Podcasts about laws governing

Generative AI is everywhere, including inside many law practices, creating documents, analyzing data, researching, and creating content. But what happens when AI makes a mistake? Who's liable? The implications could be enormous, are we may see a new wave of liability litigation. It's a brave, new world without a lot of legal guardrails.  There are existing, vague, nonspecific “tech” and business practice laws, then there emerging – AI specific – laws that aren't backed by a lot of precedent from the courts. Privacy laws, data usage, intellectual property laws, even state and federal rulings, have created a jigsaw puzzle for lawyers to apply in the AI space.  Guest Graham H. Ryan is an experienced litigator and an author and frequently quoted commentator on tech issues and the emergence of generative AI and its consequences. Ryan says it might help to look back to the “wild west” of the Internet's earliest days and the infamous “Section 230” that has helped decide who's liable for what when it comes to digital content. How far does Section 230 go when AI starts creating content instead of simply searching for it? And when does Congress get involved? Proceed with caution. Resources: International Association of Privacy Professionals, IAPP IAPP “AI Governance Global 2024” conference “The AI Industry Is Steaming Toward A Legal Iceberg,” Wall Street Journal quoting Graham Ryan Harvard Journal of Law and Technology “Department Of Justice's Review Of Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act Of 1996,” U.S. Dept. of Justice Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, via SCOTUSblog “Sanctions for Fake Generative AI Cites Harm Clients,” Bloomberg Law Analysis “The EU Artificial Intelligence Act”  “Schumer Launches New Phase In Push For AI Bill,” Politico American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

Generative AI is everywhere, including inside many law practices, creating documents, analyzing data, researching, and creating content. But what happens when AI makes a mistake? Who's liable? The implications could be enormous, are we may see a new wave of liability litigation. It's a brave, new world without a lot of legal guardrails.  There are existing, vague, nonspecific “tech” and business practice laws, then there emerging – AI specific – laws that aren't backed by a lot of precedent from the courts. Privacy laws, data usage, intellectual property laws, even state and federal rulings, have created a jigsaw puzzle for lawyers to apply in the AI space.  Guest Graham H. Ryan is an experienced litigator and an author and frequently quoted commentator on tech issues and the emergence of generative AI and its consequences. Ryan says it might help to look back to the “wild west” of the Internet's earliest days and the infamous “Section 230” that has helped decide who's liable for what when it comes to digital content. How far does Section 230 go when AI starts creating content instead of simply searching for it? And when does Congress get involved? Proceed with caution. Resources: International Association of Privacy Professionals, IAPP IAPP “AI Governance Global 2024” conference “The AI Industry Is Steaming Toward A Legal Iceberg,” Wall Street Journal quoting Graham Ryan Harvard Journal of Law and Technology “Department Of Justice's Review Of Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act Of 1996,” U.S. Dept. of Justice Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, via SCOTUSblog “Sanctions for Fake Generative AI Cites Harm Clients,” Bloomberg Law Analysis “The EU Artificial Intelligence Act”  “Schumer Launches New Phase In Push For AI Bill,” Politico American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

Chair of the Rye Community Group Alliance Michelle Cheers told Tom Elliott the "sheer volume" of jet skis in the bay is the issue that's not being addressed, and there's a simple solution.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Banking restrictions are on the chopping block, in the hope to make the lending process smoother.  Laws introduced by the previous government which aimed to prevent loan sharks are set to be scrapped.  Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayley says it had unintended consequences.  CEO of Money Sweetspot Sasha Lockley told Mike Hosking that it made lending too restrictive for both lenders and borrowers.  She says the prescriptive requirements took the human understanding out of lending.  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

North Carolina is about to implement some big and dramatic changes to the way it regulates voting and conducts elections. Going forward, all voters – even those who vote by mail – must produce a photo ID. Meanwhile, another bill recently introduced by Republican lawmakers would impose additional restrictions on voting by mail and same-day […] The post NC Newsline reporter Lynn Bonner on some big changes coming to the laws governing NC elections appeared first on NC Newsline.

Labour Minister Thulas Nxesi says government will soon implement legislations that deal employers who keep breaking the law by hiring foreigners. Nxesi was speaking to our colleagues Aldrin Sampear and Naledi Moleo amid threats of protests by truck driver protest who are calling for government to address unfavourable recruitment processes in the sector. 

Zack Buck is an associate professor at the University of Tennessee College of Law. Stephen Morrissey, the interviewer, is the Executive Managing Editor of the Journal. Z. Buck. Fraud, Abuse, and Financial Conflicts of Interest. N Engl J Med 2023;388:673-676.

Most people who believe in God believe in prayer, but their idea of prayer changes as their idea of God changes, and it is natural for each to feel that their way of praying is the correct way. But we should bear in mind that effective prayers – no matter whose prayers they may be – are effective because they embody certain universal principles which, when understood, can be consciously used. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/taylorb49/message

Most people who believe in God believe in prayer, but their idea of prayer changes as their idea of God changes, and it is natural for each to feel that their way of praying is the correct way. But we should bear in mind that effective prayers – no matter whose prayers they may be – are effective because they embody certain universal principles which, when understood, can be consciously used. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/taylorb49/message

Welcome to another edition of the Talking Property Podcast with Rob Druitt, Rod Ryan and Harvey Deegan. Paul Donovanand Helen Burnside from MDS Legal join us again to discuss various laws and responsibilities pertaining to property. In this episode they discuss what a seller can and can't do to hide neighbourly disputes, and the laws regarding owning and selling property that is co-owned with others, or is a deceased estate. All that and more on Talking Property, which is proudly supported by REIWA.com.

Andrew Bourne - Regional Manager: Africa, Zoho

Both sides of the political aisle have discussed the need to strengthen U.S. antitrust law. Congressional hearings this week could be a first test of whether that will come to fruition. Tech policy reporter Ryan Tracy joins host Amanda Lewellyn to discuss the hearings, and what the outcome could mean for tech companies. Christopher Zinsli is our supervising producer. Kateri Jochum is the executive producer of WSJ Podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is an abbreviated version of The Michael Medved Show. To get the full program, plus premium content, become a subscriber at MichaelMedved.com

In this podcast, Catherine Downing of Downing Van Dyke PC in Framingham provides a 15-minute overview of the various federal and state laws that govern requests for reasonable accommodation in housing. It’s just one lecture from MCLE’s 5/12/2020 program, Reasonable Accommodations in Housing Demystified. The full program is available as an on demand webcast or an MP3 here. https://www.mcle.org/product/catalog/code/2200248WBA Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of related eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass.

California has regulated a largely legalized marijuana market; the federal government, not so much. Just how are businesses to operate under a system of regulation that is, to say the least, fluid and evolving. How is a business – often a very large enterprise – to move through the myriad regulations and keep its executives out of Leavenworth? YLR host Jeff Hayden is joined by a distinguished panel: Courtesy of Goodwin Procter, LLP, Brett Shuman is the chair of the firm’s San Francisco office and co-chairs the firm’s cannabis practice, from Weaver Johnston Nelson, PLLC Richard Cheng developed a cannabis regulatory and corporate practice starting in late 2013 and has been listed as a top 250 cannabis expert by Databird Research Journal and a global top 200 cannabis lawyer by Cannabis Law Report & Cannabis Law Journal, from Ragghianti | Freitas LLP, in San Rafael, Habib Bentelab is a corporate attorney with clients both in and outside of the cannabis industry who regularly speaks at

The Broadcasting and Telecommunications Review committee recently published a 200-page report with recommendations on everything from how to regulate new organizations to how to make companies like Netflix and Facebook incorporate more Canadian content. We speak with Dr Sarah Ganter of the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University.

The Broadcasting and Telecommunications Review committee recently published a 200-page report with recommendations on everything from how to regulate new organizations to how to make companies like Netflix and Facebook incorporate more Canadian content. We speak with Dr Sarah Ganter of the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University.

Matt and Matt make a mishmash out of this one. They talk about all kinds of stuff happening in the Education Committee over the past week and the upcoming weeks. After this, you are caught up! 0:00 - 1:13 intro Reporting out: 1:13 - 3:101:13 - 1:42 LD 1607: An act to create the department of early care and learning1:42 - 2:09 LD 178: An Act To Increase the State Share of the Cost of Health Insurance for Retired Teachers2:09 - 2:30 LD 1521: An Act to expand skill development opportunities for Maine youth2:30 - 3:10 LD 1715: An act to reorganize the provision of services for children with disabilities from birth to 5 years of age3:10 - 4:51 movie references, nonsense, #borgninePreviews: 4:51 - 25:574:51 - 7:11 LD 2071: Resolve, Regarding Legislative Review of Portions of Chapter 125: Basic Approval Standards: Public Schools and School Administrative Units, a Major Substantive Rule of the Department of Education7:11 - 9:10 LD 2076: Resolve, Regarding Legislative Review of Portions of Chapter 40: Rule for Medication Administration in Maine Schools, a Major Substantive Rule of the Department of EducationAfternoon of 2-109:10 - 9:25 LD 2072: Resolve, Regarding Legislative Review of Portions of Chapter 132: Learning Results: Parameters for Essential Instruction, a Major Substantive Rule of the Department of Education9:25 - 10:37 LD 2075: Resolve, Regarding Legislative Review of Portions of Chapter 115: Part II Requirements for Specific Certificates and Endorsements, a Major Substantive Rule of the Department of EducationAfternoon of 2-1210:37 - 11:38 nonsense about Iowa11:38 - 13:34 LD 2014: An Act To Amend the Laws Governing the Maine State Grant Program13:34 - 20:06 LD 2016: An Act Regarding School Discipline for Maine's Youngest Students20:06 - 23:27 LD 2020: An Act To Strengthen Maritime Education by Amending the Laws Governing the Maine School for Marine Science, Technology, Transportation and EngineeringAfternoon of 2-1323:27 - 25:57 LD 2077: Resolve, Regarding Legislative Review of Portions of Chapter 180: Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Systems, a Major Substantive Rule of the Department of EducationUpdates on votes 25:57-28:2225:57 - 26:45 LD 191626:45 - 27:39 LD 191827:39 - 28:22 LD 187828:22 - 28:52 Friends referencesReviews from January 29 28:52 - 34:2828:52 - 32:40 LD 2024: An Act To Remove from the Calculation of the Cost of Education the Maine Public Employees Retirement System Teacher Plan Unfunded Actuarial Liability32:40 - 34:28 LD 2035: An Act To Modify Teacher Certification Expiration Dates for Teachers Who Use Family Medical LeavePreview of work sessions for held over bills 2-5-20 34:28 - 39:56LD 860: An Act To Establish the Maine Community College System No-cost Tuition ProgramLD 882: Resolve, To Require the Examination of the System of Learning ResultsLD 1813: Resolve, To Ensure Safe and Inclusive Learning Environments39:56 - end #borgnine

Nancy and William talk about death by plastic for hermit crabs, the increased deregulation of the pork industry, and the lack of laws governing organic ham.Our Special Guest: Writer, Christina Zubko returns to the show to update us on the homeless encampments and water condition at the Ormond Beach Lagoon in Oxnard, California facebook.com/groups/112162195884998

A father who killed his four- and six-year-old daughters on Christmas Day in 2017 will have to serve 22 years before he's eligible for parole.   B.C. Supreme Court Justice Miriam Gropper told Andrew Berry that he committed heinous crimes against his daughters as she sentenced him today in Victoria.   A jury convicted Berry of second-degree murder in September in the violent deaths of his daughters, Aubrey and Chloe Berry. Second-degree murder brings an automatic life sentence but Gropper had to determine Berry's parole eligibility.Gropper says Berry will serve the sentences concurrently.   The trial heard each girl had been stabbed dozens of times and Berry was found naked and unconscious in the bathtub of his Oak Bay apartment suffering from stab wounds to his neck and throat.   The tragic deaths of Audrey and Chloe Berry have put the issue of child custody agreements under the microscope. According to the girls' mother, Sarah Cotton, Berry had been physically, verbally and emotionally violent during their common-law union. In her statement after the sentencing, Cotton stated that the legal system is an “incredibly acrimonious system and one that favours equal parenting time over the safety and wellbeing of the child.” Cotton also called for changes to be made to the “legislation governing divorce and separation, mediation, parenting time and access to children.”    Dr. Lori Chamber is the Chair of women's studies at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay and one of the authors of the paper entitled, “Paternal Filicide and Coercive Control: Reviewing the Evidence in Cotton v Berry”.  She joins us now to discuss what the legal system should takeaway from this tragic case…   Guest: Dr. Lori Chambers  Chair of women's studies at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay Co-author of the paper entitled, “Paternal Filicide and Coercive Control: Reviewing the Evidence in Cotton v Berry”

0:00 -1:12 intro1:12 - 4:17 LD 1382: An Act To Establish Computer Science Courses and Content in Kindergarten to Grade 12 Schools4:17 - 8:06 LD 1425: An Act To Maintain the Integrity of the Department of Education by Prohibiting Its Promotion of Policies and Practices That Are Not Based on Rigorous Peer Review and Analysis, Limiting Acceptance of Private Funding in Implementing and Influencing State Policy and Retaining the Home Rule Powers to School Administrative Units8:06 - 10:35 LD 1521: An Act To Expand Skill Development Opportunities for Maine Youth10:35 - 12:08 LD 1593: An Act To Support Infrastructure Improvements in Schools12:08 - 14:00 LD 1628: An Act To Authorize Career and Technical Education Regions To Enter into Energy Conservation Performance Contracts for School Facilities14:00 - 18:01 LD 1376: An Act To Direct the Department of Education To Amend Its Rules To Ensure That Physical Restraint and Seclusion Policies Are Followed for Special Education Students and Make Biennial Reports on the Use of Physical Restraint and Seclusion18:01 - 20:26 LD 1607: An Act To Create the Department of Early Care and Learning20:26 - 21:42 LD 1641: An Act To Strengthen the School Transportation Workforce21:42 - 25:15 LD 1638: An Act To Provide for Gubernatorial Appointments to the Maine Charter School Commission25:15 - 31:35 LD 685: An Act To Amend the Laws Governing the Maine School for Marine Science, Technology, Transportation and Engineering This also talks about Lord's Day Contracts! And Horses!31:35 - 38:38 LD 721: An Act To Encourage Public Participation in School Board Meetings38:38 - end LD 1700: Resolve, To Promote the Inclusion of African-American History and Culture in the Curricular Offerings of School Administrative Units

The Military Reunion Network's Sharon Danitschek explains how her company and its military veteran attendees accommodate service animals at their meetings. She also shares information about how her meeting planner colleagues and facilities can comply with federal law regarding service animals. [Related Content: Laws Governing Service Animals at Meetings] Enjoying this episode? View more episodes of the Meetings Today Podcast! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

The Ford government is overhauling the laws in Ontario that govern combat sports. In theory this would open the door to increased business from the combat sport industry. As of now the laws are strict, but the government is trying to change that. Alex talks to UFC Senior Vice President of International and Content about what this could means for sports-fans in this province.

Matt and Matt update and review bills before the Labor Committee that are related to education.0:00 - intro1:03 - 2:58 LD 240 UPDATE!2:58 - 11:58 LD 300: An Act To Protect Hourly School Personnel Pay During School Days Missed Due to Weather or Emergency Closures11:58 - 16:34 LD 1412: An Act To Amend the Laws Governing the Collective Bargaining Rights of Employees of School Management and Leadership Centers16:34 - 18:25 LD 1041: An Act Regarding Collective Bargaining for Public Employees under the Municipal Public Employees Labor Relations Laws18:25 - 22:52 LD 900: An Act To Expand the Rights of Public Employees under the Maine Labor Laws22:52 - 27:33 LD 1184: An Act Regarding Penalties for Early Retirement for Certain Members of the Maine Public Employees Retirement System27:33 - end LD 1354: An Act To Eliminate the Penalties for State and Teacher Retirees Who Return to Employment

In this episode of The Proskauer Brief, partner Harris Mufson and associate Michelle Gyves discuss the main laws governing background checks for employers. We will discuss how employers can utilize the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to conduct pre-employment background checks on candidates.  In addition to FCRA, we also discuss how “ban the box” and credit check laws play a role in screening potential employees.  Be sure to tune in for more information on how these laws can affect both employers and candidates.

Host: Ann Luther, League of Women Voters of Maine     Engineer: John Greenman Program Topic: Ballot Questions in Maine: Whose Initiatives Are They? Key Discussion Points: We’ll discuss what happened in the recent election What our constitution provides What role the legislature and the governor are playing now. Guests: a) John Brautigam, Attorney and election law expert b) Ron Schmidt, Associate Professor of Political Science at USM. usm.maine.edu/pos/ronald-schmidt To learn more about this topic: Laws Governing the Initiative Process in Maine Initiated Bills in Maine 1911 – Peoples Vetoes in Maine 1909 – Referenda in Maine 1910 – As Progressives Turn to Ballot Initiatives, GOP Eyes Restrictions Steve Mistler story for Maine Public, February 2, 2017. The all-volunteer team at the League of Women Voters – Downeast who plan and coordinate this series includes: Don Carmichael Suzanne Carmichael Starr Gilmartin Maggie Harling Linda Hoskins Ann Luther Maryann Ogonowski Pam Person Leah Taylor Linda Washburn FMI re League of Women Voters of Maine: www.lwvme.org

Pre-employment screening is a vital aspect to choosing the right employee for a job, particularly those positions that have a high level of influence or handle company assets. It sounds so simple. However, the many laws surrounding the methods used to conduct background checks, by whom, and what information can be reported and what cannot, are quite complicated. Laws not only vary from state to state, federal laws get into the mix as well. Lester S. Rosen is an attorney, a licensed private investigator, an author of a popular tutorial on background screening, and the CEO of a background screening company. Les promises to tell everything an enterprising PI needs to know about the laws governing pre-employment screening.

Interview with Daniel R. Taber, PhD, author of Association Between State Laws Governing School Meal Nutrition Content and Student Weight Status: Implications for New USDA School Meal Standards