Podcast appearances and mentions of Robert H Bork

People are designed to produce, create, build, and contribute. Retirement isn't always a “just reward” after a long career; sometimes, it leads to a lack of connection and a loss of a sense of purpose. That is just part of the reason that Risa Ryan, CEO and Founder of The UnRetire Group, started The UnRetire Group.The European Union's new competition rules under the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act are drawing blood from two of America's greatest innovators, Apple and Google. Such mandates undermine U.S. tech leaders' basic business models and threaten to turn them into public utilities. Robert H. Bork, Jr., President of the Antitrust Education Project, joined me to discuss the issue and what should be done.Richard V. Battle, an award-winning and best-selling author, media commentator, motivational speaker, and trainer on leadership, sales, and faith, joined me to discuss the recent Trump court wins, DOGE, tariffs, and Ken Paxton's announcement about running for U.S. Senate.Become a supporter of Tapp into the Truth: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tapp-into-the-truth--556114/support Tapp into the Truth on Rumble. Follow, watch the older shows, and join the live streams.The UnRetire GroupAntitrust Education ProjectThe Antitrust ParadoxRichard V. BattleRichard Battle's Amazon author pageIf you love high-quality jerky, you need to check out Jerky Snob. They deliver small-batch, artisan jerky straight to your door every month—no MSG, no nitrates, just premium cuts and bold flavors. You can choose from 2, 4, or 8-bag subscriptions, and every delivery brings something new and delicious. One of my favorite things is the variety—spicy, smoky, sweet, all from different craft makers. It's like a jerky tasting adventure every month. Plus, it makes an awesome gift! Grab your subscription at tappintofood.com and treat yourself to better jerky. If recent events have proven anything, you need to be as prepared as possible for when things go sideways. You certainly can't count on the government for help. True liberty requires self-reliance. My Patriot SupplyDiversify and protect your hard-earned wealth. Use America's Premiere Conservative Gold Company, Harvard Gold Group. Use promo code TAPP.Support American jobs! Support the show! Get great products at great prices! Go to My Pillow and use promo code TAPP to save! Visit patriotmobile.com or Call (817) 380-9081 to take advantage of a FREE Month of service when you switch using promo code TAPP! Morning Kick is a revolutionary new daily drink from Roundhouse Provisions that combines ultra-potent greens like spirulina and kale with probiotics, prebiotics, collagen, and even ashwagandha. Just mix with water, stir, and enjoy!If you are a content creator in need of a professional drone or you just enjoy flying a drone on the weekend, EXO Drones has you covered!  EXO Drones Plus, get 15% off your order by using this link.Follow Tapp into the Truth on Locals Follow Tapp into the Truth on SubstackHero SoapPatriot DepotBlue CoolersKoa CoffeeBrainMDDiamond CBDSauce Bae2nd SkullEinstokBeanstoxBelle IsleHoneyFund"Homegrown" Boone's BourbonIsland BrandsBlackout Coffee Co.Full Circle Brewing Co.Pasmosa Sangria  

Robert H. Bork Jr., President of the Antitrust Education Project, and recently reissued his father's book, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. Trump warns EU against targeting U.S. tech firms

Robert H. Bork, Jr., President of the Antitrust Education Project, joined me to discuss the current effort to force Google to sell Chrome to "break up their monopoly." J.T. Young, a former Congressional political analyst, policy advisor, and author of Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left, joined me to discuss how Presidential pardons should not end investigations. Then Becky Noble, a journalist at Red State, dropped in to discuss the D.C. budget battle, the latest fight that the ACLU is planning to engage in, and the discovery of a missing Texas Representative.  Become a supporter of Tapp into the Truth: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tapp-into-the-truth--556114/support Tapp into the Truth on Rumble. Follow, watch the older shows, and join the live streams.Morning KickAntitrust Education ProjectThe Danger Behind DOJ's Plan to Divest Google's ChromeJ.T. YoungUnprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist LeftPardons Shouldn't Stop InvestigationsBecky Noble at Red StateThe China Model Sees Police Stations WorldwideIf recent events have proven anything, you need to be as prepared as possible for when things go sideways. You certainly can't count on the government for help. True liberty requires self-reliance. My Patriot SupplyDiversify and protect your hard-earned wealth. Use America's Premiere Conservative Gold Company, Harvard Gold Group. Use promo code TAPP.Support American jobs! Support the show! Get great products at great prices! Go to My Pillow and use promo code TAPP to save! Visit patriotmobile.com or Call (817) 380-9081 to take advantage of a FREE Month of service when you switch using promo code TAPP! If you are a content creator in need of a professional drone or you just enjoy flying a drone on the weekend, EXO Drones has you covered!  EXO Drones Plus, get 15% off your order by using this link.Follow Tapp into the Truth on Locals  Follow Tapp into the Truth on SubstackHero SoapPatriot DepotBlue CoolersKoa CoffeeBrainMDDiamond CBDSauce Bae2nd SkullEinstokBeanstoxBelle IsleMomento AIHoneyFund"Homegrown" Boone's BourbonIsland BrandsBlackout Coffee Co.Full Circle Brewing Co.Pasmosa Sangria  

Robert H. Bork, Jr., President of the Antitrust Education Project, joined me to discuss the current effort to force Google to sell Chrome to "break up their monopoly." J.T. Young, a former Congressional political analyst, policy advisor, and author of Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left, joined me to discuss how Presidential pardons should not end investigations. Then Becky Noble, a journalist at Red State, dropped in to discuss the D.C. budget battle, the latest fight that the ACLU is planning to engage in, and the discovery of a missing Texas Representative.  With BTR shutting down, follow Tapp into the Truth to Spreaker!  Tapp into the Truth on Rumble True liberty requires self-reliance. My Patriot Supply   Morning Kick  Diversify and protect your hard-earned wealth. Use America's Premiere Conservative Gold Company, Harvard Gold Group. Use promo code TAPP. Visit patriotmobile.com or Call (817) 380-9081 to take advantage of a FREE Month of service when you switch using promo code TAPP! 

The 2024 National Lawyers Convention will take place November 14-16, 2024 at the Washington Hilton in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference is "Group Identity and the Law." The conference will conclude with the annual Hon. Robert H. Bork Memorial Lecture, featuring remarks by Prof. Stephen Sachs.Featuring:Prof. Stephen Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

This Day in Legal History: Robert Bork Nomination RejectedOn October 23, 1987, the U.S. Senate rejected President Ronald Reagan's nomination of Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court by a vote of 42-58. This rejection was a pivotal moment in U.S. legal and political history, marking one of the most contentious Supreme Court nomination battles. Bork, a former solicitor general and judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, was known for his strict originalist interpretation of the Constitution, which raised concerns about how his judicial philosophy might affect rulings on civil rights, privacy, and women's rights.Bork's nomination ignited intense public opposition, particularly from civil rights organizations, women's rights groups, and liberal advocacy organizations. These groups feared that his conservative views on issues like abortion, affirmative action, and privacy rights would roll back decades of legal progress. His academic writings and controversial role in the Saturday Night Massacre during the Watergate scandal, when he followed President Nixon's orders to fire the special prosecutor investigating the case, further fueled opposition.The Senate's rejection of Bork is widely seen as a turning point in the politicization of Supreme Court nominations, where ideology became a key battleground. The term “borking” was coined to describe the aggressive campaigning and lobbying used to derail a judicial nomination. This event reshaped how future judicial nominations would be approached, with increased scrutiny on nominees' legal philosophies and the political stakes of Supreme Court appointments.Elon Musk's $1 million election giveaway has sparked debate over whether it violates federal laws prohibiting payment to register or vote. The giveaway, which selects daily winners from those who sign Musk's petition supporting the First and Second Amendments, targets key battleground states ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Legal experts are split on its legality. Some argue that it could be viewed as indirectly incentivizing voter registration, particularly since participants must be registered voters in specific states. Critics, including Pennsylvania's Governor Josh Shapiro, are calling for investigations, citing concerns about potential violations. Others, like former Federal Election Commission chair Brad Smith, believe Musk is not violating the law because signing the petition isn't directly tied to registering to vote. The controversy centers on whether Musk's actions are a clever mobilization tactic or a breach of election law.Elon Musk's $1 million election giveaway tests limits of election law | ReutersCarrier Global has agreed to a $730 million settlement related to PFAS contamination claims against its bankrupt fire protection unit, Kidde-Fenwal. The settlement will resolve lawsuits over toxic chemicals, known as PFAS or "forever chemicals," found in Kidde-Fenwal's firefighting foam products, which allegedly polluted water and soil near U.S. airports and military bases. The settlement allocates $540 million to Kidde-Fenwal and $190 million to the plaintiffs. Carrier will fund $615 million over five years and use $115 million from the sale of Kidde-Fenwal's assets. Additionally, Carrier expects up to $2.4 billion in insurance payouts to cover costs. Kidde-Fenwal filed for bankruptcy in May 2023 amid over 4,400 PFAS-related lawsuits. This settlement follows other major PFAS agreements, such as 3M's $10.3 billion and DuPont's $1.19 billion settlements.Carrier reaches $730 mln settlement over fire protection unit PFAS claims | ReutersRupert Murdoch's Dow Jones and the New York Post have filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI, accusing the startup of illegally copying their copyrighted content to generate AI-based responses. The lawsuit highlights a broader conflict between publishers and tech companies over the unauthorized use of copyrighted material for AI training and content generation. Perplexity, which competes in the search engine market, provides AI-generated summaries from various sources, including material from Dow Jones and the New York Post. The lawsuit claims that Perplexity's system reproduces content verbatim without permission, constituting copyright infringement. Dow Jones and the *New York Post* seek to stop Perplexity from using their content and demand the destruction of databases built using their work. Despite attempts to negotiate a licensing deal, Perplexity did not respond. The case reflects growing tensions between media organizations and AI companies, as publishers push for compensation for the use of their content.Murdoch's Dow Jones, New York Post sue Perplexity AI for 'illegal' copying of content | ReutersA Michigan judge rejected a Republican effort to restrict overseas voting in the state. The Republican National Committee (RNC) had filed a lawsuit claiming Michigan's election laws improperly allowed U.S. citizens living abroad, who had never resided in the state but had relatives there, to vote. Judge Sima Patel ruled that the challenged language in the law aligns with federal and state regulations. According to Michigan law, U.S. citizens who have never lived in the U.S. can vote in Michigan if a parent, guardian, or spouse last resided there, as long as they haven't registered in another state. The RNC did not immediately respond to the decision.Judge rejects Republican move to restrict overseas voting in Michigan | ReutersIn my column for Bloomberg this week I argued for the need to establish a uniform state sales tax system to alleviate the burdens on small businesses and remote sellers. The current fragmented system, with over 13,000 tax jurisdictions, creates significant compliance challenges. Since the Supreme Court's South Dakota v. Wayfair decision in 2018, remote sellers are now required to navigate a complex patchwork of tax rules across states, which hampers interstate commerce. A proposal by Senator Maggie Hassan to standardize sales tax policies has drawn opposition from states concerned about losing autonomy, but the economic harm caused by the status quo warrants congressional intervention. Small businesses are disproportionately affected, as they are often required to track taxes across multiple states, increasing administrative costs. A federal solution, like Hassan's proposal, could simplify this with exemptions for small sellers and protections for good-faith tax collection errors. Offering federal incentives for states to modernize their tax systems could help ease the transition. By building on existing frameworks, such as the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement, a collaborative approach can balance state sovereignty with the need for a more consistent tax system that supports commerce.We Need a Uniform State Sales Tax System That Supports Commerce This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Southern Sense is conservative talk with Annie "The Radio Chick-A-Dee" Ubelis, and Josh Perry, guest co-host.  We're informative, fun, irreverent and, politically incorrect.  You never know where we'll go, but you'll love the journey! Guests: Larry Sharpe, National Organizing Director for American Values 2024, the RFK Junior SuperPac, is a former teacher and US Marine who ran for New York Governor in 2018 as a Libertarian. Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the eldest son of the late Judge Robert H. Bork. He began his career journalism career as a police reporter before moving to business and economics.  He is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. LEGAL ANALYST/AUTHOR: John O'Connor, is author of Postgate: How the Washington Post Betrayed Deep Throat, Covered Up Watergate, and Began Today's Partisan Advocacy Journalism and host of The Mysteries of Watergate Podcast. Dedication:  To the Fallen from 9/11/2001 attacks on America.

Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the eldest son of the late Judge Robert H. Bork. He began his career journalism career as a police reporter before moving to business and economics. Big Tech antitrust bill could be reintroduced to Congress

This week Rodney is joined by Robert H. Bork the President of the Antitrust Education Project, and recently reissued his father's book, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. Together they will tackle the leftist ideology of ESG and how the right is beating the left at their own game.

Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. He also heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. Justice Dept. examining sale of U.S. Steel to Japanese company Nippon Steel over antitrust concerns

Corporate America Fights Back Against Wokeism- In this episode we interview Robert H. Bork, Jr., son of the legendary legal scholar and U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Robert Bork.  Find out how corporate America is beginning to successfully fight back against leftist investor groups who are trying to use ESG scores to fundamentally transform, if not destroy, the United States free enterprise system.  Also, hear about the must-read reissue of Judge Bork's famous book, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. Also ... Serving God's People- Dr. Wendy Patrick and co-host Larry Dershem interview Joshua Waller, Director of Operations for HaYovel in Israel.  Find out how an American farming family, that includes 11 adult children, are transforming agriculture in the lands of Judea and Samaria, and producing some of the best award-winning wine the world has ever tasted. In this interview you will find out how you, or someone you know, can become a volunteer and be part of this miracle, working hand in hand with God's people.  It all starts with a visit to ServeIsrael.com. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this day in legal history, October 23, 1987, the United States Senate rejected the nomination of Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court. Nominated by President Ronald Reagan, Bork, a distinguished legal scholar and a fervent conservative, faced staunch opposition primarily from the Democratic Senate, who were troubled by his originalist interpretations of the Constitution and his past controversial legal stances. His nomination was further tainted by his role in the infamous Watergate scandal, where he, as Solicitor General, obeyed President Richard Nixon's order to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, an act that significantly tarnished his public image.The discourse surrounding Bork's nomination was emblematic of the deep ideological chasms that characterize the judicial nomination process. It brought to the forefront the ideological underpinnings that often steer the acceptance or rejection of Supreme Court nominees, a facet that significantly shapes the judiciary's role in American polity. The term "borking" emerged from this episode, denoting the stringent public vetting and character assassination often associated with high-profile judicial nominations, reflecting the lasting imprint of this event on the American legal and political lexicon.The Senate's rejection of Bork was more than a mere personal defeat; it was a monumental event that underscored the importance of ideological balance within the Supreme Court and the rigorous scrutiny nominees would henceforth face. The heightened public engagement and the Senate's meticulous approach towards Bork's nomination signaled a shift in the dynamics of judicial nominations, establishing a precedent of increased vigilance and scrutiny. This day marked a seminal juncture in the Senate's role in providing 'advice and consent' for judicial nominations, setting a heightened benchmark for scrutiny that continues to resonate in contemporary nomination processes.Robert Bork's failed nomination remains an indelible part of the ongoing dialogue between jurisprudence and political ideology, showcasing the profound impact the judiciary has in shaping the nation's ideological contour. Through this lens, the rejection of Robert Bork's nomination is not only a significant chapter in legal history but also a reflective mirror of the enduring and dynamic interplay between the judiciary, the legislature, and the larger socio-political landscape of the United States.A jury concluded that Google LLC exhibited gender bias towards female executive Ulku Rowe, mandating over $1 million in damages to be paid to her. The decision came after more than five hours of deliberation on a Friday evening. The jury allocated $150,000 for Rowe's pain and suffering due to Google's discriminatory treatment, alongside $1 million in punitive damages. This lawsuit emerged as the inaugural pay discrimination case against Google since the 2018 mass employee walkouts protesting the company's handling of sexual misconduct allegations against top executives.Throughout the week-long trial, Google defended its stance, asserting that Rowe, serving as a director of engineering at Google Cloud, was provided equal opportunities and was assessed using the same performance metrics as her male peers, countering Rowe's opposing claims. The compensation structure at Google, as outlined by Paul Hastings LLP Partner Kenneth Gage, is performance-based, with Rowe's earnings fluctuating in comparison to her fellow directors over different years.Rowe accused Google of gender-based discrimination by hiring her at a lower level, paying her less than male colleagues for comparable work, and denying her a deserved promotion, which allegedly was awarded to a less qualified male. Despite her extensive 23-year experience in the financial services and technology sector, Rowe was hired as a level eight employee, whereas men hired around the same time with supposedly lesser experience were placed at level nine, earning them a higher salary.The jury, however, found that Rowe couldn't establish that she was paid less than at least two of her male counterparts, as required by New York law. Despite this, Rowe's attorney emphasized that Google had undervalued her expertise when she was hired in 2017 as the technical director of financial services at Google Cloud, and further alleged that Google retaliated by demoting her following her complaints about discrimination. The lawsuit, filed under New York equal pay law, aimed to hold Google accountable for perpetuating a lower standard of treatment and remuneration for women in tech, as outlined by Rowe's legal counsel.The verdict, although acknowledging that Rowe's pay and level were fair since her hiring and that no promotions were unjustly withheld, strongly underscores a rejection of gender discrimination and retaliation in the workplace, sending a broader message against such practices.Google Must Pay Female Executive $1 Million for Gender Bias (1)America First Legal (AFL), founded by Stephen Miller, has filed a lawsuit against New York University (NYU) accusing its law school of discriminating against White men during the selection process for its esteemed law review membership. The suit alleges that NYU Law Review is unlawfully favoring women, non-Asian racial minorities, and LGBT individuals in its selection of members and editors. Membership in law reviews, especially at prestigious institutions like NYU, is seen as a significant stepping stone for students aiming for high-profile positions in notable law firms.AFL is perhaps best known for suing the Kellogg's corporation, accusing them of sexualizing pop-tarts, specifically producing gay pop-tarts, that were somehow pushing an agenda on children. This legal action follows a broader move by AFL in June, where letters were sent to NYU and other law schools nationwide, challenging their practices concerning race and gender-based preferences in admissions, hiring, and law review memberships. The scrutiny towards diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has intensified, particularly after a recent Supreme Court decision to limit affirmative action in higher education. Conservative groups are now increasingly contesting DEI initiatives in both educational institutions and the private sector.NYU opted not to comment on the matter, and AFL did not provide an immediate response to requests for comments. Besides targeting educational institutions, AFL has been urging a US civil rights agency to probe into major corporations like Kellogg Co. and Activision Blizzard Inc. regarding their diversity policies post the Supreme Court ruling. The case against NYU is titled Doe v. New York University, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, marking another chapter in the ongoing debates surrounding affirmative action and DEI policies.Stephen Miller's America First Legal Sues NYU Over Law ReviewSam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of FTX, is facing fraud charges tied to the bankruptcy of the cryptocurrency exchange. During the trial, his lawyers have voiced concerns over the prosecution's portrayal of Bankman-Fried as a "cartoon of a villain," based on descriptions provided by his former colleagues who testified against him. Despite these concerns, the defense has refrained from challenging some negative anecdotes about Bankman-Fried's interactions with colleagues who disagreed with company decisions.The defense's approach might be strategic, intending to avoid drawing additional attention to unfavorable testimony, as challenging such claims might reinforce the negative image painted by the prosecution. However, experts suggest that the defense's avoidance of these issues may risk leaving a negative impression on the jury, potentially making them more inclined to convict Bankman-Fried.The prosecution has accused Bankman-Fried of misappropriating billions of dollars from FTX customer funds to support his other venture, Alameda Research, make risky investments, and donate over $100 million to U.S. political campaigns to bolster his image. Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to two counts of fraud and five counts of conspiracy, facing the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence if convicted.The defense argues that while Bankman-Fried may have "overlooked" risk management in growing FTX and Alameda, there was no intention to steal customers' money. They plan to present a competing narrative to counter the prosecution's portrayal, with some experts suggesting that Bankman-Fried taking the stand himself could help in establishing a more positive impression of his character.Testimony from key prosecution witnesses like Nishad Singh, former Engineering Chief at FTX, and Caroline Ellison, Alameda's former CEO and Bankman-Fried's ex-girlfriend, detailed instances where Bankman-Fried allegedly disparaged colleagues over financial disagreements. These witnesses' accounts contribute to the prosecution's narrative, contrasting starkly with Bankman-Fried's pre-arrest image as a well-intentioned individual in the cryptocurrency space.The unfolding trial reflects broader issues surrounding corporate governance and ethical conduct within the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry. The defense's upcoming narrative will seek to counter the negative portrayal of Bankman-Fried, aiming to provide a different context to the jury regarding his actions and intentions during his tenure at FTX and Alameda.Sam Bankman-Fried's lawyers avoid challenges to 'cartoon' villain image | ReutersU.S. Senator Bob Menendez is slated to enter a plea on a new indictment concerning charges of conspiring to act as an unregistered foreign agent for the Egyptian government. The accusation, filed by federal prosecutors on October 12, alleges that Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, acted on behalf of Egyptian military and intelligence officials from 2018 to 2022. This arraignment follows previous charges against Menendez and his wife, Nadine Menendez, for allegedly accepting significant amounts of cash and gold bars from three businessmen, in return for leveraging his influence to aid the Egyptian government and obstruct law enforcement inquiries into these businessmen.Menendez, dismissing the new charge as an addition to unfounded allegations, is expected to enter his plea at a hearing before U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein. Meanwhile, Nadine Menendez and one of the businessmen, Wael Hana, have already pleaded not guilty to the foreign agent charge on October 18. Amid these legal challenges, Bob Menendez has withstood pressures from fellow Democrats to step down from his senatorial position.US Senator Menendez to be arraigned on foreign agent charge | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

10-09-2023 Robert H. Bork, Jr. Learn more about the interview and get additional links here: https://thedailyblaze.com/todays-antitrust-battles-are-actually-anti-consumer/ Subscribe to the best of our content here: https://priceofbusiness.substack.com/ Subscribe to our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCywgbHv7dpiBG2Qswr_ceEQ

Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. Is the Assistant Attorney General a Crook?

Today, The Two Mikes spoke with Robert H. Bork, Jr. Mr. Bork is the head of the AntiTrust Education Project and the head of The Bork Group, a public relations agency. Mr. Bork explained the intense attacks being waged against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas by Democrats, other leftists and the media. The Pro Public website for example – a site funded by liberal millionaires and the New York Times recently have been publishing allegations that Justice Thomas has violated the ethics codes governing the actions of federal judges. In addition, Democrat and chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) also has added to this fictitious drama by whining about how the “tangled web around Justice Clarence Thomas just gets worse day-by-day” and several of his colleagues called for an investigation of Thomas.” The “great crime” that the Democrats and the media are alleging against are Judge Thomas's friendship with a wealth Texan Harlan Crow, who has hosted Judge Thomas for trips on his jet, boast, and to his lodge. The two important points to know about Mr. Crow is that (a) none of his involvement with Judge Thomas was required to be reported by the Judge at the time it occurred, and (b) Mr. Crow's companies have no business that it is in front of the Supreme Court. Despicably, the Democrats are attacking Justice Thomas for an act of kindness and decency. The Justice and his wife took into their house as a ward his grand-nephew, who was struggling in life, and sought to raise him. Mr. Crow paid for a few years of the young man's education. Now the Democrats are accusing Judge Thomas of failing to report Crow's contribution, even though the judicial ethics code requires the reporting of such a contribution only if the boy had been the Justice's natural son, not his ward. As always, the Democrats' desire to control the Supreme could is fueled by their obsession with power and their savage of hatred of any Black person who is a conservative. Sponsors CARES Act Stimulus (COVID-19) Employee Retention Tax Credits (ERC): https://www.jornscpa.com/snap/?refid=11454757 Cambridge Credit: https://www.cambridge-credit.org/twomikes/ EMP Shield: https://www.empshield.com/?coupon=twomikes Our Gold Guy: https://www.ourgoldguy.com www.TwoMikes.us

The Left's False Attacks on Clarence Thomas Are Part of a Pressure Campaign to Undermine the Supreme CourtFalse leftist attacks on Justice Thomas are part of pressure campaign to undermine Supreme CourtClarence Thomas's Luxury Travel And The Gift Tax Clarity from Chaos guest: Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. He also heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. Bork is an experienced advocate specializing in the development and implementation of communication strategies in support of litigation and legal policy. The attacks on Justice Clarence Thomas for his friendship with Texas billionaire Harlan Crow not only continue an illegitimate political pressure campaign against the Supreme Court but also expose the moral vacuum that is Washington, D.C.  ProPublica, a website funded by liberal millionaires, the Washington Post, a newspaper owned by a billionaire, and The New York Times, a media company long owned by a wealthy family, have runs stories over the last month claiming that Thomas has violated ethics codes governing federal judges. "This tangled web around Justice Clarence Thomas just gets worse and worse by the day," Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin, D-IL, said this week. Several of his colleagues have called for an investigation into Thomas and have made demands for confidential financial information from Crow.  But a close look shows that this supposed scandal amounts to little more than an accounting error that has never given rise to claims of scandal before, at least when liberal judges were involved. In the first ProPublica report, critics attacked Thomas for failing to report in his financial disclosure forms that Crow had hosted him for trips on his private jet, yacht, and lodge. The financial reporting rules did not require disclosure of hospitality from personal friends – indeed, only in March, after these trips took place, did the federal judiciary decide that judges in future should report private jet travel or stays at commercial hotels.   Although the article implied that Crow sought to buy influence with Thomas, the former runs a construction and real estate company that has no business before the Court. FIND HIM ON LINKEDIN HERE:FIND HIM ON FACEBOOK HERE:FIND HIM ON TWITTER HERE:  Support the show"Wherever you find yourself is exactly and precisely where God wills you to be" Follow us on X: @CFC30290 Follow us on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-3123766 Website: https://clarityfromchaospodcast.buzzsprout.com/ Thanks for listening to Clarity from Chaos

Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. The Left's Lies About Clarence Thomas Are Undermining the Supreme Court

The 2022 National Lawyers Convention will take place November 10-12, 2022 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference is "The Current State of the Legal Profession." The conference will conclude with the annual Hon. Robert H. Bork Memorial Lecture, featuring remarks by Judge A. Raymond Randolph.Featuring:Hon. A. Raymond Randolph, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

GUEST OVERVIEW: Robert Bork Jr. is President of the Antitrust Education Project. He also heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. Robert is an experienced advocate specializing in the development and implementation of communication strategies in support of litigation and legal policy. Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the eldest son of the late Judge Robert H. Bork. He heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. He began his career journalism career as a police reporter before moving to business and economics. As a journalist, he covered international economics at U.S. News and World Report, was managing editor of the quarterly journal Regulation, and worked as a reporter at Forbes, The Detroit Free Press, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram and The Miami Herald.

THE VIC PORCELLI SHOW 0:00 SEG 1 Nate Lucas – Host of "High Noon," Weekdays 12noon- on KFNS, 590 The Fan, St.Louis - https://twitter.com/nlucas0  18:54 SEG 2 PORCELLI'S DELI - 'Back to the Future' 31:10 SEG 3 Robert H. Bork Jr. Biden gives $2.8 billion to battery companies that commit to ESG agendaBiden administration awards $2.8 billion in grants for electric vehicle battery manufacturingBiden awards $2.8 billion for projects to boost electric vehicle battery manufacturingPUBLIUS SPECIAL GUEST: Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. He also heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. Bork is an experienced advocate specializing in the development and implementation of communication strategies in support of litigation and legal policy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

08-30-2022 Robert H. Bork, Jr. Learn more about the interview and get additional links here: https://www.usabusinessradio.com/why-antitrust-often-means-anti-consumer/ Subscribe to the best of our content here: https://priceofbusiness.substack.com/ Subscribe to our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCywgbHv7dpiBG2Qswr_ceEQ

Robert H. Bork, Jr., is the President of the Antitrust Education Project. He also heads the Bork Group, a public affairs agency. DOJ readying to sue Google for antitrust violation that could happen as soon as September

GUEST OVERVIEW: Robert H. Bork Jr. is president of the Antitrust Education Alliance. He recently wrote a new forward for his father's classic book, The Antitrust Paradox.

The 2021 National Lawyers Convention took place November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference was "Public and Private Power: Preserving Freedom or Preventing Harm?". The conference concluded with the annual Hon. Robert H. Bork Memorial Lecture, featuring remarks by Judge Laurence H. Silberman on "The Job of Attorney General—A Historical Perspective."Judge Laurence H. Silberman will be delivering remarks on "The Job of Attorney General—A Historical Perspective."Featuring:Hon. Laurence H. Silberman, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

At Least It's Better Than Browns            Today:  The Cleveland Indians are now the Guardians.  John thinks the new name worthy of an award.  Then, Gabe Kaminsky of the Federalist says Pitt University is hiding how much it is spending on what he calls racist indoctrination.  Finally, Robert H. Bork Jr. of the Bork Group, son of author Robert Bork talks about updating his father's release Antitrust Paradox to deal with questions about big tech monopolies. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Cisco and Falzon Hour Broadcast in Politics Call in to speak with the host: Cisco Acosta, Mark Falzon, and guest (845) 262-0988 Join us tonight, at 9:00 pm eastern time, with our guest, Robert H. Bork Jr. appearing on behalf of his father, with an updated version of The Antitrust Paradox By Judge Robert H. Bork. Robert H. Bork, Jr., heads the Bork Group, a 18-year-old virtual crisis, litigation, and public affairs agency, which draws from the best, most-experienced, independent communications talent.   Topics for discussion: What was  Robert Bork's “one person, one vote” principle? Did  Bork's view, of the U.S. Constitution included no right to privacy? Do you believe the Democrats will pack the Supreme Court Show Writer: Doreen Ann Show Sponsor: Studentsforabetterfuture.com

06-15-2021 Robert H. Bork Jr.

Judge Robert H. Bork’s famous work, The Antitrust Paradox, has been republished so that the new generation of general practitioners and antitrust thinkers alike can bring his work to bear on their own. Senator Mike Lee, who wrote the republished edition’s foreword, and Robert Bork, Jr., join us to discuss the book, the present state […]

Judge Robert H. Bork's famous work, The Antitrust Paradox, has been republished so that the new generation of general practitioners and antitrust thinkers alike can bring his work to bear on their own. Senator Mike Lee, who wrote the republished edition's foreword, and Robert Bork, Jr., join us to discuss the book, the present state of antitrust issues, and more.Featuring:-- Robert Bork, Jr., President, The Bork Foundation and the Antitrust Education Project-- Hon. Mike Lee, United States Senator, State of Utah-- Moderator: Dean Reuter, Vice President, General Counsel, and Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society

On January 19-20, 1990, The Federalist Society hosted a conference at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The topic of the conference was "The Presidency & Congress: Constitutionally Separated and Shared Powers." The conference concluded with an address by Judge Robert Bork.Featuring:Judge Robert H. Bork, American Enterprise InstituteIntroduction: Erwin Glikes, The Free Press*******As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

This week, the United States Department of Justice launched its rumored antitrust law suit against Google. The government's complaint brief alleges that Google has a monopoly in search and search advertising, and has unlawfully maintained that monopoly. Among the many complaints, the government points specifically to the billion dollar payments google pays to Apple, in exchange for Apple carrying the search engine on be the de facto search engine on its IOS platform. The Government is alleging that these practices are not in the best interests of consumers or competition. The case is the most high profile antitrust case in decades, and could potentially remake google, antitrust law, and the internet as we know it. Today’s Teleforum is cosponsored by The Bork Foundation, a non-partisan, nonprofit educational foundation just launched, led by Robert H. Bork, Jr. who chairs a board which includes today's speaker, George L. Priest, the Edward J. Phelps Professor of Law and Economics and Kauffman Distinguished Research Scholar in Law, Economics, and Entrepreneurship at Yale Law School.The Bork Foundation was launched this month to promote the life and legacy of Robert H. Bork – lawyer, Yale Law School professor, Solicitor General, federal appellate court judge, Supreme Court nominee, author, and public intellectual. Featuring: George L. Priest, the Edward J. Phelps Professor of Law and Economics and Kauffman Distinguished Research Scholar in Law, Economics, and Entrepreneurship at Yale Law School

On March 6, 1988, Hon. Robert H. Bork spoke to the Federalist Society's National Student Symposium at the University of Virginia. Judge Bork discussed the campaign against his recently failed Supreme Court nomination and its implications for future judicial nominations, constitutional law, politics, and culture.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.Featuring:Hon. Robert H. Bork, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. CircuitHon. T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., Assistant to the President for Domestic AffairsHon. David M. McIntosh, Domestic Policy Council

On March 6, 1988, Hon. Robert H. Bork spoke to the Federalist Society's National Student Symposium at the University of Virginia. Judge Bork discussed the campaign against his recently failed Supreme Court nomination and its implications for future judicial nominations, constitutional law, politics, and culture.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.Featuring:Hon. Robert H. Bork, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. CircuitHon. T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., Assistant to the President for Domestic AffairsHon. David M. McIntosh, Domestic Policy Council

PAPERS BY: Peter Berkowitz (The Hoover Institute), Andrew McCarthy (The Foundation for the Defense of Democracy), Kenneth Minogue (UK), Jeremy Black (UK), Daniel Johnson, and John O'Sullivan OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Roger Kimball, Brian Anderson (The City Journal), Judge Robert H. Bork, Gerald Frost (UK), George Nash, James Piereson (The William E. Simon Foundation), Herbert London (The Hudson Institute), Michael Gleba (The Scaife Foundation) FIRST BROADCAST: 09/28/07

PAPERS BY: Peter Berkowitz (The Hoover Institute), Andrew McCarthy (The Foundation for the Defense of Democracy), Kenneth Minogue (UK), Jeremy Black (UK), Daniel Johnson, and John O'Sullivan OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Roger Kimball, Brian Anderson (The City Journal), Judge Robert H. Bork, Gerald Frost (UK), George Nash, James Piereson (The William E. Simon Foundation), Herbert London (The Hudson Institute), Michael Gleba (The Scaife Foundation) FIRST BROADCAST: 09/28/07