Podcasts about amending

Call to OrderRoll CallApproval of Minutes: May 27, Board of Equalization June 4, 2026 Approval of AgendaReports of Officials and Committees: Mayor's Report Assembly Committee Reports Treasurer's Report Manager's ReportCommunications to the Assembly: CorrespondenceHear Citizens PresentOrdinances, Resolutions, & Proclamations: Public Hearing, Second Reading, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 26-05: Amending the FY26 Budget to Provide Funding for an Increase in Health Insurance CostsPublic Hearing and Adoption of Resolution No. 26-20R: Allocating National Forest Receipts Title I Funds in the Amount of $25,540.71 Unfinished BusinessNew Business: Consideration of Skagway Brewing Company, Inc. dba Skagway Brewing Company; Beverage Dispensary License #4754 – Multiple Fixed Counter Endorsement #60683 Award of Port Master Plan Update Contract Approval of Station Bar & Grill Street Closure & Noise Permit RequestAuthorization for Manager to Sign Dog Park Land Use Permit LAS 35889 Mayor and Assembly Discussion Items: Discussion of SMC 3.01.070(A)(8) re: Notice of Remote Participation in Assembly Meetings Executive SessionAdjournmentPacket

Call to OrderRoll CallApproval of Minutes:March 5, 2026May 21, 2026May 27, 2026 Board of Appeals Approval of AgendaReports of Officials and Committees: Mayor's ReportAssembly Committee Reports Treasurer's Report Manager's Report Communications to the Assembly: Correspondence Hear Citizens PresentOrdinances, Resolutions, & Proclamations: Mayoral Proclamation: Declaring Skagway's 2026 Pride Festival Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 26-05: Amending the FY26 Budget to Provide Funding for an Increase in Health Insurance Costs Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution No. 26-19R: Amending Resolution No. 26-14R, to Amend Parking Zones Unfinished BusinessNew Business: Consideration of Liquor License Renewal Applications:Alaska Excursions, Inc dba Malamute Saloon; Destination Resort License – Seasonal #5424 Combined Renewal Notice Approval of Support Letter for Skagway Ferry Terminal Replacement Project Grant Application Approval of Welcome Garden Design & Bidding Services Fee Proposal Approval of BRIC Rockslide Mitigation Project Preferred Alternative Mayor and Assembly Discussion Items: Executive SessionAdjournmentPacket

A @Christadelphians Video: [Inspiring] **Ai Summary** – Thought-provoking, insightful, and wonderfully expositional, this outstanding episode of *The Bible Standard* reveals why humility is essential when wrestling with Scripture's most puzzling passages. We, as Christadelphians, explore the strange case of King Saul's age—does the Hebrew really say he was one year old?—and the textual twists behind Lamentations 3: “we are not consumed.” We also dive into the cutting‑edge debate over Greek verbs: do they really tell us *when* something happened, or just *how* the author saw it? This is a wonderfully revealing journey into the “things we still don't know,” reminding us that following God is a process of continual learning, not stagnant certainty.**

Amending a tax return is possible. Should you amend a tax return due to a big property tax refund? Let me explain what to exactly do in this situation in today's video! If you owe the IRS at least $10,000 in back taxes or have multiple years of unfiled returns you need filed, book a free consultation here: https://choicetaxrelief.com/free-tax-...#taxamend #taxreturn #propertytaxrefund

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

① Tens of thousands of people have gathered at the parliament building in Tokyo to protest constitutional revision spearheaded by Japan's Sanae Takaichi. Why is a remilitarized Japan a threat to regional peace? (00:55) ② Iran says there is no plan for a second round of talks with Washington. How is the US seizure of an Iranian-flagged cargo ship complicating the situation? (15:35) ③ A humanoid robot has won a half-marathon in Beijing, defeating the human world record. So what does this tell us about the pace of humanoid robotics development? (25:20) ④ The Iran war has soured Britain's relations with the US. How is this situation prompting Britain to look to the EU again? (35:17) ⑤ Despite being a self-proclaimed NGO, the National Endowment for Democracy is widely regarded as aligned with Washington's foreign policy objectives. How does its track record look like? Why is China a primary focus of its infiltration and subversive activities? (44:58)

More VPM News: Watch Amending Virginia Episode 1: “Redistricting”   Richmond City settles former FOIA officer lawsuit after hostile litigation  Shockoe Institute opens interactive center at Main Street Station  Rachel Smith wants to bring people to Hanover County  On the agenda: Richmond budget, Hanover tax and utility rates  Other links: Youngkin returns to campaign trail, calls for court to strike redistricting vote (Virginia Mercury) Virginia Tech considering eliminating Living-Learning Communities (WDBJ) ⁠Spanberger: Here's how I'm working to provide practical solutions over partisanship⁠ (Richmond Times-Dispatch)* *This outlet uses a paywall.  It's our pledge drive through April 17! You can support our award-winning work by visiting VPM.org/challenges to help us bloom and grow this spring. When you designate your donation to the news challenge, you will help VPM News unlock a $10,000 bonus in support of an informed community!

Call to OrderRoll CallApproval of Minutes: December 14, 2025 Approval of AgendaReports of Officials and Committees: Mayor's Report Assembly Committee Reports Treasurer's Report Manager's Report Communications to the Assembly: Correspondence Hear Citizens PresentOrdinances, Resolutions, & Proclamations:Public Hearing, Second Reading, and Adoption Ordinance No. 26-02: Amending the FY26 Budget to Provide Funding for Public Works Shop Improvements and Public Works Consolidation Engineering, and Clinic Ultrasound Public Hearing, Second Reading, and Adoption Ordinance No. 26-03: Amending SMC 4.04 Management of Funds to Update Spending Authority Limits and Other Fund Management Regulations Unfinished Business: Review of Assembly Direction Regarding Summaries of Citizens' Comments in Assembly Minutes New Business: Direction for Garden City RV Park for 2027 Approval of Murphy Utility Easement Agreement Approval of Fee Proposal for Dredge Material Sampling, Characterization, & Reporting Incinerator Replacement Project Award of Project Contract Approval of Construction Administration Services Fee Proposal Clinic X-Ray Renovations ProjectAward of Project Contract Approval of Construction Administration Services Fee ProposalSchool Rehabilitation Phase 1 Project Award of Project Contract Approval of Construction Administration Services Fee Proposal Rockslide Maintenance Services Project Award of Project ContractApproval of Construction Administration Services Fee Proposal Mayor and Assembly Discussion ItemsExecutive SessionAdjournmentPacket

Adam Perl is a construction partner at Pinsent Masons and a leading voice in construction law reform. In this episode, Adam unpacks the structural drivers behind Australia’s high infrastructure and construction costs. The conversation explores the industry’s productivity challenges, the consequences of lowest-price tendering, and why Australia’s unit costs are among the highest globally. Adam also examines how extensive amendments to standard contracts contribute to complexity, inefficiency, and disputes. He discusses whether greater contract standardisation could improve productivity and enable better outcomes for public infrastructure investment, alongside the governance and institutional barriers that have slowed reform. Resources and links:Adam Perl on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-p-8a922a14/Pinsent Masons website: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/ Connect:The Society of Construction Law Australia website: https://www.scl.org.au/The Society of Construction Law Australia on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/society-of-construction-law-australia/ Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this podcast series are those of the individual contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Society of Construction Law Australia (SoCLA). The content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, professional, or other advice. Listeners should consider their own circumstances and seek appropriate advice from qualified professionals before acting on any information contained in this podcast. This show is produced in collaboration with SoundCartel. Visit soundcartel.com.au for more information.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Call to OrderRoll CallApproval of Minutes: November 20, 2025 Approval of AgendaReports of Officials and Committees: Mayor's Report Assembly Committee Reports Treasurer's Report Manager's Report Communications to the Assembly: Correspondence Hear Citizens PresentOrdinances, Resolutions, & Proclamations: Public Hearing, Second Reading, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 26-01: Repealing Ordinance No. 2016-15 Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds for a Senior Center and Apartments and Repealing Any Restriction on the Use of Certain Property for a Senior Center and Apartments Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 26-02: Amending the FY26 Budget to Provide Funding for Public Works Shop Improvements and Public Works Consolidation Engineering, and Clinic Ultrasound Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 26-03: Amending SMC 4.04 Management of Funds to Update Spending Authority Limits and Other Fund Management RegulationsPublic Hearing and Adoption of Resolution No. 26-13R: Repealing Resolution No. 09-10R and Adopting Rates for Public Works Equipment and Labor Unfinished Business: Consideration of Liquor License Applications: Alaska 360; New Seasonal Restaurant or Eating Place Tourism License (Application ID 5896) (Motion pending from February 19, 2026 meeting) New BusinessMayor and Assembly Discussion ItemsExecutive SessionAdjournmentPacket

0000019c-933a-ddf2-a59f-df7fd8030000https://www.wvik.org/podcast/good-morning-from-wvik-news/2026-02-24/epa-considers-amending-clean-water-actRenata SagoEPA Considers Amending Clean Water Act341

Act MP Todd Stephenson has been looking to improve and extend the End of Life Bill since around August of last year. His new bill, for which he's seeking support across the House or has his fingers crossed it'll be drawn from the ballot, would incorporate every single recommendation made by the Ministry of Health's review into the End of Life Choice Act. He wants to restore the original intent of David Seymour's earlier member's bill by addressing what he calls the overly restrictive six-month prognosis requirement. So along with the recommendations, he wants to see the End of Life Bill extended. He says the narrow threshold has excluded people with terminal diagnoses who are suffering intolerably despite being in an irreversible decline. They are not going to get better. It's just going to take them a very long time to die. His new and improved bill would replace the arbitrary cutoff at six months with a test that reflects what he calls medical reality, recognising that death doesn't always follow a calendar. The review into the Act, which was released at the end of 2024 found that the Act was working pretty much as it was intended. More than 2,400 people had requested an assisted death at the time of the review. More than 970 had received an assisted death since the Act came into force on the 7th of November in 2021. There were some minor tweaks that could be made and those would be incorporated into Todd Stephenson's bill, but overall, the review found that the bill was achieving its primary purpose. However, a report out today from Alex Penk, who is the CEO of Ethos, a registered charity that offers advice, advocacy and education to promote the rights of conscience, religion and belief, says the law already goes too far and certainly does not need to be extended. The report, Penk's report, says assisted dying is already highly controversial. He says most doctors don't want to be involved. I can certainly believe that some doctors would not want to be involved, but I'd be interested to know if that is in fact correct. There would be a range of views across the medical profession when it comes to assisted dying, just as there is in the general population. I can understand some who would not want a bar of it and some who would be happy and see it as a as a generous service. Penk says the bill would introduce euthanasia for long term conditions and disabilities like chronic heart conditions, frailty, diabetes, renal failure, multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease. He says this would force doctors and care facilities into more conscience conflicts. He says doctors have to use ethical judgment all the time, but the bill sends a message they're just supposed to do what the State tells them and there'll be a real risk it'll force ethically minded people out of medicine. I cannot see it as the State dictating. How is the State dictating? The State has put a framework in place to ensure that it's only the person who wants assisted dying who can make that request. They have to go through hoops before they can be granted that request. It's not automatic. There are really strict criteria and doctors don't have to administer end of life injections or however it is they do it – I'm assuming it's injections. They don't have to perform the act that would take a life. They can say, No, I don't believe in it. I would rather save a life than end it. Not for me. I'll give you the name of a doctor who does believe in it." So how is the State dictating? It's not telling doctors they must kill their patients. It's not telling people they must die if they have a long-term degenerative disease. As far as I'm aware, it's about a person's choice. And on the ethics side of thing, why is it ethical to keep a person alive when they don't want to be, but they don't fit that six-month criteria? Alex Penk is perfectly within his rights to choose not to take an early exit. Doctors are perfectly within their rights to say they'd rather save lives than end them. And I want to continue to have the right and have it improved to be able to call it quits when there is no longer any value for me to be here. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The U.S. Constitution likely would not have been ratified in 1788 without Article 5, which allowed for amendment. Many of the original founders championed the idea that the document would need to change as the country changed. As historian Jill Lepore points out in her newest book most of the 27 amendments to the constitution have happened just after times of war or conflict, and after 33 years without an amendment, we may be headed that way again. OPB’s Geoff Norcross speaks to Lepore in front of an audience at the 2025 Portland Book Festival about “We the People: A history of the U.S. Constitution.”

Jack Atherton discusses the complexities of American politics, focusing on the paralysis caused by rigid principles and the challenges of bipartisanship. He draws historical parallels to illustrate the difficulties in amending the Constitution and the implications of social media on political discourse. The conversation emphasizes the need for compromise and the importance of informed voter participation in elections. Takeaways Conservative principles can lead to political paralysis. The U.S. Constitution is a complex framework that requires careful navigation. Amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult to preserve rights. Judicial interpretation can shift with the political landscape. Bipartisanship is increasingly rare in today's political climate. Social media influences public perception and political ideology. Voter participation is crucial for shaping the political landscape. The radical left's agenda poses a threat to constitutional rights. Compromise is essential for effective governance. Political discourse has become more polarized and chaotic. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, the National Constitution Center launches its Article V Project, a new initiative exploring the founders' vision for Article V and an historical look at the use of the Article V process from 1789 to the present. Project contributors and constitutional law experts Gerard Magliocca, Sanford Levinson, Michael Rappaport, and Stephen Sachs explore the origins, debates, and ongoing challenges surrounding Article V in this conversation about their new essays.Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. This program is presented in conjunction with the Article V Project, made possible by Democracy Restated.  Resources Article V: Amending the Constitution Gerard Magliocca, Report: Article V Constitutional Conventions Sanford Levinson, Reflections on the Possibility of a New Constitutional Convention Michael B. Rappaport, The Convention Method for Proposing Amendments: Essential, Misunderstood, and Broken Stephen E. Sachs, Restoring Conventions, One Amendment at a Time Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠programs@constitutioncenter.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr Explore the⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠America at 250 Civic Toolkit⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate Subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen Join us for an upcoming ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠live program⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or watch recordings on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Support our important work ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Donate

In this episode, the National Constitution Center launches our Article V Project, a new initiative examining the founders' vision for Article V and an historical look at the use of the Article V process from 1789 to the present. Project contributors and constitutional law scholars Gerard Magliocca, Sanford Levinson, Michael Rappaport, and Stephen Sachs explore the origins, debates, and ongoing challenges surrounding Article V, as presented in their essays.  Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. This conversation was originally streamed live as part of the NCC's America's Town Hall program series on December 3, 2025. The Article V Project was made possible with the support of Democracy Restated.  Resources  Article V: Amending the Constitution  Gerard Magliocca, Report: Article V Constitutional Conventions  Sanford Levinson, Reflections on the Possibility of a New Constitutional Convention  Michael B. Rappaport, The Convention Method for Proposing Amendments: Essential, Misunderstood, and Broken  Stephen E. Sachs, Restoring Conventions, One Amendment at a Time  Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr Explore the America at 250 Civic Toolkit Explore Pursuit: The Founders' Guide to Happiness Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate Follow, rate, and review wherever you listen Join us for an upcoming live program or watch recordings on YouTube Support our important work:   ⁠⁠Donate

The U.S. Constitution likely would not have been ratified in 1788 without Article 5, which allowed for amendment. Many of the original founders championed the idea that the document would need to change as the country changed. As historian Jill Lepore points out in her newest book most of the 27 amendments to the constitution have happened just after times of war or conflict, and after 33 years without an amendment, we may be headed that way again. OPB’s Geoff Norcross speaks to Lepore in front of an audience at the 2025 Portland Book Festival about “We the People: A history of the U.S. Constitution.”  

Municipal Association General Counsel Eric Shytle and Associate General Counsel Sara Weathers discuss key questions of how city councils handle ordinances. They discuss when ordinances are needed, procedures for enacting them, amending ordinances during passage, and amending or repealing already-passed ordinances.

Welcome to episode 266 of Growers Daily! We cover: good disturbance, we are discussing how to fit compost into the amendment regime, and it's feedback friday! We are a Non-Profit! 

Why is it so hard to change the U.S. Constitution? Harvard historian Jill Lepore says the Constitution was intended to be amended but that we've all but abandoned the practice. That's had profound consequences, leaving us with vestigial antidemocratic provisions like the Electoral College, a malapportioned Senate and life tenure for Supreme Court justices. We talk to Lepore about why amendments are so rare and whether the Constitution can survive without them. Her new book is “We the People.” We also hear from Southern California congressman Pete Aguilar about President Trump's threats to cut “democrat” programs as the government shutdown continues, and how his caucus is responding. Guests: Jill Lepore, professor of American history, Harvard University; staff writer, The New Yorker - her new book is "We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution" Pete Aguilar, democratic representative for the 33rd Congressional District of California; chair of the U.S. House Democratic Caucus Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Send us a text

NEWS: Palace confirms Marcos is not opposed to amending Constitution for clarity | Aug. 13, 2025Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein #TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What would it take to update the Constitution and should we try? Sharon is joined by former Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold to explore this question from his book, The Constitution in Jeopardy. Together, they unpack the tools the framers gave to evolve the founding document, including the never before used, and deeply controversial, Constitutional Convention. Could such a convention be a path to necessary reform, or a backdoor to dismantling democracy itself? Credits: Host and Executive Producer: Sharon McMahon Supervising Producer: Melanie Buck Parks Audio Producer: Craig Thompson To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What if I told you that the words you choose can have an impact on your bottom line? One of the best ways to attract affluent clients is by choosing the right words–words that not only magnify the worth of your work but sow the seeds of success. That means discarding limiting words like "expensive" and "cheap" and embracing empowering language that reflects the true value of your projects and services. But, that's not to say that this is an easy fix! Amending how you use and choose words in your vocabulary can be one of the most difficult changes you can make because the way we speak is so patterned and ingrained in our minds. But, if you can make the changes with fidelity in all aspects of your life–even behind the scenes–you will shift your world and your worth. Join me in today's episode for my suggestions for the words you need to eliminate and those you should adopt to sound more on-brand for your affluent clients and support your bottom line on the way.  In this episode, you will hear: How word choices can increase the worth of your projects and attract affluent clients The impact of client language on the perception of design services and projects. Words to avoid to help you step away from perpetuating limiting beliefs Suggestions for using more creative, empowering language and replacing cliched or negative phrasing Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast. Supporting Resources: Get the Book: “Marketing Luxury Design: Attracting Affluent Clients” For more information about The Affluent Creative, check out my website www.melissagalt.com Follow me on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn @MelissaGalt and TikTok @MelissaGaltBusinessCoach Episode Credits If you like this podcast and are thinking of creating your own, consider talking to my producer, Emerald City Productions. They helped me grow and produce the podcast you are listening to right now. Find out more at https://emeraldcitypro.com Let them know we sent you.

Rejuvenation: the action or process of giving new energy or vigor to something. We talk about ways you can revamp your plants and set them up for future success. Featured shrub: Winecraft Black smokebush.

Greg Bishop shares a conversation with state Rep. Steven Reick, R-Woodstock, about the plan to set aside $75 million for Tier 2 pensioners and what he says is the real fix to Illinois' pension problems.

Welcome to episode 167 of Growers Daily! We cover: trellising pole beans in a tunnel, what is actually going on inside of a compost pile, and cover some of the basics of soil amending. We are a Non-Profit! 

Now we need to KEEP THE DREAM FLOWING more than ever! In this episode, conducted next to the monument on the Woodstock field at Bethel Woods, Scott chats with BILL LUCANO, PATRICK COLUCCI and GEORGE KLITSCH about Pat and Bill's efforts to amend the legendary Woodstock monument, Pat and George share their recollections of Woodstock, and all try to answer the question “could it ever happen again?” This is a good one, folks!

Preview: Colleague Sadanand Dhume of AEI and WSJ Reports Small Steps Toward an Amending of Dialogue Between the Two Giants of Eurasia, India and the PRC — Prior to the Kashmir Crisis. More. 1850 DELHI

PCs get upgraded, MSX comes to Europe & Coinop goes cartridge These stories and many more on this episode of the VGNRTM! This episode we will look back at the biggest stories in and around the video game industry in August 1984.  As always, we'll mostly be using magazine cover dates, and those are of course always a bit behind the actual events. Alex Smith of They Create Worlds is our cohost.  Check out his podcast here: https://www.theycreateworlds.com/ and order his book here: https://www.theycreateworlds.com/book Get us on your mobile device: Android:  https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly92aWRlb2dhbWVuZXdzcm9vbXRpbWVtYWNoaW5lLmxpYnN5bi5jb20vcnNz iOS:      https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/video-game-newsroom-time-machine And if you like what we are doing here at the podcast, don't forget to like us on your podcasting app of choice, YouTube, and/or support us on patreon! https://www.patreon.com/VGNRTM Send comments on Mastodon @videogamenewsroomtimemachine@oldbytes.space Or twitter @videogamenewsr2 Or Instagram https://www.instagram.com/vgnrtm Or videogamenewsroomtimemachine@gmail.com Links: If you don't see all the links, find them here:     https://www.patreon.com/posts/127470165 7 Minutes in Heaven: Impossible Mission Video Version: https://www.patreon.com/posts/7-minutes-in-127469932     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_Mission     http://www.mayhem64.co.uk/interview/caswell.htm Corrections: August 1984 Ep - https://www.patreon.com/posts/august-1984-121143199 Ethan's fine site The History of How We Play: https://thehistoryofhowweplay.wordpress.com/     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namco     https://archive.org/details/game_machine_magazine_jp     https://machinerobo.fandom.com/wiki/Machine_Robo:_Revenge_of_Cronos      1964: Libraries of the future are online     Popular Electronics Sept. 1964, pg. 28 1974     Atari buys Kee      https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1974/CB-1974-09-21.pdf  pg. 36 Fred introduced in PCC     https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/1974/08/020031/13rRUB7a13N        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COSMAC_ELF     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Weisbecker     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSlDY6ZPIvY 1984 Toy stocks rally     Traditional toys soar as electronic games flash 'Tilt', The San Diego Union-Tribune, September 2, 1984, Section: Business, Pg 1-8, Byline: Don Bauder             Plastic robots from Japan changing the shape of the toy market, Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA), September 21, 1984, Friday, Section: Business; Pg. 19, byline: Francine Kiefer Nintendo preps for cartridge future     Replay September 1984, pg. 3      Williams enters new production year with caution     Replay September 1984, pg. 3     https://www.mobygames.com/game/17500/star-wars-return-of-the-jedi/      Coin op revenue hit over drinking age laws     Replay September 1984, pg. 7     https://www.wgbh.org/podcasts/the-big-dig     https://youtu.be/7zr4RBw5un4?si=euu-naPtomBbqME3 Tower of Druaga gets write up in Super Soft     Super Soft Magazine, September 1984, pg. 2     https://www.mobygames.com/game/19625/the-tower-of-druaga/          Save the 7800 campaign started     https://archive.org/details/computer-entertainer-3-6/page/93/mode/1up?view=theater     https://fanlore.org/wiki/History_of_Star_Trek_Fan_Campaigns Atari renegotiating Lucasfilm deal     https://archive.org/details/computer-entertainer-3-6/page/88/mode/1up?view=theater      Chip maker feels video game fall     "GOULD'S WOES SPUR STOCK DROP, The New York Times, September 7, 1984, Friday, Late City Final ,Edition, Section: Section D; Page 1, Column 6; Financial Desk, Byline: By ERIC N. BERG     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gould_Electronics" Atari Japan to close     Atari Inc. planning to pull out of the Japanese market, The Japan Economic Journal, September 25, 1984, Section: SERVICE/LEISURE/FOOD; Pg. 17 No mention of video games in Playthings     Playthings, September 1984      Upgrade your PC     Creative Computing September 1984 pg. 125 Commodore and Atari target the middle     Commodore, Atari Spar in Mid-Price Fight, ADWEEK, September 3, 1984, Eastern Edition, Byline: Gail Belsky     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/page/n4/mode/1up?view=theater Computer Entertainer doesn't believe Atari can deliver     https://archive.org/details/computer-entertainer-3-6/mode/1up?view=theater Sinclair financials dissapoint     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/mode/1up?view=theater     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_QL Byte reviews the QL     https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Byte/80s/Byte-1984-09.pdf  pg. 415 Amstrad disk drive announced     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/page/n3/mode/1up?view=theater     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amstrad_CPC Europe to get MSX'd      MSX home computers to be shipped to Europe, The Japan Economci Journal, September 4, 1984, Section: Information Processing, Pg. 14     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/mode/1up?view=theater     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-20/page/n4/mode/1up?view=theater Philips ready to launch MSX machine     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-06/mode/2up?view=theater     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philips_VG_8000 Plus 4 delays will limit supply     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-13/mode/2up?view=theater       https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-20/page/n21/mode/1up?view=theater The C16 kills the Vic20 in Europe     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-13/mode/2up?view=theater Currys gives up on PC market     Company Briefing: Currys cuts its Micro-C losses / Micro computer shops closed, The Guardian (London), September 4, 1984 Elite released     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/page/n67/mode/1up?view=theater Deus Ex Machina brings multimedia home     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-06/mode/2up?view=theater       https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-13/page/n59/mode/2up?view=theater     Complete Playthrough: https://youtu.be/WhtI3BEgZwE?si=18V8aCTW6H6ek52l The Mimi travels to the Apple II     'Voyage of the Mimi'' Beckons Youngsters to Science Careers, The Associated Press, September 10, 1984, Monday, PM cycle, Byline: By LEE MITGANG, AP Education Writer     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Voyage_of_the_Mimi       https://archive.org/details/VoyageOfTheMimi4amCrack/Voyage%20of%20the%20Mimi%20-%20Rescue%20Mission%20title%20screen.png Find the treasure... using your computer!     Paperback Picks, United Press International, September 4, 1984, Tuesday, BC cycle, Section: Lifestyle     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure:_In_Search_of_the_Golden_Horse Melbourne returns to Middle Earth     https://archive.org/details/Computer_Video_Games_Issue_035_1984-09_EMAP_Publishing_GB/page/n21/mode/2up?view=theater           https://www.mobygames.com/group/7319/the-tolkien-software-adventure-series/ Ultimate announces "the first step in a new generation of computer adventure simulation developments."         https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/page/n4/mode/1up?view=theater Beach Head to get Speccy port     https://archive.org/details/Computer_Video_Games_Issue_035_1984-09_EMAP_Publishing_GB/page/n23/mode/2up?view=theater         https://archive.org/details/Computer_Video_Games_Issue_035_1984-09_EMAP_Publishing_GB/page/n25/mode/2up?view=theater Activision licenses to Japan     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-27/page/n4/mode/1up?view=theater       https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-20/page/n11/mode/1up?view=theater Synapse sues Atari     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-06/mode/2up?view=theater IBM enters office suite market and shoots down Kmart. p Jr rumor     IBM in Merger Talks With Rolm / Unveils New Software, The Associated Press, September 25, 1984, Section: Business News, Byline: James F. Peltz      Software Toolworks cooking book     No Headline in Original, PR Newswire, September 25, 1984 PC Paintbrush announced     https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Byte/80s/Byte-1984-09.pdf  pg. 9      SEC goes digital     S.E.C. inaugurates computer filing system,  The New York Times, September 25, 1984, Section D, Page 1, Column 1, byline: Kenneth B. Noble         https://www.nytimes.com/1984/09/25/business/sec-inaugurates-computer-filing-system.html NABU on the ropes     In Danger of Folding, The Associated Press, September 19, 1984, Section: Business News, Byline: Norman Black Viewdata still not catching on..     Futures (Micro Guardian): How the Post Office failed to deliver / Prestel, The Guardian (London), September 13, 1984     https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly-1984-09-20/page/n4/mode/1up?view=theater        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compunet Viewtron user profile     No Headline in original, PR Newswire, September 14, 1984, Dateline: Miami, Sept. 14 Publishing     Computer Magazine boom busts     Bloom Fades in Computer Magazine Market, The Associated Press, September 30, 1984, Sunday, BC cycle, Section: Business News, Byline: By SKIP WOLLENBERG, AP Business Writer Computer makers prep for Xmas ad blitz     Dreaming of a Byte Christmas, ADWEEK, September 3, 1984, All Editions, Section: Special Report; Fall Preview 1984; Computers, Byline, Gail Belsky Scott Cohen's Zap! released     Business Today; Will Atari be brought back with needed combination of creativity and pragmatism, September 27, 1984, Thursday, BC cycle, Section: Financial, Byline: By GAIL COLLINS, UPI Business Writer        https://archive.org/details/zaprisefall00cohe      FCC helps fight coinop piracy     Play Meter, September 1. 1984, pg. 12 Electronic smuggling on the rise in Brazil     Contraband of Electronic Components Grows in Brazil, The Associated Press, September 22, 1984, Saturday, BC cycle, Section: Business News, Byline: By STAN LEHMAN, Associated Press Writer Activision sues Revco     Activision; Amending lawsuit against Revco, Business Wire, September 26, 1984 Psychics didn't see crash coming...     No Headline In Original, United Press International, September 13, 1984, Thursday, PM cycle, Section: Domestic News        https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/09/13/The-psychic-consulting-firm-Delphi-Associates-must-not-have/1212463896000/        https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/russell-targ Video Games go ART!     HORIZONS-Art; Nuclear disarmament art exhibit premieres, United Press International, September 30, 1984, Sunday, BC cycle, Section: Domestic News, Byline: By DAN SUSSMAN     https://www.vdb.org/titles/mike-builds-shelter        https://www.mobygames.com/game/73468/mike-builds-a-shelter/        https://rhizome.org/editorial/2015/jun/16/mike-builds-shelter/ CAD CAM computervision      Market Outlook; All agree CAD/CAM sales will soar, Industry Week, September 17, 1984, Section: INFORMATION, Management; Pg. 111, Byline: John Teresko     1981: How COMPUTER GRAPHICS Will Change the World | Horizon | Retro Tech | BBC Archive  https://youtu.be/W8-54-9J9ns?si=uB01CAs8znTVmZfx      Senior's test their skills on Crystal Castle     ELDERLY TEST COORDINATION WITH VIDEO GAME, The New York Times, September 9, 1984, Sunday, Late City Final Edition, Section: Section 1; Part 2; Page 56, Column 2; Metropolitan Desk, Byline: AP, Dateline: PARSIPPANY, N.J., Sept. 8 Nolan is back!     "AXLON-GAMES; Nolan Bushnell returns to game business with new firm, Business Wire, September 24, 1984, Monday     https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgamepublisher/2242/axlon        https://gdri.smspower.org/wiki/index.php/Axlon Dragon's Lair debuts on Saturday morning     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon%27s_Lair_(TV_series) Mylstar RIP     Coke unit to close video game maker, United Press International, September 24, 1984, Monday, BC cycle, Section: Financial     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottlieb Recommended Links: The History of How We Play: https://thehistoryofhowweplay.wordpress.com/ Gaming Alexandria: https://www.gamingalexandria.com/wp/ They Create Worlds: https://tcwpodcast.podbean.com/ Digital Antiquarian: https://www.filfre.net/ The Arcade Blogger: https://arcadeblogger.com/ Retro Asylum: http://retroasylum.com/category/all-posts/ Retro Game Squad: http://retrogamesquad.libsyn.com/ Playthrough Podcast: https://playthroughpod.com/ Retromags.com: https://www.retromags.com/ Games That Weren't - https://www.gamesthatwerent.com/ Sound Effects by Ethan Johnson of History of How We Play. Copyright Karl Kuras  

County staff is looking into amending an existing Recreational Vehicles ordinance in order to allow people to live in RVs semi-permanently or permanently. County staff also plans to organize four public meetings this year to gather input from the community. You can learn more about the Alternative Housing Work Plan and sign-up for email updates at nevadacountyca.gov/alternativehousing.

What is broken can be mended. What is written can be edited. What is lost can be found again. Where did you go, when you let go of my hand? How have you changed now that you've come back?Content warnings for this episode include: fear // allusions to mass death // knives as weapons // murder // allusions to systems of oppression & class struggle // religious overtones Godkiller: Balance is performed by Em Carlson, Gina Susanna & Jannes Wessels. This season's dramaturge is Tim Carlson. Special thanks to our campaign artist, Mischi, who you can find @Mischiart on twitter! Our main theme for this episode, Light & Dark, was composed by Sean McRoberts. Character & Location Leitmotifs composed by Si Rutherford of Sounds of Adventure. Music and effects by Epidemic Sound. For more stories, come follow us everywhere at @blackwaterdnd, and make sure to check out our Main Campaign on Monday nights at 8pm PST at twitch.tv/blackwaterdnd. To play your own campaign of Godkiller and dive into your own divinity, go support Godkiller by purchasing the ashcan on itch.io today, with the print version published soon by Evil Hat Productions. This show is made possible by our sponsors who graciously support us playing pretend and having feelings about it. We are grateful to be sponsored by Heroforge, who offer fully customizable miniatures made with their online 3D character creator! Head on over and design your own Godkiller, and get them printed in a variety of materials, including colour printing options! With new content added each week, check out www.heroforge.com to start bringing your character to life! This show is also proudly sponsored by Moonbeam, a better and safer way to stream! Dive into Realms for vibrant community hubs where creators keep 100% of what they earn while protected by Pyxis, a revolutionary moderation tool that learns and adapts to your boundaries. So check them out and join Moonbeam today! Finally, we're thankful for our Patrons for joining us on our second journey through the Cradle. You too can come join us on Patreon, where you can check out behind the scenes info, our talkback show Chatwater, as well as exclusive Godkiller bonus content and so much more. Head on over to patreon.com/blackwaterdnd for all the info. See you next time, heretics, and to all the gods out there, be safe!

A decade ago, 21 youth plaintiffs in Oregon filed a lawsuit asserting that the government had violated their due process rights of life, liberty, and property by encouraging and permitting the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels such as oil and gas.The plaintiffs were represented by Our Children's Trust, a litigation firm based in Eugene.The case, known as Juliana v. United States, was dismissed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2020 for lack of standing and upheld in February 2021. An amended suit was dismissed by the Ninth Circuit in May 2024 again over lack of standing, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in March 2025.The proponents are now attempting to put their hydrocarbon paranoia into the Oregon Constitution. On March 26 the state legislature held a hearing on SJR 28, which would add the following language to the Constitution:"All people, including children and future generations, have the fundamental right to a clean, safe and healthy environment."This is just performative politics. Hydrocarbons power the modern world; but if lawmakers think the public wants to return to the 18th century, they should vote to outlaw fossil fuels right now and run for re-election on that record.

ESSB 5181 has passed another vote in the Washington House, intensifying debate over parental rights and student autonomy in schools. The bill amends Initiative 2081 and has sparked partisan disagreement over its scope and legality. Read the full story at https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/bill-amending-parents-rights-initiative-passes-another-hurdle-in-the-wa-house/ on www.ClarkCountyToday.com #ESSB5181 #parentalrights #educationpolicy #studentautonomy #localnews #ClarkCountyWa

4pm: Matt Markovich - Spiining the Wheel of Legislative Lunacy // New initiative aims to shield WA Parents’ Bill of Rights from revision // Nurse’s getting doctor’s pay // Amending the Constitution to address reproductive freedom and gender-affirming care. // Evidence Emerges In 'Suspicious' Gene Hackman Death // Florida woman gets 1 year in prison for killing terminally-ill husband // Sophie’s client “Switzerland” decision // Couple chooses to die together via doctor assisted suicide in Switzerland

Marc & Kim welcome Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney and senior adviser for the American Family Association, to discuss the recent proposal to amend the Constitution and allow Donald Trump to run for a third term. Ellis breaks down the Article V process, the role of state legislatures, and whether this idea has a real chance. Plus, the legal and political hurdles Republicans would face in making such a historic change.

Petesy Carroll is joined by Chuck Mindenhall and Ben Fowlkes to discuss TKO's imminent arrival in the boxing world, in conjunction with the Saudi Arabia (2:50) and TKO president Mark Shapiro suggesting that there are some flaws in the Ali Act - an act introduced in 2002 for the welfare of boxers. During the show, news broke of a boxing event taking place in Times Square, and the lads give their thoughts on a boxing card taking place in such a unique location (35:12), before the conversation turned to the UFC's media rights, which will be up for grabs before the end of 2025 (44:48). Finally, Petesy asked Chuck and Ben if the build-up to Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn has made a splash across the water (58:42).

Clement Manyathela speaks to Thembi Msane, the EFF’s National Spokesperson about the reported informal agreement reached on the National Health Insurance Act. Msane says a change in the act will undermine the voices of South Africans. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's a first for our podcast! The episode we ran on November 11, 2024 about the U.S.S. Constitution and Constitution Grove in Indiana was so popular, it made its way to the ears to the ears of the Historian for the United States Naval History & Heritage Command Detachment Boston, which is the group that is the authority on the topic! Historian, Margherita M. Desy, spent some time with me to help correct the record! We spoke for 30 minutes and you'll definitely be impressed by the wealth of knowledge exhibited here. I want to get as many things right on this podcast as I can, so I jumped at the opportunity to correct some of the errors from the original episode!  To learn more about the U.S.S. Constitution and U.S. Naval History in general please visit the United States Naval History & Heritage Command website at https://www.history.navy.mil/ To learn about the U.S.S. Constitution Museum, visit https://ussconstitutionmuseum.org/ Review this podcast at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-internet-says-it-s-true/id1530853589 Bonus episodes and content available at http://Patreon.com/MichaelKent For special discounts and links to our sponsors, visit http://theinternetsaysitstrue.com/deals  

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended complaint is a formal legal document that revises and updates the original complaint filed in a court case. It serves several key purposes and can be used in various situations to ensure that the legal proceedings are based on the most accurate and complete information available.Purposes of an Amended ComplaintCorrecting Errors: If the original complaint contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or other mistakes, an amended complaint can be filed to correct these issues. This ensures that the document is accurate and clear.Adding New Information: As a case progresses, new facts or evidence might come to light. An amended complaint can include this new information to reflect the most current understanding of the situation.Changing Legal Claims: Sometimes, the legal strategy may change, requiring adjustments to the claims or causes of action presented in the complaint. An amended complaint allows the plaintiff to modify their legal arguments.Addressing Defenses: If the defendant raises specific defenses in their response to the original complaint, the plaintiff might need to amend the complaint to address these defenses or to clarify certain points.Including Additional Parties: In some cases, new parties (either plaintiffs or defendants) may need to be added to the lawsuit. An amended complaint can be used to include these additional parties.Procedure for Amending a ComplaintThe process for filing an amended complaint can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. However, some general steps and considerations typically apply:Filing the Amendment: The plaintiff drafts the amended complaint, making the necessary changes and including any new information. This document is then filed with the court.Serving the Defendant: The amended complaint must be served on the defendant, just like the original complaint. This gives the defendant an opportunity to respond to the new allegations or claims.Court Approval: In some cases, especially if the amendment is made after certain deadlines, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's approval to file the amended complaint. This usually involves filing a motion to amend and explaining the reasons for the changes.Response from Defendant: Once the amended complaint is served, the defendant has the right to respond, either by filing an answer or a motion to dismiss, depending on their legal strategy and the nature of the amendments.Considerations and LimitationsTiming: The timing of the amendment is crucial. Early amendments (e.g., before the defendant has responded) are generally easier to make and often do not require court approval. Later amendments might be subject to stricter scrutiny and require a stronger justification.Scope: The scope of the amendments can also be a factor. Minor corrections are typically less contentious, while significant changes to the claims or parties involved might require more detailed justification and may be more likely to face opposition from the defendant.Strategic Use: Amending a complaint is a strategic tool that can strengthen a plaintiff's case. However, it must be used carefully to avoid unnecessary complications or delays in the proceedings.(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Matter of R-T-P-, 28 I&N Dec. 828 (BIA 2024)deficient NTA; claims processing rule; termination; IJ amending NTA United States v. Perez Garcia, No. 23-435 (9th Cir. Sept. 4, 2024)crime of violence; recklessness; Borden; Cal. Pen. Code § 245(a)(1) assault with a deadly weapon other than a firearm; intent, knowing; mens reaSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: stafi2024Get Started! Promo Code: FREEImmigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Sarah gives us a taste of her interview with retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer before she and David dive into the latest SCOTUS ruling on racial gerrymandering. The Agenda: —Justice Breyer and the Major Questions Doctrine —Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP —Conduct vs. speech and Morgan Wallen's Nashville bar —Random swipes at text, history, and tradition from David —Approving a SCOTUS nominee from opposing parties? —Amending the amendment process —Codifying the judicial filibuster —Justice Samuel Alito flag watch Show Notes: —Previous AO episode on voting rights in Alabama —City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC —Equal Protection Clause —Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Harvard Professor of American History and New Yorker staff writer Jill Lepore joins Preet to discuss what happened when the Department of Justice failed to prosecute Confederate President Jefferson Davis. They also talk about Lepore's new essay collection The Deadline and how on earth we can make sense of the intervening four years since Lepore last appeared on Stay Tuned.  Plus, could Ginni Thomas face legal peril due to her involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection? And, entertaining a scenario where (1) Trump is convicted and (2) re-elected and attempts to overturn his conviction(s).  Don't miss the Insider bonus, where Preet asks Lepore about her aversion to the massively popular film Barbie. To listen, become a member of CAFE Insider for $1 for the first month. Head to cafe.com/insider.   For show notes and a transcript of the episode head to: cafe.com/stay-tuned/amending-history-with-jill-lepore/ Have a question for Preet? Ask @PreetBharara on Threads, or Twitter with the hashtag #AskPreet. Email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 to leave a voicemail. Stay Tuned with Preet is brought to you by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices