Podcasts about Proceed

A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government's attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI's handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer's 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor's allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI's later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors' administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI's conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government's failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI's failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors' case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government's attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI's handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer's 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor's allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI's later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors' administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI's conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government's failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI's failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors' case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government's attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI's handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer's 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor's allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI's later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors' administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI's conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government's failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI's failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors' case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government's attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI's handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer's 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor's allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI's later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors' administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI's conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government's failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI's failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors' case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

The Madlanga Commission has ruled that it will proceed with Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala’s application. Matlala has submitted an application addressing the reasons preventing him from engaging with certain arguments. The Commission is set to hear arguments pertaining to his self-incrimination application, but uncertainty remains over his legal representation. Matlala told the Commission he was “in the dark” and had not had enough time to decide whether he agreed with his lawyers’ position on withdrawing from his legal team. His legal team asked for more time to clarify his instructions. Commissioner Baloyi described the developments as “deeply problematic”, questioning whether Matlala’s lawyers had accurately represented his instructions.

We are once again celebrating a wide swath of historical romances that are recently published and by authors we've not talked much about on the podcast! Saddle up, because we're talking the Titanic, submissive heroes, heroines against the wall, bodily autonomy and even centaurs! If you're a historical lover, you're going to have a great time finding your next read in here, and if you're not a historical lover, what are you waiting for? We're so excited to be your discoverabilibuddies on this one!Come talk about your favorite recent historical romances over on our Patreon! You'll get an extra monthly episode from us and access to the incredible readers and brilliant people on the Fated Mates Discord. Learn more at fatedmates.net/patreon.Our next read along, next week, is Sarah's A Rogue By Any Other Name, the first in her casino series. This is one we've gotten a bunch of requests for, and so, it will be our final read along of the season. Get it at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Kobo, Apple Books or wherever you get your books.BooksAcross the Living Infinite by Logan Sage AdamsTo Covet a Countess by Sapna BhogCentaur and Sensibility by Quenby OlsonThe Seduction of Mr Alfred Sainsbury by Lydia LloydThe Magnificent Earl of March by Cecilia ReneYou Had Me at Heist by Christina BrittonI Shall Never Fall in Love by Hari ConnerFavors From a Gentleman by Lauren HayworthMrs. Milner Gets a Kitchen by Jane Hadley His Awful Grace by Anne KnightEarl on Fire by FeNotesListen to our Long Live Historicals, Volume I here.Fill out more about the Romance Novel Collective and fill out their survey.There was a salt water pool on Titanic. The centaur in The Lion, The Witch & the Wardrobe is not a centaur or a satyr, but a faun, and his name is Mr. Tumnus. Here's a primer on the difference between satyrs and fauns. Apologies to the Greeks, Romans, and CS Lewis fans in the crowd. The OG Centaur books Sarah mentioned are also not centaurs, they are satyrs, but they are Holy Cannoli, Batman and by Elizabeth Amber. Proceed with caution.Some SFW and NSFW images about centaurs.The RestFor even more info about this episode, and to explore everything Fated Mates has to offer, visit: https://fatedmates.net/episodes/2026/8/17/s0848-the-new-historicals-volume-iii If you wish you had six more days in a week of people talking about romance, may we suggest joining our Patreon? Aside from an additional episode every month you get access to our Discord, where other romance readers are talking about books they love (and many other things!) all the time. It's so fun! Learn more about the Patreon and go join those cool people who love romance as much as you do at patreon.com/fatedmates. Beyond your favorite podcast app, you can find us on Instagram, Threads, Blue Sky, Tumblr, and probably some other places, too, if you look hard enough. If you've never listened to our Stop Book Banning episode, there's no better time than now.

Employers have a duty to engage with employees when they know a workplace requirement conflicts with an employee's religious practice. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org 

Tyler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Tyler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

yler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Tyler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

yler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

yler Robinson's defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state's 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson's lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution's evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense's argument against bindover.The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution's position that Robinson's alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson's defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson's alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Verifier Andy brings us a Cinemania Field Report on John Carpenter's 1981 action opus "Escape From New York." Kurt Russell vs. Isaac Hayes vs. Lee van Cleef, backed up with a whole coterie of comedown-era character actors in a masterwork of tense, urban combat. Cinemania abounds, ladies and gentlemen. Proceed with caution.   Written by Zacharia Berks and Andy Slack Performed by Andy Slack Editing & Sound Design by Ethan Ireland Music by Karl Casey at White Bat Audio Tracks Used: "Brave New World," "Big Trouble in Little China," "Frozen Planet," "Revolver," "Aikido."  

S2E156 - Proceed with CausticWE'VE BEEN NOMINATED FOR TWO CRIT AWARDS!Best Tech/Producer in TTRPGs 2026 - Paris ArrowsmithBest Supplement / Homebrew 2026 - Null Protocol Please cast your vote before the deadline chooms: ⁠⁠https://linktr.ee/CritAwards⁠⁠The crew make their first steps into the Blackwall Library, they need the gatekeeper key. And apparently it's in there. Besides, fear they have nothing in their way. Vivi tinkers with her new computer skills, Ioanna keeps the team on track, Retro is sceptical and Jeb? He's hungry. Unfortunately is that the smell of a corpse?Can Vivi avoid a trap?Everyone hates gatekeepers, right?Only the dice will tell.More info can be found here:⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠linktr.ee/NoLatency⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out out Patreon!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Patreon.com/nolatency⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Even more information and MERCH is on our website!Get a 10% DISCOUNT on the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Official Rtalsorian Store⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Using Our Promocode: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠NOLATENCY⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BlueSky & Twitter: @nolatencypodInstagram: @nolatencypodFind @SkullorJade,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @Miss_Magitek⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @Binary_Dragon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  @retrodatv⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on twitch, for live D&D and more.#cyberpunkred #actualplay #ttrpg #radioplay #scifi #cyberpunk #drama #comedy #weekly #rpg #show #series

Are you the User of AI—or about to become a Looser? This is Episode 75 of Dare Real Agile, Coach AF (A. Frédéric Joly) opens the vault of the human brain for a bold solo tale on AI, agility, and the future of work. Part 1 decodes the User / Loser / Looser triple-play: why rigidity loses, why staying loose wins, and how the HI + AI equation keeps the human in the loop the real hero. Part 2 reviews Jürgen Appelo's essay "The Age of AI Will Reveal the True Agilists"—the daring, caring way—separating true agilists from pretenders inside the new AI industrial complex. Packed with practical insight for entrepreneurs, business owners, startups, executive coaches, agile people, Scrum Masters, Product Owners, project managers, and change consultants exploring Enterprise Scrum, Business Agility, Lean, Experience Design, and New Ways of Working. If you're into AI for Enterprise, AI Craftmanship, prompt engineering, Bitcoinpreneur thinking, digital nomadism, motivation coaching, and the Freedom Lifestyle Club—this one's for you. Empirical. Human-centered. Bold. Proceed and be bold. Dare real agile.

It's only because of Chris we even saw any of these... perhaps it's a bit greedy to want more details. But we do all the same. This collection of weirdos from a forgotten tabletop game run the gamut from cool as hell to interesting but odd to... why.... And thank god we have an excellent guest to discuss them with. Thank you so much to Thom for joining us! You can find his main show Mobile Suit Breakdown here or on your podcatcher of choice, but his most exciting new venture is The Disappearances of Lydia Fountayne! Check out the website, find it on your podcatcher, or listen on YouTube! Or do all of these things! You can find a video version of this podcast for free on Scanline Media's Patreon! If you want to find us on Bluesky, Dylan is lowpolyrobot.bsky.social and Six is six.scanlinemedia.com. Our opening theme is the Hangar Theme from Gundam Breaker 3, and our ending theme for this episode is Resumption from Gundam Breaker 4. Our podcast art is a fantastic piece of work from Twitter artist @fenfelt. Want to see a list of every unit we've covered from every episode, including variants and tangents? It's right here. The Scanline Media Discord can be found here! Units discussed: RGM-090 Neo GM YMF-87Mk.III/Kai Great Zimbabwe RXA-07E Elth Fin MSA-008 Box Doll MS-T04 Bem Dery Omu RMS-143ADAD Xeku Drei Lex

Everybody wants to believe they left an unforgettable impression.But what happens when you find out you might not be the best your partner has ever had?Is great sex about performance, size, chemistry, spontaneity—or just being attached to the right memory at the right time? And even if the past was better, does that actually mean the relationship is missing anything now?Some questions build intimacy.Others will have you going through a phone at 2:00 a.m., ruining your own week.Proceed carefully.Join our Patreon CommunityBuy some merch and ebooksIG: @terryroseland & @amansperspective_

D&P Highlight: In case the judge is wondering...yes, there is enough evidence to proceed with a trial. full 388 Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:57:00 +0000 6SrxqeHbzVQsUx0amjLuXKl3Ik39BNtc news The Dana & Parks Podcast news D&P Highlight: In case the judge is wondering...yes, there is enough evidence to proceed with a trial. You wanted it... Now here it is! Listen to each hour of the Dana & Parks Show whenever and wherever you want! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News

Calvary Chapel Belfast rightfully won the University of Maine System's first bidding process. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

15 Then Peter answered and said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”16 So Jesus said, “Are you also still without understanding? 17 Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated? 18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. 20 These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.”

This is a video about FULL INTERVIEW - The LIFE WORKS Podcast (Mark Botros, Host) The Heart of Leadership with Connell Cuffie (Founder, Proceed2Lead)Proceed 2 Lead is an organization dedicated to transforming inefficient organizations into effective ones. Founded by Connell Cuffie, Proceed 2 Lead aims to foster healthier leadership in the workplace by emphasizing core values such as cherishing wisdom, seeking understanding, showing grace, and embracing the present​ (Proceed 2 Lead)​​ (Buzzsprout)​.Connell Cuffie has extensive leadership experience, having held roles at Jersey Mike's Subs, Chick-fil-A, and Hope Community Church. He has also served on the boards of Bethany Christian Services, the Maryland Symphony Orchestra, and CASA of the Eastern Panhandle. His approach centers on the power of relationships and the belief that every employee is a volunteer who trades time for money​​.Cuffie also hosts the "Uncuffed" podcast, where he discusses various leadership challenges and strategies, sharing insights on how leaders can overcome obstacles and lead more effectively​.0:00 FULL INTERVIEW - The LIFE WORKS Podcast The Heart of Leadership with Connell Cuffie (Founder, Proceed2Lead)

The Courage to Proceed by Tracie Braylock - proverbs31.org

An FAI motion has passed to continue plans for the upcoming Republic of Ireland Nations League matches against Israel. We get reaction to this with Joanne McDonald, spokesperson for the Irish Sport for Palestine group.

Supreme Court Allows Texas App Store Age Verification Law to Proceed, Samsung Shares Dip Despite Record Q2 Profits Driven by AI Demand, and Nintendo to Phase Out Switch Consoles in Europe by 2027 Due to Battery Regulations. MP3 Please SUBSCRIBE HERE for free or get DTNS shows ad-free. A special thanks to all our supporters–withoutContinue reading "China Weighs Restrictions on Exporting Advanced AI Models – DTH"

We have several problems, Neighbor--and all of them involve moisture. Cooincidence?! We think not! THEN: The Peaches learned a new term, and it will either help you become a better comedian or drive you crazy. Proceed with caution. LATER: John shares a story about when he realized his bi-polar father was losing touch with reality. But, on the plus side, he almost became the heir of an Aloe Vera Farm! Contact the Comedian's family at nextdoor@johnbranyan.com and let us know if you tend to be a bit of a conspiracy theorist.

We have several problems, Neighbor--and all of them involve moisture. Cooincidence?! We think not! THEN: The Peaches learned a new term, and it will either help you become a better comedian or drive you crazy. Proceed with caution. LATER: John shares a story about when he realized his bi-polar father was losing touch with reality. But, on the plus side, he almost became the heir of an Aloe Vera Farm! Contact the Comedian's family at nextdoor@johnbranyan.com and let us know if you tend to be a bit of a conspiracy theorist.

We have several problems, Neighbor--and all of them involve moisture. Cooincidence?! We think not! THEN: The Peaches learned a new term, and it will either help you become a better comedian or drive you crazy. Proceed with caution. LATER: John shares a story about when he realized his bi-polar father was losing touch with reality. But, on the plus side, he almost became the heir of an Aloe Vera Farm! Contact the Comedian's family at nextdoor@johnbranyan.com and let us know if you tend to be a bit of a conspiracy theorist.

On this glittering and golden episode of the Shut Up & Sit Down Podcast, Matt and Tom are sitting atop a dragon's hoard of card board! Wahey! That's what we in the business like to call “Rhyme Style”, and you can find many examples of it in the youthmusic of today :)Right atop the pile is the latest from frivolity enjoyers Weast Coast - Loners! It's a card game that has an entire clown car of variably ripped dudes. Proceed with caution! Hachi Machi!!! We follow that up with the latest game from the Reiner Knizia Cardboard Industrial Complex: Gold Country! It's camel speculation. You'll see what we mean. Last but by no means least, Matt chats about some strange dream he had about a kind of figure-of-eight draconic salad spinner - completely unrelated to our discussion of 8 Dragons.Have a great week, everybody!Timestamps:2:47 - Loners12:57 - Gold Country23:24 - 8 Dragons

On today’s edition on SUFTT, Tim and Mary take a look at the topics du jour that help the listener see that there is so much they are not hearing about. Believers have a choice to make with every passing day and headline, what will we believe about what we have heard? How does the Scripture address it?  Do we have the whole picture? A godly worldview implies that there will be a testing of the spirits and the ongoing action of being a Berean, and when it comes to the news, training ourselves to read between the lines. Today we talk about the Iran deal; with most news commentaries coming against Trump, is there something we are not considering? Not everyone thinks it is a bad deal. We also look at the latest on Fauci, RSV vaccine experiments in the 1960s, and the replacement of Keir Starmer – good, bad or same? Sometimes we subtly believe half truths innocently, but are we also refusing truth at the same time? Proceed with caution here in 2026.

You can do everything right, follow every system, hire every coach, and still build a business that doesn't feel like yours, because no strategy can outrun what's out of alignment with your values.  You're Invited to Podcast Club: Listeners of The Conscious Edge are coming together on Thursdays at 1pm ET for Podcast Club. Think book club, but for the podcast. We'll talk about the episodes, what landed, where it's challenging us, and how to actually apply it. It's a chance to meet other business owners, get into real two-way conversation, and stop just consuming content. RSVP for the dates you want at consciousedge.com/club.  Get full show notes at www.consciousedge.com/ep110 Come say “hi' on Instagram:@aleciastg Most entrepreneurs have done some version of values work. You have a why, a mission, a set of words on a page. And then somewhere along the way, following a coach here, a strategy there, a system everyone swore by, you look up and realize the business you built doesn't look much like the one you actually wanted. In this Mindfulness Matters conversation, Alecia St. Germain and her longtime business partner Jonathan Dugger go past the surface of values work and into what keeps you connected to it. They get into why values evolve as you grow, how money amplifies whatever is already running underneath you (your purpose and your self-protection patterns alike), and the difference between a value that's truly yours and one you're holding onto to feel safe. Alecia also opens up the soul purpose work she's trained in, and Jonathan shares how his own reading turned years of self-imposed pressure into something much closer to joy. Together they offer a grounded way back to alignment, including the STOP practice and a handful of questions you can return to anytime your business starts to feel out of sync with who you are.

Business and finance news from the Asia-Pacific. The US issued a 60-day license allowing Iran to sell oil on the international market, giving Tehran an economic lifeline as the two adversaries continued talks for a permanent peace deal. Vice President JD Vance, attending the discussions in Switzerland, described the first round of negotiations as "very, very good" and said Iran had agreed to allow nuclear inspectors back into the country — a claim later backed up by President Donald Trump. But Iranian officials, who also cited progress, challenged that claim, saying Vance's assertion was "false and does not reflect reality." For a closer look at what is going on in the oil market, we speak to Stephen Stapczynski, Bloomberg's Asia Energy Team Leader. Plus - The World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting of the New Champions, often known as "Summer Davos", will be held this week in the Chinese port city of Dalian. This year's theme is "Innovating at Scale" and will bring together global leaders from government, business and academia, along with innovators and representatives from international organizations, media and civil society. Bloomberg's Stephen Engle sits down with Andre Hoffmann, World Economic Forum Co-Chair. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We're only human, of course we joined the Off Campus craze! It's fun, it's sexy, and we have opinions! Plus Grace is our resident book expert because trust she's reading just about anything. Spoilers abound for the show and books!! Proceed with caution!!Remember

Welcome to the NeurologyLive® Mind Moments® podcast. Tune in to hear leaders in neurology sound off on topics that impact your clinical practice.In this Mind Moments episode, Jessica Ailani, MD, director of the MedStar Georgetown Headache Center, discusses emerging phase 2 data on bocunebart (Lundbeck), a PACAP-targeting monoclonal antibody being developed for migraine prevention. Presented at the 2026 American Headache Society Annual Meeting, findings from the PROCEED trial demonstrated efficacy in patients with episodic or chronic migraine who had previously failed 1 to 4 preventive therapies, including those considered treatment refractory. The conversation explores the efficacy and safety findings from PROCEED, pooled analyses from chronic migraine populations, and a separate study evaluating coadministration of bocunebart with ubrogepant. Ailani also discusses the potential role of PACAP-targeting therapies within the evolving migraine treatment landscape, considerations for future combination strategies, and key questions investigators will need to address as the program moves toward phase 3 development. Looking for more Headache & migraine discussion? Check out the NeurologyLive® Headache & migraine clinical focus page.Episode Breakdown: 1:10 – PROCEED trial efficacy in patients with prior preventive failures 5:10 – Safety and tolerability findings for bocunebart 6:30 – Coadministration data with ubrogepant and clinical implications 8:30 – Neurology News Network  10:50 – Rationale for combining PACAP and CGRP-targeted therapies 13:40 – Key considerations for future phase 3 development The stories featured in this week's Neurology News Minute, which will give you quick updates on the following developments in neurology, are further detailed here: Topline Phase 2 CELIA Results Show Diranersen Misses Primary End Point in Early Alzheimer Disease FDA Grants Priority Review to Bayer's Asundexian for Secondary Stroke Prevention Dyne Submits BLA for Z-Rostudirsen in Exon 51 Skipping Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Thanks for listening to the NeurologyLive® Mind Moments® podcast. To support the show, be sure to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. For more neurology news and expert-driven content, visit neurologylive.com.

For the Good of the Public brings you news and weekly conversations at the intersection of faith and civic life. Monday through Thursday, The Morning Five starts your day off with scripture and prayer, as we also catch up on the news together. Throughout the year, we air limited series on Fridays to dive deeper into conversations with civic leaders, thinkers, and public servants reimagining public life for the good of the public. Today's host was Michael Wear.  Thanks for listening to The Morning Five! Please subscribe to and rate The Morning Five on your favorite podcast platform. Learn more about the work of the Center for Christianity and Public Life at www.ccpubliclife.org. A message from our June sponsor, The Wonder Project: Subscriber support makes more great content like I Gotta Ask with Annie Downs possible. The Wonder Project subscription on Prime Video is available in the U.S. for $8.99/month or $89.99/year after a 7-day free trial.Visit IGottaAsk.com to learn more! Today's scripture: Psalm 84:1-7 (ESV) News sources: https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-iran-trade-heavy-fire-in-persian-gulf-testing-fragile-ceasefire-d4787573?mod=hp_lead_pos3  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/03/business/trump-tariffs-force-labor.html  https://www.notus.org/2026-election/supreme-court-alabama-black-district-congress-map  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/03/seven-takeaways-big-primary-night-iowa-california-more/  https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/03/politics/house-iran-war-powers-vote  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/us/politics/iowa-democratic-senate-primary-turek-wahls.html  Join the conversation and follow us at: Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@michaelwear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclife Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@MichaelRWear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclife and check out ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@tsfnetwork⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Music by: King Sis #politics #faith #prayer #scripture #news #Iran #war #Kuwait #tariffs #trade #Alabama #elections #Iowa #California Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Every playbook, every case study, every innovation workshop is built on the same question: how do you succeed? You map the path forward. You model the upside. Nobody teaches you to ask the harder question. How would you guarantee this fails? That's inversion thinking. Charlie Munger called it one of the most useful tools he had, and he used it for sixty years. Most innovators know the quote. Almost none of them actually use it. By the end of this episode, you'll know why that gap exists, what it costs, and the exact steps to close it. If you want to try this on a real decision right away, I've built a free tool for it. Link below. I'll come back to it later in the episode. What Is Inversion Thinking? Inversion thinking is the practice of reasoning backward from failure. Instead of starting with "what does success look like and how do I get there," you start with "what would guarantee this fails" and design those conditions out of the plan. You'll also hear it called thinking backwards, and when it's aimed at a project before launch, a pre-mortem. Munger's rule was three words: invert, always invert. Or, in his blunter version, "All I want to know is where I'm going to die, so I'll never go there." People hear this and think pessimism. It isn't. A pessimist names the failure and stops there. Inversion names the failure and uses it to redirect the plan, while the fix is still cheap. HP Invented the Category. Then Gave It Away. In 2005, HP built Halo. It was the best telepresence system in the world. You walked into a Halo room and the people on the other end looked like they were sitting across the table from you. Life-sized. Perfect audio. Nobody had built anything close. The team that made it was brilliant, and they believed one thing without question: quality wins. They built rooms that cost $500,000 each. They required customers to run those rooms on HP's proprietary network at a monthly cost that would make your eyes water. Every decision traced back to the same conviction. Make the experience extraordinary, and the market will come to you. Nobody in that room asked the one question that mattered. What if quality isn't what the market is buying? Because it wasn't. The market was buying access. Cisco, and then Zoom, came at the same opportunity from the opposite end. Good-enough quality, on any device, on any network, available to everyone. They understood what the Halo team never tested. In communications, reach beats quality. Every new user makes the service more valuable to everyone already on it, so the product that spreads to the most people wins, even when it looks worse. That network effect beat Halo so completely that Zoom became a verb. HP defined the category and then gave it away. In 2011, under quarterly pressure, HP sold Halo to Polycom for $89 million. In 2022, HP bought the business back, folded into Poly, for $3.3 billion. Thirty-seven times the price, to reacquire a category it had invented. The failure was visible the entire time. It lived inside one assumption nobody questioned: that quality was what the customer cared about most. An inversion exercise would have dragged it into the open. Ask "how do we guarantee Halo fails," and one honest answer was already the plan. Bet everything on quality. Price it for the few. Lock it to our own network. Leave the rest of the market wide open for a cheaper rival. No crystal ball required. Read the plan from the other side and the failure was sitting right there in it. The Three Moves Inversion runs in three moves. The first two are mechanical. The third is where the discipline lives, and where most people quit. Move One: Invert the Question Take the goal and flip it. Write your goal as one sentence. The way you'd say it to the board. "We will win the telepresence market with the best experience available." Turn it into a failure question. Same goal, opposite direction. "How would we guarantee we lose the telepresence market?" List every path to that failure. Don't rank them. Don't defend anything. Write down every way it could happen, including the ones that feel unlikely or embarrassing to say out loud. Price. Distribution. A competitor's move. A wrong read on the customer. Sort each one: recoverable, or not. A slow first year is recoverable. Letting a competitor own the network effect while you keep only the high end is not. The ones you can't undo are what matter here. Set the rest aside. Move Two: Find the Load-Bearing Assumption Behind every failure you can't recover from sits a single assumption holding the whole plan up. Find it. Take your most serious irreversible failure mode. The one from Move One that would actually end the project. Ask what would have to be true for that failure to never happen. For Halo: "Enough customers will pay a large premium for superior quality, and they'll do it fast enough to matter." That sentence is the load-bearing assumption. Ask whether you tested that assumption or inherited it. Did you confirm it with evidence, or did it ride along with the idea because it felt obviously true? The Halo team inherited theirs. Quality felt like an objective good, so nobody checked whether the market agreed. If you can't point to the evidence, you've found your real risk. A plan resting on an untested load-bearing assumption is a bet wearing the costume of a strategy, however solid the rest of it looks. Move Three: Decide What to Do With It Once the assumption is exposed, you have three honest choices. Kill it. If the assumption is false and the failure is irreversible, stop now, while stopping is still cheap. Change the plan so the failure mode disappears. The Halo team had room to do this. A software tier on any network, at lower quality, to build the user base and the network effect, with the premium rooms kept for the customers who'd pay for them. They'd have owned both ends. The plan allowed it. The conviction didn't. Proceed, with the bet named out loud. Sometimes you take the risk on purpose, eyes open, because the upside justifies it. That's legitimate. Taking the same risk by accident, because nobody said the word "assumption" in the room, is not. The one move you cannot make is to see the failure mode and proceed as though you hadn't. That isn't confidence. It's the most expensive form of hope there is. Why You Can't Do This Alone You know the three moves now. The hard part is running them on your own work. You can't fully see your own assumptions. You built the plan. You believe in it. The assumption holding it up feels so obvious that questioning it never occurs to you. The Halo team wasn't careless. They were the best in the world at what they did, and that was the problem. The more expert you are, the more your assumptions feel like facts, and the less it occurs to you to test them. Then there's the room. Even when someone can see the failure coming, the dynamics of a team work against saying it out loud. You earn standing by backing the plan, not by listing the ways it dies. Raise the failure scenario and you look like you lack conviction, or like you're not on board. So the failure half the room quietly senses stays unspoken until it's expensive. Culture rewards the loudest voice on the upside, not the person who turns out to be right about the risk. Two walls. You can't see your own assumptions, and the people who might see them are discouraged from speaking. AI has none of those problems. No ego in the plan, no career to protect, no boss to impress, no reason to soften the bad news to keep the room comfortable. Point it at your work, tell it to find the failure, and it will, without flinching and without politics. It won't make the call for you. It surfaces the failure modes you're too close to see, and then you do the judging. That's how you practice this skill on your own. You sit down with a real decision and a partner that has no reason to spare your feelings. So I built the AI Prompts for Inversion Thinking for exactly that. One prompt makes the AI write the post-mortem of your project before you've even started. Another has it play a competitor designing your defeat. Then one walks you to the single assumption your whole plan is betting on.  You bring the decision and the judgment. The prompts make sure nothing gets skipped just because it's uncomfortable to look at. Here's your work this week. Take one real decision you're sitting on, something with actual stakes, and run it through the pack. It's free at innovation.tools, or use the link in the description. The Long Game The people who use inversion well aren't more negative than their peers. They're more honest about which risks they can walk back and which ones they can't. That single distinction, made early and acted on, is the difference between a project that fails fast and cheap and one that fails slowly, expensively, in year ten. The failure that ends your project is usually the one plenty of people saw coming and nobody was willing to name. Say it now, while it still costs you nothing.

"Take the Dough, We Gotta Know" is the name of a bipartisan bill requiring more oversight into the controversial EdChoice voucher program. But will it go anywhere with mere days until summer recess?Ohio doesn't have enough oversight into EdChoice, the state-funded program giving families vouchers for their kids to go to private K-12 schools, according to two state lawmakers who say they want to change that.Senate Bill 443, introduced last Wednesday by Sen. Bill Blessing (R-Colerain Twp.) and Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid), would establish a dozen new accountability measures.Data centers in Ohio will no longer enjoy a key tax break at least for now.The pause, announced by Gov. Mike DeWine comes as lawmakers discuss the industry's future here.As resident anger over data centers builds and lost revenue from combined incentives tops $1 billion, which is far more than was previously known.A pastor turned Ohio lawmaker pushes a bill named for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.The Ohio Supreme Court weighs in on a massive solar project in Madison County on land partially owned by Bill Gates.Calling all STEM students: the state has $26 million in college scholarships for you.We're digging into all of these topics on this week's Reporter Roundtable.Guests:Sarah Donaldson, reporter, Ohio Public Radio Statehouse News BureauLaura Hancock, politics and policy reporter, Cleveland.comJake Zuckerman, reporter, Signal Ohio

"Take the Dough, We Gotta Know" is the name of a bipartisan bill requiring more oversight into the controversial EdChoice voucher program. But will it go anywhere with mere days until summer recess?Ohio doesn't have enough oversight into EdChoice, the state-funded program giving families vouchers for their kids to go to private K-12 schools, according to two state lawmakers who say they want to change that.Senate Bill 443, introduced last Wednesday by Sen. Bill Blessing (R-Colerain Twp.) and Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid), would establish a dozen new accountability measures.Data centers in Ohio will no longer enjoy a key tax break at least for now.The pause, announced by Gov. Mike DeWine comes as lawmakers discuss the industry's future here.As resident anger over data centers builds and lost revenue from combined incentives tops $1 billion, which is far more than was previously known.A pastor turned Ohio lawmaker pushes a bill named for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.The Ohio Supreme Court weighs in on a massive solar project in Madison County on land partially owned by Bill Gates.Calling all STEM students: the state has $26 million in college scholarships for you.We're digging into all of these topics on this week's Reporter Roundtable.Guests:Sarah Donaldson, reporter, Ohio Public Radio Statehouse News BureauLaura Hancock, politics and policy reporter, Cleveland.comJake Zuckerman, reporter, Signal Ohio

My Thoughts On Whats Going On and How to Proceed Join Jim as he talks about the current situation we all find ourselves in. He give advice and observations.

My Thoughts On Whats Going On and How to Proceed Join Jim as he talks about the current situation we all find ourselves in. He give advice and observations.

For the Good of the Public brings you news and weekly conversations at the intersection of faith and civic life. Monday through Thursday, The Morning Five starts your day off with scripture and prayer, as we also catch up on the news together. Throughout the year, we air limited series on Fridays to dive deeper into conversations with civic leaders, thinkers, and public servants reimagining public life for the good of the public. Today's host was Michael Wear.  Thanks for listening to The Morning Five! Please subscribe to and rate The Morning Five on your favorite podcast platform. Learn more about the work of the Center for Christianity and Public Life at www.ccpubliclife.org. Today's scripture: Luke 15:11-24 (ESV) News sources: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/27/world/live-news/iran-war-us-news?post-id=cmpo9iaj000003b6ukjay0e53  https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/27/alabama-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-redistricting-for-2026-00938494  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/26/opinion/paxton-talarico-texas-senate.html  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/james-talarico-interview-ken-paxton-texas-senate/ https://www.npr.org/2026/05/02/nx-s1-5806271/2026-midterm-elections-control-senate-race  https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/polls/north-carolina-us-senate-election-polls-2026.html  https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/polls/ohio-us-senate-election-polls-2026.html  https://www.cookpolitical.com/analysis/senate/texas-senate/texas-senate-moves-lean-republican-after-paxton-runoff-win   Join the conversation and follow us at: Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@michaelwear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclife Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@MichaelRWear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclife and check out ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@tsfnetwork⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Music by: King Sis #politics #faith #prayer #scripture #news #Iran #war #DonaldTrump #Alabama #elections #Senate A message from our June sponsor, The Wonder Project: Subscriber support makes more great content like I Gotta Ask with Annie Downs possible. The Wonder Project subscription on Prime Video is available in the U.S. for $8.99/month or $89.99/year after a 7-day free trial.Visit IGottaAsk.com to learn more! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(00:30) Supreme Court denies NFL appeal, allows Brian Flores lawsuit to proceed (22:00) Texans, WR Nico Collins agree to revised contract (27:00) Chargers, S Derwin James agree to 3-year, $75.6M extension (34:45) Chiefs QB Patrick Mahomes practices during Chiefs OTAs; Favorite to win Comeback Player of the Year Award (+160) (39:45) NCAA denies Brendan Sorsby’s request for reinstatement for 2026 season (44:30) Falcons DE James Pearce agrees to 1-year pre-trial intervention program stemming from domestic violence incident (47:00) Happy 29th Birthday, Daniel Jones!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Not everything that we covet in life necessarily redounds to our benefit. There are great many things that are double-edge swords: they can be used for good; they can accelerate our ascent to righteousness, and they can be absolutely destructive and lead us towards a death spiral of decadence. Proceed with caution. – – – […]

Stop chasing happiness and start building a life where it happens naturally. In this episode, Harvard's Tal Ben-Chahar reveals why the direct pursuit of joy often leads to misery and how "Antifragility" is the ultimate skill for 2026. We dive deep into Ben-Shahar's latest book, Happier, No Matter What, exploring the science of whole-person well-being. Learn why "Toxic Positivity" is holding you back and how Dr. JC's Interface Response System (Perceive, Pause, Process, Proceed) provides a tactical roadmap for emotional maturity. Whether you are navigating the pressures of the new AI-driven economy or seeking personal resilience, this conversation reframes discomfort as a prerequisite for growth. Discover the "Rainbow Effect" of happiness and how to strengthen your psychological flexibility to flourish in an era of constant uncertainty. #PositivePsychology #Antifragile #TalBenShahar #MentalHealth2026 #Wellbeing     Connect With Tal: Website: https://www.happinessstudies.academy/abouttalbenshahar IG: @talhappier     Dr. JC Doornick Links: Web - www.makessensebook.com YT -    / @drjcdoornick IG -   / @drjcdoornick FB -   / @makessensepodcast Makes Sense Book - https://tinyurl.com/makessensepurchase   MAKES SENSE PODCAST Welcome to the Makes Sense with Dr. JC Doornick Podcast. This podcast explores topics that expand human consciousness and enhance performance. On the Makes Sense Podcast, we acknowledge that it's who you are that determines how well what you do works, and that perception is subjective and an acquired taste. When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at begin to change. Welcome to the uprising of the sleepwalking masses. Welcome to the Makes Sense with Dr. JC Doornick Podcast.   SUBSCRIBE/RATE/REVIEW & SHARE our new podcast. FOLLOW Podcast: You will find a "Follow" button in the top right. This will enable the podcast software to alert you when a new episode launches each week. Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/makes-sense-with-dr-jc-doornick/id1730954168 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1WHfKWDDReMtrGFz4kkZs9?si=003780ca147c4aec   Podcast Affiliates: Kwik Learning: Many people ask me where I get all these topics, which I've been covering for almost 15 years. I have learned to read nearly four times faster and retain information 10 times better with Kwik Learning. Learn how to learn and earn with Jim Kwik. Get his program at a special discount here: https://jimkwik.com/dragon OUR SPONSORS: Makes Sense Academy: A private mastermind and psychologically safe environment full of the Mindset and Action steps that will help you begin to thrive. The Makes Sense Academy. https://www.skool.com/makes-sense-academy/about The Sati Experience: A retreat designed for the married couple that truly loves one another, yet wants to take their love to that higher magical level. Relax, reestablish, and renew your love at the Sati Experience. https://www.satiexperience.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

(Episode 339) She's a freshly licensed massage therapist with a cleaning business she's built from nothing, a partnership offer that feels all kinds of wrong, and a spirit that is quite literally too big to be contained. I knew the moment we started talking. The channel opened so wide I had to just keep going. What came through was a vision, ancient, sacred, expansive and a very clear message from Spirit that some of us are wild horses and the sooner we stop apologizing for it the better. This one hit me in the chest. I think it might hit you there too.In this episode we talk about:00:00 The Courage to Proceed with A Career Transition04:26 Spirit's Messages and Card Pull23:34 How To Negotiate Your Terms29:41 Breaking Limiting Beliefs34:54 Using Joy as Your Compass42:22 Outgrowing the Old Identity45:50 Leaning Into Your MagnetismGet Your 10% off your yearly Numerology Report here: http://zoeygreco.com Don't miss the next Pajama Party! http://zoeygreco.comTake my FREE quiz!What's your intuitive style? Discover your unique intuitive gifts with my free quiz: http://zoeygreco.com/quiz Did you love this episode? The Higher Self Hotline Team lovingly asks for your support!We'd be eternally grateful if you'd rate, review, and subscribe! We want to make sure you never miss a dose of divine guidance.If this conversation resonated with you, we hope you share it with someone you think would connect with the message.Stay connected with us and your higher self! Follow Zoey on socials.Connect with Zoey here: Instagram: @thezoeygrecoTikTok: @thezoeygrecoWebsite: ZoeyGreco.comAudio Editing by:Mike Sims | echovalleyaudio.comContact: echovalleyaudio@gmail.com

This episode of The Rizzuto Show is what happens when a comedy podcast accidentally stumbles into medical territory and refuses to turn back. One minute we're solving world problems (obviously), and the next we're deep into a CDC-level discussion about Shigella, antibiotic resistance, and a brand-new nightmare fuel lovingly dubbed “Man-Coli.”Yes, it's as bad as it sounds.The gang breaks down how this bacteria is evolving into something way harder to treat, why it's suddenly hitting grown men harder than anyone else, and what symptoms might make you reconsider every life decision you've ever made. Spoiler: if you're googling your stool color mid-episode… you're already in too deep.Naturally, this spirals into a full-on breakdown of the Bristol Stool Chart, because nothing says “morning radio professionals” like rating your digestive output live on-air. Somewhere between discussing travel poops, Z-Pack overuse, and why your body betrays you on vacation, we also uncover one of the most bizarre celebrity death stories of all time — the final moments of Elvis Presley.And yes… it involves a bathroom.But don't worry, this comedy podcast doesn't stay responsible for long. We pivot hard into topics like:A Xanax recall that might mess with your brain timingTornado sirens and Midwest dad survival instinctsA woman casually winning $1 MILLION on a scratcherAnd why your tax refund is definitely (not) meant for gamblingIt's chaotic, it's gross, it's weirdly informative, and it's exactly what you signed up for with a comedy podcast that treats serious topics with the absolute least amount of seriousness possible.Proceed with caution… and maybe wash your hands.Follow The Rizzuto Show → https://linktr.ee/rizzshow for more from your favorite daily comedy show.Connect with The Rizzuto Show Comedy Podcast online → https://1057thepoint.com/RizzShow.Hear The Rizz Show daily on the radio at 105.7 The Point | Hubbard Radio in St. Louis, MO.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Preview for Later TodayAnatol Lieven examines how Viktor Orbán's exit lifts the block on EU aid for Ukraine. While the loan may proceed, regional instability and potential recession threaten Europe's economic stability and debt.1930 BUDAPEST