Podcasts about Kahn

The replay of the 4th Reversing Heart Disease Summit is going on now. Register here: drtalks.com/summits/reversing-heart-disease This week, Dr. Kahn addresses the newly published 2026 guidelines for the management of hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), which will be studied and used by medical professionals all over the world. The top 10 takeaways are presented and are similar to the approach used at the Kahn Center for over a decade. Other topics include the challenge of staying vegan, the influence of cold temperatures on aortic dissection, the development of clogged arteries after a normal heart artery CT scan, the role of olive oil on the brain, red light therapy and music and the autonomic nervous system, plant-based diets and TMAO, bacteria and the brain, the role of a low uric acid level, the advantages of Eliquis over Xarelto in a new trial, and the FDA inquiry into the maker of Wegovy and Ozempic.  Thanks to Igennus.com for their support. Use the discount code DrKahn to save.

Kudos_for_Kahn_Episode_4

Kudos_for_Kahn_Episode_3

The House Oversight Committee deposed Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accountant, as part of its ongoing congressional investigation into Epstein's finances and the broader network surrounding his operations. During the deposition, Kahn told lawmakers that he never saw any “red flags” in Epstein's financial records that suggested sex trafficking or abuse. He said his relationship with Epstein was strictly professional and that he never witnessed misconduct or received complaints from victims while working for him. Kahn acknowledged that Epstein gave gifts to both men and women, but he characterized those expenses as a very small portion of Epstein's overall spending and said they did not appear suspicious at the time. He also told investigators that Epstein had claimed his 2006 arrest in Florida was a mistake and that he did not realize the girls involved were underage, an explanation Kahn said he believed at the time. Kahn added that if he had known the full extent of Epstein's crimes, he would have immediately ended his professional relationship with him.Kahn served as Epstein's accountant for more than a decade and was deeply involved in managing the financier's complex financial structure, which included numerous bank accounts, shell companies, and trusts. After Epstein's death in 2019, Kahn and Epstein's longtime attorney Darren Indyke became co-executors of his estate, which was initially valued at roughly $650 million before being reduced by settlements paid to victims. Some victims have alleged in lawsuits that Kahn and Indyke helped create and manage the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein's trafficking operation to function, including handling cash withdrawals and structuring accounts used within Epstein's network. Both men have denied wrongdoing, and a recent class-action lawsuit brought by victims was settled for at least $25 million without any admission of liability. Lawmakers say the deposition could provide insight into how Epstein financed his lifestyle and payments to victims, as well as why investigators and prosecutors never questioned key financial figures like Kahn during earlier federal investigations into Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's accountant says he didn't see any 'red flags' for abuse, trafficking - ABC News

We continue our Star Trek journey and this time talk some KAHNNNNNNNNNN!  A movie that saved the franchise and lead us to some Gems and some piles of shit.  Join us to yell at Kahn and having a submarine match in spaceeeeeee. Starring Mike Albertin, Peter Bingham-Pankratz, and Kerry. Peter's Book - https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B01FPNVI98?ccs_id=15862ce8-dced-47ec-a0f3-846c6f788d5d Kerry's Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/kerooseta A Gamer Looks at 40 - https://agamerlooksat40.com/ Carrying My Cross - https://podcasts.apple.com/pl/podcast/carrying-my-cross-a-faith-journey-podcast/id1865524685 Phoebe's Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/theletsplayprincess Phoebe's Podcast - https://nerdsabroadcast.podbean.com/ Zac's Podcast - https://linktr.ee/absolutelythebest Helena - https://linktr.ee/helhathfury Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/GamesMyMomFound Follow us on Facebook. Instagram - gamesmymomfound_ YouTube  - https://youtube.com/c/GamesMyMomFoundPodcast Discord - https://discord.gg/ Star Trek The Motion Picture (Film 207) - GMMF https://gamesmymomfoundpodcast.podbean.com/e/star-trek-the-motion-picture-film-207-gmmf

The House Oversight Committee deposed Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accountant, as part of its ongoing congressional investigation into Epstein's finances and the broader network surrounding his operations. During the deposition, Kahn told lawmakers that he never saw any “red flags” in Epstein's financial records that suggested sex trafficking or abuse. He said his relationship with Epstein was strictly professional and that he never witnessed misconduct or received complaints from victims while working for him. Kahn acknowledged that Epstein gave gifts to both men and women, but he characterized those expenses as a very small portion of Epstein's overall spending and said they did not appear suspicious at the time. He also told investigators that Epstein had claimed his 2006 arrest in Florida was a mistake and that he did not realize the girls involved were underage, an explanation Kahn said he believed at the time. Kahn added that if he had known the full extent of Epstein's crimes, he would have immediately ended his professional relationship with him.Kahn served as Epstein's accountant for more than a decade and was deeply involved in managing the financier's complex financial structure, which included numerous bank accounts, shell companies, and trusts. After Epstein's death in 2019, Kahn and Epstein's longtime attorney Darren Indyke became co-executors of his estate, which was initially valued at roughly $650 million before being reduced by settlements paid to victims. Some victims have alleged in lawsuits that Kahn and Indyke helped create and manage the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein's trafficking operation to function, including handling cash withdrawals and structuring accounts used within Epstein's network. Both men have denied wrongdoing, and a recent class-action lawsuit brought by victims was settled for at least $25 million without any admission of liability. Lawmakers say the deposition could provide insight into how Epstein financed his lifestyle and payments to victims, as well as why investigators and prosecutors never questioned key financial figures like Kahn during earlier federal investigations into Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's accountant says he didn't see any 'red flags' for abuse, trafficking - ABC NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's accountant, Richard Kahn, testified before the House Oversight Committee, claiming he was unaware of the sex offender's crimes. However, lawmakers brought up significant admissions: Kahn allegedly facilitated fake marriages, impersonated Epstein with banks, and dealt with payments for women and "girls." Law&Crime's Jesse Weber dives into the explosive details from the 7-hour deposition, the new emails revealed from the Epstein files, and the five major clients Kahn confirmed paid money to Epstein.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: If you're dealing with IRS back taxes, your first move should be a free consultation, not a call to the IRS. Get a completely free, no‑obligation review of your situation from the nation's #1 tax relief firm, Tax Hardship Center, by visiting https://taxhardshipcenter.com/taxhelpnow or calling (877) 644-6939 to see where you stand before the IRS comes collecting.HOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokeVideo Editing - Michael Deininger, Christina O'Shea, Alex Ciccarone, & Jay CruzScript Writing & Producing - Savannah Williamson & Juliana BattagliaGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrimeTwitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Kudos_for_Kahn_Episode_2

The House Oversight Committee is preparing to depose Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accountant, as part of its expanding congressional investigation into how Epstein managed and protected his wealth while allegedly operating a years-long sex-trafficking network. Kahn worked for Epstein for more than a decade and helped oversee the financier's complex financial structure, including trusts, shell entities, and other mechanisms that managed Epstein's multimillion-dollar fortune. Lawmakers believe questioning Kahn could provide insight into how Epstein funded his operations, moved money through various accounts, and maintained financial secrecy while facing mounting allegations of abuse. The committee has indicated that Kahn's knowledge of Epstein's financial infrastructure may help clarify whether money flows or financial arrangements enabled or concealed the broader trafficking enterprise.The deposition is part of a broader congressional effort to map Epstein's network of associates, advisers, and financial managers who may have played roles in his personal and business affairs. Kahn, along with Epstein's longtime attorney Darren Indyke, previously served as co-executors of Epstein's estate after his death in 2019 and has faced civil lawsuits from victims alleging they helped facilitate or conceal Epstein's illegal activities, accusations both men deny. A settlement in one of those lawsuits was later reached using funds from Epstein's estate without admissions of wrongdoing. Lawmakers say questioning individuals who handled Epstein's finances is essential to understanding how his wealth was managed, who may have benefited from it, and whether financial professionals helped maintain the structures that allowed Epstein's activities to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House Oversight Committee to depose Epstein's longtime accountant - ABC News

The House Oversight Committee is preparing to depose Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accountant, as part of its expanding congressional investigation into how Epstein managed and protected his wealth while allegedly operating a years-long sex-trafficking network. Kahn worked for Epstein for more than a decade and helped oversee the financier's complex financial structure, including trusts, shell entities, and other mechanisms that managed Epstein's multimillion-dollar fortune. Lawmakers believe questioning Kahn could provide insight into how Epstein funded his operations, moved money through various accounts, and maintained financial secrecy while facing mounting allegations of abuse. The committee has indicated that Kahn's knowledge of Epstein's financial infrastructure may help clarify whether money flows or financial arrangements enabled or concealed the broader trafficking enterprise.The deposition is part of a broader congressional effort to map Epstein's network of associates, advisers, and financial managers who may have played roles in his personal and business affairs. Kahn, along with Epstein's longtime attorney Darren Indyke, previously served as co-executors of Epstein's estate after his death in 2019 and has faced civil lawsuits from victims alleging they helped facilitate or conceal Epstein's illegal activities, accusations both men deny. A settlement in one of those lawsuits was later reached using funds from Epstein's estate without admissions of wrongdoing. Lawmakers say questioning individuals who handled Epstein's finances is essential to understanding how his wealth was managed, who may have benefited from it, and whether financial professionals helped maintain the structures that allowed Epstein's activities to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House Oversight Committee to depose Epstein's longtime accountant - ABC NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The 4th Reversing Heart Disease Summit began March 7, 2026. There will be a replay available, and the event is free to attend online. Register here: drtalks.com/summits/reversing-heart-disease This week, Dr. Kahn addresses the recurring posts on social media about nattokinase supplements as a "powerhouse" for reversing atherosclerosis. Is there new data? Is it powerful? Would mainstream medicine accept it? Should you use it? These questions and more are addressed.  Other topics include the risks of sleep apnea with insomnia, sleep duration and glucose control, possible risks of spermidine, and the happy feeling that eating flavanol-rich foods like grapes can give you.  Thanks to Igennus.com for their support. Use the discount code DrKahn to save.

Kudos_for_Kahn_Episode_1

What are the real fundamentals of great voice acting—and where should beginners start? In this episode, George the Tech talks with respected voiceover coach Martha Kahn about the core skills every actor needs. She shares her ABC approach to script analysis—Audience, Backstory, and Character—to create more authentic, conversational reads, along with practical techniques for marking scripts, building rhythm, and avoiding repetitive delivery patterns. Martha also discusses the importance of consistent vocal warmups, common pitfalls like “instant demo” promises, and a smart training progression—from commercials to narration to animation. Plus, she offers practical advice on building audition stamina and developing real-world experience before pursuing agency representation. Whether you're new to voiceover or helping a young actor get started, this episode offers clear, practical guidance from an experienced coach.  00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro 01:05 Starting the VO Process 02:19 ABCs Audience Backstory 05:01 Character and Script Markup 06:52 Practice Rhythm and Musicality 08:44 Slating Like a Pro 09:47 Warmups and Plosives 12:56 Avoiding Coaching Scams 14:36 Which Genres to Start 18:01 Auditions and Online Casting 19:54 Handling Rejection and Growth 22:33 Kids in e-Learning Work 25:21 Range, Demos, and Closing 28:11 Contact and Farewell

Siste nytt fra Midtøsten, med Natasha Hausdorff som forteller oss om Folkeretten, og Louise Kahn er med direkte fra Tel Aviv og gir oss stemningsrapport.Natasha Hausdorff er ekspert på folkerett og juridisk direktør for UK Lawyers for Israel, samt advokat (barrister) ved 6 Pump Court Chambers, der hun arbeider med kommersielle, regulatoriske og internasjonale saker. Hun er uteksaminert fra Oxford University og har tidligere vært sekretær for Israels høyesterettsjustitiarius.***► NY BOK UTE NÅ: Frykt og Stillhet - jødiske stemmer i Norge etter 7. oktober. Bestill her:  https://bok.norli.no/frykt-og-stillhet► STØTT ARBEIDET PÅ VIPPSOm du ønsker å støtte arbeidet med denne podcasten, kan du bidra med et stort eller lite beløp, etter eget ønske. All støtte settes pris på, og du bidrar til arbeidet med å lage flere episoder. Bruk Vippsnummer: #823278►  ⁠BLI ⁠⁠⁠⁠MEDLEM⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Fremover vil de som er støttemedlemmer få tilgang til episodene først. Da støtter du podcasten med det samme som prisen av en kaffe hver måned. Setter stor pris på om du blir støttemedlem. Tusen takk.► Annonsere på Henrik Beckheim Podcast?Send en mail til post@henrikbeckheim.no ► MERCH: Kjøp klær, kopper, capser og mer: https://henrikbeckheim.com/store► Linker:⁠⁠Youtube⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠Nettside⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠ | Podimo | ⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠Apple

Join Dr. Kahn for the 4th Reversing Heart Disease Summit beginning March 7, 2026. The event is free to attend online. Register here: drtalks.com/summits/reversing-heart-disease This week, Dr. Kahn reviews new research examining the connection between red meat consumption and the risk of diabetes, elevated cholesterol, and cancer. He also discusses findings from a large study showing that vegetarian diets are associated with a lower risk of several types of cancer.  Additional topics include emerging treatments for Lipoprotein(a), the role of coronary CT angiography in women and in individuals with a family history of heart disease, newly identified predictors of cardiovascular risk in women, dietary patterns that support brain health, and screening strategies to reduce the risk of cardiac arrest in young athletes.  Thanks to Igennus. Visit igennus.com and use the discount code DrKahn for savings on their products.

Michelle Lynn Kahn on “Foreign in Two Homelands: Racism, Return Migration and Turkish-German History” (Cambridge University Press). Please support Turkey Book Talk on Patreon or Substack. Supporters get a 35% discount on all Turkey/Ottoman History books published by IB Tauris/Bloomsbury, transcripts of every interview, and links to articles related to each episode.

Transitioning from "first-gen" technology leadership requires more than just a handoff; it's a strategic evolution. Retired directors Daisy Steele, Jeff Dayton, and Larry Kahn join the podcast to discuss the shift from building servers to managing complex ecosystems. They share essential insights on "brain dumps," outsourcing, and mastering "people chess" during retirement.Veracross (School Information System)Blackbaud (School Management Software)Asana (Project Management & Documentation)AARP Tax-Aide CounselingMeals on Wheels America

Diane Kahn is the Executive Director of  Humans of San Quentin (HoSQ), a humanitarian non-profit organisation that shares the stories of incarcerated people to humanise those behind bars and break down societal stereotypes, through letters, art, and poetry. Inspired by the Humans of New York project, the organisation was founded in 2020 by Diane, a former elementary school teacher, who began the project while teaching at San Quentin Rehabilitation Centre. San Quentin prison was founded in 1852, and it has served for much of its history as a symbol of the American penal system's harshest instincts, known for housing murderers, traffickers, and death row. Diane has an unstoppable dedication to helping victims and offenders heal and transform their lives, and this is a fascinating conversation about redemption.   LINKS   Human's of San Quentin website humansofsanquentin.org   The Mojo Sessions website www.themojosessions.com   The Mojo Sessions on Patreon www.patreon.com/TheMojoSessions Full transcripts of the show (plus time codes) are available on Patreon.   The Mojo Sessions on Facebook www.facebook.com/TheMojoSessions   Gary on LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/gary-bertwistle   Gary on Twitter www.twitter.com/GaryBertwistle   The Mojo Sessions on Instagram www.instagram.com/themojosessions   If you like what you hear, we'd be grateful for a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Happy listening!   © 2026 Gary Bertwistle.  All Rights Reserved.  

This week, Dr. Kahn discusses his current health challenge: a leaky mitral valve due to mitral valve prolapse, a condition of unknown cause that is unrelated to lifestyle or diet. He reviews data on mitral valve surgery, comparing repair to replacement, as well as the current availability of robotic surgery and its advantages. He plans to keep the Heart Doc VIP community updated on his status and is feeling great day to day. Short topics this week include wine, olive oil, plant-based diets for breast cancer, Life's Essential 8, the health of babies raised in vegan families, and new data on Lipoprotein(a).  Thanks to Igennus. Use the discount code DRKAHN at igennus.com .

This Day in Legal History: Jacobson v. MassachusettsOn this day in legal history, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), a case that defined the balance between individual liberty and public health. The dispute arose during a smallpox outbreak when Massachusetts authorized local governments to require vaccinations. Henning Jacobson refused the vaccine, arguing that the mandate violated his personal liberty under the Constitution. The case presented a fundamental question: how far can the state go in protecting the health of its citizens?In a 7–2 decision, the Court upheld the compulsory vaccination law. The justices reasoned that individual freedoms are not absolute. Writing for the majority, the Court explained that the Constitution permits reasonable regulations to protect public health and safety. This authority stems from the state's “police power,” a broad power to enact laws for the welfare of the community. The Court emphasized that liberty does not include the right to act in a way that harms others. During an epidemic, the government may impose measures necessary to prevent disease from spreading.The decision established an enduring precedent for public health regulation. It has been cited in later cases involving quarantine laws, vaccine mandates, and emergency health orders. More than a century later, Jacobson remains central to debates about the limits of government authority in times of crisis.A federal judge in California sharply reduced a jury pool in a class action securities trial against Elon Musk after many potential jurors said they could not be impartial. Out of 92 candidates, 38 were dismissed after admitting they could not fairly judge the case, prompting Musk's attorney to argue that strong personal hostility toward his client was affecting the process. The lawsuit, brought by former Twitter investors, alleges that Musk made misleading statements in 2022 to depress the company's stock price while negotiating its purchase. Musk denies the allegations.Judge Charles R. Breyer reminded jurors that their verdict must be based only on evidence presented at trial, not personal opinions about Musk. Several prospective jurors expressed strong views, both positive and negative, and some were removed for cause. One man who said he believed Musk should be in prison but could be fair in a civil case was not selected. Others who openly supported Musk or dismissed class actions as frivolous were also excluded. By the end of the day, a nine-member jury was seated.The case centers on claims that Musk's tweets about the deal being “on hold” and about the percentage of fake accounts misled investors. The judge previously ruled that investors plausibly alleged securities law violations and certified a class of affected shareholders. He also denied early summary judgment motions, allowing the case to proceed to trial. The upcoming trial will determine whether Musk's public statements violated federal securities laws during the 2022 acquisition process.‘Hate' For Musk Quickly Narrows Jury Pool In Twitter Deal Trial - Law360Jeffrey Epstein's estate has agreed to pay up to $35 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that two of his longtime advisers helped facilitate his sex trafficking scheme. The proposed agreement was disclosed in a federal court filing in Manhattan and must still be approved by a judge. The lawsuit, filed in 2024, targeted Darren Indyke, Epstein's former personal lawyer, and Richard Kahn, his longtime accountant, who serve as co-executors of the estate.Attorneys for the victims claimed the two men assisted Epstein by managing a network of corporations and financial accounts that concealed his activities and enabled payments to victims and recruiters. As part of the settlement, neither Indyke nor Kahn admitted wrongdoing. Their attorney stated they were prepared to contest the claims at trial but chose to settle to bring closure and resolve remaining potential claims against the estate.The estate has already distributed substantial sums to victims. A compensation program previously paid out $121 million, and an additional $49 million has been resolved through other settlements. According to defense counsel, the new agreement will offer a confidential path to compensation for individuals who have not yet settled claims.Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019, and his death was ruled a suicide.Epstein estate agrees to $35 million settlement in victim class action | ReutersThe Trump administration announced plans to scale back federal limits on mercury and other hazardous air pollutants emitted by coal-fired power plants. Officials said easing these standards would help utilities manage costs and maintain reliable baseload electricity as power demand rises, particularly from artificial intelligence data centers. The move targets updates made during the Biden administration to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which built on regulations first adopted in 2012.The Biden-era revisions would have significantly reduced allowable mercury emissions and cut releases of toxic metals such as arsenic, nickel, and lead. Supporters of those rules argued they would generate hundreds of millions of dollars in public health savings by lowering exposure to harmful pollutants. The Supreme Court previously declined to pause the updated standards while legal challenges proceeded.Environmental and public health advocates warn that weakening the rule could increase health risks, especially for children and other vulnerable populations, since mercury exposure can impair neurological development. The EPA, however, stated that the original 2012 rule already provides sufficient public health protection and that the newer requirements impose costs exceeding their benefits.The rollback aligns with broader administration efforts to support coal power, including declaring an energy emergency, granting temporary exemptions to dozens of coal plants, and revisiting prior climate-related regulatory findings. Coal plants currently produce less than one-fifth of U.S. electricity but remain significant sources of hazardous air pollution.Trump EPA to weaken rule limiting harmful mercury, air toxics from coal plants | ReutersA federal judge in California ruled that PepsiCo and its Frito-Lay division can block a proposed class action brought by convenience store owners alleging unfair pricing practices. The stores claimed the company favored large national retailers by offering them better wholesale prices, in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, which prohibits certain forms of price discrimination. The lawsuit sought to represent thousands of independently owned California stores that said they lost significant sales as a result of the alleged practices.U.S. District Judge Mónica Ramírez Almadani determined that the plaintiffs failed to show that all proposed class members suffered the same type of injury, a key requirement for class certification under federal law. She explained that price discrimination claims typically require detailed, transaction-specific evidence, making broad class treatment difficult. The court agreed with the defendants' argument that resolving the claims would require individualized inquiries into each store's circumstances.Although the judge rejected the class action request, she did not dismiss the underlying lawsuit. Instead, she allowed the plaintiffs to revise and refile their class allegations. Attorneys for the convenience stores said they plan to amend the complaint to provide additional detail about how Frito-Lay allegedly disadvantaged smaller retailers.PepsiCo, Frito-Lay win US court order barring class action in snack pricing lawsuit | ReutersThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize President Donald Trump to impose broad tariffs under a declared national emergency. In a majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court emphasized that the Constitution assigns the power to levy taxes and duties exclusively to Congress, not the executive branch. The case arose after President Trump declared national emergencies related to drug trafficking and trade deficits and then imposed sweeping tariffs on imports from numerous countries, including Canada, Mexico, and China.Small businesses and several states challenged the tariffs, arguing that IEEPA permits the president to “regulate” importation but does not explicitly authorize the imposition of duties. Lower courts agreed, and the Federal Circuit largely affirmed those rulings before the cases reached the Supreme Court. The majority concluded that the statutory term “regulate . . . importation” cannot be read to include the power to impose taxes, especially given Congress's consistent practice of clearly and specifically granting tariff authority in other statutes. The Court also relied on the “major questions” doctrine, reasoning that such sweeping economic authority requires clear congressional authorization, which IEEPA does not provide.The justices rejected arguments that emergency powers or foreign affairs concerns justified a broader interpretation. They noted that no prior president had used IEEPA to impose tariffs in its nearly 50-year history. As a result, the Court affirmed the Federal Circuit's decision invalidating the tariffs and directed dismissal of a related case for lack of jurisdiction.Justices Strike Down Trump's Emergency TariffsThis week's closing theme is by Louis Spohr.This week's closing theme features music by Spohr, a composer who stood at the crossroads between the Classical and early Romantic eras. Born in 1784, Spohr was a celebrated violinist, conductor, and teacher whose reputation in his lifetime rivaled many of his contemporaries. Though his name is less familiar today, he played an important role in shaping early nineteenth-century orchestral and chamber music. His style combines Classical clarity with the expressive warmth that would define the Romantic movement.Spohr wrote four clarinet concertos, each showcasing the instrument's growing technical and expressive range. The Clarinet Concerto in F minor reflects both virtuosity and lyricism, qualities that made the clarinet increasingly popular in concert halls of the time. The first movement, Allegro assai, opens with dramatic orchestral energy before introducing the soloist in sweeping, agile lines. The music balances precision with expressive phrasing, demanding both technical control and emotional depth from the performer.Throughout the movement, Spohr allows the clarinet to sing as much as it dazzles. Rapid passages are paired with moments of lyrical calm, highlighting the instrument's wide tonal palette. The dialogue between soloist and orchestra feels conversational rather than combative, giving the concerto an elegant cohesion. As our closing theme, this Allegro assai offers drive, color, and a glimpse into a composer once central to Europe's musical life.Without further ado, Louis Spohr's Clarinet Concerto in F minor, the first movement, the Allegro assai – enjoy! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Todd Kahn, President and CEO of Fashion Brand Coach, sits with Bloomberg's Romaine Bostick and Katie Greifeld about the company's focus on Gen Z, the power that pricing plays in attracting a new customer base, and more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This week on Heart Doc VIP, Dr. Joel Kahn takes a deep dive into one of the most influential research projects in cardiovascular history: the Framingham Heart Study. Launched in 1948 and still going strong, this landmark study helped identify many of the risk factors we now take for granted, including smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, and physical inactivity. Much of what modern cardiology considers "common knowledge" about prevention started in Framingham. Dr. Kahn also explores practical and emerging topics in heart health, including the role of magnesium and berberine supplementation, how to approach both low-carb and low-fat diets in a healthy way, and concerns about long-term proton pump inhibitor use. Additional discussion covers EECP therapy and strategies to improve coronary blood flow, along with the potential benefits of ezetimibe for cholesterol reduction and brain health. Thank you to this week's sponsor, Igennus. Visit igennus.com and use code DRKAHN for a special discount.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Michael wollte als Kind Betonmischer Fahrer werden. Beton anrühren reicht im modernen Fussball nicht mehr aus - St.Pauli, Bremen und Heidenheim wird die schlechte Offensive zum Verhängnis.Sind die Torhüter von heute zu nett? Eine neue Ecken-Variante hält Einzug in die Liga - Olli Kahn hätte sich das nicht bieten lassen.Ewald holte seinerzeit Albert Riera von Liverpool zu Olympiacos. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The February episode of "Crossroads of Rockland History" started streaming on Monday, February 16, at 10 am.On this episode of Crossroads of Rockland History, host Clare Sheridan welcomed author Eve Kahn as she returns to discuss her latest work ahead of her March presentation at Sloatsburg's Harmony Hall. The focus will be on Kahn's new book, Queen of Bohemia Predicts Own Death: Gilded-Age Journalist Zoe Anderson Norris (Fordham University Press).If you're unfamiliar with Zoe Anderson Norris (1860–1914), a notable journalist of the Gilded Age, you're not alone: Eve Kahn is on a mission to bring her story to light. Norris was known for blending fact and fiction in her writings, often weaving autobiographical elements into her stories, which led to criticism for using her personal relationships as material. Despite this, she was deeply committed to exposing the struggles of New York's poor through East Side, the magazine she launched and ran from 1909 to 1914. Remarkably, its final issue included Norris's own prediction of her death, inspiring the dramatic title of Kahn's book.Eve Kahn's presentation at Harmony Hall will take place on Sunday, March 8, at 2 pm. Tickets are $20 and benefit the restoration of the historic Jacob Sloat House.Information and tickets are online here: https://www.friendsofharmonyhall.org/events-2/queen-of-bohemia-predicts-own-death-eve-kahn-returns__________________Crossroads of Rockland History, a program of the Historical Society of Rockland County, starts streaming new episodes on the third Monday of each month at 10am. From October 2010 to May 2025, the program aired after the morning show on WRCR radio 1700 AM and www.WRCR.com. Join host Clare Sheridan as we explore, celebrate, and learn about our local history, with different topics and guest speakers every month. Our recorded broadcasts are also available for streaming on all major podcasts platforms and at our website. The Historical Society of Rockland County is a nonprofit educational institution and principal repository for original documents and artifacts relating to Rockland County. Its headquarters are a four-acre site featuring a history museum and the 1832 Jacob Blauvelt House in New City, New York. www.RocklandHistory.org

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week, Dr. Kahn breaks down a new paper examining the risks and reported side effects of statins—including the surprising finding that placebo alone is linked to many of the same symptoms. He also covers an oral PCSK9 inhibitor currently under study and what it could mean for cholesterol management. The episode then dives into the latest research on emerging therapies designed to lower lipoprotein(a), including a real-world case study that highlights where this rapidly evolving field is headed.  Shorter discussions include heart disease at a young age, why so many patients fail to reach blood pressure treatment goals, aspirin use one year after AFib ablation, skeletal muscle as an endothelial stabilizer, and why exercise variety may be one of the most powerful risk reducers we have.  Thanks to WellBean for sponsoring the show. Save on their delicious bean-based products at wellbean.life with code DrKahn15.  Dr. Kahn will also be leading a free online seminar on cholesterol on February 17, 2026 at 7 PM EST with Forks Over Knives. Register HERE.

Send a textIn this episode of Coffee Nº5, I sit down with Jennifer Bickerton and Lauren Kahn, Co-Founders of Intersection PR, to unpack the real state of PR in 2026—without buzzwords and without nostalgia.PR is no longer about isolated placements or one-off moments. It's about ecosystems. Marketing, digital, retail, Amazon, influencers, AI, and brand narrative now live in the same room whether brands like it or not. If one piece breaks, momentum breaks.We talk about what brands consistently misunderstand: influencer ROI, launch events that don't move the needle, why “just PR” doesn't exist anymore, and why communication across teams is now non-negotiable. We also dive into how AI is reshaping authority, discovery, and credibility—making long-term PR maintenance more important than ever.This episode is a grounded, honest look at PR as it actually works today—and why partnership, clarity, and integration matter more than hype.We'll talk about:Why PR in 2026 is an ecosystem—not a standalone functionThe myth of “just PR” and why siloed teams break brand momentumInfluencer ROI realities: affiliates, attribution, and what actually convertsLaunch events: when they work, when they don't, and why most failPR + AI: authority, citations, and why human voice still mattersFor more information, visit Lauren's LinkedIn and Instagram and Jennifer's LinkedIn and InstagramSubscribe to Lara's newsletter.Also, follow our host Lara Schmoisman on social media:Instagram: @laraschmoismanFacebook: @LaraSchmoismanSupport the show

This CEO is Building The Institutional Gateway To The Onchain Financial Economy – Meet Jolie Kahn Ceo AVAX One Tech $AVXGuest InformationName: Jolie KahnTitle: CEOCompany InformationCompany Name: AVAX One Technology Ltd.Ticker: (NASDAQ: AVX)Website: https://avax-one.com/ Jolie's Bio: Jolie Kahn has an extensive background in cryptocurrency, corporate finance and corporate and securities law. She has been the proprietor of Jolie Kahn, Esq. since 2002 and has a deep depth of involvement in various aspects of cryptocurrency including serving as general counsel to one of the largest bitcoin mining companies from 2018-2023 and as outside counsel to various other cryptocurrency-based public entities. She has participated in various large industry conferences both as a speaker and panelist, supporting the cryptocurrency and the blockchain ecosystem. Ms. Kahn has also acted in various corporate finance roles, including extensive involvement of preparation of period filings and financial statements and playing an integral part in public company audits. She also has worked with companies and hedge funds in complex transactions involving the structuring and negotiation of large scale debt and equity financings, mergers, and acquisitions. Ms. Kahn has practiced law in the areas of corporate finance, mergers & acquisitions, reverse mergers, and general corporate, banking, and real estate matters. She represents both public and private companies, hedge funds, and other institutional investors in their role as investors in public companies. She served as Interim CFO of GlucoTrack, Inc. from 2019 - 2023. Ms. Kahn holds a BA from Cornell University and a J.D. magna cum laude from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.Company Bio:AVAX One offers investors regulated access to Avalanche, one of the fastest-growing Layer 1 blockchain ecosystems. Combining the reliability of U.S. equity markets with the upside of next-gen finance, it is a modern strategy for a new financial era. AVAX One Technology Ltd. (NASDAQ: AVX) is the first publicly traded Avalanche Treasury company, building the premier institutional gateway to the onchain financial economy powered by the Avalanche blockchain network. Through AVAX accumulation, onchain yield, and strategic acquisitions, we aim to compound long-term value for our shareholders while supporting the growth of the Avalanche ecosystem. Led by a team of veterans from institutional finance and public company backgrounds and advised by leaders from across the digital asset industry, AVAX One is being built to be a scalable, regulated gateway for public market investors to participate in the growth of the onchain economy.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The  survivors lawsuit targets Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein's closest attorneys and longtime gatekeepers, accusing them of playing an active and knowing role in enabling, facilitating, and concealing Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. Bensky, among others,  alleges that Indyke and Kahn were not passive legal functionaries but essential operational figures who helped structure Epstein's finances, shell companies, trusts, and employment arrangements in ways that allowed abuse to continue while shielding Epstein and his associates from scrutiny. According to the complaint, they were deeply embedded in Epstein's daily affairs, had visibility into payments, housing, travel, and personnel connected to victims, and nonetheless failed to intervene or report what was happening. The lawsuit frames them as trusted insiders who understood the scope of Epstein's criminal conduct yet chose protection and silence over accountability. In doing so, Bensky argues, they materially contributed to the continuation of abuse and the harm suffered by victims.The suit also attacks Indyke and Kahn's post-arrest conduct, alleging that even after Epstein's crimes were publicly exposed, they continued to prioritize asset preservation, legal insulation, and damage control over justice for survivors. Bensky claims they used their legal authority to obstruct transparency, frustrate civil accountability, and maintain control over Epstein's estate in ways that disadvantaged victims seeking redress. Central to the case is the assertion that their fiduciary and legal duties do not immunize them from liability when those duties were allegedly exercised in service of an ongoing criminal enterprise. The lawsuit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein's lawyers were merely doing their jobs, instead recasting them as indispensable enablers whose actions and omissions helped sustain one of the most notorious trafficking networks in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This week, Dr. Kahn discussed a case study involving a 30-year-old man with newly discovered, very high cholesterol. The implications of heart disease in young adults—backed by a recent paper from the CARDIA study group—suggest that early intervention, beginning with lifestyle changes, should be offered, along with follow-up lab testing. The Portfolio Diet plan would be a strong starting point on the journey toward a more plant-based diet. Other topics covered include the risks of diet soda, the health impacts of being a night owl, coffee consumption for atrial fibrillation patients, the role of genetics in longevity, plant-based diets for kidney health, and red light therapy for brain illness and trauma.  Thanks to getfreshDRKAHN.com for the $1 offer on a bottle of fresh-pressed olive oil from some of the finest estates. EXTENDED SHOWNOTES:  Dr. Kahn also touched on several additional topics during the episode. He discussed olive oil tasting and shipping, encouraging listeners to sign up before the current shipment from Italy ends and explaining how tasting fresh olive oil helps assess quality. Red light therapy came up in the context of brain injury, including a study showing potential benefits from nasal exposure in college athletes with repeated head trauma. He also mentioned advocacy efforts to promote routine coronary calcium scoring starting at age 45. Several studies on diet and longevity were reviewed, including research showing that plant-forward diets are associated with better kidney health and that genetics may account for up to 50% of longevity—though lifestyle choices still matter greatly. Dr. Kahn also covered caffeine and heart rhythm, noting research where coffee consumption was linked to fewer episodes of atrial fibrillation, while diet soda was associated with a higher risk of dementia. Finally, he discussed sleep patterns, citing data suggesting that night owls face higher cardiovascular risks than early risers.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures orbiting Jeffrey Epstein. They were structural supports, the load bearing pillars that allowed his criminal empire to function, survive scrutiny, and endure scandal. Darren Indyke, Epstein's longtime lawyer, was the gatekeeper. He controlled access, managed settlements, structured opaque trusts, and ensured that Epstein's money and secrets were insulated from exposure. Indyke was there through arrests, plea deals, civil suits, and reputational implosions, always positioning Epstein one legal step ahead of accountability. Without Indyke's legal architecture, Epstein's web of shell companies, offshore vehicles, and confidentiality agreements collapses under its own weight. He was not merely providing legal services. He was actively maintaining the machinery that allowed Epstein to keep operating in plain sight.And then there was Richard Kahn, the financial engineer who made the money move quietly and efficiently. Kahn handled Epstein's books, managed his finances, and kept the cash flowing through a maze designed to obscure origin, purpose, and beneficiaries. This was not passive bookkeeping. This was deliberate financial camouflage, the kind that allows illegal activity to be funded, sustained, and hidden behind layers of complexity. Together, Indyke and Kahn formed a firewall between Epstein and consequence. They didn't just serve a client, they preserved an ecosystem of abuse by protecting the money that powered it. Strip them away and Epstein is exposed, vulnerable, and limited. With them in place, he was untouchable for decades. That is what indispensability looks like, and it should haunt anyone who still pretends this was the work of a lone monster rather than a professionally maintained criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In this episode of Overcoming Distractions, Dave welcomes Dr. Gilly Kahn, a clinical psychologist, ADHD specialist, and author of the new book, Allow Me to Interrupt. While ADHD is often associated with external disruptions in boys, Dr. Kahn highlights how it frequently manifests internally as emotional dysregulation in women. The conversation dives deep into why women are often diagnosed later in life and how biological factors, specifically hormonal shifts, play a critical role in how ADHD symptoms fluctuate. Key Discussion Points The Gender Bias in Diagnosis: Dr. Kahn discusses how current ADHD diagnostic criteria are historically rooted in observations of male children, often leading to women provided with an accurate diagnosis. The Estrogen-Dopamine Connection: A fascinating look at how fluctuating estrogen levels during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and perimenopause directly impact dopamine availability, often exacerbating ADHD symptoms during the luteal phase. Late-Life Diagnosis: Why many professional women aren't diagnosed until their 40s or 50s, often triggered by the increased cognitive load of demanding careers, parenting, or perimenopause. Co-occurring Physical Challenges: The link between ADHD and chronic health issues like migraines, which further complicate emotional and physical regulation. Strategic Management: Practical advice on "capitalizing" on high-energy weeks and practicing self-compassion during more difficult hormonal shifts. You can find Dr. Kahn at her website: https://www.drgillykahn.com/ **Do you want to work with Dave one-on-one? Go to www.overcomingdistractions.com and book an introductory Zoom chat. Or go directly to Dave's calendar; https://calendly.com/davidgreenwood1/15min  

In this bonus episode, Dr. Kahn sits down with his longtime friend TJ Robinson, founder of the Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club and self-described "olive oil hunter." TJ has made it his life's mission to track down the freshest, highest-quality extra virgin olive oils in the world — often straight from small producers in Europe and South America — and get them shipped to the U.S. as quickly as possible. The conversation dives into what most people don't realize about olive oil: how freshness impacts flavor, health benefits, and antioxidant levels, and why the oil sitting on a grocery store shelf may not be doing your heart any favors. TJ explains how he sources each harvest, what separates truly exceptional olive oil from the rest, and why timing is everything when it comes to preserving polyphenols and taste. Dr. Kahn and TJ also discuss why extra virgin olive oil remains one of the healthiest dietary staples available, especially for cardiovascular health, and how consumers can avoid misleading labels and outdated products.  Listeners can sample the latest Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club release for just $1 shipping by visiting getfreshDRKAHN.com .  If you prefer to watch the conversation, the full video interview is available on YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=AZP64Au_j5M

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures orbiting Jeffrey Epstein. They were structural supports, the load bearing pillars that allowed his criminal empire to function, survive scrutiny, and endure scandal. Darren Indyke, Epstein's longtime lawyer, was the gatekeeper. He controlled access, managed settlements, structured opaque trusts, and ensured that Epstein's money and secrets were insulated from exposure. Indyke was there through arrests, plea deals, civil suits, and reputational implosions, always positioning Epstein one legal step ahead of accountability. Without Indyke's legal architecture, Epstein's web of shell companies, offshore vehicles, and confidentiality agreements collapses under its own weight. He was not merely providing legal services. He was actively maintaining the machinery that allowed Epstein to keep operating in plain sight.And then there was Richard Kahn, the financial engineer who made the money move quietly and efficiently. Kahn handled Epstein's books, managed his finances, and kept the cash flowing through a maze designed to obscure origin, purpose, and beneficiaries. This was not passive bookkeeping. This was deliberate financial camouflage, the kind that allows illegal activity to be funded, sustained, and hidden behind layers of complexity. Together, Indyke and Kahn formed a firewall between Epstein and consequence. They didn't just serve a client, they preserved an ecosystem of abuse by protecting the money that powered it. Strip them away and Epstein is exposed, vulnerable, and limited. With them in place, he was untouchable for decades. That is what indispensability looks like, and it should haunt anyone who still pretends this was the work of a lone monster rather than a professionally maintained criminal enterprise.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This week, Dr. Kahn discusses a new report from the American Heart Association on the causes of heart-related deaths in the U.S., and the sobering reality that cardiovascular disease remains the nation's leading cause of death. Despite this, prevention and early detection continue to be underemphasized at the national level—meaning much of the responsibility still falls on individuals. Dr. Kahn also covers several shorter topics, including a response to the CSPI food pyramid, water quality on airplanes, Apple Watch detection of atrial fibrillation, why earlier meal timing is better, the vascular benefits of extra-virgin olive oil, and the cholesterol-lowering power of oats. Thanks to the Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club, you can sample a bottle of high-quality extra-virgin olive oil for just $1 at getfreshDRKAHN.com. Registration is now open for Dr. Kahn's lecture on January 29, 2026 at 7:00 PM EST. Sign up HERE.

Are your digital ads performing poorly despite significant investment? You might be a fraud victim. This episode breaks down the explosive growth of ad fraud from $8 billion in 2015 to $140 billion today, fueled by accessible AI tools and global criminal networks. Expert Rich Kahn explains how fraudsters use bots, malware, and human click farms to steal from every digital channel. Red flags include unpredictable campaign results, chargeback spikes, and leads who don't recognize your brand. The key to fighting back is professional fraud detection using collective intelligence from multiple clients, real-time monitoring that adapts weekly, and ongoing team education. With affiliate traffic showing 45% fraud rates, waiting for a crisis costs more than proactive prevention. Free fraud scans can reveal whether your budget is bleeding money to criminals.

This week, Dr. Kahn dives into four new research papers on omega-3 fatty acids and their impact on heart and brain health. The discussion highlights several eye-opening findings, including reduced atrial fibrillation risk and improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Dr. Kahn also explains how omega-3 intake supports brain health and why the "right" dose depends on the specific condition being addressed. Food sources, fish oil, algae-based supplements, and ahiflower are compared as practical ways to reach optimal omega-3 levels.  Additional topics in this episode include newly approved AI software for early detection of heart disease, the role of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes, the science—and hype—around NAD+ boosters, and emerging data on Prolon fasting for Crohn's disease. Dr. Kahn also reviews concerning research on heart rhythm risks associated with high-intensity endurance exercise in athletes over the age of 50. As always, the episode blends cutting-edge research with real-world clinical insight to help clarify what actually matters for long-term heart health. Thanks to The Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club — get a bottle for $1 at getfreshDRKAHN.com.  More About This Episode This episode takes a deeper look at why omega-3 blood levels matter more than simply taking a supplement. Dr. Kahn reviews large population studies linking higher omega-3 levels to lower risks of atrial fibrillation, early-onset dementia, and major cardiovascular events, including in high-risk groups such as patients on hemodialysis. The key takeaway: testing omega-3 status and personalizing intake may be far more effective than a one-size-fits-all approach.  Beyond omega-3s, Dr. Kahn explores several timely and surprising topics, including AI-enhanced CT scan technology designed to detect silent heart disease without additional radiation, real-world data on statin benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, and why costly NAD+ supplements may ultimately function as a form of vitamin B3. The episode also examines new evidence on fasting-mimicking diets for Crohn's disease and potential heart rhythm risks in high-level endurance athletes over 50. Throughout the discussion, Dr. Kahn emphasizes practical, evidence-based steps patients can review with their physicians, including omega-3 blood testing, coronary calcium scoring, and tailoring lifestyle and supplement strategies to individual risk factors.