Lawyer Talk Off The Record

I'm tackling a question I hear all the time: “How do lawyers get paid—and what actually happens if my case takes an unexpected turn?” This week, I'm breaking down a listener's real-world concerns about flat rate fees in criminal defense cases. I'll walk you through how these agreements usually work, what you should look for in a fee contract, and why it's so important to have clear communication about money from the very start.I'll also dig into how retainer fees and hourly billing can play a role, discuss the kinds of additional expenses you might run into, and share some of my own experiences to help make sense of it all. Whether you're in the process of hiring an attorney or just curious about the financial side of legal work, I'll explain what you need to know in straightforward, practical terms. Key Moments00:00 "Essential Engagement Letter Practices"05:23 Flat Rate vs. Hourly Fees08:48 Understanding Lawyer Fees Limitations10:10 Legal Fee DeterminantsHere are 3 key takeawaysGet It in Writing: Always ensure your fee agreement is crystal clear and in writing. This protects both you and your attorney and eliminates confusion about what the fee covers—especially with flat rates.Flat Fees = Predictability, but Also Flexibility: Flat fees offer peace of mind, but circumstances can change. Make sure your agreement mentions what happens if the case is dismissed quickly, or if unexpected complications arise that require more work.Ask Questions, Don't Assume: Steve stressed the importance of open communication. Ask your lawyer exactly what's included in the fee, how they handle additional expenses, and whether there are extra charges if your case goes further than expected.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Why do some defendants want to withdraw their guilty pleas, and what are the most common reasons?This comes up all the time in my legal practice: What can you do if you plead guilty and then change your mind?I'll be sharing what really happens behind the scenes when someone wants to withdraw their guilty plea, especially if the sentence they get isn't what they expected. I'll explain how joint recommendations work here in Ohio, why clear communication between lawyers and clients is absolutely crucial, and what legal hurdles you're likely to face if you try to take back a guilty plea—whether it's before or after sentencing.So if you're curious about the appeals process, struggling with buyer's remorse after a plea deal, or just want to understand how the criminal justice system really works, this episode offers real-life stories, hard-earned insights, and practical advice from inside the courtroom.Key Moments00:00 Clear Client Communication on Plea Deals05:02 Plea Withdrawal Challenges in Ohio07:05 Withdrawing Plea: Start Over Consequences09:44 Rule 11 Plea Negotiations OverviewHere are 3 key takeaways:It's Much Harder After Sentencing: In Ohio, withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing requires a very strong reason, like major mistakes during the plea process or bad legal advice. Courts generally don't like granting these requests.Timing Is Everything: Before sentencing, withdrawals should be granted more freely, but courts are increasingly strict. If you're reconsidering, don't wait.You Might Be Back to Square One: Withdrawing a plea means the original charges (and risks) are back on the table, and prosecutors may not offer the same deal again. Sometimes, things can actually get worse.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Let's look at a topic that's been making a lot of headlines lately: the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations, especially with talk around Trump's immigration policies. Now, don't worry—I promised to keep things non-political, and I plan to stick to that. Instead, I'm here to walk you through what's really going on behind the scenes: the legal procedures and how these cases play out in court.Recently, federal judges in different parts of the country have been coming to completely opposite conclusions about the government's power to use this act. So, how does that work? What happens when courts disagree this way? I'll break down the basics of appellate law, explain why we're probably headed straight for a Supreme Court decision, and talk about what that means for everyone watching this play out.If you're curious about how the legal system handles big, controversial cases like this—without all the political noise—you're in the right place. Stick around, and I'll walk you through exactly what's happening and what comes next.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm digging into a question I get all the time—should you talk to the police if they reach out and want you to come down to the station? I know this one makes a lot of folks nervous, especially if you're worried that staying quiet might make you look guilty, but you're also hearing that you should never talk to the police without a lawyer.In this episode, I'm sharing a real scenario from a listener (names changed, of course!) whose son was asked to speak with officers about an incident involving a girl he met. I'll break down the reasons why going in to talk to the police—especially if you don't know exactly what they're asking about—can be a risky move. I'll even tell you about a case from my own practice where talking to the cops made things a whole lot harder, even though my client thought he was just clearing things up.So if you've ever wondered what the right move is when the police want to “just ask a few questions,” stick around. I'm here to give you some real talk on what to do—and what not to do—if you're ever in that situation. Let's get into it!Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I want to tackle a hot topic that's getting a lot of attention here in Ohio: police qualified immunity. There's been some buzz lately with talk of amending the Ohio constitution to eliminate qualified immunity, and with moves from the Attorney General and even the Ohio Supreme Court nudging this issue closer to the ballot, the debate is really heating up.I break down what qualified immunity actually is, why it matters for police officers, government workers, and regular folks like us, and what could happen if it gets scrapped. Trust me, there are strong arguments on both sides, and it's the kind of issue that could seriously change the legal landscape here in Ohio.I'm not here to take sides today, but I do want to set the stage for a much bigger conversation. I'm planning to bring in some guests soon—lawyers who work on both sides of this debate—so we can really dig deep and talk about what's at stake.So if you've got questions or thoughts about qualified immunity, shoot them my way. I'm looking forward to having this discussion, and I hope you stick around for what's sure to be an interesting ride. Let's get into it, right here on Lawyer Talk.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ever wondered what "en banc review" really means in appellate law? On this episode of Lawyer Talk, I break down this rarely used but powerful legal maneuver in a way that's both clear and practical.Here are 3 key takeaways from the conversation:En Banc Explained: En banc review refers to a request for the entire appellate court—not just the typical three-judge panel—to re-hear a case. This usually happens when a decision may conflict with other rulings, in-state or statewide.When & Why to Request: Lawyers typically seek en banc review when a panel's decision clashes with other appellate outcomes or when a case has significant legal implications that the whole court should weigh in on.Outcomes Can Change: If granted, en banc review can lead to a brand-new decision—sometimes supporting, sometimes overturning, or even fundamentally altering the initial ruling. It's a strategic last resort when the stakes couldn't be higher.If you deal with appeals or just want insight into appellate strategy, this episode is packed with actionable info.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I hear this question a lot—have Uber and Lyft actually led to fewer drunk driving cases? Drawing on my years of experience as a DUI defense attorney, I share how rideshare apps have shifted the landscape of drinking and driving, especially among 21-year-olds today. I also discuss why, even with the best intentions and easy access to Uber and Lyft, people still find themselves in trouble after a few drinks. I tell some real-life stories from my practice and offer practical advice on how to truly avoid an OVI. So stick around for an honest look at why good decisions can go bad—and what you can do to stay safe.3 Key Takeaways:Technology Doesn't Override Human Nature: Alcohol impairs the very part of the brain that helps us make rational decisions. Even the best-laid plans to use Uber can unravel after a few drinks.Education Matters Most: Younger people, especially those in college, seem more mindful about not drinking and driving—likely thanks to improved education and awareness campaigns, even more so than rideshare availability alone.Beware of “One Last Trip”: Many DUI cases happen after people responsibly get home via Uber, but later decide to drive for food, snacks, or late-night plans—still under the influence.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Sarah in Ohio reaches out to ask about her nephew, who was recently convicted of attempted murder and felonious assault in what they believe was a clear-cut case of self-defense. After losing their appeal and feeling like the state courts haven't given them a fair shake, Sarah wants to know: can they skip straight to the United States Supreme Court?I break down exactly how the appellate process works and why, no matter how urgent or important your case feels, you can't just jump right to the Supreme Court. I walk you through the legal ladder—from trial, to the Ohio Court of Appeals, to the Ohio Supreme Court, and only then, potentially, to the highest court in the land. Along the way, I explain what kinds of issues the Supreme Court is actually looking for, and why they usually don't take up individual error corrections. If you've ever wondered how—and if—a case can make it all the way to Washington, D.C., this episode will clear things up. So tune in for an inside look at the real process of seeking justice through an appeal!Here are 3 key takeawaysNo Skipping Steps: You can't bypass intermediate appeals and go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Every case must follow a specific appellate ladder, starting with a direct appeal, then applying for review by your state's highest court.Supreme Courts Are Selective: Both the Ohio Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court choose which cases they hear, typically focusing on issues with broad constitutional impact—not just error correction in a single case.Timing and Process Matter: If your case is denied review at the state's highest level, you have a limited window (typically 90 days) to petition the U.S. Supreme Court—and even then, getting heard is rare.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ever wondered if you can sit in on a jury trial?I get asked this question all the time: Can you just walk into a courtroom and watch a jury trial, especially if it's your loved one on trial? Drawing from my experience as a criminal defense attorney, I break down the constitutional rights that guarantee public trials, share some stories from my own time in court, and talk about the rare instances where a courtroom might be closed to the public.Whether you're hoping to support someone you care about, curious about courtroom proceedings, or simply interested in how the justice system works behind the scenes, I'll walk you through what you can expect, what makes public trials so important, and even offer a bit of encouragement if you've never set foot in a courthouse before. I shed some light on the process, the surprises you might encounter, and why everyone—yes, even you—has the right to see justice in action.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Anyone appealing a conviction should always consider post-conviction strategies and consult lawyers who understand their importance and deadlines.I take you behind the scenes of Ohio's post-conviction hearings—a part of the criminal appellate process that's often misunderstood and, frankly, overlooked. Building on our previous discussion, I explain what post-conviction petitions are, why they matter, and share my recent experience handling a rare, week-long post-conviction hearing. I break down the legal standards we have to meet, the importance of expert testimony, and how the landscape for these hearings is shifting in Ohio. I also walk you through what really happens after you score a win in post-conviction court, what appeals might look like, and why post-conviction work can be a make-or-break factor when you're choosing an attorney. Whether you've got your own case on the line or just want to understand more about what happens after a criminal conviction, I've packed this episode with practical insights and real-world advice. Join me as we dig into the nitty-gritty of the appellate process and why timing—and the right legal strategy—matter so much.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Think DNA evidence always means someone's guilty? Think again!Fresh off a hearing where I examined multiple DNA experts, both for the defense and the prosecution, I want to break down the common misconceptions and hidden complexities surrounding DNA today. With technology now able to detect just the tiniest traces—sometimes as little as 20 cells—the interpretation of DNA evidence has become far less straightforward than many believe.I share real-world examples, including cases where innocent people were implicated simply because their DNA was found in unexpected places, often due to accidental transfer. My main takeaway? DNA evidence isn't always the slam dunk it's made out to be. It's more important than ever to bring in experts and scrutinize every detail when DNA becomes a factor in a case. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm Steve Palmer, I'll be sharing some of my personal experiences and insights on how incredibly precise court reporters can be, despite the challenges they face. You'll hear about both the marvelous precision and the occasional horror stories of unreliable transcriptions. I'll also talk about the transformative role of modern technology in this essential part of the legal process. Whether you're interested in how flawed records can be corrected or the significance of genuine communication in the courtroom, this episode has something for you. Here are some key takeaways:Remarkable Accuracy: Transcripts are incredibly accurate, with court reporters using real-time transcription techniques. Most of the time, they capture statements with precision. Handling Errors: In rare cases where transcripts might be flawed, there are procedures in place to ensure justice isn't compromised. From re-agreements among parties to supplementing records, there are systems to address discrepancies. Impact of Technology: We've come a long way from jotted notes and shorthand. Modern technology guarantees detailed records of court proceedings, but human elements like court reporter expertise remain crucial. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

We're tackling a question submitted by Andy through LawyerTalkPodcast.com about expunging disorderly conduct, battery, or misdemeanor charges from your record.I break down the difference between record sealing and expungements here in Ohio, especially since the law has recently changed to allow for more complete removal of records. I explain the ins and outs of what can and can't be expunged or sealed, particularly when it comes to domestic violence or more serious crimes. Plus, I walk you through the process of applying for an expungement or sealing, emphasizing how crucial it is to demonstrate that your interest in clearing your record outweighs any governmental interest.If you're looking to turn over a new leaf and move forward with a clean slate, or if you're just curious about the expungement process, you're in the right place.3 key takeawaysUnderstanding Ohio's Record Sealing and Expungement: Ohio recently updated its laws to include expungements, which means that once a record is expunged, it's completely gone, unlike sealing where the record is just hidden from the public.Eligibility Criteria for Expungement: Disorderly conduct can be expunged, but other offenses like domestic violence or sexual-related offenses might not qualify. It's crucial to understand which charges are eligible for expungement.The Expungement Process: Applying usually involves demonstrating that your interest in expunging the record outweighs any governmental interest. The courts want to see you've turned over a new leaf, which can make a compelling case for getting your records expunged.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm discussing the critical aspect of the appellate process: the hidden costs that can arise after a conviction. In this episode, I share my personal experience with the sticker shock of obtaining a trial transcript for an appeal. It's a glimpse into the financial burdens that these expenses can impose on those looking to contest their convictions and how unforeseen costs can sometimes stand in the way of justice. Drawing from my years of appellate work, I shed light on the challenges and potential solutions when faced with these unexpected financial hurdles. Whether you're directly dealing with an appeal or simply curious about the legal intricacies, this episode offers valuable insights into an often-overlooked part of the legal process.Key TakeawaysSticker Shock of Transcripts: The cost of obtaining trial transcripts can be unexpectedly high, as seen with a recent $9,800 estimate for a four-day trial. It's a sobering reality for many families trying to appeal convictions.The Necessity of Transcripts: Despite the costs, transcripts are crucial for effective appellate work. They provide a clear record of the trial proceedings, which is essential for building a strong appeal case.Planning for Hidden Costs: Individuals looking to appeal should be prepared for these hidden costs, as they can significantly impact the decision to pursue appellate action. Considering potential expenses ahead of time can help in better financial planning.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this Q&A session, I talk more about the realm of privacy and the Fourth Amendment. I answer an intriguing comment from a listener concerning our fundamental right to privacy and how it fares against government actions.I'll explore both sides of this debate, tackling questions about individual rights, the role of law enforcement, and the precarious balance between safety and freedom. We unravel why these constitutional protections are crucial, and what they mean for you. Here are three key takeawaysBalancing Act: I highlight the importance of balancing the need for security with individual privacy rights. While stopping crime is crucial, maintaining control over personal spaces without unwarranted searches is just as important.Fourth Amendment Protections: The Fourth Amendment is designed to protect citizens from government overreach. It's not only about the 'bad actors' but also understanding that even good intentions can lead to infringements on privacy if not checked.Assert Your Rights: Even if you're not hiding anything illegal, it's essential to understand and assert your legal rights. I stress the importance of knowing your rights to ensure they remain intact for everyone.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

We're talking about those real-world scenarios law students won't find in our textbooks. In this "They Don't Teach You That in Law School" edition, we tackle the complex and fascinating topic of entrapment. We explore everything from undercover operations and chat room stings to the infamous DeLorean cocaine case, decoding what truly constitutes entrapment and examining the differences between what we're taught and what really happens in practice. We peel back the curtain on high-profile cases and the controversial role of the administrative state. Whether you're a law student, a lawyer, or just curious about how these defenses play out, this episode is sure to expand your perspective.I reference our past episode Cocaine Island, Episode 100.Teachable Moments00:00 "Entrapment: Back to the Future Discussion"03:06 "Entrapment and Criminal Intent"09:01 Understanding Entrapment's Complexity12:08 Using Prior Convictions in Court14:13 Understanding Estoppel in Law19:02 Entrapment by Estoppel Explained21:06 "Rethinking Government Insurance Involvement"24:19 Interpreting Law: The Regulatory MazeHere's a quick peek at what's discussed:Understanding Entrapment: Ever wondered what really counts as entrapment? Bella and Troy pose some burning questions about how this defense works, with examples you might recognize from "To Catch a Predator." Real-World Legal Insights: I share my professional insights and anecdotes, touching on famous cases like the DeLorean entrapment case from the '80s. It's a fascinating look at how these defenses are argued beyond the classroom.The Role of Entrapment by Estoppel: Learn about this lesser-known defense strategy and how it's applied in unique situations, like the tale of the Southern Ohio tomato farmers. The Challenges of the Administrative State: The episode also tackles the complexities of regulatory schemes and the intricacies of administrative law that aren't typically taught within the four walls of a classroom. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting

I discuss the intricacies of post-conviction petitions and the nuances of the appellate process. As a seasoned appellate lawyer, I shed light on the critical timelines that can make or break an appeal and emphasize the importance of understanding the difference between a direct appeal and post-conviction petitions. I outline the crucial steps that need to be taken immediately following a conviction to ensure all avenues for appeal are properly pursued. With real-life examples and expert advice, I provide invaluable guidance for anyone navigating the complex legal terrain post-conviction. So, if you or someone you know is facing an appeal, this episode is a must-listen. Here's a sneak peek at some of the key takeaways:Timelines are Critical: Always be aware of the deadlines. In Ohio, for instance, the post-conviction petition deadline starts one year from when the trial transcript is filed in the court of appeals on the direct appeal.Know Your Ladders: I always emphasize the importance of understanding the two "ladders" in appellate work—direct appeal and post-conviction. Ignoring one can mean missing vital deadlines and opportunities to raise certain issues.Seek the Right Expertise: For a successful post-conviction petition, it's essential to assemble the right team of expert witnesses. Whether it's medical, psychological, or forensic experts, their involvement can significantly influence the case.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I'm looking back at our earlier debate ignited by a listener's comment on aerial privacy and the law. Joining me in the clip I reference is Troy Hendrickson, one of the two sharp law students from our They Don't Teach You That in Law School series.We're exploring the question: What happens when airplanes fly over your property? Do you have any reasonable expectation of privacy from above? I'll explain how the law strives to balance fixed rules with the need for flexibility in an ever-changing world, especially with advancements in surveillance technology. Here are 3 key takeawaysApplying Rules to Extremes: Lawyers often use seemingly far-fetched examples to test legal rules to their logical extremes, helping to identify exceptions and crafting rules that are both robust and adaptable.Evolving Legal Frameworks: As technology advances, the law must evolve too. Crafting legal rules involves finding a balance between providing clarity and adapting to unforeseen technological advancements.Dynamic vs. Rigid Law: A major theme is finding the balance between finality and adaptability in the law, allowing it to be both definitive for current use and flexible enough to suit future scenarios.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, we're talking about the practicalities of the legal profession that law school often overlooks. From the stress of managing a law practice to the nuances of client relations, we uncover how the real world changes the idealistic image painted in textbooks. We also touch on the importance of building a network and the unique challenges faced by those starting their own practice, especially in fields like criminal defense. Whether you're a seasoned lawyer, a law student, or someone considering this path, you'll find valuable insights into the day-to-day hustle of legal work. Key TakeawaysExpect the Unexpected: In real-world practice, lawyering isn't just about the grandeur cases and fancy cars. It's about juggling unexpected challenges and learning on your feet. Whether it's a surprise trial date or last-minute client issues, adaptability is essential.Client Relationships Are Crucial: Unlike public defenders, private lawyers must maintain a robust connection with their clients. Building trust isn't just about solving legal problems but understanding unique client needs beyond the courtroom.The Art of Business in Law: Starting a practice involves more than just legal knowledge. From understanding file management to keeping the phones ringing, the business side of a law practice is a constant learning curve. Success requires balancing client expectations with professional and personal workloads.Teaching Moments05:16 Starting a Law Practice Challenges09:36 Public vs. Private Legal Representation12:09 Role of Counselors in Legal Jobs16:24 "Balancing Private Practice Demands"17:57 Military vs. Civilian Life: PredictabilitySubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I explain the intricacies of Ohio's OVI laws in another one of our stimulating DUI 360 episodes. I'll be shedding light on why Ohio poses unique challenges for those facing OVI (or as it's known elsewhere, DUI) charges. This is largely due to an old case law called State versus Vega, which restricts defendants from questioning the general reliability of breath test machines in court. This leaves DUI lawyers, like me, with fewer defenses to work with. Key TakeawaysTwo Charging Methods: Ohio has two main avenues for charging OVI: the traditional way, where you're obviously impaired, and the per se way, which considers you guilty if your blood, breath, or urine shows a prohibited alcohol content, regardless of how sober you might appear.State vs. Vega: Ohio's unique legal precedent, established by State vs. Vega, prohibits attacking the general reliability of breath test machines in court. I delve into why this makes defending OVI cases particularly tough here, compared to other states.Admin Rule Concerns: There's a significant debate over non-elected officials making binding rules, like Ohio's Director of Health declaring breath test machines reliable without needing courtroom scrutiny. I explore the implications this holds for defendants.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I talk about the intricacies of oral arguments in the appellate process. What happens during oral arguments at the court of appeals? It's not about calling witnesses or retrying the case; it's about presenting compelling legal arguments to a panel of judges. I explain the importance of highlighting inequities in the trial and making a persuasive case for why the appeal should succeed. I also share insights into the dynamic nature of these proceedings, including how judges' questions play a pivotal role. Whether you're curious about the appeal process or want to explore some fascinating US Supreme Court arguments, this episode has you covered. What can you expect to learn?The unique dynamics of presenting an oral argument and how it differs from trial court proceedings.My top strategies for making a compelling case during an oral argument, focusing on the importance of pointing out inequities in the trial process.Why oral arguments are not just about reiterating written briefs but about adding "meat on the bone" to reinforce your points effectively.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I've got an intriguing legal question for you that goes right into the heart of the Fourth Amendment. We're exploring a listener's thought-provoking comment about the tricky balance between zoning laws, personal privacy, and government overreach. Ever wondered if police can use drones to spy on you without a warrant? Well, that's exactly what we're unpacking today.I'll be discussing how building restrictions, like those pesky fence height limitations, intersect with our constitutional rights. We'll look at the sliding scale of privacy expectations and the complex world of government regulations. Plus, I'll talk about what all this means for our Fourth Amendment freedoms. It's an interesting conversation that challenges us to think critically about our rights and the laws that shape them. Here's what you need to know:Privacy vs. Regulations: There's a tension between zoning laws and your Fourth Amendment rights. If you're restricted from certain privacy measures, like building a high fence, what does that mean for your expectation of privacy?Freedom of Choice: We still have the choice of where to live, which impacts our privacy expectations. If living in a regulated area, sometimes our expectations of privacy need to adjust accordingly.Government Regulation Watch: If regulations start infringing on Fourth Amendment rights without a solid basis, they must be scrutinized. It's essential to understand when governmental action may overstep constitutional protections.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I sit down with law student Troy for a really interesting chat about how criminal prosecution works, particularly when a victim isn't willing to testify. We look at what rights victims have in the legal system and how the state can still move forward with a case even if the victim isn't cooperating. We also take a look at laws like Marcy's Law in Ohio and how they impact things. Our conversation covers how these legal rules come into play in high-pressure situations and sheds light on important topics like evidence and confrontation rights. Plus, we discuss the unique challenges prosecutors face. Whether you're studying law or just curious about how criminal defense operates, this episode gives you a fascinating glimpse into the stuff you might not learn in law school but will definitely encounter in the field.Key Moments04:19 Prosecutors Shifting to Victims' Input06:42 "The Burning Bed" Synopsis11:23 Courtroom Debate: Prosecutor vs. Victim Rights14:15 "Matlock Moment in Court Dramas"16:56 Confrontation and Defendant's Rights19:25 Proving Guilt Without Victim Testimony22:29 Jury Doubt and Confrontation Clause27:15 "Mastering Rules Before Creativity"Here's what you'll discoverVictim's Role: Understand the implications of Marcy's Law and how victim input is dynamically shaping courtroom decisions - but not always as a deciding factor.Confrontation Conundrum: Gain clarity on the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause and its critical role in ensuring defendants can question their accusers in court, which is fundamental to fair trials.Evidential Challenges: Learn about how the absence of victim testimony creates hurdles for the prosecution and how hearsay exceptions can or cannot overcome these obstacles.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I'm drawing from my extensive experience in criminal appellate practice to emphasize how important it is to meet filing deadlines after a conviction. Think of it as a game of chess—when you meet your deadlines, your strategic options are wide open, much like having a queen in the center of the board. But miss those deadlines, and it's like finding your queen trapped in a corner with limited moves. Focusing on the legal system in Ohio, I'll explain the necessity of filing a notice of appeal within thirty days of your sentencing entry and share strategies for those who have unfortunately missed the deadline. Beware of the jurisdictional challenges if these deadlines slip by, especially when aiming for reviews in higher courts. It's crucial to engage a knowledgeable appellate lawyer quickly to explore every possible option for appeal. Key TakeawaysCriticalness of Deadlines: Missing the 30-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal can severely limit your legal options. It's like having your chess queen cornered on the board, reducing your chance of success.Options for Missed Deadlines: In Ohio, you might still have a few techniques to explore if you miss your direct appeal, especially with the right justifications.Importance of a Specialized Appellate Lawyer: Engaging a knowledgeable appellate lawyer is vital for exploring all your options globally and preserving your case for potential federal review.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm tackling a timely question from our listener, Thomas, about the legality of police waiting outside bars and following drivers. Thomas's neighbor was recently pulled over for a DUI after rolling through a stop sign. I'll walk you through why law enforcement often sets up near bars during peak drinking hours and discuss what makes certain police practices legal and constitutional in these scenarios. Remember, this isn't legal advice, but rather a chance to clear up common misconceptions and let you know the nuances of traffic stops and DUI charges. Key TakeawaysStrategic Patrols: Just like hunters and fishers go where they expect to succeed, police often patrol areas near bars to catch potential drunk drivers. While this might feel unfair, it's not illegal.Traffic Violations Matter: Even minor infractions, like rolling through a stop sign, can give police a reason to pull you over. If there's an observable traffic violation, this is viewed as a justified stop under the Fourth Amendment.Expectation of Privacy: Although we have a reasonable expectation of privacy in our cars, police need a valid reason for traffic stops, and a traffic violation can provide that reason.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

After a conviction, many wonder what their next steps should be, and I'm here to provide insight into that very process.As a practicing attorney with Palmer Legal Defense, I've handled numerous appeals not only in Ohio but in federal and state courts nationwide. In this episode, I focus on the direct appeal process, which moves directly from the trial court conviction to the court of appeals. I explore what mistakes can be argued based on the trial record, including evidentiary errors and courtroom rulings, and what issues must be saved for other appeals. So, if you're curious about the legal intricacies post-conviction, stay tuned as I start climbing the direct appeal ladder. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What are the potential reasons a lawyer might withdraw from a case, and how do these reasons relate to attorney-client privilege?With law students Bella Mata and Troy Hendrickson, I discuss the complexities surrounding a lawyer's decision to withdraw from a case. Using a recent high-profile legal situation as a backdrop, the conversation unravels the layers of ethical and moral considerations faced by defense attorneys.Key Takeaways:Ethical Dilemmas: Withdrawal from a case is not always straightforward. Lawyers must navigate complex ethical and moral grounds, ensuring they do not compromise the client's right to effective representation.Reasons for Withdrawal: Common reasons include conflicts of interest, financial issues such as non-payment, and personal beliefs or moral conflicts that prevent a lawyer from providing unbiased representation.Judge's Role: A court must grant permission for a lawyer to withdraw from a case. The judge's decision is pivotal and can depend on various factors, including the attorney's reason for withdrawal and the potential impact on the client's right to a fair trial.Key Moments00:00 Motivations of a Defense Lawyer05:27 Questioning Legal Fit or Capacity07:08 Motion to Withdraw Explained10:30 "Judge Removal Due to Ethics"14:24 "Rico's Uncertain Trial Status"Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I tackle a crucial yet often misunderstood aspect of the legal process – the suppression hearing. After receiving a client question, I break down what a suppression hearing entails, explaining the motions filed to challenge evidence admissibility based on constitutional rights like the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. I hope you will gain insights into the burden of proof required from the prosecution, the role of the defense, and the strategic importance of evidence such as body cam and dash cam footage. For anyone facing a DUI/OVI charge or working in the legal field, understanding suppression hearings is pivotal. Key TakeawaysWhat is a Suppression Hearing? I explain the function of a suppression hearing, emphasizing its role in challenging the admissibility of evidence in court. It's not just legal jargon; understanding it could make a significant difference in the outcome of a case.The Legal Process: Learn about the motions filed by defense attorneys seeking to have evidence thrown out. I explain how these motions work and what constitutional violations they might allege, focusing particularly on Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.Burden of Proof: Discover who carries the burden of proof during a suppression hearing and the strategic advantage this provides the defense. I share an anecdote from his early days in law school, highlighting this key aspect.Body Cam and Dash Cam Footage: In today's technological age, evidence collection has evolved. I discuss how crucial body cam and dash cam footage have become in presenting or defending a case.Real-life Application: Through the lens of an upcoming case I am working on, you will get a firsthand understanding of how these legal principles come into play in real scenarios.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

In this episode of Lawyer Talk, I am breaking down a hot topic: the Supreme Court case, Snyder vs United States, and a listener's big question on bribery. Ever wondered what really counts as a bribe? Or how gratuities fit into the whole mix? I am here to clear up the confusion and make sense of it all, without diving into the political rabbit hole. I talk about how the law defines bribery and why sometimes things aren't as straightforward as they seem. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/snyder-v-united-states/Here are some key takeaways from the discussion:Bribery vs. Gratuity: Understand the critical distinctions between a bribe (an influencing payment made before an action) and a gratuity (a gesture of gratitude after an action). The nuances are vital for legal definitions.Statutory Interpretation: The importance of accurately interpreting the law is highlighted. In Snyder vs. U.S., the Supreme Court ruled that the conduct didn't fit the statutory definition of bribery under federal law, emphasizing the consequences of prosecutorial decisions.Rigorous Ethics Compliance: The conversation sheds light on how strict ethics rules are, especially in legal and government spheres, prohibiting even small gestures like buying a Coke for a public official.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

This episode marks a significant milestone as we celebrate our 400th episode. Since our very first recording back in February 2018, so much has changed—from starting with basic equipment in my office to creating the dynamic studio we're in today. In this episode, we reflect on the journey and evolution of our podcast, from serious legal discussions to casual and fun roundtable talks on crazy news stories.But onto what they don't teach in law school.We discuss the real-world topic that uncovers the intersection of media sensationalism and the criminal justice system. Law students Bella Mata, Troy Hendrickson and I explore the captivating case of Luigi and its broader implications within the legal landscape. From discussing past high-profile cases to understanding the ever-evolving dynamics of courts, justice, and public perception, this episode will challenge what you thought you knew about fairness, justice, and the influence of media on legal proceedings.Key Moments00:00 Podcast Milestone: Episode 400 Celebration05:32 Sensational Trials and Media Impact07:23 FBI Raids on Trump and Allies10:53 Surprise Indictment Shocks Defense Attorney15:14 Lawyer Grandstanding: Egos Over Justice16:40 Courtroom Strategy for Fair Trial19:38 Luigi's Dilemma: Villain or Hero?22:12 "Context Matters in Court Hearings"27:55 Media Narratives and Legal Ethics29:49 "Justice System Fairness Debate"32:35 Demand for Fair Legal ProcessHere are some key takeaways - Sensationalism vs. Fairness: We examine the impact of media sensationalism on high-profile legal cases and the challenges of ensuring a fair trial amidst public and political scrutiny.Managing Media in Legal Cases: I share insights on the importance of effectively communicating with the media, especially during high-publicity cases, to manage public perception and maintain a fair judicial process.Complexities of the Justice System: Engaging discussions highlight the complexities and inconsistencies within the justice system, emphasizing that while striving for fairness, real-world application often presents unpredictable challenges.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I break down how the state of Ohio's approach to recreational and medical marijuana intersects with OVI laws. Despite marijuana being legal under state law, driving under the influence remains a legal gray area. I explain the two main types of offenses: operating a vehicle while high and having a prohibited concentration of THC or its metabolites in your system. With drug recognition experts often under scrutiny for their methods, attorneys challenge these cases while different jurisdictions handle them differently. I offer essential advice on navigating Ohio's tricky landscape of pot-related DUI charges. And remember, when faced with such charges, getting legal assistance is key.Key Takeaways:Understanding the Law: Like alcohol, marijuana-related OVI can be charged if you're under the influence or have a prohibited concentration of THC/metabolites in your system.Proving Influence: It's tricky to prove marijuana impairment since THC can linger. Police use "Drug Recognition Experts" (DREs), but their methods can be challenged.Legal Defense: If facing an OVI charge, it's essential to hire a competent Ohio lawyer to navigate the complexities and challenge the evidence effectively.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

I take you through a thought-provoking discussion on the principles of innocent until proven guilty, especially in light of the Luigi murder case. Whether you're in the legal profession or simply interested in the justice system, there are key takeaways from this episode worth reflecting on.Here are three pivotal insights:Balancing Reality with Legal Principles: I emphasize the necessity of upholding the presumption of innocence in legal practice while acknowledging the real-world instincts about a case. This dual mindset ensures that justice is not only served but perceived with fairness.The Role of Criminal Defense Lawyers: Representing seemingly guilty clients is not about agreeing with their actions but ensuring that the law is applied impartially and justly. As I note, this responsibility is crucial for maintaining a just society for all individuals.Historical and Cultural Context of Justice: I refer to historical precedents like the dialogue from A Man for All Seasons, illustrating the timeless importance of preserving legal rights, even for those we might naturally oppose.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Join me, Steve Palmer, on Lawyer Talk as I launch a new series, "What's The Appeal?" We're looking into the appellate process from start to finish. Whether you're curious about appeals or simply seeking clarity, this series is for you. Over the next episodes, I'll break down each stage with a big-picture overview and a detailed look at what happens after a conviction and sentencing. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Drone Surveillance and Fourth Amendment RightsOn the latest episode of Lawyer Talk, host Steve Palmer, along with law students Troy Hendrickson and Bella Mata, talk about the evolving legal landscape around drone technology and its implications for privacy under the Fourth Amendment. As drones become more accessible and commonplace, their use in surveillance, especially by the police, raises new legal challenges and questions. Here are some key takeaways from our discussion:Reasonable Expectation of PrivacyThe application of Fourth Amendment rights hinges on whether individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The use of drones introduces complexities, as they're less noticeable compared to helicopters, creating a challenge in assessing privacy violations.Legal Precedents and Modern TechnologyHistorical legal cases like California v. Cirillo (1986) and Florida v. Riley (1989) set precedents concerning aerial surveillance. However, the modern use of drones calls for a reevaluation of these precedents to accommodate technological advancements.Property and Trespass ImplicationsWhile drones offer new possibilities for surveillance, their use raises questions about trespassing and the extent to which individuals can protect their property. Debate continues on whether individuals should use force against intrusive drones without facing legal repercussions.As technology evolves, the dialogue around privacy rights needs constant attention. Key Moments00:00 Discussing Drones: Then and Now04:21 Supreme Court Ruling: Aerial Privacy Limits08:59 "Privacy in Junkyard Murder Case"10:38 FAA Regulations & Fourth Amendment Debate15:42 Drone Curtilage and Legal Precedents16:43 Drone Surveillance and Privacy Concerns22:12 "Necessity of Search Warrants"24:06 Search Warrants and Fourth Amendment Exceptions26:57 "Search Warrant Exceptions Debate"32:20 Evolving Case Law on Digital Privacy34:05 Rejecting Authoritarian ControlSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Many listeners wonder why and when police can request such tests during a routine stop. In this episode, I break down the legal framework surrounding these tests, explaining the standards police must meet to justify their requests. I provide valuable insights into the process. Importantly, I clarify that while police can ask for these tests, you have the right to decline. I dissect these legal principles and answer your burning questions about DUI-related matters. Remember, this is purely informational and not legal advice. Key takeaways:Reasonable Suspicion Requirement: Police need a reasonable suspicion, like the smell of alcohol, to ask you to perform a field sobriety test, but remember, you can decline.MIMS Order: When pulled over, police can order you out of your car for officer safety, thanks to the Pennsylvania vs. Mimms ruling.Legal Standards: Understanding the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause can help you better navigate your rights during a traffic stop.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

In this episode, I focus on the challenges and possibilities of appealing a criminal conviction long after the fact. I emphasize that while ideally appeals and legal inquiries should be pursued promptly after conviction, there are still avenues available for those who discover new evidence years later. Key Takeaways from the Episode:Immediate Action is Key: Steve emphasizes the importance of acting swiftly after a conviction, as the best time to appeal is right after the verdict.Limitations After Time Passes: The legal options become limited the longer you wait. The law favors finality, making appellate proceedings increasingly difficult as time goes by.Newly Discovered Evidence: If a case is old, uncovering newly discovered evidence can be a viable path. This could include a witness recanting their testimony or finding out that key evidence was improperly withheld by the prosecution.Thorough Investigation: Steve describes the process of employing a private investigator to review original transcripts and interview witnesses, forming a basis for motions like a new trial.Conviction Integrity Units: These units within prosecutor offices may help identify any misconduct or overlooked evidence from past convictions.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

"Understanding Canada's Inadmissibility Laws": "The inadmissibility laws apply whether it's it's not if you have a conviction in your home country per se, it's whether the conviction you have would be a conviction under a federal law in Canada." - Maggie StewartThis time, we're talking about cross-border legal issues with a special guest, Maggie Stewart from Mundial Law in California. If you travel, or plan to travel, to our neighbors to the north (Canada) this episode has something for you.What We Covered:00:00:33 Meet Maggie Stewart: Maggie is an attorney specializing in immigration law and helps individuals—both stars and everyday people—navigate the complexities of traveling between countries like the U.S. and Canada. Her unique approach stems from her firm's name, "Mundial," meaning "world" in Spanish.00:03:03 Canada's Border Regulations: We discuss Canada's stringent laws around criminal inadmissibility and how they impact your travel plans—be it a vacation with family or a business trip. Maggie explains the role of FBI reports in border crossings and how Canada's access to this data can surprise many travelers.00:07:01 Real-Life Scenarios: Maggie shares gripping stories about her clients, from rock stars to regular folks, who have faced unexpected challenges at the Canadian border. It's a reminder of the long-lasting impact of past legal issues. 00:18:13 Navigating Legal Complexities: Learn about rehabilitation and waivers for traveling to Canada, and why getting your FBI report before any international trip could save you a headache. Maggie provides expert tips on this essential step.00:04:56 Broader Implications: We also touch on other countries with similar travel laws, including New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, emphasizing that self-awareness of one's legal history is crucial.00:23:11 U.S.-Canada Relations: We take a brief detour into current events, discussing the political climate between the U.S. and Canada and what it might mean for future travel and business exchanges. Proactive Measures: If you've ever been fingerprinted or had legal charges, it's beneficial to obtain your FBI report and carry documentation when traveling. This can prevent unexpected issues at the border and make travel smoother.Maggie offers free fifteen-minute consultations when you provide your FBI report. More Key Moments00:00 Canada's Strict Border Inadmissibility Rules03:27 "DUI Conviction Affects Canada Entry"08:17 Traffic Violations' Impact on Immigration09:47 Canada Entry with Old Minor Convictions13:56 Wildlife Antler Collection Offense17:07 Obscure Law's Impact on Hunting20:55 "Expunging Records in Ohio"25:50 Canadian Visa Laws: A One-Size Issue27:47 Assisting Canadians with U.S. Immigration31:10 Law and Arts Advocate Journey34:41 New Website Launch AnnouncementSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience...

In this Blitz Throwback QA episode, we tackle diverse and compelling issues. Jen from a trailer park raises concerns about deplorable water quality and fears of potential displacement. Steve offers insights into the intricate world of groundwater litigation, offering expert advice. Jeremy seeks guidance on early lease termination and disputes with his landlord, receiving crucial tips on protecting his rights. Randi unfolds a gripping tale of medical malpractice involving his cousin, leading to an in-depth discussion on handling severe medical negligence cases. Along the way, Steve enlightens listeners on contingency fee structures and the steps to secure adequate legal representation. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Are we experiencing a "constitutional crisis?" I explore the intricacies of legal procedures involving the challenge of executive actions, particularly focusing on the recent controversies surrounding President Trump's administration and its handling of governmental directives. I break down the essential concepts of standing, temporary restraining orders, and judicial review, illustrating how the legal system is designed to handle such conflicts. Be assured that the reported "crisis" is part of the normal legal process and highlights the resilience of our constitutional framework. Adversarial debates can lead to meaningful resolutions in the judicial system. And understand these conflicts are crucial for developing landmark Supreme Court decisions. Here's a quick breakdown of key takeaways:Understanding Legal Procedures: The process of challenging government actions through courts is a fundamental right. From filing lawsuits in district courts to potential escalations to the U.S. Supreme Court, these steps are essential in maintaining the checks and balances within our government.Temporary Restraining Orders Explained: Often a hot topic in legal discussions, Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) are pivotal in halting government actions temporarily, allowing the courts to deliberate on potential constitutional violations without causing irreparable harm to those affected.Historical Context and Resolution: Our legal system is designed to withstand conflicts and evolve through landmark decisions. While today's media might intensify the narrative, historical precedents show that such legal debates have long been pathways to clarification and resolution.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

In this special episode, I am joined by Paul Scarcello, a seasoned legal professional with extensive experience in both prosecution and defense, and law student Troy Hendrickson. Together, they unravel the intricate details of a current high-profile case out of Florida involving Mario Fernandez Saldana, his girlfriend Shana Gardner, and their alleged involvement in a murder-for-hire plot with hitman Henry Arthur Tennant. Listen as we analyze the case dynamics, procedural twists, and the critical role of discovery in this suspenseful legal drama. Whether you're a legal buff or a curious listener, this episode promises an in-depth look at the processes and challenges faced in the criminal justice system. Here are three key takeaways from our discussion:Understanding Plea Bargains: Plea bargains are like contracts—you give something; you get something. In criminal cases, if a key player fails to hold up their end of the bargain, the consequences can be significant and shake the foundation of the case.Prosecution Challenges: The prosecution's duty is not just about securing convictions, but ensuring justice is served. This involves a keen understanding of exculpatory evidence and handling the vast amounts of digital data in modern cases.The Role of Discovery: Pre-trial discovery is crucial in criminal proceedings. Both the defense and prosecution must have access to all relevant information, which can influence the trial's outcome and ensure fairness in the judicial process.Key Moments00:00 Florida Case Co-Defendants Query05:24 Gunman Admits Guilt, Gets Sentence06:30 Husband Behind Murder Plot11:11 Courtroom Dialogue: Lawyer's Role Explained13:18 Defense Strategy: Reassess Plea Deal17:44 Teen Accomplice Receives Life Sentence21:42 "Hitman Testimony Creates Legal Complications"25:13 Evolving Trends in Criminal Justice27:01 Prosecutors' Training and Defense Challenges29:56 Avoiding Wrongful Convictions32:33 Simplifying Complex Legal CasesSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures, and how does it apply to the Kohberger murder case?We're talking about the intricacies of the Fourth Amendment and its application in this high-profile criminal case. Steve Palmer and law students Troy Hendrickson and Bella Mata explore the legal proceedings surrounding Brian Kohberger, a suspect accused of a gruesome crime in Idaho. With a focus on the recent suppression hearing, the discussion unravels the complexities of DNA evidence, search warrants, and the potential implications of police procedures. Discover how real-world legal scenarios intersect with constitutional rights, revealing both the challenges and safeguards inherent in our justice system. Whether you're a seasoned legal professional or simply curious about the inner workings of criminal defense, this episode promises an insightful journey into the nuances of the law. Here are three key takeaways:Understanding Fourth Amendment Protections: It's crucial to differentiate between scenarios where the Fourth Amendment applies, requiring a search warrant, and where exceptions exist. Expectation of privacy plays a vital role.DNA Evidence in Criminal Cases: The Kohberger case emphasizes the evolving use of DNA evidence, including ancestry databases. The defense's challenge demonstrates the complexities of admissibility and privacy concerns.Role of Suppression Hearings: These hearings are pivotal; they challenge the government's evidence collection methods, ensuring constitutional rights are upheld, highlighting the importance of legal oversight.Key Moments00:00 Open-and-Shut Suppression Case Misconceptions03:47 Dog Sniff: Not a Search07:25 Car Searches and Privacy Rules12:08 Paradox of Consent13:59 Traffic Stop Detainment Concerns18:24 Government's Burden in Fourth Amendment22:33 DNA Search Expands Nationally23:09 DNA Analysis Aids Police Identifications26:18 Kohberger Database Privacy Challenge29:28 Mistrust in Government Surveillance33:31 Fourth Amendment & DNA Privacy Debate36:01 DNA Request in Rape Investigation39:13 Cell Phone Geo-Tracking for Crimes44:00 "Doubts on DNA Evidence Reliability"47:04 Kohberger's DNA Privacy and Warrants49:22 Legal Perspectives on Kohberger CaseSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What are some of the legal implications of a DUI offense turning into aggravated vehicular assault or homicide in Ohio?Hey everyone, it's Steve Palmer here from Lawyer Talk. In this episode, I break down how a DUI can escalate. It's not just about getting caught once. If you cause an accident while intoxicated, especially with injuries, you're looking at charges like aggravated vehicular assault or even homicide. Plus, in Ohio, multiple offenses can turn into a felony fast. First offenses might hit your wallet, but by your third, you're facing jail time. Here are three key takeawaysAvoid Tragic Outcomes: Driving under the influence can quickly turn disastrous, especially if it results in injury or loss of life. Such incidents can lead to charges of aggravated vehicular assault or homicide, which carry life-altering legal penalties.Beware of Repeat Offenses: In Ohio, accumulating multiple OVI offenses can elevate charges to felonies, with mandatory jail time. Being aware of these consequences is crucial to prevent further legal complications.Costly First Offense: A first OVI offense, while not a felony, is still financially burdensome. It leads to various expenses, including legal fees, license reinstatement, and required intervention programs, even for a first-time offender.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What potential risks might arise if a client withholds information from their attorney during a legal case?Understand why it's crucial for you to share all pertinent information, even when it might be uncomfortable or intimidating.

At the heart of today's conversation is a fundamental question: Do we as citizens have to identify ourselves to the police during a stop? This isn't just a theoretical query; it stems from real-world implications of policies like stop, frisk, and identify. Steve, Bella, and Troy break down the nuances between criminal law and criminal procedure, tackling topics from the famous Terry v. Ohio case to reasonable suspicion and probable cause.But this episode isn't just about legal theory; it's also about the practical applications and real-world consequences of these laws. From historical viewpoints such as Rudy Giuliani's broken window theory" in New York to the social justice implications of these policing policies, our panel digs deep into the intersections of law, society, and individual rights.So, if you've ever wondered what your rights are when approached by the police or how legal standards like "reasonable suspicion" actually play out in everyday life, this episode is for you. Key Moments00:00 "Usurping: Rights During Police Stops"05:10 Ohio's Constitutional Rights Challenges06:28 Rudy Giuliani's Journey11:28 Orderliness Reduces Theft Behavior14:36 Community Policing Theory19:25 Police Encounter: Reasonable Suspicion Explained20:21 Legal Standards: Reasonable Suspicion vs. Probable Cause26:03 "Police ID Request and Rights"28:11 Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine31:17 Socratic Method Enhances Critical ThinkingKey TakeawaysUnderstanding Reasonable Suspicion: Our discussion honed in on the fine line between reasonable suspicion and probable cause. It's crucial to comprehend how these standards impact police stops and searches, especially in scenarios involving stop and frisk policies.The Real-World Balance: Bella and Troy underscore the balance between ensuring public safety and protecting constitutional freedoms. They highlight the importance of applying the 4th Amendment in practical, real-world contexts to safeguard citizens' rights.Learning Beyond Law School: Law school might equip you with foundational knowledge, but real-world experiences, like those discussed in our podcast, are vital. As Steve Palmer aptly puts it, law school teaches you to recognize how much you don't know, pushing you to explore and learn continuously.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

It's not just about avoiding a DUI charge—it's about making safer, more responsible choices for yourself and others on the road. With the prevalence of ride-sharing services, there's no excuse for taking unnecessary risks. This episode is a must-listen for anyone who consumes alcohol and drives. I offer crucial guidance on how to avoid legal consequences that could impact you life significantly.My expert insights and straightforward advice make the episode potentially life-saving.Key TakeawaysFirst, Do No Harm: The central theme of this episode is simple yet profound — the best way to avoid a DUI charge is not to drink and drive. I articulate this point and explain the pitfalls of overestimating one's ability to drive after consuming alcohol.Field Tests and Overcoming Pressure: What should you do if an officer pulls you over after you've had a drink? I shed light on coping mechanisms and considerations, ensuring you're informed and prepared.The Uber and Lyft Paradox: With the advent of ride-sharing services, some might assume that DUI cases have diminished. I explain why this assumption may not hold true and shares anecdotes from actual cases.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Can you legally ask a police officer for their photo ID during a traffic stop? You Have the Right to Ask: It is both legal and acceptable to ask a law enforcement officer for their photo ID during a traffic stop. However, the response you get may vary by state and the officer's disposition.Know Your Boundaries: While some states require officers to provide their identification, others do not. It's essential to understand the laws in your state and approach the situation respectfully to avoid escalating tensions.Safety First: If ever in doubt, prioritize your safety. If the officer's behavior seems suspicious, it's okay to call 911 to verify their identity. Remember, how you handle yourself can influence the outcome of the interaction.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Why is federal jurisdiction over street crimes like murder less common, and what conditions allow the federal court to take over a case from the state?We are talking about the complexities and nuances of legal cases that law schools often overlook. I'm your host, Steve Palmer, and today we're joined by our resident law school students, Bella and Troy, to dissect the high-profile Luigi Mangione murder case.We cover how Mangione's case has made waves in both state and federal courts, exploring the intricate legal tactics and lesser-known procedures involved. From the FBI's criminal complaint to the challenges of arraignment, and potential issues of double jeopardy, we'll unpack it all. Plus, we touch on why the federal government has taken a keen interest in this seemingly state-level crime and what it could mean for the future of the case.Key TakeawaysUnderstanding Jurisdictional Nuances: The episode sheds light on the dual involvement of federal and state courts in the Mangione case, emphasizing the significance of probable cause and the process of indictment in both jurisdictions.The Role of Preliminary Hearings: We talk about the importance of preliminary hearings in federal court, highlighting how they provide defense attorneys with early discovery and the ability to cross-examine witnesses, which can be pivotal in building a defense strategy.Challenges in High-Profile Cases: The discussion covers the inherent challenges in securing a fair trial in highly publicized cases, exploring arguments related to prejudicial pre-trial publicity and the strategic considerations for change of venue.Key Moments00:00 Legal Questions and Double Jeopardy Dilemma05:21 Establishing Probable Cause in Court06:43 Call for Independent Prosecution Review11:50 Preliminary Hearing and Indictment Process15:45 Federal-State Cooperation in Legal Cases18:23 Interstate Crime Prosecution Dynamics21:45 State Murder Case Becomes Federal Drug Case25:52 Trial Fairness and Venue Dispute26:58 Mangione's Legal Proceedings OverviewSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

How can completing a driver's intervention program in advance benefit someone who is negotiating a DUI/OVI case in court?I address a topic many are curious about—drunk school, officially known as the driver's intervention program. If you've ever wondered what happens when someone pleads guilty to a DUI or OVI in Ohio and faces the daunting prospect of three days in jail, this is the episode for you. I break down how the driver's intervention program offers an alternative, exploring its structure, benefits, and the impact it can have on plea negotiations. I discuss the ins and outs of this program and why it's often a preferred option over jail time. Key TakeawaysMandatory Alternative to Jail: If you're facing a DUI or OVI charge in Ohio, you might be eligible to serve 3 days in a certified Driver's Intervention Program instead. This can help you avoid jail time while fulfilling the court's requirements.Pre-Completion Benefits: Enrolling and completing the program in advance can significantly aid in plea negotiations by showing proactive steps. This often includes a substance abuse evaluation.Program Structure & Experience: The program, now mostly held in hotels, involves interactive education sessions on alcohol-related issues and DUI consequences. It's typically more bearable than jail and can offer valuable insights for future behavior.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What are the primary factors you need to consider when seeking to have your firearm rights reinstated after a nonviolent felony conviction?I've got an insightful Q&A session lined up for you on the topic of firearm privileges reinstatement. We've received a question from Mike, who asks about the steps to reinstate his firearm rights following nonviolent felony charges.I talk about the complexities surrounding this issue, including federal and state laws, expungement, and record sealing. I'll also share some valuable resources and direct you to experts like Derek DeBrosse, the renowned “Gun Lawyer,” who specializes in these matters. Key TakeawaysFederal & State Laws - Understand that firearm eligibility is influenced by both federal and state laws. Meeting one does not automatically clear you for the other.Expungement & Record Sealing - In Ohio, expunging or sealing your record, especially for nonviolent offenses, can be the quickest route to reinstating your firearm rights.Expert Collaboration - Complex cases may require specialized assistance. Steve often collaborates with firearm law experts like Derek DeBras, aka 'The Gun Lawyer,' for these challenging situations.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

The Jussie Smollett case serves as a tangible, recent example that makes the complex legal principle of double jeopardy more relatable and easier to grasp.We kick off by revisiting the high-profile case of Jussie Smollett, whose name you might remember from the sensational headlines back in 2019. We take a deep dive into whether Smollett's case was an example of double jeopardy, discussing the procedural history, the role of special prosecutors, and the implications of plea deals. We break down the complexities of double jeopardy protections, their legal underpinnings, and why they are crucial for a fair judicial system.We discuss the broader implications of special prosecutors stepping in for high-profile cases, the ethical concerns that arise, and the real-world impact on defendants and governmental resources. We also tackle the moral and ethical questions that defense attorneys face when representing clients who may or may not be guilty.Key TakeawaysUnderstanding Double Jeopardy: Dive deep into the Fifth Amendment's concept of double jeopardy and learn how it protects individuals from being prosecuted multiple times for the same offense. The episode dissects how Jussie Smollett's case exemplified this crucial constitutional protection.The Role of Special Prosecutors: Gain insights into the reasons and scenarios when a special prosecutor is brought in, especially in high-profile or complex cases. Understand the significance of resource management and conflict of interest in local prosecutorial offices.Balancing Justice and Constitutional Rights: The episode underscores the importance of protecting constitutional rights for everyone, regardless of the crime. It emphasizes that safeguarding these rights is not just about achieving just outcomes but also about maintaining the integrity of the legal system for all.Key Moments00:00 "MAGA Attack Hoax Unravels"03:40 Special Prosecutor Variability Explained09:15 Convicted, Fined, and Sentenced10:44 Appellate Bond Explained13:28 Unexpected Turn in Legal Case16:15 Diversion Plea Deals Explained21:48 Beware Righteous Government Overreach25:26 Defending the Innocent Dilemma26:42 Innocent Until Proven Guilty29:56 Defending the Unpopular in LawSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

What are some of the reasons a defendant might prefer a plea deal over going to trial in an OVI case in Ohio?Are you facing a DUI charge and wondering if you should accept a plea bargain? Hey, it's Steve Palmer from Lawyer Talk, and on our latest episode of DUI 360, we dig into whether you should go to trial or take a deal. I break down the options, like reducing your charge to reckless operation or physical control, and weigh the pros and cons, including impacts on insurance and driving privileges. With up to six months of jail time on the line for a DUI conviction in Ohio, a plea deal might just be the smarter option. Key Takeaways:Understand Your Options: Plea bargains can significantly impact the outcome of a DUI case. In Ohio, options might include reducing charges to "reckless operation" or "physical control," each with distinct consequences.Weigh the Consequences: Accepting a plea bargain can mitigate harsher penalties. For instance, a charge of physical control doesn't carry traffic points and isn't treated as a second offense if another DUI occurs.Consult a Legal Expert: The decision to accept a plea bargain isn't straightforward. Each case is unique, and speaking with a knowledgeable attorney can help navigate these crucial decisions.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law