Podcasts about deliberations

Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code MARKDAVIS at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/markdavisSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

MLB Pipeline has just refreshed its Top 100 Prospects list, and Jim Callis, Sam Dykstra, Jonathan Mayo and Jason Ratliff kick off the latest Pipeline Podcast by hashing out all the changes. Brewers shortstop Jesús Made succeeds Konnor Griffin as the No. 1 prospect, holding off Athletics shortstop Leo De Vries, and the guys also discuss players making huge jumps (such as Padres catcher Ethan Salas) and joining the list for the first time (including Orioles outfielder/first baseman Ike Irish). There's the usual Draft Talk as well, including Golden Spikes finalists who are intriguing prospects and the weekly Roch Watch. The podcast concludes with the usual question from the listener mailbag, this time about Reds infielder Edwin Arroyo. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hello to you listening in Savannah, Georgia! Coming to you from Whidbey Island, Washington this is Stories From Women Who Walk with 60 Seconds for Motivate Your Monday and your host, Diane Wyzga. What is apparition? In the Harry Potter universe of witches and wizards apparition is the ability to teleport, magically transport from one place to another. One minute you are here and the next you are there! Like mmmagic. Harry Potter & the Half Blood Prince by J.K. Rowling  No one in the real world has this talent; but we can learn from the wizarding world how apparition might motivate our Monday in 3 easy steps, in sequence:   1. Destination: See clearly where you want to go and fix your mind firmly on that place. 2. Determination: Focus your mind on where you are yearning to go. 3. Deliberation: Feeling your way into nothingness, turn and move with Deliberation. And there you are! Arrived! Have a most magical motivated Monday!  You're always welcome: "Come for the stories - Stay for the magic!" Speaking of magic, I hope you'll subscribe, share a 5-star rating and nice review on your social media or podcast channel of choice, bring your friends and rellies, and join us! You will have wonderful company as we continue to walk our lives together. AND!  Stop by my Quarter Moon Story Arts website during reconstruction, email me to arrange a no-obligation Discovery Call, and stay current with me as Quarter Moon Story Arts on Substack. Stories From Women Who Walk Production Team Podcaster: Diane F Wyzga & Quarter Moon Story Arts Music: Mer's Waltz from Crossing the Waters by Steve Schuch & Night Heron Music ALL content and image © 2019 to Present Quarter Moon Story Arts. All rights reserved.  If you found this podcast episode helpful, please consider sharing and attributing it to Diane Wyzga of Stories From Women Who Walk podcast with a link back to the original source.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports Harvey Weinstein experiences chest pains in court.

Deliberation On Tennessee GerrymanderingProtecting Tennessee Elections From Illegal Alien VotesProactive Protections Against AI InsurgencyGood News… Finally, For Tennessee HomeschoolersThe Tennessee Conservative's Brandon Lewis joins Yaffee LIVE to discuss all this & more!Check out more from Yaffee Here -  https://www.wgow.com/2025/05/12/yaffee-live-2/

Austin Petersen and Jeremy Kauffman host an event in Manchester, New Hampshire to discuss the ideals that are driving conversations around the world.

Church Life, “A Christian on Trial” Acts 24The Prosecution (vv. 1-9) The Defense (vv. 10-21) The Deliberation (vv. 22-27) Jo. 16:8-11 8 And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment: 9 concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; 10 concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no longer; 11 concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.Acts 17:29-31 29 Being then God's offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man. 30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.”

Deliberation often means diminishing returns. This edition of Doing What Works challenges you to be honest about your nature, assess the stakes of a decision, and get on with life.Here are your show notes…When the odds of a win are effectively zero.The almonds we love.What do you make all day? Decisions!“What if you told yourself that no matter what happened after you chose A or B, you wouldn't be mad at yourself?”We romanticize the road less traveled.

16. Professor Richard Epstein: Professor Richard Epstein discusses the 25th Amendment's fourth section regarding presidential disability and succession. He outlines the complex cabinet deliberation process required to elevate a vice president and the potential political instability surrounding its use in a divided nation. (16)1960?

Taking up the challenge of crafting a top-notch screenplay treatment about the life of Napoleon Bonaparte, Alex Stevenson is joined by James Topham (who knows a thing or two about screenwriting) and Ben Deery (who knows a thing or two about acting) to put the movie world to rights. Having analysed the pitfalls and frustrations of Ridley Scott's Napoleon 2023 in the first season the Napoleon Movie Quarter-Hourly, this time round the team have to come up with the magic themselves.They do not succeed in this opening episode. But the creative process is a messy one, it turns out, and our trio very much hope listeners will struggle through these opening lurches towards excellence in order to access the cinematic gold which, ultimately, lies at the culmination of this project.As our resident AI bot N-AI-poleon Bot-aparte puts it:The team discusses what makes compelling screenwriting, focusing on the importance of theme, character, and narrative structure, and explores strategies for portraying Napoleon on screen Deliberation over Napoleon's core traits, debating insecurity, power, and the idea of him as an "addicted gambler" constantly pushing his luck, shapes the central approach to the scriptThe hosts entertain genre-bending ideas—from a heist film to comedic undertones—while considering historical accuracy, key relationships (like with Josephine), and the inclusion of iconic antagonists such as Talleyrand Plans are set to collaboratively develop the screenplay “Napoleon: One Last Job” live on the podcast, tackling 15 pages at a time, blending their theatrical, historical, and screenwriting perspectivesListeners are advised not to get too excited about the whole heist thing. That might not last too long.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Awards Ceremony MUST be watched first, all deliberations are optional. The deliberations are there for if you desire the excruciating details. Unlike many other, actual awards shows that are taken seriously by the industry, we're not content to merely rip open some envelopes and throw some confetti and that's that. Oh, no. We sweat the details and record audio of all the debates Jim and A.Ron have had to arrive at the final winners. If you disagree with their rankings and ratings, these deliberations will be show the math. Jim and A.Ron discuss: Baldies 2025 Coverage: ⁠The Baldies 2025 Awards Ceremony⁠ ⁠Deliberations 1 | Best Comedy, Best First Run Movies⁠ ⁠Deliberations 2 | Biggest Disappointment, Best Debut Pilot⁠ ⁠Deliberations 3 | Best TV Drama, Best Supporting Actor, Biggest Surprise⁠ ⁠Deliberations 4 | Highest Risk/Reward, Shitface Villain, Biggest Badass, Best Lead Actor⁠ Hey there!  Check out ⁠https://support.baldmove.com/⁠ to find out how you can gain access to ALL of our premium content, as well as ad-free versions of the podcasts! ⁠Join the Club!⁠ Join the discussion: ⁠Email⁠ | ⁠Discord⁠ | ⁠Reddit ⁠| ⁠Forums⁠ Follow us: ⁠Twitch⁠ | ⁠YouTube⁠ | ⁠Twitter⁠  |  ⁠Instagram⁠  |  ⁠Facebook⁠ ⁠Leave Us A Review on Apple Podcasts⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Awards Ceremony MUST be watched first, all deliberations are optional. The deliberations are there for if you desire the excruciating details. Unlike many other, actual awards shows that are taken seriously by the industry, we're not content to merely rip open some envelopes and throw some confetti and that's that. Oh, no. We sweat the details and record audio of all the debates Jim and A.Ron have had to arrive at the final winners. If you disagree with their rankings and ratings, these deliberations will be show the math. Jim and A.Ron discuss: Baldies 2025 Coverage: ⁠The Baldies 2025 Awards Ceremony⁠ ⁠Deliberations 1 | Best Comedy, Best First Run Movies⁠ ⁠Deliberations 2 | Biggest Disappointment, Best Debut Pilot⁠ ⁠Deliberations 3 | Best TV Drama, Best Supporting Actor, Biggest Surprise⁠ ⁠Deliberations 4 | Highest Risk/Reward, Shitface Villain, Biggest Badass, Best Lead Actor⁠ Hey there!  Check out ⁠https://support.baldmove.com/⁠ to find out how you can gain access to ALL of our premium content, as well as ad-free versions of the podcasts! ⁠Join the Club!⁠ Join the discussion: ⁠Email⁠ | ⁠Discord⁠ | ⁠Reddit ⁠| ⁠Forums⁠ Follow us: ⁠Twitch⁠ | ⁠YouTube⁠ | ⁠Twitter⁠  |  ⁠Instagram⁠  |  ⁠Facebook⁠ ⁠Leave Us A Review on Apple Podcasts⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Awards Ceremony MUST be watched first, all deliberations are optional. The deliberations are there for if you desire the excruciating details. Unlike many other, actual awards shows that are taken seriously by the industry, we're not content to merely rip open some envelopes and throw some confetti and that's that. Oh, no. We sweat the details and record audio of all the debates Jim and A.Ron have had to arrive at the final winners. If you disagree with their rankings and ratings, these deliberations will be show the math. Jim and A.Ron discuss: Baldies 2025 Coverage: ⁠The Baldies 2025 Awards Ceremony⁠ ⁠Deliberations 1 | Best Comedy, Best First Run Movies⁠ ⁠Deliberations 2 | Biggest Disappointment, Best Debut Pilot⁠ ⁠Deliberations 3 | Best TV Drama, Best Supporting Actor, Biggest Surprise⁠ ⁠Deliberations 4 | Highest Risk/Reward, Shitface Villain, Biggest Badass, Best Lead Actor⁠ Hey there!  Check out ⁠https://support.baldmove.com/⁠ to find out how you can gain access to ALL of our premium content, as well as ad-free versions of the podcasts! ⁠Join the Club!⁠ Join the discussion: ⁠Email⁠ | ⁠Discord⁠ | ⁠Reddit ⁠| ⁠Forums⁠ Follow us: ⁠Twitch⁠ | ⁠YouTube⁠ | ⁠Twitter⁠  |  ⁠Instagram⁠  |  ⁠Facebook⁠ ⁠Leave Us A Review on Apple Podcasts⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Awards Ceremony MUST be watched first, all deliberations are optional. The deliberations are there for if you desire the excruciating details. Unlike many other, actual awards shows that are taken seriously by the industry, we're not content to merely rip open some envelopes and throw some confetti and that's that. Oh, no. We sweat the details and record audio of all the debates Jim and A.Ron have had to arrive at the final winners. If you disagree with their rankings and ratings, these deliberations will be show the math. Jim and A.Ron discuss: Baldies 2025 Coverage: The Baldies 2025 Awards Ceremony Deliberations 1 | Best Comedy, Best First Run Movies Deliberations 2 | Biggest Disappointment, Best Debut Pilot Deliberations 3 | Best TV Drama, Best Supporting Actor, Biggest Surprise Deliberations 4 | Highest Risk/Reward, Shitface Villain, Biggest Badass, Best Lead Actor Hey there!  Check out https://support.baldmove.com/ to find out how you can gain access to ALL of our premium content, as well as ad-free versions of the podcasts! Join the Club! Join the discussion: Email | Discord | Reddit | Forums Follow us: Twitch | YouTube | Twitter  |  Instagram  |  Facebook Leave Us A Review on Apple Podcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The evidence is in. The witnesses have testified. And now the Kouri Richins murder trial moves into its final act — closing arguments and the deliberation room where this verdict will be built or broken.Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski for Part 2 of the listener Q&A, focused on what this jury will actually do with three weeks of testimony and how this verdict is likely to take shape.Dreeke opens with deliberation psychology in a circumstantial case. No smoking gun. No confession. No direct forensic link. How do jurors move from reasonable inference to the legal standard of reasonable doubt? He maps the behavioral process of how people build and resist consensus — and what the specific contours of this case suggest about how that dynamic plays out.The forensic accountant's testimony gets examined here too. Dry. Document-heavy. Dense with loan records, failed real estate deals, and accounts reportedly running red. That kind of evidence doesn't produce the visceral reaction of testimony about fentanyl and obituaries pinned to mirrors — but Dreeke explains why financial evidence often does more durable work in the jury room than emotional testimony ever will.The defense left one thread specifically unresolved: a man who allegedly told investigators Eric sought to purchase fentanyl from another source — never followed up on. If jurors are aware of that, Dreeke explains what it does to the behavioral narrative they've been constructing.And jury instructions — handed to jurors before closing arguments — represent the architecture of how a verdict actually gets constructed. Dreeke is clear-eyed about the behavioral gap between what those instructions require and what twelve people actually do when gut feeling and legal standard don't move in the same direction.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #JuryDeliberations #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #CircumstantialEvidence #MurderVerdict #InvestigativePodcast

This week on The Heat is On…Big Tech on Trial, we reached a turning point.After weeks of testimony, we heard from the final witnesses — including Meta's paid medical expert, internal researchers, and YouTube leadership. New details emerged about deleted watch history data, internal warnings about teen risk, and what company executives knew about under-13 enforcement.Then came closing arguments.Mark Lanier argued that platform design targeted Kaley from a young age. Attorneys for Meta and YouTube pushed back, claiming there is no proven causal link between social media and mental health struggles, for Kaley or anyone else.Friday morning, the jury began deliberating.Now nine jurors must decide:Were these platforms negligently designed in ways that substantially contributed to Kaley's anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts? Or not?We're inside the courtroom translating what this case means for parents everywhere — because these trials aren't just about one child. It could shape the future of accountability for TikTok, YouTube, Meta, and Snap Inc..Verdict watch has begun.The Heat is On...Big Tech on Trial is an investigative mini-series by Scrolling 2 Death, in partnership with Heat Initiative.Video Editing expertly provided by Jacob Meade.

The evidentiary phase of the Kouri Richins murder trial is over. The defense rested Thursday without calling a single witness — and Kouri Richins used her only moment to address the court to confirm she would not be testifying.This episode covers the full story of Day 13: Detective Jeff O'Driscoll's final cross-examination, the directed verdict motion, and the extraordinary legal moment where the defense was warned that one line of questioning would blow open previously suppressed evidence against their own client. The judge called it high-stakes poker. The defense folded.Then we examine the question underneath all of it. What really happened in that hour-long recess? The legal strategy argument is real — but there's a human story here that deserves the same scrutiny. When a defendant has spent years managing a carefully constructed image and a courtroom spends three weeks dismantling it in public, the decision to stop the bleeding isn't always purely tactical. We break down the pattern, what it looks like in cases like this one, and what it may tell us about where Kouri Richins' head was on Thursday afternoon.We also go somewhere this coverage rarely goes — the attorneys. Three weeks of a high-profile, live-streamed trial takes a toll on everyone sitting at that defense table. We talk about what sustained public pressure does to people who also have professional identities and reputations on the line.Closing arguments Monday. Deliberations to follow. This one is almost done.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseRests #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial

On this week's episode, unless you have a bezoar (and a bit of cheek) handy, we highly recommend you brush up on on all of Golpalott's laws! Join Andrew, Eric, Micah and Laura for a show full of alchemy, apparition and plenty of teenage angst! News: Warner Bros. Discovery has a new home in Paramount; plus several dozen young actors have been cast as various Hogwarts students Chapter-by-Chapter continues with Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 18: Birthday Surprises We analyze Golpalott's Third Law: could this Potions class teach Harry something about how to ultimately destroy Voldemort? Does the creation of a Horcrux have an alchemical element to it? How does alchemy present in other book series, such as The Secrets of the Immortal Nicolas Flamel? Can we expect to learn more about Dumbledore and Flamel's partnership in the new Harry Potter TV Show? Apparition: Just put your mind to it! Does this class pass our sniff test? Bezoar! Hermione is upset (again) with Harry's success in Potions. Does Harry's cheek make him a bit to overconfident when trying to acquire Slughorn's unredacted memory? When Harry can't locate Malfoy on the Marauder's Map, why does overlook the Room of Requirement? MVP: Destination. Determination. Deliberation. Which is the of the Three D's? Lynx Line: Name a time in school where you found yourself totally out of your depth subject-wise. Did you overcome your knowledge gap? If so, was it due to hard work and determination? A good teacher or tutor? Or did you merely squeak by in class and never take up the subject again? Quizzitch: In this chapter, a bezoar from the stomach of a goat is used as a cure for poison. In reality, bezoars can appear in humans as ailments. What popular soft drink brand is used to treat bezoars in humans? Answer next week's question via the Quizzitch Form! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A juror from the first Feeding Our Future fraud trial recounts deliberations, the shocking bribery attempt and the challenge of weighing the evidence to MPR News reporter Matt Sepic.

Welcome to Exponential View, the show where I explore how exponential technologies such as AI are reshaping our future. I've been studying AI and exponential technologies at the frontier for over ten years. Each week, I share some of my analysis or speak with an expert guest to make light of a particular topic. To keep up with the Exponential transition, subscribe to this channel or to my newsletter: https://www.exponentialview.co/ ----- This is the first episode of AI Vistas, a new series where I bring together people I trust and respect to tackle a major question collectively.  Today's question: are we in charge of our AI tools, or are they in charge of us?  Joining me are Nita Farahany, distinguished professor of law and philosophy at Duke University and a leading thinker on cognitive liberty and mental privacy; Eric Topol, founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute and one of the world's most cited medical researchers; and Rohit Krishnan, engineer, former hedge fund manager, and AI builder. Moderating the conversation is Nick Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic. We covered: (01:33) Introducing AI Vistas (03:51) The AI agent that made a financial decision mid-drive (05:48) What does it mean to act autonomously anymore? (08:42) Why AI harms are rarer than you'd expect (10:24) When AI outperforms doctors – and why that's complicated (15:20) Constituent competence: the skill you must never offload (18:50) De-skilling is already happening  (31:20) What can schools do better? (42:50) AI slop and "hollow-ware" (46:40) What is lost when AI does the creating? (49:18) When a tool gets good enough, we hand it off (50:11) Deliberate intent: keeping AI as a tool ----- Where to find me: Exponential View newsletter: https://www.exponentialview.co/ Website: https://www.azeemazhar.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/azhar/ Twitter/X: https://x.com/azeem Where to find Nick, Nita, Eric and Rohit: Thinking Freely with Nita Farahany: https://nitafarahany.substack.com/  Ground Truths with Eric Topol: https://erictopol.substack.com/  Strange Loop Canon with Rohit Krishnan: https://www.strangeloopcanon.com/  The Most Interesting Reads with Nick Thompson: https://nxthompson.substack.com/ Production by EPIIPLUS1 Production and research: Baba Films, Chantal Smith, Marija Gavrilov. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The jury will begin its deliberations Friday morning in the murder trial of Paul Caneiro, accused of killing his brother and his brother's family before setting both of their homes on fire.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/] Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/] Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/]This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

MIT and Stanford professor Alex "Sandy" Pentland, one of the most cited researchers in the world with over 165,000 citations, explains why the real AI advantage isn't smarter models but collective intelligence. It's smarter humans working together with AI as the connective tissue. Drawing from his latest book Shared Wisdom, Pentland reveals the frameworks behind community intelligence and why data ownership, not frontier AI, will determine who wins the next decade.You'll discover:✅ Why "people plus AI" consistently beats AI alone, and the hedge fund evidence that proves it✅ How "AI buddies" are replacing corporate manuals, newsletters, and hallway conversations to keep distributed teams aligned✅ The Deliberation.io tool that makes meetings more than twice as effective by neutralizing power dynamics and keeping groups focused✅ Why a 350,000-person multinational is cutting in-house staff to 150,000 while hiring 100,000 more project-based workers, and how AI enables that shift✅ How a doctor with zero technical background built a hospital operating system in 6 weeks using AI tools✅ The staggering stat: AI costs are dropping by 50% every 3.5 months, a factor of 1,000 over three years, and what that means for personal, on-device AI✅ Why China's Belt and Road and India's Citizen Stack (1.4 billion customers signed up) are quietly winning the global data game while Silicon Valley focuses on frontier models✅ Sandy's provocative proposal: a 10% equity contribution to sovereign wealth funds at company formation, which would have created a $10 trillion US fund if started in 1990⏱️ TIMESTAMPS0:00 Why AI alone loses money: the hedge fund reality check2:07 Shared wisdom, community intelligence, and organizational culture4:25 AI buddies: the brilliant librarian inside your company5:44 Deliberation.io: making meetings 2x more effective7:01 Using AI for exploration and long-range strategic thinking11:29 Who's to blame when AI fails: executives or the machine?14:28 Why AI can't do causality and what that means for leaders18:14 AI's killer app for remote work and distributed organizations21:09 A doctor built a hospital OS in 6 weeks: small teams, massive impact24:09 Job displacement, social safety nets, and the sovereign wealth fund idea27:01 Reinventing education: Costa Rica's bet and the MIT Media Lab model32:16 LLMs vs. older AI: why you need both (and the loyalagents.org initiative)37:13 Practical starting points for redesigning work with AI40:16 Misinformation, data provenance, and the billion-dollar North Korea problem48:50 The global data race: China, India, UAE, and why frontier models aren't the game54:00 Cybersecurity warning: agentic AI creates massive new attack surfaces

From January 25, 2023: Judge Robert McBurney of the Superior Court of Fulton County held a hearing on Tuesday to decide whether or not to release the Fulton County Special Grand Jury's report on 2020 election interference in Georgia. Lawfare's Fulton County correspondent Anna Bower was in the room live-blogging the matter, and Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes caught up with her right after the hearing to talk it through. Why did the district attorney argue that the report should continue to be sealed for now? What were the media organizations' arguments, and which way was Judge McBurney leaning? Is the report going to become public? And if so, when? To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jury deliberations continue in the trial of Brendan Banfield, who is charged in the deaths of his wife, Christine Banfield, and Joseph Ryan.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?  Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/UYkhFdkRG14Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today [https://www.courttv.com/] Join the Investigation Newsletter [https://www.courttv.com/email/] Court TV Podcast [https://www.courttv.com/podcast/]Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:  [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join]FOLLOW THE CASE:  Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/courttv]Twitter/X [https://twitter.com/CourtTV]Instagram [https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/]TikTok [https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive]YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV]WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE  [https://www.courttv.com/trials/]HOW TO FIND COURT TV  [https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/]This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Trump administration called Alex Pretti, who was shot and killed by federal officers, a “domestic terrorist.” And then bystander footage flooded the internet. On this week's On the Media, how the real-time verification of video evidence is transforming public discourse. Plus, what the anti-ICE protests in Minneapolis have in common with the Boston Massacre.[01:00] Host Brooke Gladstone speaks with Brandy Zadrozny, senior enterprise reporter at MS Now, about the informal network of far-right content creators traveling to anti-ICE protests in Minneapolis, and why the right-wing narrative is losing power in the face of an outpouring of bystander footage. [17:45] Host Micah Loewinger talks with Radley Balko, author of The Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America's Police Forces, about similarities between the conditions that led to the Boston Massacre in 1770 and what we're seeing today in Minneapolis and other cities targeted by ICE operations today.[31:43] Brooke sits down with Eliot Higgins, the founder of Bellingcat, to discuss his framework for the essential functions of democracy— verification, deliberation, and accountability—which have broken down into hollow performances or simulations in the United States today.  Further reading / watching:“In Minneapolis, far-right influencers frame ICE resistance as terrorism,” by Brandy Zadrozny“Two cities under siege,” by Radley Balko“Verification, Deliberation, Accountability: A new framework for tackling epistemic collapse and renewing democracy,” by Eliot Higgins and Natalie Martin On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org.

It's a packed episode of chatting today! To kick things off, Joe tells David about seeing pictures of Josh Widdicombe's house in a newspaper recently, David daydreams about more lovely homes in Bath, they both wonder how on earth people manage to afford multi-million pound houses, they plot to get Right Move to sponsor the pod and David explains how he ended up buying a pair of Chatabiscuit's shoes. Then they have think about what it would take for them to do a Chatabix live tour - and their deliberations take up the rest of the show. FOR ALL THINGS CHATABIX'Y FOLLOW/SUBSCRIBE/CONTACT: YouTube: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@chatabixpodcast⁠ Insta: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/chatabixpodcast/⁠ TikTok: ⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@chatabix⁠ Patreon: ⁠https://www.patreon.com/chatabix⁠ Merch: ⁠https://chatabixshop.com/⁠ Contact us: chatabix@yahoo.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr. Martin Carcasson tells us how he, as the Director of the Center for Public Deliberation at Colorado State, trains people how to facilitate deliberation and overcome wicked problems so that they can "spark processes that are particularly designed to avoid triggering the worst in human nature and tap into the best."Kitted Executive AcademyThe Center for Public DeliberationThe Listen First CoalitionBetter Together AmericaMartin CarcassonThe Toulmin ModelWicked ProblemsHow Minds ChangeDavid McRaney's TwitterDavid McRaney's BlueSkyYANSS TwitterNewsletterShow NotesPatreon Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As we step into a new year, this episode explores the quiet clarity that can emerge when we move with both energy and deliberation.In this reflective, stream-of-consciousness episode, I share a short piece of writing that arrived unexpectedly — and then open it up gently, listening for what wants to be heard.You'll hear reflections on:The juxtaposition between energy and deliberation — and how this can feel like clarity rather than conflictStrengthening the energetic trails that genuinely draw our attentionChoosing discernment over momentum, alignment over urgencyLetting go without attachment — even when something once felt rightTrusting the wisdom that grows underground, in the dark, before it reaches the lightI also share a simple Flow Journaling prompt — “As I listen ever more closely…” — as an invitation to notice what might be asking for your attention, and what may be ready to be laid down with gratitude.For now, let this be enough.With love.Currently…At the moment, my work is centred around:A Piece of Quiet — a private weekly practice of listening, reflection, and Flow Journaling - hear the first three episodes here https://apieceofquiet.transistor.fm/ Occasional live gatherings and courses, softly shared through my mailing list - you can join that here https://hennyflynn.kit.com/profileYou can find everything I offer here: https://www.hennyflynn.co.uk/ ★ Support this podcast ★

Beast Games Book Club Week 1 Welcome to RHAP’s coverage of MrBeast’s “Beast Games.” Known for his over-the-top challenges and jaw-dropping production value, MrBeast has leveled up with this competitive extravaganza that brings massive stakes, outrageous games, and a cast of unforgettable contestants. Join Rob Cesternino, Stephen Fishbach, and Taran Armstrong as they dig into Beast Games Season 2, covering episodes 1 through 3. The panel, packed with reality TV expertise, unpacks the strong versus smart team theme, the rapid-fire challenge structure, and the shifting strategies that play out in the Mr. Beast universe. With familiar faces from Survivor and other reality shows entering the fray, the discussion quickly turns to the high-stakes decisions, alliances, and the unique pacing of this “expect the unexpected” competition. Across the first three episodes, Rob, Stephen, and Taran analyze how contestants react to the ever-changing landscape of Beast Games. They compare the unpredictable style of Mr. Beast's challenges with the more formulaic formats of Survivor and Big Brother, highlighting how players navigate split-second choices and offers to walk away with life-changing amounts of money. The panel debates whether experience or raw strength wins out when teams are split, digging into specifics like the tower-building challenge and the early exits of some reality TV legends. Key moments and insights include: Deliberations on whether to take the money or stick with the team, including personal “walk-away numbers” from each host The metagame of boosting your reality TV profile—with comparisons to playing for invites on future shows The showmance between two contestants and how budding relationships unfold in high-pressure, fast-moving environments Survivor alums Jesse Lopez's quick exit and Sue Smay's continued presence, plus speculation about the potential Survivor crossover in Fiji Analysis of challenge design, from physical obstacle courses to alliance-driven bluffing games, and how game structures shape decision-making With Beast Games venturing to Survivor's home turf and more tough choices ahead, challenges to team loyalty and individual ambition take center stage. Can strong or smart players gain the upper hand as the cast shrinks and the stakes get even higher? To pre-order Rob's book, The Tribe and I Have Spoken, visit www.robhasabook.com Never miss a minute of RHAP's coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the podcast feed! WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast onYouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

The dumbest people in politics are always going on about how we need more "debate" between various factions. But Stanford political scientist James Fishkin has a much more sophisticated argument that actual deliberation--not cable news morons shouting at each other--has a vital role to play in democratic functioning, and has actually carried out several experiments to that effect. He joins us to talk about his book Can Deliberation Cure the Ills of Democracy?

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The murder trial of Brian Walshe nears its conclusion as a Massachusetts jury returns for deliberations. Walshe is accused of murdering and dismembering his wife, Ana. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Whether you're a legal eagle or just curious about how our justice system really works, this episode peels back the layers of a question that's more complicated than it seems. Steve Palmer and law student Troy Henricksen answer the question - should jury deliberations be recorded? This topic was sparked by a thought-provoking listener comment, and they examine whether adding cameras or audio equipment to the deliberation room could help ensure justice, or if it would erode the very foundation of our jury system.Together, they walk through the practical, historical, and ethical implications of such recordings, exploring everything from the psychology of being watched to the slippery slope of judicial oversight. You'll hear about the deep roots of the jury process, why secrecy is considered sacred, and real-world scenarios where recording could have changed outcomes. They even touch on how Hollywood has tackled jury misconduct and why, despite its intrigue, recording deliberations could open a Pandora's box no one wants to confront.Moments00:00 "Judgment, Intervention, and Consequences"05:32 "Studio Syndrome and Self-Consciousness"07:54 "Jury Oversight and Its Impact"11:14 Jury Rights and Misconduct Discussion14:01 "Office Case: Video Evidence"16:19 "Jury Misconduct in 12 Angry Men"Here are 3 key takeaways:Sanctity of Deliberations: Recording jury deliberations would undermine the free, honest exchange we rely on for justice—jurors might perform for the camera, not for the cause of truth.Scope Creep Is Real: Once those recordings exist, it's only a matter of time before someone wants to review, challenge, or legislate over their content. This opens the door to meddling and second-guessing, ultimately weakening the jury's independence.Exceptions vs. The Rule: While egregious misconduct (like bringing outside evidence) does allow for review and intervention, the rare exception shouldn't justify upending centuries-old protections that ensure jury autonomy.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and...

A. THE FILIBUSTER AND CONTINUING RESOLUTIONS Guest: Professor Richard Epstein Professor Epstein discusses the filibuster's purpose: slowing down legislation to improve deliberation and mitigate hyper-partisanship. However, he argues its use against continuing resolutions is illegitimate, leading to "horrendous dislocation." He proposes changing the Senate rule to forbid filibusters on continuing resolutions, ensuring essential government functions are not held hostage for collateral political gain and maintaining fiscal continuity.

Jury deliberations resume in the 1st Grader Shoots Teacher Civil Trial of Abby Zwerner v. Ebony Parker civil trial. Zwerner filed a $40 million lawsuit against Parker, claiming she ignored warnings about a student who shot Zwerner. Plus, Alex Murdaugh's attorney joins Court TV.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #OpeningStatements here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/j2iShRjUR0EWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jury deliberations resume in the Irish Firefighter Rape Trial, where Terence Crosbie is standing trial for a second time on charges that he raped a woman in a Boston hotel. Timeline reveals key details for missing girl, Melodee Buzzard. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #OpeningStatements here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/OFAPKvjbEIcWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jury deliberations continue Wednesday in Bionca Ellis' trial, where she's facing charges including murder in the death of Julian Wood. Ellis has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. Accused murderer Aaron Spencer is running for sheriff. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/FRcCZVluob0Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

0:00 – Introduction & Season RecapLuFisto opens the show, referencing the LFG finals and the end of season two.Jeff reveals that LFT season three has been renewed and discusses recent roster changes, including surprise releases.1:51 – Commercials & International BroadcastsDiscussion about WWE commercials, international viewing experiences, and background appearances by wrestlers.3:43 – Surprising Releases & Character AnalysisThe hosts analyze the release of Hayes Jameson and speculate on possible reasons (injury, personal choice, or character fit).They discuss the evolution of certain characters and the importance of unique personas in wrestling.7:16 – Men's Finalist Rematch: Harlem Lewis vs. Drake MorrowDetailed breakdown of the rematch, including in-ring psychology, character work, and match flow.Commentary on wrestling techniques, storytelling, and the importance of intensity in high-stakes matches.19:17 – Post-Match Reflections & Character FuturesReflections on the match outcome, Shawn Michaels' decision-making, and the future potential of both finalists.Discussion of how certain wrestlers fit into the current NXT landscape.24:00 – Shiloh Hill's Presence & StorytellingAnalysis of Shiloh Hill's character, his on-screen demeanor, and the importance of subtle storytelling in wrestling.26:30 – Reality of Wrestling SegmentBooker T's segment with Harlem Lewis, emphasizing the importance of “checks and championships.”The hosts discuss the significance of wrestling culture and personal motivation.32:47 – Women's Final: Danni  vs. P NastyIn-depth play-by-play of the women's final, including entrances, match psychology, and key spots.Critique of match pacing, character work, and crowd engagement.46:00 – Match Analysis & Judges' ReactionsThe hosts and coaches reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the women's match.Discussion of what makes a compelling wrestling character and the importance of presence and consistency.54:00 – Shiloh vs. Harlem: The Men's FinalBreakdown of the men's final, including entrances, crowd reactions, and in-ring storytelling.Commentary on the abrupt finish and what could have made the match more satisfying.1:10:00 – Judges' Deliberation & Final DecisionsCoaches and Shawn Michaels deliberate on the winners, discussing criteria for selection and the unique qualities of each finalist.The hosts debate the logic behind the final choices and the importance of explaining decisions to the audience.1:20:00 – Reflections on the Show's Format & SuggestionsSuggestions for improving the judging system, including the idea of rotating judges and more transparency in scoring.Discussion of the value of diversity and representation in wrestling.1:30:00 – Closing Thoughts & Future PlansThe hosts promote upcoming content, including a retrospective episode with Dr. Gina Posan.Final thoughts on the season, shoutouts to the wrestling community, and recommendations for the documentary “Lunatic: The Luna Vachon Story.”Social media plugs and encouragement for listener feedback.1:36:00 – OutroLuFisto and Jeff sign off, teasing one more show and thanking listeners for their support.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.

 A gunman ambushes Idaho firefighters, Democrats in the Senate try to slow the President's Big Beautiful Bill, and the jury in the Diddy trial begins deliberations. Get the facts first on Evening Wire.