Podcast appearances and mentions of paul murdaugh

In this episode, you will hear excerpts from the most recent Alex Murdaugh status conference as we get closer to his retrial for the murders of Maggie and Paul. Impact unpacks the latest developments in the Murdaugh case, focusing on the discovery process, key testimonies, and legal strategies. Impact explores how the defense aims to discredit investigators and the implications of new evidence and tips. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day return Never pay full price again. Go to fromrebel.com — F-R-O-M-R-E-B-E-L dot com — home, baby, outdoor, and more, all at up to 70% off the brands you already love. #Murdaugh #legalstrategy, #investigation, #courtroom, #evidence, #witness estimony Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, "The Professor" joined Impact to analyze the recent developments as Alex Murdaugh moves toward the retrial of his overturned murder conviction. Murdaugh's defense attorney, Dick Harpootlian, admits he lied in court about Murdaugh passing a polygraph about the murders. The Professor, Matt Siembieda, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a law professor at Temple University, bringing legal insight and analysis to the discussion. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns #Murdaugh #polygraph #alexmurdaugh, #legalethics, #court , #defense strategies, #South Carolina law Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, we analyze the recent Murdaugh status conference, and Judge McCaslin's rulings. "The Professor", Matt Siembieta, joins Impact to discuss change of venue, prior tesimony and more decisions that were made about Murdaugh's upcoming retrial on double murder conviction. The Professor, Matt Siembieda, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a law professor at Temple University, bringing legal insight and analysis to the discussion. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, IOI delves into the latest developments in the Murdaugh case, including legal motions, venue transfers, and forensic evidence. The Professor, Matt Siembieda, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a law professor at Temple University, bringing legal insight and analysis to the discussion. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alex Murdaugh's defense is asking a judge to move the retrial out of the entire fourteenth judicial circuit, and it is the motion people argue about most. Tony Brueski takes listener questions with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.The filing calls the case among the most heavily publicized criminal prosecutions in South Carolina history. It asks the court to move the trial outside the circuit where Murdaugh's family operated for generations. His great-grandfather, grandfather and father served consecutively as the region's elected solicitor from 1920 to 2006. The circuit covers five counties: Allendale, Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton and Jasper.Judge Debra McCaslin has left it to the state and the defense to discuss possible locations and bring her options. Pretrial proceedings are running out of her home court in Lexington County.The listener objection is a fair one. Documentaries, books and streaming series about this family reached the whole country, not five counties. Moving the trial also means the community where Maggie and Paul Murdaugh lived and died does not get to sit in judgment.The counterargument holds that saturation is not uniform. Jurors drawn from counties the family ran for a century carry associations jurors elsewhere do not. That is the standard a venue motion is measured against.The defense's other pending filings include a demand for a fresh Brady and Giglio search with written certification inside thirty days, plus a bid for independent DNA testing. McCaslin has also ruled Murdaugh will appear before the new jury in street clothes and without restraints, over the state's objection.Murdaugh's convictions were overturned, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Two of the motions prosecutors just renewed in the Alex Murdaugh retrial are about what the jury will never hear. Tony Brueski takes the listener mail on them with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent who spent his career in behavioral analysis.The first would exclude evidence of third-party guilt. The state won that fight before the 2023 trial. Winning it again means Murdaugh's lawyers cannot stand up and point at another person as the killer without clearing a bar the court sets.The second would exclude any mention of a polygraph. That one has a history. In an October filing before the first trial, Murdaugh's own attorneys wrote that Curtis Eddie Smith failed a polygraph when he was questioned about whether he murdered Maggie and Paul. Smith has denied wrongdoing in the murders. Prosecutors argued then, and are arguing again, that juries give polygraphers more weight than the science supports.Prosecutors are also asking the court to admit Murdaugh's 2023 testimony at the retrial, seeking a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposing the defense's bid for outside DNA testing.The question listeners keep raising is worth taking seriously. An office that calls its evidence overwhelming is asking a judge to close two doors it already closed once. Prosecutors would say that is standard practice and that speculation is not evidence.Maggie Murdaugh and Paul Murdaugh were killed at the family's Colleton County property on June 7, 2021. Paul was twenty-two. Murdaugh has said he found their bodies.Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027, and is handling pretrial proceedings in Lexington County.With the verdicts vacated, Murdaugh stands as an untried defendant again, presumed innocent. Robin Dreeke takes the mailbag on what gets kept out and who it actually protects.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

Alex Murdaugh's lawyers want a signature from the prosecution, and the reason sits in a case most people have never heard of. Tony Brueski takes the listener mail with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.The defense filed a supplemental motion under Brady and Giglio. It asks the court to order prosecutors to search again for favorable and impeachment material generated since the 2023 trial, then certify in writing that the search was diligent and current. Thirty days.Now the case that gets a fraction of the coverage. Last spring a circuit court judge quashed the murder indictment in the Michael Colucci prosecution after concluding potentially exculpatory evidence had not been properly disclosed. Former SLED special agent David Owen, the lead investigator in the Moselle murders, faced renewed credibility scrutiny in connection with that matter. Owen retired in June 2024 after twenty-eight years of service.At Murdaugh's first trial, Owen acknowledged under cross-examination that SLED waited roughly three months to search the family's Almeda property, even though investigators later theorized Murdaugh may have taken weapons or evidence there. Asked whether that was an opportunity missed, he answered that it probably was.The current motion names neither Owen nor anyone else. It asks the state to repeat the entire discovery process against everything that has happened since.Prosecutors have not yet filed a response. Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027, with pretrial proceedings in Lexington County.Maggie Murdaugh and Paul Murdaugh were killed at the family's Colleton County hunting property on June 7, 2021.Murdaugh's convictions were overturned by the South Carolina Supreme Court, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent. He has denied the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh throughout.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

The South Carolina Supreme Court did not only fault the clerk of court when it threw out Alex Murdaugh's convictions. The justices also flagged how much of the 2023 trial was spent on the money he stole. Tony Brueski takes your questions on what that means for the retrial with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.Prosecutors spent close to two weeks of the first trial on Murdaugh's financial crimes. That evidence was not tied to the murder charges directly. It was offered to establish motive: his thefts were about to be exposed, and the state argued the killings bought him sympathy and time.Judge Debra McCaslin now decides how much of that comes in the second time. She has told the attorneys she knows nothing about the first trial and wants them complete when they explain it to her.The state's newest filings run the other direction. Prosecutors moved to admit Murdaugh's own 2023 testimony at the retrial, renewed motions to exclude polygraph evidence and third-party guilt, requested a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposed the defense's push for independent DNA analysis.Listeners are asking a sharp question about the arithmetic. If the financial evidence gets trimmed and the third-party door stays shut, what is the state walking into April 2027 with, and is it enough for twelve people who have never heard any of this.Murdaugh has denied the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh since 2021. His convictions were vacated, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent. He pleaded guilty to dozens of financial crimes and remains in prison on those sentences.Robin Dreeke handles the mail on motive, money, and what a jury actually does with a man's finances.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

Eight years after Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were shot to death, there's still unidentified male DNA sitting under Maggie's fingernails, and the prosecutors preparing to retry Alex Murdaugh for their murders are fighting to keep an independent lab away from it. SLED tested it once, said it wasn't a family member, and moved on. Nobody ever tried to find out whose it actually was. The defense wants the same forensic genealogy lab that identified Bryan Kohberger in Idaho to finish what SLED started before the remaining sample is gone. The state wants to test it themselves first, with the same method that already failed once, in a process the defense says risks using up the evidence for good.  If the prosecution is as confident as they sound that this DNA is meaningless, an outside confirmation should be the easiest yes of their case. Instead they're fighting it in court. That tells you something.  It's happening alongside another loss for the defense. On August 5th, a federal judge dismissed Alex Murdaugh's lawsuit against former clerk of court Becky Hill, a case built specifically to force her under oath and get her personal records into evidence before the retrial. Those records were the defense's best shot at tracing the anonymous email that got a juror pulled from deliberations during the original murder trial, and at making the investigators who cleared Hill of tampering explain that decision on the record.  Both fights point the same direction, toward a retrial set for April 5th, 2027, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty and Alex Murdaugh's team refusing to take a deal. The judge assigned to the retrial has already pressed prosecutors on how long independent testing would take, a sign this fight over the DNA isn't getting resolved quietly before April. Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SouthCarolina #ColdCaseDNA 

Buster Murdaugh's defamation lawsuit against Netflix targets his alleged false portrayal in the documentary series Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal, claiming the program wrongly linked him to the 2015 death of his classmate Stephen Smith. That suit is in state court. A separate federal suit against Warner Bros. was settled. In this episode, Matt and Seton attended the latest hearing in the case, and they take you into the courtroom to hear the Netflix, Gannett, and Buster Murdaugh legal teams argue their case. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns #Murdaugh #BusterMurdaugh #medialaw #courtroom #defamation #netflix Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, we revisit the Rose Petal Murder case with Troy Styles of Blunt Force Media to discuss significant new developments that could reshape the case. In February 2025, after brief deliberations, a Greenville County jury convicted Zachary Hughes of the October 2021 murder of Christina Parcell. Hughes was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The case has now been remanded to the circuit court, where a judge will determine whether newly discovered evidence, following the victim's fiancé's recent guilty plea, warrants a new trial. Hughes' direct appeal has been placed on hold pending that decision. One of the issues raised on appeal is Hughes' claim that he was not permitted to present a complete defense at trial. Hughes has maintained that he killed Parcell to protect her minor daughter from what he believed was ongoing sexual abuse.  Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns #Legal case, #courtroom performance, #conspiracy, #murder trial, # legal analysis, Z#achary Hughes, Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Investigative journalist Mandy Matney is best known for doggedly pursuing and unraveling Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes against his 100-year-old family law firm and its clients in the low country of South Carolina. Mandy's coverage of and in-depth investigation into Murdaugh's legal dynasty family began in 2019, when a boat crash involving 19-year-old Paul Murdaugh resulted in the death of 19 -year-old Mallory Beach. Mandy's relentless reporting continued through 2021 with the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh and extensive trial of former attorney Alex Murdaugh, who was eventually found guilty of their murders. However, in 2026 he was granted a new trial.    Mandy told the story via the hugely successful "Murdaugh Murders Podcast" which led to the Hulu miniseries "Murdaugh: Death in the Family", on which Mandy served as executive producer.     On 7/13/26, Judge R. Keith Kelly, Hampton County, SC, issued a contempt order against Mandy and ordered her to pay $176,500 in attorneys' fees and a fine for "wilfully" failing to appear for a deposition on March 27 2026 in the case of Beach v Parker, et al, in which she is a non-party. Of note is that the deposition did go ahead 11 days later.    In this episode, Laura and Mandy carefully examine the timeline of events, the courtroom proceedings and the wider implications-not only for Mandy, but for investigative reporting more broadly. Laura also shares her analysis of patterns of  behaviour of those who stalk and harass and how common it is for courts not to understand motivation, threats and the ‘dripping tap' power and control related intimidation tactics used by men against women.    #MandyMatney #Murdaugh #PressFreedom #InvestigativeJournalism #CrimeAnalyst #Expert #Stalking #Fixation #Obsession #Analysis #Behaviour #TrueCrime #Podcast #Crime      More from Mandy Matney and LunaShark  Support Mandy directly: Go Fund Me  LunaShark  LunaShark Premium  Links:  Youtube https://youtube.com/channel/UC6t_kdvrDw2p1F79IBnnNWQ  Instagram https://www.instagram.com/truesunlightpod  Facebook https://www.facebook.com/109188244940222  Tiktok https://tiktok.com/@lunasharkmedia    Clip   https://www.youtube.com/live/0wmHESgSHSA?si=ASJBdEm_VAvkqGKI     Sources  https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Matney-Contempt-Order-13July2026.pdf   S.C. Judge Finds Murdaugh Podcaster in Contempt of Court - FITSNews  https://www.foxnews.com/us/judge-unloads-176k-penalty-murdaugh-podcaster-mandy-matney-finding-subpoena-defiance  https://www.youtube.com/live/0wmHESgSHSA?si=slGeBV12-u6ZeV8M  www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article277634293.html  https://qcnerve.com/james-seidel-carolina-fish-market/  TSP #156 [Part One] - A Dark Day At The House Of True Sunlight After $176,500 Contempt Sanction TSP #156 [Part Two] - Reasonable Fear of an Unreasonable Justice System: More on Mandy's $176,500 Punishment Without Process  TSP #155 [Part One] - Judge McCaslin Takes the Wheel: Murdaugh Retrial Hearing Recap  TSP #155 [Part Two] - Pink in the Courtroom: Why Greg Parker Apparently Fears Free Speech      Thank You to Crime Analyst Sponsors Who Make the Show Possible. Support The Show Through the Sponsors:  Upgrade your everyday. Go to Quince.com/CRIMEANALYST for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too.  Amplify your summer look with Thrive Causemetics. Go to thrivecausemetics.com/ANALYSTS for an exclusive offer of 20% off your first order.   Support Crime Analyst  If you value these conversations, please follow, rate, and review Crime Analyst wherever you listen to podcasts. Sharing episodes helps us educate more people about coercive control, stalking, domestic abuse and homicide prevention.  For exclusive episodes, live events and behind-the-scenes content, join the Crime Analyst Squad on Patreon.    Laura's Resources and Training information: www.dashriskchecklist.com    www.thelaurarichards.com     Crime Analyst YouTube, Socials and Website     YouTube @crimeanalyst      Facebook Crime Analyst Podcast     Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999     Threads @crimeanalyst     X @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards999      TikTok @crimeanalystpod     Website www.crime-analyst.com      Leave a 5* Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Nell'episodio di oggi ti raccontiamo i casi di Stephen Smith, Gloria Satterfield, Maggie e Paul Murdaugh e i terribili omicidi del Burger Chef. Trovi tutte le fonti che abbiamo consultato nella sezione dedicata del nostro ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠sito⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

In this episode of Impact of Influence, The Professor joins Matt Harris and Seton Tucker to examine a recent contempt of court ruling involving journalist Mandy Matney. The court imposed significant monetary sanctions after finding Matney in contempt, and we break down the judge's order, the court's reasoning, and what could happen next as the legal process continues. Topics discussed include: The legal standards for contempt of court and the sanctions that may be imposed. The importance of complying with court orders and subpoenas. The potential consequences for journalists and other parties who fail to follow court directives. The court's analysis of Mandy Matney's arguments and defenses. What this ruling could mean moving forward and the possible next steps in the case. The Professor, Matt Siembieda, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a law professor at Temple University, bringing legal insight and analysis to the discussion. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Matt Siembieda, the Professor, explains what happened in the recent Murdaugh status conference. He explores courtroom dynamics, trial logistics, and the strategic moves in this high-profile case. Matt Siembieda, is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alex Murdaugh's original conviction leaned heavily on one piece of physical evidence: a white T-shirt investigators said proved he was standing close enough to shoot Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. New defense filings ahead of his retrial argue that story was built on a report that didn't originally say what jurors were told it said. According to court documents, blood-spatter analyst Tom Bevel's first write-up concluded the marks on the shirt were transfer stains, consistent with someone touching a bloody scene, not spatter from a gunshot. Defense attorneys say that conclusion shifted only after Bevel adjusted the shirt's colors in Photoshop, and the state chose never to call him to the stand to explain the change. It's one piece of a broader challenge the defense is mounting alongside a push to have unknown male DNA, pulled from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails, sent to the forensic lab Othram for genealogy testing the same technology used to identify Bryan Kohberger. Attorneys Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin have also raised questions about first-responder accounts that reportedly don't match up, and tips the defense says were forwarded to SLED without any confirmation of follow-up. The retrial is set for April 5, 2027 in front of a judge who has already made clear she won't be granting continuances, while Attorney General Alan Wilson keeps the death penalty on the table. This episode walks through the Bevel report in detail, lays the timeline against the David Camm case the defense is citing, and asks the question prosecutors will have to answer: if the shirt evidence changed once, what else might not hold up under a second look. The next hearing is set for August 14, and the defense has signaled this shirt fight is only getting started. Judge for yourself. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #MurdaughRetrial #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #TomBevel #BloodSpatterAnalysis #WhiteTShirt #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolina #DavidCamm 

Alex Murdaugh's defense told a South Carolina judge that the accounts from first responders who reached the Moselle property the night Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were killed don't agree with each other. Attorney Dick Harpootlian raised the discrepancy directly with Judge Debra McCaslin at a hearing that also set the retrial date for April 5, 2027. Harpootlian told the court the defense has received tips from people claiming to have information about who else may have been at the property, forwarded those tips to SLED, and still doesn't know whether investigators followed up on any of them. The hearing wasn't just about witnesses. The defense also pushed to have unknown male DNA, found under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails and never fully analyzed, sent to Othram, the forensic genealogy lab behind the identification of Bryan Kohberger. Attorney Jim Griffin argued the technology required to trace that DNA wasn't available when SLED first collected it and exists now. Prosecutors, for their part, say the state is ready to try the case again, and Attorney General Alan Wilson hasn't taken the death penalty off the table for a man already serving multiple life sentences. Judge McCaslin has made her position on delays clear, and the next hearing is already locked in for August 14. This episode breaks down the first-responder discrepancies motion, the DNA motion, and the wrongful-conviction case the defense keeps invoking as a warning about what happens when forensic evidence isn't fully tested. Both sides are fighting over what jurors will and won't hear, and the outcome could shape the entire retrial before it even starts. This walks through every motion on the docket, who filed it, and what each side is banking on to win. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #MurdaughRetrial #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #DickHarpootlian #Moselle #FirstResponders #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurdaughTrial #DebraMcCaslin 

Journalist Mandy Matney, who has closely covered the Beach v. Parker's “outrage” lawsuit, became part of the legal battle when attorneys for Parker's Corporation subpoenaed her for a deposition.Matney did not appear at the location specified in the subpoena, citing safety concerns that she raised shortly before the deposition was scheduled to begin. According to court filings and testimony, Matney believed the designated location was unsafe. The parties were unable to agree on an alternative location, resulting in the deposition not taking place.Following her failure to appear, Parker's attorneys filed a motion to compel her deposition and later sought to have her held in contempt of court. The court was asked to determine whether Matney's reasons for not attending were legally justified and whether her actions warranted sanctions or other consequences. The " professor", Matt Siembieda, joins Impact to shed light on this battle. Matt Siembieda, is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alex Murdaugh's murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to let the retrial drag or drift. The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, and McCaslin is being described as firmly in control of the courtroom, with little patience for unnecessary delays or excuses. The case will once again revisit the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh at the family's hunting estate in June 2021, with prosecutors expected to return to the core theory that Murdaugh murdered his wife and son as his financial crimes were closing in around him. Murdaugh continues to maintain his innocence, while his defense team argues someone else committed the murders and that the original investigation was flawed.The retrial is also shaping up to be different from the first trial because the defense is expected to push new evidence, new forensic testing, and renewed attacks on the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division's handling of the crime scene. Anne Emerson, who covered the original trial and now hosts a true-crime podcast, said defense attorney Dick Harpootlian indicated there is new evidence the defense wants to present, including a major focus on DNA recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails. The defense wants that material tested with newer forensic technology that was not available when the killings happened in 2021, hoping it could support a third-party suspect argument. At the same time, questions about whether the crime scene was clean, staged, altered, or poorly processed are expected to become another major battleground, giving the defense a path to attack the state's case while prosecutors try to preserve the circumstantial evidence that originally convinced a jury to convict Murdaugh.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New judge vows strict schedule as Murdaugh case returns amid jury tampering fallout

Alex Murdaugh's murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to let the retrial drag or drift. The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, and McCaslin is being described as firmly in control of the courtroom, with little patience for unnecessary delays or excuses. The case will once again revisit the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh at the family's hunting estate in June 2021, with prosecutors expected to return to the core theory that Murdaugh murdered his wife and son as his financial crimes were closing in around him. Murdaugh continues to maintain his innocence, while his defense team argues someone else committed the murders and that the original investigation was flawed.The retrial is also shaping up to be different from the first trial because the defense is expected to push new evidence, new forensic testing, and renewed attacks on the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division's handling of the crime scene. Anne Emerson, who covered the original trial and now hosts a true-crime podcast, said defense attorney Dick Harpootlian indicated there is new evidence the defense wants to present, including a major focus on DNA recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails. The defense wants that material tested with newer forensic technology that was not available when the killings happened in 2021, hoping it could support a third-party suspect argument. At the same time, questions about whether the crime scene was clean, staged, altered, or poorly processed are expected to become another major battleground, giving the defense a path to attack the state's case while prosecutors try to preserve the circumstantial evidence that originally convinced a jury to convict Murdaugh.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New judge vows strict schedule as Murdaugh case returns amid jury tampering falloutBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Alex Murdaugh's murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to let the retrial drag or drift. The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, and McCaslin is being described as firmly in control of the courtroom, with little patience for unnecessary delays or excuses. The case will once again revisit the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh at the family's hunting estate in June 2021, with prosecutors expected to return to the core theory that Murdaugh murdered his wife and son as his financial crimes were closing in around him. Murdaugh continues to maintain his innocence, while his defense team argues someone else committed the murders and that the original investigation was flawed.The retrial is also shaping up to be different from the first trial because the defense is expected to push new evidence, new forensic testing, and renewed attacks on the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division's handling of the crime scene. Anne Emerson, who covered the original trial and now hosts a true-crime podcast, said defense attorney Dick Harpootlian indicated there is new evidence the defense wants to present, including a major focus on DNA recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails. The defense wants that material tested with newer forensic technology that was not available when the killings happened in 2021, hoping it could support a third-party suspect argument. At the same time, questions about whether the crime scene was clean, staged, altered, or poorly processed are expected to become another major battleground, giving the defense a path to attack the state's case while prosecutors try to preserve the circumstantial evidence that originally convinced a jury to convict Murdaugh.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New judge vows strict schedule as Murdaugh case returns amid jury tampering falloutBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dick Harpootlian arrived at Alex Murdaugh's first retrial hearing carrying transcripts of interviews with the first people to arrive at Moselle after Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were found dead. What's in those transcripts, according to Harpootlian: differing accounts that suggest other individuals were present at the property that night. Accounts that don't align. And a defense team that is now asking questions about whether every lead generated by the original investigation was actually pursued.The hearing before Judge Debra McCaslin produced a trial date — April 5, 2027 — and a series of pretrial fights that signal how different this retrial is going to be. The defense has eight new expert witnesses. They want to send DNA recovered from under Maggie's fingernails to the same forensic lab that worked the Bryan Kohberger case. They're pushing to move the trial out of the entire 14th Judicial Circuit. And they've publicly stated they have a strategy to counter the kennel video — the single piece of evidence that shattered Murdaugh's alibi the first time.The prosecution says the state is ready. The death penalty is on the table. And the judge has made one thing clear: no continuances. Both sides agreed to April — but the defense warned that DNA analysis could take six months. The next pretrial hearing is August 14, where the judge will rule on the DNA testing motion.End Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitterhttps://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #Moselle #FirstResponder #MurdaughHearing #DickHarpootlian #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime

The next chapter in the Alex Murdaugh saga has begun. Alex Murdaugh returned to a Lexington courtroom as the judge set the stage for his upcoming murder retrial, establishing key deadlines and revealing what's next in one of the most closely watched true crime cases in America. In this episode of Impact of Influence, we take you inside the hearing, and give you our first takes on what happened, why it matters, and what it could mean for both the prosecution and the defense as the countdown to retrial begins. Could these early courtroom decisions shape the outcome of the case? We break down the biggest moments and what to watch for in the months ahead. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors, including Quince. Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns code word Impact Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Supreme Court Reversal: Can They Prove Murdaugh Guilty Again? Alex Murdaugh is headed back to court after South Carolina's Supreme Court overturned his double-murder convictions over improper jury influence. Today's hearing set an April 5, 2027 retrial date while defense attorneys raised major issues involving DNA testing, venue, discovery, shackles, and courtroom fairness. Retired NYPD Sgt. Bill Cannon breaks down what caused the reversal—and whether the State can prove the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh all over again. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ryan Kelly left SLED after more than a decade and took a job running internal affairs at the Charleston County Sheriff's Office. He was the person responsible for investigating misconduct allegations against other officers. On June 8, 2026, the sheriff fired him for harassment, unbecoming conduct, and improper procedures. The man who policed the police could not survive scrutiny of his own conduct.At SLED, Kelly was the lead investigator on Alex Murdaugh's staged roadside shooting — the September 2021 incident prosecutors used at trial to argue Murdaugh had a pattern of deception following the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul. Kelly testified as one of the prosecution's final witnesses, walking the jury through how Murdaugh arranged for Curtis Smith to shoot him so Buster could collect on a life insurance policy.Kelly's termination adds to a growing credibility problem for the original prosecution. SLED's lead murder investigator, David Owen, admitted at trial that he gave inaccurate testimony to the grand jury about blood evidence. Court clerk Becky Hill pleaded guilty to perjury and obstruction of justice. The South Carolina Supreme Court overturned Murdaugh's convictions and ordered a new trial. The first retrial hearing is June 29.Defense attorney Dick Harpootlian told the Post and Courier his team needs to investigate developments that have happened since the original trial. Every name that falls from the prosecution's witness list weakens the foundation the state built the first time around. Maggie and Paul Murdaugh deserve a case that holds up. Whether this prosecution can deliver one is the question heading into the courtroom.Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #RyanKelly #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #DickHarpootlian #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

The retrial of Alex Murdaugh for the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh is being shaped right now — in press conferences, in federal court filings, and in strategy signals neither side would normally make public. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta reads all of it through a lens most commentators don't have.On the defense side: a stated plan for the kennel video, unknown male DNA under Maggie's fingernails that was never submitted to CODIS, new forensic cell phone experts, eight thousand pages of locked testimony from the first trial, and a federal lawsuit against Becky Hill that opens up sworn interviews the criminal case never allowed. The defense is asking whether Hill acted alone — and building the tools to find out.On the prosecution side: the Supreme Court gutted the financial crimes presentation that made the first conviction feel like a formality. Creighton Waters has to prove motive efficiently and win a circumstantial case without the emotional narrative doing the heavy lifting. No weapon. No confession. No DNA. The death penalty is on the table for the first time. And if Alex takes the stand again, prosecutors can use everything he said the first time against him. Bob Motta on the full picture. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Bob Motta.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The kennel video was the prosecution's kill shot the first time. Paul Murdaugh's phone captured his father's voice at the Moselle property minutes before two people were shot to death. Alex denied being there. Witnesses proved he was. He took the stand and admitted the lie. The jury didn't need long after that.Now Dick Harpootlian is saying publicly that his team has a strategy for it. He won't say what, but the fact that he's signaling confidence on national television tells you the defense thinks they can neutralize the one exhibit that sank their client. They're also hiring new forensic cell phone experts to pick apart the prosecution's timeline and challenging whether anyone actually knows when the killings happened relative to Alex's movements.Jim Griffin added another layer — unknown male DNA under Maggie's fingernails that was collected during the investigation and never submitted to the national crime database. That's evidence from the murder victim herself that nobody followed up on. The defense wants it run through CODIS. If it comes back with a match, everything about this retrial changes. Bob Motta on what the defense is building. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Bob Motta.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #MurdaughRetrial #KennelVideo #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #CODIS #TrueCrime

The kennel video convicted Alex Murdaugh the first time. Audio of his voice at the Moselle property minutes before Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were found shot to death. Witnesses identified him. He took the stand and admitted he lied to investigators about being there. Three-hour deliberation. Guilty on all counts.Dick Harpootlian just told the country his defense team has a strategy to counter that video at retrial. He did not reveal details, but the signal alone tells you the defense is not planning to concede the prosecution's strongest piece of evidence. His team is also bringing in new forensic cell phone experts to challenge the timeline — when Alex arrived, how long he was there, what Maggie's phone data actually shows.Meanwhile, Jim Griffin pointed to unknown male DNA found under Maggie's fingernails that was never submitted to CODIS. Evidence from the person who was fatally shot, recovered during the investigation, and never checked against the national database. The defense wants a court order to run it. Add in eight thousand pages of locked first-trial testimony, a looming venue change fight, and a federal lawsuit against Becky Hill, and the defense is building something the prosecution has never had to face before. Bob Motta on what it all means. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Bob Motta.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #MurdaughRetrial #KennelVideo #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #CODIS #TrueCrime

For this special Father's Day episode we hear from Seton's father, "the Professor" Matt Siembieda. Matt Siembieda is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. He was also involved in the civil rights movement and he gives us his firsthand account of his involvement. This interview with the Professor originally appeared on The Wicked South Podcast with Michael Dewitt. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors, including Quince. Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns code word Impact Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For two decades, Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson watched Alex Murdaugh operate through other people. Curtis Eddie Smith cashed checks. Associates carried messages. Relationships provided cover. Deniability was built into every arrangement. Alex Murdaugh, according to the woman who knew the household better than anyone outside the family, never did anything alone. So when the defense walks into the retrial claiming “other suspects” committed the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh, Blanca doesn't flinch. She has her own theory about other people — and it doesn't point away from Alex.Blanca believes Alex had a Plan A that involved someone else being at Moselle the night of the killings. When that arrangement fell apart, she says he executed it himself and constructed a story around the boat crash families. Her basis is twenty years of watching how this man solved problems: never with his own hands when someone else's would do. She confronts the defense's third-party strategy head-on and asks the question that should follow the defense into every courtroom session: if he never did anything alone before, why would this be the exception?Attorney Eric Bland adds the retrial dimension. He built the financial crimes case the prosecution leaned on as motive. The Supreme Court ordered that evidence sharply limited. Bland addresses what survives into the second trial, whether the prosecution overplayed what he helped expose, and what it means that the defense now has subpoena power for the first time. He predicts a high likelihood of reconviction but acknowledges a real chance of a hung jury — and identifies who the holdout juror is and what gets them there. The AG is floating the death penalty. Bland explains what that changes strategically and whether the defense's claim of vindictive prosecution has legal legs.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #EricBland #CurtisSmith #Moselle #MaggieMurdaugh #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina

The woman now overseeing Alex Murdaugh's retrial reportedly rented office space from his defense attorney and named him under oath as a lawyer who shaped her career. Judge Debra McCaslin was handed exclusive jurisdiction over every Murdaugh proceeding by the South Carolina Supreme Court — the same court that reversed his murder convictions and ordered a new trial in the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Nobody has filed a motion to remove her.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines whether McCaslin's reported connection to Dick Harpootlian is a genuine problem or a headline, what her reportedly tough sentencing record tells us about how she'll run this courtroom, and the ruling that could matter more than any testimony. The Supreme Court said the first trial's financial crimes evidence went too far. McCaslin decides how far is too far the second time. That decision shapes what the next jury sees, what it never hears, and whether prosecutors can build a murder case without the motive theory they leaned on the first time.Attorney Eric Bland adds the perspective nobody else can. He built the financial fraud case. He represented the Satterfield family and watched his clients testify about what Murdaugh did to their lives. The Supreme Court said some of that testimony had “zero probative value.” Bland confronts what that language means for the people it was taken from. He also responds to Harpootlian's six-hundred-thousand-dollar civil rights lawsuit against Becky Hill, which claims any recovered money goes to Murdaugh's financial crime victims. Bland represents those victims — and his take on whether that promise carries weight lands hard.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #DebraMcCaslin #MurdaughCase #DickHarpootlian #EricBland #EricFaddis #BeckyHill #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina

The woman now controlling every motion, every evidentiary fight, and the retrial itself in the Alex Murdaugh double murder case once shared an office with the man defending him. Judge Debra McCaslin reportedly rented space from Dick Harpootlian — Murdaugh's lead attorney — when both were in private practice. They worked a class-action together. And in a separate murder case where Harpootlian represented the defendant, McCaslin was the judge who reportedly denied the state's request to revoke bond.The South Carolina Supreme Court handed McCaslin exclusive jurisdiction after reversing Murdaugh's convictions for the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. The reversal came after findings that former court clerk Becky Hill's misconduct tainted the original jury. Now the question isn't just whether Murdaugh is guilty — it's whether the system running his retrial can survive its own history.Eric Faddis has been on both sides of courtrooms where a judge's connection to counsel shaped everything. He walks through what warmth toward one lawyer actually looks like in practice — in rulings, in tone, in the calls that could go either way. Then he digs into the ruling that may matter more than any witness: the first jury heard hours of financial crimes testimony. The Supreme Court said that was excessive. McCaslin now draws the line on what the next jury hears. That single decision could determine whether prosecutors can rebuild the motive that carried the first conviction — or whether they walk into round two without their strongest weapon.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #DebraMcCaslin #DickHarpootlian #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SouthCarolina

Years before the South Carolina Supreme Court handed her the most closely watched murder retrial in the state's history, Judge Debra McCaslin stood before legislators and named the lawyers who left a mark on her career. One of them was Dick Harpootlian — the man who will stand at Alex Murdaugh's side when his double murder case goes back to trial for the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.The connection runs deeper than a compliment on the record. McCaslin reportedly rented office space from Harpootlian when she was building her practice. They collaborated on a class-action involving video poker litigation. She sat as judge in a separate murder case where Harpootlian defended the accused — and when prosecutors sought to hold his client before trial, she reportedly refused. Every layer of this history was available the moment her name was announced. And yet both sides looked at the same facts and said nothing.Eric Faddis has prosecuted felonies and defended against them. He breaks down what the Harpootlian connection means inside a courtroom — where a judge's warmth toward one attorney can show up in sustained objections, evidentiary rulings, or simply the tone that shapes how a jury reads the room. Then he gets to the decision that could rewrite this retrial before it starts: the Supreme Court ruled that twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony was excessive and that any retrial must sharply limit it. McCaslin alone decides where the line falls. If prosecutors lose their motive backbone, the evidence that remains may not carry the weight the first jury felt.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #DebraMcCaslin #DickHarpootlian #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SouthCarolina

In this episode, we explore the sentencing of Rex Heuermann, the Gilgo Beach serial killer. Part of this episode is a past Impact episode that dealt with Heuermann's connection to South Carolina. We also reflect on a past interview with FBI profiler Ann Burgess. Burgess was the inspiration for the character Dr. Wendy Carr on the Netflix series Mindhunter. She helped the FBI develop modern psychological profiling for serial killers. You can hear that full episode from the August 28, 2023, Impact of Influence podcast titled The Mindhunter Who Studied Charlotte Strangler Speaks Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors, including Quince. Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns code word Impact #GilgoBeach, #RexHeuermann, #criminalprofiling, #FBI, #serialkillers, #criminalpsychology Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Everyone covering the Alex Murdaugh retrial is fixated on one half of Judge Debra McCaslin's story — her reported history with defense attorney Dick Harpootlian. This episode digs into the other half, and it's the half that should worry the defense.Before the South Carolina Supreme Court handed McCaslin exclusive control of the Murdaugh case — the motions, the evidentiary fights, and the retrial over the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh — she built a record on the bench described as tough, fair, and impossible to rattle. She has reportedly handed down life sentences in murder cases and sided with law enforcement when defense lawyers alleged misconduct. For a defendant whose entire path to a new trial ran through claims that the system broke, that resume cuts in a very specific direction.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines both faces of this appointment with the eye of someone who has argued in front of judges exactly like her. He weighs the connection everyone's talking about — McCaslin reportedly naming Harpootlian as a lawyer who shaped her career, and once renting office space from him — against the record suggesting she gives defendants nothing they haven't earned. He explains what real judicial favoritism looks like from the inside, why it rarely resembles what people imagine, and how a judge with friendly history sometimes overcorrects against the lawyer she knows.Then the stakes: McCaslin controls how much of Murdaugh's financial-crimes evidence the next jury hears, after the Supreme Court ruled the first trial went miles too far. Faddis breaks down what the State must prove without that crutch — and which side should genuinely fear this judge.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #DickHarpootlian #SouthCarolina #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh

In this episode, Impact discusses the latest updates on the Murdaugh retrial. This includes the appointment of a new judge and the potential for a change of venue in the case. The " professor", Matt Siembieda, joins Impact to shed light on the legal strategies and potential outcomes involving the Beach V Parker Outrage Case. #Murdaughcase, #legalmotions, #venuechange, #evidencedisclosure, #socialmediainfluence, #legalanalysis, #courtroomstrategy, #SouthCarolinalaw Matt Siembieda, is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The South Carolina Supreme Court's unanimous reversal of Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions reset the legal record — and with it, the evidentiary question that a second jury will have to answer without twelve hours of financial crimes testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer approaches that question as a clean-slate exercise: strip the name from the file and evaluate what the physical evidence actually supports.Two victims were shot at the dog kennels on a remote hunting property. Two distinct firearms were used — a shotgun and a rifle. Neither weapon has been recovered. No blood was found on the defendant. The defense has consistently argued that no single shooter could have executed the crime as the state described it. Paul Murdaugh's prior legal entanglements — including a boating incident that resulted in a young woman's death — generated a documented set of unresolved grievances that investigators never fully pursued. Coffindaffer evaluates the two-weapon theory, examines where the physical scene points absent the financial motive framework, and assesses whether the prosecution's case survives substantive scrutiny under the evidentiary limitations the Supreme Court has imposed for retrial.The human dimension of the reversal is addressed through an exclusive interview with Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson — the Murdaugh family's housekeeper of twenty years and a key prosecution witness at the original trial. Simpson's testimony included her recollection of the shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the morning of June 7th, 2021, a wet towel found by the shower the following day, and her observations of Maggie Murdaugh's emotional state as Alex's financial situation deteriorated. The jury that heard her testimony convicted in under three hours.Upon learning of the Supreme Court's reversal, Simpson drove directly to Maggie Murdaugh's gravesite. In her first interview since the ruling, she addresses whether she remains the same witness she was in 2023, what Becky Hill's conduct cost the people closest to the case, and whether three years of reflection have altered what she is prepared to testify to at a second trial. The retrial's outcome may depend significantly on whether witnesses like Simpson present more forcefully under fair conditions than they did under compromised ones.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #JenniferCoffindaffe

Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson spent twenty years inside the Murdaugh household. She fixed Alex's collar the morning of June 7th, 2021. She remembered the shirt. She found the wet towel by the shower the next day. She was the person Maggie cried to when Alex's finances were collapsing and nobody would explain why. She told all of it to a jury that convicted him in three hours. Then the Supreme Court erased the convictions — and Blanca drove straight to Maggie's grave without calling anyone first.In her first interview since the reversal, Blanca addresses the question that matters most heading into a retrial: is she the same witness she was in 2023? Three years of processing what she saw inside that family, what she knew before the killings, and what she's learned since — has any of it changed what she's prepared to say under oath? She talks about what she said to Maggie at the gravesite. Whether respecting the court's decision and believing Alex is guilty can exist in the same person. And what Becky Hill — a clerk writing a book about the trial while it was still happening — took from the people who loved Maggie and Paul.The investigative question runs parallel. Jennifer Coffindaffer approaches the Murdaugh case as a clean-slate thought experiment. Strip the name off the file. Two people shot at the dog kennels on a remote hunting property. Two different firearms — a shotgun and a rifle — neither recovered. No blood on the defendant. The defense has long argued no single shooter could have done it the way the state described. Paul Murdaugh's earlier legal troubles — including a boat crash that killed a young woman — left a trail of unresolved grudges.Coffindaffer examines where a scene like this points when you come at it with fresh eyes, what the two-weapon theory actually means for the prosecution, and whether the murder case the state built can survive scrutiny without the financial crimes testimony that carried it the first time. The conviction is gone. The question of who killed Maggie and Paul is open again. These two conversations are the starting point.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

In this episode, Zach Merritt, a seasoned defense attorney, discusses the intricacies of South Carolina's stand your ground law, recent case examples, and legal strategies. Gain insights into self-defense laws, courtroom tactics, and the impact of legal decisions on real cases. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day return #Self-defense law, Stand your ground, South Carolina legal cases, Criminal defense, Legal strategy, Courtroom tactics, Civil and criminal law, Case analysis, Law education Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Everyone has an opinion about Alex Murdaugh's overturned conviction. Legal analysts are breaking down the ruling. Defense attorneys are celebrating on morning shows. Prosecutors are promising a retrial. But nobody is asking the question that matters most to the people closest to Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson isn't a legal analyst. She's the woman who cooked Maggie's last meal. Who fixed Alex's collar that morning and remembered the shirt when investigators didn't think to ask. Who found the wet towel and the khaki pants by the shower and washed them before she understood what she was looking at. She spent twenty years inside that house. She knows what normal looked like — and she knows exactly what didn't look normal the morning after.When the Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling, Blanca drove to Maggie's gravesite and sat alone. She didn't call anyone. She didn't make a statement. She went to her friend. That instinct tells you everything about where Blanca lives in this story — not in the legal arguments, not in the appeals process, but in the human cost of a system that broke at the worst possible moment.In this interview, Blanca talks about the emotional weight of the reversal. Whether she can respect the court and still believe in her own truth. What Becky Hill's actions cost the people who loved Maggie and Paul. And what it means to prepare herself to testify again.Part 1 of a three-part True Crime Today exclusive.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughOverturned #PaulMurdaugh #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers

Here's a fact in the Alex Murdaugh case that never stops being strange: the two guns used to kill Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were never recovered. Not the shotgun. Not the rifle. Two weapons, two victims at the family's dog kennels, and to this day neither one has been found. With the South Carolina Supreme Court having overturned Murdaugh's convictions and ordered a new trial, every piece of physical evidence is about to get a second look — and the missing weapons are near the top of the list.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski for the evidence-level conversation. The two guns don't match each other, and they don't match in origin: the rifle that killed Maggie reportedly traces back to a Murdaugh family firearm, while the shotgun that killed Paul has been tied to nothing on that property at all. The defense built a theory around the physics of it — that whoever fired the first weapon at close range couldn't have calmly turned and used the second. And there was no blood on Alex.Coffindaffer walks through what missing weapons do to a case, how investigators trace a gun's origin, and what it means when one weapon points inward and the other points nowhere. This is the segment for listeners who want the forensics, not the soap opera.A wife and a son were killed at the kennels years ago. The guns are still gone, and now a new trial is coming. Listen for what the evidence can still prove.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags: #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #TrueCrime #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SouthCarolina #Forensics #TrueCrimeCommunity #Lowcountry #Evidence

It's easy to forget, with all the legal noise, that this case has two victims with names: Maggie Murdaugh and her son Paul. They were killed at the family's dog kennels in June of 2021, and for the people who've followed this story closely, the news that Alex Murdaugh's convictions were overturned landed hard — because it means the question of who answers for their deaths is open all over again.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sits down with Tony Brueski to talk about where this leaves the people who loved Maggie and Paul. We talk honestly about what the Supreme Court actually decided — that a court clerk's conduct tainted the trial — and what it doesn't mean. Murdaugh hasn't been declared innocent. He's still in prison for stealing from his own clients. But a jury's verdict on the murders has been erased, and a new trial is coming.We talk about what a retrial asks of a family that already sat through six weeks of testimony once. About the long shadow this case has cast over a small South Carolina community. And about the hard truth that justice delayed, reopened, and relitigated takes a real toll on the people who just want it to be over.This one is for everyone who's kept Maggie and Paul in mind through all of it. They were a mother and a son. Whatever the courts decide next, they deserve to be remembered as more than the headline. Come sit with us.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags: #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul #TrueCrimeCommunity #Lowcountry #RememberThem

In the high-stakes world of legal drama, few cases have captured public attention like that of Alex Murdaugh. In this episode, Impact explores the crucial elements surrounding Alex Murdaugh's situation, his lawsuit against Becky Hill, the implications of a potential death penalty, and the ongoing controversies related to the boat crash outrage lawsuit. Joining the podcast is the Professor. Matt Siembieda, an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For years, the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh seemed like a closed case. Alex Murdaugh, once part of one of South Carolina's most powerful legal families, was convicted of killing his wife and son after jurors heard evidence prosecutors said they could not ignore, including the now infamous kennel video placing him near the crime scene minutes before the murders. But now, everything has changed. Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction has officially been overturned after shocking allegations involving jury influence by former court clerk Becky Hill. The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that comments allegedly made to jurors during the trial may have compromised the fairness of the proceedings, throwing one of the most high-profile murder convictions in recent history into chaos. In today's recap, we break down the original murders, the financial crimes, the kennel video that changed everything, the misconduct allegations that overturned the conviction, and whether Alex Murdaugh could actually win a retrial. Because despite years of headlines, documentaries, and courtroom drama… the Murdaugh story may be far from over. #TrueCrimeRecaps AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #MurdaughTrial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously reversed Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions on the grounds that former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill corrupted the jury process. The guilty verdicts have been vacated. The life sentences have been set aside. The legal record reflects that no individual stands convicted of the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.The constitutional framework is clear. The State charged Murdaugh with double murder. The Supreme Court determined the trial was unfair. The State's obligation to prosecute has not been extinguished — it has been reset. If the evidence is sufficient to secure a conviction under fair conditions, a second jury will deliver a verdict that withstands appellate scrutiny. If it is not, the public and the victims' families are entitled to that determination.Five days after the reversal, Murdaugh's defense team filed a Section 1983 federal civil rights complaint against Hill. The seventeen-page filing seeks six hundred thousand dollars in damages — directed entirely to the receivership — and is structured to access civil discovery mechanisms: depositions, document subpoenas, and sworn testimony. Defense counsel Jim Griffin stated publicly that the purpose is investigative, not financial.Eric Faddis examines the legal requirements of the Section 1983 claim — the elements Murdaugh's team must establish, the unusual posture of targeting a court clerk rather than law enforcement, and the strategic value of civil discovery running parallel to criminal retrial preparation. He addresses the state prosecutor's prior determination that insufficient evidence existed to charge Hill with jury tampering — a conclusion reached four months before the Supreme Court found her conduct warranted reversal.The Attorney General has reportedly indicated the death penalty is under consideration. Individuals personally harmed by Murdaugh's financial crimes have expressed willingness to testify again. Murdaugh is serving 40 years on federal financial crimes convictions and will not be released regardless of the retrial's outcome. The retrial's purpose is accountability for the deaths of two people — not the adjustment of a sentence already being served.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #Section1983 #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The South Carolina Supreme Court's reversal eliminated the prosecution's ability to present twelve hours of financial crimes testimony at retrial. The evidentiary framework that carried the first conviction — theft as motive, financial desperation as context — must now be significantly narrowed. What remains is the physical evidence collected by SLED, and its integrity is about to face scrutiny it largely avoided at trial one.The crime scene was exposed to rain. Family members walked through it before it was fully processed. No weapon was recovered. No DNA evidence connected the defendant to the killings. Blanca Simpson, the Murdaugh housekeeper, reported a suspicious white vehicle near the property — parked close to where Paul Murdaugh kept firearms — on the day of the killings. She reportedly provided more specific details in subsequent private interviews than she offered during sworn testimony. Jennifer Coffindaffer, who spent nearly three decades running federal investigations, examines that discrepancy alongside SLED's decision not to pursue the vehicle lead. She and Robin Dreeke also address the two-shooter theory SLED was unable to eliminate and the question of whether the kennel video evidence maintains its probative force absent the financial crimes testimony that contextualized it for the first jury.Defense attorney Dick Harpootlian has reportedly signaled an aggressive posture heading into the retrial, stating that the reversal will bring reluctant witnesses forward and that subpoenas will follow if necessary.On the prosecutorial side, Attorney General Alan Wilson has reportedly indicated that all sentencing options remain available — including the death penalty, which was not pursued at the original trial. Wilson is concurrently a candidate for governor. Every declared candidate for attorney general has reportedly committed to retrying the case. Dreeke examines the behavioral implications of prosecutorial decision-making that intersects with electoral politics — particularly the impact on jury selection in a jurisdiction where the case has achieved unprecedented public saturation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #AlanWilson #DeathPenalty #DickHarpootlian #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

James Lasdun, the author of The Family Man, Blood and Betrayal In The House of Murdaugh, joins Impact. At the heart of the Murdaugh case lies the shocking act of a father allegedly killing his son, Paul Murdaugh. This tragic narrative is not just about the crime itself but also about understanding the psychological and emotional landscape that leads to such an act. Lasdun highlights the rarity of a father killing an adult son, noting that such occurrences usually involve younger children. This raises the question: what drives a seemingly loving father to commit such a heinous act? Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime, past and present, from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and YouTube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Craig Melvin reports on the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh case, after his double murder convictions were overturned and a new trial was ordered for the murders of his wife and son. Andrea Canning goes behind the scenes of the making of this episode in ‘Talking Dateline'  Listen on Apple: https://apple.co/4nH8dJ0 Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/5aIT0PFtdiBMbpMNGLeO6y Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled that Alex Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial, citing improper influences on the jury. According to the court, Becky Hill's comments and actions compromised the integrity of the jury, violating Murdaugh's right to a fair trial. The court emphasized that every defendant is entitled to an impartial jury, free from external influences.  The court found that Hill made statements to jurors that suggested Murdaugh was guilty.  While the court did not review every evidentiary issue raised by Murdaugh's appeal, it provided guidance on the admissibility of his financial crimes in the upcoming trial. South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson expressed disappointment but acknowledged the necessity of a fair trial. Wilson stated that he intends to seek a speedy retrial, hoping to have it completed by the end of the year. Joining the podcast is Matt Siembieda, an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode Impact dives into a lawsuit that relates to a 2019 boat crash that killed 19 year old Mallory Beach. The alleged driver of the boat was Paul Murdaugh. The lawsuit being discussed is the Renee Beach vs Gregory Parker, et al. Impact has referred to the Beach/Parker Outrage lawsuit. The Beach family alleges that Parkers ran a campaign to harass the family including releasing photos of Mallory's body in the water after the crash. A hearing has been scheduled for journalist, Mandy Matney, to “show cause” why she should not be held in contempt of court for not attending her deposition at the subpoenaed location.  Joining the podcast is Matt Siembieda, an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. #JusticeMatters #LegalBattle #MalloryBeach #ImpactOfInfluence #MandyMatney Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices