Lawyer Talk Off The Record

In this episode, we are discussing what they never teach you in law school—how the real world of law clerkships really works. Joining me is Troy Hendrickson, my resident law clerk and a current law student, who brings his own fresh experiences to the table.Together, we break down what it actually means to be a law clerk—beyond the fancy titles—and get honest about pay expectations, resume-boosting positions, and the difference between big firm opportunities and the invaluable, hands-on education you get in a smaller practice like mine. We talk money, motivation, government jobs versus the private sector, and why sometimes the most valuable lessons don't come with the biggest paychecks.If you're in law school, just starting your legal career, or simply curious about what a clerkship looks like on the ground, you'll want to hear this conversation. Key Moments00:00 "Law School vs. Real-World Practice"03:53 Avoided Big Law Temptations08:34 Law Salary Expectations Disparity12:10 Pre-Internet Problem-Solving Skills14:29 "Mastering Skills Through Experience"17:25 Paralegals: Efficient Alternatives in AI19:40 Value Learning Over Initial Pay22:53 "Law School's Economic Lessons"Here are my top three takeaways:The Prestige and the Pay Are NOT Equal: Big Law may pay top dollar for summer clerks, but not every opportunity is a financial windfall—and often, the most prestigious or educational clerkships pay the least. Don't overlook the value of experience for resume-building, even if the paycheck is modest.The Real Learning Starts Outside the Classroom: Most of the practical skills that make you valuable in a law practice—drafting, filing, firm workflow—aren't taught in law school. You'll learn by doing, often starting with the “menial” work that teaches the business from the ground up.Focus on the Experience (Not Just the Dollars): Especially in smaller firms or government settings, you might earn less, but the breadth of hands-on work and real legal training can set you apart. As Steve pointed out, the value of an opportunity isn't always reflected on your paycheck—and sometimes, learning how things really work is worth more than a few extra bucks an hour.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in...

I'm Steve Palmer, and today I'm answering a great question sent in by Nancy from Ohio. Her son was arrested for OVI—even though his breath test was 0.07, which is below the state's legal limit of 0.08. How is that possible? In this episode, I'll clear up the confusion around Ohio's OVI laws, explain the difference between “impaired” and “per se” charges, and share how prosecutors build their cases even when the numbers seem to be in your favor. I'll also talk about why having a lawyer on your side is essential when facing an OVI or DUI charge. If you've ever wondered about what the “legal limit” really means or how law enforcement handles these cases, you'll want to listen in.Here are 3 key takeaways from the conversation:Two Ways to Be Charged:In Ohio, you can be charged with OVI either by exceeding the legal limit (‘per se' at 0.08 BAC for adults) OR by showing signs of impairment, regardless of your BAC.Impairment Can Trump the Numbers:Even if your BAC is under 0.08, evidence such as slurred speech, poor field sobriety results, or an unsteady demeanor can still result in charges if law enforcement believes you are impaired.Legal Nuances Require Expertise:Defending an OVI charge—even with a low BAC—can be complex. Legal limitations may prevent simply using the breath test result as a defense without expert testimony.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I got a listener question about the Bryan Kohberger sentencing and a comment President Trump made on social media. Trump suggested that the judge should force Kohberger to explain why he committed such terrible crimes—but is that really something a judge can do?Drawing on my own experience practicing law in Ohio, I'll walk you through the ins and outs of plea hearings, what rights a defendant actually has at sentencing, and the concept of allocution. I'll break down how things typically work in the courtroom, whether a judge can—or should—demand an explanation from the defendant, and what it means for the justice system as a whole.00:00 Can Judge Make Defendant Explain?04:44 Judge's Discretion in Plea Agreements06:34 "Case Closed, Open for Questions"Here are three key takeaways:Defendants Can't Be Forced to Explain Motives: Judges generally cannot compel a defendant to state why they committed a crime, except in limited plea scenarios. The primary focus is often on whether the guilty plea itself is backed by factual acknowledgment, not personal motivation.The Right of Allocution Is Standard, But Not Mandatory: Defendants have the right to speak (“allocute”) before sentencing—whether to apologize, explain, or even decline to say anything at all. However, most courts won't force them to do so, and this right is widely but not constitutionally recognized.Withholding Explanation Can Influence Sentencing: While silence is an option, judges have the discretion to reject plea agreements or impose harsher sentences if a defendant withholds information the court finds important.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

“What does it mean if you receive a target letter from the United States Attorney's office?” With my background in federal criminal defense, I'll explain exactly what a target letter is, why the government sends them out, and what you should do if you ever find one in your mailbox. I'll share real-world examples from my own cases—involving everything from tax evasion to firearms—and walk you through the do's and don'ts when dealing with the feds. Most importantly, I'll explain why ignoring a target letter is never the right move, and what steps you need to take to protect yourself. Here are 3 key takeaways from the episode:A target letter is a warning, not a suggestion: If you've received one, it usually means the U.S. Attorney believes they have a case against you, and an indictment is likely.Don't ignore it—get a qualified criminal defense lawyer ASAP: The letter will often tell you to do just that. Ignoring it can have serious consequences, including being picked up unexpectedly or not having time to prepare a solid defense.Civil or transactional lawyers are not enough: Steve shares real-life cautionary tales of people following the wrong advice. Only a lawyer experienced in federal criminal matters can navigate these waters.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Steve Palmer here - I'm joined by our resident law student, Troy Hendrickson, who's here to bring a fresh perspective and some real-life questions from the trenches.Today, Troy brings up a hot topic that's been making waves among his fellow clerks and across legal social media: Can courts stop ICE agents from making arrests inside the courtroom? We look into real cases—including one where a judge faced criminal charges for attempting to help a defendant evade ICE—and discuss candidly the legal and ethical limits for lawyers and judges when it comes to federal agents and immigration enforcement.We'll cover important concepts like the supremacy of federal law, what attorneys can and can't do when it comes to clients facing arrest, and where the line is between standing up for your beliefs and risking your career. Whether you're a law student, a practicing attorney, or just curious about the realities behind courtroom doors, you'll find plenty to chew on in this episode.Key Moments00:00 Judge Aids Defendant's Escape05:19 "Unpleasant Ethical Duties in Law"08:27 Legal Ethics: No Crime Assistance12:20 Arguing Both Sides Skillfully13:06 Mastering Argument: Embrace All SidesHere are my top 3 takeaways:Ethics over Emotion: As attorneys, our personal views can't trump ethical and legal obligations. Even if you disagree with the government's actions, taking active measures to help clients evade arrest (like sneaking them out the back) can cross into obstruction of justice—and carry real consequences.Know Where the Line Is: There's a critical difference between informing a client of a warrant and helping them hide or avoid law enforcement. Advising is part of the job; aiding in evasion is not.Federal vs. State Authority: The courtroom is a public forum, and ICE—as federal agents—cannot easily be banned from the space by local judges. The Supremacy Clause puts federal law above state, meaning local attempts to keep ICE out could backfire.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences...

The Limitations of AI in Legal Document Review: "You can't just rely on the AI because AI isn't perfect. They don't see things that, they don't see that other dimensional focus that you want if you're going to prepare an actual defense to a case." - Steve PalmerI'm giving you my take on one of the hottest topics in the legal world right now: artificial intelligence. More and more companies are using AI for things like contract drafting, document review, and legal research—and I'm here to share my own experiences with these tools in my practice, along with some thoughts on where this technology is headed.I'll walk you through how I use AI to manage massive piles of discovery, transcribe hours of police bodycam footage, and even help with legal research and drafting arguments. I'll also talk candidly about where AI falls short, why there's no substitute for actual legal judgment, and the dangers of putting too much trust in technology. You'll hear my take on how AI might drive down the cost of legal services and change the way law firms are structured—whether you're part of a huge corporate outfit or running a solo shop like mine.Here are my top 3 takeaways for legal professionals considering AI:AI boosts efficiency, especially with document review.Lawyers and firms can now use AI to quickly summarize large volumes of legal documents, discovery materials, and even transcribe hours of police footage, saving valuable hours that used to be spent manually reviewing files.Human oversight remains critical.While AI can draft memos and briefs or conduct legal research, Steve warns that these outputs can still include mistakes or misinterpret case law. Final review by an experienced attorney is a must to ensure accuracy and avoid professional pitfalls.AI can cut costs for lawyers and clients.By reducing repetitive tasks, AI may lower the need for excessive billable hours or extra associates. This means leaner firms and potential savings passed on to clients, especially for routine work like contracts and memos.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage

In this follow-up episode, I'm digging deeper into the behind-the-scenes realities of how judges get involved in plea deals—something that came up after a listener asked about the high-profile Kohberger case. Drawing from my own experience in the courtroom, I break down what actually happens when the defense and prosecutor work out a resolution, and just how much the judge usually knows ahead of time. I also talk about the key differences between state and federal courts, sharing some candid stories where things didn't exactly go according to plan—sometimes it really feels like the “wild wild west.” If you've ever wondered how plea discussions unfold, what role judges play, or how I prepare clients for the unknown, this episode will give you honest, practical insight. Here are 3 key takeaways:Judges Aren't Always Part of Plea Negotiations: Contrary to popular belief, the judge's main role is to approve or reject a plea, not craft the agreement. In some jurisdictions, judges may offer input, while in others, it's a strict closed-door policy, and the outcome remains uncertain until sentencing.Every Jurisdiction is Different: There's a stark difference between federal and state courts. Some state judges might preview potential sentences with counsel, while in other courts, lawyers are left guessing until the very end.Always Prepare for the Unexpected: Even with a “recommended” sentence agreed upon by both sides, the judge is not required to follow it. As Steve Palmer shared, lawyers must always prepare clients for every possible outcome.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

This week, we're talking about one of the toughest real-life dilemmas facing new lawyers—something law school rarely prepares you for: navigating client wishes versus ethical boundaries.We take you behind the scenes of everyday law practice. From handling clients who want to take highly risky (sometimes, downright hopeless) legal steps to the tough decisions attorneys must make about which fights to pick… it's an eye-opening look at the messy, often unglamorous side of legal work.Key Discussion Highlights:What happens when a client wants to withdraw a guilty plea—even if it's a terrible idea? Steve and Troy talk through how lawyers handle these requests, why it's rarely as straightforward as clients hope, and what the law actually allows.Ethical boundaries vs. making a living: How do attorneys decide whether to take on a case they believe is a lost cause? Hear about the fine line between providing hope, doing your ethical duty, and avoiding the trap of just “taking the money.”Lessons law school skips: Steve reflects on why ethics in real life is far more complex than textbook scenarios, and shares how he balances legal rules, his conscience, and his clients' desperation for help.Should lawyers ever take futile cases just because a client insists—especially if someone else will? The discussion gets honest (and a little bit philosophical) about client autonomy, justice, and where a lawyer should draw the line.Listener Challenge:Have you faced a similar dilemma—in law or another field? Would you “fix the stairs” if the client is willing to pay, even if it's not in their best interest? We want to know!Reply to this email or leave your thoughts via our socials or at lawyertalkpodcast.com.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Connect with us: Instagram | Twitter | Facebook | LawyerTalkPodcast.comMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

One of the most important—and often overlooked—aspects of the criminal justice process: how to choose the right appellate lawyer. Over the years, especially as I've shifted my practice even more toward appellate work since COVID, I've seen firsthand how critical it is to have someone by your side who knows the ins and outs of appeals, post-conviction rights, and all the potential pitfalls along the appellate ladder.Just hiring any lawyer for your appeal isn't enough. I'll walk you through the so-called “appellate ladder,” and explain how missing a single step—like forgetting to object at trial or failing to properly raise federal issues—can shut you out of federal court review down the line. I've run into these issues myself while representing clients in federal habeas corpus cases, which is why I'm passionate about making sure you know what to look for and what questions to ask when interviewing appellate lawyers.I'll also give you real-world advice: what to ask your lawyer, why it's crucial to plan several moves ahead, and how failing to build your case the right way from the start can leave you without options when it matters most.If you're facing an appeal, or just want to better understand this complex process, you'll find this episode essential. And as always, if you have any questions or want me to cover a specific topic about appeals—federal, state, or otherwise—head over to LawyerTalkPodcast.com and let me know!Here are three key takeaways for anyone considering appellate counsel:Look for True Appellate ExperienceNot all lawyers are familiar with the unique nuances and pitfalls of the appellate process. You need someone who understands the “appellate ladder” and what it takes to preserve issues at every stage.Ask about Federal IssuesYour appellate lawyer must know how to frame your objections as federal constitutional issues—not just state law issues—if you ever want your case considered in federal court (habeas corpus). Missing this step can completely close the door on federal review.Always Be Thinking Several Moves AheadAppeals are like chess. The best lawyers anticipate possible outcomes at every step and ensure all arguments are preserved for future appeals—even if those seem remote.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in...

I'm tackling a question from Lucy about what's really going on with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's infamous associate.There's a lot of mystery and speculation swirling around this case—from plea deals and pending appeals to the mechanics of Congressional subpoenas and whether Maxwell might actually decide to spill what she knows. I'll walk you through the legal nitty-gritty: how prosecutors strike deals with defendants, the real deal behind “queen for a day” letters and proffer agreements, and the reasons why someone in Maxwell's shoes would or wouldn't talk.I'll break down what protections defendants actually get, how the government handles cooperation and sentences, and what it would really take to get new info out of Maxwell at this stage. If you've wondered how these high-profile deals get made, or what power Congress actually has when it comes to compelling testimony, you won't want to miss this inside look.Moments00:00 Maxwell's Legal Battle and Subpoena03:53 "Proffer Letter Concept Explained"09:14 Government Deals and Maxwell's Legal Options11:00 Maxwell's Potential Deal and TruthHere are 3 key takeaways that shed light on the complexities of these headline-making cases:"Queen for a Day" Proffers: Defendants sometimes receive a "proffer letter," which allows them to share information with prosecutors without those statements being used directly against them. But this isn't immunity—prosecutors can use any leads gained to pursue additional evidence.Why Maxwell Might (or Might Not) Cooperate: Despite public pressure, there are still real legal risks for Maxwell in talking, especially while appeals are pending. Unless she's offered meaningful incentives (like a sentencing reduction) or immunity, there's little reason for her to share details—especially in a public forum like a Congressional hearing.Evaluating Truthfulness in Deals: Even if a defendant agrees to cooperate, prosecutors must vet the information. Deals hinge on truthful, verifiable accounts—anything less could void potential leniency.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping

Steve Palmer sits down with Troy Hendrickson, our resident law student, for a deep dive into what law school doesn't always teach you—this time, focusing on the mysterious world of grand juries. They break down what a grand jury is, the differences between grand and trial (petit) juries, and why the standard of proof is much lower at the indictment stage than at trial.Steve and Troy use the recent Epstein case as a jumping-off point, discussing the secrecy surrounding grand jury proceedings, why those records are generally kept under wraps, and who gets to peek behind the curtain (hint: it's a very short list). They unpack the legal and historical reasons for keeping grand jury information confidential, the ongoing court battles about whether transcripts should be released for so-called 'public interest' reasons, and the potential for the Supreme Court to settle this debate once and for all.Plus, the conversation veers into attorney-client privilege, conspiracy theories about the Epstein case, and how high-profile cases influence the direction of legal rules. And, as always, they share their thoughts on what law school could do better—hint: more real-life cases, less rote memorization.Moments00:00 Probable Cause and Legal Standards03:19 Grand Jury Process Explained06:44 Memory Lapses in Consent Cases12:47 Judge Denies Release of Transcripts15:44 National Injunctions and Judicial Authority19:11 SCOTUS on Judicial Authority Limits21:35 Epstein's Suicide Theories Discussed25:48 Nixon, Pentagon Papers, Legal Precedents28:12 Beyond Law School DiscussionsHere are three key takeaways:Grand Jury Process Is Often Misunderstood: Many people—even in law school—mistake the role of a grand jury. Unlike the trial jury (“petit jury”), the grand jury's only job is to decide if there's enough evidence (probable cause) to indict, not to convict. Defense attorneys are usually kept in the dark and rarely present evidence or have the right to transcripts.Grand Jury Testimony Is Highly Confidential: The secrecy rules are strict—defense can only access transcripts upon showing a “particularized need.” The rationale goes back to witness safety, protection of ongoing investigations, and safeguarding victim identities—concerns that remain deeply relevant today.Legal Precedents Shape Access—Not Public Interest: While there's massive public interest around cases like Epstein, courts have repeatedly ruled that historical or public curiosity is not enough to override the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. Real reform, if any, must come from Congress, not the courts.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm,...

"And first and foremost, we look for objections. So if the trial lawyer, if the defense lawyer says, object, this evidence shouldn't come in, or object, I want this evidence to come in and you're not letting me do it." - Steve PalmerI'm pulling back the curtain on how I approach analyzing trial transcripts during the criminal appeals process. I'll walk you through my method for preparing an appeal—from my first pass through those massive transcripts, to zeroing in on key objections, carefully reviewing the jury instructions, and finding the connective threads that could make or break a case. I'll share why I always read the closing arguments first, what I'm really searching for as I flag important moments, and how all these details come together when building strong assignments of error. Whether you're a fellow legal professional or just curious about what happens behind the scenes of an appeal, I think you'll find this episode packed with insights. And as always, if you have questions about the appellate process or want me to cover a specific topic, reach out at LawyerTalkPodcast.com. Here are my top 3 takeaways:Start with the End in Mind: Glenn always jumps to the closing arguments first. This helps him identify what both sides thought was most important, setting the stage for a focused, thorough read-through.Look Beyond the Obvious: Spotting objections is important, but so is reading between the lines. Sometimes, critical appellate issues crop up in jury instructions or voir dire, places many skip over.Find the Thread: Building a strong appeal is about connecting dots—assignments of error, evidentiary mistakes, and even courtroom themes need to be woven into a compelling narrative that judges can follow.Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

What should you do if you feel like your attorney isn't really on your side? I get calls like this more often than you'd think, and let me tell you—it's not as straightforward as just hiring someone new. I'll walk you through the realities of “firing” your lawyer, the ethical boundaries I have to consider when talking to someone who's already represented, and why communication breakdowns trigger most problems between clients and attorneys. I'll share stories from my own experience, offer advice on how to approach these tough conversations, and explain what happens if you're thinking of switching lawyers—especially if your case is moving fast toward trial. If you've ever felt left out by your lawyer or just want to understand how these situations are handled behind the scenes, you're in the right place. Key Takeaways:Communication is Everything: Most issues between attorneys and clients stem from miscommunication or a lack of updates. Before considering a switch, have a candid conversation with your current lawyer.Don't Wait Until the Last Minute: If you decide to change attorneys, do it well before important deadlines (like a trial date). Last-minute changes can put your case—and the new lawyer—in a challenging position.Follow Proper Steps: Formally terminate your current lawyer before contacting a new one. This avoids ethical complications and ensures a smoother transition.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm taking you behind the scenes of a fascinating aspect of criminal appeals that most people overlook: the cross appeal. Now, I know it might sound boring or routine at first, but trust me—once you're in the thick of appellate work, it gets a whole lot more interesting.I'll be sharing a recent experience from my own legal practice, where, after winning a significant post-conviction case, the state decided they weren't ready to walk away and filed an appeal against our victory. That put me at a crossroads—should I file a cross-appeal to cover the few issues the judge didn't rule in our favor on, even though we'd already won big?I'll break down the strategic reasons behind a cross appeal, the importance of preserving every argument for my client, and why sometimes, in appellate law, thinking several moves ahead is the key to real justice. If you've ever wondered about the nitty-gritty of criminal appeals, why every detail matters, or what it takes to go toe-to-toe with the government after a win, this episode is for you. Key Takeaways from this episode:A cross appeal preserves your arguments: If the opposing party (like the State) appeals a favorable decision, you may need to file a cross appeal to ensure all the issues you raised get reviewed—crucial for “playing chess” with the appellate process.Protecting future rights: By raising every possible issue on appeal, you protect your client's ability to bring those arguments to higher courts, like the Supreme Court, if needed. Failure to do so could waive those issues forever.Specialized appellate expertise matters: Appellate practice is a different world from trial work. Having a lawyer who understands the finer points of state and federal appeals can make all the difference for your case's outcome.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I tackle a topic that sparks a lot of debate: why do people who seem obviously guilty still enter a "not guilty" plea in court? After a recent conversation with a sharp, strong-willed friend who was baffled by this, I decided it's time to break down what really happens at an arraignment. I'll share why starting with a not guilty plea isn't about denying the facts, but about making sure everyone gets the full benefit of due process and constitutional rights. I'll explain how this plea allows me, as a defense attorney, to fully review the evidence, negotiate charges if necessary, and ensure that any decision is made knowingly and intelligently. If you've ever found yourself frustrated or confused by this part of the courtroom process—especially when you see it play out in high-profile cases—I'm here to unpack the real reasons behind it. Here are 3 key takeaways for anyone interested in justice and due process:A Not Guilty Plea Is About Process, Not Denial: Entering a not guilty plea at arraignment isn't a claim of innocence. It's an essential first step to protect a defendant's rights and ensure full discovery and review of evidence.“Guilty” Pleas Without Understanding Are Dangerous: Our system requires that a plea be made “knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.” Without complete discovery and legal counsel, it's impossible for anyone to meet that standard.Every Defendant Deserves Due Process: Sometimes the charges are overblown, the evidence is flawed, or constitutional rights may have been violated. Pleading not guilty gives defense (and prosecution) time to negotiate, review, and ensure fair outcomes, not just political theater.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Setting Boundaries as a Young Lawyer: "And being able to discern what you can do, what you can't do, what you should do, and what you shouldn't do as you start practice." - Steve PalmerI'm sharing a lesson that stuck with me from right after my own law school days: a lawyer is not a bus. Troy and I dive into what that really means—why you don't have to stop for every client, why saying “no” can save your career, and how vital it is to set boundaries, especially when you're just getting started or when family and friends come calling for favors.We talk candidly about the challenges you face outside the classroom, like handling “can't you just…” requests, resisting the temptation to take every case (even for Aunt Joanne!), and balancing the desire to help with the realities of making a living. I draw from my own war stories and mistakes so you can avoid the same pitfalls—particularly around ethical responsibilities, pro bono work, and the constant pressure to do more than you should.Here are 3 key takeaways from the episode:Lawyers aren't obligated to take every case. Just because someone asks (even Aunt Joanne!) doesn't mean you have to say yes. Saying “no” — and setting healthy boundaries — is vital to avoid overcommitment and professional pitfalls.Beware of the “Can't You Just...” Trap. Clients (and family) will often push for free or heavily discounted legal help, asking, “Can't you just write a letter?” These situations rarely end well and can drain your time, energy, and resources.Pro bono is a choice, not an obligation. While giving back is important, the decision to do pro bono work should be yours. Don't let guilt or pressure dictate when, how, or for whom you volunteer your services.Moments00:00 Understanding Professional Ethics in Law04:29 Right to Decline Client Representation08:41 Learning to Say No in Law10:37 "Recognizing Problematic Client Cases"13:31 Doing God's Work vs. Paid Work16:59 "No Guarantees, Only Effort"22:25 "Lawyer's Time Is Valuable"24:58 Selective Pro Bono Participation26:45 Not My Area of ExpertiseSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses...

“Can I appeal my conviction or sentence if I pleaded guilty?” I break down the realities of what happens when you plead guilty, how that decision limits your rights on appeal, and whether there's any hope of changing your sentence after the fact.I'll walk you through real-world scenarios I've seen in Ohio courts, explain the “magic words” judges have to say when handing down sentences, and why it's rarely a home run to challenge a sentence after a guilty plea. If you're thinking, “I'll just appeal if I don't like my sentence,” you'll want to hear my candid advice before heading down that road. Top 3 Takeaways:A guilty plea is a total admission: Once you plead guilty, the court and everyone else in the process will treat you as guilty, both legally and factually.Appealing a sentence is limited and rare: After a guilty plea, you can sometimes appeal the sentence, especially if you receive the maximum sentence or if "magic words" (required legal justifications) are missing from the judge's explanation. However, reversing or reducing the sentence through appeal is statistically rare.Be fully informed before pleading guilty: Don't assume you can “just appeal” if you're unhappy with your sentence. Talk to your attorney, weigh the risks, and make sure your decision to plead is made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

One of the big questions that's been coming up everywhere lately: how does the First Amendment actually work when it comes to online pornography? In this episode, I break down the recent Supreme Court case, Free Speech Coalition Inc. v. Paxton, which addresses whether states can require age verification pop-ups on adult websites and whether that crosses the line into unconstitutional territory.I'll walk you through the basics of how the courts view content-based regulation versus time, place, and manner restrictions, and why that distinction matters for everything from protests on the statehouse lawn to what you see on your favorite websites. We'll talk about why challenges to these regulations are so important, what makes something pass constitutional muster, and where things might be headed next in the ever-evolving world of free speech and online content.If you love digging into constitutional law, or if you simply want to understand how these headlines affect your rights, this episode is for you. Got a question? Head over to lawyertalkpodcast.com, send it my way, and let's keep the conversation going. 3 Key Takeaways:Content-Based vs. Time, Place, and Manner:Content-based regulations, where the government restricts speech based on its message, are almost always unconstitutional. By contrast, time, place, and manner restrictions (imposing rules about when, where, or how speech happens) are generally permissible if applied fairly and equally.Strict Scrutiny Applies:Content-based restrictions are subjected to the strictest legal scrutiny and rarely survive court challenges. Time, place, and manner restrictions, if neutral and reasonable, tend to fare better legally.Slippery Slope & Future Concerns:The age verification requirement for adult content raises important “what's next?” questions. Could similar regulations creep into academic, legal, or other sensitive content areas? How might new rules affect non-pornographic but still controversial discussions or resources online?Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of...

Law school spends a lot of time on big constitutional theories and landmark cases, but what about the nuts and bolts, like Rule 16, filing demands for discovery, and wading through endless hours of body cam footage? I'm here to shed light on all of it.Today, we get into the gritty details of what criminal discovery actually looks like in practice. From being buried under mountains of police video, to dealing with last-minute evidence dumps and navigating Brady violations—I share real stories, practical advice, and the kind of candid perspective that comes from decades in the trenches. If you're a future lawyer, a legal enthusiast, or just curious about what really goes on in a trial, this episode is for you. So sit back, relax, and join me at the law school table as we dig into the stuff you won't find in the textbooks.Moments00:00 "Law School Versus Real Practice"05:55 "Time Costs: Law Clerk Solution"08:38 "Case Discussion and Human Bias"12:23 Evidence Overlooked: Raising Concerns15:45 Unprepared for Trial Defense17:43 "Prosecutors as Foxes: Trust Issues"Here are my top three takeaways from the conversation:Practical Discovery Knowledge is Often Missing from Law School: While law school dives deep into constitutional theory, many students aren't exposed to the everyday realities of criminal procedure, like Ohio's Rule 16 and the actual process of filing and responding to discovery demands.Managing Evidence is a Major Challenge: With technology, gathering evidence like body and dash cam footage has become both a blessing and a burden. Reviewing hours of footage from multiple officers can consume entire weeks of attorney time — something clients and new lawyers should understand.Discovery Rules are Not Just Formalities: The rules about timely and complete evidence disclosure are not just procedural checklists. Late or incomplete discovery can fundamentally change trial strategy, require continuances, or in some cases, even lead to a dismissal — and it's up to defense counsel to fight for the fair application of these rules.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the...

The Importance of Fair Trials for Everyone: "If anybody deserves a fair trial, it is the most guilty, deplorable person you can possibly imagine. Because if he can get a fair trial, then you, when you're not guilty, you can get a fair trial too..." - Steve PalmerUsing Weinstein's high-profile New York conviction as our guide, I break down why the court's decision to allow testimony from other alleged victims became such a crucial issue on appeal.I walk you through why ensuring a fair trial (yes, even for someone as notorious as Weinstein) is so important for the justice system as a whole. You'll hear my take on what happened inside that contentious jury room, the chaos (and value) of passionate deliberations, and what it really means when jurors can't agree. We'll use classic courtroom wisdom, a nod to the film “12 Angry Men,” and explore what prosecutors can do after a hung jury.If you've ever wondered what goes on behind the scenes after a big trial wraps up, or why appeals matter, this episode is for you. You'll learn what makes the adversarial process tick and why procedural fairness isn't just a technicality. It's the backbone of justice.Here are my key takeaways:Why Procedural Fairness Matters: No matter how “guilty” or reviled someone may be, the system must guarantee a fair trial. Otherwise, the same rules protecting the innocent begin to erode. The denial of a fair trial for anyone jeopardizes the process for everyone.How Juries REALLY Work: The jury deliberations in Weinstein's retrial were reportedly contentious. Yelling, disagreements, and passionate debate. This, I argue, actually shows the adversarial system doing its job as jurors hash out the facts and arrive at the closest thing to the truth.What Happens After a Hung Jury: If a jury can't agree (a “hung jury”), prosecutors aren't required to retry the case, but often will. Especially if victims push for it or to secure a complete legal outcome, even if other convictions already mean substantial prison time.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the...

The Reality of Courtroom Standards: "And we don't talk in terms of factual innocence in the courtroom very often. It comes up sometimes on appellate sides of things, but for the most part, it's whether the prosecutor has proved somebody." - Steve PalmerThis is about the notorious case involving Brian Wilson (no, not the Beach Boys icon), who's been charged with the murder of two police officers up in Morrow County (OH).I break down why, even in a situation like this, entering a not guilty plea is not just common—it's actually the right legal move. I'll address some of the biggest misconceptions I hear about pleas, talk through the important difference between factual guilt and what the courtroom actually requires, and explain why due process has to be protected, even for those accused of the worst crimes. With the death penalty potentially on the line, I unpack how that part of the trial works and why our legal standards matter for everyone, not just the presumed innocent.If you've ever wondered how defense attorneys square their work with questions of morality, or why the system handles plea decisions the way it does, this episode is for you. Here are my top takeaways:"Not Guilty" Is a Process, Not a Claim: The initial "not guilty" plea doesn't necessarily mean the accused claims innocence; it's a vital procedural step that sets the wheels of justice in motion and ensures the State provides evidence before conviction.Burden of Proof Matters: The prosecutor must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, not simply assert it. This protects all of us, not just the accused, and sets a uniform standard that safeguards the innocent.Even in Difficult Cases, Standards Protect Us All: Justice means applying the process equally, even for those accused of terrible crimes. Skipping steps or making exceptions erodes the integrity of the entire system.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their...

Legal Nuance in Vehicular Homicide Cases: "So the jury said, look, we think the prosecutor has proved all the elements of drunk driving, meaning operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or operating the motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol content. But we don't think that the prosecutor proved the actual homicide or the murder or the death component of it." - Steve PalmerThe Karen Reed case. It's a story that's captured national attention and is even featured in a new Netflix series. I'll break down the legal details behind the jury's decision: why Karen Reed was acquitted of manslaughter but still found guilty of DUI. Drawing on my own experience as a defense attorney, I explain how “lesser included offenses” played a role and why this outcome is such a big win for the defense. Whether you're a legal enthusiast or just trying to get a handle on what actually happened, I walk you through the key elements of this fascinating, headline-making case.My Key Takeaways:Lesser Included Offense Explained: The jury found Karen Reed guilty of drunk driving but not guilty of manslaughter. This distinction arose because, although the prosecution proved she was driving under the influence, they didn't prove she caused the death—a classic application of the “lesser included offense” principle.Impact on Sentencing: Being acquitted of the more serious charge meant avoiding felony prison time, leaving only the DUI conviction, something far less severe from a sentencing standpoint.Jury Decision Dynamics: The outcome emphasizes how disputed evidence (such as whether the accused caused harm) and the prosecution's burden of proof can result in nuanced verdicts that significantly change a client's future.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Online Privacy and Law Enforcement Access: "We're arguing that we have a reasonable expectation of privacy when we use these platforms. If we wanted our identity out there, we wouldn't conceal it with a pen name or a handle or whatever you use, a username. And by creating these alternative names, we are telling the world we don't want everybody to have access to my true identity." - Steve PalmerWe're living in a world where so much of our personal information is online, from Snapchat and Instagram to emails and cell phone records. I break down exactly what law enforcement has to do to get their hands on your private data. Do they require a search warrant, or is a simple subpoena sufficient? I explain how the Fourth Amendment applies and discuss your rights regarding privacy on these digital platforms.I share some real examples from my own legal practice and explore what the federal Stored Communications Act says about these issues. We'll also take a look at some key Supreme Court cases that shape how this all plays out. And if you think this isn't relevant to you just because you're a law-abiding citizen, I'll tell you why privacy protections should matter to everyone.Here are my 3 key takeaways for you:The Stored Communications Act & SubpoenasLaw enforcement can sometimes gain access to account information (like your identity on Snapchat) with just a subpoena, not a full search warrant. This distinction is important because a subpoena is much easier to obtain than a search warrant.The Fourth Amendment Still MattersThe Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable searches, and the expectation of privacy extends to our digital lives. In many cases, courts are leaning toward requiring a search warrant (with probable cause) for authorities to access sensitive information, especially after landmark cases like Carpenter v. United States.Your Digital Identity Deserves ProtectionThere's an ongoing legal debate: Should police need a higher standard (a search warrant) to access your hidden or pseudonymous social media identities? My answer: Yes. Protecting personal privacy—even for law-abiding citizens—is foundational, no matter how convenient the shortcut for investigators.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law...

I am focusing on the complex world of unique criminal convictions—cases like shaken baby syndrome, child sex offenses, and other serious charges that nobody likes to talk about, but that I deal with every day as a defense attorney and appellate advocate.These cases stand out because the evidence can often be questionable, and the stakes couldn't be higher. I'll share my own experiences handling appeals and post-conviction work for clients I genuinely believe to be innocent, and I'll explain why it's so critical to act fast—especially when it comes to securing expert witnesses and gathering records.If you, or someone you care about, are facing a situation like this, I want to give you some practical guidance on how to move forward after a conviction, and what to look for in a lawyer who really knows how to handle these cases. Whether you're dealing with this nightmare firsthand or just want to understand what happens beyond the verdict, I hope this episode brings clarity, insight, and maybe even a little hope.Here are my top 3 takeaways for legal professionals and anyone interested in the justice system:Act Immediately & Build Your Case Early: Don't wait until appeal deadlines loom. Engaging expert witnesses, gathering comprehensive records, and consulting specialists right at the outset can make the difference between a successful appeal and a lost opportunity.Direct Appeal Isn't Everything: While you can't introduce new evidence on direct appeal, post-conviction motions allow you to present fresh insights from experts. Working both tracks at once is crucial to maximize your client's chances.Right Counsel, Right Tools: Not all lawyers—no matter how competent—have the specialized “playbook” needed for highly unique, emotional, or complex cases. Work with appellate counsel who know how to leverage national experts and resources from the start.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Should you expect to pay for an initial consultation with a lawyer? This came up thanks to a great question from one of our production guys, and I realized it's something a lot of folks are curious about, especially after seeing those “free consultation” ads everywhere.I'll walk you through the realities of when lawyers actually charge for that first meeting—why it happens more often in areas like domestic relations and how conflicts of interest can come into play. I'll also break down exactly what you should expect from an initial consultation, free or not, including how much insight you should expect to get and what a lawyer should be able to tell you about your case and fee structure. If you're thinking about reaching out to a lawyer and want to know what you're getting into, stick around. I'm here to help clear things up so you can make the best decisions for your legal needs.Here are my key takeaways:Not All Consultations Are Free: While many lawyers advertise free consultations (especially in criminal defense), it's common in areas like domestic relations or divorce law to charge a fee for that first meeting. Always check before you book!What You SHOULD Expect: An initial consultation should give you an understanding of the lawyer's experience, their general approach to handling your type of case, and a transparent discussion about the cost structure. Don't expect in-depth case work, document reviews, or witness interviews at this stage.Why Some Lawyers Charge: Charging for consultations can protect lawyers from conflicts of interest, especially in cases where talking to one party may prevent them from representing the other side. It also ensures their time—and yours—is valued.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In today's episode, we're doing something a little different—we're actually talking about what you do learn in law school, specifically when it comes to those infamous final exams. I am joined by law student Troy Hendrickson, who's just wrapped up his second year and lived to tell the tale.If you've ever wondered what law school finals are really like, buckle up. Forget what you know about undergrad exams—here it's all about three to four hours of high-pressure essays that can make or break your entire grade. Think all-nighters fueled by way too much caffeine, stressing over whether you remember that one obscure case, and facing the reality of the dreaded law school curve.We swap stories about cramming, anonymous grading, 80-page outlines, and why actually learning the material trumps just memorizing it (no, you can't really fake it ‘til you make it here). They share practical advice—like how space repetition and making your own flashcards can save you, and why talking through arguments is key.Whether you're in law school, thinking about applying, or just curious about why law students always look so tired, this episode spills all the secrets. Grab your coffee—and maybe a Red Bull—because you're about to get the inside scoop on surviving law school finals!Key Moments00:00 "Beyond Law School Lessons"03:35 "Mastering Law School Tricks"07:06 Learning Law with Black's Dictionary09:22 Unique Law School Strategy13:49 "Judge Approach to Law Essays"17:37 "Learning Through Writing"19:47 Exam Success Through Self-Summarization23:08 Law School Case Discussion Process25:28 Effective Study Group StrategiesSubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Should you represent yourself in court? This topic came to mind after I watched a viral video of a defendant trying to go it alone in front of a judge down in Texas, and it got me thinking about the risks and realities of self-representation.Drawing from my own experiences—and remembering that classic line often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, “He who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer”—I'll share why even I, as a practicing attorney, would never want to represent myself, especially when the stakes are high. I'll walk you through situations where it might actually make sense to go solo, like a straightforward speeding ticket, but I'll also dig into the hidden dangers of navigating certain legal matters on your own, including issues with things like record sealing or expungement.Whether you're considering representing yourself or you just want to know more about how lawyers think through these decisions, stick around. I'll give you candid advice, real-world stories, and the practical insights you need before your day in court.Here are my top 3 takeaways:Representing Yourself is (Almost) Never a Good Idea: As the old saying goes (attributed to Abraham Lincoln!), “He who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer.” If there's any risk of jail time, don't go solo—hire a professional to ensure you keep perspective and make sound decisions.Minor Matters May (Rarely) Be an Exception: For low-stakes issues like minor traffic tickets, representing yourself might make sense—especially when the cost of a lawyer outweighs the penalty. But go in with realistic expectations and know you won't have the same leverage or results.Do-It-Yourself Can Backfire: Especially in complex matters (even non-criminal ones like sealing or expunging records), self-representation can unintentionally harm your future chances due to procedural missteps or legal technicalities.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I hear all the time: "How do some cases end up in the Ohio Supreme Court or even the U.S. Supreme Court so quickly, when most seem to crawl through the system?" I'll walk you through the usual process of appeals and then show you how certain hot-topic cases—like challenges to executive orders or big government actions—can take a legal shortcut. I'll explain how declaratory judgment actions and emergency appeals can move these issues straight to the top of the judicial ladder, sometimes almost overnight. If you've ever wondered why some court battles make the news so fast, or how the legal system decides what's urgent, this episode is for you. Moments00:00 Rapid Court Responses Explained03:52 Expedited Court Process ExplainedKey Takeaways:Fast-Track for Emergencies: Urgent or constitutionally significant cases (like challenges to executive orders or funding disputes) often get "fast tracked" to the Supreme Court via declaratory judgment actions and requests for immediate injunctions.Not Always About the Merits: Many times, the Supreme Court is ruling not on the actual underlying legal issue, but on procedural matters—like whether or not to grant a temporary restraining order, based on criteria like irreparable harm and likelihood of success.Emergency Appeals = Expedited Review: If a district or trial court issues (or declines to issue) an injunction, either party can seek an "emergency" or expedited appeal—helping cases bypass the usual, lengthy appellate process and land in front of the Supreme Court quickly.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

In this “What's the Appeal?” episode, I'll walk you through the ins and outs of getting a case in front of the Ohio Supreme Court, unpacking the crucial difference between correcting mistakes at trial and tackling broader questions of law that really get the justices' attention. I'll explain why not every error at a lower court qualifies for supreme court review, what makes an issue important enough to reach that level, and exactly what lawyers need to argue to give their case a fighting chance. If you've ever wondered how cases get to the highest court in the state, what issues matter most, or what happens after you appeal, this episode will give you answers and a behind-the-scenes look at the process. Here are my top 3 takeaways:Not Every Case Makes It Up: The Ohio Supreme Court—and courts like it—aren't just there to correct mistakes from lower courts. There's a specific process (discretionary review) for cases with broader legal implications to get their attention.It's All About the Big Picture: You need to show that your case presents an important rule of law or policy issue. It's not enough to say there was a simple trial error; you have to prove there's a bigger constitutional or public interest at stake.Strategic Advocacy Matters: When appealing, it's crucial to frame your argument in a way that highlights why your issue should matter to everyone, not just your client. Reference broader legal trends and current interest (like the US Supreme Court taking up similar issues) to strengthen your case for review.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm digging deeper into what it's really like to consult with a lawyer—especially when it comes to criminal defense. I'll walk you through a recent experience from my own practice, where a well-meaning inquiry turned into an intensive back-and-forth with countless emails and complex attachments. This got me thinking about the fine line between offering initial guidance and the reality that, just like Abraham Lincoln said, a lawyer's time is their stock in trade.I'll talk about how I try to strike a balance during consultations—being as helpful as possible without crossing into doing unpaid work, and why sometimes the expectations between lawyers and clients can get a little blurred. I'll also share why, even in our Zoom-heavy world, I still value face-to-face meetings whenever possible. Whether you've wondered what goes on behind the scenes or you're thinking of engaging a lawyer yourself, I'll give you an honest look at how to set reasonable expectations and get the most out of your legal consultation. Thanks for tuning in to Lawyer Talk!Here are my top 3 takeaways:Boundaries Matter: While initial consultations are important, there's a point where a lawyer moves from consulting to doing substantive work. Lawyers need to protect their time (their “stock in trade”), and clients should understand when reviewing extensive case materials may require formal engagement.Communication is Key: Misunderstandings can happen about what's covered in a free consultation. Clear expectations—on both sides—help avoid frustration and ensure everyone is on the same page from the start.The Process Has Changed: The pandemic shifted the way lawyers and clients connect, with fewer in-person meetings and more reliance on digital communications. Nonetheless, a face-to-face meeting (even virtual) can still be an important step in building trust.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively....

I'm tackling a question I hear all the time: “How do lawyers get paid—and what actually happens if my case takes an unexpected turn?” This week, I'm breaking down a listener's real-world concerns about flat rate fees in criminal defense cases. I'll walk you through how these agreements usually work, what you should look for in a fee contract, and why it's so important to have clear communication about money from the very start.I'll also dig into how retainer fees and hourly billing can play a role, discuss the kinds of additional expenses you might run into, and share some of my own experiences to help make sense of it all. Whether you're in the process of hiring an attorney or just curious about the financial side of legal work, I'll explain what you need to know in straightforward, practical terms. Key Moments00:00 "Essential Engagement Letter Practices"05:23 Flat Rate vs. Hourly Fees08:48 Understanding Lawyer Fees Limitations10:10 Legal Fee DeterminantsHere are 3 key takeawaysGet It in Writing: Always ensure your fee agreement is crystal clear and in writing. This protects both you and your attorney and eliminates confusion about what the fee covers—especially with flat rates.Flat Fees = Predictability, but Also Flexibility: Flat fees offer peace of mind, but circumstances can change. Make sure your agreement mentions what happens if the case is dismissed quickly, or if unexpected complications arise that require more work.Ask Questions, Don't Assume: Steve stressed the importance of open communication. Ask your lawyer exactly what's included in the fee, how they handle additional expenses, and whether there are extra charges if your case goes further than expected.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Why do some defendants want to withdraw their guilty pleas, and what are the most common reasons?This comes up all the time in my legal practice: What can you do if you plead guilty and then change your mind?I'll be sharing what really happens behind the scenes when someone wants to withdraw their guilty plea, especially if the sentence they get isn't what they expected. I'll explain how joint recommendations work here in Ohio, why clear communication between lawyers and clients is absolutely crucial, and what legal hurdles you're likely to face if you try to take back a guilty plea—whether it's before or after sentencing.So if you're curious about the appeals process, struggling with buyer's remorse after a plea deal, or just want to understand how the criminal justice system really works, this episode offers real-life stories, hard-earned insights, and practical advice from inside the courtroom.Key Moments00:00 Clear Client Communication on Plea Deals05:02 Plea Withdrawal Challenges in Ohio07:05 Withdrawing Plea: Start Over Consequences09:44 Rule 11 Plea Negotiations OverviewHere are 3 key takeaways:It's Much Harder After Sentencing: In Ohio, withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing requires a very strong reason, like major mistakes during the plea process or bad legal advice. Courts generally don't like granting these requests.Timing Is Everything: Before sentencing, withdrawals should be granted more freely, but courts are increasingly strict. If you're reconsidering, don't wait.You Might Be Back to Square One: Withdrawing a plea means the original charges (and risks) are back on the table, and prosecutors may not offer the same deal again. Sometimes, things can actually get worse.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Let's look at a topic that's been making a lot of headlines lately: the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations, especially with talk around Trump's immigration policies. Now, don't worry—I promised to keep things non-political, and I plan to stick to that. Instead, I'm here to walk you through what's really going on behind the scenes: the legal procedures and how these cases play out in court.Recently, federal judges in different parts of the country have been coming to completely opposite conclusions about the government's power to use this act. So, how does that work? What happens when courts disagree this way? I'll break down the basics of appellate law, explain why we're probably headed straight for a Supreme Court decision, and talk about what that means for everyone watching this play out.If you're curious about how the legal system handles big, controversial cases like this—without all the political noise—you're in the right place. Stick around, and I'll walk you through exactly what's happening and what comes next.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm digging into a question I get all the time—should you talk to the police if they reach out and want you to come down to the station? I know this one makes a lot of folks nervous, especially if you're worried that staying quiet might make you look guilty, but you're also hearing that you should never talk to the police without a lawyer.In this episode, I'm sharing a real scenario from a listener (names changed, of course!) whose son was asked to speak with officers about an incident involving a girl he met. I'll break down the reasons why going in to talk to the police—especially if you don't know exactly what they're asking about—can be a risky move. I'll even tell you about a case from my own practice where talking to the cops made things a whole lot harder, even though my client thought he was just clearing things up.So if you've ever wondered what the right move is when the police want to “just ask a few questions,” stick around. I'm here to give you some real talk on what to do—and what not to do—if you're ever in that situation. Let's get into it!Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I want to tackle a hot topic that's getting a lot of attention here in Ohio: police qualified immunity. There's been some buzz lately with talk of amending the Ohio constitution to eliminate qualified immunity, and with moves from the Attorney General and even the Ohio Supreme Court nudging this issue closer to the ballot, the debate is really heating up.I break down what qualified immunity actually is, why it matters for police officers, government workers, and regular folks like us, and what could happen if it gets scrapped. Trust me, there are strong arguments on both sides, and it's the kind of issue that could seriously change the legal landscape here in Ohio.I'm not here to take sides today, but I do want to set the stage for a much bigger conversation. I'm planning to bring in some guests soon—lawyers who work on both sides of this debate—so we can really dig deep and talk about what's at stake.So if you've got questions or thoughts about qualified immunity, shoot them my way. I'm looking forward to having this discussion, and I hope you stick around for what's sure to be an interesting ride. Let's get into it, right here on Lawyer Talk.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ever wondered what "en banc review" really means in appellate law? On this episode of Lawyer Talk, I break down this rarely used but powerful legal maneuver in a way that's both clear and practical.Here are 3 key takeaways from the conversation:En Banc Explained: En banc review refers to a request for the entire appellate court—not just the typical three-judge panel—to re-hear a case. This usually happens when a decision may conflict with other rulings, in-state or statewide.When & Why to Request: Lawyers typically seek en banc review when a panel's decision clashes with other appellate outcomes or when a case has significant legal implications that the whole court should weigh in on.Outcomes Can Change: If granted, en banc review can lead to a brand-new decision—sometimes supporting, sometimes overturning, or even fundamentally altering the initial ruling. It's a strategic last resort when the stakes couldn't be higher.If you deal with appeals or just want insight into appellate strategy, this episode is packed with actionable info.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I hear this question a lot—have Uber and Lyft actually led to fewer drunk driving cases? Drawing on my years of experience as a DUI defense attorney, I share how rideshare apps have shifted the landscape of drinking and driving, especially among 21-year-olds today. I also discuss why, even with the best intentions and easy access to Uber and Lyft, people still find themselves in trouble after a few drinks. I tell some real-life stories from my practice and offer practical advice on how to truly avoid an OVI. So stick around for an honest look at why good decisions can go bad—and what you can do to stay safe.3 Key Takeaways:Technology Doesn't Override Human Nature: Alcohol impairs the very part of the brain that helps us make rational decisions. Even the best-laid plans to use Uber can unravel after a few drinks.Education Matters Most: Younger people, especially those in college, seem more mindful about not drinking and driving—likely thanks to improved education and awareness campaigns, even more so than rideshare availability alone.Beware of “One Last Trip”: Many DUI cases happen after people responsibly get home via Uber, but later decide to drive for food, snacks, or late-night plans—still under the influence.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Sarah in Ohio reaches out to ask about her nephew, who was recently convicted of attempted murder and felonious assault in what they believe was a clear-cut case of self-defense. After losing their appeal and feeling like the state courts haven't given them a fair shake, Sarah wants to know: can they skip straight to the United States Supreme Court?I break down exactly how the appellate process works and why, no matter how urgent or important your case feels, you can't just jump right to the Supreme Court. I walk you through the legal ladder—from trial, to the Ohio Court of Appeals, to the Ohio Supreme Court, and only then, potentially, to the highest court in the land. Along the way, I explain what kinds of issues the Supreme Court is actually looking for, and why they usually don't take up individual error corrections. If you've ever wondered how—and if—a case can make it all the way to Washington, D.C., this episode will clear things up. So tune in for an inside look at the real process of seeking justice through an appeal!Here are 3 key takeawaysNo Skipping Steps: You can't bypass intermediate appeals and go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Every case must follow a specific appellate ladder, starting with a direct appeal, then applying for review by your state's highest court.Supreme Courts Are Selective: Both the Ohio Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court choose which cases they hear, typically focusing on issues with broad constitutional impact—not just error correction in a single case.Timing and Process Matter: If your case is denied review at the state's highest level, you have a limited window (typically 90 days) to petition the U.S. Supreme Court—and even then, getting heard is rare.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ever wondered if you can sit in on a jury trial?I get asked this question all the time: Can you just walk into a courtroom and watch a jury trial, especially if it's your loved one on trial? Drawing from my experience as a criminal defense attorney, I break down the constitutional rights that guarantee public trials, share some stories from my own time in court, and talk about the rare instances where a courtroom might be closed to the public.Whether you're hoping to support someone you care about, curious about courtroom proceedings, or simply interested in how the justice system works behind the scenes, I'll walk you through what you can expect, what makes public trials so important, and even offer a bit of encouragement if you've never set foot in a courthouse before. I shed some light on the process, the surprises you might encounter, and why everyone—yes, even you—has the right to see justice in action.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Anyone appealing a conviction should always consider post-conviction strategies and consult lawyers who understand their importance and deadlines.I take you behind the scenes of Ohio's post-conviction hearings—a part of the criminal appellate process that's often misunderstood and, frankly, overlooked. Building on our previous discussion, I explain what post-conviction petitions are, why they matter, and share my recent experience handling a rare, week-long post-conviction hearing. I break down the legal standards we have to meet, the importance of expert testimony, and how the landscape for these hearings is shifting in Ohio. I also walk you through what really happens after you score a win in post-conviction court, what appeals might look like, and why post-conviction work can be a make-or-break factor when you're choosing an attorney. Whether you've got your own case on the line or just want to understand more about what happens after a criminal conviction, I've packed this episode with practical insights and real-world advice. Join me as we dig into the nitty-gritty of the appellate process and why timing—and the right legal strategy—matter so much.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Think DNA evidence always means someone's guilty? Think again!Fresh off a hearing where I examined multiple DNA experts, both for the defense and the prosecution, I want to break down the common misconceptions and hidden complexities surrounding DNA today. With technology now able to detect just the tiniest traces—sometimes as little as 20 cells—the interpretation of DNA evidence has become far less straightforward than many believe.I share real-world examples, including cases where innocent people were implicated simply because their DNA was found in unexpected places, often due to accidental transfer. My main takeaway? DNA evidence isn't always the slam dunk it's made out to be. It's more important than ever to bring in experts and scrutinize every detail when DNA becomes a factor in a case. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm Steve Palmer, I'll be sharing some of my personal experiences and insights on how incredibly precise court reporters can be, despite the challenges they face. You'll hear about both the marvelous precision and the occasional horror stories of unreliable transcriptions. I'll also talk about the transformative role of modern technology in this essential part of the legal process. Whether you're interested in how flawed records can be corrected or the significance of genuine communication in the courtroom, this episode has something for you. Here are some key takeaways:Remarkable Accuracy: Transcripts are incredibly accurate, with court reporters using real-time transcription techniques. Most of the time, they capture statements with precision. Handling Errors: In rare cases where transcripts might be flawed, there are procedures in place to ensure justice isn't compromised. From re-agreements among parties to supplementing records, there are systems to address discrepancies. Impact of Technology: We've come a long way from jotted notes and shorthand. Modern technology guarantees detailed records of court proceedings, but human elements like court reporter expertise remain crucial. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

We're tackling a question submitted by Andy through LawyerTalkPodcast.com about expunging disorderly conduct, battery, or misdemeanor charges from your record.I break down the difference between record sealing and expungements here in Ohio, especially since the law has recently changed to allow for more complete removal of records. I explain the ins and outs of what can and can't be expunged or sealed, particularly when it comes to domestic violence or more serious crimes. Plus, I walk you through the process of applying for an expungement or sealing, emphasizing how crucial it is to demonstrate that your interest in clearing your record outweighs any governmental interest.If you're looking to turn over a new leaf and move forward with a clean slate, or if you're just curious about the expungement process, you're in the right place.3 key takeawaysUnderstanding Ohio's Record Sealing and Expungement: Ohio recently updated its laws to include expungements, which means that once a record is expunged, it's completely gone, unlike sealing where the record is just hidden from the public.Eligibility Criteria for Expungement: Disorderly conduct can be expunged, but other offenses like domestic violence or sexual-related offenses might not qualify. It's crucial to understand which charges are eligible for expungement.The Expungement Process: Applying usually involves demonstrating that your interest in expunging the record outweighs any governmental interest. The courts want to see you've turned over a new leaf, which can make a compelling case for getting your records expunged.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I'm discussing the critical aspect of the appellate process: the hidden costs that can arise after a conviction. In this episode, I share my personal experience with the sticker shock of obtaining a trial transcript for an appeal. It's a glimpse into the financial burdens that these expenses can impose on those looking to contest their convictions and how unforeseen costs can sometimes stand in the way of justice. Drawing from my years of appellate work, I shed light on the challenges and potential solutions when faced with these unexpected financial hurdles. Whether you're directly dealing with an appeal or simply curious about the legal intricacies, this episode offers valuable insights into an often-overlooked part of the legal process.Key TakeawaysSticker Shock of Transcripts: The cost of obtaining trial transcripts can be unexpectedly high, as seen with a recent $9,800 estimate for a four-day trial. It's a sobering reality for many families trying to appeal convictions.The Necessity of Transcripts: Despite the costs, transcripts are crucial for effective appellate work. They provide a clear record of the trial proceedings, which is essential for building a strong appeal case.Planning for Hidden Costs: Individuals looking to appeal should be prepared for these hidden costs, as they can significantly impact the decision to pursue appellate action. Considering potential expenses ahead of time can help in better financial planning.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this Q&A session, I talk more about the realm of privacy and the Fourth Amendment. I answer an intriguing comment from a listener concerning our fundamental right to privacy and how it fares against government actions.I'll explore both sides of this debate, tackling questions about individual rights, the role of law enforcement, and the precarious balance between safety and freedom. We unravel why these constitutional protections are crucial, and what they mean for you. Here are three key takeawaysBalancing Act: I highlight the importance of balancing the need for security with individual privacy rights. While stopping crime is crucial, maintaining control over personal spaces without unwarranted searches is just as important.Fourth Amendment Protections: The Fourth Amendment is designed to protect citizens from government overreach. It's not only about the 'bad actors' but also understanding that even good intentions can lead to infringements on privacy if not checked.Assert Your Rights: Even if you're not hiding anything illegal, it's essential to understand and assert your legal rights. I stress the importance of knowing your rights to ensure they remain intact for everyone.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

We're talking about those real-world scenarios law students won't find in our textbooks. In this "They Don't Teach You That in Law School" edition, we tackle the complex and fascinating topic of entrapment. We explore everything from undercover operations and chat room stings to the infamous DeLorean cocaine case, decoding what truly constitutes entrapment and examining the differences between what we're taught and what really happens in practice. We peel back the curtain on high-profile cases and the controversial role of the administrative state. Whether you're a law student, a lawyer, or just curious about how these defenses play out, this episode is sure to expand your perspective.I reference our past episode Cocaine Island, Episode 100.Teachable Moments00:00 "Entrapment: Back to the Future Discussion"03:06 "Entrapment and Criminal Intent"09:01 Understanding Entrapment's Complexity12:08 Using Prior Convictions in Court14:13 Understanding Estoppel in Law19:02 Entrapment by Estoppel Explained21:06 "Rethinking Government Insurance Involvement"24:19 Interpreting Law: The Regulatory MazeHere's a quick peek at what's discussed:Understanding Entrapment: Ever wondered what really counts as entrapment? Bella and Troy pose some burning questions about how this defense works, with examples you might recognize from "To Catch a Predator." Real-World Legal Insights: I share my professional insights and anecdotes, touching on famous cases like the DeLorean entrapment case from the '80s. It's a fascinating look at how these defenses are argued beyond the classroom.The Role of Entrapment by Estoppel: Learn about this lesser-known defense strategy and how it's applied in unique situations, like the tale of the Southern Ohio tomato farmers. The Challenges of the Administrative State: The episode also tackles the complexities of regulatory schemes and the intricacies of administrative law that aren't typically taught within the four walls of a classroom. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting

I discuss the intricacies of post-conviction petitions and the nuances of the appellate process. As a seasoned appellate lawyer, I shed light on the critical timelines that can make or break an appeal and emphasize the importance of understanding the difference between a direct appeal and post-conviction petitions. I outline the crucial steps that need to be taken immediately following a conviction to ensure all avenues for appeal are properly pursued. With real-life examples and expert advice, I provide invaluable guidance for anyone navigating the complex legal terrain post-conviction. So, if you or someone you know is facing an appeal, this episode is a must-listen. Here's a sneak peek at some of the key takeaways:Timelines are Critical: Always be aware of the deadlines. In Ohio, for instance, the post-conviction petition deadline starts one year from when the trial transcript is filed in the court of appeals on the direct appeal.Know Your Ladders: I always emphasize the importance of understanding the two "ladders" in appellate work—direct appeal and post-conviction. Ignoring one can mean missing vital deadlines and opportunities to raise certain issues.Seek the Right Expertise: For a successful post-conviction petition, it's essential to assemble the right team of expert witnesses. Whether it's medical, psychological, or forensic experts, their involvement can significantly influence the case.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I'm looking back at our earlier debate ignited by a listener's comment on aerial privacy and the law. Joining me in the clip I reference is Troy Hendrickson, one of the two sharp law students from our They Don't Teach You That in Law School series.We're exploring the question: What happens when airplanes fly over your property? Do you have any reasonable expectation of privacy from above? I'll explain how the law strives to balance fixed rules with the need for flexibility in an ever-changing world, especially with advancements in surveillance technology. Here are 3 key takeawaysApplying Rules to Extremes: Lawyers often use seemingly far-fetched examples to test legal rules to their logical extremes, helping to identify exceptions and crafting rules that are both robust and adaptable.Evolving Legal Frameworks: As technology advances, the law must evolve too. Crafting legal rules involves finding a balance between providing clarity and adapting to unforeseen technological advancements.Dynamic vs. Rigid Law: A major theme is finding the balance between finality and adaptability in the law, allowing it to be both definitive for current use and flexible enough to suit future scenarios.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, we're talking about the practicalities of the legal profession that law school often overlooks. From the stress of managing a law practice to the nuances of client relations, we uncover how the real world changes the idealistic image painted in textbooks. We also touch on the importance of building a network and the unique challenges faced by those starting their own practice, especially in fields like criminal defense. Whether you're a seasoned lawyer, a law student, or someone considering this path, you'll find valuable insights into the day-to-day hustle of legal work. Key TakeawaysExpect the Unexpected: In real-world practice, lawyering isn't just about the grandeur cases and fancy cars. It's about juggling unexpected challenges and learning on your feet. Whether it's a surprise trial date or last-minute client issues, adaptability is essential.Client Relationships Are Crucial: Unlike public defenders, private lawyers must maintain a robust connection with their clients. Building trust isn't just about solving legal problems but understanding unique client needs beyond the courtroom.The Art of Business in Law: Starting a practice involves more than just legal knowledge. From understanding file management to keeping the phones ringing, the business side of a law practice is a constant learning curve. Success requires balancing client expectations with professional and personal workloads.Teaching Moments05:16 Starting a Law Practice Challenges09:36 Public vs. Private Legal Representation12:09 Role of Counselors in Legal Jobs16:24 "Balancing Private Practice Demands"17:57 Military vs. Civilian Life: PredictabilitySubmit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

In this episode, I explain the intricacies of Ohio's OVI laws in another one of our stimulating DUI 360 episodes. I'll be shedding light on why Ohio poses unique challenges for those facing OVI (or as it's known elsewhere, DUI) charges. This is largely due to an old case law called State versus Vega, which restricts defendants from questioning the general reliability of breath test machines in court. This leaves DUI lawyers, like me, with fewer defenses to work with. Key TakeawaysTwo Charging Methods: Ohio has two main avenues for charging OVI: the traditional way, where you're obviously impaired, and the per se way, which considers you guilty if your blood, breath, or urine shows a prohibited alcohol content, regardless of how sober you might appear.State vs. Vega: Ohio's unique legal precedent, established by State vs. Vega, prohibits attacking the general reliability of breath test machines in court. I delve into why this makes defending OVI cases particularly tough here, compared to other states.Admin Rule Concerns: There's a significant debate over non-elected officials making binding rules, like Ohio's Director of Health declaring breath test machines reliable without needing courtroom scrutiny. I explore the implications this holds for defendants.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

I talk about the intricacies of oral arguments in the appellate process. What happens during oral arguments at the court of appeals? It's not about calling witnesses or retrying the case; it's about presenting compelling legal arguments to a panel of judges. I explain the importance of highlighting inequities in the trial and making a persuasive case for why the appeal should succeed. I also share insights into the dynamic nature of these proceedings, including how judges' questions play a pivotal role. Whether you're curious about the appeal process or want to explore some fascinating US Supreme Court arguments, this episode has you covered. What can you expect to learn?The unique dynamics of presenting an oral argument and how it differs from trial court proceedings.My top strategies for making a compelling case during an oral argument, focusing on the importance of pointing out inequities in the trial process.Why oral arguments are not just about reiterating written briefs but about adding "meat on the bone" to reinforce your points effectively.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com