Podcasts about supreme court cases

022222 Part 3 Of 3 Supreme Court Case Gay Couple Wedding Announcement by Kate Dalley

DMT Presents Expresso That!Commentary for those on the run. A less than 15-minute take on a topic of choice. Join Eboni in her discussion of Supreme Court Cases against Affirmative Action 2022 By the way...we've got podcasts and YouTube. Check the links below  https://linktr.ee/ArchonstormSupport the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DMTExpressoThat )

Giordano welcomes back Wen Fa, an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation and an expert on the discrimination that Asian-Americans face in the university admissions process, to discuss the Supreme Court cases involving Harvard and UNC determining whether or not the process is unfair. First, Giordano asks for some clarification on terms used in the lawsuit and reporting that aren't in the common lexicon, asking about the term ‘decile' and how it applies to the lawsuit. Wen provides a contextual history to the lawsuit, telling of past Supreme Court decisions concerning affirmative action, which is largely at stake in the argument. (Photo by Getty Images)

McDonald v City of Chicago. On June 28, 2010, the Court in McDonald v City of Chicago, (2010), held that the Second Amendment was incorporated, saying that "t is clear that the Framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty." This means that the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government. It also remanded a case regarding a Chicago handgun prohibition. Four of the five justices in the majority voted to do so by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, while the fifth justice, Clarence Thomas, voted to do so through the amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause. Justice Thomas, in his concurring opinion, noted that the Privileges or Immunities Clause refers to "citizens" whereas the Due Process Clause refers more broadly to any "person", and therefore Thomas reserved the issue of non-citizens for later decision. After McDonald, many questions about the Second Amendment remain unsettled, such as whether non-citizens are protected through the Equal Protection Clause. In People v Aguilar (2013), the Illinois Supreme Court summed up the central Second Amendment findings in McDonald: Two years later, in McDonald v City of Chicago, (2010), the Supreme Court held that the second amendment right recognized in Heller is applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. In so holding, the Court reiterated that "the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense"; that "individual self-defense is 'the central component' of the Second Amendment right" (emphasis in original)(quoting Heller); and that "self-defense is a basic right, recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present day". Caetano v Massachusetts. On March 21, 2016, in a per curiam decision the Court vacated a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision upholding the conviction of a woman who carried a stun gun for self-defense. The Court reiterated that the Heller and McDonald decisions saying that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding", that "the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States", and that the protection is not restricted to "only those weapons useful in warfare". The term "bearable arms" was defined in District of Columbia v Heller, (2008) and includes any "eapo of offense" or "thing that a man wears for his defense, or takes into his hands", that is "carrying. ... for the purpose of offensive or defensive action". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v City of New York, New York. The Court heard New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v City of New York, New York on December 2, 2019, to decide whether a New York City ordinance that prevents the transport of guns, even if properly unloaded and locked in containers, from within city limits to outside of the city limits is unconstitutional. The New York Rifle & Pistol Association challenged the ordinance on the basis of the Second Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the right to travel. However, as the city had changed its rule to allow transport while the case was under consideration by the Court, the Court ruled the case moot in April 2020, though it remanded the case so the lower courts could review the new rules under the petitioner's new claims.

Supreme Court cases In the century following the ratification of the Bill of Rights, the intended meaning and application of the Second Amendment drew less interest than it does in modern times. The vast majority of regulation was done by states, and the first case law on weapons regulation dealt with state interpretations of the Second Amendment. A notable exception to this general rule was Houston v Moore, (1820), where the U.S. Supreme Court mentioned the Second Amendment in an aside. In the Dred Scott decision (1857), the opinion of the court stated that if African Americans were considered U.S. citizens, "It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right ... to keep and carry arms wherever they went." State and federal courts historically have used two models to interpret the Second Amendment: the "individual rights" model, which holds that individuals hold the right to bear arms, and the "collective rights" model, which holds that the right is dependent on militia membership. The "collective rights" model has been rejected by the Supreme Court, in favor of the individual rights model, beginning with its District of Columbia v Heller (2008) decision. The Supreme Court's primary Second Amendment cases include United States v Miller, (1939); District of Columbia v Heller (2008); and McDonald v Chicago (2010). Heller and McDonald supported the individual rights model, under which the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms much as the First Amendment protects the right to free speech. Under this model, the militia is composed of members who supply their own arms and ammunition. This is generally recognized as the method by which militias have historically been armed, as the Supreme Court in Miller said: The significance attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time. Of the collective rights model that holds that the right to arms is based on militia membership, the Supreme Court in Heller said: A purposive qualifying phrase that contradicts the word or phrase it modifies is unknown this side of the looking glass (except, apparently, in some courses on Linguistics). If "bear arms" means, as we think, simply the carrying of arms, a modifier can limit the purpose of the carriage ("for the purpose of self-defense" or "to make war against the King"). But if "bear arms" means, as the petitioners and the dissent think, the carrying of arms only for military purposes, one simply cannot add "for the purpose of killing game". The right "to carry arms in the militia for the purpose of killing game" is worthy of the mad hatter.

NO DESCRIPTION

NO DESCRIPTION

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the second hour of The Vince Coglianese Show, Vince speaks to Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry who's vaccine mandate case was argued in the Supreme Court today.  Dr. Marjorie Smelkinson joins the program to discuss whether we are at the end of the pandemic and Montgomery County school system keeping students out of the classroom. For more coverage on the issues that matter to you visit www.WMAL.com, download the WMAL app or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 from 3-6. To join the conversation, check us out on social media: @WMAL @VinceCoglianese See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In hour 1, Vince talks about the Supreme Court Case on vaccine mandates. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Freedom Broadcasters Livestream Thursday, Dec 16, 2021 Guest: Christian Oesch Topic: Is 5G Safe? https://www.vereinwir.ch/ Brief Bio: Christian Oesch, is one of the leading Swiss opponents in the instrumentalization of 5G and the Corona agenda. His presentations show how the federal governments and politics are driving this development forward. Join us to learn more about the connection between 5G and Corona, the banking system, government control, why we need to keep an eye on Switzerland and Sweden and more. What we Discussed: - The Swiss Parliament System - What is 5G - China - Management of 5G outsourced to 5G - Health Effects from EMF's - Supreme Court Case in Switzerland - The Power Needed to Run 5G - Putting Atenas on Hospitals and Schools - How to Block Electro Magnetic Waves - Satellite 5G's - Why he would never drive an Electric Car - Chemtrails - The technology the Chinese use - The Fraud Committed Interview Council Grace Asagra, RN MA Podcast: Quantum Nurse www.quantumnurse.life Roy Coughlan Podcast: AWAKENING https://www.awakeningpodcast.org/

Homer Plessy will be pardoned by the state of Louisiana 130 years after his “crime.” The state's Board of Pardons recommended the pardon for Plessy and Gov. John Bel Edwards has committed to approving it. In 1892, the 29-year-old African-American bought a first class train ticket, but was told to retire to the train car … Continue reading "Infamous Plessy vs. Ferguson Supreme Court case explained"

Josh Moon leads River of Life Church in Alachua. He loves this area, and especially the Main Street quaintness that defines the "downtown" region of Alachua. An added special touch to Josh's leadership is the fact that he has his own real-life brother on staff as the youth and worship leader. In segment 3, a visit from Mat Staver (The Liberty Counsel) on a case that he will soon be presenting to the US Supreme Court.

Host June Grasso discusses the critical Supreme Court decisions in 2021 involving Obamacare, gay rights, voting rights, student athletes, and free speech with Bloomberg News Supreme Court Reporter Greg Stohr and Bloomberg Law Supreme Court Reporter Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Inside Agriculture Segment 1

The deeply researched book reveals new details about Norma McCorvey, the plaintif in the landmark 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today in cannabis news: Cannabis industry insiders in Arizona raise concern regarding local companies competing with cannabis corporations; regulators in Missouri fight to keep concealing medical cannabis applications in a Supreme Court case; and a team of U.S. federal lawmakers submit a proposal to expedite the President's clemency procedures. It's Thursday, December 16 and TRICHOMES.com is bringing you the top cannabis news from around the web. You can also listen on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify–search TRICHOMES and subscribe.

This Sunday, I will discuss this issue of restorative justice within the context of a deadly pandemic once again, spiraling out of control. Journalist Thom Hartmann, recently called out the "Trumpies and Maskholes" as they gleefully act as the 21st century equivalent of 'Typhoid Mary or Typhoid Mark," with no consideration for the people they hurt and possibly kill. Meanwhile, the GOP is using COVID to tank the dems, again--with no consideration for the ever-growing death toll.  Hartmann mentioned that Germany is going to forcefully restrict anti-vaxxers from the public sphere. He backs up the idea by mentioning the 1905 Supreme Court Case that stated no individual has the right to infect others with a deadly and highly communicable disease. The case of Jacobson v Massachusetts established the right of the government to mandate vaccines and other measures to protect the common good.  Rick Spisak sent us a piece of his erudite writing to enjoy, and then there's the "Jackass of the Week" feature.  Check it out.  Jeanine  

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in a case involving two Arizona death row inmates that could redefine how claims of ineffective trial counsel in state courts are heard at the federal level. On this week's episode, Law360 Pulse reporter Marco Poggio joins us to explain how the argument played out, and why an eventual ruling could have life-or-death consequences for many who argue they didn't get a fair trial. Also this week: The alleged inventor of Bitcoin gets hit with a $100 million jury verdict in Florida; a novel criminal indictment of a Massachusetts state judge leaves the First Circuit scratching their heads; and finally, a Georgia judge offers an early Christmas present to parents by banning Elf on the Shelf.

In the second hour of The Vince Coglianese Show, Vince speaks with Corey DeAngelis, director of research of School Choice Now about an important Supreme Court Case taking place now and takes listeners' calls! For more coverage on the issues that matter to you visit www.WMAL.com, download the WMAL app or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 from 3-6. To join the conversation, check us out on social media: @WMAL @VinceCoglianese See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

West Va. v EPA is the case that could dismantle all regulations especially environmental regs, by using the Nondelegation Doctrine. This case has enormous implications for our nation as we know it. If corporate polluters win, then ANY new regulations for the EPA or other agencies would have to gain legislative approval. 

We are back with another week of new topics with Michael Woodland and Rockstar. This week the duo speak on the matters of the Michigan school shooting and the possibilities of the parents being charged for the crime. The two then speak on credible trainers. How much research do you put into looking for someone or a business to teach you a skill that could be used one day to save your life. Michael thinks there are a lot of fraudulent instructors out there, and Rockstar addresses what she considers during her search. Michael loses a bet from back in 2014 and now has to pay out, but why. It is all over the new firearm that he got as of recently. Pull up a chair, put your vehicle on cruise control, and put your headphones in... It's time for the M-W Tactical Podcast!!!! ►Looking to support us and everything we do, visit: https://anchor.fm/m-wtactical/support ►Website: https://m-wtactical.com/ Please donate to our GoFundMe Campaigns: We Are Wanting To Provide Free Training For Those Who Are Not As Fortunate!!!! If you are new to the M-W Tactical channel, We're happy you clicked on our video! Hopefully, you enjoy this video! Don't Forget to SUBSCRIBE to the M-W Tactical channel and press (

A case before the Supreme Court could upend abortion rights for pregnant people across the country. In this episode of Consider This from Wednesday, December 1, NPR's Audie Cornish revisits the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. She also speaks with NPR Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg, SCOTUS Blog's Tom Goldstein, and Florida State University Law Professor Mary Ziegler. They parse the arguments made last Wednesday, and weigh in on how the justices could rule.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is widely considered to be the most important Supreme Court Case on abortion in nearly three decades. We want you to understand what's happening in real-time and equip you with tools to discuss it effectively. ERI staff members Josh Brahm, Andrew Kaake, and Emily Albrecht listened live to the oral arguments, and went live the next evening to share their perspectives and answer your questions! This is the case everyone will be talking about, so prepare yourself to have productive dialogues about it! Thanks to Tim Hull for hosting the live stream! Links Mentioned: Bookmark this fetal pain study! More on the amazing story behind this study at this great post from Secular Pro-Life ERI Blog - Arguing From Equality: The Personhood of Human Embryos Here's a landing page with lots of resources from ERI on responding to bodily autonomy arguments: https://equalrightsinstitute.com/bodilyrights ERI Blog - Pro-Lifers Aren't “Forcing” Women to Stay Pregnant Quick Response #7: Banning Abortion Forces Women to Stay Pregnant ERI Blog - Is Abortion 14 Times Safer Than Childbirth? ERI Blog - Why Viability Is the Least Plausible Definition of Personhood Stand to Reason Podcast - Tim Barnett with Josh Brahm: These Are the Best Arguments Against Abortion

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this Special Abortion Rights Edition of the top-rated weekly US law and politics news analysis podcast -- MeidasTouch's LegalAF anchored by MT founder and civil rights lawyer, Ben Meiselas and national trial lawyer and strategist, Michael Popok, discuss today's (Tuesday December 1, 2021) 2-hour, US Supreme Court oral argument for Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, addressing the issue of whether a state can ban pre-viability abortions. The 9 justices wasted no time getting to the heart and heat of the matter: Does the Constitution and the current majority of the Justices support a woman's right to choose and have bodily autonomy and integrity, or don't they? Ben and Popok line up the current justice's from Left (Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan) to Far Right (Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas), and predict how this case and the majority opinion shakes out by the Summer. Reminder and Programming Note:  Watch a live recording of Legal AF pod each Saturday night at 7 pm ET on YouTube, followed by the audio pod dropping each Sunday morning. Click here to subscribe, follow + and review: https://pod.link/1580828595 Follow Legal AF by MeidasTouch on Twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Getting an abortion in Mississippi has never been easy, but it hasn't been impossible. Now, a case before the Supreme Court that centers on a clinic in Mississippi could upend abortion rights for pregnant people across the country. Today, the conservative-leaning court heard arguments in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The clinic, which is the only abortion provider remaining in Mississippi, is challenging a 2018 state law that bans termination after 15 weeks of pregnancy. If the court upholds the law, it would reverse its own precedent by allowing states to interfere with the right to abortion at that stage of pregnancy. NPR Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg, SCOTUS Blog's Tom Goldstein, and Florida State University Law Professor Mary Ziegler parse the arguments and weigh in on the possibilities on how the justices could rule.In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment that will help you make sense of what's going on in your community.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

Getting an abortion in Mississippi has never been easy, but it hasn't been impossible. Now, a case before the Supreme Court that centers on a clinic in Mississippi could upend abortion rights for pregnant people across the country. Today, the conservative-leaning court heard arguments in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The clinic, which is the only abortion provider remaining in Mississippi, is challenging a 2018 state law that bans termination after 15 weeks of pregnancy. If the court upholds the law, it would reverse its own precedent by allowing states to interfere with the right to abortion at that stage of pregnancy. NPR Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg, SCOTUS Blog's Tom Goldstein, and Florida State University Law Professor Mary Ziegler parse the arguments and weigh in on the possibilities on how the justices could rule.In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment that will help you make sense of what's going on in your community.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kristan gives a play by play of the joyful presence of the youth and pro-life leaders across the country outside SCOTUS for the Dobbs case and hope in the air. Fr. Marcel comments on the Year of St. Joseph and encourages listeners to continue this practice of going to St. Joseph and praying to him […]

Tonight's guests are Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights; and Rep. Lauren Underwood.

Diane Mackhosted this Tuesday's episode of Louisiana Considered. Mississippi Public Broadcasting's Desare Frazierand WWNO/WRKF's Rosemary Westwood speak with Mississippi Edition host Karen Brownabout the upcoming Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which will determine the future of abortion access in the United States. The Symphony Chorus of New Orleans' Music Director Steven Edwardsdiscusses the Chorus' upcoming performance of Handel's “Messiah” on Wednesday, Dec. 8. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Giant menorahs in front of government buildings and in public squares have become a staple of the Holiday season and Jewish cultural and religious life, but the pioneering public menorahs of the 80’s faced stiff legal battles. In 1986, Chabad-Lubavitch of Pittsburgh erected its annual menorah display in front of City-County Building. The American Civil Liberties Union sued, claiming the proximity of the candles to the public building violated the First Amendment separation of church and state. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in 1989 that the Chanukah display did not constitute government endorsement of religion. That landmark decision set a precedent for the thousands of public menorahs which will be displayed across the country starting on December 12, the first night of Chanukah. On December 6, two attorneys in the case, Jon Pushinsky, who represented the ACLU, and Charles H. Saul, who represented Chabad, presented the legal arguments for and against the constitutionality of the display of a menorah on public property at a special event at Chabad of Pittsburgh which is part of an ongoing JLI lecture series entitled “Great Debates in Jewish History.”

Pro-life activist with the Pro-Life Action League, Eric Scheidler, joins Jonathon to discuss possible outcomes of the upcoming Mississippi abortion case at the Supreme Court. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Kristen talks about the importance if this particular case which focuses on the legality of pre-viable babies in the womb and how the Students for Life College Campus Tours have been going reaching out to pro-life and pro-choice students and educating them and others on the science and facts of what abortion truly is. Mark […]

Episode 18: Fr. Frank discusses with Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel the brief he prepared for the Supreme Court Dobbs case. The brief, submitted on behalf of a diverse coalition of groups and leaders including Hispanics and African-Americans, and our Priests for Life associate Alveda King, urges the Court not to continue the racist and eugenic legacy of legal abortion as embodied in Roe.

Arguing before the Supreme Court is considered a privilege to most lawyers—a privilege longtime former Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben has had over 100 times. This week on The Term podcast, Dreeben discusses his most memorable moments at the lectern and how he sharpened his advocacy skills.

Episode 11: Fr. Frank interviews Stefano Gennarini of the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam) about their brief which looks at international treaties and how they uphold the rights of children in the womb.

We are back with Season 4 of the M-W Tactical Podcast. This week Michael and Rockstar continue a previous conversation with what is taking place in the Supreme Court concerning the case with the NRA and New York residents. Then the two speak on the Rittenhouse case We rehash the local Toys 4 Tots match with our buddy Ryan Lee. We discuss the match in a competition style, which was our favorite stage, and the parameters of almost being an outlaw match. Follow Ryan Lee on Instagram: @ryanj1022 Pull up a chair, put your vehicle on cruise control, and put your headphones in... It's time for the M-W Tactical Podcast!!!! Looking to support us and everything we do, visit: https://anchor.fm/m-wtactical/support Please donate to our GoFundMe Campaigns: We Are Wanting To Provide Free Training For Those Who Are Not As Fortunate!!!! Social Media Instagram: @m_wtactical @rockstarberst YouTube: M-W Tactical Facebook: M-W Tactical Website: www.M-Wtactical.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Show sponsors: Hunters HD Gold AEGIS Gun Care CAE Transfers Brass Monkey Bullets: 423-967-1063 JM4 Tactical Walk The Talk America Outdoor Dynamics

Episode 12: Fr. Frank interviews Chris Bell, Founder of Good Counsel Homes, and attorney Sean Collier, about their brief to the Court arguing that women do not need abortion in order to succeed in the world.

John and Glen discuss the weather, Rittenhouse case and more. Andrea gives a brief history of the court case that sparked the Supreme Court Case and poses the pros and cons of having a chaplain of some sort in the room with a person during execution. Dr. Meaney explains the Catholic Churches teaching on IVF, […] All show notes at Andrea Piciotti-Bayer, Chaplains on Death Row; Dr. Joseph Meaney, Ethical Concerns of IVF - This podcast produced by Relevant Radio

Episode 13: Fr. Frank interviews Peter Breen, Vice President of the Thomas More Society, about the three briefs he was involved in preparing. One of them speaks of the history of abortion law in America, another about the science behind the pro-life position, and a third in which David Daleiden argues that if babies in the womb are valuable enough for their body parts to be sold by the abortion industry, they are valuable enough to be protected.

This week Rebecca Weber gets honest with listeners and shares an extremely personal side of her family history that single-handedly contributed to Rebecca's devout love for God. As a leader of AMAC, she believes the sanctity of life should be protected at all stages. Penny Nance Young, CEO and President of Concerned Women for America, protector of children and life, joins Rebecca today. The two recognize the ethic of life, discuss pivotal Supreme Court Cases, and share sobering statistics. Listen to the end to learn how you, too, can join Rebecca and Penny to save the babies!.

SO much has happened this week, we need to catch up! On this week's episode, we break down why the SNL cast freaked out about Elon Musk's upcoming appearance, why Kamala isn't going to the border, what the new census numbers mean, how badly the Oscars flopped, how Texas setting a record low after fully opening back up from coronavirus restrictions, and what the incredibly important upcoming Supreme Court Case will mean for the Second Amendment.    *** The Left has taken control of Washington. Big Tech is shutting down the voices of the moderates and the right. And America's youth is falling in love with socialism and totalitarianism disguised as progressive cancel culture. Morgan Zegers, founder of Young Americans Against Socialism, welcomes you to Some Sanity, a podcast focusing on current events, politics, culture, and commie fighting from a conservative Gen Z perspective.    #conservative​ #liberal​ #leftist​ #left​ #right​ #politics​ #socialism​ #communism​ #liberalism​ #cancelculture​ #progress​ #peace​ #lifestyle​ #vlog​ #current​ events #political​ #culture​ #media​ #politicalpodcast​ #podcast​ #conservativepodcast​ #news​ #america​ #americannews​ #americanpolitics​ #american​ #america​ #patriot​ #patriotic​ #marxism​ #marx​ #cultural​ #culture​ #culturalmarxism  #communists