Podcasts about jpsp

"Michelle ""Lani"" Shiota is an associate professor of social psychology at Arizona State University. Her studies of positive emotions, emotion regulation, and emotional mechanisms of close relationships use multiple methods including perpheral psychophysiology measures, behavioral coding, cognitive tasks, and narrative analysis as well as self-reports. Shiota's research has been funded by National Institutes of Health, the John Templeton Foundation, and the National Science Foundation, and has been published in high-impact journals including: Emotion, JPSP, Cognition and Emotion, Psychology and Aging, and American Psychologist. She is lead author of the textbook ""Emotion"" (Oxford), and co-editor of the ""Handbook of Positive Emotions"" (Guilford). She is currently on the Executive Committee of the Society for Affective Science, she is a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science (APS), Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP), and member of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology (SESP). She received her bachelor's in communication from Stanford University, and her doctorate in social/personality psychology from University of California at Berkeley. Shiota joined the social psychology faculty at ASU in 2006, establishing the Shiota Psychophysiology Laboratory for Affective Testing (a.k.a. SPLAT Lab).

What are the most effective collective actions that social protest movements can or should undertake in the context of deep societal conflict and polarization? CASBS fellows Eran Halperin (2022-23) & Robb Willer (2012-13, 2020-21) compare their cross-national research findings and explore Halperin's real-time applied work with the dramatic, ongoing protests in Israel.ERAN HALPERIN links:Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Reconciliation Lab (PCIL)Halperin on Google ScholaraChord: Social Psychology for Social ChangeROBB WILLER links:Willer's Stanford faculty pageWiller's personal web pagePolarization and Social Change LabWiller on Google ScholarArticle in JPSP, "The Activist's Dilemma" (2020)Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS) at Stanford UniversityCASBS:website|Twitter|YouTube|LinkedIn|podcast|latest newsletter|signup|outreach​Follow the CASBS webcast series,Social Science for a World in Crisis 

Afinal, o que é o dinheiro? Qual a sua relação com a ideia de "token"? Só seres humanos compreendem a troca de dinheiro por coisas? O que a ciência tem a dizer sobre isso tudo?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (54min 07s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAAprofunde-se de vez: garantimos conhecimento com profundidade e diversidade, para se tornar um profissional em T - incluindo programação, front-end, data science, devops, ux & design, mobile, inovação & gestão.Navegue sua carreira: são mais de 1300 cursos e novos lançamentos toda semana, além de atualizações e melhorias constantes.Conteúdo imersivo: faça parte de uma comunidade de apaixonados por tudo que é digital. Mergulhe na comunidade Alura.Aproveite o desconto para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*REFERÊNCIASLong-run Effects of Lottery Wealth on Psychological Well-beinghttps://www.nber.org/papers/w24667The measurement of welfare and well-being: the Leyden approachhttps://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/3148285/8399_The_measurement_of_welfare_and_well_being_The_Leyden_Approach_Praag_.pdfBuying time promotes happinesshttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1706541114We'll Always Have Paris: The Hedonic Payoff from Experiential and Material Investmentshttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/5394dfa6e4b0d7fc44700a04/t/547d571fe4b094d782c0e634/1417500738967/Gilovich+Kumar+%28in+press%29+Always+Have+Paris+Advances.pdfStigmatizing Materialism: On Stereotypes and Impressions of Materialistic and Experiential Pursuitshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167210362790?journalCode=pspcWaiting for Merlot: Anticipatory Consumption of Experiential and Material Purchaseshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797614546556?journalCode=pssaSpending Money on Others Promotes Happinesshttps://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1150952Does spending money on others promote happiness?: A registered replication report.https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fpspa0000191Prosocial Spending and Well-Being: Cross-Cultural Evidence for a Psychological Universalhttps://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11320609/aknin%2Cet-al_prosocial_JPSP.pdf?sequence=1Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spendinghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268113000176TOKEN REINFORCEMENT: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIShttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257?casa_token=zQyRLtltys4AAAAA:G_UotK2fXK44D8yPDqzlmXZW_CKusBjH9ocK6JMyfYDHzV7dFFywyg6GuBfh26fr0nksYEX-VvSlXBvwPreference Transitivity and Symbolic Representation in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002414RISKY CHOICE IN PIGEONS: PREFERENCE FOR AMOUNT VARIABILITY USING A TOKEN-REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1901/jeab.2012.98-139?casa_token=AO_1inAQE3oAAAAA:6Q6PM7i6St3zaqUHmvxyYUK61yAVdzM1zLt9LR5dCWGSBWSWfZxuYafny1dyfXfUINVOF4laNzglmQJMSubstitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeonshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jeab.231?casa_token=dl0Q1BUkfpIAAAAA:m8S3VXAUx7CscNLsW5iGrWy8mwZEmmEO5O8ZAnnDAQ7h2bnyn1aXTPm7Jtf4jZAcf7RB3REp1TPj7SCmA meta-analytic investigation of consumer over-indebtedness: The role of impulsivityhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijcs.12570?casa_token=576VSF7GUDcAAAAA:-icBOH3mqjCwQJnJsafk8Nf9y23bxnZKJClQ-ouSzG47PEBia7Gqk6_HEu8rnr4EfxkN0Ba9TMb_zesdVideo game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gamblinghttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0360-1Adolescents and loot boxes: links with problem gambling and motivations for purchasehttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.190049On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findingshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673/fullThe Myth of the Myth of the Myth of Barter and the Return of the Armchair Ethnologistshttps://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2016/06/08/the-myth-of-the-myth-of-the-myth-of-barter-and-the-return-of-the-armchair-ethnologists/Viewing personalized video clips recommended by TikTok activates default mode network and ventral tegmental areahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921004134How Physical Education through TikTok Makes a Difference: The Use of TikTok to Promote Learning Activitieshttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eka-Novita-Sari/publication/359669497_How_Physical_Education_through_TikTok_Makes_a_Difference_The_Use_of_TikTok_to_Promote_Learning_Activities/links/624a3b8221077329f2f04ad8/How-Physical-Education-through-TikTok-Makes-a-Difference-The-Use-of-TikTok-to-Promote-Learning-Activities.pdfDebt: The First 5,000 Yearshttps://www.amazon.com/Debt-First-5-000-Years/dp/1933633867Naruhodo #64 - Salário maior significa mais felicidade?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t4c3kR1WEw&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #261 - O que a solidão pode causar nas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02dPRPGcqVs&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodoNaruhodo #341 - Cooperação entre seres vivos é algo inato?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4mL78Sm-_8&ab_channel=Cient%C3%ADstica%26PodcastNaruhodo*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Quem nunca se sentiu grato por outra pessoa de forma genuína?Ou mesmo por um acontecimento específico?Qual o poder que esse sentimento tem sobre as relações humanas?E o que é balela, segundo a ciência?Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (58min 45s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.Aproveite o desconto de R$100 para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://www.alura.com.br/promocao/naruhodo *PARCERIA: PUC MINASSabe o que significa quando uma das melhores instituições de ensino do Brasil se alia às mais modernas ferramentas de Educação? Significa que chegou a hora certa de você investir no seu próximo passo profissional.A PUC Minas desenvolveu um jeito único de combinar a flexibilidade das aulas à distância à dinâmica insubstituível dos encontros presenciais. Na PUC Minas, toda a estrutura e corpo docente formado por mestres e doutores de destaque, estão à sua disposição. Seja no campus, ou na sala da sua casa. Se o que faltava pra você voltar a estudar, era a união entre qualidade e comodidade… Agora não falta mais. Inscreva-se agora e faça parte dessa universidade, que foi classificada entre as 10 mais respeitadas por empregadores do Brasil, e que foi eleita uma das melhores do mundo pela Times Higher Education.Não perca o vestibular 2022. Inscrições para seleção por prova até 27 de outubro. E pelo ENEM, até 18 de novembro. Acesse pucminas.brPUC Minas. Onde você quer estar.*REFERÊNCIASAn Antidote to DIssatisfaction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPPPFqsECz0&ab_channel=Kurzgesagt%E2%80%93InaNutshellGratitude and Well Beinghttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010965/A preliminary study of the origins of early adolescents' gratitude differenceshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917302702?casa_token=Rq19XuOKysYAAAAA:1xN394WGiq9ckczHyFktz05HZEQW4taxSuNnjDb-tGkBnRlcUMq1KldQv9K2nOa8TcXIyej0vAGratitude as a Human Strength: Appraising the Evidencehttps://sci-hub.se/https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/pdf/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.56Counting Blessings Versus Burdens: An Experimental Investigation ofGratitude and Subjective Well-Being in Daily Lifehttp://local.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/gratitude/Emmons_McCullough_2003_JPSP.pdfThe debt of gratitude: Dissociating gratitude and indebtednesshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699930500172291A Test of Positive Reinforcement of Customershttps://journals.sagepub.com.sci-hub.st/doi/10.1177/002224297604000413The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Empirical Topographyhttps://doi.apa.org.sci-hub.st/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.82.1.112Appreciation: Individual Differences in Finding Value and Meaning as a Unique Predictor of Subjective Well-Beinghttps://sci-hub.se/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00305.xGratitude facilitates healthy eating behavior in adolescents and young adultshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103117308569?via%3DihubState, but not trait gratitude is associated with cardiovascular responses toacute psychological stresshttps://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.se/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938420302134?via%3DihubGratitude in collectivist and individualist cultureshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789699?casa_token=qzJOUygYmZgAAAAA%3ANe1cYY4SRO47iLp5cB-YaJaTsVUZJdUrMSwZQsUiaEDEx1_FgTeQf8FPbYmT1oZ19nMkxE9KyD5sGratitude Resentment and Appreciation Scale (GRAT)https://ggsc.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Gratitude_Resentment_and_Appreciation_Scale.pdfBenefits of Expressing Gratitude: Expressing Gratitude to a Partner Changes One's View of the Relationshiphttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41062251?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsBeyond Reciprocity: Gratitude and Relationships in Everyday Lifehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2692821/A Little Thanks Goes a Long Way: Explaining Why Gratitude Expressions Motivate Prosocial Behaviorhttps://www.umkc.edu/facultyombuds/documents/grant_gino_jpsp_2010.pdf“Whatever Small Thing I Have, I Should Be Grateful for”: Gratitude as Understood and Experienced by African Adolescentshttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15367-0_21Mother Nature and the Mother of All Virtues On the Rationality of Feeling Gratitude toward Naturehttps://www.pdcnet.org/enviroethics/content/enviroethics_2013_0035_0001_0027_0040The Moral Psychology of Gratitudehttps://philarchive.org/archive/TELTETPodcasts das #Minas: SONORA#MulheresPodcastershttp://anchor.fm/sonora*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay: https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast

In this installment of a series on liberalism, Benjamin Klutsey, the director of academic outreach at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, sits down with Juliana Schroeder to discuss the psychology underlying how trust and distrust are generated as well as practical ways to better facilitate productive interactions, even across severe cultural, ideological, or other divides. Dr. Schroeder is a professor in the Management of Organizations group at the Haas School of Business and a faculty affiliate in the Social Psychology Department, the Cognition Department, and the Center for Human-Compatible AI at UC Berkeley. She also co-founded and directs the Psychology of Technology Institute, which supports and advances scientific research studying the psychological consequences and antecedents of technological advancements. Her research examines the psychological processes underlying how people think about the minds of those around them, and how their judgments then influence their social judgments, decisions, and interactions. She has received funding from the National Science Foundation and awards from the Association for Psychological Science and the American Psychological Association. Want more? Check out Discourse Magazine for more pieces on classical liberalism, politics, economics, and culture. Resources Shannon White, Juliana Schroeder, and Jane L. Risen, When Enemies become Close, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5f6a300a0c80ed485d74a75b/1600794637679/White%2C+Schroeder%2C+%26+Risen+2020+JPSP.pdf Juliana Schroeder and Jane L. Risen, Befriending the enemy: Outgroup friendship longitudinally predicts intergroup attitudes in a coexistence program for Israelis and Palestinians, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5c7b0015b208fcd4071df492/1551564822844/befriending-the-enemy.pdf Seeds of Peace, https://www.seedsofpeace.org/ Braver Angels, https://braverangels.org/ Living Room Conversations, https://livingroomconversations.org/ Psychology of Technology Institute, https://www.psychoftech.org/ Juliana Schroeder, Michael Kardas, and Nicholas Epley, The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5c7aff6ae4966b9aba01f4d6/1551564652086/the-humanizing-voice.pdf Alicea Lieberman and Juliana Schroeder, Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5d5acd294a8ef600016e778a/1566231850150/TwoSocialLives_LiebermanSchroeder.pdf Jamie E. Guillory PhD Jeffrey T. Hancock PhD Christopher Woodruff MD, FRCPC, and Jeffrey Keilman MD, Text Messaging Reduces Analgesic Requirements During Surgery, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pme.12610 The Flipside, https://www.theflipside.io/ The Factual, https://www.thefactual.com/ All Sides, https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news Daniel H. Stein, Juliana Schroeder, Nicholas M. Hobson, Francesca Gino, and Michael I. Norton, When Alterations Are Violations: Moral Outrage and Punishment in Response to (Even Minor) Alterations to Rituals, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5fda6b470917ce2aa86a82d8/1608149834372/When+alterations+are+violations+-+proofs.pdf Juliana Schroeder, Jane L. Risen, Francesca Gino, and Michael I. Norton, Handshaking Promotes Deal-Making by Signaling Cooperative Intent, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c171ac1710699e060ed3d94/t/5c7aff16e2c4834c1a2bee7c/1551564567399/handshaking-promotes-deal-making-by-signaling-cooperative-intent.pdf James A. Coan, Hillary S. Schaefer, Richard J. Davidson, Lending a Hand: Social Regulation of the Neural Response to Threat, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832.x Robert Talisse, Too Much of a Good Thing, https://www.discoursemagazine.com/politics/2020/11/06/too-much-of-a-good-thing/ Danielle Allen, A Matter of Trust, https://www.discoursemagazine.com/culture-and-society/2020/12/04/a-matter-of-trust/

Click for AudioTheme for 2020:  Beyond 20/20 Spiritual VisionJanuary's Theme and Affirmation: I clearly see the Love of the DivineThis month’s Recommended Reading:  The God Shaped Brainby Timothy R. Jennings, M.D.Psychiatrist Tim Jennings unveils how our brains and bodies thrivewhen we have a healthy understanding of who God is. He dispels common misconceptionsabout God and shows how different God-concepts affect the brain differently.Our brains can adapt, change and rewire with redeemed thinking that frees usfrom unnecessary pain and suffering. Discover how science and Scripture come togetherto bring healing and transformation to our lives. Books available from Stepping Stones Books & Giftsin the store and online with free shippingCenter for Spiritual Living, Santa Rosa

A recent study published in the Journal of Personality & Social Psychology* attempts to tackle understanding the stress of decision making.  Nate G goes over the article and Dr. Lisle offers his take.  Can the stress of decision making be explained solely by the personality trait conscientiousness?   Dr. Lisle and Nate discuss.    The next topic stems from a listener's question:  "Can we choose who we want the most esteem from?  Is there a way I can care less about the esteem from some people? It is sometimes exhausting to try to please everyone."   *PDF of the JPSP article : http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/mayarossignacmilon/files/2018/08/Chen.Rossignac-Milon.Higgins.JPSP_.2018.pdf

ABOUT THIS EPISODE Implicit bias has been studied by many social psychologists, and one particular measure, the Implicit Association Test (or IAT) has often been used in that research. It has also been used by practitioners, often for purposes of raising participants' awareness of their own biases. And millions have completed IAT's online at the Project Implicit website. In this episode, I continue a discussion with six people who have all thought about the IAT, with the conversation covering such topics as (a) how well the IAT predicts discriminatory behavior and other behavior, (b) whether it's appropriate for the Project Implicit website to give individualized feedback to visitors who complete online IAT's there, and (c) the content and effectiveness of implicit bias training. My guests are psychologists Calvin Lai, Brian Nosek, Mike Olson, Keith Payne, and Simine Vazire, as well as journalist Jesse Singal. LINKS --Interpreting correlation coefficients (by Deborah J. Rumsey) (https://www.dummies.com/education/math/statistics/how-to-interpret-a-correlation-coefficient-r/) --Project Implicit (where you can take an IAT) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) --Brian Nosek's departmental web page (https://med.virginia.edu/faculty/faculty-listing/ban2b/) --Calvin Lai's departmental web page (https://psychweb.wustl.edu/lai) --"Psychology's favorite tool for measuring racism isn't up to the job" (Jesse Singal, in The Cut) (https://www.thecut.com/2017/01/psychologys-racism-measuring-tool-isnt-up-to-the-job.html) --Keith Payne's departmental web page (http://bkpayne.web.unc.edu/) --Michael Olson's departmental web page (https://psychology.utk.edu/faculty/olson.php) --Simine Vazire's departmental web page (http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/people/svazire) --The Black Goat (podcast on which Simine Vazire is a co-host) (http://www.theblackgoatpodcast.com/) --"Understanding and and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity (Greenwald, Poehlmann, Uhlmann, & Banaji, 2009) (http://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/GPU&B.meta-analysis.JPSP.2009.pdf) --"Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects" (Greenwald, Banaji, & Nosek, 2015) (https://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/Greenwald,Banaji&Nosek.JPSP.2015.pdf) --"Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effects sizes of unknown societal significance" (Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Mitchell, & Tetlock, 2015) (https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44267412/Using_the_IAT_to_predict_ethnic_and_raci20160331-25218-20vauz.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1530481600&Signature=lS5rybckXwezHZrqSzHTlW%2FgKtI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DUsing_the_IAT_to_predict_ethnic_and_raci.pdf) --"Arbitrary metrics in psychology" (Blanton & Jaccard, 2006) (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.314.2818&rep=rep1&type=pdf) --"The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice" (Payne, Vuletich, & Lundberg, 2017; access is subscription-controlled) (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568) --"Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test" (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) (http://faculty.fortlewis.edu/burke_b/Senior/BLINK%20replication/IAT.pdf) --A summary of David Hume's thoughts on the association of ideas (http://www.livingphilosophy.org.uk/philosophy/David_Hume/the_Association_of_Ideas.htm) --Two Psychologists Four Beers (podcast featuring psychologists Yoel Inbar and Mickey Inzlicht) (https://fourbeers.fireside.fm/) --Very Bad Wizards (podcast featuring psychologist David Pizarro and philosopher Tamler Sommers) (https://verybadwizards.fireside.fm/) Cover art credit: "Still Life with Bottles, Wine, and Cheese," John F. Francis (1857; public domain, from Wikimedia Commons, copyright tag: PD-US) Special Guests: Brian Nosek, Calvin Lai, Jesse Singal, Keith Payne, Michael Olson, and Simine Vazire.

On April 12, 2018, Donte Robinson and Rashon Nelson, two African-American men, were arrested for trespassing at a Philadelphia Starbucks (https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/04/14/602556973/starbucks-police-and-mayor-weigh-in-on-controversial-arrest-of-2-black-men-in-ph). They were waiting for another person to join them for a meeting, when a manager called the police because they hadn't made a purchase. In the face of ensuing controversy, Starbucks closed stores nationwide one afternoon at the end of May in order to hold anti-bias training sessions (https://www.npr.org/2018/05/17/611909506/starbucks-training-focuses-on-the-evolving-study-of-unconscious-bias) for employees. As in this case and elsewhere (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/implicit-bias-training-salt-lake/548996/), the topic of implicit racial bias has captured many imaginations. Implicit bias has been studied by many social psychologists, and one particular measure, the Implicit Association Test (or IAT) has often been used in that research. It has also been used by practitioners, often for purposes of raising participants' awareness of their own biases. And millions have completed IAT's online at the Project Implicit website. In this episode, I talk with six people who have all thought about the IAT, with the conversation covering such topics as (a) what kinds of mental associations might be revealed by performance on the IAT, (b) how reliable is it as a measure, and (c) whether or not the research debates surrounding the IAT are an example of good science. My guests are psychologists Calvin Lai, Brian Nosek, Mike Olson, Keith Payne, and Simine Vazire, as well as journalist Jesse Singal. LINKS --Scientific American Frontiers episode on implicit bias (https://cosmolearning.org/documentaries/scientific-american-frontiers-796/7/) --Project Implicit (where you can take an IAT) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) --Brian Nosek's departmental web page (https://med.virginia.edu/faculty/faculty-listing/ban2b/) --Calvin Lai's departmental web page (https://psychweb.wustl.edu/lai) --Michael Olson's departmental web page (https://psychology.utk.edu/faculty/olson.php) --Keith Payne's departmental web page (http://bkpayne.web.unc.edu/) --Simine Vazire's departmental web page (http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/people/svazire) --"Psychology's favorite tool for measuring racism isn't up to the job" (Jesse Singal, in The Cut) (https://www.thecut.com/2017/01/psychologys-racism-measuring-tool-isnt-up-to-the-job.html) --"Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects" (Greenwald, Banaji, & Nosek, 2015) (https://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/Greenwald,Banaji&Nosek.JPSP.2015.pdf) --"Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effects sizes of unknown societal significance" (Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Mitchell, & Tetlock, 2015) (https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44267412/Using_the_IAT_to_predict_ethnic_and_raci20160331-25218-20vauz.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1530481600&Signature=lS5rybckXwezHZrqSzHTlW%2FgKtI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DUsing_the_IAT_to_predict_ethnic_and_raci.pdf) --A summary of David Hume's thoughts on the association of ideas (http://www.livingphilosophy.org.uk/philosophy/David_Hume/the_Association_of_Ideas.htm) Cover art credit: "Still Life with Bottles, Wine, and Cheese," John F. Francis (1857; public domain, from Wikimedia Commons, copyright tag: PD-US) Special Guests: Brian Nosek, Calvin Lai, Jesse Singal, Keith Payne, Michael Olson, and Simine Vazire.

Links: Debate Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz11RMCrGl0 The Righteous Mind book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0052FF7YM/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 Studies: https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/infoserv/isrpub/pdf/Theattitudinaleffects_2360_.PDF https://press.princeton.edu/titles/10923.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16181440 http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~jessegra/papers/GrahamHaidtNosek.2009.Moral%20foundations%20of%20liberals%20and%20conservatives.JPSP.pdf http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1956-07306-001 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244801/

A British tabloid article about kids, brains, and spatial skills somehow provokes the biggest argument ever on the podcast. Dave and Tamler get into it about gender, toys, properly rounded brains, and balanced "play diets." Is Dave a sanctimonious toe-the-line academic liberal?  Is Tamler a Fox-News watching, mysoginist genetic determinist? Do they actually disagree about anything? Plus Dave takes Tamler back after his fling with Partially Examined Life,  and we discuss whether the new documentary The Unbelievers the atheist version of God is Not Dead?LinksThe Partially Examined Life podcast, and Tamler's Precognition of Ep. 93. [partiallyexaminedlife.com]Girls and boys DO have different brains – should they have different toys? by Rachel Carlyle [express.co.uk]The Unbelievers [unbelieversmovie.com]My Growing Disappointment with the New Atheist Movement: A Review of the The UnBelievers.  Ami Palmer.  [missiontotransition.blogspot.com]Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math≠ me. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83, 44. [briannosek.com]Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child development, 82, 766-779. [washington.edu]