Podcasts about digital markets act

- Schlaue Siri: Angeblich Bedenken nach internen Tests - Netzteil-Debatte zum MacBook Pro: Unnötig aufgeladen? - Produktionszahlen des iPhone Air: Doch nur ein Leichtgewicht? - Bordkarte aufgebohrt: Welche Airlines bei der verbesserten Wallet-App mitmachen - Freie Wahl: Apple ergänzt in iOS 26.1 Liquid-Glass-Schalter - Jetzt wird es ernst: Apple verklagt EU wegen Digital Markets Act - Umfrage der Woche - Zuschriften unserer Hörer === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis === Sichere dir 4 EXTRA-Monate auf einen 2-Jahresplan über https://nordvpn.com/apfelfunk Teste NordVPN jetzt risikofrei mit der 30 Tage Geld-Zurück-Garantie. === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis Ende === Links zur Sendung: - Mac & i: Lange erwartete kontextsensitive Siri ruft Bedenken hervor - https://www.heise.de/news/Lange-erwartete-kontextsensitive-Siri-Angeblich-Bedenken-bei-internen-Text-10778833.html - Mac & i: Dritte iOS-26.1-Beta zeigt in Richtung weiterer KI-Partner - https://www.heise.de/news/KI-nicht-nur-von-OpenAI-Dritte-iOS-26-1-Beta-zeigt-in-diese-Richtung-10762207.html - Mac & i: Musste Apple die MacBook-Stromversorgung in der EU streichen? - https://www.heise.de/news/Netzteil-Konflikt-Musste-Apple-die-MacBook-Stromversorgung-in-der-EU-streichen-10778520.html - Mac & i: Apple fährt iPhone-Air-Produktion angeblich massiv herunter - https://www.heise.de/news/Bericht-Apple-faehrt-iPhone-Air-Produktion-massiv-herunter-10794765.html - Mac & i: Diese Airlines machen bei Apples verbesserten Bordkarten mit - https://www.heise.de/news/Apple-Wallet-Diese-Airlines-machen-bei-Apples-verbesserten-Bordkarten-mit-10762155.html - Mac & i: Liquid Glass in iOS 26.1 verbessert - https://www.heise.de/news/Neue-iOS-26-1-Beta-Liquid-Glass-verbessert-Kameranerv-entfernt-10789161.html - MacRumors: Apple erhebt Klage gegen DMA - https://www.macrumors.com/2025/10/21/apple-hits-back-at-eu-law-in-court/ Kapitelmarken: (00:00:00) Begrüßung (00:13:45) Werbung (00:17:27) Themen (00:18:42) Schlaue Siri: Angeblich Bedenken nach internen Tests (00:39:09) Netzteil-Debatte zum MacBook Pro: Unnötig aufgeladen? (00:53:38) Produktionszahlen des iPhone Air: Doch nur ein Leichtgewicht? (01:14:45) Bordkarte aufgebohrt: Welche Airlines bei der verbesserten Wallet-App mitmachen (01:18:55) Freie Wahl: Apple ergänzt in iOS 26.1 Liquid-Glass-Schalter (01:25:29) Jetzt wird es ernst: Apple verklagt EU wegen Digital Markets Act (01:31:42) Umfrage der Woche (01:36:32) Zuschriften unserer Hörer

Apple heeft tijdens een rechtszaak tegen de Europese Commissie opnieuw benadrukt dat de Digital Markets Act (DMA) te streng is en niet op het bedrijf van toepassing zou moeten zijn. In de rechtszaal in Luxemburg van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie zei advocaat Daniel Beard van Apple dinsdag dat de DMA 'enorm zware en opdringere lasten' oplegt. Niels Kooloos vertelt erover in deze Tech Update. De DMA is sinds 2023 van kracht in de Europese Unie en heeft een aantal grote techbedrijven, waaronder Apple, bestempeld als 'poortwachter'. Een bedrijf is poortwachter als het een grote digitale markt in handen heeft waarvan andere bedrijven afhankelijk zijn om te kunnen concurreren met elkaar. Voor Apple gaat het bijvoorbeeld om de iPhone, waar draadloze oortjes van andere merken net zo makkelijk mee moeten kunnen koppelen als Apples AirPods, en de App Store, waarnaast ook alternatieve appwinkels moeten bestaan voor iPhone-apps. Apple houdt zich al (gedeeltelijk) aan de Digital Markets Act, maar blijft volhouden dat de regels veel te streng zijn. Zo wijst het bedrijf naar de moegaboete van 500 miljoen euro die het eerder dit jaar kreeg omdat app-ontwikkelaars niet naar aanbiedingen buiten de App Store mochten verwijzen. Het bedrag zou volgens Apple buitenproportioneel hoog zijn en bovendien zou de Europese Commissie veel meer van Apple eisen dan kan onder de DMA. Verder in deze Tech Update: Minister Vincent Karremans van Economsiche Zaken heeft dinsdagmiddag gebeld met de Chinese minister van Handel over Nexperia Amazon wil uiteindelijk een personeelsbestand hebben dat voor 75 procent uit robots bestaat See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Europe created regulatory frameworks, including the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act, in attempt to reassert control, but these laws have recently faced backlash from the Trump administration. In this episode of the TechTank podcast, Courtney Radsch speaks with Marietje Schaake about these challenges and the digital sovereignty debate. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In deze aflevering hebben we een hoop updates over toegankelijkheid, gaat de NS de informatieborden in darkmode tonen en zorgt de Digital Markets Act ervoor dat innovatie stopt? Daarnaast deelt Rick een handige app om huidkanker te checken en koopt Michele een dashcam. 0:00 - Intro 01:19 - Google hoeft Chrome niet te verkopen - https://tweakers.net/nieuws/238698/google-hoeft-van-amerikaanse-rechtbank-chrome-en-android-niet-te-verkopen.html 03:01 - NLDoc uitgesteld door gebrek aan GPU's 07:43 - Toegankelijke PDFs maken met LibreOffice - https://piccalil.li/blog/a-guide-to-creating-accessible-pdfs-using-free-tools/ 11:12 - Window.Print vs bestand printen - https://toot.cafe/@bkardell/115175224008719196 13:18 - NS gaat informatieborden in darkmode tonen - https://tweakers.net/geek/239444/ns-gaat-3600-informatieborden-in-dark-mode-zetten.html 15:16 - Principles for inclusive design - https://inclusivedesignprinciples.info/nl/ 20:55 - Interop 2026 - https://web.dev/blog/interop-2026-proposals 26:49 - Figma maakt de applicatie toegankelijker - https://www.figma.com/blog/introducing-screenreader-and-accessibility-features/ 32:34 - Figma komt met versie voor de overheid 36:02 - Nieuw in Safari iOS26 en Mac OS Tahoe - https://webkit.org/blog/17333/webkit-features-in-safari-26-0/ 40:45 - Bedrijven  en mensen roepen dat DMA innovatie tegenhoudt - https://tweakers.net/reviews/13890/bangmakerij-of-terechte-kritiek-grote-techbedrijven-verzetten-zich-tegen-de-dma.html 46:45 - Skinvision huidkanker app 50:10 - Michele gaat weer aan de Dashcam

-In order to avoid paying billions of dollars in fines for violating the European Union's Digital Markets Act, Google is considering changing how search results are displayed, Reuters reports. -Customer service support company 5CA contradicted claims by Discord that it was the victim of a hack last month. -OpenAI plans to open the floodgates to more adult uses of ChatGPT starting in December, according to a new post from CEO Sam Altman. The company announced that it would add parental controls and automatic age detection features in September, and it seems like a benefit of sorting out children from adults is an ability to offer more freedom in what ChatGPT can show users. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

News and Updates: Microsoft backtracks in Europe — Windows 10's Extended Security Updates (ESU) will be free for an extra year in the European Economic Area (EEA), lasting until October 14, 2026. After pushback from Euroconsumers under the Digital Markets Act, Microsoft dropped its requirement to enable Windows Backup (and OneDrive) for access. Users in the EEA still need to log in with a Microsoft account every 60 days, but no cloud sync or payments are required. Outside Europe, ESU costs $30 or 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points, or requires enabling cloud sync. Windows 10 end-of-support remains October 14, 2025. Cracker Barrel logo controversy amplified by bots — Researchers at PeakMetrics found that nearly half of early outrage posts on X about Cracker Barrel's new logo were bot-generated. Around 44.5% of the first 52,000 posts — and nearly half of boycott calls — were flagged as bot-driven. Alt-tech platforms like Truth Social, Gettr, Gab, 4chan, and Rumble also spread the backlash. While 75% of posts came from real users, botnets amplified discontent into a viral outrage cycle. Social media now central to news diets — A new Pew study shows 53% of U.S. adults sometimes get news from social media. Facebook (38%) and YouTube (35%) lead, followed by Instagram (20%) and TikTok (20%). X (12%) and Reddit (9%) lag behind. Younger adults are far more likely to use TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram for news, while older adults still lean on TV. Only 2% of Americans say they get news from AI chatbots like ChatGPT or Google Gemini. Police stop a driverless Waymo — San Bruno, California police pulled over a Waymo robotaxi after it made an illegal U-turn. With no human driver, officers couldn't issue a citation. Current law only allows tickets for human drivers, though a new state law next year will let violations be reported to the DMV. Waymo says it is reviewing the “glitch.” The incident sparked viral debate over how to hold self-driving cars accountable.

This week Apple continues its war with the EU over the Digital Markets Act, the entertainment industry continues its war with AI, and Asahi goes to war after a cyber attack brings its business to a halt. Plus HP Ireland country manager Neil Dover talks about technology and culture in the workplace.Don't forget Niall's sci-fi movie recommedation on Netflix "Lost in Starlight"Listen to Tech Radio now on Apple, Spotify and YouTube—----- Apple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/tech-radio-ireland/id256279328Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/5vAWM1vvHbQKYE79dgCGY2YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@TechRadioIrelandRSS - https://feeds.transistor.fm/techradio

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Intel has reportedly approached Apple about investing in the company. Some of Apple's new features will be delayed in the EU due to the Digital Markets Act. A study showcases a dramatic rise in fraudulent mobile apps on both iOS and Android. And Apple is working on its own ChatGPT-style chatbot app, which is being tested internally by employees. Intel is seeking an investment from Apple as part of its comeback bid. Apple warns of more feature delays in Europe. New study shows 'massive spike' in fraudulent apps powered by AI. Apple releases iOS 26.0.1 with fixes for Wi-Fi, Cellular, and camera issues on iPhone 17 models. Apple releases macOS Tahoe 26.0.1 with M3 Ultra bug fix. Apple working on all-new operating system. New iPad Pro with M5 chip leaked in unboxing video. Two new Apple displays nearing mass production, may launch this year. Apple's ChatGPT-style chatbot app deserves a public release. Apple researchers develop SimpleFold, a lightweight AI for protein folding prediction. Jessica Chastain 'not aligned' with Apple's decision to delay series about hate groups. Why did Apple get cold feet about 'Savant'? Tigers-Red Sox clash on Apple TV+ will feature live game footage on new iPhone 17 Pro. College football keeps picking iPad over Surface as fourth conference joins team Apple. Now available: Adobe Premiere on iPhone brings pro-quality video editing to creators. FCC mistakenly leaks confidential iPhone 16e schematics. Apple responds to iPhone 17 Pro scratch and durability concerns. Meet the new light of Jony Ive's life. Why Ford's CEO doesn't love Apple CarPlay Ultra. Picks of the Week Jason's Picks: Relay for St. Jude Alex's Pick: Vertical Heart Set Insert Tool Andy's Pick: UGREEN Phone Stand Leo's Pick: Nomat Goods Horween Leather Folio for iPhone 17 Pro Max Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: threatlocker.com/twit pantheon.io

Puntata che parte dal comunicato Apple vs Unione Europea: con Francesco analizziamo come il Digital Markets Act stia imponendo limiti all'ecosistema Apple (e non solo). Si discute di funzioni ritardate, interoperabilità forzata, rischi di sicurezza, “gatekeeper” e la posizione europea. Uno sguardo lucido alle pressioni su Cupertino, perché ora la battaglia sulla concorrenza digitale riguarda ogni utente.Visita Digiteee e scopri tutte le notizie sulla tecnologiaSegui Digiteee su TikTokDimmi la tua su Twitter, su Threads, su Telegram, su Mastodon, su BlueSky o su Instagram.Mail jacoporeale@yahoo.it Scopri dove ascoltare il podcast e lascia una recensione su Apple Podcast o Spotify.Ascolta An iPad guy su YouTube Podcast.Supporta il podcast

In Folge 279 sprechen die ApfelNerds über Scratchgate, Daniel war im Apple Store, das iPhone 17 Pro Teardown bringt spannende Erkenntnisse, die iPhone 17 sollen die WLAN/Bluetooth-Verbindung verlieren, es gibt Rauschen im Lautsprecher seit iOS 26, Apple verwendet iPhone 17 Pro in MLB-Streams, Tap to Pay kommt in weitere europäische Länder, MacBooks sollen tatsächlich ein Touch-Display bekommen, Apple soll Model Context Protocol unterstützen, Apple arbeitet an einer Chatbot-App, Mark Gurman spricht über kommende Hardware, es gibt Updates und einen kurzen Abriss zu Apples DMA-Presseerklärung (mehr dazu später).

Managed service providers (MSPs) are experiencing significant growth driven by interest in artificial intelligence (AI), with 92% reporting an uptick in business. However, a concerning trend has emerged: only about half of these providers feel equipped to assist small and mid-sized businesses in adopting AI tools, a sharp decline from 90% the previous year. This growing readiness gap highlights the challenges MSPs face in meeting customer expectations as AI adoption accelerates. Experts emphasize the need for integrated security solutions to help navigate the complexities of AI.OpenAI's recent benchmarks reveal that a staggering 95% of enterprise AI projects fail, underscoring the difficulties companies encounter in justifying their AI investments. Despite advancements in AI models, their effectiveness remains inconsistent, particularly in handling complex, ongoing projects. The evaluation system introduced by OpenAI aims to bridge the gap between theoretical capabilities and real-world demands, indicating that while AI can perform tasks faster and cheaper than humans, it still struggles with contextual understanding and interaction.In the realm of digital content, Cloudflare has launched a feature allowing website owners to block Google's AI overview search product, addressing concerns from publishers about traffic losses due to AI-generated content. This move comes amid legal challenges faced by Google from publishers who argue that their content is being used without proper attribution. While Cloudflare's feature offers a potential solution, its effectiveness hinges on Google's compliance, raising questions about the future of content ownership in the age of AI.Regulatory pressures are also reshaping the landscape for major tech companies. Microsoft has been compelled to offer free extended security updates for Windows 10 in select European markets, responding to consumer advocacy for better support. Meanwhile, Apple has delayed the release of several features in Europe due to compliance challenges with the EU's Digital Markets Act. These developments highlight the increasing influence of regulation on technology services, prompting MSPs to prepare for client inquiries regarding disparities in service offerings across regions.Four things to know today00:00 92% of MSPs Report AI-Driven Growth, But Only Half Feel Ready to Support SMB Adoption02:50 Fast, Cheap, and Fragile: OpenAI Finds AI Struggles in Real Work While Cloudflare Challenges Google's AI Overviews06:44 EU Pressure Forces Microsoft to Extend Free Windows 10 Updates as Apple Delays Features Under DMA09:39 Innovation vs. Obligation: How Debt, Automation, and AI Metrics Are Rewriting the Managed Services PlaybookThis is the Business of Tech.    Supported by:  https://mailprotector.com/ Webinar:  https://bit.ly/msprmail All our Sponsors: https://businessof.tech/sponsors/ Do you want the show on your podcast app or the written versions of the stories? Subscribe to the Business of Tech: https://www.businessof.tech/subscribe/Looking for a link from the stories? The entire script of the show, with links to articles, are posted in each story on https://www.businessof.tech/ Support the show on Patreon: https://patreon.com/mspradio/ Want to be a guest on Business of Tech: Daily 10-Minute IT Services Insights? Send Dave Sobel a message on PodMatch, here: https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/businessoftech Want our stuff? Cool Merch? Wear “Why Do We Care?” - Visit https://mspradio.myspreadshop.com Follow us on:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079/YouTube: https://youtube.com/mspradio/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@businessoftechBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/businessof.tech Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

L'elaborazione del linguaggio naturale umano da parte delle macchine è stata per decenni un'enorme sfida per gli sviluppatori. Assistenti come Google Assistant, Alexa, Siri o Cortana hanno rappresentato i primi tentativi di sviluppare sistemi in grado di riconoscere la voce e interpretare i comandi, ma con risultati spesso deludenti. La situazione è cambiata drasticamente con l'avvento dei Large Language Model, che oggi riescono a comprendere facilmente le intenzioni dell'utente, interpretarle e rispondere di conseguenza. In questa puntata analizziamo come i modelli linguistici comprendono la nostra voce e quali sono le tecnologie che migliorano questa comprensione, esplorando alcuni esempi di prodotti tra cui il nuovo Insta360 WAVE.Nella sezione delle notizie parliamo del possibile addio ai cookie banner, dell'annuncio della NASA sulla data per la missione Artemis II e infine della battaglia legale di Apple contro il Digital Markets Act europeo.--Indice--00:00 - Introduzione01:05 - Verso la fine dei cookie banner? (AgendaDigitale.eu, Luca Martinelli)02:33 - La NASA annuncia la data per Artemis II (DDay.it, Matteo Gallo)03:28 - Apple contro il DMA europeo (HDBlog.it, Davide Fasoli)05:09 - Come i computer comprendono la nostra voce (Luca Martinelli)16:21 - La nostra esperienza con Insta360 WAVE (Davide Fasoli, Luca Martinelli)26:21 - Conclusione--Testo--Leggi la trascrizione: https://www.dentrolatecnologia.it/S7E39#testo--Contatti--• www.dentrolatecnologia.it• Instagram (@dentrolatecnologia)• Telegram (@dentrolatecnologia)• YouTube (@dentrolatecnologia)• redazione@dentrolatecnologia.it--Sponsor--• Puntata realizzata in collaborazione con Insta360--Brani--• Ecstasy by Rabbit Theft• Whatever by Cartoon & Andromedik

-Elon Musk's xAI is suing OpenAI, alleging that the ChatGPT maker has stolen its trade secrets. The lawsuit comes after the company recently sued a former employee, Xuechen Li, for allegedly stealing confidential information from the company before taking a job at OpenAI. -Spotify has announced a set of policy changes surrounding AI-generated music and spam on its streaming platform. The company is helping to develop an industry standard for AI disclosure in music credits, alongside DDEX. It will be strengthening its approach to AI-assisted spam, such as unauthorized vocal clones, as well as uploaded music that fraudulently delivers music to another artist's profile. -The European Union has summarily rejected calls from Apple to repeal and replace its Digital Markets Act, the law that governs much about how giant tech companies must operate within the 27-nation bloc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

After a hiatus, we've officially restarted the Uncommons podcast, and our first long-form interview is with Professor Taylor Owen to discuss the ever changing landscape of the digital world, the fast emergence of AI and the implications for our kids, consumer safety and our democracy.Taylor Owen's work focuses on the intersection of media, technology and public policy and can be found at taylorowen.com. He is the Beaverbrook Chair in Media, Ethics and Communications and the founding Director of The Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy at McGill University where he is also an Associate Professor. He is the host of the Globe and Mail's Machines Like Us podcast and author of several books.Taylor also joined me for this discussion more than 5 years ago now. And a lot has happened in that time.Upcoming episodes will include guests Tanya Talaga and an episode focused on the border bill C-2, with experts from The Citizen Lab and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers.We'll also be hosting a live event at the Naval Club of Toronto with Catherine McKenna, who will be launching her new book Run Like a Girl. Register for free through Eventbrite. As always, if you have ideas for future guests or topics, email us at info@beynate.ca Chapters:0:29 Setting the Stage1:44 Core Problems & Challenges4:31 Information Ecosystem Crisis10:19 Signals of Reliability & Policy Challenges14:33 Legislative Efforts18:29 Online Harms Act Deep Dive25:31 AI Fraud29:38 Platform Responsibility32:55 Future Policy DirectionFurther Reading and Listening:Public rules for big tech platforms with Taylor Owen — Uncommons Podcast“How the Next Government can Protect Canada's Information Ecosystem.” Taylor Owen with Helen Hayes, The Globe and Mail, April 7, 2025.Machines Like Us PodcastBill C-63Transcript:Nate Erskine-Smith00:00-00:43Welcome to Uncommons, I'm Nate Erskine-Smith. This is our first episode back after a bit of a hiatus, and we are back with a conversation focused on AI safety, digital governance, and all of the challenges with regulating the internet. I'm joined by Professor Taylor Owen. He's an expert in these issues. He's been writing about these issues for many years. I actually had him on this podcast more than five years ago, and he's been a huge part of getting us in Canada to where we are today. And it's up to this government to get us across the finish line, and that's what we talk about. Taylor, thanks for joining me. Thanks for having me. So this feels like deja vu all over again, because I was going back before you arrived this morning and you joined this podcast in April of 2020 to talk about platform governance.Taylor Owen00:43-00:44It's a different world.Taylor00:45-00:45In some ways.Nate Erskine-Smith00:45-01:14Yeah. Well, yeah, a different world for sure in many ways, but also the same challenges in some ways too. Additional challenges, of course. But I feel like in some ways we've come a long way because there's been lots of consultation. There have been some legislative attempts at least, but also we haven't really accomplished the thing. So let's talk about set the stage. Some of the same challenges from five years ago, but some new challenges. What are the challenges? What are the problems we're trying to solve? Yeah, I mean, many of them are the same, right?Taylor Owen01:14-03:06I mean, this is part of the technology moves fast. But when you look at the range of things citizens are concerned about when they and their children and their friends and their families use these sets of digital technologies that shape so much of our lives, many things are the same. So they're worried about safety. They're worried about algorithmic content and how that's feeding into what they believe and what they think. They're worried about polarization. We're worried about the integrity of our democracy and our elections. We're worried about sort of some of the more acute harms of like real risks to safety, right? Like children taking their own lives and violence erupting, political violence emerging. Like these things have always been present as a part of our digital lives. And that's what we were concerned about five years ago, right? When we talked about those harms, that was roughly the list. Now, the technologies we were talking about at the time were largely social media platforms, right? So that was the main way five years ago that we shared, consumed information in our digital politics and our digital public lives. And that is what's changing slightly. Now, those are still prominent, right? We're still on TikTok and Instagram and Facebook to a certain degree. But we do now have a new layer of AI and particularly chatbots. And I think a big question we face in this conversation in this, like, how do we develop policies that maximize the benefits of digital technologies and minimize the harms, which is all this is trying to do. Do we need new tools for AI or some of the things we worked on for so many years to get right, the still the right tools for this new set of technologies with chatbots and various consumer facing AI interfaces?Nate Erskine-Smith03:07-03:55My line in politics has always been, especially around privacy protections, that we are increasingly living our lives online. And especially, you know, my kids are growing up online and our laws need to reflect that reality. All of the challenges you've articulated to varying degrees exist in offline spaces, but can be incredibly hard. The rules we have can be incredibly hard to enforce at a minimum in the online space. And then some rules are not entirely fit for purpose and they need to be updated in the online space. It's interesting. I was reading a recent op-ed of yours, but also some of the research you've done. This really stood out. So you've got the Hogue Commission that says disinformation is the single biggest threat to our democracy. That's worth pausing on.Taylor Owen03:55-04:31Yeah, exactly. Like the commission that spent a year at the request of all political parties in parliament, at the urging of the opposition party, so it spent a year looking at a wide range of threats to our democratic systems that everybody was concerned about originating in foreign countries. And the conclusion of that was that the single biggest threat to our democracy is the way information flows through our society and how we're not governing it. Like that is a remarkable statement and it kind of came and went. And I don't know why we moved off from that so fast.Nate Erskine-Smith04:31-05:17Well, and there's a lot to pull apart there because you've got purposeful, intentional, bad actors, foreign influence operations. But you also have a really core challenge of just the reliability and credibility of the information ecosystem. So you have Facebook, Instagram through Meta block news in Canada. And your research, this was the stat that stood out. Don't want to put you in and say like, what do we do? Okay. So there's, you say 11 million views of news have been lost as a consequence of that blocking. Okay. That's one piece of information people should know. Yeah. But at the same time.Taylor Owen05:17-05:17A day. Yeah.Nate Erskine-Smith05:18-05:18So right.Taylor Owen05:18-05:2711 million views a day. And we should sometimes we go through these things really fast. It's huge. Again, Facebook decides to block news. 40 million people in Canada. Yeah.Taylor05:27-05:29So 11 million times a Canadian.Taylor Owen05:29-05:45And what that means is 11 million times a Canadian would open one of their news feeds and see Canadian journalism is taken out of the ecosystem. And it was replaced by something. People aren't using these tools less. So that journalism was replaced by something else.Taylor05:45-05:45Okay.Taylor Owen05:45-05:46So that's just it.Nate Erskine-Smith05:46-06:04So on the one side, we've got 11 million views a day lost. Yeah. And on the other side, Canadians, the majority of Canadians get their news from social media. But when the Canadians who get their news from social media are asked where they get it from, they still say Instagram and Facebook. But there's no news there. Right.Taylor Owen06:04-06:04They say they get.Nate Erskine-Smith06:04-06:05It doesn't make any sense.Taylor Owen06:06-06:23It doesn't and it does. It's terrible. They ask Canadians, like, where do you get people who use social media to get their news? Where do they get their news? and they still say social media, even though it's not there. Journalism isn't there. Journalism isn't there. And I think one of the explanations— Traditional journalism. There is—Taylor06:23-06:23There is—Taylor Owen06:23-06:47Well, this is what I was going to get at, right? Like, there is—one, I think, conclusion is that people don't equate journalism with news about the world. There's not a one-to-one relationship there. Like, journalism is one provider of news, but so are influencers, so are podcasts, people listening to this. Like this would be labeled probably news in people's.Nate Erskine-Smith06:47-06:48Can't trust the thing we say.Taylor Owen06:48-07:05Right. And like, and neither of us are journalists, right? But we are providing information about the world. And if it shows up in people's feeds, as I'm sure it will, like that probably gets labeled in people's minds as news, right? As opposed to pure entertainment, as entertaining as you are.Nate Erskine-Smith07:05-07:06It's public affairs content.Taylor Owen07:06-07:39Exactly. So that's one thing that's happening. The other is that there's a generation of creators that are stepping into this ecosystem to both fill that void and that can use these tools much more effectively. So in the last election, we found that of all the information consumed about the election, 50% of it was created by creators. 50% of the engagement on the election was from creators. Guess what it was for journalists, for journalism? Like 5%. Well, you're more pessimistic though. I shouldn't have led with the question. 20%.Taylor07:39-07:39Okay.Taylor Owen07:39-07:56So all of journalism combined in the entire country, 20 percent of engagement, influencers, 50 percent in the last election. So like we've shifted, at least on social, the actors and people and institutions that are fostering our public.Nate Erskine-Smith07:56-08:09Is there a middle ground here where you take some people that play an influencer type role but also would consider themselves citizen journalists in a way? How do you – It's a super interesting question, right?Taylor Owen08:09-08:31Like who – when are these people doing journalism? When are they doing acts of journalism? Like someone can be – do journalism and 90% of the time do something else, right? And then like maybe they reveal something or they tell an interesting story that resonates with people or they interview somebody and it's revelatory and it's a journalistic act, right?Taylor08:31-08:34Like this is kind of a journalistic act we're playing here.Taylor Owen08:35-08:49So I don't think – I think these lines are gray. but I mean there's some other underlying things here which like it matters if I think if journalistic institutions go away entirely right like that's probably not a good thing yeah I mean that's whyNate Erskine-Smith08:49-09:30I say it's terrifying is there's a there's a lot of good in the in the digital space that is trying to be there's creative destruction there's a lot of work to provide people a direct sense of news that isn't that filter that people may mistrust in traditional media. Having said that, so many resources and there's so much history to these institutions and there's a real ethics to journalism and journalists take their craft seriously in terms of the pursuit of truth. Absolutely. And losing that access, losing the accessibility to that is devastating for democracy. I think so.Taylor Owen09:30-09:49And I think the bigger frame of that for me is a democracy needs signals of – we need – as citizens in a democracy, we need signals of reliability. Like we need to know broadly, and we're not always going to agree on it, but like what kind of information we can trust and how we evaluate whether we trust it.Nate Erskine-Smith09:49-10:13And that's what – that is really going away. Pause for a sec. So you could imagine signals of reliability is a good phrase. what does it mean for a legislator when it comes to putting a rule in place? Because you could imagine, you could have a Blade Runner kind of rule that says you've got to distinguish between something that is human generatedTaylor10:13-10:14and something that is machine generated.Nate Erskine-Smith10:15-10:26That seems straightforward enough. It's a lot harder if you're trying to distinguish between Taylor, what you're saying is credible, and Nate, what you're saying is not credible,Taylor10:27-10:27which is probably true.Nate Erskine-Smith10:28-10:33But how do you have a signal of reliability in a different kind of content?Taylor Owen10:34-13:12I mean, we're getting into like a journalistic journalism policy here to a certain degree, right? And it's a wicked problem because the primary role of journalism is to hold you personally to account. And you setting rules for what they can and can't do and how they can and can't behave touches on some real like third rails here, right? It's fraught. However, I don't think it should ever be about policy determining what can and can't be said or what is and isn't journalism. The real problem is the distribution mechanism and the incentives within it. So a great example and a horrible example happened last week, right? So Charlie Kirk gets assassinated. I don't know if you opened a feed in the few days after that, but it was a horrendous place, right? Social media was an awful, awful, awful place because what you saw in that feed was the clearest demonstration I've ever seen in a decade of looking at this of how those algorithmic feeds have become radicalized. Like all you saw on every platform was the worst possible representations of every view. Right. Right. It was truly shocking and horrendous. Like people defending the murder and people calling for the murder of leftists and like on both sides. Right. people blaming Israel, people, whatever. Right. And that isn't a function of like- Aaron Charlie Kirk to Jesus. Sure. Like- It was bonkers all the way around. Totally bonkers, right? And that is a function of how those ecosystems are designed and the incentives within them. It's not a function of like there was journalism being produced about that. Like New York Times, citizens were doing good content about what was happening. It was like a moment of uncertainty and journalism was doing or playing a role, but it wasn't And so I think with all of these questions, including the online harms ones, and I think how we step into an AI governance conversation, the focus always has to be on those systems. I'm like, what is who and what and what are the incentives and the technical decisions being made that determine what we experience when we open these products? These are commercial products that we're choosing to consume. And when we open them, a whole host of business and design and technical decisions and human decisions shape the effect it has on us as people, the effect it has on our democracy, the vulnerabilities that exist in our democracy, the way foreign actors or hostile actors can take advantage of them, right? Like all of that stuff we've been talking about, the role reliability of information plays, like these algorithms could be tweaked for reliable versus unreliable content, right? Over time.Taylor13:12-13:15That's not a – instead of reactionary –Taylor Owen13:15-13:42Or like what's most – it gets most engagement or what makes you feel the most angry, which is largely what's driving X, for example, right now, right? You can torque all those things. Now, I don't think we want government telling companies how they have to torque it. But we can slightly tweak the incentives to get better content, more reliable content, less polarizing content, less hateful content, less harmful content, right? Those dials can be incentivized to be turned. And that's where the policy space should play, I think.Nate Erskine-Smith13:43-14:12And your focus on systems and assessing risks with systems. I think that's the right place to play. I mean, we've seen legislative efforts. You've got the three pieces in Canada. You've got online harms. You've got the privacy and very kind of vague initial foray into AI regs, which we can get to. And then a cybersecurity piece. And all of those ultimately died on the order paper. Yeah. We also had the journalistic protection policies, right, that the previous government did.Taylor Owen14:12-14:23I mean – Yeah, yeah, yeah. We can debate their merits. Yeah. But there was considerable effort put into backstopping the institutions of journalism by the – Well, they're twofold, right?Nate Erskine-Smith14:23-14:33There's the tax credit piece, sort of financial support. And then there was the Online News Act. Right. Which was trying to pull some dollars out of the platforms to pay for the news as well. Exactly.Taylor14:33-14:35So the sort of supply and demand side thing, right?Nate Erskine-Smith14:35-14:38There's the digital service tax, which is no longer a thing.Taylor Owen14:40-14:52Although it still is a piece of past legislation. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It still is a thing. Yeah, yeah. Until you guys decide whether to negate the thing you did last year or not, right? Yeah.Nate Erskine-Smith14:52-14:55I don't take full responsibility for that one.Taylor Owen14:55-14:56No, you shouldn't.Nate Erskine-Smith14:58-16:03But other countries have seen more success. Yeah. And so you've got in the UK, in Australia, the EU really has led the way. 2018, the EU passes GDPR, which is a privacy set of rules, which we are still behind seven years later. But you've got in 2022, 2023, you've got Digital Services Act that passes. You've got Digital Markets Act. And as I understand it, and we've had, you know, we've both been involved in international work on this. And we've heard from folks like Francis Hogan and others about the need for risk-based assessments. And you're well down the rabbit hole on this. But isn't it at a high level? You deploy a technology. You've got to identify material risks. You then have to take reasonable measures to mitigate those risks. That's effectively the duty of care built in. And then ideally, you've got the ability for third parties, either civil society or some public office that has the ability to audit whether you have adequately identified and disclosed material risks and whether you have taken reasonable steps to mitigate.Taylor Owen16:04-16:05That's like how I have it in my head.Nate Erskine-Smith16:05-16:06I mean, that's it.Taylor Owen16:08-16:14Write it down. Fill in the legislation. Well, I mean, that process happened. I know. That's right. I know.Nate Erskine-Smith16:14-16:25Exactly. Which people, I want to get to that because C63 gets us a large part of the way there. I think so. And yet has been sort of like cast aside.Taylor Owen16:25-17:39Exactly. Let's touch on that. But I do think what you described as the online harms piece of this governance agenda. When you look at what the EU has done, they have put in place the various building blocks for what a broad digital governance agenda might look like. Because the reality of this space, which we talked about last time, and it's the thing that's infuriating about digital policy, is that you can't do one thing. There's no – digital economy and our digital lives are so vast and the incentives and the effect they have on society is so broad that there's no one solution. So anyone who tells you fix privacy policy and you'll fix all the digital problems we just talked about are full of it. Anyone who says competition policy, like break up the companies, will solve all of these problems. is wrong, right? Anyone who says online harms policy, which we'll talk about, fixes everything is wrong. You have to do all of them. And Europe has, right? They updated their privacy policy. They've been to build a big online harms agenda. They updated their competition regime. And they're also doing some AI policy too, right? So like you need comprehensive approaches, which is not an easy thing to do, right? It means doing three big things all over.Nate Erskine-Smith17:39-17:41Especially minority parlance, short periods of time, legislatively.Taylor Owen17:41-18:20Different countries have taken different pieces of it. Now, on the online harms piece, which is what the previous government took really seriously, and I think it's worth putting a point on that, right, that when we talked last was the beginning of this process. After we spoke, there was a national expert panel. There were 20 consultations. There were four citizens' assemblies. There was a national commission, right? Like a lot of work went into looking at what every other country had done because this is a really wicked, difficult problem and trying to learn from what Europe, Australia and the UK had all done. And we kind of taking the benefit of being late, right? So they were all ahead of us.Taylor18:21-18:25People you work with on that grant committee. We're all quick and do our own consultations.Taylor Owen18:26-19:40Exactly. And like the model that was developed out of that, I think, was the best model of any of those countries. And it's now seen as internationally, interestingly, as the new sort of milestone that everybody else is building on, right? And what it does is it says if you're going to launch a digital product, right, like a consumer-facing product in Canada, you need to assess risk. And you need to assess risk on these broad categories of harms that we have decided as legislators we care about or you've decided as legislators you cared about, right? Child safety, child sexual abuse material, fomenting violence and extremist content, right? Like things that are like broad categories that we've said are we think are harmful to our democracy. All you have to do as a company is a broad assessment of what could go wrong with your product. If you find something could go wrong, so let's say, for example, let's use a tangible example. Let's say you are a social media platform and you are launching a product that's going to be used by kids and it allows adults to contact kids without parental consent or without kids opting into being a friend. What could go wrong with that?Nate Erskine-Smith19:40-19:40Yeah.Taylor19:40-19:43Like what could go wrong? Yeah, a lot could go wrong.Taylor Owen19:43-20:27And maybe strange men will approach teenage girls. Maybe, right? Like if you do a risk assessment, that is something you might find. You would then be obligated to mitigate that risk and show how you've mitigated it, right? Like you put in a policy in place to show how you're mitigating it. And then you have to share data about how these tools are used so that we can monitor, publics and researchers can monitor whether that mitigation strategy worked. That's it. In that case, that feature was launched by Instagram in Canada without any risk assessment, without any safety evaluation. And we know there was like a widespread problem of teenage girls being harassed by strange older men.Taylor20:28-20:29Incredibly creepy.Taylor Owen20:29-20:37A very easy, but not like a super illegal thing, not something that would be caught by the criminal code, but a harm we can all admit is a problem.Taylor20:37-20:41And this kind of mechanism would have just filtered out.Taylor Owen20:41-20:51Default settings, right? And doing thinking a bit before you launch a product in a country about what kind of broad risks might emerge when it's launched and being held accountable to do it for doing that.Nate Erskine-Smith20:52-21:05Yeah, I quite like the we I mean, maybe you've got a better read of this, but in the UK, California has pursued this. I was looking at recently, Elizabeth Denham is now the Jersey Information Commissioner or something like that.Taylor Owen21:05-21:06I know it's just yeah.Nate Erskine-Smith21:07-21:57I don't random. I don't know. But she is a Canadian, for those who don't know Elizabeth Denham. And she was the information commissioner in the UK. And she oversaw the implementation of the first age-appropriate design code. That always struck me as an incredibly useful approach. In that even outside of social media platforms, even outside of AI, take a product like Roblox, where tons of kids use it. And just forcing companies to ensure that the default settings are prioritizing child safety so that you don't put the onus on parents and kids to figure out each of these different games and platforms. In a previous world of consumer protection, offline, it would have been de facto. Of course we've prioritized consumer safety first and foremost. But in the online world, it's like an afterthought.Taylor Owen21:58-24:25Well, when you say consumer safety, it's worth like referring back to what we mean. Like a duty of care can seem like an obscure concept. But your lawyer is a real thing, right? Like you walk into a store. I walk into your office. I have an expectation that the bookshelves aren't going to fall off the wall and kill me, right? And you have to bolt them into the wall because of that, right? Like that is a duty of care that you have for me when I walk into your public space or private space. Like that's all we're talking about here. And the age-appropriate design code, yes, like sort of developed, implemented by a Canadian in the UK. And what it says, it also was embedded in the Online Harms Act, right? If we'd passed that last year, we would be implementing an age-appropriate design code as we speak, right? What that would say is any product that is likely to be used by a kid needs to do a set of additional things, not just these risk assessments, right? But we think like kids don't have the same rights as adults. We have different duties to protect kids as adults, right? So maybe they should do an extra set of things for their digital products. And it includes things like no behavioral targeting, no advertising, no data collection, no sexual adult content, right? Like kind of things that like – Seem obvious. And if you're now a child in the UK and you open – you go on a digital product, you are safer because you have an age-appropriate design code governing your experience online. Canadian kids don't have that because that bill didn't pass, right? So like there's consequences to this stuff. and I get really frustrated now when I see the conversation sort of pivoting to AI for example right like all we're supposed to care about is AI adoption and all the amazing things AI is going to do to transform our world which are probably real right like not discounting its power and just move on from all of these both problems and solutions that have been developed to a set of challenges that both still exist on social platforms like they haven't gone away people are still using these tools and the harms still exist and probably are applicable to this next set of technologies as well. So this moving on from what we've learned and the work that's been done is just to the people working in this space and like the wide stakeholders in this country who care about this stuff and working on it. It just, it feels like you say deja vu at the beginning and it is deja vu, but it's kind of worse, right? Cause it's like deja vu and then ignoring theTaylor24:25-24:29five years of work. Yeah, deja vu if we were doing it again. Right. We're not even, we're not evenTaylor Owen24:29-24:41Well, yeah. I mean, hopefully I actually am not, I'm actually optimistic, I would say that we will, because I actually think of if for a few reasons, like one, citizens want it, right? Like.Nate Erskine-Smith24:41-24:57Yeah, I was surprised on the, so you mentioned there that the rules that we design, the risk assessment framework really applied to social media could equally be applied to deliver AI safety and it could be applied to new technology in a useful way.Taylor Owen24:58-24:58Some elements of it. Exactly.Nate Erskine-Smith24:58-25:25I think AI safety is a broad bucket of things. So let's get to that a little bit because I want to pull the pieces together. So I had a constituent come in the office and he is really like super mad. He's super mad. Why is he mad? Does that happen very often? Do people be mad when they walk into this office? Not as often as you think, to be honest. Not as often as you think. And he's mad because he believes Mark Carney ripped him off.Taylor Owen25:25-25:25Okay.Nate Erskine-Smith25:25-26:36Okay. Yep. He believes Mark Carney ripped him off, not with broken promise in politics, not because he said one thing and is delivering something else, nothing to do with politics. He saw a video online, Mark Carney told him to invest money. He invested money and he's out the 200 bucks or whatever it was. And I was like, how could you possibly have lost money in this way? This is like, this was obviously a scam. Like what, how could you have been deceived? But then I go and I watched the video And it is, okay, I'm not gonna send the 200 bucks and I've grown up with the internet, but I can see how- Absolutely. In the same way, phone scams and Nigerian princes and all of that have their own success rate. I mean, this was a very believable video that was obviously AI generated. So we are going to see rampant fraud. If we aren't already, we are going to see many challenges with respect to AI safety. What over and above the risk assessment piece, what do we do to address these challenges?Taylor Owen26:37-27:04So that is a huge problem, right? Like the AI fraud, AI video fraud is a huge challenge. In the election, when we were monitoring the last election, by far the biggest problem or vulnerability of the election was a AI generated video campaign. that every day would take videos of Polyevs and Carney's speeches from the day before and generate, like morph them into conversations about investment strategies.Taylor27:05-27:07And it was driving people to a crypto scam.Taylor Owen27:08-27:11But it was torquing the political discourse.Taylor27:11-27:11That's what it must have been.Taylor Owen27:12-27:33I mean, there's other cases of this, but that's probably, and it was running rampant on particularly meta platforms. They were flagged. They did nothing about it. There were thousands of these videos circulating throughout the entire election, right? And it's not like the end of the world, right? Like nobody – but it torqued our political debate. It ripped off some people. And these kinds of scams are –Taylor27:33-27:38It's clearly illegal. It's clearly illegal. It probably breaks his election law too, misrepresenting a political figure, right?Taylor Owen27:38-27:54So I think there's probably an Elections Canada response to this that's needed. And it's fraud. And it's fraud, absolutely. So what do you do about that, right? And the head of the Canadian Banking Association said there's like billions of dollars in AI-based fraud in the Canadian economy right now. Right? So it's a big problem.Taylor27:54-27:55Yeah.Taylor Owen27:55-28:46I actually think there's like a very tangible policy solution. You put these consumer-facing AI products into the Online Harms Act framework, right? And then you add fraud and AI scams as a category of harm. And all of a sudden, if you're meta and you are operating in Canada during an election, you'd have to do a risk assessment on like AI fraud potential of your product. Responsibility for your platform. And then it starts to circulate. We would see it. They'd be called out on it. They'd have to take it down. And like that's that, right? Like so that we have mechanisms for dealing with this. But it does mean evolving what we worked on over the past five years, these like only harms risk assessment models and bringing in some of the consumer facing AI, both products and related harms into the framework.Nate Erskine-Smith28:47-30:18To put it a different way, I mean, so this is years ago now that we had this, you know, grand committee in the UK holding Facebook and others accountable. This really was creating the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. And the platforms at the time were really holding firm to this idea of Section 230 and avoiding host liability and saying, oh, we couldn't possibly be responsible for everything on our platform. And there was one problem with that argument, which is they completely acknowledged the need for them to take action when it came to child pornography. And so they said, yeah, well, you know, no liability for us. But of course, there can be liability on this one specific piece of content and we'll take action on this one specific piece of content. And it always struck me from there on out. I mean, there's no real intellectual consistency here. It's more just what should be in that category of things that they should take responsibility for. And obviously harmful content like that should be – that's an obvious first step but obvious for everyone. But there are other categories. Fraud is another one. When they're making so much money, when they are investing so much money in AI, when they're ignoring privacy protections and everything else throughout the years, I mean, we can't leave it up to them. And setting a clear set of rules to say this is what you're responsible for and expanding that responsibility seems to make a good amount of sense.Taylor Owen30:18-30:28It does, although I think those responsibilities need to be different for different kinds of harms. Because there are different speech implications and apocratic implications of sort of absolute solutions to different kinds of content.Taylor30:28-30:30So like child pornography is a great example.Taylor Owen30:30-31:44In the Online Harms Bill Act, for almost every type of content, it was that risk assessment model. But there was a carve out for child sexual abuse material. So including child pornography. And for intimate images and videos shared without consent. It said the platforms actually have a different obligation, and that's to take it down within 24 hours. And the reason you can do it with those two kinds of content is because if we, one, the AI is actually pretty good at spotting it. It might surprise you, but there's a lot of naked images on the internet that we can train AI with. So we're actually pretty good at using AI to pull this stuff down. But the bigger one is that we are, I think, as a society, it's okay to be wrong in the gray area of that speech, right? Like if something is like debatable, whether it's child pornography, I'm actually okay with us suppressing the speech of the person who sits in that gray area. Whereas for something like hate speech, it's a really different story, right? Like we do not want to suppress and over index for that gray area on hate speech because that's going to capture a lot of reasonable debate that we probably want.Nate Erskine-Smith31:44-31:55Yeah, I think soliciting investment via fraud probably falls more in line with the child pornography category where it's, you know, very obviously illegal.Taylor Owen31:55-32:02And that mechanism is like a takedown mechanism, right? Like if we see fraud, if we know it's fraud, then you take it down, right? Some of these other things we have to go with.Nate Erskine-Smith32:02-32:24I mean, my last question really is you pull the threads together. You've got these different pieces that were introduced in the past. And you've got a government that lots of similar folks around the table, but a new government and a new prime minister certainly with a vision for getting the most out of AI when it comes to our economy.Taylor32:24-32:25Absolutely.Nate Erskine-Smith32:25-33:04You have, for the first time in this country, an AI minister, a junior minister to industry, but still a specific title portfolio and with his own deputy minister and really wants to be seized with this. And in a way, I think that from every conversation I've had with him that wants to maximize productivity in this country using AI, but is also cognizant of the risks and wants to address AI safety. So where from here? You know, you've talked in the past about sort of a grander sort of tech accountability and sovereignty act. Do we do piecemeal, you know, a privacy bill here and an AI safety bill and an online harms bill and we have disparate pieces? What's the answer here?Taylor Owen33:05-34:14I mean, I don't have the exact answer. But I think there's some like, there's some lessons from the past that we can, this government could take. And one is piecemeal bills that aren't centrally coordinated or have no sort of connectivity between them end up with piecemeal solutions that are imperfect and like would benefit from some cohesiveness between them, right? So when the previous government released ADA, the AI Act, it was like really intention in some real ways with the online harms approach. So two different departments issuing two similar bills on two separate technologies, not really talking to each other as far as I can tell from the outside, right? So like we need a coordinating, coordinated, comprehensive effort to digital governance. Like that's point one and we've never had it in this country. And when I saw the announcement of an AI minister, my mind went first to that he or that office could be that role. Like you could – because AI is – it's cross-cutting, right? Like every department in our federal government touches AI in one way or another. And the governance of AI and the adoption on the other side of AI by society is going to affect every department and every bill we need.Nate Erskine-Smith34:14-34:35So if Evan pulled in the privacy pieces that would help us catch up to GDPR. Which it sounds like they will, right? Some version of C27 will probably come back. If he pulls in the online harms pieces that aren't related to the criminal code and drops those provisions, says, you know, Sean Frazier, you can deal with this if you like. But these are the pieces I'm holding on to.Taylor Owen34:35-34:37With a frame of consumer safety, right?Nate Erskine-Smith34:37-34:37Exactly.Taylor Owen34:38-34:39If he wants...Nate Erskine-Smith34:39-34:54Which is connected to privacy as well, right? Like these are all... So then you have thematically a bill that makes sense. And then you can pull in as well the AI safety piece. And then it becomes a consumer protection bill when it comes to living our lives online. Yeah.Taylor Owen34:54-36:06And I think there's an argument whether that should be one bill or whether it's multiple ones. I actually don't think it... I think there's cases for both, right? There's concern about big omnibus bills that do too many things and too many committees reviewing them and whatever. that's sort of a machinery of government question right but but the principle that these should be tied together in a narrative that the government is explicit about making and communicating to publics right that if if you we know that 85 percent of canadians want ai to be regulated what do they mean what they mean is at the same time as they're being told by our government by companies that they should be using and embracing this powerful technology in their lives they're also seeing some risks. They're seeing risks to their kids. They're being told their jobs might disappear and might take their... Why should I use this thing? When I'm seeing some harms, I don't see you guys doing anything about these harms. And I'm seeing some potential real downside for me personally and my family. So even in the adoption frame, I think thinking about data privacy, safety, consumer safety, I think to me, that's the real frame here. It's like citizen safety, consumer safety using these products. Yeah, politically, I just, I mean, that is what it is. It makes sense to me.Nate Erskine-Smith36:06-36:25Right, I agree. And really lean into child safety at the same time. Because like I've got a nine-year-old and a five-year-old. They are growing up with the internet. And I do not want to have to police every single platform that they use. I do not want to have to log in and go, these are the default settings on the parental controls.Taylor36:25-36:28I want to turn to government and go, do your damn job.Taylor Owen36:28-36:48Or just like make them slightly safer. I know these are going to be imperfect. I have a 12-year-old. He spends a lot of time on YouTube. I know that's going to always be a place with sort of content that I would prefer he doesn't see. But I would just like some basic safety standards on that thing. So he's not seeing the worst of the worst.Nate Erskine-Smith36:48-36:58And we should expect that. Certainly at YouTube with its promotion engine, the recommendation function is not actively promoting terrible content to your 12 year old.Taylor Owen36:59-37:31Yeah. That's like de minimis. Can we just torque this a little bit, right? So like maybe he's not seeing content about horrible content about Charlie Kirk when he's a 12 year old on YouTube, right? Like, can we just do something? And I think that's a reasonable expectation as a citizen. But it requires governance. That will not – and that's – it's worth putting a real emphasis on that is one thing we've learned in this moment of repeated deja vus going back 20 years really since our experience with social media for sure through to now is that these companies don't self-govern.Taylor37:31-37:31Right.Taylor Owen37:32-37:39Like we just – we know that indisputably. So to think that AI is going to be different is delusional. No, it'll be pseudo-profit, not the public interest.Taylor37:39-37:44Of course. Because that's what we are. These are the largest companies in the world. Yeah, exactly. And AI companies are even bigger than the last generation, right?Taylor Owen37:44-38:00We're creating something new with the scale of these companies. And to think that their commercial incentives and their broader long-term goals of around AI are not going to override these safety concerns is just naive in the nth degree.Nate Erskine-Smith38:00-38:38But I think you make the right point, and it's useful to close on this, that these goals of realizing the productivity possibilities and potentials of AI alongside AI safety, these are not mutually exclusive or oppositional goals. that it's you create a sandbox to play in and companies will be more successful. And if you have certainty in regulations, companies will be more successful. And if people feel safe using these tools and having certainly, you know, if I feel safe with my kids learning these tools growing up in their classrooms and everything else, you're going to adoption rates will soar. Absolutely. And then we'll benefit.Taylor Owen38:38-38:43They work in tandem, right? And I think you can't have one without the other fundamentally.Nate Erskine-Smith38:45-38:49Well, I hope I don't invite you back five years from now when we have the same conversation.Taylor Owen38:49-38:58Well, I hope you invite me back in five years, but I hope it's like thinking back on all the legislative successes of the previous five years. I mean, that'll be the moment.Taylor38:58-38:59Sounds good. Thanks, David. Thanks. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.uncommons.ca

From the BBC World Service: Apple has called for the European Union's antitrust watchdogs to scrap some of its tech regulations, which it says lead to a worse experience for users. It's not the first time Apple has voiced its opposition to Europe's Digital Markets Act. We hear more. Plus, China has — for the first time — set a target for reducing carbon emissions. And, a Dutch village famous for its windmills is planning to charge visitors to see them.

From the BBC World Service: Apple has called for the European Union's antitrust watchdogs to scrap some of its tech regulations, which it says lead to a worse experience for users. It's not the first time Apple has voiced its opposition to Europe's Digital Markets Act. We hear more. Plus, China has — for the first time — set a target for reducing carbon emissions. And, a Dutch village famous for its windmills is planning to charge visitors to see them.

Mara Gergolet analizza le ragioni dell'apertura da parte del cancelliere tedesco Friedrich Merz sull'utilizzo dei beni, congelati dall'inizio della guerra, per sostenere lo sforzo bellico di Kiev. Stefano Montefiori parla della sentenza con cui un tribunale di Parigi ha inflitto 5 anni di carcere all'ex presidente francese per i finanziamenti illeciti ottenuti da Gheddafi. Paolo Ottolina spiega perché il gigante del tech ha chiesto l'abrogazione del Digital Markets Act.I link di corriere.it:Cosa vuol dire la svolta della Germania sui miliardi russi, e perché significa che sull'Ucraina Trump ha lasciato sola l'EuropaSarkozy condannato a 5 anni per i finanziamenti ricevuti da Gheddafi: «Dormirò in prigione, ma sono innocente»Apple attacca frontalmente le regole europee: «Il Dma non funziona e va abrogato». L'Ue: nessuna intenzione di farlo

- DMA-Test: EU-Kommission bleibt hart, Apple geht in die Offensive - Gekappt: Hat der N1-Chip mit Kinderkrankheiten zu kämpfen? - Kratzt Apple nicht: Ungewöhnliche Reaktion auf Scratchgate - Aus, vorbei: Ist die Downgrade-Sperre für iOS noch zeitgemäß? - Stille Installation: Comeback mit neuem Namen? - Nicht so schnell: 5G auf Apple Watch Ultra 3 nur bei Telekom und Sunrise - Umfrage der Woche - Zuschriften unserer Hörer === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis === Sichere dir 4 EXTRA-Monate auf einen 2-Jahresplan über https://nordvpn.com/apfelfunk Teste NordVPN jetzt risikofrei mit der 30 Tage Geld-Zurück-Garantie. === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis Ende === Links zur Sendung: - Mac & i: Apple scheitert mit DMA-Notbremse - https://www.heise.de/news/Apple-scheitert-mit-DMA-Notbremse-iPhone-muss-kompatibler-werden-10666537.html - EU-Kommission: Antwort der EU - https://ec.europa.eu/competition/digital_markets_act/cases/202538/DMA_100203_1809.pdf - Mac & i: Größere Öffnung für Nicht-Apple-Watches in iOS 26.1 geplant - https://www.heise.de/news/Neues-Framework-Leitet-iOS-26-1-Benachrichtigungen-an-Nicht-Apple-Uhren-weiter-10668991.html - Apple Newsroom (Deutschland): Die Auswirkungen des Digital Markets Act auf EU Nutzer - https://www.apple.com/de/newsroom/2025/09/the-digital-markets-acts-impacts-on-eu-users/ - Mac & i: Einzelne Nutzer klagen über Probleme mit N1-Chip - https://www.heise.de/news/Neuer-N1-Chip-Einige-Berichte-ueber-WLAN-Verbindungsunterbrechungen-10667536.html - 9to5Mac: Apple reagiert auf Kratzerdiskussion bei neuen iPhones - https://9to5mac.com/2025/09/24/apple-responds-to-iphone-17-pro-scratch-and-durability-concerns/ - Mac & i: Apple blockiert Downgrades von iOS 26 auf iOS 18 - https://www.heise.de/news/Ausgemustert-Apple-blockiert-Downgrades-von-iOS-26-auf-iOS-18-10667779.html - Mac & i: Stille Installation in künftigen iOS-Versionen? - https://www.heise.de/news/Sicherheitsupdates-Stille-Installation-in-kuenftigen-iOS-Versionen-10667562.html - Mac & i: Kein Satelliten-Messaging bei Apple Watch Ultra 3, 5G nur bei der Telekom - https://www.heise.de/news/Apple-Watch-Ultra-3-Kein-Satelliten-Messaging-5G-nur-bei-der-Telekom-10663425.html Kapitelmarken: (00:00:00) Begrüßung (00:10:42) Werbung (00:13:17) Themen (00:14:22) DMA-Test: EU-Kommission bleibt hart, Apple geht in die Offensive (00:39:00) Gekappt: Hat der N1-Chip mit Kinderkrankheiten zu kämpfen? (00:42:37) Kratzt Apple nicht: Ungewöhnliche Reaktion auf Scratchgate (00:51:37) Aus, vorbei: Ist die Downgrade-Sperre für iOS noch zeitgemäß? (00:58:44) Stille Installation: Comeback mit neuem Namen? (01:03:56) Nicht so schnell: 5G auf Apple Watch Ultra 3 nur bei Telekom und Sunrise (01:07:22) Umfrage der Woche (01:10:10) Zuschriften unserer Hörer

Tom by TomTom, zo heet het nieuwe kastje van het Nederlandse techbedrijf dat navigatie en rijhulp mogerlijk maakt. Wat je ermee kunt, hoor je van Joe van Burik in deze Tech Update. Verder in deze Tech Update: Apple wil dat de EU de mededingingswetgeving Digital Markets Act bij het grof vuil zet Trump tekent vandaag decreet dat overname van TikTok voor de VS mogelijk moet maken See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mehr Halbleiter, mehr Rechenzentren, mehr Leistung, mehr KI, … Eine Handvoll US-Unternehmen, die sogenannten „Magnificent Seven“, beherrscht weite Teile der globalen IT-Infrastruktur. Die Firmen kennen anscheinend nur eine Devise: wachsen. Doch dadurch wachsen auch Energie-, Wasser-, Flächen- und Ressourcenbedarf. Als „Magnificent Seven“ (M7) gelten sieben Tech-Unternehmen aus den USA: Amazon, Alphabet (dazu gehört Google), Apple, Meta (Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp), Microsoft, Nvidia und außerdem das Firmengeflecht von Elon Musk um Tesla und SpaceX. Diese sieben haben zusammen mittlerweile einen Marktwert von rund 18 Billionen Euro, was dem Bruttoinlandsprodukt der gesamten EU entspricht. Fast jedes der Unternehmen hat in seinem Bereich eine marktbeherrschende Stellung erreicht, kann Preise und Bedingungen diktieren. Die c't-Redakteurinnen Andrea Trinkwalder und Greta Friedrich sowie der c't-Redakteur Hartmut Gieselmann haben recherchiert, wie die M7 auf Menschen, Umwelt und Wirtschaft wirken. Im c't uplink sprechen sie darüber, was der KI-Hype in diesem Kontext bedeutet und welche Initiativen es bereits gibt, sich vom Einfluss der großen Tech-Firmen zu lösen. Mehr dazu, wie große Tech-Firmen global wirken und welche Initiativen ihren Einfluss begrenzen wollen, lesen Sie in der c't-Ausgabe 20/2025, auf ct.de sowie in der c't-App für iOS und Android. Die Ausgabe 20/2025 gibt es ab dem 19. September 2025 am Kiosk.

The European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) is changing the app economy—and not for the better. This law aims to promote competition for European companies by restricting large online platforms' dominance, which are mostly American. But how is this working in practice? What are the main DMA-related challenges app developers should be aware of? And does the DMA create more problems than it solves? To answer these questions, Shane interviews Graham Dufault, general counsel of the App Association. In this role, he represents small and medium-sized mobile software developers and connected device companies within the app economy. His practical experience with the DMA's consequences is crucial for unpacking all this and more.

Bentornati alla settima stagione di #RadioNext, dove settimanalmente affrontiamo il tema degli impatti della trasformazione digitale e delle tecnologie abilitanti sui mercati, i modelli di business, le organizzazioni e i processi. E ripartiamo da un tema che impatta processi, contratti e P&L: il Data Act, che entra in vigore oggi, venerdì 12 settembre 2025.Con Giulia Sala, partner e co-responsabile Data Protection & AI di DGRS - Studio Legale Milano, abbiamo messo a fuoco cosa cambia davvero per le imprese con l’entrata in vigore del regolamento: più controllo degli utenti-persone e aziende-sui dati generati dai dispositivi connessi, dall’auto ai macchinari IoT, e obblighi puntuali per produttori e fornitori di servizi ancillari nel rendere disponibili i “dati grezzi”. La conseguenza è industriale prima che giuridica: supply chain di dati da aprire, policy da riscrivere, interfacce di richiesta e consegna da progettare per non trasformare la compliance in attrito operativo. Per i team legali e data/IT la “ABC” operativa parte dalla mappatura: quali dataset condividere e in che formato, quali proteggere per segreto commerciale e IP, come tracciare e validare le richieste (oltre alla titolarità effettiva del prodotto)? In ambito automotive e manutenzione, l’accesso ai dati abilita nuovi modelli di assistenza e concorrenza sull’aftermarket: è l’occasione per ripensare partnership e SLA, non solo i testi contrattuali. Sul cloud il regolamento attacca il lock-in: trasparenza nei contratti, migrazioni facilitate e, dal 2027, niente costi di switching. Tradotto per CIO e CPO: pianificare fin da ora architetture portabili, data export “one-click” e clausole di uscita effettive, perché i vincoli economici diventano sempre meno difendibili alla luce della norma. Resta un rischio di complessità per l’utente finale, tra informative e consensi; ma qui il punto non è (solo) il perimetro privacy. L’obiettivo dichiarato è economico: sviluppare il mercato dei dati, anche a vantaggio delle PMI che finora non potevano accedere a informazioni chiave per casi d’uso come la manutenzione predittiva. La domanda per chi guida il business è diretta: come trasformare l’accesso ai dati d’uso in nuove linee di ricavo o in risparmi misurabili, senza scaricare complessità su clienti e rete? Il Data Act non vive isolato: si innesta accanto a GDPR, Data Governance Act e Digital Markets Act, come ulteriore tassello della strategia europea dei dati. Perché non trattarlo come un progetto prodotto-con owner, backlog e KPI-anziché una semplice “checklist legale”?

Wie sicher sind unsere Daten wirklich – und wer hat am Ende Zugriff darauf?In dieser Folge von MY DATA IS BETTER THAN YOURS spricht Host Jonas Rashedi mit Nina-Sophie Sczepurek, Co-Founder & COO bei leitzcloud by vBoxx, über Datensouveränität, Cybersicherheit und die strategische Bedeutung von Cloud-Architekturen. Nina erklärt, wie US-Gesetze wie der Cloud Act selbst auf Server in Europa wirken, warum Schleswig-Holstein und Dänemark auf europäische Cloud-Lösungen umsteigen wollen und wie neue EU-Gesetze wie der Cyber Resilience Act Unternehmen zu mehr Sicherheit verpflichten.Besonders praxisnah wird es, wenn sie von Projekten berichtet, in denen Unternehmen sensible Daten wie HR- oder Finanzinformationen bewusst in separate, europäische Clouds auslagern – oder gleich ganze private Cloud-Infrastrukturen aufbauen. Das Gespräch zeigt, wie eng technologische Entscheidungen mit geopolitischen Entwicklungen verwoben sind. Es geht um Vertrauen in Technologie, die Rolle von Multi-Cloud-Strategien und darum, warum Sensibilisierung und Transparenz entscheidend sind. MY DATA IS BETTER THAN YOURS ist ein Projekt von BETTER THAN YOURS, der Marke für richtig gute Podcasts. Zum LinkedIn-Profil von Nina: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nina-sophie-sczepurek/?locale=de_DE Zur Webseite von leitzcloud by vBoxx: https://leitzcloud.eu/ Zu allen wichtigen Links rund um Jonas und den Podcast: https://linktr.ee/jonas.rashedi 00:00 Intro und Begrüßung 02:02 Vorstellung Nina 04:32 Was bedeutet Datensouveränität? 06:47 Politische Rahmenbedingungen und Cloud Act 10:12 Risiken außereuropäischer Anbieter 14:18 Europas Potenzial und erste Schritte 15:47 Neue Cybersicherheitsgesetze 18:56 B2B-Sensibilisierung 22:16 Strategisches Datenmanagement 27:21 Multi-Cloud-Strategien 30:37 Vertrauen in Technologie 33:00 Praxisbeispiele aus Projekten 37:25 Blick in die Zukunft 38:19 Persönlicher Umgang mit Daten

A version of this essay has been published by firstpost.com at https://www.firstpost.com/opinion/shadow-warrior-from-crisis-to-advantage-how-india-can-outplay-the-trump-tariff-gambit-13923031.htmlA simple summary of the recent brouhaha about President Trump's imposition of 25% tariffs on India as well as his comment on India's ‘dead economy' is the following from Shakespeare's Macbeth: “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”. Trump further imposed punitive tariffs totalling 50% on August 6th allegedly for India funding Russia's war machine via buying oil.As any negotiator knows, a good opening gambit is intended to set the stage for further parleys, so that you could arrive at a negotiated settlement that is acceptable to both parties. The opening gambit could well be a maximalist statement, or one's ‘dream outcome', the opposite of which is ‘the walkway point' beyond which you are simply not willing to make concessions. The usual outcome is somewhere in between these two positions or postures.Trump is both a tough negotiator, and prone to making broad statements from which he has no problem retreating later. It's down-and-dirty boardroom tactics that he's bringing to international trade. Therefore I think Indians don't need to get rattled. It's not the end of the world, and there will be climbdowns and adjustments. Think hard about the long term.I was on a panel discussion on this topic on TV just hours after Trump made his initial 25% announcement, and I mentioned an interplay between geo-politics and geo-economics. Trump is annoyed that his Ukraine-Russia play is not making much headway, and also that BRICS is making progress towards de-dollarization. India is caught in this crossfire (‘collateral damage') but the geo-economic facts on the ground are not favorable to Trump.I am in general agreement with Trump on his objectives of bringing manufacturing and investment back to the US, but I am not sure that he will succeed, and anyway his strong-arm tactics may backfire. I consider below what India should be prepared to do to turn adversity into opportunity.The anti-Thucydides Trap and the baleful influence of Whitehall on Deep StateWhat is remarkable, though, is that Trump 2.0 seems to be indistinguishable from the Deep State: I wondered last month if the Deep State had ‘turned' Trump. The main reason many people supported Trump in the first place was the damage the Deep State was wreaking on the US under the Obama-Biden regime. But it appears that the resourceful Deep State has now co-opted Trump for its agenda, and I can only speculate how.The net result is that there is the anti-Thucydides Trap: here is the incumbent power, the US, actively supporting the insurgent power, China, instead of suppressing it, as Graham Allison suggested as the historical pattern. It, in all fairness, did not start with Trump, but with Nixon in China in 1971. In 1985, the US trade deficit with China was $6 million. In 1986, $1.78 billion. In 1995, $35 billion.But it ballooned after China entered the WTO in 2001. $202 billion in 2005; $386 billion in 2022.In 2025, after threatening China with 150% tariffs, Trump retreated by postponing them; besides he has caved in to Chinese demands for Nvidia chips and for exemptions from Iran oil sanctions if I am not mistaken.All this can be explained by one word: leverage. China lured the US with the siren-song of the cost-leader ‘China price', tempting CEOs and Wall Street, who sleepwalked into surrender to the heft of the Chinese supply chain.Now China has cornered Trump via its monopoly over various things, the most obvious of which is rare earths. Trump really has no option but to give in to Chinese blackmail. That must make him furious: in addition to his inability to get Putin to listen to him, Xi is also ignoring him. Therefore, he will take out his frustrations on others, such as India, the EU, Japan, etc. Never mind that he's burning bridges with them.There's a Malayalam proverb that's relevant here: “angadiyil thottathinu ammayodu”. Meaning, you were humiliated in the marketplace, so you come home and take it out on your mother. This is quite likely what Trump is doing, because he believes India et al will not retaliate. In fact Japan and the EU did not retaliate, but gave in, also promising to invest large sums in the US. India could consider a different path: not active conflict, but not giving in either, because its equations with the US are different from those of the EU or Japan.Even the normally docile Japanese are beginning to notice.Beyond that, I suggested a couple of years ago that Deep State has a plan to enter into a condominium agreement with China, so that China gets Asia, and the US gets the Americas and the Pacific/Atlantic. This is exactly like the Vatican-brokered medieval division of the world between Spain and Portugal, and it probably will be equally bad for everyone else. And incidentally it makes the Quad infructuous, and deepens distrust of American motives.The Chinese are sure that they have achieved the condominium, or rather forced the Americans into it. Here is a headline from the Financial Express about their reaction to the tariffs: they are delighted that the principal obstacle in their quest for hegemony, a US-India military and economic alliance, is being blown up by Trump, and they lose no opportunity to deride India as not quite up to the mark, whereas they and the US have achieved a G2 detente.Two birds with one stone: gloat about the breakdown in the US-India relationship, and exhibit their racist disdain for India yet again.They laugh, but I bet India can do an end-run around them. As noted above, the G2 is a lot like the division of the world into Spanish and Portuguese spheres of influence in 1494. Well, that didn't end too well for either of them. They had their empires, which they looted for gold and slaves, but it made them fat, dumb and happy. The Dutch, English, and French capitalized on more dynamic economies, flexible colonial systems, and aggressive competition, overtaking the Iberian powers in global influence by the 17th century. This is a salutary historical parallel.I have long suspected that the US Deep State is being led by the nose by the malign Whitehall (the British Deep State): I call it the ‘master-blaster' syndrome. On August 6th, there was indirect confirmation of this in ex-British PM Boris Johnson's tweet about India. Let us remember he single-handedly ruined the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukraine War in 2022. Whitehall's mischief and meddling all over, if you read between the lines.Did I mention the British Special Force's views? Ah, Whitehall is getting a bit sloppy in its propaganda.Wait, so is India important (according to Whitehall) or unimportant (according to Trump)?Since I am very pro-American, I have a word of warning to Trump: you trust perfidious Albion at your peril. Their country is ruined, and they will not rest until they ruin yours too.I also wonder if there are British paw-prints in a recent and sudden spate of racist attacks on Indians in Ireland. A 6-year old girl was assaulted and kicked in the private parts. A nurse was gang-raped by a bunch of teenagers. Ireland has never been so racist against Indians (yes, I do remember the sad case of Savita Halappanavar, but that was religious bigotry more than racism). And I remember sudden spikes in anti-Indian attacks in Australia and Canada, both British vassals.There is no point in Indians whining about how the EU and America itself are buying more oil, palladium, rare earths, uranium etc. from Russia than India is. I am sorry to say this, but Western nations are known for hypocrisy. For example, exactly 80 years ago they dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, but not on Germany or Italy. Why? The answer is uncomfortable. Lovely post-facto rationalization, isn't it?Remember the late lamented British East India Company that raped and pillaged India?Applying the three winning strategies to geo-economicsAs a professor of business strategy and innovation, I emphasize to my students that there are three broad ways of gaining an advantage over others: 1. Be the cost leader, 2. Be the most customer-intimate player, 3. Innovate. The US as a nation is patently not playing the cost leader; it does have some customer intimacy, but it is shrinking; its strength is in innovation.If you look at comparative advantage, the US at one time had strengths in all three of the above. Because it had the scale of a large market (and its most obvious competitors in Europe were decimated by world wars) America did enjoy an ability to be cost-competitive, especially as the dollar is the global default reserve currency. It demonstrated this by pushing through the Plaza Accords, forcing the Japanese yen to appreciate, destroying their cost advantage.In terms of customer intimacy, the US is losing its edge. Take cars for example: Americans practically invented them, and dominated the business, but they are in headlong retreat now because they simply don't make cars that people want outside the US: Japanese, Koreans, Germans and now Chinese do. Why were Ford and GM forced to leave the India market? Their “world cars” are no good in value-conscious India and other emerging markets.Innovation, yes, has been an American strength. Iconic Americans like Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and Steve Jobs led the way in product and process innovation. US universities have produced idea after idea, and startups have ignited Silicon Valley. In fact Big Tech and aerospace/armaments are the biggest areas where the US leads these days.The armaments and aerospace tradeThat is pertinent because of two reasons: one is Trump's peevishness at India's purchase of weapons from Russia (even though that has come down from 70+% of imports to 36% according to SIPRI); two is the fact that there are significant services and intangible imports by India from the US, of for instance Big Tech services, even some routed through third countries like Ireland.Armaments and aerospace purchases from the US by India have gone up a lot: for example the Apache helicopters that arrived recently, the GE 404 engines ordered for India's indigenous fighter aircraft, Predator drones and P8-i Poseidon maritime surveillance aircraft. I suspect Trump is intent on pushing India to buy F-35s, the $110-million dollar 5th generation fighters.Unfortunately, the F-35 has a spotty track record. There were two crashes recently, one in Albuquerque in May, and the other on July 31 in Fresno, and that's $220 million dollars gone. Besides, the spectacle of a hapless British-owned F-35B sitting, forlorn, in the rain, in Trivandrum airport for weeks, lent itself to trolls, who made it the butt of jokes. I suspect India has firmly rebuffed Trump on this front, which has led to his focus on Russian arms.There might be other pushbacks too. Personally, I think India does need more P-8i submarine hunter-killer aircraft to patrol the Bay of Bengal, but India is exerting its buyer power. There are rumors of pauses in orders for Javelin and Stryker missiles as well.On the civilian aerospace front, I am astonished that all the media stories about Air India 171 and the suspicion that Boeing and/or General Electric are at fault have disappeared without a trace. Why? There had been the big narrative push to blame the poor pilots, and now that there is more than reasonable doubt that these US MNCs are to blame, there is a media blackout?Allegations about poor manufacturing practices by Boeing in North Charleston, South Carolina by whistleblowers have been damaging for the company's brand: this is where the 787 Dreamliners are put together. It would not be surprising if there is a slew of cancellations of orders for Boeing aircraft, with customers moving to Airbus. Let us note Air India and Indigo have placed some very large, multi-billion dollar orders with Boeing that may be in jeopardy.India as a consuming economy, and the services trade is hugely in the US' favorMany observers have pointed out the obvious fact that India is not an export-oriented economy, unlike, say, Japan or China. It is more of a consuming economy with a large, growing and increasingly less frugal population, and therefore it is a target for exporters rather than a competitor for exporting countries. As such, the impact of these US tariffs on India will be somewhat muted, and there are alternative destinations for India's exports, if need be.While Trump has focused on merchandise trade and India's modest surplus there, it is likely that there is a massive services trade, which is in the US' favor. All those Big Tech firms, such as Microsoft, Meta, Google and so on run a surplus in the US' favor, which may not be immediately evident because they route their sales through third countries, e.g. Ireland.These are the figures from the US Trade Representative, and quite frankly I don't believe them: there are a lot of invisible services being sold to India, and the value of Indian data is ignored.In addition to the financial implications, there are national security concerns. Take the case of Microsoft's cloud offering, Azure, which arbitrarily turned off services to Indian oil retailer Nayara on the flimsy grounds that the latter had substantial investment from Russia's Rosneft. This is an example of jurisdictional over-reach by US companies, which has dire consequences. India has been lax about controlling Big Tech, and this has to change.India is Meta's largest customer base. Whatsapp is used for practically everything. Which means that Meta has access to enormous amounts of Indian customer data, for which India is not even enforcing local storage. This is true of all other Big Tech (see OpenAI's Sam Altman below): they are playing fast and loose with Indian data, which is not in India's interest at all.Data is the new oil, says The Economist magazine. So how much should Meta, OpenAI et al be paying for Indian data? Meta is worth trillions of dollars, OpenAI half a trillion. How much of that can be attributed to Indian data?There is at least one example of how India too can play the digital game: UPI. Despite ham-handed efforts to now handicap UPI with a fee (thank you, brilliant government bureaucrats, yes, go ahead and kill the goose that lays the golden eggs), it has become a contender in a field that has long been dominated by the American duopoly of Visa and Mastercard. In other words, India can scale up and compete.It is unfortunate that India has not built up its own Big Tech behind a firewall as has been done behind the Great Firewall of China. But it is not too late. Is it possible for India-based cloud service providers to replace US Big Tech like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure? Yes, there is at least one player in that market: Zoho.Second, what are the tariffs on Big Tech exports to India these days? What if India were to decide to impose a 50% tax on revenue generated in India through advertisement or through sales of services, mirroring the US's punitive taxes on Indian goods exports? Let me hasten to add that I am not suggesting this, it is merely a hypothetical argument.There could also be non-tariff barriers as China has implemented, but not India: data locality laws, forced use of local partners, data privacy laws like the EU's GDPR, anti-monopoly laws like the EU's Digital Markets Act, strict application of IPR laws like 3(k) that absolutely prohibits the patenting of software, and so on. India too can play legalistic games. This is a reason US agri-products do not pass muster: genetically modified seeds, and milk from cows fed with cattle feed from blood, offal and ground-up body parts.Similarly, in the ‘information' industry, India is likely to become the largest English-reading country in the world. I keep getting come-hither emails from the New York Times offering me $1 a month deals on their product: they want Indian customers. There are all these American media companies present in India, untrammelled by content controls or taxes. What if India were to give a choice to Bloomberg, Reuters, NYTimes, WaPo, NPR et al: 50% tax, or exit?This attack on peddlers of fake information and manufacturing consent I do suggest, and I have been suggesting for years. It would make no difference whatsoever to India if these media outlets were ejected, and they surely could cover India (well, basically what they do is to demean India) just as well from abroad. Out with them: good riddance to bad rubbish.What India needs to doI believe India needs to play the long game. It has to use its shatrubodha to realize that the US is not its enemy: in Chanakyan terms, the US is the Far Emperor. The enemy is China, or more precisely the Chinese Empire. Han China is just a rump on their south-eastern coast, but it is their conquered (and restive) colonies such as Tibet, Xinjiang, Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, that give them their current heft.But the historical trends are against China. It has in the past had stable governments for long periods, based on strong (and brutal) imperial power. Then comes the inevitable collapse, when the center falls apart, and there is absolute chaos. It is quite possible, given various trends, including demographic changes, that this may happen to China by 2050.On the other hand, (mostly thanks, I acknowledge, to China's manufacturing growth), the center of gravity of the world economy has been steadily shifting towards Asia. The momentum might swing towards India if China stumbles, but in any case the era of Atlantic dominance is probably gone for good. That was, of course, only a historical anomaly. Asia has always dominated: see Angus Maddison's magisterial history of the world economy, referred to below as well.I am reminded of the old story of the king berating his court poet for calling him “the new moon” and the emperor “the full moon”. The poet escaped being punished by pointing out that the new moon is waxing and the full moon is waning.This is the long game India has to keep in mind. Things are coming together for India to a great extent: in particular the demographic dividend, improved infrastructure, fiscal prudence, and the increasing centrality of the Indian Ocean as the locus of trade and commerce.India can attempt to gain competitive advantage in all three ways outlined above:* Cost-leadership. With a large market (assuming companies are willing to invest at scale), a low-cost labor force, and with a proven track-record of frugal innovation, India could well aim to be a cost-leader in selected areas of manufacturing. But this requires government intervention in loosening monetary policy and in reducing barriers to ease of doing business* Customer-intimacy. What works in highly value-conscious India could well work in other developing countries. For instance, the economic environment in ASEAN is largely similar to India's, and so Indian products should appeal to their residents; similarly with East Africa. Thus the Indian Ocean Rim with its huge (and in Africa's case, rapidly growing) population should be a natural fit for Indian products* Innovation. This is the hardest part, and it requires a new mindset in education and industry, to take risks and work at the bleeding edge of technology. In general, Indians have been content to replicate others' innovations at lower cost or do jugaad (which cannot scale up). To do real, disruptive innovation, first of all the services mindset should transition to a product mindset (sorry, Raghuram Rajan). Second, the quality of human capital must be improved. Third, there should be patient risk capital. Fourth, there should be entrepreneurs willing to try risky things. All of these are difficult, but doable.And what is the end point of this game? Leverage. The ability to compel others to buy from you.China has demonstrated this through its skill at being a cost-leader in industry after industry, often hollowing out entire nations through means both fair and foul. These means include far-sighted industrial policy including the acquisition of skills, technology, and raw materials, as well as hidden subsidies that support massive scaling, which ends up driving competing firms elsewhere out of business. India can learn a few lessons from them. One possible lesson is building capabilities, as David Teece of UC Berkeley suggested in 1997, that can span multiple products, sectors and even industries: the classic example is that of Nikon, whose optics strength helps it span industries such as photography, printing, and photolithography for chip manufacturing. Here is an interesting snapshot of China's capabilities today.2025 is, in a sense, a point of inflection for India just as the crisis in 1991 was. India had been content to plod along at the Nehruvian Rate of Growth of 2-3%, believing this was all it could achieve, as a ‘wounded civilization'. From that to a 6-7% growth rate is a leap, but it is not enough, nor is it testing the boundaries of what India can accomplish.1991 was the crisis that turned into an opportunity by accident. 2025 is a crisis that can be carefully and thoughtfully turned into an opportunity.The Idi Amin syndrome and the 1000 Talents program with AIThere is a key area where an American error may well be a windfall for India. This is based on the currently fashionable H1-B bashing which is really a race-bashing of Indians, and which has been taken up with gusto by certain MAGA folks. Once again, I suspect the baleful influence of Whitehall behind it, but whatever the reason, it looks like Indians are going to have a hard time settling down in the US.There are over a million Indians on H1-Bs, a large number of them software engineers, let us assume for convenience there are 250,000 of them. Given country caps of exactly 9800 a year, they have no realistic chance of getting a Green Card in the near future, and given the increasingly fraught nature of life there for brown people, they may leave the US, and possibly return to India..I call this the Idi Amin syndrome. In 1972, the dictator of Uganda went on a rampage against Indian-origin people in his country, and forcibly expelled 80,000 of them, because they were dominating the economy. There were unintended consequences: those who were ejected mostly went to the US and UK, and they have in many cases done well. But Uganda's economy virtually collapsed.That's a salutary experience. I am by no means saying that the US economy would collapse, but am pointing to the resilience of the Indians who were expelled. If, similarly, Trump forces a large number of Indians to return to India, that might well be a case of short-term pain and long-term gain: urvashi-shapam upakaram, as in the Malayalam phrase.Their return would be akin to what happened in China and Taiwan with their successful effort to attract their diaspora back. The Chinese program was called 1000 Talents, and they scoured the globe for academics and researchers of Chinese origin, and brought them back with attractive incentives and large budgets. They had a major role in energizing the Chinese economy.Similarly, Taiwan with Hsinchu University attracted high-quality talent, among which was the founder of TSMC, the globally dominant chip giant.And here is Trump offering to India on a platter at least 100,000 software engineers, especially at a time when generativeAI is decimating low-end jobs everywhere. They can work on some very compelling projects that could revolutionize Indian education, up-skilling and so on, and I am not at liberty to discuss them. Suffice to say that these could turbo-charge the Indian software industry and get it away from mundane, routine body-shopping type jobs.ConclusionThe Trump tariff tantrum is definitely a short-term problem for India, but it can be turned around, and turned into an opportunity, if only the country plays its cards right and focuses on building long-term comparative advantages and accepting the gift of a mis-step by Trump in geo-economics.In geo-politics, India and the US need each other to contain China, and so that part, being so obvious, will be taken care of more or less by default.Thus, overall, the old SWOT analysis: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. On balance, I am of the opinion that the threats contain in them the germs of opportunities. It is up to Indians to figure out how to take advantage of them. This is your game to win or lose, India!4150 words, 9 Aug 2025 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit rajeevsrinivasan.substack.com/subscribe

Next in Media spoke with Marketecture CEO Ari Paparo, author of the new book "Yield: How Google Bought, Built, and Bullied Its Way to Advertising Dominance" about how Google was able to build a monopoly on programmatic ads, despite so many people in the ad industry shouting about it for years - and whether we can stop the next one.

On this week's episode of Top in Tech, Adriana Capparelli, Practice Director, is joined by Emilie Kerstens, Senior Associate, and Anna Lisa Schäfer-Gehrau, Associate, to unpack the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and its growing significance for EU-US relations in the tech and trade space. They explore how the DMA is shaping Europe's digital regulatory landscape and creating new tensions with US policymakers, who view the framework as disproportionately targeting American firms. The discussion covers early enforcement lessons, the changing tone of transatlantic trade negotiations, and what the DMA reveals about the EU's broader regulatory direction. They also reflect on the practical challenges of compliance, the role of emerging case law, and the implications for future digital legislation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Anna Bicker, heise-online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota und Malte Kirchner sprechen in dieser Ausgabe der #heiseshow unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Auf Verhandlungsbasis: Setzt die EU ihre Digitalgesetze für die USA aus? Die EU erwägt möglicherweise, ihre strengen Digitalgesetze wie den Digital Markets Act (DMA) für US-Unternehmen zu lockern oder auszusetzen. Kritiker befürchten einen "Kuhhandel" mit den USA, der die europäische Digitalstrategie untergraben könnte. Welche Auswirkungen hätte eine solche Aussetzung auf den europäischen Digitalmarkt? Kann die EU ihre digitale Souveränität wahren, wenn sie bei amerikanischen Tech-Giganten Kompromisse eingeht? Und was bedeutet das für den Wettbewerb zwischen europäischen und US-amerikanischen Digitalunternehmen? - Gegen lange Leitungen: Große Leitsystem-IT-Umstellung bei der Bahn – Die Deutsche Bahn modernisiert ihr veraltetes Leitsystem. Das neue System soll die Koordination der Züge effizienter machen und Verspätungen reduzieren. Wie realistisch sind die Verbesserungsversprechen der Bahn angesichts der bisherigen IT-Probleme? Welche konkreten Vorteile können Bahnkunden von der Umstellung erwarten? Und warum hat die Modernisierung des Leitsystems so lange gedauert? - Bitte nicht schwarz sehen: Windows bald ohne Bluescreen – Microsoft plant, den berüchtigten blauen Bildschirm des Todes (Blue Screen of Death) durch eine schwarze Variante zu ersetzen. Die Änderung soll noch im Sommer eingeführt werden und markiert das Ende einer jahrzehntelangen Windows-Tradition. Warum ändert Microsoft nach so langer Zeit das Design der Fehlerseite? Wird die schwarze Variante benutzerfreundlicher oder ist es nur eine optische Anpassung? Und welche anderen Neuerungen plant Microsoft für das Windows-Design? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, das WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen.

In today's episode of FLYTECH Daily, Nick and Michelle break down five stories that are shaking up Big Tech, mobile innovation, and even politics. It's a mix of layoffs, lawsuits, and LED-backed phones — all under 10 minutes.   Here's what we've got lined up:

Apple gaat verschillende pakketten aanbieden voor appmakers in de App Store voor de EU. Met die wijziging zegt Apple te voldoen aan de DMA-wetgeving van de Europese Commissie. Gisteren verliep de uiterlijke deadline voor Apple om de wijzigingen door te voeren, anders zou er een extra boete komen op de half miljard die in april werd uitgedeeld aan het bedrijf. Apple biedt appmakers een 'basispakket' met 5% commissie op in-app-aankopen, maar daarbij leveren ontwikkelaars in op een aantal tools die kunnen helpen bij het promoten van de app. Zo lever je in op automatische app-updates voor je app. Bij het pakket met alle functies betaal je als ontwikkelaar 13% commssie. Ook zal Apple een aanvullende 5% commissie vragen over aankopen die buiten de App Store om gedaan worden. Apple heeft aangegeven het nog altijd oneens te zijn met de strenge regels en de eerdere boete. Het bedrijf zal dus nog altijd in hoger beroep gaan, maar past nu wel de regels aan om hogere boetes te voorkomen. De Europese Commissie gaat nog beoordelen over de nieuwe pakketten wel voldoen aan de Digital Markets Act. Verder in deze Tech Update: Uber gaat oud-topman Travis Kalanick helpen met aankoop Pony.ai voor zelfrijdende autotechnologie Blue Screen Of Death wordt Black Screen Of Death See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump ist zum Nato-Gipfel planmäßig an- und abgereist. Das gilt bereits als Sieg der europäischen Diplomatie. Höchste Zeit, dem US-Präsidenten zwei unangenehme Wahrheiten hinterherzurufen.

No episódio, Ana Frazão conversa com Silvia Fagá, Professora de Economia da FGV , Sócia da ECOA, Vice-Presidente do IBRAC – Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos da Concorrência, Consumo e Comércio Internacional e Presidente do WIA – Women in Antitrust, sobre o Direito Antitruste brasileiro diante dos desafios trazidos pelos mercados digitais, explorando os seus pontos fortes e fracos, bem como os principais desafios da atualidade. A professora Silvia trata das peculiaridades da economia digital que impactam na dinâmica concorrencial, do papel dos dados pessoais e da inteligência artificial na conformação dos mercados. Dentre os tópicos da conversa, estão a atuação do CADE nos mercados digitais e a necessidade ou não de uma regulação ex ante para as plataformas digitais, a exemplo do Digital Markets Act europeu. Na parte final, a professora Silvia ainda aborda a questão de gênero na economia, expondo sua opinião a respeito dos principais gargalos para a ascensão feminina na carreira.

Trump droht mit 50 Prozent Zöllen – die EU will den US-Tech-Konzernen entgegenkommen. Außerdem: Diese Dividenden-ETFs bieten die höchste Rendite.

Google Hotels is facing increasing pressure from competitors like Expedia, Tripadvisor, and Trivago, partly due to changes from the EU's Digital Markets Act and the rise of Google's AI Overviews impacting search visibility. Hotel developers are embracing dual-brand properties to cut costs and boost profitability by sharing infrastructure and appealing to broader market segments, with major chains like Marriott and Hilton leading the trend. Meanwhile, JetBlue is cutting costs amid soft travel demand, with potential route reductions and hiring slowdowns as it struggles to break even this year. Expedia Makes Gains as Google Hotels Is Increasingly 'Bruised' Two Brands, One Roof: Why Dual-Brand Hotels Are on the Rise JetBlue CEO Says Airline Unlikely to Break Even, Cost Cuts to Come Connect with Skift LinkedIn: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/company/skift/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ WhatsApp: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAL375LikgIXmNPYQ0L/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://facebook.com/skiftnews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/skiftnews/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Threads: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.threads.net/@skiftnews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Bluesky: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bsky.app/profile/skiftnews.bsky.social⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/skift⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Subscribe to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@SkiftNews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and never miss an update from the travel industry.

ChatGpT, Meta oder TikTok – sie alle verstoßen oft gegen EU-Digitalrechte. Dabei sollten der Digital Services Act, die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung und der Digital Markets Act genau das verhindern. Doch Verstöße zu ahnden, ist meist langwierig und kompliziert. Richter, Marcus; Hoheisel, Klara; Terschüren, Hagen; Lochau, Lea www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Breitband

La Comisión Europea y la jueza del caso Epic vs. Apple han dicho basta. Apple no puede dar más patadas a la la lata. Han determinado que los cambios de Apple para permitir tiendas de terceros en la App Store no son suficientes, calificando su tarifa como abusiva. La estrategia de "cumplimiento malicioso" de Apple para ganar tiempo se ha acabado.Nos hacemos viejos al celebrar el décimo aniversario del Apple Watch, que pasó de ser un dispositivo de comunicación a enfocarse en salud y fitness, consolidándose como un producto clave en la era Tim Cook. Evaluamos las series de Apple TV+, destacando títulos como Silo, Severance y Slow Horses, que mantienen un alto nivel crítico a pesar de un ligero bajón en 2023. Comentamos los rumores sobre una posible colaboración con Intel para fabricar procesadores, lo que reduciría la dependencia de TSMC y mitigaría riesgos geopolíticos. Además, destacamos los desafíos de Apple para trasladar parte de su producción a India, donde China está poniendo trabas para evitar la migración. Aunque la producción en India es más costosa, la diversificación es clave ante la incertidumbre regulatoria y los aranceles en EE.UU. Apple aims to source all US iPhones from India in pivot away from China Apple's India Manufacturing Push Faces Spoilers, Including China — The Information Calificaciones Apple TV - Google Sheets Apple (AAPL) Failed to Open App Store to Competition, Judge Rules - Bloomberg (12) Tim Sweeney on X: "NO FEES on web transactions. Game over for the Apple Tax. Apple's 15-30% junk fees are now just as dead here in the United States of America as they are in Europe under the Digital Markets Act. Unlawful here, unlawful there. 4 years 4 months 17 days. https://t.co/3kSYnt5pcI" / X La Comisión Europea impone una multa millonaria a Apple y Meta eeuu jueza apple - Kagi Search Varapalo para Apple en el caso contra Epic Games: Una jueza de EEUU la declara en desacato por no frenar sus prácticas anticompetitivas Juez determina que Apple violó fallo antimonopolio sobre App Store; acciones caen Por Investing.com Majin Bu on X: "iPhone 17 Air https://t.co/SxMfuL9WWj" / X 10 años apple watch - Kagi Search You can get a free Apple Watch pin today at the Apple Store - 9to5Mac El Apple Watch cumple diez años esta semana. Y Apple quiere celebrarlo contigo de la mejor forma Intel Foundry Direct Connect – April 29, 2025 – Register now Intel Foundry Roadmap Update - New 18A-PT variant that enables 3D die stacking, 14A process node enablement | Tom's Hardware

La Unión Europea ha dado un golpe sobre la mesa multando a dos gigantes del sector: Apple y Meta. ¿La razón? no están cumpliendo con la nueva Ley de Mercados Digitales, conocida como la DMA por sus siglas en inglés (Digital Markets Act), una normativa que busca frenar los abusos de poder de las grandes plataformas digitales. Bianca Vaquero, experta en el tema, comenta sobre este y otros asuntos.

In this extra episode of The Sound of Economics, Bruegel's Bertin Martens and Fiona M. Scott Morton explain the EU's first fines under the Digital Markets Act, in conversation with Rebecca Christie. Apple and Meta were hit with the penalties on 23 April 2025 in what will be a test case for the European Commission's new mandate to rein in digital gatekeepers. This podcast walks through why the fines were assessed, whether they will be big enough to change the companies' behaviour, and how the EU must manage its regulatory agenda in the middle of a trade war. This podcast was recorded on 25 April 2025. Relevant research: Scott Morton, F. (2024) ‘It's time for the European Union to rethink personal social networking', Policy Brief 34/2024, Bruegel Bertin Martens, ‘EU targeting of digital services in tariff retaliation would present challenges', Bruegel First Glance, 11 April 2025 Scott Morton, F. (2024) ‘Entry and competition in mobile app stores', Working Paper 03/2024, Bruegel ‘The state of play on global tax', The Sound of Economics, Bruegel podcast with Rebecca Christie, Benjamin Angel and Pascal Saint-Amans, 6 December 2023 * Music is excerpted from Lake Danse by Roy Hargrove, courtesy of Red Brick Songs and Universal Music

Benjamin and Chance reflect on the history of the Apple Watch on its ten year anniversary. Also, the EU slaps Apple with its first ever fines under the DMA. Rockwell is said to already be making waves with big Siri leadership changes, and Chance appreciates the flexibility of modern Photographic Styles. And in Happy Hour Plus, Benjamin dives into the bizarre UI world of the five-levels-deep iCloud+ settings screen. Subscribe at 9to5mac.com/join. Sponsored by Insta360: Get a free 45-inch invisble selfie stick with your Insta360 X5 purchase at store.insta360.com with promo code happyhour. Available for the first 30 purchases only, so act quick. Sponsored by Shopify: Grow your business no matter what stage you're in. Sign up for a $1 per month trial at shopify.com/happyhour. Sponsored by Storyworth: Give all the “moms” in your life a unique, heartfelt gift that you'll all cherish for years. Save $10 on your first purchase at storyworth.com/9TO5MAC. Hosts Chance Miller @chancemiller.me on Bluesky @chancehmiller@mastodon.social @ChanceHMiller on Instagram @ChanceHMiller on Threads Benjamin Mayo @bzamayo on Twitter @bzamayo@mastodon.social @bzamayo on Threads Subscribe, Rate, and Review Apple Podcasts Overcast Spotify 9to5Mac Happy Hour Plus Subscribe to 9to5Mac Happy Hour Plus! Support Benjamin and Chance directly with Happy Hour Plus! 9to5Mac Happy Hour Plus includes:  Ad-free versions of every episode  Pre- and post-show content Bonus episodes Join for $5 per month or $50 a year at 9to5mac.com/join.  Feedback Submit #Ask9to5Mac questions on Twitter, Mastodon, or Threads Email us feedback and questions to happyhour@9to5mac.com Links Siri's new boss is already making big internal changes, per report Opinion: Apple Watch Series 2 may right enough wrongs to keep it on my wrist Comment: Going from a skeptic to an every day user with Apple Watch Series 2 Rumor: iPhone 17 Pro could launch in Sky Blue Apple fined 500 million euros by EU under the Digital Markets Act, forced to make changes to App Store policies Commission closes investigation into Apple's user choice obligations and issues preliminary findings on rules for alternative apps under the Digital Markets Act

Perplexity voice assistant can now interact with your iPhone, and it's better than Siri, iPhone 17 Air models reveal an ultra-slim design, Google loses two trials and what it means for Chrome, Search and OpenAI, plus Apple Watch celebrates 10 years since launch.Take the Primary Tech member benefit poll here!Bonus Episode: iPad Needs a Better Keyboard - Listen hereSponsored by:Insta360 X5: Get the new Insta360 X5 camera with user replaceable lens, longer battery life, and 8K video! Use promo code **PRIMARY** at checkout: https://store.insta360.com/product/x5Notion AI: Organize your work and life using Notion AI. Try Notion for free when you go to: notion.com/primarytechnologyGet Show Notes via EmailSign up to get exactly one email per week from the Primary Tech guys with the full episode show notes for your perusal. Click here to subscribe.Watch on YouTube!Subscribe and watch our weekly episodes plus bonus clips at: https://youtu.be/5wOS-rMmS7UJoin the CommunityDiscuss new episodes, start your own conversation, and join the Primary Tech community here: social.primarytech.fmSupport the showGet ad-free versions of the show plus exclusive bonus episodes every week! Subscribe directly in Apple Podcasts or here if you want chapters: primarytech.memberful.com/joinReach out:Stephen's YouTube Channel@stephenrobles on ThreadsStephen on BlueskyStephen on Mastodon@stephenrobles on XJason's Inc.com Articles@jasonaten on Threads@JasonAten on XJason on BlueskyJason on MastodonWe would also appreciate a 5-star rating and review in Apple Podcasts and SpotifyPodcast artwork with help from Basic Apple Guy.Those interested in sponsoring the show can reach out to us at: podcast@primarytech.fmLinks from the showNintendo Switch 2 preorders: everything you need to know to nab one | The VergeOpenPin HubPerplexity Voice AIPerplexity Plagiarized Our Story About How Perplexity Is a Bullshit Machine | WIREDApple's New Siri Chief Mike Rockwell Overhauls Management to Start Turnaround - BloombergApple Intelligence | Clean Up Photos: Flex | iPhone 16 - YouTubeLow Glare | Mac does that | Apple - YouTubeiPhone 17 Air's Extreme Thinness Demoed in New Video - MacRumorsApple Sports scores another win with new Game Card Sharing featureAds are rolling out more broadly on Threads today, and our goal is still for them to enhance your overall experience. We're closely monitoring and will continue listening to your feedback as we scale.Instagram Launches 'Edits' App to Replace CapCut - MacRumorsGoogle's antitrust trial begins with a fight over Chrome, money, and AI | The VergeSam Altman Just Trolled Everyone, and It's The Smartest Idea I've Seen YetApple fined 500 million euros by EU under the Digital Markets Act, forced to make changes to App Store policies - 9to5MacDid Tim Cook finagle a special tariff deal? Senator Warren wants to know | The VergeBluesky launches blue check verification | TechCrunchReview: Apple Watch is beautiful, but rough around the edges | AppleInsiderApple Watch Series 7 review: Bigger than you think | AppleInsider (00:00) - Intro (02:54) - Switch 2 Pre-Order Chaos (11:25) - Membership Poll! (13:49) - Humane Ai Pin LIVES (15:55) - Perplexity Just Beat Siri (21:07) - Plagiarism and Perplexity (26:21) - Shifts in Apple's Siri Team (31:00) - Weird Apple Intelligence Ads (34:10) - Sponsor: Insta360 (36:40) - Sponsor: Notion (38:30) - iPhone 17 Air (44:18) - Apple Sports App (49:35) - Threads Got Ads (50:42) - Instagram Edits App (53:16) - Google Lost in Court, Now What? (01:01:21) - EU Fines Apple $500M (01:04:30) - Tim Cook Jukes Tariffs (01:05:53) - Bluesky Blue Checks (01:12:24) - Watch Turns 10 ★ Support this podcast ★

Plus, Europe drops its first fines against Apple and Meta for violating the Digital Markets Act.Starring Tom Merritt, Jenn Cutter, and Dr Niki.Links to stories can be found here.

S&P Futures are displaying a strong move higher this morning. President Trump indicated that he has no plans to remove Fed Chair Jerome Powell from his position. He also indicated that his 145% tariffs on China will come down substantially. There are reports that Trump will meet with Chinese President XI in early May. Comments from Treasury Secretary Bessent were also bullish as he indicated his belief that a trade deal with China can be reached. Trade deals with India and Japan are said to be close. However, these agreements are expected to be broad in scope and light on details. President Trump is expected to sign Executive Orders today on reducing the cost of prescription drugs and also on government efficiency and regulatory reform. This morning the flash PMI data is set to be released before the markets open and the Fed's Beigh Book in the afternoon. TSLA is trading higher this morning after negative earnings release, profits fell by 71%. Musk indicated that he will be cutting back his work at the White House to spend more time on TSLA. EU regulators have fined AAPL & Meta for violations of its Digital Markets Act. After the bell today, IBM, NOW, TSN, CMG & DFS are scheduled to report.

Sales of Apple devices spike heavily as tariffs and potential price hikes drive customers to a shopping frenzy for Apple goods. Apple, alongside Google, is given permission to keep TikTok in its App Store until the US deal is finalized. Could the iPhone's auto-suggested contact be to blame for the Signal scandal? And even though Severance is a big hit, it isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a boost in subscribers. Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs. How Apple 'flew' 5 flights full of iPhones from India and China in 3 days to beat Trump tariffs. Apple customers dash to stores to buy iPhones ahead of tariffs. Tarriff-related iPhone price increases estimated to be lower than feared. From Kuo: Apple can reduce impact of Trump's massive tariffs in five ways. Secret court rules against Yvette Cooper over Apple encryption. White House reportedly blames auto-suggested iPhone contact for Signal scandal. EU to issue Apple's Digital Markets Act antitrust ruling within weeks. Visa offers Apple roughly $100 million to take over credit card from Mastercard. Apple launches new Mac and Vision Pro app for managing Immersive content. Apple's canceled Federation Square store lives on in Apple Vision Pro. New "Immersive VIP Yankee Stadium" immersive video. Apple TV+ brings Lumon Industries to life. Even Severance isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a big boost in subscribers. Z-Wave, popular among smart home enthusiasts, becomes an open-source protocol with a new long-range technology as it seeks Matter support to avoid obsolescence. CalDigit's new Thunderbolt 5 docks bring plenty of ports. Picks of the Week: Leo's Pick: icloudpd 1.27.2 Jason's Picks: Insta360 2-in-1 Invisible Selfie Stick + Tripod & Neewer Mini Desk tripod. Andy's Pick: Kindle Comic Converter Mikah's Pick: puffies. Hosts: Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Guest: Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: 1password.com/macbreak spaceship.com/twit

Sales of Apple devices spike heavily as tariffs and potential price hikes drive customers to a shopping frenzy for Apple goods. Apple, alongside Google, is given permission to keep TikTok in its App Store until the US deal is finalized. Could the iPhone's auto-suggested contact be to blame for the Signal scandal? And even though Severance is a big hit, it isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a boost in subscribers. Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs. How Apple 'flew' 5 flights full of iPhones from India and China in 3 days to beat Trump tariffs. Apple customers dash to stores to buy iPhones ahead of tariffs. Tarriff-related iPhone price increases estimated to be lower than feared. From Kuo: Apple can reduce impact of Trump's massive tariffs in five ways. Secret court rules against Yvette Cooper over Apple encryption. White House reportedly blames auto-suggested iPhone contact for Signal scandal. EU to issue Apple's Digital Markets Act antitrust ruling within weeks. Visa offers Apple roughly $100 million to take over credit card from Mastercard. Apple launches new Mac and Vision Pro app for managing Immersive content. Apple's canceled Federation Square store lives on in Apple Vision Pro. New "Immersive VIP Yankee Stadium" immersive video. Apple TV+ brings Lumon Industries to life. Even Severance isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a big boost in subscribers. Z-Wave, popular among smart home enthusiasts, becomes an open-source protocol with a new long-range technology as it seeks Matter support to avoid obsolescence. CalDigit's new Thunderbolt 5 docks bring plenty of ports. Picks of the Week: Leo's Pick: icloudpd 1.27.2 Jason's Picks: Insta360 2-in-1 Invisible Selfie Stick + Tripod & Neewer Mini Desk tripod. Andy's Pick: Kindle Comic Converter Mikah's Pick: puffies. Hosts: Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Guest: Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: 1password.com/macbreak spaceship.com/twit

Sales of Apple devices spike heavily as tariffs and potential price hikes drive customers to a shopping frenzy for Apple goods. Apple, alongside Google, is given permission to keep TikTok in its App Store until the US deal is finalized. Could the iPhone's auto-suggested contact be to blame for the Signal scandal? And even though Severance is a big hit, it isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a boost in subscribers. Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs. How Apple 'flew' 5 flights full of iPhones from India and China in 3 days to beat Trump tariffs. Apple customers dash to stores to buy iPhones ahead of tariffs. Tarriff-related iPhone price increases estimated to be lower than feared. From Kuo: Apple can reduce impact of Trump's massive tariffs in five ways. Secret court rules against Yvette Cooper over Apple encryption. White House reportedly blames auto-suggested iPhone contact for Signal scandal. EU to issue Apple's Digital Markets Act antitrust ruling within weeks. Visa offers Apple roughly $100 million to take over credit card from Mastercard. Apple launches new Mac and Vision Pro app for managing Immersive content. Apple's canceled Federation Square store lives on in Apple Vision Pro. New "Immersive VIP Yankee Stadium" immersive video. Apple TV+ brings Lumon Industries to life. Even Severance isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a big boost in subscribers. Z-Wave, popular among smart home enthusiasts, becomes an open-source protocol with a new long-range technology as it seeks Matter support to avoid obsolescence. CalDigit's new Thunderbolt 5 docks bring plenty of ports. Picks of the Week: Leo's Pick: icloudpd 1.27.2 Jason's Picks: Insta360 2-in-1 Invisible Selfie Stick + Tripod & Neewer Mini Desk tripod. Andy's Pick: Kindle Comic Converter Mikah's Pick: puffies. Hosts: Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Guest: Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: 1password.com/macbreak spaceship.com/twit

Sales of Apple devices spike heavily as tariffs and potential price hikes drive customers to a shopping frenzy for Apple goods. Apple, alongside Google, is given permission to keep TikTok in its App Store until the US deal is finalized. Could the iPhone's auto-suggested contact be to blame for the Signal scandal? And even though Severance is a big hit, it isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a boost in subscribers. Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs. How Apple 'flew' 5 flights full of iPhones from India and China in 3 days to beat Trump tariffs. Apple customers dash to stores to buy iPhones ahead of tariffs. Tarriff-related iPhone price increases estimated to be lower than feared. From Kuo: Apple can reduce impact of Trump's massive tariffs in five ways. Secret court rules against Yvette Cooper over Apple encryption. White House reportedly blames auto-suggested iPhone contact for Signal scandal. EU to issue Apple's Digital Markets Act antitrust ruling within weeks. Visa offers Apple roughly $100 million to take over credit card from Mastercard. Apple launches new Mac and Vision Pro app for managing Immersive content. Apple's canceled Federation Square store lives on in Apple Vision Pro. New "Immersive VIP Yankee Stadium" immersive video. Apple TV+ brings Lumon Industries to life. Even Severance isn't enough to give Apple TV+ a big boost in subscribers. Z-Wave, popular among smart home enthusiasts, becomes an open-source protocol with a new long-range technology as it seeks Matter support to avoid obsolescence. CalDigit's new Thunderbolt 5 docks bring plenty of ports. Picks of the Week: Leo's Pick: icloudpd 1.27.2 Jason's Picks: Insta360 2-in-1 Invisible Selfie Stick + Tripod & Neewer Mini Desk tripod. Andy's Pick: Kindle Comic Converter Mikah's Pick: puffies. Hosts: Leo Laporte, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Guest: Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to MacBreak Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free shows, a members-only Discord, and behind-the-scenes access. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: 1password.com/macbreak spaceship.com/twit