Podcast appearances and mentions of King V Burwell

Descripcion: Michael Cannon has been described as ObamaCare's "single most relentless antagonist." He currently serves as director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington DC. He also provided the legal foundation for the Supreme Court case King v. Burwell, and served as domestic policy analyst for the US Senate Republican Policy Committee. In this interview Cannon discusses the problems with ObamaCare and why the law has not fundamentally delivered on its promises of improving quality while controlling costs.

With the recent Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell, regarding the Affordable Care Act, how will the ACA impact structured settlements?  Join Ringler Radio host, Larry Cohen and co-host, Mike Zea with special guest, Jordan Bossler, Director with the AIG Structured Settlement Department, as we simplify this sometimes complex topic to consider what types of cases may be effected and what it means for Medicare and Medicaid.  

With the recent Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell, regarding the Affordable Care Act, how will the ACA impact structured settlements?  Join Ringler Radio host, Larry Cohen and co-host, Mike Zea with special guest, Jordan Bossler, Director with the AIG Structured Settlement Department, as we simplify this sometimes complex topic to consider what types of cases may be effected and what it means for Medicare and Medicaid.  

In this episode, Dr. Darrell Bock, Jeff Mateer, and Honorable Rollin Van Broekhoven discuss Supreme Court decisions, focusing on King v. Burwell and the Affordable Care Act. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Carrie Lukas, IWF's Managing Director, sits down with IWF Director of Health Policy Hadley Heath Manning to discuss the future of America's health care system after the King v. Burwell Supreme Court ruling. Is Obamacare here to stay? What will the future cost of health care look like? How do we solve the problems that keep popping up in the health care system? What is the path forward? Hadley and Carrie answer these questions and more in the latest Working For Women podcast.

DFA Senior Advisor and University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack talks with two of the Nation's leading experts on health reform: Professor Timothy Jost, and Henry Aaron of the Brookings Institution. They discussed the implications of the King v. Burwell victory and the future challenges and strategies for improving the Nation’s health care. A full audio recording of the call is available here. Guest Speakers: Timothy JostTimothy Jost holds the Robert L. Willett Family Professorship of Law at the Washington and Lee University School of Law. He is a co-author of a casebook,Health Law, used widely throughout the United States in teaching health law, and of a treatise and hornbook by the same name. He is also the author of HealthCare Coverage Determinations: An International Comparative Study; Disentitlement? The Threats Facing our Public Health Care Programs and a Rights-Based Response; and Readings in Comparative Health Law and Bioethics, the second edition of which appeared this spring. He has also written numerous articles and book chapters on health care regulation and comparative health law and policy, and has lectured on health law topics throughout the world. His most recent book is Health Care at Risk: A Critique of the Consumer-Driven Movement, which was published by Duke University Press in 2007. Henry J. AaronHenry J. Aaron is currently the Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Senior Fellow in the Economic Studies program at the Brookings Institution. From 1990 through 1996 he was the director of the Economic Studies program.  He is a member of the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the advisory committee of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, and the visiting committee of the Harvard Medical School. He is a member of the board of directors of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. He was a founding member, vice president, and chair of the board of the National Academy of Social Insurance. He has been vice president and member of the executive committee of the American Economic Association and was president of the Association of Public Policy and Management. He has been a member of the boards of directors of the College Retirement Equity Fund and Georgetown University.

DFA Senior Advisor and University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack talks with two of the Nation's leading experts on health reform: Professor Timothy Jost, and Henry Aaron of the Brookings Institution. They discussed the implications of the King v. Burwell victory and the future challenges and strategies for improving the Nation’s health care. A full audio recording of the call is available here. Guest Speakers: Timothy JostTimothy Jost holds the Robert L. Willett Family Professorship of Law at the Washington and Lee University School of Law. He is a co-author of a casebook,Health Law, used widely throughout the United States in teaching health law, and of a treatise and hornbook by the same name. He is also the author of HealthCare Coverage Determinations: An International Comparative Study; Disentitlement? The Threats Facing our Public Health Care Programs and a Rights-Based Response; and Readings in Comparative Health Law and Bioethics, the second edition of which appeared this spring. He has also written numerous articles and book chapters on health care regulation and comparative health law and policy, and has lectured on health law topics throughout the world. His most recent book is Health Care at Risk: A Critique of the Consumer-Driven Movement, which was published by Duke University Press in 2007. Henry J. AaronHenry J. Aaron is currently the Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Senior Fellow in the Economic Studies program at the Brookings Institution. From 1990 through 1996 he was the director of the Economic Studies program.  He is a member of the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the advisory committee of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, and the visiting committee of the Harvard Medical School. He is a member of the board of directors of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. He was a founding member, vice president, and chair of the board of the National Academy of Social Insurance. He has been vice president and member of the executive committee of the American Economic Association and was president of the Association of Public Policy and Management. He has been a member of the boards of directors of the College Retirement Equity Fund and Georgetown University.

The Supreme Court’s decision on King v. Burwell validated President Obama’s massive power grab, allowing him to tax, borrow, and spend $700 billion without congressional approval. This establishes a precedent that could let any president modify, amend, or suspend any enacted law at his or her whim.As it stands, Obamacare will continue to disrupt coverage for sick Americans until Congress repeals it and replaces it with reforms that make health care better, more affordable, and more secure. Despite the ruling, Obamacare remains unpopular with the American public and the battle to set in place a health care system that works for all Americans is far from over.Come hear leading scholars discuss the impact of King v. Burwell on health care reform, separation of powers, and the rule of law. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Dan Munro, contributor at Forbes and author of the forthcoming book Casino Healthcare, joins the Crux Points Podcast to discuss healthcare in a post King v. Burwell environment, interoperability, behavior modification, single payer vs universal coverage and more. Additional information at sitewirehealth.com/cruxpoints

This week's episode covers King v Burwell, a case that saved Obamacare in America despite being almost completely incorrect from a strict statutory construction standpoint.  King is also compared to the Texas Disparate Housing case and how both cases illustrate the difference between being persuasive and being correct.   Brett and Nazim also share their thoughts on the outcome of the same sex marraige case, despite recording the day before it was decided.

On this episode, we review the courts much-anticipated decision in King v. Burwell, which considered whether the Internal Revenue Service may permissibly promulgate regulations to extend tax-credit subsidies to coverage purchased through Exchanges established by the federal government under section 1321 of the Affordable Care Act.

The Supreme Court has ruled in King v. Burwell that individuals who get their health insurance through an exchange established by the federal government are eligible for tax subsidies. Says Cato scholar Michael F. Cannon, “The Court today validated President Obama’s massive power grab, allowing him to tax, borrow, and spend $700 billion that no Congress ever authorized. …In doing so, the Court has sent a dangerous message to future administrations: If you are going to violate the law, make sure you go big.” See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Supreme Court's King v. Burwell decision ratified the President's interpretation of the Affordable Care Act with respect to insurance premium subsidies and taxes to support those subsidies. Trevor Burrus and Michael F. Cannon comment. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This fantastic episode of AHC covers the latest news in the industry, discusses potential mega-consolidation in the insurance marketplace and breaks down the impact of the King v. Burwell Supreme Court Case. More on healthreformexplained.com

This fantastic episode of AHC covers the latest news in the industry, discusses potential mega-consolidation in the insurance marketplace and breaks down the impact of the King v. Burwell Supreme Court Case. More on healthreformexplained.com

This fantastic episode of AHC covers the latest news in the industry, discusses potential mega-consolidation in the insurance marketplace and breaks down the impact of the King v. Burwell Supreme Court Case. More on healthreformexplained.com

This fantastic episode of AHC covers the latest news in the industry, discusses potential mega-consolidation in the insurance marketplace and breaks down the impact of the King v. Burwell Supreme Court Case. More on healthreformexplained.com

A decision in the Supreme Court's King v. Burwell case is expected very soon. In this episode of AMSA ad lib, Dr. David K. Jones of Boston University's School of Public Health gives us some background in anticipation of a major decision that could affect the future of the Affordable Care Act.

Today I interview Jim Gwinner. Jim is the Senior Vice President of Public Affairs for the LS2 Group and has spent a considerable amount of time studying Obamacare. On today’s edition of Home Front, we give you the scoop on what the Supreme Court is mulling over and share some insights on what could happen to the country depending on the outcome of the King V. Burwell case. This has to do with the subsidies that are only allowed in states that have set up their own state insurance exchanges. If you are interested in your healthcare or the government’s involvement, you will want to listen to our show today. The post Obamacare with Jim Gwinner appeared first on Home Front with Cynthia Davis.

The Supreme Court is set to announce its ruling in King v. Burwell, a case that could put health insurance subsidies at risk for millions of people. Our Motley Fools discuss the potential ruling and its impact.

The MOMocrats had a hard time watching the videotape of the police action at that McKinney, Texas pool party this weekend - but, as Cynematic points out, the results may indicate hope for the next generation in the fight against racism. Just keep carrying those smartphones, folks, so we can continue to document abuse when we see it.  Also discussed: The lack of planning for what could happen to folks with health insurance on the Federal exchanges if the King v. Burwell decision strikes down funding, the budget problems in red states and the California "miracle," and surprisingly strong polling numbers for a fictional villain. MOMocrats Cynematic, Karoli and Donna Schwartz Mills discuss politics from a progressive POV in this Engender Media Group production.

Listen NowShortly before the Supreme Court recesses in early July the Court will rule on David King v. Sylvia Burwell, the case where the plaintiffs argue the Affordable Care Act only allows for tax credit subsidies via state-run exchanges or only those, as the ACA states, "established by the state."  If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff an estimated 5 to 8 million newly insured will lose their coverage absent a subsidy because to date only 16 states plus the District of Columbia have set up state health insurance exchanges or marketplaces.  If this is the Court's ruling how might the Republican-controlled Congress react?   Regardless of the Court's decision the health care reform likely becomes a 2016 presidential campaign issue for the Republican party.  During this 21-minute discussion, Dr. Tevi Troy outlines possible responses by the Republican controlled Congress to a Court's decision in favor of the plaintiffs, how Republican presidential candidates may shape the race's health care reform debate (moreover if the Court rules in favor of Burwell) and he addresses major aspects of the ACA that remain contentious, i.e., the employer mandate, the Cadillac tax and Medicaid reform.Dr. Tevi Troy is currently President of the American Health Policy Institute and Adjunct Fellow at the Hudson Institute.  Previously he served as Deputy Secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, as Deputy Assistant and Acting Assistant to the White House Domestic Policy Council, as Policy Director for Senator John Ashcroft and as Senior Domestic Policy Adviser and Domestic Policy Director for the House Policy Committee.  Still previously he was a Researcher at the American Enterprise Institute.  His numerous writings include,"What Jefferson Read, Eisenhower Watched and Obama Tweeted, 200 Years of Popular Culture in the White House," and "Intellectuals and the American Presidency," Philosophers, Jesters or Technicians?"  Dr. Troy earned his Ph.D. in American Civilizations from the University of Texas as Austin.     Information on Dr. Troy's latest book, ""What Jefferson Read, Eisenhower Watched and Obama Tweeted, 200 Years of Popular Culture in the White House” can be found at: http://www.amazon.com/What-Jefferson-Watched-Obama-Tweeted/dp/1621570398/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1437409023&sr=8-1&keywords=what+jefferson+read+ike+watched+and+obama+tweeted. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thehealthcarepolicypodcast.com

Senator Bill Cassidy and Tevi Troy discuss the fate of the ACA in relation to King v. Burwell and alternative plans including the Patient Freedom Act.

Senator Bill Cassidy and Tevi Troy discuss the fate of the ACA in relation to King v. Burwell and alternative plans including the Patient Freedom Act.

Dr America gives Us More real talk about the Latest Challenge to Obamacare in America. No filler or scare mongering. Actual. Real. Talk. #CNNGoHome

This week's episode of AHC takes a thorough look at what is happening in the healthcare and insurance industries for quarter two of 2015. Stuart Slonin, president of Sig Consulting, joined to discuss an assortment of issues from health insurance to Medicaid; its pros and cons, The IRS: new responsibilities, King v. Burwell, ACA and Wealth Redistribution, Health care cost increases - public perception, physicians and the ACA plus much more.

This week's episode of AHC takes a thorough look at what is happening in the healthcare and insurance industries for quarter two of 2015. Stuart Slonin, president of Sig Consulting, joined to discuss an assortment of issues from health insurance to Medicaid; its pros and cons, The IRS: new responsibilities, King v. Burwell, ACA and Wealth Redistribution, Health care cost increases - public perception, physicians and the ACA plus much more.

This week's episode of AHC takes a thorough look at what is happening in the healthcare and insurance industries for quarter two of 2015. Stuart Slonin, president of Sig Consulting, joined to discuss an assortment of issues from health insurance to Medicaid; its pros and cons, The IRS: new responsibilities, King v. Burwell, ACA and Wealth Redistribution, Health care cost increases - public perception, physicians and the ACA plus much more.

This week's episode of AHC takes a thorough look at what is happening in the healthcare and insurance industries for quarter two of 2015. Stuart Slonin, president of Sig Consulting, joined to discuss an assortment of issues from health insurance to Medicaid; its pros and cons, The IRS: new responsibilities, King v. Burwell, ACA and Wealth Redistribution, Health care cost increases - public perception, physicians and the ACA plus much more.

This week's episode of AHC takes a thorough look at what is happening in the healthcare and insurance industries for quarter two of 2015. Stuart Slonin, president of Sig Consulting, joined to discuss an assortment of issues from health insurance to Medicaid; its pros and cons, The IRS: new responsibilities, King v. Burwell, ACA and Wealth Redistribution, Health care cost increases - public perception, physicians and the ACA plus much more.

Next Wednsday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in King v. Burwell case. Independent Women's Forum health policy director Hadley Heath Manning speaks with Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute to discuss the case and why it is so important. What rulings could come down from the court? What would they mean? What are some important takeaways that the American people need to keep in mind about the case?

Brett and Nazim discuss King v. Burwell, a dumb case based on dumb facts and dumb law that will probably have a dumb outcome.  Making lemonade out of lemons, Nazim shares a wealth of great knowledge about the background and current state of the law, while Brett shares how many hotdogs he can eat in one sitting.

Christian finds himself among two telecommunications and IP experts, Joe and guest Aaron Perzanowski, to discuss the FCC’s recently issued regulations mandating some form of “net neutrality” on broadband internet providers. Will these regulations hold up? Why does your cable company want to provide you with “antivirus” software? What did we receive in the mail last week? Which listener thinks we’re full of it? It’s all in this week’s show. This show’s links: Aaron Perzanowski’s faculty profile and writing Episode 52 and Episode 53 on King v. Burwell William Baude, Could Obama Bypass the Supreme Court?, and Michael Dorf, Obama Wouldn’t Circumvent SCOTUS on Subsidies We’ve reached North Dakota! Our earlier shows on net neutrality: Episode 49, Episode 16 (with Jim Speta), and Episode 10 (with Christina Mulligan) About the FCC’s Open Internet Order Download page for the Open Internet Order and Commissioner statements About the FCC Computer Inquiries of the 1960s and 1970s AT&T v. City of Portland National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services Verizon v. FCC About the FCC’s Incentive Auction for the 600MHz band Special Guest: Aaron Perzanowski.

University of Virginia School of Law professor Mimi Riley and Timothy Jost from Washington and Lee University School of Law discussed the Supreme Court case challenging Obamacare, King v. Burwell, and the future of the Affordable Care Act. The Health Law Association sponsored the event at UVA Law on March 23.

. The post King v. Burwell with Thomas Miller and Carrie Severino appeared first on RealClear Radio Hour.

We start with developments in an area at the core of expertise: speed traps. We continue with policing and, mainly, more on the Obamacare II case. We also have been told to expect an emolument. This show’s links: Michelle Wirth, Bill To Reduce ‘Speed Traps’ Gains Senate Approval DOJ Civil Rights Division, Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department; AG Holder’s prepared remarks on the report Oral Argument 52: Nihilism The SCOTUSblog page for King v. Burwell, containing the briefs, commentary, and links to the argument David Ziff, Halbig and the “Isolationist” Theory of Statutory Interpretation David Ziff, Halbig and the Problem of Creeping Constitutionalism Simon Maloy, GOP’s George Costanza Moment: The “Moops” Doctrine and the War on Obamacare coffeegeek.com’s review of the Gene Cafe Roaster

Last week the Supreme Court heard arguments in King v. Burwell, the case that could undo Obamacare. Now, as far as we can tell, lawyers who disagree with the Obamacare law always seem to find the policy unconstitutional. Today on The Gist, Harvard law professor Charles Fried is the lone exception. Plus, Dan Pashman from The Sporkful podcast brings reason and order to the Slate office fridge. For the Spiel, it’s time for another lobstar of the antentwig. Today’s sponsor: The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst, the new documentary series from HBO. It airs Sunday at 8 p.m. only on HBO. Join Slate Plus! Members get bonus segments, exclusive member-only podcasts, and more. Sign up for a free trial today at slate.com/gistplus. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dr America gives Us real talk about the Latest Challenge to Obamacare in America. No filler or scare mongering. Actual. Real. Talk. #CNNGoHome

1st hour: Chuck talks with Dr. David Hogburg, health care policy analyst at the National Center for Policy Research on the King v. Burwell case before the Supreme Court. Link: http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA670.html 2nd hour: Chuck talks with Ilya Feoktistov, Director of Research at Americans for Peace and Tolerance, on Islamic terrorists in Boston. Link: http://www.peaceandtolerance.org

Joe and Christian try to understand King v. Burwell, or Obamacare II, in light of the oral argument last week. This show’s links: The SCOTUSblog page for King v. Burwell, containing the briefs, commentary, and links to the argument` The Supreme Court’s page for downloading audio of the oral argument Dahlia Lithwick’s Amicus episode about the case

This week Peter Suderman joins us to help suss out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a law he says is so complex and opaque that “no one person” understands every single part of it perfectly. We discuss the long history of the idea behind a government-backed and mandated health care system and its unlikely origins, the “three legged stool” necessary for implementing the PPACA, and the philosophical ideas behind the law.We also discuss challenges to the PPACA, including King v. Burwell, a case that will be heard in the U.S. Supreme Court this week.What is Obamacare, and what does it do? How does it work? Why did we have to “pass it to find out what’s in it,” as Nancy Pelosi so infamously put it? See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act -- King v. Burwell -- Dahlia Lithwick hears from experts on both sides of what could be the most important case in the Court’s entire term. First, she speaks with Jonathan Adler, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University and a one of the lawsuit’s chief architects. Then she hears from Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School and a co-author of an amicus brief submitted in the case. ************** This week’s episode is sponsored by HBO. Its new documentary series “The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst” airs Sundays at 8. We’re also sponsored by the Great Courses. Save up to 80% off their most bestselling courses here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Contrary to myth, Obamacare’s opponents have many alternatives to the health care law that is once again before the Supreme Court. The Washington Examiner’s Philip Klein, a leading conservative health care writer, takes us inside the debate on the right over how to overhaul the health care system along free-market lines in the wake of a ruling in King v. Burwell, and possibly in the wake of Obamacare.Drawing on eight years of experience reporting on the issue, and dozens of interviews with prominent health policy experts, Klein lays out a free-market vision for health care and presents three competing approaches to getting there: reform, replace, and restart. Join us to hear from Klein, as well as from leading proponents of each school of thought. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

As Obamacare heads back to the Supreme Court, Jonathan Adler explains everything you need to know ahead of the March 4 oral argument. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Christine Eibner discusses the role of premium tax credits in ensuring stability in the individual health insurance marketplace and the ramifications of King v. Burwell on the Affordable Care Act.