Podcasts about gun control act

news guns missouri elements unconstitutional brad young gun control act second amendment preservation act

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 17, 2025 46:23

Bondi v. VanDerStok concerned whether the ATF's 2022 update to its regulations under the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), which articulated that federal law requirements that apply to the manufacture and sale of standard firearms also apply to "ghost guns" --readily convertible weapons parts or receiver kits-- exceeds the mandate of the same. The ATF argued it simply clarified what had already been true in response to the notable rise in the use of ghost guns. The challengers, including two individual gun owners and a gun advocacy organization, alleged the updated regulations exceeded the statutory authority granted to the ATF and brought a facial challenge. The Court heard oral argument on October 8, 2024.On March 26, 2025, a 7-2 Court ruled the ATF's rule is not facially inconsistent with the GCA.Join us for a Courthouse Steps Decision program where we will break down and analyze this decision and what its potential effects might be.Featuring:Zack Smith, Legal Fellow and Manager, Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program, The Heritage Foundation --Note: this program has been rescheduled from its original time on 04/10/25, and will now be hosted on 04/11/25 at 12pm ET.

court decision supreme court litigation atf bondi courthouse gca gun control act criminal law & procedure

New gun control act in Missouri is an attempt to 'fix unconstitutional elements' of past law

Total Information AM

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 4:51

Brad Young, partner at Harris Dowell Fisher & Young, and the KMOX Legal Analyst joins Megan Lynch looking at a proposed revamp of the Second Amendment Preservation Act, which was declared unconstitutional. He says this bill would prevent local police from cooperating with federal officials if an investigation involves guns. Plus a look at a bill that would impact the newly-passed right to abortions in Missouri.

Civil Rights and the Birth of Modern Gun Control

Pacific Ward

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 4, 2025 24:50

This episode investigates the origins of modern gun control laws and their connection to the civil rights era. We examine how legislation like the Gun Control Act of 1968 emerged alongside increased Black activism and armed self-defense, revealing the political motives often hidden behind calls for public safety.

black guns modern birth civil rights gun control gun control act

Bondi v. Vanderstok

Supreme Court Opinions

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 1, 2025 76:22

In this case, the court considered this issue: Did the ATF exceed its statutory authority in promulgating its Final Rule purporting to regulate so-called “ghost guns”?The case was decided on March 26, 2025.The Supreme Court held that the Gun Control Act of 1968 authorizes the ATF to regulate weapon parts kits and unfinished frames or receivers that can be readily converted into functional firearms. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the 7-2 majority opinion of the Court. Weapon parts kits qualify as “weapons” under the statute when they contain all necessary components to build a gun and their intended function is clear. Everyday language permits describing incomplete objects by their intended use, just as a disassembled rifle remains a “weapon.” The statute reinforces this understanding by treating starter guns as firearms even though they require modification. A kit like Polymer80's “Buy Build Shoot,” which can be assembled in about 20 minutes using common tools, meets the law's definition because it can be “readily converted” into a functioning firearm, just as a blocked-barrel starter gun qualifies when easily modified for live fire. While not all kits may fall under this definition, the statute clearly covers at least some, making a facial challenge to the rule invalid. The definition of “frame or receiver” also includes partially complete versions that can be finished quickly with standard tools. Ordinary language and the statute's serialization requirements support this reading, as identification numbers are required on unfinished frames and receivers. Law enforcement has long treated such components as regulated firearms, and even the challengers conceded that some unfinished frames fall within the law's scope. While some objects may be too incomplete to qualify, the statute reaches at least those requiring only minimal work, making ATF's rule facially consistent with the law. Concerns about unintended consequences under the National Firearms Act are misplaced, as the government disavowed any authority to classify AR-15 receivers as machine guns, and the doctrines of lenity and constitutional avoidance do not apply where the statute's meaning is clear.Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson each joined the majority opinion and also wrote separate concurring opinions.Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito each authored dissenting opinions.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

law court supreme court concerns weapons ordinary brett kavanaugh ketanji brown jackson atf samuel alito bondi neil gorsuch final rule gun control act national firearms act polymer80

03-26-25 Mark and Ryan Petty dissectr SCOTUS ruling and RIP Justices Kavanaugh, Sotomayer, and Jackson

Armed American Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 26, 2025 40:10

Armed American Radio, Supreme Court, Ghost Guns, Gun Control Act, Ryan Petty, Second Amendment, firearm definitions, legal implications, ATF regulations, freedom Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, Mark Walters discusses the recent Supreme Court ruling on ghost guns, focusing on the implications of the decision and the language used in the ruling. Joined by Ryan Petty, they dissect the nuances of firearm definitions, the impact of the Gun Control Act, and the various concurring opinions from justices. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of legal language and the potential infringements on individual freedoms. takeaways The Supreme Court ruling on ghost guns has significant implications. The language used in legal rulings can be complex and confusing. Understanding firearm definitions is crucial in legal contexts. The Gun Control Act has been challenged as potentially unconstitutional. Concurring opinions from justices can reveal differing perspectives on the law. The ATF's role in regulating firearms is often criticized for its ambiguity. The penalties for firearm violations can be severe and life-altering. The conversation highlights the importance of individual freedoms in legal discussions. The nuances of language can lead to misunderstandings in legal rulings. The need for clarity in laws affecting gun ownership is paramount.

supreme court scotus ruling petty brett kavanaugh second amendment atf ghost guns mark walters gun control act armed american radio justices kavanaugh

Who Gets to Define the Word "Firearm"? (Garland v. VanDerStok)

Tiers of Scrutiny w/ Eva Eapen & Pari Sidana

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 10, 2024 12:53

In this episode, we delve into the Supreme Court case that challenges the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) 2022 revisions to the Gun Control Act of 1986. These revisions introduced new definitions of key terms like "firearm," "firearm frame," and "receiver" that could have far-reaching implications for gun regulations across the country. The case revolves around whether the ATF has overstepped its authority by redefining these terms and altering the legal landscape for gun owners, manufacturers, and regulators. Join us as we break down the legal arguments, the historical context of the Gun Control Act, and the potential consequences of this case for the future of firearms law. Here are the sources we used: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-852/315742/20240625172334020_23-852%20VanDerStok.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-852/302555/20240307152938802_23-852%20VanDerStok%20cert%20resp%20Final.pdf https://apnews.com/article/biden-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-gun-politics-5f0f26cdb5d3bcbc6f9c5daf471c118d https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-852 https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2024/23-852

supreme court alcohol define bureau firearms tobacco atf 20final docketpdf gun control act firearms atf

Ep 156. Jewish Pro Life Show 9.10.24 with special guest John H. Hingson IV

Jewish Pro-Life

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 21, 2024 76:28

Jewish Pro Life Show 9.10.24 with special guest John H. Hingson IV Please share this and our other content on your social media to amplify our message in this troubled world. Thank you. Mr. Hingson shares his unique and powerful correlation between guns rights and abortion rights. He delves into politics, religion, history, and relevant parts of Torah to show how the sin of abortion causes the withdrawal of our God-given right to self-defense. Open discussion follows his presentation. Contact Mr. Hingson at InsultingConsulting.net. Abortion and Gun Control: Cause and Effect http://insultingconsulting.net/reports.html. How to Prevent the Next Holocaust and Why It's Already Happening Right Here in America Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) https://jpfo.org 1968 Gun Control Act same as Nazi Gun Control Act of 1938: https://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/GCA_68.htm JPFO Genocide Chart https://jpfo.org/pdf02/genocide-chart.pdf Rabbi Tovia Singer https://outreachjudaism.org Let's Get Biblical!: Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah? https://outreachjudaism.org/shop/lets-get-biblical-expanded-2-volume-study-guide/ Rabbi Yitzchok Dovid Smith RabbiSmith.org Video on 6 Steps for Decision-Making www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCSt3J8bEPM&t=0s The 6 Steps defined in paper/handout form: https://tinyurl.com/y4c2o662 (Note: The guest speaker wishes to say he had the sixth step confused with the fifth one in today's JPLF show.) Zecharia 8:23 Program for Noahides https://www.rabbismith.org/zecharia-8-23 Health Freedom Movement “The way to save America is to have as many children as possible because the act of having children shows the greatest faith in G-d Al-mighty!” -- Rabbi Yitzchok Dovid Smith "Karma" v. Divine Justice Torah: If a man takes what is not his own, his own is taken from him. Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn, the Sixth Lubavitcher Rebbe https://dailyzohar.com/tzadikim/238-Rabbi-Yosef-Yitchak-Schneerson-of-Lubavitch "L'alter l'teshuvah, l'alter l'geulah": "Immediately repentance, immediately to Redemption!" -- the Sixth Lubavitcher Rebbe At the Jewish Pro-Life Foundation, we're making the original pro-life religion pro-life again! News, education, enlightenment and spiritual renewal. Saving Jewish Lives & Healing Jewish Hearts by providing the Jewish community with Pro-Life Education, Pregnancy Care and Adoption Referrals, and Healing After Abortion. To learn more visit https://jewishprolifefoundation.org/ Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JewishProLifeFoundation/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/JewishProLife Follow us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk8B3l4KxJX4T9l8F5l-wkQ Follow us on MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/cecilyroutman Follow us on Gab: https://gab.com/JewishProLife Clouthub: https://app.clouthub.com/forum#/users/u/ProLifeCecily Follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cecily-routman-3085ab140/ Follow us on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/cecilyroutman/ Follow us on Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/prolifececily Follow us on Brighteon Social: https://brighteon.social/@ProLifeCecily Follow us on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/JewishProLifeFoundation Follow us on TruthSocial:https://truthsocial.com/@prolifececily Follow us on Telegram: https://t.me/JewishProLife Follow us on Podcasts: https://jewishprolife.libsyn.com/ Donate: https://jewishprolifefoundation.org/donate In Israel: https://jewishprolifefoundation.co.il The Jewish Pro-Life Foundation is an IRS approved 501(c)3 non-profit educational public charity. We are committed to Torah and Jewish Tradition. We are not affiliated with any political organization or any other religious organization or movement.

The Federalist Society's Teleforum: Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Garland v. VanDerStok

The Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 23, 2024

Garland v. VanDerStok concerns whether the ATF’s 2022 update to its regulations under the Gun Control Act of 1968, which clarified that federal law requirements that apply to the manufacture and sale of standard firearms also apply to “ghost guns” –readily convertible weapons parts or receiver kits– exceeds the mandate of the same. The ATF […]

atf courthouse federalist society oral arguments gun control act teleforum

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Garland v. VanDerStok

history culture guns protection act louisiana tech university matt christman cold war america gun control act

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 23, 2024 38:12

Garland v. VanDerStok concerns whether the ATF's 2022 update to its regulations under the Gun Control Act of 1968, which clarified that federal law requirements that apply to the manufacture and sale of standard firearms also apply to "ghost guns" --readily convertible weapons parts or receiver kits-- exceeds the mandate of the same. The ATF argues it simply clarified what had already been true in response to the notable rise in the use of ghost guns. The challengers, including both two individual gun owners and a gun advocacy organization, challenged the rule, alleging it exceeded the statutory authority granted to the ATF. The Court is now set to consider whether such kits constitute "firearms" and/or "frames or receivers" as regulated under the Act.Oral argument was heard on October 8, 2024.Join us for a Courthouse Steps Oral Argument program with litigating attorney Peter Patterson who argued on behalf of the respondents.Featuring:Peter A. Patterson, Partner, Cooper & Kirk

partner court supreme court act oral litigation atf courthouse oral arguments gun control act administrative law & regulatio criminal law & procedure

Bonus - Gun Country, Ep. 3 w/Drew McKevitt (Preview)

American Prestige

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 13, 2024 5:03

Drew McKevitt, the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University, joins the program to conclude his conversation with Danny and Derek about his book Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America. This episode explores the repercussions of the 1968 Gun Control Act, grassroots gun control groups formed in its wake, gun rights groups, the Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986, the rise of the militia movement, UN attempts to regulate guns in the 1990s, school shootings and mass shootings, and where things stand today. Pick up a copy of Drew's book here. Subscribe now for the full episode! Grab a copy of Matt Christman's Book ¡No Pasarán! here!

Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852 [Arg: 10.8.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 13, 2024 76:08

QUESTION PRESENTED:(1) Whether “a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 is a “firearm” regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968; and (2) whether “a partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional frame or receiver” that is “designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to function as a frame or receiver” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.12(c) is a “frame or receiver” regulated by the act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

united states supreme court docket gun control act

Can the ATF Regulate Ghost Guns?

We the People

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 10, 2024 58:24

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Garland v. VanDerStok, a case challenging the authority of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to regulate “ghost guns” under the Gun Control Act. In this episode, Clark Neily of the Cato Institute and Dru Stevenson of the South Texas College of Law join Jeffrey Rosen to recap the oral arguments and debate whether ghost guns—which are untraceable weapons without serial numbers, assembled from components or kits that can be bought online—may be regulated as firearms. Resources: Garland v. VanDerStok (oral argument audio via CSPAN; argument transcript) Dru Stevenson, quoted in: “‘Ghost guns' in the crosshairs”, BusinessDay (March 7, 2024) Drury Stevenson, “Shall Not Be Infringed,” (July 2024) Clark Neily, quoted in: “Will ‘sigh of relief' after US supreme court gun ruling be short-lived?,” The Guardian (June 22, 2024) Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. Subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen. Join us for an upcoming live program or watch recordings on YouTube. Support our important work. Donate

ghosts law supreme court alcohol bureau firearms tobacco stay connected regulate c span cato institute explosives ghost guns jeffrey rosen south texas college gun control act clark neily

A Seat at the Sitting - October 2024

us supreme court edt case no gun control act

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 9, 2024 68:04

Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting. The cases covered in this preview are listed below.Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger, (October 7) -Federalism & Separation of Powers; Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; and (2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.Williams v. Washington, (October 7) -Federalism & Separation of Powers; Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court.Garland v. VanDerStok, (October 8) -Second Amendment; Whether “a weapon parts kit that is designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 is a “firearm” regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968; and (2) whether “a partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional frame or receiver” that is “designed to or may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted to function as a frame or receiver” under 27 C.F.R. § 478.12(c) is a “frame or receiver” regulated by the act.Lackey v. Stinnie, (October 8) -Civil Procedure; (1) Whether a party must obtain a ruling that conclusively decides the merits in its favor, as opposed to merely predicting a likelihood of later success, to prevail on the merits under 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and (2) whether a party must obtain an enduring change in the parties’ legal relationship from a judicial act, as opposed to a non-judicial event that moots the case, to prevail under Section 1988.Glossip v. Oklahoma, (October 9) -Criminal Law; (1) Whether the state’s suppression of the key prosecution witness’ admission that he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness’ false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law under Brady v. Maryland and Napue v. Illinois; (2) whether the entirety of the suppressed evidence must be considered when assessing the materiality of Brady and Napue claims; (3) whether due process of law requires reversal where a capital conviction is so infected with errors that the state no longer seeks to defend it; and (4) whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' holding that the Oklahoma Post-Conviction Procedure Act precluded post-conviction relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment.Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, (October 15), -Immigration; Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.Medical Marijuana v. Horn, October 15 -Criminal Law; Whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, (October 16) -Environmental Law & Regulation; Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform.Bufkin v. McDonough, (October 16) -Vetrans Affairs; Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1), which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule.Featuring:James S. Burling, Vice President of Litigation, Pacific Legal FoundationJohn Masslon, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington Legal FoundationMatthew Rice, Solicitor General, Tennessee Attorney General's OfficeZack Smith, Legal Fellow and Manager, Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program, The Heritage Foundation(Moderator) Kirby T. West, Attorney, Institute of Justice

Legal News for Weds 10/9 - Google To Breakup? Richard Glossip Death Row Appeal and SCOTUS Support for Regulation on "Ghost Guns"

Minimum Competence

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 9, 2024 5:20

This Day in Legal History: Che Guevara ExecutedOn October 9, 1967, Ernesto "Che" Guevara, a prominent figure in revolutionary movements across Latin America, was executed by Bolivian forces after being captured during a failed guerrilla campaign. Guevara was a key leader in the Cuban Revolution and sought to spread Marxist insurgencies throughout Latin America, hoping to ignite similar revolutions. His execution without a trial, carried out with the assistance of the CIA, became a controversial event, raising questions about the legal treatment of non-state actors under international law.Che Guevara's death highlighted the evolving legal frameworks for dealing with insurgencies, guerrilla warfare, and the rights of captured combatants. At the time, international law, including the Geneva Conventions, offered limited protection to guerrilla fighters, whose status as non-traditional combatants fell outside of established norms for prisoners of war. The Bolivian government's decision to execute Guevara without due process sparked widespread condemnation and intensified debates on the legality of such actions.The legacy of Che Guevara's execution extended far beyond his death, as it became a symbol of the broader struggles for political justice, human rights, and the use of state power to suppress insurgencies. His killing underscored the need for clearer international legal standards governing the treatment of insurgents, contributing to later discussions on how to apply humanitarian law to non-state actors and revolutionaries.The U.S. government may seek to force Google to break up parts of its business, such as its Chrome browser and Android operating system, to address what it argues is an illegal monopoly in online search. A judge found in August that Google's dominance—processing 90% of U.S. searches—violates antitrust laws. The Justice Department's proposed remedies aim to end Google's control over search distribution and prevent its dominance from expanding into artificial intelligence (AI). One suggestion is to stop Google from making billion-dollar payments to device manufacturers like Apple to have its search engine pre-installed as the default. Google plans to appeal, calling the proposals radical, and arguing that users choose its search engine for its quality. The company also claims it faces competition from platforms like Amazon. Additionally, a recent court ruling requires Google to allow more competition in its app store. The Justice Department's more detailed proposal will be submitted in November, and Google can respond by December.The antitrust ruling against Google could have significant consequences for smaller companies like Mozilla, which heavily relies on Google's payments to make its Firefox browser financially viable. If Google is forced to stop paying for default search positions, Mozilla could lose a substantial portion of its revenue—more than $500 million annually—putting its future in jeopardy. This would limit Mozilla's ability to compete with larger players like Apple and Microsoft, and could further consolidate market power in the hands of Big Tech.US considers breakup of Google in landmark search case | ReutersWill Google's historic monopoly lawsuit be the death knell for Mozilla and Firefox? | FortuneThe U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip, who is seeking to have his conviction overturned for a 1997 murder-for-hire. Glossip, now 61, was convicted of paying Justin Sneed to kill Barry Van Treese, the owner of the motel where Glossip worked. Sneed, who confessed to the murder, testified against Glossip in exchange for avoiding the death penalty. Glossip admits to helping cover up the crime but denies commissioning the murder. Newly uncovered evidence suggests that prosecutors withheld information that could have helped Glossip's defense. Oklahoma's Attorney General, Gentner Drummond, now supports Glossip's appeal, acknowledging flaws in the case, though he still believes Glossip should face some punishment. Due to the attorney general's stance, the Supreme Court appointed an outside lawyer to defend the conviction. The justices are expected to rule by June 2025.US Supreme Court to weigh appeal by Oklahoma death row inmate Glossip | ReutersThe U.S. Supreme Court is signaling support for President Biden's regulation of "ghost guns," or build-at-home firearm kits, by likely allowing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to regulate these kits as firearms. The rule, introduced in 2022, would require serial numbers, background checks, and record-keeping for gun kits, treating them like fully assembled guns. Challengers, including gun-rights advocates, argue that the rule expands beyond the authority granted by the 1968 Gun Control Act. However, several justices, including Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett, expressed skepticism about the challengers' claims, noting how easily kits can be turned into functioning firearms. The case echoes past legal battles over firearms regulation, such as the one involving bump stocks, and centers on the scope of the ATF's power.Supreme Court Signals Backing for Biden's ‘Ghost Gun' Rule (1) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

U.S. Supreme Court Garland v. VanDerStok, Case No. 23-852

Audio Arguendo

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 8, 2024

Second Amendment: Are gun kits - i.e. "ghost guns" - a "firearm" under the Gun Control Act? - Argued: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:22:6 EDT

Bonus - Gun Country, Ep. 2 w/Drew McKevitt (PREVIEW)

American Prestige

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 6, 2024 4:09

Danny and Derek continue their conversation with Drew McKevitt, the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University, about his book Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America. This episode picks up in the late 1950s with America's push for gun regulation, baby boomers' access to surplus military weapons, militant groups in the 1960s, European countries' gun exports to the US, the Gun Control Act of 1968, and more. Pick up a copy of Drew's book here. Subscribe now for the full episode!

america history culture european guns louisiana tech university cold war america gun control act

Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 296: Backdoor Threats

Assorted Calibers Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 24, 2024 97:16

In This Episode Erin and Weer'd discuss: how ATF Agents violated Bureau policy in the killing of Bryan Malinowski; the gun control legislation which has passed the Maine House of Representatives at the urging of Governor Janet Mills; Biden's plan to restrict private firearm sales under the Safer Communities Act; a National Shooting Sports Foundation report which found that the vast majority of magazines in public possession are over 10 rounds; SCOTUS granting cert to the "Frames and Receivers" case. Weer'd fisks David Hogg's debate against Spike Cohen in New Hampshire; Oddball talks about the Linux xz_utils supply chain attack; and David talks about America's Rifle, the AR-15 Did you know that we have a Patreon? Join now for the low, low cost of $4/month (that's $1/podcast) and you'll get to listen to our podcast on Friday instead of Mondays, as well as patron-only content like mag dump episodes, our hilarious blooper reels and film tracks. Show Notes Main Topic ATF Agents Violated Policy, Failed to Use Body Cameras During Deadly Arkansas SWAT Raid Sweeping gun legislation approved by Maine lawmakers after mass shooting Biden to close ‘gun-show loophole' and expand background checks for firearms NSSF Report Reveals Firearm Magazines with Capacity Over 10 Rounds is National Standard Supreme Court has granted Cert in our challenge to ATF's frames and receivers Final Rule! Weer'd Audio Fisk Guns In America: Debate on Gun Control with David Hogg and Spike Cohen HWFO Highlights from the David Hogg vs. Spike Cohen Debate at Dartmouth Why Did David Hogg Pull Out of Gun Debate When He Found Out It's Against Colion Noir? ACP: The Bloomberg Conspiracy Parkland shooting families reach $127.5m settlement over FBI inaction National Firearms act 1934 Gun Control Act of 1968 The Brady Bill of 1993 The Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 Safest States in America Weer'd World: Images of the Antis: A Twofer How mass killers pick out venues where their victims are sitting ducks Wikipedia: Colt AR-15 Wikipedia: Semi-automatic firearm Oddball's Corner Pocket XZ Utils Supply Chain Attack: A Threat Actor Spent Two Years to Implement a Linux Backdoor Gun Lovers and Other Strangers The Black Rifle The Black Rifle II Retro Black Rifle BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 1 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 2 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 3 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 4 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 5 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 6 BPC: We Have An AR At Home, Part 7 BPC: AR Maintenance 101 Brownells MidwayUSA Forgotten Weapons: The AR15 is Becoming C&R Eligible Brena Bock Author Page David Bock Author Page Team And More

Fri 11/10 - ATF Ghost Gun Rule Gone, Backlog of Labor Permits, Trump Wants Fraud Trial Tossed and a Tax Prof Claims Age Discrimination

Minimum Competence

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 10, 2023 7:13

On this day in legal history, November 10, 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision in Abrams v. United States, a case that profoundly impacted the interpretation of the First Amendment regarding free speech. This ruling upheld the 1918 Amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917, making it a criminal offense to urge the curtailment of war material production intended to hinder the U.S. war effort against Germany. The case originated when Hyman Rosansky was arrested for distributing leaflets in New York City, denouncing American intervention in Russia and advocating for the cessation of weapon production against Soviet Russia. These leaflets, printed in both English and Yiddish, led to the arrest of Rosansky and six other Russians, all of whom had emigrated from Russia to the United States.The trial, which concluded on October 23, 1919, resulted in varying sentences for the defendants. Gabriel Prober was acquitted, while Hyman Rosansky received a three-year sentence. Jacob Abrams, Hyman Lachowsky, and Samuel Lipman were each sentenced to 20 years and fined $1,000. Mollie Steimer received a 15-year sentence and a $5,000 fine.In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the defendants' First Amendment rights were not violated. Justice John Hessin Clarke, writing for the majority, argued that the intent to hinder war production could be inferred from the defendants' words, posing an imminent danger as per the "clear-and-present-danger" standard. However, in a powerful dissent, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. contended that free speech should only be curtailed when there is a clear and present danger of immediate evil or intent to bring it about. This dissent would later influence the legal understanding of free speech rights. The Abrams case was eventually largely overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, marking a significant shift in the legal stance on freedom of speech.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently ruled that part of the ATF's regulation on "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's authority. This rule, which targets privately made firearms without serial numbers, was deemed to conflict with the Gun Control Act. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt emphasized that it's not within the ATF's remit to create laws, a responsibility that belongs to Congress. The court affirmed that the ATF must adhere to existing statutory limits until Congress acts. The ruling vacated and remanded parts of a lower court's decision, with Circuit Judge Andrew S. Oldham critiquing the rule as overreaching. The case stems from a challenge by manufacturers, dealers, individuals, and gun-rights groups against the Biden administration's reinterpretation of the 1968 gun law. The ATF's rule aimed to regulate ghost guns by treating disassembled frames or receivers as firearms, requiring serial numbers, background checks, and transaction records. The District Court for the Northern District of Texas had previously invalidated this rule, but the Supreme Court allowed regulation to continue pending legal proceedings. The case, VanDerStok v. Garland, is part of broader efforts to increase enforcement against untraceable ghost guns.‘Ghost Guns' Rule Exceeds ATF Authority, Appeals Court HoldsUS appeals court calls Biden's 'ghost gun' limits unlawful | ReutersThe U.S. faces a significant backlog in processing labor permits, complicating efforts to manage the influx of undocumented immigrants and alleviate labor shortages. The Biden administration's move to grant temporary work permits to almost 500,000 Venezuelans is threatened by this backlog at the immigration agency. This slowdown impacts the U.S. labor market recovery, as foreign-born workers, essential during the pandemic, now contribute less to the labor force. The backlog includes around 350,000 Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applications, mostly from Venezuelans facing long wait times. Businesses like New York's Mirror Lake Inn Resort & Spa are seeking to hire migrants through TPS for various roles, highlighting the dependency on foreign labor. Despite efforts, USCIS faces challenges due to funding issues and increased processing times, exacerbated by the pandemic. The White House's expansion of the TPS program and reliance on congressional support are critical for addressing these backlogs and easing labor market pressures.A 9 Million Backlog for American Visas Deepens the Labor CrunchDonald Trump's lawyers have requested a New York judge to issue a directed verdict in his favor in a civil fraud case, marking a critical juncture in the trial threatening his business empire. This move follows the New York Attorney General's office resting its case against Trump, his two sons, and his companies, accusing them of inflating asset values for financial gain. Despite Trump and his children testifying that they relied on accountants for financial statements, evidence indicates their involvement. The attorney general seeks $250 million in penalties and a ban on Trump's real estate activities in New York. Judge Arthur Engoron, who previously found Trump and his companies committed fraud, has yet to rule on this request. Trump, facing multiple legal challenges and leading the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, has accused the judge and attorney general of political bias.Trump's lawyers mount long-shot bid to toss NY fraud lawsuit | ReutersPhilip Postlewaite, a longtime Northwestern law professor, has sued the university for age discrimination, alleging his salary is lower than that of less experienced colleagues. Postlewaite, who has taught tax law at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law since 1981 and founded its Tax LL.M. program in 2002, claims he has received significantly lower pay increases since declining a buyout offer in 2013. His 2022 base salary was reported to be below both the median and top 25% of law school salaries, despite his 49 years of teaching experience. He filed complaints with the EEOC and the Illinois Department of Human Rights, leading to a lawsuit filed in a Chicago federal court. The university has not commented on the pending litigation.Northwestern law professor sues school, claims age discrimination | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Gun Capitalism & Gun Control in the U.S. after World War II

Unsung History

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 6, 2023 52:55

In 1945, the population of the United States was around 140 million people, and those Americans owned an estimated 45 million guns, or about one gun for every three people. By 2023, the population of the United States stood at just over 330 million people, and according to historical data from the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the number of guns produced and imported for the US market since 1899 exceeds 474 million firearms. Even assuming some of those guns have broken or been destroyed or illegally exported, there are easily more guns than people in the United States today. How and why the number of guns rose so precipitously in the US since World War II is our story today. Joining me to help us learn more about guns in the United States in the second half of the 20th Century is Dr. Andrew C. McKevitt, the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University and author of Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America. Our theme song is Frogs Legs Rag, composed by James Scott and performed by Kevin MacLeod, licensed under Creative Commons. The mid-episode music is “Johnny Get Your Gun,” composed by Monroe H. Rosenfeld and performed by Harry C. Browne, in New York on April 19, 1917; the audio is in the public domain and available via the Library of Congress National Jukebox. The episode image is a Hi-Standard ad from 1957. Additional sources: “How Many Guns Are Circulating in the U.S.?” by Jennifer Mascia and Chip Brownlee, The Trace, Originally posted March 6, 2023, and Updated August 28, 2023. “The Mysterious Meaning of the Second Amendment,” by James C. Phillips and Josh Blackman, The Atlantic, February 28, 2020. “Timeline of Gun Control in the United States,” by Robert Longley, ThoughtCo, updated on January 08, 2023. “Do Black People Have Equal Gun Rights?” by Charles C. W. Cooke, The New York Times, October 25, 2014. “Gun Control Is as Old as the Old West,” by Matt Jancer, Smithsonian Magazine, February 5, 2018. “The NRA Wasn't Always Against Gun Restrictions,” by Ron Elving, NPR, October 10, 2017. “How NRA's true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby,” by Joel Achenbach, Scott Higham and Sari Horwitz, Washington Post, January 12, 2013. “Opinion: The reality of gun violence in the US is bleak, but history shows it's not hopeless,” by Julian Zelizer, CNN, April 1, 2023. “Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act of 1968,” by Franklin E. Zimring, The Journal of Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (1975): 133–98. “Remarks Upon Signing the Gun Control Act of 1968,” by President Lyndon B. Johnson, The American Presidency Project. “The Inside History of How Guns Are Marketed and Sold in America,” by Olivia B. Waxman, Time Magazine, August 19, 2022. “The Supreme Court will hear a case that could effectively legalize automatic weapons,” by Ian Millhiser, Vox, November 3, 2023. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

united states america new york history culture americans new york times guns world war ii cnn journal supreme court alcohol atlantic washington post npr sold capitalism timeline kevin macleod time magazine vox gun control second amendment firearms tobacco lyndon baines johnson cooke old west explosives smithsonian magazine legal studies james scott us bureau louisiana tech university thoughtco julian zelizer cold war america ian millhiser josh blackman gun control act scott higham sari horwitz joel achenbach olivia b waxman ron elving

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2732 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2023 44:55

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten. Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precision https://aeroprecisionusa.com Modern Gun School https://mgs.edu Ace Firearms http://www.acefirearms.com DeSantis Holsters https://www.desantisholster.com Staccato http://staccato2011.com Taran Tactical Innovations https://tarantacticalinnovations.com Spikes Tactical https://www.spikestactical.com Chambers Custom https://chamberscustom.com/ Federal Ammunition https://www.federalpremium.com/ Primary Arms https://www.primaryarms.com/

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2732 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2023 44:51

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten.Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precisionhttps://aeroprecisionusa.comModern Gun Schoolhttps://mgs.edu Ace Firearmshttp://www.acefirearms.comDeSantis Holstershttps://www.desantisholster.comStaccatohttp://staccato2011.comTaran Tactical Innovationshttps://tarantacticalinnovations.comSpikes Tacticalhttps://www.spikestactical.comChambers Customhttps://chamberscustom.com/Federal Ammunitionhttps://www.federalpremium.com/Primary Armshttps://www.primaryarms.com/

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2732 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2023 45:04

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten.Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precisionhttps://aeroprecisionusa.comModern Gun Schoolhttps://mgs.edu Ace Firearmshttp://www.acefirearms.comDeSantis Holstershttps://www.desantisholster.comStaccatohttp://staccato2011.comTaran Tactical Innovationshttps://tarantacticalinnovations.comSpikes Tacticalhttps://www.spikestactical.comChambers Customhttps://chamberscustom.com/Federal Ammunitionhttps://www.federalpremium.com/Primary Armshttps://www.primaryarms.com/

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2730 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2023 44:55

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten. Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precision https://aeroprecisionusa.com Modern Gun School https://mgs.edu Ace Firearms http://www.acefirearms.com DeSantis Holsters https://www.desantisholster.com Staccato http://staccato2011.com Taran Tactical Innovations https://tarantacticalinnovations.com Spikes Tactical https://www.spikestactical.com Chambers Custom https://chamberscustom.com/ Federal Ammunition https://www.federalpremium.com/ Primary Arms https://www.primaryarms.com/

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2730 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2023 45:04

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten.Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precisionhttps://aeroprecisionusa.comModern Gun Schoolhttps://mgs.edu Ace Firearmshttp://www.acefirearms.comDeSantis Holstershttps://www.desantisholster.comStaccatohttp://staccato2011.comTaran Tactical Innovationshttps://tarantacticalinnovations.comSpikes Tacticalhttps://www.spikestactical.comChambers Customhttps://chamberscustom.com/Federal Ammunitionhttps://www.federalpremium.com/Primary Armshttps://www.primaryarms.com/

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 2730 Hr 3

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2023 44:51

Discussing the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the overall effect of Bruen with Writer Dean Weingarten.Lock N Load is presented by; Aero Precisionhttps://aeroprecisionusa.comModern Gun Schoolhttps://mgs.edu Ace Firearmshttp://www.acefirearms.comDeSantis Holstershttps://www.desantisholster.comStaccatohttp://staccato2011.comTaran Tactical Innovationshttps://tarantacticalinnovations.comSpikes Tacticalhttps://www.spikestactical.comChambers Customhttps://chamberscustom.com/Federal Ammunitionhttps://www.federalpremium.com/Primary Armshttps://www.primaryarms.com/

Sportsmen's Nation - Whitetail Hunting

No Lowballers - Mobster Memories: Tales of the Tommy Gun, Colt 1911, & Other Mob Favorites

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2023 28:46

In this week's No Lowballers podcast by GoWild presented by GunBroker.com, we're talking about guns that have connections … to the mob and organized crime. If you love the mobster scene and the classic mob movies, find out which of these guns you can take home to own yourself from GunBroker.com! What are some of the best mob movies of all time? We kick things off talking about the Thompson Submachine Gun a.k.a. The Tommy Gun. Is the Tommy Gun the quintessential gangster gun?? Did you know the background of this story starts near Louisville? Kentucky certainly has several more ties to the mob era–find out what other connections those are! Host Logan from High Caliber History recounts the exciting story of the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, an event that made the Tommy Gun famous. Also be sure to check out The Mob Museum in Las Vegas to learn more about this and other historic events that shaped American history. Why did the military have no interest in this firearm when they first considered it? Next, we're talking about some of the handguns that have been associated with mobsters but also have had their place in the military, like the Colt 1911. Logan mentions a recognizable name in the firearm industry who has a highly unusual, ultra-modified 1911. Allen talks about why mobsters were able to out-gun police and law enforcement. We also take a hands-on look at the Smith & Wesson Military & Police .38 Special, a revolver that eventually went on to become the Smith & Wesson Model 10. We also peeked at a Colt 1903 Hammerless .32ACP. These calibers seem small by our standards today, but in their prime they brought plenty of knockdown power. Brad makes a great point about why both mobsters and military soldiers enjoyed these pocket pistols. We also talked about the game-changing National Firearms Act of 1934 and how that shaped firearm purchases for the future. This is when the federal government started to place restrictions, and more came with the Gun Control Act of 1968 and then the Hughes Amendment in 1986. If you like what you're hearing, please leave us a rating and review!! The No Lowballers podcast is a brand new joint venture between GoWild and GunBroker.com to explore the history and heritage of firearms. We hope to expose you to the vintage guns of the golden age along with newer, modern guns, specialty items, and a few other odd balls along the way. Jump in and come along for the ride! The show launches every Thursday morning. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. Check out the Sportsmen's Empire Podcast Network for more relevant, outdoor content! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

american las vegas guns police tales kentucky memories jump louisville favorites mobsters day massacre go wild sportsmen tommy gun mob museum gun control act national firearms act sportsmen's empire podcast network gunbroker

No Lowballers - Mobster Memories: Tales of the Tommy Gun, Colt 1911, & Other Mob Favorites

Sportsmen's Nation - Big Game | Western Hunting

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2023 27:16

In this week's No Lowballers podcast by GoWild presented by GunBroker.com, we're talking about guns that have connections … to the mob and organized crime. If you love the mobster scene and the classic mob movies, find out which of these guns you can take home to own yourself from GunBroker.com! What are some of the best mob movies of all time? We kick things off talking about the Thompson Submachine Gun a.k.a. The Tommy Gun. Is the Tommy Gun the quintessential gangster gun?? Did you know the background of this story starts near Louisville? Kentucky certainly has several more ties to the mob era–find out what other connections those are! Host Logan from High Caliber History recounts the exciting story of the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, an event that made the Tommy Gun famous. Also be sure to check out The Mob Museum in Las Vegas to learn more about this and other historic events that shaped American history. Why did the military have no interest in this firearm when they first considered it?Next, we're talking about some of the handguns that have been associated with mobsters but also have had their place in the military, like the Colt 1911. Logan mentions a recognizable name in the firearm industry who has a highly unusual, ultra-modified 1911. Allen talks about why mobsters were able to out-gun police and law enforcement. We also take a hands-on look at the Smith & Wesson Military & Police .38 Special, a revolver that eventually went on to become the Smith & Wesson Model 10. We also peeked at a Colt 1903 Hammerless .32ACP. These calibers seem small by our standards today, but in their prime they brought plenty of knockdown power. Brad makes a great point about why both mobsters and military soldiers enjoyed these pocket pistols. We also talked about the game-changing National Firearms Act of 1934 and how that shaped firearm purchases for the future. This is when the federal government started to place restrictions, and more came with the Gun Control Act of 1968 and then the Hughes Amendment in 1986.If you like what you're hearing, please leave us a rating and review!!The No Lowballers podcast is a brand new joint venture between GoWild and GunBroker.com to explore the history and heritage of firearms. We hope to expose you to the vintage guns of the golden age along with newer, modern guns, specialty items, and a few other odd balls along the way. Jump in and come along for the ride! The show launches every Thursday morning. Subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.Check out the Sportsmen's Empire Podcast Network for more relevant, outdoor content!

american las vegas guns tales kentucky memories jump louisville favorites mobsters day massacre go wild sportsmen tommy gun mob museum gun control act national firearms act sportsmen's empire podcast network gunbroker

The Hunter Biden Gun Debacle: A Closer Look at Firearms Law and Enforcement

Munitions Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2023 30:57 Transcription Available

Steve Palmer and Derek DeBross discuss the controversial case involving Hunter Biden and the alleged mishandling of a firearm. The federal government seemingly gave Hunter Biden a pass on the charges, highlighting the discrepancy between how gun laws are enforced against others and how it was seemingly ignored in Hunter Biden's case. They delve into the relevant laws, specifically the Gun Control Act of 1968, which prohibits unlawful users or addicts of controlled substances from possessing firearms.Email us your questions at info@munitionsgroup.com.Co-host Derek DeBrosse is a licensed Ohio attorney with a firearms legal practice emphasizing in Gun Rights Restoration. Derek began his law practice immediately after law school in 2008 when he graduated from Regent University School of Law; Derek also holds a B.A. from The Ohio State University. Mr. DeBrosse's practice not only focuses on rights restoration but also a variety of other firearm-related matters from NFA issues to FFL representation. Derek has represented individual, corporate, and grass-roots organizational firearm clients in both Federal and State court.Co-host Stephen E. Palmer is a trusted Columbus criminal defense attorney of nearly 30 years. He has developed a distinctive approach to criminal defense work by making a sincere effort to know each of his clients on a personal level. Steve recognizes that no two cases are the same, and neither are his clients' needs. He believes that criminal defense isn't just about representing a client in court; it's about helping clients craft solutions to their problems. Steve reaches solutions through careful contemplation of all facets of a client's problems—not just the black-and-white legal issues.Recorded at Channel 511, a production of 511 South High Media LLC.Be sure to subscribe to the Munitions Law Group - Cheshire DeBrosse, P.C. YouTube ChannelCopyright 2024 Steve Palmer and Derek DeBrosse

law state joe biden ohio guns federal columbus ohio state university debacle hunter biden closer look enforcement nfa ffl steve palmer regent university school gun control act firearms law

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books Network

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in History

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in Political Science

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in American Studies

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in Public Policy

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in Law

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

Off the Page: A Columbia University Press Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

New Books in American Politics

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Patrick J. Charles, "Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States" (Columbia UP, 2023)

NBN Book of the Day

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2023 42:55

Today, gun control is one of the most polarizing topics in American politics. However, before the 1960s, positions on firearms rights did not necessarily map onto partisan affiliation. What explains this drastic shift? Patrick J. Charles charts the rise of gun rights activism from the early twentieth century through the 1980 presidential election, pinpointing the role of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association had lobbied legislators for decades, but they had cast firearms control as a local issue. After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 spurred congressional proposals to regulate firearms, gun rights advocates found common cause with states' rights proponents opposed to civil rights legislation. Following the enactment of the Gun Control Act, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle began to stake out firm positions. Politicians including Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan recognized the potential of gun control as a wedge issue, and gun rights became increasingly tied to the Republican Party. Drawing on a vast range of archival evidence, Charles offers new insight into the evolution of the gun rights movement and how politicians responded to anti-gun control hardliners. He examines in detail how the National Rifle Association reinvented itself as well as how other advocacy groups challenged the NRA's political monopoly. Offering a deep dive into the politicization of gun rights, Vote Gun: How Gun Rights Became Politicized in the United States (Columbia University Press, 2023) reveals the origins of the acrimonious divisions that persist to this day. Patrick J. Charles is senior historian and archivist for the United States Air Force. Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

The Joyce Kaufman Show 6/6/23

The Joyce Kaufman Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2023 46:05

Joyce talks about functioning when you don't feel your best. She talks about President Joe Biden's wellbeing, the number of presidential candidates, political witch-hunts, and how the Gun Control Act still prevents users of recreational marijuana from owning guns even where marijuana is legal under state law. She also talks about the growing number of health problems in children and Big Pharma. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

joe biden big pharma gun control act joyce kaufman

The Joyce Kaufman Show 6/6/23

The Joyce Kaufman Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2023 43:35

Joyce talks about functioning when you don't feel your best. She talks about President Joe Biden's wellbeing, the number of presidential candidates, political witch-hunts, and how the Gun Control Act still prevents users of recreational marijuana from owning guns even where marijuana is legal under state law. She also talks about the growing number of health problems in children and Big Pharma. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

joe biden big pharma gun control act joyce kaufman

Weds 4/26 - SCOTUS Seized Home Case, ChatPWC, 6th Circuit Likes Bump Stocks, EU Doesn't Like MS Activision Buy, MSG Doesn't Pay Property Tax

Minimum Competence

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 26, 2023 6:22

The US Supreme Court will consider whether Hennepin County's seizure of a woman's Minneapolis condo over unpaid taxes contravened her constitutional rights. Geraldine Tyler had moved out of her home to a senior community when she ran up a tax bill of around $15,000. The county sold the property for $40,000 but refused to give Tyler the surplus. She argues that the action amounts to a Fifth Amendment taking without just compensation or an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment. Supporters of Tyler have filed 25 amicus briefs supporting her argument. If the county loses, it could have implications for small businesses and lending.US Supreme Court mulls legality of a state's property tax 'windfall'Seized Home Sold for Profit Set for Supreme Court ConsiderationPwC US, one of the Big Four accounting firms, will invest $1 billion over the next three years to expand the use of AI by its tax accountants, auditors, and consultants. PwC will partner with Microsoft to provide its 65,000 employees with the AI tools to reduce busywork, improve quality of outcomes, and shorten their workday. PwC already uses Microsoft's Azure OpenAI Service for clients in the healthcare, insurance, and aviation industries. The firm plans to use AI across all its business lines, including tax and audit, to speed up the process of sifting through financial data and to assist in spotting anomalies or outliers. Additionally, AI tools could help accountants and advisers to write first drafts of position papers and memos. The $1 billion investment is an attempt to stay ahead of competitors such as KPMG, which recently announced incorporating AI technology into its global audit platform through a collaboration with MindBridge Analytics Inc.PwC Stakes $1 Billion on AI Investments in Tax, Consulting WorkThe $69 billion takeover of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft has been blocked by the UK antitrust watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). The CMA said that its concerns could not be solved by remedies such as the sale of blockbuster title Call of Duty or other solutions involving promises to permit rivals to offer the game on their platforms. Microsoft has said that it will appeal the decision. The CMA's conclusions come before decisions from the European Union and the US Federal Trade Commission, which is waiting for a hearing in the summer. The deal would have been one of the 30 biggest acquisitions of all time. If it is eventually blocked, Microsoft could be on the hook for a break-up fee of up to $3 billion. Activision shares tumbled more than 10% in pre-market trading, while Microsoft rose 7.4%. The CMA took the view that the merger could result in higher prices, fewer choices, and less innovation for UK gamers. Microsoft had been fighting the regulatory battle in the UK and Europe, with full-page advertisements in British newspapers and press conferences in Brussels to try to influence sentiment on the deal.Microsoft's $69 Billion Activision Deal Blocked by UK (2)Madison Square Garden in Manhattan has not paid property taxes since 1982, which is a cause for concern given the immense public funds invested in the facility. The tax exemption stems from a deal made with former Mayor Ed Koch to prevent teams from fleeing to New Jersey. The total tax expenditure for the exemption is over $875 million, with an ongoing annual cost of $43 million, according to the Independent Budget Office. Taxing the arena like other neighboring businesses would fund New York City's electric vehicle charging station initiatives in about four years, and one year's property tax revenue would fully fund the city's program to improve criminal case processing. However, teams that receive tax breaks frequently threaten to leave cities for better deals elsewhere, which makes cities reluctant to hold them accountable. While these venues purportedly provide benefits like job creation, studies show they may be net fiscal negatives for surrounding communities. The future of ensuring that venues pay their fair share lies in national initiatives such as the No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2022, which aimed to eliminate tax-exemption status for bonds used to finance sports stadiums.Madison Square Garden's Tax Exemption Is a Disservice to NYCThe Sixth Circuit has ruled that bump stocks, a device that can be attached to a semi-automatic rifle to make it function like a machine gun, cannot be regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) under the Gun Control Act. The opinion was based on the rule of lenity, a criminal law doctrine that construes ambiguous statutes in favor of the defendant. The court noted that the ATF didn't adopt a rule treating bump stocks as a machine gun part that could be regulated until after the deadly shooting in Las Vegas in 2018, where the shooter used a rifle with a bump stock to kill 58 people. The ruling creates a circuit split, with the Tenth and D.C. circuits saying that bump stocks can be regulated, while the Fifth Circuit disagrees. Although courts generally defer to an agency's interpretation of a law they enforce, the court said that deference wasn't appropriate here. The court therefore applied the rule of lenity, which says criminal statutes must be construed strictly. Judge John K. Bush concurred in the judgment but said that it's up to Congress, not ATF, to change the law.Bump Stock Machine Gun Regulation Struck Down by Sixth Circuit Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Rebunked #094 | Kevin Perez | Come And Take It

REBUNKED with Scott Armstrong

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 8, 2023 62:45

NEW Analog Superchats PO BOX (Time, Talent & Treasure) Scott Armstrong 1113 Murfreesboro RD, Ste 106-146 Franklin, TN 37064 Tip Jar: https://GiveSendGo.com/Rebunked Joining me tonight is Kevin Perez, a 2nd Amendment activist and educator with a passion for preserving our ever-dwindling liberties. Today we will be discussing the history of the Gun Control Act, why they are targeting short barrel rifles and bump stocks, go over several court cases and offer some solutions about how you can safeguard our collective right to bear arms. Check out The Last American Vagabond Substack: https://TLAVAgabond.substack.com Rebunked News is happy to shout out: The Wellness Company, get a doctor for $10/month : https://bit.ly/twcrebunked Autonomy: Gain the high-value skills for lifelong success in just 12 weeks. Learn more: https://bit.ly/AutonomyRebunked Heavy Metal Detox - TruthTRS: https://TruthTRS.com VALUE-FOR-VALUE DONATION: https://Rebunked.news VENMO: https://account.venmo.com/u/rebunked CASHAPP: https://cash.app/$rebunked PAYPAL: https://Paypal.me/Rebunked T-SHIRTS: https://Rebunked.news/Shirts PREMIUM: https://SubscribeStar.com/Rebunked TELEGRAM: https://t.me/Rebunkednews GAB: https://gab.com/rebunkednews INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/rebunkednews TWITTER: https://twitter.com/rebunkednews Theme Song: Now Arise by Rhymewave: https://linktr.ee/rhymewave

paypal perez amendment ste givesendgo wellness company gun control act rebunked

Bump Stocks Are Back Now Thanks To Federal Court - LEO Round Table S08E02a

LEO Round Table

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 10, 2023 19:19

00:00 Intro 01:02 Bump stocks are back now thanks to Federal court 09:52 Officers being charged and idicted across the country LEO Round Table (law enforcement talk show) Season 8, Episode 02a (1,900) filmed on 01/09/2023 Topic 1 concerns the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals striking down the ban on bump stocks after it was found that the law the ATF put into place did not cover them. Also mentioned: Gun Control Act, National Firearms Act, Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, and former President Donald Trump. Topic 2 concerns Addis (Louisiana) Police Officer David Cauthron being charged with negligent homicide after crashing his vehicle during a pursuit resulting in the deaths of two teenage girls and Trenton (New Jersey) Police Officer Nicholas Piotrowski being indicted for pepper spraying elderly man Joseph Ahr Sr. Show Panelists and Personalities: Chip DeBlock (Host and retired police Detective) Bret Bartlett (retired police Captain) Bob Kroll (retired police Lieutenant) David D'Agresta (retired police Officer and sheriff's Corporal) Andrea Casale (retired police Officer) Will Statzer (Producer) Related Events, Organizations and Books: The Wounded Blue - Lt. Randy Sutton's charity https://thewoundedblue.org/ Rescuing 911: The Fight For America's Safety - by Lt. Randy Sutton (Pre-Order) https://rescuing911.org/ Books by panelist and retired Lt. Randy Sutton: https://www.amazon.com/Randy-Sutton/e/B001IR1MQU%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share Book by panelist and retired Lt. Bob Kroll's wife (featuring Lt. Kroll and Off. Derek Chauvin) They're Lying: The Media, The Left, and The Death of George Floyd - by Liz Collin https://thelieexposed.com/ Books by panelist and retired Secret Service Agent Mike Roche including "Mass Killers": https://www.amazon.com/Mike-Roche/e/B00BHEIF78%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share Content Partners: ThisIsButter - One of the BEST law enforcement video channels https://rumble.com/user/ThisIsButter The Free Press - LEO Round Table is in their Cops and Crimes section 5 days a week https://www.tampafp.com/ https://www.tampafp.com/category/cops-and-crime/ Video Show Schedule: Mondays at 7pm ET - 90 minute LIVE show on YouTube, Facebook1, Facebook2, LinkedIn and Twitter Tue - Sat at 9am ET - Excerpts from LIVE show are uploaded to YouTube and Rumble (approx. time) Syndicated Radio Schedule: http://leoroundtable.com/radio/syndicated-radio-stations/ Podcasts: https://anchor.fm/leoroundtable Website: http://leoroundtable.com/ Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/leoroundtable Parler: https://parler.com/profile/LEORoundTable/media YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/leoroundtable Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/leoroundtable/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/LEORoundTable LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/leo-round-table Sponsors: MotionDSP - Video enhancement/redaction and audio redaction https://www.motiondsp.com/ Galls - Proud to serve America's public safety professionals https://www.galls.com/leo Bang Energy - Energy drinks and products https://bangenergy.com/ The International Firearm Specialist Academy - The New Standard for Firearm Knowledge https://www.gunlearn.com/ MyMedicare.live - save money in Medicare insurance options from the experts http://www.mymedicare.live/ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/leoroundtable/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/leoroundtable/support

Appeals Courts Wrestle With Gun Bans For Felons

Bearing Arms' Cam & Co

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2023 22:26

The Gun Control Act of 1968's ban on gun ownership for those convicted of felony of felony offenses is facing renewed legal scrutiny in light of the Bruen decision, with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreeing to hear the case of a Pennsylvania man barred from exercising his 2A rights because of a decades-old conviction for welfare fraud.

guns pennsylvania courts bans appeals wrestle felons 2a bruen third circuit court gun control act

Allen West | Steadfast & Loyal | Michael Cargill

Allen West | Steadfast & Loyal Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 2, 2023 25:18

Michael Cargill is a passionate #2A defender. He is suing the ATF, alleging abuse of powers under the Gun Control Act of 1968 to shut down federally licensed firearm retailers for minor clerical and paperwork errors. Also on YouTube, Rumble, or your favorite podcasting platform.Sponsored by USCCA: https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/ Get full access to Steadfast & Loyal by Allen West at allenwest.substack.com/subscribe

rumble loyal steadfast atf 2a allen west uscca gun control act michael cargill

Richard Archie reviews the Perez-Gallan decision concerning unconstitutionality of orders of protection

Tennessee Firearms Association

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 8, 2022 1:39

In November 2022, a federal district court in Texas was asked to dismiss a federal criminal charge against an individual who had been arrested for being in possession of a handgun but who had an order of protection against him. Under federal law, a part of the Gun Control Act, the pending order of protection caused the man to be classified as a “prohibited person” relative to firearms ownership or possession. That status exposed him to federal felony charges. TFA's Richard Archie reviews highlights from the Court's opinion.

texas court decision perez orders tfa gun control act

Lawsuit: Biden Admin Weaponizing Gun Control Act to Revoke Dealer Licenses

KTRH News

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 25, 2022 0:43

joe biden guns lawsuit dealer licenses weaponizing biden admin revoke gun control act

The Future of Homemade Firearms: The Legal and Political Implications of ATF Final Rule 2021R-05F

america director law americans professor congress 3d legal biden administration assistant directors firearms homemade atf merrick garland final rule political implications south texas college legal policy gun control act

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2022 60:40

Americans have been privately manufacturing and assembling firearms since before this country's founding. Now, thanks to the prevalence of commercially available firearm parts, “buy, build, shoot” kits, and 3D printers, it is easier than ever to build a gun in the comfort of one's own home, which bypasses many of the statutory and regulatory regimes that govern buying a fully built firearm from a gun store. To some, this represents a loophole in America's gun laws. Others see this as a modern innovation in the tradition of home gun building that has always existed in America. The Biden Administration shares the former view. On April 11, 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland signed ATF Final Rule 2021R-05F. Among other measures, this rule changes the ATF's definition of “firearm frame or receiver” found in the Gun Control Act of 1968, greatly expanding the list of what is considered a firearm by the agency, and therefore what can be strictly regulated under existing federal law. Furthermore, both houses of Congress currently have bills before them designed to increase the regulation of homemade firearms, and to ban certain types of these so-called “ghost guns”. In this timely webinar, our experts will cover the ATF's Final Rule, set to go into effect on August 24, 2022, and will discuss the legal and political implications surrounding homemade firearms and the regulation thereof. Featuring:-- Matthew Larosiere, Director of Legal Policy at Firearms Policy Coalition-- Dru Stevenson, Wayne Fisher Research Professor, Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law Houston -- Moderator: Ryan Lacey, Assistant Director, Practice Groups, The Federalist Society---To register, cick the link above

7. henota: the 2nd amendment + the NRA

unenlightened

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 27, 2022 37:07

welcome to the first episode of henota (historical events no one talks about). in this episode, we dive into the history of the 2nd amendment and the NRA and how that is currently impacting our world today. tw: we do talk about mass shootings (not in-depth, but please be aware) resources:Moms Demand Action: https://momsdemandaction.orgEverytown - https://act.everytown.org/sign/senate-act05252022/?source=mdno_hp_takeover&refcode=mdno_hp_takeover&utm_source=mdno_hp_takeover&utm_medium=o&utm_campaign=hp_takeover&_gl=1*xgtmbr*_ga*MTYwODY0NjYxMi4xNjU0Mjk3MzAz*_ga_LT0FWV3EK3*MTY1NDI5NzMwNC4xLjAuMTY1NDI5NzMwNC4wGun Control Resources: https://www.laweekly.com/6-organizations-you-can-support-to-promote-gun-control/Voting Resources: https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_calendar social media: instagram: @devon.riddle, @unlightenedpodcast tiktok: @devonriddle email: unenlightened email coming soon website: website coming sometime (don't hold your breath) patreon: https://www.patreon.com/unenlightened sources:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/memorial-day-weekend-mass-shootings-rock-us/ar-AAXVUMOhttps://time.com/4106381/nra-1871-history/https://historycooperative.org/history-of-the-second-amendment/Support the showSupport the show --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/unenlightened/support

elections second amendment nra moms demand action gun control act

#054 From Where Did Gun Control Come? And Where Does It Go From Here? Further. Every. Day.

Further. Every. Day.

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 15, 2022 65:57

It is no longer a slippery slope fallacy to claim that after guns, they will come for metal knives, and after the metal knives, they will come for the plastic ones. Great Britain has seen a string of knife bans, to the point that it is not even legal to carry a knife if the authorities do not think that your reason is good enough. (Story from the hstoday.us below) The Church of England is literally using language like “pointy knifes” must be banned, letter below. To further the point, they are literally attempting to ban plastic cutlery for purposes of carbon footprint reduction (How will we prepare food at this rate?), again new story below. This may seem silly, but it is actually happening to knives. Many conservatives have been laughed at for even suggesting that this is the logical end of the gun debate, that all guns will be banned and knives will be next. We see that occurring in Britain in real time. When discussing the topic of Gun Control, one can easily run into the weeds of stats and lose the war for winning the battle. We need to remember from where does this type of ideology stem, and what has it produced. Note, I am a stats guy. I believe in knowing the facts, but that is only a small percentage of the conversation if you wish to win someone on the other side of the Gun Control Debate. Last week we discussed stats and common arguments, so now let's look at the origins of gun control and what the philosophy of gun control has produced in societies that have implemented it. In America, it bears merit to look at why gun control was even considered in a society that had recognized a citizen's common law right to own a firearm since the English Bill of Rights of 1688. This Bill of Rights, by the way, reinstated the rights of all to keep and bear arms. Protestants, specifically, had been stripped of this right under persecution by James II. So why would a Protestant nation even consider gun control laws, they had just left violent persecution in Europe. Many of them fought for these very reforms. So why would some of these refugees employ similar tyrannical policies? For the same reasons those in Europe oppressed the Protestants, sin and power. Looking at American History is like looking at the tale of two Americas. One America was fighting for Christ's Liberty for all, and the other living in the same sin nature in which the rest of the world wallows. The gun control issue is one of many debates that has serious philosophical implications. Either all have the right to defend themselves, as God has declared in His Word, or Man has the right to pick and choose if man has the right to self defense. When man usurps God's authority, tragedy inevitably strikes. One of the first gun laws in America was written in Virginia in 1640 specifically against the African Slaves who had been brought to the New World: “Prohibiting negroes, slave and free, from carrying weapons including clubs." (The Los Angeles Times, "To Fight Crime, Some Blacks Attack Gun Control," January 19, 1992) Also passed in 1640 Virginia was this statute: "That all such free Mulattoes, Negroes and Indians...shall appear without arms." [7 The Statues at Large; Being a Collection of all the Laws of Virginia, from the First Session of the Legislature, in the Year 1619, p. 95 (W.W. Henning ed. 1823).] (GMU CR LJ, p. 67) Virginia continued to institute such laws and was joined by South Carolina in 1712 when the latter codified a statute banning:"An act for the better ordering and governing of Negroes and slaves." [7 Statutes at Large of South Carolina, p. 353-54 (D.J. McCord ed. 1836-1873).] (GMU CR LJ, p. 70) In 1791 the 2nd Amendment was ratified, codifying the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It is important to note that the first congress almost split over the issue of slavery during our battle for independence from Britain, which truly didn't end until January 8, 1815 in New Orleans. Benjamin Franklin after having returned from France to broker the end of the French Revolutionary War brought a petition before Congress that read as such: ““Mankind are all formed by the same Almighty Being, alike objects of his care, and equally designed for the enjoyment of happiness.” All people were entitled to the “blessings of liberty . . . without distinction of color.” It noted the contradiction of slavery and freedom in the American experiment while seeking the means “for removing this inconsistency from the character of the American people,” and it called on Congress to grant “liberty to those unhappy men who alone in this land of freedom are degraded into perpetual bondage.” It advocated not only the end of the slave trade, as the Quaker petition had the day before, but the end of slavery itself.” billofrightsinstitute.org The Abolitionist case took a back seat to survival and rested until the decadespreceding the Civil War which, however complex, was at least in part foslavery. In those decades marching up to the Civil War many states passed other egregious gun laws. In 1825 Florida enstated a law allowing local authorities to ransack Melanated homes (slave or free) for the purposes of confiscating any weapons of any sort (even a cane could be considered contraband. In 1828 Florida did in fact reverse somewhat to allow Free Melanated people to own firearms, only with a license. (Because you know you can't trust some sorts of people so we need licenses. This argument has become no less immoral with time.) In 1831 Florrida reversed again and repealed all licenses held by melanated people. (If God is not the one endowing us with our rights, and government is, then our rights are based on elections and political whimsy.) In 1857 the Dredd Scott vs Sandford case, one of the worst cases of jurisprudence ever seen in America, the court upheld the following: Fro Chief Justice Taney: “if members of the African race were "citizens" they would be exempt from the special "police regulations" applicable to them. "It would give to persons of the negro race...full liberty of speech...to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went." (Id. p. 417) U.S. Supreme Court held that descendants of Africans who were imported into this country and sold as slaves were not included nor intended to be included under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, whether emancipated or not, and remained without rights or privileges except such as those which the government might grant them, thereby upholding slavery. Also held that a slave did not become free when taken into a free state; that Congress cannot bar slavery in any territory; and that blacks could not be citizens.” After the Civil War, the reconstruction era saw the above laws “Slave Codes” become “Black Codes”. These often banned Melanated ownership of firearms without a license. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was meant to overturn these and the 14th Amendment reinforced the CRA of 1866, but states continued in their sin. “Opponents of the 14th Amendment objected to its adoption because they opposed federal enforcement of the freedoms in the bill of rights. Sen. Thomas A. Hendricks (D-Ind.) said "if this amendment be adopted we will then carry the title [of citizenship] and enjoy its advantages in common with the negroes, the coolies, and the Indians." [CONG. GLOBE, 39th Congress, 1st Session, pt. 3, 2939 (4 June 1866)]. Sen. Reverdy Johnson, counsel for the slave owner in Dred Scott, opposed the amendment because "it is quite objectionable to provide that 'no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States'." Thus, the 14th Amendment was viewed as necessary to buttress the Civil Rights Act of 1866, especially since the act "is pronounced void by the jurists and courts of the South," e.g. Florida has as "a misdemeanor for colored men to carry weapons...and the punishment...is whipping..." [CONG GLOBE, 39th Con., 1st Session, 504, pt. 4, 3210 (16 June 1866)].” The KKK was formed the same year in 1866, primarily by Democrats who felt as Thomas Hendricks did. This organization and those who held hate in their hearts towards the freed slaves wanted gun control to make their business of oppression easier. Saturday Night Special Laws were concocted and enacted to make inexpensive firearms “Saturday Night Specials'' difficult to obtain. This made it difficult to afford a firearm for all of those who the left saw as undesirable, especially the melanated individuals, but also the Appalachian and Italian, who were also connoted with “higher criminality and lower breeding”. Remember, these were the same people who were enthralled with eugenics and thought the poor and slaves were in these circumstances because of their genetics and nature. In 1911, the Sullivan Law was enacted. This law required police permission to obtain a permit to own a handgun. Again, the Southern Italian was also specifically singled out as particularly criminal in nature, as well as the more melanated African American. In 1934 the National Firearms Act was passed to prevent the ownership of firearms that were considered too dangerous to be left in the hands of the common folk. Firearms under this law were still available if you were to ask for a license and pay a tax equal to that of a used automobile. In 1941 Florida a judge admitted to the unequal administration of a gun control law: “In concurring opinion narrowly construing a Florida gun control law passed in 1893, Justice Buford stated the 1893 law "was passed when there was a great influx of negro laborers in this State....The same condition existed when the Act was amended in 1901 and the Act was passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers....The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population and in practice has never been so applied...". Watson v. Stone, 148 Fla. 516, 524, 4 So.2d 700, 703 (1941) (GMU CR LJ, p. 69)” After MLK was assasinated in 1968, the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed and Robert Sherril, an avowed anti-gun journalist admitted that: “that the Gun Control Act of 1968 was "passed not to control guns but to control Blacks." [R. Sherrill, The Saturday Night Special, p. 280 (1972).] (GMU CR LJ, p. 80) "The Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed not to control guns but to control blacks, and inasmuch as a majority of Congress did not want to do the former but were ashamed to show that their goal was the latter, the result was they did neither. Indeed, this law, the first gun-control law passed by Congress in thirty years, was one of the grand jokes of our time. First of all, bear in mind that it was not passed in one piece but was a combination of two laws. The original 1968 Act was passed to control handguns after the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., had been assassinated with a rifle. Then it was repealed and repassed to include the control of rifles and shotguns after the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy with a handgun.... The moralists of our federal legislature as well as sentimental editorial writers insist that the Act of 1968 was a kind of memorial to King and Robert Kennedy. If so, it was certainly a weird memorial, as can be seen not merely by the handgun/long-gun shellgame, but from the inapplicability of the law to their deaths." (The Saturday Night Special and Other Guns, Robert Sherrill, p. 280, 1972)” In 1994 Clinton introduced HR 3838 to ban firearms in government housing, people who need to be able to protect themselves more than most. All of this to say, Britain's gun and knife bans have not worked, Australia's bans have done little, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao's bans accomplished exactly what they wished. Why would we in America continue the regressive and Anti-God philosophy of Gun Control. Let us live in Liberty, but with responsibility. Those who commit heinous acts should be held to account, but we can also deter them with an armed populace. Knife Crackdown: https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/border-security/u-k-launches-nationwide-crackdown-on-knife-crime/ Pointy Knife Ban: https://www.rochester.anglican.org/communications/news/government-urged-to-restrict-the-sale-of-pointed-knives.php Plastic Cutlery Ban: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/20/single-use-plastic-plates-and-cutlery-could-be-banned-in-england List of Gun Laws: https://www.sedgwickcounty.org/media/29093/the-racist-origins-of-us-gun-control.pdf Bill of Rights Institute: https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/benjamin-franklin-and-the-first-abolitionist-petitions NY State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen Debate: https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2021/08/a-historians-assessment-of-the-anti-immigrant-narrative-in-nysrpa-v-bruen/

america god jesus christ american church australia europe man france england state story italian guns south new orleans congress african americans african stone south carolina rev laws britain rights martin luther king jr act democrats civil war id large adolf hitler collection constitution americas clinton new world globe his word amendment great britain indians mankind los angeles times joseph stalin american history blacks gun control protestant appalachian benjamin franklin firearms kkk statues opponents legislature mao fla henning protestants gun laws quaker robert f kennedy civil rights act cong abolitionists cra mccord negroes sherrill dred scott sandford melanated first session prohibiting gun control debate james ii black codes one america pistol association southern italian anti god gun control act national firearms act this bill rights institute african slaves english bill

Did the ATF go easy on gun stores that fueled Chicago crime?

Chicago's Afternoon News with Steve Bertrand

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2022

Champe Barton, a reporter at The Trace, joins Lisa Dent on Chicago’s Afternoon News to break down a report that details the gun dealers singled out by the city as suppliers of a large number of guns used in crimes, and how those dealers violated the Gun Control Act of 1968. Follow Your Favorite Chicago’s […]

chicago stories business interview politics talk news radio guns crime journalists fueled stores bertrand dent wgn newsnation newsmakers go easy afternoon news gun control act

Biden To Announce New Rule Cracking Down On Ghost Guns

Business Drive

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 13, 2022 1:00

United States President Joe Biden is set to announce a new Department of Justice rule meant to crack down on so-called ghost guns. The White House says the weapons, which can be bought as kits to be assembled at home and lack federal tracking serial numbers, have been increasingly recovered at crime scenes across the US in recent years. The new DoJ rule says that manufacturers of some types of ghost gun kits will be subject to the same restrictions as firearm manufacturers under the Gun Control Act. The rule would also require federally licensed dealers and gunsmiths who receive guns without serial numbers to serialise the weapon with federal authorities before selling it to a customer.

ghosts news joe biden white house crime doj cracking down new rule ghost guns gun control act

Talk Law Radio Gunsmith and Federal Firearms License Law with Adam Turcotte & Alex Vollmer (Reupload)

Talk Law Radio Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 19, 2022 50:25

Today's show is about the law of federal firearms licensing and gunsmithing. Our guest, Adam Turcotte will talk about his experience as an FFL dealer and full time gun smith and Alex Vollmer and I will talk about the Federal Firearms Act of 1938 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 as well as Federal Firearms License (FFL) regulations, opinions of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) federal agency. There are four segments to the show. 1st segment is getting to know Adam Turcotte. 2nd and 3rd segment are about laws, regulations and court cases involving federal firearms licenses. The 4th segment is about legacy. After you talk about your legacy, I will talk about how Marquardt Law Firm helps with legacy planning including NFA Gun Trusts. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

federal firearms reupload vollmer turcotte ffl gunsmith gun control act alcohol tobacco firearms atf

RSWC #130 Ashley Hlebinsky.mp4

Riding Shotgun With Charlie

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 22, 2021 44:02

Riding Shotgun With Charlie#130Ashley HlebinskyFirearm HistorianThe DC Project Ashley Hlebinsky is THE coolest firearm historian you'll ever meet! We were both speakers at AMMcon (hosted by the Second Amendment Foundation) in Dallas recently. Since she is a historian and we were in Dallas there is only one place for us to visit: Dealey Plaza. Of course, you know this is where Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald. I LOVE the Kennedy assassination conspiracies! All of them. And while watching any documentary on it, I will buy whatever theory they're selling. But not Ashley. She likes the real story! Ashley wanted to be a doctor like many folks, but she was interested in battlefield medicine which led to firearms and firearm history. Ted Koppel said about her, she wanted to learn to save lives then to things that could take lives. But she's really into much more about how firearms work, how the evolution of firearms has changed, and its impact on the industry, technology, society, and culture. One of her personal interests is in guns used in crimes. Many museums don't want to bring up the firearms used in crimes, but Ashely really enjoys that part of the story about firearms. She says that not knowing about firearms leads museums to put some wrong firearms on display. This is where she really enjoys working, coming up with how a firearm used in a crime can be a valid and educational display at a museum. During her undergrad years after she changed majors, she was doing as much as she could including volunteering, internships, researching, and learning to shoot. While a senior in college, Ashley was able to parlay internships into getting hired by the Smithsonian. She was able to go from the Smithsonian to the Cody Firearms Museum in Wyoming, where she ran just about everything behind the scenes and all the displays for the exhibitions, collections, and education. Once we get to Dealey Plaza, the conversation turns to the Kennedy assassination and what was going on during the 1960's and many of the various conspiracies. We do get some selfies at the School Book Depository, the grassy knoll, and the two X's where the bullets hit Kennedy. Ashley brings up what she calls the Post World War II era and how the turbulent times and several assassinations lead to the Gun Control Act of 1968. We talk about the possibility of Frank Sinatra and Marilyn Monroe ties to the Kennedys, the similarities between Lincoln & Kennedy. And other irrelevant and interesting topics. Including James Earl Jones, where the Carcano rifle is, and the FBI trying to get Martin Luther King, Jr to commit suicide. Besides everything that Ashley is involved with she's also with The DC Project. She testified in front of Congress. She's a producer of TV shows on the paranormal on the TRVL Channel and several shows for Brother in Arms and Midway USA's Gun Stories. Ashley was a great sport going to Dealey Plaza and taking the conversation in several places. I'm glad that I was able to have her as part of the Stagecoach Across America. Favorite quotes: “Personally, I'm more fascinated by guns used in crime and how to interrupt them than guns not used in crime.” “A lot of people want to work in the gun vault. And he said I was the only person that he actually thought could do it.” “When I go to a museum, I don't like to read. I'm there to see the stuff.” “Because there's so much armed radicalism, the government starts doing some crazy stuff.” “I wouldn't be surprised if it was an inside job. Because they're doing kinds of stuff for the benefit of I'm not sure who. ” Ashley Hlebinsky Instagram https://www.instagram.com/historyinheels/ Ashley Hlebinsky Facebook https://www.facebook.com/officialashleyhlebinsky Ashley Hlebinsky Twitter https://twitter.com/ashleyhlebinsky The DC Project https://www.dcproject.info/ Gun Freedom Radio https://gunfreedomradio.com/ Pot of Gold Estate Auctions https://potofgoldestate.com/ Second Amendment Foundation http://saf.org/ Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms https://www.ccrkba.org/ Please support the Riding Shotgun With Charlie sponsors and supporters. Buy RSWC & GunGram shirts & hoodies, stickers & patches, and mugs at the store! http://ridingshotgunwithcharlie.com/rswc-shop/ Keyhole Holsters Veteran Owned, American Made http://www.keyholeholsters.com/ Dennis McCurdy Author, Speaker, Firewalker http://www.find-away.com/ Self Defense Radio Network http://sdrn.us/

tv brothers speaker congress fbi martin luther king jr wyoming personally arms frank sinatra marilyn monroe i love pot smithsonian lee harvey oswald kennedys american made dealey plaza veteran owned bear arms firewalker ted koppel lincoln kennedy charlie cook second amendment foundation citizens committee dc project post world war ii gun control act ashley hlebinsky cody firearms museum gun freedom radio trvl channel self defense radio network

Episode 22: The 1968 Gun Control Act

Today in the History of Freedom

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2021 2:53

Acts don't control guns, they control people.

guns acts gun control act

#190: The National Rifle Association

English Learning for Curious Minds | Learn English with Podcasts

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 2, 2021 22:16

It's one of the United States' most powerful advocacy groups and is a fierce defender of gun rights.But it hasn't always been like this.In this episode, we'll discover how it went from helping create gun control laws to becoming the most powerful pro-gun organisation in Washington D.C. The early years of the NRA Helping introduce gun control laws in the 1930s Passing the Gun Control Act of 1968 The 1970s: A change in the NRA What does the NRA actually do? 5 key activities How the NRA reacts after a mass shooting The effect on the NRA of mass shootings Barack Obama: "the best gun salesman in America" The controversy within the NRA How many Americans live in a household with guns? American perceptions towards gun ownership Full transcript, subtitles and key vocabulary available on the website: https://www.leonardoenglish.com/podcasts/nra

united states american americans washington dc nra rifles english language ingles national rifle association learn english study english gun control act ingls

Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 166: The ACP That Almost Didn't Happen

Assorted Calibers Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 16, 2021 80:08

In This Episode: Weer'd has technical difficulties, but overcomes them! Erin and Weer'd discuss some attempts to run around the Protection in Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; David talks about the Gun Control Act of 1968 and how it affected the gun industry; and Weer'd interviews Phillip Smith of the National African-American Gun Association to talk about this fast-growing organization. Did you know that we have a Patreon? Join now for the low, low cost of $4/month (that's $1/podcast) and you'll get to listen to our podcast on Friday instead of Mondays, as well as patron-only content like mag dump episodes, our hilarious blooper reels and film tracks. Show Notes Main Topic: Gun-Maker Offers Sandy Hook Families $33 Million. Here's What They May Be Considering Shall Not Be Questioned: Remington Settlement Mexico Sues U.S. Gun Manufacturers For Contributing To Arms Trafficking Deaths OSD 129: The lawsuit accusing gun makers of complying with the law Military presents plan to manufacture replica of 50-caliber Barrett Where did they go? The missing soldiers Billboards near Smith and Wesson display reminder of gun violence Gun Lovers and Other Strangers: Gun Control Act of 1968 ***PDF Warning*** National Firearms Act of 1934 ***PDF Warning*** Federal Firearms Act of 1938 ***PDF Warning*** Pre-GCA68-Ad 1970-Shooters-Bible-Preface 1970-Shooters-Bible-Winchester Shooters-Bible-Smith-and-Wesson Shooters-Bible-Colt 1970-Shooters-Bible-Charter-Arms 1960-Machine-Gun-Ad-01 1960-Machine-Gun-Ad-02 1960-Machine-Gun-Ad-03 1958-Solothurn-Ad 1960-American-Rifleman-Boys-Anti-Tank-Rifle Philip Smith Interview: National African American Gun Association

mexico race guns racism military lawsuits settlement second amendment weer billboards assorted calibers gun control act phillip smith arms act lawful commerce naaga

Special Report: The State of Braces with Alex Bosco | SOTG 1063

Student of the Gun Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 16, 2021 73:21

Alex Bosco is the founder of SB Tactical and the OG of firearms stabilizing braces. After nine years of approving pistol stabilizing braces and devices, the BATFE has proposed a 71 pages redefining of the very same products of which they already approved. Whether are not you are a fan of stabilizing braces or not, this subject is critically important to every American citizen. Note we did not say “gun owner” we said citizen. You must listen louder to this special episode. Can the United States of America function as a Representative Republic if we allow an unelected regulatory agency to arbitrarily create rules, change the rules, and then threaten to punish the citizens who found themselves breaking the rules that were altered at the whim of bureaucrats, not elected representatives? Thanks for being a part of SOTG! We hope you find value in the message we share. If you've got any questions, here are some options to contact us: • Send an Email • Send a Text • Call Us Enjoy the show! And remember…You're a Beginner Once, a Student For Life! TOPICS COVERED THIS EPISODE • Huge thanks to our Partners:Brownells | CrossBreed | Duracoat | SWAT Fuel • [0:04:12] Special Report: The State of Braces with Alex Bosco • Braces for Sale https://bit.ly/2RLXJxr • Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces” www.atf.gov • Preliminary Regulatory Analysis and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis www.atf.gov/file FEATURING: Alex Bosco, SB Tactical, Madison Rising, Jarrad Markel, Paul Markel, SOTG University PARTNERS: Brownells, Inc., CrossBreed Holsters, DuraCoat Firearm Finishes, SWAT Fuel FIND US ON: Full30, Parler, MeWe.com, iTunes, Stitcher, AppleTV, Roku, Amazon, GooglePlay, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, tumblr SOURCES From www.atf.gov: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces” On June 7, 2021, the Attorney General signed ATF proposed rule 2021R-08, “Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached ‘Stabilizing Braces,'” amending ATF's regulations to clarify when a rifle is “intended to be fired from the shoulder.” The proposed rule outlines the factors ATF would consider when evaluating firearms equipped with a purported “stabilizing brace” to determine whether these weapons would be considered a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle” under the Gun Control Act of 1968, or a “rifle” or “firearm” subject to regulation under the National Firearms Act. (Click Here for Full Article)

united states america american amazon sale stitcher google play apple tv attorney generals roku parler firearms special report bosco braces atf mewe gun control act national firearms act sotg batfe madison rising sb tactical paul markel crossbreed holsters jarrad markel

America's Gun Problem: The Causes and Possible Solutions

Mad Mad World

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 17, 2021 64:39

The Cereal Party of Los and Bertram is back with a new problem they are trying to solve. The first step in solving any problem is admitting that there is one. The United States of America has a tremendous problem with gun violence, whether we want to admit it or not. Los and Bertram try to dissect the causes of this violence and look at all sides of the issue. This episode is less about statistics and more about solutions, as well as the root causes behind the problem. Resources from this episode: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56509481 (US gun control: Biden calls for a ban on assault weapons | BBC News) https://www.theviolenceproject.org/mass-shooter-database/ (The Violence Project: A Mass Shooter Database) https://apnews.com/article/homicide-chicago-violence-coronavirus-pandemic-gun-violence-be4b972267e31358dd165925d5a33cce (Chicago ends 2020 with 769 homicides as gun violence surges) https://gun-control.procon.org/ (Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted? | ProCon.org) Gun Control Around the World: A Primer | The Atlantic https://crimesolutions.ojp.gov/ratedprograms/207#pd (Operation Ceasefire: Boston's solution to gun-crime) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/03/ersie-joyner-interview-oakland-police-ceasefire-gun-violence-prevention (Oakland's solution to gun-crime | The Guardian) https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country (Gun Deaths by Country 2021) https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/ (The Secret History of Guns | The Atlantic) https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2018/02/a-case-against-gun-control/553715/ (A Case Against Gun Control | The Atlantic) https://alltheragescience.com/commentary/fact-check-did-the-nra-supported-gun-control-when-the-black-panthers-advocated-that-minorities-arm-themselves/ (Fact-Check: Did the NRA support gun control when the Black Panthers advocated that minorities arm themselves?) https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nra-california-open-carry-ban/ (Did the NRA Support a 1967 ‘Open Carry’ Ban in California? | Snopes) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/11/21/the-american-indian-foundation-of-american-gun-culture/ (The American Indian foundation of American gun culture) https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/12/the-case-for-more-guns-and-more-gun-control/309161/ (The Case for More Guns | The Atlantic) https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/constitutional-case-gun-control/600694/ (A Constitutional Case for Gun Control | The Atlantic) https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gun-control-act-1968 (The Gun Control Act of 1968)

united states america american california chicago joe biden guardian black panther oakland nra american indian bbc news secret history bertram snopes procon gun deaths gun control act

BANG! GAT EPIDEMIC?

Revelations Radio Network

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 10, 2021

Canary Cry News Talk 04.09.2021: BANG! GAT EPIDEMIC? 666, BrainGate Wireless, Young Blood Anti-Aging - CCNT 322 Watch Live TWITCH, YOUTUBE 1, YOUTUBE 2, DLIVE Listen: RSS, Spotify, Apple Sign Up to the EMAIL LIST so we can contact you in case of emergency! -YouTube caves! Gonz wins! Susan Speaks! -Prince Philip passes at 99 FLIPPY -Flippy given context POLYTICK -Biden on Gun Control Act (Clips + Email from Producer Gravemind) a. Biden nominate’s David Chipman as ATF director (WACO) b. Bryan, Texas shooting c. Laguna Hills, CA shooting d. South Carolina, mass shooting (night before) -George Floyd autopsy report says he died of asphyxiation a. “Buildings will burn” if Chauvin isn’t convicted -Alex Jones “saves” children (staged or legit?) -Civil unrest in Ireland, bus on fire -Joe Manchin crushed Biden and Liberals dream 666 -LD666 -REFICUL 666 -Penteros666 BEAST SYSTEM -

Locked Up: How the Modern Prison-Industrial Complex Puts So Many Americans in Jail

The Resistance Library from Ammo.com

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 23, 2021 63:55

On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast Sam and Dave discuss the prison industrial complex in the United States. "Where you find the laws most numerous, there you will find also the greatest injustice." - Arcesilaus, Greek philosopher and student of Plato on power and personal sovereignty There's no two ways about it: The United States of America and its 50 state governments love putting people in prison. The U.S. has both the highest number of prisoners and the highest per capita incarceration rate in the modern world at 655 adults per 100,000. (It's worth noting that China's incarceration statistics are dubious, and they execute far more people than the United States. Indeed, the so-called People's Republic executes more people annually than the rest of the world combined.) Still, that's more than 2.2 million Americans in state and federal prisons as well as county jails. On top of those currently serving time, 4.7 million Americans were on parole in 2016, or about one in 56. These numbers do not include people on probation, which raises the number to one in 35. Nor does it include all of the Americans who have been arrested at one time or another, which is over 70 million – more than the population of France. For firearm owners in particular, the growth in this “prison-industrial complex” is troubling because felons are forbidden from owning firearms and ammunition under the 1968 Gun Control Act. As the number of laws has grown and the cultural shift for police has gone from a focus on keeping the peace to enforcing the law, more and more Americans are being stripped of their 2nd Amendment rights (not to mention other civil rights like voting – as of 2017, 6.1 million Americans cannot vote because of their criminal records). All told, eight percent of all Americans cannot own firearms because of a felony conviction. For American society as a whole, the prison-industrial complex has created a perverse incentive structure. Bad laws drive out respect for good laws because there are just so many laws (not to mention rules, regulations, and other prohibitions used by federal prosecutors to pin crimes on just about anyone). How did we get here? You can read the full article “Locked Up: How the Modern Prison-Industrial Complex Puts So Many Americans in Jail” at Ammo.com. For $20 off your $200 purchase, go to https://ammo.com/podcast (a special deal for our listeners). Follow Sam Jacobs on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamJacobs1776 And check out our sponsor, Libertas Bella, for all of your favorite Libertarian shirts at LibertasBella.com. Helpful Links: Locked Up: How the Modern Prison-Industrial Complex Puts So Many Americans in Jail Weapons of War On Our Streets: A Guide to the Militarization of America's Police The USA PATRIOT Act: The Story of an Impulsive Bill that Eviscerated America's Civil Liberties Protection or Pain Treatment: Choosing Between Your Gun and Medical Marijuana Resistance Library Sam Jacobs

Is ATF Giving Trump an October Surprise of Its Own?

Bearing Arms' Cam & Co

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 29, 2020 27:39

Days before the election, the ATF has quietly started re-interpreting the definition of "handgun" as defined by the Gun Control Act, and it's already starting to impact the importation of AR and AK-style pistols. Josh Savani, director of research and information at NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, tells Cam that the ATF's new moves are a preview of the regulatory assault on the Second Amendment that we can expect if Joe Biden is elected president.

donald trump giving joe biden institute ak second amendment nra atf october surprises legislative action gun control act

Oct 22: 1968 Gun Control Act

Today in the History of Freedom

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2020 2:53

The modern movement gets its boost.

gun control act

History of US Gun Control (Part 6: Nobody Likes The ATF)

The Statist Quo

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2020 96:27

On the sixth installment of our series on the history of US gun control, we examine the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, which was the result of a Senate investigation in 1982 that detailed the litany of entrapment and malicious prosecution of gun owners and dealers by the ATF. After finding that 75% of charges it filed were spurious at best, Congress made an attempt to rein the ATF in. The FOPA revised several parts of the Gun Control Act of 1968, added some protections for travelers, and banned manufacture of new automatic weapons. Thanks, Feds!Thank you to all of our listeners and supporters for seeing us through our 100th episode!Fraudulent Vote https://youtu.be/kxYnxx8cRxghttps://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/senate-bill/49https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/feds-paid-a-teen-to-get-a-neck-tattoo-of-a-giant-squid-smoking-a-joint/282279/THE FIREARMS OWNERS' PROTECTION ACT: A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVEhttps://firearmscoalition.org/tag/atf-abuse/https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=osgrd1MPb7IPart IPart IIPart IIIPart IVPart VWebsiteFacebookTwitterPatreonNEW Merch Store!

history congress senate likes gun control feds atf gun control act

010 Ghost Guns, Suppressors, Machine Guns and the NFA

Latent Force Prepared Defensive Action Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2020 64:52

In episode #10 Jay and Mike discuss ghost guns, suppressors, machine guns, and the NFA. They take a dive into the topic of the newly drafted Raskin (D-MD) Cicilline(D-RI) legislation designed to stop the home manufacture of the uber scary "Ghost Gun" - guns made from 80% frames and receivers - and the machines that make them. This only starts the conversation about the ignorance of lawmakers when it comes to guns. Mike gives a guided tour of the ATF rules regarding NFA items and how tax stamps are obtained and collected. Be sure to visit our website www.latentforce.com If you have questions or comments shoot us an email podcast@latentforce.com Here are links to the items discussed in this episode. Longmire Books by Craig Johnson https://www.craigallenjohnson.com/novels.htm Sharps 1874 Rifle .45-70 http://csharpsarms.com/ Winchester 1894 or "Model 94" 30-30 https://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-94.html Colt Government Model 1911 https://gundigest.com/handguns/colt-1911-government-model-and-beyond Beretta 92FS https://www.beretta.com/en-us/92-fs/ Magnum PI - Colt 1911 https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2009/8/11/magnum-pis-colt-pistol/ Lethal Weapon - Beretta 92FS https://youtu.be/3aSdLAndoJU Die Hard - Beretta 92 https://diehard.fandom.com/wiki/Beretta_92 Col. Jeff Cooper’s Conditions of Readiness Condition 0 – Round in the chamber; hammer cocked; thumb safety is OFF; full magazine in the gun. Condition 1 – (Also known as “Cocked and Locked”)- Round in the chamber; hammer cocked; thumb safety is ON; full magazine in the gun. Condition 2 – Round in the chamber; hammer down; full magazine in the gun. Condition 3 – Chamber is empty; hammer down; full magazine in the gun. Condition 4 – Chamber is empty; hammer down; NO magazine in the gun. 30 Caliber Clip Idiot Senator Kevin De Leon (D-CA) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJmFEv6BHM0 5 Dumbest Politicians on Guns https://www.outdoorhub.com/stories/2016/01/07/5-embarrassing-gun-quotes-politicians/ Bugs Bunny - What an ultra maroon https://youtu.be/HuxJqIs2a-Y Raskin Cicilline Ghost Gun Legislation https://raskin.house.gov/media/press-releases/raskin-cicilline-introduce-legislation-stop-home-manufacture-ghost-guns Ghost Gunner CNC Machine https://ghostgunner.net/ Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/house-bill/4445 Undetectable Firearms Act of 2020 https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/senators-introduce-legislation-to-ban-ghost-guns-as-covid-19-pandemic-drives-demand-for-untraceable-firearms Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms https://www.atf.gov/firearms Silencerco Suppressor https://silencerco.com/ National Firearms Act of 1934 https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act Gun Control Act of 1968 https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/laws-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives Silencerco Maxim 50 - Muzzle Loader with Suppressor https://www.ammoland.com/2017/09/silencerco-maxim-50-muzzleloader/ Mini Cannon Tech https://www.minicannontech.com/ Rep Diana DeGette - Idiot Politician and Magazine Ban https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxtu228bYFw Colorado Magazine Ban is Stupid and a Failure https://reason.com/2019/11/14/colorados-large-capacity-magazine-ban-is-a-colossal-failure/ Gun Sales in 2020 - 2 million in March 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/01/business/coronavirus-gun-sales.html Montana Firearms Freedom Act This is from Wikipedia so don't blindly trust the info, do research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Firearms_Freedom_Act

History of US Gun Control (Part 4)

The Statist Quo

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 26, 2020 116:49

This episode is a continuation of our discussion of the history of gun control in the United States. Part 4 covers the Gun Control Act of 1968 from a different angle than Part 3, and we also talk about the societal and cultural climate of the 1960s and 70s, to see if we can tease out factors that caused people to demand gun control (if what the mainstream says is correct). We also talk about the Cincinnati Revolt in 1977, marking the NRA's transformation into a pro-gun rights lobby. We also go over some state gun control efforts, federal bills to ban handguns, the fact and fiction of Saturday Night Specials, and the rise of anti-gun lobbying groups like the Coalition to Ban Handguns (it's still around) and Handgun Control Inc, which would eventually morph into the Brady Campaign.Enjoy!The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence - Imagine A Future Free From Gun Violence (formerly Coalition to Ban Handguns)Guns Prevent Thousands of Crimes Every Day, Research Shows | Lawrence W. ReedThe Argument Beneath the Surface of Gun Control | Kenneth LaFaveThe Costs and Consequences of Gun ControlThe NRA once supported gun controlPart 1Part 2Part 3WebsiteFacebookTwitterPatreon

united states history consequences coalition surface gun control nra brady campaign gun control act

71: The Scary Reality of "Ghost Guns"

Red, Blue, and Brady

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2020 34:15

Ghost guns — constructed firearms that lack serial numbers or other identifying markings — have been gaining popularity over the last decade. These weapons, which are typically made of plastic and allow users to bypass background checks and registration regulations, are assembled from kits that can be purchased online, providing an easy way of obtaining firearms for people with criminal records. For example, if you are banned from owning guns in a state with universal background checks, you won’t be able to walk into a store and purchase a gun — but, if you order the parts for that gun online and assemble it yourself, it’s likely that nobody will know.US law allows for the creation and possession of these ghost guns for personal use, while pre-assembled firearms made available for sale or distribution must bear their maker's markings and unique serial numbers. Furthermore, as per the 1968 Gun Control Act, a federal license is required to manufacture them.However, the Act provided an exemption for people who make their own firearms for personal use, and the 1993 Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which established the federal background check system, included a similar allowance for homemade weapons. To put it plainly, it’s perfectly legal for Americans to build their own untraceable, unregistered firearms.To understand why weapons of this nature present such a threat to public safety, host JJ is joined by Steve Lindley, ghost gun expert and Brady Program Manager, and Kyleanne Hunter, Brady's VP of Programs.Mentioned in this podcast:Tell the ATF to take action on ghost guns (Brady)What are ghost guns? (Brady)Ghost guns: the DIY firearms (60 Minutes)I made an untraceable AR-15 (Wired)RBB listeners get a free quote with ADT today by clicking here!For more information on Brady, follow us on social media @Bradybuzz or visit our website at bradyunited.org.Full transcripts and bibliographies of this episode are available at bradyunited.org/podcast.National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 1-800-273-8255. Music provided by: David “Drumcrazie” CurbySpecial thanks to Hogan Lovells for their long-standing legal support ℗&©2019 Red, Blue, and BradySupport the show (https://www.bradyunited.org/donate)

music ghosts reality americans diy scary act programs national suicide prevention lifeline atf adt ghost guns hogan lovells gun control act bradybuzz

GunFreedomRadio EP197 The Ameri-CAN Series: Can Gun Rights Prevent Genocides? with Jeff Kelman

Gun Freedom Radio

Play Episode Listen Later May 11, 2020 60:29

We are doing a series called Ameri-CAN. Talking about the CAN-DO spirit that is part of our American DNA. So much about our lives has been turned upside down by this Corona Virus / Covid-19, and we have been hearing a lot about what we CAN’T do and where we CAN’T go, but our guests during this series are going to talk to us about their area of expertise and all of the ways we still CAN learn and grow, train, connect, and expand our freedoms in ways we maybe haven’t thought about before. Our guest today is Jeff Kelman. Jeff grew up in an anti-gun family and it wasn’t until he was a teenager before he realized that it is actually legal for civilians to own guns in the United States. As a young adult Jeff purchased his first firearm and began understanding the responsibility of gun ownership, and became interested in researching the history of laws restricting owning guns around the world, and how those laws intersect with the Holocaust and other genocides. 1) How do the laws in pre-Nazi Germany relate to the laws that have been implemented here in the United States? (The Nazi "Weapons Law" of 1938 that U.S. Senator Thomas J. Dodd used as a partial template for the Gun Control Act of 1968.) 2) The Anti-Rights / Anti-Gun crowd are always fond of using phrases like “Common Sense Gun Laws” to make them sound reasonable and warm and fuzzy. Among the types of laws they want to implement are registration and licensing. Historically speaking, how have these kinds of measures worked out for the citizens who complied? 3) Over the past few weeks, we have been watching Mayors across the nation urging their citizens to “snitch” on each other for things as simple as being outside enjoying some fresh air. In Los Angeles the Mayor went so far as to dangle a carrot by saying, quote, “Snitches get rewards”. As soon as I heard that, my mind went to the Red Flag Gun Laws that are being pushed for by politicians all over the nation, and that can result in anonymous “tips” leading to a citizen’s door being kicked in and their guns being forcefully confiscated. Not due to any crime that person committed, but simply because a snitch doesn’t feel comfortable that the other person owns something they don’t like. How does all of this relate to what you have seen in World History? 4) We are currently watching American citizens give up important and Constitutionally protected freedoms and liberty because we are navigating something we have never seen before, this worldwide pandemic. We could call it the "psychology of the unknown” impacting how compliant or defiant humans are in any given circumstance. Thinking back to the time before the Holocaust, we often want to use our hind site and say - if the Jewish people had had firearms they would have fought back and prevented the atrocities. I have to believe that at some point they would have, once the reality of what was happening really set in. But, what has your research shown you about that assertion? 5) What has your research shown you about why, traditionally speaking, Jewish Americans tend to be against gun ownership? That seems counter-intuitive, considering the number of times Jews have been persecuted across time and across the globe. 6) You are still in the process of gathering research for your Master’s Thesis, but is there an overarching message that you could come to about the importance of firearms ownership in being and remaining a free and sovereign individual who is a citizen of a free and sovereign nation? Do guns matter? 7) I (Cheryl Todd) am part of a Pro-Rights / Pro-Gun Women’s group called The DC Project. We assert that the key to preserving liberty and safety is Education Not Legislation. Is there anything specific in your research that would support this assertion?

Episode 15 - Gun Control Act of 1968

Live to Shoot - Defending our 2nd Amendment Rights

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2020 8:00

In this episode we follow up our conversation on the National Firearms Act of 1934 with a discussion about the Gun Control Act of 1968email me at jefftdowdle@gmail.com

gun control act national firearms act

History of US Gun Control (Part 3)

The Statist Quo

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 27, 2020 128:35

In our next installment on the history of American gun control, we humbly present to you a unique take on the Gun Control Act of 1968, the law that established everybody's favorite government overreach, the Federal Firearms Licensee system!Many people on both sides of the debate invoke Hitler, just like any other issue. The pro-gunners often comment on the Nazis disarmament schemes, and they're partially correct. But the legacy of Nazi gun-grabbing lives on in United States Code today, in the Gun Control Act of 1968. It's not well known that there's a striking similarity in the text of that law, the Weimar Germany gun laws of the 1920s and the 1938 Nazi firearms law passed by Hitler's Reichstag. And to top it all off, the GCA's principal sponsor, Sen. Thomas Dodd, owned a German copy of the Nazi law and had the Library of Congress translate it in 1968, while drafting his own version that became the GCA!!We go over this disturbing fact and the political context that spawned the crises of the 1960s that the Feds exploited to carve out more red tape for your privileges....ahem, I mean rights. Enjoy!Link:The Harcourt Article we referencehttps://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1327/http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/gateway.htmFacebookTwitter

american history german nazis adolf hitler gun control feds library of congress reichstag weimar germany gca united states code gun control act

Action Radio: "What the hell happened to the NRA???"

Action Radio Online with Greg Penglis

Play Episode Listen Later May 22, 2019 121:00

*** Interesting discussion involving NRA history, their history ot being "PRO-Gun Control," and a history of corruption and mis-used funds that really detract from the mission of the NRA which is sadly needed more than ever. We talked about how the Left completely distorts and reverses the meaning of the Second Amendment, and how government at all levels violates it. We need a powerful NRA, but for conservatives it's no where near as powerful an advocate of the Second Amendment as it could be. We also had our Creek Tribe Report with Vice Chief Dan Helms 30 minutes in, and at 45 minutes in our new Vaccine Project Admin Bri Young from Hawaii who spent about 45 minutes going over many aspects of the vaccine problem. Last half hour I talked through an article pointing out exactly how the NRA actually wrote and supported major gun control laws, from the 1920's to the 1968 Gun Control Act. Stay connected by going to the "Action Radio with Greg Penglis" Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/radiolegislature/ Please share our show with friends and family at: BlogTalkRadio.com/citizenaction Check out our citizen written bills at: www.WriteYourLaws.com On iTunes now at: Action Radio Online with Greg Penglis GregPenglis@ActionRadioGP on Twitter Join us on Facebook also at: The Action Radio Group Page, The Fetke Report, Action Radio Video Page, Action Radio Writers Group, Action Radio Youtube Channel, Action Radio Vaccine Project, Action Radio Family Law Project, Action Radio Art Project, Action Radio Cruise and Travel Group, Action Radio Student Advocacy Group, and the Action Radio OMG! Report Group.

left hawaii civil rights gun control second amendment nra blogtalkradio national rifle association hell happened gun control act action radio report group

Ep 12 | Past Tense, Current Events: "Gun Control"

40 Acres & a Fool

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 9, 2019 47:24

In 1971, attorney Robert Kukla authored "Gun Control", a look back at the founding of the modern gun control movement in the 1960's and its push for sweeping anti-gun legislation that resulted in the Gun Control Act of 1968. From the anti-NRA media campaigns to anti-gun politicians hoping to capitalize on tragedy and more, Cam documents the many ways in which the gun control debate today resembles the fight of 50 years ago, and what 2nd Amendment supporters can learn from the legislative battles back then.

amendment current events gun control nra past tense gun control act

City of Gustav – The History of Federal Gun Control

Can You Hear Me?

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 14, 2018 90:18

In response to listener feedback, Gustav presents the history of Federal Gun Control and tries his best not to provide too much editorial commentary (but of course there is some. In the discussion he covers: Federalist Paper No. 46 Black Codes Municipal Gun Control in the Old West the Mailing Firearms Act of 1927 the National Firearms Act 0f 1934 (NFA) the Federal Firearms Act of 1938 (that created the FFL) the Gun Control Act of 1968 creation of the BATF in 1972 the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 including the Hughes Amendment the Brady Bill in 1993 the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 Along the way, he explains the major advances in firearm designs, explains the fallacy of the gun show loophole and the truth about private transfers. Then he answers questions from listeners about: Gun registries Mental health requirements Background checks NFA regulated weapons Magazine capacity Bump stocks It turned into a lot longer episode than planned and ultimately the full crew will have a gun control discussion. But until then, email us your thoughts, questions, rants or solutions to gun issues to canyouhearmepod@gmail.com Follow us on Twitter @canyouhearmepod @realgustav @tywebb3000 @longmireheavy Find us on Tumblr and Instagram @canyouhearmepod The post City of Gustav – The History of Federal Gun Control appeared first on Can You Hear Me?.

history mental guns magazine federal tumblr gun control bump gustav old west nfa can you hear me ffl black codes gun control act national firearms act brady bill law enforcement act violent crime control

484 - If History Is Any Guide...

Black Man With A Gun Show

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 5, 2016 42:32

We are in for a whirl.. This week I am reminded to remind you that we are all part of a cycle. Gun control and the issues we are seeing today happened before. Michael Crighton wrote: if you don’t know history you don’t know anything. you are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree. Going to reflect and share details of the 1966 Texas Tower Shooting, the Gun Control Act of 1968, and how all of that as well as the news sounds familiar to 1966 today. Was Chares Whitman nuts, just evil, had a medical condition or what? And did it matter? We use the same excuses today. This show is sponsored by members of my patreon.com/blackmanwithagun family and friends in business, Crossbreedholsters.com, US Concealed Carry Association and Dillon Precision. Shout outs to Womens’ Gun Show womansgunshow.com Charlie Cooks personalshootinginstruction.com. M-Wtactical.com And order your patch today to show your support of the show http://blackmanwithagun.com/patch since singing cheers me up, Dylan and Hendrix's version sung by Bones Hooks is at the end of this podcast.

history texas guide guns sniper blanchard whitman kenn gun control act michael crighton m wtactical

The Primer - Episode 13 - Healey Bans Guns

The GOAL Podcast - Official Podcast of Gun Owners' Action League

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2016 24:33

Massachusetts Attorney General Unilaterally Changes Gun Laws http://www.mass.gov/ago/public-safety/awbe.html Without any prior notice or public hearings and while the legislature is on break for national conventions the Massachusetts Attorney General, Maura Healey, has issued an “Enforcement Notice” to firearm retailers throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts changing the longstanding definition of so-called “Assault Weapons”. For nearly 18 years since the passage of the 1998 Gun Control Act firearm retailers, gun owners and state agencies have been operating under the same interpretation. Now, suddenly, without warning or any due process a single person with a clear political agenda decides to change the rules. All Massachusetts residents should be alarmed! GOAL is currently trying to decipher the enforcement letter, but with as much information that it contains, it is not very clear what it means. Statements such as the following make it very convoluted: “… a weapon is a Copy or Duplicate, for example, if the operating system and firing mechanism of the weapon are based on or otherwise substantially similar to one of the Enumerated Weapons.” Virtually every semi-automatic that utilizes a detachable magazine has the same operating system or firing mechanism, so what does this mean? The short answer is we simply don't know. Our best advice to firearm retailers for now is to err on the side of caution. These new rules may cover a lot more than just what we might think. GOAL is working with people and groups around the State and the nation to clarify these new interpretations and decide the best course of action. One thing is certain that this new interpretation is purely a political stunt and has nothing to do with public safety or real law. Jim Wallace Executive Director

Lock N Load with Bill Frady Ep 638