Podcasts about innocent until proven guilty

What happens when leaders stay silent about abuse? In this episode, the Remnant Radio hosts—Joshua Lewis, Michael Rowntree, and Michael Miller—break down Mike Winger's explosive six-hour investigation into Shawn Bolz and the devastating coverup culture plaguing charismatic Christianity.​The hosts dive deep into the evidence Mike Winger presented showing how Shawn Bolz faked prophetic words through data mining, committed sexual misconduct, and how Bethel Church leadership knew about it for years but failed to warn their own congregation. This isn't just disappointing—it's dangerous. When victims suffered devastating consequences from fraudulent prophecies, where was the public accountability?​ Joshua, Michael, and Michael also respond to Kris Vallotton's recent sermon that many see as damage control rather than genuine accountability. They examine his claims about social media fake news, family confidentiality, and shepherding complexity—but find these arguments fall short of biblical standards for church discipline.​ This episode tackles critical questions every Christian needs to wrestle with: -What does biblical prophecy actually look like versus manipulation and fraud?​ -When should church leaders publicly expose false prophets and abusers?​ -How do we balance mercy with justice against deception?​ -What does 1 Timothy 5:19-20 require when multiple witnesses come forward?​ Whether you're navigating charismatic theology, concerned about spiritual abuse, or simply want to understand what biblical accountability looks like in the modern church, this episode provides crucial insights.EXTRA LINKS:Mike Winger episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GH05S53QlY0&t=14543sBethel Sermon: Starts at 1:41:36 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s25IuN0oDrs0:00 – Introduction0:51 – Overview of Mike Winger's Investigation & Kris Vallotton's Response3:48 – Background on Victims5:38 – Timeline of Bethel's Knowledge 9:50 – Analysis of Kris Vallotton's Speech: Complexities of Shepherding Claim22:04 – Critique of "Everyone Has a Platform" and Fake News Narrative27:03 – Evaluating the "No Family Talks Anymore" Defense34:26 – The Problem of Breaking Confidentiality vs. Protecting Victims43:58 – "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" and the Investigation Excuse55:17 – Using Judas and Broken People as Justification1:10:04 – Were the Prophetic Words Valid? Addressing Nuance vs. Deflection1:21:04 – Revelation 2:20 and Tolerating Jezebel: A Self-Defeating Argument Subscribe to The Remnant Radio newsletter and receive our FREE introduction to spiritual gifts eBook. Plus, get access to: discounts, news about upcoming shows, courses and conferences - and more. Subscribe now at TheRemnantRadio.com.Support the showABOUT THE REMNANT RADIO:

Structural tax overhaul. Privatization progress ahead? MNZL eyes big raise. Morning Drive is your daily download of the essential headlines shaping Egypt. From business policy and finance to the latest in tech, all in under 10 minutes. Hosted by ‘Synthetic Salma’ — an AI-powered version of our own Executive Editor Salma El-Saeed. You can read the full newsletter on the website: https://enterprise.news/egypt/en Morning Drive is brought to you by: Madinet Masr GRANITE Financial Holding Bonyan for Real Estate Investments Learn more about how you can advertise with EnterpriseAM by emailing Moustafa Taalab mtaalab@enterprisemea.com And check out our other show Making It, where we speak to CEOs and entrepreneurs about building a great business in the region: https://omny.fm/shows/making-it See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Should "innocent until proven guilty" be upheld in the Canadian justice system?

SUBSCRIBE to our newsletter: https://riskreversalmedia.beehiiv.com/subscribe Dan Nathan & Guy Adami break down the top market headlines and bring you stock market trade ideas for Wednesday, August 6th. FactSet Insight Podcast: https://www.factset.com/podcasts Follow Doug on Twitter: https://x.com/DougKass --Learn more about FactSet: https://www.factset.com/lp/mrkt-callMRKT Call is brought to you by our presenting sponsors CME Group, FactSet, SoFi & MoneyLionSign up for our emailsFollow us on Twitter @MRKTCallFollow @GuyAdami on TwitterFollow @CarterBWorth on TwitterFollow us on Instagram @RiskReversalMediaLike us on Facebook @RiskReversalWatch all of our videos on YouTube Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Adam and Jordana 9a hour!

Key Themes and Important Ideas:1. Foundational Importance:The presumption of innocence is presented as a "vital safeguard that underpins the entire criminal justice system" and "serves as the bedrock of our legal protections."It ensures that "the burden remains on the state to prove its case and that no person is punished without a clear, evidentiary demonstration of guilt."2. Historical Roots:The concept has origins in ancient legal traditions, including Roman law, where the state's responsibility to prove guilt began to take shape.The common law tradition in medieval Europe further refined the notion, with English jurists articulating that the accused did not bear the burden of proving innocence.The maxim “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” – "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies" – encapsulates the core of the presumption of innocence.3. Constitutional and International Enshrinement:While not explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution, the principle is "inferred from the due process clauses of both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments."Internationally, Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly states: "Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence."These codifications affirm it as both a legal principle and a fundamental human right.4. Operation within the Criminal Justice System:It places the "burden of proof squarely on the prosecution" throughout a criminal trial.The state must present evidence that meets the high standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt."This standard is intentionally rigorous due to the high stakes involved (freedom, reputation, life).Ambiguity in evidence must be viewed "in favor of the accused," acting as a "shield against wrongful conviction."5. The Meaning of "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt":It does not imply absolute certainty or mathematical precision.It means the evidence must be "so convincing that a reasonable person would have no logical reason to doubt the defendant's guilt."Any "reasonable uncertainty about the accused's guilt" after considering all evidence compels a verdict of not guilty.6. Practical Implications for Legal Actors:Prosecutors: Bear a "heavy responsibility" to gather robust, reliable evidence and present a case leaving little room for doubt. They cannot rely on "conjecture, bias, or even circumstantial evidence that fails to meet the stringent threshold of certainty." Effective practice demands "ethical principles and rigorous standards of proof."Defense Attorneys: Have a "powerful tool" to argue for their clients' rights by emphasizing the prosecution's burden. They can highlight gaps or inconsistencies to "sow reasonable doubt." Their role is often to ensure the state fails to meet its burden, not necessarily to prove absolute innocence.7. Seminal Case Law:Courts have "repeatedly reaffirmed that the presumption of innocence is a cornerstone of fair trials."Landmark decisions have explicitly stated that "the burden of proof rests with the prosecution and that any ambiguity in the evidence must benefit the defendant."Appellate courts have underscored that "beyond a reasonable doubt" is a "firm requirement" for conviction.8. Impact on the Jury's Role:Jurors are instructed to approach the case with the understanding that the defendant is presumed innocent.These instructions are "vital to ensuring that jurors do not allow their personal biases or preconceived notions to influence their judgment."It acts as a "check against potential miscarriages of justice" by ensuring rigorous and impartial scrutiny of the prosecution's case.

In this in-depth lecture, we journey through the evolution of the presumption of innocence—a cornerstone of criminal law that insists an accused is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. We explore its historical origins, its enshrinement in constitutional and international human rights frameworks, and its practical application in the courtroom. Discover how this fundamental principle shapes the roles of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges, and learn about the challenges posed by modern media and evolving legal practices. Ideal for law students, legal professionals, and anyone interested in safeguarding justice, this lecture provides a comprehensive look at the doctrine that continues to protect individual rights and maintain the integrity of our criminal justice system.

It's week 2 of the 4-Part Marriage Intensive, which can be best described as a fire-hose of information; so save these episodes and go back and listen again and again! Pastors Zac and Ashley start with a quick run-down of the 5 Love Languages which leads nicely into the fun topic of Accusations and then wrap it up with a nice little bow of Communication!  Hooray Marriage!!!  Topic Ideas - info@hpc.church 

Jana and Mark welcome Author James Porfido, an accomplished criminal attorney with 35 years of experience in prosecution and defense, to share his insights on the criminal justice system's shortcomings. Join the conversation as they investigate real-world instances of imbalance in the legal system and consider ways to restore fairness.

I take you through a thought-provoking discussion on the principles of innocent until proven guilty, especially in light of the Luigi murder case. Whether you're in the legal profession or simply interested in the justice system, there are key takeaways from this episode worth reflecting on.Here are three pivotal insights:Balancing Reality with Legal Principles: I emphasize the necessity of upholding the presumption of innocence in legal practice while acknowledging the real-world instincts about a case. This dual mindset ensures that justice is not only served but perceived with fairness.The Role of Criminal Defense Lawyers: Representing seemingly guilty clients is not about agreeing with their actions but ensuring that the law is applied impartially and justly. As I note, this responsibility is crucial for maintaining a just society for all individuals.Historical and Cultural Context of Justice: I refer to historical precedents like the dialogue from A Man for All Seasons, illustrating the timeless importance of preserving legal rights, even for those we might naturally oppose.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Thank you for joining me in the studio again for another weekend rant session. I give my thoughts on a few of the random news stories such as Microsoft announcing the development of their newest quantum processor, Diddy's lawyer bowing out of his case, and with the Luigi doc dropping, how can he expect an uncompromised trial? Let's jump right into another fun and winding monologue about everything going on in the world!

Part 2 of this series brings you to the trial preparation of an attempted murder case, with the defendant facing a potential life sentence.  We'll hear the emotional perspective of the attorneys throughout the life of the case and explore the psychology of false confessions.  This episode also highlights the work of a false confession expert as we discussed how lying about evidence and contamination during an interrogation can lead to unreliable results. Ever wonder what it's like behind the scenes of trial preparation for attempted murder?  In this two-part Special Edition of the Truth Be Told podcast, we explore a case from 2014 out of Brooklyn, NY where heroes from FDNY rescued two young children who were trapped inside a burning apartment.  As the flames subsided, the investigation ensued, and police were pointed at a primary suspect for the alleged arson.  Once in custody, the police conducted an interrogation which produced a controversial confession to the incident.  This resulted in the defendant facing multiple charges of attempted murder, assault and arson with the potential of spending life in prison. However, as the legal team of Adam Heyman, Anna Carlsen and Sarah Siegel learned more about their assigned case – it was not as open and shut as it seemed.  This team of attorneys joined the Truth Be Told podcast to give their perspective on how they reviewed the case, prepared for trial and ultimately represented their client.  The team also brought in Maria Hartwig, PhD, an expert in false confessions and police interrogation techniques to provide her opinion to the court on the reliability of the confession that loomed over their case.  Professor Hartwig also joins the panel to share the research behind false confessions and the common contributors, such as misclassification, coercion and contamination. This two-part episode is intended to provide you the insight and perspective from the legal team of the defendant, and understanding how an expert witness is effectively used at trial.  For investigators, this series also provides several takeaways on how to ensure evidence is collected appropriately and can be relied on for further investigation or prosecution.  Our hope is to provide future jurors, investigators, attorneys and anyone involved in the courtroom working group with a new perspective on how our system is built on the foundational premise of “innocent until proven guilty."  *Disclaimer: This podcast series does not represent a comprehensive review of the investigation into this case, but rather highlights the perspective of the defense team.  There are no assertions made by the Truth Be Told podcast as to the integrity of the investigation itself or the reliability of the statements provided by involved parties.  We encourage listeners to review all the information and formulate their own opinion relative to the case but with a more enlightened perspective provided by our panel of guests.  

Ever wonder what it's like behind the scenes of trial preparation for attempted murder?  In this two-part Special Edition of the Truth Be Told podcast, we explore a case from 2014 out of Brooklyn, NY where heroes from FDNY rescued two young children who were trapped inside a burning apartment.  As the flames subsided, the investigation ensued, and police were pointed at a primary suspect for the alleged arson.  Once in custody, the police conducted an interrogation which produced a controversial confession to the incident.  This resulted in the defendant facing multiple charges of attempted murder, assault and arson with the potential of spending life in prison. However, as the legal team of Adam Heyman, Anna Carlsen and Sarah Siegel learned more about their assigned case – it was not as open and shut as it seemed.  This team of attorneys joined the Truth Be Told podcast to give their perspective on how they reviewed the case, prepared for trial and ultimately represented their client.  The team also brought in Maria Hartwig, PhD, an expert in false confessions and police interrogation techniques to provide her opinion to the court on the reliability of the confession that loomed over their case.  Professor Hartwig also joins the panel to share the research behind false confessions and the common contributors, such as misclassification, coercion and contamination.  This two-part episode is intended to provide you the insight and perspective from the legal team of the defendant, and understanding how an expert witness is effectively used at trial.  For investigators, this series also provides several takeaways on how to ensure evidence is collected appropriately and can be relied on for further investigation or prosecution.  Our hope is to provide future jurors, investigators, attorneys and anyone involved in the courtroom working group with a new perspective on how our system is built on the foundational premise of “innocent until proven guilty." Disclaimer: This podcast series does not represent a comprehensive review of the investigation into this case,but rather highlights the perspective of the defense team.  There are no assertions made by the Truth Be Told podcast as to the integrity of the investigation itself or the reliability of the statements provided by involved parties.  We encourage listeners to review all the information and formulate their own opinion relative to the case but with a more enlightened perspective provided by our panel of guests.

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is vital but often overlooked in both the legal system and society. From the Duke Lacrosse case to immunity grants shielding guilt, public judgment frequently bypasses due process. This reflection urges applying fairness to judgments, emphasizing the importance of evidence and justice for all in preserving reputations and integrity.

The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is vital but often overlooked in both the legal system and society. From the Duke Lacrosse case to immunity grants shielding guilt, public judgment frequently bypasses due process. This reflection urges applying fairness to judgments, emphasizing the importance of evidence and justice for all in preserving reputations and integrity.

A former employee is accusing Country Singer Garth Brooks of years of sexual misconduct, culminating in a terrifying assault that will leave you speechless. From disturbing hotel incidents to chilling manipulation tactics, we are breaking down the claims that paint a much darker picture of the beloved musician..this audio is from the PopCrimeTV YouTube Channel.Watch the Report: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWTKzHu1otw&lc=Ugyrh2L_iTPQEOkAARd4AaABAgLawsuits:https://www.wigdorlaw.com/wp-content/...https://www.scribd.com/document/77603...Garth Brooks is Innocent Until Proven Guilty, All Allegations Are Considered Alleged Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9/11/24This class is Lui nishmat edan Claude Ben Sharon

In the wake of the #MeToo Movement, some people decided to believe all women, whether they were telling the truth or not. One of the men impacted by this was  former "The Bachelor" star Clayton Echard, whose life and reputation were shredded by false accusations from a dishonest woman. Clayton tells the audience the true story and explains why the media is listening to a woman with zero evidence, how cancel culture has affected him, and how justice can be served. Become a member at members.charliekirk.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the wake of the #MeToo Movement, some people decided to believe all women, whether they were telling the truth or not. One of the men impacted by this was  former "The Bachelor" star Clayton Echard, whose life and reputation were shredded by false accusations from a dishonest woman. Clayton tells the audience the true story and explains why the media is listening to a woman with zero evidence, how cancel culture has affected him, and how justice can be served. Become a member at members.charliekirk.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

From a colony of bats plaguing one of its hospitals in Florida to an alleged connection to money laundering in Malta, Steward Health‘s descent into bankruptcy is anything but ordinary.In this week's episode of Cloud 9fin, global head of distressed debt reporting Max Frumes and deputy distressed editor Rachel Butt walk through the lead-up to Steward's bankruptcy filing and the many challenges that the company, its management and its landlord — and lender — Medical Properties Trust will have to navigate as the situation plays out.

Gwendolyn Dolske and Rudy Salo welcome Law Professor and author of Demand The Impossible: One Lawyer's Pursuit of Justice for All, Robert Tsai. We discuss the story behind the book detailing the American Lawyer Steven Bright. What is meant by justice?  How can the law impact culture?  What is the role of money in justice?   Learn more about Robert Tsai's work: https://www.bu.edu/law/profile/robert-l-tsai/ Get 50% your order with FactorMeals using the code Details50: Factormeals.com/details50 Check out http://www.avonmoreinc.com Get extra content: https://www.patreon.com/GoodIsInTheDetails Accepting Sponsors.  Get in Touch: https://www.goodisinthedetails.com

Dear Pennies and Pallers, Letter one is from Lulu, who is struggling with how to treat her neighbor who has been accused of a heinous crime (content warning - this letter and our responses address sexual abuse - if you need to you can skip ahead to 39:30). In letter two, Kristin regales us her four-year old's curiosities. We also talk Disneyland food, not resolving songs, we wish happy birthdays to loved ones, and more! We wish you well, sincerely, Your Pen Pals Daniel Van Kirk and Rory ScovelSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Not defending Diddy here per se, but when the Feds get a warrant to search your house and then they totally trash it, do they come back and clean it all up?

In this episode of Self Evident, we discuss 3 viral topics that had America talking– Claudine Gay, Mickey Mouse being in the public domain, and the election ballot.… Continue Reading

Want to listen ad-free? Join my ad-free podcast here: patreon.com/TheSCPExperience Huge thanks to Factor for sponsoring the podcast. Be sure to head to FactorMeals.com/scp50 to get 50% off your entire order of ready-to-eat meals! SCP Foundation SAFE class object, SCP-141: Innocent Until Proven Guilty This story was derived from https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-141 and is released under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Author: Lucas Click Discover the Author's impressive series of SCP Tales here: https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BVWJFGV3 Check out more of Mr. Click's work here: newpulptales.com DISCLAIMER: This episode contains explicit content. Parental guidance is advised for children under the age of 18. Listen at your own discretion. #thescpexperience #scp #scpfoundation #scpencounters #securecontainprotect #scpstories #scpexplained #whatisscp Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Are People Innocent Until Proven Guilty

Happy Halloween! We analyze the aftermath of our hometown's infamous double ax murder. Part 2 of 2 reveals how a Portuguese immigrant's actions may have influenced the trial and covers the remaining life and death of Lizbeth A. Borden, including Kelly's visitas to the properties. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/folkandfad/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/folkandfad/support

Episode One Hundred and Sixty-Six Innocent until proven guilty

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode is Largely Q&A;  regarding the episode Innocent Until Proven Guilty.  Support the show

Content warning: This episode discusses rape, sexual assault, and gender-based violence. If you need support, you can call Rape Crisis for free on 0808 500 2222This week - though an 'open secret' in the media industry - it was revealed by the Times, the Sunday Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches that Russell Brand has been accused of rape, sexual assault, and emotional abuse. Four women have alleged sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013, others have made a range of accusations about Brand's controlling, abusive and predatory behaviour. More women have come forward since the article and documentary aired. Brand denied the allegations and said his relationships have all been consensual, and said there is a mainstream media conspiracy theory to take him down.In this episode, we address Brand's announcement of a 'mainstream media conspiracy', plus other reactionary statements including 'Why didn't she say anything before?', 'What about false accusations?', and - often the biggest statement when rich and famous men are accused of sexual assault - 'Innocent until proven guilty!'. To address the crucial context of systemic failures that's often missing from the conversation on rape convictions, we then revisit our Series 1 investigation: "Rape Justice: What happens to the 98%?" The charge rate of rape is less than 2%. The investigation features rape survivors not just from the UK, but from the US and Europe too: however varied their experiences or assault, silence and injustice are themes that shape them all. They attest to the multitude of reasons why victims may not go to the police; and why even when they DO go to the police, they may come to regret it. Sources: CPS Q3 and Q4 reports for 2022-2023Speakers:Alison Turkos @alisonturkosPieke Roelofs @pieke_r www.photoandgrime.comVerity Nevitt @veritynevitt www.thegeminiproject.orgDame Vera Baird, Victim's Commissioner @VictimsCommSarah Crew, National Police Chiefs Council @aspsarah_crewSiobhan Blake, Crown Prosecution Service @CPSUK @crownprosecutorsYour hosts are @helenawadia and @mathildamall. Music by Samfire @soundofsamfire.We've launched a Patreon. If you want to support us for a small monthly fee, head to patreon.com/MediaStormPodcastMedia Storm was launched by the house of The Guilty Feminist and is part of the Acast Creator Network. Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/media-storm. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dr David Bull discusses the day's biggest topics with Sam Armstrong, Commentator...You can listen to the whole show weekdays from 6.30-10am Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sometimes when you're drunk, and you're driving, you just need someone to pin it on. Like your best friend.

In this episode we discuss what the founding fathers had to say about protecting the innocent, and convicting the guilty.  We discuss some very controversial topics on this issue as they pertain the Constitution of the United States, and the various State Constitutions.  Dr. Franklin and Mr. John Adams are guests on the podcast.  Support the show

 Today the Talkmaster takes a look at the concept of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty". It's a value as old and as American as Baseball, Apple Pie, and Chevys not built in Mexico. But is it a misunderstood value? Neal thinks so! Fire up this edition of the Boortz report and find out why!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

 Today the Talkmaster takes a look at the concept of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty". It's a value as old and as American as Baseball, Apple Pie, and Chevys not built in Mexico. But is it a misunderstood value? Neal thinks so! Fire up this edition of the Boortz report and find out why!Atlanta's ONLY All Conservative News & Talk Station.: https://www.xtra1063.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Topics include: 1)84-yr-old Andrew Lester is released on bail after arrest in the Ralph Yarl shooting. Carl is convinced, since race hustlers have chimed in on the case, Lester will not receive a fair trial.2)Sen. John Fetterman is not mentally fit to serve. 3)Speaker McCarthy releases proposal to avoid debt ceiling. 4)A young couple that was beat up during the Chicago teen riots last weekend, speaks out. 5)Commies gone wild: Biden looks to punish those with good credit scores by making them fund high risk mortgages. WATCH AND SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/@carljacksonshowandblog More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecarljacksonshow Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

*THIS WEEK:* Anheuser-Busch. Fine. And how's your dick? Apparently, tucked back. Got a Tesla? Keep your pants on! “Amateur Nation on the Street” *On “A la Carte”:* Nancy Pelosi's “due process dyslexia”, is there anything better than the sound of children laughing? Answer: “Yes”, and, President Coloring Book left his homework in Ireland.*On “3 Pro Things”: the REAL “homeless” issue in Commiefornia, an organization that honors and remembers ALL of America's veterans, and the greatest school bus driver of all time since Otto of “The Simpsons”.*DRYBAR COMEDY SPECIAL: “Amateur Nation*”: https://www.drybarcomedy.com/lous**MAIN: https://www.lousantini.com/**SUBSCRIBE* on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOh5fIZVQdT0VG2M59S0Vwg* *Facebook:* https://facebook.com/lousantinientertainment *Instagram:* https://www.instagram.com/lou.santini3/*Truth Social:* https://truthsocial.com/@lousantini3*LinkedIn:* https://www.linkedin.com/in/lousantini/*GETTR:* https://gettr.com/user/lousantini

Topics include: 1)84-yr-old Andrew Lester is released on bail after arrest in the Ralph Yarl shooting. Carl is convinced, since race hustlers have chimed in on the case, Lester will not receive a fair trial.2)Sen. John Fetterman is not mentally fit to serve. 3)Speaker McCarthy releases proposal to avoid debt ceiling. 4)A young couple that was beat up during the Chicago teen riots last weekend, speaks out. 5)Commies gone wild: Biden looks to punish those with good credit scores by making them fund high risk mortgages. WATCH AND SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/@carljacksonshowandblog More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecarljacksonshow Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join us as Pastor Troy Smothermon and Pastor Shawn Kelly talk politics and Faith.

3/16/23

In the UniParty's "America" - you can be falsely arrested and thrown into prison for YEARS without access to the very exculpatory evidence that may exonerate you and prove your innocence SO LONG AS keeping you imprisoned is a slap to Donald Trump. How Tucker Carlson's video drop demolishes the prevailing narrative about January 6 and has caused #J6CoverUp to trend on Twitter.

Do you really believe that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty? In this episode Carl argues that the video evidence of Tyre Nichol's confrontation with 5 black Memphis cops that allegedly led to his death should NOT be released to the public and only be seen by the family, defendants and jury. Carl believes high profile cases do more to hurt the justice system by destroying the chances of finding an impartial jury, than do to bring about real justice.   WATCH THE VIDEO AND SUBSCRIBE https://youtu.be/WDl6I_tGUyM   More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Do you really believe that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty? In this episode Carl argues that the video evidence of Tyre Nichol's confrontation with 5 black Memphis cops that allegedly led to his death should NOT be released to the public and only be seen by the family, defendants and jury. Carl believes high profile cases do more to hurt the justice system by destroying the chances of finding an impartial jury, than do to bring about real justice.   WATCH THE VIDEO AND SUBSCRIBE https://youtu.be/WDl6I_tGUyM   More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Pastor Bryan breaks down Romans 5:12-21, discussing what it means to be born naturally (under the headship of Adam) verses supernaturally (under the headship of Christ) and how wild it is to be living in both realities at the same time. We will also debunk the dark doctrine of original sin and replace it with the truth about our condition at birth and the incredible hope this gives us for the eternal existence of the infants we have lost before or in the early days/years just after their birth.

Pastor Bryan breaks down Romans 5:12-21, discussing what it means to be born naturally (under the headship of Adam) verses supernaturally (under the headship of Christ) and how wild it is to be living in both realities at the same time. We will also debunk the dark doctrine of original sin and replace it with the truth about our condition at birth and the incredible hope this gives us for the eternal existence of the infants we have lost before or in the early days/years just after their birth.

Once upon a time there were rules in a courtroom and an overarching idea of innocence until proven guilty. It feels like this has changed to the point where walking into a courtroom is the very same feeling as being set upon by an enemy. It is in this “new” reality that we again cover (more...) The post 357- Innocent Until Proven Guilty vs. Lawlessness (Free) appeared first on Crrow777 Radio.