Podcast appearances and mentions of deborah ramirez

EPISODE 117: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:41) SPECIAL COMMENT: I do not believe Joe Biden and/or his team mishandled any classified documents. Unfortunately, it's clear Joe Biden and/or his team mishandled the messaging, the process, and the narrative. If you have to tell seven different stories in two weeks, it begins to matter less and less that you were totally cooperative and proactive and invited the feds to search, and it begins to look more and more like that oldest of presidential story templates: It no longer looks like what the president said it was.  Happily there are several things the president can still did to regain the narrative and smash the undeserved gift his team handed the inquisition-happy Republicans and the pudding-brained American political-media complex so desperate for a Democratic scandal that Peter Baker actually wrote a piece comparing Biden's papers to Clinton-Lewinsky! And he better do them TODAY. B-Block (16:25) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: Sebastian; (17:30) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: The Brett Kavanaugh Sexual Assault documentary, Revised Edition, plus George Santos, and the SCOTUS Investigation that wasn't really an investigation. (20:14) IN SPORTS: Trump praises Trump, The Golfer Of Strength And Stamina. Hockey's Vancouver Canucks screw up again. A month until Spring Training games and the chaos of the new rules. And my secret method to make sure all batting averages actually go up (24:36) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Nikki Haley doesn't know what the "P" in VP stands for, the lights are on but no one's home, and Greg Abbott's epic twitter self-own. C-Block (29:13) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: Talk about White Houses trying to control the narrative: in 2004 George W. Bush's people were a) convinced I was on their side b) knew I was only interviewing Iraq War critic Ambassador Joe Wilson in order to savage him c) decided to help me by emailing all their talking points but d) couldn't figure out how to spell my name. Hilarity ensued (and all they wound up doing was revealing to me all of "their" people at NBC News.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Garnetts. What an accomplished Colorado family. I worked with Stan Garnett at the Denver DA's Office and now his son Alec Garnett is Colorado's House Speaker-Designate which means he will soon wield the gavel of immense Colorado political power. Listen and learn the secrets to raising a great son.   Alec discusses legislative priorities and why he chose to live in Denver rather than his native Boulder.  We review the amazing world of Colorado sports wagering under a legislative scheme Alec devised. Learn about Garnett family Christmas traditions. Expect this Colorado phenom to go far, perhaps Denver Mayor, perhaps Colorado Governor, maybe more.   Lynn Bartels is a veteran reporter for many great Denver papers.  Now, she is a columnist and a witty observer of all things political. We dish the dirt on the media, the GOP, Denver Trump Radio (e.g. Peter Boyles). Lynn gives a thumb down for the current Secretary of State Jena Griswold.  We both give thumbs down to Jenna Ellis and Donald Trump's bullshit claims of rigged elections.   Stan Garnett and I have a nice visit in Craig's Lawyers' Lounge, the first visit since his representation of Deborah Ramirez who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual improprieties back at Yale.  We also discuss Lin Wood of JonBenet and now “rigged election” fame.  Stan sizes up the changes in local DA's offices.   Our Troubadour Dave Gunders delights with a wonderful Christmas song titled When the Lion lays Down with the Lamb, an older recording with his darling daughters Sarah and Rachel Gunders. Michael Bailey, a Craig's Lawyers' Lounge regular, my lawyer, and a terrific sponsor has an epic visit to discuss Christmas 2020 in the Bailey home.   Rundown- Alec Garnett (With an early surprise from Stan) - 00:03:53 Lynn Bartels - 00:38:14 Stan Garnett in Craig's Lawyers' Lounge - 01:26:54 Dave Gunders - 01:56:05 Michael Bailey in Craig's Lawyers' Lounge - 02:06:13  

It's a bit unusual to find oneself adjacent to the biggest news story of the week, but that's exactly what happened to our own Rob Long. He, like Brett Kavanaugh, Deborah Ramirez, Max Stier, and Robin Pogrebin are all member of the Yale University Class of 1987. We explore this story in this show in great detail with Byron York (he of The Washington Examiner and our own Byron York Show podcast). Source

In the 25th episode of The Whole Truth With Jill Rosensweig, Attorney Rosensweig discusses the recent resolution that was filed in the House of Representatives, seeking an inquiry as to whether Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh should be impeached.  This raises many questions, including, how does the impeachment process work?  What would be the grounds to impeach Kavanaugh?  What is the likelihood of the senate convicting him and removing him from the Supreme Court?  What is the burden of proof?  What is the smartest strategy in terms of what to focus on in trying to successfully impeach and convict Kavanaugh?  Do you simply have to prove the allegations of sexual misconduct are true or do you need to prove that he lied about these incidents?  Ms. Rosensweig discusses all of this and more in this episode. 

NYT deletes bizarre tweet referencing Brett Kavanaugh's 'harmless' penis... NYT faces questions all around for new Kavanaugh story... NYT TARGETS KAVANAUGH BELIEVE ALL WOMEN ANALYST: Everett Bartlett, president of the Stop Abusive and Violent Environments' (SAVE). Between an offensive tweet and a significant revision, The New York Times’ handling of a new sexual misconduct allegation against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh attracted almost as much attention as the accusation itself. The story also gave President Donald Trump and his allies fresh ammunition in his campaign against the media, where the Times was already a favorite target. The revelation that led several Democratic presidential contenders to call for Kavanaugh’s impeachment came in the 11th paragraph of a story labeled “news analysis” that ran in the Sunday opinion section. The story is based on an upcoming book by Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” about the junior justice’s brutal confirmation battle last year. Headlined “Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not,” the story was primarily about Deborah Ramirez, a Connecticut woman who alleged that Kavanaugh, as a freshman at Yale in 1983, had pulled down his pants and thrust his penis at her. Kavanaugh has denied those claims. Yet the authors said they’d uncovered a similar story involving Kavanaugh at another freshman-year party, where he allegedly exposed himself and friends pushed his penis into the hands of a female student. The story said former classmate Max Stier reported the incident to the FBI and senators as Kavanaugh’s nomination was being discussed, but the story said Stier would not discuss it with the authors. Kavanaugh would not comment on the story, a court spokeswoman said Monday.

Though Judge Brett Kavanaugh was finally appointed to the Supreme Court, much to the chagrin and hysteria of some in Congress, the campaign against him has yet to end. Today's guest, Ryan Lovelace, the author of Search and Destroy: Inside the Campaign Against Brett Kavanaugh, takes us behind the scenes to unravel the truth. Since the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford, in her testimony before Congress, failed to convince enough people that Kavanaugh was an attempted rapist, the same political forces behind her trotted out another alleged victim, Deborah Ramirez. The Kavanaugh-haters are afraid that his being on the Supreme Court endangers Roe v. Wade, but they would believe this of anyone President Trump nominated, despite no such proof. Dr. Carole, a forensic psychiatrist who's testified in countless cases of alleged sexual assault, finds it outrageous that some think these women should be believed just because they're women, and cases tried in the media instead of a courtroom.

The New York Times was forced to clarify a story that contained a new unsubstantiated sex allegation against U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and the same story reported that Kavanaugh did indeed assault classmate Deborah Ramirez, whose account fell apart last year after the Times’s own reporting failed to verify it. Read the article here!

When CPR News reporters traveled statewide on a pre-elections road trip, they asked Coloradans what they thought of President Trump. Then, how the AP calls election races. Next, Deborah Ramirez is glad she came forward. Also, this robot comforts seniors with dementia. Then, a Fruita woman who was a Rockford Peach. Finally, Molly Brown's story is a ballet.

Jane Mayer, Chief Washington Correspondent for the New Yorker, broke the story of Deborah Ramirez and her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh. She talks to Preet about the leads she’s still chasing, where the FBI should be looking, and how the Senate would vote if half its members were women.   Plus, Preet’s take on the Trump tax investigation. Do you have a question for Preet? Tweet them to @PreetBharara with the hashtag #askpreet, email staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 and leave a voicemail.  

Summary Alfred Dreyfus was a French Jewish artillery officer whose trial and conviction in 1894 on charges of treason can easily be seen as a precursor to the Kavanaugh trial--yes, trial.  And it is past time that those of us on this side of the Atlantic know of this willful travesty of justice. Known today as the Dreyfus affair, the incident eventually ended with Dreyfus's complete exoneration. No, this podcast is not simply about drawing a parallel between what France did to Dreyfus and what our country is trying to do to Brett Kavanaugh; it goes far beyond that. Links and References Blame Game Life Improving Dramatically; Protests Expanding WWE Politics Contact Please do reach out with comments or questions.  You can email me at will@revolution2-0.org, or connect with me on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And you can subscribe to the podcast on your favorite device through Apple Podcasts, Google, or Stitcher. Transcript Alfred Dreyfus was a French Jewish artillery officer whose trial and conviction in 1894 on charges of treason can easily be seen as a precursor to the Kavanaugh trial--yes, trial.  And it is past time that those of us on this side of the Atlantic know of this wilful travesty of justice. Known today as the Dreyfus affair, the incident eventually ended with Dreyfus's complete exoneration. No, this podcast is not simply about drawing a parallel between what France did to Dreyfus and what our country is trying to do to Brett Kavanaugh; it goes far beyond that. Emile Zola, a contemporary of Dreyfus and a French writer and playwright, published an open letter, “J’Accuse…!”, a bitter denunciation of the heavily biased trial and foregone conclusions in France in January of 1898. In the letter Zola addressed President of France Félix Faure and accused the government of anti-Semitism and the unlawful jailing of Alfred Dreyfus, a French Army General Staff officer who was sentenced to lifelong penal servitude for espionage. Zola pointed out judicial errors and lack of serious evidence. The letter was printed on the front page of the Paris newspaper and caused a stir in France and abroad. For his accusations against the false accusers, Zola was prosecuted for libel and found guilty in 1898. To avoid imprisonment, he fled to England and continued to defend Dreyfus. Captain Dreyfus was guilty of nothing more than being a convenient target, but he suffered greatly by being disgraced and imprisoned in a penal colony. Zola was guilty of nothing more than attacking the indefensible and defending the unpopular and vulnerable; he also suffered. That sort of thing can’t happen here, can it? After all, we have this centuries-old judicial system that, if anything, is overly protective of the accused. But aren’t we all too capable of attacking targets of convenience in the pursuit of an agenda--exactly what France did to Alfred Dreyfus over 100 years ago? When conservative Justice Clarence Thomas was similarly accused by Anita Hill in 1991, he made it clear that his impassioned denials had less to do with possibly of being on the Supreme Court than his personal reputation and dignity. “This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It's a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree.” Justice Thomas quite understandably saw this as a race issue. Perhaps it is more about gender and politics. Anita Hill, Dr. Christine Ford and Deborah Ramirez are very progressive females; Thomas and Kavanaugh are conservative males. And is Roe v Wade the political elephant in all of these rooms?

In the weeks since Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, not one, not two, but three women have stepped forward to accuse him of perpetrating or participating in sexual assault. The first charge was Doctor Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation of attempted rape. Ford accused Kavanaugh of holding her down, muffling her screams, and trying to take off her clothes. The second charge was Deborah Ramirez’s, who accused Kavanaugh of exposing his penis to her and laughing about it to his friends. The third charge, which emerged on Wednesday, came from Julie Swetnick. Swetnick accused Kavanaugh of running a “rape train,” getting girls drunk and participating in gang rapes. These are shocking accusations. But maybe we should have expected revelations about sexual misconduct from a Trump nominee. After all, as of last count, President Trump has more than 16 allegations of sexual misconduct against him. But it’s not just that the two have both amassed accusations of sexual crimes that makes them simpatico. For Kavanaugh is not just a Trump pick. He is the natural product of the worldview Trump espouses, what I like to call Trumpism. Put simply, Trumpism is all about empowering the empowered. Trumpism is about taking the cool kids, the rich white kids who have always got what they wanted, and making sure that they get even more. Read more: https://forward.com/opinion/411002/brett-kavanaugh-was-a-cool-kid-who-thought-he-owned-the-world-maybe-he/

Welcome to Notable News for the 26th of September! Today we talk about all things Judge Kavanaugh so this episode has a trigger warning. Included in this episode: -The New Yorker Sunday night news drop about Deborah Ramirez and Judge Kavanaugh at Yale -Michael Avenatti, from his interactions with the Senate Judiciary Committee, the bots and trolls attacking his account, the 4chan falsehoods, and his client Julie Swetnick -The upcoming hearing for Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh -Who Rachel Marshall is and why it is so strange that she will be questioning Dr. Ford You're always welcome to join my Facebook group where we are celebrating Self-Care September. Don't we all need extreme self care these days? Have a notable day!

Also: Michael Avenatti, Trump continues his attacks on Deborah Ramirez, more people are attacking Kavanaugh's integrity and the UN laughs at Trump,

9.26.18 Updated because Mel's vocals were low. My bad, forgot to turn the compressor on. This is some Kanye stuff. ---------- Thanks for listening, ya'll. That's all the energy I got left to type this. God bless ya.

09-25-2018 - President Trump challenges Deborah Ramirez' allegations of sexual misconduct against Judge Kavanaugh - audio - English

Ford was 15, Kavanaugh 17. Ford raakte hevig getraumatiseerd en onderging therapie. Kanavaugh weet van niks. Teenagers die op hetzelfde feest waren, kunnen zich het voorval niet herinneren Wat begrijpelijk is, want de meeste tieners waren dronken. Deze week getuigt ze waarschijnlijk voor de Senaatscommissie van justitie die over de nominatie van Kavanaugh moet stemmen. Ze weigerde dat te doen zonder advocaten, want de commissie bestaat uitsluitend uit oudere, in meerderheid Republikeinse, mannen. Ze wil niet belachelijk of verdacht worden gemaakt. Maar bewijzen kan ze niets, evenmin als die andere klaagster, Deborah Ramirez. Bewijzen kunnen ze niets, evenmin als Kavanaugh. Het is het allergrootste probleem in dit soort zaken, of je ze nu #MeToo noemt of niet. Het is een universeel probleem. In de jaren negentig kwamen, eerst in Amerika, later in Europa, veel vrouwen naar voren die in hun jeugd waren verkracht door hun vader. De verdrongen herinneringen kwamen tijdens psychotherapie naar boven. De gevolgen waren enorm. Na enige tijd verklaarde een aantal van de vrouwen zich bij nader inzien te hebben vergist, en te zijn beïnvloed door verkeerde en leidende vragen van de therapeuten. De kwestie van het false memory syndrome werd een tijdje lang wereldnieuws. De tragedie was dat de beschuldigingen weliswaar voor een aantal vaders niet klopte, maar voor anderen natuurlijk wél, want incest is een nog steeds onderschat probleem. Hoe kom je achter de waarheid? Wat doe je met het ene woord tegen het andere? In de kwestie-Kavanaugh gaat het vooral om de politiek. Trump wil niet afgaan, zo vlak voor de parlementsverkiezingen. Wat dat betreft slaan Trumps tegenstanders trouwens de plank mis: als Kavanaugh wordt afgewezen, komt er gewoon een andere conservatieve kandidaat. Maar dat in zon ernstige kwestie en dat is het de waarheid naar boven komt is van universeel belang. De klagers liegen, of Kavanaugh liegt, zoals bij vrijwel alle seksuele misdrijven. En echt niet alleen in Amerika. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has been accused of sexual assault by three different women, one of whom said that she witnessed his efforts to inebriate girls so they could be “gang raped.” His first accuser, Christine Ford, recalls thinking that he may “inadvertently” kill her while trying to attack her and remove her clothing. Deborah Ramirez, his second accuser, says she had felt “mortified.” The Intercept reporters Ryan Grim and Naomi Klein join Mehdi Hasan to discuss the implications of Kavanaugh’s nomination and what this mess says about America.

Also: Michael Avenatti, Trump continues his attacks on Deborah Ramirez, more people are attacking Kavanaugh's integrity and the UN laughs at Trump,

Russian S-300 air defense system may make Syria “untouchable,” but Israel seems ready to test it, according to writer Whitney Webb at MintPress News. After the Russian Ministry of Defense held the Israeli Air Force solely responsible for the recent downing of a Russian Il-20 reconnaissance plane in Syria, Russia has announced that it will move forward with a long-standing Syrian government request for more advanced air defense systems, namely the Russian-made S-300. Syria purchased the S-300 in 2013, but, at the request of Israel, the system was never delivered. How will this impact the political and military landscape in the region? With the US support for Israel unwavering under the Trump administration, will Israel risk sparking a larger war in Syria knowing that the Americans will likely back them — no matter the cost? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will meet with President Donald Trump onThursday. We initially thought that Rosenstein had verbally submitted his resignation to White House Chief of Staff John Kelly. An Axios source said Rosenstein was "expecting to be fired," so he planned to step down. We now know that at least for the moment, that's not the story. There was a lot of time and mental horsepower spent on this “story” this morning by the networks only to find out we won't have a story until Thursday. The statement came after nearly three hours of confusion this morning about Rosenstein's status at the Justice Department. This demonstrates a huge problem with Washington, DC, reporting, especially regarding stories happening in Washington itself. The desire to get the scoop has eclipsed the desire to get the scoop right. A second woman has come forward alleging sexual misconduct by embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Deborah Ramirez, who attended Yale University with Kavanaugh, told The New Yorker that Kavanaugh pulled down his pants and exposed himself to her at a party while they were classmates there. What does this mean for his nomination going forward, and what about the defenses of Kavanaugh by his supporters – he was only 17 (in the case of the first allegation by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford); it has not happened since; oh, these were just hormone-crazed adolescents? While several details, including whether Republicans will use an outside lawyer to question Dr. Ford before the Senate Judiciary Committee, remain unsettled, a spokesman for the committee said its chairman, Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, considers the negotiations over, and Dr. Ford's lawyers said the hearing will go on no matter how those details are resolved. GUESTS: Dr. Gerald Horne - Award-winning author and Moores Professor of History and African American Studies at the University of Houston.Carmine Sabia - Journalist and writer for CitizenTruth.org.Sherry Hamby, Ph.D. - Psychology of violence director at Life Paths Appalachian Research Center, founder and co-chair of ResilienceCom and research professor of psychology at the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee.Leslie Proll – Civil rights lawyer advising the NAACP on judicial nominations, and former NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund policy director.

Als een modelburger, braafste jongetje van de klas, ideale huisvader, trouwe kerkganger, door een oud-medeleerling op de middelbare school wordt beschuldigd van poging tot verkrachting, en die modelburger ontkent in alle toonaarden, wie heeft er dan gelijk? De klachten van de Amerikaanse universiteitsdocent Christine Blasey Ford en sociaal werkster Deborah Ramirez tegen Brett Kavanaugh, kandidaat voor het Hooggerechtshof, zijn meer dan welles-nietes.

On Monday’s Mark Levin show, why shouldn’t we believe Brett Kavanaugh’s denials? Why should we believe his accusers? It’s Kavanaugh who acceded to six FBI background checks. It’s Kavanaugh who had a high-profile position in the Bush White House. His accussers don’t have a single witness to any of these accusations. And only now, when he’s an inch away from being confirmed to the United States Supreme Court — when we’re 42 days away from the midterm elections — the same people who want President Trump’s head on a stake now want Kavanaugh’s head on a stake. Also, the latest accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who was recently sought after by the Democrats claims she didn't remember much, but after six days with lawyers, she's now remembering plenty. Now, Christine Ford, claims she doesn't remember much either, but is sure about Kavanaugh. However, other accusers like Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broaddrick all had details and reported the assault by president Clinton soon after it happened, yet were never taken seriously. Then, it’s time to get angry, because the Supreme Court and Senate doesn’t belong to Move On org, or NARAL; they belong to us! This isn't a game, this is real life - our lives, our Constitution, our Country! The Supreme Court has too much power and too few justices that enforce the Constitution and that is why they are panicking over confirming a Constitutionalist! Afterwards, CNN’s Brian Stelter actually has the audacity to attack Mark for fake news. He attacked Mark as a smear machine against Christine Ford but he is the one who has a long history of hackish, sleazy behavior. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Monday’s Mark Levin show, why shouldn’t we believe Brett Kavanaugh’s denials? Why should we believe his accusers? It’s Kavanaugh who acceded to six FBI background checks. It’s Kavanaugh who had a high-profile position in the Bush White House. His accussers don’t have a single witness to any of these accusations. And only now, when he’s an inch away from being confirmed to the United States Supreme Court — when we’re 42 days away from the midterm elections — the same people who want President Trump’s head on a stake now want Kavanaugh’s head on a stake. Also, the latest accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who was recently sought after by the Democrats claims she didn't remember much, but after six days with lawyers, she's now remembering plenty. Now, Christine Ford, claims she doesn't remember much either, but is sure about Kavanaugh. However, other accusers like Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broaddrick all had details and reported the assault by president Clinton soon after it happened, yet were never taken seriously. Then, it’s time to get angry, because the Supreme Court and Senate doesn’t belong to Move On org, or NARAL; they belong to us! This isn't a game, this is real life - our lives, our Constitution, our Country! The Supreme Court has too much power and too few justices that enforce the Constitution and that is why they are panicking over confirming a Constitutionalist! Afterwards, CNN’s Brian Stelter actually has the audacity to attack Mark for fake news. He attacked Mark as a smear machine against Christine Ford but he is the one who has a long history of hackish, sleazy behavior. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There is a second accuser for Brett Kavanaugh named Deborah Ramirez and this dates back to their days at Yale. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

Deborah Ramirez accuses Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a party at Yale during the 1983-1984 school year. Six days - 35 years later - of thinking made her comfortable alleging Kavanaugh was the guy. Wasn't sure it was him, but now she is. Dr. Ford's story still isn't corroborated. No one corroborates her story - which Jennifer Granholm says actually is a form of corroboration. The politics of this process.

Deborah Ramirez accuses Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a party at Yale during the 1983-1984 school year. Six days - 35 years later - of thinking made her comfortable alleging Kavanaugh was the guy. Wasn’t sure it was him, but now she is. Dr. Ford’s story still isn’t corroborated. No one corroborates her story - which Jennifer Granholm says actually is a form of corroboration. The politics of this process.

Opening Monologues. Real-Time Kavanaugh Chaos. As the sexual misconduct allegations of Christine Blasey Ford wilt further under added scrutiny, The New Yorker launches another attack against SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Remarkably, these new accusations from Deborah Ramirez -- also going back to the 1980s -- appear even flimsier than those offered by Dr. Ford. Neither scenario has any corroborating witnesses. Has the Left made another big mistake? We listen to Alan Dershowitz describe the "insane" situation the Democrats have foisted upon America, one which he compares to an "inquisition." How is Sen. Grassley holding up under pressure? Meanwhile, the Deep State appears to be splintering in the aftermath of the "declassification" directive from President Trump. Rod Rosenstein now at odds with Andrew McCabe? Also, we sample Trump Rally commentary on the MAGA Economy and the high stakes Midterm Elections. A vote for GOP candidates is a vote for POTUS. With Listener Calls & Music via Blues Traveler, Boston, George Harrison and Randy Travis.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Deborah Ramirez accuses Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a party at Yale during the 1983-1984 school year. Six days - 35 years later - of thinking made her comfortable alleging Kavanaugh was the guy. Wasn’t sure it was him, but now she is. Dr. Ford’s story still isn’t corroborated. No one corroborates her story - which Jennifer Granholm says actually is a form of corroboration. The politics of this process.

**This episode contains explicit details about alleged sexual misconduct and may not be suitable for all listeners** Deborah Ramirez has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her during a drunken party at Yale. Kavanaugh denies the accusations, and Republicans are calling it a smear campaign. Plus, amid rumors that he suggested wearing wires around the president, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's future in the job is in question. This episode: political reporter Asma Khalid, national political correspondent Mara Liasson, Congressional reporter Kelsey Snell, and justice correspondent Carrie Johnson. Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.org. Find and support your local public radio station at npr.org/stations.

On today's episode of Loud & Clear, John Kiriakou is joined by Massoud Shadjareh, the founder of the Islamic Human Rights Commission, and Mohammad Marandi, an expert on American studies and postcolonial literature who teaches at the University of Tehran.Iranian officials this morning vowed “unforgiving revenge” over an attack on a military parade on Saturday that killed 29 people, including the four attackers, and wounded 70. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps blamed “regional supporters of terrorism,” meaning Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, both of which denied involvement. US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, meanwhile, said that Iran’s president should look in the mirror before blaming others. And this as Rudy Giuliani addressed the “Iran Uprising Summit” in Manhattan hosted by the bizarre political cult and terrorist organization MEK, a group that counts National Security Advisor John Bolton as one of its allies. Monday’s regular segment Technology Rules with Chris Garaffa is a weekly guide on how monopoly corporations and the national surveillance state are threatening cherished freedoms, civil rights and civil liberties. Web developer and technologist Chris Garaffa joins the show. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was summoned to the White House this morning as rumors swirled that he had either resigned or would be fired. Neither happened, but in Rosenstein’s meeting with White House chief of staff John Kelly, he requested a meeting with the President on Thursday. The speculation now is that he will resign then. John speaks with Ted Rall, an award-winning editorial cartoonist and columnist whose work is at rall.com, and Daniel Lazare, a journalist and author of three books—”The Frozen Republic,” “The Velvet Coup,” and “America's Undeclared War.” Federal prosecutors in New York are weighing criminal charges against former Obama White House general counsel Greg Craig amid allegations that he failed to register as a foreign agent in a probe that is linked to the Paul Manafort investigation. Prosecutors are also considering charges against Craig’s law firm, international legal powerhouse Skadden Arps. Jim Kavanagh, the editor of thepolemicist.net, joins the show. Moscow will bolster Syria’s air defense following the downing of a Russian plane last week by sending a modern S-300 air defense system to the Syrian army in the next two weeks, according to the Russian defense minister. The decision was made by Russian president Vladimir Putin because of Israeli involvement in the plane’s shoot-down. Mark Sleboda, an international relations and security analyst, joins John. As Senate Republicans push for a quick vote this week on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Senate Democrats are investigating a new allegation of sexual misconduct against him. Deborah Ramirez, who went to Yale with Kavanaugh, said he exposed himself to her at a party. This is the second allegation against Brett Kavanaugh of sexual harassment or assault. Professor Hannah Dickinson, associate professor at Hobart and William Smith Colleges and a women’s advocate, joins the show.Monday’s segment “Education for Liberation with Bill Ayers” is where Bill helps us look at the state of education across the country. What’s happening in our schools, colleges, and universities, and what impact does it have on the world around us? John speaks with Bill Ayers, an activist, educator and the author of the book “Demand the Impossible: A Radical Manifesto.”

Brought to you by HispanicMPR.com