Podcasts about National Firearms Act

We Like Shooting - Ep 652 This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by: C&G Holsters (Code: WLSISLIFE) Midwest Industries (Code: WLSISLIFE) Night Fision (Code: WLSISLIFE) Die Free Co. (Code: WLSISLIFE) Bowers Group (Code: WLS) Flatline Fiber Co (Code: WLS15) Second Call Defense Swampfox Optics Text Dear WLS or Reviews +1 743 500 2171  Public https://welikeshooting.com/titles/ GEAR CHAT Note Bodyguard 2.0 Holster [Meprolight] Sting Lumina The Meprolight Sting Lumina is a dual-wavelength compact laser pointer with an integrated IR illuminator, designed for close-quarters battle (CQB) and covert nighttime operations. It features red or green visible laser options for fast target acquisition, paired with a covert IR laser pointer and adjustable IR flashlight beam. Built for high-recoil environments with MIL-STD compliance, quick-detach Picatinny mount, and ambidextrous controls powered by AA battery. [We Like Shooting] Coyote Vision Simulator The Coyote Vision Simulator is an online tool designed to simulate how patterns appear through the eyes of a coyote, accounting for their visual acuity, dichromatic color vision, UV sensitivity, and night vision capabilities. It provides a scientific explanation of canine vision differences from humans. No physical product details are available on the page. Note Coyote Vision vs. Nomad [FAB Defense] GL-Core IMPACT The FAB Defense GL-Core IMPACT is a shock-absorbing buttstock featuring a patented recoil reduction mechanism with three variable settings adjustable by repositioning the spring via a retaining pin. It minimizes felt recoil by up to 50%, improves accuracy, reduces shooter fatigue, and is compatible with Mil-Spec and Commercial carbine buffer tubes. The design includes an ergonomically shaped rubberized butt-pad, adjustable cheek-rest, and an inverted positioning lever to prevent accidental opening. BULLET POINTS Imported Story https://pew.report/c/UAOY9M Patrol Incident Gear PIG (FDT) OPFOR Glove The PIG (FDT) OPFOR Glove from Patrol Incident Gear is designed for force-on-force training using marking cartridges like UTM or Simunition rounds. It provides impact protection via precision molded TRP pads to prevent hand injuries while maintaining trigger sensitivity with a tapered trigger finger and touchscreen compatibility on finger and thumb. Tested by training companies and law enforcement, it is praised as a game changer for role players in scenario-based training, airsoft, or paintball. Note (Nick) Nick's public shaming (match update) CCI Blazer Brass Clean-Fire Suppressor CCI's new Blazer Brass Clean-Fire Suppressor is designed to reduce lead and copper residue in firearms. It is now shipping as of the press release. The product targets cleaner shooting experiences for suppressed firearms. GUN FIGHTS No one stepped into the arena this week. THE AGENCY BRIEF Agency Update   Agency Update   Agency Update   Agency Update Preparedness. Austin Terrorist Attacks. WLS IS LIFESTYLE GOING BALLISTIC USA Today Warns on Gun Violence Archive Mass Shooting Data Disputes (Savage) The article critiques the Gun Violence Archive (GVA) definition of mass shootings as four or more people injured or killed (excluding shooter), which includes gang, drug, and domestic incidents, contrasting with the FBI's narrower focus on mass killings with four or more deaths. GVA reports inflated figures like 656 mass shootings in 2023 and 417 in 2019, versus FBI's 30 for 2019, sourced from media and social media. USA Today notes these numbers may differ from FBI/CDC data and could be challenged, amid criticisms of media misuse for anti-gun narratives. Illinois v. Joel Fernandez: SWAT Arrest for Possessing 38 Rounds of Ammo Without FOID Card (Savage) Joel Fernandez, a 20-year-old in Lake in the Hills, Illinois, was arrested by SWAT and charged with possessing 38 rounds of ammunition without a valid Firearms Owner ID (FOID) card. The incident involved a joint investigation leading to a search warrant, shelter-in-place order, and preschool lockdown. Under Illinois law, possessing even a single round without a FOID card is a serious crime. New York Senate Bill 362: Proposed 10-Day Waiting Period for Gun Purchases (Savage) New York lawmakers have introduced Senate Bill 362, mandating a 10-day waiting period for firearm purchases from dealers after passing the national instant criminal background check and completing Form 4473. The bill applies to lawful citizens in New York and is criticized as an unnecessary delay on Second Amendment rights with no proven public safety benefits. Opponents, including the NRA-ILA, argue it fails to reduce suicides, homicides, or mass shootings and may endanger those needing immediate self-defense. Roberts v. ATF: Third Lawsuit Challenging NFA Constitutionality (Savage) The American Suppressor Association Foundation and other 2A groups filed Roberts v. ATF in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, challenging the National Firearms Act's registration regime for suppressors and short-barreled firearms. The suit argues that with the $200 excise tax eliminated, the remaining registration lacks justification as a revenue measure per Sonzinsky v. United States. It joins similar challenges in Brown v. ATF and Jensen v. ATF. U.S. v. Hemani: Supreme Court Case on Section 922(g)(3) Firearm Ban for Unlawful Drug Users (Savage) The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on March 2, 2026, in U.S. v. Hemani, challenging the constitutionality of Section 922(g)(3), which prohibits firearm possession by ‘unlawful' drug users. The case involves federal defendant Ali Danial Hemani, who admitted to regular marijuana use while possessing a firearm. Circuit courts are split on the law's validity under the Second Amendment. FBI on Austin Mass Shooting: Evidence Indicates Potential Nexus to Terrorism (Savage) The Austin mass shooting occurred at Buford's Backyard Beer Garden on Sixth Street near the University of Texas campus, where an unidentified suspect drove an SUV to the scene, fired a pistol at patrons, and was killed by Austin police less than one minute later. The FBI, assisting the Austin Police Department, stated evidence on the subject and in his vehicle, including a Koran, indicates a potential nexus to terrorism, though motivation remains undetermined. Three people were killed including the shooter, with 17 injured and 14 hospitalized. REVIEWS Review: Lord Norvell 5 stars. For the Love of god please get rid of Savage. He is unbearable and ruins the show. I dont mean this jokingly seriously I have been listening for many uears and i had to quit because I cant stand listening to him talk. He cannot pronounce any words and sounds like his mouth is full of cum . You have him reading the news which is absolutely retarded and i have to shut it off even though I want to actually hear the news. His stupid personality is fucking lame and he just fucking runins everything. I loved the show so.much more when he was gone. Review: Nick Kerr five squares for the stranger things heavy DT episode. it really helped humanize jeremy to hear him let his feminine side roar like katy perry riding a flaming pegasus into a crabs vagina…but also kind of sad, because you could tell he wished he had the courage to come out in dramatic fashion like that kid on the show. Review: Half-rican 5 stars. Pretty decent cast all around. Shawn is loosing weight, and will probably end up with saggy skin covering up his ssb like a set of old lady meat curtains. Show sucked when Savage was gone. I missed us both hearing or reading the news for the first time live on the show, Then there is Nick. if I could perform a miracle I would swap his butthole with Aaron's . I don't know if it would be an improvement. And that just leaves Jermey (say it like a Mexcian). Good old Jermey Meno-Pozderac. Some people say he is a cunt, that would explain how all those shirts look like they have a yeast infection. Review: Sigger Jim Trigger Warning! When talking about gunpowder, these racists used the term “black” powder. This is incredibly outdated and hurtful.If you are not willing to use the term “African American Powder” or “Powder of Color” then maybe you shouldn't have a gun podcast. 5 stars Before we let you go – JOIN GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA We'd love if you supported the show, join Agency 171 at agency171.com. Lot's of prizes, rewards and kick ass swag. No matter how tough your battle is today, we want you here fight with us tomorrow. Don't struggle in silence, you can contact the suicide prevention line by dialing 988 from your phone. Remember – Always prefer Dangerous Freedom over peaceful slavery. We'll see you next time! Nick – @busbuiltsystems | Bus Built Systems Jeremy – @ret_actual | Rivers Edge Tactical

Episode 279-Bang or Bong. Maybe both. Also Available OnSearchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer — Episode Transcript Page – 1 – of 11 Gun Lawyer — Episode 279 Transcript SUMMARY KEYWORDS Supreme Court case, marijuana user ban, Second Amendment rights, ACLU, NRA, New Jersey, Hughes amendment, West Virginia, machine guns, loopholes, gun rights, felon restoration, Epstein files, Michael Bloomberg, gun violence prevention. SPEAKERS Speaker 2, Evan Nappen, Teddy Nappen Evan Nappen 00:16 I’m Evan Nappen. Teddy Nappen 00:18 And I’m Teddy Nappen. Evan Nappen 00:20 And welcome to Gun Lawyer. So, we have some exciting things coming in the future here. I want to make sure the listeners are well aware. In the Supreme Court, we have a case coming up that is going to look at the prohibitor for firearm possession concerning marijuana use, if you’re a user of marijuana. And the case is U.S. versus Hemani. This is very interesting, because it is widely believed that the Court is going to strike down the gun ban for marijuana users. Regardless of how you feel about marijuana use, I’m looking forward to seeing this opinion, because it may be useful in knocking down other gun disqualifiers. Because, folks, gun disqualifiers, such as the gun ban for marijuana use, is an area of exploitation by the gun rights oppressors. Evan Nappen 01:38 So, if they can’t just get a flat out gun ban through, which they try to do all the time, if they can piece meal gun bans to various classes of individuals, then they get the job done that way. That’s why you see the ever expanding list of persons who they try to get disqualified from being able to exercise their Second Amendment rights. And this case has, I believe, potentially very far reaching implications as to subverting that anti-gun rights, that gun rights oppression tactic. So, we want to look at it at as more than just the marijuana. It will be fascinating to see it be a victory, because we have parties in support of this ban going away as diverse as, on the same side now, the ACLU and the NRA. Both. The ACLU is in favor of getting rid of the marijuana user gun ban, because it is, of course, beneficial to in their view, I’m sure, legalization of marijuana, which is something that they would be in support. The NRA is in favor of it going away, because it is consistent with The NRA’s position of supporting Second Amendment rights. So, this has created the classic strange bedfellows situation. (https://www.marijuanamoment.net/aclu-attorney-confident-supreme-court-will-strike-down-gun-ban-for-marijuana-users-after-oral-arguments-next-week/ ) Page – 2 – of 11 Evan Nappen 03:28 But ultimately, what we see coming from it should be a victory for gun rights. And I believe and hope it will be even further reaching than simply addressing the marijuana question. It’s going to be, I believe, very helpful in fighting other disqualifications. Remember, New Jersey is one of the states that tries to always have an expansive list of what disqualifies a person from being able to exercise their Second Amendment rights. They love to create disenfranchisements of our rights because they are rights oppressors, and this tactic, hopefully, will be taking a hit here. So, we’ll keep you informed about the progress and what occurs under the Hemani decision. Teddy Nappen 04:30 I will say, just from the ACLU, just to be clear, they are heavily backed by the Democrat for their super PACs. I’m just saying. Like that is the, and I can’t wait to see all the individuals of the ACLU all out in mass as they’re about to help win a pro-gun victory as well. Yeah. Evan Nappen 04:55 I guess they’re looking at it more as a pro-marijuana victory and ending prejudice toward marijuana users. But whatever their motivation may be, we are going to be consistent in our support for Second Amendment rights. Getting rid of disqualifiers is getting rid of disqualifiers that are disenfranchisements to our Second Amendment rights. So, hey, at least they’re on the right side on this one, and maybe we can get them to continue to see the light on other disqualifiers. Such as restoration of rights for felons and such, right? I mean, this is something you would think they would be in favor of, as well, for restoration of rights. You paid your dues. You served your time. And if you’re not a violent felon, why are you disenfranchised of your rights? I mean, even violent felons, when you get right down to it. I mean, there’s, I missed that in the Second Amendment, where it says we have a right to keep and bear arms, unless you’re a felon, you know, or any of these exemptions. They aren’t there. So, to what degree we tolerate them, to what degree we may think they’re even valuable, I don’t know, but we need to. I’d rather be seeing us pull back on every type of ban and maximize freedom and maximize our Second Amendment rights. Evan Nappen 06:31 Also, in regards to maximizing our rights, there is a really interesting I just love this. I love this. There is an attempt, now, a very shrewd attempt on the pro-rights side to create the ability to get around, yes, a loophole, folks. Because you know what loopholes are. Loopholes are freedom finding a way. And this. Teddy Nappen 07:08 I thought it was a hole in a Castle. Evan Nappen 07:10 Yeah. Right, exactly. Loopholes were the hole in the castle that you would fire your arrows from, because you would still be protected. You could still fire through those, those square, rectangular hole. They’re the loopholes. So, that’s why they’re called that. But, anyway. The key loophole here is in the Hughes Amendment. What there’s an attempt to do, particularly in West Virginia, who has taken the lead here with a bill in West Virginia, which is SB 1071. This is right from AmmoLand, by the way. Page – 3 – of 11 (https://www.ammoland.com/2026/02/contact-chairman-willis-now-sb1071-could-restore-machine-gun-rights-in-west-virginia-if-it-gets-a-hearing/) It could restore access to modern machine guns. That’s right. Evan Nappen 08:00 What they’re doing, what they’re attempting to do is a bill that will create a state run Office of Public Defense within the West Virginia State Police. To procure and sell modern, select-fire machine guns directly to qualified, law-abiding citizens. That’s right. You know how some states have State liquor stores. This will become the state machine gun store. That’s right. It can operate via the Hughes Amendment. Now, the Hughes Amendment was the law back in ’86 that prohibited the, I mean, actually the Hughes Amendment prohibited the new, the sale of new manufacture of machine guns. Okay? So, that created this situation we have now where it’s legal for a citizen to obey the NFA and acquire a machine gun and pay the $200 tax. But the problem is no new machine guns could be put into registration, you see. And that created this essentially, artificially, ridiculously high, crazy prices to own full auto. So, this bill takes the Hughes Amendment and essentially flips the script on the Hughes Amendment by stating that, and this is under Title 18 922(o), that the Hughes Amendment. Here’s, the key loophole language. “. . . does not apply with respect to a transfer to or by, or possession by or under the authority of, a State or any department or political subdivision thereof.” Evan Nappen 10:20 So, in other words, the bill will create a State agency that purchases machine guns and transfers them by quote, right in the law, “by or under the authority of”, the State of West Virginia. The transfers are therefore fully compliant with federal law and critically exempt from the National Firearms Act $200 transfer tax because they’re government facilitated. It’s brilliant. It’s brilliant. It’ll make it so that qualified persons, any adult, who can legally possess firearms under federal and state law, they’d undergo a background check at state police, state police troop headquarters. The office would, where possible, prioritize West Virginia manufacturers, operate distribution points using existing facilities, and issue official state certificates of transfer. Subsequent transfers between qualified citizens would require a simple $275 re-transfer fee through the office, which is waived for heirs. A $250 surcharge per gun plus a modest administrative fee capped at 50 bucks, would flow to the new Public Defense Fund to cover costs, generating revenue for the state without raising taxes. Evan Nappen 11:48 And it was GOA (Gun Owners of America) that drafted this bill. This is really cool. And now I think Kansas is putting a bill forward, and I’m sure we’ll see other pro-gun states moving to create this. This way we can gut the Hughes Amendment and open up the market for new full auto. And by doing that, they’ll become even more commonly owned and become an even greater argument for the Second Amendment and their protection. Eventually, with enough exploitation of loopholes, laws themselves that created the original ban become useless and in fact, go away. We’ve seen this happen. We’ve seen this happen. For example, when it came to NFA Trusts, to purchase NFA, you had to get, at one point, what was called a chief law enforcement officer to sign off. And if your chief didn’t sign off on that, you could not appeal it. You were just dead in the water and could not acquire NFA. Then along comes the idea of setting up a trust where trusts do not require a chief law enforcement to sign off. So, everyone started doing NFA Trusts to acquire NFA, because it avoided the Chiefs sign off. And Page – 4 – of 11 because of that, there were about 10,000 trusts at ATF on NFA. So many just got around it that they finally just repealed the rule and said, guess what? You don’t need to have your chief law enforcement approve it. They just have to get notice of it. But they got rid of the sign off. Why? The loophole defeated it. Evan Nappen 13:50 We see that even going on with switchblades. We’ve seen how there’s been a huge expansion in knife rights based on the ability to work the loopholes for interstate sale and for state sales to be independent. And how the federal prohibition was simply affecting very specific transactions under federal law. To the point where the federal government, in trying to uphold the federal switchblade law, said, as one of their justifications, well, the law isn’t even enforced anymore. That’s right. Why? Loopholes! Loopholes. Freedom finding a way. And so this is exciting to see this taking place on machine guns. Finally going at the NFA. Not shying away from taking on the big stuff. Not letting them get away with claiming that any firearm is somehow intrinsically evil, wrong or bad. We’re finally fighting back with offense. Offense for once. Not just totally on the defense. Evan Nappen 15:07 Speaking of which, you may encounter a new group called “Bridging the Divide”. (https://bridgethedividenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Brief-Policy-Outline.pdf) Bridging the Divide on Firearm Policy. Oh yeah, they’re claiming that there’s some bipartisan, that they have taken pro-gun folks and anti-gun and uniting them on principles that everybody believes in. They’re claiming to do this. And here’s their wonderful policies. Lo and behold, when you look closely at this so-called, you know, “Bridging the Divide”, which is, you know, bridging the gap, which is more of laying a trap, my friends. Laying a trap. What you see are their policies that they’re claiming is, you know, they have this bipartisan, so to speak. This is pro-gun and anti-gun right oppressors. Gun rights oppressors and gun rights people. Evan Nappen 16:08 And of course, here’s their policies. They have eight of them, eight of them. This so-called “Bridging the Divide.” One, Prohibiting Factors for Firearm Purchase and Possession. This is right from their “Firearm Policy Outline.” They want to prohibit gun possession by those convicted of violent crime at the misdemeanor level while removing state restrictions on those non-violent felonies. So, they want to expand prohibitions to misdemeanors. Claiming, of course, non-violent felonies, right? Yeah. And then remove prohibition of gun purchases by persons who use marijuana. Well, yeah, guess what? The Court’s already going to kill that. So, they’re throwing this in. They want to, essentially, what they’re looking to do is expand prohibitions to misdemeanors. Who’s kidding who? Come on. Give me a break. Evan Nappen 17:04 Two, Background Checks. Create state level background checks for private sales. Oh, so, in other words, Universal Background Checks, and they want to impose it state by state. More of that. So, end private sales. But they want to have “logical exemptions”? Well, it’s the same, so-called logical exemptions. Let’s just instead of logical, we’ll call it “narrow”, narrow exemptions. No. Private sales should remain private sales. It is more of an intrusion, more of oppression, on our gun rights. How about three? What’s the third thing? Extreme Risk Protection. Oh, seriously? Red flag. We have seen, Page – 5 – of 11 experienced, and are currently experiencing the unbelievable denial of due process that takes place from that garbage. Evan Nappen 17:55 Four, Dealer Registration and Gun Trafficking. They want to focus on the small number of dealers from whom the majority of traced crime guns originate. Oh, really? Well, guess what? What creates those statistics? Anytime they’re run – when guns are seized. And if you’re seizing guns the way New Jersey does, at the drop of a hat and those guns are run, that raises dealer numbers as quoting “crime guns”, even though they’re not crime guns. It is absolutely a flawed basis, and they want to focus on that. Five, Child Firearm Access Prevention. Oh, lock up your safety. That’s what that’s called. Lock up your safety to protect the children. Here we go again. Six, Firearm Suicide Prevention. Ah. In states where murder rates are low, well, let’s go at suicide. Anything we can do to go at the guns, right? And what happens with suicide prevention? Oh, well, that’s the wellness check. You know what’s going on in New Jersey with wellness checks? Anybody calls on anybody, and the police come. They take you away. They take your guns. They hold you for about three days to see if you’re okay. And even though you’re fine, now we got to fight to get your rights back. Fight to get your guns back. There’s a million ways to kill yourself, folks. Focusing on the gun isn’t the answer. Focus on actual causes. But no, it’s just an excuse. Teddy Nappen 19:34 I think the biggest issue with this whole concept of “Bridging the Divide” is take a step back and let us, let us be on equal terms. Here’s the problem, they cannot define what an assault firearm is. They are. Evan Nappen 19:50 Wait, wait, Teddy. I haven’t even gotten to that yet. I haven’t gotten to that. Teddy Nappen 19:54 All right. Evan Nappen 19:54 Number seven, Firearm Injury Prevention Education. They want to tie public health to firearm injuries. Why? Because that goes to healthcare so they can regulate it. Get it regulated back through the health, federal health agencies. Get it back to the CDC. Get them back on it. Cranking out anti-gun nonsense. That’s the game. Eight, Community Violence Intervention. Oh, that gets funding to who? Anti-gun groups. That’s what it’s about. Evan Nappen 20:33 So, we’re looking at these policies and then who’s on it? Well, their board is chock full, chock full of all former and bunch of all anti-gun rights folks. Then they sprinkle in a few that are supposedly pro-gun. So, who’s one of them? Rob Pincus. Rob Pincus is on there, proudly on there. They have listed him as a gun rights advocate. Except here’s a little article from Lee Williams back in March 29, 2021, from thegunwriter.com. (https://thegunwriter.substack.com/p/huh-rob-pincus-supports-expanded?utm_source=publication-search) It says, “Huh? Rob Pincus calls for expanded background checks, gun control and then says he didn’t.” Oh, really? Interesting. You can read that article and see. Page – 6 – of 11 The people they’re getting on board. There’s no major player there that is truly an advocate of our gun rights that I could find, and plenty that aren’t. Evan Nappen 21:30 Nowhere in their policy does it say repeal assault firearm bans, repeal large capacity magazine bans, repeal sensitive place prohibitions, or enact national reciprocity. All the things that we’re fighting for, for our rights. No. All it is is more, more, more. Just a subterfuge of more bans, more back doors to taking away rights. I didn’t see a damn thing here that expands our rights. Nothing. It’s just take, take, take. And package it as some kind of compromise. Their compromise is always us giving up our rights. Forget it, folks. Just forget it. Evan Nappen 22:18 And finally, let me point out, right from The Trace, right from The Trace. Sent out in an email blast, and I just want to read you this from The Trace. (https://mailchi.mp/thetrace/inside-the-loosely-regulated-world-of-gun-manufacturing-4869976?e=a13774efb8) This is fascinating. “Since the Trump administration snatched. . . ” This is The Trace. Snatched. They think of the Mel Brooks. You know, sees snatched, right? But anyway. “Since the Trump administration snatched funding from gun violence prevention . . .” Oh, in other words, let’s decode that. Since Trump took away all the money going to gun rights oppression groups, “. . . the field’s practitioners have had to confront an uncertain future.” Oh, they’re no longer getting the money from the Government. Huh. “Without federal dollars, state and local governments will have to decide whether to pick up the tab. It’s far from a sure thing. Gun violence intervention programs have long had to fight to prove the value of their work. The problem, however, is that it’s difficult to measure. Studying gun violence is expensive, and the nature of violence makes it a uniquely challenging subject to pull apart.” In other words, to propagandize into an anti-gun policy, to take away our rights. “And while gun violence research has seen a resurgence in recent years, the Trump administration cut funding for that field, too.” Yeah, isn’t that cute? I love it. “. . . meaning the available evidence for these programs could grow slimmer.” Evan Nappen 23:46 So folks, The Trace is bitching and moaning about losing their money, and who took it from them? President Trump. And it’s about time. There’s no reason our tax dollars need to go to oppression of our gun rights, and it’s the Trump administration that ended this funding. Keep that in mind. Teddy Nappen 24:10 Just to kind of going back to the whole issue. Whenever the Left try to present themselves like no, no, we need to find these common sense issues. Okay. Let’s define our terms, because the Left does not see the Second Amendment as a right. We know this because the Left wing nut case of a judge, Jackson went and broke down her entire descent of Bruen, describing how it is not a right. It’s a privilege. Arguing that when we deal with gun cases, you have to consider the victims of gun violence rather than looking to the law and the Constitution. That is where they’re coming from. They’re coming from the stupidity and suicidal empathy when they say they’re bridging the gap. That is their argument. Page – 7 – of 11 Evan Nappen 25:01 Just don’t fall for it. Don’t fall for it. But here’s something that you would, that you would like to do, something that you should do, something that you would enjoy doing. And that is going to WeShoot. WeShoot is an indoor range in Lakewood, New Jersey. It’s the range where Teddy and I shoot and where we get our training. You will love WeShoot. And WeShoot is offering some great deals on guns. As a matter of fact, they have a Troy A4 Defender. It’s compact, balanced, and NJ compliant. This platform delivers serious capability in a maneuverable package. It shoulders naturally, runs smoothly, and feels purpose built. They also have a Sig Sauer P365 AXG Fuse. This is where innovation meets metal. The AXG alloy grip module gives you the premium weight and control, while the longer slide and enhance sight radius makes fast, accurate shooting effortless. Try out that SIG P365 at WeShoot. Evan Nappen 26:16 They’re also offering a Smith & Wesson CSX. Now, this is a micro-compact with an aluminum frame and a very crisp single-action trigger feel. It’s slim. It’s refined, and it’s built for discrete carry without sacrificing shoot ability. It has that classic metal construction in a defensive, ready size. Also, you can see Julianna and the MAC 5. This is a retro-inspired style with modern execution. The MAC 5 delivers iconic roller-delayed energy, and Juliana brings the confidence to match. So, check that out as well. Go to weshootusa.com, weshootusa.com. Check out the guns, check out Julianna, and check out the great things that are offered there. Fantastic training, top training. You can get your CCARE certificate so you can get your carry and have a great time in their pro shop. The service you’ll receive is second to none. Go to weshootusa.com. Evan Nappen 27:37 Also, please, please make sure you are a member of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs. They are the premier gun rights group in New Jersey. They are the umbrella organization of gun clubs in New Jersey. They are fighting for our rights. My good friend and colleague, Dan Schmutter, is there in federal court. He’s doing a great job. We’re waiting for some more results to report. Exciting times. We’re going to have some, I feel, excellent results over “sensitive places”, the magazine ban and the assault firearm ban, as we keep fighting and slogging through it. Getting our rights back. Plus the Association is on guard at the courts, at the legislature and the courthouse, both. We have a full-time paid lobbyist and, man, New Jersey is always a challenge. So, make sure you’re a member. Go to anjrpc.org and join today. You’ll get news sent right to your email. You’ll get a beautiful newsletter, and you’ll know that you’re part of the solution. You want to be part of the solution. The solution to the problem. The problem is gun rights oppressors, and the Association fights them in the belly of the beast, New Jersey, right there. ANJRPC.org. Evan Nappen 29:04 And don’t forget to get a copy of my book, New Jersey Gun Law. It’s the bible of New Jersey gun law. It is the book you need to navigate through the insanity that is New Jersey gun law. I try to make it as easy as possible. Question and answer format with 120 topics. It’s a book everybody uses, and you need one. Just go to EvanNappen.com and order yours. And when you get it, don’t lend it out, because you’ll never get it back. I hear that complaint all the time. So, make sure you keep your hands on it, or you’ll lose it. Go to EvanNappen.com and get a copy of New Jersey Gun Law today. Now, we have Press Checks with Teddy. Teddy, what do you have for us today in Press Checks? Page – 8 – of 11 Teddy Nappen 29:50 Well, as you know, Press Checks are always free, and I just want to preface this on this one. Where you see in the news media, they’ve been pushing the whole Epstein thing. All right? They’ve been trying to push that. And of course, the Left ended up destroying themselves, as they’ve lost multiple power players who have been implicated in the whole, in the whole surroundings that it comes with the Epstein files being released. And one of the individuals who, by the way, this individual had close ties to Jeffrey Epstein since, like, the early days, Michael Bloomberg. You know, maybe it was because he had a, you know, big gulp in his hand, and that’s why, you know, he’s like, Oh, how dare you. But, yeah. Teddy Nappen 30:41 So, we go to AmmoLand, where this was a wonderful article written up by Alan Gottlieb. (https://www.ammoland.com/2026/02/ccrkba-demands-bloomberg-come-clean-about-epstein-relationship/) Regarding the fact that now we are demanding that all the anti-gun groups, including Everytown, including all of his multi anti gun right the gun rights oppressors groups cut ties with Michael Bloomberg. You know, the money. And there was, I actually went. And funny enough, anyone can do this. You can go on to the Epstein files on the government website, and they have the entire files library. You can type in word searches. So, you type in “Michael Bloomberg”. I went and read through the different documents on it. Now, to preface this, there was no showing of wrongdoing in what was discovered by the fact he was. However, he was invited with Michael Bloomberg, George Stephanopoulos, Eric Schmidt, all these individuals, to a cocktail party with Jeffrey Epstein to watch The Imitation Game. You know, that movie about Alan Turing where he broke the German Enigma. Okay. Bear in mind, this is 2015. Jeffrey Epstein had already been convicted of the first initial charges back in 2000. Evan Nappen 32:05 He was a felon, you know. So, hey, they love to make a point that they shouldn’t have guns. Epstein kept trying and trying and trying to get his rights back so he could get guns. Yet, here he is with the king of anti-gun funding, Bloomturd. Teddy Nappen 32:25 Yeah. Evan Nappen 32:26 What’s that all about? Teddy Nappen 32:27 There was also a letter. Now, again, there was no direct correspondence with Michael Bloomberg. However, there was a letter from Maxwell, Jillian’s mother, basically inviting him to attend a premiere, apparently, this was a movie, Power of Good. I’ve never heard of this one. But this very clearly shows that there was direct information going back and forth. There was also, it seemed to be, there was a massive invitation, and Jeffrey Epstein was trying to create this almost investor group. I want to tell you. Like he wanted to make this online new media. He was naming these board of directors, one of which was Michael Bloomberg, the Rothschild, Lee Rothschild, Alan Goodman. So, various individuals. He Page – 9 – of 11 seemed to be almost like a financial advisor or a bank roller for Jeffrey Epstein. Again, there’s no showing of wrongdoing, but it’s just, clearly, he had a relationship with him. Even highlighted to the articles where, in 2011 the Palm Beach Daily News, Epstein’s address book included Michael Bloomberg. In 2013, there were multiple pictures taken with Bloomberg and Maxwell together having book parties at the Four Seasons restaurant in New York City, where I guess they were reading gender queer, but also the level. Evan Nappen 33:51 Well, the way they brought in the Clintons to the committee, they need to bring Bloomberg in. I mean, you know, this is. The Left kept pushing and pushing and pushing about the Epstein files. Hoping against hope, that they could somehow get President Trump on this, when, in reality, what we’re seeing is it blowing up in the Left’s face, aren’t we? Teddy Nappen 34:12 Yeah. Also, here’s a really big one. Epstein was invited to a Bloomberg hosted fundraiser for Plaskett. Congresswoman Plaskett. You know, the woman who took direct funding from Jeffrey Epstein, actually got donation money. So, not only was he hosting the dinner, cordially inviting Epstein to come on down. Even writing a letter. Please join our host. Michael Bloomberg. Dear Jeffrey Epstein, please join our host, Michael Bloomberg, to the dinner. So, very clearly he was running in these circles. There’s a very clear tie relationship. Again, no showing of wrongdoing. There wasn’t a direct correspondence with him in the emails. And if you actually go through a lot of the emails, he would email news articles. That’s why you know Bloomberg News. And he would email them to others. So, that did also come up. It just shows the very clear ties. This is the one that really sticks out to me. Documents release revealed he was interested in gun politics and Bloomberg’s work. They don’t show direct donations to EveryTown. However, in 2013 there’s an email soliciting Epstein for a donation to American for Responsible Solutions, which is run by Gabby, Gabby Giffords, who later became Giffords. Evan Nappen 35:34 That’s right. But all they care about with Epstein is Trump. And how does that all relate? Is Trump in the Epstein files, Teddy? Teddy Nappen 35:46 Oh, very much. Yes, yes, Trump is in the Epstein files. Okay, I’ve got to tell this to everyone here. The black pillars, all those out there, we do not have all the information. We know that for a fact. Okay? Has it been mishandled? Absolutely. Pam Bondi should resign. Fall on her sword. Because she has damaged the administration on Trump for the mishandling with the stupid binder gate, all the stupidity of, oh, I have the client list on my desk. That was a lie. And the whole situation there. However, if you actually look at the timeline, you can go see the articles. See the full breakdown of it for Donald Trump. Teddy Nappen 36:24 Here’s the timeline, 2004 to 2005, there was reported abuse by a 14-year-old girl by Epstein. Then Trump immediately ended the relation with Jeffrey Epstein. Banned him from Mar a Lago. In 2008, Epstein was convicted with the help of Donald Trump, who cooperated with the victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer, who fully deposed himself to the lawyers. As opposed to all the other people that are Page – 10 – of 11 implicated, who just stayed away. He actually went in to help the victims. Imagine that. And going in next 2000, after Maxwell is convicted as well, where she trafficked to Epstein. Also in 2019, he’s later arrested again. Guess who’s President in 2019? Donald Trump. He was arrested for sex who invested arrested Epstein for sex trafficking, and then he’s later dead in 2019. So, not only does it exonerate, where, after he was convicted, Trump broke off all relationships with Epstein. He helped get Jeffrey Epstein. That is all that they have on Donald Trump when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. Teddy Nappen 37:32 All the fake news, all the fake and you know why he said hoax? He wasn’t saying the Jeffrey Epstein whole pedo ring was a hoax? No, he is saying hoax, as in talking about the Dems whole plot to directly connect Trump to the pedophile ring. That is their plot. That was the hoax. Was it misspoken? Yes, Trump fires from the hip. Sue him. That’s how it goes. But actually looking at the facts of what came down, this is what he should have said. Under four years of Biden, not one committee was formed to go at the Epstein files, to go after the Epstein files. The Dems didn’t even want to touch it, which, by the way, all the people that were running in Epstein circles, Schumer, all the, all the heavy donators, Bill Gates, all these individuals are running in Michael Bloomberg, running heavily donations, including Jeffrey Epstein, who heavily donated to the Democrats. So, it’s the level of insanity that goes into it. Teddy Nappen 38:37 By the way, for everyone to remember. Did you know? Did you also know the fact that all of a sudden, the victims who never spoke out during the four years under Biden are now taking Super Bowl ads saying, release more files. Okay, what happened to we have our list. We’re making our list. Just say it. Are you worried about defamation? Musk said he’ll pay for defamation. And good luck as trying to go after women of victims of sexual abuse. I’m sure a go fund me will be immediately formed and covered. So, what are you waiting on? Oh, that’s right, these are just political cudgels for you to abuse. Okay? That is a fact, and that’s what I’m saying to the victims who, all of a sudden, will not name names. So, that it’s one of the big things, like, very clearly, it’s being used as a political tool. They don’t actually want to release the names. Evan Nappen 39:28 Well, I think it’s interesting that it’s come around to Mr. Bloomberg, and that has major effect in terms of funding of further gun rights oppression. He needs to explain the way they’re looking at it. Forced it to be opened up. Hey, guess what? You’re there. You need to explain it now. At least do that. Teddy Nappen 39:52 Also this. Evan Nappen 39:53 There you go. Teddy Nappen 39:54 Proof in concept. Peter Mandelson, who was directly connected to Jeffrey Epstein. He was Keir Starmer’s Cabinet Minister, who just recently resigned. He resigned in shame. So, the proof is in the Page – 11 – of 11 proof is, in fact, that this has the effect. If we could break up Bloomberg from EveryTown. I mean, there is their money. They have nothing aside from. Evan Nappen 40:17 Well, they’re not getting funding anymore from the Government. Yeah, from USAID killed all that. Yeah, so that’s good. Well, let me tell you, Teddy, about this week’s GOFU. That is a Gun Owner Fuck Up, where you learn about expensive mistakes that others have made so that you don’t make them. Now this week’s GOFU that I want to talk about, might even be considered a future GOFU. But it applies still today. If West Virginia, Kansas, or any of these places end up creating State machine gun stores, if you will, which I believe they will, and this ends up taking off, make sure that you do NOT, as a non-resident of those states, acquire a machine gun from those states and then, no less, bring it to New Jersey. In other words, the GOFU, in the big picture, is you have to be cognizant of your jurisdiction and what you’re doing in your jurisdiction, and when you’re in another jurisdiction, what you can and can’t do. Evan Nappen 41:34 We see the jurisdictional problem arise all the time. Whether it’s in carrying a gun where you’re allowed to carry in one state and not in another, whether it’s purchase or possession of a firearm in any given state versus another, people bringing guns or accessories or other things that were legal in one place and illegal in another. The burden is on you to know this. I am constantly seeing cases where people make that very critical error. So, the GOFU, in a general term, my friends, is make sure you know your jurisdictions laws and do not inadvertently violate them because you are in another jurisdiction, and you are coming into this other jurisdiction, this is where the trouble can begin. It can be quite serious. So, be very cognizant of this when dealing with guns. Evan Nappen 42:40 This is Evan Nappen and Teddy Nappen reminding you that gun laws don’t protect honest citizens from criminals. They protect criminals from honest citizens. Speaker 2 42:51 Gun Lawyer is a CounterThink Media production. The music used in this broadcast was managed by Cosmo Music, New York, New York. Reach us by emailing Evan@gun.lawyer. The information and opinions in this broadcast do not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney in your state. Downloadable PDF TranscriptGun Lawyer S5 E279_Transcript About The HostEvan Nappen, Esq.Known as “America's Gun Lawyer,” Evan Nappen is above all a tireless defender of justice. Author of eight bestselling books and countless articles on firearms, knives, and weapons history and the law, a certified Firearms Instructor, and avid weapons collector and historian with a vast collection that spans almost five decades — it's no wonder he's become the trusted, go-to expert for local, industry and national media outlets. Regularly called on by radio, television and online news media for his commentary and expertise on breaking news Evan has appeared countless shows including Fox News – Judge Jeanine, CNN – Lou Dobbs, Court TV, Real Talk on WOR, It's Your Call with Lyn Doyle, Tom Gresham's Gun Talk, and Cam & Company/NRA News. As a creative arts consultant, he also lends his weapons law and historical expertise to an elite, discerning cadre of movie and television producers and directors, and novelists. He also provides expert testimony and consultations for defense attorneys across America. Email Evan Your Comments and Questions  talkback@gun.lawyer Join Evan's InnerCircleHere's your chance to join an elite group of the Savviest gun and knife owners in America.  Membership is totally FREE and Strictly CONFIDENTIAL.  Just enter your email to start receiving insider news, tips, and other valuable membership benefits.   Email (required) *First Name *Select list(s) to subscribe toInnerCircle Membership Yes, I would like to receive emails from Gun Lawyer Podcast. (You can unsubscribe anytime)Constant Contact Use. Please leave this field blank.var ajaxurl = "https://gun.lawyer/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php";

We Like Shooting - Ep 650 This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by: C&G Holsters (Code: WLSISLIFE) Midwest Industries (Code: WLSISLIFE) Primary Arms Night Fision (Code: WLSISLIFE) Blue Alpha Mitchell Defense (Code: WLS10) Bowers Group (Code: WLS) Swampfox Optics Guests: Matt Larosiere Patreon.com/fuddbusters Text Dear WLS or Reviews +1 743 500 2171  New Public Notes Page: https://dngrsfrdm.com/public/ BULLET POINTS Nielsen Device Boosterless Silencer System The Nielsen Device is a boosterless silencer system designed for direct-thread mounting on pistols, eliminating the need for a traditional Nielsen booster or piston. It enables suppressed shooting with standard direct impingement pistol designs without the torque issues associated with boosters. The system uses a proprietary boosterless mount and boosterless booster assembly for reliable function on various pistol calibers. Mission First Tactical (MFT) New Pocket Holster Mission First Tactical (MFT) introduces a new pocket holster designed for concealed carry, featuring a durable construction with a sticky exterior for secure pocket retention. It accommodates micro-compact pistols and supports quick draw access while preventing printing. The holster is compatible with popular subcompact firearms like the Sig P365 and Glock 43. Luth-AR Globe Charging Handle The Luth-AR Globe Charging Handle is an AR-15 charging handle featuring a large spherical knob for ambidextrous operation, designed to reduce fatigue during extended shooting sessions. It is constructed from 7075 T6 aluminum with a hard coat anodized finish and weighs 1.6 ounces. The handle allows for easier manipulation in various conditions, including gloved use, and is compatible with standard AR-15 upper receivers. Note (Nick) GAFS https://gafshub.com/wls GUN FIGHTS No one stepped into the arena this week. WLS IS LIFESTYLE Note pocket carry Thin Line Weapons NFA Collection Thin Line Weapons offers a selection of NFA-regulated firearms including suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns. The page lists products such as the Huxwrx Flow 556K suppressor and various SBR configurations. All items comply with National Firearms Act requirements and are available for purchase with appropriate ATF approvals. GOING BALLISTIC ATF's ‘Engaged in the Business' Rule Mirrors Canada's Firearms Confiscation Approach (Shooting Wire Analysis) The article argues that the ATF's Final Rule on the Definition of “Engaged in the Business” Selling Firearms and Ammunition, effective May 20, 2024, effectively enables a backdoor gun grab in the US similar to Canada's 2020 Order in Council banning over 1,500 firearms models. It claims the rule reclassifies private sales and occasional transfers as requiring a Federal Firearms License (FFL), mirroring Canada's prohibition-then-buyback strategy. The piece warns this erodes Second Amendment rights by criminalizing common firearm transactions without due process. Utah HB 431: GOP Rep. Cheryl Acton Pushes to Ban Open Carry on College Campuses (Savage) Utah Republican Representative Cheryl Acton has introduced House Bill 431 to prohibit the open carry of firearms on the campuses of public colleges and universities in the state. The bill targets loaded firearms visible to others, aiming to enhance campus safety amid concerns over gun violence. It applies specifically to institutions under the Utah Board of Higher Education. Tumbler Ridge Shooting Highlights Gun Control Arguments (Bearing Arms Analysis) (Savage) The article analyzes a shooting incident in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, Canada, where a man used a restricted firearm to kill two people before being stopped by an armed civilian. It critiques how gun control advocates exploit such tragedies to push for stricter laws despite existing severe restrictions on firearms in Canada. The piece argues that the incident demonstrates the consistent pattern of gun control arguments relying on emotional appeals rather than evidence of effectiveness. Bearing Arms: Reason Transgender Gun Ban Proposal Won't Advance (Savage) The article discusses a proposed federal rule by the Biden administration to prohibit firearm purchases by individuals with gender transition-related medical diagnoses, such as gender dysphoria. It argues the rule faces significant legal and political hurdles, including likely injunctions from courts that have blocked similar ATF actions. The author asserts it lacks momentum and is destined to fail. Shooting News Weekly Critique of Evidence-Free Claims on Guns and Public Safety Conflict (Savage) The article criticizes a purported expert's assertion of a conflict between concealed carry and public safety, labeling it as evidence-free hackery. It argues that such claims lack empirical support and misrepresent data on concealed carry impacts. The piece defends concealed carry by highlighting the absence of credible evidence linking it to increased public safety risks. New Mexico House Bill 86 (HB 86) Sweeping Gun Control Measure Scheduled for Hearing (Savage) New Mexico's House Bill 86 proposes comprehensive gun control measures including bans on assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and ghost guns, along with red flag laws and restrictions on open carry. The bill is set for a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on February 17, 2026. Sponsored by Rep. Rehm, it aims to address gun violence through multiple regulatory changes. REVIEWS Review: Jaqin Ta'Sox from Connecticut From; Jaqin Ta'Sox: Review I still think y'all are gay. But, regarding ep 647. I agree with Jerambay, 99%. I agree with Shawn as far as the narrative being twisted, disagree with most of his thoughts on the agents. Everyone who can legally carry should be able carry everywhere, full stop. The narrative of him carrying a 320 with spare mags to “cause chaos” is BS. The difference in Rittenhouse and the Minisota Nut, is in their choices. Rittenhouse didn't look for danger, danger found him, he ran away, then defended himself. Minisota nut, put himself in the middle of a wave of insanity. Had he gave the agents a buffer, he could've yelled and cursed all he wanted. Tragic, but justified.   Review: From Jeff E Comment only. Liberals are the biggest fucking idiots. They try to tell us how Trump is a dick tator, while they do everything in their power to dismantle the Constitution, specifically 2A. The very things that were setup to limit government, not to limit us. Sadly, they don't teach this in school anymore, (about Constitution limiting government). While like in Illinois they call our politicians “lawmakers”, when they should be called servants. Jeff E Five Squares Review: Anonymous Coward from Pennsylvania Anonymous Coward from Under My Desk Great show. Worth five squares. Ask me about my weiner. Before we let you go – JOIN GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA We'd love if you supported the show, join Agency 171 at agency171.com. Lot's of prizes, rewards and kick ass swag. No matter how tough your battle is today, we want you here fight with us tomorrow. Don't struggle in silence, you can contact the suicide prevention line by dialing 988 from your phone. Remember – Always prefer Dangerous Freedom over peaceful slavery. We'll see you next time! Nick – @busbuiltsystems | Bus Built Systems Jeremy – @ret_actual | Rivers Edge Tactical Aaron – @machinegun_moses Savage – @savage1r Shawn – @dangerousfreedomyt | @camorado.cam | Camorado

In this episode, we unpack the bizarre case of a man who legally registered a potato as a firearm suppressor with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. We explore how changes to the National Firearms Act registration process made this possible, what it says about regulatory boundaries, and why this seemingly absurd stunt — complete with the serial number “TATE001” — raises serious questions about how broad the definition of a silencer really is. Along the way we dive into the politics, the paperwork, and the cultural reaction to one of the strangest regulatory stories in recent memory.This Week's Featured Hashtag#OddWaysToShowAppreciationOther Interesting Things·         ATF Website·         More information on the Potato Registry ·         Alienation of Affection in North Carolina·         Nate the Hoof Guy·         More Information on the Brenay Kennard AffairSend a text to The Ebone Zone! Support the showIf you have questions or comments email ebonezonepodcast@yahoo.com Follow the Ebone Zone on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OfficialEBZLike the Ebone Zone on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ebonezoneofficial/Visit www.ebonezone.com for more content!

In This Hour: REBROADCAST - of 11.23.25 -- Why is U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi supporting the National Firearms Act, which regulates silencers and short barrel rifles? -- The Post Office pushes back on concealed carry.  John Petrolino has the secret memo sent to employees.    --  The U.S. Supreme Court is considering more Second Amendment cases when it has already accepted two this session.  What's going on here? Gun Talk 01.18.26 Hour 3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gun-talk--6185159/support.

Congressman Eric Burleson joins to dissect the House vote extending Obamacare subsidies, criticizing the 17 Republicans who flipped as fiscally irresponsible and politically myopic. He also weighs in on Josh Hawley's War Powers vote on Venezuela, labeling it unnecessary and damaging to presidential authority. The discussion expands to nationwide protests against law enforcement, Minnesota's controversial policies, and recent ATF struggles after the National Firearms Act tax repeal, with Burleson calling for the agency's abolition. The segment blends policy analysis with sharp critiques of political and bureaucratic missteps. #Obamacare #EricBurleson #WarPowers #JoshHawley #LawEnforcement #ATF #SecondAmendment #CongressionalPolitics

This week, we're covering a topic that may give you a bit of deja vu. Or, even, deja deja vu. That's because we've seen this all before. Twice. On Wednesday, a Fifth Circuit panel reissued its opinion in US v. Peterson for the second time. That makes it the third revision. To discuss the difference between the three, we have federal litigator and legal commentator Gabriel Malor back on the show. He noted that in every version, the panel upheld Peterson's conviction for possessing an unregistered silencer. However, he said each version became less expansive than the last. In the latest version, Malor pointed out that the subtle changes the panel made all went toward emphasizing that Peterson's Second Amendment challenge was only as-applied to him and that the panel thought he did a particularly bad job. Malor argued the panel was sending signals with its edits. He said the judges had moved pretty far from their original holding that silencers are not arms protected by the Second Amendment. And, even though they still ruled Peterson's challenge failed, they laid out a potential path for how other challengers might succeed. Special Guest: Gabriel Malor.

Contributing writer Jake Fogleman and I cover a new legal brief from the nation's largest gun-control groups filed in support of the Trump administration's position regarding the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act. We also discuss the DOJ's new Second Amendment division officially going live with an interesting take on who gun rights apply to.

In This Hour:-- Why is U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi supporting the National Firearms Act, which regulates silencers and short barrel rifles?-- The Post Office pushes back on concealed carry.  John Petrolino has the secret memo sent to employees.   --  The U.S. Supreme Court is considering more Second Amendment cases when it has already accepted two this session.  What's going on here?Gun Talk 11.23.25 Hour 3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gun-talk--6185159/support.

Congressman Andrew Clyde (R-GA) joins Cam to discuss his letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, signed by 30 other members of the House, that demands the DOJ end the National Firearms Act's registration requirements after the $200 NFA tax was repealed as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Steve Dulan, professor, attorney, and Second Amendment expert, joins The Steve Gruber Show to break down the latest developments shaking up the firearms community. A new Form 4 proposal could allow for silencers with a $0 transfer tax, marking a major shift in federal firearms regulation. Dulan also discusses the high-profile lawsuit by the NRA, Gun Owners of America, and Firearms Policy Coalition seeking to dismantle parts of the National Firearms Act, arguing that current restrictions violate constitutional rights.

In this episode, tax attorney Toby Mathis, Esq., welcomes Tom Chittum, former ATF Deputy Director and firearms law expert, to discuss the critical intersection of firearms ownership and estate planning. They explore what families need to know when inheriting firearms, from identifying contraband weapons to navigating complex federal regulations. Tom explains the biggest mistakes executors make, including informal transfers and failing to determine whether firearms, such as machine guns, are properly registered under the National Firearms Act of 1934. The conversation covers the distinction between regular firearms and NFA weapons (machine guns, silencers, short-barreled shotguns), the severe criminal penalties for unlawful possession, and the importance of working with federal firearms licensees for transfers. Tom provides practical guidance on securing firearms, maintaining proper inventories, using gun trusts to simplify inheritance, and understanding both actual and constructive possession. With insights from decades of ATF experience, Tom offers actionable steps gun owners can take today to protect their families from legal headaches and ensure valuable firearms or family heirlooms don't become government-destroyed contraband due to simple mistakes. Highlights/Topics: 0:00 Why Listen to Tom Chittum 2:58 Biggest Mistakes with Firearm Inheritance 6:20 History of Federal Gun Laws 8:36 Legal Possession and Registration Requirements 11:30 Prohibited Persons and Transfer Restrictions 12:59 How to Transfer Firearms to Heirs 15:30 NFA Firearms and Special Requirements 18:35 Gun Trusts and Estate Planning 22:29 Executor Rights and Possession 24:31 Securing Firearms in Estates 25:51 Handling Contraband Firearms 28:50 Weekend Action Steps for Gun Owners 31:00 Outro Share this with business owners you know Resources: Schedule Your FREE Consultation https://andersonadvisors.com/strategy-session/?utm_source=guns-and-estate-planning-what-every-family-needs-to-know&utm_medium=podcast Tax and Asset Protection Events https://andersonadvisors.com/real-estate-asset-protection-workshop-training/?utm_source=guns-and-estate-planning-what-every-family-needs-to-know&utm_medium=podcast  Anderson Advisors https://andersonadvisors.com/ Toby Mathis YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@TobyMathis Toby Mathis TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@tobymathisesq Clint Coons YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@ClintCoons

The Department of Justice has once again told a federal court that, even though it believes suppressors are protected by the Second Amendment, the $200 tax and registration requirements imposed by the National Firearms Act are just a "modest burden" that doesn't infringe on our right to keep and bear arms.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics surrounding gun rights, including the implications of the National Firearms Act, the intersection of gun rights and the trans community, and the ongoing challenges of rights restoration for individuals with felony convictions. The conversation also touches on the mental health aspects of gun control and the broader implications of legislation affecting gun ownership in America. The conversation delves into various aspects of gun rights, crime rates, and the implications of recent political actions. It discusses the influence of activist judges on gun control, the rise of juvenile crime, and the impact of Trump's policies on crime rates in cities like DC. The discussion also touches on the importance of self-defense legal protections, the controversial topic of transgender rights in relation to gun ownership, and the recent rulings on public transportation and concealed carry laws. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to gun rights and public safety. Takeaways Gun rights are a fundamental aspect of American freedom. The National Firearms Act has created significant barriers to gun ownership. Mental health issues are often intertwined with discussions about gun control. Rights restoration for felons is a contentious legal issue. The push for gun control often overlooks the rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control measures do not effectively prevent crime. The Second Amendment protects individual liberties, not just collective rights. Legislation should not penalize entire groups for the actions of individuals. The firearms industry is facing financial pressures that could impact legislation. The conversation around gun rights is evolving, with new generations advocating for less compromise. Activist judges are influencing gun control policies. Many Americans support the right to own firearms. Juvenile crime is a significant issue in urban areas. Trump's policies have led to a decrease in crime rates. Self-defense legal protections are essential for gun owners. The transgender community's rights are being debated in relation to gun ownership. Public transportation bans on firearms are being challenged legally. Mental health discussions are crucial in the gun rights debate. The media often ignores stories that reveal the truth about crime. There is a growing sentiment that America is at a tipping point regarding gun rights. Keywords gun rights, Second Amendment, Armed American Radio, National Firearms Act, gun control, mental health, rights restoration, trans community, legal challenges, firearms legislation, activist judges, gun control, juvenile crime, law enforcement, Trump, crime rates, self-defense, legal protection, transgender rights, public transportation  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics surrounding gun rights, including the implications of the National Firearms Act, the intersection of gun rights and the trans community, and the ongoing challenges of rights restoration for individuals with felony convictions. The conversation also touches on the mental health aspects of gun control and the broader implications of legislation affecting gun ownership in America. The conversation delves into various aspects of gun rights, crime rates, and the implications of recent political actions. It discusses the influence of activist judges on gun control, the rise of juvenile crime, and the impact of Trump's policies on crime rates in cities like DC. The discussion also touches on the importance of self-defense legal protections, the controversial topic of transgender rights in relation to gun ownership, and the recent rulings on public transportation and concealed carry laws. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to gun rights and public safety. Takeaways Gun rights are a fundamental aspect of American freedom. The National Firearms Act has created significant barriers to gun ownership. Mental health issues are often intertwined with discussions about gun control. Rights restoration for felons is a contentious legal issue. The push for gun control often overlooks the rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control measures do not effectively prevent crime. The Second Amendment protects individual liberties, not just collective rights. Legislation should not penalize entire groups for the actions of individuals. The firearms industry is facing financial pressures that could impact legislation. The conversation around gun rights is evolving, with new generations advocating for less compromise. Activist judges are influencing gun control policies. Many Americans support the right to own firearms. Juvenile crime is a significant issue in urban areas. Trump's policies have led to a decrease in crime rates. Self-defense legal protections are essential for gun owners. The transgender community's rights are being debated in relation to gun ownership. Public transportation bans on firearms are being challenged legally. Mental health discussions are crucial in the gun rights debate. The media often ignores stories that reveal the truth about crime. There is a growing sentiment that America is at a tipping point regarding gun rights. gun rights, Second Amendment, Armed American Radio, National Firearms Act, gun control, mental health, rights restoration, trans community, legal challenges, firearms legislation, activist judges, gun control, juvenile crime, law enforcement, Trump, crime rates, self-defense, legal protection, transgender rights, public transportation  

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics surrounding gun rights, including the implications of the National Firearms Act, the intersection of gun rights and the trans community, and the ongoing challenges of rights restoration for individuals with felony convictions. The conversation also touches on the mental health aspects of gun control and the broader implications of legislation affecting gun ownership in America. The conversation delves into various aspects of gun rights, crime rates, and the implications of recent political actions. It discusses the influence of activist judges on gun control, the rise of juvenile crime, and the impact of Trump's policies on crime rates in cities like DC. The discussion also touches on the importance of self-defense legal protections, the controversial topic of transgender rights in relation to gun ownership, and the recent rulings on public transportation and concealed carry laws. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to gun rights and public safety. Takeaways Gun rights are a fundamental aspect of American freedom. The National Firearms Act has created significant barriers to gun ownership. Mental health issues are often intertwined with discussions about gun control. Rights restoration for felons is a contentious legal issue. The push for gun control often overlooks the rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control measures do not effectively prevent crime. The Second Amendment protects individual liberties, not just collective rights. Legislation should not penalize entire groups for the actions of individuals. The firearms industry is facing financial pressures that could impact legislation. The conversation around gun rights is evolving, with new generations advocating for less compromise. Activist judges are influencing gun control policies. Many Americans support the right to own firearms. Juvenile crime is a significant issue in urban areas. Trump's policies have led to a decrease in crime rates. Self-defense legal protections are essential for gun owners. The transgender community's rights are being debated in relation to gun ownership. Public transportation bans on firearms are being challenged legally. Mental health discussions are crucial in the gun rights debate. The media often ignores stories that reveal the truth about crime. There is a growing sentiment that America is at a tipping point regarding gun rights. Keywords gun rights, Second Amendment, Armed American Radio, National Firearms Act, gun control, mental health, rights restoration, trans community, legal challenges, firearms legislation, activist judges, gun control, juvenile crime, law enforcement, Trump, crime rates, self-defense, legal protection, transgender rights, public transportation  

In this episode of Leupold's Hunt Talk Radio, Randy is at the HQ of Silencer Central to catch up with the CEO, Brandon Maddox and talk about the many updates since the last podcast six months ago. Topics covered include funding conservation, Silencer Central's effort to reform the National Firearms Act and pass the Hearing Protection Act, the difficulty of getting changes in DC, the benefits of silencer deregulation, and a lot of other topics related to hunting and owning suppressors. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

After Congress slashed the National Firearms Act (NFA) tax on silencers and short-barreled firearms, nearly every gun-rights group in the country promised to sue in an effort to overturn those sections of the law outright. Now, a few weeks later, those groups have nearly all sorted into two coalitions, and they've both filed suit. One coalition, led by Gun Owners of America (GOA), filed in the Fifth Circuit. Another, led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), filed in the Eighth Circuit. To analyze the arguments of each case, we've got independent gun-rights lawyer Matt Larosiere on the show. He's brought both tax power and Second Amendment challenges against the NFA before. So, he has direct experience with the claims at issue in both cases. Larosiere said he is on board with the logic behind the GOA and NRA lawsuits, but he argued they face a difficult climb to achieve their goals. He said tax challenges are more complex than most people imagine, and it can be difficult for Second Amendment attorneys to navigate the waters of a successful pleading. He said the Second Amendment claim in the NRA case may have an easier path, but noted it wasn't a new tactic and has failed in the past. Special Guest: Matt Larosiere.

In this episode of Whiskey & Windage, we sit down with Dave Matheny, founder of Silencer Shop and a leading voice in the fight for suppressor freedom. Dave breaks down recent changes in the “Big Beautiful Bill” that directly affect NFA regulations, including tax stamp processes and wait times—what's improved, what still sucks, and what it all means for law-abiding gun owners.We also dive into why now is the time to renew the push to completely remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act. From legal challenges to public perception, Dave gives us a behind-the-scenes look at what it takes to make silencers more accessible and why it matters for the Second Amendment community.Whether you're a suppressor owner, a firearms enthusiast, or just someone tired of outdated gun laws, this is an episode you won't want to miss. Dave brings both experience and insight that you simply can't get anywhere else.Subscribe now and hear what's next in the fight for NFA reform—and how you can be a part of it.

NRA-ILA Executive Director John Commerford joins Cam to discuss the new federal lawsuit taking on the registration of suppressors, short-barreled firearms, and "any other weapons" required by the National Firearms Act.

Ryan Wrecker and Kim welcome Mark Walters, host of Armed American Radio and a Talkers Heavy 100 honoree, to discuss a landmark lawsuit challenging the 1934 National Firearms Act. Mark breaks down how recent legislative changes stripping the $200 tax stamp render the NFA unconstitutional, sparking a legal battle led by gun rights groups. The trio dive into the ongoing debate about the ATF's role, expressing skepticism about its future and concerns over its power under different administrations. The conversation touches on gun culture shifts, social media's impact, and the absurdity of gun-related restrictions, all with a light-hearted tone sprinkled with ideas like gun vending machines and claw machines. The segment closes with a shoutout to the NRA and Mark's radio show.

Ryan Wrecker fills in and kicks off Hour 3 with a mix of lighthearted banter and hard-hitting talk. They dive into the bizarre concept of “Scream Club” in Chicago, where crowds gather weekly to scream into Lake Michigan as a stress release. From there, the conversation pivots to political hot topics including the fallout from Texas Democrats fleeing the state, speculation on a grand jury probe into Obama-era officials over Trump-Russia conspiracies, and the deep entanglement between government and media. The hour wraps with an in-depth discussion with Mark Walters about a lawsuit challenging the 1934 National Firearms Act, the future of gun rights, and the complexities surrounding the ATF.

Steve Gruber is joined by attorney and professor Steve Dulan to discuss a new proposal from Democrats to raise the tax on suppressors (silencers) to over $4,000. While the bill is expected to fail, Dulan explains how it underscores the ongoing constitutional issues with the National Firearms Act and highlights the Left's relentless push against the Second Amendment.

The One Big Beautiful Bill has reduced the tax on suppressors and short barreled rifles from $200 to $0. But what about registration requirements? What does that mean for suppressor bills in Ohio? And what about claims that suppressors are used in crime? Rob Sexton, BFA's Legislative Affairs Director, joins the podcast to discuss how recent changes to the National Firearms Act affect you.

There has been a ton of gun news over the past week. So, we figured it would be a good time to have another Q&A podcast. I think we judged that correctly because we had enough great questions on enough interesting topics sent in by Reload Members to fill up one of our longest podcasts of the year. We discussed everything from the impacts of the National Firearms Act tax cut to the future of the NRA and the Department of Justice's strategy in Second Amendment cases. Contributing Writer Jake Fogleman and I dive into the details on each question. We cover a huge variety of topics across every genre of gun coverage.

Last week, we talked about the political implications of the National Firearms Act (NFA) tax cuts in the budget bill. This week, we're talking about the market implications. To do that, we've got the co-founders of Open Source Defense back on the show. In addition to running a smart publication on gun culture and politics, Kareem Shaya and Chuck Rossi also run a firearms business investment firm. They said the tax cut is likely to juice demand for silencers (more accurately known as suppressors), short-barrel rifles and shotguns, as well as guns in the "any other weapon" (AOW) category. They looked at the recent surge in silencer demand related to last year's precipitous drop in registration processing times as a potential guidepost for how much demand may spike. Kaream noted suppressor sales were up 80 percent year-over-year between 20023 and 2024. He said demand could see a similar jump once the cut hits, although the six-month delay before that happens might depress the market in the meantime. Meanwhile, Chuck argued that new demand would likely open up innovation in the space. He said he expects new companies will come in to try and produce mass market suppressors or even disposable ones. He said we could see renewed interest in short-barrel rifles and the long-neglected AOW category that leads to new breakout products.

In This Hour:-- We came THAT close to removing silencers and short barrel rifles from the National Firearms Act, but it didn't happen.  What was really going on behind closed doors? Knox Williams, from the American Suppressor Association runs it down and gives his take on whether this was a win or a loss.--  What's it mean that the $200 federal tax on suppressors and short barrel rifles is being removed?   Will prices go up?  Will supply increase? Will shorter barrels become the norm? -- Tom talks about his friend Ray Oeltjen, who recently passed away, and explains what he learned about constant activism on the Second Amendment from a man who never gave up.Gun Talk 07.13.25 Hour 1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gun-talk--6185159/support.

Episode 376 of the John1911 podcast is now live:   The last of the gun range construction.  Mastering a skidsteer.  The Colt R6530. Making a run at a Porsche Tractor. National Firearms Act taxes. The FBI eviscerates the P320.    Marky John1911.com "Shooting Guns & Having Fun"  

Contributing writer Jake Fogleman and I break down a new lawsuit filed by gun rights advocates in the aftermath of the One Big Beautiful Bill that argues NFA restrictions are no longer lawful without its $200 tax. We also talk about Canada's ongoing difficulties in carrying out its now 5-year-old plan to confiscate semi-automatic firearms, as well as Colorado lawsuit that pits mass shooting survivors against a Second Amendment Sanctuary county.

After the signing of the OBBB and the announcement of lawsuits challenging the National Firearms Act, what's likely to be the next big story for Second Amendment advocates? The Reload's Stephen Gutowski joins Cam to discuss several possibilities on the horizon.

With the taxes on many NFA items zeroed out starting on January 1, 2A groups are launching new legal assaults on the National Firearms Act itself. FPC Action Foundation head Cody J. Wisniewski joins Cam to talk about the latest legal battles, as well as the continued objections to the proposed merger between ATF and DEA.

This week, we saw a National Firearms Act tax cut make it across the finish line and into law. Silencers, short-barrel rifles and shotguns, as well as firearms in the "any other weapons" category will now see a $0 tax in place of the previous $200 one. But not everyone in the gun world is happy about that. So, we have Cam Edwards of Bearing Arms back on the show to work through what the text does, why it ended up the way it did, and whether gun owners should consider it a win. Cam noted the final text is not everything gun-rights activists had pushed for since the Senate Parliamentarian ruled full delisting was against the rules of budget reconciliation. He said he disagreed with the ruling and could understand why some gun-rights activists unsuccessfully pushed to fire or overrule her. However, he also said it was important to understand the politics of the situation in order not to be caught off guard by either one of those reasonably predictable outcomes. Despite arguments to the contrary, Cam said the law should still be viewed as a win for gun owners. Perhaps an imperfect one, but one of the more significant at the federal level in a generation. Special Guest: Cam Edwards.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various topics related to gun rights, the National Firearms Act, and the political landscape surrounding these issues. He engages with Arizona State Representative Kwong Nguyen, expressing frustrations over the Senate parliamentarian's decisions and the challenges faced by gun owners. The conversation emphasizes the importance of advocacy, the role of organizations like the NRA, and the need for active engagement from the public to influence legislation. The episode concludes with a call to action for listeners to support their rights and stay informed. Takeaways The National Firearms Act remains a contentious issue. Frustration exists over the Senate parliamentarian's influence. Advocacy and engagement are crucial for gun rights. The NRA plays a significant role in the fight for gun rights. Political dynamics often complicate legislative efforts. Gun owners must remain vigilant and proactive. Understanding the Second Amendment is essential for advocacy. The importance of grassroots movements cannot be overstated. Calls to action can make a difference in legislation. Engagement with representatives is necessary for change. Keywords gun rights, National Firearms Act, NRA, Second Amendment, political advocacy, Kwong Nguyen, Mark Walters, Arizona politics, gun ownership, legislative process  

This week, we're looking into a bit of a Second Amendment legal mystery. Recently, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled silencers aren't "arms" and, therefore, don't enjoy constitutional protections. But then the Department of Justice (DOJ) changed hands and changed its mind on the case. In response, the panel took the unusual step of withdrawing its opinion. But we don't know what it plans to do next. That's why we've got federal litigator and legal commentator Gabriel Malor back on the show to give his view on what may be coming. A lot of other commentators and several gun-rights groups have taken the withdrawal as a strong sign the panel plans to reverse itself on whether silencers, often called suppressors, are arms. But Malor said that's unlikely to happen. He noted the DOJ's new position in the case doesn't actually argue silencers are arms, just that they enjoy some level of Second Amendment protection. He also said the panel thoroughly considered the arms question in its initial opinion and is unlikely to reverse, given no new facts or arguments are being presented. Malor also pointed out the panel addressed the basic argument DOJ is now backing and found it lacking, though it spent comparatively little time on that part of the case in its initial opinion. He said the panel is likely going to delve a bit deeper into the DOJ's new argument before returning the same basic ruling. Special Guest: Gabriel Malor.

  Episode 244-Gun Rights Oppressors Coming on Strong Also Available On Searchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer -- Episode 244 Transcript SUMMARY KEYWORDS Gun rights, reconciliation bill, National Firearms Act, silencers, SBRs, SBSs, Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth McDonough, Senator Cornyn,

As Second Amendment policy returns to the national spotlight under a second Trump administration, one provision buried in a massive reconciliation bill could spell the beginning of the end for suppressor regulations under the National Firearms Act. The House version removes them from the tax scheme entirely, while the Senate version goes even further—potentially gutting […]

As Second Amendment policy returns to the national spotlight under a second Trump administration, one provision buried in a massive reconciliation bill could spell the beginning of the end for suppressor regulations under the National Firearms Act. The House version removes them from the tax scheme entirely, while the Senate version goes even further—potentially gutting the $200 tax on other NFA-regulated items. Joining us is Knox Williams, president and executive director of the American Suppressor Association, to unpack what's in the bill, what could derail it, and how his organization is fighting to end suppressor bans and taxes across the country. Also discussed: the Biden-era legacy of regulatory overreach, Trump's executive order to review federal actions against 2A rights, and what gun control nonprofits like Giffords are doing to push back. American Suppressor AssociationThe National Firearms ActThe Big Beautiful BillHouse-Passed One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act Includes Removal of $200 Tax Stamp on SuppressorsBig Beautiful Bill Now Includes SHORT Act, Hearing Protection

This week, we're taking a close look at the federal gun free school zones law with National Review's Charles Cooke. A federal appeals court just upheld the zones against a Second Amendment challenge for what may be the first time in the post-Bruen era. Cooke argued the law is bad policy, but he agreed it doesn't violate the Second Amendment. Instead, Cooke argued it's actually an unconstitutional expansion of the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce. He noted the law had already been struck down by the Supreme Court over this issue once before. However, Congress passed a new version soon afterward. Cooke said the new law has the same problem the old one had. We also talked about the current push to partially repeal the National Firearms Act through budget reconciliation. Cooke again said he'd like to see repeal make it through the process, but he had doubts that delisting silencers or short-barrel shotguns can clear the Byrd Rule. He also expressed some skepticism about whether language in the bill to try and nullify state NFA mirror laws would work in practice. Special Guest: Charles Cooke.

Contributing writer Jake Fogleman and I break down Senate Republicans' new proposal to remove everything but machineguns and destructive devices from regulation under the National Firearms Act as part of President Trump's "big beautiful bill." We discuss the upsides and pitfalls of this approach for gun-rights advocates and explain what needs to happen next for it to become law. We also cover a new ruling out of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on the federal Gun Free School Zones Act, a new DOJ brief arguing that AR-15s are protected by the Second Amendment, and emerging new details surrounding a tragic shooting at a recent protest in Salt Lake City.

This week, we're taking a deep dive into the fight over using reconciliation to delist silencers from the National Firearms Act (NFA). The House included a provision to eliminate the tax on firearm silencers/suppressors and one to completely remove them from the NFA's purview. But that wasn't without controversy, and the Senate is now taking up the bill. That's why we've got Knox Williams, the head of the American Suppressor Association, on the show to update us on where things are headed. Williams said there was a meeting between gun-rights activists and Senate staffers this week that left him confident they have a good chance of getting everything they want. He said Republicans were on board with the argument that silencers can be fully delisted because the NFA is a tax at its core. Still, there is a lot of uncertainty about how the parliamentarian will rule on the delisting. Williams agreed that the tax cut is seen as a sure bet. However, he said there's a strong chance delisting gets through, too. Special Guest: Knox Williams.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses critical issues surrounding gun rights and legislation with John Comerford, Executive Director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. The conversation covers the current legislative landscape, including the potential for significant changes to the National Firearms Act, the status of national concealed carry reciprocity, and the importance of state-level elections in shaping gun rights. The episode emphasizes the need for proactive engagement from gun owners and advocates to ensure the protection and advancement of Second Amendment rights. In this segment of the conversation, Mark Walters discusses the importance of recent legislation aimed at protecting the Second Amendment and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. The conversation also touches on the moral implications of self-defense, particularly in cases involving youth and gun ownership. The discussion highlights the political landscape surrounding gun control legislation and the challenges faced by advocates in the current environment. In this segment of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses the National Rifle Association's new direction and membership drive, emphasizing the importance of supporting the organization for the future of gun rights. The conversation shifts to recent changes in the NRA board and the potential for new leadership. Legal updates on significant gun control cases are explored, highlighting the ongoing challenges and the impact of recent polls on public opinion regarding gun control. The discussion also touches on the Democratic Party's shifting stance on gun policies and the potential for a more moderate approach in future elections. Finally, the segment concludes with a critique of gun control activism and the narratives surrounding it, particularly focusing on figures like David Hogg. In this conversation, the speakers discuss the current political landscape regarding gun rights, the role of the NRA, and the implications of recent judicial decisions on the Second Amendment. They emphasize the importance of advocacy and legislative action to protect gun rights, while also addressing the challenges posed by local and state laws. The conversation highlights the need for proactive measures in the face of ongoing political pressure from the left. Takeaways The NRA is focused on legislative opportunities to advance gun rights. There is a significant chance to remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act. National concealed carry reciprocity is a priority but faces challenges in Congress. State elections play a crucial role in shaping gun rights legislation. The NRA is actively working in blue states to protect Second Amendment rights. Voter engagement is essential for maintaining and advancing gun rights. The political landscape is shifting, creating unique opportunities for gun rights advocates. The NRA is involved in numerous legal cases to protect gun rights across the country. Complacency among gun owners can undermine efforts to protect rights. The future of the ATF and its role in gun regulation remains a contentious issue. The importance of legislation to protect the Second Amendment. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Self-defense is a moral responsibility when one's life is threatened. Youth aged 18-20 face restrictions on gun ownership despite being part of the political process. Political maneuvering often complicates gun rights advocacy. The need for legal representation for gun owners is critical. Legislation can be a step-by-step process rather than an all-or-nothing approach. The left's persistent efforts to undermine gun rights require constant vigilance. Public perception and media coverage can influence gun rights discussions. The conversation around gun ownership is deeply intertwined with broader societal issues. The NRA is moving forward with new management and initiatives.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses critical issues surrounding gun rights and legislation with John Comerford, Executive Director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. The conversation covers the current legislative landscape, including the potential for significant changes to the National Firearms Act, the status of national concealed carry reciprocity, and the importance of state-level elections in shaping gun rights. The episode emphasizes the need for proactive engagement from gun owners and advocates to ensure the protection and advancement of Second Amendment rights. In this segment of the conversation, Mark Walters discusses the importance of recent legislation aimed at protecting the Second Amendment and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. The conversation also touches on the moral implications of self-defense, particularly in cases involving youth and gun ownership. The discussion highlights the political landscape surrounding gun control legislation and the challenges faced by advocates in the current environment. In this segment of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses the National Rifle Association's new direction and membership drive, emphasizing the importance of supporting the organization for the future of gun rights. The conversation shifts to recent changes in the NRA board and the potential for new leadership. Legal updates on significant gun control cases are explored, highlighting the ongoing challenges and the impact of recent polls on public opinion regarding gun control. The discussion also touches on the Democratic Party's shifting stance on gun policies and the potential for a more moderate approach in future elections. Finally, the segment concludes with a critique of gun control activism and the narratives surrounding it, particularly focusing on figures like David Hogg. In this conversation, the speakers discuss the current political landscape regarding gun rights, the role of the NRA, and the implications of recent judicial decisions on the Second Amendment. They emphasize the importance of advocacy and legislative action to protect gun rights, while also addressing the challenges posed by local and state laws. The conversation highlights the need for proactive measures in the face of ongoing political pressure from the left. Takeaways The NRA is focused on legislative opportunities to advance gun rights. There is a significant chance to remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act. National concealed carry reciprocity is a priority but faces challenges in Congress. State elections play a crucial role in shaping gun rights legislation. The NRA is actively working in blue states to protect Second Amendment rights. Voter engagement is essential for maintaining and advancing gun rights. The political landscape is shifting, creating unique opportunities for gun rights advocates. The NRA is involved in numerous legal cases to protect gun rights across the country. Complacency among gun owners can undermine efforts to protect rights. The future of the ATF and its role in gun regulation remains a contentious issue. The importance of legislation to protect the Second Amendment. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Self-defense is a moral responsibility when one's life is threatened. Youth aged 18-20 face restrictions on gun ownership despite being part of the political process. Political maneuvering often complicates gun rights advocacy. The need for legal representation for gun owners is critical. Legislation can be a step-by-step process rather than an all-or-nothing approach. The left's persistent efforts to undermine gun rights require constant vigilance. Public perception and media coverage can influence gun rights discussions. The conversation around gun ownership is deeply intertwined with broader societal issues. The NRA is moving forward with new management and initiatives.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses critical issues surrounding gun rights and legislation with John Comerford, Executive Director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. The conversation covers the current legislative landscape, including the potential for significant changes to the National Firearms Act, the status of national concealed carry reciprocity, and the importance of state-level elections in shaping gun rights. The episode emphasizes the need for proactive engagement from gun owners and advocates to ensure the protection and advancement of Second Amendment rights. In this segment of the conversation, Mark Walters discusses the importance of recent legislation aimed at protecting the Second Amendment and the role of the NRA in advocating for gun rights. The conversation also touches on the moral implications of self-defense, particularly in cases involving youth and gun ownership. The discussion highlights the political landscape surrounding gun control legislation and the challenges faced by advocates in the current environment. In this segment of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses the National Rifle Association's new direction and membership drive, emphasizing the importance of supporting the organization for the future of gun rights. The conversation shifts to recent changes in the NRA board and the potential for new leadership. Legal updates on significant gun control cases are explored, highlighting the ongoing challenges and the impact of recent polls on public opinion regarding gun control. The discussion also touches on the Democratic Party's shifting stance on gun policies and the potential for a more moderate approach in future elections. Finally, the segment concludes with a critique of gun control activism and the narratives surrounding it, particularly focusing on figures like David Hogg. In this conversation, the speakers discuss the current political landscape regarding gun rights, the role of the NRA, and the implications of recent judicial decisions on the Second Amendment. They emphasize the importance of advocacy and legislative action to protect gun rights, while also addressing the challenges posed by local and state laws. The conversation highlights the need for proactive measures in the face of ongoing political pressure from the left. Takeaways The NRA is focused on legislative opportunities to advance gun rights. There is a significant chance to remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act. National concealed carry reciprocity is a priority but faces challenges in Congress. State elections play a crucial role in shaping gun rights legislation. The NRA is actively working in blue states to protect Second Amendment rights. Voter engagement is essential for maintaining and advancing gun rights. The political landscape is shifting, creating unique opportunities for gun rights advocates. The NRA is involved in numerous legal cases to protect gun rights across the country. Complacency among gun owners can undermine efforts to protect rights. The future of the ATF and its role in gun regulation remains a contentious issue. The importance of legislation to protect the Second Amendment. The NRA plays a crucial role in advocating for gun rights. Self-defense is a moral responsibility when one's life is threatened. Youth aged 18-20 face restrictions on gun ownership despite being part of the political process. Political maneuvering often complicates gun rights advocacy. The need for legal representation for gun owners is critical. Legislation can be a step-by-step process rather than an all-or-nothing approach. The left's persistent efforts to undermine gun rights require constant vigilance. Public perception and media coverage can influence gun rights discussions. The conversation around gun ownership is deeply intertwined with broader societal issues. The NRA is moving forward with new management and initiatives.

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of self-defense, particularly focusing on the legal implications and societal perceptions surrounding the use of firearms in self-defense situations. It discusses specific cases, the importance of having legal support, and the role of firearms in ensuring personal safety. The dialogue also touches on road rage incidents and the emotional dynamics involved in such confrontations, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and training. Additionally, the conversation reflects on the significance of Memorial Day in relation to gun rights advocacy and the ongoing legal battles surrounding firearm regulations. In this conversation, Mark Walters and Mark Smith discuss the recent developments surrounding the Second Amendment, particularly focusing on the Fifth Circuit's controversial decision regarding suppressors. They analyze the implications of the Trump administration's position on gun rights, the disconnect in government regulations, and the broader context of Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights the importance of legal precedents and the ongoing battle for gun rights in America. Takeaways Self-defense cases are complex and vary greatly by situation. Having legal support is crucial in self-defense scenarios. Firearms can be essential for home defense and personal safety. Media often overlooks positive self-defense stories. Public perception of firearms is influenced by societal narratives. Victimhood culture can affect views on self-defense. Road rage incidents can escalate quickly and require caution. Emotional states can impact decision-making in self-defense situations. Responsible gun ownership includes training and awareness. Advocacy for gun rights is vital in the current political climate. The Fifth Circuit's decision has sparked significant controversy. The Trump administration's position marks a significant shift in favor of gun rights. Suppressors are now recognized as protected arms under the Second Amendment. The right to acquire firearms is essential to the Second Amendment. Training with firearms is now considered a protected right. The burden of proof for gun control laws has shifted to the government. The National Firearms Act's regulations on suppressors are under scrutiny. There is a disconnect in the government's stance on suppressors. Legal precedents play a crucial role in shaping Second Amendment rights. The future of suppressor legislation remains uncertain but hopeful. Keywords self-defense, firearms, legal support, road rage, gun rights, home defense, media representation, public perception, Memorial Day, advocacy, Second Amendment, suppressors, Fifth Circuit, Trump administration, gun rights, DOJ, firearms legislation, constitutional law, gun control, legal analysis  

Summary The conversation covers various aspects of self-defense, particularly focusing on the legal implications and societal perceptions surrounding the use of firearms in self-defense situations. It discusses specific cases, the importance of having legal support, and the role of firearms in ensuring personal safety. The dialogue also touches on road rage incidents and the emotional dynamics involved in such confrontations, emphasizing the need for responsible gun ownership and training. Additionally, the conversation reflects on the significance of Memorial Day in relation to gun rights advocacy and the ongoing legal battles surrounding firearm regulations. In this conversation, Mark Walters and Mark Smith discuss the recent developments surrounding the Second Amendment, particularly focusing on the Fifth Circuit's controversial decision regarding suppressors. They analyze the implications of the Trump administration's position on gun rights, the disconnect in government regulations, and the broader context of Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights the importance of legal precedents and the ongoing battle for gun rights in America. Takeaways Self-defense cases are complex and vary greatly by situation. Having legal support is crucial in self-defense scenarios. Firearms can be essential for home defense and personal safety. Media often overlooks positive self-defense stories. Public perception of firearms is influenced by societal narratives. Victimhood culture can affect views on self-defense. Road rage incidents can escalate quickly and require caution. Emotional states can impact decision-making in self-defense situations. Responsible gun ownership includes training and awareness. Advocacy for gun rights is vital in the current political climate. The Fifth Circuit's decision has sparked significant controversy. The Trump administration's position marks a significant shift in favor of gun rights. Suppressors are now recognized as protected arms under the Second Amendment. The right to acquire firearms is essential to the Second Amendment. Training with firearms is now considered a protected right. The burden of proof for gun control laws has shifted to the government. The National Firearms Act's regulations on suppressors are under scrutiny. There is a disconnect in the government's stance on suppressors. Legal precedents play a crucial role in shaping Second Amendment rights. The future of suppressor legislation remains uncertain but hopeful. Keywords self-defense, firearms, legal support, road rage, gun rights, home defense, media representation, public perception, Memorial Day, advocacy, Second Amendment, suppressors, Fifth Circuit, Trump administration, gun rights, DOJ, firearms legislation, constitutional law, gun control, legal analysis  

Episode 239-The Big Beautiful and Silent Bill Also Available On Searchable Podcast Transcript Gun Lawyer-- Episode 239 SUMMARY KEYWORDS Gun Lawyer, Second Amendment, Hearing Protection Act, National Firearms Act, silencers, reconciliation bill, taxation, filibuster, gun rights, suppressors, short barrel rifles, President Trump,

Knox Williams, head of the American Suppressor Association, joins Cam to discuss the removal of suppressors from the National Firearms Act, which is part of the budget reconciliation bill approved by the House on Thursday morning.

This week, a rant…as we have said for decades, the National Firearms Act desperately needs to be repealed. How, and why we won't get that anytime soon, remains to be seen, but there is hope for removing the $200 tax from suppressors…and maybe more. MichaelBane.TV - On the Radio episode # 271. Scroll down for reference links on topics discussed in this episode. Disclaimer: The statements and opinions expressed here are our own and may not represent those of the companies we represent or any entities affiliated to it. Host: Michael Bane Producer: Flying Dragon Ltd. More information and reference links: Act Now to Fully Remove Suppressors from the NFA!/NRA-ILA BEARING ARMS on the Suppressor Fight: https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/05/19/is-this-why-the-tax-stamp-on-suppressors-is-dropped-to-0-n1228634 https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/05/20/ways-and-means-remove-suppressors-from-nfa-list-but-did-do-this-n1228651 https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2025/05/19/numerous-gun-rights-groups-unite-in-open-letter-calling-for-nfa-reform-n1228637 After Four Months, Trump Is Already The Best Gun Rights President of the Modern Era/Kostas Moros, Shooting News Weekly The NFA is Coming from Inside the House/Open Source Defense Congressman Burlison Reintroduces the Repeal the NFA Bill American Suppressor Association The Music of Vinnie Camilleri The Music of Rotem Moav  

NRA-ILA Executive Director John Commerford joins Cam with the latest news on the attempt to remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act through the budget reconciliation process and how you can help make it happen.