Podcasts about Competition law

In the latest instalment of Cleary Gottlieb's Antitrust Review podcast, host Nick Levy is joined by Ariel Ezrachi, Professor of Competition Law at Oxford University. Their conversation covers an array of topics, including the role of competition law, the risks of politicization, digital regulation, algorithmic collusion, dark patterns, AI, and much more.

New disclosure requirements for U.S. premerger notifications under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act were announced in the fall of 2024 and became effective in February 2025. What are the practical implications of the new requirements for in-house counsel tasked with preparing for an HSR filing? In this episode, Matt Bester and Paul Covaleski of Accenture LLP talk to Alicia Downey and Matt Tabas about some concrete suggestions for accurately and cost-effectively identifying and assembling the newly-required information and documents. Listen and learn some tips that will be useful not only for in-house counsel but also outside counsel and firms of all sizes involved in reportable transactions. With special guests: Matthew J. Bester, Director of Competition Law, Accenture LLP and Paul Covaleski, Antitrust and Competition Counsel, Accenture LLP Related Links: Matthew J. Bester & Paul Covaleski, "A Practical Guide to the New HSR Form For In-House Counsel," Business Law Today (ABA Business Law Section, Mar. 27, 2025) Our Curious Amalgam Episode #297: "HSR You Kidding Me? Unpacking the New Requirements for Merging Parties in the U.S." (Oct. 28, 2024) Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC and Matt Tabas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has begun SMS investigations under its new digital markets regime – with tech giants like Apple and Google already in its sights. In this episode, we cast the spotlight on the CMA’s early investigations under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (the DMCC Act). The UK’s new digital regime came into force in January this year, introducing widespread changes to competition law, the enforcement of consumer law and a regime regulating designated digital companies in the UK. Under the DMCC Act, the CMA has the power to designate companies with “strategic market status” (SMS), impose tailored conduct requirements, and make pro-competition interventions. Together, Ashurst’s Fiona Garside, Chris Eberhardt and Isabella Hunt discuss the CMA’s first SMS investigations into Google’s search and advertising services, and Apple’s and Google’s mobile ecosystems. The conversation highlights the activities under investigation, emphasises the importance of third-party input to shape regulatory outcomes, and draws comparisons with the EU’s Digital Markets Act. There’s also discussion of how the CMA’s “4 P’s framework” (pace, predictability, proportionality, and process) might apply and speculation about future investigations into the UK’s highly concentrated cloud services market. To listen and subscribe to this podcast, search for ‘Ashurst Legal Outlook’ on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast player. And to find out more about the full range of Ashurst podcasts, visit ashurst.com/podcasts. The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode, Erin is joined by Vass Bednar, public policy expert, podcast host, and co-author of The Big Fix, for a wide-ranging conversation on competition law and anti-trust issues in an age of technological and geopolitical change. They also discuss affordability issues and how different generations of Canadians view the Canadian economy differently.  Vass shares her unique insights on high profile sectors like telecom, grocery, AI and data, as well as what Canadian policy makers should take from global anti-trust trends. If you've ever wondered why your bills may be too high and what Canada needs to do to become more competitive and productive, this episode is for you.

The episode covers key aspects of competition law in India, focusing on the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) approach to mergers and anti-competitive practices. The CCI scrutinizes deals where combined market shares exceed 30-40%, particularly among competitors, but has never blocked a transaction since the merger control regime began in 2011. Indian law generally treats companies and their subsidiaries as a single economic entity, except in bidding markets where group companies must avoid sharing sensitive information. The conversation highlights India's evolving competition law, drawing from mature jurisdictions while tailoring rules for the local market. Foreign investors are typically well-informed about Indian competition laws, aligning with approval processes and rules. The evolving legal landscape is seen as an exciting time for competition law practitioners in India.Our GuestVaibhav ChoukseVaibhav is a Partner in the Firm's Competition Law Practice with over 16 years of experience. He has been practicing competition law since its inception in India, specializing in complex litigation, and merger control, advising clients across diverse industries. His expertise spans complex competition matters before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and appellate courts.In litigation, Vaibhav routinely advises multinational corporations and industry associations on cartel investigations and leniency, dawn raids, vertical agreements, abuse of dominance, and competition compliance. He has successfully defended global auto-component manufacturers, a multiplex operator, and a leading paper manufacturer in cartel cases. He currently advises major players in the seed, pharmaceutical, cement, and financial sectors in ongoing cartel and vertical restraint investigations. In abuse of dominance matters, he represents Hyundai and Ford in India's first auto-parts aftermarket abuse case and FabHotels in India's first MFN case against MakeMyTrip and OYO. He also represented Nuziveedu Seeds in its abuse of dominance case against Monsanto before the CCI and Delhi High Court. He is also involved in constitutional and procedural challenges to CCI investigations before various High Courts. Recently, he secured a stay on the CCI's investigation against sellers on a leading e-commerce platform from various High Courts.In merger control, he has secured approvals for complex transactions, including ONGC/ NTPC/ Ayana Renewable, Del Monte/ Agro Tech Foods, Coforge/Cigniti, BPEA EQT/Indira/ HDFC Credila, Temasek/Manipal Hospitals, KKR/Hero Future Energies, IBM/Kyndryl, TVS Group restructuring, Ford/Mahindra, Goldman Sachs/ReNew Power (SPAC), and Trafigura/Essar Oil.A prolific author and speaker, Vaibhav contributes to leading competition law journals and newspapers and frequently speaks at industry forums. He is recognized among India's top competition lawyers by Chambers & Partners, Who's Who Legal, Legal500, Forbes Powelist, AsiaLaw, and Global Competition Review.  Vaibhav was recently recognized in Asian Legal Business (ALB) Asia 40 Under 40, 2024 as one of Asia's top 40 legal talents under 40, distinguished as the only competition lawyer on the list.He holds a master's degree in Competition Law from King's College London, where he had the privilege of studying under Prof. Richard Whish KC (Hon) in EU Competition Law. Our HostAjay ShamdasaniAjay Shamdasani is a veteran writer, editor and researcher based in Hong Kong. He holds an AB in history and government from Ripon College, JD and MIPCT degrees from the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce Law School, and an LLM in financial regulation from the Illinois Institute of Technology's Chicago-Kent College of Law.His 15-year long career as a financial and legal journalist began as deputy editor of A Plus magazine – the journal of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants. From there, he assumed the helm of Macau Business magazine as its editor-in-chief, and later, joined Asialaw magazine as its deputy editor.More recently, he spent close to seven years as a senior correspondent with Thomson Reuters' subscription-based trade-wire service Regulatory Intelligence/Compliance Complete (previously called Complinet) in Hong Kong. While there, he covered regulatory developments in that city, as well as Singapore, India and South Korea.

Veronica Roberts (UK Head of Competition, Regulation and Trade), Peter Rowland (Of Counsel) and Ruth Allen (Knowledge Lawyer) share their insights into navigating competition law and FDI regulation in the pharmaceutical sector. Looking ahead to 2025, they highlight some key risks to be aware of and offer practical tips on pro-active steps that companies can take to address them. Topics discussed include the types of anti-competitive agreements that are likely to be in the regulatory spotlight, significant developments in respect of abuse of dominance, the growing risk of competition damages actions, the approach of the UK and EU regulators to so-called "killer acquisitions" and the sensitivities around foreign investment in the pharmaceutical sector.

Stephen Grootes speaks to Ntobeko Rapuleng, Senior Associate in Competition Law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr about the Competition Commission's draft guidelines on internal restructuring and what this means for businesses undergoing significant changesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

THE TIM JONES AND CHRIS ARPS SHOW 0:00 SEG 1 Is Margaret Brennan an anti-Semite? Speaker’s Stump Speech is brought to you by https://www.hansenstree.com/ and is about why good policy makes good politics 19:56 SEG 2 Abby Foster, VP of Policy and Advocacy for the Retail Energy Advancement League | TOPIC: Are electric utilities failing Missouri? End the utility monopoly in Missouri | Why do rates keep increasing? | Nick Schroer’s Bill SB 487, which would create "The Electrical Choice and Competition Law” https://www.retailenergychoice.org/ 34:48 SEG 3 The Associated Press has been banned from the White House press briefings and Air Force One https://newstalkstl.com/ FOLLOW TIM - https://twitter.com/SpeakerTimJones FOLLOW CHRIS - https://twitter.com/chris_arps 24/7 LIVESTREAM - http://bit.ly/NEWSTALKSTLSTREAMS RUMBLE - https://rumble.com/NewsTalkSTL See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

THE TIM JONES AND CHRIS ARPS SHOW Abby Foster, VP of Policy and Advocacy for the Retail Energy Advancement League | TOPIC: Are electric utilities failing Missouri? End the utility monopoly in Missouri | Why do rates keep increasing? | Nick Schroer’s Bill SB 487, which would create "The Electrical Choice and Competition Law” https://www.retailenergychoice.org/ https://newstalkstl.com/ FOLLOW TIM - https://twitter.com/SpeakerTimJones FOLLOW CHRIS - https://twitter.com/chris_arps 24/7 LIVESTREAM - http://bit.ly/NEWSTALKSTLSTREAMS RUMBLE - https://rumble.com/NewsTalkSTL See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

THE TIM JONES AND CHRIS ARPS SHOW 0:00 SEG 1 Is Margaret Brennan an anti-Semite? Speaker’s Stump Speech is brought to you by https://www.hansenstree.com/ and is about why good policy makes good politics 19:56 SEG 2 Abby Foster, VP of Policy and Advocacy for the Retail Energy Advancement League | TOPIC: Are electric utilities failing Missouri? End the utility monopoly in Missouri | Why do rates keep increasing? | Nick Schroer’s Bill SB 487, which would create "The Electrical Choice and Competition Law” https://www.retailenergychoice.org/ 34:48 SEG 3 The Associated Press has been banned from the White House press briefings and Air Force One https://newstalkstl.com/ FOLLOW TIM - https://twitter.com/SpeakerTimJones FOLLOW CHRIS - https://twitter.com/chris_arps 24/7 LIVESTREAM - http://bit.ly/NEWSTALKSTLSTREAMS RUMBLE - https://rumble.com/NewsTalkSTL See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

THE TIM JONES AND CHRIS ARPS SHOW Abby Foster, VP of Policy and Advocacy for the Retail Energy Advancement League | TOPIC: Are electric utilities failing Missouri? End the utility monopoly in Missouri | Why do rates keep increasing? | Nick Schroer’s Bill SB 487, which would create "The Electrical Choice and Competition Law” https://www.retailenergychoice.org/ https://newstalkstl.com/ FOLLOW TIM - https://twitter.com/SpeakerTimJones FOLLOW CHRIS - https://twitter.com/chris_arps 24/7 LIVESTREAM - http://bit.ly/NEWSTALKSTLSTREAMS RUMBLE - https://rumble.com/NewsTalkSTL See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

When it comes to your health, having digitized information available for seamless sharing across multiple healthcare providers and other stakeholders -- including patients themselves -- is a clear benefit. But can certain actors disrupt the goal of interoperability? David Schwartz, a healthcare-focused antitrust lawyer, joins Jeny Maier and Matt Tabas to introduce us to the challenge of healthcare information blocking and what avenues are available to enforcers to address this behavior. Listen to this episode if you're curious about how competition law principles play a part in ensuring that patients receive more effective care through seamless exchange of electronic medical records. With special guest: David Schwartz, Partner, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Related Links: Everson J, Patel V, Adler-Milstein J., Information blocking remains prevalent at the start of 21st Century Cures Act: results from a survey of health information exchange organizations 2015 Information Blocking Report  HHS Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy (a/k/a the Office of National Coordinator) webpage on information blocking HHS ASTP/ONC webpage on information blocking exceptions Hosted by: Jeny Maier, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Matt Tabas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The independent Mexican competition law regulator, COFECE, has been abolished and absorbed into the Ministry of Economics. What does this mean for merger control and competition law enforcement in Mexico? Lucia Ojeda Cárdenas, lawyer at SAI Law & Economics in Mexico City, joins Matthew Hall and Subrata Bhattacharjee to discuss this dramatic reform to the Constitution of Mexico. Listen to this episode to learn more about the timing of the changes, the structure of the new agency and implications for Mexican and foreign companies operating in the country. With special guest: Lucia Ojeda Cárdenas, partner, SAI Law & Economics  Related Links: SAI memo November 2024, Bill to eliminate various autonomous constitutional agencies, including COFECE COFECE press release November 2024, Position regarding the approval of the reform on organic simplification COFECE position paper regarding the reform COFECE position paper regarding the transition to the new competition authority IFT position paper regarding the reform  IFT position paper regarding the budget assigned by Congress  Congress of the Union, Decree whereby various provisions of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States are reformed, added, and repealed, in organic simplification matters Hosted by: Matthew Hall, McGuireWoods London LLP and Subrata Bhattacharjee, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Rozmowa Piotra Szczepańskiego z dr Magdaleną El Ghamari w ramach cyklu #rozmowywszechnicy [29 stycznia 2025 r.] https://wszechnica.org.pl/wyklad/polityka-donalda-trumpa-wobec-bliskiego-wschodu/ Bliski Wschód to jeden z frontów, na którym Zachód, a szczególnie USA, ściera się z korporacją autokratyczną (Iran, Rosja, Korea Północna, Chiny). Jak obecnie wygląda sytuacja. Czy Izrael, w wyniku operacji w Gazie odniósł lokalny sukces i osłabił część tej korporacji? Jaka była polityka USA wobec regionu za prezydenta Joe Bidena, a jaka za będzie za czasów prezydentury Donalda Trumpa? dr Magdalena El Ghamari – wykładowca w Uniwersytecie w Białymstoku (Instytut Historii i Nauk Politycznych, Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego) oraz analityk w portalu Defence24 oraz zastępca Prezesa w Fundacji Po.Int. Członek European Security Assosiation, Stowarzyszenia Kombatantów Misji pokojowych ONZ, Towarzystwa Polsko –Albańskiego oraz International Institute for Private-, Commercial-, and Competition Law w Tiranie. Studia doktoranckie ukończyła w Katedrze Działań Połączonych Akademii Obrony Narodowej. Dysertacja doktorska zatytułowana „Międzykulturowość w operacjach reagowania kryzysowego”, sfinalizowana w obszarze nauk o obronności, o specjalności operacje i techniki operacyjne. Otworzyła drugi przewód doktorski w Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Warszawie. Wykładowca akademicki oraz szkoleniowiec (Instytut Studiów nad Terroryzmem, Szkoła Wyższa Towarzystwa Wiedzy Powszechnej w Warszawie, Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania w Rzeszowie, Wyższa Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania w Warszawie, Centrum Szkolenia na Potrzeby Sił Pokojowych w Kielcach, UNESCO, Grupy Interwencyjne Straży Więziennej, Straż Graniczna, Policja) oraz uczestniczka programów międzynarodowych (Helsińska Fundacja Praw Człowieka, Polski Czerwony Krzyż, Europejska Akademia Dyplomacji). Kierownik projektu międzynarodowego w 2015 roku: : Bałkański tygiel bezpieczeństwa: problemy teraźniejszości, czy wyzwania przyszłości? Kierownik projektu międzynarodowego w 2016: „bałkańskie szlaki migracyjne” na południowych granicach Europy we współpracy Frontexem oraz „Kosowo 2016 – bałkański patchwork”. Autorka tekstów z zakresu bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego, międzykulturowości oraz kultury arabsko – muzułmańskiej (ostatnia monografia: Cool Jihad – w druku, wydawnictwo Difin, Analiza porównawcza doświadczeń iracko-libijskich w kontekście sytuacji na Ukrainie, Rzeszów 2016, Między kulturą, a religią – operacje wojskowe w Iraku i Afganistanie, Oficyna Kucharski, Toruń 2015, Zarządzanie i dowodzenie we współczesnych uwarunkowaniach, Warszawa 2013, Cross-Culture Awareness in crisis response operations, Warszawa 2012). Szkoleniowiec uczestników polskich kontyngentów wojskowych z zakresu środowiska prowadzenia operacji. Prowadzi sieć wykładów zatytułowanych „W kręgu kultury Islamu” dla nauczycieli i szkół ponadgimnazjalnych w całej Polsce. Współpracuje w ramach prowadzenia wykładów oraz konferencji z wieloma uniwersytetami w Polsce (WSOWL, UJK, UAM, WSB, AMW, US) oraz zagranicą Uniwersytet w Albanii (Tirana) oraz Kosowie (Prisztina – jako profesor wizytujący podczas Summer University) oraz szkoleniowiec dla CCOE NATO (Enschede Holandia) Jeśli chcesz wspierać Wszechnicę w dalszym tworzeniu treści, organizowaniu kolejnych #rozmówWszechnicy, możesz: 1. Zostać Patronem Wszechnicy FWW w serwisie https://patronite.pl/wszechnicafww 2. Możesz wspierać nas, robiąc zakupy za pomocą serwisu Fanimani.pl - https://tiny.pl/wkwpk 3. Możesz przekazać nam darowiznę na cele statutowe tradycyjnym przelewem Darowizny dla Fundacji Wspomagania Wsi można przekazywać na konto nr: 33 1600 1462 1808 7033 4000 0001 Fundacja Wspomagania Wsi Znajdź nas: https://www.youtube.com/c/WszechnicaFWW/ https://www.facebook.com/WszechnicaFWW1/ https://anchor.fm/wszechnicaorgpl---historia https://anchor.fm/wszechnica-fww-nauka https://wszechnica.org.pl/ #rozmowywszechnicy #polityka #wschód #trump #bliskiwschód #izrael #gaza

India is now one of the most important competition law jurisdictions in the world. With direct court action against anti-competitive practices not an option, how can a third party seek to persuade the Competition Commission of India to become involved? Abir Roy, partner and co-founder of Sarvada Legal, joins Matthew Roberts and Matthew Hall to discuss the underlying rules and practical issues involved in bringing an information (complaint) before the CCI. Listen to this episode to learn more about precedent cases, the evidence required, the various stages of an investigation, timeframes, confidentiality, remedies, the availability of compensation and other issues involved in this area. With special guest: Abir Roy, partner and co-founder, Sarvada Legal Related Links: Order in Alphabet/Google case 2022 Order in Alphabet/Google case 2024 Competition Commission of India webpage (Filing of Information) Competition Commission of India press release (Meta fine) Hosted by: Matthew Reynolds, Huth Reynolds LLP and Matthew Hall, McGuireWoods London LLP

In this episode of Two Think Minimum, Nicolas Petit, Chair in Competition Law at the European University Institute, joins hosts Tom Lenard, Scott Wallsten, and Sarah Oh Lam to explore the pressing challenges facing European competitiveness. Drawing insights from the recent Draghi Report, Petit discusses Europe's innovation gaps, the role of big tech, and the critical policy shifts needed to secure the region's economic future.

In diesem C! Podcast spricht Corinne Flick mit Rupprecht Podszun, Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für deutsches und europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. Er ist Direktor des Instituts für Kartellrecht, Präsident der Academic Society for Competition Law und Mitglied der Monopolkommission, über:Warum der Wettbewerb der Ausdruck unserer Freiheit ist

Apple is reportedly facing a fine from the European Union, and it could be a hefty one. It’s the first Big Tech company to be slapped with a financial penalty under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which went into effect last year. The law, aimed at spurring competition in digital markets, requires Big Tech companies designated as “gatekeepers” to change policies that lock consumers into their products. Like, say, the walled garden of the Apple App Store. EU regulators ruled that Apple violated the DMA by failing to fully support app developers “steering” consumers to alternative marketplaces. It’s a story Matt Binder, a senior tech reporter for Mashable, has been following.

Apple is reportedly facing a fine from the European Union, and it could be a hefty one. It’s the first Big Tech company to be slapped with a financial penalty under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which went into effect last year. The law, aimed at spurring competition in digital markets, requires Big Tech companies designated as “gatekeepers” to change policies that lock consumers into their products. Like, say, the walled garden of the Apple App Store. EU regulators ruled that Apple violated the DMA by failing to fully support app developers “steering” consumers to alternative marketplaces. It’s a story Matt Binder, a senior tech reporter for Mashable, has been following.

Apple is reportedly facing a fine from the European Union, and it could be a hefty one. It’s the first Big Tech company to be slapped with a financial penalty under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, which went into effect last year. The law, aimed at spurring competition in digital markets, requires Big Tech companies designated as “gatekeepers” to change policies that lock consumers into their products. Like, say, the walled garden of the Apple App Store. EU regulators ruled that Apple violated the DMA by failing to fully support app developers “steering” consumers to alternative marketplaces. It’s a story Matt Binder, a senior tech reporter for Mashable, has been following.

Speaker: Dr Kalpana Tyagi, Assistant Professor, Maastricht UniversityAbstract: Data protection, privacy and copyright may be closely aligned, yet distinctly respond to the common element, that is data – comprising of personal as well as non-personal elements. While data may not be copyright-protected, works (at least in their current form) are copyright-protected. As the Generative AI tools become more advanced, data and copyright-protected works may cease to bear any direct resemblance to pre-existing works. This can be attributed to the rise of synthetic data. While synthetic data may facilitate compliance with the 2016 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it also heralds notable challenges for the current IPR (particularly copyright) framework. This interplay between law and technology - in light of its inter- & intra-disciplinary complexity - remains under-explored in the literature. At the CIPIL seminar, Dr. Tyagi presents her research findings on this interplay between copyright (and other IPRs) as well as data protection and privacy in the context of synthetic data and Generative AI.Biography: Kalpana Tyagi is Assistant Professor of Intellectual Property and Competition Law in the European and International Law Department, Maastricht University. She holds a multidisciplinary PhD (summa cum laude) from the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich where she worked as Max Planck Fellow for Innovation and Competition until 2015. She also holds a bachelor's degree in marketing and business strategy (I division) from College of Business Studies, New Delhi (2002), a bachelor's degree in law (I division) from the Department of Law, New Delhi, an LLM degree in International Business Laws (I division) from Singapore and China (2009) and a specialized master in European Law and Economics (magna cum laude) from University of Hamburg, Bologna and Ghent (2012). Her main areas of interest relate to the interface of intellectual property rights and competition law, particularly in the context of digitalization.For more information see:https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.

Speaker: Dr Kalpana Tyagi, Assistant Professor, Maastricht UniversityAbstract: Data protection, privacy and copyright may be closely aligned, yet distinctly respond to the common element, that is data – comprising of personal as well as non-personal elements. While data may not be copyright-protected, works (at least in their current form) are copyright-protected. As the Generative AI tools become more advanced, data and copyright-protected works may cease to bear any direct resemblance to pre-existing works. This can be attributed to the rise of synthetic data. While synthetic data may facilitate compliance with the 2016 EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it also heralds notable challenges for the current IPR (particularly copyright) framework. This interplay between law and technology - in light of its inter- & intra-disciplinary complexity - remains under-explored in the literature. At the CIPIL seminar, Dr. Tyagi presents her research findings on this interplay between copyright (and other IPRs) as well as data protection and privacy in the context of synthetic data and Generative AI.Biography: Kalpana Tyagi is Assistant Professor of Intellectual Property and Competition Law in the European and International Law Department, Maastricht University. She holds a multidisciplinary PhD (summa cum laude) from the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich where she worked as Max Planck Fellow for Innovation and Competition until 2015. She also holds a bachelor's degree in marketing and business strategy (I division) from College of Business Studies, New Delhi (2002), a bachelor's degree in law (I division) from the Department of Law, New Delhi, an LLM degree in International Business Laws (I division) from Singapore and China (2009) and a specialized master in European Law and Economics (magna cum laude) from University of Hamburg, Bologna and Ghent (2012). Her main areas of interest relate to the interface of intellectual property rights and competition law, particularly in the context of digitalization.For more information see:https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.

How will competition authorities shape the future of AI for businesses and consumers? Partner Jordan Ellison and Senior PSL Annalisa Tosdevin discuss the current focus of competition authorities on the AI sector, and what this could mean for businesses and consumers in practice. 

Can competition law save humanity? Over the past two years, Fiona Schaeffer has spurred on the lawyers, regulators, and economists of the ABA Antitrust Law Section to examine the role that antitrust law has, or potentially will have, in dealing with the existential challenges posed by climate change and the rise of artificial intelligence. In this episode, co-hosts Alicia Downey and Anora Wang talk with Fiona about why she chose to focus attention on these two issues during her recent term as Section Chair, and the insights that listeners should take away from the Section's work to date. With special guest: Fiona Schaeffer, Milbank LLP Related Links: Joint Section Comments on the Canadian Competition Bureau's Discussion Paper on Artificial Intelligence and Competition (July 9, 2024) Report on Competition Law and Sustainability to the JFTC by the International Comments and Policy Committee (March 18, 2024) Joint Section Comments on the European Commission's Consultation on Generative AI (March 6, 2024) Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC and Anora Wang, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

Please join us for a fireside chat with Gwendolyn Cooley, former Chair of the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) Multistate Antitrust Task Force (2021-2024) and former Wisconsin Assistant Attorney General (2005-2024). This candid conversation will cover how State Attoneys General work together across administrations, their work with Federal antitrust agencies, and more.Gwendolyn J. Lindsay CooleyFeaturing:Gwendolyn J. Lindsay Cooley, Former NAAG Antitrust Task Force Chair and Former Assistant Attorney General at Wisconsin Department of JusticeModerator: Dina Kallay, Head of Antitrust and Competition Law, Ericsson--To register, click the link above.

Partner Louise Klamka takes us down the catwalk where fashion meets competition law. Is the Birkin bag in a market of its own? Is "accessible luxury" a contradiction in terms or a reason to keep Tapestry away from Capri? And how does this relate to industrial relations and ESG-washing? Plus supermarket discounts and the new Food and Grocery Code; new directions for competition law in the European Commission and the Courts; and the Australian Competition Tribunal gets ready for its new role in the merger review framework. All this and More Songs about Buildings and Food with co-hosts Moya Dodd and Matt Rubinstein. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

New ACCC Commissioner Dr Philip Williams AM trades a long history in economics in the private sector and academia for a crucial role with the competition regulator. He joins partner Simon Muys to discuss the history and future of competition law and economics, from misuse of market power to the structure–conduct–performance paradigm. Plus we examine the proposed merger notification thresholds; Disney's in court for unfair contract terms and a sports joint venture; the new anti-siphoning list gets a workout; the CMA investigates Ticketmaster over Oasis tickets; and the long awaited amendments to the Privacy Act finally land. All this and dynamic pricing with co-hosts Moya Dodd and Matt Rubinstein.     Meet the Gilbert + Tobin Competition, Consumer + Market Regulation team  Email us at edge@gtlaw.com.au   NPR on Trading Places and the Eddie Murphy rule  G+T on the draft notification thresholds and their place in the new merger framework  More about motorway interchange design than you probably need to know  The Conversation on Disney's arbitration clause  Judge Margaret M. Garnett issues a preliminary injunction against the Venu sports streaming joint venture  The BBC on Oasis and Ticketmaster and Choice on dynamic pricing    G+T on the first tranche of amendments to the Privacy Act  The Bundeskartellamt on applying the Remondis clause to Remondis  Meet the Gilbert + Tobin Competition, Consumer + Market Regulation team  Email us at edge@gtlaw.com.au   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Plus, Telegram CEO hits back at French charges in first public comments since his arrest. And J.P. Morgan Chase is investigating possible check fraud spurred by TikTok videos. Zoe Thomas hosts.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When you go to look something up on the internet, more often than not you're Googling. The search engine's ubiquity has earned Google billions and billions of dollars, but now a US judge has ruled that Google became a monopoly illegally. How you search the internet might change as a result, with the forced break-up of the firm one of the options on the table to ensure more competition in the market. So, how did Google rise to the top and stay there? Today, we dissect the biggest tech competition ruling in decades with Leah Nylen, Bloomberg's anti-trust reporter. Featured: Leah Nylen, Bloomberg anti-trust reporter

Labour markets are in the focus of competition law regulators worldwide and companies and their advisers need to know what the issues are. What is the situation in the EU and its member states? Johanna Kübler, partner at German competition law firm Commeo, joins Jaclyn Phillips and Matthew Hall to discuss the background to this current focus in the EU, the legal rules that apply, the current status of leading investigations and key practical compliance messages. Listen to this episode to learn more about how to navigate and comply with competition law in this important area. With special guest: Johanna Kübler, partner, COMMEO Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB Related Links: Portugal Competition Authority technology consulting no-poach investigation 2024: https://www.concorrencia.pt/en/articles/adc-accuses-multinational-technology-consulting-group-anticompetitive-practices-labor https://www.concorrencia.pt/en/articles/adc-fined-multinationals-anticompetitive-practices-labor-market European Commission Competition Policy Brief "Antitrust in Labour Markets" May 2024 Commissioner Vestager speech October 2021 "A new era of cartel enforcement" European Commission food delivery no-poach investigation November 2023 Commeo newsletter "Labour Markets in the Focus of Competition Watchdogs" May 2024 UK Competition and Markets Authority purchase of freelance services investigations U.S. Federal Trade Commission "FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes" April 2024 Hosted by: Jaclyn Phillips, White & Case LLP and Matthew Hall, McGuireWoods London LLP

In this episode, Dr. Melissa Omino is joined by Dr. Desmond Oriakhogba, an Associate Professor at The University of the Western Cape. Dr. Oriakhogba is an expert in Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Dr. Omino and Dr. Oriakhogba have an in-depth discussion on Dr. Oriakhogba's book, The Right to Research in Africa: Exploring the Interface between Copyright and Human Rights. The book explores the intersection and manifestation of tensions between intellectual property rights and human rights, focusing on the conflict between Copyright and the Right to Research in light of the African context.The book has five chapters and is written in accessible language. It is framed to target a broad audience, offering insights for law and policymakers, judges, lawyers, researchers, students, and the general public.ResourcesAudio Home Recording Act (AHRA) of 1992 (the "Sony Act")https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/senate-bill/1623/textSony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. in 1984https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/sonycorp-universal-1984.pdf  Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Workshttps://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20828/volume-828-I-11850-English.pdf  The Right to Research-Arjun Appadurahttps://docs.ufpr.br/~clarissa/pdfs/Research_AppaduraiA.pdf  Why Intellectual Property and Pandemics Don't Mixhttps://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-intellectual-property-and-pandemics-dont-mix/  General Comment No. 25 (2020) On Article 15: Science and Economic, Social and Cultural Rightshttps://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2020-article-15-science-and  AU Agenda 2063 https://au.int/en/agenda2063/sdgs#:~:text=and%20children's%20rights-,4.,empower%20all%20women%20and%20girls.  Springer Briefs In Law Serieshttps://www.springer.com/series/10164   

In our first Podcast on the work of the Treasury Taskforce, Stephanie Panayi and Andrew North delved into the merger reform proposals that were under consideration by the Treasury Taskforce preceding today's Government announcement. Leveraging Andrew's extensive knowledge of the UK and EU merger regimes, we dissect several key aspects of the Treasury's consultation including:

On episode 206, we welcome Mark White to discuss the drawbacks of antitrust laws, what rights consumers actually have, if trusts are unfair and unjust, the utilitarian argument against those laws, the flawed healthcare insurance system in the US and how its consumers struggle, whether it's feasible to constantly have new entrepreneurs challenging trusts, the trading system in the NFL and how it prevents unfair competition, and what the economy could look like if antitrust laws are relaxed Mark D. White is Professor and Chair of the Department of Philosophy at the College of Staten Island/CUNY, where he teaches courses in philosophy, economics, and law, and is also a member of the economics doctoral faculty at the Graduate Center of CUNY. His books include A Philosopher Reads Marvel Comics' Thor, A Philosopher Reads Marvel Comics' Civil War, The Virtues of Captain America, Batman and Ethics, The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics and A Philosopher Reads...Marvel Comics' Daredevil: From the Beginning to Born Again. His newest book is called Rights versus Antitrust: Challenging the Ethics of Competition Law. | Mark D. White | ► Website | https://www.profmdwhite.com ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/profmdwhite ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/profmdwhite ► Rights versus Antitrust | https://amzn.to/49HNVa7 Where you can find us: | Seize The Moment Podcast | ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMoment ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/seize_podcast ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/seizethemoment ► TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@seizethemomentpodcast ► Patreon | https://www.patreon.com/user?u=32208666  

In this special episode of International Law Talk: Patricia Shaughnessy, Professor at Stockholm University and John Fellas, independent full-time arbitrator. The episode is a recurrence of John Fellas' speech ‘the future of arbitration: evolution or revolution?', presented during the 20th Anniversary Conference of the International Commercial Arbitration Law program in Stockholm in August 2023. John Fellas' speech has been nominated for the 2024 GAR Awards. Stay informed on https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/ This podcast episode is part of International Law Talk. Wolters Kluwer will bring you insightful analysis, commentary, and discussion from thought leaders and experts on current topics in the field of International Arbitration, IP Law, International Tax Law, Competition Law and other international legal fields. Music tune: Scuba, Metre. #internationallawtalk

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/economics

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.  Bruce Wardhaugh's Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions. Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers.

The interplay between patent law and competition law has been a consistent focus for the antitrust agencies over the years, most notably in the pharmaceutical sector between brand and generic drugs. But will the FTC take a new approach to dealing with branded drug company patents listed in the FDA's "Orange Book"? Mika Ikeda, Competition Counsel at Johnson & Johnson joins Jaclyn Phillips and Jeny Maier to discuss the FTC's historical interest in Orange Book listings and what actions the agency may take in the future. Listen to this episode to learn more about FTC policy related to competition in drug markets, and why the "Orange Book" is orange! With special guest: Mika Ikeda, Senior Counsel, Competition Law, Johnson & Johnson Related Links: Federal Trade Commission Statement Concerning Brand Drug Manufacturers' Improper Listing of Patents in the Orange Book (Sept. 14, 2023) Hosted by: Jaclyn Phillips, White & Case LLP and Jeny Maier, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Competition Law | The Legal Insider S02E06

Gender differences are often overlooked when conducting competition law analysis. How should gender impact the work of competition regulators? Lynn Robertson, Competition Expert at the OECD's Competition Policy Division and co-author of the OECD's Gender Inclusive Competition Toolkit, joins Alicia Downey and Matthew Hall to discuss the Toolkit project. Listen to this episode to learn more about the background to the project, the key insights and findings set out in the Toolkit and the OECD's future work in this area. With special guest: Lynn Robertson, Competition Expert, Competition Policy Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, OECD Related Links: OECD Gender Inclusive Competition Toolkit Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Principal, Downey Law LLC and Matthew Hall, Partner, McGuireWoods London LLP

Even as maximum corporate penalties go through the roof, there may be more deterrence in pursuing a business's officers and employees. Partner Liana Witt talks us through individual liability for competition law contraventions and how not to end up as the anti-hero. Plus Treasury consults on changes to the merger process; new leadership and new expectations for the Productivity Commission; the High Court hits the ground running; and when's the ACCC going to drop another competition court case? All this and evermore with co-hosts Moya Dodd and Matt Rubinstein.   The inaugural 2nd Anniversary End of Year Holiday Season Speak Now Podcast Survey G+T on the Treasury consultation on merger review process proposals MLex on the ACCC's Marcus Bezzi and the merger reform proposals Two A.I. "covers" of Taylor Swift singing Radiohead's "Creep" More on Alex Morgan and Taylor Swift New Productivity Commission Chair Danielle Wood on the ABC's 7.30 High Court Ceremonial Sittings for Gageler CJ and Beech-Jones J "Listening to Taylor Swift in Prison" by Joe Garcia in The New Yorker MLex, "Has the will to win chilled the Australian watchdog's antitrust-enforcement campaign?" Meet the Gilbert + Tobin Competition + Regulation team Email us at edge@gtlaw.com.au See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

CMU's Andy Malt and Chris Cooke review key events in music and the music business from the last week. On this edition, competition law expert (as well as musician and label owner) Amelia Fletcher's letter to Spotify boss Daniel Ek about the streaming services plan for a two-tier royalty system, and the rickrolling takedown battle between two stream-ripping platforms.  SECTION TIMES 01: Spotify (00:04:27) 02: Stream-ripping (00:19:56) (Timings may be slightly different due to adverts) STORIES DISCUSSED THIS WEEK • Spotify two-tier payment “discriminatory and exploitative” says competition law expert • Stream-ripper gets court order to identify who is behind rick-rolling Google takedown notices ALSO MENTIONED • Music industry contributes £6.7 billion GVA to British economy • Download the UK Music This Is Music 2023 report • Amelia Fletcher's full letter to Daniel Ek

The role of antitrust in health care is a common topic in the antitrust world. But does health care quality play a big enough role in the discussion? Professor Theodosia Stavroulaki joins Jaclyn Phillips and Jeny Maier to discuss her new book, which focuses on the role of competition and quality in healthcare markets. Listen in to hear more about Professor Stavroulaki's compelling research. With special guest: Theodosia Stavroulaki, Assistant Professor of Law, Gonzaga University School of Law Related Links: Theodosia Stavroulaki, Mergers That Harm Our Health (Berkeley Business Law Journal) Hosted by: Jeny Maier, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Jaclyn Phillips, White & Case LLP

This podcast provides a unique insight in how to get your deal approved against the background of an increasingly complex competition law and national security filing world. Oliver Bretz is founding partner of Euclid law. He has has dealt with competition authorities for many years and has set up his firm to be the most commercial specialist in competition law advice. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The 2023 Annual Spring Meeting of the ABA Antitrust Law Section offered the Our Curious Amalgam team a chance to speak with international competition law enforcers from around the world. In this episode, we ask Matthew Boswell, Commissioner of the Canadian Competition Bureau, Alexandre Cordeiro Macedo, President of CADE in Brazil, and Dr. Chih-Min (Andy) Chen, Vice Chairperson of the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission, about their respective agencies' enforcement priorities, what trends they see on the horizon, and what advocates with matters before their agencies should do to be most effective. As a bonus, listeners will also get to know our distinguished guests a little better on a personal level. With special guests: Matthew Boswell, Commissioner of Competition, Competition Bureau Canada, Alexandre Cordeiro Macedo, President, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), and Dr. Chih-Min (Andy) Chen, Vice Chairperson, Taiwan Fair Trade Commission Related Links: Competition Bureau Canada Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE) Taiwan Fair Trade Commission Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC and Anora Wang, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The 2023 Annual Spring Meeting of the ABA Antitrust Law Section offered the Our Curious Amalgam team a chance to speak with international competition law enforcers from around the world. In this episode, we ask Natalie Harsdorf-Borsch, acting director of the Austrian Federal Competition Authority, Laura Melusine Baudenbacher, president of the Swiss Competition Commission, and Šarūnas Keserauskas, the then chairman of the Lithuanian Competition Council, about their respective agencies' enforcement priorities, what trends they see on the horizon, and what advocates with matters before their agencies should do to be most effective. As a bonus, listeners will also get to know our distinguished guests a little better on a personal level. With special guests: Natalie Harsdorf-Borsch, Acting Director, Austrian Federal Competition Authority, Dr. Laura Melusine Baudenbacher, President, Swiss Competition Commission, and Šarūnas Keserauskas, Chairman, Lithuanian Competition Council (2011-2023) Related Links: Austrian Federal Competition Authority (Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde) Swiss Competition Commission Competition Council of the Republic of Lithuania (Konkurencijos taryba) Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC, Anora Wang, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Sergei Zaslavsky, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, and Jeny Maier, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

There are many debates in the antitrust world today, but none is as fundamental as the discussion over the core purpose of antitrust. Should antitrust law be solely concerned with economic efficiency, or is it also a tool for upholding and promoting our democratic political values? Spencer Waller, law professor at the Loyola University Chicago School of Law, and Geoffrey Manne, founder of the International Center for Law and Economics, debate this important question with hosts Sergei Zaslavsky and Melissa Maxman. Listen to this episode to hear competing perspectives on such key issues as the connection between economic and political power, the proper role of different branches of government in shaping antitrust policy, and much more. With special guests: Spencer Waller, John Paul Stevens Chair in Competition Law, Loyola University Chicago School of Law and Geoffrey Manne, Founder and President of International Center for Law and Economics Related Links: Harry First and Spencer Weber Waller, Antitrust's Democracy Deficit, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 2543 (2013) Antitrust and Democracy by Spencer Weber Waller :: SSRN Geoffrey Manne & Alec Stapp, Does Political Power Follow Economic Power? (Dec. 30, 2019) Hosted by: Sergei Zaslavsky, O'Melveny & Myers and Melissa Maxman, Cohen & Gresser