Podcasts about connor college

Trust and Not Believe? Or Believe and Not Trust? Does losing faith in institutions go hand in hand with losing faith in God?… GUEST Dr Ryan P Burge … assistant prof of political science at Eastern Illinois Univ … author of “20 Myths about Religion & Politics in America” and ,”The Nones: Where They Came From, Who They Are, & Where They Are Going” (just went into 2nd edition) … His research appears on the site Religion in Public, he tweets at @ryanburge, and you can find his substack: graphsaboutreligion.com Finally Transformed: From Transgender to Christian … GUEST Jonathan Gass… director of graduate programs and online content at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State Univ, where he also teachesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trust and Not Believe? Or Believe and Not Trust? Does losing faith in institutions go hand in hand with losing faith in God?… GUEST Dr Ryan P Burge … assistant prof of political science at Eastern Illinois Univ … author of “20 Myths about Religion & Politics in America” and ,”The Nones: Where They Came From, Who They Are, & Where They Are Going” (just went into 2nd edition) … His research appears on the site Religion in Public, he tweets at @ryanburge, and you can find his substack: graphsaboutreligion.com Finally Transformed: From Transgender to Christian … GUEST Jonathan Gass… director of graduate programs and online content at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State Univ, where he also teachesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

U.S. citizenship was not a given for the people who occupied the land before there was a United States. Nor was the idea universally welcomed by all Native nations. Citizenship ensured the right to vote in national elections and equal protection under the Constitution. But it also required relinquishing a measure of sovereignty, something the Onondaga Nation and the Haudenosaunee refuse to recognize to this day. A century after President Calvin Coolidge signed the Indian Citizenship Act, we'll look at the strengths and sacrifices of becoming American citizens. GUESTS Dr. Suzan Shown Harjo (Cheyenne & Hodulgee Muscogee), president of the Morning Star Institute and a recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom Robert Miller (Eastern Shawnee), professor at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University and tribal judge Sam Deloria (Yankton Dakota enrolled in Standing Rock), former director of the American Indian Law Center and American Indian Graduate Center Allison Neswood (Navajo), staff attorney with the Native American Rights Fund

Host Sahar Aziz and Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Professor Khaled Beydoun discuss the latest legal and political developments in the troubling rise of global Islamophobia in India, China, and other Asian countries. The conversation is informed by Professor Beydoun's new book The New Crusades: Islamophobia and the Global War on Muslims.Support the Center for Security, Race and Rights by following us and making a donation:Donate: https://give.rutgersfoundation.org/csrr-support/20046.html Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rucsrr Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/rutgerscsrr Follow us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/rucsrr Follow us on TikTok: https://tiktok.com/rucsrr Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://csrr.rutgers.edu/newsroom/sign-up-for-newsletter/

The First Amendment Clinic at ASU's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law filed a motion on behalf of Kari Lake.

From the HEA archives in May 2021 with timeless insights. Arizona State University as an institution is known for innovation and doing things differently. As you'll discover in this interview, the athletic department has embraced that culture of innovation under President Crow and Vice President/Athletic Director Ray Anderson. This episode is packed with campus collaborations, such as with the ASU Global Sport Institute, led by his former Stanford football teammate and agent Kenneth Shropshire, and using experiences outside of college athletics and bringing them in to help him and the athletic department prepare for the changes ahead in college athletics. Anderson is also a professor in the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at ASU and shares why he continues to teach class. 0:45 NFL Experience Helping in the AD Chair 2:25 Culture of Innovation at ASU 4:48 Athletic Facility Priorities 7:06 Local Resistance to ASU Changes 9:25 Adding Instead of Dropping Sports 12:52 Why You Signed Contract Extension 16:07 Agent Experience Helping Understand Changes 18:30 Professor of Law 22:05 ASU Global Sport Institute Partnership 26:36 AD Advice for Embracing Industry Changes

The U.S. Supreme Court decisively rejected what many legal observers considered the most serious challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act in the law's 45-year history. The ruling is a relief for ICWA supporters, many of whom were fearful of a decision that could turn back or weaken the law that ensures Native foster children a home with Native guardians. We'll get reaction and analysis from those who have been watching the legal fight closely. You can get more context from Native America Calling on the Supreme Court's decision here. GUESTS Dr. Sarah Kastelic (Alutiiq), director of the National Indian Child Welfare Association   Derrick Beetso (Navajo Nation), director, College of Law, Indian Gaming, and Self-Governance, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, and former general counsel for the National Congress of American Indians Hilary Tompkins (citizen of the Navajo Nation), partner with Hogan Lovells and former Solicitor of the U.S. Department of the Interior Erin Dougherty Lynch, Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Senior Staff Attorney and Managing Attorney of NARF's Anchorage, Alaska, office Beth Wright (Pueblo of Laguna), NARF

Free Tasha Shelby is the website where you can learn more about Tasha's case. To support Tasha:Governor Tate Reeves: C  Governor's office,  call 601-359-3150/ email governor@govreeves.ms.gov.Lynn Fitch, Mississippi Attorney General:  601.359.3680/P.O. Box 220, Jackson MS 3920Valena Beety is a law professor, an innocence litigator, and a former federal prosecutor. She has exonerated wrongly convicted clients, founded the West Virginia Innocence Project, and obtained presidential grants of clemency for drug offenses. She served as an appointed commissioner on the West Virginia Governor's Indigent Defense Commission. She is currently a professor of law at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law and the deputy director of the Academy for Justice, a criminal justice center at the law school.VTasha Mercedes Shelby is a writer and an advocate for incarcerated women. Tasha was wrongly convicted of a crime that did not occur on June 16, 2000 in Biloxi, Mississippi. In her twenty-two years of incarceration, she has earned her GED, taken classes at Millsaps College through the Prison to College Pipeline, and developed as a writer and as an artist. She continues to fight her wrongful conviction and you can learn more about her struggle at Free Tasha Shelby.Alex Waters is the technical producer, audio editor and engineer for the Short Fuse Podcast. He is a music producer and a student at Berklee College of Music. He has written and produced music and edited for podcasts including The Faith and Chai Podcast and Con Confianza. He writes, produces and records music for independent artists, including The Living.  He lives in Brooklyn can can be reached at  alexwatersmusic12@gmail.com with inquiries. 

Valena Beety is a law professor, an innocence litigator, and a former federal prosecutor. She has exonerated wrongly convicted clients, founded the West Virginia Innocence Project, and obtained presidential grants of clemency for drug offenses. She served as an appointed commissioner on the West Virginia Governor's Indigent Defense Commission. She is currently a professor of law at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law and the deputy director of the Academy for Justice, a criminal justice center at the law school.VTasha Mercedes Shelby is a writer and an advocate for incarcerated women. Tasha was wrongly convicted of a crime that did not occur on June 16, 2000 in Biloxi, Mississippi. In her twenty-two years of incarceration, she has earned her GED, taken classes at Millsaps College through the Prison to College Pipeline, and developed as a writer and as an artist. She continues to fight her wrongful conviction and you can learn more about her struggle at Free Tasha Shelby. Alex Waters Alex is the technical producer, audio editor and engineer for the Short Fuse Podcast. He is a music producer and a student at Berklee College of Music. He has written and produced music and edited for podcasts including The Faith and Chai Podcast and Con Confianza. He writes, produces and records music for independent artists, including The Living.  He lives in Brooklyn can can be reached at  alexwatersmusic12@gmail.com with inquiries. 

Guests include:Carri Chischilly - NATIVE HEALTH Maternal Child Health Program ManagerNatalia Sells - Indian Legal Program at ASU's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law with Nicole Lomay - Senior Outreach Program Manager for the Banner Alzheimer's InstituteSabina Rajasundaram - Founder of CodefySupport the show

Joe Sims, who led Jones Day's Antitrust & Competition Law Practice to national and global prominence during nearly 40 years at the Firm, has endowed a new chair at his alma mater, the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University: The Sims Chair in Competition Law and Regulation at ASU Law. David Gelfand, one of the country's leading antitrust lawyers, has been named the Sims Chair and professor of practice at ASU Law. Mr. Sims and Mr. Gelfand discuss the Chair, the current state of U. S. antitrust and competition law, and their plans for ASU Law's antitrust program.

On April 14, 2021, the Federalist Society's Philadelphia Lawyers Chapter hosted Prof. Ilan Wurman to discuss his new book, The Second Founding: Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendment.The Fourteenth Amendment is now over 150 years old. The Supreme Court has long rejected interpreting that Amendment with its original meaning. But what would an originalist interpretation of the Amendment look like? Would it be unworkable for modern problems? In this talk, Ilan Wurman, an associate professor at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, argues not only that we should reclaim the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, but that doing so would lead to many desirable and surprising results. Professor Wurman argues that the privileges or immunities clause is not, like many originalists claim, a fundamental rights provision, but is instead an antidiscrimination provision. The implications for incorporation, economic liberty, school desegregation, and gay rights may surprise you. Featuring:Prof. Ilan Wurman, Associate Professor, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State UniversityModerator: Matthew J. Hank, Shareholder, Littler Mendelson P.C.; The Federalist Society's Philadelphia Lawyers Chapter * * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Despite being on two opposite sides of the political spectrum, Alex Bybee & McKay Tucker find commonality in their goal of striving for empathy & understanding. Alex, founder of Disagree Better, an organization designed to help individuals navigate difficult conversations, shares in this episodes why he identifies as a pragmatic progressive. McKay, a law student at Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, shares why he identifies as a conservative. Learn how both stay informed on politics, and why they believe disagreeing is not synonymous with disunity. 

How do you create a Constitution for a free society? Professor Ilan Wurman of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University joins us to discuss what makes the Constitution worthy of our obedience today. Learn more at https://fedsoc.org/no86.

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers And Solutions Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:00am Location: 1310 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions Subcommittees: Elections (116th Congress) On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, the Subcommittee on Elections of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing entitled “Native American Voting Rights: Exploring Barriers and Solutions.” The Committee hearing will take place at 10:00am at 1310 Longworth HOB. Witnesses: The Honorable Ben Ray Luján Member of Congress, Washington D.C. Mr. Leonard Forsman Chairman, Suquamish Tribe, Suquamish, WA Ms. Amber Torres Chairperson, Walker River Paiute Tribe Ms. Doreen McPaul Attorney General, Navajo Nation Mrs. Patricia Ferguson-Bohnee Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Sandra Day O' Connor College of Law, Phoenix, AZ Mr. Elvis Norquay Member, Turtle Mountain Reservation, Rolla, ND Ms. Jacqueline De Leon Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO Committee Notice: https://cha.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/native-american-voting-rights-exploring-barriers-and-solutions

Professor Daniel Bodansky will speak about ‘Law and Politics in the UN Climate Regime: A Preview of the Santiago Climate Conference.’ Followed by a Q&A. Is implementation of the Paris Agreement on track? What are the Agreement's prospects for success? The talk will review developments in the international climate change regime, including the recently concluded UN Climate Change Summit, analyze the state of play in the UNFCCC regime, and preview the upcoming conference of the parties (COP25) in Santiago in December. Professor Daniel Bodansky is Regents’ Professor at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. He served as Climate Change Coordinator at the U.S. State Department from 1999-2001. His book, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, received the 2011 Sprout Award from the International Studies Association as the best book that year in the field of international environmental studies. His latest book, International Climate Change Law, co-authored with Jutta Brunnée and Lavanya Rajamani, was published by Oxford University Press in June 2017, and received the 2018 Certificate of Merit from the American Society of International Law as the best book in a specialized area of international law published the previous year. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a graduate of Harvard (A.B.), Cambridge (M.Phil.) and Yale (J.D.).

Professor Daniel Bodansky will speak about ‘Law and Politics in the UN Climate Regime: A Preview of the Santiago Climate Conference.’ Followed by a Q&A. Is implementation of the Paris Agreement on track? What are the Agreement's prospects for success? The talk will review developments in the international climate change regime, including the recently concluded UN Climate Change Summit, analyze the state of play in the UNFCCC regime, and preview the upcoming conference of the parties (COP25) in Santiago in December. Professor Daniel Bodansky is Regents’ Professor at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. He served as Climate Change Coordinator at the U.S. State Department from 1999-2001. His book, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, received the 2011 Sprout Award from the International Studies Association as the best book that year in the field of international environmental studies. His latest book, International Climate Change Law, co-authored with Jutta Brunnée and Lavanya Rajamani, was published by Oxford University Press in June 2017, and received the 2018 Certificate of Merit from the American Society of International Law as the best book in a specialized area of international law published the previous year. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a graduate of Harvard (A.B.), Cambridge (M.Phil.) and Yale (J.D.).

Professor Daniel Bodansky will speak about ‘Law and Politics in the UN Climate Regime: A Preview of the Santiago Climate Conference.’ Followed by a Q&A. Is implementation of the Paris Agreement on track? What are the Agreement's prospects for success? The talk will review developments in the international climate change regime, including the recently concluded UN Climate Change Summit, analyze the state of play in the UNFCCC regime, and preview the upcoming conference of the parties (COP25) in Santiago in December. Professor Daniel Bodansky is Regents’ Professor at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. He served as Climate Change Coordinator at the U.S. State Department from 1999-2001. His book, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, received the 2011 Sprout Award from the International Studies Association as the best book that year in the field of international environmental studies. His latest book, International Climate Change Law, co-authored with Jutta Brunnée and Lavanya Rajamani, was published by Oxford University Press in June 2017, and received the 2018 Certificate of Merit from the American Society of International Law as the best book in a specialized area of international law published the previous year. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a graduate of Harvard (A.B.), Cambridge (M.Phil.) and Yale (J.D.).

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The third panel explored "Economic Liberty in Criminal Justice: Business Crimes and Economic Sanctions".Although criminal justice is often associated with non-economic issues—such as those raised by violent crimes and long prison sentences—the system regularly implicates individual economic liberty, as can be seen in the prohibition and prosecution of certain commercial and financial interactions. Sometimes individuals are held strictly liable for their actions even in the absence of force, fraud, or direct harm. In turn, the government may impose a variety of economic sanctions for purported wrongdoing, with fines, fees, and forfeitures levied in legal processes which often seem bereft of basic procedural protections. This panel will explore these and other criminal justice issues and the implications for individual economic liberty.Prof. Beth A. Colgan, Assistant Professor of Law, UCLA LawProf. Erik Luna, Amelia D. Lewis Professor of Constitutional and Criminal Law, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawMs. Christina Sandefur, Executive Vice President, Goldwater InstituteMr. Peter J. Wallison, Senior Fellow and Arthur F. Burns Fellow in Financial Policy Studies, American Enterprise InstituteModerator: Hon. Elizabeth L. Branch, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The second panel asked "Is Economic Protectionism a Legitimate State Interest?".The Tenth Circuit held in Powers v. Harris that “intra-state economic protectionism, absent a violation of a specific federal statutory or constitutional provision, is a legitimate state interest.” The Second Circuit agrees. In contrast, the Fifth and Sixth Circuits have struck down laws aimed at protecting local economic actors as unjustified by state police power. Does a state violate the Equal Protection Clause when it restricts economic liberty for the sole purpose of economic protectionism? For example, is the Equal Protection Clause violated when a state doesn’t make an activity or ownership of a certain type of property per se illegal, but the state employs economic “checkpoints” to significantly discourage the activity or specified property ownership (i.e., guns, pornography, etc.).This panel will also explore the impact of cronyism on emerging technologies and federalism. For example, had Uber and Lyft not been so successful in expeditiously building themselves up before being taken seriously by regulators and traditional industry competitors (i.e., taxi companies), the taxi companies likely could have, and would have, lobbied to pass legislation and create regulations making ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft illegal, or so cost prohibitive as to preclude the ridesharing industry from ever being financially viable. Prof. Paul Bender, Dean Emeritus and Professor of Law, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawDr. Yaron Brook, Chairman of the Board, Ayn Rand InstituteProf. Roderick M. Hills, Jr., William T. Comfort, III Professor of Law, NYU LawProf. Todd J. Zywicki, George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law SchoolModerator: Hon. Edith H. Jones, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The first panel discussed "The Original Understanding of 'Privileges of Immunities'".Scholars contest the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1873, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to state economic regulations under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the Slaughter-House Cases. Since then, the Privileges or Immunities Clause has been best known as a “practical nullity.” However, Justice Thomas provided a strong challenge to this interpretation in his McDonald v. City of Chicago concurrence.This panel explores whether the Fourteenth Amendment was principally concerned with equality, guaranteeing fundamental rights, or both. If the Fourteenth Amendment does guarantee fundamental rights, does it merely incorporate the bill of rights against the states, or does it do more and provide protections for economic liberty? And was the Amendment intended to accomplish these purposes through a substantive notion of “due process” or through the Privileges or Immunities Clause? Is the fundamental-rights view inconsistent with judicial restraint? This panel will discuss these fundamental questions concerning the Fourteenth Amendment’s original meaning, and whether maintaining an expansive notion of substantive due process or resurrecting the Privileges or Immunities Clause would be an ill-conceived invitation to judicial activism.Prof. Randy E. Barnett, Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory, Georgetown LawProf. Kurt T. Lash, E. Claiborne Robins Distinguished Chair in Law, University of Richmond School of LawProf. Ilan Wurman, Visiting Assistant Professor, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawProf. Rebecca E. Zietlow, Charles W. Fornoff Professor of Law and Values, University of Toledo College of LawModerator: Judge Amul R. Thapar, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The fourth panel discussed "Blockchain-Backed Cryptocurrencies: Order Without Law in the Digital Age".In the wake of skyrocketing Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency prices, the SEC has argued that cryptocurrencies should be regulated as securities. Yet, many of those responsible for developing cryptocurrencies view them as an efficient, reliable way of storing and exchanging value without government interference or regulation. This panel will discuss the likelihood that cryptocurrencies will play a meaningful role in the global economy, and if and how they should be regulated.Ms. Mary Beth Buchanan, General Counsel, Kraken Cryptocurrency ExchangeMr. Jim Harper, Former Executive Vice President, Competitive Enterprise InstituteProf. Gary Marchant, Regent’s Professor of Law and Director for the Center for Law, Science and Innovation, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawProf. John O. McGinnis, George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of LawModerator: Hon. John B. Nalbandian, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The third panel explored "Economic Liberty in Criminal Justice: Business Crimes and Economic Sanctions".Although criminal justice is often associated with non-economic issues—such as those raised by violent crimes and long prison sentences—the system regularly implicates individual economic liberty, as can be seen in the prohibition and prosecution of certain commercial and financial interactions. Sometimes individuals are held strictly liable for their actions even in the absence of force, fraud, or direct harm. In turn, the government may impose a variety of economic sanctions for purported wrongdoing, with fines, fees, and forfeitures levied in legal processes which often seem bereft of basic procedural protections. This panel will explore these and other criminal justice issues and the implications for individual economic liberty.Prof. Beth A. Colgan, Assistant Professor of Law, UCLA LawProf. Erik Luna, Amelia D. Lewis Professor of Constitutional and Criminal Law, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawMs. Christina Sandefur, Executive Vice President, Goldwater InstituteMr. Peter J. Wallison, Senior Fellow and Arthur F. Burns Fellow in Financial Policy Studies, American Enterprise InstituteModerator: Hon. Elizabeth L. Branch, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The fourth panel discussed "Blockchain-Backed Cryptocurrencies: Order Without Law in the Digital Age".In the wake of skyrocketing Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency prices, the SEC has argued that cryptocurrencies should be regulated as securities. Yet, many of those responsible for developing cryptocurrencies view them as an efficient, reliable way of storing and exchanging value without government interference or regulation. This panel will discuss the likelihood that cryptocurrencies will play a meaningful role in the global economy, and if and how they should be regulated.Ms. Mary Beth Buchanan, General Counsel, Kraken Cryptocurrency ExchangeMr. Jim Harper, Former Executive Vice President, Competitive Enterprise InstituteProf. Gary Marchant, Regent’s Professor of Law and Director for the Center for Law, Science and Innovation, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawProf. John O. McGinnis, George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of LawModerator: Hon. John B. Nalbandian, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The second panel asked "Is Economic Protectionism a Legitimate State Interest?".The Tenth Circuit held in Powers v. Harris that “intra-state economic protectionism, absent a violation of a specific federal statutory or constitutional provision, is a legitimate state interest.” The Second Circuit agrees. In contrast, the Fifth and Sixth Circuits have struck down laws aimed at protecting local economic actors as unjustified by state police power. Does a state violate the Equal Protection Clause when it restricts economic liberty for the sole purpose of economic protectionism? For example, is the Equal Protection Clause violated when a state doesn’t make an activity or ownership of a certain type of property per se illegal, but the state employs economic “checkpoints” to significantly discourage the activity or specified property ownership (i.e., guns, pornography, etc.).This panel will also explore the impact of cronyism on emerging technologies and federalism. For example, had Uber and Lyft not been so successful in expeditiously building themselves up before being taken seriously by regulators and traditional industry competitors (i.e., taxi companies), the taxi companies likely could have, and would have, lobbied to pass legislation and create regulations making ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft illegal, or so cost prohibitive as to preclude the ridesharing industry from ever being financially viable. Prof. Paul Bender, Dean Emeritus and Professor of Law, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawDr. Yaron Brook, Chairman of the Board, Ayn Rand InstituteProf. Roderick M. Hills, Jr., William T. Comfort, III Professor of Law, NYU LawProf. Todd J. Zywicki, George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law SchoolModerator: Hon. Edith H. Jones, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The first panel discussed "The Original Understanding of 'Privileges of Immunities'".Scholars contest the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1873, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to state economic regulations under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the Slaughter-House Cases. Since then, the Privileges or Immunities Clause has been best known as a “practical nullity.” However, Justice Thomas provided a strong challenge to this interpretation in his McDonald v. City of Chicago concurrence.This panel explores whether the Fourteenth Amendment was principally concerned with equality, guaranteeing fundamental rights, or both. If the Fourteenth Amendment does guarantee fundamental rights, does it merely incorporate the bill of rights against the states, or does it do more and provide protections for economic liberty? And was the Amendment intended to accomplish these purposes through a substantive notion of “due process” or through the Privileges or Immunities Clause? Is the fundamental-rights view inconsistent with judicial restraint? This panel will discuss these fundamental questions concerning the Fourteenth Amendment’s original meaning, and whether maintaining an expansive notion of substantive due process or resurrecting the Privileges or Immunities Clause would be an ill-conceived invitation to judicial activism.Prof. Randy E. Barnett, Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory, Georgetown LawProf. Kurt T. Lash, E. Claiborne Robins Distinguished Chair in Law, University of Richmond School of LawProf. Ilan Wurman, Visiting Assistant Professor, ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of LawProf. Rebecca E. Zietlow, Charles W. Fornoff Professor of Law and Values, University of Toledo College of LawModerator: Judge Amul R. Thapar, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On January 3, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations. The presentations were a part of the 21st Annual Faculty Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana.Featuring:Vince Buccola, University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School: “The Logic and Limits of Municipal Bankruptcy”Paul Crane, University of Richmond School of Law: “Incorporating Collateral Consequences into Criminal Procedure” Jennifer Mascott, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School: “The Ratifiers’ Theory of Officer Accountability”Lance Sorenson, Utah Office of the Attorney General: “The Hybrid Nature of the Property Clause: Implications for Judicial Review of National Monument Reductions”Lael Weinberger, University of Chicago JD/PhD Candidate: “Frankfurter, Abstention Doctrine, and the Development of Modern Federalism: A History and Three Futures”Ilan Wurman, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law: “The Origins of Substantive Due Process”Commenter: Richard Epstein, NYU School of Law, University of Chicago Law School Moderator: Larry Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law

On January 3, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations. The presentations were a part of the 21st Annual Faculty Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana.Featuring:Vince Buccola, University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School: “The Logic and Limits of Municipal Bankruptcy”Paul Crane, University of Richmond School of Law: “Incorporating Collateral Consequences into Criminal Procedure” Jennifer Mascott, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School: “The Ratifiers’ Theory of Officer Accountability”Lance Sorenson, Utah Office of the Attorney General: “The Hybrid Nature of the Property Clause: Implications for Judicial Review of National Monument Reductions”Lael Weinberger, University of Chicago JD/PhD Candidate: “Frankfurter, Abstention Doctrine, and the Development of Modern Federalism: A History and Three Futures”Ilan Wurman, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law: “The Origins of Substantive Due Process”Commenter: Richard Epstein, NYU School of Law, University of Chicago Law School Moderator: Larry Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law

This week, Bobbi-Sue sits down with Stephanie Jarvis, principal of SJarvis Consulting, a sports and events consulting firm, and lecturer at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. Stephanie’s career started in compliance in collegiate athletics. She continued in that role for quite a while before moving over to the Fiesta Bowl and […] The post Leveling The Playing Field: Stephanie Jarvis, Principal of SJarvis Consulting appeared first on Radio Influence.

Besides absolutists of the right (the tsar and his adherents) and left (Lenin and his fellow Bolsheviks), the Russian political landscape in 1917 featured moderates seeking liberal reform and a rapid evolution towards a constitutional monarchy. Vasily Maklakov, a lawyer, legislator and public intellectual, was among the most prominent of these, and the most articulate and sophisticated advocate of the rule of law, the linchpin of liberalism. He advocated a wide range of reforms, especially in the realms of religious freedom, national minorities, judicial independence, citizens’ judicial remedies, and peasant rights. This book, written by D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Stephen F. Williams, tells the story of Maklakov’s efforts and his analysis of the reasons for their ultimate failure. It is thus, in part, an example for movements seeking to liberalize authoritarian countries today―both a warning and a guide. Featuring:Hon. Stephen F. Williams, Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitProf. Julia Fromholz, Director, Rule of Law & Governance Program, Arizona State University, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Besides absolutists of the right (the tsar and his adherents) and left (Lenin and his fellow Bolsheviks), the Russian political landscape in 1917 featured moderates seeking liberal reform and a rapid evolution towards a constitutional monarchy. Vasily Maklakov, a lawyer, legislator and public intellectual, was among the most prominent of these, and the most articulate and sophisticated advocate of the rule of law, the linchpin of liberalism. He advocated a wide range of reforms, especially in the realms of religious freedom, national minorities, judicial independence, citizens’ judicial remedies, and peasant rights. This book, written by D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Stephen F. Williams, tells the story of Maklakov’s efforts and his analysis of the reasons for their ultimate failure. It is thus, in part, an example for movements seeking to liberalize authoritarian countries today―both a warning and a guide. Featuring:Hon. Stephen F. Williams, Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitProf. Julia Fromholz, Director, Rule of Law & Governance Program, Arizona State University, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

“I get to help students and applicants that dream of being lawyers be successful in the application process,” says our guest Adam Almaraz, who is the director of JD admissions at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. Read More... The post THCC93- From High School to Law School – The Info You Need Interview with Adam Almaraz, Director of JD Admissions at Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University appeared first on Taming The High Cost of College.

“I get to help students and applicants that dream of being lawyers be successful in the application process,” says our guest Adam Almaraz, who is the director of JD admissions at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. Read More... The post THCC93- From High School to Law School – The Info You Need Interview with Adam Almaraz, Director of JD Admissions at Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University appeared first on Taming The High Cost of College.