Podcasts about international environmental law

In this episode of Plan Sea, hosts Anna Madlener and Wil Burns sit down with Professor Dr. Alexander Proelss, Chair in the International Law of the Sea and International Environmental Law, Public International Law, and Public Law at the University of Hamburg, to discuss the current state and recent developments of international legal frameworks regulating ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (oCDR). Alexander discusses the need for international law to ensure responsible regulation of oCDR, and offers insight into the relevant international agreements for oCDR research.Alexander joins Anna and Wil to help make sense of the existing international landscape, as well as what they mean for the development and regulation of ocean-climate research. He explains that international law is essential to ensuring responsible development of oCDR — and yet there is no single international treaty governing it.  He explains how the 1972 London Convention and the 1996 London Protocol (LC/LP) — originally designed to regulate the dumping of waste but later adapted to govern marine geoengineering — is the most relevant international framework to date, guiding the ocean-climate field. However, it has had slow progress in listing and regulating oCDR methods such as ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE). Alexander discusses how today, the LC/LP interacts with the Paris agreement, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the 2023 Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Agreement (BBNJ). He also offers insight into how new legislation in Germany could make the country a "front runner" by implementing the LC/LP, permitting scientific research of several oCDR approaches and marking a significant shift from its previously highly precautionary stance.Alexander also discusses the tendency of international agreements to limit oCDR activities to scientific research and how regulation must balance risk mitigation with harnessing the benefits of oCDR. Looking ahead, he explains how a clear framework for governing commercial activity could help proven oCDR methods grow responsibly. To learn more about the latest state of international legal frameworks for oCDR, listen to the episode above, subscribe with your favorite podcast service, or find the entire series here. Plan Sea is a semi-weekly podcast exploring ocean-based climate solutions, brought to you by the Carbon to Sea Initiative and the American University Institute for Responsible Carbon Removal.ACRONYMS/CONCEPTS:London Convention (LC): Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972London Protocol: 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972OAE: ocean alkalinity enhancementoCDR: ocean carbon dioxide removalCDR: carbon dioxide removalUNCLOS: UN Convention on the Law of the SeaEEZ: exclusive economic zonesBBNJ: Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Agreement of 2023ICJ: International Court of JusticePlan Sea is a semi-weekly podcast exploring ocean-based climate solutions, brought to you by the Carbon to Sea Initiative & the American University Institute for Responsible Carbon Removal.

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, an in-depth investigatory show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (2/17/26). As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant. !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2q643"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");   Rumble("play", {"video":"v73pkys","div":"rumble_v73pkys"}); Video Source Links (In Chronological Order): (9) Instagram Allegations of bodies buried at Epstein's New Mexico ranch prompt investigation calls EFTA00067066.pdf EFTA00038382.pdf (11) Bethany Blankley on X: "NM Epstein ranch now owned by Texas comptroller candidate @DonHuffines https://t.co/akMjV2t0i4 via @thecentersquare I asked his attorney several questions: When asked if the Huffines were concerned about the sex-trafficked victims on the property if they had done any forensic" / X NM Epstein ranch now owned by Texas comptroller candidate | Texas | thecentersquare.com (10) The Last American Vagabond on X: "They're just straight lying to everyone. How does anyone support these clowns? https://t.co/hwef9NkR12" / X (10) James Li on X: "Dan Bongino is lying. According to the FBI, they hold approximately 14.6 Terabytes of archived data related to Epstein. To date, the DOJ has only released ~300GB worth of files (roughly 2% of the total). This isn't going away Dan!! https://t.co/S2XgWO6iCW" / X New Tab (14) Kevork Almassian on X: "The Empire Above Epstein" / X (11) ParaPower Mapping on X: "Lmfao HOOOLY SHIIIT, look at this https://t.co/VcKqE21oXe" / X EFTA02656963.pdf The Prince and The Spy - The Last American Vagabond Axon acquires Carbyne for $625 million, consolidating Israeli 911 surveillance tech with US police body camera giant | The Capture Cascade Timeline Public safety giant Axon acquires Carbyne for $625 million in cash | Ctech Welcome to the Palantir World Order IMA: The Palantir AI Panopticon (11) Kim Dotcom on X: "Breaking Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI agent was used to gain super-user access and here”s what the hackers allegedly found: Peter Thiel and Alex Karp commit mass surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry on a massive scale. They have thousands of hours of" / X AI overlords of the world hacked: Fallout from the massive Palantir breach — RT World News Meet Your Digital Twin: This AI Model Can Predict Your Future Health – and Help You Change It | Weizmann USA New Tab Apple buys Israeli ‘pre-speech' tech firm implicated in Gaza genocide - The Grayzone Q US20250173415A1 - Using facial movements to generate a conversational record - Google Patents Trump Admin Admits 4 New mRNA COVID Shots Underway & The US' New Israeli-Made AI Pre-Crime System (1) GIDEON: The AI System That Flags Threats Before the Next Attack - YouTube (11) Whitney Webb on X: "I've warned about the pre-crime push to "stop mass shootings before they happen" for years, especially during the first Trump administration. I don't think it's a coincidence that this happens just as the full extent of the Epstein-Thiel-Carbyne911 relationship is being" / X Whitney Webb Interview - CIA/Mossad-Linked Surveillance Systems Quietly Installed Throughout The US The Truth About the United States' "Continuity of Government" Plans & The Coronavirus Perfect Storm (1) REX 84 Brooks-North-Inouye Iran Contra. - YouTube New Tab Big Tech Confirms DHS Subpoenas: Meta and Google Users Targeted Over Anti-ICE Posts Homeland Security Demands Social Media Sites Reveal Names Behind Anti-ICE Posts - The New York Times New Tab DARPA's "Generative Optogenetics" Program Is All That We've Feared & Held Hostage By Geoengineering US-Israeli Start-Up Announces Reckless Solar Geoengineering Experiments from April 2026 - Center for International Environmental Law (14) Ryan Rozbiani on X: "NEW

On today's show, American Property Casualty Insurance Association's Robert Passmore and Central Marin Fire Department's Todd Lando impart a list of advisories about how to live with the growing threat of wildfires.  Also, I have a rebuttal conversation on wildfires and who should ultimately be footing the bill for all the calamities with Charles Slidders of The Center for International Environmental Law. More Links: readyforwildfire.org   The post To Be Prepared appeared first on KPFA.

La COP30 s'est achevée dans une atmosphère de désillusion rarement aussi partagée. Climatologues, ONG, experts du GIEC… tous dénoncent un accord jugé creux, incapable de répondre à l'urgence climatique. Et ils le disent sans détour.Davide Faranda, directeur de recherche au CNRS, résume le sentiment général : « un accord vide », incapable de protéger les priorités essentielles — sécurité alimentaire, santé, stabilité des sociétés. Il pointe une incohérence majeure : l'absence totale de référence aux énergies fossiles, pourtant cause première du dérèglement climatique. « Sans engagements concrets, mesurables et vérifiables, les promesses resteront des slogans », regrette-t-il, estimant que l'Europe a perdu en influence et se retrouve aspirée dans un monde dominé par les rapports de force.Même amertume chez François Gemenne, spécialiste des migrations environnementales et co-auteur du dernier rapport du GIEC. Son verdict est lapidaire : « Le texte est naze. Archi-nul. » Il déplore un recul massif par rapport à la COP28, notamment sur les énergies fossiles, totalement effacées du texte final. Il s'attendait au moins à des avancées sur la déforestation ou l'agriculture : « Là aussi, le bilan est nul. »Katharine Hayhoe, climatologue américaine très suivie, souligne elle aussi l'absurdité d'un accord qui se limite… à « entamer des discussions » sur la sortie des fossiles, après deux semaines de négociations intenses.Les ONG ne mâchent pas leurs mots non plus. WWF France reconnaît quelques avancées symboliques — comme la création d'un mécanisme de transition juste, ou la reconnaissance du rôle des peuples autochtones — mais juge l'ensemble très en dessous des besoins, surtout après une année entière passée au-dessus des +1,5 °C. « Ces avancées demeurent très insuffisantes pour enclencher l'action rapide et transformative nécessaire », prévient l'organisation.Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, président de la COP20, parle carrément d'« illusions » : de grandes promesses sans actions, un document fragilisé par les forces opposées à l'ambition climatique. Quant à Nikki Reisch, du Center for International Environmental Law, elle tranche : « Cet accord est vide. Les réponses ne se trouvent plus dans ces négociations, mais dans les mouvements qui ouvrent la voie à un avenir sans énergies fossiles. » À un an de la COP31 à Antalya, une chose frappe : une partie de la confiance autrefois placée dans ces grands sommets semble s'être évaporée. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Une deuxième semaine de négociations qui débute à la COP30 au Brésil. Les pays participants ont gardé le plus dur pour la fin, les financements et les compensations des pays riches à destination des plus vulnérables. Les négociations sont fragilisées par la présence en nombre de participants liés, plus ou moins directement, à l'industrie des énergies fossiles et la présence de lobbyistes dans les couloirs ne risque pas d'arranger les choses. Les explications de Nikki Reisch, directrice du Programme Climat et Énergie au Center for International Environmental Law, en direct de Belém.

Today, we're diving into a crisis that's hitting close to home for many North Carolinians, one that sits at the intersection of climate change, corporate accountability, and financial survival: the insurance crisis unfolding in the wake of Hurricane Helene.I talk with Charles Slidders, Senior Attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, or CIEL. Charles is a legal expert working on the front lines of climate justice and he's co-author of a powerful new analysis that reveals a troubling pattern: insurance companies are helping finance the very fossil fuel projects that are driving extreme weather… and then turning around to hike rates or drop coverage when those disasters strike.When Hurricane Helene tore through the Carolinas, it didn't just knock down trees or flood neighborhoods, it tore the lid off something deeper. It showed just how shaky our financial systems really are, especially when it comes to insurance.As the state works to recover, one thing's clear: it's not a matter of if another storm will hit, it's whether we'll be prepared when it does.Contact and connect with Charles: https://www.ciel.org/

This week on Green Street, Patti and Doug talk about the Trump administration's plans to stop making scientific climate reports easily available to the public, and the new study showing that children living near oil and gas drilling sites have a significantly higher incidence of leukemia. Then Steven Feit, senior attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law, talks about the myth of carbon capture technology and how CEIL is using international law to push back against big oil's plans for continued pollution of the earth with plastic.

This talk delivered by Professor René Provost explored important lessons on the promises and limits of non-state justice in conflict zones, specifically looking at the Kurdish-dominated Democratic Autonomous Administration of North East Syria. Zones of armed conflict are spaces of disorder, which state and non-state belligerents alike aim to curtail through law. Starting in 2014, the Kurdish-dominated Democratic Autonomous Administration of North East Syria established its own courts and enacted its own laws, in civil as well as criminal matters. For a decade, this unrecognised system of administration of justice has struggled to bring social order to this war-afflicted territory. Meet our speaker and chair René Provost Ad.E. FRSC is the James McGill Professor of Justice Beyond the State at the Faculty of Law of McGill University. He joined the Faculty of Law of McGill University in 1994, where he was Associate Dean (Academic) from 2001 to 2003 and the founding Director of the McGill Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism from 2005 to 2010. Professor Provost teaches Public International Law, International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, International Environmental Law, Legal Anthropology, and various courses in legal theory. His latest book is 'Rebel Courts – The Administration of Justice by Armed Insurgents' (Oxford University Press 2021), winner of the 2022 ICON-S Prize for Best Book in Public Law and the 2023 American Society of International Law Certificate of Merit for Creative Scholarship. Robert Lowe is Deputy Director of the LSE Middle East Centre and Co-Convenor of the Kurdish Studies Series at the LSE Middle East Centre. His main research interest is Kurdish politics, with particular focus on the Kurdish movements in Syria. He is Co-Editor of the Kurdish Studies Series, published by I.B. Tauris.

From June 9th to 13th, some 15,000 participants—including more than 60 Heads of State and Government—convened in Nice, on France's Mediterranean coast, for a major UN-sponsored conference on oceans. So what happened at the UN Oceans Summit, and why does it matter? Joining me to answer these questions and more is Bruna Campos of the Center for International Environmental Law. We caught up last week as the conference was coming to a close, and in our conversation, Bruna Campos explains why this summit was convened in the first place, which governments are pushing for more robust protections of our oceans, and which countries are standing in the way. https://www.globaldispatches.org/40PercentOff https://www.globaldispatches.org/20PercentOff Support the show at full price here: https://www.globaldispatches.org/ 

As actividades da indústria do petróleo e gás causam impactos significativos ao longo de todo o ciclo, desde a exploração até o abandono das infra-estruturas. O alerta é de Bruna Campos, responsável de campanhas sobre petróleo e gás offshore (no mar) do Centro para o Direito Ambiental Internacional (CIEL – Center for International Environmental Law), durante a terceira Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Oceano (UNOC3), que decorreu em Nice, França. Segundo Bruna Campos, os efeitos da actividade extractiva estendem-se a cada etapa do processo — exploração, produção, transporte e desactivação — afectando de forma profunda os ecossistemas marinhos e as comunidades costeiras. “As actividades de petróleo e gás têm um impacto em todo o ciclo, exploração, produção e transporte. E até na fase final, que se traduz no abandono da infra-estrutura, cada parte do ciclo tem o seu próprio impacto”, explicou. Na fase de exploração, o uso intensivo de sonares representa uma ameaça séria à fauna marinha. “Aquilo causa um grande problema a muitas espécies no mar, como por exemplo, às baleias ou aos golfinhos. Mas não só, aos microrganismos também, como o zooplâncton, que têm muitos problemas com esse tipo de som. Não reagem muito bem. Isso causa um problema em toda a parte da alimentação marinha.” A responsável de campanhas sobre petróleo e gás offshore alertou ainda para a frequência com que ocorrem derrames de petróleo, contrariando a percepção comum de que são eventos raros. “As pessoas pensam que o derrame de petróleo é muito raro, só que não. E os derrames acontecem todos os dias. Uma publicação da SkyTruth, organização que utiliza imagens de satélites para poderem ver esses tipos de derrames, repararam que os derrames acontecem todos os dias em muitas infra-estruturas.” Estes derrames têm implicações ambientais e humanas, com consequências particularmente graves nas comunidades que dependem da do oceano e da pesca. A especialista destacou que os efeitos não se limitam ao meio-ambiente, mas também afectam directamente a segurança alimentar, os direitos culturais e os modos de vida tradicionais. “Todos os direitos humanos são postos em causa.” Apesar das múltiplas discussões e anúncios, uma das críticas que frequentemente se apontam às grandes cimeiras é a ausência de acções concretas por parte dos governos. “É isso o grande problema. Estamos a pedir para os países mudarem esse tipo de retórica e para começarem a falar sobre as acções, sobre o que eles vão verdadeiramente fazer.” Bruna Campos acrescenta igualmente a importância de incluir as comunidades afectadas nas decisões que dizem respeito ao seu futuro. “As comunidades que vivem nessas áreas devem fazem parte da decisão, mais do que serem ouvidas devem fazer parte da decisão.”

Noventa e cinco países apelaram, em Nice, a que as negociações do tratado da ONU sobre os plásticos – previstas para o próximo mês de Agosto em Genebra, Suíça – resultem num acordo ambicioso, que abranja todo o ciclo de vida dos plásticos. Na Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Oceano em Nice, França, ministros e representantes de 95 países assinaram o “Alerta de Nice para um Tratado Ambicioso sobre os Plásticos”. O documento identifica cinco pontos críticos que devem fazer parte de um acordo eficaz, incluindo a redução da produção e do consumo de plásticos, a eliminação progressiva de produtos plásticos nocivos e a melhoria do design dos produtos para garantir a sustentabilidade ambiental. Em 2019, estimava-se que 28 milhões de toneladas métricas de poluição por plásticos foram libertadas para o ambiente. Se nada for feito, esse número duplicará até 2040. Ontem, terça-feira, o secretário-geral da ONU, António Guterres tinha alertado para a poluição plástica que “estrangula a vida marinha e contamina a nossa alimentação”, acrescentando que os microplásticos já foram detectados no sangue e cérebro humano. Em entrevista à RFI, Andres del Castillo, especialista no programa de saúde ambiental do Centro para o Direito Ambiental Internacional (CIEL - Center for International Environmental Law) espera que Nice envie um sinal claro ao mundo da necessidade de “regras claras” para se “acabar com a contaminação de plástico” e isso passa pelo “controlo de produção de plástico, controlo dos produtos e dos químicos que fazem mal no plástico e com mecanismos de financiamento”. A luta contra a contaminação por plástico ao nível internacional começou exactamente por causa das pesquisas científicas e os problemas com a biodiversidade marinha. Depois foi evoluindo para a questão dos microplásticos há quase duas décadas. Agora temos certeza que os plásticos têm efeitos nefastos não somente com a diversidade, mas como na mudança climática. Recentes estudos científicos fazem um vínculo directo entre contaminação por plásticos e a mudança climática. O especialista no programa de saúde ambiental do CIEL ressalva também a importância da limpeza dos oceanos, processo que deve ser partilhado entre os países com responsabilidade historica e aqueles que actualmente produzem a “maioria do plástico no mundo”, que é a China. O Tratado Global sobre Plásticos foi criado pelas Nações Unidas em 2022 e está actualmente em negociação. O objectivo é que se traduza num documento juridicamente vinculativo que ajude os países a reduzir e eliminar a poluição plástica. A comunidade científica em muito tem contribuído para este acordo, fornecendo dados concretos sobre os dados que a poluição plástica causa à saúde humana, à sociedade, às economias e ao meio ambiente.

The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law

Greetings Glocal Citizens! This week Hélène Himmer, a French national with roots in the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, now based in Portugal joins me in conversation about her current work at African Futures Lab (AfaLab) leading a project on climate reparations. I met Hélène last November at FORGE: Harnessing Creative Arts for Reparatory Justice, a convening of artists, media, cultural workers, civil society, and government leaders across Africa, Europe and the U.S. to further the movement for reparations. The event took place in Accra, Ghana and featured Glocal Citizens Esther Armah (https://glocalcitizens.fireside.fm/guests/esther-armah), Makmid Kamara (https://glocalcitizens.fireside.fm/guests/makmid-kamara), and Nyamal Tutdeal (https://glocalcitizens.fireside.fm/guests/nyamal-tutdeal) as facilitators. In addition to meeting so many dynamic diasporans I was introduced to organizations like AfaLab, an international non-profit organization supporting racial justice movements in Europe and Africa through conducting research and developing policy and legal strategies to empower civil society actors and public and private institutions in their fight for justice and reparations. Currently the Policy and Advocacy Officer at AfaLab, Hélène is a committed activist and professional with a diverse background in human rights law, corporate social responsibility and international development. Her activism began in her early teens with a youth organization focused on education, youth rights and inclusion. She then spent several years working for racial justice in France. Moving to the corporate sector, Hélène worked in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in start-ups and technology companies. However, her passion for social impact led her to international organizations where she specialized in advocacy, project management and partnerships. Her work has focused on climate justice, peacebuilding, anti-corruption, women's empowerment, youth cooperation and inclusive societies across Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and the MENA region. Where to find Hélène? AfaLab Policy Paper "Unlocking Climate Reparations: Key Obstacles in the Emergence of a Climate Reparations Framework" (https://www.afalab.org/news/2024-09-18-unlocking-climate-reparations-key-obstacles-in-the-emergence-of-a-climate-reparations-framework/) Listen in on AfaLab's Season 3 Podcast Future Perfect | futur antérieur on Climate Reparations (https://www.afalab.org/podcast-future-perfect-futur-anterieur/) On LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/hélène-himmer-886037157/) On Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/african_futures_lab/) What's Hélène reading? REDD-Monitor (https://redd-monitor.org/) Other topics of interest: Brittany, France (linkhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brittany) A bit about Guadeloupe (https://kwekudee-tripdownmemorylane.blogspot.com/2013/11/guadeloupe-african-descendants-in.html) Who is Dr. Farhana Sultana (https://farhanasultana.com/)? About the Loss and Damage Fund (https://www.undp.org/belarus/stories/loss-and-damage-fund-developing-countries) Center for International Environmental Law (https://www.ciel.org/) Special Guest: Hélène Himmer.

"I call international environmental law a '30% solution'—it's not the most important factor in addressing problems like climate change. Politics, science, economics, and social attitudes all play crucial roles. Law can contribute, but it's just one piece."Order here: https://www.amazon.com/Art-Craft-International-Environmental-Law/dp/019767237XIn this ClimateGenn episode I am speaking with the Regent's Professor at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Dan Bodansky, about the second edition of his book ‘The Art and Craft of International Law'.Dan is a recognised expert having worked on a range of negotiations across the decades including being part of the US negotiating team at the UNFCCC in the 1990's. Dan's talks through how International Environmental Law has evolved with state and non-state actors–including how civil society plays a role in creating momentum that can translate into societal norms that lead to international agreements.All of this is set against the rogue nature of the current US administration and the drastically reduced operating space in which we have to preserve a liveable climate.In the next episode I am speaking with Professor Jennifer Francis from the Woods Hole Research Centre, for an update on record Sea Ice loss in the Arctic and the myriad impacts this has on so many other parts of the global climate system.Forthcoming episodes also include my speaking with Zita Sebesvari, Deputy director of the United Nations University - Institute for Environment and Human Security –who is the lead author on a new Interconnected Disaster Risks report. And also an in-depth discussion with professor Mike McCracken about the role of solar radiation management geoengineering, offering a nuanced response to my recent interview with professor Raymond Pierrehumbert.Thanks to all subscribers. Please do send feedback or like and share, or become a member on Youtube or Patreon to support the channel. Thank you.

In this Climategenn episode I am speaking with Mike Berners-Lee about his new book ‘Climate Of Truth'. Mike gives us his spiralling definition of the poly crisis that we are faced with today.Order here: https://amzn.to/3G59RlPHe cites examples of deceit in our society that have not just created the dire problems we face today but are actually doubling down as we accelerate into the crosshairs of nightmare consequences.Despite the seriousness of the threats, ‘Climate of Truth' is a pragmatic book helping to find ways to tap into personal agency, switching off malignant media, while calling out the lies and delusion that have gripped western society.In the next episode I will be speaking with esteemed legal expert, Professor Dan Bodansky from Arizona State University, about the 2nd Edition of ‘The Art And Craft of International Environmental Law'. We'll be discussing the complexities of how International Environmental Law has emerged, how it is effective and whether it is even going to survive what some are calling the ‘post-rules' era – which sounds to me like an age of total chaos.Subscribers help keep the interview series going and we have many more episodes in the pipeline in this period of environmental-socio-political flux. Thank you to all who subscribe - please do send feedback or add comments. I do try to read and respond. You can also order my cook COPOUT that is available worldwide from many online retailers.

Lecture summary: Property is a fundamental legal institution governing the use of things: who may own what, how and why. Given that such questions extend to a wide range of natural resources essential to human well-being, such as food, water and shelter, then it is reasonable to assume that human rights should play an important role in shaping property rights discourse and practice. And yet this assumption is somewhat misplaced. The relationship between property and human rights and property remains relatively underdeveloped in both practice and academic literature, and virtually non-existent when we move to the maritime domain. In this paper, I explore and question the role that property and human rights can and should play in the maritime domain. I outline how such rights arise and are protected under human rights instruments, before exploring how they might inform the moral and legal distribution of resources. In particular, I focus on how we might balance individual rights and public interests that arise in respect of property, and how these are informed by the nature of the oceans as a commons.Richard Barnes is Professor of International Law at the University of Lincoln and Adjunct Professor of Law at the Norwegian Centre for the Law of the Sea, the University of Tromsø. His current research focuses on the human right to property, ocean commons, and the BBNJ Agreement. He is widely published in the fields of international law and law of the sea. Property Rights and Natural Resources (2009), won the SLS Birks Book Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship. He has edited several collections of essays including Research Handbook on Plastics Regulation (2024), Frontiers in International Environmental Law. Oceans and Climate (2021), Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts (2020), and The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Living Instrument (2016). Professor Barnes a member of the ILA Committee on the Protection of People at Sea. He has acted as a consultant for the WWF, Oceana, ClientEarth, the European Parliament, the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. He has also provided advice to foreign ministries. He has appeared numerous times before Parliamentary select committees on matters related to law of the sea, fisheries and Brexit. He is on the Editorial Board of International and Comparative Law Quarterly, the International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, the New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, the German Yearbook of International Law, and the Portuguese Yearbook of the Law of the Sea.

Lecture summary: Property is a fundamental legal institution governing the use of things: who may own what, how and why. Given that such questions extend to a wide range of natural resources essential to human well-being, such as food, water and shelter, then it is reasonable to assume that human rights should play an important role in shaping property rights discourse and practice. And yet this assumption is somewhat misplaced. The relationship between property and human rights and property remains relatively underdeveloped in both practice and academic literature, and virtually non-existent when we move to the maritime domain. In this paper, I explore and question the role that property and human rights can and should play in the maritime domain. I outline how such rights arise and are protected under human rights instruments, before exploring how they might inform the moral and legal distribution of resources. In particular, I focus on how we might balance individual rights and public interests that arise in respect of property, and how these are informed by the nature of the oceans as a commons.Richard Barnes is Professor of International Law at the University of Lincoln and Adjunct Professor of Law at the Norwegian Centre for the Law of the Sea, the University of Tromsø. His current research focuses on the human right to property, ocean commons, and the BBNJ Agreement. He is widely published in the fields of international law and law of the sea. Property Rights and Natural Resources (2009), won the SLS Birks Book Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship. He has edited several collections of essays including Research Handbook on Plastics Regulation (2024), Frontiers in International Environmental Law. Oceans and Climate (2021), Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts (2020), and The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Living Instrument (2016). Professor Barnes a member of the ILA Committee on the Protection of People at Sea. He has acted as a consultant for the WWF, Oceana, ClientEarth, the European Parliament, the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. He has also provided advice to foreign ministries. He has appeared numerous times before Parliamentary select committees on matters related to law of the sea, fisheries and Brexit. He is on the Editorial Board of International and Comparative Law Quarterly, the International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, the New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, the German Yearbook of International Law, and the Portuguese Yearbook of the Law of the Sea.

Lecture summary: Property is a fundamental legal institution governing the use of things: who may own what, how and why. Given that such questions extend to a wide range of natural resources essential to human well-being, such as food, water and shelter, then it is reasonable to assume that human rights should play an important role in shaping property rights discourse and practice. And yet this assumption is somewhat misplaced. The relationship between property and human rights and property remains relatively underdeveloped in both practice and academic literature, and virtually non-existent when we move to the maritime domain. In this paper, I explore and question the role that property and human rights can and should play in the maritime domain. I outline how such rights arise and are protected under human rights instruments, before exploring how they might inform the moral and legal distribution of resources. In particular, I focus on how we might balance individual rights and public interests that arise in respect of property, and how these are informed by the nature of the oceans as a commons.Richard Barnes is Professor of International Law at the University of Lincoln and Adjunct Professor of Law at the Norwegian Centre for the Law of the Sea, the University of Tromsø. His current research focuses on the human right to property, ocean commons, and the BBNJ Agreement. He is widely published in the fields of international law and law of the sea. Property Rights and Natural Resources (2009), won the SLS Birks Book Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship. He has edited several collections of essays including Research Handbook on Plastics Regulation (2024), Frontiers in International Environmental Law. Oceans and Climate (2021), Research Handbook on Climate Change, Oceans and Coasts (2020), and The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Living Instrument (2016). Professor Barnes a member of the ILA Committee on the Protection of People at Sea. He has acted as a consultant for the WWF, Oceana, ClientEarth, the European Parliament, the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. He has also provided advice to foreign ministries. He has appeared numerous times before Parliamentary select committees on matters related to law of the sea, fisheries and Brexit. He is on the Editorial Board of International and Comparative Law Quarterly, the International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, the New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, the German Yearbook of International Law, and the Portuguese Yearbook of the Law of the Sea.

This week on Green Street, Patti and Doug discuss the environmental and human health impact of chemical fire retardants used in California, the elimination of federal environmental justice programs, and the EPA's ban of red dye #3 thirty years after it was shown to cause cancer. Then Steven Feit, senior attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law talks about geo-engineering, carbon capture, pyrolysis and other efforts of the fossil fuel industry to try to convince the public their products are part of a sustainable future.

Winter Weather Warnings for 13 States" (from Newsweek). Are geoengineering operations a part of this equation? "No amount of research or small-scale testing can ever demonstrate what would happen if these dangerous technologies (geoengineering) were unleashed on a planetary scale", a quote from the Center for International Environmental Law. Too late, the damage that has already been done can't be undone in any time frame that matters. The "CIEL" organization continues with this statement, "There is nothing in the history of humanity to suggest that we could fairly and responsibly govern an undertaking like geoengineering that would need to be sustained over hundreds of years". Question, does the suggestion of such a timeframe have any relevance when the collapse of industrialized militarized civilization is already unfolding by the day?

Earlier this month, the top United Nations court opened two weeks of hearings into what countries worldwide are legally required to do to combat climate change. Nikki Reisch, director of the climate and energy program at the Center for International Environmental Law, explains the hearings so far and what relief they may provide for vulnerable nations.

Is the law fit for purpose?This is one question Nikki Reisch, Director of the Climate and Energy Program at the Center for International Environmental Law, and I discuss on today's episode. Nikki joins me to explain the wave of climate litigation taking place around the world, making climate a human rights issue for the first time in history. We discuss this in the context of nation states currently undermining international law on the global stage. Nikki insists that the law is a powerful tool which must be both used and protected by support from the public arena, reminding us that the basis for law is consent, and that these landmark decisions provide credence for citizens to take action on the ground against climate inaction. Planet: Critical is 100% independent and community-powered. If you value it, and have the means, become a paid subscriber today. Get full access to Planet: Critical at www.planetcritical.com/subscribe

Wine fraud, migration policy and climate litigation: there's something for everyone this week. Back in April, Switzerland's government lost a groundbreaking European court case and was ordered to rewrite its climate policy. Has it actually done that? No, no it has not. We speak to Geneva-based climate lawyer Seb Duyck about whether Switzerland can be forced to change its tune. We're also talking about offshore migrant detention centres, a full-bodied fraud case and the latest sign that AI is coming for podcasters' jobs.    Thanks for listening! If you enjoy our podcast, we'd love it if you'd consider chipping in a few bucks a month at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/europeanspodcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (many currencies are available). You can also help new listeners find the show by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠leaving us a review⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or giving us five stars on Spotify.      Seb is a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law. You can follow him on Twitter here.   You can listen to our award-winning 2023 episode about the KlimaSeniorinnen case, 'The Biggest Climate Case That Ever Was', here and find the follow-up interview with Molly Quell here.   This week's Inspiration Station offerings: 'Swimming in the Dark' by Tomasz Jędrowski, translated by Robert Sudół; 'World Without End' by Christophe Blain and Jean-Marc Jancovici, translated by Edward Gauvin.   Other resources for this episode:    Ursula von der Leyen's letter to EU leaders on migration, October 14, 2024 https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/15/October-2024-EUCO-Migration-letter.pdf  'What is refugee rentierism? An explainer'. The New Humanitarian, August 14, 2024 https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2024/08/14/what-refugee-rentierism-explainer    00:22 Katy's parents made a podcast 06:18 Good Week: Pedro Sánchez 19:48 Bad Week: Rich wine-drinkers 29:14 Interview: Seb Duyck on Switzerland's failed response to the KlimaSeniorinnen ruling 46:26 Inspiration Station: 'Swimming In The Dark' and 'World Without End' 51:02 Happy Ending: Luka Modrić, an inspiration for all people in their late thirties   Producers: Katz Laszlo and Wojciech Oleksiak  Mixing and mastering: Wojciech Oleksiak Music: Jim Barne and Mariska Martina   Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ |⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Threads⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ |⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Mastodon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠hello@europeanspodcast.com⁠

People should not be there: 'Unsurvivable' 20-foot storm surge predicted as ferocious Hurricane Helene heads to Florida" (from Live Science). Was Hurricane Helene everything official sources said it would be? Or, are there elements in the equation that no official source will ever make mention of? Why would we think otherwise? "World's Oceans on Verge of Being Too Acidic to Sustain Life, Scientists Warn" (from Science Alert). "Political Momentum for Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Growing" (from the Center for International Environmental Law). Can global climate engineering operations be exposed and halted in time to make a difference?  

Ankita Shanker, founder of WMILAR kindly talks to us about her vision for the World's 1st Global Moot Competition & Moot Training Courses on Animal Rights Law. As the website explains, 'The WMILAR combines traditional aspects of International Law (including but not limited to International Human Rights Law and International Environmental Law) with contemporary issues of animal rights. It does so through a mooting competition aimed at law students, and a 2-pronged training course aimed at law students and law teachers.'  

Professor Daniel Bodansky's seminal and widely acclaimed book The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law was first published in 2010. In contrast to other general works on international environmental law, the book focused on the processes of developing, implementing, and enforcing international environmental law rather than on legal doctrine. In order to comprehensively analyse these processes, the book is highly interdisciplinary, relying not only on the legal toolkit but integrating perspectives and lenses of political science and economics, as well as philosophy, sociology, and anthropology.This year, Oxford University Press published the second edition of The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, co-authored by Prof Daniel Bodansky and LCIL Centre Fellow, Prof Harro van Asselt. Aside from the co-authorship, this second edition differs in several important aspects from the previous edition, in order to adequately reflect the important developments that international environmental law has witnessed during the last decade.At this event, Professors Bodansky and van Asselt will provide an overview of the approach to international environmental law taken in this second edition, highlighting the ways in which it differs from the first. This presentation is intended to subsequently lead to a discussion on developments specifically in the international climate change regime, including prospects for the Paris Agreement and the recent request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on climate change.

Professor Daniel Bodansky’s seminal and widely acclaimed book The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law was first published in 2010. In contrast to other general works on international environmental law, the book focused on the processes of developing, implementing, and enforcing international environmental law rather than on legal doctrine. In order to comprehensively analyse these processes, the book is highly interdisciplinary, relying not only on the legal toolkit but integrating perspectives and lenses of political science and economics, as well as philosophy, sociology, and anthropology. This year, Oxford University Press published the second edition of The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, co-authored by Prof Daniel Bodansky and LCIL Centre Fellow, Prof Harro van Asselt. Aside from the co-authorship, this second edition differs in several important aspects from the previous edition, in order to adequately reflect the important developments that international environmental law has witnessed during the last decade. At this event, Professors Bodansky and van Asselt will provide an overview of the approach to international environmental law taken in this second edition, highlighting the ways in which it differs from the first. This presentation is intended to subsequently lead to a discussion on developments specifically in the international climate change regime, including prospects for the Paris Agreement and the recent request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on climate change.

Professor Daniel Bodansky's seminal and widely acclaimed book The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law was first published in 2010. In contrast to other general works on international environmental law, the book focused on the processes of developing, implementing, and enforcing international environmental law rather than on legal doctrine. In order to comprehensively analyse these processes, the book is highly interdisciplinary, relying not only on the legal toolkit but integrating perspectives and lenses of political science and economics, as well as philosophy, sociology, and anthropology.This year, Oxford University Press published the second edition of The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, co-authored by Prof Daniel Bodansky and LCIL Centre Fellow, Prof Harro van Asselt. Aside from the co-authorship, this second edition differs in several important aspects from the previous edition, in order to adequately reflect the important developments that international environmental law has witnessed during the last decade.At this event, Professors Bodansky and van Asselt will provide an overview of the approach to international environmental law taken in this second edition, highlighting the ways in which it differs from the first. This presentation is intended to subsequently lead to a discussion on developments specifically in the international climate change regime, including prospects for the Paris Agreement and the recent request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on climate change.

More than 170 countries will gather in Ottawa, Canada between April 23 and April 29 to negotiate a legally binding instrument on plastic pollution with a view to agreeing on a global treaty by the end of 2024. In this episode of the ESG Insider podcast, we'll hear from stakeholders who will be present at the negotiations about key issues being debated and the potential implications.  Willemijn Peeters discusses policies and actions to increase recycling and reuse of plastics and reduce plastic pollution. Willemijn is Founder and CEO of circularity consultancy Searious Business, which works with companies to manage their plastic use. She's also an Adviser to the UN on the global plastics agreement.  We speak to Carroll Muffett, CEO of the Center for International Environmental Law, a nonprofit advocacy organization. He says that transforming and reducing plastic production will be one of the key topics at the negotiations.   "We are already overwhelmed with plastic pollution and the problem is only getting worse. The only way to address that is to dramatically and rapidly reduce the amount of plastics that are entering our world," Carroll says. "These negotiations should be a wake-up call to any business that is anchored in the continuing production and use of plastic."  And we hear the industry perspective from Stewart Harris, Senior Director of Global Plastics Policy at the trade group the American Chemistry Council, who says demand for plastic will continue to grow.   "Reaching an agreement where the majority of countries can join is an incredibly high priority for the plastics industry," he says. "When we get all the countries sitting around the table, we get an agreement where they can all join, that's what's going to drive and have the most impact in terms of solving this issue of plastic pollution."  You can listen to the first episode of our miniseries on plastics here: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/how-plastic-impacts-companies-investors-public-health-and-the-environment    This piece was published by S&P Global Sustainable1, a part of S&P Global.       Copyright ©2024 by S&P Global       DISCLAIMER       By accessing this Podcast, I acknowledge that S&P GLOBAL makes no warranty, guarantee, or representation as to the accuracy or sufficiency of the information featured in this Podcast. The information, opinions, and recommendations presented in this Podcast are for general information only and any reliance on the information provided in this Podcast is done at your own risk. This Podcast should not be considered professional advice. Unless specifically stated otherwise, S&P GLOBAL does not endorse, approve, recommend, or certify any information, product, process, service, or organization presented or mentioned in this Podcast, and information from this Podcast should not be referenced in any way to imply such approval or endorsement. The third party materials or content of any third party site referenced in this Podcast do not necessarily reflect the opinions, standards or policies of S&P GLOBAL. S&P GLOBAL assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of the content contained in third party materials or on third party sites referenced in this Podcast or the compliance with applicable laws of such materials and/or links referenced herein. Moreover, S&P GLOBAL makes no warranty that this Podcast, or the server that makes it available, is free of viruses, worms, or other elements or codes that manifest contaminating or destructive properties.

This week on Truth to Power, we bring you a conversation about the vital role that biodiversity must play in rescuing us from climate chaos. Join Forward Radio hosts, Justin Mog (Sustainability Now!) and Hart Hagan (The Climate Report) for a conversation with Beck Mordini, Executive Director of Biodiversity for a Livable Climate, https://bio4climate.org/. Beck has over 20 years of nonprofit experience including protecting the biodiversity of native plants at the Santa Barbara Botanic Garden and protecting undocumented workers from exploitation in Washington state. Her studies of International Environmental Law in Nairobi, Kenya were her first exposure to the issues of desertification and the challenges to global action. While practicing law in Colorado, she and friends founded Climbing for Life, a technical rock-climbing program for at-risk youth. Beck's career shifted to nonprofit management as a grant writer, development director, marketing and communications manager, community liaison, and executive director. Beck has been a Pachamama Project Drawdown workshop leader, worked on the County Community Climate Action Plan, and testified on behalf of solar reforms to the Board of Supervisors.  She has degrees from the University of Virginia and the College of William & Mary with coursework in Sustainable Agriculture and Sustainable business from local colleges. On today's program, we hear Beck's story and learn about the organization she now heads called Biodiversity for a Livable Climate! Learn about planting Miyawaki micro-forests in the middle of cities to tap into the myriad benefits of functioning ecosystems; and explore with us the power and importance of Regenerative solutions to the climate crisis. For more on the importance of beavers, Justin recommends the book “Eager: The Surprising, Secret Life of Beavers and Why They Matter” by Ben Goldfarb. https://www.bengoldfarb.com/eager On Truth to Power each week, we gather people from around the community to discuss the state of the world, the nation, the state, and the city! It's a community conversation like you won't hear anywhere else! Truth to Power airs every Friday at 9pm, Saturday at 11am, and Sunday at 4pm on Louisville's grassroots, community radio station, Forward Radio 106.5fm WFMP and live streams at http://forwardradio.org

Listen in for our second discussion in this series on a Just Transition and its implications for the reuse economy—featuring highlights from a recent Alternative Economy report put out by the Center for Biological Diversity plus the INC-3 meetings in Nairobi. Guests Marcel Howard and Jessica Roff from the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives and Kelley Dennings with the Center for Biological Diversity provide deep insight into the importance of language; the models for regenerative economies that exist right now; what they are excited about for the near future—and more. Resources: Center for Biological Diversity report: Alternative Economies: Uplifting Activities For A Sustainable FutureCenter for Biological DiversityGAIAPlastic Free FutureBreak Free From PlasticINC-3Society of Native NationsCenter for International Environmental Law

Matt Matern speaks with Durwood Zaelke, founder of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. Durwood's career spans major environmental cases and founding the Center for International Environmental Law. He focuses on using the Montreal Protocol to combat climate change.

In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew is joined by Margaret Spring to discuss the pressing issue of plastic pollution. Margaret shares updates on a UN treaty and highlights the research and programs conducted at the Monterey Bay Aquarium. The conversation explores the actions needed from countries, companies, and individuals to reduce plastic use. Tune in to learn more about the impact of plastic pollution and how we can all contribute to protecting the ocean. Detailed Description Margaret Spring joins Andrew on the podcast to discuss Ocean Plastic Pollution. She has a background in science, initially pursuing a degree in marine science. However, she realized that she could make a greater impact on the environment and the ocean by pursuing a career in law. Margaret believed that becoming a lawyer would allow her to effectively translate scientific knowledge and communicate it to others. She also mentioned the need to translate scientific findings for their expert colleagues. Despite acknowledging the challenges and intense training required to become a lawyer, Margaret remained committed to using her love for science and expertise in law to advocate for ocean justice and the protection of the ocean. She also highlighted their experience working in organizations like the Southern Environmental Law Center and the Center for International Environmental Law, which provided them with a better understanding of policy and politics. During the episode, Margaret emphasized the importance of incorporating a business focus into the intersection of science and policy. She highlighted the efforts of her organization, the Monterey Bay Aquarium, in this regard, noting that they have been integrating business practices into their operations even before the guest's arrival. Margaret stressed the need to realistically assess the environmental impact of their operations, particularly on the ocean, and effectively communicate this information to visitors and audiences. Margaret also mentioned that their organization's credibility is enhanced by her commitment to modeling change and conservation. As a nonprofit organization, they rely on donations and contributions, but they also strive to conserve resources and manage expenses. They acknowledged the need to continuously improve their work and demonstrate tangible change. Additionally, Margaret acknowledged the fortunate position of their organization in California, a state with progressive policies in certain areas. Furthermore, Margaret recognized that the business aspect of conservation is often overlooked in discussions about marine biology and marine conservation. She believed that in the future, the business perspective will play a significant role in leading conservation initiatives, particularly in addressing issues like plastic pollution. By integrating a business focus into the intersection of science, policy, and conservation, she believed that they can have a greater impact and drive major policy changes that benefit everyone. Monterey Bay Aquarium Plastic Pollution Resources: https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/act-for-the-ocean/plastic-pollution/what-we-do Share your conservation journey on the podcast by booking here: https://calendly.com/sufb/sufb-interview   Fill out our listener survey: https://www.speakupforblue.com/survey   Join the audio program - Build Your Marine Science and Conservation Career: https://www.speakupforblue.com/career   Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc   

If you're looking for encouragement to make a career pivot, you need to listen to this!  ‘Ronke Kokoruwe trained as a barrister and then qualified as a solicitor after obtaining a Masters in International Environmental Law from the London School of Economics before becoming a certified executive coach, a trainer and speaker and the founder of iVerbalize, a public speaking and communications training and coaching business. We have a fabulous conversation that resonated on so many levels;  The power of self belief That it's ok not know You don't hav to figure it all out or go it alone and more...   'Ronke is on a mission to champion women to step up in their leadership capabilities and to take the steps to shift ‘from spectator to speaker'; expressing themselves from a place of intention and with greater courage and clarity. To connect with 'Ronke  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ronke-kokoruwe  Web: iverbalize.co.uk  Email: ronke@iverbalize.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Did you enjoy this episode? “Subscribe” to my weekly Monday Morning Motivation Message + Career design strategy, stories to inspire, events & programs for Mid-career Black women & access to information I only share with subscribers - direct to your inbox to support & guide your journey a fabulous midlife - https://janicesutherland.ck.page/newsletter ____________________________________ FIND ME ON: Official Website | https://www.janicesutherland.com Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/iamjanicesutherland LinkedIn | https://www.linkedin.com/in/iamjanicesutherland Twitter | https://www.twitter.com/This_Woman_Can YouTube Channel | https://www.youtube.com/@thiswomancan Janice Sutherland helps frustrated, #mid-career, professional Black women re-align their careers while staying true to their values and personal and professional priorities.  #thiswomancan #careerdevelopment #careerpivot

Did you know that about 8 percent of the world's oil production is used to make plastic and power the manufacturing of it? And what's even more frightening is that figure is projected to rise to 20 percent by 2050.With our guest, Delphine Lévi Alvarès, Global Petrochemicals Campaigner Coordinator for #BreakFreeFromPlastic, Center for International Environmental Law, we deep dive into what's going on with plastic. We discuss:How about 90% of plastic is made from fossil fuel and that plastic is the next frontier for the fossil fuel industryWhere are we in terms of tackling plastic pollution? What is the Plastic Treaty? Where are we at with the negotiations?What can we expect for our future?We hope you enjoy the episode! Don't hesitate to rate and review. Some useful resources: latest report by the team of Fredric Bauer at Lund University https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-12/still-one-earth-plastic-pollution.pdfhttps://www.ciel.org/reports/winter-is-coming-plastic-has-to-go/https://www.ciel.org/reports/airborne-microplastics-briefing/

Plastic is the dominant material of modern life, used in everything from furniture to cars to packaging to medical equipment. In most parts of the world it's hard to live a single day without coming into contact with plastic. But as its use has exploded over the past century, so have the problems associated with it. Plastic pollution has created huge islands of waste in our oceans; microplastics have been found in freshly fallen Antarctic snow, and even in human blood. This week delegates from nearly 200 countries have been in Paris for UN-sponsored talks aimed at developing a landmark treaty to end plastic pollution. But how could such a treaty work? What could other solutions to the scourge of plastic pollution - or 'stupid plastic' - look like? And does the world really want to live without plastic? Joining Shaun Ley are panellists - David Azoulay, environmental lawyer and a director at the Centre for International Environmental Law based in Geneva, Switzerland. Sherri Mason, Director of Sustainability and Professor of Chemistry at Penn State University, Lake Erie campus. Shahriar Hossain from the Environment and Social Development Organisation based in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Also featuring - Ambassador Ilana Seid who represents the Pacific nation of Palau at the United Nations, and chairs the Pacific Small Islands Developing States Group. Joshua Baca is Vice President of Plastics at the American Chemistry Council. Produced by - Imogen Wallace and Rumella Dasgupta (Photo: Plastic bag drifting in the Botnia Gulf,Finland; Credit: Olivier Morin/AFP)

Lecture Summary: This lecture will discuss recent developments in the UN Climate Regime, focusing in particular on the mismatch between the increasing emphasis on temperature goals and target-setting under the Paris Agreement and its treatment of equity and fairness in delivering these goals and targets.Lavanya Rajamani is a Professor of International Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, and Yamani Fellow in Public International Law, St Peter's College, Oxford. Lavanya writes, teaches and advises on international climate change law. She has been closely involved in the climate change negotiations in various capacities for two decades, including as advisor to Chairs, Presidencies, and the Secretariat. She was part of the core UNFCCC drafting and advisory group for the Paris Agreement. And a Coordinating Lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report. She is also currently involved in providing the evidence base for ongoing climate change litigation in national, regional and international courts.

Lecture Summary: This lecture will discuss recent developments in the UN Climate Regime, focusing in particular on the mismatch between the increasing emphasis on temperature goals and target-setting under the Paris Agreement and its treatment of equity and fairness in delivering these goals and targets. Lavanya Rajamani is a Professor of International Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, and Yamani Fellow in Public International Law, St Peter's College, Oxford. Lavanya writes, teaches and advises on international climate change law. She has been closely involved in the climate change negotiations in various capacities for two decades, including as advisor to Chairs, Presidencies, and the Secretariat. She was part of the core UNFCCC drafting and advisory group for the Paris Agreement. And a Coordinating Lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report. She is also currently involved in providing the evidence base for ongoing climate change litigation in national, regional and international courts.

Lecture Summary: This lecture will discuss recent developments in the UN Climate Regime, focusing in particular on the mismatch between the increasing emphasis on temperature goals and target-setting under the Paris Agreement and its treatment of equity and fairness in delivering these goals and targets.Lavanya Rajamani is a Professor of International Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, and Yamani Fellow in Public International Law, St Peter's College, Oxford. Lavanya writes, teaches and advises on international climate change law. She has been closely involved in the climate change negotiations in various capacities for two decades, including as advisor to Chairs, Presidencies, and the Secretariat. She was part of the core UNFCCC drafting and advisory group for the Paris Agreement. And a Coordinating Lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report. She is also currently involved in providing the evidence base for ongoing climate change litigation in national, regional and international courts.

Negotiations for a new Global Treaty on Plastics formally kicked off in early December. Delegates from around 160 countries met in Uruguay for the first round of talks aimed at reducing the harmful impact of plastics on both the environment and health.  Antonio Guterres has called plastics "fossil fuels in another form." And called on governments to support a treaty that not only dealt with plastic waste and recycling, but also the entire life cycle of plastics, including measures to control the production of plastics.  My guest today Andres Del Castillo attended the negotiations, which took place in the seaside city Punta Del Este. He is a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law.  We kick off discussing why regulating plastics through an international agreement is necessary. We then discuss the process for these negotiations and the stances thus far of key governments around the world, including the USA, China, the European Union and countries in the global south.    

Follow me to see #HeadsTalk Podcast Audiograms every Monday on LinkedIn. Episode Title:-

Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage has been touted as one of the great hopes for reducing global greenhouse emissions, tens of billions of dollars are behind hundreds of projects around the world, with more on the way. But critics, like Carroll Muffett, President and CEO of the Center for International Environmental Law, say CCUS is not effective or even necessary.Plus, energy emergencies in Europe and California are calling for costly and dramatic measures. LINKS FOR SHOW NOTES: https://governor.hawaii.gov/main/as-coal-plant-closes-major-solar-farm-comes-online/ https://www.eatneutral.com/about-us https://www.ciel.org/ https://www.ciel.org/reports/carbon-capture-is-not-a-climate-solution/ https://www.state.gov/establishing-an-ambassador-at-large-for-the-arctic-region/ https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/eez.html

Everyone else might have moved on but we're still plodding through the latest IPCC report over here. Carbon dioxide removal, or CDR, came up all over this report, and because the summary is vastly more positive about the potential of this tech than the rest of the report (thanks in no small part to influence from Saudi Arabia and the U.S.), I wanted to bring together a more complete picture of what the report actually says about it. Nikki Reisch and Carroll Muffett from the Center for International Environmental Law join to help.

Edith Brown Weiss - Liability, Accountability and Compliance with International Environmental Law

Edith Brown Weiss - International Environmental Law in Context

Edith Brown Weiss - Sources of International Environmental Law

Edith Brown Weiss - Principles of International Environmental Law (Section 1/2)

Edith Brown Weiss - Principles of International Environmental Law (Section 2/2)

En este episodio Edgardo Sobenes conversa con la Dra. Alejandra Torres Camprubí acerca del aumento del nivel del mar y las consecuencias jurídicas en la condición de Estado. La Dra. Camprubí inicia el episodio recordándonos los requisitos de la condición de Estado bajo el derecho internacional. Posteriormente nos comenta sobre la escena política y jurídica internacional en lo relacionado al aumento del nivel del mar y la condición de Estado. Nos habla sobre el Antropoceno, los desafíos a las dimensiones territoriales, demográficas y políticas del Estado, al igual que sobre el  desmantelamiento de los elementos jurídicos generales que otorgan la condición de un Estado (población, territorio, gobierno).Con un acercamiento minucioso y detallado, la Dra. Camprubí nos explica el impacto del aumento del nivel del mar en las fronteras marítimas y derechos en zonas marítimas. Nos habla sobre la presencia física de una población en un territorio soberano para la continuidad de la existencia del Estado, los desplazados por efectos del cambio climático, la desaparición total de territorios, y reflexiona sobre el sistema legal internacional y las respuestas que este ofrece.Membresía del Podcast (https://www.hablemosdi.com/contenido-premium) Acerca de Dra. Alejandra Torres Camprubí Libro: Statehood Under Water: Challenges of Sea-Level Rise to the Continuity of Pacific Island States La Dra. Torres Camprubí es asociada senior del Departamento de Litigios y Arbitraje Internacional del bufete Foley Hoag LLP. Ha representado a más de diez Estados soberanos y entidades estatales en disputas interestatales ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia (CIJ) y el Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del mar (TIDM) en disputas fronterizas territoriales y marítimas, y casos relativos a violaciones del derecho internacional humanitario y de derechos humanos. Defiende igualmente los intereses soberanos en procedimientos arbitrales iniciados por inversores privados, ya sean administrados por el Centro Internacional de Arreglo de Diferencias Relativas a Inversiones (CIADI) o por la Corte Permanente de Arbitraje (CPA), en particular en los sectores energético, minero y aeronáutico. Desde el punto de vista académico, la Dra. Torres Camprubí ha sido investigadora post-doctoral senior del Instituto Fridtjof Nansen de Oslo, como miembro de un proyecto internacional e interdisciplinario sobre las consecuencias jurídicas del Antropoceno para el Derecho internacional. Se desempeñó como asesora legal en las negociaciones de cambio climático de las Naciones Unidas y ha publicado en temas relacionados con la pérdida de la estadidad por el aumento del nivel del mar, el cambio climático y la seguridad internacional, y la equidad en el régimen internacional sobre el cambio climático. Entre sus publicaciones cuenta con la monografía, fruto de su tesis doctoral en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, titulada Statehood under Water: Challenges of Sea-Level Rise to the Continuity of Pacific Island States (Brill/Nijhoff, 2016), así como con el artículo “Securitization of Climate Change: the Inter-regional Institutional Voyage”, Oxford Yearbook of International Environmental Law, (2018): pp. 1-24. Es miembro activo del ILA Committee on International Law and Sea-Level Rise desde su fundación.  Support the show

Global plastic use is expected to double by 2040, with most plastic sent to landfills and only 13 percent recycled. According to CIEL (Center for International Environmental Law), plastic production and incineration could produce 2.8 gigatons of carbon dioxide every year by 2050.Â