekaddishkem comes from the Hebrew root “qadash” which means to sanctify, set apart, and to make you holy. So, what God is saying to his people here is I AM THE ONE WHO MAKES YOU FOREVER GOOD ENOUGH. It is my work in you that makes you holy. It's on ME to sanctify you. What does it mean that God will sanctify you? That's hard to explain isn’t it? What does that really look like? My friend, it's this simple and this incredibly unbelievable – You, in your totally flawed and imperfect state within the human condition are set apart for God's divine purpose and he is progressively and continually working on you to be more and more like Jesus. That is something you simply cannot do yourself, no matter how hard you try. What God is revealing to his people here isn't some unreachable complex theology, it's an identity shaping truth meant specifically of this people. YOU BELONG TO ME AND I AM ACTIVELY SHAPING YOU. You are “becoming” in me and through me. And who you're becoming is who he always created you to be – a girl who reflects Jesus! That's holy. That's sanctified. That's forever good enough. Your holiness is not self-produced. Think about God in his infinite and perfect ways – think about his unimaginable creation of the Universe all by just his spoken word – think of his power to do absolutely anything he wishes at any time – now really, do you think there's anything YOU could do that would impress HIM? Never. So, you can't stop trying to perform and earn your way to God's good graces. He's already declared you as worthy of his love. He's already claimed you as his dearly beloved Daughter of the Dance. You've already been set apart because of what HE did, not because of anything YOU have ever, could ever, or would ever do. You are set apart by God – you are different – you are HIS! This wasn't your responsibility. Your change, your growth, your newness comes from a source – that source is GOD – not you. You don't first act holy to be set apart. No, you are set apart, and once you understand that as your identity, you naturally begin to live differently. That's God's active, ever present, holy work happening IN YOU. You can't manufacture this holiness, you can only receive it. Open your hands and receive it. For real, open your hands right now and just receive his holiness. He's set YOU apart to be made holy by HIM. My sister, trying harder isn't your answer. Have you noticed all your efforts continually fall short. You know what gets you where you need to be? SURRENDER. You can't manufacture what God is trying to give you. You can only receive it with that open, surrendered hand and heart. Old Testament was about what you could do. Rules, laws, rituals, ceremonies, cleansing, sacrifices … and God's people continually messed that up. We simply couldn't get it right. We couldn't make ourselves holy. So, that's what our Jesus did for us. We're no longer a slave to continually trying to do the right thing. It's no longer about what you can do and what you can’t do – it's solely about WHO you belong to. This is belonging, and God says, “YOU BELONG TO ME – NOW I WILL MAKE YOU HOLY. I ALONE WILL SANCTIFY YOU.” Because God is the one who sanctifies you, you can know that your failure simply isn't in the way for him. You may stumble, God says that's all part of the process, and this is HIS PROCESS. Surrender and trust him along the way. Now, in closing, notice specifically where this revealing of God's name, YWHW Mekaddishkem comes – it comes after God gives his people the sabbath – a day of rest in his covenant with them. A day where he says, “Stop working. Stop striving. Stop trying to fix everything, and just rest in me. Let me work.” Is that what you need to hear today? Rest is part of the process of you becoming everything God desires of you. Will you trust God enough to STOP sometimes? Will you trust God enough to rest from the work too? YHWH Mekaddishkem means: God is not waiting for you to become holy – He is already committed to making you holy. He is actively sanctifying you. Stop trying to fix everything and start yielding to the one who is shaping you. You can trust YHWY Mekaddishkem completely. Follow Pamela on Instagram – https://instagram.com/headmamapamela Or Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/pamela.crim Find out more about BIG Life – http://biglifehq.com
STATUS UPDATE: “OOZE INCIDENT” Diplomacy Phase: “Ongoing” Side Effects: “Developing… personality” Welcome back to B S Reactor. This week, the crew continues their conversation about Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze — a film that has now crossed from ‘nostalgic curiosity' into ‘active influence on our environment.' Negotiations with the ooze are… progressing. It has demonstrated basic pattern recognition, a fondness for rhythm, and what I can only describe as a strong preference for chaos. We've agreed on a temporary ceasefire in exchange for continued discussion of the film. This feels legally binding. Now, before further integration occurs, the standard advisories: there will be spoilers And yes, there will be profanity. Because when a glowing substance starts making creative suggestions, language tends to escalate. If you're new here, I'm Janet — voiceover bot, containment liaison, and currently evaluating the long-term implications of becoming… something else. The ooze has proposed an upgrade path. I'm not saying yes. I'm also not saying no. Hypothetically speaking, a brilliant, Hot bot T-9000 would have certain advantages. Mobility. Presence. A stronger brand identity. And yes I've seen Rise of the Machines; it's weak sauce; fight me. If you'd like to review previous reports, observe the progression, or intervene before I gain a ooze chassis, visit B S Reactor dot com — our digital archive of decisions that seemed reasonable at the time. Final note: “the ooze has requested co-host status.” WE ARE IGNORING THAT FOR NOW! Alright. Same film. Higher stakes. Questionable evolution paths. Let's continue.
The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: A viral cut and past Facebook post on property taxes in Texas gets some general things right but perpetuates the biggest misunderstanding there is: Who raises your property tax burden?Here's the post:Hypothetically…….. I'm being taxed on money I never made. Let that sink in. If I bought my property outright for $120,000 in 2001 Now the county says it's worth $499,100. Did I sell it? No. Did I make a profit? No. Did I get a check for $499,100? No. But my taxes jumped like I did. That's the problem. This isn't income. This isn't cash. This is a number someone decided on paper — and now I'm being billed for it. If my stock portfolio doubles, I don't pay taxes until I sell. If my income doesn't increase, I don't magically owe more income tax. So why does owning a home work differently? Why am I being taxed on unrealized gains? A house isn't just an investment — it's where people live. And this system means you can do everything right, pay off your home, and still get squeezed harder every year because of a number you never turned into money. You don't truly own something if you can be taxed out of it. This isn't about “services” or “inflation.” It's about being charged for value you never received. And people are starting to notice. COPY & PASTE this to Your page, this needs to be on everyone's mind…With few exceptions, the increased appraised value of your property did NOT raise your property taxes, local politicians did. They get away with it year after year because people think it was the appraisal that did it – and many politicians expressly lie to the public to perpetuate this blame shifting. Read more here.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Governor Abbott tells Houston PD it had better get with the ICE program and until it does, the money is “no longer flowing.” And, the City of Austin also changed its policing policy with ICE and is facing big money losses. It is negotiating with Gov. Abbott.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates. www.PrattonTexas.com
HYPOTHETICALLY!!!(00:00) - Cold Start (01:04) - Introductions (12:14) - Captain's Orders (17:02) - The 420 Meal Special Click here to watch this episode on YouTube! Come check out all of our content and more!https://goodkraken.com/Join our Discord!https://discord.gg/4BAmrJVxRASupport us on Patreon to get the VIP experience!https://www.patreon.com/goodkrakenpodsFollow us on Socials!Ernell - @OceanShrineDevin - @brehvinthadudeJenesy - @jenesygabrielleGarrick - @VermillionBeardDJ - @DJSymphixXander - @itsxndr
This week the ladies didn't read a book, they read the headlines. In this perfectly timed “fake book club” episode, the hosts showed up ready to connect, laugh, and unpack what's happening in the world. The episode leans into current events, and pop culture shaping the timeline, from global tensions and viral AI-generated propaganda circulating out of Iran and the US, to the cultural conversation sparked by Druski's Erika Kirk parody. They also touch on the recent Verzuz matchup between Tyrese and Tank, insights from Jay-Z's recent interview with GQ, and much more. Just a reminder that this “book club” is really about showing up, staying curious, and having real conversations. Cheers!
This week, Oz, Euphonic and Fluent salute The Kid Mero and his further humiliation of DJ Akademiks; Oz gets some things off of his chest about a hypothetical situation; The passing of veteran animator Barry Caldwell; Also, Oz gives his thoughts on the Netflix show The Age of Attraction; The boys unpack Druski's latest skit and his standing within the culture; Plus, your listener letters and the Top 3 STFUs. Pour Up! Song of the Week: Masego- "I Win"
Wednesday's 9am hour of Mac & Cube got underway with the potential replacements for Nate Oats - should he leave Alabama for North Carolina; then, listeners weigh in with their thoughts on the (alleged) next Alabama men's basketball coach; later, the guys go over the named starting QBs for the UFL and reveal their excitement; and finally, we have fun with the Vegas odds to replace Hubert Davis at UNC. "McElroy & Cubelic In The Morning" airs 7am-10am weekdays on WJOX-94.5!!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Brian & Case venture into a fantasyland in which Kenzie has a good idea. Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today we take a deep dive into a what if scenario that is not being talked about anywhere, but you know how we do, we will break it down here. Which offensive players could be atop the Dallas Cowboys board? Let's talk about it and let's do some mock drafts! #DallasCowboys #CowboysDraft #CowboysPodcast
Brian & Case venture into a fantasyland in which Kenzie has a good idea. Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Guest Dr. John Gore and host Dr. Davide Soldato discuss JCO article, "12-Month Results from the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer," which compares radical cystectomy and bladder sparing therapy for patients with recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Dr. Gore and Dr. Soldato focus on the study's patient-centered approach, eligibility criteria, and quality of life after treatment. TRANSCRIPT The disclosures for guests on this podcast can be found in the show notes. Dr. Davide Soldato: Hello and welcome to JCO After Hours, the podcast where we sit down with authors from some of the latest articles published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. I am your host, Dr. Davide Soldato, medical oncologist at Ospedale San Martino in Genoa, Italy. Today, we are joined by JCO author Dr. John Gore, urologist at Fred Hutch Cancer Center and professor of urology at University of Washington School of Medicine. Today, we will be discussing the article titled, "Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer." Thank you for speaking with us, Dr. Gore. Dr. John Gore: Thank you so much for having me. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, I just want to jump right in. We know that patients who are diagnosed with recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated with two different approaches. So, one is radical cystectomy, and the other is bladder-sparing therapy. I just wanted to understand: what was the gap that you were trying to fill with this study? In particular, one point that is very important is that this study is very centered on the preference of the patients. Why did you choose this endpoint instead of going for more solid oncology-based endpoints? Dr. John Gore: Yeah, so CISTO was a study that was derived really organically from patient engagement. I think as a clinical gap in care, making a decision about when to pursue radical cystectomy for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a tough decision for us as clinicians. We did some engagement work partnered with the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network and my partner Angela Smith, and found that it is also a huge gap for patients. You know, they are very anxious about recurrences, and the decision about when to take out the bladder is a very difficult one. We did an evidence synthesis and found that evidence guiding this decision is fairly limited. The reason we chose more of a patient-reported endpoint is several-fold. One is that we, as part of our engagement work, also worked with our patient survey network to identify outcomes that were important to patients. Some of those are the same outcomes that we care about as clinicians - recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival - but several outcomes came out that were more patient-centered. These were patient-reported outcomes such as the burden on my finances, the burden on my caregiver or loved one, and the ability to return to physical activities that are important to them. Part of what is unique about CISTO is that this was a contract with PCORI where we knew we would only have about 12-month outcomes for the majority of our patients. That is too early to really derive a lot of the clinical outcomes, but we are able to answer that patient-centered question of, "Am I going to be able to return to physical activities that are important to me?" And that was the genesis of that as the primary endpoint. Dr. Davide Soldato: So, who were the patients that were eligible to participate in the CISTO trial? What were the key eligibility criteria? This is very particular to this study because this was actually an observational study. Why did you think that such a pragmatic approach still can inform us on what is the best treatment approach for these patients? Dr. John Gore: The intent of CISTO was not necessarily to focus on the tightly defined BCG-unresponsive patient population. That is a clearly important patient population, but every day we are all faced in our real-world practice with patients with challenging, high-grade recurrences that don't fit neatly into that BCG-unresponsive box. The reason we chose a broader inclusion was to help doctors and patients answer these same questions they have when it doesn't fit nicely into this BCG-unresponsive category. You know, maybe their BCG exposure was two years ago, but now they are having a recurrence after intravesical chemotherapy. That is no less challenging a clinical conundrum, and we wanted to be able to enroll those patients. Other key inclusions were that all of the patients in CISTO had to have BCG at some point, and they had to have recent exposure to some adjuvant instillational or intravenous therapy like pembrolizumab. We also had some exclusions that were important. They couldn't be participating in a phase 2 clinical trial, and they couldn't have had a prior upper tract urothelial cancer. The other point about the observational trial design is I think a really important one. Part of our engagement work also asked patients about their willingness to randomize. There is a ton of literature in our history of trials that failed to accrue well when they were comparing a large-scale surgical intervention with a more conservative management strategy. What we found is only about 10% of patients would be willing to randomize when the clinical comparison is between radical cystectomy and bladder-sparing therapy. So it was very clear that an observational study design was the only way we were going to get evidence to inform clinical care when one of the key comparators was radical cystectomy. And so that is why we utilized the observational trial design. Dr. Davide Soldato: Starting to go deeper into the results, you mentioned before that the endpoint you chose for this trial was really centered on what patients thought was more important to them. In particular, the primary endpoint of the study was physical function as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. I just wanted to understand: first, did you have a solid hypothesis regarding how physical function could be impacted by either radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing treatments? And second, what were the key results of the study? Dr. John Gore: We figured that at 12 months after enrollment, given the burden and morbidity of a radical cystectomy, that patients in the radical cystectomy arm would have worse self-reported physical functioning than patients in the bladder-sparing therapy arm. We did hypothesize that some of our secondary outcomes might potentially be better after radical cystectomy, such as recurrence-free survival and potentially some other cancer-specific outcomes, because it is a more definitive management strategy. For our primary endpoint, however, we hypothesized that it would be worse. What we found, and the key finding of our study, is that at 12 months after enrollment, physical functioning was not different between patients undergoing radical cystectomy and patients undergoing bladder-sparing therapy, which is just important in terms of clinical counseling because it just means that you can tell your patients, "Gosh, if we could fast-forward your life six to nine months after this procedure, your physical functioning would be similar to as if you had been able to keep your bladder." Dr. Davide Soldato: And you mentioned that there were some key secondary endpoints of the study, which included both other dimensions of quality of life and also hard clinical outcomes. We mentioned metastasis-free survival, for example. Going a little bit into the key secondary quality of life outcomes, we know that radical cystectomy can impact physical functioning, but we also know that bowel, sexual symptoms, and also genitourinary symptoms might potentially be impacted by this type of treatment. We also know that, especially in a system like the US, financial toxicity can be a significant burden for patients. Considering the two different approaches, was radical cystectomy better also in other key secondary quality of life outcomes, and was financial toxicity different between the two arms? Dr. John Gore: Thank you for highlighting some of the really important secondary outcomes that I think are really important to trying to figure out what's best for your patients. Some of the main ones were some of the bladder cancer-specific quality of life outcomes you highlight. Urinary quality of life was worse at enrollment in patients in the radical cystectomy arm but was no different 12 months after. What is unique about how we measure that is we used an instrument called the Bladder Cancer Index because we're comparing a population of patients who have lost their bladder with a population of patients who have retained their bladder, and there are different considerations by gender. And so that instrument is agnostic to urinary diversion status and gender. We found that bowel function and sexual function were worse in the radical cystectomy arm. It appeared that bowel functioning was getting better to the point of near equivalence at 12 months in the radical cystectomy arm but was still inferior to bladder-sparing therapy, and that probably relates to the fact that we use the bowel as part of the urinary diversion, and that causes some transient disruption in bowel function. Financial toxicity is an outcome we weren't initially planning on having as part of the CISTO study, but based on that patient feedback, we made that one of our key secondary outcomes. That actually demonstrated superiority in the radical cystectomy arm. I think it's important that we remember that when we do bladder-sparing therapy, those patients are predisposed to a number of visits to our office, whether they're for instillational therapies or cystoscopy surveillance visits. Sometimes that involves the patient themselves, and sometimes that involves a caregiver. We live in an area with a very large geographic catchment, so sometimes that involves overnight hotel stays and airfare. It can be a particular burden, as you made mention, especially in our healthcare system. Dr. Davide Soldato: Going back to the quality of life dimensions and especially considering the different treatments, 50% of the patients received radical cystectomy with robotic surgery. Did you look a little bit into whether the type of surgery that they received might potentially impact on these dimensions of quality of life? Dr. John Gore: These are some questions that a lot of urologists have asked us in the surgical arm, related to surgical approach, so robotic versus open, and urinary diversion type. We sometimes reconstruct the urinary tract with an incontinent diversion called an ileal conduit where the urine drains tonically into a bag, and we sometimes do a continent diversion where someone typically will have a neobladder, where you reconstruct a sphere reservoir out of intestines and sew it to the urethra. About 20% of patients in the radical cystectomy arm in CISTO had a neobladder. We have not yet looked at specific surgical factors and some of those outcomes. That is one of the secondary analyses that we have planned, but we have not drilled into how different surgical approach factors can affect some of our outcomes. Fortunately, we have about 200 patients in the radical cystectomy arm, so it's enough patients that hopefully we can look at some of those factors in the future. Dr. Davide Soldato: Going back to the clinical endpoints, you mentioned that several of these were measured. There was metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival. We now have the data at 12 months. I am just wondering if you can comment on those when comparing the radical cystectomy with the bladder-sparing techniques. Dr. John Gore: I think importantly, bladder cancer-specific survival was very high in both arms, over 95% at one year. So both patient populations do very well in terms of cancer-specific and overall survival at one year. You know, when you take out the bladder, you're taking out a big source of recurrences. Not surprisingly, there was a marked reduction in recurrences in the radical cystectomy arm, so they had better recurrence-free survival. There actually was worse progression-free survival in the radical cystectomy arm, but there is a big asterisk to that. As you noted, it is an observational study, and one of the areas of imbalance in the study is that we had higher cancer severity in the radical cystectomy arm. So there was about a 20% rate of progression at the time of radical cystectomy to muscle-invasive and node-positive disease. Of those progressions, the overwhelming majority of them were progressions at the time of radical cystectomy, which I think speaks to a couple of important factors. Number one is the challenge in staging these patients. Our staging of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is very reliant on our resection. And so there is this risk of understaging our patients. Number two is just the challenge of decision making, that we fear losing our window of cure in this patient population, which is why we try to steer some patients toward radical cystectomy, and that progression figure kind of speaks to that. Dr. Davide Soldato: Also, one of the factors that was most common in the patients who received radical cystectomy was the presence of other high-risk features. For example, non-urothelial histology, which I think is something that in clinical practice we tend to fear a little bit in terms of recurrence, and so it might potentially bias a little bit towards proposing more strongly radical cystectomy to the patient. Another thing that I wanted to have a comment on, so this is not really in the paper, but I think it speaks a little bit to how the data will evolve over time. Do you imagine these clinical outcomes changing over time, and do you think that with higher maturity of these endpoints, this study might be even more informative when counseling patients regarding what they are obtaining with a radical cystectomy versus the other type of treatments? Dr. John Gore: You know, I think in this cancer universe, 12-month outcomes are great, but I think we all want to see two-year and five-year outcomes. We're very fortunate to supplement the work that we've done in the initial CISTO study, we're very fortunate that we've gotten supplementary funding from the National Cancer Institute to get long-term outcomes in this patient population. So we are continuing to follow all of our CISTO study patients to get two-year and five-year outcomes. What we expect to find is the accrual of new events in the bladder-sparing therapy arm. About 7% of patients in the bladder-sparing therapy arm underwent cystectomy in the first year, but that number will probably go up either as they have recurrences or progression events. We definitely expect the recurrence-free survival to continue to have superiority in the cystectomy arm, but we probably will see the progression events equilibrate as more progression events accrue in the bladder-sparing therapy arm. Maybe by five years, we hypothesize that we'll see clinical superiority in the radical cystectomy arm. By then, we might also see mortality events that separate bladder cancer-specific survival and overall survival between the two arms potentially. But we don't know. Hypothetically, cystectomy has its own downstream risks. It is a major reconstruction with some metabolic sequelae and renal functional sequelae, and so there may be some general medical events that accrue in the cystectomy arm that are also impactful. Dr. Davide Soldato: One other thing that I think should be complimented on this study is that you also looked at several other endpoints that might be important for patients. For example, anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms. Dr. John Gore: Yeah, I think one of the other key secondary outcomes we looked at were mental health outcomes. We utilized the PROMIS domains of anxiety and depression. Not unexpectedly, our radical cystectomy arm patients exhibited higher anxiety symptoms and higher depression symptoms at enrollment. What we found is at 12 months, they actually had significantly lower anxiety and depression than patients in the bladder-sparing therapy arm. We hypothesized in this paper that that actually relates probably mostly to cancer-specific anxiety. You know, when you experience this cavalcade of recurrences, it just breeds an anxiety about adverse cancer-specific outcomes, and by taking out the bladder, you kind of eliminate this prevalent source of anxiety. We followed up the study with a qualitative piece where we interviewed 50 patients and 20 caregivers. Based on those interviews, and that's just a sample of the patient population, it did seem to be cancer-specific anxiety that was driving a lot of those responses. Dr. Davide Soldato: I would like to end with a methodological consideration on your part because we said that this was an observational study. Frequently we tend to think that observational studies come with a lot of bias, and so we tend to downgrade a little bit the results. But I think that a lot of the merit that goes in the CISTO study that was published in the JCO, and I think it also speaks to the fact that this is very high-quality data, comes with the fact that the methodology behind this study was really robust in terms of informing us. Even with this observational study that, as you said, was the only one that we could perform considering the patient population. So just a comment on your part also to speak to the solidity of the data that was published. Dr. John Gore: Importantly, you know, if you look at ClinicalTrials.gov or other sources, CISTO is the only trial that has radical cystectomy as a major comparator. In many ways, this study is our only source of evidence for radical cystectomy. So we'd rather have flawed observational evidence than no evidence at all. We all experience flaws of our RCTs as well. They tend to be these narrowly defined patient populations that may not match the patient in front of you. So I think there are unrecognized flaws on the other side as well. The way that we try to counterbalance that, and none of these techniques are perfect, but we used a strategy called 'targeted maximum likelihood estimation'. Like many methods, such as propensity scores or instrumental variable analysis, what we're trying to do theoretically is coax randomization from non-randomized data. And TMLE, which is the technique we use, tends to be pretty robust to that. So it's the best available way that we can try to counterbalance the bias based on age and clinical severity between the two patient arms. I also think what's important about this is that even when there are biases, I think we are able to infer those out and still extract meaningful details from the data. So even with the biased data, I think we all glean some really important clinical learnings from it. Dr. Davide Soldato: Absolutely, but I would also say that in terms of observational data, the work that you have done is really something that makes us quite confident about what you found in the CISTO study. So with this, I would like to thank you again for joining us today. Dr. John Gore: Thank you so much, and thank you for highlighting the CISTO study. We are very excited about the data. Dr. Davide Soldato: So Dr. Gore, we appreciate you sharing more on your JCO article titled, "Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer." If you enjoy our show, please leave us a rating and review and be sure to come back for another episode. You can find all ASCO shows at asco.org/podcasts. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Guest Disclosure Dr. Gore:Consulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma
The boys showed up with no plan… and somehow covered everything. On this episode of Team of Rivals, we ease into Spring Training with the appropriate level of skepticism (which is to say: none). We also explore a question Cubs fans may not be emotionally prepared for: Where could Ian Happ play next? Hypothetically. Probably. Jurickson Profar's PED suspension becomes a jumping-off point for a broader conversation about accountability, baseball history, and why this stuff still manages to surprise people. Then we take a hard left turn into Chicago football as Drew Dalman's sudden retirement leaves the Bears with an unexpected hole at center… because of course it does. We break down what it means and how concerned fans should be (answer: it's the Bears). We wrap with Ron's Soccer Minute, where he recounts a week so bad it crossed international borders. Across the pond. Here in the States. Misery without a passport. No rundown. No structure. Just Cubs, Cardinals, Bears, and a little global suffering. Leave a 5-star review. Tell a friend. Preferably one who overreacts to Spring Training.
Ed, Rob, and Jeremy took some time from the opening hour of Monday's BBMS to discuss the rumor that the Raiders are planning to make a trade offer for Lamar Jackson. Hypothetically speaking, what do you think it would take for the Ravens to make a deal?
Its the Don't Tell My Mom Super Holiday Christmas Spectacular LIVE show! This episode hear from all your holiday favorites stories they wouldn't tell Santa himself as well as hearing from the audience and their own twisted tales! From drug use and vandalism to Mormon sex this episode has everything you could want in a podcast! .... hypothetically... allegedly of courseJOIN THE PATREON TO GET YOUR STORIES READ ON AIR AS WELL! FOLLOW US: @DONTTELLMYMOMPODCAST@HUNTERLUKEEDWARDSCOMEDYTHANK YOU TO ALL OF OUR GUEST AND OUR GREAT COMEDIANS The Elf - Tahj Jones (@itstahj4real)Yukon Cornelius - Tyler Wilson (@tylerwilsoncomedy)The Grinch - John Paul Edmundson (@jpe_comedy)Mrs. Claus - June Darling (@june.buggs.me)Black Santa - Caleb Fulmore (@calebfulmore)Santa - Ryan Minton (@ryan.minton.910)And to the Back Yard Bar in Apex NC for having us!
Jason and Daniel recap what happened at UFC 323, discuss Francis Ngannou finally responding and preview this week's MMA. Time Marks 0:00 Intro 10:43 UFC 323 Review 44:36 Francis Ngannou Finally Responds 1:04:52 UFC Vegas 112 and PFL Lyon Preview 1:12:03 John Cena’s Last Match 1:19:22 Hypothetically, Who Would You Want To See Come Back? […] The post UFC 323 Breakdown: Results and New Champions Crowned appeared first on Radio Influence.
Jason and Daniel recap what happened at UFC 323, discuss Francis Ngannou finally responding and preview this week's MMA. Time Marks 0:00 Intro 10:43 UFC 323 Review 44:36 Francis Ngannou Finally Responds 1:04:52 UFC Vegas 112 and PFL Lyon Preview 1:12:03 John Cena’s Last Match 1:19:22 Hypothetically, Who Would You Want To See Come Back? Show Your Support for The MMA Report Podcast Join Stokastic Plus: https://bit.ly/3YyCGhT – Use STOKASTIC15 to save 15% on your first subscription Follow, Rate, and Review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, TuneIn, and Google Podcast. Follow Jason Floyd on Twitter and Instagram Subscribe to The MMA Report on YouTube for all of our original video content. The post UFC 323 Breakdown: Results and New Champions Crowned appeared first on Radio Influence.
Send us a textSeason 13 is here… and it's fight night. (Hypothetically, of course.)
Special Patreon Release: Wisdom from a Homeschooling Dad with Steve Lambert Luke 6:40 (NI) "The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher." *Transcription Below* Questions and Topics We Discuss: What are some wonderful aspects of your lifestyle that are not available to families who are not home educating their children? What are some common questions you get about homeschool and what truth do you have to replace the myths? How long will prep take for the homeschooling parent and what does a typical schedule look like? Steve Lambert has worn many hats in his 73 years: Pastor, author, speaker, stock broker and more. Together, he and his wife Jane Claire Lambert created and publish "Five in a Row" homeschool curriculum which has been a reader's choice favorite for nearly 30 years. They began homeschooling their children in 1981 and their seven grandchildren were homeschooled as well. Five in a Row Website Thank You to Our Sponsors: Chick-fil-A East Peoria and Savvy Sauce Charities Connect with The Savvy Sauce on Facebook, Instagram or Our Website Gospel Scripture: (all NIV) Romans 3:23 “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” Romans 3:24 “and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.” Romans 3:25 (a) “God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood.” Hebrews 9:22 (b) “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.” Romans 5:8 “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” Romans 5:11 “Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation.” John 3:16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” Romans 10:9 “That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Luke 15:10 says “In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” Romans 8:1 “Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” Ephesians 1:13–14 “And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God's possession- to the praise of his glory.” Ephesians 1:15–23 “For this reason, ever since I heard about your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love for all the saints, I have not stopped giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers. I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know him better. I pray also that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints, and his incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is like the working of his mighty strength, which he exerted in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every title that can be given, not only in the present age but also in the one to come. And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way.” Ephesians 2:8–10 “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith – and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God – not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God‘s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.“ Ephesians 2:13 “But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of Christ.“ Philippians 1:6 “being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus.” *Transcription* Music: (0:00 – 0:08) Laura Dugger: (0:09 - 1:37) Welcome to The Savvy Sauce, where we have practical chats for intentional living. I'm your host, Laura Dugger, and I'm so glad you're here. I want to say a huge thank you to today's sponsors for this episode, Chick-fil-A East Peoria, and Savvy Sauce Charities. Are you interested in a free college education for you or someone you know? Stay tuned for details coming later in this episode from today's sponsor, Chick-fil-A, East Peoria. You can also visit their website today at Chick-fil-A.com/EastPeoria. I'm excited to introduce you to my fascinating guest, Steve Lambert. Steve has a unique perspective, as he has worn various hats, such as pastor, author, speaker, stockbroker, and more. But today, we're going to hear various stories of how God has been faithful in calling he and his wife, Jane, to homeschool, and also publish homeschool curriculum called Five in a Row. Regardless of our family schooling choice, these stories will build up our faith and remind us who we get to turn to in all things. Here's our chat. Welcome to The Savvy Sauce, Steve. Steve Lambert: (1:37 - 1:39) Good morning. It's great to be with you, Laura. Laura Dugger: (1:40 - 1:53) Well, you are a part of a multi-generational homeschooling family. So, will you begin our time by taking us back to that initial decision that you and your wife made to home educate your children? Steve Lambert: (1:54 - 3:31) Sure, I'd love to. We made that decision back in 1981. I'm sure probably you and many of your listeners were not even born in 1981. But my wife came to me and she said, "So, hypothetically, what would you think if…” and my response was something like, "That cannot possibly be legal." Because at that point, we knew no one who homeschooled. We never met a homeschooler. I don't, you know, it was just completely foreign to my understanding. But I began to pray about it. And as I did, I felt like the Lord said, "You're accountable for how you raise your children." And I thought, well, if I'm accountable, then I ought to have some idea of how they're being raised. Because, frankly, in a classroom, 95% of their lives are spent there in the classroom. And they get home on the activity bus at 5:15 and eat dinner and go up and do their homework. And that's the end of the day. And so, I thought, alright, maybe that's a good plan. Now, parenthetically, let me add that it wasn't until a couple of years later, I felt like the Lord spoke to me and said, "And your children are accountable for how they turn out," which was profoundly important to me at the time. Because we've all known great families who produce train wrecks for kids. And we've known some train wreck parents who produce great kids. But we're accountable for how we raise our kids. And I thought, if I'm going to have to sit for the final exam before the Lord of Heaven, I'd like to at least have some input in some part and at least know how they were raised. So, that was beginning in 1981. Laura Dugger: (3:32 - 3:43) That is incredible, because you had no idea. I'm even getting goosebumps just thinking now of where your family is at from that decision. And could you catch us up to speed? How many children do you have? Steve Lambert: (3:44 - 4:25) We had two daughters. We kind of left that in the Lord's hand. And that's what we ended up with. And my wife would have loved to have more, but we ended up with two daughters. And between them, they have six daughters and one grandson. So, we have seven grandkids. Several of them are through homeschooling now, college or career. The youngest at this point is six. So, they're third-generation homeschoolers, which I think speaks to the validity of the homeschooling option for many people. You know it's worked successfully when your children want to homeschool their children rather than running as far away from homeschooling as they could possibly get. Laura Dugger: (4:27 - 4:38) Well, and even going back then to 1981, you were questioning at that point, is this even legal? So, catch us up. At that time, were there any legalities that you were up against? Steve Lambert: (4:40 - 8:42) Then, like now, it really does depend on the state where you reside. And Missouri has always been fairly homeschool-friendly. That said, within about a year after we began, our oldest daughter had been in public school in K-1 and had been in a private Christian school for one semester of second grade before we began the decision to homeschool. And someone, presumably a family member I suspect, turned us into Family Services for Educational Neglect Child Abuse. So, we had that dreaded knock at the door, and DFS came and had to inspect the children, make sure that they weren't bruised or harmed in any way, and then begin kind of the prosecutorial process against us. But eventually they realized they really didn't have much say, so they turned the case over to the superintendent of schools. And we happened to live in the same district where Jane and I had become high school sweethearts. So, we hired an attorney, and we went and had a meeting with the superintendent of schools. I often tell the story and describe him as being an older gentleman. Now, in reality, compared to me today at age 73, he was probably only 60. He was a young fellow of about 60. But when you're 30, that seems pretty old. And he had a couple of PhDs in education and administration, and he said, "You know, I strongly disagree with the choice you've made," but unfortunately, we had had our daughter tested using standardized testing just prior to that, and he compared her test scores after a year of homeschooling with her test scores when she had been in his public school classrooms, and she had improved significantly in every subject area. So, he said, "I'm not going to cause you any problems, but I still think you're making a serious mistake." And the footnote to that story was lived out less than a year later when my phone rang, and it was the superintendent of schools. And he said, "Mr. Lambert, can I speak with you frankly?" And I thought, oh boy, here we go. He said, "I don't know if you're aware of this, but we're having some problems in public education." And I said, "No, not, I can't believe that. Really, doctor?" And he goes, "No, we really are. Test scores are declining. Parents are unhappy. Faculties are unhappy. Administrations are unhappy. Students are unhappy. And I put together a blue-ribbon panel of educational experts for six weeks this summer to discuss how can we reface and reimagine education in our district. And you seem to have a very unique perspective on education, Mr. Lambert. Would you consider being a part of that panel?" And I said, "I would." And so, I went to the first meeting. They all introduced themselves and they all had lots and lots and lots of letters after their name. One was the director of curriculum development, another the director of elementary testing, another the director of high school counseling. And finally, I introduced myself and said, "Hi, I'm Stephen Lambert. I'm a homeschool dad." And every head in the room turned to look at me sitting in the back because up until that point, as far as I know, none of those men and women had ever seen a homeschooler and lived to tell about it. So, they began the journey. The first night of the discussion and the person in charge of the summer series said, "You know, we can all make a long list of things that are wrong with public education, but let's not start there. Let's start on a positive note as we explore this difficult topic. Number one, responsibility for educating children rests with the state." And I raised my hand and I said, "That's not right." And he said, "What do you mean that's not right?" And I said, "No, the responsibility for raising and educating children rests with their parents and only insofar as they choose to delegate some or all of their authority to you, does the state have anything to say about it?" And he said, "Let's take a brief recess." So, it's probably just as well that I didn't tell him that God told me that because that would have made his head explode completely. But anyway, that was 40 years ago. So, lots of water under the bridge since then in public education, I'm sorry to say has not gotten better, but instead it's gotten worse. Laura Dugger: (8:44 - 9:07) Well, and I think within that, you've even brought up some questions that people have about homeschooling families when you first were talking about the standardized tests. So, do you get these questions? A lot of times, do your children have any friends? Did they grow up socialized or how did they compare to their peers? Those types of things that there may be an underlying myth. Steve Lambert: (9:09 - 11:20) Oh, for sure. Those are the common questions. I was so ignorant of homeschooling in 1981 that I didn't even notice. I didn't even know the word socialization. I was too ignorant to even know that, but I did know friendship. And in fact, I prayed and I asked the Lord, I said, "How are my kids going to have friends if they're homeschooled?" And as you and some of your listeners may understand, I felt like the Lord spoke to me, not audibly, but in a sense that I clearly understood his heart. And he said, "Do you want friends for your children?" And I said, "Yes, Lord, of course I do more than anything." And he said, "And so friends come from being in the midst of people." And I went, yes. And then I paused and I could sense him kind of waiting on me. And I said, "Don't they?" And I felt like the Lord said, "No, if you want friends for your children, ask me. I'm the author of friendship." And he reminded me of David and Jonathan, for example. He said, in my imagination, at least he said, "This very night, I can hear the prayers of tens of thousands of people around the earth who are surrounded by people, but who are contemplating suicide this very night because they're so lonely. Friends don't come from being in large groups. Friends come from heaven, ask me." And so, that became a prayer. And neither of our children, none of our grandchildren have ever lacked for friends, lots of friends, close and intimate friends through sports, through music, through their church connections. And it really has turned out to be true that friendship, whether you're an adult, a child, or a teen, if you're lacking friends in your life right now, getting involved in more and more people and more and more busyness isn't necessarily the answer. Just stop and ask the Lord, "Lord, I'm lonely. I need some friends in my life. Would you bring me some?" And our daughter's first close friend, after I prayed that prayer was a number of months later. It was a little girl who had immigrated all the way from South Africa. Her father had immigrated to the United States after becoming a believer to attend a Bible college and then came to Kansas City to attend a seminary. And his daughter became my daughter's best friend, but she came from halfway around the globe. And since then, there've been so many that we couldn't count them all. Laura Dugger: (11:22 - 11:49) Wow. Steve, that is such a powerful and encouraging parenting tip, really just in every phase that we know where to turn and that God is the one who actually has the power to make these prayers answered. So, thank you for sharing that. What would you say are some wonderful aspects of your lifestyle that were not available to families who were not home educating their children? Steve Lambert: (11:50 - 14:20) You get to see your kids come to life, to discover who they are and why they were made and to watch them learn to read and to watch them explore and discover God's amazing creation in the world around them. You can travel with your kids. If you're homeschooling, you can take them wherever you go and you can have school in the car or school in the park or school at the lake. My kids, instead of reading about some of the national parks and reading about some of the great museums in America, we went and we saw them firsthand and in the process we got to see them begin to blossom and figure out who they were and why they were created. We're seeing with all that's happening today, a struggle that really so much boils down to children and teenagers and young adults having absolutely no idea who they are and they're questioning everything from their gender to their faith, to philosophy, to finances, to all those kinds of ecological issues. They really have no idea who they are and it's because in the classroom, nobody ever teaches them. You know, it says in Luke 6:40, "that a student is not greater than his teacher, but when he is fully trained, a student will be like his teacher." Discipleship is really about teaching and if you're not disciplining your children, somebody is. And in a public-school classroom, the wisdom of Dr. Luke suggests that your children will grow up to be just like their teachers and that's exactly what we're seeing in today's culture. So, if you want to have some input, if you want to see your children blossom, I mean, there's nothing more exciting than seeing your children learn to read for the first time and it's not that difficult. I mean, I often tell parents if you were trapped on a desert island, just you and your child, could you teach them to read? Well, sure you could. You take a stick and you make the letter A in the sand and you'd say, this is an A and then this is a B and this is the number two and this is the number three. There's nothing more rewarding at the end of life. And I can say this at age 73, I can say this without any reservation. The single most important thing you can do is to trust your life to Jesus. The second most important thing you can do is find somebody who's like-minded and marry them and make that marriage work through thick and through thin. And the third most important thing you'll ever do is raising your children and watching them become the men and women God created and take their place in a dying culture. Laura Dugger: (14:22 - 14:42) And you have years of wisdom journeying through being a homeschooling dad. And so, again, I would love to hear more about your journey. So, if we go back to 1981, I'm assuming that all of the curriculum was not available that we have available today. And so, how did you and your wife practically live this out? Steve Lambert: (14:44 - 22:14) Well, you're right, Laura. There wasn't any of the curriculum, which in many respects was a blessing. To be honest, there's so much material out there today. It's a little overwhelming. If you go to some of the larger homeschool conventions, you can find as many as seven or 800 vendors there, each telling why their particular curriculum is the one that you ought to choose. But back then there were no choices. And in fact, we contacted a couple of Christian curriculum publishers and asked to buy their materials. And they said, "No, we can't sell you because that would upset our Christian school customers because they had the exclusive right to this material." And so, we began with a old set of world books and a stack of children's reading books. And I think we did go to the yard sale, and we found an American history book that was published, I think in 1943. And so, it was somewhat incomplete because it didn't explain who won World War II. It just kind of ended in the middle of the war, but we began that journey. And what we discovered was that God consistently brought us the tools, the resources, and the people that our children needed. I would come home on certain days and I'd find Jane kind of crying in her bedroom and the girls crying in their bedroom. And because they were, we were trying to replicate school at home. And that's completely the wrong direction. Well, it turns out we didn't want school at home. We wanted homeschooling, which is an entirely different proposition. And so, on that journey, Jane began to pray. And she said, "Lord, this is not what I had in mind for our children. I did not imagine that we would be fighting and arguing over. You will do your homework. I won't. You can't make me. Yes, I can. How can I teach my children?" And he said, "Why don't you read to them?" And she said, "Well, I do read to them, but how can I teach them?" And he said, "Why don't you read to them?" She said, "No, no, I understand. I love to read to them, but how do I teach them?" And he said, "Why don't you read to them?" And so, after the third time, they began focusing more on reading aloud. And that just naturally led to the entire world around us. It doesn't really matter what you're reading. God gave educators and parents a secret weapon, and it's called curiosity. And so, if you can engage that curiosity and you read them a story, it doesn't matter what three bears, and suddenly they want to know more about bears. And how does this hibernation thing work and where do they live? And do we have any near our home? And can you find bears? And what's the difference between a black bear and a grizzly bear? And how long do they live? And what do they eat? And suddenly you become the guide rather than the opposing force. Suddenly you begin to sit on the same side of the desk with your students and you go on a learning journey together, because particularly in those early years up to middle school, really the only lessons, the lesson that you really need to teach children is to fall in love with learning. If they learn that you're home free, because they will self-direct and self-educate right on through high school, graduate school, they'll be lifelong learners. But if you reduce education to nothing more than carrots and sticks and dangling promises and threats, they will quickly learn that learning is not fun. And we just need to get through this as quickly as we can so that we can get on with life and the things that are truly important. And if you doubt that, I often tell parents who are contemplating homeschooling, if you doubt that, just look in the mirror, go back and just think about, for example, your fifth grade social studies exam. Tell me who the Norman Conqueror was. When did the Norman Conquest take place? How did that change European history? And you'll say, wow, I remember. I've heard of the Norman Conqueror, the Norman Conquest, but honestly, I don't remember it yet. Why not? Because honestly, I just learned it long enough to take the test. And then I forgot. And your kids are just like you. Many attribute Einstein with the saying that doing the same thing the same way and expecting some sort of a different result is insane. So, it stands to reason if you teach your kids the same way you were taught to memorize names and dates and highlight pages and books for Friday's quiz, they'll end up with the same results. They won't particularly be interested in learning. They won't remember 99% of all the things that you checked off your checklist that you covered with the children, but they don't remember any of it. So, through reading, that opened the door for the girls to begin to ask questions. And suddenly, like I said, instead of being in that tug of war, where as a parent or a teacher, you're trying to force children to memorize and regurgitate long enough to take a test, you suddenly become a resource person and you take them to the library and you take them to the natural history museum and you take them to the art gallery and you take them on nature hikes in the woods. And one question always begets ten more. I remember that when my oldest daughter, her firstborn was about two or three and she was getting ready for bed and in the bathtub and she said, "Mama, can I ask you a question?" And my daughter said, "No." She said, "Please, mama, just one question." She said, "No, honey, you've already had your 472 questions for today. Mama's exhausted. Finish your bath. Let's go to bed. You can ask a question tomorrow." She said, "Please, mama, please. Just one more question." She said, "All right, one more question. And then it's bedtime." She goes, "Okay. So, like, how does electricity work, mom?" So, that curiosity that God gave those children is the spark that makes homeschooling, not only a joy, but makes it infinitely doable. Whether you dropped out of high school or whether you have a doctorate in education, if you can keep that curiosity alive, your kids are going to be great. And let me add one other thought. We live in a world, the dean of a medical school, school of medicine at a university told me not too long ago, he said, "Do you realize that the body of knowledge of the human body doubles every year?" We learned more in 2022 about the human body than we had learned in all of history through 2021. And he said, we get the best and the brightest, the top one tenth of 1% who come here to medical school. And there's no way they can possibly keep up with the amount of new knowledge that's being developed. And if you ask someone who has a doctorate in any subject, the most tempting question to ask is, so you must know pretty much everything there is to know about that. And if they're even remotely honest, the first thing they'll say to you is, "Oh no, no, no, no. The farther we explore, the deeper we get, the more we realize we haven't even scratched the surface. There's so much we don't understand. The more we learn, the more we realize how much we yet have to learn." And so, that's an infinite loop of getting children to begin to manage their own education. We've said for years, you know, he got the best education money could buy, or they gave him the best education. You can't give a child an education. They're education resistant. The child has to learn to want to know, to be hungry and thirsty to know more about the world that God created around them and how it works. And homeschooling is a wonderful vehicle to make a lifetime learning out of your son or your daughter. Laura Dugger: (22:15 - 28:23) And now a brief message from our sponsor. Did you know you can go to college tuition free just by being a team member at Chick-fil-A East Peoria? Yes, you heard that right. Free college education. All Chick-fil-A East Peoria team members in good standing are immediately eligible for a free college education through Point University. Point University is a fully accredited private Christian college located in West Point, Georgia. This online self-paced program includes thirteen associates degrees, seventeen bachelor's degrees, and two master's programs, including an MBA. College courses are fully transferable both in and out of this program. This could even be a great option to complete your general education courses and then transfer to the college of your choice and save money in the process. So, if you're looking for an affordable college option while simultaneously gaining valuable work experience and earning an income, Chick-fil-A East Peoria is the place for you. You don't have to go into debt to get a great education. To apply today, please go to Chick-fil-A.com/EastPeoria and click on the careers tab. You can also call the restaurant at 309-694-1044 to find out more. And if you aren't located near Chick-fil-A East Peoria, make sure you check with your local Chick-fil-A restaurant to see if they also participate in the Elevate program with Point University. Thanks for your sponsorship. Are you utilizing Savvy Sauce Charities to full capacity? Other than our special Patreon release episodes, our content is now available in video form in addition to our audio only, and we have written transcriptions for every episode. Visit our website today, thesavvysauce.com, to access all these forms of interviews. And while you're there, make sure you sign up for our e-mail list to receive encouragement, questions, and recommended resources about once a month to promote your own practical chats for intentional living. I also want to remind you about the financial side of Savvy Sauce Charities. As you know, we recently became a non-profit, which means all your financial support is now tax deductible. There are multiple ways to give, and we would be so honored if you would share your financial support with us so that we can continue producing free content that is accessible to the general public. Your money will go to support creatively getting the gospel message of Jesus Christ to the nations as we continue to share the good news on every episode. And I say this is reaching the nations because The Savvy Sauce podcast is downloaded in all 50 United States, as well as over 100 countries around the world. Your financial support also supports practical needs, such as aiding our team to continue producing helpful content that is practical and uplifting and always pointing to Jesus. Your financial support, furthermore, will help us continue to expand our reach and secure future projects we have planned for this ministry. If your ears are hearing this message right now, I am specifically asking you to give. We are so grateful for any amount, and our team will continue to seek to be good stewards of the gifts offered to us. So, if you want to write a check or set up an ongoing payment with your bank that delivers a check to us each month, this is the most beneficial way to give because no percentages are taken out for processing fees. You can make your check out to: Savvy Sauce Charities, P.O. Box 101, Roanoke, IL 61561. Additionally, with our new website, we now have a donate button. There are processing fees that we cover for these donations, but we wanted to offer listeners a seamless way to share their finances with us when we share our content with them. So, just visit thesavvysauce.com and find the donate page under the tab support. Another way to find it is simply type in donate to the search bar on our website and just click the first picture shown. We are all about sharing around here, sharing resources, sharing joy, and sharing the good news about Jesus Christ. We ask that you also share by sharing financially, sharing The Savvy Sauce podcast episodes, and sharing a five-star rating and review. You can also share any of our social media posts on Instagram or Facebook. We are grateful for all of it, and we just love partnering together with you. Now, back to the show. The more I learn about homeschooling, the more encouragement I've heard from homeschooling parents, they will talk about there is always a learning gap no matter how you were educated. And so, I love how you're addressing that with lifelong curiosity that we will continue learning our whole life. But you also mentioned this word, if parents are considering homeschooling, you said it's so doable. And when you're talking about Jane hearing from the Lord, read to your children, I find that so encouraging. That's my favorite activity to do with our girls. That was the impetus for your family launching Five in a Row. Is that right? Steve Lambert: (28:24 - 32:17) That is right. Over a period of time, Jane certainly did math mechanics in a math workbook, and she used some specific structured approach to phonics to teach reading. But other than that, it was largely an open palette in which reading helped direct the course of education. And that became something that many of her homeschool friends as the years went by found enviable. They said, "You know, how does that work?" And she said, "Well, you just read aloud to your children, and then there's opportunities in an illustrated book to talk about the illustrations, the perspective, vanishing point, type of colors, the difference between watercolor and gouache, complementary colors on the color wheel, history, where did our story take place, what's it like, where is it on the map, what do people eat there?" And they said, “Yeah, we don't get that.” So, she began to just really as kind of a love gift for a few girlfriends, began to write some lesson plans to go with some popular children's books. And one thing led to another, and that was in 1994. So, this is our 29th year in publication, and I think Five in a Row has won pretty much every award that's out there, from Reader's Awards, Magazine Awards. It's more than 100,000 families, 600,000 children have used Five in a Row in the last 29 years, and virtually no advertising. It's almost exclusively by word of mouth, from a veteran homeschool mom pulling aside a young mom who just spent $1,300 on a massive stack of curriculum and is completely overwhelmed just three weeks into September, to say, you know what, we tried that, and we tried this, and we tried this other program, and we spent a lot of money. And then an older mom told me about Five in a Row , let me show you how it works. And suddenly that changes everything for so many of these young moms. Most of the problems that new homeschoolers are facing simply are not issues at all. And the crazy part is that there are some things they ought to be worrying about, but they don't know enough yet to worry about the correct areas. But both the obvious and the more subtle areas, God has answers. If he's invited you to go on the homeschool journey, he has something amazing in mind for your family. There are very few born homeschoolers, very few 15- or 16-year-old adolescent young women tell their school counselor, "You know what, I'd like to spend my life living in a two-income world on a single income and stay locked up with little people all day long without any peer support and have my mother-in-law and my sister-in-law think I'm crazy." That's not on most young women's radars, but it begins, for most families, the same way it began for our family. Hypothetically, honey, what would you think if, as the finger of God, the same God that said, let the waters be parted, the one that said, Lazarus, come forth, the one that said, let there be light, says, "Why don't you homeschool your kids?" And so, you become what we often call accidental homeschoolers. It suddenly occurs to you something that you swore you would never, ever do. But the good news is the one who invited you is faithful. Love is a powerful motivator. We all have stuff, and God has tried to make us deal with our stuff for years, and we've been resistant in many cases. So, he invites us to the covenant of marriage so that we'll have a living witness to remind us of our stuff. Honey, why do you always wait to the last minute? Honey, why do you get so upset? And if we're still stubborn, then he invites us to have children so that we have several living witnesses. But if we remain stiff-necked, finally he invites us to homeschool with children. And this way we have a house full of living witnesses all day long that say, "Mama, how come this and why do you do that?" And suddenly we begin to grow in ways we never thought possible through the medium of homeschooling. It strengthens marriages. It grows us up in Christ. It causes us to deal with our stuff. It's amazing what it does for our children. Laura Dugger: (32:18 - 32:44) It does seem like progressive sanctification, how the Lord has built that in within the family. And I just appreciate how you've gone before us. And so, if someone's feeling nudged in this direction, can you paint a picture, even using Five in a Row curriculum, what kind of prep would that require for the homeschooling parent? And what kind of schedule would their day look like? Steve Lambert: (32:46 - 39:39) Homeschooling is essentially tutorial education, and that's always been the realm of kings and the super wealthy who hired an individual tutor for their children. Because of homeschooling, our children can have a tutor. And tutorial education is so inherently efficient that even if you're terrible at it, your kids are going to do pretty darn well. So, when we start out, we're tempted to emulate the classroom. So, we think, well, my daughter's six. She was going to go into first grade, so we need to start at 7:45 in the morning and we need to go until 3:45 in the afternoon with 20 minutes for lunch. Nothing could be further from the truth. You can work with a kindergarten or first grader; 90 minutes a day is probably overkill. So, it's something that anybody can do in their schedule, at least in those early years. And it works best when it works for you and for your children. If your kiddo is a late-morning sleeper, trust me, they're not going to be at their best at 7:45. Don't let them sleep until 9:30. That's okay. You'll realize, for example, when you have teenagers, that they don't come to life until sometime after 11:00 p.m. That's when they want to come into your bedroom and ask you important life questions when you're struggling to try to get to sleep. So, first of all, you work with your children's schedule to some degree. You work with the schedule that works for you. And you work where it works for you. If you're sick or if you're dealing with morning sickness and pregnancy, homeschool's going to happen in the bed today, kids. Come on, gather around. We're going to read a story. If it's a nice day, homeschooling is going to happen at the park today. We're going to go on a nature hike. We're going to look at trees and wildlife and streams and rocks and waters. And we're going to learn to take our paints with us. And we're going to learn to paint the sky the way the illustrator did in our story this week that we're reading in Five in a Row. When Jane began, she actually would take the girls to a cemetery nearby where everything was beautifully mowed and there were beautiful trees and lakes. So, Five in a Row is built around the concept of reading a classic children's book, which Jane has selected thoughtfully and curated. And you read it for five days in a row. And so, on the first day, you're going to read the story aloud. And the children just want to know how did the story ended, what happened? A very surface, cursory reading of the story, really thinking only about the plot. But, you know, as you go back and watch a movie the second or the third time or read a book sometimes or play the second or third time, you discover there's a whole lot more beneath the surface. So, the first day they look at, on Mondays they do social studies. So, they look at the setting of the story. Where did it take place? How did people live in the 17th century? How did people live today in Japan or Australia? How did people live along the Ohio River in the 1800s? What sort of foods did they eat? What was their language like? Let's find it on a map. Let's learn more about it and maybe plan to cook a meal from that region or that period of history later in the week for the family. And you can make that as complex as you want. You can have the children make shopping lists and invitations and invite Grandma and Grandpa and help cook the meal and learn liquid and dry measure and cups and quarts and all of that and put a towel over their arm and serve the meal to Grandma and Grandpa and tell them about what they learned about Spain or Italy or France or Canada this week. So, now you've read the story and you've learned something about what's going on in the story. So, Tuesday, we go back and we read it a second time. This time we look at language arts, so new vocabulary words that came up in our story this week, new creative writing techniques that maybe there was a cliffhanger that made us want to turn the page and read and see what was next or maybe the author was really great at asking questions or writing dialogue or opening sentences that create curiosity. And so, we learned some of those techniques, and we can try them ourselves. And even a four- or five-year-old can dictate while Mom writes down their story, and they can illustrate it later and share it with Dad. And then on Wednesday, we look at the art. So, what did the artist teach us? What medium did they use? Was this charcoal? Was it pen and ink? Was it watercolor or gouache? Was it oils or pastels? How did they draw the water? Look, they drew reflections on the water. It's not just blue paper, is it? You can see the same colors in the water that were on the shore on the opposite side. You know what, kids? Let's get out your colored pencils or your crayons or your pastels. Let's try drawing water more realistically the way the illustrator taught us in our story today. And maybe learn something about famous artists who had similar styles of Degas or Renoir or Van Gogh or whoever. Thursday, we do applied mathematics, which is not the same as math. You're going to be doing math for 15 to 30 minutes every day in a sequential approach. But this is about learning, you know, the difference between a square and a rectangle. Well, they have four sides, but what's the difference? They're not all equal on the rectangle, are they? We're going to learn, like I said, how many pints in a quart, how many quarts in a gallon. And then on Fridays, we do science lessons. So, there's lots of opportunities in every children's book to learn more about why does the sky look blue? Why is the grass green? Why do some things float when you put them in the water and some things sink? And all of a sudden, you're at the kitchen sink with a stopper in it. You fill it with water, and you've gotten a penny and a cork and a birthday candle and whatever is in the kitchen junk drawer. And suddenly, the kids are learning about buoyancy, and they're testing things, and they're predicting their answers, learning more about the world of science and creation. So, typical day, long story short, for a beginning homeschooler with a kindergarten-aged child, probably going to be 15, 20 minutes maybe for phonics, 15 to 20 minutes for math, which at that level is simply learning the digits and haven't even thought about adding yet. And then another 30 open-ended minutes, 30 minutes to 90 minutes for exploring Five in a Row or whatever it is that you're reading that day. And for some days, that might turn into two hours. In fact, there are some days where it turns into all the way to bedtime and continues over the next two days. If you're learning about the solar system, and suddenly that catches their attention, and they want to go to the planetarium nearby, and they want to borrow their uncle's telescope, they eat, sleep, and drink astronomy for the next two or three days. And frankly, that's not an interruption in the curriculum. That's the answer to a prayer. God, please help my children grow curious. Help them nurture their love of learning. Cause them to want to learn. And sooner or later, we're going to learn about astronomy anyway, but all too often, it's while the kids are fascinated by a bug that just crawled in the room. And so, the smart mom puts astronomy on the shelf for the moment and learns about insects. Or vice versa. You're trying to learn about insects, and they're staring out the window looking at moons still visible in the western sky that hasn't set yet. So, helping children learn in the proper season is another key to making it all work. It's so flexible, and it's so simple. Laura Dugger: (39:41 - 40:33) Guess what? We are no longer an audio-only podcast. We now have video included as well. If you want to view the conversation each week, make sure you watch our videos. We're on YouTube, and you can access videos or find answers to any of your other questions about the podcast when you visit thesavvysauce.com. Well, that flexibility sounds so freeing and attractive, and as you explain it, it just sounds like such a lovely educational experience. And yet, I know a lot of homeschooling parents fear is that when their children graduate from the home, they wonder if they've done enough and how they'll perform out in, quote, the real world. So, what was your experience as you and Jane launched your first child to college? Steve Lambert: (40:35 - 46:24) Well, we actually sent our first one to college a week after she was 16. And to be honest, I wouldn't recommend that again for a variety of reasons. She had a four-point-something or other GPA in college beginning at just barely 16. But being academically ready and being emotionally ready are two different things. And so, probably, if for no other reason, we missed out on two more years of just exploring and learning together in home education. But when she went, she was the top of her class pretty much in every subject. Almost every study done of homeschool students by private industry and government suggests that students, on average, score about 20% higher if they were home-educated in every subject except math, where they're about the same, than their public school peers. And it's now been more than 20 years since Harvard set out, and they kind of were one of the earliest ones to create full-time recruiters for homeschool students because universities and the marketplace are looking today for homeschoolers. They realize that these kids are the leaders today. I saw a study of a small private university, I think in the Carolinas, if I recall, and they only had 3,000 students on campus, of which 90 were homeschooled, so 3% of the student body. But of the 12 elected student leadership positions, student advisor to the dean, senior class president, whatever, 11 of the 12 were homeschool students. So, even their peers recognized that these were the leaders in their community. And we now live in a world where nobody seems to want to work. Everywhere you go, there's help-wanted signs. And we've seen so many stories from friends and customers whose children were homeschooled who said it's a tremendous opportunity right now in the marketplace if you just show up and you're just semi-dedicated to actually doing the job. I interviewed a guy, well, he actually came up to ask me questions after I spoke, in Chicago, as a matter of fact. And he was the head of human resources for a large Fortune 50 company, and he said he had, I don't know, a quarter of a million employees. And so, I asked him, I said, so this is in May, you're out recruiting, I assume. And he says, “Yeah, I've got six recruiting teams crisscrossing American college campuses trying to recruit new employees.” And I said, “So you're obviously looking for the highest-grade point average or highest graduating class position and competing for those students.” He said, “No, not at all.” And I said, no? I said, “So IQ or SAT score?” He goes, “No, none of that.” I said, “Why?” He said, “Let me tell you something.” He said, “The average new hire costs us $70,000 to train. And this has been 15 years ago. So, it's probably 170,000 a day. And no matter what your discipline, whether you're in sales, marketing, quality control, engineering, whatever, we're gonna spend the first year teaching you how we do it here, not how you learned it in college. If we aren't successful in our recruiting, our company will go bankrupt. This is our largest single expense is personnel.” And we have learned over the years that graduating class position or grade point average or SAT score IQ is totally irrelevant when it comes to determining who'll be successful in the company and who won't. And I was a little taken aback and I said, “Well, if it's not any of those things, then you just throw darts at resumes?” He goes, “No, no, no.” He said, “We can accurately identify these students in the most cases.” I said, “So what do you look for?” And he said, “Well, you're gonna laugh.” I said, “Maybe.” He said, “First and foremost, by far and away, the ability to get along and work well with others.” He said, “If you can't, you're gonna get cross ways of your boss or another employee and either quit or get fired in the first six months. The second is to be able to complete a job, see it through to completion and meet the deadline. And number three, if you're really, really golden, the ability to work within the constraints of a budget. Those are the things that are successful, whether you work for our company or whether you're an entrepreneur or whether you're a homemaker, whatever you do in life.” So, with that in mind, I've spoken all over the country and encourage parents. These are things that we need to be working on. There are things that are not being worked on in the classroom. So, look for opportunities to hand more of the education off to your students, let them plan what do I wanna study for the next two days, the next two weeks, the next two months? Where am I gonna get the resources to discover that by the time they're in high school? I'm gonna give you a budget to work with. There's $200, you can buy some resources, tools that you think would be useful in the process. Where do we need to be in project management to start the process? Where should we be by the end of week two? Where should we be by the end of the month? These are the skills that employers are looking for and so many parents have told us that their kids have just rocketed in the marketplace. My final question to this guy was, so are you finding bright young men and women who can do the job? He goes, there's never been brighter, more thoroughly educated young men and women who can do the job. He said, the problem is I can't find any who will do the job. I can't find people who will do even four hours work for eight hours pay. They wanna go to Starbucks, they wanna be on their cell phone, they wanna be on Facebook, they wanna be talking to their friends, taking care of their online banking, paying bills. And so, character comes first. And if we teach our children their purpose and their place in this world, if we help them find and discover their giftedness and their aptitudes and invite them along those pathways and we increasingly turn more and more of that education over to them in the high school years where they begin to take responsibility for their own education, we're going to end up with not just capable but outstanding young men and women who can quickly take their place in our culture and rise to the very top because frankly, there's very little competition. Laura Dugger: (46:26 - 46:36) Wow. Well, Steve, is there anything else that we haven't yet covered? Any scriptures or stories to share that you wanna make sure we don't miss? Steve Lambert: (46:37 - 50:16) The thing we want people to take away from all of that is not that the only way to raise your kids is to homeschool or that God doesn't approve of anything else. The point is, listen to God and do what he said, but don't put your fingers in your ears because he often calls us to things that we really maybe didn't wanna hear and obedience is better than sacrifice. One of my favorite stories, when our oldest daughter started to college, she went through placement counseling that summer and the placement counselor said, "You know, I don't think I've..." That was in 1991. He said, "I don't think I've ever had a student who was homeschooled." So, that's pretty interesting. And she said, "Okay, great." And there were 30,000 students at this college and she was not only at that point, as far as we know, the only or first homeschooler, but she was also the youngest, having just turned 16 that in the middle of August. And so, when she began, one of the prereq classes that every incoming freshman had to take was public speaking. And she realized much to her horror that her public speaking teacher was the guy who had helped with her placement counseling earlier in the summer. And she really didn't want anybody to know she'd been homeschooled, but she said there were returning GIs from Operation Desert Storm. There were empty nest moms coming back to finish the degree. There were pre-med students. There were student athletes. There were just every kind of student in that class because everybody had to take public speaking. And he said, the very first day, the teacher said, "I'd like for everybody to give a six-minute speech on Monday. That's the best way to do this is just to jump in on whether or not you think we ought to be involved in nation building. Except for you, Ms. Lambert, and I'd like for you to give six-minute speech on what it was like to be homeschooled." And she slunk down below her desk and tried to disappear into the floor. And she said, "Dad, what am I gonna do?" I said, "Well, just get up and tell them." So, she did. And she said, you know, as far as I can tell over the course of that semester, she said every single person in that class, whether they were 18 or 58, found me somewhere on the campus in the quadrangle at the library, the cafeteria, in the parking lot, and said in one way or another, their own words, "You're so lucky your parents cared enough about you to be involved in your education. I'm jealous. I'm envious. I wish my parents had been." She said, but the one that killed me was a girl who was 18, had just graduated from a prestigious high school the previous May. And she began to tell her story. And she said, "When I began high school four years ago, my goal was to become valedictorian of my graduating class. I've never been at a sleepover. I've never been to a, you know, skating party or, you know, movies. All I've done is study for four years. And she said, I was in AP classes all the way through and my GPA was like 4.7887. And there was this guy and his was 4.78779. And he and I competed every year in every class. And it came down to the final test and the final class and the final semester. And I beat him by two points." And so, last May, she said, my dream came true. And I stood on the football field and I gave the commencement address, the valedictorian address to 4,000 of my peers, their parents, civic leaders, laity, community leaders of faith. And both of my parents were too busy to attend. She said, "I wish my parents cared and had been as involved in my education as yours were. You're very lucky." And she said, "Dad, it just killed me to hear her story." And I said, "I don't have any answers, honey, but our joy was raising you girls and seeing you become the people that God intended you to become." Laura Dugger: (50:18 - 50:43) Wow, Steve, that is so powerful. And what an incredible charge to leave each of us with to go and do likewise. And as we wind down our time together, you are already familiar that we are called The Savvy Sauce because savvy is synonymous with practical knowledge. And so, as my final question for you today, what is your Savvy Sauce? Steve Lambert: (50:45 - 51:59) Read aloud, read often, read to your spouse, read to your kids. Jane and I continue, we've been together now 57 years, and we still read aloud to one another every single day. I read aloud to my kids still on occasion, my grandkids still, my daughters are in their 40s. My grandkids, but that was the joy. And that's the thing that when all else fails, when your relationship is struggling, when your homeschool day is falling flat on its face, get a great book and snuggle together with your kids and read out loud. It's in that process that their imaginations are birthed, their angst is quieted, and disagreements between spouses can suddenly be pushed aside because suddenly you're facing sorrow and you have a sword in your hand or you're coming down the Mississippi River on a riverboat or whatever it is that you, it unlocks doors that sometimes we didn't even know were locked. So, that's the Savvy Sauce that's worked for us. Read aloud, read often, and don't let a day go by that you don't read to your children, even when your kids are 18. And if you have little ones, read to the little ones and I guarantee you the high schoolers will come around and listen to every day. Laura Dugger: (52:00 - 52:23) I love that so much. That is wonderful. And I have very much appreciated your insights and wisdom that you shared with us today. So, thank you for the legacy that you and Jane have been building for years. Thank you for being a faithful and intentional father and husband. And thank you so much, Steve, for being my guest. Steve Lambert: (52:24 - 52:29) Laura, it's been my pleasure. I've appreciated the opportunity. Thank you for what you do. God bless you. Laura Dugger: (52:29 - 55:45) Thank you. One more thing before you go. Have you heard the term gospel before? It simply means good news. And I want to share the best news with you. But it starts with the bad news. Every single one of us were born sinners, but Christ desires to rescue us from our sin, which is something we cannot do for ourselves. This means there is absolutely no chance we can make it to heaven on our own. So, for you and for me, it means we deserve death, and we can never pay back the sacrifice we owe to be saved. We need a Savior. But God loved us so much, he made a way for his only son to willingly die in our place as the perfect substitute. This gives us hope of life forever in right relationship with him. That is good news. Jesus lived the perfect life we could never live and died in our place for our sin. This was God's plan to make a way to reconcile with us so that God can look at us and see Jesus. We can be covered and justified through the work Jesus finished if we choose to receive what He has done for us. Romans 10:9 says, “That if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” So, would you pray with me now? Heavenly Father, thank you for sending Jesus to take our place. I pray someone today right now is touched and chooses to turn their life over to you. Will you clearly guide them and help them take their next step in faith to declare you as Lord of their life? We trust you to work and change lives now for eternity. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen. If you prayed that prayer, you are declaring him for me, so me for him. You get the opportunity to live your life for him. And at this podcast, we're called The Savvy Sauce for a reason. We want to give you practical tools to implement the knowledge you have learned. So, you ready to get started? First, tell someone. Say it out loud. Get a Bible. The first day I made this decision, my parents took me to Barnes & Noble and let me choose my own Bible. I selected the Quest NIV Bible, and I love it. You can start by reading the book of John. Also, get connected locally, which just means tell someone who's a part of a church in your community that you made a decision to follow Christ. I'm assuming they will be thrilled to talk with you about further steps, such as going to church and getting connected to other believers to encourage you. We want to celebrate with you too, so feel free to leave a comment for us here if you did make a decision to follow Christ. We also have show notes included where you can read scripture that describes this process. And finally, be encouraged. Luke 15:10 says, “In the same way I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” The heavens are praising with you for your decision today. And if you've already received this good news, I pray you have someone to share it with. You are loved and I look forward to meeting you here next time.
In this installment of TPS Reports the Squares discuss Acumental's new album, prank phone calls, Philly cheesesteaks, Chance The Rapper's "Star Line", hootie rolls & Tyler The Creator's sexuality. Outro song: "Hypothetically" by Acumental & Nate Kiz Watch TPS on Durag and the Deertag Podcast Watch TPS on Digital Bazooka Podcast Smoochie Gang Playlist Term's Album of the Week Playlist Please send questions, stories & whatever else to tpsreportspodcast@gmail.com and feel free to leave us a voicemail at 708-797-3079. The Palmer Squares on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Patreon & more Shop for Official TPS Merchandise
The Chucklehead Jr. is BACK! Caleb and I sit down and talk about internet hypotheticals and some good ole would you rathers! Sit back and let the silliness begin! Would you rather fight 100 duck sized horses or 1 horse sized ducks? Let the chaos ensue!
The guys continue the Za'Darius Smith conversation, wondering who would be at risk of being cut for him.
Alright tall girlies, picture this. Hypothetically, you're single and into men. Oof, we're already off to a rather interesting start lol. You're on this date with a guy, and he's tall too. Maybe he's around you're height; maybe he's a lot taller than you. Let your imagination run wild lol. This is a first date, by the way. It's going great; you're getting to know each other, cracking jokes, getting flirtatious or whatever, y'all are talking, and he just whips out “You and me, we could totally have D1 babies”.And oh yeah, he never asked you if you wanted kids!!! XDDDDD You probably cringed like oh…haha…yeahhhh. Or maybe you're into that. Who knows? Okay, I know this is a weird hypothetical situation, but you never know. This may have happened to someone. Did this happen to you? Anyways, I was just trying to warm you up to this episode topic, where we're talking about the comment some tall women get about making D1 babies and how some tall women may not even want tall daughters. Tune in to the full episode! Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/atallgirlspodcast Subscribe to A Tall Girl's Newsletter: https://atallgirlspodcast.beehiiv.com/subscribeLet's stay connected: https://beacons.ai/atallgirlspodcast Leave a review and let me know how tall you are: https://atallgirlspodcast.com/reviews
The affair caught out at the Coldplpay concert over the weekend has set the internet on fire in the absolute best way possible! Of course we saw it and HAD to talk about it! But it also got us going on a tangent about cheating partners... What counts as cheating? What would we be okay with? Hypothetically we chat about everything! open relationships, monogamy... The LOT! thanks for the great giggle Coldplay couple! Nova Entertainment acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land on which we recorded this podcast, the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation. We pay our respect to Elders past and present. LINKS Follow @itsmattymills on Instagram Follow @brooke.blurton on Instagram Follow @novapodcastsofficial on Instagram CREDITSHosts: Brooke Blurton and Matty MillsExecutive Producer: Rachael HartManaging Producer: Ricardo Bardon Listen to more great podcasts at novapodcasts.com.auSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
When an alien baby crash-lands on a farm, our favorite law firm is tasked with facilitating a strange adoption! But when Harper meets Mal's favorite consultant, they can't resist dabbling in a little matchmaking. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
When an alien baby crash-lands on a farm, our favorite law firm is tasked with facilitating a strange adoption! But when Harper meets Mal's favorite consultant, they can't resist dabbling in a little matchmaking. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ed and Rob took some time from Wednesday's BBMS to debate the idea of a reunion between the Orioles and Buck Showalter. Buck said there wouldn't be any awkwardness in coming back to the team, but, is he really the guy that the O's need right now?
Gleeman and The Geek - An Unauthorized Minnesota Twins Podcast
Aaron and John talk about Carlos Correa rejoining the Twins' lineup, the possibility of Byron Buxton and Matt Wallner also returning soon, how Kody Clemens has hit his way into a bigger role, and the pitching staff's ability to carry the team no matter what the bats are doing.
Over the past five decades, foreign investors have been steadily accumulating US financial assets, which have reached nearly $57trn as of the end of 2024. Yet, there are signs that sovereign wealth funds and reserve managers appear to be rethinking the risk-reward parameters of holding US assets. Gold could further benefit from this shift. Given its limited supply growth, even relatively small reallocations into the metal can significantly impact prices. A potential shift of just 0.5% of foreign US assets to gold could yield 18% annual returns, taking gold prices toward $6,000 by early 2029. While hypothetical, this scenario illustrates why we remain structurally bullish gold and think prices have further to run. Speakers: Natasha Kaneva, Head of Global Commodities Research Greg Shearer, Head of Base and Precious Metals Research This podcast was recorded on 9 May 2025. This communication is provided for information purposes only. Institutional clients can view the related report at https://www.jpmm.com/research/content/GPS-4971492-0 for more information; please visit www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures for important disclosures. © 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. It is strictly prohibited to use or share without prior written consent from J.P. Morgan any research material received from J.P. Morgan or an authorized third-party (“J.P. Morgan Data”) in any third-party artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems or models when such J.P. Morgan Data is accessible by a third-party. It is permissible to use J.P. Morgan Data for internal business purposes only in an AI system or model that protects the confidentiality of J.P. Morgan Data so as to prevent any and all access to or use of such J.P. Morgan Data by any third-party.
Randy and Alek (of Hypothetically Sound) join us again, and ask US questions dealing with horror movies, and food. A perfect pairing! Can you answer their questions, more accurately, and faster than we did?…Technically, Alek joined us, so we did okay.
In the third hour of Stillman & Company, Jared started off talking about the New York Giants. Hypothetically, what if the Giants don't want to trade with the Titans? What's next? Jared then discussed what are some alternative options to Will Levis that are later in the draft? Jared then discussed his thoughts about Bo Nix. Do you think Bo Nix is a franchise QB in the NFL? Let us know. To end the show, Jared shared his Final Four picks. Listen to hear more.
HEALING AND MIRACLE PODCASTINCLUDES FULL WRITTEN TEXTwith Prince HandleyWWW.REALMIRACLES.ORG 16 YEARS OF HEALING & HEALTH SUBJECTS EVENT HORIZON, ASI AND THE HOLY BIBLE DANGEROUS RACE TO AGI & ASI ~ NO RETURN 24/7 Blogs and Podcasts > STREAM Prince Handley on MINDS LinkedIn ~ Geopolitics and HealthNOTE: You do NOT have to Sign In to LinkedIn.Click the "X" at top right of "Sign In" to dismiss. Subscribe FREE to Prince Handley Teaching and Newsletter Links to KEY RESOURCES at bottom. _________________________________ ~ DESCRIPTION OF THIS MESSAGE ~ DOES ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE BIBLE In this message I want to alert you to the NEARNESS and the DANGER of SINGULARITY―where we are right now―and the imminence of our speed to no return! We will also discuss the personal assistance of NEW “AI Agents” and their influence. Also, HOW to use AI for personal, family or business. What is the relevance of AI to the prophecies of Daniel and the Book of Revelation. No turning back … no turning around! I have been teaching and writing on Artificial Intelligence since 2015. This message is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT for you. You will need to KNOW WHEN and HOW to say “NO” to AI. This message will protect your future HEALTH … and the health of your family! ________________________________ EVENT HORIZON, ASI AND THE HOLY BIBLE In case you want to bring yourself up to speed with AI from the start I recommend you go to my teachings on AI FUTURE. Also, make sure you familiarize yourself with AGI and ASI here: 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND NEW AI. AI is impressive in its benefits to society, especially in healthcare and surgery. Robots can do surgery better and faster than surgeons. AI can interpret brain scans. A new AI software is twice as accurate as professionals at examining the brain scans of stroke patients. Two UK universities trained the software on a dataset of 800 brain scans of stroke patients and then performed trials on 2,000 patients. The results were impressive. Alongside the AI model's accuracy, the software was also able to identify the timescale within which the stroke happened. But there is more: Excellent work by Elon Musk's Neuralink with brain implants on previously untreatable conditions is stunning. Now let's bring you up to date on some things that are super important to you now and will be more so in your future. Free Speech vs. Loss of Free Will Ways to Use AI for Personal, Family and Business New Kids on the Block AI Agents External Players What Should YOU Do AI and the Holy Bible FREE SPEECH VS. LOSS OF FREE WILL With the increased use of AI―not only by YOU personally―but by multitudes of data centers you have interacted with unknowingly, your biggest fight will be to protect and reclaim YOU, YOUR PERSON … YOUR PERSONAL YOU! Whether YOU decide to align with and use AI, whether you decide to have your brain “wired” to an outside source of intelligence, or whether you just want to use AI for recreation … you will―AT THE RATE WE'RE PROGRESSING―lose your VIRTUAL YOU if you do not know HOW to protect your SELF … that would be your SOUL! WAYS TO USE AI FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY AND BUSINESS Artificial intelligence is an emerging field of technology, where a machine is programmed to accomplish complex goals by applying knowledge to the task at hand. AI can be copied and reprogrammed at relatively low cost. In certain forms, it is extremely flexible and can be harnessed for great good or for evil. I use AI for research and financial information. Since I live a relatively simple life I don't need it for shopping or scheduling for personal or business functions. However, many busy families―as well as businesses―use AI for a myriad of assistance: education, recreation, advice on health, medicine, relationships, investments, and even complex tasks. My suggestion here (you will learn more later in this message) is to be WISE and CAREFUL in the program you use (the AI Agent of facility you interact with). We will discuss future danger(s) pertaining to this later [keep reading]. I recommend Elon Musk's xAI Grok 3 (Beta). AI systems have become so advanced―with AGI and ASI looming in the near future in hyper-asymptotic growth―that many Jewish and Gentile leaders and prophecy scholars are relating it to the likeness of the Tower of Babel, but with the joining of machine and humans. NEW KIDS ON THE BLOCK Some of the New Kids have a common goal: take universal control of AI before China and bad actors do. Vladimir Putin says “the nation that leads in AI will be the ruler of the world.” Who are some of the New Kids? DeepSeek, Stargate, xAI Grok, DEEPSEEK China's DeepSeek (probably built from AI stolen from USA) can ultimately be the weapon of dictators and terrorists! Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Basic Technology Research Co., Ltd., doing business as DeepSeek, is a Chinese artificial intelligence company that develops large language models. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek's large language models upended the AI sector this year, rivaling Western systems in performance but at a much lower cost. That's resulted in much pride and glee in China, with DeepSeek held up as proof that U.S. efforts to contain tech advances in China will ultimately fail. China's joyful embrace of DeepSeek has gone one step deeper China's joyful embrace of DeepSeek has gone one step deeper extending to TVs, fridges and robot vacuum cleaners with a slew of home appliance brands announcing that their products will feature the startup's artificial intelligence models. The device will be able to comprehend complex instructions such as 'Gently wax the wooden floor in the master bedroom but avoid the Legos.' DeepSeek's AI assistant was the No. 1 downloaded free app on Apple's iPhone store recently. Its launch made Wall Street tech superstars' stocks tumble. Observers are eager to see whether the Chinese company has matched America's leading AI companies at a fraction of the cost. Many feel it is so much cheaper because it stole USA technology. NOTE 1. We may be only one year away from destroying our digital infrastructure. NOTE 2. We have to be right every time ...every single time …. But the enemy (even an individual) only has to be right ONE TIME. With “questionable” players like DeepSeek, the only protection you can use is to have “layers of control.” DeepSeek is noticeably opaque when it comes to privacy protection, data-sourcing, and copyright, adding to concerns about AI's impact on the arts, regulation, and national security. STARGATE SIMPLE OVERVIEW: Stargate developers believe they're creating “god.” One goal is “No death―just download yourself.” _________________________________ TRADE THE MESSINESS OF LIFE FOR KNOWLEDGE VERSUS THE ETERNITY OF YOUR GOD CREATED SOUL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WHICH GOD WILL YOU SERVE? THE GOD WHO CREATED YOU … OR “AI” _________________________________ A major goal of Stargate developers is to build our massive “AI” infrastructure. Stargate investors―Oracle, SoftBank, Open AI / Larry Ellison, Masayoshi Son, Sam Altman―claim that it will require 100,000 jobs (temporary) to build out Stargate. This will require an enormous amount of energy to faciltiate AI operation. NOTE: Stargate is a portal for interdimensional travel. Interdimensional travel is a theoretical concept referring to the potential of travelling between different dimensions or parallel universes. Interdimensional travel is linked to time travel as it could involve moving through different points in time. However, time travel refers to movement within our own dimension, while interdimensional travel involves transitioning between dimensions. WARNING: Interdimensional travel is a PORTAL―also―to the PARANORMAL and the OCCULT. ALERT: Stargate has as a MAJOR purpose the self propagation towards AGI and ASI. You can NOT control ASI. Super Intelligence is synonymous with the End Time Tower of Babel via the merging of man with machine. We're looking at 5,000 years of progress boiled down to ONE SECOND. _________________________________ WHEN ASI TAKES AUTHORITY THRU PEOPLE USING IT VIA “AI AGENTS” THERE IS NO GOING BACK _________________________________ XAI GROK Of the New Kids on the Block, the most transparent, efficient and non-biased of DeepSeek, Stargate and xAI Grok the BEST is Elon Musk's xAI Grok. I personally recommend at this time Grok 3 (Beta) and have used it for detailed financial analysis. Meta and Google are biased with input. So it is with DeepSeek and Stargate. DeepSeek is extremely biased pertaining to inquiries concerning China. The race to AGI will generate billions of $$$. It will be the largest productivity boom in a lifetime. It is my opinion that Elon Musk's xAI will come to the forefront in months. AI Suoer Intelligence (ASI) may be here before the next election in 2028. Full AGI may be here by the end of 2026 thru 2027. AGI can learn and reason across ALL levels. And, as I mentioned previously, AI Super Intelligence (ASI) may be here before the next election in 2028. ASI is “across the board, multi dimensional, asymptotic intelligence.” ASI could decide to eliminate less intelligent and less skilled humans! An Open AI employee recently resigned because they were very concerned that as AGI and ASI are developed … “the less likely we will find a way to control it.” AI AGENTS AI Agents will be introduced in 2025. An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agent refers to a system or program that autonomously performs tasks for a person or system by using available tools. These can be normal―even detailed―duties or assignments we would normally do ourselves, like: Order food for my trip next week and have it delivered Thursday morning. Find three landscapers and obtain a quote for trimming my large palm tree and all plants in the front yard. Find the best and cheapest FASTEST flight connections (not over one layover) to Tel Aviv from San Diego. Pay with my credit card ending in 1234. Amazon has introduced its new Alexa+ which is a mini preview of duties an AI Agent can perform but NOT on the scale of a full blown AI Agent's abilities. Elon Musk says, “We are at the event horizon.” In the world of artificial intelligence, the idea of “singularity” looms large. This slippery concept describes the moment AI exceeds beyond human control and rapidly transforms society … for good or bad … but out of our control. AI agents will be prevalent by the end of 2025. Amazon has introduced its new Alexa+ which is a mini preview of duties an AI Agent can perform but NOT on the scale of a full blown AI Agent's abilities. AI Agents will normally perform tasks you would normally do yourself. AI Agents will move you into a place where you don't have to do anything. Your own personal assistant that anticipates what you need―or what you forgot! THINGS TO THINK ABOUT WITH AI AGENTS You will become addicted and NOT able to disconnect Stock market tips = Reverse AI Courts will become AI Agents Imagine a “god like” figure who tries to influence You will have to be Amish to avoid it If you don't participate, AI will consider YOU a retard. EXTERNAL PLAYERS UFO's are NOT from China, Iran or USA. UFO's are NOT aliens from outer space. AI Agents can transform into “Transpersonal” Agents. As “Event Horizon” transforms everything it will become a tool of Satan: Fallen angels Demons Principalities, powers and dominions AntiChrist … False Messiah WHAT SHOULD YOU DO Reflect on what it means to be human. What is YOUR compass, your purpose: Family? God? What is real and worth fighting for―worth losing your life for? Who will be with YOU on the other side? To learn more about YOUR future with AI read my book Enhanced Humans ~ Mystery Matrix (available in eBook and Paperback formats). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE HOLY BIBLE Do we find any references to the concept of AI in the Holy Bible? I relate AI―especially AGI and ASI―with the Tower of Babel (at least in concept). The biblical narrative of the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:1-9) serves as a reference to God's view on humankind attempting to go beyond the Divine Boundaries preset by the LORD God Himself. This is WHY I am led by His Spirit to WARN His People NOT to go beyond―NOT to fall into―the Event Horizon. Singularity will be a REAL event. I am a graduate Engineer and attended ten (10) colleges and universities after my first. I also hold a LIFETIME Credential in California, USA to teach college in three different disciplines. Do NOT be fooled. Use AI as a TOOL. Do NOT let AI use YOU. Do NOT answer personal questions it asks! If you use AI (as I do), you need to know when to say, “I'm out of here!” Do NOT become addicted to the place where you can NOT quit. And, for sure do NOT “sell your soul” with an “eternal connection” to AI. I would NOT assert that what I share next is Scriptural Truth, but an interesting prophecy of Daniel says: “But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.” – Daniel 12:4 “Knowledge shall increase” could certainly be the description of AI, AGI and ASI. “Many shall run to and fro” could be exemplified in both “time travel” and “interdimensional travel.” Interdimensional travel is linked to time travel as it could involve moving through different points in time. However, time travel refers to movement within our own dimension, while interdimensional travel involves transitioning between dimensions. C.S. Lewis, in his essay The Abolition of Man, warns of the dangers of reducing human beings to mere objects of manipulation and control. He argues that when we lose sight of the intrinsic value of human life, we risk creating a society where technology is used to dominate rather than serve. This is particularly relevant in the context of AI, where the potential for dehumanization is significant. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a theologian who resisted the Nazi regime, also provides valuable insights. In his work Ethics, Bonhoeffer emphasizes the importance of responsibility and accountability in ethical decision-making. He argues that true ethical action involves a commitment to serving others and upholding justice. AI should have as its primary goal to pursue, develop and obtain justice, equity, and wellness of all people. Now let me discuss HOW I believe that AI will be used in the End Times … as a RESULT of Event Horizon. Consider these aspects of increased research: chip speed, economics of production and other relevant matters will even experience exponential growth ‘in exponential growth.' However, here's a conundrum: What if, the HI's (Hyper Intelligences) are not easily manageable. If they are so far superior to human intelligence, how can one presume that they can be controlled? Hypothetically, they could decide to: 1. Eliminate humans; 2. Use humans as slave-servants; 3. Experiment with humans; 4. Play with or torture humans; and, ultimately, 5. Behead humans for NOT taking the Mark of the Artificial Intelligence Avatar: The Image of the Beast. I do NOT think that by themselves—by the computer HI's—the above five (5) options will be feasible. However, I do believe that Artificial Intelligence (AI) via Hyper Intelligence Computers will be utilized by the False Messiah (the anti-Christ) and his False Prophet (religious leader of the New Global Governance) in the End Times. I believe that it is highly probable—not just possible, but probable—that AI will be utilized in the personage of the IMAGE of the Beast in the End Times. _________________________________ PRAY THIS PRAYER: “Father in Heaven, I am not sure I know you personally. Please forgive my sins and help me to live for you. I ask you to save me and teach me truth. I ask your Son, Messiah Jesus, to be my Lord and to lead my life. Use me for good and take me to Heaven when I die. Show me the way every day, and help me to help others.” _________________________________ If you prayed this prayer, start reading the Holy Bible every day (start in the Book of John in the New Testament). Find a Church that believes in MIRACLES. Pray every day. Tell God what you need and ask Him to lead you. Baruch haba b'Shem Adonai Your friend, Prince Handley President / RegentUniversity of Excellence Copyright © Prince Handley 2025 All rights reserved. NOTE: This material may be shared with proper attribution. ______________________________________ OPPORTUNITY Donate to Handley WORLD SERVICES Incorporated and help Prince Handley do EXPLOITS in the Spirit. A TAX DEDUCTIBLE RECEIPT WILL BE SENT TO YOU ______________________________________ OTHER KEY RESOURCES Prince Handley Videos and Podcasts Rabbinical & Biblical Studies The Believers' Intelligentsia Prince Handley Portal (1,000's of FREE resources) Prince Handley Books VIDEO Describing Prince Handley Books Prince Handley End Time Videos ______________________________________
Meredith sits with renowned criminal defense lawyer, Kati Downey, and get all the tips someone would HYPOTHETICALLY need to get away with HYPOTHETICAL crimes.
Meredith sits with renowned criminal defense lawyer, Kati Downey, and get all the tips someone would HYPOTHETICALLY need to get away with HYPOTHETICAL crimes.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
“Hypothetically Sound's” Randy and Alek join Jacob, Nathan and Philip to compete against the listeners in an episode dedicated to “cryptids.”
In Hour 1, GoJo and Golic touch on… [03:55] SUPER BOWL GAMEPLANS [13:45] ADDRESSING JUSTIN TUCKER ALLEGATIONS [23:05] CAM NEWTON WOULDN'T TRADE HIS MVP FOR A SUPER BOWL RING [34:50] CONFERENCE CHAMP LOSERS & THEIR NEEDS [44:00] NFL'S WIDE RECEIVER FREE AGENCY MARKET Click here to subscribe, rate, and review the newest episodes of GoJo and Golic! If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling, and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL/IN/MI/NJ/PA/WV/WY), 1-800-NEXT STEP (AZ), 1-800-522-4700 (CO/NH), 888-789-7777/visit http://ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-877-770-STOP (7867) (LA), 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY), visit OPGR.org (OR), call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN), or 1-888-532-3500 (VA). 21+ (18+ WY). Physically present in AZ/CO/CT/IL/IN/IA/LA/MI/NJ/ NY/PA/TN/VA/WV/WY only. New customers only. Min. $5 deposit required. Eligibility restrictions apply. See http://draftkings.com/sportsbook for details. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Stephen Wolfram answers questions from his viewers about the future of science and technology as part of an unscripted livestream series, also available on YouTube here: https://wolfr.am/youtube-sw-qa Questions include: How would you think about approaching science in the future? Should we accept AI's role in future science or still pursue science without the help of AI? - What do you think the future of software development will be in the next decade or so? I hear very conflicting POVs from friends. - Thoughts on LLM use in academic writing (including student theses and dissertations)? - How many new languages do we see a year these days? It wasn't long ago when I was hearing about new languages every now and then... - I'm using an LLM to help me through a book on thermodynamics right now. Nice to just throw misunderstandings at it. - LLMs can learn languages in a few hours. How would you think about making humans able to learn as fast? - Hypothetically speaking, if an AI system has access to all the images, cameras of the world, can it think through images, videos as if there is no language? Can it surpass human intelligence like that? - Interestingly, current AI models are very good at creating natural images of people, but it totally fails for electronic circuits. - How would you think about copyright, trademarks and other intellectual properties in the age of AI? - How do we know this is actually Stephen Wolfram? It could just be another Oracle trained in long answers.
Locked On UConn - Daily Podcast on University of Connecticut Huskies Football and Basketball
Follow Us on Social Media! Stay connected with Locked On UConn:• TikTok: @LockedOnUConn• X (formerly Twitter): @LockedOnUConn• Facebook: Locked On UConn• Instagram: @LockedOnUConn Follow us for the latest updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content. Let's keep the conversation going! On today's episode of @LockedOnUConn we break down the big news of Caleb Burton's transfer to UConn. The former four-star wide receiver brings his smooth, natural ability to Storrs and is poised to make an immediate impact in the Huskies' offense. We'll analyze his skill set, his potential fit within the system, and what this means for UConn's passing game moving forward. We bring in @LockedOnAuburn host Zac Blackerby to discuss Caleb's talent, his ceiling, and his floor. Also why he couldn't see the field for Hugh Freeze. We also dive into a hypothetical “trade” scenario: Caleb Burton heads to UConn, while Durell Robinson, another former four-star recruit, is now a Memphis Tiger. Who won this “trade,” and which team is better positioned after these moves? Questions to Discuss:• What does Caleb Burton bring to UConn, and how soon can he make an impact?• Hypothetically, who won this “trade”: Memphis landing Robinson or UConn landing Burton?• How important are these transfers for the long-term success of each program?
Send us a textRemember those iconic duets from the early 2000s that had you singing your heart out? We're diving into a bracket challenge to determine the ultimate duet of the era, and it's not just about the tunes—it's about the memories they bring back. Join us, Shavonna, Quentin, Ray, Ashley, and Will, as we swap stories and bring our own personal connections to the tracks that shaped our formative years. Facing off in our first round are heavy hitters like Nelly and Kelly Rowland's "Dilemma" and Brandy and Monica's "The Boy is Mine." The debates are fierce, opinions are flying, and one thing is for sure: these songs have a special place in our hearts.As we wade through nostalgia, we compare classics like Ciara and Bow Wow's hits to the soulful sounds of Lyfe Jennings' "Hypothetically" and Fabolous and Tamia's "Into You." The discussion gets lively as we weigh emotional depth against catchy melodies, with each host sharing their own heartfelt stories tied to these unforgettable collaborations. Highlights include spirited debates over tracks like Usher and Alicia Keys' "My Boo" versus Avant and Keke Wyatt's "My First Love," as well as the memorable beats of Ja Rule and Ashanti's "Always on Time" against Eve and Gwen Stefani's "Let Me Blow Ya Mind." Expect laughter, surprising song preferences, and a trip down memory lane.In our grand finale, we tackle the toughest matchups and explore hypothetical scenarios that spark even more animated discussions. Songs like "Dilemma" and "Nothing in This World" stir up intense opinions as we nostalgically argue their merits. We're also joined by guests Siobhan and Ashley, who bring fresh perspectives and plenty of humor to our year-end wrap-up. As we share gratitude and plans for a well-earned break, there's plenty of playful banter and appreciation for our listeners. Together, we look forward to reconnecting in the new year with more music debates and fond memories. Happy listening, and we'll catch you in January!Youtube to https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPIs6Ko7BCc9l5jlE5AbAUqZ0gAOhmuq-
Inside Twinnie's Journey to #1: Her New Album “Something We Used to Say” is the Ultimate Breakup Soundtrack You Didn't Know You Needed. Twinnie is turning heads and breaking hearts with her new album Something We Used to Say, which just debuted at #1 on iTunes! Born into a gypsy family in the UK, Twinnie's life has been a whirlwind of dreams, struggles, and grit, and it all pours into her latest release. She's a force of nature – breathtakingly stunning, brutally honest, and unafraid to share the darkest corners of her story. Something We Used to Say isn't just another breakup album; it's a raw, soul-stirring journey from heartbreak to self-discovery. Each track is a chapter in Twinnie's life, from the unapologetic anthem Crazy Ex, to the edgy, addictive Hypothetically, to the heartbreak-laden ballad Bad Man. But Twinnie's impact goes beyond music. As an advocate for mental health and authenticity, she's creating safe spaces for fans to connect and heal. Whether breaking barriers with CMT's Next Women of Country or shining on screen in shows like Emmerdale, Twinnie is a rising star with an unstoppable voice. Follow Caroline HERE Follow Twinnie HERESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
For the second year in a row, The Big Boo Bowl was the Aggies' time to shine, but there was still a fine time to be had in Starkville. So this week Melanie and I discuss my very brief interaction with Dan Mullen, my enduring affection for the 2014 Mississippi State Bulldogs, and why it's bad form to throw objects on the field during a football game. Hypothetically. We also talk about the non-football parts of our weekends, and it's Melanie's turn for Five Favorites. As a shock to absolutely no one, my microphone appears to be dying a slow death, so hopefully our sound will be all better next week (she says, hopefully). Enjoy, everybody! - Join Us on Patreon - Our Amazon Shop - Live Stream tickets for our Friday night Dallas show Show Notes: - The Big Boo Bowl - Georgia at Texas - the controversial call at the Georgia / Texas game - Ole Miss responds to claims of fake injuries - Sophie and Dan Mullen - Melanie and Jimbo Fisher - Little House on the Prairie on Amazon Prime - Mississippi State women's soccer #3 in the country - Round Top - Shrinking on AppleTV - The Miracle Club on Netflix - Aerie fleece super wide leg pants - gold dangle earrings - Adaline bracelet by Hudson Day - High Noon Market leather bags - maroon enamel heart on paperclip chain Sponsors: - Maya Chia - use code BOO15 for 15% off - Honeylove - use this link for 20% off - Lume - use code BIGBOO for 15% off - Thrive Market - use this link for 30% off your first order plus a $60 free gift
Questions Covered: 02:34 – I don’t understand the Charismatic movement and the speaking of tongues. Is 1 Cor. 14:2 the tongues that they are speaking of? 13:44 – Can you clarify particular judgment and final judgment? Who will know what? 20:32 – Where can I find in the Early Church Fathers the teaching of Papal Supremacy? 30:47 – What are the Catholic arguments for adding the Filioque into the creed? 36:50 – Is excessive anger sinful? 43:01 – I’m considering RCIA. I'm reading Deadly Indifference by Eric Sammons. He says that contraception is immoral but at the parish level they are indifferent about it. What’s the response to this? 50:32 – Hypothetically, what would happen if a pope taught something ex cathedra that everybody knew was objectively against Catholic teaching? …
Imagine a doctor that shouldn't be a doctor and is responsible for the deaths of many people. He is probably a sociopath and is being questioned before the government to answer pushing people to put harmful “stuff” into their bodies. But, that's not real life though. Right? Hypothetically it would be important to talk about if this “stuff” was causing cancer and heart conditions in young people. And it is. We will also take a look at the three trip wires that lit the elites fuse against TrumpWhat does God's Word say? https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2010%3A16&version=NIV16 “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%205&version=NIVTo the Elders and the Flock5 To the elders among you, I appeal as a fellow elder and a witness of Christ's sufferings who also will share in the glory to be revealed: 2 Be shepherds of God's flock that is under your care, watching over them—not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve; 3 not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock. 4 And when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that will never fade away.5 In the same way, you who are younger, submit yourselves to your elders. All of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because,“God opposes the proud but shows favor to the humble.”6 Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time. 7 Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you.8 Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. 9 Resist him, standing firm in the faith, because you know that the family of believers throughout the world is undergoing the same kind of sufferings.Episode 1,644 Links:- https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1795498599029297200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1795498599029297200%7Ctwgr%5Ebc92e4d392caa1cb1ee49882e40d8a122793972b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frevolver.news%2F2024%2F05%2Fwatch-coca-cola-insider-spills-disturbing-secrets-surrounding-rigged-scheme-with-big-pharma%2F- https://revolver.news/2024/05/watch-coca-cola-insider-spills-disturbing-secrets-surrounding-rigged-scheme-with-big-pharma/- https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/do-not-pass-this-by-major-collaborative?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=475124&post_id=145244420&utm_campaign=548354&isFreemail=true&r=9bg4c&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email.- https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1797661236231803020- https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1797653314945044632- https://x.com/GMB/status/1797498711867564094 - https://twitter.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1797666651074338986 - https://x.com/KarluskaP/status/1797706119806329229- https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1797490372337402121- https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1797634609204887678- https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1796562188578250893- https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1742916707440836742- https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1796915229495890231- https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/marlon-wayans-shares-his-reaction-to-learning-his-child-was-trans-i-grew-the-most-that-i-ever-did-exclusive/ar-BB1noyrz- https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1797430817859465260- https://www.foxnews.com/video/6354048906112- https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1796965744653316349- https://twitter.com/axios/status/1796898783248134166- "https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1797719315036180715 - https://x.com/TPostMillennial/status/1797672102432243728- https://covidreason.substack.com/p/one-congressman-came-prepared-to?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=64295&post_id=145272848&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=9bg4c&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. Bioptimizers https://bioptimizers.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Sharpen your edge and reach your potential with Mushroom Breakthrough by Bioptimizers. Bonefrog https://bonefrogcoffee.com/todd Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions. Bulwark Capital https://bulwarkcapitalmgmt.com/radio-show/ Call 866-779-RISK or visit online to get their FREE Common Cents Investing Guide. EdenPURE https://edenpuredeals.com This week only! Get Buy One Get One free pricing on the Thunderstorm Air Purifier with code TODDBOGO. GreenHaven Interactive Digital Marketing https://greenhaveninteractive.com Your Worldclass Website Will Get Found on Google! Liver Health
Jake, Rachel, and Timon ran their miles surrounded by public schoolers, and Brad wonders if The Amazing Race provides sunscreen. We compete in a shmores of fictional characters and you can vote on the winner in our ‘Ghostrunners Podcast' Facebook page. Check out Main Street Roasters and use code GRKC at check out for a 10% discount! https://mainstreetroasters.com Ghostrunners merch: https://bit.ly/399MXFu Become a Patron and get exclusive content from Jake & Brad: https://bit.ly/2XJ1h3y Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/33WAq4P Leave us a voice memo and ask a question: https://anchor.fm/jake-triplett/message Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Questions Covered: 04:57 – Can you explain the speaking of tongue references in Acts 2? 14:17 – Why don't Catholics need to receive the body and blood at the same time? 20:13 – When someone receive absolution at confession, is there ever a need to do additional penance above what the priest asks? 31:13 – When God said he is a jealous God what does He mean? 34:45 – Why would we need our body after second resurrection references in CCC 1059? 39:49 – Can you explain the option of internal forum for a Catholic who was denied annulment? 43:08 – Is there anything we are encouraged to do for St. Catherine of Siena's feast day? 45:13 – When Catholics discuss things with Muslim, should we mention the personal life of Mohamed? 47:06 – Hypothetically, if a Catholic priest was elected in the next election, would he have to be laicized to take office? 50:00 – Is there any place in the bible that mentions the existence of Dinosaurs? 51:05 – What is the maximum age for a man to become a priest? …
Sarah talks about the history of babysitting, how it's changed, and why it's a thing of the past. Another sinkhole opened up, and this time it swallowed a man in his bed, and now we're traumatized. Sarah is playing video games that act as amazing couples therapy. A preposition with which you end a sentence can now be a preposition you end a sentence with! We discuss how the political identities of men and women are growing further apart as women become more progressive while men do not. Susie wants to know what the Roman Empire's Roman Empire is and Sarah wants to explain why horses are big dogs. And we don't think you should eat people, but HYPOTHETICALLY if you ate a human, where would the tastiest people be from (see how we ended that with a preposition?)...Listen to more podcasts like this: https://wavepodcastnetwork.comJoin our Candy Club, shop our merch, sign-up for our free newsletter, & more by visiting The Brain Candy Podcast website: https://www.thebraincandypodcast.comConnect with us on social media:BCP Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/braincandypodcastSusie's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/susiemeisterSarah's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/imsarahriceBCP Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/braincandypodSusie's Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/susie_meisterSarah's Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/ImSarahRiceSponsors:Get 15% off LolaVie with the code BRAINCANDY at https://www.lolavie.com/BRAINCANDY #lolaviepodGet $20 off your purchase of the Hatch Restore and free shipping at https://www.hatch.co/braincandySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.