Podcasts about investigation fbi

In the United States, federal investigators may use testimony from accusers in civil matters to pursue criminal charges if a crime has been committed. Here's how this process generally works:Separation of Civil and Criminal Proceedings: Civil and criminal matters are typically handled separately in the legal system. Civil cases involve disputes between individuals or entities seeking monetary damages or specific performance, while criminal cases involve the prosecution of individuals by the government for violating laws.Accuser Testimony in Civil Cases: In civil cases, individuals (the accusers) may testify under oath about their experiences, allegations, or claims against the defendant. This testimony is presented before a judge or jury, and the standard of proof is typically lower than in criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is usually based on a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the evidence supports the accuser's claims more than it supports the defendant's position.Federal Investigation: If the accuser's testimony in a civil case suggests that a crime may have been committed, federal investigators, such as those from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or other relevant agencies, may launch a criminal investigation. They will gather additional evidence, interview witnesses, and assess the credibility of the accuser's testimony in the context of potential criminal charges.Criminal Charges: If the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence to support criminal charges, prosecutors may bring charges against the accused individual or entity. The decision to pursue criminal charges is typically based on the sufficiency of evidence, the applicable laws, and prosecutorial discretion.Use of Accuser Testimony: Accuser testimony from the civil case may be used as evidence in the criminal trial, subject to rules of evidence and the defendant's rights to confront witnesses. The credibility of the accuser and the reliability of their testimony will likely be scrutinized during the criminal proceedings.Criminal Trial: The defendant in the criminal case will have the opportunity to present a defense, including challenging the accuser's testimony, presenting alibi evidence, or disputing the prosecution's evidence. The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard of proof than in civil cases.Potential Outcomes: If the defendant is found guilty in the criminal trial, they may face penalties such as imprisonment, fines, probation, or other consequences depending on the nature of the crime and applicable laws. If found not guilty, they will be acquitted of the charges.So, what, if any sort of information are the accusers providing to the Feds?   Let's dive in and see if we can find some clarity in all of this muck.(commercial at 9:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ex Cassie likely 'important' witness in Homeland Security trafficking probe: expert | Fox News

The leader of the federal agency that investigated the DWI corruption scandal has left his position as Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Albuquerque. Now, former SAC Raul Bujanda sat down with KRQE's Anchor, Dean Staley, for an exit interview that covered crime, guns, and the state's biggest police corruption scandal. Bujanda discusses his time with the FBI, youth violence, and speaks candidly about teens' access to guns. What does the former FBI leader believe is the main driver of crime in New Mexico? Will more cops be charged in the corruption scheme? Thanks for listening. If you've got an idea, send it to us at chris.mckee@krqe.com or gabrielle.burkhart@krqe.com. Give us a follow on social media at @ChrisMcKeeTV and @gburkNM. Watch or listen to our prior podcasts online at KRQE.com/podcast and our KRQE YouTube channel, or on broadcast TV every Wednesday at 10:35 p.m. MST on Fox New Mexico. 

Todd Renner is a seasoned cybersecurity professional with over 25 years of experience leading global cyber investigations, incident response efforts, and digital asset recovery operations. He advises clients on a wide range of cybersecurity and data privacy matters, combining deep technical knowledge with a strategic understanding of risk, compliance, and regulatory frameworks. With a distinguished background at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and National Security Agency (NSA), Mr. Renner has contributed to national security, international cyber collaboration, and has played a key role in mentoring the next generation of cybersecurity professionals. In this episode… The rising complexity of cyber threats continues to test how businesses prepare, respond, and recover. Sophisticated threat actors are exploiting these vulnerabilities of private companies and leveraging AI tools to accelerate their attacks. Despite these dangers, many organizations hesitate to involve law enforcement when a cyber event occurs. This hesitation often stems from misconceptions about what law enforcement involvement entails, including fears of losing control over their systems or exposing sensitive company information. As a result, companies may prioritize quickly restoring operations over pursuing retribution from the attackers, leaving critical security gaps unaddressed. Collaborating with law enforcement doesn't mean forfeiting control or exposing confidential data unnecessarily. Investigations often reveal repeated issues, including mobile device compromises, missing multifactor authentication, and failing to improve cybersecurity measures after a breach. To be better prepared, companies need to develop and practice incident response plans, ensure leadership remains involved, and build security programs that evolve beyond incident response. And, as threat actors actively use AI to accelerate data aggregation and create convincing deepfakes, companies need to start thinking about how to better detect these threats. In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels speak with Todd Renner, Senior Managing Director at FTI Consulting, about how organizations are responding to modern cyber threats and where many still fall short. Todd shares why companies hesitate to engage law enforcement, how threat actors are using AI for faster targeting and impersonation, and why many businesses fail to strengthen their cybersecurity programs after a breach. He also discusses why deepfakes are eroding trust and raising new challenges for companies, and he provides practical tips for keeping both organizations and families safe from evolving threats.

On Friday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) arrested Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan for allegedly helping an unauthorized migrant evade arrest. Dugan was charged with “obstructing or impeding a proceeding before a department or agency of the United States” and “concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest,” as stated in a criminal complaint signed by Milwaukee FBI agents and unsealed on Friday.Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: What do you think of Judge Dugan's arrest? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Aaron Sheets - TWA FLIGHT 800 SOLVEDTrans World Airlines Flight 800 (TW800/TWA800) was a scheduled international passenger flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City, United States, to Fiumicino Airport in Rome, Italy, with a stopover at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris, France. On July 17, 1996, at approximately 8:31 p.m. EDT, twelve minutes after takeoff, the Boeing 747-100 serving the flight exploded and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, New York, United States.All 230 people on board died in the crash; it is the third-deadliest aviation accident in U.S. history. Accident investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) traveled to the scene, arriving the following morning  amid speculation that a terrorist attack was the cause of the crash. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and New York Police Department Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) initiated a parallel criminal investigation. Sixteen months later, the JTTF announced that no evidence of a criminal act had been found and closed its active investigationBut what actually happened? Does it all way up? Many questions remain stubbornly unanswered. Aaron Sheets may have those answers.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is more than just a collection of policy proposals; it is a comprehensive vision for a radical shift in American governance. Born out of a coalition of over 100 respected conservative organizations, Project 2025 aims to reshape the federal government in ways that are both profound and contentious.At the heart of Project 2025 is its manifesto, "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise," published in April 2023. This document, crafted by more than 400 scholars and policy experts, outlines a sweeping array of policy suggestions designed to address what the project's proponents see as the country's most pressing challenges. One of the key proposals is to "secure the border, finish building the wall, and deport illegal aliens," reflecting a hardline stance on immigration that aligns with long-held conservative views on border security[1].Another significant area of focus is the reform of federal agencies, particularly the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Project 2025 advocates for de-weaponizing these agencies by increasing accountability and oversight, a move that its authors believe will restore trust in these institutions and ensure they are more accountable to the democratically elected branches of government[1].Energy policy is also a critical component, with the project calling for the unleashing of American energy production to reduce energy prices. This approach is rooted in the belief that domestic energy production can be a powerful economic driver and a means to achieve energy independence[1].The project's economic policies are equally ambitious, with a strong emphasis on cutting the growth of government spending to reduce inflation. This fiscal conservatism is central to the project's broader goal of making federal bureaucrats more accountable to the elected branches of government. By reducing federal spending, the project's authors argue that the government can be made more efficient and responsive to the needs of the people[1].Education reform is another key area, with Project 2025 proposing to move control and funding of education from federal bureaucrats to parents and state and local governments. This decentralization is intended to give communities more control over their educational systems, a move that reflects a long-standing conservative critique of federal overreach in education policy[1].One of the more contentious proposals is the ban on biological males competing in women's sports, a policy that has sparked heated debates about gender identity and athletic fairness. This proposal is part of a broader set of social policies that aim to redefine the role of the federal government in regulating personal and social issues[1].The project's vision for disaster response is also noteworthy. Project 2025 suggests reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This approach is based on the argument that FEMA is "overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt." The proposal includes changing the cost-sharing arrangement so the federal government covers 25% of the costs for small disasters and up to 75% for "truly catastrophic disasters"[4].This shift in disaster response aligns with broader themes of decentralization and state autonomy that run through many of Project 2025's proposals. For instance, Donald Trump, whose policies have been compared to those of Project 2025, has suggested that states should take more responsibility for disaster response, stating, "That's what states are for, to take care of problems"[4].Despite its ambitious scope, Project 2025 has faced significant criticism. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has warned that the project's agenda represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. The ACLU argues that by seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, Project 2025 prioritizes control over fairness and enforcement over welfare[3].Experts and critics alike point out that the incremental implementation of these policies in states like Texas and Washington is already testing the limits of legislative and judicial resilience. These small, strategic moves are paving the way for the project's larger vision, which could have far-reaching detrimental effects on communities and the economy, particularly for marginalized groups such as women, immigrants, and low-income families[5].As I reflect on the breadth and depth of Project 2025, it is clear that this initiative is not just a set of policy proposals but a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether one sees this vision as a necessary correction or a dangerous deviation from current norms, it is undeniable that Project 2025 is shaping the conversation about the future of American governance.Looking ahead, the next few years will be crucial in determining the trajectory of Project 2025. As the 2025 presidential election approaches, the alignment of Trump's policies with those of Project 2025 will likely remain a point of contention. The project's success will depend on its ability to garner widespread support and navigate the complex landscape of American politics.In the end, Project 2025 stands as a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether it succeeds in its ambitious goals or faces significant resistance, its impact on the national discourse is already being felt. As the country moves forward, it will be important to continue monitoring the developments of Project 2025, not just as a set of policies, but as a reflection of the deeper debates about the role of government in American society.

Agbioscience was on-site at the Indiana Farm Bureau's Ag Threats and Security Summit in March and had a chance to sit down with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s Special Agent in Charge Herb Stapleton to talk all things biosecurity. We get into: The complex labyrinth of threats and risks affecting agriculture in the Midwest and across the United States How threats to agriculture are evolving and what that evolution means for farmers and agbioscience companies alike As Special Agent in Charge, what Herb has witnessed as the most prevalent cyber threats to ag across the Midwest in recent years Herb's perspective on the relationship between food security and national security What controls farmers and agbioscience companies can put in place to be prepared Action items Herb hopes attendees take from the event – from the simple to the complex

Agbioscience was on-site at the Indiana Farm Bureau's Ag Threats and Security Summit in March and had a chance to sit down with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s Special Agent in Charge Herb Stapleton to talk all things biosecurity. We get into:  The complex labyrinth of threats and risks affecting agriculture in the Midwest and across the United States How threats to agriculture are evolving and what that evolution means for farmers and agbioscience companies alike As Special Agent in Charge, what Herb has witnessed as the most prevalent cyber threats to ag across the Midwest in recent years Herb's perspective on the relationship between food security and national security What controls farmers and agbioscience companies can put in place to be prepared Action items Herb hopes attendees take from the event – from the simple to the complex 

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by a coalition of conservative scholars, policy experts, and former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and implement a slew of radical reforms that could have far-reaching implications for American governance.At its core, Project 2025 is driven by four key pillars designed to create an effective conservative administration. This involves a significant overhaul of the federal civil service system, where merit-based hiring would be replaced by appointments based on loyalty to the administration. This shift is particularly evident in the proposed takeover of key government agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)[5].Imagine a scenario where the DOJ, an institution meant to uphold the law impartially, is transformed into a partisan tool. This is exactly what Project 2025 envisions, with the DOJ being tasked to prosecute "anti-white racism" instead of protecting against discrimination across all groups. This proposal is not just a policy change; it represents a fundamental shift in how justice is perceived and administered in the United States.The project also targets other federal agencies for dismantling or significant restructuring. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are slated for abolition, reflecting a broader disdain for the current bureaucratic structure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a cornerstone of medical research, would see its independence curtailed, with specific proposals to defund stem cell research. These changes are not merely administrative; they signify a profound reorientation of national priorities[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its economic agenda. The plan advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that would likely exacerbate climate change and undermine decades of environmental protection efforts. Additionally, it proposes a flat income tax for individuals and significant tax cuts for corporations, which critics argue would widen the income gap and burden lower-income Americans. Medicare and Medicaid, critical safety nets for millions, would face cuts, further straining the healthcare system[5].The social and cultural implications of Project 2025 are equally profound. The initiative seeks to criminalize pornography and remove legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, rolling back hard-won rights for marginalized communities. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs would be ended, reflecting a broader rejection of progressive social policies. The plan even goes so far as to propose laws supported by the Christian right, including the criminalization of sending and receiving abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[5].Immigration policy is another area where Project 2025's vision is starkly different from current practices. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach not only raises serious constitutional concerns but also underscores a harsh and punitive stance on immigration[5].The architects of Project 2025 are not mere theorists; many have direct ties to Donald Trump's administration and campaign. Several key contributors worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, and the project's goals align closely with Trump's *Agenda 47* program. Despite Trump's later attempts to distance himself from the plan, his second administration has already begun implementing many of its proposals. Just four days into his second term, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions mirrored or partially mirrored Project 2025's recommendations[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy initiative but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal federal government. However, critics warn that these changes could have devastating consequences for workers, the environment, and marginalized communities.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 will likely be marked by intense political battles and legal challenges. As the country navigates these changes, it will be crucial to monitor how these policies affect real people and communities. The next few years will be a critical period, as the full impact of Project 2025 becomes clearer and the nation grapples with the implications of such profound governance reforms.In the end, Project 2025 is a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether one views it as a necessary revolution or a dangerous overreach, it is undeniable that this initiative has the potential to reshape the very foundations of American governance. As we move forward, it is essential to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the future we want to build and the values we wish to uphold.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by over 400 scholars and policy experts from the conservative movement, Project 2025 is a manifesto that outlines a radical transformation of American governance, aligning closely with the ideological leanings of former President Donald Trump.At its core, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and impose a partisan control over key government agencies. This is evident in the proposal to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with individuals loyal to the administration. Agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are targeted for this overhaul, suggesting a profound shift in how these institutions operate and the priorities they will serve[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the dismantling or abolition of certain federal agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are among those slated for significant changes or outright elimination. This move is part of a broader strategy to streamline government, but critics argue it could lead to a loss of critical services and oversight. For instance, dismantling DHS could compromise national security and disaster response efforts, while abolishing the Department of Education could undermine federal support for public schools and higher education[5].The project also delves deeply into economic and environmental policies. It advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for climate change and public health. Additionally, it proposes reducing taxes on corporations and implementing a flat income tax on individuals, which could exacerbate income inequality. The plan further suggests cutting Medicare and Medicaid, critical healthcare programs for millions of Americans, and reversing many of the policies implemented by President Joe Biden[5].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025's proposals are particularly contentious. The plan recommends making the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent and defunding its stem cell research. This could stifle medical innovation and hinder the development of new treatments for various diseases. Moreover, the project proposes enacting laws that criminalize the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception, reflecting a strong alignment with the Christian right's agenda[5].Social and civil rights are also under scrutiny in Project 2025. The initiative suggests removing legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Instead, it proposes that the DOJ should focus on prosecuting anti-white racism, a move that many see as a misguided and divisive approach to addressing racial issues. Furthermore, the project calls for criminalizing pornography, a policy that raises significant questions about free speech and personal freedoms[5].Immigration policy is another critical area where Project 2025's proposals are stark. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach is not only controversial but also raises serious concerns about human rights and the rule of law[5].Despite the ambitious and often controversial nature of these proposals, Project 2025 has already begun to influence policy in significant ways. Following Trump's 2024 election victory, several architects and supporters of the project were nominated to positions in his second administration. An analysis by *Time* found that nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in the early days of his second term "mirror or partially mirror" proposals from Project 2025[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it is clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in American governance. The project's writers and contributors, many of whom worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, have crafted a blueprint that is both detailed and far-reaching. While the stated goals of Project 2025 are to streamline government and align it with conservative values, expert analyses suggest that the potential impacts could be far more complex and multifaceted.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will likely be a contentious and ongoing process. As the administration continues to roll out these policies, it will be crucial to monitor their effects on various sectors of American society. The upcoming milestones will include legislative battles, judicial challenges, and public reactions that will shape the ultimate impact of this initiative.In the end, Project 2025 is not just a policy document; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether this vision aligns with the values and aspirations of the American people remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by significant change and profound debate.

Are you concerned about your child's safety in the digital age? In this important Teach Them Diligently podcast episode, Leslie Nunnery and Kevin Cronister offer practical, actionable advice for parents. Learn how to establish open communication, set boundaries for online friendships, and monitor your child's activities while respecting their privacy. Kevin shares crucial insights on recognizing grooming tactics and provides a step-by-step guide on what to do if your child is victimized online, including preserving evidence, reporting procedures, and the vital need for emotional support. This episode is a must-listen for any parent navigating the complexities of raising children in today's digital world. Meet the Guest: Kevin Cronister is a 15-year law enforcement veteran. He currently serves as a Detective with the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force in the Kansas City Metro Area. He's a Squad Leader, as well as a Ballistic Shield Operator and Firearms Instructor for SWAT. Kevin earned his master's degree in forensic psychology and holds numerous certifications, such as Advanced Interview & Interrogation through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) certified for responding to issues with those in mental health crises, and Advanced Digital Forensic Analysis for the iOS and Android operating system. He is a certified Force Science Analyst and currently serves on the Use of Force Review Board for his agency. Kevin is currently enrolled in the McAfee Institute's Certified Expert in Cyber Crime Investigation (CECI) program. He trains mixed martial arts and obtained his brown belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu from UFC veteran Trey Ogden at Marathon MMA in Overland Park, Kansas. Kevin is the Chief Operating Officer (CEO) of Guardian Training Solutions, LLC., a law enforcement education and training company teaching tactical and investigative courses both in-person and online.  Key Takeaways: Understand Online Dangers & Grooming: Parents must be aware of the specific threats children face online, including the manipulative tactics of grooming.Foster Open Communication: Creating a safe space for children to talk about their online experiences is crucial for early intervention and support.Establish Clear Online Rules & Boundaries: Setting guidelines for online friendships, interactions, and screen time is essential for safety.Monitor Responsibly & Respect Privacy: Parents should oversee online activity while fostering trust and respecting their child's appropriate boundaries.Respond Calmly & Preserve Evidence: If victimization occurs, a calm parental response and proper preservation of digital evidence are vital first steps.Prioritize Reporting & Seek Support: Timely reporting to law enforcement and providing emotional support are essential for the child's well-being and accountability.https://youtu.be/ESkT6N1j1aQ Podcast Sponsor: For years, Action Bible resources have helped homeschool kids better understand the Bible and grow their faith in Jesus. Bestselling Action Bible illustrated books, Bibles, and games can be purchased wherever books are sold. Click HERE to purchase your copies today. Additional Resources: Find out more about Kids Digital Health HEREFind out more about Guardian Training Solutions HERE 

Join the Bad Girl, The One and Only Playa, and The Stars as they take a look at The Subway Guy turned convicted sex offender Jared Fogle. Jared Scott Fogle,, born August 23, 1977, is an American former spokesman for Subway restaurants and confessed serial child molester. Fogle appeared in Subway's advertising campaigns from 2000 to 2015 until an FBI investigation led to him being convicted of child sex tourism and possessing child pornography. While a student at Indiana University, Fogle lost 245 lb. between 1998 and 1999. Having frequented a Subway restaurant as part of his diet plan, he was hired to help advertise the company the following year. Fogle's popularity led to his appearances in over 300 commercials during his 15 years with Subway, alongside other media appearances. Allegations of Fogle having inappropriate relations with minors began in 2007 but did not gain traction until 2015 when the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uncovered that he received child pornography from an associate. Pleading guilty to the child sex tourism and child pornography charges the same year, Fogle was sentenced to 15 years and 8 months in federal prison. He remains incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution, Englewood, as of 2025. Your True Crime Crew shies away from no controversy! Tune in on Monday, March 31st at 7 EST for this landmark episode! #jaredfogle #thesubwayguy #truecrime

There are calls for a probe after a journalist was reportedly accidentally added to a group chat with messages about US plans to strike Yemen. The FBI has created a team to look into the recent Tesla attacks. The Trump administration is cutting dozens of grants for LGBTQ health research. A couple who've been in the US for 35 years have been deported back to Colombia. Plus, parts of the US are heating up this week. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hollywood and the Media Truth About Drug Gangs and Police. Special Episode. The portrayal of law enforcement and criminal organizations in Hollywood has long shaped public perception. However, the media's representation of police work and the realities of drug gangs often diverge from the truth. Dr. Stephen Morreale, a retired DEA agent, college professor, and host of The Cop Doc Podcast, is dedicated to dispelling these myths. He sheds light on the overwhelming violence committed by organized drug gangs and the misconceptions surrounding law enforcement. The story on this episode of the "Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast", is available on their website for free in addition to Apple Podcasts and Spotify, as well as through other podcast platforms. The Reality of Drug Gangs in America Hollywood often glamorizes or oversimplifies the operations of drug gangs, but the truth is far more complex and violent. The United States is home to numerous gangs deeply involved in drug trafficking and organized crime. Groups like MS-13, Nuestra Familia, Surenos, Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings, and 1% Motorcycle Clubs have an extensive presence across the country. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as of 2014, there were approximately 33,000 gangs in the U.S., classified into street gangs, motorcycle gangs, and prison gangs. While some of these organizations are multi-ethnic, many operate along racial lines, restricting membership based on ethnicity. Follow the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms. At least 23 gangs operate at a national level, spanning multiple states and drug markets. Moreover, law enforcement has identified connections between transnational drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) and several street and prison gangs. Mexican DTOs, such as the Federation, the Gulf Cartel, the Juárez Cartel, and the Tijuana Cartel, leverage U.S. based Hispanic street gangs and prison gangs for drug smuggling, distribution, and enforcement. These DTOs avoid direct involvement in retail drug distribution, instead utilizing gang members to minimize their exposure to law enforcement. Read supporting stories about this and much more from Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast in platforms like Medium, Newsbreak and Blogspot. The Role of the DEA and Law Enforcement, Hollywood and the Media Truth About Drug Gangs and Police. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is at the forefront of combating these criminal enterprises. Its mission is to enforce U.S. controlled substances laws, dismantle drug trafficking organizations, and reduce the availability of illicit drugs in domestic and international markets. Dr. Morreale, who served in law enforcement for 30 years, played a crucial role in these efforts, retiring as Assistant Special Agent in Charge for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Investigations. During his 20-year tenure with the DEA, he worked on financial investigations, asset forfeiture, and enforcement operations targeting major drug networks. Follow the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and podcast on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms In addition to his work with the DEA, Dr. Morreale was instrumental in advancing community policing efforts. In 1990, he co-founded the New England Community Police Partnership, a program that trained thousands of police officers and community members to foster better relationships between law enforcement and the public. He educated future law enforcement professionals as Chair and Full Professor of Criminal Justice at Worcester State University. The interview is available as a free podcast on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and podcast website, also available on platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and most major podcast outlets. Dispelling Hollywood Myths Through The Cop Doc Podcast Through his podcast, The Cop Doc Podcast, Dr. Morreale provides a platform for in-depth discussions on law enforcement, policing reforms, and the challenges officers face in the field. His expertise is especially relevant in an era where social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X play a significant role in shaping public opinion. Many misconceptions about law enforcement stem from sensationalized portrayals in movies and TV shows, leading to unrealistic expectations and misunderstandings about police procedures and challenges. Hollywood often focuses on dramatic shootouts, rogue cops, and quick case resolutions, but the truth is that real policing involves extensive investigations, intelligence gathering, and strategic planning. While media outlets and streaming services like Apple Podcasts and Spotify provide platforms for entertainment and also facts, it is crucial for the public to seek out factual information. This conversation is a valuable resource in this regard, offering insights from experienced law enforcement professionals and academics. Check out the show on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms The Impact of Social Media and News Outlets, Hollywood and the Media Truth About Drug Gangs and Police. The role of social media in spreading misinformation cannot be overlooked. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X have become primary sources of news for many people, but they often contribute to the dissemination of biased or incomplete narratives about policing and criminal organizations. Dr. Morreale emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking when consuming media. His work highlights the need for a balanced perspective that acknowledges both the challenges and successes of law enforcement efforts. It is available as a free podcast on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast website, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and most major podcast platforms. Conclusion, Hollywood and the Media Truth About Drug Gangs and Police. Dr. Stephen Morreale's career in law enforcement and academia has given him a unique perspective on the realities of drug gangs and policing. Through his Podcast, he continues to challenge Hollywood myths, educate the public, and provide a factual account of law enforcement. In an age where media influence is stronger than ever, it is essential to seek the truth beyond dramatized portrayals and social media narratives. By engaging with experts and factual sources, the public can gain a more accurate understanding of the complexities of crime and policing in America. You can help contribute money to make the Gunrunner Movie. The film that Hollywood won't touch. It is about a now Retired Police Officer that was shot 6 times while investigating Gunrunning. He died 3 times during Medical treatment and was resuscitated. You can join the fight by giving a monetary "gift" to help ensure the making of his film at agunrunnerfilm.com. Time is running out to secure the Medicare coverage you deserve! Whether you're enrolling for the first time or looking for a better plan, our experts help you compare options to get more benefits, lower costs, and keep your doctors, all for free! Visit LetHealthy.com, that's LetHealthy.com or call (866) 427-1225, (866) 427-1222 to learn more. Learn useful tips and strategies to increase your Facebook Success with John Jay Wiley. Both free and paid content are available on this Patreon page. Your golden years are supposed to be easy and worry free, at least in regards to finances. If you are over 70, you can turn your life insurance policy into cash. Visit LetSavings.com, LetSavings.com or call (866) 480-4252, (866) 480-4252, again that's (866) 480 4252 to see if you qualify. Be sure to check out our website. Be sure to follow us on MeWe, X, Instagram, Facebook,Pinterest, Linkedin and other social media platforms for the latest episodes and news. Background song Hurricane is used with permission from the band Dark Horse Flyer. You can contact John J. "Jay" Wiley by email at Jay@letradio.com, or learn more about him on their website. Get the latest news articles, without all the bias and spin, from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast on the Newsbreak app, which is free. Find a wide variety of great podcasts online at The Podcast Zone Facebook Page, look for the one with the bright green logo. Hollywood and the Media Truth About Drug Gangs and Police. Attributions DOJ Wikipedia DEA The Cop Doc PodcastSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a blueprint crafted by the Heritage Foundation for a potential second Donald Trump presidency, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page document is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive plan to reshape the very fabric of American governance.At its core, Project 2025 aims to centralize power in the White House, leveraging the unitary executive theory to expand presidential control over the federal government. This vision is championed by conservative legal scholars and has been embraced by the Supreme Court in recent years. As Kevin Roberts, a key figure in the project, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president," reflecting a desire to eliminate the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to reinstate Schedule F, an executive order issued by Trump in October 2020 that was later rescinded by President Biden. Schedule F would strip career government employees of their employment protections, allowing the president to fire and replace them with loyalists and ideologues. This move would fundamentally alter the civil service system, which has been merit-based since the Pendleton Act of 1883. As the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Public Policy Director Jacque Simon warned, "If all of their recommendations were implemented, it wouldn't just eviscerate our statutory collective bargaining rights and pay system but undo the basics of the apolitical, merit-based system we have today"[5].The implications of Schedule F are far-reaching. It would enable the president to reward cronies and punish enemies, creating an environment ripe for corruption and abuse of power. Independent agencies, which currently provide crucial oversight and accountability, would be rendered ineffective. This could lead to a chilling effect where government employees are discouraged from speaking out, and agencies might be incentivized to suppress the truth and spread misinformation[2].Project 2025 also outlines drastic changes to various federal agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), created in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, would be eliminated, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would be privatized. This move would revert the country to a pre-9/11 era, potentially compromising national security efforts and intelligence sharing. The Department of Education would be dismantled, with oversight and federal funding for education handed over to the states, a change that could severely impact Title I funding for high-poverty schools and exacerbate existing teacher shortages[5][3].The Department of Justice, under Project 2025, would undergo significant reforms. The DOJ would be tasked with combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and its Civil Rights Division would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, argued that advancing the interests of certain segments of American society comes at the expense of others and violates federal law. This approach would fundamentally alter the DOJ's role in protecting civil rights, instead aligning it with a conservative agenda[1].In the realm of public education, Project 2025's proposals are equally alarming. The plan would eliminate Title I funding, which has been critical for high-poverty schools since 1965, and replace it with no-strings-attached block grants to states. This change could lead to significant budget strains for already underfunded schools, undermining academic outcomes for millions of vulnerable students. Additionally, the project advocates for weakening regulations on charter schools and promoting federal voucher laws, which could siphon funds from public schools and destabilize state budgets[3].The project's stance on healthcare is also contentious. It proposes cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and reversing many of the healthcare policies implemented by President Joe Biden. This would strip away healthcare coverage for pre-existing conditions, a move that has been widely criticized by Democrats and healthcare advocates. Vice-President Kamala Harris has been vocal about these plans, stating that Project 2025 is a "plan to return America to a dark past"[3][4].Project 2025 also delves into environmental and social policies. It recommends reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels and proposes making the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent, including defunding its stem cell research. The project suggests criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, and ending DEI programs. It even proposes enacting laws supported by the Christian right, such as criminalizing the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[1].Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from Project 2025, the connections between the project and his administration are clear. Many of the project's architects and supporters are former Trump officials, and several Trump campaign officials have maintained contact with the project. After Trump's 2024 election victory, he nominated several of the plan's architects and supporters to positions in his second administration. An analysis by *Time* found that nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in his second term "mirror or partially mirror" proposals from Project 2025[1].The public's reaction to Project 2025 has been overwhelmingly negative. Polls indicate that the more Americans learn about the project, the more they oppose it. A Navigator poll found that 53% of Americans, including 37% of non-MAGA Republicans, oppose the project, while only 12% support it. The opposition stems from concerns about the plan's impact on healthcare, education, and the overall erosion of democratic institutions[3].As I reflect on the breadth and depth of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in how the federal government operates. The project's proponents see it as a last opportunity to "save our republic" by aligning it with a far-right agenda. However, critics argue that it would dismantle the administrative state, undermine national security, and strip away fundamental rights and freedoms.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on various factors, including legislative support and judicial oversight. As the country navigates these potential changes, it is crucial for Americans to remain informed and engaged. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the decisions made in the coming months will have lasting implications for generations to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and alarm. This sprawling initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and involving a myriad of conservative groups and former Trump administration officials, is nothing short of a blueprint for a radical transformation of the U.S. federal government.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manifesto that outlines a vision for a second Trump presidency, one that would usher in sweeping changes across various federal agencies and policy domains. The project is divided into four key pillars: a comprehensive policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a detailed playbook for the first 180 days in office[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to consolidate executive power. The plan advocates for placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This is rooted in a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. As Kevin Roberts, a key figure in the project, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[1].The project's impact on federal agencies is profound. For instance, it proposes dismantling or abolishing several key departments, including the Department of Education and the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Education, in particular, would see its role significantly reduced, with control over education funding and policy transferred to the states. This would include closing the Department of Education and shifting programs under the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) to the Department of Health and Human Services[1][2].In the realm of education, Project 2025 envisions a future where federal involvement is minimal. It suggests allowing Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to expire, thereby removing $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. The Head Start program, which provides essential services to children of low-income families, would be ended, with critics like Roger Severino arguing it does not provide value, though without providing evidence[1][2].The project's stance on environmental policy is equally contentious. It seeks to reverse a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights would be closed, and the agency would be barred from using private health data to determine the effects of pollution. The expansion of the national electrical grid would be blocked, and funding for renewable energy projects would be curtailed. Instead, the project advocates for the development of vast oil, gas, and coal resources, including Arctic drilling[1].Project 2025 also has a clear agenda on social issues. It proposes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The DOJ would be tasked with prosecuting what the project terms "anti-white racism," and affirmative action programs would be targeted as violating federal law. Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, argued that advancing the interests of certain segments of American society "comes at the expense of other Americans—and in nearly all cases violates longstanding federal law"[1].The project's approach to law enforcement is another area of significant change. The DOJ, described as a "bloated bureaucracy" infatuated with a "radical liberal agenda," would be thoroughly reformed and closely overseen by the White House. The director of the FBI would be personally accountable to the president, and consent decrees between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed. Capital punishment would be promoted for "particularly heinous crimes" like pedophilia, and the Uniformed Division of the Secret Service would be authorized to enforce the law in the District of Columbia, which the project describes as "infested with crime"[1].In terms of economic policy, Project 2025 advocates for a flat income tax on individuals, reducing taxes on corporations and capital gains, and cutting Medicare and Medicaid. It suggests merging several statistical agencies, including the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, into a single organization aligned with conservative principles. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would be abolished, and the role of the National Labor Relations Board would be significantly reduced[1].Despite its comprehensive nature, Project 2025 has faced significant criticism and public opposition. Many see it as a dangerous plan to expand presidential power and gut the system of checks and balances. The American public, according to various polls, is largely united in their disapproval of the project's proposals[2].Donald Trump, despite his administration's deep ties to the project, has attempted to distance himself from it. In a social media post, he claimed, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." However, the involvement of former Trump officials and the alignment of the project's proposals with Trump's past policies and current campaign promises suggest a closer connection than he admits[3].As we look to the future, the implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching and profound. If implemented, these policies could fundamentally alter the fabric of American governance, impacting everything from education and environmental protection to law enforcement and economic policy. With Trump's second term underway, the next few months will be crucial in determining how many of these proposals become reality.In the words of Sarah E. Hunt, president of the Joseph Rainey Center for Public Policy, "The Inflation Reduction Act is crucial, and it is vital that Republicans engage in supporting good energy and climate policy." Her sentiments reflect a broader concern among many Americans: that Project 2025's vision for the future may be at odds with the nation's long-term well-being and the principles of democratic governance[1].As the nation navigates this complex and contentious landscape, one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a pivotal moment in American politics, one that will shape the course of the country for years to come. Whether its ambitious plans will be realized remains to be seen, but the debate it has sparked is undeniable—a testament to the enduring power of ideas and the unyielding spirit of public discourse.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is pointing the finger at TraderTraitor, a North Korean hacker group, as being behind the largest ever crypto heist in history. The group, also known as Lazarus, allegedly stole 400,000 Ethereum tokens from cryptocurrency exchange Bybit on Friday. Also in this edition: Donald Trump revokes Chevron's permit allowing the US energy giant to exploit Venezuela's oil resources.

On Thursday, the Senate confirmed Kashyap “Kash” Patel as the next director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Patel was a former federal prosecutor who served in the White House during President Donald Trump's first term and is viewed by many as a Trump loyalist. On Sunday, Trump announced that Patel had named Dan Bongino as deputy FBI director. Bongino is a popular conservative podcaster who served in the New York Police Department and the Secret Service.Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: What do you think of Patel and Bongino? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle's social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

pWotD Episode 2855: Dan Bongino Welcome to Popular Wiki of the Day, spotlighting Wikipedia's most visited pages, giving you a peek into what the world is curious about today.With 486,940 views on Monday, 24 February 2025 our article of the day is Dan Bongino.Daniel John Bongino (born December 4, 1974) is an American conservative political commentator, radio host, author, and former law enforcement officer who will serve as the 20th deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) beginning in 2025. He currently hosts The Dan Bongino Show on Rumble and previously hosted Unfiltered with Dan Bongino on Fox News until April 2023. Bongino began his career as a New York City Police Department (NYPD) officer from 1995 to 1999 before serving as a U. S. Secret Service agent from 1999 to 2011. He later ran for Congress three times as a Republican, though unsuccessfully.On February 23, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that Bongino had been named the next deputy director of the FBI.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 02:28 UTC on Tuesday, 25 February 2025.For the full current version of the article, see Dan Bongino on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm long-form Gregory.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I found myself navigating a complex web of policy proposals, ideological convictions, and far-reaching implications for American governance. This initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and involving over 100 conservative groups, is more than just a policy guide; it is a blueprint for a radical transformation of the federal government.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-plus page "Mandate for Leadership" authored by former Trump administration officials and other conservative stalwarts. The project is built around four pillars: a policy guide for the next presidential administration, a database of potential personnel, training for these candidates, and a playbook of actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the redistribution of power within the federal government. The project advocates for a significant expansion of presidential powers, aiming to place the entire executive branch under direct presidential control. This includes eliminating the independence of agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). According to Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, all federal employees should answer directly to the president, reflecting a unitary executive theory that centralizes greater control in the White House[2].This centralization of power is not limited to administrative restructuring. Project 2025 also proposes sweeping reforms in various federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Education is slated for dismantling, a move that would gut federal education funding and deny critical resources to vulnerable students. The National Education Association has warned that such changes would devastate public education, sanctioning discrimination against LGBTQ+ students and undermining the very fabric of the education system[3].In the realm of disaster response, Project 2025 suggests a drastic shift in the role of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The proposal recommends reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, rather than the federal government. This aligns with Trump's recent actions, where he established a review council to advise on FEMA's capabilities and suggested that states should take over disaster response management. The project's authors argue that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness," leading to deep debt and an unsustainable model[1].The project's stance on law enforcement is equally contentious. It calls for a thorough reform of the DOJ, criticizing it as a "bloated bureaucracy" infatuated with a "radical liberal agenda." The proposal suggests that the DOJ should combat "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and that the Civil Rights Division should prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. This vision is starkly at odds with traditional civil rights protections and reflects a broader agenda to reverse decades of progress in civil rights[2].Project 2025's economic policies are no less radical. The plan includes proposals to cut overtime protections for over 4 million workers, stop efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and limit access to food assistance for millions of Americans. It also aims to eliminate funding for key public transportation projects, such as the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, which has been crucial for awarding federal grants to local communities for infrastructure projects. These changes would make it significantly harder for Americans without cars to commute to work or travel around their communities[5].The environmental implications of Project 2025 are equally alarming. The plan seeks to undermine critical climate action by attacking the EPA's "Endangerment Finding," a cornerstone of federal efforts to curb emissions under the Clean Air Act. By 'updating' this finding, Project 2025 would make it harder for the EPA to take action against climate change, effectively rolling back hard-fought gains in environmental protection[5].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the initiative's architects and supporters have been nominated to key positions in his administration. This close alignment between Trump's policies and Project 2025's proposals has led critics to argue that the project is, in essence, a roadmap for Trump's second term. As CBS News noted, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in his second term mirror or partially mirror proposals from Project 2025[4].The broader themes of Project 2025—centralization of power, dismantling of social safety nets, and a radical shift in federal policies—paint a picture of an initiative that is both ambitious and deeply divisive. As the American public becomes more aware of these proposals, opposition grows, reflecting a deep-seated concern about the direction in which this project could steer the country.Looking forward, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will likely be a contentious and highly politicized process. With the project's architects now in key positions within the administration, the next few months will be crucial in determining how many of these proposals become reality. As the nation navigates this complex landscape, one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a profound shift in American governance, one that could have far-reaching and lasting impacts on the lives of millions of Americans.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive plan to reshape the very fabric of American governance. This project, designed to guide the next Republican president, has been a topic of both intrigue and controversy, especially given its alignment with many of the policies implemented by President Trump in his second term.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-plus page policy guide authored by former Trump administration officials and other conservative thinkers. The project is built around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, training programs for these candidates, and a strategic plan for implementing these policies[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambitious plan to overhaul the executive branch. The project advocates for a significant consolidation of power in the White House, aligning with the unitary executive theory that aims to centralize greater control over the government. This vision includes making all federal employees directly accountable to the president, a move that critics argue would undermine the independence of crucial agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)[3].The project's authors are clear about their intentions to transform key federal agencies. For instance, Project 2025 proposes dismantling or abolishing agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED), while significantly reforming others. The DOJ, in particular, is targeted for a thorough overhaul, with the project describing it as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. The proposed reforms include having the DOJ combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[3].The impact on social and economic policies is equally profound. Project 2025 calls for rolling back civil rights protections across multiple fronts, including cutting DEI programs and LGBTQ+ rights in healthcare, education, and workplaces. It also proposes limiting access to food assistance, which affects over 40 million people monthly, and eliminating the Head Start early education program that serves more than a million children. Additionally, the project suggests restricting safety nets for farmers, which could disproportionately affect low-income farmers and those without extensive assets[2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025's proposals are just as far-reaching. The plan includes pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private options, which critics argue would be worse for patients. It also recommends restricting access to medication abortion and ending coverage of emergency contraception. These changes are part of a broader agenda to reshape healthcare policy in line with conservative principles[2][3].The project's stance on immigration and border security is another critical area. Project 2025 aligns with President Trump's recent executive actions, such as deploying active-duty troops to the southern border to "seal the borders and maintain the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of the United States." The plan also calls for suspending refugee admissions and shifting resources away from the Refugee Admissions Program to address what it describes as a "collapse" of U.S. border security and immigration enforcement[1][3].Economic policies are also a focal point, with Project 2025 advocating for significant changes in taxation, trade, and regulatory oversight. The plan includes reducing taxes on corporations and capital gains, instituting a flat income tax on individuals, and reversing former President Biden's policies. It also proposes reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels and combining various regulatory agencies to streamline oversight, a move that could have far-reaching implications for economic data collection and business regulation[3].The project's vision for law enforcement is equally contentious. It suggests that the Uniformed Division of the Secret Service should enforce the law outside of the White House and its immediate surroundings, reflecting a broader concern about crime in the District of Columbia. Additionally, Project 2025 promotes the use of capital punishment for "particularly heinous crimes" and advocates for a more lenient approach to small businesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)[3].As I navigate through the detailed proposals of Project 2025, it becomes evident that this initiative is not just a set of policy recommendations but a comprehensive blueprint for reshaping American governance. The project's architects, many of whom have been nominated to positions in Trump's second administration, are clear about their goals: to centralize power, roll back civil rights protections, and implement a conservative agenda across various sectors.Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, encapsulates the project's ambition when he describes President Trump's actions as "home runs" that are "in many cases more than we could have even dared hope for."[1]However, these proposals also raise significant concerns about the potential impacts on American society. Critics argue that these changes could devastate working people, small businesses, and the overall health of the economy. The elimination of programs like the Economic Development Administration (EDA) and the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, for instance, could undermine federal investments in communities and public transportation, making it harder for Americans to make ends meet[2].As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 will continue to shape the policy landscape of the United States. With many of its proposals already being implemented through executive actions, the next few months will be crucial in determining the full extent of these changes. The Senate's role in confirming key appointments and the public's response to these policies will be pivotal in shaping the future of American governance.In the end, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in how the federal government operates and the values it upholds. Whether this shift will be seen as a positive transformation or a dangerous consolidation of power remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the implications will be far-reaching and profound.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative aimed at reshaping the federal government of the United States, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally different America. Led by the Heritage Foundation and crafted by former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan that spans four pillars: a policy guide, a database of potential administration personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for the first 180 days in office[4].At its core, Project 2025 seeks to consolidate executive power, aligning the federal government more closely with conservative principles. One of the most striking aspects of this initiative is its proposal to overhaul the structure and function of various federal agencies. For instance, Project 2025 advocates for the dismantling or abolition of key agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED). This would allow the president to implement the Project 2025 agenda with minimal bureaucratic resistance[3].The project's authors argue that many federal agencies have become bloated and inefficient. For example, they suggest that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is "overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt." To address this, Project 2025 proposes reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, with the federal government covering only 25% of the costs for small disasters and up to 75% for truly catastrophic ones[1].This shift in disaster response management is not isolated; it reflects a broader theme of decentralization and reduced federal involvement. Project 2025 also recommends ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that "DHS should not be in the business of handing out federal tax dollars: These grants should be terminated"[1].The impact of such changes would be far-reaching. For instance, the elimination of the Economic Development Administration (EDA) at the Department of Commerce could undermine the federal government's ability to invest in transformative infrastructure projects. The EDA has been instrumental in awarding billions of dollars for key public transportation projects and other community investments, resulting in the creation or saving of 220,000 jobs and generating nearly $20 billion in private investment[2].Another critical area of focus is the restructuring of statistical and regulatory agencies. Project 2025 proposes merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single organization, aligning its mission with conservative principles. This move is seen as a way to centralize data collection and analysis under direct presidential control, which critics argue could politicize essential data that businesses and policymakers rely on[3].The project also targets social and economic safety nets. It suggests limiting access to food assistance, which over 40 million people rely on monthly, and eliminating the Head Start early education program that serves over 1 million children. Additionally, it proposes pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private health insurance options, which could affect the healthcare of millions of Americans[2].In the realm of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends rolling back overtime protections for 4.3 million workers and keeping the overtime exception threshold low to avoid burdening businesses, particularly in rural areas. It also advocates for work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps, further complicating the lives of those already struggling to make ends meet[2][3].The initiative's stance on law enforcement and justice is equally contentious. Project 2025 views the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. It proposes a thorough reform of the DOJ, with the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) being personally accountable to the president. The project also suggests combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism" by prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[3].One of the most alarming aspects of Project 2025 is its expansion of presidential powers, based on a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory. This vision aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House, eliminating the independence of agencies like the DOJ, the FBI, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As Kevin Roberts, a key figure behind the project, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[3].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the alignment between its proposals and his past policies and campaign promises is striking. Trump has nominated several of the project's architects and supporters to positions in his administration, and analysis has shown that nearly two-thirds of his executive actions mirror or partially mirror proposals from Project 2025[3].As we move forward, the implications of Project 2025 are daunting. The dismantling of federal agencies, the consolidation of executive power, and the rollback of social and economic safety nets could fundamentally alter the fabric of American governance. The project's vision of a more centralized, conservative government raises critical questions about the balance of power, the role of the federal government, and the future of social welfare programs.In the coming months, as the project's proposals begin to take shape, Americans will be watching closely to see how these changes unfold. Will the vision of Project 2025 become the new norm, or will it face significant resistance from Congress, the judiciary, and the public? The answer to this question will determine the course of American governance for years to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of unease about the profound implications this initiative could have on the fabric of American governance. Spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank with deep ties to the Trump administration, Project 2025 is more than just a policy guide; it's a comprehensive blueprint for a radical restructuring of the federal government.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillared initiative: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention for its sweeping proposals that align closely with Trump's past policies and current campaign promises[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to consolidate executive power. The project advocates for placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This vision is rooted in the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. As Kevin Roberts, the Heritage Foundation President, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[2].The proposed changes to federal agencies are far-reaching. Project 2025 suggests merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single organization, aligning its mission with conservative principles. It recommends abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and shrinking the role of the National Labor Relations Board, which protects employees' ability to organize and fight unfair labor practices. The project also calls for the elimination of the Federal Trade Commission, a move that would significantly undermine antitrust enforcement[2].In the realm of education, Project 2025 envisions a significant reduction of the federal government's role. It proposes closing the Department of Education and giving states control over education funding and policy. The project advocates for public funds to be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools, and suggests cutting funding for free school meals and ending the Head Start program. This shift is justified by the project's backers as a move to treat education as a private rather than a public good[2].The project's stance on environmental issues is equally contentious. It seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also advocates for the expansion of fossil fuel use, including Arctic drilling, and opposes the transition to renewable energy by blocking the expansion of the national electrical grid[2].Project 2025's approach to law enforcement is marked by a critical view of the DOJ, which it describes as a "bloated bureaucracy" infatuated with a "radical liberal agenda." The project proposes reforming the DOJ to combat what it terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and suggests that the Civil Rights Division should prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. This stance is echoed by Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, who argues that advancing the interests of certain segments of American society comes at the expense of others and violates federal law[2].The project's impact on social policies is also significant. It recommends instituting work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and proposes legislation requiring higher pay for working on Sundays, based on the belief that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest." Additionally, it suggests that OSHA should be more lenient on small businesses and that the overtime exception threshold should be kept low to avoid burdening businesses in rural areas[2].Critics of Project 2025 argue that it would destroy the system of checks and balances in the U.S. government, creating an "imperial presidency" with almost unlimited power to implement policies. The League of Conservation Voters has criticized the project as a giveaway to private industry, while Republican climate advocates have disagreed with its climate policy, highlighting the growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change[3][2].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a set of policy proposals but a vision for a fundamentally different America. With its emphasis on centralizing executive power, dismantling federal agencies, and promoting conservative principles across various sectors, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in how the federal government could operate.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on the outcome of future elections and the political will of the next administration. As the 2024 elections approach, the debate around this project is likely to intensify. Whether Project 2025 will succeed in reshaping American governance remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: its impact, if realized, would be profound and far-reaching. As the American public navigates this complex landscape, it is crucial to engage in informed discussions about the future of democracy and the role of government in American life.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sprawling initiative crafted by former Trump administration officials and the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a radical restructuring of the U.S. federal government.Project 2025 is encapsulated in a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," which outlines a comprehensive plan to reorganize every federal agency to align with conservative principles. This project is not just about policy tweaks; it's about transforming the very fabric of American governance. The Heritage Foundation's President, Kevin Roberts, has described their role as "institutionalizing Trumpism," a notion that underscores the deep connections between this project and the former Trump administration[1][4][5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to consolidate executive power. The initiative advocates for placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This centralization is rooted in a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to give the president unprecedented control over the government. As Kevin Roberts put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[2][3].The project's impact on federal agencies is far-reaching. For instance, it proposes merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single entity, with a mission aligned with conservative principles. It also recommends abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is responsible for enforcing antitrust laws. The National Labor Relations Board, crucial for protecting employees' rights to organize, would see its role significantly diminished[2].In the realm of education, Project 2025 envisions a drastic reduction in the federal government's role. It suggests closing the Department of Education and transferring control over education funding and policy to the states. Federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be curtailed, and programs like the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. The project also advocates for the expiration of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which provides $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools[2].The environment is another area where Project 2025's proposals are particularly contentious. The initiative seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close its Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also supports the expansion of fossil fuel use, including Arctic drilling, and advocates for preventing states from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks[2].Project 2025's stance on climate change is starkly at odds with the views of many Republicans, including younger conservatives who acknowledge human activity's role in climate change. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has called the project's climate policies "wrongheaded," highlighting a growing consensus among younger Republicans that climate action is essential[2].The project's approach to law enforcement is equally transformative. It views the DOJ as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people, particularly due to its role in investigating alleged Trump-Russia collusion. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division would be reformed to combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. This shift aligns with the views of former Trump DOJ official Gene Hamilton, who argues that advancing certain segments of society comes at the expense of others and violates federal law[2].In the media and communications sector, Project 2025 proposes significant changes. It suggests defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS and NPR, and revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status. This could force NPR to relocate from its current FM dial range, making way for religious programming. The project also advocates for more media consolidation and proposes legislation to prevent social media companies from removing "core political viewpoints" from their platforms[2].The implications of these proposals are profound. If implemented, they would fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, potentially undermining the system of checks and balances that is a cornerstone of American democracy. As the American Progress article notes, Project 2025 "would destroy the U.S. system of checks and balances and create an imperial presidency"[3].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the alignment between his policies and the project's proposals is striking. CBS News analysis has identified over 270 proposals in the project's blueprint that match Trump's past policies and current campaign promises. Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, has praised Trump's actions as "home runs" that reflect the initiative's efforts and the readiness of the conservative movement[4][5].As we look ahead, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided in the coming months and years. With its comprehensive and far-reaching proposals, this initiative represents a critical juncture in American governance. Whether it succeeds in reshaping the federal government or is met with significant resistance will depend on the political landscape and the will of the American people.In the words of Kevin Roberts, "the nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement encapsulates the project's ambition and the stakes involved. As we navigate this complex and contentious terrain, it is clear that Project 2025 is not just a policy initiative – it is a battle for the future of American democracy.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Full Episode (02/11/2025): 3:05pm- On Tuesday, the Trump Administration secured the release of Pennsylvania school teacher Marc Fogel from a Russian prison. Fogel was wrongfully detained in 2021 and had received a 14-year sentence at a hard labor camp. 3:20pm- Constitutional Crisis! On Monday night, CNN host Kaitlan Collins claimed the U.S. is in the midst of a “constitutional crisis” as President Donald Trump and his administration attempts to reduce the size of the executive branch. Similarly, The New York Times newsroom accused the Trump Administration of ignoring court orders and creating a “constitutional crisis,” but amazingly concedes the “crisis” will likely be resolved with the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor! They conclude their article by preemptively accusing the court of “abdicating their responsibility.” 3:40pm- Susan Crabtree—RealClearPolitics National Political Correspondent—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to discuss a new report which indicates the Iranian threat on Donald Trump's life was far more serious than the public was led to believe during the 2024 campaign. Crabtree is author of the book, “Fools Gold: The Radicals, Con Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All”—which is available for pre-order now. 4:00pm- On Monday night, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth signed a memorandum reversing the naming of Fort Liberty—and renaming it Fort Bragg. Though, the military base will now be named after a World War II hero, Roland L. Bragg. 4:15pm- During Sunday's Super Bowl matchup between the Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City Chiefs, the U.S. Secret Service aired a recruitment commercial directed by Michael Bay. 4:20pm- Joining President Donald Trump from the Oval Office, Elon Musk defended his work on behalf of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—emphasizing that it is important that elected officials get to decide what happens rather than a “large unelected bureaucracy.” 4:30pm- Senator Dave McCormick—United States Senator from Pennsylvania—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and reacts to the Trump Administration securing the release Pennsylvania school teacher Marc Fogel from a Russian prison. Earlier this year, Senator McCormick and Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) drafted a letter calling for Fogel's release. 5:05pm- Joining President Donald Trump from the Oval Office, Elon Musk defended his work on behalf of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—emphasizing that it is important that elected officials get to decide what happens rather than a “large unelected bureaucracy.” After being accused of ignoring the courts and causing a “constitutional crisis” by media outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, President Trump emphasized that his administration will respect judicial rulings. 5:20pm- Constitutional Crisis! On Monday night, CNN host Kaitlan Collins claimed the U.S. is in the midst of a “constitutional crisis” as President Donald Trump and his administration attempts to reduce the size of the executive branch. Similarly, The New York Times newsroom accused the Trump Administration of ignoring court orders and creating a “constitutional crisis,” but amazingly concedes the “crisis” will likely be resolved with the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor! They conclude their article by preemptively accusing the court of “abdicating their responsibility.” 5:25pm- History Lesson with Rich: Alexander Hamilton was a famous performer who notably lost a rock, paper, scissors battle to his rival Aaron Burr…wait, is that not right? 5:30pm- John Hoyt—Vice President of the National Fraternal Order of Police—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and explains why the FOP is fully supporting Kash Patel to become Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). 6:05pm- Phil Kerpen—President of American Commitment—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to discuss the Trump Administration's numerous achievements through the first s ...

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 3: 5:05pm- Joining President Donald Trump from the Oval Office, Elon Musk defended his work on behalf of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—emphasizing that it is important that elected officials get to decide what happens rather than a “large unelected bureaucracy.” After being accused of ignoring the courts and causing a “constitutional crisis” by media outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, President Trump emphasized that his administration will respect judicial rulings. 5:20pm- Constitutional Crisis! On Monday night, CNN host Kaitlan Collins claimed the U.S. is in the midst of a “constitutional crisis” as President Donald Trump and his administration attempts to reduce the size of the executive branch. Similarly, The New York Times newsroom accused the Trump Administration of ignoring court orders and creating a “constitutional crisis,” but amazingly concedes the “crisis” will likely be resolved with the Supreme Court ruling in Trump's favor! They conclude their article by preemptively accusing the court of “abdicating their responsibility.” 5:25pm- History Lesson with Rich: Alexander Hamilton was a famous performer who notably lost a rock, paper, scissors battle to his rival Aaron Burr…wait, is that not right? 5:30pm- John Hoyt—Vice President of the National Fraternal Order of Police—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and explains why the FOP is fully supporting Kash Patel to become Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The Rich Zeoli Show- Full Episode (02/04/2025): 3:05pm- On Tuesday, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to advance Tulsi Gabbard's nomination to Director of National Intelligence. The vote was 9 to 8 along party lines—with Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Todd Young (R-IN) voting for approval despite rumors of hesitancy. 3:30pm- From the Oval Office on Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order which would end U.S. involvement with the United Nations Human Rights Council and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Last year, there were numerous reports documenting UNRWA's close ties to Hamas. President Trump also addressed China's retaliatory tariffs, reports he will dismantle the Department of Education, DOGE actively reducing the size of government, and the importance of protecting American sovereignty. 4:05pm- From the Oval Office on Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order which would end U.S. involvement with the United Nations Human Rights Council and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Last year, there were numerous reports documenting UNRWA's close ties to Hamas. President Trump also addressed China's retaliatory tariffs, reports he will dismantle the Department of Education, DOGE actively reducing the size of government, and the importance of protecting American sovereignty. 4:15pm- Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that El Salvador president offered to house dangerous criminals from gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua—which President Donald Trump recently designated as foreign terror organizations. 4:30pm- Dr. Wilfred Reilly—Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University & Author of “Lies My Liberal Teacher Told Me”—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and reacts to a new report which indicates 38% of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents were, at one point, investigating January 6th related crimes. Plus, what do women REALLY want? A new survey indicates strong, wealthy men are still preferred—shocking! And Dr. Reilly says that President Donald Trump should award Stanford economist Dr. Thomas Sowell with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. 5:05pm- Speaking with the press from the Oval Office alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald Trump said he would like Jordan and Egypt to take in Palestinians displaced from Gaza. 5:20pm- Is New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy terrified of the Trump Administration? During a recent interview, Murphy revealed an undocumented migrant currently lives at his home—and dared the Trump Administration to “come in to try to get her.” A representative for the governor insisted that Murphy's words were “misinterpreted.” 5:35pm- While speaking from the Oval Office, President Donald Trump said that if Iran assassinates him, he has left instructions to “obliterate” them and that “there would be nothing left.” 5:40pm- Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) said that people will die if the Trump Administration pulls funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Rich and Matt wonder: how many people will die if we don't spend $70,000 in taxpayer money on D.E.I. musicals in Ireland? 6:05pm- Don't say “Super Bowl” + Rich doesn't check his emails. 6:10pm- On Tuesday, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to advance Tulsi Gabbard's nomination to Director of National Intelligence. The vote was 9 to 8 along party lines—with Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Todd Young (R-IN) voting for approval despite rumors of hesitancy. 6:15pm- Speaking from the Senate floor, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA)—a doctor—explained why he has voted to advance Robert Kennedy Jr.'s nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. 6:20pm- “If Presidents Can't Control Executive Agencies, Elections Are Fake.” In her article for The Federalist, Joy Pullman notes that Democrats are hypocritically suggesting that Donald Trump can't create a new executive department (like DOGE), while s ...

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 2: 4:05pm- From the Oval Office on Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order which would end U.S. involvement with the United Nations Human Rights Council and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Last year, there were numerous reports documenting UNRWA's close ties to Hamas. President Trump also addressed China's retaliatory tariffs, reports he will dismantle the Department of Education, DOGE actively reducing the size of government, and the importance of protecting American sovereignty. 4:15pm- Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that El Salvador president offered to house dangerous criminals from gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua—which President Donald Trump recently designated as foreign terror organizations. 4:30pm- Dr. Wilfred Reilly—Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University & Author of “Lies My Liberal Teacher Told Me”—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and reacts to a new report which indicates 38% of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents were, at one point, investigating January 6th related crimes. Plus, what do women REALLY want? A new survey indicates strong, wealthy men are still preferred—shocking! And Dr. Reilly says that President Donald Trump should award Stanford economist Dr. Thomas Sowell with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Today on Lawfare No Bull: On Jan. 30, the Senate Judiciary Committee held the confirmation hearing of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director nominee Kash Patel. The Committee questioned Patel about his role in the Jan. 6 choir, his “enemies list” and views on political retribution, his testimony before the grand jury in the classified documents case, plans for the FBI if confirmed, and more.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

CIA Admits Lab Leak Likely In Covid Pandemic Breaking News: CIA Concludes COVID-19 Likely Originated from Wuhan Lab       In a major development, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic most likely originated from a laboratory incident in Wuhan, China. This aligns with previous findings from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Energy, both of which have publicly stated their belief that the virus likely escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The CIA's report, however, characterizes this assessment as having "low confidence," meaning there is still a lack of conclusive evidence. Despite this, the agency's statement adds further credibility to the lab leak theory, which has been the subject of intense debate since the pandemic began in late 2019.....(more) @Cororonavirus #Covid-19 #CIA #WuhanInstitute #VAERS

The Trump administration is making alarming moves inside the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In an unprecedented move, at least a dozen federal prosecutors tied to special counsel Jack Smith's case against Trump have been removed. But it doesn't stop there. Sources say top FBI officials have also been fired, including those handling investigations into the January 6th insurrection. Critics warned this is a blatant attempt to dismantle accountability, gut law enforcement independence, and shield Trump's allies from prosecution. Senate Intelligence Chair Mark Warner is sounding the alarm, saying these firings could put national security at risk, calling it a dangerous political takeover of institutions meant to be neutral. Meanwhile, civil rights groups fear a chilling effect on future investigations, especially those tied to democracy and voting rights. The question now, with the FBI and DOJ under Trump's thumb, is who will hold the powerful accountable? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hollywood focus on the CIA Is It Correct? Her Experience. Hollywood has long been fascinated with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Blockbuster franchises such as Mission Impossible, The Bourne Identity, and TV series like Homeland have shaped the public perception of the CIA as a high-stakes world filled with thrilling missions, cutting-edge gadgets, and international espionage. But how much of this portrayal aligns with reality? Her powerful story is in a recent podcast interview on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast, available on their website and platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify and most major podcast platforms. Michele Rigby Assad, a former CIA officer, is a guest on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast and gives her firsthand experience that challenges the Hollywood narrative. Michele Rigby Assad defies the Hollywood stereotype of a CIA agent. Her journey from a small-town upbringing in Florida to working in counterterrorism operations worldwide presents a different, truthful story about life inside the CIA. Unlike the stereotypical male-dominated, action-packed spy films, Michele’s experience as a covert officer reveals the agency’s rigorous training, intense challenges, and the real-world implications of intelligence work. Follow the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms. The CIA vs. Hollywood’s Portrayal Hollywood often glamorizes intelligence work, focusing on thrilling chases, daring rescues, and sophisticated gadgets. While some elements are inspired by real operations, many aspects are greatly exaggerated. Michele Rigby Assad sheds light on the truth behind the agency’s operations. Hollywood focus on the CIA Is It Correct? Her Experience. Read the supporting stories about this and much more from Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast in platforms like Medium, Newsbreak and Blogspot. According to the CIA’s official website, the agency is described as "the Nation’s first line of defense," operating where others cannot to ensure national security. Formed from the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) during World War II, the CIA’s purpose has always been intelligence gathering, covert operations, and counterintelligence efforts. Unlike the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which primarily focuses on domestic law enforcement, the CIA is dedicated to overseas intelligence operations, often working behind the scenes to influence global events. Wikipedia provides a more detailed historical perspective, describing the CIA as a civilian foreign intelligence service responsible for collecting and analyzing security information, mainly through human intelligence (HUMINT). The agency is headquartered at the George Bush Center for Intelligence in Langley, Virginia. While its primary function is intelligence gathering, the CIA has historically been involved in various covert actions, including political influence, supporting foreign groups, and, in some cases, planning assassinations and regime changes. Listen to the interview as a free podcast on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and podcast website, also available on platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and most major podcast outlets. Michele Rigby Assad’s Experience She entered the agency with no prior military or law enforcement background. Yet, she excelled in the high-stakes world of intelligence, working alongside her husband on counterterrorism missions in war-torn regions. Hollywood focus on the CIA Is It Correct? Her Experience. Her experiences are documented in her book Breaking Cover, where she introduces the concept of "Get Off the X." This CIA survival technique teaches officers to escape deadly ambushes as quickly as possible. She applies this philosophy to life outside intelligence, urging individuals to overcome fear and obstacles to achieve success. Her book highlights not only the physical dangers of her career but also the psychological challenges of living undercover, making split-second decisions, and adapting to constantly shifting threats. Follow the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and podcast on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms. Beyond her work in intelligence, Michele has transitioned into corporate risk assessment, business mediation, and government diplomacy. She offers training for organizations seeking expertise in Arab World politics and culture, helping companies navigate geopolitical complexities and security risks. The Role of Media in Shaping Perceptions The influence of Hollywood in shaping public opinion about the CIA cannot be understated. Through our platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and the interview which is free is on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show website Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and most major podcast platforms. You'll find that the narratives presented in films and television often become the de facto understanding of intelligence work. But is Hollywood’s focus on the CIA correct? While it offers an entertaining and dramatized version, the real stories, like Michele Rigby Assad’s, reveal a far more complex and demanding profession. Intelligence officers must be adaptable, resilient, and capable of handling high-pressure situations. Unlike their fictional counterparts, their work is often slow, methodical, and requires years of dedication without the promise of recognition. Hollywood focus on the CIA Is It Correct? Her Experience. Check out the show on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Newsbreak, Medium and most all social media platforms Hollywood’s portrayal of the CIA is designed for entertainment, not accuracy. While elements of truth exist, much of what we see on screen is exaggerated for dramatic effect. Michele Rigby Assad’s real-life experience provides a more authentic look into the agency, showcasing the challenges and sacrifices intelligence officers make. Her story is a testament to perseverance, adaptability, and courage in one of the world’s most secretive professions. When social media and news platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Apple News, Spotify, Podcast, Newsbreak, Medium, and Truth shape public discourse, it’s crucial to differentiate between cinematic fiction and reality. Understanding the true nature of intelligence work helps us appreciate the dedication of those who serve in silence, often far from the limelight of Hollywood’s glamorous portrayal. It is available as a free podcast on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast website, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and most major podcast platforms. 3 things you can do to dramatically increase revenue offline and online. That's one of the things you will learn at Creative Con 2025. Meet me, John Jay Wiley the host of the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast At Creative Con located at the Intercontinental Hotel in Chicago February 21st through the 23rd. If you are an entrepeneur, business leader, author, podcaster or online professional of any type you'll learn how to take your business to the next level. Creative Con 2025 is the ultimate business and networking event. There is too much to list at Creative Con 2025. Get details at www.Cre8tivecon.com You can help contribute money to make the Gunrunner Movie. The film that Hollywood won't touch. It is about a now Retired Police Officer that was shot 6 times while investigating Gunrunning. He died 3 times during Medical treatment and was resuscitated. You can join the fight by giving a monetary "gift" to help ensure the making of his film at agunrunnerfilm.com. Learn useful tips and strategies to increase your Facebook Success with John Jay Wiley. Both free and paid content are available on this Patreon page. Background song Hurricane is used with permission from the band Dark Horse Flyer. Find a wide variety of great podcasts online at The Podcast Zone Facebook Page, look for the one with the bright green logo. Be sure to check out our website. Be sure to follow us on MeWe, X, Instagram, Facebook,Pinterest, Linkedin and other social media platforms for the latest episodes and news. You can contact John Jay Wiley by email at Jay@letradio.com. Get the latest news articles, without all the bias and spin, from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast on the Newsbreak app, which is free. Hollywood focus on the CIA Is It Correct? Her Experience. Breaking Cover Book Get Off The X Michele Rigby Assad CIA WikipediaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On Thursday, Senate committees held hearings to consider the nominations of Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Kash Patel as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). While most of President Donald Trump's nominees have been confirmed by the Senate with bipartisan support — including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem — Gabbard, Kennedy, and Patel's outlook is the most uncertain of Trump's remaining nominees. In today's special Friday edition, we'll cover their Senate hearings in a truncated version of our standard Tangle format with an overview of each hearing, perspectives from writers on the left and right, and our take. This is a preview of today's special edition that is available in full and ad-free for our premium podcast subscribers. If you'd like to complete this episode and receive Sunday editions, exclusive interviews, bonus content, and more, head over to tanglemedia.supercast.com and sign up for a membership. If you are currently a newsletter subscriber, inquiry with us about how to receive a 33% discount on a podcast subscription! Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to tanglemedia.supercast.com to sign up! You can also give the gift of a Tangle podcast subscription by clicking here.You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle's social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week's Security Sprint, Dave and Andy covered the following topics: Main Topics:  House Homeland Releases Updated “Terror Threat Snapshot” Assessment In Wake Of New Year's Day ISIS-Inspired Terrorist Attack In New Orleans. PDF: “Terror Threat Snapshot.”  US lawmakers warn of 'emboldened' terror threat Nashville school shooter left behind 47-page manifesto detailing hate: report 'God I am ugly': Nashville school shooter's social media shows he embraced white supremacy Nashville School Shooter's Manifesto: Calls To Attack Mosques, Churches, Synagogues, Military Bases, Government Buildings, Power Grids, Schools Madison and Nashville School Shooters Appear to Have Crossed Paths in Online Extremist Communities Antioch, Tenn., Shooter Inspired by Broad Extremist Beliefs and Previous Mass Killers   FBI PSA: North Korean IT Workers Conducting Data Extortion. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is providing an update to previously shared guidance regarding Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) Information Technology (IT) workers to raise public awareness of their increasingly malicious activity, which has recently included data extortion. China's Cyber Threat: Under Trump, US Cyberdefense Loses Its Head; Chinese hacks, rampant ransomware, and Donald Trump's budget cuts all threaten US security. In an exit interview with WIRED, former CISA head Jen Easterly argues for her agency's survival. “Everybody should assume that our adversaries, in particular China, are attempting to go after our critical infrastructure. The private sector, they are on the front lines of this fight, because they own and operate the vast majority of our critical infrastructure. It's why companies need to put collaboration over self-preservation.” “Time For Us To Get A Step Ahead Of The Typhoons”: Chairman Green Opens Hearing On Global Cyber Threats “Preparation Of The Battlefield”: Cybersecurity Experts Testify On Global Threats To The Homeland WaterISAC: House Committee Hearing – Unconstrained Actors: Assessing Global Cyber Threats to the Homeland. Witnesses also cited recent incidents at water utilities.   Quick Hits:   Insider Threats: Orlando Man Pleads Guilty To Conducting Series Of Cyber Intrusions Against Former Employer British Museum forced to partly close after alleged IT attack by former employee CISA and FBI Release Updated Guidance on Product Security Bad Practices Virus season roars back with "quad-demic" of illness Scammers Are Creating Fake News Videos to Blackmail Victims TikTok Threat Arrest: "[Trump] needs to be assassinated" USCP Arrests Man with Gun. Article: Capitol Police: Officer suspended for allowing man with concealed gun into building CISA and FBI Release Advisory on How Threat Actors Chained Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Cloud Service Applications Ransomware gang uses SSH tunnels for stealthy VMware ESXi access Cobalt Strike and a Pair of SOCKS Lead to LockBit Ransomware Ransomware's Evolution: Key Threat Groups Targeting the Energy and Utilities Sector in 2025 Ongoing Campaign Targeting Amazon Web Services S3 Buckets

pWotD Episode 2822: Ross Ulbricht Welcome to Popular Wiki of the Day, spotlighting Wikipedia's most visited pages, giving you a peek into what the world is curious about today.With 1,203,355 views on Wednesday, 22 January 2025 our article of the day is Ross Ulbricht.Ross William Ulbricht (born March 27, 1984) is an American who created and operated the darknet market website Silk Road from 2011 until his arrest in 2013. He was imprisoned from 2013 until January 2025, when he received a full pardon by U. S. President Donald Trump.Silk Road operated as a hidden service on the Tor network and facilitated the sale of narcotics and other illegal products and services. Ulbricht ran the site under the pseudonym "Dread Pirate Roberts", after the fictional character from The Princess Bride.In October 2013, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) arrested Ulbricht and took Silk Road offline. In 2015, he was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, distributing narcotics by means of the internet, conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to traffic fraudulent identity documents, and conspiracy to commit computer hacking. He was sentenced to double life in prison plus 40 years without the possibility of parole. Ulbricht's appeals to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2017 and the U. S. Supreme Court in 2018 were unsuccessful.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 02:16 UTC on Thursday, 23 January 2025.For the full current version of the article, see Ross Ulbricht on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm standard Amy.

Los Angeles County District Attorney and Sheriff talk to Dr. Phil about charges against looters and arsonists Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman talks to Dr. Phil about charging 10 individuals in four crimes committed during the devastating wildfires. Nine people are facing felony charges in connection to residential burglaries in the cities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, and a separate defendant has been charged with arson for intentionally starting a fire in the city of Azusa. “These crimes are appalling and represent a direct attack on our community during a time of unprecedented loss and vulnerability,” District Attorney Hochman said. “Let me be clear: If you exploit this tragedy to prey on victims of these deadly fires, we will find you and we will prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.”  The felony charges were the result of a multi-agency collaboration that underscores the strength of local, state, and federal partnerships. Law enforcement agencies, including the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department; Los Angeles Police Department; Los Angeles County Fire Arson Unit; U.S. Attorney's Office; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) collaborated closely with the District Attorney's Office to bring these suspects to justice. And Sheriff Robert Luna talks to Dr. Phil about his request for additional National Guard members to help his team. Looting and theft remain a top concern for the sheriff's department as well as online scams. Plus a man who says thanks to strangers his home in Altadena was saved. Thank you to our sponsors: Beam: Visit https://ShopBeam.com/DrPhil and use code DRPHIL for up to 40% off. Tax Network USA: Visit https://TNUSA.com/DRPHIL or call 1-800-958-1000. Preserve Gold: Get a FREE precious metals guide that contains essential information on how to help protect your accounts. Text “DRPHIL” to 50505 to claim this exclusive offer from Preserve Gold today.  

Arran Sheets - The mystery of TWA 800Jan 27, 2023Ed is joined by Arran Sheets aka Rob Shef, to discuss the mystery surrounding the crash of TWA 800 outside New York. At the time it was taken to be another crash, albeit any crash is tragic for all concerned.Pretty soon word was put about by witnesses and people claiming to be insiders that it wasn't a fault with the plane or pilot error; the bitter truth, they claim, is that TWA800 came down as the result of a missile hitting the plane.Despite Government denials, these rumours have persisted, and the evidence for the claims has gathered in both credibility and weight. No one knows and no organisation has claimed responsibility for the missile, should it be a factual portrayal of events. This has spawned rumours in the same way 9/11 has grown into an entire movement.Arran Sheets talks of his work, his research and his belief that the entire event is an orchestrated work of deception by shadowy figures as yet to be identified. But why?From WIKIPEDIATrans World Airlines Flight 800 (TWA800) was a Boeing 747-100 that exploded and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, New York, on July 17, 1996, at about 8:31 pm. EDT, 12 minutes after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport, on a scheduled international passenger flight to Rome, with a stopover in Paris.: 1  All 230 people on board died in the crash; it is the third-deadliest aviation accident in U.S. history. Accident investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) traveled to the scene, arriving the following morning[1]: 313  amid speculation that a terrorist attack was the cause of the crash. Consequently, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and New York Police Department Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) initiated a parallel criminal investigation.Sixteen months later, the JTTF announced that no evidence of a criminal act had been found and closed its active investigation.Youtube: No Bull AnalisysBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

This week, we are joined by Colorado Public Radio reporter Elaine Tassy to look into the tragic and unresolved murder case of Maggie Long. A high school senior and beloved member of her community, Maggie was found dead in her home in Bailey, Colorado, 7 years ago, after stopping there to bring water and cookies to a school concert. The investigation revealed that she was brutally attacked and set on fire, with at least three to four suspects believed to be involved. The FBI has classified her death as a hate crime, and the Colorado Bureau of Investigation has received over 237 tips related to the case. A $75,000 reward is currently offered for information leading to the resolution of this heartbreaking case. Join us as we explore the details surrounding Maggie Long's murder and the ongoing efforts to bring her killer to justice. The $75,000 reward is being offered in this case on behalf of the Park County Sheriff's Office, Maggie Long's family, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Anyone with information is asked to call the Maggie Long Task Force tip line at (303) 239-4243 or email: maggie.long.tips@state.co.us. SOURCES: CBI FBI https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/19/us/maggie-long-murder-hate-crime.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare https://www.cpr.org/2024/12/04/reward-offered-information-maggie-long-murder/ https://www.cpr.org/2022/03/25/more-than-four-years-later-memories-of-maggie-long-linger-for-friends-family/ 9News CBS Colorado 9News Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're a smartphone user, you may want to listen up. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is urging smartphone users to rethink how they communicate, warning iPhone and Android users against texting and recommending encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp, Signal, and Facebook Messenger. However, the Bureau also raises concerns about these apps, stressing the need for responsible, managed encryption. This comes amid revelations of a cyber espionage campaign linked to China's Ministry of State Security known as "Salt Typhoon." The hackers have breached U.S. telecommunications networks comprised of sensitive metadata and private communications, including those of government officials. While China denies involvement, the FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) confirmed the attacks are part of a broader pattern targeting U.S. infrastructure. The FBI and CISA are urging organizations to bolster defenses and report suspected breaches. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Time to meet our Second Client, who hass suspicious that her partner is cheating, he's weird and secretive with his phone and has been treating her differently.   We put the Fox Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the case.Subscribe on LiSTNR: https://play.listnr.com/podcast/fifi-fev-and-nickSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 4: 6:05pm- During a recent CNN segment, the network's Senior Data Analyst Harry Enten revealed statistics indicating that only 41% of Americans believe the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is trustworthy. Could this be good news for Donald Trump's FBI Director nominee Kash Patel? 6:15pm- The New York Times has published a brand-new hit piece targeting Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Department of Education Linda McMahon. 6:30pm- The British Board of Film Classification has published a trigger warning on the film Wicked for “potential discrimination towards green-skinned women.” PLUS the University of Minnesota reveals its latest project: “MyGender Dolls.” 6:40pm- Final House Report Finds Government Misled Public About COVID. Leif Le Mahieu of The Daily Wire writes: “House lawmakers released their final comprehensive report on COVID on Monday detailing how government officials misled the public about the origins of the pandemic. The 520-page report from the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic covered everything from school closures to gain-of-function research to Anthony Fauci's leadership of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The release of the report comes after the committee spent two years conducting over 30 transcribed interviews and depositions, holding 25 hearings and meetings, and going over one million pages of documents.” You can read the full article here: https://www.dailywire.com/news/what-not-to-do-final-house-report-finds-gov-misled-public-about-covid

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 3: 5:00pm- While appearing on CNN, Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) was awkwardly confronted with an old clip of himself stating that Joe Biden would never use his power as president to pardon a family member. 5:30pm- Donald Trump announced he has nominated Kash Patel to serve as the 9th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In a piece largely criticizing Patel's nomination, even The Wall Street Journal concedes he has “worked as a federal prosecutor and served in several senior national-security roles, experiences not uncommon in the background of an FBI director.” So, if he is qualified, why are Democrats and mainstream media personalities so upset? The WSJ continues: “But outside his résumé, the antagonistic positions he has taken about the agency set him far apart from most anyone who has served as its leader.” Rich explains why Americans should be excited about Patel's nomination—as he is the ideal candidate to challenge wide-spread corruption within the FBI. You can read the full article here: https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/trump-picked-patel-for-fbi-after-some-aides-warned-it-could-backfire-cfc27173?mod=hp_lead_pos2 5:50pm- While speaking with Fox News earlier this year, Donald Trump predicted that Joe Biden would pardon his son Hunter before leaving office. 5:55pm- While speaking with the press aboard Air Force One, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre revealed that President Joe Biden wouldn't have pardoned his son Hunter if Kamala Harris had won the 2024 presidential election.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Full Episode (12/02/2024): 3:05pm- In a statement released on Sunday, President Joe Biden announced his decision to pardon his son Hunter Biden of any offenses “which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in” dating back to 2014. Earlier this year, the younger Biden had been convicted of federal gun and tax evasion charges. A sentencing hearing had been scheduled for later this month. In his statement, President Biden justified his decision by claiming the Department of Justice treated his son “differently” and that he had been “singled out.” President Biden had previously said—on multiple occasions—that he would not pardon his son. 3:30pm- President Joe Biden's pardon clears Hunter Biden of any crimes “he has committed or may have committed or taken part in” dating back to 2014—which is precisely when Hunter began working for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. Republicans have claimed that President Biden directly benefited financially from his son's affiliation with the company. 3:40pm- Despite the pardon, Senate Minority Whip John Thune (R-SD)—who will serve as Senate Majority leader beginning in January—announced that the U.S. Senate will continue to investigate potential corruption involving Hunter Biden and the Biden family. 3:50pm- While speaking with the press aboard Air Force One, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre revealed that President Joe Biden wouldn't have pardoned his son Hunter if Kamala Harris had won the 2024 presidential election. 4:05pm- Listeners call into the show with their reactions to news that President Joe Biden has pardoned his son Hunter. 4:10pm- While appearing on Fox News, IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley said he was not surprised President Joe Biden chose to pardon his son. 4:20pm- In a statement posted to Truth Social, president-elect Donald Trump wrote: “Everybody is talking about the hostages who are being held so violently, inhumanely, and against the will of the entire World, in the Middle East—But it's all talk, and no action! Please let this TRUTH serve to represent that if the hostages are not released prior to January 20, 2025, the date that I proudly assume Office as President of the United States, there will be ALL HELL TO PAY in the Middle East, and for those in charge who perpetrated these atrocities against Humanity. Those responsible will be hit harder than anybody has been hit in the long and storied History of the United States of America. RELEASE THE HOSTAGES NOW!” 4:30pm- John Yoo—Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at University of California at Berkeley & a Visiting Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution—joins The Rich Zeoli Show to discuss President Joe Biden's pardon of his son Hunter Biden, joking “he's still pardoning turkeys AFTER Thanksgiving.” 4:50pm- Hunter Biden's pardon states: “Offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted.” However, it was issued at around 8pm on December 1st. So, did that mean Hunter could have committed any federal crime he wanted with immunity until 11:59pm on Dec. 1st? Did Hunter miss a golden opportunity to run wild without legal repercussions for 4-hours? 5:00pm- While appearing on CNN, Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) was awkwardly confronted with an old clip of himself stating that Joe Biden would never use his power as president to pardon a family member. 5:30pm- Donald Trump announced he has nominated Kash Patel to serve as the 9th Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In a piece largely criticizing Patel's nomination, even The Wall Street Journal concedes he has “worked as a federal prosecutor and served in several senior national-security roles, experiences not uncommon in the background of an FBI director.” So, if he is qualified, why are Democrats and mainstr ...

Wild ride for markets - election movers and groovers. Fed dousing the fire a bit. Inflation is still a thing. Nuke talk again.... PLUS we are now on Spotify and Amazon Music/Podcasts! Click HERE for Show Notes and Links DHUnplugged is now streaming live - with listener chat. Click on link on the right sidebar. Love the Show? Then how about a Donation? Follow John C. Dvorak on Twitter Follow Andrew Horowitz on Twitter DONATIONS ? OHHH - the new shirt design is coming along... Warm-Up - Up and Down - Election Confusing Markets - What a wild ride - more to come - CTP for Carvana will be closing out this coming Friday and that is it for 2024 - CTP Cup comes in December - More hacks that no one cares about - Another big bankruptcy - Nuke talks again Markets - Up and down - shine off that penny? - Every pick / comment brings on new move - Fed pours some cold water on markets - Inflation - still a thing - Something happening - only happened a few times in history ANNOUNCEMENT : AH - Chili Competition Results - 3rd Place Netflix - Jake Paul (27) and Mike Tyson (58) - 60 million people "tried" to watch - Glitches - system overload - Jake Paul took it in a 8 round decision. - Can you imagine if Netflix starts doing these live events with a $1 charge? - Jake Paul got $40M and Tyson got $20M Follow Up - Palantir - Jumps after earnings and then announcing move to NASDAQ (Nov 26) - As of last Friday - #1 performer in S&P 500 this year - Up 48% MTD and 250% YTD - Big move Friday was because it will qualify for NAZ 100 (QQQ) and lots of buying will need to be done - Good for Peter: Thiel's Palantir holdings have increased in value by about $3.2 billion since the earnings report and $2 billion since the election. Once Hot -Now Not - Here is company that we had for clients -bought low, sold higher, bought some more higher, sold on way down - Super Micro - SMCI - was a darling for some time - then a few short sellers attacked - stock sold off - Company decided to follow the other guys with 10-1 stock spilts - stock was as high as $1,200 per share pre split- now??? $21.75 ($217.50 comparable) - Could be kicked out of NASDAQ - Short -Sellers couldbe right - Super Micro is late in filing its 2024 year-end report with the SEC, and has yet to replace its accounting firm. --- UPDATE - Super Micro Computer secures BDO USA as lead auditor, targets key filings by early 2025 amid NASDAQ approval process (Stock up 25%) Markets - Not Often Seen - The stock market has done this only three times since January 1871 - The Shiller P/E ratio has reached a reading of 38 only three times during a bull market rally in 153 years. In December 1999, during the dot-com boom, the Shiller P/E peaked at a reading of 44.19. Meanwhile, in the first week of 2022, it very briefly lifted above 40. - On most occasions, this heat needs to be cooled... It could take time as this is a slow moving ratio/indicator - Another point - only a few times in history have we seen a market up 20% - 2 consecutive years. --- Will it continue? History shows that this needs to cool off too - but that does not mean a crash is imminent. More Cooling - Russell 2000 was HOT right after the election. - Day after it was up like 5%+++ - Last week, down 4% Hack'd - Hackers linked to a Chinese intelligence agency were able to breach T-Mobile as part of a months-long campaign to spy on the cellphone communications of high-value intelligence targets - Last Wednesday, The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the U.S. cyber watchdog agency CISA said China-linked hackers have intercepted surveillance data intended for American law enforcement agencies after breaking into an unspecified number of telecom companies. - Earlier in October, the Journal reported that Chinese hackers accessed the networks of U.S. broadband providers, including Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies,

  On today's Coffee with Rich, we will be joined by T.C. Fuller. We will discuss what may be instore for 2025. JOIN US!   T.C. Fuller is an experienced federal investigator and firearms trainer. He has spent his life carrying a firearm for the U.S. government. T.C. first served as an Army Infantry officer, Explosive Ordnance Disposal officer, before leaving the Army to accept an appointment as a Special Agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). He spent the next 20 years working in all areas of investigative interest within the FBI, and served for several years as an instructor in the FBI's Firearms Training Unit in Quantico, VA.   T.C. holds a Bachelor of Science in Criminology, as well as a Masters of Education in Interdisciplinary Studies and a Doctorate in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. As a published writer, T.C. has written an innovative book on the topic of improving law enforcement deadly force training, as well as having written for several print magazines on the areas of law enforcement procedures, explosives, firearms and edged weapons.   Among T.C.'s personal achievements, he has been awarded the U.S. Army's highest peace-time award for heroism, the Soldier's Medal. Besides finding, capturing and convicting a fugitive on the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted list, T.C. has also been a successful competitive shooter for more than 20 years, earning a Master class certification from the International Defensive Pistol Association, winning numerous local, state and regional competitions along the way. He is now operating his own company, The Horus Group, LLC, which serves as a consultancy on firearms and training, as well as providing high-end, private firearms training for both armed professionals and citizens.   T.C.'s Website: https://www.thehorusgroup.net/ T.C.'s recent article: https://americanwarriorsociety.com/may-you-live-in.../    

In the United States, federal investigators may use testimony from accusers in civil matters to pursue criminal charges if a crime has been committed. Here's how this process generally works:Separation of Civil and Criminal Proceedings: Civil and criminal matters are typically handled separately in the legal system. Civil cases involve disputes between individuals or entities seeking monetary damages or specific performance, while criminal cases involve the prosecution of individuals by the government for violating laws.Accuser Testimony in Civil Cases: In civil cases, individuals (the accusers) may testify under oath about their experiences, allegations, or claims against the defendant. This testimony is presented before a judge or jury, and the standard of proof is typically lower than in criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is usually based on a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the evidence supports the accuser's claims more than it supports the defendant's position.Federal Investigation: If the accuser's testimony in a civil case suggests that a crime may have been committed, federal investigators, such as those from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or other relevant agencies, may launch a criminal investigation. They will gather additional evidence, interview witnesses, and assess the credibility of the accuser's testimony in the context of potential criminal charges.Criminal Charges: If the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence to support criminal charges, prosecutors may bring charges against the accused individual or entity. The decision to pursue criminal charges is typically based on the sufficiency of evidence, the applicable laws, and prosecutorial discretion.Use of Accuser Testimony: Accuser testimony from the civil case may be used as evidence in the criminal trial, subject to rules of evidence and the defendant's rights to confront witnesses. The credibility of the accuser and the reliability of their testimony will likely be scrutinized during the criminal proceedings.Criminal Trial: The defendant in the criminal case will have the opportunity to present a defense, including challenging the accuser's testimony, presenting alibi evidence, or disputing the prosecution's evidence. The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard of proof than in civil cases.Potential Outcomes: If the defendant is found guilty in the criminal trial, they may face penalties such as imprisonment, fines, probation, or other consequences depending on the nature of the crime and applicable laws. If found not guilty, they will be acquitted of the charges.So, what, if any sort of information are the accusers providing to the Feds?   Let's dive in and see if we can find some clarity in all of this muck.(commercial at 9:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ex Cassie likely 'important' witness in Homeland Security trafficking probe: expert | Fox News

  "Empathy for the Devil," The latest book by Dr. TC Fuller Get your Challenge Coin! https://train.americanwarriorsociety.com/home     On today's Coffee with Rich, we will be joined by T.C. Fuller. We will discuss TC's last book, "Empathy for the Devil." JOIN US! T.C. Fuller is an experienced federal investigator and firearms trainer. He has spent his life carrying a firearm for the U.S. government. T.C. first served as an Army Infantry officer, Explosive Ordnance Disposal officer, before leaving the Army to accept an appointment as a Special Agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). He spent the next 20 years working in all areas of investigative interest within the FBI, and served for several years as an instructor in the FBI's Firearms Training Unit in Quantico, VA.   T.C. holds a Bachelor of Science in Criminology, as well as a Masters of Education in Interdisciplinary Studies and a Doctorate in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. As a published writer, T.C. has written an innovative book on the topic of improving law enforcement deadly force training, as well as having written for several print magazines on the areas of law enforcement procedures, explosives, firearms and edged weapons. Among T.C.'s personal achievements, he has been awarded the U.S. Army's highest peace-time award for heroism, the Soldier's Medal. Besides finding, capturing and convicting a fugitive on the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted list, T.C. has also been a successful competitive shooter for more than 20 years, earning a Master class certification from the International Defensive Pistol Association, winning numerous local, state and regional competitions along the way. He is now operating his own company, The Horus Group, LLC, which serves as a consultancy on firearms and training, as well as providing high-end, private firearms training for both armed professionals and citizens.   T.C. (Empathy for the Devil) https://a.co/d/hJDeSBH T.C.'s Website: https://www.thehorusgroup.net/ T.C.'s recent article: https://americanwarriorsociety.com/may-you-live-in.../

We're making it easy for you to judge the job performances of your members of Congress! In this episode, Jen tells you about a list of single issue votes that were taken in the House and Senate during the 118th Congress. Most importantly, we gave you all the information you need to find your members' voting records in this episode's show notes. You can find your 2024 Congressional Election Study guide in the episode 301 show notes on www.congressionaldish.com. Happy voting! Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Contribute monthly or a lump sum via Support Congressional Dish via (donations per episode) Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to: Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! Enacted Laws Congressional Dish Episode: ← find how your Representative voted here ← find how your Senator voted here Effects of H.R. 7888: Expands the number of people allowed to be legally spied on by the U.S. government and the number of people with information stored in the FISA database (which has information about Americans whose data has been collected along with information about foreigners). It does so by… Giving the Department of Justice (DOJ) permission to search the FISA database to vet foreigners who are applying for tourist visas to visit the United States and Expanding the definition of ‘foreign intelligence' to include counter narcotics targets. Expands the number of companies who get legal immunity for turning our information over to the government by expanding the definition of “electronic communications service provider”. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is no longer legally allowed to search the FISA database solely to find evidence of a crime. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is prohibited from using uncorroborated information from political groups or anonymous sources in press reports to get FISA warrants. Limits the number of people within the government who are allowed to search through the database. Background Sources for H.R. 7888: INTEL.gov. Michael Horowitz. April 27, 2023. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General. Jonathan Turley. December 14, 2019. The Hill. Conor Clarke. February 2014. Stanford Law Review. “The Biggs Amendment” to H.R. 7888 [failed] ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effect of the Biggs Amendment: Would require U.S. government officials to get a warrant before searching through the FISA database for information about U.S. citizens or companies, with emergency exceptions. Congressional Dish Episode: ← find how your Representative voted here Effects of H.R. 7521: It is now illegal for companies to provide internet hosting services, distribute, and/or update “foreign adversary controlled applications”, websites, or games, which are partially owned by a foreign person and are determined by the President - with no proof required - to pose “a significant threat to the national security of the United States.” Establishes a process that allows companies to host, distribute, and/or update if the app, website, or game changes ownership. If companies host, distribute, and/or update the targeted apps, websites, or games, the companies are subject to fines that - depending on the user base of the targeted app, website, or game - can be hundreds of billions of dollars. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 8034: Provide almost $26 billion to Israel. 64% of the money would be for war expenses 35% of the money would be for humanitarian purposes Less than 1% of the money would be for diplomatic expenses Provide $400 million for FEMA Background Sources for H.R. 8034: April 17, 2024. Al Jazeera. Fatima Al-Kassab. January 26, 2024. NPR. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 8035: Provide over $60 billion for Ukraine (and other neighboring countries) 83% of the money would be for war expenses 16.5% of the money would be for humanitarian expenses Less than 0.5% of the money would be for diplomatic expenses Provide $341 million for production of nuclear weapons materials and nuclear nonproliferation programs House Bills ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 7023: Double the length of permits to discharge pollutants in waterways from 5 years to 10 years Removes the EPA administrators ability to prohibit discharges in specific disposal sites if he determines that the discharge of materials will have an unacceptable adverse effect on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds and fishery areas, wildlife, or recreational areas after a disposal permit has been issued. Creates nationwide permits to allow for transmission projects for people, water, wastewater, carbon dioxide, fuel, and oil and gas pipelines that do not result in a “loss greater than 1/2 acre of waters of the United States for each single and complete project” In reissuing these nationwide permits, the EPA would not be required to consult with a state nor any other Federal agency and these permits will get to short cut environmental assessments that are required by the National Environmental Policy Act. Limits judicial review Puts a 60 day time limit after the permit is issued for a judicial review Doesn't allow anyone who didn't file a comment during the public comment period to file a lawsuit. If someone did file a comment, they may not file a lawsuit about anything that they didn't address in their comment. Prohibits the court from vacating, revoking, or limiting the permit unless the court finds that the activities authorized “present an imminent and substantial danger to human health or the environment for which there is not other equitable remedy available under the law' Approves an end-of-Trump administration EPA approval for Florida to administer Clean Water Act permitting. Background Sources for H.R. 7023: Becky Bohrer and Patrick Whittle. January 31, 2023. PBS News. July 19, 2016. Earthjustice. Earthjustice. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 1435: Prohibit states from banning fossil fuel burning internal combustion engines in cars and trucks. Effectively revokes the EPA waiver that allows California to ban the sale of fossil fuel burning cars. Background Sources for H.R. 1435: Jeff St. John. September 23, 2020. Greentech Media. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended effects of H.R. 7176: Give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission the “exclusive authority” to approve or deny applications to export natural gas from the United States to a foreign country, which eliminates requirements for Department of Energy approval and provisions to address free trade agreements. Deems exportation or importation of natural gas to be in the public interest. Background Sources for H.R. 7176: September 26, 2024. National Drought Mitigation Center. Zachary-Taylor Wright. September 17, 2024. MySA. Steven Santana. July 23, 2024. MySA. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 6543: Requires providers of short term lodging (hotels and AirBnBs) and Internet platforms that advertise and sell short term lodging to display the total price including all mandatory fees, except for government taxes and fees. ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 3950: Requires ticket issuers and secondary market ticket issuers to clearly display the total ticket price, including all fees, at the time the ticket price is first displayed and provides an itemized list of charges before the ticket purchasing process is complete. Prohibits ticket issuers and secondary market ticket issuers from selling tickets that they do not physically possess at the time of sale. Prohibits secondary ticket issuers from using the word ‘official' or similar words implying a partnership in their marketing and search engine wording unless they have the consent of the venue, team, or artist. Requires ticket issuers to provide a refund or a similar ticket to a rescheduled event, with the approval of the customer, if an event is canceled or postponed (except for in case of a natural disaster or other event beyond the ticket issuer's control). ← find how your Representative voted here Intended Effects of H.R. 4639: Prohibits law enforcement or the intelligence community from buying customer or subscriber information directly from companies or from data brokers. Any information “illegitimately obtained” is not allowed to be used against us in court. Has exceptions for FISA surveillance of foreigners. Limits immunity for companies that comply with surveillance orders and do not stop the surveillance when a court order is denied. Background Sources for H.R. 4639: Carly Page. July 18, 2022. TechCrunch. Senior Advisory Group Panel on Commercially Available Information. January 27, 2022. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Byron Tau. June 19, 2020. The Wall Street Journal. Senate Bills ← find how your Senator voted here Intended Effects of S. 316: Repeal the authorizations for US military operations in Iraq that were passed in 1991 and 2002. Background Sources for S. 316: Meghann Myers. January 25, 2024. Military Times. ← find how your Senator voted here Intended Effects of S. 4072: To prevent the enforcement of the , which would set stricter standards for fossil fuel burning cars and trucks that would be phased in between model year 2027 and 2032. Prohibits enforcement of any similar rule that could be written in the future. The standards could be met via the production of cleaner fossil fuel powered vehicles, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and electric vehicles. EPA estimates the air pollution reductions would provide ~$13 billion in reduced annual health care costs by preventing the emission of thousands of tons of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds. EPA estimates the new standards would save Americans $46 billion per year in fuel costs and $16 billion per year due to reduced maintenance and repair costs for drivers, totaling ~$6,000 over the course of a new vehicle's lifetime. ← find how your Senator voted here Intended Effects of S. 4445: Guarantees an individual's rights to receive fertility treatment, make decisions regarding the donation, use, storage, and disposal of oocytes, sperm, fertilized eggs and embryos, and enter contracts with health care providers to enact those decisions. Guarantees a health provider's right to provide fertility treatments and provide for testing, use, storage, shipping, and disposal of genetic material including oocytes, sperm, fertilized eggs, and embryos. Guarantees a health insurance provider's right to cover fertility treatments. Guarantees a manufacturer's right to manufacture, import, market, sell, and distribute drugs and devices that are used for fertility treatments. Allows lawsuits against any State or individual who interferes with the right to fertility treatments by the Attorney General, health care providers, and individuals adversely affected. This would supersede any State law regardless of when it was enacted and prohibits enforcement of any state law that is in conflict with these rights. Requires the Department of Defense to provide fertility treatments (specifically three egg retrievals and unlimited embryo transfers) to active duty military members and their spouses. Requires health plans, Medicaid, and Medicare that cover obstetrical (child birth related) services to also provide coverage for fertility treatments. Background sources for S. 4445: Maya C. Miller. September 17, 2024. The New York Times. Alander Rocha. April 3, 2024. Alabama Reflector. Alander Rocha. February 19, 2024. Alabama Reflector. Audio Sources March 21, 2024 Clips Rep. Rick Larsen (D-WA): My colleagues have criticized EPA's use of its Clean Water Act review or veto authority. Yet, the record shows EPA's use of this authority has been consistent with congressional intent. I see no reason for removing this authority. Since enactment of the Clean Water Act in 1972, EPA has only exercised this authority 14 times—most recently in relation to large-scale mining proposals in Alaska and West Virginia. EPA's use of this authority has, in fact, been bipartisan. EPA used it 2 times during Democratic administrations and 12 times during Republican administrations. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): This bill will cut red tape, strengthen the permitting process in favor of those seeking the permits, provide clarity to the EPA to ensure that they are following what the law intends, and, most importantly, fight back against the militant climate agenda. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): Our court system is already being attacked from every angle. Let's not let the environmentalists continue to manipulate the courts to push their climate religion. It should be an efficient and speedy process so businesses can build the infrastructure that our country depends on. Rep. David Rouser (R-NC): Mr. Chairman, in closing, I encourage my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this bill, which provides energy predictability and certainty that our utilities, energy, manufacturing, and agricultural industries need to succeed, which are so critical to American greatness in energy, food production, and the manufacturing necessary to improve the standard of living of every American. That is what this is about, Mr. Chairman. Music by Editing Production Assistance

The second Trump assassination attempt. On Sunday, former President Donald Trump was targeted in what the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has deemed an assassination attempt at his golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Trump was not harmed, and police arrested the suspected gunman shortly after he fled the scene. The incident comes two months after Trump survived an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.We covered the attempted assassination in July and the ensuing fallout within the Secret Service here.You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.You can watch the replay of our live stream of the Harris Trump debate with commentary from Isaac on our YouTube Channel!Check out Episode 6 of our podcast series, The Undecideds. Please give us a 5-star rating and leave a comment!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Help share Tangle.I'm a firm believer that our politics would be a little bit better if everyone were reading balanced news that allows room for debate, disagreement, and multiple perspectives. If you can take 15 seconds to share Tangle with a few friends I'd really appreciate it. Email Tangle to a friend here, share Tangle on X/Twitter here, or share Tangle on Facebook here.Take the survey: Who do you think is to blame for the recent attempt on Donald Trump's life? Let us know!Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle's social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

War Room After Month-Long Investigation, FBI Claims No Motive In Trump Assassination Attempt In Biggest Cover-Up Yet