POPULARITY
Wie kann ich mir sicher sein? Wem soll ich glauben, wenn verschiedene Positionen vertreten werden? Wie kann ich Ideen und Quellen kritisch prüfen, um sicherer zu werden? Und wie gehe ich mit den trotzdem verbleibenden Unsicherheiten am besten um? Gemeinsam mit Ronja gehen wir diesen Fragen nach. weitergedacht Unsere Tipps für alle, die sich weiter mit dem Thema beschäftigen möchten: Zu Wahrheit und anderen Grundbegriffen empfehlen wir “Die Wahrheit über Wahrheit” mit Philipp Hübl (Video-Aufzeichnung der Veranstaltung #whatthefact), “Gibt es die eine Wahrheit?” mit Lorraine Daston und Ilija Trojanow (Video, Sternstunde Philosophie) sowie “Was ist Wahrheit?” (Podcast, Philosophie to go). Um das Thema Fehlbarkeit geht es auch in “Warum wir uns nie sicher sein können” mit Geert Keil (Podcast, Sein und Streit) und in “Kritisches Denken” mit Jonas Pfister (Kritisches Denken-Podcast). Zu Diskussionskultur und intellektuellen Tugenden empfehlen wir “Meinung ist kein Virus” mit Romy Jaster (Artikel, ALBERT. Das Journal der Einstein Stiftung Berlin), “Mit Bescheidenheit zu guten Entscheiden” mit Jonas Wittwer (Reatch Podcast) sowie zwei Videos der Sendung “Sternstunde Philosophie”: ”Wir müssen reden” mit Laura de Weck und Romy Jaster sowie “Wissen und Macht” mit Miranda Fricker, u.a. zu epistemischer Gerechtigkeit. Zu all diesen Themen gibt es auch einige tolle TED-Talks (englische Videos mit deutschen Untertiteln): “How to see past your own perspective and find truth” von Michael Lynch, “What to trust in a "post-truth" world” von Alex Edmans und “How to disagree productively and find common ground” von Julia Dhar. Auf PhilPublica gibt es noch viele weitere Quellen zu allen genannten Themen, zum Beispiel zu Kritischem Denken und zu Fehlbarkeit sowie hier und hier zu intellektuellen Tugenden, zu epistemischer Gerechtigkeit, intellektueller Redlichkeit und Rechthaberei. Gut zugängliche Einführungsbücher für alle, die ein wenig mehr lesen möchten, sind “Kritisches Denken” und “Werkzeuge des Philosophierens” von Jonas Pfister (Reclam 2020 und 2013) sowie “Die Wahrheit schafft sich ab. Wie Fake News Politik machen” von Romy Jaster und David Lanius (Reclam 2019).
This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/julia_dhar_how_to_disagree_productively_and_find_common_ground ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/176-academic-words-reference-from-julia-dhar-how-to-disagree-productively-and-find-common-ground-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/gWhTGUKPfFA (All Words) https://youtu.be/gF2m9cS_9LM (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/38IfFa7h1xA (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)
In this episode, we have the pleasure of hosting Julia Dhar. As a Partner at the Boston Consulting Group, Julia leads BeSmart, the firm's Behavioral Economics and Insights initiative. With her background as a behavioral economist, she advocates for the use of behavioral insights to enhance product and service design across public and private organizations. Julia's extensive experience includes advising and implementing behavior change initiatives across a range of sectors including finance, education, social welfare, and more. During our conversation we explored: - How individuals and organizations can positively influence their own lives and work through the thoughtful application of behavioral science - The business of being busy: discussing the ways in which people disproportionately hide their busyness and the need to identify non-promotable tasks - The challenges of change aversion and the need to ensure that people feel equipped to cope with change and keep up with a constantly evolving world - Human-centric and science-informed approach to change management We conclude by discussing Dhar's hopeful vision for a world in which organizations prioritize the humans that will be changing, rather than the systems and processes that need to change, and the importance of strong connections between academic and business communities To learn more about Dhar and her work, visit Home - BCG Henderson Institute. Join the conversation and share your thoughts about this podcast on Twitter @BVANudgeConsult. Don't have social media? Our inbox is always open at contact@bvanudgeconsulting.com. BCG Henderson Institute.com
This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/julia_dhar_how_to_have_constructive_conversations ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/114-academic-words-reference-from-julia-dhar-how-to-have-constructive-conversations--ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/cN2XD2se66Q (All Words) https://youtu.be/lQ9E8GYEQZE (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/umtUPIsnywE (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)
The tried and true rules of the formal debate model can be useful to learn the skills needed to disagree productively, find common ground, and influence decisions, whether you're presenting an analysis to colleagues in your firm's security selection process or fielding portfolio performance questions from clients. Mike Wallberg, CFA, speaks with Julia Dhar, Managing Director and Partner, Boston Consulting Group, about debate model techniques and other behavioral insights to help investors sharpen investment ideas and improve client relationships. Thank you for listening, if you enjoyed this episode please tell a friend and be sure to leave a review. To find the full line-up of CFA Institute podcasts, visit https://cfainst.is/podcasts.
We are coming to the end of another eventful year, another 12 month bundle of opportunities, challenges, plenty of highlights and some definite unforeseen low lights. Hopefully you are about to embark on a well-deserved break. This is exactly what the inside influence team and myself will be doing. So over the next few weeks we are going to be taking a festive step back to rest up, recalibrate and re-inspire ourselves for 2022. However, if you need some inspiration to get you thinking and planning for next year, we have you covered. Our holiday season of power cuts or power minis are back. Our final power cut episode is with Julia Dhar.Julia Dhar is a Managing Director and Partner at the Boston Consulting Group and the founder of BeSmart, BCG's behavioral economics and behavioral insights initiative. Julia's mission is to enable leaders in government and the private sector to apply the science of behavior change across a range of social services and topics, including economic development, finance, education, criminal justice and welfare. Her two TED talks on how to have constructive conversations have had at last count over 10 million views. She was also world school debate champion three times.So it's safe to say she knows a fair amount about crafting a successful argument.However, what drew me to Julia wasn't her ability to persuade – although as you'll hear she is very persuasive - but instead the vision she's dedicated the rest of her life and career to driving – how as Nations, teams and families - we can start to disagree more productively.In this conversation we dive into:The importance of respectful listening and how to construct the rules of respectful listening.Why every conversation should start with ‘shared reality' – an idea or intention you can all agree upon.And finally… THE most beautiful and game changing question I have heard in a very long time - “What can you share that will help me see what you see?”If you enjoy this powercut episode and would like to hear my full conversation with Julia Dhar please head over to my website juliemasters.com or listen at all the usual places #itunes #spotify #googleplay #stitcher. For now sit back, relax and enjoy my powercut conversation with Julia Dhar. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Some people tend to over-apologize. They even apologize for things that are not their fault. I start this episode by explaining why we do it and why we need to stop. And when you do have to apologize, I will tell you how. (Source: Harriet Lerner author of the book Why Won't You Apologize (https://amzn.to/37NoYug) Getting enough sleep is far more important than many people realize. It affects your health, mood, performance and longevity. Here to reveal just how important it is and how to make sure you are getting enough sleep is Dr. Jennifer Ashton, chief medical correspondent for ABC-TV and author of the book, The Self-Care Solution (https://amzn.to/2tlwDkw). Arguments and disagreements can be interesting, even fiery but often they are just an exercise in futility. That may be because we are approaching the process of arguing all wrong. Julia Dhar is a partner at Boston Consulting Group and author of the book The Decision Maker's Playbook (https://amzn.to/36MlZkq). Listen as she offers some fascinating research on disagreements and some excellent strategies to use when you get into an argument so that the conversation is actually productive – or at the very least not destructive. Wash, condition, rinse. That's the order of how you probably wash your hair. So what if you changed up the order a bit? Listen as I explain why that may be a good thing for your hair. https://www.healthline.com/health/beauty-skin-care/shampoo-or-conditioner-first PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS! To match with a licensed therapist today, go to https://TalkSpace.com and use the promo code SYSK to get $100 off of your first month and show your support for the show! TurboTax experts can relieve you from the stress of taxes and file for you so you can do… not taxes! Come to TurboTax and don't do your taxes. Visit https://TurboTax.com to learn more. Intuit TurboTax. Did you know you could reduce the number of unwanted calls & emails with Online Privacy Protection from Discover? - And it's FREE! Just activate it in the Discover App. See terms & learn more at https://Discover.com/Online Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
How good are you at changing your mind? It's not a question we tend to ask ourselves often. I once interviewed a political strategist from Washington, who mentioned that practically no resources are spent trying to ‘convert' voters from one political party to the next. That there was simply no point. In fact, according to research, when our viewpoints are challenged we usually dig deeper into our position than before. So that raises the next question - If most of us are terrible at changing our minds, wouldn't a better focus be to learn how to disagree more productively? Today's GuestJulia Dhar is a Managing Director and Partner at the Boston Consulting Group and the founder of BeSmart, BCG's behavioral economics, and behavioral insights initiative. Julia's mission is to enable leaders in government and the private sector to apply the science of behavior change across a range of social services and topics. Twitter: https://twitter.com/julia_dharLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/juliafetherston/ You'll LearnWhy how we've been taught to talk about our differences is broken.The importance of separating ideas from identityAnd finally… the most beautiful question I have heard in a long time - “What can you share that will help me see what you see?” In Julia's words: “We need people with the technical skills of debate and persuasion. Not because we get to be right, but because we get to change people's minds AND change our own.” As part of this conversation, you'll hear her ask me what I've changed my mind about recently. Honestly, I haven't been able to get that question out of my mind since. It's easy to believe that we need to take a stance on our viewpoints every chance we get. That we need to be ready to defend our beliefs at a moment's notice, or lest we let the other side win. I think I'm changing my mind about that. Which as someone who's not backwards about coming forwards with my viewpoints, marks a substantial change in my approach.We know factually that confrontation rarely works. But more than that. What if it also robs us of the ability to discover the ‘shared realities' where we can meet. And maybe in doing that, we might change our own minds. Myself and the team will be taking a break over summer - or in my case the balmy Australian winter. So for the next six weeks we've hand picked three of MY all time favorite golden oldie episodes to keep the momentum moving. We're also still planning to launch my new virtual program The Influencer Code in the second half of this year, so if you're not already head to my website and hop on the waitlist to find out more.References and links mentionedThe Influencer Code Masterclass WaitlistJulia Dhar: How to have constructive conversationsJulia Dhar: How to disagree productively and find common ground See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Have you ever found yourself caught in conflict and can't find a resolution? This episode gives you insight into what percentage of our arguments have actual solutions. You learn about the three types of problems and I provide a new way to approach conflict to turn it into conversation. https://www.instagram.com/nicolehagman_writes/ Episode Quotes and Resources: “The way you reach people is by finding common ground, separating ideas from identity and being genuinely open to persuasion. Debate is organized conversations about the way the world is, and could be.” Julia Dhar https://ideas.ted.com/6-strategies-to-help-you-turn-heated-dinner-arguments-into-real-conversations/ https://www.shanesnow.com/take-the-intellectual-humility-assessment www.Humilityandconviction.uconn.edu https://snow.academy/intellectual-humility-assessment https://www.gottman.com/blog/managing-conflict-solvable-vs-perpetual-problems/
How can organizations become more experimental? Julia Dhar, the cofounder and leader of BeSmart, BCG's behavioral economics and insights initiative, says identify a big problem, start small, and do not overly worry that academics may criticize your experiment. As a bonus, Dhar provides her three favorite nudges for everyday living. This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacy
Often it feels like the only thing we can agree on is that we can't agree on anything. World debate champion Julia Dhar offers three techniques to reshape the way we talk to each other so we can take our disagreements somewhere fruitful — over family dinners, during work meetings, and in our national conversations. Plus host Modupe Akinola explains why better arguments might start not with arguments at all, but with better questions. We hope you enjoy this episode from the TED Business archive, and find it helpful in any difficult conversations you have to navigate over the holiday season.
Whether you have an opinion about the pandemic. Or whether the latest TikTok recipe is a fad or a triumph. How can you disagree productively — and even find common ground? We’re going to use some tips from debate champion and viral Ted Talk giver, Julia Dhar. Links ‘How to disagree productively and find common ground’ - TED Talk by Julia Dhar - https://bit.ly/juliadhar-howtodisagree-tedXtalk. The Space Instagram @thespace_podcast and https://bit.ly/thespace_instagram. Review The Space on Apple Podcasts and https://bit.ly/review-the-space. Credits Host: Casey Donovan @caseydonovan88 Content: Amy Molloy @amy_molloy.Executive Producer: Elise CooperEditor: Adrian WaltonSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
«Debemos aprender a entablar una conversación sin buscar una victoria, sino un progreso», dice Julia Dhar, campeona mundial de debate. En esta charla práctica, Julia nos comparte tres características fundamentales de los desacuerdos productivos, basados en la curiosidad y el propósito. ¿Cuál es el resultado final? Conversaciones constructivas que mejoran tus argumentos y fortalecen tus relaciones.
« Nous devons savoir comment entrer dans des conversations sans attendre la victoire, mais le progrès », selon la championne du monde de débat Julia Dhar. Dans ce discours pratique, elle partage trois caractéristiques essentielles de désaccords productifs, basées sur la curiosité et l'objectif. Le résultat final ? Des conversations constructives qui renforcent votre argument et vos relations.
"We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress," says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity and purpose. The end result? Constructive conversations that sharpen your argument -- not your relationships.
"We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress," says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity and purpose. The end result? Constructive conversations that sharpen your argument and strengthen your relationships.
"We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress," says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity and purpose. The end result? Constructive conversations that sharpen your argument -- not your relationships.
"We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress," says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity and purpose. The end result? Constructive conversations that sharpen your argument -- not your relationships.
A president's first 100 days carry immense pressure to succeed. Memorable wins can build momentum, but mishaps will be magnified by public scrutiny. In the third episode of American Metamorphosis, journalist and author Helene Cooper describes how Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf used the period immediately after her inauguration to set the country on a path to full international debt forgiveness after more than a decade of civil war. Julia Dhar, co-founder and leader of BeSmart, Boston Consulting Group's behavioral economics and insights initiative, explains how leaders make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Danny Werfel, Managing Director & Partner at Boston Consulting Group, describes how President Obama implemented the Recovery Act almost immediately after he was sworn into office.
Often it feels like the only thing we can agree on is that we can't agree on anything. World debate champion Julia Dhar offers three techniques to reshape the way we talk to each other so we can take our disagreements somewhere fruitful — over family dinners, during work meetings, and in our national conversations. Plus host Modupe Akinola explains why better arguments might start not with arguments at all, but with better questions.
Этот выпуск в YouTube: https://youtu.be/CT3eqLU8Lyo Дима и Вячеслав обсуждают TED talk Джулии Дхар и размышляют о том, действительно ли поломаны публичные дискуссии и что можно сделать, чтобы их починить. * Реклама интересного подхода к найм была про Heineken, а не про Carlsberg * Бизнес-игры – плохие курсы актерского мастерства? * Цветовой тест Люшера (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A6%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82_%D0%9B%D1%8E%D1%88%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0) * Апелляция к базовым ценностям и внешний взгляд на дебаты * How to disagree productively and find common ground (https://www.ted.com/talks/julia_dhar_how_to_disagree_productively_and_find_common_ground) – Julia Dhar at TED * Public discourse поломан? – Что значит поломан? "Публичная дискуссия – театр, который преследует свои, другие цели" * Подкаст Intelligence Squared (https://www.intelligencesquared.com/podcasts/) * Убеждение – это цель или инструмент? * Public is watching you * Points (https://points.work/) – площадка для глубоких обсуждений * Всегда ли дебаты про "за и против"? Нет, бывают вопросы "как?" * Дебаты и ложная дихотомия "Если у нас низкий уровень, это не мешает этот уровень потихоньку поднимать" * Поиск общей цели, общих ценностей – инструмент продуктивных дискуссий * Деперсонализация идей и предложений – тоже полезный инструмент * Не ко всему стоит приплетать дебаты * Strong Opinions, Weakly Held (https://blog.codinghorror.com/strong-opinions-weakly-held/) * Люди часто переоценивают свою открытость к переубеждению
Julia is Partner at Boston Consulting Group and cofounder and leader of BeSmart, BCG's behavioral economics and insights initiative. In this role, she brings her passion and experience designing complex system transformation through nuanced behavioral change to clients in the public and private sectors. Julia has advised and implemented transformational strategy initiatives across a range of social impact and public sector organizations, including economic development and planning, finance, labor, education, and social welfare. She works with private sector clients to integrate choice architecture and customer insights to improve the productivity, performance, and customer experience of organizations in sectors including airlines and travel and tourism, energy, IT, and telecommunications. Before joining the firm, Julia worked as private secretary to the deputy prime minister and minister of finance in New Zealand. She also led a major study to increase private capital for public services as a member of the UK cabinet office's social investment and finance team.
Some days, it feels like the only thing we can agree on is that we can't agree -- on anything. Drawing on her background as a world debate champion, Julia Dhar offers three techniques to reshape the way we talk to each other so we can start disagreeing productively and finding common ground -- over family dinners, during work meetings and in our national conversations. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Some days, it feels like the only thing we can agree on is that we can't agree -- on anything. Drawing on her background as a world debate champion, Julia Dhar offers three techniques to reshape the way we talk to each other so we can start disagreeing productively and finding common ground -- over family dinners, during work meetings and in our national conversations.
A lot of us tend to over-apologize. This episode begins with an explanation of why we do it and why we should stop doing it. Then when you do have to apologize, I’ll tell you how. (Source: Harriet Lerner author of the book “Why Won’t You Apologize” (https://amzn.to/37NoYug))Sleep is important. It’s probably more important than most people realize in terms of health, performance and longevity. Joining me to explain just how important it is and how to make sure you are getting enough sleep is Dr. Jennifer Ashton, chief medical correspondent for ABC-TV and author of the book, The Self-Care Solution (https://amzn.to/2tlwDkw).Wash, condition, rinse. That’s how you wash your hair. But you might want to change up the order. I’ll explain how and the reasons why. http://www.rd.com/health/beauty/condition-before-shampoo/Arguments and disagreements can be interesting but often not very productive. The reason may be that we are going at it all wrong. Julia Dhar is a partner at Boston Consulting Group and author of the book The Decision Maker’s Playbook (https://amzn.to/36MlZkq). She joins me to discuss some fascinating research on disagreements and she offers some excellent strategies to use when you disagree so that the conversation is actually productive – or at least not destructive.
Some days, it feels like the only thing we can agree on is that we can't agree -- on anything. Drawing on her background as a world debate champion, Julia Dhar offers three techniques to reshape the way we talk to each other so we can start disagreeing productively and finding common ground -- over family dinners, during work meetings and in our national conversations.
Algunos días, parece como si lo único en lo que estamos de acuerdo es en que no estamos de acuerdo en nada. Basándose en su experiencia como campeona mundial de debate, Julia Dhar nos ofrece tres técnicas para reformar la manera en que nos hablamos para que podamos empezar a estar en desacuerdo de forma productiva y encontrar terreno común en reuniones familiares, reuniones de trabajo y conversaciones nacionales.
Às vezes, parece que a única coisa que podemos concordar é que não concordamos em nada. Explorando seu histórico como campeã mundial de debate, Julia Dhar propõe três técnicas para transformar a maneira como falamos uns com os outros e começar a discordar de maneira produtiva, encontrando o que temos em comum, seja em jantares de família, reuniões de trabalho ou discussões nacionais.
An manchen Tagen scheint es, als könnten wir uns nur darauf einigen, dass wir uns nicht einig werden können. Anhand ihrer Erfahrungen als Weltmeisterin im Debattieren bringt Julia Dhar ihrem Publikum drei Techniken näher, wie sich die Art, miteinander zu sprechen, so verändern lässt, dass wir uns produktiv widersprechen und Gemeinsamkeiten finden können – beim Familienessen, bei dienstlichen Besprechungen und in der öffentlichen Diskussion.
가끔 동의할 수 있는 유일한 것이 어떤 것에도 동의할 수 없다는 것인 것처럼 느껴집니다. 세계 토론 대회 우승자인 자신의 배경을 이용하여, 줄리아 다는 가족 저녁 식사, 직장 회의, 그리고 전국 단위 논의에서 생산적으로 이견을 내고 공통 기반을 찾기 시작할 수 있도록 상호 간 이야기하는 방법을 고쳐주는 세 가지 기법을 제공합니다.
Certains jours, il semble que la seule chose sur laquelle nous puissions nous accorder est que nous ne sommes d'accord sur rien. En s'appuyant sur son expérience en tant que championne mondiale du débat, Julia Dhar offre trois techniques pour redéfinir la façon dont nous parlons à l'autre afin que nous puissions commencer à être en désaccord de façon constructive et trouver un terrain d'entente lors des dîners de famille, les réunions de travail et dans nos conversations nationales.